76
|
Passaro A, Leighl N, Blackhall F, Popat S, Kerr K, Ahn MJ, Arcila ME, Arrieta O, Planchard D, de Marinis F, Dingemans AM, Dziadziuszko R, Faivre-Finn C, Feldman J, Felip E, Curigliano G, Herbst R, Jänne PA, John T, Mitsudomi T, Mok T, Normanno N, Paz-Ares L, Ramalingam S, Sequist L, Vansteenkiste J, Wistuba II, Wolf J, Wu YL, Yang SR, Yang JCH, Yatabe Y, Pentheroudakis G, Peters S. ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:466-487. [PMID: 35176458 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer in 2021. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 34 leading experts in the management of lung cancer. The aim of the consensus was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where the available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were: (i) tissue and biomarkers analyses; (ii) early and locally advanced disease; (iii) metastatic disease and (iv) clinical trial design, patient's perspective and miscellaneous. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the recommendations developed, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.
Collapse
|
77
|
Stock S, Isselhard A, Jünger S, Peters S, Schneider G, Haarig F, Halbach S, Okan O, Fischer F, Bollweg TM, Bauer U, Schaeffer D, Vogt D, Berens EM, Ernstmann N, Bitzer EM. [DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 2) - Operationalisation and Measuring of Health Literacy from a Health Services Research Perspective]. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 84:e26-e41. [PMID: 35472769 PMCID: PMC9050455 DOI: 10.1055/a-1807-0853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Das vorliegende „DNVF Memorandum Gesundheitskompetenz (Teil 2) –
Operationalisierung und Messung von Gesundheitskompetenz aus Sicht der
Versorgungsforschung“ des Deutschen Netzwerks Versorgungsforschung e.V.
(DNVF) stellt die Fortführung des Memorandums „DNVF Memorandum
Gesundheitskompetenz (Teil 1) – Hintergrund, Gegenstand und
Fragestellungen in der Versorgungsforschung“ dar. Neben den allgemeinen
Anforderungen an die Messung der Gesundheitskompetenz, beschäftigt sich
dieses Memorandum auch mit den speziellen Anforderungen, wie die Abgrenzung zu
verwandten Konstrukten, den Unterschieden zwischen performanzbasierten und
Selbsteinschätzungsverfahren, den Unterschieden zwischen generischen und
spezifischen Instrumenten, dem Einsatz von Screeninginstrumenten sowie der
Messung der Gesundheitskompetenz bei speziellen Personengruppen. Weiterhin
werden Besonderheiten bei der Messung der digitalen Gesundheitskompetenz,
Potenziale qualitativer und partizipativer Forschungszugänge sowie
forschungsethische Gesichtspunkte bei der Messung der Gesundheitskompetenz
erarbeitet. Ein besonderer Wert wird auf den Praxisbezug gelegt, der am Ende der
jeweiligen Abschnitte mit einem Fazit für die Versorgungsforschung
aufgegriffen wird. Abschließend wird einen Blick auf Herausforderungen
und Forschungsdesiderate im Zusammenhang mit der Messung von
Gesundheitskompetenz im Rahmen der Versorgungsforschung geworfen.
Collapse
|
78
|
Lowe C, Keppel G, Waqa K, Peters S, Fisher RN, Scanlon A, Osborne‐Naikatini T, Thomas‐Moko N. Fijian sea krait behavior relates to fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity in old‐growth coastal forest: The importance of integrated land–sea management for protecting amphibious animals. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e8817. [PMID: 35475179 PMCID: PMC9022443 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The importance of terrestrial coastal ecosystems for maintaining healthy coral reef ecosystems remains understudied. Sea kraits are amphibious snakes that require healthy coral reefs for foraging, but little is known about their requirements of terrestrial habitats, where they slough their skin, digest prey, and breed. Using concurrent microclimate measurements and behavior surveys, we show that a small, topographically flat atoll in Fiji with coastal forest provides many microhabitats that relate to the behaviors of Yellow Lipped Sea Kraits, Laticauda colubrina. Microclimates were significantly related to canopy cover, leaf litter depth, and distance from the high‐water mark (HWM). Sea kraits were almost exclusively observed in coastal forest within 30 m of the HWM. Sloughing of skins only occurred within crevices of mature or dying trees. Resting L. colubrina were significantly more likely to occur at locations with higher mean diurnal temperatures, lower leaf litter depths, and shorter distances from the HWM. On Leleuvia, behavior of L. colubrina therefore relates to environmental heterogeneity created by old‐growth coastal forests, particularly canopy cover and crevices in mature and dead tree trunks. The importance of healthy coastal habitats, both terrestrial and marine, for L. colubrina suggests it could be a good flagship species for advocating integrated land‐sea management. Furthermore, our study highlights the importance of coastal forests and topographically flat atolls for biodiversity conservation. Effective conservation management of amphibious species that utilize land‐ and seascapes is therefore likely to require a holistic approach that incorporates connectivity among ecosystems and environmental heterogeneity at all relevant scales.
Collapse
|
79
|
Peters S, Penrod J, Li J, Lubinga S, Gupta R, Bushong J, Rizzo J, Ramalingam S. 10P Treatment-free survival (TFS) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients (pts) treated with 1L nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) or platinum doublet chemotherapy (PDC) in CheckMate (CM) 227. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
80
|
Lazarus J, Maswime S, Fieggen G, Cairncross LL, Irlam J, Reed A, Peters S, Fagan JJ. Call for the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority to revisit regulations relating to single- use medical devices. S Afr Med J 2022; 112:13547. [PMID: 35587800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
|
81
|
Paz-Ares L, O'Brien M, Mauer M, Dafni U, Oselin K, Havel L, Esteban Gonzalez E, Isla D, Martinez-Marti A, Faehling M, Tsuboi M, Lee JS, Nakagawa K, Yang J, Keller S, Jha N, Marreaud S, Stahel R, Peters S, Besse B. VP3-2022: Pembrolizumab (pembro) versus placebo for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) when indicated: Randomized, triple-blind, phase III EORTC-1416-LCG/ETOP 8-15 – PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 study. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
82
|
Dafni U, Soo R, Peters S, Tsourti Z, Vervita K, Han JY, De Castro J, Coate L, Früh M, Hashemi S, Nadal E, Carcereny E, Angeles Sala González M, Bernabé Caro R, Provencio Pulla M, Cuffe S, Ruepp B, Roschitzki-Voser H, Rosell R, Stahel R. 32P Impact of smoking status on the relative efficacy of the EGFR TKI/angiogenesis inhibitor combination therapy in advanced NSCLC: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
83
|
König D, Schär S, Vuong D, Guckenberger M, Furrer K, Opitz I, Weder W, Rothschild SI, Ochsenbein A, Zippelius A, Addeo A, Mark M, Eboulet EI, Hayoz S, Thierstein S, Betticher DC, Ris HB, Stupp R, Curioni-Fontecedro A, Peters S, Pless M, Früh M. Long-term outcomes of operable stage III NSCLC in the pre-immunotherapy era: results from a pooled analysis of the SAKK 16/96, SAKK 16/00, SAKK 16/01, and SAKK 16/08 trials. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100455. [PMID: 35398718 PMCID: PMC9011017 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab consolidation has yielded excellent results in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, it is essential to identify patients who might benefit from a surgical approach. Material and methods Data from 437 patients with operable stage III NSCLC enrolled in four consecutive Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) trials (16/96, 16/00, 16/01, 16/08) were pooled and outcomes were analyzed in 431 eligible patients. All patients were treated with three cycles of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin/docetaxel), followed in some patients by neoadjuvant radiotherapy (44 Gy, 22 fractions) (16/00, 16/01, 16/08) and cetuximab (16/08). Results With a median follow-up time of 9.3 years (range 8.5-10.3 years), 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 37% and 25%, respectively. Overall, 342 patients (79%) underwent tumor resection, with a complete resection (R0) rate of 80%. Patients (n = 272, 63%) with R0 had significantly longer OS compared to patients who had surgery but incomplete resection (64.8 versus 19.2 months, P < 0.001). OS for patients who achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) (n = 66, 15%) was significantly better compared to resected patients without pCR (86.5 versus 37.0 months, P = 0.003). For patients with pCR, the 5- and 10-year event-free survival and OS rates were 45.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.8% to 57.7%] and 28.1% (95% CI 15.2% to 42.6%), and 58.2% (95% CI 45.2% to 69.2%) and 45.0% (95% CI 31.5% to 57.6%), respectively. Conclusion We report favorable long-term outcomes in patients with operable stage III NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel ± neoadjuvant sequential radiotherapy from four prospective SAKK trials. Almost two-third of the patients underwent complete resection after neoadjuvant therapy. We confirm R0 resection and pCR as important predictors of outcome. Combined modality treatment in operable stage III NSCLC results in 5- and 10-year survival rates of 37% and 25%. Long-term survival for patients with incomplete resection is poor. Complete resection and pCR are important predictors for outcome.
Collapse
|
84
|
Garon E, Cho B, Luft A, Alatorre-Alexander J, Geater S, Trukhin D, Kim SW, Ursol G, Hussein M, Lim F, Yang CT, Araujo L, Saito H, Reinmuth N, Medic N, Mann H, Shi X, Peters S, Mok T, Johnson M. 5MO Patient reported outcomes (PROs) with 1L durvalumab (D), with or without tremelimumab (T), plus chemotherapy (CT) in metastatic (m) NSCLC: Results from POSEIDON. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
85
|
Pérol M, Felip E, Dafni U, Polito L, Pal N, Tsourti Z, Ton TGN, Merritt D, Morris S, Stahel R, Peters S. Effectiveness of PD-(L)1 Inhibitors Alone or in Combination With Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in First-Line (1L) Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (nsq-NSCLC) With PD-L1-High Expression Using Real-World Data. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:511-521. [PMID: 35218887 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-PD-(L)1 therapy alone (cancer immunotherapy [CIT]-mono) or combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CIT-chemo) is used as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study compared clinical outcomes with CIT-mono vs CIT-chemo in the specific clinical scenario of non-squamous (Nsq)-NSCLC with a high PD-L1 expression of ≥50% (tumor proportion score (TPS) or tumor cells (TC)). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using a real-world de-identified database. Patients with metastatic Nsq-NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression initiating first-line CIT-mono or CIT-chemo between 24 October 2016 and 28 February 2019 were followed up to 28 February 2020. We compared overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted (aHR) for differences in baseline key prognostic characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting methodology. RESULTS Patients with PD-L1-high Nsq-NSCLC treated with CIT-mono (n=351), were older and less often presented with de novo stage IV disease than patients treated with CIT-chemo (n=169). With a median follow-up of 19.9 months for CIT-chemo vs 23.5 months for CIT-mono, median OS and rwPFS did not differ between the two groups (median OS: CIT-chemo, 21.0 months vs CIT-mono, 22.1 months, aHR=1.03, 95% CI 0.77-1.39, P=0.83; median rwPFS: CIT-chemo, 10.8 months vs CIT-mono, 11.5 months, aHR=1.04, 95% CI 0.78-1.37, P=0.81). CIT-chemo showed significant and meaningful improvement in OS and rwPFS vs CIT-mono only in the never-smoker subgroup, albeit among a small sample of patients (n=50; OS HR=0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.83, interaction P=0.02; rwPFS HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95, interaction P=0.04). CONCLUSION Except in the subgroup of never-smoker patients, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line CIT treatment does not appear to impact survival outcomes in Nsq-NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
|
86
|
Gridelli C, Peters S, Mok T, Forde PM, Reck M, Attili I, de Marinis F. First-line immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: results of an International Expert Panel Meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100355. [PMID: 34922299 PMCID: PMC8689080 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy represents the standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as monotherapy in high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors (≥50%) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. However, most pivotal clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) did not include patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. Hence, a consensus is lacking on the safety and efficacy of ICIs in this specific subgroup of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2021 with the aim of reviewing the available evidence on the use of ICIs in NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2, both in clinical practice and in a research setting. RESULTS All panelists expressed concern about the applicability of currently available PS scales to evaluate patients for ICI treatment. The panelists agreed that, though limited, the available data support the safety of single-agent immunotherapy in PS 2 NSCLC patients, whereas concern was raised on the safety of ICI combinations, mainly related to chemotherapy and/or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 toxicity. On the basis of reviewed data, ICI efficacy may be speculated in PS 2 NSCLC patients; however, PS 2 remains a negative prognostic category as compared to PS 0-1 in patients treated with ICI, as it is for chemotherapy. The panelists defined high, medium and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to the inclusion of PS 2 patients in prospective clinical trials and the specific evaluation of combined ICI treatments with attenuated chemotherapy doses. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current evidence, the panelists outlined the major limitations affecting PS 2 patients with NSCLC and reached common considerations on the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of ICI monotherapy and ICI combinations in the first-line setting.
Collapse
|
87
|
Peters S, Scherpereel A, Cornelissen R, Oulkhouir Y, Greillier L, Kaplan M, Talbot T, Monnet I, Hiret S, Baas P, Nowak A, Fujimoto N, Tsao A, Mansfield A, Popat S, Zhang X, Hu N, Balli D, Spires T, Zalcman G. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma: 3-year outcomes from CheckMate 743. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:488-499. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
88
|
Mikkelsen B, Peters S. WHO-ESMO collaboration in cancer control: policies into action to save lives. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100373. [PMID: 35246324 PMCID: PMC8803307 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
89
|
Zitzmann AL, Shojaa M, Kast S, Kohl M, von Stengel S, Borucki D, Gosch M, Jakob F, Kerschan-Schindl K, Kladny B, Lange U, Middeldorf S, Peters S, Schoene D, Sieber C, Thomasius F, Uder M, Kemmler W. The effect of different training frequency on bone mineral density in older adults. A comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone 2022; 154:116230. [PMID: 34624560 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Exercise frequency is a key aspect of exercise protocols. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we determined the effect of training frequency on (areal) bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (LS) and hip. Reviewing seven electronic databases up to April 2021, we conducted a systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA statement. Inclusion criteria were (a) controlled exercise trials (b) with at least two study arms that compared low versus high exercise frequency, (c) an intervention ≥6 months and (d) BMD assessments at lumbar spine (LS) or hip. The analysis was conducted as a mixed-effect meta-analysis and used "type of exercise" and "study duration" as moderators in subgroup analyses. Standardized mean differences (SMD) for LS- and hip-BMD changes were defined as outcome measures. Seven studies with 17 exercise groups were included in the analysis. We observed significantly higher effects of high (≥2 sessions/week) vs. low net training frequency (1-<2 sessions/week) exercise on LS- (SMD 0.55, 95%-CI: 0.20-0.90) but not hip-BMD (0.19, -0.06 to 0.45). Study duration was found to be a significant moderator for the effect of training frequency at LS- but not hip-BMD. In parallel, the type of exercise moderately influences the effect of training frequency on LS- but not on hip-BMD. We observed a superior effect of higher net training frequency on BMD. Longer exercise exposition increases this effect. Considering e.g. holidays, indisposition or other temporary absence, exercise programs on osteoporosis should provide at least 3 sessions/week/year to allow a net training frequency of more than two sessions/week. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021246804).
Collapse
|
90
|
Rosa M, Fogarty S, Bui J, McCusker M, Agostinelli A, Peters S, Joshi S, Lui E. An Assessment of Different Region of Interest (ROI) Sampling Techniques for Calculating Native T1 and Extracellular Volume (ECV) on Cardiac MRI. Heart Lung Circ 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
91
|
Peters S, Merta J, Schmidt L, Jazmati D, Kramer PH, Blase C, Tippelt S, Fleischhack G, Stock A, Bison B, Rutkowski S, Pietsch T, Kortmann RD, Timmermann B. Evaluation of dose, volume and outcome in children with localized, intracranial ependymoma treated with proton therapy within the prospective KiProReg Study. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:1193-1202. [PMID: 34964901 PMCID: PMC9248402 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy (RT) of ependymoma in children is an important part of the
interdisciplinary treatment concept. However, feasibility and dose concepts are still
under investigation, particularly in very young children. The aim of this study was to
evaluate the standard dose and volume of proton therapy (PT) in children with
ependymoma. Methods In this analysis, 105 patients with localized, intracranial ependymoma under the age of
18 years treated with PT between 2013 and 2018 were included. Patient characteristics,
treatment, outcome, and follow-up data were analyzed using descriptive statistics,
Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis. Results The median age of patients at PT was 2.8 years (0.9-17.0 years). The molecular subgroup
analysis was performed in a subset of 50 patients (37 EP-PFA, 2 EP-PFB, 7 EP-RELA, 2
EP-YAP, 2 NEC [not elsewhere classified]). The median total dose was 59.4 Gy (54.0-62.0
Gy). The median follow-up time was 1.9 years. The estimated 3-year overall survival
(OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 93.7%, 74.1%,
and 55.6%, respectively. Within univariable analysis, female gender and lower dose had a
positive impact on OS, whereas age ≥4 years had a negative impact on OS and PT given
after progression had a negative impact on PFS. In the multivariable analysis, multiple
tumor surgeries were associated with lower PFS. New ≥3° late toxicities occurred in 11
patients. Conclusion For children with localized ependymoma, PT was effective and well tolerable. Multiple
surgeries showed a negative impact on PFS.
Collapse
|
92
|
Schoenfeld AJ, Antonia SJ, Awad MM, Felip E, Gainor J, Gettinger SN, Hodi FS, Johnson ML, Leighl NB, Lovly CM, Mok T, Perol M, Reck M, Solomon B, Soria JC, Tan DSW, Peters S, Hellmann MD. Clinical definition of acquired resistance to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1597-1607. [PMID: 34487855 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Acquired resistance (AR) to programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] blockade is frequent in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in a majority of initial responders. Patients with AR may have unique properties of persistent antitumor immunity that could be re-harnessed by investigational immunotherapies. The absence of a consistent clinical definition of AR to PD-(L)1 blockade and lack of uniform criteria for ensuing enrollment in clinical trials remains a major barrier to progress; such clinical definitions have advanced biologic and therapeutic discovery. We examine the considerations and potential controversies in developing a patient-level definition of AR in NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 blockade. Taking into account the specifics of NSCLC biology and corresponding treatment strategies, we propose a practical, clinical definition of AR to PD-(L)1 blockade for use in clinical reports and prospective clinical trials. Patients should meet the following criteria: received treatment that includes PD-(L)1 blockade; experienced objective response on PD-(L)1 blockade (inclusion of a subset of stable disease will require future investigation); have progressive disease occurring within 6 months of last anti-PD-(L)1 antibody treatment or rechallenge with anti-PD-(L)1 antibody in patients not exposed to anti-PD-(L)1 in 6 months.
Collapse
|
93
|
Reck M, Ciuleanu T, Pluzanski A, Lee J, Bernabe Caro R, Linardou H, Burgers J, Gallardo C, Nishio M, Peters S, Paz-Ares L, Hellmann M, Borghaei H, Ramalingam S, O’Byrne K, Hu N, Bushong J, Eccles L, Grootendorst D, Brahmer J. 122MO Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) and baseline (BL) brain metastases (mets): Intracranial and systemic outcomes from CheckMate 227 Part 1. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.10.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
94
|
Even C, Goldberg S, Siu L, Planchard D, Hwang M, Chen CK, He J, Song X, Zhou D, Doake R, Krug L, Peters S. 162P Population pharmacokinetic modeling of tremelimumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.10.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
95
|
Keam B, Machiels JP, Kim HR, Licitra L, Golusinski W, Gregoire V, Lee YG, Belka C, Guo Y, Rajappa SJ, Tahara M, Azrif M, Ang MK, Yang MH, Wang CH, Ng QS, Wan Zamaniah WI, Kiyota N, Babu S, Yang K, Curigliano G, Peters S, Kim TW, Yoshino T, Pentheroudakis G. Pan-Asian adaptation of the EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100309. [PMID: 34844180 PMCID: PMC8710460 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx was published in 2020. It was therefore decided by both the ESMO and the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO) to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in July 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to consider the potential ethnic differences associated with the treatment of SCCs of the head and neck (SCCHN) in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with SCCHN (excluding nasopharyngeal carcinomas) representing the oncological societies of Korea (KSMO), China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter was discussed when appropriate. This manuscript provides a series of expert recommendations (Clinical Practice Guidelines) which can be used to provide guidance to health care providers and clinicians for the optimisation of the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with SCC of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx across Asia.
Collapse
|
96
|
Kanesvaran R, Porta C, Wong A, Powles T, Ng QS, Schmidinger M, Ye D, Malhotra H, Miura Y, Lee JL, Chong FLT, Pu YS, Yen CC, Saad M, Lee HJ, Kitamura H, Bhattacharyya GS, Curigliano G, Poon E, Choo SP, Peters S, Lim E, Yoshino T, Pentheroudakis G. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with renal cell carcinoma. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100304. [PMID: 34864348 PMCID: PMC8645910 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of renal cell carcinoma was published in 2019 with an update planned for 2021. It was therefore decided by both the ESMO and the Singapore Society of Oncology (SSO) to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in May 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2019 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of renal cell carcinomas in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter were discussed when appropriate.
Collapse
|
97
|
Yoshino T, Argilés G, Oki E, Martinelli E, Taniguchi H, Arnold D, Mishima S, Li Y, Smruti BK, Ahn JB, Faud I, Chee CE, Yeh KH, Lin PC, Chua C, Hasbullah HH, Lee MA, Sharma A, Sun Y, Curigliano G, Bando H, Lordick F, Yamanaka T, Tabernero J, Baba E, Cervantes A, Ohtsu A, Peters S, Ishioka C, Pentheroudakis G. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis treatment and follow-up of patients with localised colon cancer. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1496-1510. [PMID: 34411693 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of localised colon cancer was published in 2020. It was decided by both the ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special virtual guidelines meeting in March 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of localised colon cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with localised colon cancer representing the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug availability and reimbursement situations in the different Asian countries.
Collapse
|
98
|
Xing L, Yu J, Peters S, Besse B, Spira A, Wang J, Yang Y, Wang H. 167TiP AdvanTIG-301: Anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb) ociperlimab (OCI) + tislelizumab (TIS) + concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by OCI + TIS or TIS + cCRT followed by TIS vs cCRT followed by durvalumab (DUR) in previously untreated, locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.10.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
99
|
Soo RA, Han JY, Dafni U, Cho BC, Yeo CM, Nadal E, Carcereny E, de Castro J, Sala MA, Bernabé R, Coate L, Provencio Pulla M, Garcia Campelo R, Cuffe S, Hashemi SMS, Früh M, Massuti B, Garcia-Sanchez J, Dómine M, Majem M, Sanchez-Torres JM, Britschgi C, Pless M, Dimopoulou G, Roschitzki-Voser H, Ruepp B, Rosell R, Stahel RA, Peters S. A randomised phase II study of osimertinib and bevacizumab versus osimertinib alone as second-line targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC with confirmed EGFR and acquired T790M mutations: the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP 10-16) BOOSTER trial. Ann Oncol 2021; 33:181-192. [PMID: 34839016 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitising EGFR and acquired T790M mutations, progression inevitably occurs. The angiogenic pathway is implicated in EGFR TKI resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS BOOSTER is an open-label randomised phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of combined osimertinib 80 mg daily and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks, versus osimertinib alone, in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and acquired T790M mutations after failure on previous EGFR TKI therapy. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Between May 2017 and February 2019, 155 patients were randomised (combination: 78; osimertinib: 77). At data cut-off of 22 February 2021, median follow-up was 33.8 months [interquartile range (IQR): 26.5-37.6 months] and 129 (83.2%) PFS events were reported in the intention-to-treat population. There was no difference in median PFS between the combination [15.4 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2-18.0 months] and osimertinib arm (12.3 months; 95% CI 6.2-17.2 months; stratified log-rank P = 0.83), [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68-1.37]. Median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI 17.8-32.1 months) in the combination arm and 24.3 months (95% CI 16.9-37.0 months) in the osimertinib arm (stratified log-rank P = 0.91), (HR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.67-1.56). Exploratory analysis revealed a significant interaction of smoking history with treatment for PFS (adjusted P = 0.0052) with a HR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.30-0.90) for smokers, and 1.47 (95% CI 0.92-2.33) for never smokers. ORR was 55% in both arms and the median time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in the combination than in the osimertinib arm, 8.2 months versus 10.8 months, respectively (P = 0.0074). Safety of osimertinib and bevacizumab was consistent with previous reports with grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) reported in 47% and 18% of patients on combination and osimertinib alone, respectively. CONCLUSIONS No difference in PFS was observed between osimertinib plus bevacizumab and osimertinib alone. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were more common in patients on combination.
Collapse
|
100
|
Sessa C, Cortes J, Conte P, Cardoso F, Choueiri T, Dummer R, Lorusso P, Ottmann O, Ryll B, Mok T, Tempero M, Comis S, Oliva C, Peters S, Tabernero J. The impact of COVID-19 on cancer care and oncology clinical research: an experts' perspective. ESMO Open 2021; 7:100339. [PMID: 34953404 PMCID: PMC8608656 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic promises to have lasting impacts on cancer clinical trials that could lead to faster patient access to new treatments. In this article, an international panel of oncology experts discusses the lasting impacts of the pandemic on oncology clinical trials and proposes solutions for clinical trial stakeholders, with the support of recent data on worldwide clinical trials collected by IQVIA. These lasting impacts and proposed solutions encompass three topic areas. Firstly, acceleration and implementation of new operational approaches to oncology trials with patient-centric, fully decentralized virtual approaches that include remote assessments via telemedicine and remote devices. Geographical differences in the uptake of remote technology, including telemedicine, are discussed in the article, focusing on the impact of the local adoption of new operational approaches. Secondly, innovative clinical trials. The pandemic has highlighted the need for new trial designs that accelerate research and limit risks and burden for patients while driving optimization of clinical trial objectives and endpoints, while testing is being minimized. Areas of considerations for clinical trial stakeholders are discussed in detail. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the underrepresentation of minority groups in clinical trials; the approach for oncology clinical trials to improve generalizability of efficacy and outcomes data is discussed. Thirdly, a new problem-focused collaborative framework between oncology trial stakeholders, including decision makers, to leverage and further accelerate the innovative approaches in clinical research developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This could shorten timelines for patient access to new treatments by addressing the cultural and technological barriers to adopting new operational approaches and innovative clinical trials. The role of the different stakeholders is described, with the aim of making COVID-19 a catalyst for positive change in oncology clinical research and eventually in cancer care.
Collapse
|