Comparative analysis of four nutritional scores predicting the incidence of MACE in older adults with acute coronary syndromes after PCI

To determine the most appropriate nutritional assessment tool for predicting the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 1 year in elderly ACS patients undergoing PCI from four nutritional assessment tools including PNI, GNRI, CONUT, and BMI. Consecutive cases diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of the Air force characteristic medical center from 1 January 2020 to 1 April 2022 were retrospectively collected. The basic clinical characteristics and relevant test and examination indexes were collected uniformly, and the cases were divided into the MACE group (174 cases) and the non-MACE group (372 cases) according to whether a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) had occurred within 1 year. Predictive models were constructed to assess the nutritional status of patients with the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) scores, and Body Mass Index (BMI), respectively, and to analyze their relationship with prognosis. The incremental value of the four nutritional assessment tools in predicting risk was compared using the Integrated Discriminant Improvement (IDI) and the net reclassification improvement (NRI). The predictive effect of each model on the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 1 year in elderly ACS patients undergoing PCI was assessed using area under the ROC curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision analysis curves, and clinical impact curves; comparative analyses were performed. Among the four nutritional assessment tools, the area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher for the PNI (AUC: 0.798, 95%CI 0.755-0.840 P < 0.001) and GNRI (AUC: 0.760, 95%CI 0.715-0.804 P < 0.001) than for the CONUT (AUC: 0.719,95%CI 0.673-0.765 P < 0.001) and BMI (AUC: 0.576, 95%CI 0.522-0.630 P < 0.001). The positive predictive value (PPV) of PNI: 67.67% was better than GNRI, CONUT, and BMI, and the negative predictive value (NPV): of 83.90% was better than CONUT and BMI and similar to the NPV of GNRI. The PNI, GNRI, and CONUT were compared with BMI, respectively. The PNI had the most significant improvement in the Integrated Discriminant Improvement Index (IDI) (IDI: 0.1732, P < 0.001); the PNI also had the most significant improvement in the Net Reclassification Index (NRI) (NRI: 0.8185, P < 0.001). In addition, of the four nutritional assessment tools used in this study, the PNI was more appropriate for predicting the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 1 year in elderly ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy on mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can quickly restore myocardial perfusion after acute coronary syndrome. Whether and which lipid-lowering regimens are effective in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and mortality risk after PCI remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the benefits of different lipid-lowering regimens on the risk of MACEs and mortality in the post-PCI population by network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Public databases, including PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, were searched from inception to August 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on lipid-lowering regimens in post-PCI populations were included and analysed. The outcomes were the incidence of all-cause mortality and MACEs, whether reported as dichotomous variables or as HRs.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine RCTs were included. For MACEs, alirocumab plus rosuvastatin (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.44), evolocumab plus ezetimibe and statins (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.59), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) plus pitavastatin (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.96) and icosapent ethyl plus statins (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.86) had significant advantages and relatively high rankings. For mortality, rosuvastatin (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.84), ezetimibe plus statins (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.89) and icosapent ethyl plus statins (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.96) had significant advantages compared with the control.

CONCLUSION

EPA, especially icosapent ethyl, plus statins had a beneficial effect on reducing the risk of MACEs and mortality in post-PCI patients. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors plus statins were able to reduce the risk of MACEs, but the risk of mortality remained unclear.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018099600.

The Incidence of Complication in the Perioperative Period of Rotational Atherectomy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Retrospective Study of Low Speed Versus High Speed

The safety and efficacy of rotational atherectomy (RA) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with different rotational speeds remain unclear. This was an observational retrospective registry study. Between February 2017 and January 2022, a total of 283 patients with ACS were treated with RA. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the low-speed group (130,000 to 150,000 rotations/min [rpm],182 cases) and the high-speed group (160,000 to 220,000 rpm, 101 cases) according to the maximum RA speed. The outcomes analyzed were procedural complications; incidence of heart failure, stent thrombosis, and cardiac death during hospitalization; and 30-day major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Patients in the low-speed RA group had a higher incidence of vasospasm during RA (15.4% vs 6.9%, p = 0.040), whereas the incidence of slow blood flow was higher in the high-speed RA group (16.5% vs 27.7%, p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in other complications or in 30-day major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events between the 2 groups. Moreover, logistic regression analysis identified rotational speed (160,000 to 220,000 rpm) as a predictor of slow flow during RA (odds ratio 1.900, 95% confidence interval 1.006 to 3.588, p = 0.048). For every 10,000-rpm increase in rotational speed, the risk of slow flow increased by 27% (odds ratio 1.273, 95% confidence interval 1.047 to 1.547, p = 0.015). In conclusion, patients with ACS treated with a lower RA speed (130,000 to 150,000 rpm) had a higher risk of vasospasm, whereas those treated with higher speeds (160,000 to 220,000 rpm) had a higher incidence of slow flow. High rotational speed (160,000 to 220,000 rpm) is an independent risk factor for slow flow during RA in patients with ACS.

One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Chronic and Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Bioresorbable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents

There is a paucity of data regarding the safety of a 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients at HBR with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or ACS treated with PCI using bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (BP-EES) followed by 1-month DAPT. Patients at HBR who underwent PCI with BP-EES were prospectively enrolled in 10 Italian centers. All patients were treated with 1-month DAPT. In case of need for anticoagulation, patients received an oral anticoagulant in addition to a P2Y12 inhibitor for 1 month, followed by oral anticoagulation only after that. The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite/probable stent thrombosis at 12 months. Overall, 263 patients (59.4%) with CCS and 180 patients (40.6%) with ACS were enrolled. No significant difference was evident between patients with CCS and ACS for the primary end point (4.3% vs 5.6%, respectively, p = 0.497) and for each isolated component. The risk for Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 1 to 5 or type 3 to 5 bleedings was also similar between patients with CCS and ACS (4.3% vs 5.2%, p = 0.677, and 1.6% vs 2.9%, p = 0.351, respectively). In conclusion, among HBR patients with ACS who underwent PCI with BP-EES, a 1-month DAPT strategy is associated with a similar risk of ischemic and bleeding events compared with those with CCS.

Bivalirudin versus heparin in contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bivalirudin is associated with fewer major bleeding events than heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but confounding effects of concomitant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, routine femoral artery access, and less potent effects of clopidogrel limits meaningful comparisons. The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare bivalirudin to heparin in contemporary practice.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant studies, including comparisons between bivalirudin and heparin in the current medical era from inception to December 23, 2021. Studies reporting incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) in patients undergoing PCI and meeting the inclusion criteria were retained. Data extraction was performed by three independent reviewers.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 8 studies. Compared to heparin, bivalirudin during PCI was associated with a lower NACE risk, lower all-cause death, and similar MACE risk, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.97, p = 0.02), 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.94, p = 0.002), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.78-1.10, p = 0.38), respectively. Moreover, the reduction in NACE was mainly attributed to reduced bleeding (22% reduction in the risk of major bleeding, 95% CI 0.63-0.97, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that bivalirudin use during PCI reduced the risk of NACE and all-cause death but did not reduce the risk of MACE compared with heparin use in PCI. More studies specifically designed for anticoagulation strategies and a personalized anticoagulation regimen to comprehensively balance bleeding and ischemia risks are required.

The association between serum anion gap and acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to explore the association between serum anion gap (SAG) and acute kidney injury (AKI) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 2,428 ACS patients who underwent CABG in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (Mimic-IV) database. The endpoint of this study was AKI after CABG. The baseline data of the two groups (non-AKI group vs. AKI group) was compared, and the restricted cubic spline (RCS) plot, multivariable logistic regression model, and subgroup analysis were used to explore the relationship between SAG and the risk of AKI after CABG.

RESULTS

In the adjusted multivariate logistic regression model, SAG was an independent predictor of AKI after CABG (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23, P = 0.015). The RCS revealed that the relationship between SAG levels and risk of AKI was J-shaped. When the SAG was ≥ 11.58 mmol/L, the risk of AKI increased by 26% for each unit increase in SAG. Additionally, we further divided the SAG into quartiles. In the fully adjusted model, compared with the first quartile of SAG, the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for AKI risk across the SAG quartiles were 0.729 (0.311, 1.600), 1.308 (0.688-2.478), and 2.221 (1.072, 4.576).

CONCLUSIONS

The SAG level was associated with the risk of AKI after CABG in a J-shaped curve in the ICU. However, the underlying causes of the problem need to be investigated.

Gender Differences in Long-Term Outcomes of Young Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Long-Term Outcome Analysis from a Multicenter Registry in Japan

Young patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have shown worse long-term outcomes but remain inadequately investigated. We analyzed 1,186 consecutive young patients (aged ≤55 years) from the Keio Cardiovascular PCI registry who were successfully discharged after PCI (2008 to 2019) and compared them to 5,048 older patients (aged 55 to 75 years). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, bleeding, stroke requiring admission, and coronary artery bypass grafting within 2 years after discharge. In the young patients, the mean age was 48.4 ± 5.4 years, acute coronary syndrome cases accounted for 69.6%, and 92 (7.8%) were female. Body mass index; hemoglobin levels; and proportions of smoking, hyperlipidemia, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction were lower and dialysis or active cancer proportions were higher in young female patients than male patients. A higher number of young female than male patients reached the primary end point and all-cause death (15.2% vs 7.1%, p = 0.01; 4.3% vs 1.0%, p = 0.023), mainly because of noncardiac death (4.3% versus 0.5%, p = 0.001). After covariate adjustment, the primary end point rates were higher among young women than men (hazard ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 3.89, p = 0.042). Gender did not predict the primary end point among older patients (vs men; hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.06, p = 0.14). In conclusion, young women showed worse outcomes during the 2-year post-PCI follow-up, but this gender difference was absent in patients aged 55 to 75 years.

Predictive value of systemic immune-inflammatory index combined with CHA2DS2-VASC score for contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) combined with CHA2DS2-VASC score in predicting the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment.

METHODS

1531 consecutive patients with ACS and undergoing PCI were recruited from January 2019 to December 2021. All patients were divided into CI-AKI and non-CI-AKI groups according to the pre-procedure and post-procedure creatinine changes, and the baseline data were compared between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the factors influencing CI-AKI in ACS patients after PCI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the predictive value of SII, CHA2DS2-VASC, and their combined levels on CI-AKI after PCI.

RESULTS

Patients with high SII and high CHA2DS2-VASC score had a higher incidence of CI-AKI. For SII, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting CI-AKI was 0.686. The optimal cut-off value was 736.08 with a sensitivity of 66.8% and a specificity of 66.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.662-0.709; P < 0.001]. For CHA2DS2-VASC score, the AUC was 0.795, the optimal cut-off value was 2.50 with a sensitivity of 80.3% and a specificity of 62.7% (95% CI 0.774-0.815; P < 0.001). When combining SII and CHA2DS2-VASC score, the AUC was 0.830, the optimal cut-off value was 0.148 with a diagnostic sensitivity of 76.1% and a specificity of 75.2% (95% CI 0.810-0.849; P < 0.001). The results showed that SII combined with CHA2DS2-VASC score resulted in improved predictive accuracy of CI-AKI. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that albumin level (OR = 0.967, 95% CI 0.936-1.000; P = 0.047), lnSII level (OR = 1.596, 95% CI 1.010-1.905; P < 0.001), and CHA2DS2-VASC score level (OR = 1.425, 95% CI 1.318-1.541; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for CI-AKI in patients with ACS treated with PCI.

CONCLUSION

High SII and high CHA2DS2-VASC score are risk factors for the development of CI-AKI, and the combination of the two improves the accuracy of predicting the occurrence of CI-AKI in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Less bleeding by omitting aspirin in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: Rationale and design of the LEGACY study

BACKGROUND

Early aspirin withdrawal, also known as P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy, following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) can reduce bleeding without a trade-off in efficacy. Still the average daily bleeding risk is highest during the first months and it remains unclear if aspirin can be omitted immediately following PCI.

METHODS

The LEGACY study is an open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of immediate P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months in 3,090 patients. Patients are randomized immediately following successful PCI for NSTE-ACS to 75-100 mg aspirin once daily versus no aspirin. The primary hypothesis is that immediately omitting aspirin is superior to DAPT with respect to major or minor bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, while maintaining noninferiority for the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke compared to DAPT.

CONCLUSIONS

The LEGACY study is the first randomized study that is specifically designed to evaluate the impact of immediately omitting aspirin, and thus treating patients with P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy, as compared to DAPT for 12 months on bleeding and ischemic events within 12 months following PCI for NSTE-ACS.

Sex differences in post-operative outcomes following non-cardiac surgery

It is uncertain whether sex is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes after non-cardiac surgery. We examined sex differences in short- and long-term mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in Alberta, Canada. Using linked administrative databases, we identified patients undergoing one of 45 different non-cardiac surgeries who were hospitalized between 2008 and 2019. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) were reported for mortality at 30-days, 6-months, and 1-year stratified by sex. Secondary outcomes including all-cause hospitalization, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), hospitalization for infection, hospitalization for stroke, and hospitalization for bleeding were also analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was adjusted for age, sex, surgery type, the components of the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. We identified 552,224 unique patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery of which 304,408 (55.1%) were female. Male sex was a predictor of mortality at 30-days (aOR 1.25 (1.14, 1.38), p<0.0001), 6-months (aOR 1.26 (1.20, 1.33), p<0.0001), and 1-year (aOR 1.25 (1.20, 1.31), p<0.0001). Similarly, male sex was a predictor of hospital readmission at 30-days (1.12 (1.09, 1.14), p<0.0001), 6-months (aOR 1.11 (1.10, 1.13), p<0.0001), and 1-year (aOR 1.06 (1.04, 1.07), p<0.0001). When the results were stratified by age, the effect of male sex on clinical outcome diminished for age ≥ 65years compared to younger patients. In conclusion, male patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery have higher risks of all-cause mortality and readmission after adjustment for baseline risk factor differences, particularly in those under 65-years-old. The overall incidence of readmission for stroke, bleeding, HF and ACS after non-cardiac surgery was low. The impact of male sex on clinical outcomes decreases with increasing age, suggesting the importance of considering the effect of both sex and age on clinical outcomes after non-cardiac surgery.

Triglyceride-glucose index is associated with poor prognosis in acute coronary syndrome patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, which is a reliable substitute indicator for insulin resistance, has been considered an independent risk factor for long-term outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, it remains unknown whether the TyG index is associated with poor prognosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 1158 ACS patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI were retrospectively studied. The TyG index was calculated by ln[fasting triglyceride (mg/dL) × fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)/2]. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and unplanned repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

During a median of 42-month follow-up, 350 patients (30.2%) experienced at least one endpoint event. Based on the optimal cut-off value of the TyG index, patients were divided into the high TyG index group and the low TyG index group. Patients in the high TyG index group had higher risks of MACCE (35.3% vs. 25.3%, p < 0.001), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (31.1% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.003), nonfatal stroke (4.2% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.022) and unplanned repeat revascularization (19.4% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001) than those in the low TyG index group. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that there was an independent association between the TyG index and MACCE regardless of whether the TyG index was a continuous or categorical variable (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86, p = 0.009; HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.16-2.01, p = 0.003, respectively). Restricted cubic spline curve exhibited that the relationship between the TyG index and MACCE was linear (p for non-linear = 0.595, p for overall = 0.005). By incorporating the TyG index groups into baseline risk model, the accuracy of predicting MACCE was improved [AUC: baseline risk model, 0.618 vs. baseline risk model + TyG index groups, 0.636, p for comparison = 0.042].

CONCLUSIONS

The TyG index is independently associated with MACCE, suggesting that the TyG index may serve as a valid indicator for predicting poor prognosis in ACS patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI.

WeChat-Based Education and Rehabilitation Program Improves Physical Performance and Quality of Life in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

WeChat provides the chance for online caring program to improve physical recovery and quality of life (QoL) in patients with cardio/cerebral vascular diseases, especially in special period such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread time. This study intended to evaluate the influence of the WeChat-based education and rehabilitation program (WERP) on physical performance and QoL in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Totally, 180 patients with ACS after PCI were randomized to the WERP (N = 90) and control care (CC) (N = 90) groups, then received corresponding caring program for 3 months. Short physical performance battery (SPPB) score, 6-minute walking distance (6MWT), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) score, and EuroQol-5 Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) score were assessed at discharge, month (M)1, M2, and M3, respectively. Our study showed that SPPB score at M1 ( P = 0.029), M2 (P = 0.048), and M3 (P = 0.030) was higher in WERP group than in CC group. Besides, 6MWT at M1 (P = 0.026), M2 (P = 0.023), and M3 (P = 0.041) were longer in WERP group than in CC group. Finally, EQ-5D score at M1 (P = 0.022) and M3 (P = 0.023) was lower, while EQ-VAS score at M1 (P = 0.020), M2 (P = 0.013), and M3 (P = 0.039) was higher in WERP group than in CC group. Subgroup analyses further showed that patients with baseline SPPB score ≤ 9 benefited more from WERP. Conclusively, WERP could be an option to improve physical performance and QoL in patients with ACS after PCI.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Asian American/Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) and Hispanics are growing minority United States populations, but are poorly represented in the cardiovascular literature. This study examines guideline adherence and outcomes in AAPIs and Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) in a quaternary care center after inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary end points were inpatient post-PCI bleed, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and all-cause mortality, whereas the secondary end point was the prescription rate of post-PCI guideline-directed medical therapy including aspirin, statins, P2Y12 receptor blockers, and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation. Intergroup differences were assessed through analysis of variance or two-way chi-square tests, and the association of race with binary outcomes was examined through logistic regression with NHW as the reference group. Compared with NHW, AAPIs, and Hispanics had higher odds of diabetes mellitus, and AAPIs had higher odds of hypertension and being on dialysis. Hispanics had higher odds of post-PCI mortality versus NHW, both in acute coronary syndrome (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, p = 0.03) and elective PCI (OR 2.51, p = 0.04). AAPI also trended toward higher mortality than NHW in both categories. AAPIs were found to have higher odds of statin prescription (OR 1.91, p = 0.04). Hispanics had lower odds of ticagrelor prescription versus NHW (OR 0.65, p = 0.04), and AAPIs trended toward such. No differences were found for cardiopulmonary rehabilitation prescriptions in groups. This study suggests that despite quality improvement efforts, disparities remain in postprocedural outcomes in minority groups in comparison with NHW.

Predictive Value of the Lipoprotein(a) to Prealbumin Ratio and of the NT-proBNP to LVEF Ratio for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to prealbumin (PA) ratio and the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ratio for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A 1:1 matched case-control study was performed to retrospectively analyze ACS patients who underwent PCI from January 2022 to June 2022. Patients with MACE were selected as the case group (n = 55), and age- and gender-matched patients without MACE were selected as the control group (n = 55). Clinical data for the two groups was compared by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Risk factors and the odds ratio (OR) for MACE in ACS patients were evaluated, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the Lp(a)/PA ratio, the NT-proBNP/LVEF ratio, and their combination for the prediction of MACE in ACS patients.

RESULTS

The MACE and non-MACE groups showed statistically significant differences for time from onset to PCI, LVEF, NT-proBNP, white blood cell (WBC), Lp(a), PA, Lp(a)/PA, NT-proBNP/LVEF, number of catheterizations, number of implanted stents >2, and support diameter >3 (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF, Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF were independent risk factors for MACE. ROC curve analysis for Lp(a)/PA showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of MACE was 0.779 (0.693-0.864), the cut-off point was 1.36, the sensitivity was 69.1%, and the specificity was 74.5%. The AUC for NT-proBNP/LVEF in predicting MACE was 0.827 (0.75-0.904), the cut-off point was 61.04, the sensitivity was 65.5%, and the specificity was 92.7%. For the combination of Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF, the AUC for the prediction of MACE was 0.889 (0.830-0.947), the cut-off point was 0.37, the sensitivity was 81.8%, and the specificity was 81.8%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF at admission showed good predictive value for the occurrence of MACE in ACS patients after PCI.

Very long-term outlook of acute coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of polymer-free versus durable-polymer new-generation drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Detailed long-term follow-up data on patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in general, and those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in particular, are limited. We aimed to appraise the long-term outlook of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with state-of-the-art coronary stents for STEMI, other types of ACS and stable coronary artery disease (CAD), and also explore the potential beneficial impact of new-generation polymer-free drug-eluting stents (DES) in this setting.

METHODS

Baseline, procedural and very long-term outcome data on patients undergoing PCI and randomized to implantation of new-generation polymer-free vs. durable polymer DES were systematically collected, explicitly distinguishing subjects with admission diagnosis of STEMI, non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS), and stable CAD. Outcomes of interest included death, myocardial infarction, revascularization (i.e. patient-oriented composite endpoints [POCE]), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and device-oriented composite endpoints (DOCE).

RESULTS

A total of 3002 patients were included, 1770 (59.0%) with stable CAD, 921 (30.7%) with NSTEACS, and 311 (10.4%) with STEMI. At long-term follow-up (7.5±3.1 years), all clinical events were significantly more common in the NSTEACS group and, to a lesser extent, in the stable CAD group (e.g. POCE occurred in, respectively, 637 [44.7%] vs. 964 [37.9%] vs. 133 [31.5%], P<0.001). While these differences were largely attributable to adverse coexisting features in patients with NSTEACS (e.g. advanced age, insulin-dependent diabetes, and extent of CAD), the unfavorable outlook of patients presenting with NSTEACS persisted even after multivariable adjustment including several prognostically relevant factors (hazard ratio [HR] of NSTEACS vs. stable CAD 1.19 [95% confidence interval 1.03-1.38], P=0.016). Notably, even after encompassing all prognostically impactful features, no difference between polymer-free and permanent polymer drug-eluting stents appeared (HR=0.96 [0.84-1.10], P=0.560).

CONCLUSIONS

Unstable coronary artery disease, especially when presenting without ST-elevation, represents an informative marker of adverse long-term prognosis in current state-of-the-art invasive cardiology practice. Even considering admission diagnosis, and despite of using no polymer, polymer-free DES showed similar results with regards to safety and efficacy when compared with DES with permanent polymer.

Feasibility of rotational atherectomy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: favorable in-hospital outcomes and clinical importance of complexed coronary atherosclerosis

The feasibility of rotational atherectomy (RA) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients who present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains fully unsettled. We retrospectively evaluated 198 consecutive patients who underwent RA during PCI from 2009 to 2020. All patients underwent intracoronary imaging (intravascular ultrasound 96.5%, optical coherence tomography 9.1%, both 5.6%) during PCI. Patients who underwent RA during PCI were divided into two groups: ACS (n = 49; unstable angina pectoris, n = 27; non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, n = 18, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction, n = 4) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) (n = 149). The RA procedural success rate was comparable between in the ACS and CCS groups (93.9 vs. 89.9%, P = 0.41). No significant differences were observed in procedural complications and in-hospital death between the groups. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) after 2 years was significantly higher in ACS group compared with CCS group (38.7 vs. 17.4%, log-rank P = 0.002). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified SYNTAX score or CABG SYNTAX score > 22 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-5.06, P = 0.002) and mechanical circulatory support during the procedure (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.21-5.59, P = 0.013) as predictors of MACE at 2 years, but not ACS on index admission (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.84-2.99, P = 0.151). RA procedure is feasible as a bail-out strategy for ACS lesions. However, more complexed coronary atherosclerosis and mechanical circulatory support during RA procedure, but no ACS lesions were associated with worse mid-term clinical outcomes.

Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes. However, data on outcomes of IVUS-guided PCI in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is scarce. Therefore, we sought to study the utilization rate and outcomes of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with ACS. Using the National Readmission database, we identified all patients with ACS who underwent PCI from 2016 to 2019. We used a 1:1 propensity-matched analysis to compare the outcome of patients with ACS who underwent PCI with and without IVUS. In 1,263,997 patients with ACS, 563,521 (44.6%) underwent PCI without IVUS and 40,095 (3.17%) underwent IVUS-guided PCI. A Propensity scored matched comparison of PCI with and without IVUS showed IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.85, p <0.01) compared with PCI without IVUS. The utilization of IVUS increased from 2.64% in 2016 to 4.10% in 2019, p <0.001. In conclusion, IVUS-guided PCI is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with ACS, yet the current utilization of IVUS-guided PCI remains low across the United States.

Lipoprotein(a) and the Effect of Alirocumab on Revascularization After Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Many patients require revascularization after index acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Lipoprotein(a) is thought to play a pathogenic role in atherothrombosis. In ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, alirocumab reduced major adverse cardiovascular events after ACS, with greater reduction among those with higher lipoprotein(a) levels. We explored whether risk of revascularization after ACS was modified by the level of lipoprotein(a) and treatment with alirocumab or placebo.

METHODS

In ODYSSEY OUTCOMES alirocumab was compared with placebo in 18,924 patients with ACS and elevated atherogenic lipoprotein levels despite optimized statin treatment. In this post hoc analysis, treatment effects are summarized using competing risks proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 1559 (8.2%) patients had coronary, 204 (1.1%) had limb, and 40 (0.2%) had carotid revascularization. Alirocumab reduced coronary revascularization (2.8 vs 3.2 events per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.80-0.97]; P = 0.01) and any revascularization (3.2 vs 3.7 events per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.78-0.94]; P = 0.001). Baseline lipoprotein(a) quartile was directly associated with risk of coronary or any revascularization in the placebo arm and inversely related to treatment HRs (all P for trend < 0.01). Alirocumab produced the greatest reduction of coronary revascularization in patients with baseline lipoprotein(a) in the top quartile (≥ 59.6 mg/dL; HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.57-0.84]), but no apparent reduction in the bottom quartile (HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.82-1.22]). Findings were similar for the effect of alirocumab on any revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Alirocumab reduced revascularization rates after ACS. The risk of revascularization and reduction in that risk with alirocumab were greatest in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) at baseline.

"Main Vessel-Oriented" Treatment Strategy Versus "Open Side Branch" Treatment Strategy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Culprit Bifurcation Lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions is associated with an increased risk of complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The study aimed to evaluate the in-hospital outcomes of patients with ACS with culprit bifurcation lesions who were treated with either a "main vessel-oriented" (MVO) treatment strategy or an "open side branch" (OSB) treatment strategy. This retrospective study included 575 consecutive patients with ACS. "MVO" and "OSB" treatment strategies were defined as primary/urgent percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed by either totally ignoring the side branch (SB) or trying to maintain both main vessel and SB open with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow. Procedural success and major cardiac/cerebrovascular events during hospitalization were noted. MVO and OSB treatment strategies were performed on 384 and 191 patients, respectively. The procedural success rate was significantly higher in the OSB treatment strategy whereas major cardiac/cerebrovascular events rates were similar except for the contrast-induced nephropathy rate being slightly higher in OSB treatment strategy. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly higher procedural success rate in OSB treatment strategy if the SB was located within the bifurcation core, especially in those where the diameter of SB was ≥2 mm. In conclusion, our results suggest a better procedural result with SB protection attempts in patients with ACS with a culprit bifurcation lesion if the SB is originating within the bifurcation core and its diameter is ≥2 mm. MVO treatment strategy may be preferred in most cases with minor SBs located distant to the bifurcation core because of the similar procedural success.

Pretreatment with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and delay to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

2020 ESC guidelines for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) recommend against the pretreatment with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (P2Y12i) in patients undergoing early invasive management (<24 h). The rationale is, in part, to prevent bleeding complications and the delay of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in patients with suitable coronary anatomy. This study aimed to analyze the theoretical impact of pretreatment with a P2Y12i on delay to CABG surgery in a real-world population with NSTE-ACS.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing invasive evaluation in 2019. Those with previous CABG or nonobstructive coronary disease were excluded.

RESULTS

The total cohort included 262 patients (mean age 68±12 years, 69% male, 15% with unstable angina and mean GRACE score 134±35). Median time from FMC to angiography was 2 (1-4) days. Overall, 168 (64%) patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, 47 (18%) were proposed for CABG and the remainder received conservative management. All patients considered for CABG received pretreatment with P2Y12i (clopidogrel or ticagrelor). The median time from angiography to CABG was 12 (7-15) days. Six patients experienced recurrent angina (13%) and 2 (4%) died before surgery due to refractory ventricular fibrillation. Those who underwent CABG under P2Y12i effect were more likely to receive blood and platelets transfusions (64.7% vs. 28.6%, P=0.017 and 82.4% vs. 21.4%, P<0.001, respectively), although there were no differences regarding major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with P2Y12i was a potential but not the sole driver of CABG delay in our cohort. Adopting the new recommendations of withholding pretreatment might decrease this delay, but other factors must be considered.