Type III IFN-lambda mRNA expression in sputum of adult and school-aged asthmatics

BACKGROUND

The increased susceptibility of asthmatics to rhinovirus infection has recently been related to deficient IFN-lambda 1 (IL-29) and IFN-lambda 2/3 (IL-28) production by bronchial epithelial cells and macrophages.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we studied IFN-lambda mRNA expression in the airways of stable asthmatics in comparison with healthy subjects and in relation to asthma symptoms, non-invasive parameters of airway inflammation and lung function parameters.

METHODS

Airway cells were obtained by sputum induction, in 14 healthy and 35 asthmatic adults and 12 asthmatic school-aged children. IFN-lambda was studied at the mRNA level by quantitative RT-PCR.

RESULTS

Asthmatic adults have increased sputum IL-28 mRNA but similar IL-29 mRNA expression in comparison with healthy subjects. In asthmatics, both sputum IL-28 and IL-29 mRNA expression correlate with the sputum CD3 gamma mRNA expression (reflecting infiltrated T cells). IL-28 (but not IL-29) mRNA levels correlate with the relative and absolute number of eosinophils present in the sputum sample. Sputum IL-29 mRNA (but not IL-28) correlates negatively with asthma symptoms in steroid-naive patients and is significantly higher in steroid-treated than in steroid-naive patients. Finally, both IL-28 and IL-29 mRNA levels are higher in asthmatic children than in asthmatic adults.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that asthmatic subjects have substantial type III IFN-lambda mRNA levels in the airways. Our data furthermore suggest that IL-29 could have an immunoprotective role in the lower airways.

Comparison of the anti-inflammatory effects of extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone dry powder inhaler on exhaled inflammatory markers in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND

Extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone differs from other inhaled corticosteroids by its fine aerosol characteristics. Therefore, extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone may be particularly useful for treating peripheral airway inflammation in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the anti-inflammatory effects of extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone dry powder inhaler (DPI) in asthmatic children by measuring bronchial and alveolar nitric oxide (NO) and inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC).

METHODS

In a 6-month crossover study, 33 children aged 6 to 12 years with moderate persistent asthma were randomly treated with extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone (200 microg daily via an Autohaler) and fluticasone DPI (200 microg daily via a Diskus). The primary outcome variables were alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux. The secondary outcome variables were levels of inflammatory markers in EBC, lung function indices, symptoms, exacerbations, and adverse effects. All the variables were recorded at baseline and after each treatment period.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SE alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux were comparable after treatment with hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone DPI (4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.3 +/- 0.5 ppb, P = .55, and 1,124.3 +/- 253.6 vs 1,029.1 +/- 195.5 pL/s, P = .70, respectively). In addition, levels of inflammatory markers in EBC, lung function indices, and symptoms did not differ between treatments. Patients used fewer beta2-agonists during the last 2 weeks of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone treatment.

CONCLUSION

The anti-inflammatory effects of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone are similar to those of fluticasone DPI in children with moderate persistent asthma.

Ciclesonide versus other inhaled steroids for chronic asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are an integral part of asthma management, and act as an anti-inflammatory agent in the airways of the lung. These agents confer both significant benefit in terms of symptom management and improvement in lung function, but may also cause harm in terms of local and systemic side-effects. Ciclesonide is a novel steroid that is metabolised to its active component in the lung, making it a potentially useful for reducing local side effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of ciclesonide relative to those of other inhaled corticosteroids in the management of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials with pre-defined terms. Additional searches of PubMed and Clinicalstudyresults.org were undertaken. The literature searches for this review are current up to June 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel or crossover studies were eligible for the review. We included studies comparing ciclesonide with other steroids both at nominally equivalent dose or lower doses of ciclesonide.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty one trials involving 7243 participants were included. Equal daily doses of ciclesonide and beclomethasone (BDP) or budesonide (BUD) gave similar results for peak expiratory flow rates (PEF), although forced vital capacity (FVC) was higher with ciclesonide. Data on forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) were inconsistent. Withdrawal data and symptoms were similar between treatments. Compared with the same dose of fluticasone (FP), data on lung function parameters (FEV1, FVC and PEF) did not differ significantly. Paediatric quality of life score favoured ciclesonide. Candidiasis was less frequent with ciclesonide, although other side-effect outcomes did not give significant differences in favour of either treatment. When lower doses of ciclesonide were compared to BDP or BUD, the difference in FEV1 did not reach significance but we cannot exclude a significant effect in favour of BDP/BUD. Other lung function outcomes did not give significant differences between treatments. Paediatric quality of life scores did not differ between treatments. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency between ciclesonide and BDP/BUD. Comparison with FP at half the nominal dose was undertaken in three studies, which indicated that FEV1 was not significantly different, but was not equivalent between the treatments (per protocol: -0.05 L 95% confidence intervals -0.11 to 0.01).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review give some support to ciclesonide as an equivalent therapy to other ICS at similar nominal doses. The studies assessed low doses of steroids, in patients whose asthma required treatment with low doses of steroids. At half the dose of FP and BDP/BUD, the effects of ciclesonide were more inconsistent The effect on candidiasis may be of importance to people who find this to be problematic. The role of ciclesonide in the management of asthma requires further study, especially in paediatric patients. Further assessment against FP at a dose ratio of 1:2 is a priority.

Seasonal allergic rhinitis: limited effectiveness of treatments

(1) Seasonal allergic rhinitis, otherwise known as hayfever, is a harmless condition, although it can cause major discomfort and interfere with activities of daily living. We conducted a review of the literature, based on our in-house methodology, to determine the risk-benefits of treatments used in this setting. (2) Placebo-controlled trials show that sodium cromoglicate relieves symptoms, especially if it is used before symptoms appear. Adverse effects are rare with sodium cromoglicate nasal solutions and eye drops. (3) Nasal steroids have well-documented efficacy. Beclometasone is the best choice. Adverse effects include epistaxis, nasal irritation and, occasionally, systemic disorders. (4) Oral antihistamines are less effective than nasal steroids. They also provoke adverse effects, especially drowsiness. Nasal azelastine seems to have a similar efficacy as oral antihistamines. (5) The adverse effects of systemic steroids must not be overlooked, especially with long-term use. Oral administration is an alternative for severe symptoms that do not respond to other treatments, although this is rarely the case. Long-acting intramuscular steroids carry an increased risk of adverse effects. (6) Despite evaluation in several randomised controlled trials, there is no firm evidence that homeopathic preparations have any specific efficacy in allergic rhinitis. (7) Vasoconstrictors, ipratropium and montelukast, have negative risk-benefit balances in hay fever. (8) When a single allergen is responsible (grasses, ragweed, birch), clinical trials suggest that specific desensitisation can provide a modest improvement. However, this treatment carries a risk of local adverse effects, as well as a risk of rare but severe anaphylactic reactions, especially in patients who also have unstable severe asthma. (9) Sublingual desensitisation seems to be even less effective than subcutaneous desensitisation in adults. Follow-up is too short to know whether there is a risk of severe anaphylactic reactions. The results of paediatric studies are even less convincing. (10) In practice, when drug therapy is needed to relieve symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis, sodium cromoglicate is the first-line treatment. If a nasal steroid solution is chosen, it should be used for the shortest possible period.

[Therapeutic efficacy and follow-up study of inhaled corticosteroids vs. oral montelukast in treatment of cough variant asthma]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and oral leukotriene modifier (LTM) montelukast on the prognosis of children with cough variant asthma (CVA), and to identify the related risk factors for the development of classic asthma in children with CVA.

METHODS

Eighty-four children with CVA (2 - 6 yrs) were randomized to receive inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 200 microg/d through pressurized metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer with mask or oral montelukast 5 mg, once at bedtime for 6 months, then followed by 18 months observation period after the end of the study medication.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in antitussive days between the two groups (ICS group: 14 +/- 9 days, LTM group: 13 +/- 9 days, Z = 1.12, P = 0.25). Wheezing developed in 7.1% of the children in ICS group during 24 months follow-up period, which was significantly lower than that in LTM group (33.3%, chi2 = 8.92, P = 0.003). The prevalence of eczema or allergic rhinitis was higher in children who developed wheezing than those who did not develop wheezing (eczema: 47.1% vs. 19.4%, chi(2) = 4.16, P = 0.042; allergic rhinitis: 58.8% vs. 31.3%, chi2 = 4.40, P = 0.036). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that eczema and allergic rhinitis were risk factors for wheezing development in children with CVA, the odds ratio was 7.668 and 3.855 respectively (P < 0.05 for all). But administration of ICS was negatively correlated with the development of wheezing by an odds ratio of 0.128 (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with CVA may progress to classic asthma; eczema and allergic rhinitis are two risk factors for wheezing development in children with CVA. Both ICS and LTM are effective antitussive treatment, but ICS may be more effective than LTM on preventing the progression of CVA to classic asthma.

Influence of allergy in patients with nasal polyposis after endoscopic sinus surgery

CONCLUSION

Allergy does not modify the symptoms and steroid consumption (oral and local) of nasal polyposis (NP) patients after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the role of allergy in the evolution after FESS of patients presenting with the diagnosis of NP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study of 63 consecutive patients with NP (57% males, mean age 45.8 years), who were analyzed to detect whether the results of a surgical treatment of NP were influenced by the presence of positive allergic tests (Phadiatop). Three nasal criteria were scored: nasal obstruction, posterior rhinorrhea, and the loss of smell. The frequency of asthma was evaluated. Medical treatment of NP after FESS consisted of washing of the nasal cavities, steroid spray, and oral steroid administration. The amount of consumption of steroids (prednisolone and beclomethasone) was studied.

RESULTS

Decrease of all nasal symptoms was not statistically different in the two groups of patients with and without allergy. Cumulative consumption of prednisolone and beclomethasone after surgery was similar in the two groups.

[Effects of long term use of beclomethasone dipropionate nasal spray on bone density with perennial allergic rhinitis]

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of long term use of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) nasal spray on bone density with perennial allergic rhinitis (AR) in adults.

METHOD

A 5-year randomized study was conducted on the effects of BDP nasal spray on serum calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, and bone density determined before and after the treatment in 36 adult patients with perennial AR. 20-45 years of age, were randomly divided into 3 groups. That is group A (nasal spray 1 - <3 year), group B (nasal spray BDP 3 - <5 year) and group C (nasal spray BDP > or =5 year). The data were analyzed by paired t test.

RESULT

The perennial AR were followed up for more than > or =1 year, > or =3 year and > or =5 year to observe the influences of nasal spray BDP. There were no significant difference between the data examined before and after the treatment (P > 0.05). Bone development is not influenced by nasal spray BDP < or =400 microg/d within 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Long term use of BDP nasal spray in adult patients does not lead to osteoporosis if the lowest effective steroid dose is given.

A reappraisal of the clinical efficacy of nebulized flunisolide in pediatric asthma: the Italian experience

Flunisolide (FLU) is a synthetic corticosteroid with potent topical anti-inflammatory activity. Its oral bioavailability is poor (6.7%). After gastrointestinal and lung absorption, the drug undergoes rapid and extensive first-pass metabolism by the liver to an inactive 6beta-hydroxylated metabolite. Plasma half-life is estimated to be 3.9 to 4.6 hours. FLU has a low volume of distribution at steady state and a short terminal half-life after inhalation (96 L and 1.6 hour, respectively). FLU, like budesonide, has a short pulmonary residence time and it is hypothesized that it may undergo esterification in the cell due to the presence of a free hydroxyl group at C21. Nebulization may offer important advantages over other inhalation methods. Nebulizers allow drug delivery in very young children through passive inhalation, depending less on patient coordination and cooperation. Comparative studies indicate that FLU is nebulized to a better advantage than beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide. This is attributed to its elevated water solubility. The aim of this article is to outline the factors that influence drug nebulization and the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of FLU compared to other inhaled corticosteroids. In addition, we report a series of clinical data regarding the efficacy of nebulized FLU with focus on the Italian experience. Overall, the physicochemical characteristics and pharmacokinetic profile of FLU favor its use for nebulization. Clinical data indicate that nebulized FLU is effective in asthma treatment in infants and children. Side effects were not reported at the commonly used doses.

The properties of inhaled corticosteroids: similarities and differences

Inhaled corticosteroids remain the most important therapy for chronic asthma in both adults and children. As all inhaled corticosteroids act by binding to a common glucocorticoid receptor there is little evidence of any real difference in clinical efficacy between the different inhaled corticosteroids. The main potential differences are in their propensity to cause side effects. Local side effects such as a hoarse voice do occur in a proportion of adults and there is some limited evidence that ciclesonide may cause less local side effects. In adults there is little evidence for clinically important systemic side effects from doses of inhaled steroids below 800 mcg/day (beclomethasone equivalent). Above this dose a proportion of patients may show some adrenocortical suppression, though it is unlikely to be of clinical importance. Data on bone mineral density and fracture rates is discrepant, but an overview would suggest that below 800 mcg/day there is no increase in fracture risk whereas above this dose there might be an increased fracture risk. The properties of ciclesonide would suggest that it has less propensity for systemic side effects, but large long term studies are needed to confirm this. In children using inhaled steroids at above-licensed doses reductions in short-term growth can occur, but there is little evidence for reductions in long-term growth at normal doses. At above-licensed doses, biochemical adrenocortical suppression can occur with some unusual but documented cases of clinical Addisonian crisis. Limited evidence in paediatric age groups would suggest that ciclesonide may have some advantage although it is not as yet licensed in all countries for paediatric use. Data on differences in side effects between normal and asthmatic patients, and between asthmatic patients with near-normal lung function compared to those with impaired lung function, indicate that inhaled corticosteroids (particularly fluticasone) are absorbed more in those with normal lung function; this strongly supports stepping down the inhaled steroid dose when asthma is controlled - as is recommended in asthma guidelines.

Long-term asthma therapy: adapt steroid therapy to severity

(1) Asthma is influenced by a variety of factors and its natural history varies over time. Clinically, asthma ranges from fleeting respiratory discomfort to incapacitating dyspnoea due to frequent and severe attacks. (2) This article examines the general principles of long-term drug therapy for asthma patients, taking into account the results of the clinical drug evaluation described in part I of this review (French edition). (3) The four most recent clinical practice guidelines did not take into account the latest data on the potentially severe adverse effects of long-acting beta-2 agonists. At least two of these guidelines received financial support from drug companies. (4) There is a general consensus that intermittent asthma does not require continuous therapy. For these patients, drug treatment is based on short-acting beta-2 agonists taken solely when symptoms arise. (5) Long-term treatment of persistent asthma is based on inhaled steroids at doses adapted to severity. However, given the adverse effects of inhaled steroids, the minimal effective dose should be identified and treatment should be reduced in a stepwise manner once asthma is under control. (6) When severe asthma persists or does not improve with high-dose inhaled steroid therapy, the treatment with the best risk-benefit balance is oral steroid therapy. (7) The use of long-acting beta-2 agonists is limited to the control of nocturnal symptoms when inhaled steroid therapy is inadequate. (8) Standard drugs used for asthma have no proven foetotoxicity, whereas poorly controlled asthma carries a risk of complications for both the mother and her unborn child.

A study to evaluate safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with moderate persistent asthma

RATIONALE

Accumulation of eosinophils in the bronchial mucosa of individuals with asthma is considered to be a central event in the pathogenesis of asthma. In animal models, airway eosinophil recruitment and airway hyperresponsiveness in response to allergen challenge are reduced by specific targeting of interleukin-5. A previous small dose-finding study found that mepolizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, had no effect on allergen challenge in humans.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of three intravenous infusions of mepolizumab, 250 or 750 mg at monthly intervals, on clinical outcome measures in 362 patients with asthma experiencing persistent symptoms despite inhaled corticosteroid therapy (400-1,000 mug of beclomethasone or equivalent).

METHODS

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Morning peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, daily beta(2)-agonist use, symptom scores, exacerbation rates, and quality of life measures. Sputum eosinophil levels were also measured in a subgroup of 37 individuals. Mepolizumab was associated with a significant reduction in blood and sputum eosinophils in both treatment groups (blood, P < 0.001 for both doses; sputum, P = 0.006 for 250 mg and P = 0.004 for 750 mg). There were no statistically significant changes in any of the clinical end points measured. There was a nonsignificant trend for decrease in exacerbation rates in the mepolizumab 750-mg treatment group (P = 0.065).

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab treatment does not appear to add significant clinical benefit in patients with asthma with persistent symptoms despite inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of mepolizumab on exacerbation rates, using protocols specifically tailored to patients with asthma with persistent airway eosinophilia.

High-dose inhaled beclomethasone treatment in patients with chronic cough: a randomized placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

It is important to determine whether chronic cough is associated with asthma and can be helped by treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of beclomethasone and placebo in patients with chronic cough for at least 8 weeks after excluding those with cough due to postnasal drip and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comprising 64 patients was performed for 2 weeks. The active group received metered-dose inhaler chlorofluorocarbon-beclomethasone (1,500 microg/d), and the placebo group received identical-appearing placebo inhalers. All the participants completed a respiratory questionnaire and underwent bronchoprovocation testing (BPT) with methacholine and allergy skin testing. The primary outcome measure was a decrease in daily cough scores (symptom diary and visual analog scale) during the 2-week treatment period.

RESULTS

The active group comprised 44 patients and the placebo group 20 patients. Cough duration averaged 20 weeks. At the end of treatment 82% of the active group and 15% of the placebo group had complete resolution of cough. In the active group 22 patients (50%) had positive BPT results, and in the placebo group 10 patients (50%) had positive results. There was no correlation between treatment response and responses on the respiratory questionnaire, allergy skin testing, or BPT.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with high-dose inhaled beclomethasone provided an excellent response in a subgroup of patients with chronic cough that did not correlate with atopy or airway hyperresponsiveness.

Swimming and persons with mild persistant asthma

The aim of our study was to analyze the effect of recreational swimming on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in patients with mild persistent asthma. This study included 65 patients with mild persistent asthma, who were divided into two groups: experimental group A (n = 45) and control group B (n = 20). Patients from both groups were treated with low doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and short-acting β2 agonists salbutamol as needed. Our program for patients in group A was combined asthma education with swimming (twice a week on a 1-h basis for the following 6 months). At the end of the study, in Group A, we found a statistically significant increase of lung function parameters FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec) (3.55 vs. 3.65) (p < 0.01), FVC (forced vital capacity) (4.27 vs. 4.37) (p < 0.05), PEF (peak expiratory flow) (7.08 vs. 7.46) (p < 0.01), and statistically significant decrease of BHR (PD₂₀ 0.58 vs. 2.01) (p < 0.001). In Group B, there was a statistically significant improvement of FEV1 3.29 vs. 3.33 (p < 0.05) and although FVC, FEV1/FVC, and PEF were improved, it was not significant. When Groups A and B were compared at the end of the study, there was a statistically significant difference of FVC (4.01 vs. 4.37), FEV1 (3.33 vs. 3.55), PEF (6.79 vs.7.46), and variability (p <0.001), and statistically significantly decreased BHR in Group A (2.01 vs. 1.75) (p < 0.001). Engagement of patients with mild persistent asthma in recreational swimming in nonchlorinated pools, combined with regular medical treatment and education, leads to better improvement of their parameters of lung function and also to more significant decrease of their airway hyperresponsiveness compared to patients treated with traditional medicine

Efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate HFA 200 microg once daily in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchial asthma

The efficacy and safety of once-daily beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 200 microg), in combination with the propellant hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) was compared with that of budesonide turbuhaler (BUD-TH) 400 microg twice daily and fluticasone propionate inhaler (FP-IH) 250 microg twice daily in 40 patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All patients had used inhaled corticosteroids for at least 1 month. On randomization, 20 patients were switched to HFA-BDP and 20 patients remained on their existing BUD-TH or FP-IH treatment. After 8 weeks, HFA-BDP demonstrated a greater improvement in spirometric values, respiratory symptoms and beta2-agonist use. No significant local adverse effects were observed. Blood cortisol levels remained in the normal range in both groups. We conclude that HFA-BDP (200 microg once-daily) offered more benefit in terms of clinical and spirometry indices than BUD-TH (400 microg twice daily) or FP-IH (250 microg twice daily) in patients with moderate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Esophageal candidiasis as a side effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder: recovery by switching over to hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP)

BACKGROUND

Esophageal candidiasis is one of the local side effects of inhaled corticosteroid treatment, and it is difficult to prevent this condition. Our previous report indicated that the prevalence of esophageal candidiasis among patients treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder (FP-dp) reached up to 37% in Japanese patients. Although a reduction in the daily dose of inhaled FP-dp can eliminate this infection, it may lead to asthma not being well-controlled in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate whether switching to an equal daily dose of inhaled hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP), the oropharyngeal deposition of which is very low, can eliminate the infection without deterioration of asthma.

METHODS

A total of 10 stable asthmatic patients with esophageal candidiasis, induced by inhaled FP-dp treatment (400 or 800 microg/ day), were enrolled in this study. A second upper GI endoscopy was performed, more than 1 month but less than 3 months after switching to an equal dose of inhaled HFA-BDP with a tube spacer device, Duopacer. The patients' medications were not changed during the study.

RESULTS

Esophageal candidiasis was eliminated in 9 of the 10 patients. The degree of candidiasis reduced in another patient. The forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1.0) did not worsen during the study.

CONCLUSION

Switching from FP-dp to HFA-BDP with Duopacer is useful in preventing esophageal candidiasis.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of rectal beclomethasone dipropionate vs. 5-aminosalicylic acid in mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) is a second-generation steroid with topical effects and minimal systemic activity for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To review all available literature to assess the efficacy of enema/foam BDP compared with enema/foam 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in the control of left-sided mild-moderate UC.

METHODS

We selected randomized controlled trials of enema/foam BDP compared with enema/foam 5-ASA treatment in patients with UC. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data independently.

RESULTS

Four trials involving 428 UC patients, 209 treated with 5-ASA (1-4 g o.d.) and 219 with BDP (3 mg o.d.), were included. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 5-ASA induced improvement/remission of UC in 146 (69.9%) patients, while BDP in 143 (65.3%). The test for heterogeneity (Cochran Q) was not significant and Mantel-Haenszel pooled estimate of odds ratio was 1.23 (95% CI = 0.82-1.85). The results did not change when analysis was performed on a per-protocol basis.

CONCLUSION

The randomized controlled trials identified in this review showed that rectal BDP has equal effect as 5-ASA to control symptoms in UC.

Differential anti-inflammatory effects of large and small particle size inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

BACKGROUND

Extra-fine particle formulations of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) exhibit clinical effects comparable with conventional particle formulations of chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) at half the dose. There is little data comparing their effects on inflammation. We have evaluated the effects of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on pulmonary and systemic markers of asthmatic inflammation.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized crossover trial was undertaken comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of HFA-BDP (100 and 400 microg/day) and CFC-BDP (200 and 800 microg/day). Treatment with montelukast was evaluated as add-on to the higher dose of BDP.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline after withdrawal of usual asthma therapy, 100 microg of HFA-BDP significantly attenuated serum eosinophilic cationic protein levels (0.61-fold change, 95% CI 0.49-0.77; a 39% reduction, P < 0.001), but 200 microg of CFC-BDP did not (0.87-fold change, 95% CI 0.63-1.23; P = 1). A dose of 800 microg of CFC-BDP and 400 microg of HFA-BDP led to reductions in exhaled nitric oxide (0.57-fold change, 95% CI 0.44-0.73; a 43% reduction, P < 0.001 and 0.65-fold change, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; a 35% reduction, P = 0.008, respectively); and peripheral eosinophils (-74 cells/microl, 95% CI -146 to -2; P = 0.020 and -77 cells/microl, 95% CI -140 to -14; P = 0.012, respectively). Montelukast further reduced exhaled nitric oxide (0.81-fold change, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; P = 0.028) with 400 microg HFA-BDP and eosinophils (-44 cells/microl, 95% CI -80 to -8; P = 0.012) with 800 microg CFC-BDP, but not vice versa.

CONCLUSION

Chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate and HFA-BDP have differential effects on pulmonary and systemic inflammation, which dictate the additive effects of montelukast.

[A multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison of suppressive effects on asthmatic inflammation of lower airways and improved effects on health-related QOL between HFA-BDP and fluticasone propionate]

PURPOSE

It is important to evaluate the effects of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP), which shows predominant deposition in the lower airways, on asthmatic inflammation in the lower airways and the Quality of Life (QOL) of asthma patients, as compared with those of fluticasone propionate (FP) Diskus.

METHODS

Seventy-seven adult patients with mild persistent or more severe asthma who were being treated with FP for >/=3 months were randomly assigned to the HFA-BDP group and continued FP group. The differential count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood, the serum cortisol levels, and pulmonary function parameters were measured before the study and at 3 months after the start of the study treatment. The improvements in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores were also compared. Sputum samples collected by the induced expectoration method (inhalation of 10% saline for 15 min) were divided into the early-phase sputum samples obtained within 15 minutes of the inhalation and the late-phase sputum samples obtained later than 15 minutes after the inhalation, and the eosinophil count and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels were measured.

RESULTS

In the HFA-BDP group (N=40), the differential count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood was significantly decreased as compared with that in the FP group (p=0.009), and the scores in all the domains of the AQLQ and the percentage improvement of the total score were significantly better as compared with those in FP group (p=0.033). The eosinophil count in the late-phase sputum samples (p=0.022) as well as the ECP level in the sputum samples showed more pronounced decreases in the HFA-BDP group as compared with those in the FP group. On the other hand, no significant changes were detected in the pulmonary function values.

CONCLUSION

Use of the HFA-BDP preparation can more effectively suppress residual inflammation in the lower airways and significantly improve the QOL as compared with use of the FP preparation of asthma patients. Examination of induced sputum samples allows detection of changes in the peripheral airways that cannot be detected by pulmonary function testing.

Effect of antiasthmatic medication on dental disease: dental caries and periodontal disease

The prevalence of asthma has been increasing since the 1980s. Asthma and tooth decay are the two major causes of school absenteeism. There are few studies present in the literature. The objectives of the present study were to know the severity of dental caries and periodontal problems in children before and after taking antiasthmatic medication. The present study was conducted on 105, six- to fourteen-year-old asthmatic children to determine the condition of their dental caries and their periodontal status before and after taking antiasthmatic medication, for a period of 1 year and these were matched with their controls. The results showed that salbutamol inhaler shows increased caries rate with high significance over other groups, which was followed by salbutamol tablets and beclamethasone inhaler respectively. It has been concluded that antiasthmatic medication has its effects on dental caries and periodontal disease and asthmatic patients are recommended to adopt more precautionary oral hygiene practices and keep their caries activity and periodontal health under constant check.

Beclomethasone dipropionate versus mesalazine in distal ulcerative colitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Topical beclomethasone diproprionate has shown efficacy in ulcerative colitis.

AIM

To assess, in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, the tolerability and safety of topical beclomethasone diproprionate (3mg) enema and foam versus mesalazine (2g) enema and foam in mild-moderate distal ulcerative colitis.

PATIENTS

In 15 referral gastrointestinal units, 99 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were enrolled. This number was lower than planned according to the statistical analysis, due to a low recruitment rate.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to random preparations (beclomethasone diproprionate enema, beclomethasone diproprionate foam, mesalazine enema, mesalazine foam) once nightly for 8 weeks, with clinical and endoscopical assessment (Disease Activity Index score) at baseline (T0), 4 (T4) and 8 weeks (T8). Results were expressed as median and range (95% confidence interval). The efficacy was assessed by comparing the Disease Activity Index value at T4 and T8 by using the Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Efficacy was comparable in the beclomethasone diproprionate or mesalazine groups at both T4 and T8 (response at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 78% [95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8] versus mesalazine 79% [95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8]; T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 84% [95% confidence interval 0.7-0.9] versus mesalazine 90% [95% confidence interval 0.7-1.0]; p=n.s.; remission at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 24% [95% confidence interval 0.1-0.3] versus mesalazine 28% [95% confidence interval 0.1-0.3]; remission at T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 36% [95% confidence interval 0.2-0.5] versus mesalazine 52% [95% confidence interval 0.3-0.6]; p=n.s.). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T4 and T8 versus T0 in the four groups (T4 versus T0: beclomethasone diproprionate foam Disease Activity Index 2 versus 6 p<0.0001; beclomethasone diproprionate enema 4 versus 6, mesalazine enema 3 versus 6, mesalazine foam 3.5 versus 7, p<0.001 for all three groups; T8 versus T0: p<0.01). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T8 versus T4 in the beclomethasone diproprionate enema and foam (Disease Activity Index: 2 versus 4 and 1 versus 4, respectively; p<0.05) and in the mesalazine enema (Disease Activity Index: 1.5, range 0-4 versus 3, range 0-12; p<0.01), but not in the mesalazine foam group (Disease Activity Index: 1, range 0-9 versus 3.5, range 0-8; p=n.s.). The safety profile was favourable for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Beclomethasone diproprionate and mesalazine enema and foam show a comparable tolerability and efficacy in mild active distal ulcerative colitis.