A case of treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia (t-AML) are now well established as complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy. We experienced a 28-yr-old female patient who developed t-MDS/t-AML with characteristic chromosomal abnormalities including 11q23 chromosomal rearrangement following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The patient was admitted with bulky abdominal masses of B cell lineage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. After 2 cycles of systemic chemotherapy of the Vanderbilt regimen, the patient underwent ASCT with high dose chemotherapy of the BEAC regimen. She also received radiation of 48 Gy for the residual periportal lymphadenopathy. The initial cytogenetic analysis of the infused mononuclear cells revealed a normal karyotype. Twenty two months after the ASCT, pancytopenia was noted and her bone marrow aspirate showed dysplastic hemopoiesis with myeloblasts up to 12% of nonerythroid nucleated cells. The patient was diagnosed as t-MDS (refractory anemia with an excess of blasts). Cytogenetic analysis showed complex chromosomal abnormalities including 11q23 rearrangement, which is frequently found in topoisomerase II inhibitor-related hematologic malignancies. Four months later, it was noted that the t-MDS had evolved into an overt t-AML. Cytogenetic analysis showed an evolving pattern with more complex abnormalities. The patient was treated with combination chemotherapy, but her leukemic cells were resistant to the therapy.

Phase II evaluation of low-dose oral etoposide for the treatment of relapsed or progressive AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: an AIDS Clinical Trials Group clinical study

PURPOSE

Liposomal anthracyclines and paclitaxel are considered the best available cytotoxic therapies for Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), but relapse is common. To identify new interventions for relapsed or progressive KS, a phase II study of low-dose etoposide to assess its toxicity and efficacy was conducted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with high-risk KS were treated with oral etoposide 50 mg/d for 7 consecutive days of every 2-week cycle. All patients' disease had relapsed or progressed after prior combination chemotherapy or anthracycline therapy. For patients without a complete or partial response after two cycles of therapy and no toxicity greater than grade 2, the dose of etoposide was escalated to 100 mg/d orally on days 1 to 7 of each 14-day cycle. Treatment-related and disease-specific quality of life was evaluated using patient reports on the General Health Self-Assessment Form and a KS-specific measure.

RESULTS

One patient achieved a complete response, 12 patients had a partial response (overall response rate, 36.1%), and stable disease was observed in 12 patients (33.3%). Tumor responses were seen in all disease sites. Fourteen patients had their dose escalated, of whom five responded. The median time to response was 17.7 weeks; the median duration of response was 25 weeks. The most frequent hematologic abnormality was neutropenia, which was grade 4 in seven patients and grade 3 in six. Opportunistic infections occurred in eight patients during the treatment period. Both response to treatment and toxicity influenced patient-reported quality of life.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that low-dose oral etoposide at a dose of 50 mg/d is safe and effective for the treatment of refractory or progressed AIDS-related KS and has an overall positive effect on the quality of life of responding patients.

Intermittent, repetitive administrations of irinotecan (CPT-11) reduces its side-effects

To reduce the side-effects of irinotecan (CPT-11) while maintaining its anti-cancer effects against recurrent ovarian carcinomas, we devised a novel administration schedule for CPT-11 single chemotherapy. It consisted of an initial dose of 70 mg/m2, followed by increasing the dose to 100 mg/m2 every 10 days (three times per month) for 9 cycles. Nineteen patients with refractory or recurrent ovarian carcinomas were treated. In comparison with a late phase II study of single CPT-11 chemotherapy in Japan (100 mg/m2 every 7 days; four times per month), the number of patients who suffered from leukocytopenia and diarrhea higher than grade 3 was significantly lower with our new method (36.8 versus 57.1%; P < 0.01 and 0 versus 19.2%; P < 0.001, respectively). The total response rate was 26% (5/19). This rate was almost equal to a late phase II study. We suggest that our new protocol of single CPT-11 administration should be available clinically to all patients for reducing the side-effects while maintaining its anti-cancer effects. CPT-11 is useful in patients with refractory ovarian carcinomas as a second- or third-line chemotherapy.

In vitro anti-hepatoma activity of fifteen natural medicines from Canada

Fifteen crude drugs, Stellaria media Cyrill. (Caryophyllaceae), Calendula officinalis L. (Compositae), Achillea millefolium L. (Compositae), Verbascum thapsus L. (Scrophulariaceae), Plantago major L. (Plantaginaceae), Borago officinalis L. (Boraginaceae), Satureja hortensis L. (Labiatae), Coptis groenlandica Salisb. (Ranunculaceae), Cassia angustifolia Vahl. (Leguminosae), Origanum majorana L. (Labiatae), Centella asiatica L. (Umbelliferae), Caulophyllum thalictroides Mich. (Berberidaceae), Picea rubens Sargent. (Pinaceae), Rhamnus purshiana D.C. (Rhamnaceae) and Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (Malvaceae), which have been used as folk medicine in Canada, were evaluated for their anti-hepatoma activity on five human liver-cancer cell lines, i.e. HepG2/C3A, SK-HEP-1, HA22T/VGH, Hep3B and PLC/PRF/5. The samples were examined by in vitro evaluation for their cytotoxicity. The results showed that the effects of crude drugs on hepatitis B virus genome-containing cell lines were different from those against non hepatitis B virus genome-containing cell lines. C. groenlandica was observed to be the most effective against the growth of all five cell lines and its chemotherapeutic values will be of interest for further studies.

Phase II study of docetaxel in patients with pancreatic cancer previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy

In this study, we estimated the response rate, duration of response, and type, severity and reversibility of toxicities in patients with Stage IV adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with docetaxel. Twenty-one patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, previously untreated or treated with surgery or radiation alone, were treated with 100 mg/m2 docetaxel as a 1 hr infusion once every 21 days. All the patients were pretreated with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine. Twenty patients were assessable for both response and toxicity. One patient was assessable for toxicity alone. However, all the patients were assessed for survival. The major side effect of the drug was neutropenia, which required a dose reduction to 75 mg/m2 in approximately half of the patients. Nine patients were hospitalized with neutropenic fever. Fluid retention was not a significant problem. One patient had a partial response lasting for 21 weeks and 7 patients had stable disease. The remaining patients had progressive disease. The median survival for all the patients was 5.9 months. Docetaxel as a single agent showed limited activity against adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Since the completion of this study, molecular predictors of in vitro response to docetaxel have been described. Confirmation of the clinical relevance of such predictors in humans could allow for the identification of a subgroup of patients with a higher rate of response to docetaxel.

The novel and effective nonplatinum, nontaxane combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: potential for decreased toxicity and combination with biological therapy

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are two of the most active third-generation agents for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The authors conducted a formal Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in both untreated and previously treated patients with Stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients were treated on the current Phase II trial of front-line or second/third-line therapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in NSCLC. Eligible patients manifested either untreated disease (n = 42) or had received at least one but not more than two prior chemotherapy regimens (n = 36). The median age was 57.5 years (range, 33-79) with 57 men (73%) and 21 women (27%). The median performance status was one (range, one to two). The initial eight patients (four untreated and four previously treated) were treated at a previously established maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15, with significant myelosuppression seen in five out of eight patients requiring dose omission in the first cycle. The next 70 patients received a reduced dose of vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) followed by gemcitabine (900 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15.

RESULTS

Seventy eight patients were treated. Fifteen (36%) of the 42 evaluable patients who received front-line therapy had objective responses and 14 (33%) had stable disease. In the patients with prior treatment, 6 (17%) of 36 patients had partial response and 18 patients (50%) had stable disease. Median survival time for the previously untreated patient group was 10.1 months, with a one year survival of 43% and a two year survival rate of 32%. For the previously treated patients, the median survival time was 8.5 months, with a one year survival rate of 30%. Toxic effects were notable for significant myelosuppression, with > or =Grade 3 granulocytopenia seen in 55% of the patients on the untreated arm and 67% of the patients on the previously treated arm. Additionally, 9.5% and 13.9% (untreated and previously treated), respectively, of these patients experienced Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia at some point in their treatment. A full dose delivery analysis showed that this myelosuppression resulted in Course 1, Day 15 skipped doses (even at the reduced dose level) in 42% of previously untreated patients and 47% of pretreated patients. Other side effects seen at Grades 3 and 4 in previously untreated and treated patients included anemia (9.5% and 2.8%), asthenia (4.8% and 5.5%), infection (14.3% and 5.6%), pain (9.5% and 19.4%), and pulmonary complications (4.8% and 13.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine/vinorelbine is an active, well-tolerated combination in both front-line and second/third-line therapy for Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The response rate, median survival rate, and one year survival rate compare favorably with platinum-based regimens. The toxicity profile of the gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination was quite favorable, with minimal Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects aside from granulocytopenia, which resulted in numerous Day 15 skipped doses but no significant febrile neutropenia or infection. The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine could be a useful regimen in standard clinical practice and has the potential for efficient combination with biologic/targeted therapy. Multiple randomized trials of this combination versus platinum combinations are now ongoing [corrected].

Five-day infusion of fluorouracil and vinorelbine for advanced breast cancer patients treated previously with anthracyclines

Vinorelbine has proven to be effective in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. In particular, no cross-resistance with anthracyclines has been demonstrated. Protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion presents a better pharmacological profile than its bolus administration. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of these two antitumor drugs in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with anthracycline-containing regimens. From February 1998 to January 2000, 65 patients were enrolled into the study The most important inclusion criteria were as follows: Karnofsky 70-100, measurable or evaluable disease and normal renal, hepatic, bone marrow and cardiac function. Mean age was 48 years (range: 31-70). Fourteen of the 65 women had already received more than one chemotherapy line. Twenty-three patients had previously been treated with taxanes. Sites of involvement were the lungs in 50% of the patients, the liver in 37%, soft tissue in 72%, bone in 58% and other sites in 32%. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 administered on days 1 and 6 every 21 days and 5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days. The total number of cycles was 340 (mean: five cycles). The treatment was well tolerated. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 4.6% of patients. Fourteen percent of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and 3% experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 stomatitis was observed in 9.2% of patients, grade 3 neurologic toxicity was observed in 1.5%, and grade 3 cardiotoxicity in 4.6%. Grade 3 site reaction occurred in 3% of patients. Sixty patients were evaluated for response. One patient (1.7%) attained complete clinical response and 28 (46.7%) attained partial response. In 22 patients (36.6%) stable disease was documented and nine patients (15%) progressed while on treatment. Median time to progression was 24 weeks, median duration of response was 35 weeks and median overall survival was 41 weeks. Vinorelbine with 5-day infusion of 5-fluorouracil presented high therapeutic activity in breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines, with acceptable toxicity.

Phase II study of docetaxel and epirubicin in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer

The efficacy and safety of docetaxel-epirubicin chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was investigated in Chinese women. Three-weekly cycles comprised epirubicin 75 mg/m2 i.v. followed 1 h later by docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. After 3 cycles, responding patients received a further 3 cycles, followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel alone. Forty-six patients entered the study, of whom 37% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients withdrew due to toxicity and were not evaluable for response. There were five complete responses and 31 partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 83.7% (95% CI 72.7-94.8%). The median time to progression was 10.96 months (95% CI 7.76-12.86) and median survival was 24.2 months (95% CI 16.6-). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (96% of patients) and neutropenia with fever (39%). Hepatotoxicity occurred in six patients, two being attributable to hepatitis B virus reactivation. No patients suffered grade 3/4 cardiac toxicity and there were no treatment-related mortalities. Quality of life aspects deteriorated after 3 cycles, but there was a trend towards improved emotional aspects after 9 cycles. We conclude that docetaxel-epirubicin chemotherapy is highly effective for recurrent metastatic/locoregional breast cancer, with myelosuppression being the main toxicity.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate), a hexacyclic camptothecin, on a daily-times-five schedule in patients with advanced leukemia

PURPOSE

DX-8951f is a novel hexacyclic camptothecin-analogue topoisomerase I inhibitor with both in vitro antileukemic activity and myelosuppression as a dose-limiting toxicity in solid tumor Phase I studies. DX-8951f is active in a human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) severe combined immunodeficient mouse model. In a leukemia Phase I study, we investigated the toxicity profile and pharmacokinetics of DX-8951f in patients with primary refractory or relapsed AML or acute lymphocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blastic phase (CML-BP).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

DX-8951f was given as an i.v. infusion over 30 min daily for 5 or 7 days. The starting dose was 0.6 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days (3.0 mg/m(2)/course). Courses were given every 3-4 weeks according to toxicity and antileukemic efficacy.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (AML, 21 patients; myelodysplastic syndrome, 1 patient; acute lymphocytic leukemia, 2 patients; CML-BP, 1 patient) were treated. Stomatitis was the dose-limiting toxicity, occurring in two of two patients treated at 1.35 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, two of three treated at 1.2 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, and one of six treated at 0.9 mg/m(2)/day for 7 days. The recommended Phase II dose was 0.9 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. The pharmacokinetics of DX-8951 was linear and well fit by a two-compartment model.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase II studies are warranted to further define the activity of DX-8951f in patients with hematological malignancies.

[A case-control study of prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea: the reducing side effects of irinotecan by oral alkalization combined with control of defecation]

Irinotecan and its active metabolite, SN-38, were reported to have the absorption characteristics of weakly basic drugs. Moreover, stasis of these compounds is thought to induce damage to the intestinal mucous membrane. The purpose of this report was to examine whether oral alkalization (OA) combined with control of defecation (CD) might prevent irinotecan-induced side effects. From day one of irinotecan infusion to day four, OA & CD were practiced using orally administered sodium bicarbonate, magnesium oxide, basic water, and ursodeoxycholic acid. Thirty-two lung cancer patients were treated with irinotecan in combination with cisplatin in the absence of OA & CD (Group A). Thirty-seven patients matched for background characteristics were treated with the same regimen in the presence of OA & CD (Group B). Group B had a reduced incidence of delayed diarrhea (Grade 2 < or = Group A 32.3% vs. Group B 9.4%), nausea, vomiting, and myelotoxicity, especially granulocytopenia compared with Group A. In addition, dose intensification was well-tolerated in Group B. Tumor response rates for non-small cell lung cancer were 59.3% (16/27 patients) in Group B against 38.5% (10/26 patients) in Group A. OA & CD appears to reduce the irinotecan-induced side effects, especially delayed diarrhea. Risk factors statistically associated with delayed diarrhea include advanced age and the use of irinotecan without OA & CD.

Prevention and treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in experimental investigations with CPT-11 and oxaliplatin

Following surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma, local recurrence in the tumor bed or in the mesentery remains a frequently encountered problem. Currently there are no recognized standard therapy protocols for the prevention of local recurrence or the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aim of our trial was to investigate whether CPT-11 and oxaliplatin could decrease i.p. tumor growth in a basic experimental animal model. Experiments were performed on three groups of animals plus controls. In the first group, the cytostatic agents were applied directly following tumor cell implantation into the peritoneal cavity. In the second group, early postoperative i.p. chemotherapy (days 5, 10 and 15 following surgery) was administered. In the third group, late i.p. chemotherapy (days 15, 20 and 25 after tumor cell transfer) was administered with the intention of reducing a manifest peritoneal carcinomatosis. The trial also set out to describe any side effects observed following i.p. administration. The results indicated that CPT-11 and oxaliplatin were highly effective in reducing i.p. tumor spread after direct i.p intraoperative application. Intraperitoneal administration of CPT-11 or oxaliplatin also decreased i.p. tumor growth after early i.p. chemotherapy. CPT-11 was a little more effective with lower side effects. However, it was clear that it was not possible to treat a manifest peritoneal carcinomatosis in this way.

A phase I pharmacokinetic and translational study of the novel vascular targeting agent combretastatin a-4 phosphate on a single-dose intravenous schedule in patients with advanced cancer

Combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P) is a novel antitumor vascular targeting agent, the first agent of this class of compounds to enter the clinic. We performed a Phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile of CA4P on a single-dose i.v. schedule. We also obtained preliminary data on its effect on tumor blood flow using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) techniques and cell adhesion molecules at the higher-dose levels. Twenty-five assessable patients with advanced cancer received a total of 107 cycles over the following dose escalation schema: 18, 36, 60, 90 mg/m(2) as a 10-min infusion and 60 mg/m(2) as a 60-min infusion at 3-week intervals. There was no significant myelotoxicity, stomatitis, or alopecia. Tumor pain was a unique side effect, which occurred in 10% of cycles, and there were four episodes of dose-limiting toxicity at dosages > or =60 mg/m(2), including two episodes of acute coronary syndrome. Pharmacokinetics revealed rapid dephosphorylation of the parent compound (CA4P) to combretastatin A4 (CA4), with a short plasma half-life (approximately 30 min). A significant (P < 0.03) decline in gradient peak tumor blood flow by DCE-MRI in six of seven patients treated at 60 mg/m(2) was observed. A patient with anaplastic thyroid cancer had a complete response and is alive 30 months after treatment. The toxicity profile is consistent with a drug that is "vascularly active" and devoid of traditional "cytotoxic" side effects. Dosages < or =60 mg/m(2) as a 10-min infusion define the upper boundary of the maximum-tolerated dose.

Clinical and economic benefits of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The combination of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid has clinical and survival benefits over 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid alone in the setting of first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to compare the economic implications, from a UK health commissioner perspective, of the two treatment arms (de Gramont regimen) in this setting. Resource utilisation data collected prospectively during the study were used as a basis for estimating cumulative drug dosage, chemotherapy administration, and treatment of complications during first line therapy. Resource utilisation associated with further chemotherapy in patients who had progressed during the study was derived from a retrospective case note review. Drug acquisition costs were derived from the British National Formulary (September, 2001) and unit costs for clinical consultation and services were taken from the latest relevant cost database. Cumulative costs per patient associated with further chemotherapy were lower in the irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid treatment arm. Based on incremental costs per life-year gained of 14 794 pounds sterling, the combination of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid can be considered cost-effective by commonly accepted criteria compared with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid alone. Thus, clinical and economic data demonstrate that irinotecan, either in combination with irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the first line setting or as monotherapy in the second line setting, has a major role in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Pharmacodynamics of non-break weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) and pharmacokinetics of Cremophor-EL vehicle: results of a dose-escalation study

We characterized the toxicity and determined the maximum tolerated dose of non-break weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in chemotherapy-naive cancer patients, and studied pharmacokinetics of the formulation vehicle Cremophor-EL with this schedule. Twenty-three patients with primary refractory solid tumors received weekly paclitaxel at the dose range of 70-200 mg/m2. As dose-limiting toxicity we defined granulocytopenia grade > or =2 causing a treatment delay for more than 2 weeks, or febrile neutropenia or grade >2 organ-specific toxicity. Plasma kinetics of Cremophor-EL were analyzed over the first five courses of treatment. Non-break weekly paclitaxel was feasible at doses up to 110 mg/m2, while granulocytopenia precluded scheduled administration of doses > or =130 mg/m2. Clinically relevant peripheral neurotoxicity tended to occur at around 1500 mg/m2 cumulative dosage at weekly doses > or =110 mg/m2. Detectable Cremophor-EL levels were found in all pre-dose samples, but there was no evidence of accumulation up to the sixth course. Our results, discussed in the light of an overview of published data, suggest that chronic weekly administration of paclitaxel is feasible and with a lack of significant accumulation of Cremophor-EL levels at doses up to 90 mg/m2.

Docetaxel for previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer

Two phase III trials were conducted using docetaxel (Taxotere), administered every 3 weeks, as second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. In the TAX 317 trial, 204 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel (49 received 100 mg/m2 and 55 received 75 mg/m2) or best supportive care (100 patients). Median survival was 7.5 months with docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 (D75) vs 4.6 months for best supportive care (P = .010); and 1-year survival was 37% for D75 vs 11% for best supportive care (P = .010). Quality-of-life analysis also showed statistically significant improvement in disease-related symptoms with docetaxel vs best supportive care. In the TAX 320 study, 373 patients were randomized to receive docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 (D100), docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 (D75), or a control arm of either vinorelbine (Navelbine) or ifosfamide (Ifex) (V/I). Partial response rates were 11.9% with D100 and 7.5% with D75 vs 1% with V/I (P values: .001 [D100] and .036 [D75]). Median response duration was over 7 months. One-year survival was 32% with D75 vs 19% in V/I (P = .025). Prior paclitaxel exposure had no bearing on the response rate and survival advantage of second-line treatment with docetaxel. Response rates to docetaxel were equivalent in the cohort of patients who had received prior paclitaxel (10.5%) and the group ofpatients who had not received prior paclitaxel (8.5%). The 1-year survival rates for patients with no prior paclitaxel therapy were 33% (D75) vs 20% (V/I); and the 1-year survival rates for patients who had received prior paclitaxel were 30% (D75) vs 17% (V/I). In conclusion, two large randomized phase III trials of second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC have shown significant differences favoring docetaxelfor response rate, time to progression, survival, and quality of life. Prior paclitaxel did not decrease the likelihood of response to docetaxel, nor did it lessen the survival advantage seen with docetaxeL Docetaxel offers a clinically meaningful benefit in this setting, with manageable toxicity. Based upon the observed response rates, survival, impact on quality of life, and toxicity profile, the optimal dose of docetaxel in this pretreated population is 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.

Docetaxel for locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Current data and future directions as front-line therapy

Docetaxel (Taxotere) has shown activity both as a single-agent and in combination with multiple other cytotoxic agents in the front-line therapy of advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A randomized, phase III trial demonstrated a survival advantage for docetaxel over best supportive care in the front-line setting, with docetaxel achieving a 2-year survival of 12% vs 0% for best supportive care. Combinations of docetaxel with the platinum agents have been the most extensively studied in the front-line setting and have produced notably high response rates and encouraging median survivals. When compared to the paclitaxel/cisplatinum combination in a large, phase III randomized trial, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin resulted in similar response, median survival, and 1-year survival rates. Another randomized phase III trial compared docetaxel/platinum combinations to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved vinorelbine (Navelbine)/cisplatin regimen. The docetaxel/cisplatin combination produced a superior overall survival, 2-year survival, and overall response rates compared to vinorelbine/cisplatin. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin (Paraplatin) demonstrated similar survival and response, and was associated with quality-of-life benefits over the vinorelbine/cisplatin arm. Docetaxel has been successfully combined with gemcitabine in multiple trials with impressive response and survival rates, and an acceptable toxicity profile. A large phase IIb trial demonstrated therapeutic equivalence and lesser toxicities for the docetaxel/gemcitabine combination compared to the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin. The docetaxel/gemcitabine combination therefore represents a viable nonplatinum regimen for first-line treatment of NSCLC. Other combinations that have been tested include docetaxel with vinorelbine, and docetaxel with irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar). Docetaxel is active in NSCLC and should be investigated further in combination with novel molecularly targeted drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, andfarnesyl transferase inhibitors.

The role of docetaxel in the management of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

The activity of docetaxel (Taxotere) as a single agent (overall response rates, 24%-45%) in the treatment of patients with recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck has resulted in the investigation of docetaxel-based doublet and triplet combinations in both the recurrent and neoadjuvant settings. When combined with cisplatin, with or without fluorouracil (5-FU), in the treatment of recurrent disease, response rates of 33% to 44% have been observed for docetaxel, with median survival ranging from 9.6 to 11 months. In the neoadjuvant setting, response rates have been typically greater than 90%, with promising disease-free and overall survival results. Randomized trials are now under way to assess the value of docetaxel-based therapy relative to that of the standard cisplatin/5-FU combination in both the neoadjuvant and recurrent settings. Preclinical data indicate that docetaxel is a potent radiosensitizer and its initial evaluation with concurrent radiation in patients with locally advanced unresectable squamous cell cancer of the head and neck suggests feasibility. Phase II evaluation of this approach is in progress.

Canalicular stenosis secondary to weekly versus every-3-weeks docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the frequency of canalicular stenosis as a side effect of weekly versus every-3-weeks docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective nonrandomized comparative trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients enrolled in a phase II study of weekly docetaxel plus trastuzumab and 18 patients enrolled in a phase II study of every-3-weeks docetaxel plus doxorubicin were evaluated. Each patient underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination, probing and irrigation of the nasolacrimal duct, and, in some instances, a nuclear lacrimal scan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

If epiphora (excessive tearing) was reported by the patient, its time of onset was documented. In patients with epiphora, presence or absence of canalicular stenosis was evaluated on the basis of the findings on probing and irrigation. The duration of treatment with docetaxel, the dose frequency, and the cumulative dose of docetaxel were recorded in each case.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (77%) receiving weekly docetaxel plus trastuzumab had epiphora. Nine of these patients had significant anatomic narrowing of the canaliculi. Bicanalicular silicone intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy was recommended in all nine patients. Eight patients underwent surgery and experienced complete or near complete resolution of epiphora. Although two patients (11%) receiving every-3-weeks docetaxel plus doxorubicin reported transient symptoms of epiphora, neither patient was found to have narrowing of the canaliculi, and the epiphora was not severe enough to justify surgical intervention. The mean duration of docetaxel therapy for the patients in this study was 19 weeks. The mean cumulative dose of docetaxel was higher in patients with canalicular stenosis than in patients without this side effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Canalicular stenosis was more common in patients receiving weekly docetaxel than in those receiving every-3-weeks docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. Bicanalicular silicone intubation early in the course of weekly docetaxel therapy should be considered, because this intervention can prevent complete closure of the canaliculi. Once complete or near complete stenosis of the canaliculi occurs, placement of a permanent Pyrex glass tube may become necessary to overcome the blockage of tear outflow.

Pharmacology of topoisomerase I inhibitors irinotecan (CPT-11) and topotecan

Topotecan and irinotecan (CPT-11) are both anticancer agents active in the inhibition of topoisomerase I, an enzyme involved in DNA replication and RNA transcription. During the last decades, an immense amount of research into this class of anticancer agents has been conducted, the positive results of which led to the clinical use of topotecan and CPT-11 in ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer, respectively. Here, we review the currently most important pharmacologic aspects of these drugs, including their mechanisms of action, metabolism, activity- and toxicity-profiles and mechanisms of resistance, to provide a global insight into their pharmacology. We also discuss the effects of combinations with other anticancer agents, which have been tested for synergistic antitumor effects. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic biomodulation, to enhance the bioavailability of the active anticancer agent or to reduce drug related toxicities have currently reached clinical application. As pharmacogenetics enters the clinical stage, this will lead to more "fine-tuning" in anticancer treatment (for instance by individualized dosing). The clarification of the mechanisms of action and resistance of topotecan and CPT-11 should enable us to understand their pharmacological behavior even better and might lead to the development of more potent camptothecin-derivatives in the future.

Docetaxel and radiation as combined-modality therapy

Combined-modality approaches for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck cancer, and esophageal cancer offer survival benefits by improving locoregional control and treating micrometastatic disease. The taxanes are active, tolerable drugs in these solid tumors and have radiation-sensitizing activity. Docetaxel (Taxotere) has been studied in combination with radiation with favorable results. In phase II trials, docetaxel combined with radiation therapy resulted in response rates of up to 80%, with the most commonly used schedule being docetaxel at 20 to 30 mg/m2 per week with concomitant radiation administered at fractions of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy, 5 days a week over 5 to 6 weeks. Studies of docetaxel and platinum combinations have been conducted predominantly in patients with NSCLC. Early results show good activity and acceptable toxicity, with esophagitis or mucositis being dose-limiting. Doses of docetaxel at 20 mg/m2 per week combined with cisplatin at 25 mg/m2 or carboplatin (Paraplatin) at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 2 with concomitant radiation appear to be well tolerated and active. Future investigations, including phase III trials in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, are encouraged. Current trials are studying various design schedules, including induction chemotherapy with radiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy.

The current status of docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer

Docetaxel (Taxotere) has been intensively investigated for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, where it has proved to be one of the most active agents. Initial phase II studies in anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer demonstrated impressive response rates that have been confirmed in phase III randomized trials. Docetaxel remains the only single agent to demonstrate a survival benefit in anthracycline-resistant patients. More recently, the combination of docetaxel with capecitabine (Xeloda) has demonstrated additional improvement in survival over docetaxel alone in a randomized phase III trial. In patients previously treated with an alkylating agent, docetaxel is the only single drug to demonstrate improved efficacy over doxorubicin in a randomized trial. Docetaxel has been investigated in combination with the anthracyclines doxorubicin and epirubicin in randomized trials. The docetaxel-containing regimens have consistently demonstrated improvement over the non-docetaxel-containing regimens. The efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel has extended the line of investigation for combinations with agents normally administered on a weekly basis, such as vinorelbine [Navelbine], gemcitabine [Gemzar], and trastuzumab [Herceptin], with promising findings. In addition, the results of the triple-drug combination of docetaxel, a platinum salt (cisplatin or carboplatin), and trastuzumab have resulted in impressive response rates and time to progression in a population of metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2/neu-positive tumors. The consistent demonstration of a high level of efficacy with manageable toxicity ensures the continued widespread investigation of docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer.