Approaching zero: temporal effects of a restrictive antibiotic policy on hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing coliforms and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

A restrictive antibiotic policy banning routine use of ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin was implemented in a 450-bed district general hospital following an educational campaign. Monthly consumption of nine antibiotics was monitored in defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1000 patient-occupied bed-days (1000 pt-bds) 9 months before until 16 months after policy introduction. Hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing coliform cases per month/1000 pt-bds were identified and reviewed throughout the hospital. Between the first and final 6 months of the study, average monthly consumption of ceftriaxone reduced by 95% (from 46.213 to 2.129 DDDs/1000 pt-bds) and that for ciprofloxacin by 72.5% (109.804 to 30.205 DDDs/1000 pt-bds). Over the same periods, hospital-acquisition rates for C. difficile reduced by 77% (2.398 to 0.549 cases/1000 pt-bds), for MRSA by 25% (1.187 to 0.894 cases/1000 pt-bds) and for ESBL-producing coliforms by 17% (1.480 to 1.224 cases/1000 pt-bds). Time-lag modelling confirmed significant associations between ceftriaxone and C. difficile cases at 1 month (correlation 0.83; P<0.005), and between ciprofloxacin and ESBL-producing coliform cases at 2 months (correlation 0.649; P=0.002). An audit performed 3 years after the policy showed sustained reduction in C. difficile rates (0.259 cases/1000 pt-bds), with additional decreases for MRSA (0.409 cases/1000 pt-bds) and ESBL-producing coliforms (0.809 cases/1000 pt-bds). In conclusion, banning two antibiotics resulted in an immediate and profound reduction in hospital-acquired C. difficile, with possible longer-term effects on MRSA and ESBL-producing coliform rates. Antibiotic stewardship is fundamental in the control of major hospital pathogens.

Abstract P4-13-08: Diabetes, Related Factors and Breast Cancer Risk

Diabetes and breast cancer are both extremely common conditions in women and may share common risk factors. It is natural to investigate any potential common risk factors and to seek biological clarification and improve prospects for prevention.

Therefore, in order to help clarify the potential association between diabetes, related factors and breast cancer risk, a comprehensive literature review and formal meta-analysis was carried out, planned, conducted and reported following PRISMA guidelines regarding meta-analysis of observational studies. Variables studies in relation to breast cancer risk were adiposity, physical activity, glycaemic load, glycaemic index, diabetes, IGF-1, fasting glucose, fasting insulin and C-peptide, adiponectin and metformin and glargine use among patients with diabetes. For all variables except diabetes and breast cancer, only prospective studies were included in meta-analyses. Summary Relative Risks (SRR) and corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated from random effect models.

For breast cancer at all ages, the calculated risks were as follows: diabetes (SRR = 1.27 95% CI (1.16, 1.39); physical activity (SRR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.85, 0.92)); glycaemic load (SRR = 1.06, 95% CI (1.00, 1.12)); glycaemic index (SRR = 1.04, 95% CI (0.99, 1.10)); fasting glucose (SRR = 1.12, 95% CI (1.01, 1.24)); serum insulin (SRR = 1.18, 95% CI (0.75, 1.85)); c-peptide (SRR = 1.29, 95% CI (0.91, 1.82)); adiponectin (SRR = 1.16, 95% CI (0.93, 1.46)); metformin (SRR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.69, 1.46)); and glargine (SRR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.00, 1.24)). An increase of 5 units in Body Mass Index (a weight increase if 14.5 kg in a person 1.70 metres tall) was associated in post-menopausal breast cancer (SRR = 1.12, 95% CI (1.08, 1.16)) but not at pre-menopausal ages (SRR = 0.83, 95% CI (0.72, 0.95)). Serum insulin was associated with breast cancer at post-menopausal ages but not at pre-menopausal ages whereas with c-peptide there was a significant association at pre-menopausal ages but not post-menopausal. For IGF-1, Hodge's Standardised Mean Difference (HSMD) was calculated in cohort studies and there was no significant association with breast cancer at all ages (HSMD = 0.003, 95% CI (−0.059, 0.065)), at post-menopausal ages (HSMD = −0.014, 95% CI (−0.106, 0.077)) or at pre-menopausal ages (HSMD = 0.039, 95% CI (−0.038, 0.117)).

The risk of breast cancer is increased among post-menopausal women who have diabetes. Among those factors related to diabetes, key risk factors for breast cancer appear to be adiposity and lack of physical activity which are both related to the risk of developing diabetes. Action on these lifestyle factors should form the basis of a common prevention strategy. There is a need to re-evaluate potential biological mechanisms to explain the increased risk in post-menopausal women with diabetes.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-08.

Abstract P4-13-07: Meta-analysis of epidemiological studies of Insulin Glargine and Breast Cancer Risk

After having lain dormant for a while, the association between diabetes, its risk factors and treatments, and cancer risk and death is now high on the clinical and research agenda. The microscope is currently focused on the relationships between Pioglitazone and Bladder Cancer, Exenatide and Pancreas Cancer, Liraglutide and pancreas cancer and insulin use and lung cancer. The potential association between use of insulin glargine and breast cancer risk has been the subject of recent major studies.

All data regarding cancer risk and use of insulin glargine has been assembled and meta-analyses performed using state-of-the-art statistical methodology. A random effects model was employed with tests for heterogeneity (I2) and publication bias. These meta-analyses are based on reports from 21 epidemiological studies involving over one million patients and 3 million person-years of observation.

Based on independent estimates from these studies, the Summary Relative Risk (SRR) for all forms of cancer was (SRR = 0.91, 95% CI (0.84, 0.99)), and for breast cancer SRR = 1.11 (95% CI (1.00, 1.48)). For new users of glargine, the SRR for breast cancer was SRR = 1.22 (95% CI (1.00, 1.48)). For colorectal cancer the SRR = 0.83 (95% CI (0.74, 0.94)) and for prostate cancer SRR = 1.14 (95% CI (0.93, 1.39)). Overall, the risk of developing cancer among users of insulin glargine is reduced compared to the risk of users of other insulins. Similarly, the risk of colorectal cancer is reduced among users of glargine.

While the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval is 1.00, the risk of breast cancer does not increase with increasing duration of use of glargine. In some studies the trend in risk with increasing duration of use goes in opposite directions. The development of a detectable breast cancer from the initial carcinogenic event depends on the tumour doubling time. The time for a de novo breast cancer to become detectable ranges from 12.3 years for a doubling time of 150 days; 16.4 years for a doubling time of 200 days; and 20.5 years for a doubling time of 250 days. Most published studies have a maximum of 3–4 years of glargine use.

The databases employed in these analyses were not designed for such epidemiological investigation. A major limitation is the absence of knowledge as to why a potential treatment was prescribed for an individual and why a change in therapy was indicated. Further potential limitations to this meta-analysis include that the comparison group was not the same in all studies but this could also be seen as a strength. The meta-analysis of the randomized trials had several insulin comparators and the retinopathy study had NPH as the comparator. This is not likely to invalidate the findings of this analysis nor would the fact that different adjustments were made in the individual studies.

The current evidence gives no support to the hypothesis that insulin glargine is associated with an increased risk of cancer as compared to other insulins and should give reassurance to physicians and their patients. In respect to breast cancer, there is no indication of a causal association between use of insulin glargine and increased risk of breast cancer.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-07.

International consensus on (ICON) pediatric asthma

Asthma is the most common chronic lower respiratory disease in childhood throughout the world. Several guidelines and/or consensus documents are available to support medical decisions on pediatric asthma. Although there is no doubt that the use of common systematic approaches for management can considerably improve outcomes, dissemination and implementation of these are still major challenges. Consequently, the International Collaboration in Asthma, Allergy and Immunology (iCAALL), recently formed by the EAACI, AAAAI, ACAAI, and WAO, has decided to propose an International Consensus on (ICON) Pediatric Asthma. The purpose of this document is to highlight the key messages that are common to many of the existing guidelines, while critically reviewing and commenting on any differences, thus providing a concise reference. The principles of pediatric asthma management are generally accepted. Overall, the treatment goal is disease control. To achieve this, patients and their parents should be educated to optimally manage the disease, in collaboration with healthcare professionals. Identification and avoidance of triggers is also of significant importance. Assessment and monitoring should be performed regularly to re-evaluate and fine-tune treatment. Pharmacotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment. The optimal use of medication can, in most cases, help patients control symptoms and reduce the risk for future morbidity. The management of exacerbations is a major consideration, independent of chronic treatment. There is a trend toward considering phenotype-specific treatment choices; however, this goal has not yet been achieved.

Management of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection over 12 months in a genitourinary medicine setting against British Association for Sexual Health and HIV auditable outcome measures

Audit of gonorrhoea management resulted in recognition of a need to change the clinic protocol for first-line antibiotic therapy and also in improvements in clinic recording of written information given to patients and the outcome of contact tracing.

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Following primary breast cancer treatment, the early detection of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) or ipsilateral secondary cancer in the treated breast and detection of new primary cancers in the contralateral breast is beneficial for survival. Surveillance mammography is used to detect these cancers, but the optimal frequency of surveillance and the length of follow-up are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To identify feasible management strategies for surveillance and follow-up of women after treatment for primary breast cancer in a UK setting, and to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of differing regimens.

METHODS

A survey of UK breast surgeons and radiologists to identify current surveillance mammography regimens and inform feasible alternatives; two discrete systematic reviews of evidence published from 1990 to mid 2009 to determine (i) the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of differing surveillance mammography regimens for patient health outcomes and (ii) the test performance of surveillance mammography in the detection of IBTR and metachronous contralateral breast cancer (MCBC); statistical analysis of individual patient data (West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit Breast Cancer Registry and Edinburgh data sets); and economic modelling using the systematic reviews results, existing data sets, and focused searches for specific data analysis to determine the effectiveness and cost-utility of differing surveillance regimens.

RESULTS

The majority of survey respondents initiate surveillance mammography 12 months after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) (87%) or mastectomy (79%). Annual surveillance mammography was most commonly reported for women after BCS or after mastectomy (72% and 53%, respectively). Most (74%) discharge women from surveillance mammography, most frequently 10 years after surgery. The majority (82%) discharge from clinical follow-up, most frequently at 5 years. Combining initiation, frequency and duration of surveillance mammography resulted in 54 differing surveillance regimens for women after BCS and 56 for women following mastectomy. The eight studies included in the clinical effectiveness systematic review suggest surveillance mammography offers a survival benefit compared with a surveillance regimen that does not include surveillance mammography. Nine studies were included in the test performance systematic review. For routine IBTR detection, surveillance mammography sensitivity ranged from 64% to 67% and specificity ranged from 85% to 97%. For magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), sensitivity ranged from 86% to 100% and specificity was 93%. For non-routine IBTR detection, sensitivity and specificity for surveillance mammography ranged from 50% to 83% and from 57% to 75%, respectively, and for MRI from 93% to 100% and from 88% to 96%, respectively. For routine MCBC detection, one study reported sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 50% for both surveillance mammography and MRI, although this was a highly select population. Data set analysis showed that IBTR has an adverse effect on survival. Furthermore, women experiencing a second tumour measuring >20 mm in diameter were at a significantly greater risk of death than those with no recurrence or those whose tumour was <10 mm in diameter. In the base-case analysis, the strategy with the highest net benefit, and most likely to be considered cost-effective, was surveillance mammography alone, provided every 12 months at a societal willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year of either £20,000 or £30,000. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for surveillance mammography alone every 12 months compared with no surveillance was £4727.

LIMITATIONS

Few studies met the review inclusion criteria and none of the studies was a randomised controlled trial. The limited and variable nature of the data available precluded any quantitative analysis. There was no useable evidence contained in the Breast Cancer Registry database to assess the effectiveness of surveillance mammography directly. The results of the economic model should be considered exploratory and interpreted with caution given the paucity of data available to inform the economic model.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance is likely to improve survival and patients should gain maximum benefit through optimal use of resources, with those women with a greater likelihood of developing IBTR or MCBC being offered more comprehensive and more frequent surveillance. Further evidence is required to make a robust and informed judgement on the effectiveness of surveillance mammography and follow-up. The utility of national data sets could be improved and there is a need for high-quality, direct head-to-head studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of tests used in the surveillance population.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Where do hands go? An audit of sequential hand-touch events on a hospital ward

BACKGROUND

Reservoirs of pathogens could establish themselves at forgotten sites on a ward, posing a continued risk for transmission to patients via unwashed hands.

AIM

To track potential spread of organisms between surfaces and patients, and to gain a greater understanding into transmission pathways of pathogens during patient care.

METHODS

Hand-touch activities were audited covertly for 40 × 30 min sessions during summer and winter, and included hand hygiene on entry; contact with near-patient sites; patient contact; contact with clinical equipment; hand hygiene on exit; and contact with sites outside the room.

FINDINGS

There were 104 entries overall: 77 clinical staff (59 nurses; 18 doctors), 21 domestic staff, one pharmacist and five relatives. Hand-hygiene compliance among clinical staff before and after entry was 25% (38/154), with higher compliance during 20 summer periods [47%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 35.6-58.8] than during 20 winter periods (7%; 95% CI: 3.2-14.4; P < 0.0001). More than half of the staff (58%; 45/77) touched the patient. Staff were more likely to clean their hands prior to contact with a patient [odds ratio (OR): 3.44; 95% CI: 0.94-16.0); P = 0.059] and sites beside the patient (OR: 6.76; 95% CI: 1.40-65.77; P = 0.0067). Nearly half (48%; 37/77) handled patient notes and 25% touched the bed. Most frequently handled equipment inside the room were intravenous drip (30%) and blood pressure stand (13%), and computer (26%), notes trolley (23%) and telephone (21%) outside the room.

CONCLUSION

Hand-hygiene compliance remains poor during covert observation; understanding the most frequent interactions between hands and surfaces could target sites for cleaning.

Global analysis of breast feeding and risk of symptoms of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema in 6-7 year old children: ISAAC Phase Three

BACKGROUND

In Phase Three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC), we investigated the relationship between breast feeding in infancy and symptoms of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema in 6-7 year old children.

METHODS

Parents or guardians of 6-7 year old children completed written questionnaires on current symptoms of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema, and on a range of possible asthma risk factors including a history of breast feeding ever. Prevalence odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression, adjusted for gender, region of the world, language, per capita gross national income, and other risk factors.

RESULTS

In all 206,453 children from 72 centres in 31 countries participated in the study. Reported breast feeding ever was not associated with current wheeze, with an odds ratio (adjusted for gender, region of the world, language, per capita gross national income, and factors encountered in infancy) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.05), current rhinoconjunctivitis (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93-1.08), current eczema (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.12), or symptoms of severe asthma (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.05). Breast feeding was however associated with a reduced risk of severe rhinoconjunctivitis (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.94) and severe eczema (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no consistent association between breast feeding use in the first year of life and either a history or current symptoms of wheezing, rhinoconjunctivitis or eczema in 6-7 year old children, but possibly an effect on severe symptoms of the latter two conditions.

Xenon-enhanced cerebral blood flow at 28% xenon provides uniquely safe access to quantitative, clinically useful cerebral blood flow information: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Xe-CT measures CBF and can be used to make clinical treatment decisions. Availability has been limited, in part due to safety concerns. Due to improvements in CT technology, the concentration of inhaled xenon gas has been decreased from 32% to 28%. To our knowledge, no data exist regarding the safety profile of this concentration. We sought to better determine the safety profile of this lower concentration through a multicenter evaluation of adverse events reported by all centers currently performing xenon/CT studies in the US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were prospectively recruited at 7 centers to obtain safety and efficacy information. All studies were performed to answer a clinical question. All centers used the same xenon delivery system. CT imaging was used during a 4.3-minute inhalation of 28% xenon gas. Vital signs were monitored on all patients throughout each procedure. Occurrence and severity of adverse events were recorded by the principal investigator at each site.

RESULTS

At 7 centers, 2003 studies were performed, 1486 (74.2%) in nonventilated patients. The most common indications were occlusive vascular disease and ischemic stroke; 93% of studies were considered clinically useful. Thirty-nine studies (1.9%) caused respiratory suppression of >20 seconds, all of which resolved spontaneously. Shorter respiratory pauses occurred in 119 (5.9%), and hyperventilation, in 34 (1.7%). There were 53 additional adverse events (2.9%), 7 of which were classified as severe. No adverse event resulted in any persistent neurologic change or other sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Xe-CT CBF can be performed safely, with a very low risk of adverse events and, to date, no risk of permanent morbidity or sequelae. On the basis of the importance of the clinical information gained, Xe-CT should be made widely available.

Effectiveness of seasonal 2010/11 and pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009 vaccines in preventing influenza infection in the United Kingdom: mid-season analysis 2010/11

This study provides mid-season estimates of the effectiveness of 2010/11 trivalent influenza vaccine and previous vaccination with monovalent influenza A(H1N1)2009 vaccine in preventing confirmed influenza A(H1N1)2009 infection in the United Kingdom in the 2010/11 season. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 34% (95% CI: -10 - 60%) if vaccinated only with monovalent vaccine in the 2009/10 season; 46% (95% CI: 7 - 69%) if vaccinated only with trivalent influenza vaccine in the 2010/11 season and 63% (95% CI: 37 - 78%) if vaccinated in both seasons.

Effectiveness of seasonal 2010/11 and pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009 vaccines in preventing influenza infection in the United Kingdom: mid-season analysis 2010/11

This study provides mid-season estimates of the effectiveness of 2010/11 trivalent influenza vaccine and previous vaccination with monovalent influenza A(H1N1)2009 vaccine in preventing confirmed influenza A(H1N1)2009 infection in the United Kingdom in the 2010/11 season. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 34% (95% CI: -10 - 60%) if vaccinated only with monovalent vaccine in the 2009/10 season; 46% (95% CI: 7 - 69%) if vaccinated only with trivalent influenza vaccine in the 2010/11 season and 63% (95% CI: 37 - 78%) if vaccinated in both seasons.

Effectiveness of pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009 infection in England and Scotland 2009-2010

Following the global spread of pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009, several pandemic vaccines have been rapidly developed. The United Kingdom and many other countries in the northern hemisphere implemented seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccine programmes in October 2009. We present the results of a case–control study to estimate effectiveness of such vaccines in preventing confirmed pandemic influenza infection. Some 5,982 individuals with influenza-like illness seen in general practices between November 2009 and January 2010 were enrolled. Those testing positive on PCR for pandemic influenza were assigned as cases and those testing negative as controls. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated as the relative reduction in odds of confirmed infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Fourteen or more days after immunisation with the pandemic vaccine, adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 72% (95% confidence interval (CI): 21% to 90%). If protection was assumed to start after seven or more days, the adjusted VE was 71% (95% CI: 37% to 87%). Pandemic influenza vaccine was highly effective in preventing confirmed infection with pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009 from one week after vaccination. No evidence of effectiveness against pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009 was found for the 2009/10 trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (adjusted VE of -30% (95% CI: -89% to 11%)).

Effectiveness of pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009 infection in England and Scotland 2009-2010

Binary file ES_Abstracts_Final_ECDC.txt matches

Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness

This study evaluated three methods for monitoring hospital cleanliness. The aim was to find a benchmark that could indicate risk to patients from a contaminated environment. We performed visual monitoring, ATP bioluminescence and microbiological screening of five clinical surfaces before and after detergent-based cleaning on two wards over a four-week period. Five additional sites that were not featured in the routine domestic specification were also sampled. Measurements from all three methods were integrated and compared in order to choose appropriate levels for routine monitoring. We found that visual assessment did not reflect ATP values nor environmental contamination with microbial flora including Staphylococcus aureus and meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). There was a relationship between microbial growth categories and the proportion of ATP values exceeding a chosen benchmark but neither reliably predicted the presence of S. aureus or MRSA. ATP values were occasionally diverse. Detergent-based cleaning reduced levels of organic soil by 32% (95% confidence interval: 16-44%; P<0.001) but did not necessarily eliminate indicator staphylococci, some of which survived the cleaning process. An ATP benchmark value of 100 relative light units offered the closest correlation with microbial growth levels <2.5 cfu/cm(2) (receiver operating characteristic ROC curve sensitivity: 57%; specificity: 57%). In conclusion, microbiological and ATP monitoring confirmed environmental contamination, persistence of hospital pathogens and measured the effect on the environment from current cleaning practices. This study has provided provisional benchmarks to assist with future assessment of hospital cleanliness. Further work is required to refine practical sampling strategy and choice of benchmarks.

Efficacy of Vinblastine, Bleomycin, Methotrexate (VBM) Combination Chemotherapy with Involved Field Radiotherapy in Early Stage (I-IIA) Hodgkin Disease Patients

Vinblastine, bleomycin, methotrexate (VBM) combination chemotherapy (CT) with involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) was first described by the Stanford group as an active regimen in early stage Hodgkin's disease (HD). Here, we report our retrospective experience of a modified VBM schedule + IFRT in a similar group of patients. From 1988, 49 patients with stage I-IIA HD received vinblastine (VBL) 6 mg/m2, bleomycin (BLM) 10 IU/m2, methotrexate (MTX) 30 mg/m2 day 1,8 every four weeks for three cycles; IFRT was delivered four weeks later followed by three additional cycles of VBM with a dose reduction of BLM (6 IU/m2). The regimen was well tolerated, with grade 3-4 neutropenia occurring in 20 patients. No acute or late pulmonary toxicity was recorded in our series. Estimated Freedom from Progression (FFP) and Overall Survival (OS) at five years are 75% (95% CI, 60.1%-92.2%) and 85% (95% CI, 73.6%-98.1%), respectively. In this retrospective analysis, VBM + IFRT treatment with bleomycin dose reduction seems safe and active. Such combination could be considered as first line treatment for early stage HD patients with favorable prognosis and/or not suitable for anthracyclines-containing regimens.

Clinical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer

Background: Autoantibodies may be present in a variety of underlying cancers several years before tumours can be detected and testing for their presence may allow earlier diagnosis. We report the clinical validation of an autoantibody panel in newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer (LC).

Patients and methods: Three cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed LC were identified: group 1 (n = 145), group 2 (n = 241) and group 3 (n = 269). Patients were individually matched by gender, age and smoking history to a control individual with no history of malignant disease. Serum samples were obtained after diagnosis but before any anticancer treatment. Autoantibody levels were measured against a panel of six tumour-related antigens (p53, NY-ESO-1, CAGE, GBU4-5, Annexin 1 and SOX2). Assay sensitivity was tested in relation to demographic variables and cancer type/stage.

Results: The autoantibody panel demonstrated a sensitivity/specificity of 36%/91%, 39%/89% and 37%/90% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with good reproducibility. There was no significant difference between different LC stages, indicating that the antigens included covered the different types of LC well.

Conclusion: This assay confirms the value of an autoantibody panel as a diagnostic tool and offers a potential system for monitoring patients at high risk of LC.