Does anaesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomised study of regional versus general anaesthesia in 438 elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common complication after cardiac and major non-cardiac surgery with general anaesthesia in the elderly. We hypothesized that the incidence of POCD would be less with regional anaesthesia rather than general.

METHODS

We included patients aged over 60 years undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. After giving written informed consent, patients were randomly allocated to general or regional anaesthesia. Cognitive function was assessed using four neuropsychological tests undertaken preoperatively and at 7 days and 3 months postoperatively. POCD was defined as a combined Z score >1.96 or a Z score >1.96 in two or more test parameters.

RESULTS

At 7 days, POCD was found in 37/188 patients (19.7%, [14.3-26.1%]) after general anaesthesia and in 22/176 (12.5%, [8.0-18.3%]) after regional anaesthesia, P = 0.06. After 3 months, POCD was present in 25/175 patients (14.3%, [9.5-20.4%]) after general anaesthesia vs. 23/165 (13.9%, [9.0-20.2%]) after regional anaesthesia, P = 0.93. The incidence of POCD after 1 week was significantly greater after general anaesthesia when we excluded patients who did not receive the allocated anaesthetic: 33/156 (21.2%[15.0-28.4%]) vs. 20/158 (12.7%[7.9-18.9%]) (P = 0.04). Mortality was significantly greater after general anaesthesia (4/217 vs. 0/211 (P < 0.05)).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was found in the incidence of cognitive dysfunction 3 months after either general or regional anaesthesia in elderly patients. Thus, there seems to be no causative relationship between general anaesthesia and long-term POCD. Regional anaesthesia may decrease mortality and the incidence of POCD early after surgery.

Cognitive dysfunction after minor surgery in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Major surgery is frequently associated with postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly patients. Type of surgery and hospitalization may be important prognostic factors. The aims of the study were to find the incidence and risk factors for POCD in elderly patients undergoing minor surgery.

METHODS

We enrolled 372 patients aged greater than 60 years scheduled for minor surgery under general anesthesia. According to local practice, patients were allocated to either in- (199) or out-patient (173) care. Cognitive function was assessed using neuropsychological testing preoperatively and 7 days and 3 months postoperatively. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction was defined using Z-score analysis.

RESULTS

At 7 days, the incidence (confidence interval) of POCD in patients undergoing minor surgery was 6.8% (4.3-10.1). At 3 months the incidence of POCD was 6.6% (4.1-10.0). Logistic regression analysis identified the following significant risk factors: age greater than 70 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.8 [1.7-8.7], P = 0.01) and in- vs. out-patient surgery (OR: 2.8 [1.2-6.3], P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding of less cognitive dysfunction in the first postoperative week in elderly patients undergoing minor surgery on an out-patient basis supports a strategy of avoiding hospitalization of older patients when possible.

Pre-operative fasting guidelines: an update

Liberal pre-operative fasting routines have been implemented in most countries. In general, clear fluids are allowed up to 2 h before anaesthesia, and light meals up to 6 h. The same recommendations apply for children and pregnant women not in labour. In children <6 months, most recommendations now allow breast- or formula milk feeding up to 4 h before anaesthesia. Recently, the concept of pre-operative oral nutrition using a special carbohydrate-rich beverage has also gained support and been shown not to increase gastric fluid volume or acidity. Based on the available literature, our Task Force has produced new consensus-based Scandinavian guidelines for pre-operative fasting. What is still not clear is to what extent the new liberal fasting routines should apply to patients with functional dyspepsia or systematic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. Other still controversial areas include the need for and effect of fasting in emergency patients, women in labour and in association with procedures done under 'deep sedation'. We think more research on the effect of various fasting regimes in subpopulations of patients is needed before we can move one step further towards completely evidence-based pre-operative fasting guidelines.

PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations

The aim of this systematic review was to develop recommendations for the management of postoperative pain after primary elective total hip arthroplasty, updating the previous procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) guidelines published in 2005 and updated in July 2010. Randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses published between July 2010 and December 2019 assessing postoperative pain using analgesic, anaesthetic, surgical or other interventions were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases. Five hundred and twenty studies were initially identified, of which 108 randomised trials and 21 meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. Peri-operative interventions that improved postoperative pain include: paracetamol; cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitors; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone. In addition, peripheral nerve blocks (femoral nerve block; lumbar plexus block; fascia iliaca block), single-shot local infiltration analgesia, intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia also improved pain. Limited or inconsistent evidence was found for all other approaches evaluated. Surgical and anaesthetic techniques appear to have a minor impact on postoperative pain, and thus their choice should be based on criteria other than pain. In summary, the analgesic regimen for total hip arthroplasty should include pre-operative or intra-operative paracetamol and cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitors or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, continued postoperatively with opioids used as rescue analgesics. In addition, intra-operative intravenous dexamethasone 8-10 mg is recommended. Regional analgesic techniques such as fascia iliaca block or local infiltration analgesia are recommended, especially if there are contra-indications to basic analgesics and/or in patients with high expected postoperative pain. Epidural analgesia, femoral nerve block, lumbar plexus block and gabapentinoid administration are not recommended as the adverse effects outweigh the benefits. Although intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg can be used, the PROSPECT group emphasises the risks and side-effects associated with its use and provides evidence that adequate analgesia may be achieved with basic analgesics and regional techniques without intrathecal morphine.

The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric Trial)

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a common complication in patients with hip fractures and is associated with an increased risk of subsequent dementia. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on the prevention of delirium and longer-term cognitive decline.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial in which patients with hip fracture were randomized to treatment in an acute geriatric ward or standard orthopedic ward. Inclusion and randomization took place in the Emergency Department at Oslo University hospital. The key intervention in the acute geriatric ward was Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment including daily interdisciplinary meetings. Primary outcome was cognitive function four months after surgery measured using a composite outcome incorporating the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) and the 10 words learning and recalls tasks from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease battery (CERAD). Secondary outcomes were pre- and postoperative delirium, delirium severity and duration, mortality and mobility (measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)). Patients were assessed four and twelve months after surgery by evaluators blind to allocation.

RESULTS

A total of 329 patients were included. There was no significant difference in cognitive function four months after surgery between patients treated in the acute geriatric and the orthopedic wards (mean 54.7 versus 52.9, 95% confidence interval for the difference -5.9 to 9.5; P = 0.65). There was also no significant difference in delirium rates (49% versus 53%, P = 0.51) or four month mortality (17% versus 15%, P = 0.50) between the intervention and the control group. In a pre-planned sub-group analysis, participants living in their own home at baseline who were randomized to orthogeriatric care had better mobility four months after surgery compared with patients randomized to the orthopedic ward, measured with SPPB (median 6 versus 4, 95% confidence interval for the median difference 0 to 2; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric care given in an acute geriatric ward was not effective in reducing delirium or long-term cognitive impairment in patients with hip fracture. The intervention had, however, a positive effect on mobility in patients not admitted from nursing homes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01009268 Registered November 5, 2009.

Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane- or propofol-based anaesthesia for day-care surgery

BACKGROUND

Sevoflurane has a low blood-gas partition coefficient resulting in a rapid recovery. Few studies have examined the maintenance and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane compared with propofol in a standardized outpatient population.

METHODS

The study was a multicentre study performed in 10 centres. One hundred and sixty-nine elective outpatients due for knee-arthroscopy received 100 mg diclofenac rectally as pain prophylaxis prior to induction of general anaesthesia with fentanyl 1.0-1.5 micrograms/kg + propofol 2.0-2.5 mg/kg i.v. Anaesthesia was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen through a laryngeal mask and continuous administration of either: sevoflurane (group S) or propofol infusion (group P) in order to maintain stable haemodynamics. Data of postoperative function and side-effects were collected in a double-blind design, including a patient interview after 24 h.

RESULTS

The sevoflurane patients had a significantly faster emergence from anaesthesia, with response to commands at 6.9 +/- 0.4 min versus 8.2 +/- 0.4 min in the propofol group (P < 0.05, mean +/- SD). At 15 min after surgery, group S had a better score in the digit symbol substitution test and felt less confused in a visual analogue scale test compared with group P (P < 0.05). Peroperative bradycardia, nausea and vomiting and late postoperative dizziness were more common in group S. In the sevoflurane group, 32% had nausea or vomiting in the 24 h observation period compared with 18% for propofol (P < 0.05). There was no difference between group S and group P in postoperative pain, eligibility for recovery room discharge (75 +/- 12 versus 70 +/- 11 min) or home-readiness (155 +/- 12 versus 143 +/- 11 min).

CONCLUSION

Maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane results in a more rapid emergence, but a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting compared with propofol. The side-effects were minor in our study, and did not result in any difference in time to discharge from the recovery ward or the hospital.

The Prolonged Postoperative Analgesic Effect When Dexamethasone Is Added to a Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug (Rofecoxib) Before Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids provide analgesia. In this study, we evaluated the effects of adding dexamethasone to a multimodal postoperative analgesic regimen, including a long-acting nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug.

METHODS

One-hundred patients admitted for ambulatory breast cancer surgery were studied. They received paracetamol 2 g and rofecoxib 50 mg orally 1 h before start of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. The patients were then randomized to receive, in a double-blind manner, either dexamethasone 16 mg IV or placebo. Both groups received fentanyl 1 mug/kg IV and 20-40 mL bupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL wound infiltration before the end of surgery.

RESULTS

There was no difference in pain scores or rescue medication between the groups during the first 4 h after surgery. After discharge, the median pain score during coughing or shoulder movement was 3 on a 0-10 scale in patients receiving placebo, and 1 in the patients receiving dexamethasone, which did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). From 24 to 72 h, the median pain with coughing or shoulder movement in patients receiving placebo was 2, and 1 in patients receiving dexamethasone, which did reach statistical significance (P < 0.05). Forty percent of patients receiving dexamethasone were pain free from 4 to 24 h, compared with 24% of patients receiving placebo, a difference that did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09). Similarly, 46% of patients receiving dexamethasone were pain free from 24 to 72 h, compared with 28% of patients receiving placebo (P = 0.06). More patients had slept poorly on the first night in the dexamethasone group than in the control group, 68% vs 44%, (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone 16 mg provides prolonged postoperative analgesia from 24 to 72 h after surgery when added to a multimodal regimen including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (rofecoxib).

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

The results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed as an outpatient procedure were evaluated in a prospective study.

METHODS

Initially, only well motivated and healthy patients were offered outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After 50 procedures, all patients referred to the hospital, except those with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade IV and those living alone, were included. Some 200 procedures were studied.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (6 per cent) were admitted, and 188 (94 per cent) were discharged 4-8 h after operation. Fifteen patients (8 per cent) who had early discharge were readmitted, nine with complications; in six no complications were documented. The frequency of minor complications was 2 per cent and of major complications 5 per cent. Some 173 patients who had successful outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy completed a questionnaire: 164 (95 per cent) characterized their experience as excellent, five (3 per cent) as good, two (1 per cent) as intermediate and two (1 per cent) as unacceptable.

DISCUSSION

This high achievement of day-case treatment, even in patients with ASA grade III, is explained by a new anaesthetic regimen together with good surgical technique and close follow-up.

PROSPECT guideline for tonsillectomy: systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations

Tonsillectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures; however, pain management remains challenging. Procedure‐specific efficacy as well as specific risks of treatment options should guide selection of pain management protocols based on evidence and should optimise analgesia without harm. The aims of this systematic review were to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after tonsillectomy. A systematic review utilising preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis guidelines with procedure‐specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language up to November 2019 assessing postoperative pain using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified. Out of the 719 potentially eligible studies identified, 226 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, excluding the studies examining surgical techniques. Pre‐operative and intra‐operative interventions that improved postoperative pain were paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; intravenous dexamethasone; ketamine (only assessed in children); gabapentinoids; dexmedetomidine; honey; and acupuncture. Inconsistent evidence was found for local anaesthetic infiltration; antibiotics; and magnesium sulphate. Limited evidence was found for clonidine. The analgesic regimen for tonsillectomy should include paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone, with opioids as rescue analgesics. Analgesic adjuncts such as intra‐operative and postoperative acupuncture as well as postoperative honey are also recommended. Ketamine (only for children); dexmedetomidine; or gabapentinoids may be considered when some of the first‐line analgesics are contra‐indicated. Further randomised controlled trials are required to define risk and combination of drugs most effective for postoperative pain relief after tonsillectomy.

Why do women wake up faster than men from propofol anaesthesia?

BACKGROUND

It has repeatedly been shown that female patients wake up faster from propofol anaesthesia than male patients. The reason for this is not clear. It is possible that female patients have a more rapid decline in plasma propofol concentration after termination of an infusion, or there could be gender differences in the sensitivity to propofol, making women wake up at higher concentrations. We tested the hypothesis that women wake up faster because of a more rapid decline in plasma propofol.

METHODS

Sixty adult patients (30 female and 30 male; ASA I or II) undergoing lower limb surgery under regional anaesthesia, were enrolled in an open study. Propofol was given as the only hypnotic drug, administered by the plasma target control system (TCI) Diprifusor, titrated to bispectral index (BIS) values of 40-60. Blood samples for propofol measurements were taken just before the propofol infusion was stopped and when the patients woke up.

RESULTS

The female patients woke up faster than the male patients (5.6 vs 8.2 min, P=0.003). The plasma propofol concentration declined more rapidly in the women (P=0.02). An additional significant finding was that the TCI algorithm had a better fit for the women than for the men, with a median prediction error (MDPE) of 2% in the female patients compared with 40% in the male patients (P<0.001). At emergence the men had a significantly higher measured propofol concentration than the women (P=0.05).

CONCLUSION

The female patients had a more rapid decline in plasma propofol at the end of infusion. Gender differences in pharmacokinetics could explain the faster emergence for female patients after propofol anaesthesia, and gender differences in propofol sensitivity may also be present.

Bispectral index, serum drug concentrations and emergence associated with individually adjusted target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol for laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Target-controlled infusions (TCI) are used to simplify administration and increase precision of i.v. drugs during general anaesthesia. However, there is a limited relationship between preset targets and measured concentrations of drugs and between measured concentrations and measures of brain function, such as the bispectral index (BIS).

METHODS

We set out to evaluate the performance of TCI devices for propofol (Diprifusor) and remifentanil (Remifusor, prototype), during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 21 patients. We also checked if there was any correlation between serum concentrations of propofol and BIS during individually adjusted anaesthesia.

RESULTS

The Diprifusor and Remifusor had a median absolute performance error of 60% and 25% respectively. Propofol concentrations were underpredicted by a median of 60%, and remifentanil concentrations were slightly overpredicted by a median of 7%. When anaesthesia was adjusted to keep BIS values between 45 and 60, no correlation existed between measured concentrations of propofol and the corresponding BIS values, although both BIS and serum propofol concentration discriminated well between the awake and asleep states. Emergence was rapid and uneventful in all patients. Female patients had a more rapid emergence than male patients (6.6 and 11.6 min respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TCI devices for remifentanil and propofol result in large variation in measured serum concentrations. The lack of correlation between BIS and serum concentrations of propofol adds to the debate about whether BIS measures hypnosis as a graded state during surgery. This study confirms that women wake up faster than men, but provides no explanation for this repeatedly shown difference.

Bispectral index, predicted and measured drug levels of target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and emergence

BACKGROUND

Target-controlled infusions (TCI) have been launched as simple, accurate and reliable delivery systems of intravenous drugs. Bispectral index of EEG (BIS) seems promising in measuring hypnotic effect of anaesthetic drugs. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of TCI systems in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to correlate measured drug levels to BIS values. Data were analysed for possible gender differences during emergence.

METHODS

After written informed consent, 20 patients were enrolled in an open study. Remifentanil was set at 7.5 ng/ml as target throughout the whole procedure, and propofol at 5 microg/ ml at induction and 3 microg/ml after intubation. Values in blood samples of remifentanil and propofol were correlated to the estimated values and to systolic blood pressure and BIS. BIS values and measured drug levels during emergence and emergence time were compared for the two sexes.

RESULTS

Measured drug values varied considerably from the set target with a prediction error of -22% for remifentanil and 49% for propofol. The anaesthesia level was regarded as quite deep with a mean BIS during stable surgery of 42 +/- 7, and at this level we found no correlation between measured values of either of the two drugs and BIS. The emergence time was significantly shorter for women (12.6 +/- 2.5 min) than for men (19.0 +/- 4.2 min) (P=0.001), with no significant differences in measured levels of propofol or remifentanil or BIS during the emergence period.

CONCLUSION

Present systems for TCI of remifentanil and propofol result in large intra- and interindividual variations in measured drug levels, and measured levels differ from target. There may be possible interaction between the two anaesthetics at a pharmacokinetic level. Within the level of anaesthesia studied here, BIS was not an indicator of the actual drug levels. Women woke up significantly faster than men.

Perioperative care for the older outpatient undergoing ambulatory surgery

As the number of ambulatory surgery procedures continues to grow in an aging global society, the implementation of evidence-based perioperative care programs for the elderly will assume increased importance. Given the recent advances in anesthesia, surgery, and monitoring technology, the ambulatory setting offers potential advantages for elderly patients undergoing elective surgery. In this review article we summarize the physiologic and pharmacologic effects of aging and their influence on anesthetic drugs, the important considerations in the preoperative evaluation of elderly outpatients with coexisting diseases, the advantages and disadvantages of different anesthetic techniques on a procedural-specific basis, and offer recommendations regarding the management of common postoperative side effects (including delirium and cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, dizziness, pain, and gastrointestinal dysfunction) after ambulatory surgery. We conclude with a discussion of future challenges related to the growth of ambulatory surgery practice in this segment of our surgical population. When information specifically for the elderly population was not available in the peer-reviewed literature, we drew from relevant information in other ambulatory surgery populations.

Is peri-operative cortisol secretion related to post-operative cognitive dysfunction?

BACKGROUND

The pattern of cortisol secretion is influenced by surgery. As cortisol can adversely affect neuronal function, this may be an important factor in the development of post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). We hypothesized that the incidence of POCD would be related to changes in cortisol level.

METHODS

We studied 187 patients aged over 60 years undergoing major non-cardiac surgery with general or regional anaesthesia. Saliva cortisol levels were measured pre-operatively and at 1 day, 7 days and 3 months post-operatively in the morning (08.00 h) and in the afternoon (16.00 h) using salivettes. Cognitive function was assessed pre-operatively, on day 7 and at 3 months using four neuropsychological tests. POCD was defined as a combined Z score of greater than 1.96.

RESULTS

After surgery, salivary cortisol concentrations increased significantly. POCD was detected in 18.8% of subjects at 1 week and in 15.2% after 3 months. The pre-operative ratios between the morning and afternoon cortisol concentrations (am/pm ratios) were 2.8 and 2.7 in patients with POCD at 1 week vs. those without POCD at 1 week, respectively. The am/pm ratios decreased significantly post-operatively to 1.9 and 1.6 at 1 week, respectively (P = 0.02 for both). In an analysis considering all am/pm ratios, it was found that the persistent flattening in am/pm ratio was significantly related to POCD at 1 week.

CONCLUSION

The pattern of diurnal variation in cortisol level was significantly related to POCD. Thus, circadian rhythm disturbance or metabolic endocrine stress could be an important mechanism in the development of cognitive dysfunction after major surgery.

Fast-track surgery for bariatric laparoscopic gastric bypass with focus on anaesthesia and peri-operative care. Experience with 500 cases

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity implies challenges in anaesthesiological handling. We report our experience from 500 consecutive patients during 3 years.

METHODS

The patients were due for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and enteral bypass. Sleep was induced after pre-oxygenation with target control infusions (TCI) of remifentanil and propofol; vecuronium was supplied for facilitating endotracheal intubation. The propofol infusion was stopped and desflurane 3-6% was given for BIS-titrated anaesthetic maintenance together with remifentanil TCI. Antiemetic prophylaxis was supplied with intravenous (IV) droperidol, ondansetron and dexamethasone; post-operative pain prophylaxis was IV paracetamol, parecoxib and bupivacaine infiltration. The patients were extubated in the operating room and kept in the post-operative care unit for 3-4 h, being tested for a 20 m walk before discharge to the ward.

RESULTS

The procedure was uncomplicated peri-operatively in all 500 cases and in 497 patients (99.4%) post-operatively. Three patients had one complication, which resolved without sequelae: oesophageal rupture from gastric tubing, reoperation for anastomosis leakage and pneumonia. The mean duration of surgery was 57 min (range 37-91). The mean time from the start of anaesthesia until the start of surgery and time from the end of surgery until the end of anaesthesia were both significantly reduced throughout the study period, from 23 to 7.8 and 5.8 to 1.9 min, respectively (P<0.001). The mean total hospital stay was reduced from 3 days at start to 2 days in the end of the series (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Safe bariatric short-stay surgery is feasible with a dedicated anaesthesiological concept in an expert surgical team.

Spinal anaesthesia for outpatient surgery

In a prospective study of 51 young male outpatients given spinal anaesthesia through a 25-gauge needle, we found a 37.2% incidence of postdural puncture headache. In addition, 54.9% complained of backache after surgery. Occurrence of headache significantly prolonged the sick-leave from work. General anaesthesia would be preferred by 31.4% of patients for a similar procedure in the future. These patients had a higher incidence of postoperative backache and pain during lumbar puncture. It is concluded that spinal anaesthesia is not a satisfactory technique for outpatient procedures in young men.

Lack of pre-emptive analgesic effect of (R)-ketamine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

AIM

This study evaluated the pre-emptive analgesic effect of intravenous (i.v.) (R)-ketamine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. (R)-ketamine was used due to the lower incidence of side-effects.

METHODS

Sixty patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to 3 groups and studied in a double-blind manner. Two i.v. injections were administered: one after induction of anesthesia, approximately 3 min before surgery, and one after surgery. The placebo group (PLA, n = 20) received saline in both injections. The preoperative group (PRE, n = 20) received (R)-ketamine 1 mg/kg and then saline. The postoperative group (POST, n = 20) received saline and then (R)-ketamine 1 mg/kg. Postoperatively, the patients used a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS) at 30 min and every hour for 4 h and with a verbal rating scale (VRS) at 24 h and after 7 days.

RESULTS

There were no occurrence of side-effects from (R)-ketamine. VAS and VRS at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h postoperatively showed no statistical differences. In the POST group, extubation was delayed and pain score (VAS) at 30 min postoperatively was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the two other groups. There were no statistical differences in meperidine consumption during the first 4 h postoperatively and no differences in consumption of analgesics at 24 h and 7 days.

CONCLUSION

In this study a 1 mg/kg dose of (R)-ketamine given at the end of surgery exerted a short-lasting hypnotic and analgesic effect. The same dose given preoperatively did not show postoperative analgesic effect or pre-emptive effect.