"Occult" hepatitis B virus as source of infection in liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection almost always recurs after liver transplantation in patients who were surface antigen (HBsAg) positive before surgery but apparent de novo acquisition of infection in a transplant setting has not previously been reported. We have used sensitive techniques to elucidate the origin of such infections in patients in a California transplantation programme. We tested post-transplant serum from 207 patients who had been HBsAg negative and found 20 to be HBsAg positive. The origin of infection was identified in 7 patients, being occult pre-transplant infection in 5 and occult infection in the donor in 2. No pre-transplant patient nor donor with demonstrable HBV DNA had serological markers of hepatitis B. Post-transplant HBV DNA was present in serum from 19 patients. Analysis of the variable pre-S region of HBV demonstrated 100% sequence homology between recipient liver and post-transplant serum (2 patients) and between donor serum and recipient post-transplant serum (2). There was only 84% homology between the 2 different patients infected with subtype adw. 19 patients are alive, 9 without histological evidence of hepatitis (mean follow-up 33 months), and survival was significantly greater than that of a group with recurrent HBV infection. Apparent acquisition of HBV infection with liver transplantation is not rare, and may be due to occult pre-transplant infection or occult infection in the donor. The post-transplant outcome of this infection tends to be benign but our findings do underscore the clinical relevance of HBV infection in the absence of serological markers.

Major histocompatibility complex class I deficiency prolongs islet allograft survival

Because of islet allograft rejection, nonimmunosuppressed pancreatic islet allotransplantation has been unsuccessful for the treatment of type I diabetes. The role of major histocompatibility complex class I antigen expression on islet allograft survival was evaluated with the use of mice homozygous for a beta 2-microglobulin gene disruption. These mice express little if any functional major histocompatibility complex class I antigen. When these major histocompatibility complex class I-deficient islets were used as donors in an allogenic murine transplantation model, islet allograft survival was markedly prolonged. These results demonstrate a major importance for the alloresponse directed against major histocompatibility complex class I antigen.

Immunosuppressive therapy as a determinant of transplantation outcomes

Although surgical proficiency is essential to the immediate outcome of transplantation, long-term success depends upon how adequately the transplantation recipient is managed. Immunosuppression, the most critical aspect of after care, is subject to wide variation. In January 1990, a survey was sent to the directors of all transplant programs in the United States performing one or more kidney, heart, liver, heart-lung, or pancreas transplant in 1988. Detailed data were obtained on both the drugs and methods used for induction and maintenance immunosuppression, as well as the treatment of rejection. Each program director was asked to rank each immunosuppressive approach according to its perceived impact on patient outcomes. Over 85% of all eligible program directors completed the survey. There is no evidence of survey respondent bias. The use of polyclonal and monoclonal agents for induction immunosuppression was favored most by pancreas program directors (72-76%). These agents were least preferred by liver transplant programs (35-37%). About half of kidney, heart, and heart-lung program directors preferred these agents. Triple-drug therapy consisting of CsA, PRED, and AZA was considered the most preferable maintenance protocol for all transplants (i.e., kidney, 89%; heart, 94%; liver, 88%; heart-lung, 86%; pancreas, 96%). Either i.v. steroids or OKT3 were regarded as the preferred approaches for the treatment of acute or resistant rejection. Finally, the acceptability of outpatient treatment of rejection varied by transplant type (i.e., kidney, 9%; heart, 58%; liver, 5%; heart-lung, 29%; pancreas, 8%). Although there are similarities in the ratings of various aspects of immunosuppressive therapy, there are important differences. This information is critical to anticipate the implications of new immunosuppressive agents and to evaluate changes in the use of existing drugs and therapeutic approaches.

Liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess outcome after liver transplantation for fulminant (FHF) and subfulminant (SHF) hepatic failure and to determine the factors responsible for outcome.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

Thirty-five patients who underwent 42 liver transplantations for FHF and eight patients who underwent eight liver transplantations for SHF at a large university medical center were followed up for 1 month to 5 years.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Actuarial patient and graft survival for FHF and SHF were assessed and compared with the outcome for all patients who underwent liver transplantation at the same center over the same period (445 transplants in 420 patients). Patients were treated with intracranial pressure monitoring, aggressive measures to decrease intracranial pressure, and rapid transplantation. Functional status and recurrent disease were additional end points.

RESULTS

One-year actuarial patient survival rates for FHF and SHF were 92% and 100%, respectively. Minor neurological sequelae were noted in two patients. Functional status was excellent. Posttransplant hepatitis was present in two patients with an original diagnosis of FHF and acute hepatitis B and in three patients with an original diagnosis of FHF and non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with FHF and SHF can achieve excellent results after liver transplantation. Rapid assessment of candidacy with monitoring of intracranial pressure and aggressive treatment for intracranial hypertension are thought to be essential in the outcome of these patients.

New immunologic insights into mechanisms of allograft rejection

Our current understanding of liver allograft rejection indicates that multiple cellular interactions, involving a variety of cell-associated and soluble mediators, are critical to the response. The extravasation and localization of recipient immune cells to the allograft is dependent on recognition and interaction of complementary adhesion molecules expressed on circulating leukocytes and endothelium. Similar receptor-ligand pairs can also augment the binding of effector cells to target tissue within the allograft. Inflammatory mediators such as IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IFN-gamma produced within the allograft can increase the local expression of adhesion molecules and thereby promote the entry of specific and nonspecific cells. The TCR expressed on T lymphocytes has the potential to recognize MHC antigens expressed on the allograft in many different forms. Thus, the T cell response to graft-associated alloantigens appears to be complex and dynamic. The production of T cell-derived cytokines is central to the activation and maturation of effector cells within the allograft. The identification of cytotoxic mediators such as serine protease and MBP within rejecting human allografts supports the role of cytotoxic T cells and eosinophils as effector cells. Undoubtedly, the development of genetically manipulated animal models will serve to further elucidate our understanding of the cellular mechanisms of graft rejection.

Nonoperative management of biliary leaks after orthotopic liver transplantation

Specific therapy should be instituted expeditiously once the diagnosis of a biliary leak has been made in patients who have undergone orthotopic liver transplantation. Controversy exists over whether to use nonoperative or operative management. The results of 325 consecutive orthotopic liver transplants in 297 adult and pediatric recipients were reviewed. The biliary tract was reconstructed using a choledochocholedochostomy anastomosis (254/325 or 78%) or a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy anastomosis (71/325 or 22%). The incidence of biliary leaks was 23% (74/325). Overall, only 3% (10/325) of the orthotopic liver transplant recipients required operative repair of a biliary leak. Biliary leaks occurring in patients with Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy anastomoses (9/71 or 13%) commonly required operative repair (6/9 or 67%), whereas leaks that occurred in patients with choledochocholedochostomy anastomoses (65/254 or 26%) seldom required operative repair (4/65 or 6%). All choledochojejunostomy leaks occurred at the anastomosis, whereas choledochocholedochostomy leaks occurred either at the anastomosis (17/254 or 7%) or the T-tube insertion site (45/254 or 18%). Our study confirms that in centers with proficient endoscopic and interventional radiologic support, resolution of biliary leaks in orthotopic liver transplant patients can be achieved with nonoperative management.

Creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with the wallstent endoprosthesis: results in 100 patients

One hundred patients underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for variceal bleeding (n = 94), intractable ascites (n = 3), hepatorenal syndrome (n = 2), and preoperative portal decompression (n = 1). Shunts were completed in 96 patients. Portal vein pressure was reduced from 34.5 mm Hg +/- 7.6 (standard deviation) to 24.5 mm Hg +/- 6.2; the residual portal vein-hepatic vein gradient was 10.4 mm Hg +/- 0.9. Acute variceal bleeding was controlled in 29 of 30 patients. Of the 96 patients who underwent successful TIPS creation, 26 have died and 22 have undergone liver transplantation; the remaining 48 patients have survived an average of 7.6 months. Variceal bleeding recurred in 10 patients. Fifteen patients developed shunt stenosis (n = 6) or occlusion (n = 9). Patency was reestablished in eight of the nine occluded shunts. Seventeen patients developed new or worsened encephalopathy. The authors conclude that TIPS creation is an effective and reliable means of lowering portal pressure and controlling variceal bleeding, particularly in patients with acute variceal bleeding unresponsive to sclerotherapy and patients with chronic variceal bleeding before liver transplantation.

IL-2 and IL-5 gene expression in response to alloantigen in liver allograft recipients and in vitro

IL-2 and IL-5 gene expression in response to alloantigen was studied in liver allograft recipients and in an in vitro system. Seventy-seven sequential liver allograft biopsies from 22 patients were analyzed for IL-2 and IL-5 mRNA by polymerase chain reaction and Southern blot hybridization. Message for IL-5 was present in 74% of allografts with rejection, 46% of allografts with resolving rejection, and 33% of allografts with no evidence of rejection. The frequency of IL-5 transcripts in rejecting allografts was significantly different than the frequency of IL-5 transcripts in grafts without evidence of rejection (P = 0.003). Message for IL-2 was detected in 29% of rejecting allografts, 18% of allografts without evidence of rejection, and 43% of allografts with resolving rejection. There was no significant association between IL-2 gene expression and the histopathological status of the allograft. Interestingly, 9 of 15 biopsies that contained IL-2 message in the no rejection and resolving rejection categories went on to display rejection shortly thereafter. IL-2 and IL-5 gene expression rarely occurred simultaneously within allografts. An in vitro system consisting of irradiated, allogeneic stimulator cells and normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells as responders was established to further investigate alloantigen-driven IL-2 and IL-5 production. Both IL-2 and IL-5 were produced in response to alloantigen as determined by specific bioassays. Maximal levels of IL-5 activity in culture supernatants generally followed maximal IL-2 levels by 24 hr, but both IL-2 and IL-5 production were dramatically inhibited by CsA. Analysis of cytokine gene expression revealed that IL-2 transcription peaked within the initial 24 hr of culture, whereas IL-5 transcription was maximal at 120 hr of culture. The expression of a CTL-specific serine esterase gene was similar to IL-5 in that it was maximal during the latter phases of the culture period. Thus, both human IL-2 and IL-5 are produced in response to alloantigen and are inhibitable by CsA. These data suggest that IL-2 and IL-5 may participate in cellular pathways of tissue damage within the rejecting allograft.

Evidence for a nonclassical pathway of graft rejection involving interleukin 5 and eosinophils

The role of IL-5 and eosinophils in allograft rejection was studied in human liver allograft recipients. Liver allograft biopsies were analyzed for intragraft IL-5 gene expression, and the percentages of eosinophils and plasma cells within the portal infiltrate as well as peripheral eosinophil levels were determined. The majority of allografts with evidence of rejection had concomitant IL-5 mRNA and eosinophilia, while no resolving or nonrejecting allografts had simultaneous IL-5 mRNA and eosinophilia. In fact, rejecting liver allografts that contain IL-5 mRNA and eosinophils also contain infiltrating cells that produce the cytotoxic mediator major basic protein. In contrast, intragraft plasma cell and peripheral eosinophil levels did not correlate with the histopathologic status of the allograft. Cyclosporine and FK506 had similar effects on the frequency of IL-5 gene expression in rejecting and nonrejecting allografts. However, OKT3 appeared to profoundly modulate IL-5 gene expression, since 0 of 11 biopsies obtained during OKT3 treatment for rejection contained IL-5 transcripts. These observations raise the possibility of a cellular pathway of liver allograft rejection mediated by IL-5-activated eosinophils.

Use of Prograf (FK 506) as rescue therapy for refractory rejection after liver transplantation. US Multicenter FK 506 Liver Study Group

This report describes the clinical characteristics and demographics of patients enrolled into this rescue trial for patients experiencing refractory rejection after liver transplantation. Actuarial graft and patient survival at 12 months postconversion was 50% and 72%, respectively. Actual treatment success at 3 months postconversion was 70%. Karnofsky scores and liver function tests were significantly improved for patients continuing on therapy indicating clinical benefit in these patients. The safety profile of FK 506 is acceptable for such a high-risk group of patients. These preliminary clinical results support the conclusion that FK 506 can effectively control and reverse refractory rejection in a majority of liver transplantation patients.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: preliminary results in 25 patients

A retrospective study of transjugular intrahepatic shunts performed between June 1990 and June 1991 is reported. Twelve patients were actively bleeding at the time of the procedure; 12 other patients had had one to five bleeding episodes within the previous 2 weeks, and one patient had massive ascites from Budd-Chiari syndrome. Most patients had severe liver disease: 21 Child's class C, three Child's class B, and one Child's class A. Transjugular intrahepatic shunting was technically successful in all cases. Portal vein pressures were reduced on average from 36 +/- 7 cm H2O to 22 +/- 6 cm H2O. Variceal bleeding ceased after transjugular intrahepatic shunting in all patients who were actively bleeding. Five patients died (30-day mortality, 20%), and eight patients subsequently underwent elective liver transplantation. The transjugular intrahepatic shunts in the 12 other patients have remained patent an average of 5.5 months. Shunt occlusion occurred in three patients at 21, 24, and 102 days, respectively. All three occlusions were successfully reopened with percutaneous techniques, yielding a primary shunt patency of 88% and secondary shunt patency of 100%. Complications included new onset encephalopathy in one patient, which cleared with medical therapy and transient renal failure in one patient. These preliminary data suggest that transjugular intrahepatic shunting is a safe and effective therapy for the short-term treatment of patients with variceal hemorrhage, particularly in patients with severe liver disease awaiting transplantation. The long-term benefit of transjugular intrahepatic shunting awaits further follow-up.