Peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin vs interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected patients

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is associated with low response rates and high incidence of side effects. One hundred twenty-one hepatitis C virus (HCV)-HIV-coinfected patients were randomized to receive interferon alpha-2b (3 MU thrice weekly; n = 61) or peginterferon alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week; n = 60), plus ribavirin (800 mg daily), for 24 (genotype 2 or 3) or 48 weeks (genotype 1 or 4). We assessed early virological response at 4, 8 and 12 weeks to predict sustained virological response (SVR). Safety assessment included frequent blood lactate measurement and relative quantitation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In intention-to-treat analysis, the SVR rate was higher in the peginterferon group (55%vs 26%; P = 0.002). The difference for HCV genotypes 1 and 4 was 45%vs 14% (P = 0.009) and 50%vs 27% (P = 0.387), respectively, and for genotype 2 or 3, 71%vs 43% (P = 0.12) Viral response at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment was highly predictive of SVR. Among genotype 3 patients, 17 of 20 (85%) whose HCV RNA was already undetectable at 4 weeks had an SVR after 24 weeks of treatment. Hyperlactataemia occurred in 22 patients and was clinically significant in six, two of whom died. mtDNA decreased significantly 4-12 weeks after the start of treatment in patients developing clinically significant hyperlactataemia. Peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin was more effective than interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in HIV-coinfected patients. Frequent monitoring of virological response may be very helpful to optimize treatment compliance, to tailor treatment duration and to minimize side effects.

Liver transplantation in HIV-HCV coinfected patients: a case-control study

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated cirrhosis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients was compared with non-HIV patients. Nine patients with HIV-HCV coinfection were compared with patients transplanted before and after each HIV patient (control group). Immunosuppression consisted in tacrolimus with steroids or mycophenolate mofetil. Acute cellular rejection and three-year actuarial patient survival were respectively 44% and 87.5% in HIV group and 22% and 93.7% in the control group (P=NS). Acute hepatitis C virus occurred earlier (2.3 vs. 4.3 months) and was more cholestatic (mean bilirubin: 10.8 vs. 1.6 mg/dL) in the HIV group. Eight (100%) HIV and nine (64.3%) control patients received antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. One patient (11.1%) of the control group and one patient (20%) of the HIV group presented a sustained virologic response (P=NS). Short- to midterm results of LT in HIV-HCV co-infected patients were excellent and similar to non-HIV patients.

Less lipoatrophy and better lipid profile with abacavir as compared to stavudine: 96-week results of a randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To assess lipoatrophy, other toxicities, and efficacy associated with abacavir as compared with stavudine in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, open trial, stratified by viral load and CD4 cell count, conducted January 2001 to July 2004. Two hundred thirty-seven adult patients with HIV infection initiating antiretroviral therapy were assigned to receive abacavir (n = 115) or stavudine (n = 122), both combined with lamivudine and efavirenz. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with lipoatrophy as assessed by physician and patient observation at 96 weeks.

RESULTS

A lower proportion of patients assigned to abacavir developed clinical signs of lipoatrophy (4.8% vs. 38.3%; P < 0.001). These observations were confirmed by anthropometric data. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans performed in 57 patients showed significantly greater total limb fat loss in the stavudine arm (-1579 vs. 913 g; P < 0.001). The lipid profile in abacavir patients presented more favorable changes in the levels of triglycerides (P = 0.03), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc; P < 0.001), and apolipoprotein A1 (P < 0.001) as well as in the ratio between total cholesterol and HDLc (P = 0.005). Throughout the study, a higher proportion of patients in the stavudine group received lipid-lowering agents as compared to the abacavir group (17% vs. 4%; P = 0.002). Similar virologic and immunologic responses were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Assuming the limitations inherent to clinical assessment, this study shows a notably weaker association of abacavir with lipoatrophy than stavudine. DEXA scans and anthropometric measurements supported the clinical findings. In addition, the lipid changes that occurred were more favorable in patients receiving abacavir.

Utility of week-4 viral response to tailor treatment duration in hepatitis C virus genotype 3/HIV co-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of a week-4 virological response for sustained response prediction in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3/HIV-co-infected patients treated with interferon and ribavirin for 24 weeks.

METHODS

Using a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based quantitative assay (COBAS AmpliPrep-COBAS-TaqMan 48; Roche Diagnostics) we retrospectively analysed samples obtained at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 from a subset of 35 HCV genotype 3-HIV co-infected patients enrolled in a randomized comparative trial of peginterferon alpha-2b versus interferon alpha-2b both in combination with ribavirin.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis, 78% of patients treated with peginterferon and 53% of those receiving standard interferon achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) Overall, at 4 weeks, 49% of patients had HCV RNA < 50 IU/ml and 63% had < 600 IU/ml. Of these rapid responders 88 and 86% achieved a SVR, respectively, with only one patient relapsing among end-of-treatment responders. In contrast, only 44 and 31% of patients with a week-4 HCV RNA >or= 50 or >or= 600 IU/ml achieved an SVR, respectively, with relapse rates of 33 and 50%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis a serum HCV RNA level below 600 IU/ml at week 4 was the strongest independent predictor of SVR (odds ratio, 11.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 75.0; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Monitoring early viral response may be useful to tailor the duration of treatment among patients with HCV genotype 3/HIV-co-infection. Patients whose HCV RNA falls below 600 IU/ml at 4 weeks are at low risk of relapse after 24 weeks of combination therapy.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between rifampicin and the once-daily combination of saquinavir and low-dose ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess plasma steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of rifampicin, isoniazid, saquinavir and ritonavir in HIV and tuberculosis (TB) co-infected patients, and investigate potential interactions between TB drugs and protease inhibitors (PIs).

METHODS

Open-label, single-arm, sequential PK study including 22 patients with HIV infection and TB. During the first 2 months, patients received rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide, with or without ethambutol (first PK study, n = 22). Then patients stopped pyrazinamide and ethambutol and started once-daily antiretroviral therapy (ART) with didanosine, lamivudine, ritonavir (200 mg) and saquinavir (1600 mg) (second PK study, n = 18). Patients stopped all TB drugs after 9 months continuing the same ART (third PK study, n = 15). Differences between TB drug parameters in the first and second PK studies, and between PI parameters in the second and third PK studies were used to assess interactions.

RESULTS

Rifampicin and isoniazid pharmacokinetics did not change substantially with saquinavir and ritonavir. A significant 39.5%, 34.9% and 48.7% reduction in median saquinavir AUC(0-24), C(max) and C(trough), respectively, was seen with rifampicin and isoniazid. Ritonavir AUC(0-24), C(max) and C(trough) decreased 42.5%, 49.6% and 64.3%, respectively, with rifampicin and isoniazid.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant interaction between saquinavir, ritonavir and rifampicin, with reduction in median plasma concentrations of saquinavir and ritonavir. Saquinavir should be given with caution in patients receiving rifampicin. Twice-daily dosing or higher saquinavir doses in once-daily administration should be tested to obtain more appropriate plasma levels.

Recomendaciones españolas sobre el uso adecuado de enfuvirtida

Enfuvirtide is a high-cost, parenterally administered drug commonly used in late phases of HIV infection, when its efficacy may be compromised. To optimize enfuvirtide use, consensus recommendations for this purpose have been formulated by 247 physicians attending patients with HIV infection in Spain. A literature review was performed in which grades of evidence and recommendations were defined according to the origin of the data (randomized clinical trials, non-randomized studies, expert opinion). Twenty-eight local consensus meetings were held between May and September 2005 to discuss the most important aspects related to the use of enfuvirtide, following a pre-established system used in all the meetings. The main conclusions were as follows: a) enfuvirtide use is often excessively delayed and is given to patients with little chance of treatment success; b) enfuvirtide is indicated in patients who require antiretroviral treatment and for whom an optimum treatment with three other fully effective drugs cannot be designed; c) the most important prognostic factor is the availability of at least one other completely active drug; d) there is no infallible method to avoid the development of local reactions, but measures are available to decrease their incidence and severity; and e) patient counseling and training for correct administration of the drug are essential to improve adherence, the repercussions of local reactions and, of course, the efficacy of the treatment.

Three-year follow-up of protease inhibitor-based regimen simplification in HIV-infected patients

Patients with sustained virological suppression on protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy were randomly assigned to switch the PI to nevirapine (n = 155), efavirenz (n = 156), or abacavir (n = 149) and were followed for at least 3 years regardless of the discontinuation of assigned therapy. There was a higher probability of maintaining virological suppression after 3 years of follow-up with nevirapine or efavirenz than with abacavir. In contrast, abacavir showed a lower incidence of adverse effects leading to drug discontinuation.

Early monitoring of ribavirin serum concentration is not useful to optimize hepatitis C virus treatment in HIV-coinfected patients

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest that higher ribavirin (RBV) exposure could improve early hepatitis C virus (HCV) response. Furthermore, interindividual RBV bioavailability shows high variation, and dose-limiting haemolytic anaemia is a common adverse event. Therefore, it has been suggested that monitoring RBV serum levels could be used to drive dose modification and to optimize management of HCV-infected patients receiving combination treatment.

METHODS

To assess the effect of RBV serum levels on HCV RNA clearance at week 4 and 12 of treatment, and to determine the correlation between RBV serum concentration and haemoglobin decrease, RBV trough levels were measured by HPLC in stored serum samples obtained from 94 HCV-HIV-coinfected patients at week 4 and 12 of treatment with peginterferon-alpha2b (1.5 microg/kg/weekly) pIus ribavirin (800-1,200 mg/day).

RESULTS

The median RBV levels increased from 1.70 microg/ml at week 4 to 1.97 microg/ml at week 12 of treatment (P = 0.001) and were independently predicted by weight-adjusted dose of RBV and co-administration of tenofovir. Haemoglobin drop was higher among patients who received zidovudine and weakly correlated with RBV level. Although RBV concentration was lower in genotype 1 or 4 HCV-infected patients who cleared the virus at treatment week 4, the ability of this parameter to discriminate between responders and non-responders at treatment week 4 and 12 was poor.

CONCLUSION

Intracellular RBV accumulation early in treatment might improve the kinetics of HCV response in difficult to treat patients. Although this hypothesis and the potential interaction between RBV and tenofovir warrant further research, our data do not support RBV serum monitoring as a tool to optimize treatment in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients.

Early Antiviral Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence after Liver Transplantation in HIV-Infected Patients

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of early antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients undergoing liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease.

Methods

Open prospective trial of early treatment of HCV recurrence in consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients transplanted at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona between 2002 and 2004. All patients had indication for liver transplantation, no previous CDC class C HIV-associated opportunistic events, a CD4+ T-cell count >100 cells/fxl, and undetectable plasma HIV RNA on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Treatment with pegylated interferon-a2b (1.5 μg/kg/week) and ribavirin (800–1000 mg/day) was given for 24 to 48 weeks, as soon as HCV recurrence was histologically documented.

Results

Of six patients who underwent transplant, five patients surviving the early post-transplantation period developed HCV recurrence, presenting as severe cholestatic hepatitis in three, and were started on antiviral treatment a median of 12 weeks (range: 5–31) after transplantation. After a median follow-up of 24 months all treated patients were alive. Biochemical response was achieved in all patients, although only one achieved a sustained virological response. Mild rejection before HCV recurrence occurred in two cases. Treatment was well tolerated with no episodes of rejection or mitochondrial toxicity. No patient required modification of the antiretroviral regimen. Liver biopsies performed in patients without virological response, 12–34 months after transplantation, showed cirrhosis in two and moderate chronic active hepatitis in the remainder.

Conclusions

Despite early antiviral treatment, severe HCV recurrence after liver transplantation may compromise long-term survival in HIV-infected patients. Improved treatment strategies for these patients are urgently required.

Genetic evolution of gp41 reveals a highly exclusive relationship between codons 36, 38 and 43 in gp41 under long-term enfuvirtide-containing salvage regimen

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the genetic changes in the gp41 protein in HIV-infected patients with detectable plasma viraemia receiving a long-term salvage enfuvirtide regimen.

METHODS

We studied 13 heavily antiretroviral-experienced patients receiving a salvage regimen containing enfuvirtide. Substitutions in gp41 were analysed by population-based sequencing at baseline and longitudinally after the initiation of enfuvirtide treatment. To investigate sequence evolution we also analysed multiple gp41 clones from four selected patients. A Fisher's two-tailed test was used to assess the distribution of resistance-associated mutations in the clonal sequences.

RESULTS

Mutations at positions 36 and 38 in gp41 (HR1) emerged rapidly (median emerging time 10 weeks), but disappeared at subsequent timepoints in most of the patients. Amino acid changes did not accumulate over time, with no patient having more than two mutations in HR1 after 6 months of treatment. The mutation N43D was not observed together with changes at positions 36 or 38 in any patient. Clonal analysis showed that the three main gp41 resistance mutations were highly mutually exclusive (P < 0.001), being present in individual clones and constituting independent populations.

CONCLUSION

Substitutions at positions 36 and 38 are rapidly selected but disappear thereafter in HIV-1-infected patients failing an enfuvirtide-containing salvage therapy. We found a highly exclusive relationship between the three main enfuvirtide resistance-associated mutations (amino acids 36, 38 and 43), suggesting that the genetic evolution of HIV-1 gp41 protein is a dynamic and much more complex process than previously though.

Discontinuation of primary and secondary Toxoplasma gondii prophylaxis is safe in HIV-infected patients after immunological restoration with highly active antiretroviral therapy: results of an open, randomized, multicenter clinical trial

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, no randomized trials have evaluated whether prophylaxis against toxoplasmic encephalitis can be safely discontinued after the CD4+ T cell count increases in response to highly active antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, nonblinded, multicenter clinical trial of the discontinuation of primary or secondary prophylaxis against toxoplasmic encephalitis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with a sustained response to antiretroviral therapy (defined as a CD4+ T cell count of > or =200 cells/mm3 and a plasma HIV type 1 [HIV-1] RNA level of <5000 copies/mL for at least 3 months). Prophylaxis was restarted if the CD4+ T cell count decreased to <200 cells/mm3.

RESULTS

The 381 patients receiving primary prophylaxis had a median CD4+ T cell count on study entry of 343 cells/mm3, and 318 (83%) of 381 patients had undetectable HIV-1 RNA in plasma. After a median follow-up period of 25 months (409 person-years), there were no episodes of toxoplasmic encephalitis among the 196 patients who discontinued prophylaxis (at 1 year, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for relapse rate was 2.40%). For the 57 patients receiving secondary prophylaxis, the median CD4+ T cell count on entry was 407 cells/mm3, and 49 (86%) of 57 patients had undetectable HIV-1 RNA in plasma. After a median follow-up period of 30.5 months (69 person-years), there were no episodes of toxoplasmic encephalitis among the 28 patients who discontinued prophylaxis (at 1 year, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for relapse rate was 16%).

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-infected adult patients receiving effective highly active antiretroviral therapy, primary and secondary prophylaxis against toxoplasmic encephalitis can be safely discontinued after the CD4+ T cell count has increased to > or =200 cells/mm3 for >3 months.

Atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir: pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of a promising double-boosted protease inhibitor regimen

OBJECTIVE

To assess the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of lopinavir (LPV), ritonavir (RTV) and atazanavir (ATV) as a double-boosted protease inhibitor regimen in HIV-infected adults.

METHODS

Sixteen patients who started LPV/RTV (400/100 mg b.i.d.) and ATV (300 mg q.d.) were enrolled in the study group (arm A). LPV pharmacokinetics were compared to those of two historical groups: arm B, 15 patients who received LPV/RTV (400/100 mg b.i.d.); and arm C, 25 patients who received LPV/RTV/saquinavir (SQV) (400/100/1000 mg b.i.d.). ATV pharmacokinetics were compared to those of 15 consecutive patients who received ATV and RTV (300/100 mg q.d.) (arm D). Drug concentrations were measured by HPLC.

RESULTS

LPV concentrations were significantly higher in arm A than in arms B and C. Median (interquartile range) LPV area under the curve (AUC)0-12 values were 115.7 (99.8-136.5), 85.2 (68.3-109.2) and 85.1 (60.6-110.1) microg/h/ml, respectively. C(max) values were 12.2 (10.7-14.5), 9.5 (6.8-13.9) and 10.0 (6.9-13.6) microg/ml, respectively. C(min) values were 9.1 (7.1-10.4), 5.6 (4.7-8.2) and 5.5 (4.2-7.5) microg/ml, respectively. No difference was observed for ATV AUC0-24 or C(max) between arms A and D. ATV C(min) values were 1.07 (0.61-1.79) in arm A and 0.58 (0.32-0.83) in arm D (P = 0.001). Treatment was not discontinued in any patient because of adverse effects. At 24 weeks, viral load was < 50 copies/ml in 13 of 16 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ATV and LPV/RTV provided high plasma concentrations of both PI, which seemed to be appropriate for patients with multiple prior therapeutic failures, yielding good tolerability and substantial antiviral efficacy.

Early antiviral treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of early antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients undergoing liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease.

METHODS

Open prospective trial of early treatment of HCV recurrence in consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients transplanted at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona between 2002 and 2004. All patients had indication for liver transplantation, no previous CDC class C HIV-associated opportunistic events, a CD4+ T-cell count >100cells/microl, and undetectable plasma HIV RNA on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Treatment with pegylated interferon-alpha2b (1.5 microg/kg/week) and ribavirin (800-1000 mg/day) was given for 24 to 48 weeks, as soon as HCV recurrence was histologically documented.

RESULTS

Of six patients who underwent transplant, five patients surviving the early post-transplantation period developed HCV recurrence, presenting as severe cholestatic hepatitis in three, and were started on antiviral treatment a median of 12 weeks (range: 5-31) after transplantation. After a median follow-up of 24 months all treated patients were alive. Biochemical response was achieved in all patients, although only one achieved a sustained virological response. Mild rejection before HCV recurrence occurred in two cases. Treatment was well tolerated with no episodes of rejection or mitochondrial toxicity. No patient required modification of the antiretroviral regimen. Liver biopsies performed in patients without virological response, 12-34 months after transplantation, showed cirrhosis in two and moderate chronic active hepatitis in the remainder.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite early antiviral treatment, severe HCV recurrence after liver transplantation may compromise long-term survival in HIV-infected patients. Improved treatment strategies for these patients are urgently required.

Value of culture and nested polymerase chain reaction of blood in the prediction of relapses in patients co-infected with leishmania and human immunodeficiency virus

The use of culture and a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of blood in predicting the probability of relapse was evaluated in 20 patients co-infected with Leishmania and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Fourteen of 20 patients relapsed, with 24 clinical relapses diagnosed. During clinical relapse, the parasite was detected by culture in 21 of 24 blood samples and by nested PCR in 23 of 24 blood samples. After treatment and during asymptomatic periods, the parasite was detected by culture in 18 (19.1%) of 94 blood samples and by nested PCR in 58 (61.7%) of 94 blood samples. For positive blood cultures, the Kaplan-Meier probability estimates for relapse at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 44%, 68%, 76%, and 76%, respectively, while for positive nested PCRs, the estimates were 20%, 33%, 45%, and 50%, respectively. For negative blood cultures, relapse probabilities for the same time points were 7%, 12%, 12%, and 12%, while for negative nested PCRs, these probabilities were 8%, 14%, 21%, and 26%. Nested PCR-positive results in asymptomatic periods indicated presence of the parasite, but not necessarily relapse. However, the presence of viable parasites during post-treatment follow-up increased the probability of relapse and showed that culture positivity could be a good relapse marker.

Once-Daily Regimen of Saquinavir, Ritonavir, Didanosine, and Lamivudine in HIV-Infected Patients With Standard Tuberculosis Therapy (TBQD Study)

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of a once-daily regimen with didanosine, lamivudine, saquinavir, and low-dose ritonavir in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients with tuberculosis treated with rifampin and the influence of rifampin on plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) of saquinavir.

METHODS

Single-arm, prospective, multicenter, open-label pilot study, including 32 adult ARV-naive subjects with HIV infection and tuberculosis under standard treatment that included rifampin (600 mg q.d.) and isoniazid (300 mg q.d.). After 2 months of tuberculosis treatment, patients were started on once-daily ARV therapy, consisting of didanosine, lamivudine, ritonavir (200 mg), and saquinavir soft gel capsules (1600 mg). HIV RNA level, CD4 cell count, clinical and laboratory toxicity, and saquinavir Ctrough during and after antituberculosis therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

After 48 weeks of follow-up, 20 of 32 patients (62.5%; 95% CI: 45.8% to 79.2%) in the intent-to-treat population and 20 of 28 (71.4%; 95% CI: 54.4% to 88.4%) in the on-treatment population had an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL. Treatment tolerance was acceptable in all patients except for 2 with biologic hepatic toxicity leading to discontinuation. Seven patients had virologic failure. In 10 patients (36%), saquinavir Ctrough was <0.05 microg/mL during tuberculosis therapy and 5 of them had virologic failure. The median saquinavir Ctrough was 44% lower (interquartile range: 19% to 71%) with coadministration of rifampin than without.

CONCLUSION

The combination of didanosine, lamivudine, saquinavir, and ritonavir may be a useful treatment regimen for patients with tuberculosis in whom a once-daily protease inhibitor-containing regimen is considered indicated. Nevertheless, on the basis of pharmacokinetic profile the dose of 1600/200 mg of saquinavir/ritonavir cannot be recommended. Further studies with higher doses of saquinavir (2000 mg) boosted with ritonavir are warranted.

Once-daily antiretroviral therapy: Spanish Consensus Statement

BACKGROUND

Administration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) once daily is creating extraordinary interest among the members of the scientific community and also among those who receive the therapy. However, in clinical practice, some doubts remain about its use.

OBJECTIVES

This document examines the characteristics and possibilities of treatment administered once daily.

METHODS

Consensus of 248 Spanish experts in the field.

RESULTS

Once-daily dosing is considered an added value which could favour adherence and, therefore, efficacy, as well as the quality of life of certain patients, however, the objective of adequate adherence in the long term is often difficult to achieve regardless of the treatment used. In theory, any patient can receive once-daily therapy, although some patients could particularly benefit from it, e.g. those with unfavourable social or personal circumstances, including drug users, patients whose treatment must be supervised, patients receiving multiple medications, or those who need rescue therapy after multiple treatment failures. At present, it is possible to design once-daily ART using some of the combinations of drugs considered as first-choice in national and international recommendations for antiretroviral therapy, but the options are still limited. The marketing of new drugs with this characteristic could allow us to increase the number and types of patient who can benefit from once-daily regimens, including those patients who need rescue therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily ART is a good alternative to regimens administered several times each day when a potent combination of active drugs is available.

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Combination Therapy with Didanosine, Lamivudine and Nevirapine in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-Infected Patients

Background

Simplified antiretroviral regimens are needed to improve patient adherence and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a once-daily regimen consisting of didanosine (ddI), lamivudine (3TC) and nevirapine (NVP) for adult antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV-1 infection.

Methods

This was a prospective, one-arm, multicentre pilot study. Daily drug dosage was 250 or 400 mg didanosine, 300 mg lamivudine and 400 mg nevirapine. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with a plasma HIV-RNA level <50 copies/ml at 12 months on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis.

Results

Seventy patients were enrolled in the study. At baseline, mean plasma HIV-1 RNA was 5.10 log10 copies/ml, and mean CD4 cell count was 262 cells/μl. At month 12, 67% (95% CI: 56–78) of patients maintained a viral load of <50 copies/ml in the ITT analysis and CD4 counts increased a median of 201 cells/μl. The treatment was more effective in patients with baseline CD4 counts >100 cells/μl than in those with a poorer immunological status at baseline, although the number of patients with CD4 counts <100 was low. Four patients died during the study period. Therapy was discontinued in 18 patients due to virological failure in 11, adverse events in seven, loss to follow-up or withdrawal of consent in four and death in one. Eight out of nine patients with available genotype after virological failure showed resistance mutations to NVP (Y181C and others) and 3TC (M184V/I), and four of them also had ddI resistance (L74V). The lipid profile was favourable, with a decrease in the ratio of total-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Conclusion

A once-daily combination of ddI, 3TC and NVP seems to be an effective, safe and easy-to-take regimen in antiretroviral-naive patients, at least in those who do not have severe immunodepression at baseline.

[Efavirenz and nevirapine plasma levels in HIV-infected patients with hemophilia]

The aim of this study was to evaluate efavirenz and nevirapine plasma levels in HIV-infected hemophilic patients seen in two hospitals in Barcelona. Plasma levels of these drugs were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at four-month intervals, together with viral load and CD4 cell count. Nineteen patients treated with efavirenz and 8 with nevirapine were included, and 68 efavirenz and 31 nevirapine determinations were performed. Mean study time was 12 months. Median efavirenz plasma concentration was 2.95 .g/ml (interval: 1.54-5.26 .g/ml) in patients with favorable virological response and 1.86 .g/ml (0.82-4.88 .g/ml) in patients with detectable viral load (p = 0.32). Nevirapine plasma concentrations were 4.41 .g/ml (3.50-6.72 .g/ml) and 3.12 .g/ml (2.44-3.80 .g/ml) respectively (p = 0.18).

Metabolic benefits 24 months after replacing a protease inhibitor with abacavir, efavirenz or nevirapine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 24-month metabolic and morphological benefits obtained from replacing the protease inhibitor (PI) in a regimen with nevirapine, efavirenz or abacavir.

DESIGN AND METHODS

NEFA was a randomized study designed to compare the efficacy of nevirapine, efavirenz or abacavir as substitutes for PI. A subset of 90 patients [abacavir (n = 29), efavirenz (n = 32), nevirapine (n = 29)] formed the metabolic study. Fasting total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and triglycerides levels were determined. Glucose homeostasis parameters were also collected. Lipodystrophy was evaluated by clinical examination and morphological measurements.

RESULTS

Treatment simplification led to overall lipid profile improvements. At 24 months, the two non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors produced similar lipid benefits: HDL-c levels increased [efavirenz, 15% (P = 0.001); nevirapine, 21% (P < 0.001)] and TC to HDL-c ratios decreased [efavirenz, 14% (P < 0.001); nevirapine, 19% (P < 0.01)], an effect not observed in the abacavir arm. Non-HDL-c levels decreased by 10% in both the abacavir (P = 0.001) and efavirenz (P < 0.05) arms. Significant decreases in the levels of triglycerides occurred for the first year in all treatments; however, at 24 months most of the initial loss had been regained. Patients with baseline moderate or severe lipodystrophy obtained less-pronounced lipid benefits. Several insulin resistance markers showed a trend towards improvement. Conversely, no improvements in morphological abnormalities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacing PI with efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir improved the lipid profile, with more marked results in non-lipodystrophic patients. In contrast, this strategy does not seem to be effective for reversing body fat abnormalities.

Patrón epidemiológico de la infección por el VIH en 15 hospitales españoles: casos de nuevo diagnóstico incluidos en la cohorte VACH en 2001 y 2002

BACKGROUND

Studying the changing trends of HIV epidemics is a useful means of evaluating the results of current preventive plans as well as of defining future needs and objectives.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of the newly-diagnosed cases of HIV infection included in the Spanish VACH cohort. New HIV cases were defined as those diagnosed between January 2001 and December 2002. Their epidemiologic characteristics were compared with those of patients included in the same cohort who had been diagnosed between January 1998 and December 2000.

RESULTS

We studied 603 new cases (27% women). In 146 (24.4%) HIV infection had been acquired by sharing material for intravenous drug use (IVDU), 171 (28,6%) were men who had had sex with other men (MSM) and 247 (41.3%) acknowledged some risk for heterosexual HIV transmission. The median age was 36 years (range: 18-80). Only 1.5% of the patients were younger than 20 years while 32.1% were older than 40 years. This percentage was significantly higher than that corresponding to 1998-2000 (27.5%; p < 0,05). HIV infection was diagnosed simultaneously with an AIDS-defining condition in 13.3% of patients and an AIDS-defining disease was diagnosed in the first month after HIV-diagnosis in another 40 patients (6.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm the trends observed in previous studies: a growing proportion of newly diagnosed cases among women, a decreasing proportion of IVDU, a growth of MSM, and a trend toward diagnosis at a later age.

Evaluation of a latex agglutination test (KAtex) for detection of Leishmania antigen in urine of patients with HIV-Leishmania coinfection: value in diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up

The usefulness of antigen detection in urine as an alternative tool for diagnosis of leishmaniasis and post-treatment follow-up in patients with Leishmania-HIV coinfection was evaluated with a latex agglutination test (KAtex; Kalon Biological, UK). Forty-nine HIV-infected patients with visceral leishmaniasis were included in the study. Antigen detection in urine (ADU) was positive in 42 of 49 (sensitivity, 85.7%) samples obtained during a primary episode. After treatment, a follow-up study in 23 patients was performed by simultaneous ADU and culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in 148 determinations. The two methods gave concordant results in 94 cases, 38 of which were positive and 56 negative. In five cases, ADU was negative and culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was positive: two of these cases corresponded to clinical relapses. In 49 cases, culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was negative and ADU was positive. In the absence of clinical symptoms, the detection of parasite antigens in 71 of 130 (54.6%) urine samples was not associated with clinical disease. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of relapse at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 16% (95%CI, 15-17%), 20% (95%CI, 18-22%), 31% (95%CI, 27-35%), and 71% (95%CI, 52-89%), respectively, in patients with a positive ADU result. In contrast, when ADU was negative, the probability of relapse was 5% at 6 months (95%CI, 2-8%) (only 2 of 11 patients who relapsed had a negative test). ADU by KAtex is appropriate for primary diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis, for monitoring the efficacy of treatment, and for detection of subclinical infection.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily combination therapy with didanosine, lamivudine and nevirapine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

Simplified antiretroviral regimens are needed to improve patient adherence and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a once-daily regimen consisting of didanosine (ddI), lamivudine (3TC) and nevirapine (NVP) for adult antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV-1 infection.

METHODS

This was a prospective, one-arm, multicentre pilot study. Daily drug dosage was 250 or 400 mg didanosine, 300mg lamivudine and 400 mg nevirapine. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with a plasma HIV-RNA level <50 copies/ml at 12 months on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled in the study. At baseline, mean plasma HIV-1 RNA was 5.10log10 copies/ml, and mean CD4 cell count was 262 cells/microl. At month 12, 67% (95% CI: 56-78) of patients maintained a viral load of <50 copies/ml in the ITT analysis and CD4 counts increased a median of 201 cells/microl. The treatment was more effective in patients with baseline CD4 counts >100 cells/microl than in those with a poorer immunological status at baseline, although the number of patients with CD4 counts <100 was low. Four patients died during the study period. Therapy was discontinued in 18 patients due to virological failure in 11, adverse events in seven, loss to follow-up or withdrawal of consent in four and death in one. Eight out of nine patients with available genotype after virological failure showed resistance mutations to NVP (Y181C and others) and 3TC (M184V/I), and four of them also had ddI resistance (L74V). The lipid profile was favourable, with a decrease in the ratio of total-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

A once-daily combination of ddI, 3TC and NVP seems to be an effective, safe and easy-to-take regimen in antiretroviral-naive patients, at least in those who do not have severe immunodepression at baseline.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of a double-boosting regimen of saquinavir soft gel plus lopinavir plus minidose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults

Management of treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus patients has become complex, and therapy may need to include two protease inhibitors at therapeutic doses. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics in serum of saquinavir (1,000 mg twice daily [b.i.d.]), lopinavir (400 mg b.i.d.), and ritonavir (100 mg b.i.d.) in a multidrug rescue therapy study and to investigate whether steady-state pharmacokinetics of lopinavir-ritonavir are affected by coadministration of saquinavir. Forty patients were included (25 given ritonavir, lopinavir, and saquinavir and 15 given ritonavir and lopinavir). The median pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir were as follows: area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), 85.1 microg/ml . h; maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), 10.0 microg/ml; trough concentration of drug in serum (C(trough)), 7.3 microg/ml; and minimum concentration of drug in serum (C(min)), 5.5 microg/ml. Lopinavir concentrations were similar in patients with and without saquinavir. The median pharmacokinetic parameters for saquinavir were as follows: AUC(0-12), 22.9 microg/ml . h; C(max), 2.9 microg/ml; C(trough), 1.6 microg/ml; and C(min), 1.4 microg/ml. There was a strong linear correlation between lopinavir and ritonavir and between saquinavir and ritonavir concentrations in plasma. The correlation between lopinavir and saquinavir levels was weaker. We found higher saquinavir concentrations in women than in men, with no difference in lopinavir levels. Only patients with very high body weight presented lopinavir and saquinavir concentrations lower than the overall group. Ritonavir has a double-boosting function for both lopinavir and saquinavir, and in terms of pharmacokinetics, the drug doses selected seemed appropriate for combining these agents in a dual protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimen for patients with several prior virologic failures.

Failure of Cetirizine to Prevent Nevirapine-Associated Rash

OBJECTIVES

Rash is the most frequent adverse event associated with nevirapine. The use of antihistamines remains unclear in this setting. A double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of cetirizine in the prevention of nevirapine rash.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with cetirizine (10 mg/d x 30 days) was conducted. Inclusion criteria were HIV-1 infection and nevirapine therapy started with any CD4 cell count or plasma viral load and without simultaneous use of abacavir, cotrimoxazole, or rifampin. Clinical follow-up was performed at 15, 30, and 90 days.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventeen evaluable patients were enrolled (107 patients receiving cetirizine and 110 patients receiving placebo), 32.3% of whom were women. The median baseline CD4 cell count and plasma viral load were 341 cells/mm and 11,000 copies/mL, respectively. Overall, 29 rashes (13.4%) were detected: 16 (15.0%) in the cetirizine group and 13 (11.8%) in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-2.88; P = 0.50). The incidence of moderate to severe rashes leading to nevirapine withdrawal was 10.3% (11 of 107 patients) in the cetirizine group and 7.3% (8 of 110 patients) in the placebo group (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 0.52-4.18; P = 0.43). Adverse events leading to withdrawal of therapy appeared in 14 patients (13.1%) from the cetirizine group and 10 (9.1%) from the placebo group (P = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

Cetirizine does not prevent the incidence or affect the severity of nevirapine-associated rash.

Nevirapine-containing regimens in HIV-infected naive patients with CD4 cell counts of 200 cells/microl or less

We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of nevirapine-containing regimens in 118 naive patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy with CD4 cell counts S 200 cells/jl. After 24 months, 51% of patients continued nevirapine, 43 and 83% had viral loads < 50 copies/ml by intent-to-treat and on-treatment analyses, and a mean increase of +246 CD4 cells/microl occurred. More than 80% of patients who continued with nevirapine had viral loads < 50 copies/ml and CD4 cell counts > 200 cells/pl.