Serum Heparin-binding Epidermal Growth Factor-like Growth Factor (HB-EGF) as a Biomarker for Primary Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal malignancy among gynaecological cancers. Although many anticancer agents have been developed for the treatment of ovarian cancer, it continues to have an extremely poor prognosis. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like grown factor (HB-EGF) has been reported to be a rational therapeutic target for ovarian cancer. Here, we evaluated the clinical significance of serum HB-EGF by examining the association between prognosis and serum HB-EGF levels in patients with primary ovarian cancer. We found that high serum HB-EGF concentrations were significantly associated with poor prognosis in a combined cohort of patients with all stages of ovarian cancer, as well as in a subset of patients with advanced disease. In addition, serum HB-EGF levels increased as the cancer advanced. These data suggest that serum HB-EGF may be a target for the design of novel therapies for ovarian cancer.

Physical implementation of oblivious transfer using optical correlated randomness

We demonstrate physical implementation of information-theoretic secure oblivious transfer based on bounded observability using optical correlated randomness in semiconductor lasers driven by common random light broadcast over optical fibers. We demonstrate that the scheme can achieve one-out-of-two oblivious transfer with effective key generation rate of 110 kb/s. The results show that this scheme is a promising approach to achieve information-theoretic secure oblivious transfer over long distances for future applications of secure computation such as privacy-preserving database mining, auctions and electronic-voting.

Impact of Patient Age on the Postoperative Survival in Pancreatic Head Cancer

BACKGROUND

Some reports have stated that pancreatoduodenectomy for elderly patients have comparable morbidity and mortality to that of young patients. However, the long-term outcomes of these patients have not been fully evaluated, especially for pancreatic head cancer.

METHODS

A total of 227 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer between 2007 and 2014 were included. They were stratified according to age: young (<70 years), elderly (70 to <80 years), and very elderly (≥80 years). The short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in terms of morbidity among the three groups. The median disease-free survival times were 15 months in the young, 11 months in the elderly, and 7 months in the very elderly. The disease-free survival of the young patients was significantly better than that in both the elderly and the very elderly (p = 0.012 and p = 0.016). The median overall survival times were 30 months in the young, 20 months in the elderly, and 14 months in the very elderly. The overall survival of the young patients was significantly better than that in both the elderly and the very elderly (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001). The difference was marginal between the elderly and the very elderly (p = 0.053). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), age ≥80 years (p = 0.013), lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003), blood transfusion (p = 0.015), and CA 19-9 ≥300 U/ml (p = 0.040) were significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age influenced the survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Gene Expression Profiling of Peripheral Blood From Kidney Transplant Recipients for the Early Detection of Digestive System Cancer

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing cancer in comparison with the general population. To effectively manage post-transplantation malignancies, it is essential to proactively monitor patients. A long-term intensive screening program was associated with a reduced incidence of cancer after transplantation. This study evaluated the usefulness of the gene expression profiling of peripheral blood samples obtained from kidney transplant patients and adopted a screening test for detecting cancer of the digestive system (gastric, colon, pancreas, and biliary tract).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD

Nineteen patients were included in this study and a total of 53 gene expression screening tests were performed. The gene expression profiles of blood-delivered total RNA and whole genome human gene expression profiles were obtained. We investigated the expression levels of 2665 genes associated with digestive cancers and counted the number of genes in which expression was altered. A hierarchical clustering analysis was also performed. The final prediction of the cancer possibility was determined according to an algorithm.

RESULTS

The number of genes in which expression was altered was significantly increased in the kidney transplant recipients in comparison with the general population (1091 ± 63 vs 823 ± 94; P = .0024). The number of genes with altered expression decreased after the induction of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (1484 ± 227 vs 883 ± 154; P = .0439). No cases of possible digestive cancer were detected in this study period.

CONCLUSION

The gene expression profiling of peripheral blood samples may be a useful and noninvasive diagnostic tool that allows for the early detection of cancer of the digestive system.

Updated results from GEST study: a randomized, three-arm phase III study for advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The GEST study showed non-inferiority of S-1 but not superiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine alone for overall survival with the data by the cut-off date of 31st July in 2010 for chemo-naïve patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We considered it important to determine whether S-1 maintains non-inferiority after a long-term follow-up in the GEST study and to obtain a firm positive conclusion. In addition, it may be an interesting challenge to explore the efficacious profile of GS in the long-term follow-up study. Using the data from the follow-up period, background and efficacy in patients from Taiwan and Japan, as well as the rates of tumor shrinkage in locally advanced and metastatic patients (Waterfall plot) were also analyzed.

METHODS

The results of the primary analysis were reconfirmed, and subset analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival was performed based on the overall survival data updated by the cut-off date of 31st July in 2011.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 29.8 months, and 795 deaths occurred (95.6%). The median overall survival was 8.8 months for gemcitabine, 9.7 months for S-1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.17), and 9.9 months for GS (HR 0.91; 97.5% CI 0.75-1.11). In patients with performance status (PS) 0, the median overall survival was 9.8 months for gemcitabine, 10.9 months for S-1, and 10.5 months for GS. In patients with PS 1, the median overall survival was 6.2 months for gemcitabine, 6.3 months for S-1, and 9.6 months for GS.

CONCLUSION

Our survey reconfirmed the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine and showed S-1 can be used as one of the standard treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00498225.

Abstract P2-01-27: Sentinel lymph node biopsy by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with sonazoid in patients with breast cancer - Prospective multicenter study

Background: The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate feasibility of the periareolar injection of contrast agent (Sonazoid (SNZ)) followed by ultrasonography (US) for identification of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer patients with clinically negative node.

Patients and Methods: Patients with T1-2N0M0 breast cancer were recruited in this study. They received the periareolar injection of SNZ followed by US to identify contrast-enhanced SLN. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was done for each CE-SLN. Then, they underwent SLN biopsy with the conventional method, blue dye and/or radiotracer (B/R).

Results: In almost all cases, contrast-enhanced lymphatic vessels were clearly visualized US soon after the periareolar injection of SNZ, and SLN, into which lymphatic flow was draining, was easily identified. The identification rate of SLN was 98% (98/100) by SNZ and 100% (100/100) by B/R. The number of SLNs identified by SNZ (mean per patient, 1.52) was significantly (P &lt; 0.001) lower than that of those by B/R (2.22). Twenty-five patients had at least one metastasis in the SLNs identified by SNZ and/or B/R. In these patients, SLNs (n=39) identified by both SNZ and B/R showed a significantly (P &lt; 0.0001) higher positivity (74.4%) for metastases than those (n=19) identified by B/R alone (21.1%).

Conclusion: Identification of SLN by periareolar injection of SNZ followed by US is a technically easy method and the identification rate of SLN was as high as 98%, being comparable to the conventional B/R. SLNs detected by SNZ seem to represent the true SLNs which first receive lymphatic flow from the tumor among the SLNs detected by B/R.

Citation Format: Shimazu K, Ito T, Uji K, Miyake T, Motomura K, Noguchi S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with sonazoid in patients with breast cancer - Prospective multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-27.