Rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in adult renal transplantation

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) and horse antithymocyte globulin (horse ATG) are the polyclonal antithymocyte agents available for use in solid organ transplantation in the United States. Horse ATG is indicated for induction immunosuppression and for treatment of acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation; rATG is indicated for treatment of acute rejection only. However, rATG is commonly used in clinical practice as an induction immunosuppressive agent, instigating many questions regarding appropriate dosing, tolerability, safety, and efficacy. Available evidence supports the use of rATG as an induction agent in adult renal transplant recipients. The use of this product for induction therapy has been studied in conjunction with a full-dose, triple-therapy maintenance regimen (sequential quadruple immunosuppression) consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antimetabolite, and corticosteroids. Rabbit ATG has a proven safety and efficacy profile both as treatment of acute rejection and as induction therapy in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. The most common adverse events associated with rATG are cytokine release syndrome, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia. Results of early studies showed an increased rate of cytomegalovirus disease associated with rATG treatment, but recent studies indicate that routine administration of modern antiviral prophylaxis can reduce this risk. Current practice with rATG is evolving to minimize lifelong exposure to calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids.

The role of basiliximab induction therapy in organ transplantation

Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to the alpha-subunit (CD25) of IL-2 receptors on the surface of activated T lymphocytes, and is a highly effective prophylaxis agent against rejection in organ transplant recipients. Its pharmacokinetic profile is characterized by a biphasic and slow clearance with long terminal half-life and a volume of distribution within the central compartment and outside the circulatory system. Basiliximab induction demonstrated an excellent safety profile, with no increase in the incidence of malignancy, infections or death. It has also been used effectively in high-risk recipients, steroid-sparing and steroid-minimization protocols, and in post-transplant patients with renal dysfunction who would benefit from delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors. Basiliximab induction therapy given at days 0 and 4 after transplantation appears to be safe and cost-effective for immunoprophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients, specifically in kidney and liver transplantation, when given in conjunction with dual or triple immunosuppressive therapy.

Infectious complications after kidney transplantation: current epidemiology and associated risk factors

BACKGROUND

The impact of newer immunosuppressive and antimicrobial prophylactic agents on the pattern of infectious complications following kidney transplantation has not been well studied.

METHODS

This is an observational study in 127 adult recipients transplanted from 2001 to 2004. Patients received thymoglobulin (ATG) (50%) or basiliximab (50%) for induction and were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil, either tacrolimus (73%) or sirolimus (SRL) (27%), and prednisone (79%). Antimicrobial prophylaxis included perioperative cefazolin, trimethoprim/sulfamethaxazole for six months, valganciclovir for three months and nystatin for two months. Regression models were used to examine the association of various factors with infections.

RESULTS

We observed 127 infections in 65 patients, consisting of urinary tract infection (UTI) (47%), viral infections (17%), pneumonia (8%) and surgical wound infections (7%). UTI was the most common infection in all post-transplant periods. Enterococcus spp. (33%) and Escherichia coli (21%) were the most prevalent uropathogens. Of six patients with cytomegalovirus infection, none had tissue-invasive disease. There were no cases of pneumocystis pneumonia or BK nephropathy. Six patients developed fungal infections. Two deaths due to disseminated Rhizopus and Candida albicans accounted for a 1.5% infection-related mortality. Retransplantation and ureteral stents were independently associated with UTI (OR=4.5 and 2.9, p=0.06 and 0.03, respectively), as were ATG and SRL with bacterial infections (OR=3.3 and 2.5, p=0.009 and 0.047, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the use of newer immunosuppressive agents in recent years is associated with some changes in the epidemiology of post-transplant infections. Enterococci have become the predominant uropathogen. Invasive fungal infections, although rare, are often fatal.

[Clinical effect of induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies after deceased-donor kidney transplantation (an experience from Vilnius Center)]

We aimed at evaluating the impact of monoclonal antibodies on immune response against deceased-donor kidney transplant: the frequency and severity of acute rejection episodes during first 3 months after transplantation and graft loss rate at one year. The frequency of infectious complications during the first 6 months after transplantation and patient survival rate during one year were also analyzed. Our study included 187 deceased-donor renal transplants performed in Santariskes Clinics of Vilnius University Hospital from January 2000 to December 2004. Study group (Group 1) consisted of 66 patients who received additional induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies (31 patients treated with basiliximab and 35 patients treated with daclizumab); 121 patients in control group (Group 2) were treated only with conventional immunosuppression. Both groups received maintenance immunosuppressive therapy including cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. There were no significant differences in the age of patients, HLA mismatches, percentages of highly sensitized patients (panel-reactive antibody level more than 50%), and repeated transplantation between both groups. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (15.2% vs. 28.1%, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in patient survival rates (95.5% vs. 90.1%) between two groups at one year, but graft survival rate was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (94.0% vs. 77.0%, P<0.05). The proportion of patients with infectious complications during the first 6 months after transplantation was significantly lower in study group than in control group (33.3% vs. 49.6%, P<0.05). Therefore, induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection in early period after transplantation and led to higher graft survival rate. The lower frequency of infectious complications was observed in patients receiving induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies.

Influence of basiliximab induction therapy on long term outcome after liver transplantation, a prospectively randomised trial

BACKGROUND

In OLT induction therapy with interleukin-2-receptor antibodies is often applied as part of the standard immunosuppression protocol. It was the aim of this study to determine if Basilixirnab mduction therapy serves to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes and improves graft function and survival in the long term after OLT.

MATERIAL/METHODS

We prospectively analysed 99 patients transplanted at our institution (1997-2000). Patients were randomised to two study groups: 51 patients received Basiliximab induction combined with Calcineurin inhibitors and steroids, 48 patients received CNIs and steroids only. Incidence and severity of rejection, graft and patient survival and intensity of long-term immunosuppression were analysed. Frequency of CNI and steroid induced adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

In our patient collective we could not detect a significant impact of Basiliximab induction therapy on the fre queny of acute or chronic rejection. CNI levels were almost identical in both groups; graft and patient survival rates were not influenced by the application of induction therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In our patient collective induction therapy does not have a general positive influence on the post transplant course. A slight improvement in long term renal function could be detected for Basiliximab treated patients.

Long-term results of monoclonal anti-Il2-receptor antibody versus polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies as induction therapy in renal transplantation

We compared the influence of induction therapy on 5-year patient and graft survival as well as on renal function in 100 kidney graft recipients at low immunological risk treated with antilymphocyte globulin (n = 50) versus anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody (n = 50) in a prospective multicenter study. Long-term immunosuppressive treatment included cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and a short course of steroids in all patients. Five year graft (86% vs 86%) and patient (94% vs 94%) survivals were identical in both study arms. Moreover, neither serum creatinine or proteinuria were significantly different between the two groups. Our results showed that the choice of the induction therapy seemed to not have a major impact on long-term outcomes among renal recipients at low immunological risk.

Early steroid withdrawal protocol with basiliximab, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal-transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

Adverse effects of steroids have led to efforts to minimize their use in recipients of organ transplants. This study evaluated an early steroid withdrawal protocol including basiliximab, cyclosporine (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal-transplant recipients.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and April 2005, our early steroid withdrawal protocol was used in 130 patients who underwent renal transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of CsA (6-8 mg/kg), MMF (2 g/kg) and methylprednisolone (MP); basiliximab was given as induction therapy (steroid withdrawal group). MP was administered in a dose of 500 mg or 250 mg at renal transplantation; thereafter, the dose was rapidly tapered and MP was withdrawn on day 14 post-transplant.

RESULTS

The incidence of acute rejection in the steroid withdrawal group was similar to that in the conventional steroid treatment group (without basiliximab) (18% vs. 21%). The severity of rejection episodes was similar in the two groups. Patient and graft survivals were 100% and 97% in the steroid withdrawal group. In 80 of the 130 patients (62%) in the steroid withdrawal group, MP was successfully withdrawn, with good allograft function during follow-up. In the other 50 patients (38%), MP was reinitiated because of acute rejection or other reasons. The success rate of steroid withdrawal 12 months after transplantation in recipients of ABO-compatible grafts was significantly higher than that in recipients of ABO-incompatible grafts (66% vs. 44%). The dose of MMF during the 12 months after renal transplantation was significantly lower in steroid reinitiated group than in the successful withdrawn group (p<0.05). Patients in the successful withdrawn group showed metabolic benefits such as lower cholesterol levels as compared with the steroid reinitiated group.

CONCLUSION

Although further follow-up is necessary to confirm our results, our protocol successfully permitted the early withdrawal of steroids in 62% of renal-transplant recipients, with no resumption of steroid treatment during 3 years of follow-up.

[The safety and efficacy of basiliximab as induction agent in preventing early acute rejection in Chinese cardiac transplantation receipts]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of basiliximab as induction agent in preventing early acute rejection post heart transplantation.

METHODS

Basiliximab (20 mg, iv) was administered one hour before and 4 days post operation to patients (n = 47) underwent heart transplantation between June 2004 and Feb 2005 in our department. Intravenous methylprednisolone (500 mg at operation beginning and repeated immediately post operation, followed by 125 mg every 8 hours for the first day). Prednisone was then initiated at 1 mg.kg(-1).d(-1) tapered 10 mg every 3 days to 10 mg/d. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 0.5 - 1.0 g twice daily) was also administered post intubation, oral Cyclosporine A (CsA, 3 to 6 mg.kg(-1).d(-1)) was prescribed after transplantation if serum creatinine was < 150 micromol/L. The dose of CsA was individually adjusted to achieve a target serum concentration of 180 - 300 ng/ml. Endomyocardial biopsies were performed 3 weeks (19.7 +/- 9.6) d post heart transplantation. Biopsy specimens were graded according to the standardized criteria of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Echocardiograms were routinely performed weekly within the first 3 weeks post-operation.

RESULTS

All 47 consecutive patients [mean age (44.9 +/- 13.4) years, range 13 - 63 years, 38 men] survived the operation and the underlying diseases was idiopathic cardiomyopathy (42.5%), ischemic heart disease (25.5%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (17.0%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (4.2%), heart tumor (4.25%), valve heart disease (2.1%), hypertensive cardiomyopathy (2.1%) and giant cell myocarditis (2.1%). There were 4 patients with pre-operation PRA > 10% and CDC was less than 5% in all patients. The grades of the acute rejection in biopsy specimens were as follow: Grade (G) 0 in 30 (63.8%), G IA in 11 (23.4%), G IB in 3 (6.3%) and GII in 3 (6.3%) patients. The average dose of MMF was (1.2 +/- 0.3) g/d. The initial time of receiving CsA was (3.4 +/- 2.1) day post operation. The average cumulative dose of CsA was (4.1 +/- 1.2) mg.kg(-1).d(-1) before endomyocardial biopsy. The average serum concentration of CsA was (237.0 +/- 76.2) ng/ml. Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by echocardiogram was normal in all patients within the first 3 weeks. Five patients suffered from respiratory infections and recovered post antibiotic and symptomatic therapies.

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab as induction agent in combination with conventional triple immunosuppressive therapy is safe and effective in preventing acute rejection in Chinese cardiac transplantation receipts.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy reduces the frequency of acute rejection and delayed graft function after transplantation. A rabbit antithymocyte polyclonal antibody or basiliximab, an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, is most commonly used for induction.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, international study, we compared short courses of antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab in patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor. Patients taking cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone were randomly assigned to receive either rabbit antithymocyte globulin (1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight daily, 141 patients) during transplantation (day 0) and on days 1 through 4 or basiliximab (20 mg, 137 patients) on days 0 and 4. The primary end point was a composite of acute rejection, delayed graft function, graft loss, and death.

RESULTS

At 12 months, the incidence of the composite end point was similar in the two groups (P=0.34). The antithymocyte globulin group, as compared with the basiliximab group, had lower incidences of acute rejection (15.6% vs. 25.5%, P=0.02) and of acute rejection that required treatment with antibody (1.4% vs. 8.0%, P=0.005). The antithymocyte globulin group and the basiliximab group had similar incidences of graft loss (9.2% and 10.2%, respectively), delayed graft function (40.4% and 44.5%), and death (4.3% and 4.4%). Though the incidences of all adverse events, serious adverse events, and cancers were also similar between the two groups, patients receiving antithymocyte globulin had a greater incidence of infection (85.8% vs. 75.2%, P=0.03) but a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (7.8% vs. 17.5%, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor, induction therapy consisting of a 5-day course of antithymocyte globulin, as compared with basiliximab, reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection but not the incidence of delayed graft function. Patient and graft survival were similar in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00235300 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Effective Immunoprophylaxis With Basiliximab Plus Triple Therapy in Renal Transplantation: Five-Year Single-Center Experience

We studied prospectively the efficacy and safety of basiliximab combined with triple immunosuppression in adult recipients of > or = 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. All studied patients received equal immunosuppressive drugs: 20 mg infusion of basiliximab on day 0 and on day 4, cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, safety of this therapy, renal graft function, and patient and graft survivals. One hundred seventy-two patients were studied. The HLA-antigen mismatches were 2.9 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SD), and the cold ischemia time was 22.0 +/- 7.5 hours. Fifty-three (31.5%) patients experienced delayed graft function. At 12 months, 5 (3.0%) patients experienced acute rejection. Six renal grafts were lost, but not from rejection. Two patients died. Sixty-six infections required treatment in the hospital. One carcinoma of cervix (in situ) and two basal cell carcinomas of skin were detected. Hypersensitivity reactions and cytokine-release syndrome were not observed. At 12 months, serum creatinine was significantly higher (119 +/- 46 micromol/L; P < .001) in patients with delayed graft function than in patients with immediate graft function (99 +/- 26 micromol/L). Patient and graft survivals were 98.8% and 97.1%, respectively. Basiliximab combined with this triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with very low incidence of acute rejections, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high short-term survival rates in adult recipients of deceased donor renal transplant.

Basiliximab Versus Rabbit Anti-thymocyte Globulin for Induction Therapy in Patients After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The use of basiliximab or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG) for induction therapy has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes post-transplantation. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of basiliximab vs RATG in a population of adult heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

We retrospective analyzed the safety and efficacy of basiliximab compared with RATG among 48 adult heart transplant recipients at our center. Twenty-five patients received basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4 after heart transplantation), and 23 patients received RATG (1.5 mg/kg for 3 days). A standard triple-drug immunosuppression regimen was administered to all patients.

RESULTS

The average biopsy score (ABS) at 1 month was 0.79 +/- 0.18 in the Basiliximab Group vs 0.47 +/- 0.2 in the RATG group (p = 0.023) and at 3 months was 0.75 +/- 0.24 in the Basiliximab Group vs 0.46 +/- 0.12 in the RATG Group (p = 0.032). At 6 months after transplantation, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (0.97 +/- 0.23 vs 0.58 +/- 0.17, p = .14). At 12 months the ABS was 0.85 +/- 0.4 in the Basiliximab Group vs 0.63 +/- 0.15 in the RATG Group (p = 0.12), and the number of episodes of infection was similar in both groups (19 vs 26; p = 0.16). There was no correlation between cumulative cyclosporine doses and rejection. Creatinine clearance levels were not statistically different between groups at baseline and up to 12 months after heart transplantation. Three patients died in the Basiliximab Group, and 2 patients died in the RATG Group.

CONCLUSIONS

Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin is more effective than basiliximab for prevention of rejection episodes after heart transplantation. Both induction agents provide similar safety profile.

Is the Determination of the Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor after Application of Interleukin-2 Receptor Antibodies Still Appropriate for Immunological Monitoring after Renal Transplantation?

INTRODUCTION

The use of monoclonal antibodies against the alpha-chain of the membrane-bound interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha) as immune suppressants causes characteristic changes in the levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) in serum and urine.

METHODS

38 kidney transplant patients were included in this study. 28 of them received an induction therapy with the IL-2R antibody basiliximax (Simulect) in addition to standard immunosuppression, 10 patients constituted the control group.

RESULTS

Time courses of sIL-2R levels of Simulect patients with and without complications after transplantation have been compared. It turned out that of a total of 18 cases with complications 15 cases could be identified by their elevated sIL-2R levels, which corresponds to a sensitivity of 83%.

CONCLUSION

Acute rejection, CMV infection, extrarenal bacterial infection and pyelonephritis in the transplant all cause a significant increase of the sIL-2R level even after application of Simulect.

Living Donor Islet Transplantation, the Alternative Approach to Overcome the Obstacles Limiting Transplant

We performed the world's first successful living donor islet transplantation for unstable diabetes. A total of 408,114 islet equivalents were isolated from half a living pancreas and transplanted immediately to the recipient who was a 27-year-old female. The donor was a 56-year-old female in good health, mother of the recipient. The islets functioned immediately, and the recipient was weaned completely from insulin on the 22nd posttransplant day, and has maintained excellent glycemic control since. The donor was discharged on the 18th postoperative day with normal oral glucose tolerance test and without complications. Living donor islet transplantation could cure one insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients with a single donor. There are some advantages in the living donor islet transplantation: (a) living donor can alleviate the issue of donor shortage; (b) highly potent islets can be isolated from a living donor; and (c) the recipient can be treated with immunosuppressant and controlled blood glucose level tightly prior to the transplantation. These are important factors in overcoming the obstacles limiting islet transplantation. We believe that the living donor islet transplantation may become an additional option in treating insulin-dependent diabetes.

Two-dose basiliximab compared with two-dose daclizumab in renal transplantation: a clinical study

BACKGROUND

Addition of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists basiliximab or daclizumab to a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen significantly reduces risk of acute rejection with a tolerability profile similar to a placebo. Use of a truncated two-dose regimen of daclizumab has been reported, but till date, there has been no controlled study of two-dose daclizumab vs. two-dose basiliximab.

METHODS

Deceased-donor renal transplant recipients were randomized to basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4) or daclizumab (50 mg on days 1 and 14) with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Flow cytometry was used to calculate the proportion of CD25(+) T cells in peripheral blood.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were randomized to basiliximab and 28 to daclizumab. There was one patient death in each group, with no other graft losses. By six months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 0% with basiliximab vs. 21.4% with daclizumab (p < 0.05). Three patients in the daclizumab group required OKT3 for steroid-resistant rejection. There were no between-group differences in the incidence of infection. The proportion of CD25(+) T cells declined markedly during the first two wk in both groups, but was significantly lower in the basiliximab group during weeks six to eight.

CONCLUSION

Two doses of basiliximab are more effective than two 1 mg/kg doses of daclizumab in preventing acute rejection in de novo renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroid maintenance therapy. In patients receiving relatively low-level immunosuppression in order to minimize toxicity, basiliximab may be preferable to a truncated daclizumab regimen.

Effect of Basiliximab on Renal Allograft Rejection Within 1 Year After Transplantation

Basiliximab is widely used in clinical practice for initial immunosuppressive treatment of renal transplant recipients, seeking to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes without adverse events. This retrospective study included 123 renal allograft recipients transplanted at a single center. All were followed for longer than 1 year after transplantation and treated with calcineurin inhibitor and steroid (methylprednisolone) for prophylactic immunosuppression, but basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil were optional. We compared the outcomes of renal transplant recipients who were versus treated were not with basiliximab as initial immunosuppressive therapy. Basiliximab was used for initial immunosuppression in 42 patients. Their maintenance immunosuppressive treatment included triple (n = 44) or double (n = 79) regimens, including a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine [n = 87] or tacrolimus [n = 36]), methylprednisolone with or without mycophenolate mofetil. Twenty-six (21.1%) patients had a rejection episode within 1 year after transplantation and 22 (17.9%) had infections. Within the first year after transplantation the patients who were treated with basiliximab showed fewer rejection episodes (n = 6, 14.3%) than the patients without this therapy (n = 20, 24.7%), which was not statistically significant (P = .245). However, basiliximab significantly affected the occurrence of rejection episodes among the double immunosuppressive regimen group (P = .006), but not the triple regimen group (P = .098) without an impact on infection episodes (P value of double, triple = .291, .414) within 1 year after transplantation. We concluded that basiliximab was more useful for the recipients treated with double immunosuppression with a calcineurin inhibitor and steroid than for those on a triple regimen including mycophenolate mofetil.

[Clinical study on haploid HLA-matched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of malignant hematological disease]

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the most effective method to treat malignant hematological disease. However the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors can be found for only 25%-30% patients. The probability of finding an unrelated matched donor is 1/50000-1/100000, or even lower. If we choose haploid HLA-matched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation instead, we may be able to find donors for 90% patients. Our present study was to explore the feasibility of allo-HSCT by using haploid HLA-matched donor in treatment for malignant hematological disease.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with malignant hematological disease received allo-HSCT with HLA 2 or 3 antigen mismatched related donors. All patients were treated with intensive immunosuppression, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization, antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and combination of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The conditioning regimen was intensified and prolonged by using the combination of cyclosporine (Cs) A, MMF, ATG and anti-CD25 antibody for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis.

RESULTS

All patients achieved sustained, full donortype engraftment. Acute GVHD occurred in 21 of 25 patients. Eight of them were grade I aGVHD, six grade II aGVHD, two grade III aGVHD and five grade IV aGVHD. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 48%,and grade III-IV aGVHD was 28.57%. Chronic GVHD was observed in 12 of 25 patients and none of them developed extensive cGVHD. Sixteen patients were alive and disease free, with 64.0+/- 2.98% 1 year disease-free survival rate. One year overall survival rate was 64.0+/-3.08%. Nine patients died, 1 from relapse and 8 from transplantation related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Haploid HLA-matched allo-HSCT is a relatively efficient method for the treatment of patients with malignant hematological disease, who have no related matched donors. Nevertheless, strict administration should be carried out since it's a high risk approach.

Randomized trial of basiliximab induction versus steroid therapy in pediatric liver allograft recipients under tacrolimus immunosuppression

Avoidance of corticosteroids could be beneficial after pediatric liver transplantation (LTx). To test this hypothesis, we performed a randomized prospective study to compare immunosuppression with tacrolimus (TAC) and steroids versus TAC and basiliximab (BAS) after pediatric LTx. Seventy-two patients were recruited, 36 receiving TAC and steroids and 36 TAC and BAS. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of the first rejection episode. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidence and severity of rejection, patient and graft survival, and incidence of adverse events. Overall 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 91.4% and 85.5% in the steroid group, and 88.6% and 80% in the BAS group (p = NS). Patients free from rejection were 87.7% in the BAS group and 67.7% in the steroid group (p = 0.036). The use of BAS was associated with a 63.6% reduction in incidence of acute rejection episodes. Overall incidence of infection was 72.3% in the steroid group and 50% in the BAS group (p = 0.035). We conclude that the combination of TAC with BAS is an alternative to TAC and steroid immunosuppression in pediatric LTx, which allows for a significant reduction in the incidence of acute rejection and infectious complications.

Pinpoint targeted immunosuppression: anti-CD20/MMF desensitization with anti-CD25 in successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy

BACKGROUND

In Japan, ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation began in 1989; these transplantations have flourished because of the lack of cadaveric donors, and more than 600 cases were performed up to 2004. Splenectomy has been considered to be necessary for successful ABO-I kidney transplantation, and the majority of pre-conditioning protocols include splenectomy in Japan. However, we have lost some grafts due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) accompanying explosive elevation of anti-A/B antibody (Ab) titer even though the patients had a low pre-operative Ab titer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We utilized two doses of anti-CD20, rituximab, simply combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/low-dose steroid desensitization started 1 month before surgery in ABO-I kidney transplantation. Two sessions of pre-operative Ab removal by double filtration plasmapheresis or plasma exchange were carried out. We performed six ABO-I kidney transplantations without splenectomy. Anti-A/B Ab titers were more than 16 to 32 times before treatment. We did not plan any post-operative repeated Ab removal or intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG).

RESULTS

Pre-operative anti-A/B Ab titers were successfully reduced to less than eight times in all cases. Except for one case in which we had to remove the graft due to aspiration pneumonia and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) sepsis, the other five cases did not experience antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). An additional session of post-operative Ab removal and/or IVIG was not necessary. In all patients, B cells (CD19+, CD20+, CD21+) and activated T cells (CD25+) were selectively suppressed, although CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cell populations remained stable, thus we call our protocol "pinpoint targeted immunosuppression." Plasma immunoglobulin level was also successfully suppressed, especially after 6 weeks of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Anti-CD20/MMF desensitization is safe and allows successful ABO-I kidney transplantation without splenectomy.

A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of tacrolimus-based therapy with or without basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation

In a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of adding basiliximab to a standard tacrolimus-based regimen in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Patients < 18 years received tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (TAS, n = 93) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids/basiliximab (TAS + B, n = 99). Target tacrolimus levels were 10-20 ng/mL between days 0-21 and 5-15 ng/mL thereafter. Steroid dosing was identical in both groups. Basiliximab was administered at 10 mg (patients < 40 kg) or 20 mg (patients > or = 40 kg) within 4 h of reperfusion; the same dose was repeated on day 4. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 20.4% (TAS) and 19.2% (TAS + B); steroid-resistant acute rejection rates were 3.2% and 3.0%, respectively. Patient survival was 100%; graft survival rates were 95% in both arms. The nature and incidence of adverse events were similar in both arms except toxic nephropathy and abdominal pain, which were significantly higher in the TAS + B arm (14.1% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.03 and 11.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.02; respectively). Median serum creatinine concentrations at 6 months were 86 micromol/L in the TAS and 91 micromol/L in the TAS + B arm; glomerular filtration rate was 79.4 and 77.6 (mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively. Adding basiliximab to a tacrolimus-based regimen is safe in pediatric patients, but does not improve clinical efficacy.

A Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Basiliximab and Muromonab (OKT3) in Heart Transplantation: SIMCOR Study

BACKGROUND

Antilymphocytic antibodies have been long used for the prevention of acute rejection early after heart transplantation (HTx), but their adverse effects have limited their widespread use. Our aim was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the novel anti-CD25 antibody basiliximab (BAS) compared with muromonab (OKT3).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter study, 99 patients were randomly assigned to receive either BAS or OKT3 in the early post-HTx period. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Specific safety variables were predefined for a better comparison of adverse effects. Secondary endpoints concerning anti-rejection efficacy were also evaluated.

RESULTS

No adverse events related to study medication were found in the BAS group, whereas 23 were observed among patients receiving OKT3 (P<0.0001). The proportion of patients with predefined adverse events day 4 post-HTx was much higher with OKT3 than with BAS (43% vs. 4%; P<0.0001). Fever, acute pulmonary edema, hypotension, and other complications accounted for most of the difference. At 1-year follow-up, biopsy-proven rejection episodes grade>or=3A had occurred in 39.6% of BAS patients versus 40.4% of OKT3 patients (P=0.87). There were no differences in terms of severity and timing of acute rejection episodes. The number of infectious episodes, complications not related to study medication, and actuarial survival were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In this HTx study, induction therapy with BAS was safer and better tolerated than OKT3, without significant differences in efficacy outcomes.

Acute Rejection Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients on Steroid-Avoidance Immunosuppression Receiving Induction With Either Antithymocyte Globulin or Basiliximab

Immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of corticosteroids, usually with induction therapy, is safe in kidney transplant recipients. In 89 patients, we induced immunosuppression with basiliximab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (17 and 72 patients, respectively). Selection criteria for basiliximab were age (>or=65 years), history (malignancy; chronic infection), and type 1 diabetes mellitus (eligible for pancreas transplant). Steroids were administered through posttransplantation day 4 (five doses); maintenance immunosuppression was with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. At last follow-up (average, 286 days), most patients were steroid-free (antithymocyte globulin, 90%; basiliximab, 88%). Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 4, and 12 months posttransplantation. The overall risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 12%. At 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection-free survival was 93% for antithymocyte globulin, 65% for basiliximab (P<.001). Median time to biopsy-proven acute rejection was 27 and 71 days, respectively. The low incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection with steroid-avoidance immunosuppression may be further reduced with antithymocyte globulin.

Acute rejection after heart transplantation

Acute rejection (AR) seems to be less common with current immunosuppressive strategies; however, it remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the first year following heart transplantation. Despite great interest in noninvasive methods for detecting rejection, the endomyocardial biopsy remains the standard method for AR identification and, recently, the cardiac biopsy grading system has been reviewed. Moreover, the availability of several immunosuppressive drug combinations has generated confusion in the minds of clinicians. This review will focus on recently published studies that are related to the clinical impact of AR, combination regimens of chronic maintenance immunosuppression and specific therapeutic options for treating AR.