SAT0207 ANTI-SSA/RO POSITIVITY AND CONGENITAL HEART BLOCK: OBSTETRIC AND FETAL OUTCOME IN A COHORT OF ANTI-SSA/RO POSITIVE PREGNANT WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASES FROM THREE ITALIAN TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTERS

Background:

neonatal lupus syndrome (NLS) is an acquired disease caused by the trasplacental passage of anti-SSA antibodies. Congenital heart block (CHB) represents the most serious manifestation of NLS. The rate of CHB in Anti-SSA positive pregnant women ranges from 1 to 5% in different studies

Objectives:

to retrospectively assess the prevalence of CHB in a cohort of anti-SSA positive pregnant women followed in 3 Italian tertiary centers

Methods:

pregnancies of anti-SSA positive women attending the pregnancy clinic of ASST Pini CTO/Policlinico Mangiagalli, Rheumatology Division of Spedali Civili, Brescia and Rheumatology Division of Ospedale S Matteo, Pavia from 2009 to 2019 were included. Patients underwent monthly clinical examination. Fetal heart rate was assessed weekly by Doppler ultrasound from 14thto 26thgestational week. On week 14 and 26, a fetal echocardiography was performed. A EKG was performed at birth

Results:

351 prospectively followed pregnancies in 292 anti-SSA/Ro positive women were included. Table 1 reports diagnosis. None of the prospectively followed pregnancies were complicated by complete CHB. Seven additional patients were referred to our clinics after diagnosis of CHB and were subsequently found to be anti-SSA positive, reporting no symptoms of diseases. Considering the 7 additional pregnancies, the incidence of CHB was 1.9%. We observed 3 neonates (0.8%) with cutaneous NLS and 1 case of transient increase of liver enzymes. In another neonate, a 1thdegree A-V block was found after birth. A complete analysis of maternal and fetal outcome was possible in 244 cases (Table 2) and compared with 3158 unselected healthy controls. Among these 244 cases, 65% were taking hydroxychloroquine

Table 1.

patients diagnosis

n%Sjogren’s Syndrome58`20Systemic lupus erythematosus7626UCTD7425Asymptomatic Ro carriers5619Other2810292100Table 2.

maternal and fetal outcome

healthy controls N=3158Anti-SSA/Ro ptsN=244P valuePrevious CHB n (%)2 (0.8)Anti-SSB pos n (%)46 (18.8)aPL pos n (%)49 (20)PregnancyLive births3158241Preeclampsia, n (%)43 (1.1)2 (0.8)nsDeliveryDelivery <37 wks, n (%) / < 34 wks n (%)401 (12.6) /201 (6)35 (15.6) / 14 (6)ns / nsCesarean Section, n (%)897 (29.3)115 (47.5)<0.001

Conclusion:

none of the patients prospectively followed in our centers before and during pregnancy developed complete CHB. If the 7 cases of anti-SSA positivity diagnosed after CHB detection were included in the analysis, the incidence of CHB was comparable to previous reports. Our data suggest that a strict follow up and proper treatment of anti-SSA positive patients with or without an autoimmune disease before and during pregnancy can reduce the risk of NLS. Further studies are warranted to confirm a possible protective role of anti-rheumatic treatments, including HCQ

References:

[1]Fredi M. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019

Disclosure of Interests:

Maria Gerosa: None declared, Micaela Fredi: None declared, Laura Andreoli: None declared, Cecilia Chighizola: None declared, Lorenza Maria Argolini: None declared, Davide Donzelli: None declared, Tamara Vojinovic: None declared, Véronique Ramoni: None declared, Elisa Bellis: None declared, Laura Trespidi: None declared, Federica Gazzola: None declared, Enrico Ferrazzi: None declared, Sonia Zatti: None declared, Fausta Benvenuti: None declared, Pier Luigi Meroni: None declared, Franco Franceschini: None declared, Carlomaurizio Montecucco: None declared, Rolando Cimaz: None declared, Roberto Caporali Consultant of: AbbVie; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Lilly; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Celgene; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pfizer; UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Lilly; Gilead Sciences, Inc; MSD; Pfizer; Roche; UCB, Angela Tincani: None declared

FRI0167 LONG TERM CLINICAL OUTCOME IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS FOLLOWED FOR MORE THAN 20 YEARS IN THREE ITALIAN TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTERS: THE MILAN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS CONSORTIUM (SMILE) COHORT

Background:

the prognosis of Systemic lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients has significantly improved over time, raising the need for more data about disease activity and damage accrual in the long term.

Objectives:

to investigate the risk of long term disease activity and to identify viable prognostic markers for disease flares in SLE patients with long standing disease

Methods:

data on SLE patients regularly followed at ASST PINI-CTO, Fondazione Ca’ Granda Policlinico and Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (Milan Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Consortium, SMiLE, cohort) with disease duration ≥ 20 years, were retrospectively analyzed. Organ involvement as per the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) definitions was recorded along with achievement of clinical and complete remission (CR and CCR: clinical SLEDAI =0, PGA <0.5 and no prednisone or immunosuppression ± negative serology) and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) at 15 (T15) and 20 (T20) years of follow up. Damage accrual was estimated according to the SLE International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index (SDI).

Results:

data from 168 patients (table 1) were available for analysis. Remission (CR+CCR) and LLDAS were achieved in 22% and 61% at T15 and 25% and 71% at T20. LLDAS was not associated with a history of involvement in any BILAG domain, but it was inversely associated with treatment with mycophenolate at any time (50 vs 23% treated vs not treated; p=0.02). SDI>0 was found in 49% patients at T15 and in 71% at T20. LLDAS at T15 was associated with lower flare rates in the following five years (HR= 0.395, 95%, CI=0.239-0.653; Figure, left panel; p<0.001). The risk of flaring for LLDAS was largely comparable to CCR and CR (Figure, middle panel). In the T15-T20 timeframe, 37% of patients had a flare. Patients with both low complement and anti-dsDNA positivity at T15 had an increased risk of flaring compared to serologically inactive patients (HR=2.86, 95%, CI=1.572-5.19; Figure right panel). Flaring patients were more likely to show an increase in SDI from T15 to T20 (37% vs 9% in patients with stable SDI; p<0.001)

Table 1.

Demographic, laboratory and clinical characteristics of patients with SLE

Characteristics(n=168)Demographic characteristicsFemale, n (%)150 (89.3)Age at diagnosis years, median (IQR)24 (18-32)Clinical and serological features during 15 years follow up, n (%)Musculoskeletal140 (83)Mucocutaneous135 (80)Constitutional114 (68)Haematological103 (61)Nephritis81 (48)Cardiopulmonary49 (29)NPSLE31 (18)Positive anti-dsDNA136 (81)Hypocomplementemia136 (81)Positive antiphospholipid73 (44)CR / CCR at T1513 (8) / 23 (14)CR / CCR at T2017 (10) / 25 (15)

Conclusion:

LLDAS is common in SLE patients with long disease duration although up to 37% of patients with 15-year disease duration may experience a flare during the following 5 years. The flare risk increases with failure to attain LLDAS at T15 and with active serology. Late flares associate with damage accrual.

References:

[1]Aringer M, Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; Franklin K, Ann Rheum Dis 2019

Table 2.

therapy during the 20 year follow up

Therapy (ever)%Prednisone83Hydroxychloroquine91Mycophenolate mofetil33Azathioprine50Methotrexate23Cyclophosphamide36Fig 1:

risk of flare according to disease activity

Disclosure of Interests:

Maria Gerosa: None declared, Giuseppe Alvise Ramirez: None declared, Chiara Bellocchi: None declared, Lorenza Maria Argolini: None declared, Luca Moroni: None declared, Martina Cornalba: None declared, Nicola Farina: None declared, Lorenzo Dagna Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, and SOBI, Roberto Caporali Consultant of: AbbVie; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Lilly; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Celgene; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pfizer; UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Lilly; Gilead Sciences, Inc; MSD; Pfizer; Roche; UCB, Enrica Bozzolo: None declared, Lorenzo Beretta Grant/research support from: Pfizer

AB1336-HPR NON-PHARMACOLOGIC TOPICS RELEVANT FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH IN RHEUMATIC DISEASES: THE PATIENT PERSPECTIVE

Background:

The research approach on Rheumatic diseases (RDs) is challenging and patient involvement as partners in medical research is an emerging force to obtain relevant information and to add unique skills, values and experiences to research. Despite growing interest in non-pharmacologic aspects of clinical research in RDs, the patients’ perspective is currently poorly explored.

Objectives:

To identify and rank the priorities for clinical research according to patients’ perspective.

Methods:

A structured face-to-face meeting between physicians and a patient representative was convened to list the non-pharmacologic topics relevant to RD patients. A cross-sectional no-profit on-line anonymous survey was devised to evaluate opinions of RD patients. They were asked to rate the following topics: food/nutrition, air pollution, smoking, work activity, social participation, physical activity, emotional well-being/stress, alternative medicine, and patient-physician relationship. Moreover, patients were asked to explain for which reason a topic was considered important (disease prevention, halting disease progression, symptoms control and disease cure). The survey was disseminated by ALOMAR (Lombard Association for Rheumatic Diseases) between June and October 2019.

Results:

200 rheumatic patients completed the survey: 130 inflammatory arthritis, 50 connective tissue diseases/vasculitis, and 20 among osteoarthritis, gout, condrocalcinosis, polymyalgia and primary fibromyalgia. Respondents were 178 female with median age of 50 years and median disease duration of 7 years. Among the nine topics identified, the one most rated by patients was the doctor-patient relationship; 188 (94%) of respondents considered this topic very or extremely important (see table below). In descending order, patients rated very or extremely important: psychological well-being/stress 185 (92.5%), physical activity 155 (77.5%), nutrition, eating habits and alcohol 150 (75%), alternative therapies 144 (72%), work activity 144 (72%), environmental pollution 134 (67%), social life 121 (60.5%) and cigarette smoke 119 (59.5%). The topics considered relevant was perceived to be able to influence disease symptoms. Regarding RD prevention, environmental pollution and cigarette smoking were considered the most important topics, while fewer patients believed that research on other topics could help to stop disease progression or to achieve disease healing.

RankingTopicNot or quite importantVery or extremely important1Doctor-patient relationship, n (%)12 (6.0)188 (94.0)2Psychological well-being/stress, n (%)15 (7.5)185 (92.5)3Physical activity, n (%)45 (22.5)155 (77.5)4Nutrition/eating habits/alcohol, n (%)50 (25.0)150 (75.0)5Alternative therapies, n (%)56 (28.0)144 (72.0)6Work activity, n (%)56 (28.0)144 (72.0)7Environmental pollution, n (%)66 (33.0)134 (67.0)8Social life, n (%)79 (39.5)121 (60.5)9Cigarette smoke, n (%)81 (40.5)119 (59.5)

Conclusion:

This survey highlights the relevance of several unmet needs. The holistic approach, in terms of medical consultation and psychological well-being, is considered the most important component able to influence disease perception. By capturing patient opinions on non-pharmacological topics for clinical research, this survey indicates that the active patient involvement is essential to design successful translational studies and improve clinical outcomes.

Acknowledgments:

We thank the Lombard Association of Rheumatic Diseases (ALOMAR) for its contribution to plan and disseminate the survey and the group that sustain systemic sclerosis (GILS).

Disclosure of Interests:

Francesca Ingegnoli: None declared, Tommaso Schioppo: None declared, Tania Ubiali: None declared, Silvia Ostuzzi: None declared, Massimiliano Buoli: None declared, Valentina Bollati: None declared, Roberto Caporali Consultant of: AbbVie; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Lilly; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Celgene; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pfizer; UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Lilly; Gilead Sciences, Inc; MSD; Pfizer; Roche; UCB

Multicentric study comparing cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in the maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis: 8 years follow up

BACKGROUND

The ideal long-term maintenance therapy of Lupus Nephritis (LN) is still a matter of debate. The present study was aimed at comparing the efficacy/safety profile of cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in long-term maintenance therapy of LN.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven active LN. After induction therapy, all patients received maintenance therapy with CsA, MMF or AZA based on medical decision. Primary endpoint was complete renal remission (CRR) after 8 years (defined as proteinuria < 0.5 g/24 h, eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 mq); secondary endpoints were: CRR after 1 year, renal and extrarenal flares, progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD stage 3 or above) and side-effects.

RESULTS

Out of 106 patients, 34 received CsA, 36 MMF and 36 AZA. Clinical and histological characteristics at start of induction therapy were comparable among groups. At start of maintenance therapy, CsA patients had significantly higher proteinuria (P = 0.004) or nephrotic syndrome (P = 0.024) and significantly lower CRR (23.5% vs 55.5% on MMF and 41.7% on AZA, P = 0.024). At one year, CRR was similar in the three groups (79.4% on CsA, 63.8% on MMF, 58.3% on AZA, P = 0.2). At 8 years, the primary endpoint was achieved by 79.4% of CsA vs 83.3% of MMF and 77.8% of AZA patients (P = 0.83); 24 h proteinuria, serum creatinine, eGFR were similar. CKD stage 3 or above developed in 8.8% of CsA, in 8.3% of MMF and in 8.3% of AZA patients (P = 0.92). Flares-free survival curves and incidence of side-effects were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study comparing CsA, MMF and AZA on long-term LN maintenance therapy. All treatments had similar efficacy in achieving and maintaining CRR, despite more severe baseline clinical features in patients treated with CsA.

COVID-19 infection and rheumatoid arthritis: Faraway, so close!

The outbreak of the new coronavirus infections COVID-19 in December 2019 in China has quickly become a global health emergency. Given the lack of specific anti-viral therapies, the current management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2) is mainly supportive, even though several compounds are now under investigation for the treatment of this life-threatening disease. COVID-19 pandemic is certainly conditioning the treatment strategy of a complex disorder as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), whose infectious risk is increased compared to the general population because of an overall impairment of immune system typical of autoimmune diseases combined with the iatrogenic effect generated by corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs. However, the increasing knowledge about the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection is leading to consider some anti-rheumatic drugs as potential treatment options for the management of COVID-19. In this review we will critically analyse the evidences on either positive or negative effect of drugs commonly used to treat RA in this particular scenario, in order to optimize the current approach to RA patients.

COVID-19 and what pediatric rheumatologists should know: a review from a highly affected country

On March 11th, 2020 the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. The infection, transmitted by 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCov), was first discovered in December 2019, in Wuhan, Hubei Province, and then rapidly spread worldwide. Italy was early and severely involved, with a critical spread of the infection and a very high number of victims. Person-to-person spread mainly occurs via respiratory droplets and contact. The median incubation period is 5 days. The spectrum of respiratory symptoms may range from mild to severe, strictly depending on the age of the patient and the underlying comorbidities.In children COVID-19 related disease is less frequent and less aggressive. In Italy 1% of positive cases are under 18 years of age, and no deaths have been recorded before 29 years of age. For patients affected by rheumatic disease, despite the concerns related to the imbalance of their immune response and the effect of immunosuppressive treatments, there are still few data to understand the real consequences of this infection. Major scientific societies have issued recommendations to help rheumatologists in caring their patients. Interestingly, some of the drugs mostly used by rheumatologists appear to be promising in critical COVID-19 infected patients, where the hyperinflammation and cytokine storm seem to drive to the multiorgan failure.Pediatric rheumatologists are expected to play a supporting role in this new front of COVID-19 pandemic, both as general pediatricians treating infected children, and as rheumatologists taking care of their rheumatic patients, as well as offering their experience in the possible alternative use of immunomodulatory drugs.

Hyaluronic Acid Injections in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Secondary to Primary Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis

The purpose of this study is to review the current literature on the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) specifically applied to the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) secondary to primary inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Osteoarthritis should be carefully considered because it has potentially devastating effects on health-related quality of life. Locally injected HA seems to be an effective treatment for OA but it is not clear how to place this treatment in the context of inflammatory rheumatic disorders. To retrieve relevant articles, we conducted the search through MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases performing the PICO strategy. We finally selected four randomized clinical trials and six observational studies and grouped them in accordance with its main objective within three focuses: the clinical effect of HA therapy in joints without any signs of inflammation, the clinical effects of HA therapy in joints with active synovitis, and the involvement and changes of synovial fluid in the treatment of secondary OA. Our qualitative analysis clearly showed that the current literature is marked by high levels of heterogeneity and therefore difficult to interpret. Therefore, our hypothesis that viscosupplementation should be considered as a treatment for chronic moderate symptomatic OA secondary to inflammatory rheumatic diseases, and not for flares with joint swelling, cannot be definitely supported. Well-designed studies are necessary to definitively clarify the range of application of intra-articular HA injections in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic disorders.

Biologic therapy and spinal radiographic progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: A structured literature review

We aimed to perform a structured literature review of spinal radiographic progression, as assessed by the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) treated with biologic therapy. Searches were limited to English language manuscripts published in the 11 years prior to 9 July 2019. Randomized controlled trials, open-label extensions (OLEs) and observational studies reporting mSASSS progression in patients with AS or nr-axSpA treated with biologics were eligible for inclusion. Bias was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) tool. Among the 322 studies identified in the literature search, 23 (11 OLEs and 12 cohort studies) met the eligibility criteria and were selected for inclusion. Most studies reported mSASSS progression in patients with AS receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment. One study reported mSASSS progression in patients with AS treated with secukinumab, an interleukin-17A inhibitor. The mean (range) MINORS score was 11.3 (7-15) for the 15 noncomparative studies and 15 (12-22) for the 8 comparative studies. Although results of the individual studies were variable, mSASSS progression in patients with AS was generally minimal and slow with long-term TNFi therapy. Moreover, odds ratios for the likelihood of mSASSS progression with/without TNFi favoured TNFi therapy in several of the cohort studies. The rate of mSASSS progression following continuous secukinumab treatment was low and remained stable over 4 years. Of two studies reporting progression in patients with nr-axSpA treated with TNFis, one showed no mSASSS progression; however, the lack of control limited comparative conclusions.

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update

OBJECTIVES

To provide an update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations to account for the most recent developments in the field.

METHODS

An international task force considered new evidence supporting or contradicting previous recommendations and novel therapies and strategic insights based on two systematic literature searches on efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) since the last update (2016) until 2019. A predefined voting process was applied, current levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned and participants ultimately voted independently on their level of agreement with each of the items.

RESULTS

The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 12 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); glucocorticoids (GCs); biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and biosimilar (bs) DMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib). Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering on sustained clinical remission is provided. Cost and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs are addressed. Initially, MTX plus GCs and upon insufficient response to this therapy within 3 to 6 months, stratification according to risk factors is recommended. With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD or JAK inhibitor should be added to the csDMARD. If this fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD is recommended. On sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered, but not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were mostly high.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on the management of RA with respect to benefit, safety, preferences and cost.

Alveolar haemorrhage in ANCA-associated vasculitis: Long-term outcome and mortality predictors

INTRODUCTION

Alveolar haemorrhage (AH) is considered an important cause of morbidity and early mortality in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of outcome in patients with AH-AAV and to evaluate outcome and causes of death in this subset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 29 Italian Centers. Clinicians were asked to recruit all patients diagnosed with AAV-associated AH during the last 10 years, from 2007 to 2016. Univariate and multivariable analysis were performed.

RESULTS

One-hundred and six patients were included (median age at onset of 55 years [IQR 42-67]). The majority were ANCA-positive (PR3 57.1%, MPO 33.7%) and 72.6% had also renal involvement. At presentation, anaemia was shown in 97 (92.4%) patients, hemoptysis in 54 (51.9%), respiratory failure in 68 (66.7%), of whom 48 (70.6%), requiring respiratory support. At the end of the 37 months [IQR 13-77] follow-up, 19/106 (17.9%) patients were dead. The main causes of death were active disease and infections. By stepwise regression analysis, age >65 years (HR 3.66 [95% CI 1.4-9.51], p = 0.008) and the need for respiratory support (HR 4.58 [95% CI 1.51-13.87], p = 0.007) at AH onset were confirmed to be predictive of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of outcome in AAV-AH were determined. Factors related to the patient's performance status and the severity of the lung involvement strongly influenced the outcome. Balancing harms and benefits for the individual patient in induction and maintenance treatment strategies is crucial.

Retrospective evaluation of patient profiling and effectiveness of apremilast in an Italian multicentric cohort of psoriatic arthritis patients

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the baseline characteristics, the reasons for prescription, and the effectiveness/safety profile of real-life apremilast for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

PsA patients treated with apremilast were retrospectively extracted from an Italian multicentric cohort. Baseline population characteristics and reasons for apremilast prescription were analysed. Clinical response was defined as the proportion of patients achieving Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission/low disease activity (LDA), minimal disease activity (MDA), and very low disease activity (VLDA). Six-month retention rate was computed by the Kaplan-Meier method, with a detailed analysis of reasons for discontinuation. Univariate and multivariate models were developed to examine predictors of clinical response and persistence.

RESULTS

The study population included 131 patients mainly with oligoarticular PsA (58%), carrying at least one comorbidity (64.1%, in particular history of malignancies [25.9%] and latent tuberculosis [16.3%]) treated with apremilast as first-line targeted therapy (47.7%) or in biologics failures (52.3%). Contraindication to biologics (60.3%) and lack of poor prognostic factors (27.5%) were the most frequent reason for apremilast prescription. The 6-month retention rate was 72.1%. Inefficacy (n=7), diarrhoea (n=10), nausea (n=3), and headache (n=7) were the most frequent reasons for discontinuation. At 3 months DAPSA LDA/remission, MDA, and VLDA were observed in 40.3, 6.7, and 5.6% of patients, respectively. Female sex was a negative predictor of both retention rate and clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

In our real-life analysis apremilast was mainly used in oligoarticular PsA carrying comorbidities leading to contraindications to biologics. Effectiveness and safety profiles were consistent with clinical trials.

Influence of Antisynthetase Antibodies Specificities on Antisynthetase Syndrome Clinical Spectrum Time Course

Antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a rare clinical condition that is characterized by the occurrence of a classic clinical triad, encompassing myositis, arthritis, and interstitial lung disease (ILD), along with specific autoantibodies that are addressed to different aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (ARS). Until now, it has been unknown whether the presence of a different ARS might affect the clinical presentation, evolution, and outcome of ASSD. In this study, we retrospectively recorded the time of onset, characteristics, clustering of triad findings, and survival of 828 ASSD patients (593 anti-Jo1, 95 anti-PL7, 84 anti-PL12, 38 anti-EJ, and 18 anti-OJ), referring to AENEAS (American and European NEtwork of Antisynthetase Syndrome) collaborative group’s cohort. Comparisons were performed first between all ARS cases and then, in the case of significance, while using anti-Jo1 positive patients as the reference group. The characteristics of triad findings were similar and the onset mainly began with a single triad finding in all groups despite some differences in overall prevalence. The “ex-novo” occurrence of triad findings was only reduced in the anti-PL12-positive cohort, however, it occurred in a clinically relevant percentage of patients (30%). Moreover, survival was not influenced by the underlying anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies’ positivity, which confirmed that antisynthetase syndrome is a heterogeneous condition and that antibody specificity only partially influences the clinical presentation and evolution of this condition.

Transitional care of young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Italy: results of a Delphi consensus survey

OBJECTIVES

To present the results of a Delphi consensus survey among Italian paediatric and adult rheumatologists on transitional care (TC) of young people (YP) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

A taskforce of 27 paediatric and adult rheumatologists evaluated the applicability of the 2016 EULAR/PReS recommendations for TC to the Italian rheumatology practice and healthcare system and formulated additional country-specific statements aimed to increase their suitability. After a two-round discussion, applicability of EULAR/PReS recommendations and agreement with newly-proposed statements were voted on a 0-10 scale (where 0 = no applicability/agreement and 10 = total applicability/agreement). A mean level of agreement ≥8 was deemed acceptable.

RESULTS

The consensus threshold was reached for only 4 of the 12 EULAR/PReS recommendations and for 25 of the 27 country-specific statements. Poor agreement with EULAR/PReS recommendations was mostly explained by paucity of centres in Italy that possess both paediatric and adult rheumatologists, disagreement about optimal time of transition start and de nition of transition coordinator, diversity between paediatric and adult clinimetric assessments, and lack of administrative and financial support.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus initiative represents an important step forward toward the establishment of a nationwide TC network for YP with JIA in Italy. The main goals established for the future are the identification of adult rheumatology centres that are willing to participate in the TC process, the education of adult rheumatology teams on childhood-onset rheumatic diseases and transition issues, and the increased awareness of public healthcare authorities and other stakeholders about the importance of good-quality TC.