Breast Conservation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Surgical Results From the BrighTNess Randomized Clinical Trial

Exploring locoregional treatment reporting in neoadjuvant systemic breast cancer treatment studies: A systematic review

Accurate information about locoregional treatments in breast cancer neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) trials is vital to support surgical decision-making and allow meaningful interpretation of long-term oncological outcomes. This systematic review (PROSPERO registration CRD42023470891) aimed to describe the current practice of outcome reporting in NST studies. A systematic search identified primary research studies published 01/01/2018-08/09/2023 reporting outcomes in patients receiving NST for breast cancer followed by locoregional treatment. Included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies (NRS) with >250 participants reporting at least one locoregional treatment outcome. Outcomes were extracted verbatim and categorised using content analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise results. Of the 3111 abstracts screened, 137 studies (22 RCTs and 115 NRS) reporting at least one locoregional outcome in 575,531 patients were included. The 137 studies reported a total of 510 surgical outcomes with a median of 3 (range 1-12) per study. No single outcome was reported in all studies. Type of breast (n = 129, 94.2 %) and axillary (n = 86, 62.8 %) surgery were reported most frequently. Only 34 % (n = 47) studies reported how treatment response was assessed and if/how this informed surgical decision-making. Only a fifth (n = 28) reported outcomes relating to surgical de-escalation. Only 72 studies (52.6 %) reported any radiation therapy (RT)-related outcome, most frequently whether RT had been received (n = 63/72, 87.5 %). Current reporting of locoregional treatment outcomes in NST studies is poor, inconsistent and urgently needs to be improved. A core outcome set and reporting guidelines may improve the quality and value of future research.

Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Classification and Treatment Optimisation of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents a significant medical challenge due to its highly invasive nature, high rate of metastasis, and lack of drug-targetable receptors, which together lead to poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The traditional treatment guidelines for early TNBC are based on a multimodal approach integrating chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation and are associated with low overall survival and high relapse rates. Therefore, the approach to treating early TNBC has shifted towards neoadjuvant treatment (NAC), given to the patient before surgery and which aims to reduce tumour size, reduce the risk of recurrence, and improve the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. However, recent studies have shown that NAC is associated with only 30% of patients achieving pCR. Thus, novel predictive biomarkers are essential if treatment decisions are to be optimised and chemotherapy toxicities minimised. Given the heterogeneity of TNBC, mass spectrometry-based proteomics technologies offer valuable tools for the discovery of targetable biomarkers for prognosis and prediction of toxicity. These biomarkers can serve as critical targets for therapeutic intervention. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of TNBC diagnosis and treatment, highlighting the need for a new approach. Specifically, it highlights how mass spectrometry-based can address key unmet clinical needs by identifying novel protein biomarkers to distinguish and early prognostication between TNBC patient groups who are being treated with NAC. By integrating proteomic insights, we anticipate enhanced treatment personalisation, improved clinical outcomes, and ultimately, increased survival rates for TNBC patients.

Homologous recombination deficiency status predicts response to immunotherapy-based treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a biomarker that predicts response to ovarian cancer treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or breast cancer treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. However, there are few studies on the prognosis of lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy using HRD as a biomarker.

METHODS

We studied the relationship between HRD status and the effectiveness of first-line ICI-based therapy in EGFR/ALK wild-type metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) patients.

RESULTS

This study included 22 treatment naïve NSCLC patients. The HRD score ranged from -26.37 to 92.34, with an average of 24.57. Based on analysis of the progression-free survival (PFS) data from the included NSCLC patients, threshold traversal was carried out. HRD (+) was defined as an HRD score of 31 or higher. Kaplan-Meier PFS survival analysis showed prolonged median PFS (mPFS) in NSCLC patients with HRD (+) versus HRD (-) (N/A vs. 7.0 ms, log-rank p = 0.029; HR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.96, likelihood-ratio p = 0.03). In patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and HRD score ≥31 (co-status high), the mPFS was temporarily not reached during the follow-up period. In patients with PD-L1 TPS <1% and HRD score <31, the mPFS was 3 ms. Cox regression analysis showed that the hazard ratio of the co-status was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.04-0.54), which was a good prognostic factor, and the prognostic effect of co-status was better than that of HRD score alone.

CONCLUSION

The HRD status can be identified as an independent significance in NSCLC patients treated with first-line ICI-based therapy.

Functions and mechanisms of RNA m6A regulators in breast cancer (Review)

Breast cancer (BC) is a major malignant tumor in females and the incidence rate of BC has increased worldwide in recent years. N6‑methyladenosine (m6A) is a methylation modification that occurs extensively in eukaryotic RNA. The abnormal expression of m6A and related regulatory proteins can activate or inhibit certain signal pathways or oncogenes, thus affecting the proliferation, metastasis and prognosis of BC. Numerous studies have shown that m6A regulator disorder exists in BC, and this disorder can be reversed. Therefore, m6A is predicted as a potential therapeutic target for BC. However, the molecular mechanism of m6A RNA methylation regulating the occurrence and development of BC has not been comprehensively elucidated. In this review article, the functions of various m6A regulators and the specific mechanisms of certain regulators of the progress of BC were summarized. Furthermore, the dual role of RNA methylation in tumor progression was discussed, concluding that RNA methylation can not only lead to tumorigenesis but at times give rise to inhibition of tumor formation. In addition, further comprehensive analysis on mechanisms of m6A regulators in BC is conducive to screening effective potential targets and formulating targeted treatment strategies, which will provide new methods for the prevention and treatment of BC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Italy: A Senonetwork analysis of 37,215 patients treated from 2017 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the "real world" has been poorly investigated. Aim of this study was to examine the rate of NACT in Italy, trends over time and determinants of therapeutic choices.

METHODS

Senonetwork, the recognized network of Breast Centers in Italy, has developed a voluntary national data warehouse with the aim to monitor and improve treatments quality. A retrospective analysis was conducted among 58,661 breast cancer (BC) patients treated between 2017 and 2022 by 24 high-volume Breast Centers participating in the project.

RESULTS

After subset exclusion, 37,215 primary BC patients were analysed, 32,933 underwent primary-breast-surgery and 4,282 underwent NACT. From 2017 to 2022, the overall NACT incidence increased particularly for HR-/HER2+, Triple-Negative, and HR+/HER2+ BC (p < 0.001). In cN + patients the recommendation to axillary lymph-node dissection after NACT decreased over time along with an increase of <4 lymph-nodes removed (p < 0.001). Immediate breast reconstruction and indication for nipple sparing mastectomy increased significantly over time (OR = 1.10, p = 0.011 and OR 1.14, p < 0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, there was a trend towards an increased adoption of conservative treatment for HR-/HER2+ (p = 0.01) and Triple Negative tumors (p = 0.06). Implementation of NACT varied significantly among Breast-Centers from 3.8 to 17.7 % (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The impact of NACT on the subsequent surgical management is substantial and continues to evolve over time, resulting in less-extensive surgery. Even among high-volume Centers NACT implementation rate is still highly variable. Although we registered a significant increase in its use during the study period, these results need to be further improved.

Development of an Ultrasound-based Nomogram for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response and Axillary Response in Node-Positive Patients with Triple- Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The accurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast and axillary lymph nodes (ALN) before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is of utmost importance for the development of treatment strategies. We aim to construct a nomogram on ultrasound (US) and clinical-pathologic factors to predict breast and ALN pCR in node-positive triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs).

METHODS

Patients identified with TNBCs from institution 1 (n = 328) were used for training cohort and those from institution 2 (n = 192) were for validation cohort. US was conducted before and after NAC, and characteristics were obtained from medical records. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to identify US and clinical-pathologic factors associated with breast and ALN pCR in the training cohort. The assessment of predictive performance was conducted using the receiving operating characteristic curve (ROC), discrimination, and calibration.

RESULTS

Overall, 34.6% of patients achieved breast pCR and 48.1% of patients achieved ALN pCR. The nomogram 1 used for predicting pCR in the breast (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.88) outperformed the clinical (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.78) and US models (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.83). The nomogram 2 used for predicting pCR in the axllia (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.87) also outperformed the clinical (AUC, 0.64; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.69) and US models (AUC, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.84). The calibration curve and discrimination curve indicate that the nomogram has good calibration performance and clinical applicability.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram showed promising predictive performance for predicting breast and ALN pCR in patients with TNBCs.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Evaluation of the Impact on Surgical Outcomes and Prognosis

The correlation between TNM staging and histology variations in a sample of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy demonstrates a positive impact on both increasing conservative surgery and achieving pCR, resulting in better outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and the risk of relapse. Benefits have also been highlighted in terms of cosmetic outcomes, postoperative complications, and psychological benefits. However, the overall outcomes must be evaluated according to the subtype and individual characteristics of the patients.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Preoperative MRI in In-breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether the identification of additional tumors in the breast using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) results in a lower risk of in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies were performed. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

From 768 citations, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. The 20 studies consisted of 14 retrospective reviews, 3 matched cohorts, and 3 randomized controlled trials. Whereas 2 studies reported a statistically significant lower rate of IBTR with pMRI, 18 studies showed no difference, and no studies reported a higher rate. Of the 18 studies showing no significant difference, 12 demonstrated a trend toward a lower IBTR rate in the pMRI group. The criteria for meta-analysis were met by 16 studies. A meta-analysis of 11 studies that reported hazard ratios (HR) for IBTR showed a trend toward a lower rate of IBTR for patients who received preoperative MRI (hazard ratio (HR), 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-1.05). A meta-analysis of five studies that reported event rates and had similar follow-up duration for both groups demonstrated a lower relative risk (RR) of IBTR (RR, 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Although some evidence supports the hypothesis that identification of additional tumors in the breast using pMRI results in lower rates of IBTR after BCS, the main meta-analysis in this study did not confirm this hypothesis.

Impact of breast surgical procedure on survival in BRCA mutated patients with invasive breast cancer: Mastectomy versus conservative treatment

INTRODUCTION

Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations have a higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to the wild-type population. For patients with a BRCA mutation, there are no specific recommendations for surgical management. The aim of this study was therefore to retrospectively investigate overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of BRCA mutated patients with localized invasive breast cancer, by comparing conservative surgery versus mastectomy.

METHODS

This study was based on data from the Côte d'Or breast and gynecological cancer registry. Data from patients with a constitutional BRCA1/2 mutation who presented with invasive breast cancer were collected retrospectively from 1998 to 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe RFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 69 had conservative surgery and 35 underwent mastectomy. Regarding survival, there was no significant difference in OS (HR =1.49; 95 % confidence interval (CI) [0.76-2.93], p = 0.25). Similarly, there was no significant difference in RFS (HR =1.40; 95 % CI [0.81-2.40], p = 0.22), survival without homolateral recurrence (HR =0.88; 95 % CI [0.30-2.61], p = 0.89), without contralateral recurrence (HR =1.50; 95 % CI [0.55-4.09], p = 0.42), or without distant metastatic recurrence (HR =1.42, 95 % CI [0.69-2.90], p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

In invasive breast cancer in a patient with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, conservative surgery, when possible, appears to be a feasible option over total mastectomy, with no difference in overall survival. However, the patient should be informed of the aggressive nature of recurrence in this population requiring chemotherapy in most cases.

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set and reporting guidelines for locoregional treatment in neoadjuvant systemic breast cancer treatment trials: the PRECEDENT project

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant systemic anticancer therapy (neoSACT) is increasingly used in the treatment of early breast cancer. Response to therapy is prognostic and allows locoregional and adjuvant systemic treatments to be tailored to minimise morbidity and optimise oncological outcomes and quality of life. Accurate information about locoregional treatments following neoSACT is vital to allow the translation of downstaging benefits into practice and facilitate meaningful interpretation of oncological outcomes, particularly locoregional recurrence. Reporting of locoregional treatments in neoSACT studies, however, is currently poor. The development of a core outcome set (COS) and reporting guidelines is one strategy by which this may be improved.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A COS for reporting locoregional treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) in neoSACT trials will be developed in accordance with Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) and Core Outcome Set-Standards for Development guidelines. Reporting guidance will be developed concurrently.The project will have three phases: (1) generation of a long list of relevant outcome domains and reporting items from a systematic review of published neoSACT studies and interviews with key stakeholders. Identified items and domains will be categorised and formatted into Delphi consensus questionnaire items. (2) At least two rounds of an international online Delphi survey in which at least 250 key stakeholders (surgeons/oncologists/radiologists/pathologists/trialists/methodologists) will score the importance of reporting each outcome. (3) A consensus meeting with key stakeholders to discuss and agree the final COS and reporting guidance.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for the consensus process will be obtained from the Queen's University Belfast Faculty Ethics Committee. The COS/reporting guidelines will be presented at international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. Dissemination materials will be produced in collaboration with our steering group and patient advocates so the results can be shared widely.

REGISTRATION

The study has been prospectively registered on the COMET website (https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2854).

Precision Oncology in Breast Cancer Surgery

Outcomes for patients with breast cancer have improved over time due to increased screening and the availability of more effective therapies. It is important to recognize that breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that requires treatment based on molecular characteristics. Early endpoints such as pathologic complete response correlate with event-free survival, allowing the opportunity to consider de-escalation of certain cancer treatments to avoid overtreatment. This article discusses clinical trials of tailoring treatment (eg, I-SPY2) and screening (eg, WISDOM) to individual patients based on their unique risk features.

Breast-conserving surgery is not associated with increased local recurrence in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is routinely used for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Upfront breast-conserving therapy (BCT) consisting of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to be associated with improved outcome in patients with early TNBC as compared to mastectomy.

METHODS

We identified 2632 patients with early TNBC from the German Breast Group meta-database. Patients with cT1-2 cN0 and ypN0, available surgery and follow-up data were enrolled. Data of 1074 patients from 8 prospective NACT trials were available. Endpoints of interest were locoregional recurrence as first site of relapse (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed univariate and multivariate Fine-Gray analysis and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 64 months, there were 94 (8.8%) locoregional events as first site of relapse. Absence of pathologic complete response (pCR) was associated with increased LRR upon uni- and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.28; p < 0.001 and HR = 2.22; p = 0.001). Type of surgery was not associated with LRR. Patients in the BCS-group had better DFS and OS (DFS: HR = 0.47; p < 0.001 and OS: HR = 0.40; p < 0.001). BCS was associated with improved DFS and OS upon multivariate analysis (DFS: HR = 0.51; p < 0.001; and OS HR = 0.43; p < 0.001), whereas absence of pCR was associated with worse DFS and OS (DFS: HR = 2.43; p < 0.001; and OS: HR = 3.15; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis of patients with early stage node-negative TNBC treated with NACT, BCS was not associated with an increased risk of LRR but with superior DFS and OS.

Breast surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

For patients with operable breast cancer, neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) can be used to downstage the primary tumor in the breast and to facilitate breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with large tumors who desire breast conservation. Rates of breast pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are highest in patients with triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive (HER2+) disease; however, achieving pCR is not necessary for successful downstaging and avoidance of mastectomy, and rates of conversion to BCS-eligibility are high across all receptor subtypes. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) can be used instead of NAC in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer to downstage the breast, particularly when the patient has no clear indication for systemic chemotherapy, but desires breast conservation. In patients treated with NET, rates of conversion to BCS-eligibility are similar to rates observed with NAC. The oncologic safety of BCS after NAC and NET has been established in prospective trials, and local recurrence (LR) rates are acceptably low provided negative surgical margins can be obtained. Investigation is under way to determine the feasibility and safety of omitting breast surgery in patients with responsive subtypes who have no residual invasive or in situ disease identified on post-treatment tumor bed biopsies; however, the significant risk of missing residual disease-which may impact selection of adjuvant systemic therapy-may preclude future adoption of this approach.

Early-stage triple negative breast cancer: the therapeutic role of immunotherapy and the prognostic value of pathological complete response

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents an aggressive disease associated with a high risk of recurrence after curative treatment and a poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Chemotherapy was for years the only treatment available in the early and metastatic setting, due to the lack of actionable targets. Clinical practice has changed following the results obtained with the addition of immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy, the development of novel drugs [i.e. antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)], and the use of targeted treatments for patients carrying germline pathogenic breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) 1 or BRCA 2 variants. The treatment of early-stage disease has had a shift in clinical practice since July 2021, after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of pembrolizumab in association with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for TNBC and as a single agent in the subsequent adjuvant setting. This intensive treatment based on the combination of a poly-chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) led to the improvement of short- and long-term outcomes, but it has highlighted some new unmet clinical needs in the treatment of early-stage TNBC: the selection of the most effective adjuvant therapy and the integration of pembrolizumab with other therapeutic strategies [capecitabine, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors] based on the achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR); the identification of predictive biomarkers to select patients who could most benefit from the addition of ICI, to minimize toxicities and to maximize outcomes; the possibility of de-escalating chemotherapy in favor of immune-combo or novel agents, such as ADCs; the role of immunotherapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-low patients. The advent of immunotherapy not only addresses current challenges in TNBC treatment but also holds the promise of a radical transformation in its therapeutic paradigm, enhancing significantly clinical outcomes and offering new perspectives for patients grappling with this aggressive form of breast cancer.

The importance of the multidisciplinary team in the decision-making process of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recent literature suggests that rates of breast conservation surgery (BCS) are lower than expected in patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to underscore the role of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the decision-making process of patients who underwent breast surgery after NAC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on patients with breast cancer treated according to an algorithm developed at the Breast Unit of Northern Sardinia between January 2019 and May 2023. Data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, upfront treatment (surgery or NAC), type of primary surgery (BCS or mastectomy [Ma]) and patients' adherence to the treatment proposed by the MDT.

RESULTS

Overall, 1061 women were treated during the study period, of whom 164 received NAC (Group A) and 897 upfront surgery (Group B). In group A, conversion from BCS ineligibility to BCS eligibility was observed in 47 patients (40.1%). Final surgery in patients who became BCS-eligible after NAC was BCS in 42 cases (89.3%) and Ma in 5 (10.6%). Rates of patients' adherence to the treatment proposed by the MDT were significantly better in the Group A (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the MDT has a pivotal role in increasing the rates of breast conservation in women submitted to NAC.

Prognostic analysis of cT1-3N1M0 breast cancer patients who have responded to neoadjuvant therapy undergoing various axillary surgery and breast surgery based on propensity score matching and competitive risk model

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with positive clinical axillary lymph nodes (cN1+) remains a topic of controversy. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of various axillary and breast surgery approaches on the survival of cN1+ breast cancer patients who have responded positively to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma of breast between 2010 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. To mitigate confounding bias, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was employed. Prognostic factors for both overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated through COX regression risk analysis. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, cumulative incidence and independent prognostic factors were assessed using a competing risk model.

Results

The PSM analysis matched 4,890 patients. Overall survival (OS) and BCSS were slightly worse in the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) group (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.91-1.31, p = 0.322 vs. HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.87-1.29, p = 0.545). The mastectomy (MAST) group exhibited significantly worse OS and BCSS outcomes (HR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.50, p = 0.018 vs. HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.68, p = 0.002). The combination of different axillary and breast surgery did not significantly affect OS (p = 0.083) but did have a significant impact on BCSS (p = 0.019). Competing risk model analysis revealed no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) in the axillary surgery group (Grey's test, p = 0.232), but it showed a higher cumulative incidence of BCSD in the MAST group (Grey's test, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥ 70 years, black race, T3 stage, ER-negative expression, HER2-negative expression, and MAST were independent prognostic risk factors for both OS and BCSS (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

For cN1+ breast cancer patients who respond positive to NAT, the optimal surgical approach is combining breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with SLNB. This procedure improves quality of life and long-term survival outcomes.

A real-world study of the effectiveness and safety of apatinib-based regimens in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

This investigation sought to examine the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib used alongside chemotherapy in the clinical management of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) within a real-world setting, whilst comparing the outcomes with those treated solely with chemotherapy.

METHODS

This case series study analyzed clinical data and treatment outcomes of 163 patients with metastatic TNBC who underwent rescue treatment at the Medical Oncology Department of Clinical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, School of Fujian Medical University, China, between October 2011 and January 2023. All the patients underwent rescue treatment with either chemotherapy alone or apatinib (250 mg/day) combined with chemotherapy. The study's primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety profiles.

RESULTS

The study was designed to compare two groups [1]. Out of the 163 TNBC patients who participated in the study, 107 individuals (65.6%) received treatment based on chemotherapy, whereas 56 patients (34.4%) were given treatment based on a combination of low-dose apatinib (250 mg/day) and other treatments, including chemotherapy. After propensity score matching (PSM), the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received apatinib-based treatment were 50.0 and 90.0%, respectively, while they were 6.7 and 20.0%, respectively, for the chemotherapy-based group (P < 0.001). The group that received apatinib-based treatment showed superior results in both PFS and OS compared to the group that received chemotherapy. The median PFS and OS for the apatinib-based group were 7.8 and 20.3 months, respectively, while they were only 2.2 months and 9.0 months, respectively, for the chemotherapy-based group (P < 0.001) [2]. Patients who were administered combo therapies, including PD-1 inhibitors, were excluded. In total, 97 patients received chemotherapy alone, while 34 patients were treated with apatinib in combination with chemotherapy. After propensity score matching (PSM), the ORR and DCR for the total group who received combo therapies were 44.4 and 81.5%, respectively, while they were 11.1 and 22.2%, respectively, for the chemotherapy alone group (P < 0.001). The group receiving both apatinib and chemotherapy displayed notable advantages over the group solely receiving chemotherapy in regards to PFS and OS for the entirety of the population. The PFS was found to be 7.8 months in comparison to 2.1 months (P < 0.001) and the OS was 21.1 months in contrast to 9.0 months (P < 0.001). Apatinib combined with chemotherapy induced grade 3/4 hematological toxicities, including neutropenia (8.8%) and thrombocytopenia (2.9%). Additionally, non-hematological toxicities were commonly observed, such as Hand-foot syndrome (35.3%), proteinuria (26.5%), hypertension (61.8%), higher alanine aminotransferase levels (26.5%), and fatigue (35.3%). The most frequent non-hematological grade 3/4 toxicities were Hand-foot syndrome (2.9%) and hypertension (5.9%). The study did not report any fatal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of low-dose apatinib with chemotherapy has proven to be more effective than chemotherapy alone in treating metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Additionally, the occurrence of grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities was significantly lower compared to the recommended dose of apatinib.

The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical site wound infection after immediate breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: A meta-analysis

Using a meta-analysis approach, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on the incidence of surgical site wound infection during immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following breast cancer. The aim was to provide evidence-based support for the prevention of wound surgical site infection during IBR after breast cancer surgery. Relevant literature on the effects of NACT on IBR in patients with breast cancer published up until May 2023, was retrieved from various databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang databases, and China Biology Medicine Database. Two researchers performed the literature screening, data collection, and quality assessment of the included studies independently. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata version 17.0. Fourteen studies involving 3401 patients (599 in the intervention group and 2802 in the control group) were included in the analysis. The incidence of surgical site infection in the NACT group was higher than that in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (7.17% vs. 4.85%, odds ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.50, p = 0.902). These findings suggest that NACT does not increase the risk of surgical site infection during IBR. However, owing to the variation in sample size and literature quality among the included studies, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the safety of IBR in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Towards detection of early response in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer using Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion

Introduction

The early identification of good responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) holds a significant potential in the optimal treatment of breast cancer. A recent Bayesian approach has been postulated to improve the accuracy of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for clinical translation. This study examined the prediction and early sensitivity of Bayesian IVIM to NACT response.

Materials and methods

Seventeen female patients with breast cancer were scanned at baseline and 16 patients were scanned after Cycle 1. Tissue diffusion and perfusion from Bayesian IVIM were calculated at baseline with percentage change at Cycle 1 computed with reference to baseline. Cellular proliferative activity marker Ki-67 was obtained semi-quantitatively with percentage change at excision computed with reference to core biopsy.

Results

The perfusion fraction showed a significant difference (p = 0.042) in percentage change between responder groups at Cycle 1, with a decrease in good responders [-7.98% (-19.47-1.73), n = 7] and an increase in poor responders [10.04% (5.09-28.93), n = 9]. There was a significant correlation between percentage change in perfusion fraction and percentage change in Ki-67 (p = 0.042). Tissue diffusion and pseudodiffusion showed no significant difference in percentage change between groups at Cycle 1, nor was there a significant correlation against percentage change in Ki-67. Perfusion fraction, tissue diffusion, and pseudodiffusion showed no significant difference between groups at baseline, nor was there a significant correlation against Ki-67 from core biopsy.

Conclusion

The alteration in tumour perfusion fraction from the Bayesian IVIM model, in association with cellular proliferation, showed early sensitivity to good responders in NACT.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03501394, identifier NCT03501394.

Omission of Axillary Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for ypN + positive patients as patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) were excluded from trials omitting ALND in pN + patients. We sought to characterize trends in omission of ALND in patients with ypN + disease.

METHODS

Adult women with invasive breast carcinoma in the National Cancer Database between 2012 and 2019 who received NST (chemotherapy or endocrine) and had ypN + disease were included. Patients were excluded if they did not have definitive surgery within eight months of diagnosis. The primary study outcome was completion of ALND versus omission. Differences in demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment were identified using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 103,121 women were included. Most had cT1 (26%) or cT2 (45%) tumors, cN + disease (71%), and ductal histology (83%). 69% of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 31% neoadjuvant endocrine without chemotherapy (30% both). ALND was performed in 77% of patients. Omission of ALND became more prevalent each year from 2012 (14%) to 2019 (34%). On multivariate modeling, year of diagnosis, black race, cN status, higher grade, estrogen receptor+/HER2-receptor subtype, and mastectomy were associated with increased prevalence of ALND. Age, Charlson/Deyo comorbidity index score, endocrine versus chemotherapy, and adjuvant radiation were not associated with receipt of ALND.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite guidelines recommending ALND, omission is common in patients with ypN + breast cancer after NST. Omission of ALND increased significantly over time and is associated with clinical and demographic factors. Future study is needed to determine the oncologic safety of this approach.

The percentage of unnecessary mastectomy due to false size prediction using preoperative ultrasonography and MRI in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Imaging-estimated tumour extent after neoadjuvant chemotherapy tends to be discordant with the pathological extent. The authors aimed to prospectively determine the proportion of decisions regarding total mastectomy for potential breast-conserving surgery candidates owing to false size prediction with imaging in neoadjuvant chemotherapy and non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors prospectively enroled clinical stage II or III breast cancer patients who are scheduled for total mastectomy between 2018 and 2021. This study was conducted at Seoul National University Hospital at South Korea. Before surgery, each surgeon recorded the hypothetical maximum tumour size at which the surgeon would have been able to attempt breast-conserving surgery if the patient had actually less than the size of the tumour at that location in the breast. After surgery, the hypothetical maximum tumour size was compared with the final pathologic total extent of the tumour, including invasive and in situ cancers.

RESULTS

Among the 360 enroled patients, 130 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 230 did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of the total of each group, 47.7% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 21.3% in the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy group had a smaller pathologic tumour extent than the pre-recorded hypothetical maximum tumour size (P<0.001). Further analyses were conducted for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. The proportions of total mastectomy with false size prediction were higher in HER2-positive (63.3%) and triple-negative (57.6%) patients compared with ER-positive/HER2-negative (25.0%) patients (P<0.001). Both magnetic resonance imaging-pathology and ultrasonography-pathology size discrepancies were significantly associated with false decisions for total mastectomy (both P<0.001). Without magnetic resonance imaging, the false decision may be reduced by 21.5%.

CONCLUSION

A total of 47.7% of patients who received total mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were breast-conserving surgery eligible, which was significantly higher than that of non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients. Magnetic resonance imaging contributed the most to false size predictions.

89Zr-Trastuzumab PET/CT Imaging of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer for Predicting Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of invasive ductal breast malignancies are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. These patients receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) including HER2-targeting therapies. Up to 65% of patients achieve a pathological complete response (pCR). These patients might not have needed surgery. However, accurate preoperative identification of a pCR remains challenging. A radiologic complete response (rCR) on MRI corresponds to a pCR in only 73% of patients. The current feasibility study investigates if HER2-targeted PET/CT-imaging using Zirconium-89 (89Zr)-radiolabeled trastuzumab can be used for more accurate NAT response evaluation.

METHODS

HER2-positive breast cancer patients scheduled to undergo NAT and subsequent surgery received a 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT both before (PET/CT-1) and after (PET/CT-2) NAT. Qualitative and quantitative response evaluation was performed.

RESULTS

Six patients were enrolled. All primary tumors could be identified on PET/CT-1. Four patients had a pCR and two a pathological partial response (pPR) in the primary tumor. Qualitative assessment of PET/CT resulted in an accuracy of 66.7%, compared to 83.3% of the standard-of-care MRI. Quantitative assessment showed a difference between the SUVR on PET/CT-1 and PET/CT-2 (ΔSUVR) in patients with a pPR and pCR of -48% and -90% (p = 0.133), respectively. The difference in tumor-to-blood ratio on PET/CT-1 and PET/CT-2 (ΔTBR) in patients with pPR and pCR was -79% and -94% (p = 0.133), respectively. Three patients had metastatic lymph nodes at diagnosis that were all identified on PET/CT-1. All three patients achieved a nodal pCR. Qualitative assessment of the lymph nodes with PET/CT resulted in an accuracy of 66.7%, compared to 50% of the MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

NAT response evaluation using 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT is feasible. In the current study, qualitative assessment of the PET/CT images is not superior to standard-of-care MRI. Our results suggest that quantitative assessment of 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT has potential for a more accurate response evaluation of the primary tumor after NAT in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II-III breast cancer: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

We conducted this study to reflect a single-center experience with the use of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NAC) for the management of women with operable breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review on all women presenting with operable, stage II-III, breast cancer and were scheduled for NAC at Suez Canal University Hospital. The primary outcome of this study was to estimate the proportion of patients with breast cancer who become eligible for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after (NAC).

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were included. Before the initiation of chemotherapy, only 66 (44.9%) patients were indicated for (BCS). A total of 40 (49.4%) new patients, out of the 81 patients who were ineligible before chemotherapy, became eligible for BCS after NAC (95% CI 39.3-61.9%). On the other hand, 8 (12.1%) patients became ineligible for BCS after NAC, out of 66 patients who were initially eligible. Out of the 98 eligible patients for BCS after chemotherapy, 72 (73.5%) patients underwent the surgery, and the remaining 26 (26.5%) patients chose modified radical mastectomy (MRM). A total of 55 out of 72 (76.4%) patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR). One woman (0.1%) experienced relapse in the 3rd year of follow-up and three women (2%) experienced relapse in the 5th year of follow-up. We found a statistically significant relationship between patients who became eligible for breast-conserving surgery and both age and estrogen receptor negativity (p = 0.001 and 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

NAC can play a crucial role in increasing the rate of eligibility for BCS among women with operable, stage II-III, breast cancer.

Spectrum of ultrasound findings in patients with history of breast conservative treatment

Breast conservative treatment (BCT) is currently accepted as the standard treatment option for breast cancer. Targeted ultrasound helps detect recurrent lesions, postoperative changes, and scarring tissue. In this pictorial essay, we review the ultrasound features of benign (seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, traumatic neuroma, fibrosis/scarring) and malignant (recurrence, new primary cancer) causes of palpable lumps after BCT and provide images from our patients to illustrate some typical findings of common pathologies. Ultrasound, especially as an adjunct to mammography, can make a specific diagnosis in most cases.

Explaining risks and benefits of loco-regional treatments to patients

Treatment for early-stage breast cancer is complex, requiring multidisciplinary care with a multitude of treatment options available for each patient. Coupled with the rising importance of shared decision-making, patient-physician conversations are progressively more complicated. These conversations require frank disclosure of risks and benefits of the different treatment modalities in a way that is individualized for each patient and simple to understand. In most patients, breast conserving therapy with radiation should be presented as the gold-standard local treatment given similar long-term and improved quality of life outcomes. De-escalation is currently at the forefront of research in loco-regional treatments, and further investigations are required to best determine the optimal patient populations for reduced sentinel lymph node sampling, omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy altogether and omission of radiation treatment. For future trials, better endpoints need to be established considering patient-centered outcomes as well as recurrence.

Efferocytosis Nanoinhibitors to Promote Secondary Necrosis and Potentiate the Immunogenicity of Conventional Cancer Therapies for Improved Therapeutic Benefits

Efferocytosis of apoptotic cancer cells by tumor-associated macrophages or other phagocytes is reported to promote tumor immunosuppression by preventing them from secondary necrosis, which would lead to the release of intracellular components and thus enhanced immunogenicity. Therefore, current apoptosis-inducing cancer treatments (e.g., chemotherapy and radiotherapy) are less satisfactory in eliciting antitumor immunity. Herein, a nanoparticulate inhibitor of efferocytosis is prepared by encapsulating BMS777607, a hydrophobic inhibitor of receptors in macrophages responsible for phosphatidylserine-dependent efferocytosis, with biocompatible poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) and its amphiphilic derivatives. The yielded nano-BMS can inhibit the efferocytosis of apoptotic cancer cells, thus redirecting them to immunogenic secondary necrosis. As a result, intratumorally injected nano-BMS is capable of activating both innate and adaptive antitumor immunity to achieve greatly improved therapeutic responses, when synergized with nonimmunogenic chemotherapy by cisplatin, immunogenic chemotherapy by oxaliplatin, or radiotherapy by external beams. Moreover, we further demonstrate that the inhalation of nano-BMS could significantly promote the efficacy of cisplatin chemotherapy to suppress tumor lung metastases. Therefore, this study highlights a general strategy to potentiate the immunogenicity of different cancer treatments by suppressing efferocytosis-propelled tumor immunosuppression, showing tremendous clinical potential in rescuing existing cancer therapies for more effective treatment.

What is the ideal endpoint in early-stage immunotherapy neoadjuvant trials in lung cancer?

Numerous clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been performed over the last 5 years. As the number of neoadjuvant trials increases, attention must be paid to identifying informative trial endpoints. Complete pathologic response has been shown to be an appropriate surrogate endpoint for clinical outcomes, such as event-free survival or overall survival, in breast cancer and bladder cancer, but it is less established for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The simultaneous advances reported with adjuvant ICI make the optimal strategy for early-stage disease debatable. Considering the long time required to conduct trials, it is important to identify optimal endpoints and discover surrogate endpoints for survival that can help guide ongoing clinical research. Endpoints can be grouped into two categories: medical and surgical. Medical endpoints are measures of survival and drug activity; surgical endpoints describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant approaches at a surgical level as well as perioperative attrition and complications. There are also several exploratory endpoints, including circulating tumor DNA clearance and radiomics. In this review, we outline the advantages and disadvantages of commonly reported endpoints for clinical trials of neoadjuvant regimens in NSCLC.

Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with shorter survival and a higher likelihood of the cancer returning. In early TNBC, platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to improve pathological complete response (pCR); however, its effect on long-term survival outcomes has not been fully elucidated and recommendations to include platinum chemotherapy are not consistent in international guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of platinum-based chemotherapy as adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment in people with early triple-negative breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 4 April 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials examining neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum chemotherapy for early TNBC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Our secondary outcomes were pCR, treatment adherence, grade III or IV toxicity related to chemotherapy, and quality of life. Prespecified subgroups included BRCA mutation status, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, frequency of chemotherapy, type of platinum agent used, and the presence or absence of anthracycline chemotherapy. We assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's RoB 1 tool and certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

From 3972 records, we included 20 published studies involving 21 treatment comparisons, and 25 ongoing studies. For most domains, risk of bias was low across studies. There were 16 neoadjuvant chemotherapy studies (one of which combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy) and four adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Most studies used carboplatin (17 studies) followed by cisplatin (two), and lobaplatin (one). Eight studies had an anthracycline-free intervention arm, five of which had a carboplatin-taxane intervention compared to an anthracycline-taxane control. All studies reporting DFS and OS used carboplatin. Inclusion of platinum chemotherapy improved DFS in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings (neoadjuvant: hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.75; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 1966 participants; high-certainty evidence; adjuvant: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.88; 4 studies, 1256 participants; high-certainty evidence). Platinum chemotherapy in the regimen improved OS (neoadjuvant: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.86; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 1973 participants; high-certainty evidence; adjuvant: 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.96; 4 studies, 1256 participants; high-certainty evidence). Median follow-up for survival outcomes ranged from 36 to 97.6 months. Our analysis confirmed platinum chemotherapy increased pCR rates (risk ratio (RR) 1.44, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.59; 15 studies, 16 treatment comparisons, 3083 participants; high-certainty evidence). Subgroup analyses showed no evidence of differences in DFS according to BRCA mutation status, HRD status, lymph node status, or whether the intervention arm contained anthracycline chemotherapy or not. Platinum chemotherapy was associated with reduced dose intensity, with participants more likely to require chemotherapy delays (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.94; 4 studies, 5 treatment comparisons, 1053 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), dose reductions (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.02; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 2055 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and early cessation of treatment (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.38; 16 studies, 17 treatment comparisons, 4178 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Increased haematological toxicity occurred in the platinum group who were more likely to experience grade III/IV neutropenia (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.63; 19 studies, 20 treatment comparisons, 4849 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), anaemia (RR 8.20, 95% CI 5.66 to 11.89; 18 studies, 19 treatment comparisons, 4757 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and thrombocytopenia (RR 7.59, 95% CI 5.10 to 11.29; 18 studies, 19 treatment comparisons, 4731 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between chemotherapy groups in febrile neutropenia (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.49; 11 studies, 3771 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Renal impairment was very rare (0.4%, 2 events in 463 participants; note 3 studies reported 0 events in both arms; 4 studies; high-certainty evidence). Treatment-related death was very rare (0.2%, 7 events in 3176 participants and similar across treatment groups; RR 0.58, 95% 0.14 to 2.33; 10 studies, 11 treatment comparisons; note 8 studies reported treatment-related deaths but recorded 0 events in both groups. Thus, the RR and CIs were calculated from 3 studies rather than 11; 3176 participants; high-certainty evidence). Five studies collected quality of life data but did not report them.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Platinum-based chemotherapy using carboplatin in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting improves long-term outcomes of DFS and OS in early TNBC, with no evidence of differences by subgroup. This was at the cost of more frequent chemotherapy delays and dose reductions, and greater haematological toxicity, though serious adverse events including neuropathy, febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death were not increased. These findings support the use of platinum-based chemotherapy for people with early TNBC. The optimal dose and regimen are not defined by this analysis, but there is a suggestion that similar relative benefits result from the addition of carboplatin to either anthracycline-free regimens or those containing anthracycline agents.

Impact of oncoplasty in increasing breast conservation rates Post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

Introduction

The essential goal of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is to downstage the primary tumor making it amenable for breast conservation surgery (BCS). However, since the safety of this surgery is paramount, post-NACT breast conservation rates remain low. As per the recommendation of the 2018 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) overview of long-term post-NACT follow-up, we have devised a protocol for imaging, localization, rad-path analysis, and documentation of radiotherapy techniques to ensure the safety of post-NACT breast conservation.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort of 180 breast cancer patients who received NACT and were operated on by a single surgical oncologist from 2015 to 2020. After selection based on published guidelines, patients were treated with neoadjuvant systemic (chemo or hormone) therapy. In cases where primary tumors responded and reduced to 1-2 cm in size mid-NACT, the residual tumors were localized by clips under ultrasound guidance and calcification was wire localized. All patients were treated using appropriate surgical and oncoplastic techniques where indicated. Negative margins were ensured by intra-operative rad-path analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were given as per protocol.

Results

In 81 cases that required mastectomy at presentation, we were able to achieve a 72.8% post-NACT BCS rate with the help of oncoplasty. Overall, 142 of 180 (80%) patients were treated with breast conserving surgery of which 80% (121 of 142) were oncoplasty. Margins were assessed on intra-operative frozen and re-excised in the same setting. No positive margins were reported in final histopath of 142 breast conservation procedures. Post-operative complication rates after breast conservation in the first year were at 17% (24 of 142 including two major complications). Patient reported outcomes were satisfactory with increased satisfaction for breast conservation compared with immediate breast reconstruction.

Discussion

Employing oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) techniques following stringent protocols for accurate localization of the residual tumor, intra-operative rad-path analysis, and adjuvant treatments, we show successful breast conservation in 72.8% of our mastectomy-qualified patients after downstaging by NACT. We also report satisfactory outcomes for post-NACT surgery, patient-reported satisfaction, and survival.

Value of mammographic microcalcifications and MRI-enhanced lesions in the evaluation of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

Background

Microcalcifications persist even if a patient with breast cancer achieves pathologic complete response (pCR) as confirmed by surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). In practice, surgeons tend to remove all the microcalcifications. This study aimed to explore the correlation between changes in the extent of microcalcification after NAT and pathological tumor response and compare the accuracy of mammography (MG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the size of residual tumors.

Methods

This was a retrospective study which included a consecutive series of patients in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital. Between January 2010 and January 2020, 127 patients with breast cancer and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4-5 microcalcifications were included in this study. The maximum diameter of the microcalcifications on MG and lesion enhancement on MRI pre- and post-NAT were measured. The correlations between the changes in residual microcalcifications on MG and pCR were analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed between the extent of the residual microcalcifications, residual enhancement, and residual tumor size.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in the changes in microcalcifications after NAT according to the RECIST criteria on MRI (P=0.09) and Miller-Payne grade (P=0.14). MRI showed a higher agreement than did residual microcalcifications on MG in predicting residual tumor size (ICC: 0.771 vs. 0.097).

Conclusions

MRI is more accurate for evaluating residual tumor size in breast cancer. In our study, the extent of microcalcifications on MG after NAT had nearly no correlation with the pathological size of the residual tumor. Therefore, residual tumors with microcalcifications may not necessarily be a contraindication to breast-conserving surgery.

Advances in the Management of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with both inter- and intratumor heterogeneity, thought to result in a more aggressive course and worse outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become the preferred treatment modality of early-stage TNBC as it allows for the downstaging of tumors in the breast and axilla, monitoring early treatment response, and most importantly, provides important prognostic information that is essential to determining post-surgical therapies to improve outcomes. It focuses on combinations of systemic drugs to optimize pathologic complete response (pCR). Excellent response to NAT has allowed surgical de-escalation in ideal candidates. Further, treatment algorithms guide the systemic management of patients based on their pCR status following surgery. The expanding knowledge of molecular pathways, genomic sequencing, and the immunological profile of TNBC has led to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, including PARP inhibitors, further revolutionizing the therapeutic landscape of this clinical entity. However, subgroups most likely to benefit from these novel approaches in TNBC remain elusive and are being extensively studied. In this review, we describe current practices and promising therapeutic options on the horizon for TNBC, surgical advances, and future trends in molecular determinants of response to therapy in early-stage TNBC.

Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

To compare recurrence and survival outcomes between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Methods

The data of 730 patients who underwent NACT between 2000 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 104 (14.2%) patients received BCS and 626 (85.8%) received mastectomy. Locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastases (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of BCS versus mastectomy on outcomes was assessed by multivariate Cox models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates between the two groups.

Results

The median follow-up of BCS and mastectomy groups were 86.5 and 87.4 months, respectively. There were significant differences in distribution of most baseline characteristics between two groups. Compared with those who underwent mastectomy, the patients with BCS had similar 5-year LRR, DM, and DFS rates, but had significantly higher 5-year BCSS (98.9% vs. 90.4%, P = 0.005) and OS (98.9% vs. 90.1%, P = 0.003) rates. Multivariate analysis also showed that BCS significantly improved BCSS (HR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.85, P = 0.025) and OS (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.79, P = 0.018). After IPTW adjustment, the LRR, DM, DFS, BCSS and OS between two groups had no significant differences.

Conclusions

The recurrence and survival outcomes are comparable with BCS and mastectomy. Thus, BCS is a safe treatment option for selected breast cancer patients after NACT.

A prospective cohort study identifying radiologic and tumor related factors of importance for breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an established treatment option for early breast cancer, potentially downstaging the tumor and increasing the eligibility for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The primary aim of this study was to assess the rate of BCS after NAC, and the secondary aim was to identify predictors of application of BCS after NAC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational prospective cohort study of 226 patients in the SCAN-B (Clinical Trials NCT02306096) neoadjuvant cohort during 2014-2019. Eligibility for BCS was assessed at baseline and after NAC. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using covariates with clinical relevance and/or those associated with outcome (BCS versus mastectomy), including tumor subtype, by gene expression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall BCS rate was 52%, and this rate increased during the study period (from 37% to 52%). Pathological complete response was achieved in 69 patients (30%). Predictors for BCS were smaller tumor size on mammography, visibility on ultrasound, histological subtype other than lobular, benign axillary status, and a diagnosis of triple-negative or HER2-positive subtype, with a similar trend for gene expression subtypes. Mammographic density was negatively related to BCS in a dose-response pattern. In the multivariable logistic regression model, tumor stage at diagnosis and mammographic density showed the strongest association with BCS.

CONCLUSION

The rate of BCS after NAC increased during the study period to 52%. With modern treatment options for NAC the potential for tumor response and BCS eligibility might further increase.

Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients with disease progression during neoadjuvant systemic therapy

BACKGROUND

Disease progression during neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer indicates poor prognosis, while predictors of the clinical outcomes of these patients remain unclear. By comparing the clinical outcomes of patients with different patterns of salvage treatment strategies, we try to evaluate the factors predicting distant failure and explore the favourable treatment for them.

METHODS

Patients with disease progression during neoadjuvant systemic therapy for stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2008 and July 31, 2021 in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were enrolled. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions or the appearance of new breast or nodal lesions. Kaplan-Meier, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions were utilized to compare survival outcomes between different salvage treatment strategies.

RESULTS

Among 3775 patients treated with NST, 60 (1.6%) patients encountered disease progression. A significant difference between the outcomes of patients receiving direct surgery and other salvage modalities was found (p = 0.007). Triple-negative breast cancer (p = 0.010) and not receiving direct surgery (p = 0.016) were independently associated with distant disease-free survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of distant failure in patients with disease progression include triple-negative breast cancer and not receiving direct surgery. Direct surgery seems to be more favourable than other treatments for patients with disease progression. For inoperable patients, neoadjuvant radiation can increase their operability but not improve their prognosis.

Can breast MRI predict pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

For patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer, it is standard of care to perform pre- and post-NAC imaging to evaluate response to therapy prior to surgery. In this study we assess outcome metrics of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following NAC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent a breast MRI before and after NAC between 2016 and 2021 at a single, multisite academic institution. All breast MRI studies were characterized as either radiologic complete response (rCR) or non-rCR. Corresponding surgical pathology reports were reviewed and categorized as pathologic complete response (pCR) or non-pCR. We defined a positive test as having residual enhancement on MRI (non-rCR) and a positive outcome as having residual disease on final surgical pathology (non-pCR).

RESULTS

There were 225 patients included in the study (mean age 52 ± 12 years). Breast cancer receptor distribution was HR+/HER2- (n = 71, 32%), HR+/HER2+ (n = 51, 23%), HR-/HER2- (n = 72, 32%), and HR-/HER2+ (n = 31, 14%). In total, 78 (35%) had rCR and 77 (34%) had pCR; 43 (19%) had both rCR and pCR. The overall accuracy rate was 69% (156/225), sensitivity 76% (113/148), specificity 56% (43/77), positive predictive value 77% (113/147), and negative predictive value 55% (43/78). The PPV was significantly associated with receptor status (p = 0.004). No patient or imaging characteristics were associated with sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Breast MRI only moderately predicts pathologic response for invasive breast cancer treated with NAC (overall accuracy 69%). PPV is significantly associated with receptor status.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer in Kurdistan, Iraq

PURPOSE

The core management of nonmetastatic breast cancer includes surgical tumor removal by either breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has shown the potential to downstage locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and reduce the extent of breast or axillary surgery. This study aimed to assess the treatment approach for nonmetastatic breast cancer in the Kurdistan region of Iraq and to compare its alignment with the current international recommendations for cancer treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,000 patients with prespecified eligible inclusion criteria who underwent either BCS or mastectomy for nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer at oncology centers in the Kurdistan region of Iraq between the period 2016 and 2021.

RESULTS

Of 1,000 patients (median age, 47 years [range, 22-85 years]), 60.2% underwent mastectomy and 39.8% underwent BCS. The proportion of patients treated with NACT has increased over time, with 8.3% of patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment in 2016 compared with 14.2% in 2021. Similarly, BCS increased from 36.3% in 2016 to 43.7% in 2021. Most patients who underwent BCS had early breast cancer with low nodal involvement burden.

CONCLUSION

The increasing trends of BCS practice in LABC along with the increased use of NACT in the Kurdistan region in recent years comply with international guidelines. Our large multicenter, real-life series emphasizes the need to implement and discuss more conservative surgical approaches, enhanced with the broader use of NACT, through education and information programs for health providers and patients, in the context of multidisciplinary team discussions, to deliver high-quality, patient-centric breast cancer care.

Prospective Study of Pain Outcomes Associated With Breast Surgery in Women With Nonhereditary Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess pain severity and interference with life in women after different types of breast cancer surgery and the demographic, treatment-related, and psychosocial variables associated with these pain outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Data are conflicting regarding pain outcomes and quality of life (QOL) among women who undergo different types of breast surgery.

METHODS

Women with nonhereditary breast cancer completed the brief pain inventory before surgery and at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months postsurgery. We assessed associations between pain outcomes and CPM status and mastectomy status using multivariable repeated measures models. We assessed associations between pain outcome and QOL and decision satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of 288 women (mean age 56 years, 58% non-Hispanic White), 50 had CPM, 75 had unilateral mastectomy, and 163 had BCS. Mean pain severity scores were higher at one (2.78 vs 1.9, P = 0.016) and 6 months (2.79 vs 1.96, P = 0.031) postsurgery in women who had CPM versus those who did not, but there was no difference at 12 and 18 months. Comparing mastectomy versus BCS, pain severity was higher at 1 and 12 months. There was a significant interaction between pain severity and time point for CPM ( P = 0.006), but not mastectomy status ( P = 0.069). Regardless of surgery type, Black women had higher pain severity ( P = 0.004) than White women. Higher pain interference was associated with lower QOL ( P < 0.001) and lower decision satisfaction ( P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Providers should counsel women considering mastectomy about the potential for greater acute pain and its impact on overall well-being. Racial/ethnic disparities in pain exist and influence pain management in breast surgical patients.

Current Treatment Landscape for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancers and is characterized by an aggressive nature and a high rate of recurrence despite neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Although novel agents are constantly being introduced for the treatment of breast cancer, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes is the mainstay treatment option for TNBC. Based on CTNeoBC pooled analysis data, the achievement of pathologic CR (pCR) in TNBC is directly linked to improved survival outcomes. Therefore, the treatment paradigm for early TNBC has shifted to neoadjuvant treatment, and the escalation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve the pCR rate and the addition of post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy to control the residual disease have been investigated. In this article, we review the current treatment landscape for early TNBC, from standard cytotoxic chemotherapy to recent data on immune checkpoint inhibitors, capecitabine, and olaparib.

The underused potential of breast conserving therapy after neoadjuvant system treatment - Causes and solutions

Breast conserving therapy (BCT), consisting of breast conserving surgery and subsequent radiotherapy, is an equivalent option to mastectomy for women with early breast cancer. Although BCT after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) has been routinely recommend by international guidelines since many years, the rate of BCT worldwide varies largely and its potential is still underused. While the rate of BCT in western countries has increased over the past decades to currently about 70%, the rate of BCT is as low as 10% in other countries. In this review, we will evaluate the underused potential of breast conservation after NAST, identify causes, and discuss possible solutions. We identified clinical and non-clinical causes for the underuse of BCT after NAST including uncertainties within the community regarding oncologic outcomes, the correct tumor localization after NAST, the management of multifocal and multicentric tumors, margin assessment, disparities of socio-economic aspects on a patient and national level, and psychological biases affecting the shared decision-making process between patients and clinicians. Possible solutions to mitigate the underuse of BCT after NAST include interdisciplinary teams that keep the whole patient pathway in mind, optimized treatment counseling and shared decision-making, and targeted financial support to alleviate disparities.

Breast-Conserving Surgery in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyze the influencing factors and predictors of the efficiency and prognosis of NAC.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted by dividing patients into two groups according to two different therapy methods. With BCS as the exposure factor, 46 cases were assigned to the exposed group and 80 cases to the nonexposed group. We compare the difference in operation-related indicators, postoperative complications, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups. The factors affecting the efficiency and prognosis of NAC were analyzed by binary logistic regression, and the optimal cutoff value was determined by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The survival curve was plotted, and the univariate log-rank test was performed to analyze the difference in OS between the two groups. The influencing factors of OS were analyzed by the Cox risk regression model.

Results

NAC + BCS resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and shorter operative time and length of hospital stay than that in NAC (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis, or OS between the two groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the clinical stage I and Ki-67 high expression were independent protective factors of the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 were independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 high expression was an independent risk factor of OS (P < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the AUC of Ki-67 for NAC efficacy, prognosis, and OS were 0.706, 0.820, and 0.687, respectively, with optimal cutoff values of 25.5%, 29.0%, and 32.5%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that the OS of patients with NAC + BCS was 73.9% and NAC + MRM was 70.0% (P > 0.05). In the low expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 100.0% and 77.8%, respectively (P=0.060). In the high expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 53.8% and 63.6%, respectively (P=0.419).

Conclusions

NAC + BCS is a good method for treating TNBC, which has an obvious short-term effect and a good long-term prognosis. Clinical stage I and the high expression of Ki-67 are independent protective factors for the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 are independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 is a potential predictor for the efficacy, prognosis, and OS of NAC in TNBC patients. The high expression of Ki-67 indicates better NAC efficacy, a poorer prognosis, and a lower OS.

Predictors of surgery choices in women with early-stage breast cancer in China: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The breast-conserving surgery and reconstruction rate in China is relatively low when compared with those in Western countries. Moreover, predictors of surgical choices for women with breast cancer in China have not yet been explored. This study aims to explore differences in the surgical choices of women with different demographic and clinical characteristics and the predictors that influence surgical choices of women with early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included women with early-stage (0-II) breast cancer who underwent surgeries at one of two Xiamen University-affiliated hospitals between 2009 and 2017. Using medical records, eleven variables were collected: the woman's age, year of diagnosis, hospital, marital status, payment method, cancer stage, presence of positive axillary lymph node, histology, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and the type(s) of surgery they chose. Binary logistic regression was used to analyse predictors of surgical choice.

RESULTS

A total of 1,787 cases were included in this study. Of the total number of women with breast cancer, 61.3% underwent mastectomy without breast reconstruction, 26.4% underwent mastectomy with breast reconstruction, and the remaining 12.2% chose breast-conserving surgery. Women with different demographic and clinical characteristics underwent different types of surgery. Cancer stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and the choice of hospital were found to be predictors of breast-conserving surgery. Meanwhile, age, year of diagnosis, payment method, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the choice of hospital were found to be predictors of reconstruction after mastectomy in women with early-stage breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In China, surgical choices for women with breast cancer have diversified. Healthcare workers should understand the surgical preferences of women of different ages. For early detection of breast cancer, knowledge of breast self-examination and breast cancer screening should be provided. Adequate information about the safety of reconstruction and advocacy for medical insurance coverage of reconstruction should be offer. Breast surgeons need specialised training and standardising protocols towards different types of breast surgery. These actions will help women make better, well-informed decisions about their breast surgeries.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer In the Elderly: Are We Accomplishing Our Treatment Goals?

INTRODUCTION

Rates of downstaging and tolerability to NAC in women age ≥ 70 years with operable breast cancer have not been well studied. We sought to compare downstaging rates and NAC completion between women age 50-69 years and age ≥ 70 years.

METHODS

Consecutively treated women age ≥ 50 years with cT1-3N0-1 breast cancer receiving NAC followed by surgery from November 2013 to April 2020 were studied. Rates of downstaging from breast-conserving surgery (BCS)-ineligible to BCS-eligible and avoidance of axillary dissection (ALND) in cN1 patients were compared between patients age 50-69 and ≥ 70 years. NAC regimens and rates of completion also were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 651 women, age ≥ 50 years, with 668 cT1-3N0-1 breast cancers that were treated with NAC, were identified; 75 (11.1%) were age ≥ 70 years. Patients age ≥ 70 years were less likely to have lobular cancers (5% vs. 10%, p = 0.03), receive an anthracycline-based regimen (69% vs. 93%, p < 0.001), and complete their entire prescribed regimen (57% vs. 78%, p < 0.001). Of 312 BCS-ineligible patients eligible for downstaging, conversion rates to BCS-eligibility were similar between age groups (72% [≥ 70] vs. 74% [50-69], p > 0.9). Women age ≥ 70 years who converted to BCS-eligible post-NAC were more likely to undergo BCS than younger patients (93% vs. 74%, p = 0.04). Of 390 cN1 patients, 162 (42%) achieved a nodal pCR; ALND avoidance was similar between age groups (43% [≥ 70] vs. 42% [50-69], p > 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

While patients age ≥ 70 years received less anthracycline-based NAC and were less likely to complete their prescribed regimen, they experienced high rates of breast and axillary downstaging, similar to younger patients, suggesting that well-selected elderly patients can safely receive NAC with substantial clinical benefit.

Staging Breast Cancer with MRI, the T. A Key Role in the Neoadjuvant Setting

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) indications have expanded from inoperable locally advanced to early-stage breast cancer. Achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) has been proven to be an excellent prognostic marker leading to better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Although diagnostic accuracy of MRI has been shown repeatedly to be superior to conventional methods in assessing the extent of breast disease there are still controversies regarding the indication of MRI in this setting. We intended to review the complex literature concerning the tumor size in staging, response and surgical planning in patients with early breast cancer receiving NACT, in order to clarify the role of MRI. Morphological and functional MRI techniques are making headway in the assessment of the tumor size in the staging, residual tumor assessment and prediction of response. Radiomics and radiogenomics MRI applications in the setting of the prediction of response to NACT in breast cancer are continuously increasing. Tailored therapy strategies allow considerations of treatment de-escalation in excellent responders and avoiding or at least postponing breast surgery in selected patients.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II–III Breast Cancer: A Single-center Experience.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-968632/v3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Introduction We conducted this study to reflect a single-center experience with the use of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy for the management of women with operable breast cancer. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review on all women presenting with operable, stage II-III, breast cancer and were scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy at Suez Canal University Hospital. The primary outcome of this study was to estimate the proportion of patients with operable breast cancer who become eligible for breast conservative surgery (CBS) after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Results A total of 147 patients were included. Before the initiation of chemotherapy, only 66 (44.9%) patients were indicated for breast conservative surgery (CBS). A total of 40 (50.6%) new patients, out of the 81 patients who were ineligible before chemotherapy, became eligible for breast conservative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (95% CI 39.3–61.9%). On the other hand, eight (12.1%) patients became ineligible for breast conservative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Out of the 98 eligible patients for breast conservative surgery after chemotherapy, 72 (73.5%) patients underwent the surgery, and the remaining 26 patients chose total modified radical mastectomy (MRM). A total of 55 (76.4%) patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR). One woman (0.1%) experienced relapse at the 3rd year of follow-up and three women (2%) experienced relapse at the 5th year of follow-up. The difference between patients who underwent breast conservative surgery and total mastectomy was not statistically significant (p = 0.22 and 0.07, respectively). Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can play a crucial role in increasing the rate of eligibility for breast conservative surgery among women with operable, stage II-III, breast cancer.

Breast surgery after neoadjuvant therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The standard of care in breast surgery has changed, from mastectomy to breast conserving surgery whenever possible, and from axillary dissection to sentinel node biopsy. Neoadjuvant systemic approaches have broadened the indications for organ-conserving and less mutilating surgery, but also raise important questions of balancing locoregional treatment de-escalation and protecting excellent long-term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have aimed at investigating the safety of de-escalating surgical approaches not only in the upfront breast surgery situation but also after neoadjuvant systemic therapy. This pertains to both the safety of breast conserving surgery - including more complex oncoplastic approaches - within the new (posttherapeutic) anatomical extent of the residual disease, but more controversially to de-escalating surgical treatment of the axilla. While sentinel node biopsy appears to be the standard of care for node-negative disease also after primary systemic therapy, the optimal procedure in situations of posttherapeutic node-positive disease remains highly controversial.

SUMMARY

Both breast and axillary surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for women with breast cancer has undergone multiple paradigm changes in recent years. For the primary tumor in the breast, breast-conserving surgery constitutes the standard of care, and unnecessary mastectomies should be strongly discouraged. For axillary surgery, sentinel-node biopsy should be aimed at, and completion axillary dissections minimized for situations of extensive disease and or poor neoadjuvant treatment response. Additional techniques such as targeted axillary dissection are currently under evaluation in clinical trials.

Surgical options of the breast and clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A single-center retrospective study

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has evolved significantly and has been widely accepted for downstaging disease in early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer patients. Since the optimal surgical intervention for patients receiving NAC remains controversial, we aim to investigate the survival outcome of patients treated with different surgical management.

Methods

A retrospective, nested case-control study was conducted in patients with invasive breast cancer that underwent NAC at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2010 to June 2019. Based on surgical intervention, patients were divided into mastectomy and breast conservation groups. Patients were matched on age at diagnosis, menopausal status, the year of the surgery, post neoadjuvant therapy pathological tumor (ypT) stage, post neoadjuvant therapy pathological node (ypN) stage, molecular subtypes, and axillary surgery by propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 2080 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 1819 (87.5%) patients were categorized as mastectomy group, and 261 (12.5%) patients were classed as breast conservation group. Over 9-years of research, the proportion of breast conservation steadily increased in patients after NAC. Data showed that younger (P<0.001) and pre-menopausal (P<0.001) patients with normal BMI (P=0.022) were more likely to receive breast conservation. Patients at advanced ypT stage (P<0.001), ypN stage (P<0.001), and clinical TNM stage (P<0.001) were more often to undergo mastectomy, while breast conservation rate was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative tumors (P=0.023). Compared with the mastectomy group, significant benefits in overall survival were observed in patients who received breast conservation (Hazard ratio 0.41, [95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.97]; p=0.049) in the matched cohort. There was no statistical difference between groups related to disease-free survival and locoregional recurrence.

Conclusions

Tumor biology can significantly impact the surgical decision in patients administrated with NAC. Breast conservation was a safe alternative for mastectomy in the NAC setting without compromising survival outcomes and locoregional control.

Identification of a Gene Panel Predictive of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Employing Transcriptomic and Functional Validation

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients exhibiting pathological complete response (pCR) have better clinical outcomes compared to those with residual disease (RD). Therefore, robust biomarkers that can predict pCR may help with triage and resource prioritization in patients with TNBC. Herein, we identified a gene panel predictive of RD and pCR in TNBC from the discovery (n = 90) treatment-naive tumor transcriptomic data. Eight RD-derived genes were identified as TNBC-essential genes, which were highly predicative of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in an additional cohort of basal breast cancer (n = 442). Mechanistically, targeted depletion of the eight genes reduced the proliferation potential of TNBC cell models, while most remarkable effects were for combined SLC39A7, TIMM13, BANF1, and MVD knockdown in conjunction with doxorubicin. Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses revealed significant predictive power for the identified gene panels with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 for the validation cohort (n = 50) to discriminate RD from pCR. Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) network analysis of the pCR-derived gene signature identified an 87-immune gene signature highly predictive of pCR, which correlated with better OS, RFS, and distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in an independent cohort of basal and, to a lesser extent, HER2+ breast cancer. Our data have identified gene signatures predicative of RD and pCR in TNBC with potential clinical implications.

Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients

BACKGROUND

There have been conflicting studies reporting on survival advantages between breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy (BCS) in comparison with mastectomy. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of BCS and mastectomy in terms of overall survival (OS) comparing all past published studies.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of literature through October 2021 in PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE. The studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohorts that compare BCS versus mastectomy. We excluded studies that included male sex, stage 0, distant metastasis at diagnosis, bilateral synchronous cancer, neoadjuvant radiation/chemotherapy, and articles with incomplete data. We performed a meta-analysis following the random-effect model with the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

From 18,997 publications, a total of 30 studies were included in the final analysis: 6 studies were randomized trials, and 24 were retrospective cohorts. A total of 1,802,128 patients with a follow-up ranging from 4 to 20 years were included, and 1,075,563 and 744,565 underwent BCS and mastectomy, respectively. Among the population, BCS is associated with improved OS compared with mastectomy [relative risk (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.74]. This effect was similar when analysis was performed in cohorts and multi-institutional databases (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49-0.67). Furthermore, the benefit of BCS was stronger in patients who had less than 10 years of follow-up (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent BCS had better OS compared with mastectomy. Such results depicting survival advantage, especially using such a large sample of patients, may need to be included in the shared surgical decision making when discussing breast cancer treatment with patients.