1
|
Howe GN, Edmonston DY, Dirks GC, Boop FA, Merchant TE. Conformal Radiation Therapy for Ependymoma at Age ≤3 Years: A 25-Year Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:869-877. [PMID: 36690160 PMCID: PMC10782549 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) affects survival after surgery for young children (age <3 years) diagnosed with intracranial ependymoma. Conformal photon RT promised to spare normal tissue and was introduced more than 25 years ago to improve outcomes for these vulnerable patients. Long-term results for those first treated with conformal methods provide valuable information and serve as a comparison against newer methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1997 and 2018, 101 patients <3.1-years-old were treated with conformal and intensity modulated photon therapy after definitive surgery for intracranial ependymoma. The median age at RT was 2.1 years and the time from diagnosis to the start of RT was 10 weeks. The extent of resection was gross-total in 82%, and 38% underwent more than 1 attempt at resection. The total prescribed dose was 54 to 59.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. RESULTS The 10-year event-free and overall survivals were 58.5% ± 5.0% and 72.6% ± 4.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 18.4 years (range, 4.2-23.3 years). Tumor progression occurred in 34 patients with a median time of 1.6 years. Death occurred in 34 patients from ependymoma (n = 24), secondary malignancy (n = 6), necrosis (n = 2), shunt failure (n = 1), and anaphylactic reaction (n = 1). Twenty-three patients developed a secondary tumor including 6 cases of fatal high-grade glioma. Of the surviving cohort and those ≥18 years old, 98% obtained a high school diploma, 64% had a current driver's license, 89% were students or employed full or part time, 32% were living independently, and 70% received higher education or training. CONCLUSIONS Long-term results of children treated using photon conformal RT after surgery demonstrate that adjuvant RT resulted in long-term disease control and functional independence. These results point to the need for new treatment strategies to improve tumor control and provide investigators hope that newer RT methods will further reduce complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle N Howe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Drucilla Y Edmonston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennesse
| | - Grace C Dirks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Frederick A Boop
- Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Narin F, Bahadir S, Hanalioğlu Ş, Karakaya D, Başar I, Işikay I, Söylemezoğlu F, Akalan N, Bilginer B. Does Gross Total Resection Improve Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Pediatric Intracranial Ependymomas? Single-Center Clinical Experience Of 61 Cases. World Neurosurg 2022; 165:e469-e478. [PMID: 35772712 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To share our clinical experience of 25 years and identify prognostic factors for progression-free and overall survival in pediatric intracranial ependymomas. METHODS In total, 61 children who were treated between 1995 and 2020 in a single institution were included in the study. Medical records of the patients were retrospectively reviewed to obtain and analyze the following data: patient age at first surgery, sex, presenting symptoms, hydrocephalus and any invasive treatment, anatomic site, extent of resection, pathologic grade, time to progression, and time to death. Progression-free and overall survival rates and affecting factors were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Dysphagia, number of surgeries, and spinal seeding were associated with progression free and overall survival in univariate analysis. The extent of resection, World Health Organization grade, and visual problems were also associated with progression whereas sex was associated with overall survival. Cox regression identified the extent of resection and single surgery as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival. No independent factor was found for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS This single center experience of 25 years confirms the beneficial effect of gross total resection on disease progression. Although spinal seeding seems to affect survival rates, greater number of cases are needed to reveal its full effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fırat Narin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sinan Bahadir
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amasya University Faculty of Medicine, Amasya, Turkey.
| | - Şahin Hanalioğlu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dicle Karakaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Başar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Ilkay Işikay
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Figen Söylemezoğlu
- Department of Pathology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nejat Akalan
- Department of Neurosurgery, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Burçak Bilginer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Current State of Radiotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors: An Overview of Post-Radiotherapy Neurocognitive Decline and Outcomes. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071050. [PMID: 35887547 PMCID: PMC9315742 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumors of the central nervous system are the most common solid malignancies diagnosed in children. While common, they are also found to have some of the lowest survival rates of all malignancies. Treatment of childhood brain tumors often consists of operative gross total resection with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The current body of literature is largely inconclusive regarding the overall benefit of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. However, it is known that both are associated with conditions that lower the quality of life in children who undergo those treatments. Chemotherapy is often associated with nausea, emesis, significant fatigue, immunosuppression, and alopecia. While radiotherapy can be effective for achieving local control, it is associated with late effects such as endocrine dysfunction, secondary malignancy, and neurocognitive decline. Advancements in radiotherapy grant both an increase in lifetime survival and an increased lifetime for survivors to contend with these late effects. In this review, the authors examined all the published literature, analyzing the results of clinical trials, case series, and technical notes on patients undergoing radiotherapy for the treatment of tumors of the central nervous system with a focus on neurocognitive decline and survival outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Tripathi M, Deora H, Tripathi S, Ballari N. Role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of intracranial pathologies of pediatric population: Current concepts, limitations, and future directions. J Pediatr Neurosci 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/jpn.jpn_51_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
5
|
Citation analysis of the most influential ependymoma research articles illustrates improved knowledge of the molecular biology of ependymoma. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:1041-1088. [PMID: 34613526 PMCID: PMC8976812 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01579-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The history of academic research on ependymoma is expansive. This review summarizes its history with a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on ependymoma. In March 2020, we queried the Web of Science database to identify the most cited articles on ependymoma using the terms “ependymoma” or “ependymal tumors,” yielding 3145 publications. Results were arranged by the number of times each article was cited in descending order. The top 100 articles spanned across nearly a century; the oldest article was published in 1924, while the most recent was in 2017. These articles were published in 35 unique journals, including a mix of basic science and clinical journals. The three institutions with the most papers in the top 100 were St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (16%), the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (6%), and the German Cancer Research Center (5%). We analyzed the publications that may be considered the most influential in the understanding and treatment management of ependymoma. Studies focused on the molecular classification of ependymomas were well-represented among the most cited articles, reflecting the field’s current area of focus and its future directions. Additionally, this article also offers a reference for further studies in the ependymoma field.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bennett J, Erker C, Lafay-Cousin L, Ramaswamy V, Hukin J, Vanan MI, Cheng S, Coltin H, Fonseca A, Johnston D, Lo A, Zelcer S, Alvi S, Bowes L, Brossard J, Charlebois J, Eisenstat D, Felton K, Fleming A, Jabado N, Larouche V, Legault G, Mpofu C, Perreault S, Silva M, Sinha R, Strother D, Tsang DS, Wilson B, Crooks B, Bartels U. Canadian Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Standards of Practice. Front Oncol 2020; 10:593192. [PMID: 33415075 PMCID: PMC7783450 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.593192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary CNS tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related death in pediatrics. It is essential to understand treatment trends to interpret national survival data. In Canada, children with CNS tumors are treated at one of 16 tertiary care centers. We surveyed pediatric neuro-oncologists to create a national standard of practice to be used in the absence of a clinical trial for seven of the most prevalent brain tumors in children. This allowed description of practice across the country, along with a consensus. This had a multitude of benefits, including understanding practice patterns, allowing for a basis to compare in future research and informing Health Canada of the current management of patients. This also allows all children in Canada to receive equivalent care, regardless of location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Bennett
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Craig Erker
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Lucie Lafay-Cousin
- Department of Oncology, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Juliette Hukin
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Sylvia Cheng
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hallie Coltin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Adriana Fonseca
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Donna Johnston
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Lo
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Radiotherapeutics, BC Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shayna Zelcer
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Saima Alvi
- Pediatric Oncology, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Regina, SK, Canada
| | - Lynette Bowes
- Division of Pediatrics, Memorial University, St. John's, NF, Canada
| | - Josée Brossard
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Janie Charlebois
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - David Eisenstat
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology & Palliative Care, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Kathleen Felton
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Jim Pattison Children's Hospital, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Adam Fleming
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nada Jabado
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Valérie Larouche
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, CHU de Quebec, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Geneviève Legault
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Chris Mpofu
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Jim Pattison Children's Hospital, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | - Mariana Silva
- Division of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Roona Sinha
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Jim Pattison Children's Hospital, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Doug Strother
- Department of Oncology, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Beverly Wilson
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology & Palliative Care, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Bruce Crooks
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Ute Bartels
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang Q, Cheng J, Li J, Zhang S, Liu W, Ju Y, Hui X. The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1585. [PMID: 32974195 PMCID: PMC7472988 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim Survival rates and prognostic factors of cortical ependymomas (CEs) remain elusive. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment, and outcomes for patients with CEs based on institutional and literature case series. Materials and Methods Thirty patients with CEs from our department were included in this study. Furthermore, a systemic review of the literature yielded an additional 106 patients with CEs. Clinical data including patient age, sex, symptoms, tumor location, World Health Organization (WHO) grade, extent of surgery, radiation, recurrence, and survival were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results From January 2009 to October 2019, 30 (4.2%) cases were diagnosed as CEs in our department. These series consisted of 19 males and 11 females, 10 continuous patients after 2017 screened for C11orf95-RELA fusion, and 9 patients (90%) were RELA fusion positive. During the follow-up period, nine (30%) patients depicted tumor recurrence or progression; four (13.3%) patients died of tumor progression. The literature review yielded 106 CE cases, with additional 30 cases of our own collected for further analysis. Of these 136 cases, the frontal lobe (40%) was the most common location, and the average age was 22.6 ± 17.6 years. Anaplastic histology/WHO grade III tumors were identified in 68 (50%) patients. Statistically analysis demonstrated that extent of surgery and WHO tumor grade were significant prognostic factors in Kaplan–Meier log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards models. Gross total resection (GTR) predicted longer progression-free survival (PFS) [P = 0.013, hazard ratio (HR) = 3.012, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.257–7.213] and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.003, HR = 5.322, 95% CI = 1.751–16.178). WHO grade III tumors had worse PFS (P = 0.002, HR = 5.17, 95% CI = 1.804–14.816) and OS (P = 0.025, HR = 5.640, 95% CI = 1.248–25.495). Conclusion CEs accounted for only 3.5 to 5.7% of ependymomas, with seizures the most common symptom and the frontal lobe the most frequent location. CEs may have higher rate of RELA fusions, but generally favorable prognosis. The extent of surgery and WHO tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. GTTR or WHO grade II tumors had better overall outcome in patients with CEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiguang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jian Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiuhong Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Si Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenke Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Ju
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xuhui Hui
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ritzmann TA, Rogers HA, Paine SML, Storer LCD, Jacques TS, Chapman RJ, Ellison D, Donson AM, Foreman NK, Grundy RG. A retrospective analysis of recurrent pediatric ependymoma reveals extremely poor survival and ineffectiveness of current treatments across central nervous system locations and molecular subgroups. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28426. [PMID: 32614133 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relapse occurs in 50% of pediatric ependymoma cases and has poor prognosis. Few studies have investigated the clinical progress of relapsed disease, and treatment lacks a standardized approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed 302 pediatric ependymoma cases. Tumor, demographic, and treatment variables were investigated for association with relapse risk, time to recurrence, and survival after relapse. DNA methylation profiling was performed for 135/302 cases, and predominant subgroups were EPN_PFA (n = 95) and EPN_RELA (n = 24). Chromosome 1q status was ascertained for 185/302 cases by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and DNA methylation profiles. RESULTS Sixty-two percent of cases relapsed, with a median of two recurrences with no difference between posterior fossa and supratentorial locations (66% vs 55% relapse rate). One hundred seventeen (38%) cases relapsed within two years and five (2%) beyond 10 years. The late relapses were clinically heterogeneous. Tumor grade and treatment affected risk and time to relapse variably across subgroups. After relapse, surgery and irradiation delayed disease progression with a minimal impact on survival across the entire cohort. In the EPN_PFA and EPN_RELA groups, 1q gain was independently associated with relapse risk (subhazard ratio [SHR] 4.307, P = 0.027 and SHR 1.982, P = 0.010, respectively) while EPN_PFA had increased relapse risk compared with EPN_RELA (SHR = 0.394, P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Recurrent pediatric ependymoma is an aggressive disease with poor outcomes, for which current treatments are inadequate. We report that chromosome 1q gain increases relapse risk in common molecular subgroups in children but a deeper understanding of the underlying biology at relapse and novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy A Ritzmann
- Children's Brain Tumor Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hazel A Rogers
- Children's Brain Tumor Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon M L Paine
- Department of Neuropathology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lisa C D Storer
- Children's Brain Tumor Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Thomas S Jacques
- Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health and Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Rebecca J Chapman
- Children's Brain Tumor Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Ellison
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Andrew M Donson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Nicholas K Foreman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Richard G Grundy
- Children's Brain Tumor Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang Q, Cheng J, Zhang S, Li Q, Hui X, Ju Y. Supratentorial pediatric cortical ependymomas: a comprehensive retrospective study. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 44:1543-1551. [PMID: 32607870 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01336-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric cortical ependymomas (CEs) are rare; the clinical features and optimal treatment remain ill-defined. We aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics and outcome of pediatric CEs based on institutional series and literature review. Thirteen children with CEs from our department were included in the present study. Furthermore, a search of English language peer-reviewed articles yielded 43 patients with CEs. The clinical data, treatment, and outcome were retrospectively reviewed and statistically analyzed. Our institutional series consisted of nine males and four females. The literature review yielded 56 pediatric CE cases (including ours) for further analysis. Of these 56 cases, frontal lobe (n = 19, 41.3%) was the most common location and most of the tumors were located in the right hemisphere (n = 27, 58.7%). Seizures (n = 23, 41.1%) were the most frequent preoperative symptoms. Thirty patients (n = 30, 53.6%) were WHO grade II. Five continuous patients in our series screened for C11orf95-RELA fusion and all the patients (100%) were RELA fusion positive. Fourteen (26.4%) patients experienced tumor recurrence and 4 (7.5%) patients died during the follow-up. Multivariate survival analysis depicted extent of surgery resection was the only prognostic factor for PFS and patient with gross total resection (P = 0.037, HR 3.682, 95% CI 1.082-13.79) had longer PFS. Furthermore, Log-rank testing for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the extent of surgery resection (P = 0.007) was the only prognostic factor for OS. Pediatric CEs are rare, commonly seen in frontal lobe and right hemisphere. Seizures are the most common symptoms. They may have higher rate of RELA fusions, but favorable outcome. A low incidence of anaplastic histology has been depicted. Gross total resection is significantly associated with longer PFS and OS. Careful follow-up is necessary because the tumors may progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiguang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Wu Hou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jian Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Wu Hou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Si Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Wu Hou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Wu Hou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Xuhui Hui
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Wu Hou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yan Ju
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Wu Hou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review discusses the evidence base behind current and emerging strategies of management of intracranial and spinal ependymomas in children, with a particular focus on aspects of surgical techniques, challenges and complications. RECENT FINDINGS The cornerstone of management remains maximal safe resective surgery, which has repeatedly been shown to correlate with improved survival. This is followed by focal conformal radiotherapy, although good results using proton beam therapy, with the potential for diminished side effects, are emerging. The role of chemotherapy remains largely unproven for paediatric ependymoma. Despite optimal management strategies, many children with ependymoma suffer from tumour recurrence. The standard of care for paediatric ependymoma comprises surgery and radiotherapy. Results of ongoing clinical trials will help shape its management in order to leverage our increasingly sophisticated understanding of the genetic drivers behind these tumours into survival benefit for this challenging group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian M Toescu
- Developmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, UCL-GOS Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - Kristian Aquilina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tensaouti F, Ducassou A, Chaltiel L, Bolle S, Habrand JL, Alapetite C, Coche-Dequeant B, Bernier V, Claude L, Carrie C, Padovani L, Muracciole X, Supiot S, Huchet A, Leseur J, Kerr C, Hangard G, Lisbona A, Goudjil F, Ferrand R, Laprie A. Feasibility of Dose Escalation in Patients With Intracranial Pediatric Ependymoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:531. [PMID: 31293971 PMCID: PMC6598548 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: Pediatric ependymoma carries a dismal prognosis, mainly owing to local relapse within RT fields. The current prospective European approach is to increase the radiation dose with a sequential hypofractionated stereotactic boost. In this study, we assessed the possibility of using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), comparing VMAT vs. IMPT dose delivery. Material and methods: The cohort included 101 patients. The dose to planning target volume (PTV59.4) was 59.4/1.8 Gy, and the dose to SIB volume (PTV67.6) was 67.6/2.05 Gy. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the tumor bed plus residual tumor, clinical target volume (CTV59.4) was GTV + 5 mm, and PTV59.4 was CTV59.4 + 3 mm. PTV67.6 was GTV+ 3 mm. After treatment plan optimization, quality indices and doses to target volume and organs at risk (OARs) were extracted and compared with the standard radiation doses that were actually delivered (median = 59.4 Gy [50.4 59.4]). Results: In most cases, the proton treatment resulted in higher quality indices (p < 0.001). Compared with the doses that were initially delivered, mean, and maximum doses to some OARs were no higher with SIB VMAT, and significantly lower with protons (p < 0.001). In the case of posterior fossa tumor, there was a lower dose to the brainstem with protons, in terms of V59 Gy, mean, and near-maximum (D2%) doses. Conclusion: Dose escalation with intensity-modulated proton or photon SIB is feasible in some patients. This approach could be considered for children with unresectable residue or post-operative FLAIR abnormalities, particularly if they have supratentorial tumors. It should not be considered for infratentorial tumors encasing the brainstem or extending to the medulla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Tensaouti
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Ducassou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Léonor Chaltiel
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Valérie Bernier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Christian Carrie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Aymeri Huchet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Bordeaux, France
| | - Julie Leseur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Christine Kerr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Regional du Cancer Montpellier, Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Grégorie Hangard
- Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Albert Lisbona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Régis Ferrand
- Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Benesch M, Mynarek M, Witt H, Warmuth-Metz M, Pietsch T, Bison B, Pfister SM, Pajtler KW, Kool M, Schüller U, Pietschmann K, Juhnke BO, Tippelt S, Fleischhack G, Schmid I, Kramm CM, Vorwerk P, Beilken A, Classen CF, Hernáiz Driever P, Kropshofer G, Imschweiler T, Lemmer A, Kortmann RD, Rutkowski S, von Hoff K. Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Intracranial Ependymoma in Children: Frequency, Molecular Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcome in the Prospective HIT Series. Oncologist 2019; 24:e921-e929. [PMID: 30850560 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on frequency, clinical presentation, and outcome of primary metastatic intracranial ependymoma in children are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospective data on patients younger than 21 years with metastatic intracranial ependymoma at first diagnosis, registered from 2001 to 2014 in the HIT-2000 trial and the HIT-2000 Interim Registry, were analyzed. RESULTS Of 453 registered patients with intracranial ependymoma and central neuropathology review, initial staging included spinal magnetic resonance imaging in all patients and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis in 402 patients. Ten patients (2.2%) had metastatic disease, including three with microscopic CSF positivity only (M1 metastasis stage, 0.7% of patients with CSF staging). Location of the primary tumor was supratentorial in four patients (all supratentorial RELA-fused ependymoma [ST-EPN-RELA]) and within the posterior fossa in five patients (posterior fossa ependymoma type A [PF-EPN-A], n = 4; posterior fossa ependymoma not further classifiable, n = 1), and multifocal in one patient.All four patients with ST-EPN-RELA were alive in first or second complete remission (CR) 7.5-12.3 years after diagnosis. All four patients with macroscopic metastases of posterior fossa or multifocal ependymoma died. Three patients with initial M1 stage (ST-EPN-RELA, n = 1; PF-EPN-A, n = 2) received chemotherapy and local irradiation and were alive in second or third CR 3.0-9.7 years after diagnosis. Progression-free and overall survival of the entire cohort at 5 years was 13% (±6%), and 58% (±16%), respectively. CONCLUSION Primary metastatic disease is rare in children with intracranial ependymoma. Prognosis may depend on molecular subgroup and extent of dissemination, and relevance of CSF analysis for initial staging remains to be clarified. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Childhood ependymoma presenting with metastasis at first diagnosis is very rare with a frequency of 2.4% in this population-based, well-characterized cohort. Detection of microscopic metastases in the cerebrospinal fluid was extremely rare, and impact on prognosis and respective treatment decision on irradiation field remains unclear. Initial metastatic presentation occurs in both supratentorial RELA-fused ependymoma and posterior fossa ependymoma. Prognosis may differ according to extent of metastasis and biological subgroup, with poor prognosis in diffusely spread metastatic posterior fossa ependymoma even after combination therapy with both intensive chemotherapy and craniospinal irradiation, which may help to guide individual therapeutic decisions for future patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Benesch
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Martin Mynarek
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Witt
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Monika Warmuth-Metz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Institute of Neuropathology, Brain Tumor Reference Center of the German Society for Neuropathology and Neuroanatomy (DGNN), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Brigitte Bison
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristian W Pajtler
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcel Kool
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schüller
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Research Institute Children's Cancer Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Pietschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Björn-Ole Juhnke
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Pediatrics III, University Children's Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gudrun Fleischhack
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Pediatrics III, University Children's Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Irene Schmid
- Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Christof M Kramm
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Peter Vorwerk
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University Otto von Guericke Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Beilken
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | | | - Pablo Hernáiz Driever
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, (corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriele Kropshofer
- Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas Imschweiler
- Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Andreas Lemmer
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katja von Hoff
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, (corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ducassou A, Padovani L, Chaltiel L, Bolle S, Habrand JL, Claude L, Carrie C, Muracciole X, Coche-Dequeant B, Alapetite C, Supiot S, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Bernier-Chastagner V, Huchet A, Leseur J, Le Prise E, Kerr C, Truc G, Nguyen TD, Bertozzi AI, Frappaz D, Boetto S, Sevely A, Tensaouti F, Laprie A. Pediatric Localized Intracranial Ependymomas: A Multicenter Analysis of the Société Française de lutte contre les Cancers de l'Enfant (SFCE) from 2000 to 2013. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:166-173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
14
|
Alvarez Moret J, Obermeier T, Pohl F, Loeschel R, Koelbl O, Dobler B. Second cancer risk after radiation therapy of ependymoma using the flattening filter free irradiation mode of a linear accelerator. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:632-639. [PMID: 30125453 PMCID: PMC6123158 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric patients suffering from ependymoma are usually treated with cranial or craniospinal three‐dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Intensity‐modulated techniques spare dose to the surrounding tissue, but the risk for second malignancies may be increased due to the increase in low‐dose volume. The aim of this study is to investigate if the flattening filter free (FFF) mode allows reducing the risk for second malignancies compared to the mode with flattening filter (FF) for intensity‐modulated techniques and to 3DCRT. A reduction of the risk would be advantageous for treating pediatric ependymoma. 3DCRT was compared to intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with and without flattening filter. Dose–volume histograms (DVHs) were compared to evaluate the plan quality and used to calculate the excess absolute risk (EAR) to develop second cancer in the brain. Dose verification was performed with a two‐dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array and the out‐of‐field dose was measured with an ionization chamber to determine the EAR in peripheral organs. Delivery times were measured. Both VMAT and IMRT achieved similar plan quality in terms of dose sparing in the OAR and higher PTV coverage as compared to 3DCRT. Peripheral dose in low‐dose region, which is proportional to the EAR in organs located in this region, for example, gonads, bladder, or bowel, could be significantly reduced using FFF. The lowest peripheral EAR and lowest delivery times were hereby achieved with VMATFFF. The EAR calculated based on DVH in the brain could not be reduced using FFF mode. VMATFFF improved the target coverage and homogeneity and kept the dose in the OAR similar compared to 3DCRT. In addition, delivery times were significantly reduced using VMATFFF. Therefore, for radiotherapy of ependymoma patients, VMATFFF may be considered advantageous for the combination of Elekta Synergy linac and Oncentra External Beam planning system used in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Alvarez Moret
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Tina Obermeier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Pohl
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Rainer Loeschel
- Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Applied Sciences, OTH Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Koelbl
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Dobler
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Imaging biomarkers of outcome after radiotherapy for pediatric ependymoma. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:103-107. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
16
|
Kano H, Su YH, Wu HM, Simonova G, Liscak R, Cohen-Inbar O, Sheehan JP, Meola A, Sharma M, Barnett GH, Mathieu D, Vasas LT, Kaufmann AM, Jacobs RC, Lunsford LD. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Ependymomas: An International Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 2018; 84:227-234. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hideyuki Kano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yan-Hua Su
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Mei Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Gabriela Simonova
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech
| | - Roman Liscak
- Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech
| | - Or Cohen-Inbar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Antonio Meola
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mayur Sharma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David Mathieu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Lucas T Vasas
- Section of Neurosurgery, University of Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Rachel C Jacobs
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
De B, Khakoo Y, Souweidane MM, Dunkel IJ, Patel SH, Gilheeney SW, De Braganca KC, Karajannis MA, Wolden SL. Patterns of relapse for children with localized intracranial ependymoma. J Neurooncol 2018; 138:435-445. [PMID: 29511977 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2815-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
We examined patterns of relapse and prognostic factors in children with intracranial ependymoma. Records of 82 children diagnosed with localized intracranial ependymoma were reviewed. 52% first presented to our institution after relapse. Median age at initial diagnosis was 4 years (range 0-18 years). Gender was 55% male. Initial tumor location was infratentorial in 71% and supratentorial in 29%. Histology was WHO Grade II in 32% and Grade III in 68%. As part of definitive management, 99% had surgery, 70% received RT (26% 2D/3D-conformal RT[CRT], 22% intensity-modulated RT [IMRT], 22% proton), and 37% received chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 4.6 years (range 0.2-32.9). Overall, 74% of patients relapsed (50% local, 17% distant, 7% local + distant) at a median 1.5 (range 0.1-17.5) years. Five-year OS and FFS for patients presenting prior to relapse are 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-83%) and 48% (95% CI 30-64%), respectively. On log-rank, superior overall survival (OS) was demonstrated for gross total resection (p = 0.03). Superior failure-free survival (FFS) was demonstrated for age < 5 years (p = 0.04). No difference in OS or FFS was found between 2D/3D-CRT versus IMRT/proton (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, age ≤ 5 was independently associated with a lower risk of death and failure versus older patients (p < 0.05). Contrary to previous reports, young age may not be a poor prognostic factor in patients who can tolerate intensive treatment. Future studies examining patients stratified by clinical and molecular attributes are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Yasmin Khakoo
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark M Souweidane
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ira J Dunkel
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Suchit H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Stephen W Gilheeney
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C De Braganca
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tensaouti F, Ducassou A, Chaltiel L, Bolle S, Muracciole X, Coche-Dequeant B, Alapetite C, Bernier V, Claude L, Supiot S, Huchet A, Kerr C, le Prisé E, Laprie A. Patterns of failure after radiotherapy for pediatric patients with intracranial ependymoma. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:362-367. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2016] [Revised: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
19
|
Haresh KP, Gandhi AK, Mallick S, Benson R, Gupta S, Sharma DN, Julka PK, Rath GK. Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes of Intracranial Ependymoma Treated with Multimodality Approach. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2017; 38:420-426. [PMID: 29333005 PMCID: PMC5759057 DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_202_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to analyze treatment outcomes of intracranial ependymoma (ICE) treated at our institute with multimodality approach. Materials and Methods: Demography, treatment details, and survival data of 40 patients (2005–2012) were collected in a predesigned pro forma. Kaplan Meier method was used to analyze disease-free survival (DFS) and the impact of prognostic factors was determined using univariate analysis (log-rank test). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox-proportional hazard model. SPSS version 21.0 was used for all statistical analysis. Results: Male:female ratio was 29:11. Gross total resection: subtotal resection or less was 42.5%: 57.5%. A total of 16 patients (40%) had anaplastic histology. All except two patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Four patients received concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide [TMZ]) and 10 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (6 carboplatin plus etoposide; 4 TMZ). Median follows up was 18 months (2–60 months). Median DFS for the entire cohort was 22.42 months. The estimated 1, 2, and 3 years DFS was found to be 58.5%, 41%, and 30.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients receiving higher radiation dose (56 Gray vs. 60 Gray; hazard ratio [HR] 0.366; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.142–0.9553; P = 0.02) and lower MIB labeling index (<20 vs. ≥20; HR 0.238; 95% CI 0.092–0.617; P = 0.001) had a better DFS. Higher radiation dose continued to be an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR 0.212; 95% CI 0.064–0.856; P = 0.03). Conclusion: ICE has guarded prognosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy to a higher radiation dose improves survival. Higher MIB labeling index connotes a dismal survival despite the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunhi Parambath Haresh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajeet Kumar Gandhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Supriya Mallick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rony Benson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Subhash Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Daya Nand Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Pramod Kumar Julka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Goura Kisor Rath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B.R.A IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi,, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Over the past 150 years since Virchow's initial characterization of ependymoma, incredible efforts have been made in the classification of these tumors and in the care of pediatric patients with this disease. While the advent of modern neurosurgery and the optimization of radiation have provided significant gains, a more complex but incomplete picture of pediatric ependymomas has begun to form through a combination of international collaborations and detailed genetic and histologic characterizations. This review includes and synthesizes the clinical understanding of pediatric ependymoma and their developing molecular insight into what is truly a family of malignancies in which distinct members require different surgical approaches, radiation plans, and targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A Vitanza
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sonia Partap
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lobón MJ, Bautista F, Riet F, Dhermain F, Canale S, Dufour C, Blauwblomme T, Zerah M, Beccaria K, Saint-Rose C, Puget S, Carrie C, Lartigau E, Bondiau PY, Valteau-Couanet D, Grill J, Bolle S. Re-irradiation of recurrent pediatric ependymoma: modalities and outcomes: a twenty-year survey. SPRINGERPLUS 2016; 5:879. [PMID: 27386327 PMCID: PMC4920736 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2562-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Standard treatment for recurrent ependymomas is not defined. Re- irradiation has been proposed but its modalities and results are still to be explored. Patients and methods From June 1994 to December 2013, 32 pediatric patients with ependymoma were re-irradiated for local (n = 15) or metastatic (n = 17) relapses. Files were reviewed retrospectively. Results Local relapses were treated with hypofractionated focal radiotherapy (hypoFFRT) (n = 8) or focal fractionated radiotherapy (FFRT) (n = 7). Metastatic relapses were treated with hypoFFRT (n = 3), FFRT (n = 3), spinal radiotherapy (n = 4) and craniospinal irradiation (CSI) (n = 7). Median PFS and OS after re-irradiation were 1.2 and 3.5 years respectively with a median follow-up of 2.1 years (0.2–11.4). For local relapses, median PFS was 2.5 years for patients treated with hypoFFRT versus 1.2 years for patients treated with FFRT (p = 0.2). For metastatic relapses, median PFS was 0.7 years for patients treated with focal radiotherapy (hypoFFRT, FFRT, spinal radiotherapy) versus 6.8 years for patients treated with CSI (p = 0.073). 15 patients achieved greater PFS after second radiotherapy (RT2) than after first radiotherapy (RT1). 27 patients (84 %) had surgery before re-irradiation. PFS was better for patients with GTR before RT2 (14.7 vs 6.7 months) (p = 0.05). 5 patients developed radionecrosis; only one required corticosteroids. Conclusion Re-irradiation at relapse is a safe, feasible and potentially curative treatment. Metastatic relapse may require CSI even when isolated and re-operated. For local relapses, considering conflicting results in the literature, a randomized trial is warranted to explore fractionated focal radiotherapy versus hypofractionated focal irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jesus Lobón
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Francisco Bautista
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - François Riet
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France
| | - Frederic Dhermain
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France
| | - Sandra Canale
- Department of Radiology Gustave Roussy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France
| | - Christelle Dufour
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Thomas Blauwblomme
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Michel Zerah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Beccaria
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | | | - Stephanie Puget
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Dominique Valteau-Couanet
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Jacques Grill
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Stephanie Bolle
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Murphy ES, Chao ST, Angelov L, Vogelbaum MA, Barnett G, Jung E, Recinos VR, Mohammadi A, Suh JH. Radiosurgery for Pediatric Brain Tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2016; 63:398-405. [PMID: 26536284 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The utility of radiosurgery for pediatric brain tumors is not well known. For children, radiosurgery may have an important role for treating unresectable tumors, residual disease, or tumors in the recurrent setting that have received prior radiotherapy. The available evidence demonstrates utility for some children with primary brain tumors resulting in good local control. Radiosurgery can be considered for limited residual disease or focal recurrences. However, the potential toxicities are unique and not insignificant. Therefore, prospective studies need to be performed to develop guidelines for indications and treatment for children and reduce toxicity in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gene Barnett
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Edward Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, John R. Marsh Cancer Center, Hagerstown, MD, USA
| | - Violette R Recinos
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alireza Mohammadi
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bindra RS, Wolden SL. Advances in Radiation Therapy in Pediatric Neuro-oncology. J Child Neurol 2016; 31:506-16. [PMID: 26271789 DOI: 10.1177/0883073815597758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy remains a highly effective therapy for many pediatric central nervous system tumors. With more children achieving long-term survival after treatment for brain tumors, late-effects of radiation have become an important concern. In response to this problem, treatment protocols for a variety of pediatric central nervous system tumors have evolved to reduce radiation fields and doses when possible. Recent advances in radiation technology such as image guidance and proton therapy have led to a new era of precision treatment with significantly less exposure to healthy tissues. These developments along with the promise of molecular classification of tumors and targeted therapies point to an optimistic future for pediatric neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit S Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Central nervous system tumors represent the most common solid tumors in children and are a leading cause of cancer-related fatalities in this age group. Here, we provide an update on insights gained through molecular profiling of the most common malignant childhood brain tumors. RECENT FINDINGS Genomic profiling studies of medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (diffuse midline glioma, with H3-K27M mutation), have refined, if not redefined, the diagnostic classification and therapeutic stratification of patients with these tumors. They detail the substantial genetic heterogeneity across each disease type and, importantly, link genotypic information to clinical course. The most aggressive, treatment-resistant (and also treatment-sensitive) forms within each disease entity are identified, and their potentially actionable targets. SUMMARY Molecularly based classification of pediatric brain tumors provides a critical framework for the more precise stratification and treatment of children with brain tumors.
Collapse
|
25
|
Dorfer C, Tonn J, Rutka JT. Ependymoma: a heterogeneous tumor of uncertain origin and limited therapeutic options. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2016; 134:417-431. [PMID: 26948369 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-802997-8.00025-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Ependymomas are tumors that typically occur with an age-based site preference, with adults harboring supratentorial and spinal tumors and pediatric tumors being mainly in the posterior fossa. Despite their similar histologic appearance, the prognosis varies significantly by age and tumor location, with a better prognosis in increasing age. The mainstay of treatment remains surgical excision with or without radiation therapy as the tumor biology is poorly understood and chemotherapy is generally considered to be ineffective. More recently, molecular biology data have increased our understanding of the genetic and epigenetic changes that drive these tumors, but still it will take a lot of effort to find effective chemotherapeutic regimens. Currently, we are trying to define a subset of tumors, for which radiation therapy can be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Dorfer
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joerg Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinic of Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich-Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | - James T Rutka
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Frandsen JE, Wagner A, Bollo RJ, Shrieve DC, Poppe MM. Long-term life expectancy for children with ependymoma and medulloblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015; 62:1986-91. [PMID: 26017317 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a paucity of long-term follow-up data for children with intracranial ependymoma (IE) and medulloblastoma (MB). What happens to these children 20, 30, or 40 years after diagnosis? Do they have potential for a normal lifespan? The purpose of this study was to ascertain the long-term survival potential in children with MB or IE who have survived 5 years from diagnosis. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using the SEER Program. Children (ages 0-19 years) from 1973 to 2011 with a diagnosis of MB or IE were identified. A cohort was created of potentially cured patients who survived 5 years from diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier estimates were utilized to analyze long-term survival. RESULTS We identified 876 patients with MB and 474 patients with IE who were alive 5 years from diagnosis. Patients with MB had a 30-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of 70.2% and 80.1%, respectively. Patients with IE had a 30-year OS and CSS of 57.3% and 68.8%, respectively. When comparing MB with IE, MB had improved CSS (P = 0.04) and trended toward increased OS (P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS A significant number of deaths due to disease occur for several decades after treatment for both IE and MB. Despite this, the potential for long-term survival exists in 5-year survivors of both histologies. If alive at 5 years from diagnosis, patients with MB tend to have a lower risk of death from disease compared to those with IE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan E Frandsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Aaron Wagner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Robert J Bollo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Dennis C Shrieve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Matthew M Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sarıkafa Ş, Çelik SE, Yarikkaya E, Sayılgan A. Malignant Transformation of Grade II Ependymoma in a 2-Year-Old Child: Case Report. J Neurol Surg Rep 2015; 76:e151-5. [PMID: 26251794 PMCID: PMC4520988 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Accepted: 02/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ependymomas are central nervous system neoplasms that account for a third of all posterior fossa tumors in children. The most common location for infratentorial ependymoma is within the fourth ventricle. We present a case report of malignant transformation of an infratentorial grade II ependymoma in a 2-year-old child who presented with vomiting and visual disturbance. An infratentorial brain tumor in the left cerebellar area was totally removed, and the initial pathologic diagnosis was grade II ependymoma. The tumor recurred aggressively 1 year later; subtotal removal and adjuvant chemotherapy were performed. After a second operation, a histopathologic study was performed. The second specimen was defined as a grade III anaplastic ependymoma. Transformation to grade III anaplastic ependymoma is possible for a grade II ependymoma but very rare. The diagnosis of the anaplastic variant of intracranial ependymomas is difficult. Surgical treatment remains the mainstay of the treatment for all cases. Ependymomas in young infants have a worse prognosis than older children, so we need individual clinical evaluation and close follow-up of such cases. This article highlights the requirement of a close follow-up for grade II ependymomas for anaplastic transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Şule Sarıkafa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Suat Erol Çelik
- Department of Neurosurgery, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Enver Yarikkaya
- Department of Pathology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayşe Sayılgan
- Department of Pathology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ye J, Zhu J, Yan J, Chen P, Wan Z, Chen F, Zhang L, Qian J, Luo C. Analysis on therapeutic outcomes and prognostic factors of intracranial ependymoma: a report of 49 clinical cases in a single center. Neurol Sci 2015. [PMID: 26216494 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2347-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Although intracranial ependymoma is relatively rare, it is often associated with great clinical aggressiveness and poor overall survival. There are controversies over factors affecting the prognosis of the disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate factors that may affect the therapeutic outcome and prognosis of intracranial ependymoma by reviewing the medical records of 49 patients who were surgically treated in our hospital between 2001 and 2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic variables relative to patient and tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities. All 49 patients (24 men and 25 women; mean age 27.6 years) underwent surgical resection, of whom 14 patients also underwent postoperative radiotherapy. Local recurrence was found in 15 (48.8 %) patients, and 22 (51.2 %) patients died during the follow-up periods. The 5-year recurrence rate was 65 % and the survival rate was 51 %. The results of statistical analysis suggested that preoperative extraventricular drainage and surgical resection extent were prognostic factors related to progression-free survival, and that age, surgical resection extent and histological grade were closely associated with survival. Interestingly, there was a significant correlation between the symptom of hydrocephalus and age (P = 0.010), and patients with a better clinical status (KPS ≥ 80) were significantly associated with a lower WHO grade (P = 0.007). In conclusion, we confirmed that surgical resection extent was the major independent factor affecting both recurrence and survival of patients with intracranial ependymoma, while age and WHO grade were prognostic factors affecting survival but not recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingliang Ye
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.,Department of Neurosurgery, CPLA No.98 Hospital, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Junle Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Jiayi Yan
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Peiqin Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Zhiping Wan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Jun Qian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Chun Luo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Weber DC, Wang Y, Miller R, Villà S, Zaucha R, Pica A, Poortmans P, Anacak Y, Ozygit G, Baumert B, Haller G, Preusser M, Li J. Long-term outcome of patients with spinal myxopapillary ependymoma: treatment results from the MD Anderson Cancer Center and institutions from the Rare Cancer Network. Neuro Oncol 2014; 17:588-95. [PMID: 25301811 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal myxopapillary ependymomas (MPEs) are slowly growing ependymal gliomas with preferential manifestation in young adults. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of patients with MPE treated with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and/or chemotherapy. METHODS The medical records of 183 MPE patients (male: 59%) treated at the MD Anderson Cancer Center and 11 institutions from the Rare Cancer Network were retrospectively reviewed. Mean patient' age at diagnosis was 35.5 ± 15.8 years. Ninety-seven (53.0%) patients underwent surgery without RT, and 86 (47.0%) were treated with surgery and/or RT. Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy. Median follow-up was 83.9 months. RESULTS Fifteen (8.2%) patients died, 7 of unrelated cause. The estimated 10-year overall survival was 92.4% (95% CI: 87.7-97.1). Treatment failure was observed in 58 (31.7%) patients. Local failure, distant spinal relapse, and brain failure were observed in 49 (26.8%), 17 (9.3%), and 11 (6.0%) patients, respectively. The estimated 10-year progression-free survival was 61.2% (95% CI: 52.8-69.6). Age (<36 vs ≥36 y), treatment modality (surgery alone vs surgery and RT), and extent of surgery were prognostic factors for local control and progression-free survival on univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS In this series, treatment failure of MPE occurred in approximately one third of patients. The observed recurrence pattern of primary spinal MPE was mainly local, but a substantial number of patients failed nonlocally. Younger patients and those not treated initially with adjuvant RT or not undergoing gross total resection were significantly more likely to present with tumor recurrence/progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien C Weber
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Yucai Wang
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Robert Miller
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Salvador Villà
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Renata Zaucha
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Yavuz Anacak
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Gokhan Ozygit
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Birgitta Baumert
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Guy Haller
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| | - Jing Li
- Center of Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen/Würenlingen, Switzerland (D.C.W.); Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Y.W., J.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.M.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain (S.V.); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland (R.Z.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland (A.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, Tilburg, the Netherlands (P.P.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey (Y.A.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey (G.O.); Department of Robert-Janker-Klinik in Germany, Bonn, Germany (B.B.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland (G.H.); Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zwagerman NT, Foster K, Jakacki R, Khan FH, Yock TI, Greene S. The development of Moyamoya syndrome after proton beam therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61:1490-2. [PMID: 24501091 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2013] [Accepted: 01/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The development of Moyamoya syndrome (MMS) after cranial irradiation for pediatric tumors has been well established. However, information on the development of MMS after proton beam radiotherapy is sparse. We present the case of a 2-year-old child who developed radiation-induced MMS after treatment with proton beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan T Zwagerman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Antony R, Wong KE, Patel M, Olch AJ, McComb G, Krieger M, Gilles F, Sposto R, Erdreich-Epstein A, Dhall G, Gardner S, Finlay JL. A retrospective analysis of recurrent intracranial ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61:1195-201. [PMID: 24615997 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2013] [Accepted: 01/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence occurs in almost 50% of patients with intracranial ependymoma, and their outcome following recurrence is poor. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 22 patients with intracranial ependymoma and subsequent relapse(s) (59 recurrences) treated at Children's Hospital Los Angeles or New York University between January 1997 and December 2012. RESULTS Median duration of follow-up was 52 months (7-171 months). Median age at initial diagnosis was 4 years (0.3-19 years) with 8 patients younger than 3 years at presentation. Eleven patients had anaplastic and 11 cellular pathologies. Eighteen patients had infratentorial tumors at diagnosis and 3 (all infratentorial) had metastatic spinal cord involvement at presentation. Cerebrospinal fluid involvement was not identified at diagnosis or relapse. Median time to first recurrence was 16 months (1.3 to 115 months). The number of recurrences in each patient ranged from 1 to 9 (median = 2). Thirty-seven recurrences (63%) were detected asymptomatically by surveillance imaging. Fifteen recurrences (26%) arose outside the initial tumor site. Recurrences were treated by surgical resection (45), with irradiation (30), and with various oral chemotherapies (23) with (7) or without (16) conventional chemotherapy. The 5 and 10 year overall survival rates from first recurrence were 0.37 ± 0.14 and 0.25 ± 0.14. CONCLUSION Prolonged (5-10 year) survival from first relapse was noted in over one-quarter of our patients. It remains unclear whether early radiographic diagnosis, differing treatment modalities beyond radical surgical resection or possibly unrecognized biological differences contributed towards this prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben Antony
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liu APY, Shing MMK, Yuen HL, Li CH, Ling SC, Luk CW, Ha SY, Li CK, Kwong DLW, Chan GCF. Timing of adjuvant radiotherapy and treatment outcome in childhood ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61:606-11. [PMID: 24167035 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2013] [Accepted: 09/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several trials incorporating adjuvant focal RT for treatment of young children with ependymoma have demonstrated improved survival with acceptable adverse effects. The optimal timing of RT administration is, however, unknown. PROCEDURE A retrospective review of territory-wide database was performed to identify pediatric patients with ependymoma diagnosed between 1995 and 2011. OS and EFS were compared between patients receiving upfront RT (<150 days of diagnosis), delayed RT (≥150 days of diagnosis), or no RT. RESULTS Thirty-one patients with intracranial ependymoma were identified. Median age was 3.5 years and 14 (45%) were male. Primary tumor was supratentorial in 10 (32%) and infratentorial in 21 (68%). All patients underwent initial surgery, with gross-total resection (GTR) in 27 (87%). Twelve (39%) received upfront RT, 10 (32%) had delayed RT and 9 (29%) had no RT. During the study period, there were 11 relapses (35%) and 10 deaths (32%). Five-year OS was 69.9% and 5yr-EFS was 49.3%. In univariate analysis, GTR led to improved OS (P < 0.001) and EFS (P = 0.004); superior OS and EFS was observed in patients who received RT when compared with those without (P = 0.018 and 0.011, respectively). Upfront RT also resulted in better OS and EFS than delayed RT (P = 0.049 and 0.014, respectively). No significant effect on survival was observed with age, sex, tumor location, RT dosage, and protocol used. In multivariate analysis, GTR significantly improved OS (P = 0.002) and EFS (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Our results support the early initiation of adjuvant RT in the multi-modal management of pediatric ependymomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Pak-Yin Liu
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Muzumdar D, Ventureyra ECG. Treatment of posterior fossa tumors in children. Expert Rev Neurother 2014; 10:525-46. [DOI: 10.1586/ern.10.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
34
|
Lo SS, Chang EL, Sloan AE. Role of stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of intracranial ependymoma. Expert Rev Neurother 2014; 6:501-7. [PMID: 16623649 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.6.4.501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Ependymoma accounts for 5-10% of all childhood CNS tumors and less than 5% of intracranial tumors in adults. Ependymomas typically have a sharp tumor-brain parenchyma interface and this characteristic lends itself well to stereotactic radiation delivery. Data on the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for ependymoma in various settings have emerged over the past 10 years. SRS has been used in recurrent disease and as a boost after external beam radiation therapy. FSRT has been used in pediatric brain tumors and can potentially limit the long-term toxicities associated with radiation therapy by reducing the amount of normal brain parenchyma treated. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the long-term efficacy and toxicities associated with these treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana Lions Gamma Knife Center, Indiana University Medical Center, 535 Barnhill Drive, RT 041, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ghia AJ, Mahajan A, Allen PK, Armstrong TS, Lang FF, Gilbert MR, Brown PD. Supratentorial gross-totally resected non-anaplastic ependymoma: population based patterns of care and outcomes analysis. J Neurooncol 2013; 115:513-20. [PMID: 24085643 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1254-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2013] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Observation following gross-total resection (GTR) for non-anaplastic supratentorial ependymomas is often advocated based on small, retrospective series. The purpose of this study is to perform a population-based analysis to examine outcomes for this rare cohort of low-risk patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program of the United States National Cancer Institute. We identified patients with supratentorial non-anaplastic ependymoma who underwent GTR alone or GTR followed by radiation. We identified 92 patients who met these criteria. The median age was 17.5 years (range 1-83) with the majority female (58 %) and white (75 %). Radiotherapy (RT) was delivered in half of patients. The 5-/10-year Kaplan-Meier estimated overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) for the overall cohort was 83.2/71.4 and 84.1/78.0 %, respectively. There was no evidence of decreased CSS (HR 0.52 [0.18-1.51]; p = 0.23) or OS (HR 0.63 [0.25-1.59]; p = 0.33) with the omission of RT on univariate analysis. Age ≥18 years correlated with worse OS (HR 4.01 [1.45-11.11]; p = 0.008) and CSS (HR 2.86 [0.99-8.31]; p = 0.05). RT did not impact outcome for this low-risk cohort of patients. Older age correlates with poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Survival rates for patients with ependymoma, a glial tumor arising from the ependymal cells lining the ventricles of the brain and spinal cord canal, have changed little during the past decade. Contemporary "standard" therapy for children and adults with ependymoma consists of maximal surgical resection followed by focal irradiation except in cases of disseminated disease. Despite refinements in radiotherapy techniques and improvements in survival for patients with gross totally resected, nonanaplastic disease, many therapeutic challenges remain, especially for patients with unresectable, macroscopic, metastatic, or anaplastic disease. Moreover, radiotherapy to the developing central nervous system, especially in patients younger than age 5 years, can have potential long-term neurocognitive and neuroendocrine sequelae. Chemotherapy has not played a role in most treatment regimens for ependymoma to date, but due to the ongoing therapeutic challenges for a subset of patients, this modality is being reinvestigated in a few ongoing studies. Early recognition of patients who will not respond to primary therapy is imperative to modify treatment regimens, such as intensification with the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy, the use of novel experimental therapies, or their combination. Refinements in patient stratification schemes that are based on a combination of clinical variables and molecular profiles also require improved knowledge of tumor biology. Several molecular alterations have been identified already, some of which may be of prognostic significance. Furthermore, disruption of molecular alterations in signaling pathways involved in the development and maintenance of ependymoma by using novel molecularly targeted therapies may improve outcomes and reduce toxicity for patients with ependymoma.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Pediatric intracranial ependymoma is a rare disease representing approximately 7% of brain tumors in children aged 15 years or younger. Due to the relative rarity of these tumors, a clear standard therapy has been difficult to establish. The mainstay of treatment is surgical resection and the majority of data demonstrate improved outcome with gross total resection. The standard of care also includes postoperative radiation therapy for most patients with grade II and III tumors. Chemotherapy has been used in many capacities in this disease; however, its optimal role is yet to be defined. Current controversies such as treatment with surgery alone in completely resected tumors, use of chemotherapy for subtotally resected tumors and use of adjuvant postradiation chemotherapy are incorporated into the design of the current Children's Oncology Group clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Mansur
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals & Seidman Cancer Center, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-6068, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Oh MC, Sayegh ET, Safaee M, Sun MZ, Kaur G, Kim JM, Aranda D, Molinaro AM, Gupta N, Parsa AT. Prognosis by tumor location for pediatric spinal cord ependymomas. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 11:282-8. [PMID: 23259510 DOI: 10.3171/2012.11.peds12292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Ependymoma is a common CNS tumor in children, with spinal cord ependymomas making up 13.1% of all ependymomas in this age group. The clinical features that affect prognosis in pediatric spinal cord ependymomas are not well understood. A comprehensive literature review was performed to determine whether a tumor location along the spinal cord is prognostically significant in children undergoing surgery for spinal cord ependymomas. METHODS A PubMed search was performed to identify all papers that contained data on patients with spinal cord ependymomas. Only pediatric patients (age < 18 years) who underwent resection with a clearly reported tumor location were included in the analysis. Myxopapillary tumors were excluded from study. Tumor location was subdivided into 6 regions: cervicomedullary, cervical, cervicothoracic, thoracic, thoracolumbar, and conus medullaris. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the effects of tumor location on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Fifty-eight patients who underwent resection of spinal cord ependymomas were identified. Ependymomas were located all along the spinal cord but occurred with the highest frequency in the cervical region (29.3%). Progression-free survival was significantly better in patients with tumors arising in the upper portion of the spinal cord (p = 0.031), which remained significant in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (p < 0.05). Moreover, OS was significantly better in patients with upper spinal cord ependymomas than in those harboring ependymomas in the lower spinal cord (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Although more common in adults, spinal ependymomas can occur anywhere along the spinal cord in the pediatric population; however, tumors occurring in the lower half of the spinal cord carry a worse prognosis with shorter PFS and OS. By comparison, ependymomas in the upper spinal cord recur later and less frequently, with little or no mortality in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Oh
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jung J, Choi W, Ahn SD, Park JH, Kim SS, Kim YS, Yoon SM, Song SY, Lee SW, Kim JH, Choi EK. Postoperative radiotherapy for ependymoma. Radiat Oncol J 2012; 30:158-64. [PMID: 23346534 PMCID: PMC3546283 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2012.30.4.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2012] [Revised: 10/08/2012] [Accepted: 10/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluated the patterns of failure, survival rate, treatment-related toxicity and prognostic factors in postoperative radiotherapy of patients with ependymoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty patients who underwent surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for ependymoma between the period of June 1994 and June 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. The age of patients ranged from 21 months to 66 years (median, 19 years). Seventeen patients had grade II ependymoma, and 13 had grade III anaplastic ependymoma according to the World Health Organization grading system. The postoperative irradiation was performed with 4 or 6 MV photon beam with median dose of 52.8 Gy (range, 45 to 63 Gy), and radiation field including 2 cm beyond the preoperative tumor volume. Median follow-up period was 51 months (range, 12 to 172 months). RESULTS Fourteen out of 30 (46.7%) patients experienced recurrence, and 12 of those died. Among those 14 patients who experienced recurrence, 11 were in-field and 3 were out-of-field recurrence. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 66.7% and 56.1%, respectively. On univariate analysis, tumor grade was a statistically significant prognostic factor for OS and PFS. There were two complications after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy, including short stature and facial palsy on the left side. CONCLUSION We observed good survival rates, and histologic grade was a prognostic factor affecting the OS and PFS. Almost all recurrence occurred in primary tumor site, thus we suggest further evaluation on intensity-modulated radiotherapy or stereotatic radiosurgery for high-risk patients such as who have anaplastic ependymoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhong Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Benesch M, Frappaz D, Massimino M. Spinal cord ependymomas in children and adolescents. Childs Nerv Syst 2012; 28:2017-28. [PMID: 22961356 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-1908-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2012] [Accepted: 08/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord ependymomas are very rare among children and adolescents. Due to their rarity, our current knowledge of these tumors is based on case reports and few retrospective case series. METHODS The present review summarizes the currently available literature on childhood spinal cord ependymomas. RESULTS Although overall survival rates are favorable, relapse incidence is high, particularly in myxopapillary ependymomas. Since long-term follow-up data are provided in a limited number of studies only, the true relapse incidence is unknown. Maximal safe radical surgery is the backbone of treatment for children with spinal cord ependymomas, but the impact of adjuvant treatment on progression and survival is still unclear. Presently, the decision to initiate non-surgical treatment depends primarily on the WHO grade of the tumor and the extent of resection. In terms of the known side effects, early radiotherapy should be avoided in children with WHO grade II spinal cord ependymomas irrespective of the extent of resection but is indicated in anaplastic spinal cord ependymomas both after complete and incomplete resection. The high relapse incidence in myxopapillary ependymomas argue for the use of early radiotherapy, but its definitive impact on progression has to be proven in larger series. Close surveillance is important due to the high recurrence rate in all patients with spinal cord ependymomas. CONCLUSION Prospective collection of both clinical and molecular data from a greater number of patients with spinal cord ependymomas within an international collaboration is the prerequisite to establish standardized management guidelines for these rare CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Benesch
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 38, 8036 Graz, Austria.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Intracranial ependymoma: long-term results in a series of 21 patients treated with stereotactic (125)iodine brachytherapy. PLoS One 2012; 7:e47266. [PMID: 23144811 PMCID: PMC3489891 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2012] [Accepted: 09/13/2012] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We evaluated the long-term outcome in patients harboring intracranial ependymomas treated with interstitial brachytherapy (IBT). Methods Twenty-one patients (M/F = 9/12; median age: 29 years; range: 8–70 years), diagnosed with intracranial ependymoma (1 WHO I, 11 WHO II, 9 WHO III) were treated with IBT using stereotactically implanted 125Iodine seeds between 1987 and 2010, either primarily, as adjuvant therapy following incomplete resection, or as salvage treatment upon tumor recurrence. Sixteen of 21 patients underwent microsurgical resection prior to IBT; in 5 patients, IBT was performed primarily after stereotactic biopsy for histological diagnosis. The cumulative tumor surface dose ranged from 50–65 Gy treating a median tumor volume of 3.6 ml (range, 0.3–11.6 ml). A median follow-up period of 105.3 months (range, 12.7–286.2 months) was evaluated. Results Actuarial 2-, 5- and 10-years overall- and disease-specific survival rates after IBT were each 90% and 100% at all times for ependymomas WHO I/II, for anaplastic ependymomas WHO III 100%, 100%, 70% and 100%, 100%, 86%, respectively. The neurological status of seven patients improved, while there was no change in 12 and deterioration in 2 patients, respectively. Follow-up MR images disclosed a complete tumor remission in 3, a partial remission in 12 and a stable disease in 6 patients. Treatment-associated morbidity only occurred in a single patient. Conclusions This study shows that stereotactic IBT for intracranial ependymomas is safe and can provide a high degree of local tumor control. Due to the low rate of side effects, IBT may evolve into an attractive alternative to microsurgery in ependymomas located in eloquent areas or as a salvage treatment.
Collapse
|
42
|
Amirian ES, Armstrong TS, Aldape KD, Gilbert MR, Scheurer ME. Predictors of survival among pediatric and adult ependymoma cases: a study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1973 to 2007. Neuroepidemiology 2012; 39:116-24. [PMID: 22846789 PMCID: PMC3470871 DOI: 10.1159/000339320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2011] [Accepted: 04/26/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite previous research, prognostic factors for ependymoma remain relatively controversial. The purpose of our study was to examine demographic, clinical, and tumor attributes as potential predictors of survival using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data (1973-2007). METHODS All ependymoma (ICD-O-3 code 9391) and anaplastic ependymoma cases (ICD-O-3 code 9392) with complete data (n = 2,369 and n = 319, respectively) were included from SEER. Predictive Cox regression models were built separately among pediatric and adult cases. Recursive partitioning was used to corroborate results from regression models. RESULTS Among pediatric cases, tumor characteristics with a significantly increased mortality risk were anaplastic histology (vs. low grade, HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.04-2.19) and infratentorial tumor location (vs. spinal cord, HR: 3.86, 95% CI: 1.17-12.77). Among adults, supratentorial tumors were associated with higher mortality hazard (vs. spinal cord tumors) than infratentorial tumors (HR: 4.83, 95% CI: 3.49-6.68 and HR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.79-3.25, respectively). Complete surgical resection of the tumor conferred the most protection among pediatric and adult patients. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that treatment type and tumor characteristics are important prognostic factors in patients with ependymoma. However, there may be key differences between pediatric and adult cases regarding how these factors influence survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Susan Amirian
- Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Kenneth D. Aldape
- Department of Pathology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark R. Gilbert
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael E. Scheurer
- Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vaidya K, Smee R, Williams JR. Prognostic factors and treatment options for paediatric ependymomas. J Clin Neurosci 2012; 19:1228-35. [PMID: 22840355 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2011] [Revised: 02/07/2012] [Accepted: 02/14/2012] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine factors of prognostic relevance for paediatric ependymomas, and evaluate the efficacy of treatment modalities. This is a retrospective study of 43 patients with ependymoma (<18 years) who underwent a combination of surgical excision, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy treatment at The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre between 1969 and 2009. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the prognostic relevance of various parameters affecting the two-year and five-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The five-year OS and PFS were 50.3% and 44.8% respectively (median follow-up 50 months). Eighteen patients (41.9%) experienced tumour recurrence: 13 had a local recurrence (LR) and five had both LR and distant recurrence. On univariate analysis, a more favourable prognosis in terms of both OS and PFS was evident for supratentorial tumours compared to infratentorial tumours (OS p=0.007, PFS p=0.045), stereotactic radiosurgery/ fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy compared to craniospinal irradiation or local posterior fossa/local brain±boost radiotherapy modalities (OS p=0.047, PFS p=0.031), total radiotherapy dose >50 Gy compared to ≤50 Gy (OS p=0.008, PFS p=0.005), and in patients with no tumour recurrence compared to those with recurrence (OS p=0.03, PFS p<0.001). Although not statistically significant, a more favourable multivariate outcome was evident in patients who underwent complete surgical resection. Chemotherapy treatment and histopathological grade, however, were not relevant to prognosis. This study supports the need to pursue more aggressive treatment for infratentorial and/or recurrent tumours. Ideal treatment involves maximal surgical resection, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (>50 Gy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Vaidya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Level 2, High Street, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australi
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
The increasing efficacy of pediatric cancer therapy over the past four decades has produced many long-term survivors that now struggle with serious treatment related morbidities affecting their quality of life. Radiation therapy is responsible for a significant proportion of these late effects, but a relatively new and emerging modality, proton radiotherapy hold great promise to drastically reduce these treatment related late effects in long term survivors by sparing dose to normal tissues. Dosimetric studies of proton radiotherapy compared with best available photon based treatment show significant dose sparing to developing normal tissues. Furthermore, clinical data are now emerging that begin to quantify the benefit in decreased late treatment effects while maintaining excellent cancer control rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane E Cotter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Milde T, Kleber S, Korshunov A, Witt H, Hielscher T, Koch P, Kopp HG, Jugold M, Deubzer HE, Oehme I, Lodrini M, Gröne HJ, Benner A, Brüstle O, Gilbertson RJ, von Deimling A, Kulozik AE, Pfister SM, Martin-Villalba A, Witt O. A novel human high-risk ependymoma stem cell model reveals the differentiation-inducing potential of the histone deacetylase inhibitor Vorinostat. Acta Neuropathol 2011; 122:637-50. [PMID: 21863243 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-011-0866-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2011] [Revised: 08/09/2011] [Accepted: 08/15/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Incompletely resectable ependymomas are associated with poor prognosis despite intensive radio- and chemotherapy. Novel treatments have been difficult to develop due to the lack of appropriate models. Here, we report on the generation of a high-risk cytogenetic group 3 and molecular group C ependymoma model (DKFZ-EP1NS) which is based on primary ependymoma cells obtained from a patient with metastatic disease. This model displays stem cell features such as self-renewal capacity, differentiation capacity, and specific marker expression. In vivo transplantation showed high tumorigenic potential of these cells, and xenografts phenotypically recapitulated the original tumor in a niche-dependent manner. DKFZ-EP1NS cells harbor transcriptome plasticity, enabling a shift from a neural stem cell-like program towards a profile of primary ependymoma tumor upon in vivo transplantation. Serial transplantation of DKFZ-EP1NS cells from orthotopic xenografts yielded secondary tumors in half the time compared with the initial transplantation. The cells were resistant to temozolomide, vincristine, and cisplatin, but responded to histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) treatment at therapeutically achievable concentrations. In vitro treatment of DKFZ-EP1NS cells with the HDACi Vorinostat induced neuronal differentiation associated with loss of stem cell-specific properties. In summary, this is the first ependymoma model of a cytogenetic group 3 and molecular subgroup C ependymoma based on a human cell line with stem cell-like properties, which we used to demonstrate the differentiation-inducing therapeutic potential of HDACi.
Collapse
|
47
|
Amirian ES, Armstrong TS, Gilbert MR, Scheurer ME. Predictors of survival among older adults with ependymoma. J Neurooncol 2011; 107:183-9. [PMID: 21952907 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0730-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2011] [Accepted: 09/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The biological process of aging encompasses a multitude of complex physiological and lifestyle changes that may alter the way typical prognostic factors affect survival among older ependymoma patients. Because very little is known about the clinical significance of traditional prognostic factors and the magnitude of their effects among older individuals, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between survival and demographic and tumor characteristics among patients with ependymoma who were 60 years of age or older. Using the 1973-2007 dataset from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program, we evaluated the impact of several factors on both overall and ependymoma-specific survival, utilizing multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. We identified 367 ependymoma cases who were 60 years of age or older at diagnosis and had complete data from SEER. Of these, 19 (5.2%) had anaplastic tumors; all others were low-grade tumors. Age, tumor site, extent of surgery, and tumor histology were found to be significant predictors of ependymoma prognosis. The strongest predictor of poor outcome was supratentorial tumor location (adjusted HR: 6.94, 95% CI: 3.19-15.08, compared to spinal cord tumors). Our study suggests that tumor location, tumor histology, and surgical margin may be key predictors of survival among older ependymoma patients. We believe our study is one of the first to assess the prognostic value of these factors for ependymoma survival exclusively in an older patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Susan Amirian
- Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM305, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Massimino M, Solero CL, Garrè ML, Biassoni V, Cama A, Genitori L, Di Rocco C, Sardi I, Viscardi E, Modena P, Potepan P, Barra S, Scarzello G, Galassi E, Giangaspero F, Antonelli M, Gandola L. Second-look surgery for ependymoma: the Italian experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 8:246-50. [PMID: 21882914 DOI: 10.3171/2011.6.peds1142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Complete ependymoma resection ensures a better prognosis for children with this tumor, but the complete excision of infratentorial ependymomas involves serious risks. Second-look surgery for tumor remnants may be less harmful and enable complete removal. There is a potential, although still unclear, role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in preparation for further surgery. METHODS Since 1994, the authors have adopted two successive protocols for intracranial ependymoma, both including a phase of adjuvant chemotherapy for children with surgical tumor remnants with a plan for potential second-look surgery before radiotherapy. RESULTS In the first protocol, 9 of 63 children underwent further surgery, and 6 became tumor free with no additional sequelae. Their prognosis for progression-free survival and freedom from local relapse was comparable to that of children who were operated on only once. In the second protocol, efforts were made to achieve complete resection and 29 of 110 patients underwent reoperations: 9 after the first surgery, 17 after chemotherapy, and 3 soon after radiotherapy. Fourteen of the 29 patients became tumor free, 1 of them with worsening neurological symptoms. The outcome of the 66 patients who became tumor free after 1 operation was compared with that of the 14 who became tumor free after reoperation. The 3-year progression-free survival of the 66 patients compared with the 14 other patients was 71.4% ± 6.9% and 90% ± 9.5%, respectively; the 3-year freedom from local relapse was 84.7% ± 5.9% and 90% ± 9.5%, respectively; and the 3-year overall survival was 85.9% ± 5.4% and 87.5% ± 11.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Second-look surgery proved feasible with no major morbidity, and results improved with time. Local tumor control was comparable in patients undergoing 1 or more resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura Massimino
- Pediatric Unit, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pediatric intracranial ependymoma: the roles of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. J Neurooncol 2011; 106:367-75. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0671-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2011] [Accepted: 07/14/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
50
|
Aguilera DG, Mazewski C, Schniederjan MJ, Leong T, Boydston W, Macdonald TJ. Neurofibromatosis-2 and spinal cord ependymomas: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27:757-64. [PMID: 21132433 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-010-1351-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2010] [Accepted: 11/16/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT The incidence of ependymoma in patients with neurofibromatosis-2 (NF-2) is low and information regarding treatment and prognosis is lacking. We present two cases of cervicomedullary tumors in patients with NF-2 from our institution, and we provide a review of the literature in order to summarize the known clinical information about this rare occurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patient #1 had histological confirmation of ependymoma and was treated with subtotal resection followed by observation and has had no evidence of progression for 11 months. Patient #2 has been observed for 4 1/2 years without treatment for a cervicomedullary tumor, which appears to be an ependymoma by imaging. Although it has increased in size very slowly, there have been no clinical symptoms. Among the additional 21 cases of NF-2 and ependymoma from the literature, the most common location is the cervical spine (70%), and the median age at diagnosis is 15 years. Surgical resection was performed in 85% of the cases and subtotal resection in 64% of cases. Fifteen patients (75%) were reported alive at the time of the published reports, with survival ranging from 0.1 to 10 years, and the 8-year survival estimated as 51%. Survival was related to the location of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS We conclude from our two cases and review of the existing literature that NF-2 associated spinal ependymomas have an indolent course and typically can be observed or treated by surgical excision alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dolly G Aguilera
- Aflac Cancer Center and Blood Disorders Service at Children's Health Care of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|