Diagnostic yield of FDG-PET/CT in fever of unknown origin: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and Delphi exercise

EANM/SNMMI guideline/procedure standard for [18F]FDG hybrid PET use in infection and inflammation in adults v2.0

INTRODUCTION

Hybrid [18F]FDG PET imaging is currently the method of choice for a wide variety of infectious and inflammatory disorders and was recently adopted in several clinical guidelines. A large amount of evidence-based articles, guidelines and appropriate use criteria have been published since the first version of this guideline in 2013.

PURPOSE

To provide updated evidence-based information to assist physicians in recommending, performing and interpreting hybrid [18F]FDG PET examinations for infectious and inflammatory disorders in the adult population.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of evidence-based articles using whole-body [18F]FDG hybrid imaging on the indications covered within this guideline was performed. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses published within the last 10 years until January 2023 were identified in PubMed/Medline or Cochrane. For each indication covered in this manuscript, diagnostic performance was provided based on meta-analyses or systematic reviews. If not available, results from prospective or retrospective studies were considered based on predefined selection criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid [18F]FDG PET is extremely useful in the work-up and management of adults with infectious and inflammatory diseases, as supported by extensive and rapidly growing evidence-based literature and adoption in clinical guidelines. Practical recommendations are provided describing evidence-based indications as well as interpretation criteria and pitfalls. Monitoring treatment response is the most challenging but insufficiently studied potential application in infection and inflammation imaging.

Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for providing a targeted approach for etiology of PUO

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in providing a targeted approach for diagnosing the etiology of Pyrexia of Unknown Origin (PUO).

METHODS

A total of 573 PUO patients were included in this ambispective study, with a mean age of 39.40 ± 4.6 years. Patients underwent FDG PET/CT scans using dedicated hybrid scanners. PET/CT data were interpreted by experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The study analyzed the guidance provided by FDG PET/CT for appropriate biopsy sites and assessed concordance between PET/CT findings and histopathological examination.

RESULTS

Out of the 573 patients, a final diagnosis was reached for 219 patients, including malignancy, infectious causes, noninfectious inflammatory causes (NIID), and precancerous conditions. FDG PET/CT played a crucial role in guiding clinicians to appropriate biopsy sites, contributing to a higher diagnostic yield. Concordance between PET/CT findings and histopathological examination emphasized the noninvasive diagnostic potential of PET/CT in identifying underlying causes of PUO. Overall, FDG PET/CT contributed to guiding the appropriate site of biopsy or concordance of the first differential diagnosis with the final diagnosis in 50.05% of cases.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the valuable role of FDG PET/CT in providing a targeted approach for diagnosing PUO, showcasing its potential in guiding clinicians towards appropriate biopsy sites and improving the diagnostic yield. The findings underscore the importance of integrating FDG PET/CT into the diagnostic pathway for PUO, ultimately enhancing patient management and outcomes. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate these results and refine the integration of FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of PUO.

Recommendations for Updating Fever and Inflammation of Unknown Origin From a Modified Delphi Consensus Panel

Background

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are syndromes commonly used as medical diagnoses. Since the existing literature has a mixture of diagnostic approaches, developing consensus-based recommendations would be helpful for clinicians, researchers, and patients.

Methods

A modified Delphi process was performed from October 2022 to July 2023, involving 4 rounds of online surveys and 2 live video conferences. The panel comprised international experts recruited based on peer-reviewed published publications and studies.

Results

Among 50 invited experts, 26 (52.0%) agreed to participate. Twenty-three panelists completed round 1 of the survey, 21 completed rounds 2 and 3, 20 completed round 4, and 7 participated in round 5 live video discussions. Of the participants, 18 (78.3%) were academic-based clinicians and researchers, 5 (21.7%) practiced in a community-based hospital, and 6 (26.1%) were female. Consensus was reached on 5 themes: (1) incorporating epidemiologic factors, such as geographic location and travel history; (2) updated criteria for classifying FUO or IUO; (3) initial evaluation approaches; (4) a classification system for diagnoses; and (5) recommendations for judicious limitation of empiric therapies. Experts strongly disagreed with using 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography as part of the diagnostic criteria for FUO. There were mixed opinions about the importance of the temperature measurement site, the 3-week minimum illness criterion, the need for a standard definition of relapsing fevers, and the use of similar evaluation strategies for FUO and IUO.

Conclusions

These Delphi-generated consensus-based recommendations offer potential improvements compared with earlier definitions and a guide for clinical practice and future research.

EANM consensus document on the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in fever and inflammation of unknown origin

PURPOSE

Patients with fever and inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO) are clinically challenging due to variable clinical presentations with nonspecific symptoms and many differential diagnoses. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) is increasingly used in FUO and IUO, but the optimal diagnostic strategy remains controversial. This consensus document aims to assist clinicians and nuclear medicine specialists in the appropriate use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in FUO and IUO based on current evidence.

METHODS

A working group created by the EANM infection and inflammation committee performed a systematic literature search based on PICOs with "patients with FUO/IUO" as population, "[18F]FDG-PET/CT" as intervention, and several outcomes including pre-scan characteristics, scan protocol, diagnostic yield, impact on management, prognosis, and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

We included 68 articles published from 2001 to 2023: 9 systematic reviews, 49 original papers on general adult populations, and 10 original papers on specific populations. All papers were analysed and included in the evidence-based recommendations.

CONCLUSION

FUO and IUO remains a clinical challenge and [18F]FDG PET/CT has a definite role in the diagnostic pathway with an overall diagnostic yield or helpfulness in 50-60% of patients. A positive scan is often contributory by directly guiding treatment or subsequent diagnostic procedure. However, a negative scan may be equally important by excluding focal disease and predicting a favorable prognosis. Similar results are obtained in specific populations such as ICU-patients, children and HIV-patients.

The yield of total body CT in the workup of fever of unknown origin in hospitalized medical patients

INTRODUCTION

Total body computerized tomography (TBCT) is frequently used as a diagnostic tool for fever of unknown origin (FUO) workup instead of a recommended fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography FDG-PET/CT. We have assessed the TBCT diagnostic yield on a large, unselected cohort of patients with FUO.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study, examining all patients hospitalized in internal medicine between 2012 and 2019 with a documented fever and three negative blood cultures who subsequently had a total-body CT performed. After manually reviewing, we included 408 who met the criteria of FUO. We defined a positive study as a scan that led to the documented final diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients (40.2 %) had a positive TBCT result. The majority of positive CT findings were of infectious etiologies (58.5 %), followed by neoplasms (22.8 %) and inflammatory disorders (14.0 %), with the chest (43.9 %) and abdomen (29.8 %) most affected. Using a logistic regression model, a positive scan results were associated with an elevated CRP (p<0.001). Decision tree analysis showed that 55 % of scans of patients with an elevated CRP (>6 mg/dL), low hemoglobin and high leucocyte count (>18000/ml) were positive. Patients without an elevated CRP had a positive scan in only 26 % of tests, and those with also an elevated albumin (>4 gr/dL) and low CRP had positive scan in only 11 % of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

TBCT has a clinically significant yield under specific clinical scenarios in medical patients with FUO- reaching 55 % in patients with an elevated CRP and leukocyte count and low hemoglobin. It is reasonable to proceed to TTBCT when FDG-PET/CT is unavailable and in well-defined clinical situations.

Nuclear Medicine Imaging Tools in Fever of Unknown Origin: Time for a Revisit and Appropriate Use Criteria

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a clinical conundrum for patients and clinicians alike, and imaging studies are often performed as part of the diagnostic workup of these patients. Recently, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened and approved a guideline on the use of nuclear medicine tools for FUO. The guidelines support the use of 2-18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in adults and children with FUO. 18F-FDG PET/CT allows detection and localization of foci of hypermetabolic lesions with high sensitivity because of the 18F-FDG uptake in glycolytically active cells that may represent inflammation, infection, or neoplasia. Clinicians should consider and insurers should cover 18F-FDG PET/CT when evaluating patients with FUO, particularly when other clinical clues and preliminary studies are unrevealing.

PET/CT in Inflammatory and Auto-immune Disorders: Focus on Several Key Molecular Concepts, FDG, and Radiolabeled Probe Perspectives

Chronic immune diseases mainly include autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Managing chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases has become a significant public health concern, and therapeutic advancements over the past 50 years have been substantial. As therapeutic tools continue to multiply, the challenge now lies in providing each patient with personalized care tailored to the specifics of their condition, ushering in the era of personalized medicine. Precise and holistic imaging is essential in this context to comprehensively map the inflammatory processes in each patient, identify prognostic factors, and monitor treatment responses and complications. Imaging of patients with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases must provide a comprehensive view of the body, enabling the whole-body mapping of systemic involvement. It should identify key cellular players in the pathology, involving both innate immunity (dendritic cells, macrophages), adaptive immunity (lymphocytes), and microenvironmental cells (stromal cells, tissue cells). As a highly sensitive imaging tool with vectorized molecular probe capabilities, PET/CT can be of high relevance in the management of numerous inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Relying on key molecular concepts of immunity, the clinical usefulness of FDG-PET/CT in several relevant inflammatory and immune-inflammatory conditions, validated or emerging, will be discussed in this review, together with radiolabeled probe perspectives.

FDG-PET/CT for investigation of pyrexia of unknown origin: a cost of illness analysis

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to explore the current utilisation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the diagnostic pathway of pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) and associated cost of illness in a large tertiary teaching hospital in Australia.

METHOD

1257 febrile patients between June 2016 and September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 57 patients who met the inclusion criteria of "classical PUO", of which FDG-PET/CT was performed in 31 inpatients, 15 outpatients and 11 inpatients did not have an FDG-PET/CT scan. The patient demographics, clinical characteristics and inpatient cost were analysed, together with the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT and impact on clinical management.

RESULT

The mean age, length of stay and total cost of admission were higher for inpatients who received FDG-PET/CT versus those who did not. The median cost per patient-bed-day did not differ between the two groups. Inpatients who received earlier FDG-PET/CTs (≤ 7 days from admission) had shorter length of stays and lower total cost compared to those who received a later scan. A negative FDG-PET/CT scan, demonstrating no serious or life-threatening abnormalities resulted in subsequent discharge from hospital or outpatient clinic in 7/10 (70%) patients. There were 11/40 (28%) scans where ancillary abnormalities were identified, requiring further evaluation.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/CT showed high diagnostic accuracy and significant impact on patient management in patients with PUO. FDG-PET/CT performed earlier in admission for PUO was associated with shorter length of stay and lower total cost.

Update on imaging in fever and inflammation of unknown origin: focus on infectious disorders

BACKGROUND

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are diagnostic challenges that often require an extensive work-up. When first-line tests do not provide any or only misleading clues, second-line investigations such as specialized imaging techniques are often warranted.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the diagnostic value of imaging techniques that are commonly used in patients with FUO/IUO.

SOURCES

MEDLINE database was searched to identify the most relevant studies, trials, reviews, or meta-analyses until 31 March 2023.

CONTENT

The most important types of second-line imaging tests for FUO and IUO are outlined, including [67Ga]-citrate single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (CT), labelled leukocyte imaging, [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT ([18F]-FDG-PET), and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging. This review summarizes the diagnostic yield, extends on potential future imaging techniques (pathogen-specific bacterial imaging and [18F]-FDG-PET/magnetic resonance imaging), discusses cost-effectiveness, highlights practical implications and pitfalls, and addresses future perspectives. Where applicable, we provide additional data specifically for the infection subgroup.

IMPLICATIONS

Although many imaging examinations are proven to be useful in FUO and IUO, [18F]-FDG-PET/CT is the preferred second-line test when available as it provides a high diagnostic yield in a presumably cost-effective way.

Fever As the Exclusive Presenting Symptom in a Case of Colon Cancer

The definition of fever of unknown origin (FUO) has evolved overtime. Most recently, FUO is recognized as fever with uncertain diagnosis despite three days of hospital admission or three or more outpatient visits. Despite diagnostic medical advancements, FUO remains quite a challenge. In the past, infections, such as abscesses, endocarditis, tuberculosis, and complicated urinary tract infections, were common etiologies of FUO; however, at present, such conditions are readily diagnosed. FUO secondary to malignancy has also been decreasing as a result of radiological advancements. Patients with colon cancer usually present with symptoms secondary to the local anatomy of the tumor. Conversely, fever is an uncommon presentation, especially if it is the sole symptom. Here, we report a unique presentation of colon cancer. Our patient only had intermittent fever for one year before being diagnosed with colon cancer. The fever subsided after resection of the tumor. Despite breakthroughs in diagnostic medicine, FUO remains a challenging diagnosis. Practicing clinicians should have a high level of suspicion to rule out underlying malignancy in the setting of recurrent fevers or FUO.

Differential diagnosis of lymphoma with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin accompanied by lymphadenopathy

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in the differential diagnosis of lymphoma in patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) accompanied by lymphadenopathy and to develop a simple scoring system to distinguish lymphoma from other etiologies.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on patients with classic FUO accompanied by lymphadenopathy. After standard diagnostic procedures, including PET/CT scan and lymph-node biopsy, 163 patients were enrolled and divided into lymphoma and benign groups according to the etiology. The diagnostic utility of PET/CT imaging was evaluated, and beneficial parameters that could improve diagnostic effectiveness were identified.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of PET/CT in diagnosing lymphoma in patients with FUO accompanied by lymphadenopathy were 81.0, 47.6, 59.3, and 72.7%, respectively. The lymphoma prediction model combining high SUVmax of the "hottest" lesion, high SUVmax of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, old age, low platelet count, and low ESR had an area under the curve of 0.93 (0.89-0.97), a sensitivity of 84.8%, a specificity of 92.9%, a PPV of 91.8%, and an NPV of 86.7%. There was a lower probability of lymphoma for patients with a score < 4 points.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT scans show moderate sensitivity and low specificity in diagnosing lymphoma in patients with FUO accompanied by lymphadenopathy. The scoring system based on PET/CT and clinical parameters performs well in differentiating lymphoma and benign causes and can be used as a reliable noninvasive tool.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study on FUO was registered on http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov on January 14, 2014, with registration number NCT02035670.

FDG PET in Evaluation of Patients With Fever of Unknown Origin: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a diagnostic challenge, with its cause remaining undiagnosed in approximately half of patients. Nuclear medicine tests typically are performed after a negative or inconclusive initial workup. Gallium-67 citrate and labeled leukocytes were previous mainstays of radionuclide imaging for FUO, although they had limited diagnostic performance. FDG PET/CT has subsequently emerged as the nuclear medicine imaging test of choice, supported by a growing volume of evidence. A positive FDG PET/CT result contributes useful information by identifying potential causes of fever, localizing sites for further evaluation, and guiding further management; a negative result contributes useful information by excluding focal disease as the cause of fever and predicts a favorable prognosis. In 2021, CMS rescinded a prior national noncoverage determination for FDG PET for infection and inflammation, leading to increasing national utilization of FDG PET/CT for FUO workup. This article reviews the current status of the role of FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with FUO. The literature reporting the diagnostic performance and yield of FDG PET/CT in FUO workup is summarized, with comparison with historically used nuclear medicine tests included. Attention is also given to the test's clinical impact; protocol, cost, and radiation considerations; and application in children.

Higher diagnostic yield of 18F-FDG PET in inflammation of unknown origin compared to fever of unknown origin

OBJECTIVE

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) is an important imaging technique in the workup of fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO). Studies comparing the diagnostic yield of 18F-FDG PET between both entities are lacking.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of FUO/IUO patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET between 2000 and 2019 in the University Hospitals of Leuven (Belgium). 18F-FDG PET images were assessed for accuracy and contribution towards the final diagnosis. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between meeting FUO or IUO criteria and diagnostic contribution of 18F-FDG PET with and without adjustment for confounders.

RESULTS

Out of 604 patients, 439 (73%, mean age 56 years, 43% female) underwent 18F-FDG PET imaging, including 349 (79%) classified as FUO and 90 (21%) as IUO. Noninfectious inflammatory disorders were significantly more frequent in the IUO group (37% versus 25%; P = 0.03). 18F-FDG PET imaging had a sensitivity of 93% (89-96%), a specificity of 35% (29-42%), and made a positive contribution to the final diagnosis in 25% (21-29%) of cases. IUO was significantly associated with contributive 18F-FDG PET imaging compared to FUO (aOR 2.21 [95% CI 1.31-3.72]; P = 0.003). Among those with contributive 18F-FDG PET imaging, giant cell arteritis (IUO 25% versus FUO 12%) and polymyalgia rheumatica (IUO 17% versus FUO 1%) were numerically more frequent in the IUO group.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic contribution of 18F-FDG PET was higher among those with IUO, most likely due to differences in diagnostic spectrum.

Pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) and the cost of care in a tertiary care institute in Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in diagnostic technology, pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) remains a clinical concern. Insufficient information is available regarding the cost of care for the management of PUO in the South Asian Region.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with PUO from a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka to determine the clinical course of PUO and the burden of the cost incurred in the treatment of PUO patients. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical calculations.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with PUO were selected for the present study. The majority were males (n = 55; 55.0%). The mean ages of male and female patients were 49.65 (SD: 15.55) and 46.87 (SD: 16.19) years, respectively. In the majority, a final diagnosis had been made (n = 65; 65%). The mean number of days of hospital stay was 15.16 (SD; 7.81). The mean of the total number of fever days among PUO patients was 44.47 (SD: 37.66). Out of 65 patients whose aetiology was determined, the majority were diagnosed with an infection (n = 47; 72.31%) followed by non-infectious inflammatory disease (n = 13; 20.0%) and malignancies (n = 5; 7.7%). Extrapulmonary tuberculosis was the most common infection detected (n = 15; 31.9%). Antibiotics had been prescribed for the majority of the PUO patients (n = 90; 90%). The mean direct cost of care per PUO patient was USD 467.79 (SD: 202.81). The mean costs of medications & equipment and, investigations per PUO patient were USD 45.33 (SD: 40.13) and USD 230.26 (SD: 114.68) respectively. The cost of investigations made up 49.31% of the direct cost of care per patient.

CONCLUSION

Infections, mainly extrapulmonary tuberculosis was the most common cause of PUO while a third of patients remained undiagnosed despite a lengthy hospital stay. PUO leads to high antibiotic usage, indicating the need for proper guidelines for the management of PUO patients in Sri Lanka. The mean direct cost of care per PUO patient was USD 467.79. The cost of investigations contributed mostly to the direct cost of care for the management of PUO patients.

Indications for diagnostic use of nuclear medicine in rheumatology: A mini-review

Nuclear medicine techniques allow important insights not only into oncologic, neurologic, and infectious conditions, but also for the assessment of rheumatic diseases. This review provides a brief, update on the potential role of nuclear imaging in rheumatology, especially on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis and other large vessel arteritis according to international recommendations. Besides, the potential role of this and other nuclear imaging techniques for the rheumatologic practice are summarized. With ¹⁸F-fluoride as tracer for positron emission tomography, a new option for bone scintigraphy comes up, whereas the use of a semiquantitative sialoscintigraphy is no more supported for classification of Sjögren's syndrome according to current recommendations. Other techniques are used for different organ manifestations in systemic rheumatic diseases like for myocardial infarction and apoplectic insult.

Optimal use of the FDG-PET/CT in the diagnostic process of fever of unknown origin (FUO): a comprehensive review

Numerous studies have clarified the usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT (positron emission tomography) for diagnosing the cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO). Various types of disease can cause FUO, but the cause remains unknown in a certain proportion of FUO, even when the advanced diagnostic methodologies are used. FDG-PET/CT is regarded as a second-line modality in the diagnostic process of FUO, and its potential to identify the cause of FUO will be maximized when the appropriate clinical considerations are understood. Accordingly, this review presents basic knowledge regarding FUO, and reports the current status of FDG-PET/CT applied to diagnosing the cause of FUO, including diagnostic performance, test protocols, possible factors influencing the diagnostic result, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. This knowledge will enable effective future use of FDG-PET/CT to improve outcomes in patients with FUO.

Quantifying the contribution of 18F-FDG PET to the diagnostic assessment of pediatric patients with fever of unknown origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) in the diagnostic assessment of pediatric fever of unknown origin is not known, and evidence from adults is not applicable.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the contribution of ¹⁸F-FDG PET to pediatric fever of unknown origin, considering its diagnostic limitations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to Feb. 18, 2021. We included studies on patients with pediatric fever of unknown origin presenting sufficient data to calculate the likelihood of achieving definite diagnosis (based on pathology or clinical follow-up) between those with abnormal PET findings versus those with normal PET findings. We assessed the risk of bias using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale and quantified the value of PET by pooling the likelihood of achieving definite diagnosis using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 6 studies and found that pediatric patients with abnormal PET findings were about 17 times more likely to achieve definite diagnoses than those with normal PET findings (odds ratio [OR]: 16.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.0-35, P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analyses using a fixed-effect model (OR 16.91, 95% CI 8.1-35, P < 0.0001) or removing one study at a time (OR 12-20, 95% CI lower bound 3.8-8.6, 95% CI upper bound 33-45, P < 0.0001) did not significantly alter the results. Sample size (interaction P = 0.75), imaging modality (interaction P = 0.29), length of follow-up (interaction P = 0.37), fever of unknown origin subclasses (interaction P = 0.89) and geographical areas (interaction P = 0.74) of studies showed no statistically significant influence on the results.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET is a promising approach in the diagnostic work-up of pediatric fever of unknown origin. Further studies are warranted to support routine use in clinical care.

Nonmalignant Thoracic Disorders: An Appraisal of Fluorodeoxyglucose and Non-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography Applications

PET/computed tomography (CT) with fluorodeoxyglucose and nonfluorodeoxyglucose PET tracers has established itself in the management of malignant disorders. Its role in the assessment of nonmalignant conditions, such as infectious and noninfectious inflammatory diseases and other benign conditions, has emerged independently and alongside its role being evaluated in malignancy and continues to evolve. It is evident that PET/CT has the potential to play a significant role in various nonmalignant disorders of the thorax. This review highlights current developments and areas where PET/CT has a potential to impact the clinical management of nonmalignant thoracic conditions with special focus on nonfluorodeoxyglucose tracers.

Diagnostic value of F-18 FDG PET/CT in fever or inflammation of unknown origin in a large single-center retrospective study

Cause determination is challenging in fever or inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO) despite today’s diagnostic modalities. We evaluated the value of F-18 FDG PET/CT in an unselected patient collective. This retrospective nonrandomized single-center study enrolled 300 male and female patients with FUO/IUO. PET/CT findings were compared with final clinical outcomes to determine the sensitivity, specificity, clinical significance, etiological distribution of final diagnoses, impact on treatment, role of white-blood cell count (WBC), and C-reactive protein (CRP). In 54.0% (162/300) PET/CT was the decisive exanimation for establishing the final diagnosis, in 13.3% (40/300) the findings were equivocal and indecisive, in 3.3% (10/300) PET/CT findings were false positive, while in 29.3% (88/300) a normal F-18 FDG pattern was present. Statistical analysis showed a sensitivity of 80.2% and a specificity of 89.8% for the contribution of PET/CT to the final diagnosis. CRP levels and WBC were not associated with PET/CT outcome. PET/CT let to new treatment in 24.0% (72/300), treatment change in 18.0% (54/300), no treatment change in 49.6% (149/300), and in 8.3% (25/300) no data was available. Our study demonstrates the utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT for source finding in FUO/IUO if other diagnostic tools fail.

Diagnostic Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Evaluation of Patients With Inflammation of Unknown Origin

BACKGROUND

Sometimes, the underlying causes of inflammation cannot be established despite meticulous investigation, including medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and radiologic procedures. Rheumatologists are often faced with patients whose condition is known as inflammation of unknown origin (IUO). Differential diagnosis of IUO is diverse, and investigation of these cases is challenging and time-consuming.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess the diagnostic role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the evaluation of patients with IUO.

METHODS

The study sample consisted of 97 adult patients with IUO who have not been previously diagnosed with an infectious, inflammatory, or malignant disease. The necessary data were collected from January 2015 to June 2018 with a 6-month follow-up period. The patients were screened using PET/CT after a specific diagnosis could not be established with detailed laboratory and radiologic evaluations.

RESULTS

A final diagnosis was established at follow-up, and 47 (54%) of the 97 patients had inflammatory diseases, 30 (34.4%) had malignancies, and 10 (11.4%) had infections. Despite meticulous investigation, 10 patients were left undiagnosed in the follow-up. PET/CT aided diagnosis in 59 patients (60.8%), but it was not helpful in 38 patients (39.2%). PET/CT was positive in 30 (63%) of the 47 patients with inflammatory diseases, whose final diagnosis was inflammatory rheumatic disease, as follows: large-vessel vasculitis in 19 patients, polymyalgia rheumatica in 7 patients, and seronegative arthritis or other rare miscellaneous diseases in 4 patients. The sensitivity of PET/CT was 67% with a specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 100% and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Investigation of the underlying etiology of IUO is time-consuming and challenging. PET/CT may help identify the final diagnosis more quickly by locating an obscure inflammatory site; thus, it may reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, diagnostic time, anxiety, work loss, morbidity, and mortality.

Place of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnostic Workup in Patients with Classical Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO)

Objective: To explore the diagnostic contribution of the ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in a population of patients with classical fever of unknown origin (FUO), to pinpoint its place in the diagnostic decision tree in a real-life setting, and to identify the factors associated with a diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT. Method: All adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of classical FUO who underwent an ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in the University Hospital of Montpellier (France) between April 2012 and December 2017 were included. True positive ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, which evidenced a specific disease causing FUO, were considered to be contributive. Results: Forty-four patients with FUO have been included (20 males, 24 females; mean age 57.5 ± 17.1 years). Diagnoses were obtained in 31 patients (70.5%), of whom 17 (38.6%) had non-infectious inflammatory diseases, 9 had infections (20.5%), and 3 had malignancies (6.8%). ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT was helpful for making a final diagnosis (true positive) in 43.6% of all patients. Sensitivity and specificity levels were 85% and 37%, respectively. A total of 135 investigations were performed before ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, mostly CT scans (93.2%) and echocardiography (59.1%), and 108 after ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, mostly biopsies (including the biopsy of a temporal artery) (25%) and MRIs (34%). In multivariate analysis, the hemoglobin level was significantly associated with a helpful ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT (p = 0.019, OR 0.41; 95% CI (0.20–0.87)), while the CRP level was not associated with a contributive ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT. Conclusion: ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT may be proposed as a routine initial non-invasive procedure in the diagnostic workup of FUO, especially in anemic patients who could be more likely to benefit from ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT.

Predictors of Diagnostic Contributions and Spontaneous Remission of Symptoms Associated with Positron Emission Tomography with Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxy Glucose Combined with Computed Tomography in Classic Fever or Inflammation of Unknown Origin: a Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

In patients with fever or inflammation of unknown origin (fever of unknown origin [FUO] or inflammation of unknown origin [IUO], respectively), expert consensus recommends the use of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxy glucose combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) when standard work-up fails to identify diagnostic clues. However, the clinical variables associated with successful localization of the cause by FDG-PET/CT remain uncertain. Moreover, the long-term outcomes of patients with unexplained FUO or IUO after negative FDG-PET/CT results are unknown. Therefore, we assessed predictors of successful diagnosis of FUO or IUO caused by FDG-PET/CT and associations of spontaneous remission of symptoms with FDG-PET/CT results.

METHODS

All patients with FUO or IUO, who underwent FDG-PET/CT from 2013 to 2019 because diagnostic work-up failed to identify a cause, were retrospectively included. We calculated the diagnostic yield and performed multivariable logistic regression to assess characteristics previously proposed to be associated with successful localization of FUO or IUO causes. We also assessed whether the FDG-PET/CT results were associated with spontaneous remissions.

RESULTS

In total, 50 patients with diagnostically challenging FUO or IUO (35 with FUO and 15 with IUO) were assessed. Other than one case of infection, all the identified causes were either malignancy or non-infectious inflammatory diseases (each with 18 patients), and FDG-PET/CT correctly localized the cause in 29 patients (diagnostic yield = 58%). None of the proposed variables was associated with successful localization. All 13 patients with sustained unexplained cause remained alive (median follow-up, 190 days). Spontaneous remission was observed in 4 of 5 patients with a negative FDG-PET/CT, and 1 of 8 with a positive result (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

In the current cohort, the proposed variables were not predictive for successful localization by FDG-PET/CT. A negative FDG-PET/CT scan may be prognostic for spontaneous remission in patients with sustained FUO or IUO.

The Utility of 18FDG-PET/CT in Diagnosing Fever of Unknown Origin: The Experience of a Large Tertiary Medical Center

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) poses a diagnostic challenge, and 18-fluorodexoyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) may identify the source. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of 18FDG-PET/CT in the work-up of FUO. The records of patients admitted to Sheba Medical Center between January 2013 and January 2018 who underwent 18FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of FUO were reviewed. Following examination of available medical test results, 18FDG-PET/CT findings were assessed to determine whether lesions identified proved diagnostic. Of 225 patients who underwent 18FDG-PET/CT for FUO work-up, 128 (57%) met inclusion criteria. Eighty (62.5%) were males; mean age was 59 ± 20.3 (range: 18-93). A final diagnosis was made in 95 (74%) patients. Of the 128 18FDG-PET/CT tests conducted for the workup of FUO, 61 (48%) were true positive, 26 (20%) false positive, 26 (20%) true negative, and 15 (12%) false negative. In a multivariate analysis, weight loss and anemia were independently associated with having a contributary results of 18FDG-PET/CT. The test yielded a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 37%, positive predictive value of 70%, and negative predictive value of 37%. 18FDG-PET/CT is a valuable tool in the diagnostic workup of FUO. It proved effective in diagnosing almost half the patients, especially in those with anemia and weight loss.

Imaging a Fever-Redefining the Role of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Fever of Unknown Origin Investigations

Growing evidence suggests that 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (18FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a useful imaging technique for the evaluation of fever of unknown origin (FUO). This imaging technique allows for accurate localization of foci of hypermetabolism based on 18FDG uptake in glycolytically active cells that may represent inflammation, infection, or neoplasia. The presence of abnormal uptake can help direct further investigation that may yield a final diagnosis. A lack of abnormal uptake can be reasonably reassuring that these conditions are not present, thereby avoiding unnecessary additional testing. Insurers have not routinely covered outpatient 18FDG-PET/CT for the indication of FUO in the United States. However, data published since 2007 suggest early use in FUO diagnostic evaluations improves diagnostic efficiency and reduces costs. Clinicians and insurers should consider 18FDG-PET/CT as a useful tool when preliminary studies are unrevealing.

State of the art of 18F-FDG PET/CT application in inflammation and infection: a guide for image acquisition and interpretation

AIM

The diagnosis, severity and extent of a sterile inflammation or a septic infection could be challenging since there is not one single test able to achieve an accurate diagnosis. The clinical use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the assessment of inflammation and infection is increasing worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to achieve an Italian consensus document on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in inflammatory and infectious diseases, such as osteomyelitis (OM), prosthetic joint infections (PJI), infective endocarditis (IE), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), cardiac implantable electronic device infections (CIEDI), systemic and cardiac sarcoidosis (SS/CS), diabetic foot (DF), fungal infections (FI), tuberculosis (TBC), fever and inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO), pediatric infections (PI), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), spine infections (SI), vascular graft infections (VGI), large vessel vasculitis (LVV), retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF) and COVID-19 infections.

METHODS

In September 2020, the inflammatory and infectious diseases focus group (IIFG) of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) proposed to realize a procedural paper about the clinical applications of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in inflammatory and infectious diseases. The project was carried out thanks to the collaboration of 13 Italian nuclear medicine centers, with a consolidate experience in this field. With the endorsement of AIMN, IIFG contacted each center, and the pediatric diseases focus group (PDFC). IIFG provided for each team involved, a draft with essential information regarding the execution of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI scan (i.e., indications, patient preparation, standard or specific acquisition modalities, interpretation criteria, reporting methods, pitfalls and artifacts), by limiting the literature research to the last 20 years. Moreover, some clinical cases were required from each center, to underline the teaching points. Time for the collection of each report was from October to December 2020.

RESULTS

Overall, we summarized 291 scientific papers and guidelines published between 1998 and 2021. Papers were divided in several sub-topics and summarized in the following paragraphs: clinical indications, image interpretation criteria, future perspectivess and new trends (for each single disease), while patient preparation, image acquisition, possible pitfalls and reporting modalities were described afterwards. Moreover, a specific section was dedicated to pediatric and PET/MRI indications. A collection of images was described for each indication.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in oncology is globally accepted and standardized in main diagnostic algorithms for neoplasms. In recent years, the ever-closer collaboration among different European associations has tried to overcome the absence of a standardization also in the field of inflammation and infections. The collaboration of several nuclear medicine centers with a long experience in this field, as well as among different AIMN focus groups represents a further attempt in this direction. We hope that this document will be the basis for a "common nuclear physicians' language" throughout all the country.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40336-021-00445-w.

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 67Ga-SPECT for the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin: a multicenter prospective study in Japan

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to compare the sensitivity of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with that of 67Ga single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the identification of the site of greatest importance for the final diagnosis of the cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO).

METHODS

The study participants consisted of patients with an axillary temperature ≥ 38.0 °C on ≥ 2 occasions within 1 week, with repeated episodes for ≥ 2 weeks prior to providing consent, and whose final diagnosis after undergoing specific examinations, including a chest-to-abdomen CT scan, was uncertain. All the patients underwent FDG-PET/CT imaging first, followed by 67Ga-SPECT imaging within 3 days. The results of the FDG-PET/CT and 67Ga-SPECT examinations were reviewed by the central image interpretation committee (CIIC), which was blinded to all other clinical information. The sensitivities of FDG-PET/CT and 67Ga-SPECT were then evaluated with regard to identifying the site of greatest importance for a final diagnosis of the cause of the fever as decided by the patient's attending physician. The clinical impacts (four grades) of FDG-PET/CT and 67Ga-SPECT on the final diagnosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 149 subjects were enrolled in this study between October 2014 and September 2017. No adverse events were identified among the enrolled subjects. Twenty-one subjects were excluded from the study because of deviations from the study protocol. Among the 128 remaining subjects, a final diagnosis of the disease leading to the appearance of FUO was made for 92 (71.9%) subjects. The final diagnoses in these 92 cases were classified into four groups: noninfectious inflammatory disease (52 cases); infectious disease (31 cases), malignancy (six cases); and other (three cases). These 92 subjects were eligible for inclusion in the study's analysis, but one case did not meet the PET/CT image acquisition criteria; thus, PET/CT results were analyzed for 91 cases. According to the patient-based assessments, the sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT (45%, 95% CI 33.1-58.2%) was significantly higher than that for 67Ga-SPECT (25%, 95% CI 15.5-37.5%) (P = 0.0029). The clinical impact of FDG-PET/CT (91%) was also significantly higher than that for 67Ga-SPECT (57%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET/CT showed a superior sensitivity to 67Ga-SPECT for the identification of the site of greatest importance for the final diagnosis of the cause of FUO.

Gallium citrate-67 single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for localizing the foci of classic fever and inflammation of unknown origin: A retrospective study of diagnostic yield

OBJECTIVES

Only few studies have assessed the use of gallium citrate-67 single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (67Ga-SPECT/CT) for localizing the foci of classic fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO). Hence, the current study aimed to assess the diagnostic contribution of 67Ga-SPECT/CT in a tertiary referral setting where nuclear imaging tests are performed after an unsuccessful comprehensive primary diagnostic workup.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the medical records of 27 adult patients with FUO/IUO who had an unsuccessful diagnostic workup and who underwent 67Ga-SPECT/CT for the localization of FUO/IUO foci in our university hospital between 2013 and 2019. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield. The secondary outcomes were overall clinical efficacy and spontaneous remission of FUO/IUO symptoms in patients with a negative 67Ga-SPECT/CT finding.

RESULTS

Almost all patients completed the recommended diagnostic workup, except for urine culture and abdominal ultrasonography. Moreover, prior to 67Ga-SPECT/CT, all patients underwent thoraco-abdominopelvic CT scan, which was a non-diagnostic procedure. After a median follow-up of 843 days, the cause was identified in 16 (59%) patients. 67Ga-SPECT/CT successfully localized the FUO/IUO foci in eight patients (diagnostic yield = 30%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14%-50%). However, the causes remained unknown during follow-up in 11 (41%) patients. Among them, five experienced spontaneous regression of symptoms. 67Ga-SPECT/CT was negative in four of the five patients with spontaneous regression in symptoms without a definite cause. Considering this an important event, the overall clinical efficacy of 67Ga-SPECT/CT increased to 44% (95% CI: 25%-65%).

CONCLUSION

67Ga-SPECT/CT had an acceptable diagnostic yield for the localization of FUO/IUO foci, which are challenging to diagnose, in a contemporary tertiary referral care setting. In patients who experienced spontaneous regression in symptoms with an unexplained cause, the absence of abnormal uptake might indicate prospective spontaneous remission. Thus, 67Ga-SPECT/CT could be an active first-line nuclear imaging modality in settings where fluorine-18-fluorodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography is not available for the assessment of FUO/IUO causes.

FDG-PET/CT in Fever of Unknown Origin, Bacteremia, and Febrile Neutropenia

Fever of unknown origin, bacteremia, and febrile neutropenia are diagnostic challenges. FDG-PET/CT is a well-established modality in infection imaging and the literature increasingly supports its use in these settings. In fever of unknown origin, FDG-PET/CT is helpful, but diagnostic yield depends on patient selection and inflammatory markers. In bacteremia, FDG-PET/CT is cost-effective, reduces morbidity and mortality, and impacts treatment strategy. Although use of FDG-PET/CT in these domains is not established as part of a definitive diagnostic strategy, FDG-PET/CT may help establish final diagnosis in a difficult population and should be considered early in the diagnostic process.

Evaluation of FDG-PET/CT Use in Children with Suspected Infection or Inflammation

[¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT ([¹⁸F]-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool in suspected infectious or inflammatory conditions. Studies on the value of FDG-PET/CT in children are scarce. This study assesses the role of FDG-PET/CT in suspected infection or inflammation in children. In this multicenter cohort study, 64 scans in 59 children with suspected infection or inflammation were selected from 452 pediatric FDG-PET/CT scans, performed in five hospitals between January 2016 and August 2017. Main outcomes were diagnostic information provided by FDG-PET/CT for diagnostic scans and impact on clinical management for follow-up scans. Of these 64 scans, 50 were performed for primary diagnosis and 14 to monitor disease activity. Of the positive diagnostic scans, 23/27 (85%) contributed to establishing a diagnosis. Of the negative diagnostic scans, 8/21 (38%) contributed to the final diagnosis by narrowing the differential or by providing information on the disease manifestation. In all follow-up scans, FDG-PET/CT results guided management decisions. CRP was significantly higher in positive scans than in negative scans (p = 0.004). In 6% of diagnostic scans, relevant incidental findings were identified. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT performed in children with suspected infection or inflammation resulted in information that contributed to the final diagnosis or helped to guide management decisions in the majority of cases. Prospective studies assessing the impact of FDG-PET/CT results on diagnosis and patient management using a structured diagnostic protocol are feasible and necessary.

Fever and Fever of Unknown Origin: Review, Recent Advances, and Lingering Dogma

Fever has preoccupied physicians since the earliest days of clinical medicine. It has been the subject of scrutiny in recent decades. Historical convention has mostly determined that 37.0°C (98.6°F) should be regarded as normal body temperature, and more modern evidence suggests that fever is a complex physiological response involving the innate immune system and should not be characterized merely as a temperature above this threshold. Fever of unknown origin (FUO) was first defined in 1961 by Petersdorf and Beeson and continues to be a clinical challenge for physicians. Although clinicians may have some understanding of the history of clinical thermometry, how average body temperatures were established, thermoregulation, and pathophysiology of fever, new concepts are emerging. While FUO subgroups and etiologic classifications have remained unchanged since 1991 revisions, the spectrum of diseases, clinical approach to diagnosis, and management are changing. This review considers how newer data should influence both definitions and lingering dogmatic principles. Despite recent advances and newer imaging techniques such as 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, clinical judgment remains an essential component of care.

Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT in critically ill patients with suspected infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Nuclear imaging, including gallium scintigraphy and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), has been widely used to identify focus of infection in fever of unknown origin. However, little is known about its role in critically ill patients, who are usually with multiple inflammatory foci and unable to tolerate long image acquisition time. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FDG PET for suspected infection in critically ill patients.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched up to July 24th, 2019 to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of FDG PET for finding infection focus in critically ill patients following the PRISMA guidelines. The bivariate mixed-effects model was used to pool the measure for diagnostic performance. Publication bias was evaluated by Deeks' method.

RESULTS

A total of 4 studies with 87 patients were included. All the four studies evaluated FDG PET. Majority of the patients were either mechanically ventilated (76%) or shocked requiring vasopressors (61%). Test and transportation related adverse events were rare (2%). The summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.79-0.99) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.45-0.83), respectively. The AUC for summary ROC curve was 0.83.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET was a very sensitive tool with acceptable specificity for detecting the origin of infection in critically ill patients. However, current available studies have limitation in evaluating safety issue. Further research should investigate both benefit and risk of doing this test for this group of vulnerable patients.

The impact of global budgeting in Taiwan on inpatients with unexplained fever

Unexplained fever is one of the most common and difficult diagnostic problems faced daily by clinicians. This study evaluated the differences in health service utilization, health care expenditures, and quality of care provided to patients with unexplained fever before and after global budget (GB) implementation in Taiwan.The National Health Insurance Research Database was used for analyzing the health care expenditures and quality of care before and after implementation of the GB system. Patients diagnosed as having unexplained fever during 2000-2001 were recruited; their 2000-2001 and 2004-2005 data were considered baseline and postintervention data, respectively.Data of 259 patients with unexplained fever were analyzed. The mean lengths of stay (LOSs) before and after GB system implementation were 4.22 ± 0.35 days and 5.29 ± 0.70 days, respectively. The mean costs of different health care expenditures before and after implementation of the GB system were as follows: the mean diagnostic, drug, therapy, and total costs increased respectively from New Taiwan Dollar (NT$) 1440.05 ± NT$97.43, NT$3249.90 ± NT$1108.27, NT$421.03 ± NT$100.03, and NT$13,866.77 ± NT$2,114.95 before GB system implementation to NT$2224.34 ± NT$238.36, NT$4272.31 ± NT$1466.90, NT$2217.03 ± NT$672.20, and NT$22,856.41 ± NT$4,196.28 after implementation. The mean rates of revisiting the emergency department within 3 days and readmission within 14 days increased respectively from 10.5% ± 2.7% and 8.3% ± 2.4% before implementation to 6.3% ± 2.2% and 4.0% ± 1.7% after implementation.GB significantly increased LOS and incremental total costs for patients with unexplained fever; but improved the quality of care.

FDG PET/CT of Infection: Should It Replace Labeled Leukocyte Scintigraphy of Inpatients?

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and helpfulness to referring clinicians of labeled leukocyte scintigraphy versus FDG PET/CT in inpatients with suspected infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective study, labeled leukocyte scintigraphy and FDG PET/CT examinations performed from 2009 to 2017 for suspected infection in inpatients were identified. Sensitivity, specificity, and helpfulness of PET/CT versus labeled leukocyte scintigraphy were calculated by means of a mixed generalized linear model. Number of yearly tests and radiopharmaceutical costs were also assessed. RESULTS. Fifty-seven patients (30 men, 27 women; median age, 65 years; range, 21-91 years) underwent whole-body labeled leukocyte scintigraphy. Forty-two patients (30 male patients, 12 female patients; median age, 62.5 years; range, 12-91 years) underwent PET/CT for suspected infection. Labeled leukocyte scintigraphy was 66.7% sensitive, whereas the sensitivity of PET/CT was 89.7% (p = 0.0485). The higher sensitivity of PET/CT did not come at a cost to specificity, which was 73.3% as opposed to 76.9% for labeled leukocyte scintigraphy (p = 0.8050). The odds of a positive study being helpful increased 4.6-fold for PET/CT versus labeled leukocyte scintigraphy (p = 0.0412). From 2009 to 2011, 33 labeled leukocyte scintigraphic examinations were performed versus two PET/CT examinations; and from 2012 to 2014, 16 labeled leukocyte scintigraphic versus 22 PET/CT examinations; from 2015 to 2017, eight labeled leukocyte scintigraphic versus 18 PET/CT examinations. The cost of labeled leukocytes increased between 2009 and 2017, but that of FDG decreased. By 2017, a labeled leukocyte radiopharmaceutical dose was approximately 10 times the cost of an FDG dose. CONCLUSION. PET/CT was more sensitive than and as specific as labeled leukocyte scintigraphy for identifying a source of infection in inpatients, and it was more helpful to referring clinicians. Use of PET/CT increased over time and was associated with substantial savings in radiopharmaceutical cost.

PET/CT Imaging in Soft Tissue Infection and Inflammation-An Update

Nuclear medicine procedures, including Ga-67 and labeled leucocyte SPECT/CT as well as PET/CT using 18F-FDG and recently Ga-68 tracers, have found extensive applications in the assessment of infectious and inflammatory processes in general and in soft tissues in particular. Recent published data focus on summarizing the available imaging information with the purpose of providing the referring clinicians with optimized evidence based results. Guidelines and/or recommendations of clinical societies have incorporated nuclear medicine tests (using both labeled leucocytes and FDG) in their suggested work-up for evaluation of infective endocarditis and in certain patients with suspected vascular graft infections. Joint guidelines of the European and American nuclear medicine societies include fever of unknown origin, sarcoidosis, and vasculitis among the major clinical indications that will benefit from nuclear medicine procedures, specifically from FDG PET/CT. Limitations and pitfalls for the use of radiotracers in assessment of infection and inflammation can be related to patient conditions (eg, diabetes mellitus), or to the biodistribution of a specific radiopharmaceutical. Limited presently available data on the use of functional and/or metabolic monitoring of response to infectious and inflammatory processes to treatment and with respect to the effect of drugs such as antibiotics and glucocorticoids on the imaging patterns of these patients need further confirmation.

Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases according to Published Meta-Analyses

Purpose

To date, several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in infectious and inflammatory diseases. This article aims to summarize the published evidence-based data about the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in this setting.

Methods

A comprehensive computer literature search of meta-analyses published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library database from January 2009 through December 2018 and regarding the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in infectious and inflammatory diseases was carried out. This combination of key words was used: (i) “PET” OR “positron emission tomography” OR “FDG” OR “fluorodeoxyglucose” AND (ii) meta-analysis. Only records on inflammatory or infectious diseases were selected.

Results

The diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in detecting inflammatory and infectious diseases has been summarized taking into account 36 meta-analyses published in the literature. Evidence-based data demonstrated good diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for several inflammatory and infectious diseases, in particular cardiovascular infectious and inflammatory diseases and some musculoskeletal infections.

Conclusions

Evidence-based data about the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in infectious and inflammatory diseases are increasing, with good diagnostic performance of this imaging method for some indications. More prospective multicenter studies and cost-effective analyses are warranted.

Contribution of 18F-FDG PET/CT in a case-mix of fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are challenging medical problems. Previous studies have shown that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) plays an important role in the diagnosis of FUO, but few studies have explored this diagnostic technique in relation to IUO.

PURPOSE

To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published data on the diagnostic performance of PET/CT in the diagnosis of FUO and IUO.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines published in March 2018. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance was performed using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratification based on study design, number of patients, geographic area, and final diagnosis based on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Meta-regression analyses were performed to recognize heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 23 studies, comprising a total sample size of 1927 patients. The pooled diagnosis performance was calculated with a per-patient-based analysis: sensitivity = 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79-0.89), specificity = 0.63 (95% CI = 0.49-0.75), positive likelihood ratio = 2.3 (95% CI = 1.5-3.4), negative likelihood ratio = 0.25 (95% CI = 0.16-0.38), diagnostic odds ratio = 9 (95% CI = 4.0-20), and AUC = 0.84 (95% CI = 0.81-0.87).

CONCLUSION

In patients with non-specific symptoms and signs, 18F-FDG PET/CT is very helpful for recognizing and excluding diseases, directing further diagnostic decisions, and avoiding unnecessary invasive examinations. We recommend that 18F-FDG PET/CT should be considered among the first-line diagnostic tools for patients with FUO and IUO.