1
|
Itonaga M, Ashida R, Kitano M. Updated techniques and evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. DEN OPEN 2025; 5:e399. [PMID: 38911353 PMCID: PMC11190023 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), including fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has revolutionized specimen collection from intra-abdominal organs, especially the pancreas. Advances in personalized medicine and more precise treatment have increased demands to collect specimens with higher cell counts, while preserving tissue structure, leading to the development of EUS-FNB needles. EUS-FNB has generally replaced EUS-FNA as the procedure of choice for EUS-TA of pancreatic cancer. Various techniques have been tested for their ability to enhance the diagnostic performance of EUS-TA, including multiple methods of sampling at the time of puncture, on-site specimen evaluation, and specimen processing. In addition, advances in next-generation sequencing have made comprehensive genomic profiling of EUS-TA samples feasible in routine clinical practice. The present review describes updates in EUS-TA sampling techniques of pancreatic lesions, as well as methods for their evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal MedicineWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan
| | - Reiko Ashida
- Second Department of Internal MedicineWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal MedicineWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu H. Undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas: a narrative review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1409197. [PMID: 38962271 PMCID: PMC11220528 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1409197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas (UCOGCP) is a rare pancreatic tumor that accounts for less than 1% of all pancreatic malignancies. The characteristic pathological manifestation of UCOGCP is the presence of osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs) distributed among pleomorphic undifferentiated tumor cells. UCOGCP can occur either alone or in association with other types of pancreatic tumors. At present, there is no unified consensus or guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of UCOGCP, and most of the literature are individual case reports. With the accumulation in the number of clinical cases and the development of precision medicine technology, the understanding of UCOGCP is also deepening. Researchers have begun to recognize that UCOGCP is a pancreatic tumor with distinctive clinical and molecular characteristics. In this review, we focus on the latest research status and future exploration directions in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of UCOGCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoxiang Wu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Metelli F, Manfredi G, Pagano N, Buscarini E, Crinò SF, Armellini E. The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Ancillary Techniques in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1233. [PMID: 38928649 PMCID: PMC11202526 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14121233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis with a multifactorial pathogenesis. Historically, it has been classified as type 1 and type 2, according to its clinical and histological features. The diagnosis of AIP is challenging and relies on a combination of clinical, histopathologic, serologic, and imaging characteristics. In the available guidelines, the imaging hallmarks of AIP are based on cross-sectional imaging and cholangiopancreatography retrograde endoscopic findings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is generally used for pancreatic tissue acquisition to rule out pancreatic cancer and diagnose AIP with limited accuracy. Several papers reported the reliability of EUS for providing informative morphologic features of AIP. Nowadays, the improvement in the resolution of EUS conventional images and the development of new ancillary technologies have further increased the diagnostic yield of EUS: contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are non-invasive and real-time techniques that strongly support the diagnosis and management of pancreatic diseases. In this review article, we will present the role of conventional EUS and ancillary diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of AIP to support clinicians and endosonographers in managing this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio Metelli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, ASST Maggiore Hospital Crema, 26013 Crema, Italy; (F.M.); (G.M.); (E.B.)
| | - Guido Manfredi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, ASST Maggiore Hospital Crema, 26013 Crema, Italy; (F.M.); (G.M.); (E.B.)
| | - Nico Pagano
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Oncological and Specialty Medicine, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Elisabetta Buscarini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, ASST Maggiore Hospital Crema, 26013 Crema, Italy; (F.M.); (G.M.); (E.B.)
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Elia Armellini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST-Bergamoest, 24068 Seriate, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chalhoub JM, Hawa F, Grantham T, Lester J, Carpenter ES, Mendoza-Ladd A, Wani S, Machicado JD. Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)03258-9. [PMID: 38852683 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The optimal number of passes to maximize the diagnostic ability of EUS fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid pancreatic masses (SPMs) is not well known. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the impact of the incremental number of passes on diagnostic accuracy, tissue adequacy, and diagnostic yield for EUS-FNB of SPMs. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials comparing per-pass diagnostic outcomes of FNB needles in patients with SPMs. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. A separate analysis was performed on studies that used contemporary Franseen and fork-tip needles. RESULTS Overall, 19 randomized controlled trials (N = 3552) were identified. For EUS-FNB of SPMs, 3 passes with any FNB needle outperformed 2 passes for accuracy (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-2.09; I2 = 0%), adequacy (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.30-2.83; I2 = 61%), and yield (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.37-3.27; I2 = 14%). Adding a fourth or fifth pass resulted in no significant improvement in diagnostic parameters. When using contemporary FNB needles, adding a second to a single pass significantly improved accuracy (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23-2.63; I2 = 0%), adequacy (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.65-2.90; I2 = 0%), and yield (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.50-4.95; I2 = 0%). Adding a third pass to a second pass with contemporary needles improved adequacy (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.97-4.46; I2 = 0%) but did not provide better diagnostic accuracy or yield. CONCLUSIONS Two passes with Franseen or Fork-tip needles and 3 passes with any FNB needle suffice to provide optimal diagnostic performance for EUS-FNB of SPMs, without additional diagnostic benefits with more passes. Our results can inform future guidelines and quality benchmarks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean M Chalhoub
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, New York, USA
| | - Fadi Hawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Tyler Grantham
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, New York, USA
| | - Janice Lester
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, New York, USA
| | - Eileen S Carpenter
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Antonio Mendoza-Ladd
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jorge D Machicado
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guzmán-Calderón E, Chacaltana A, Díaz-Arocutipa C, Díaz R, Arcana R, Aparicio JR. Impact of biliary stents in the performance of the EUS-guided tissue acquisition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2024; 47:327-336. [PMID: 37285933 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIM Pancreatobiliary tumours are challenging to diagnose exclusively by imaging methods. Although the optimum moment for carrying out the EUS is not well defined, it has been suggested that the presence of biliary stents may interfere with the proper staging of tumours and the acquisition of samples. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of biliary stents on EUS-guided tissue acquisition yield. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review in different databases, such as PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and OVID Database. A search was made of all studies published up to February 2022. RESULTS Eight studies were analyzed. A total of 3185 patients were included. The mean age was 66.9±2.7 years; 55.4% were male gender. Overall, 1761 patients (55.3%) underwent EUS guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with stents in situ, whereas 1424 patients (44.7%) underwent EUS-TA without stents. The technical success was similar in both groups (EUS-TA with stents: 88% vs EUS-TA without stents: 88%, OR=0.92 [95% CI 0.55-1.56]). The type of stent, the needle size and the number of the passes were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS EUS-TA has similar diagnostic performance and technical success in patients with or without stents. The type of stent (SEMS or plastic) does not seem to influence the diagnostic performance of EUS-TA. Future prospectives and RCT studies are needed to strengthen these conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edson Guzmán-Calderón
- Gastroenterology Unit of Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru; Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), Peru; Gastroenterology Unit of Angloamericana Clinic, Lima, Peru.
| | - Alfonso Chacaltana
- Gastroenterology Unit of Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Ramiro Díaz
- Gastroenterology Unit of Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru
| | - Ronald Arcana
- Gastroenterology Unit of Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru
| | - José Ramón Aparicio
- Gastroenterology Unit of Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shionoya K, Tonozuka R, Mukai S, Tsuchiya T, Tanaka R, Yamamoto K, Nagai K, Mastunami Y, Kojima H, Itoi T. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy using a three-prong asymmetry tip needle for pancreatic tumors and peridigestive tract lesions: Retrospective single-center study. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2024; 31:294-304. [PMID: 38212938 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition is vital for diagnosing pancreatic and peridigestive tract lesions. A new three-prong asymmetry tip needle has been developed for this procedure. In this study, we retrospectively assessed the diagnostic ability, tissue collection volume, and procedural adverse events of the three-prong asymmetry tip needle for solid pancreatic, subepithelial, and other organ lesions. METHODS We analyzed the data of 58 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition using a three-prong asymmetry tip needle between August 2022 and April 2023 at a single care center. RESULTS The tissue collection rate was 91.4% with 89.7% accuracy, 89.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 25% negative predictive value. No significant differences in collection rates or diagnostic performance were observed based on the target organ, puncture route, or lesion size. Using our original assessment method, the average histological core tissue score was 3.1 ± 0.8, whereas the blood contamination volume was 2.5 ± 0.8. Only one of 58 patients (1.7%) developed a pancreatic fistula of moderate severity as an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS The three-prong asymmetry tip needle demonstrated good diagnostic capability and adequate sample volume with safety for pancreatic, subepithelial, and other organ lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Takayoshi Tsuchiya
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mangiavillano B, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo FM, Barbera C, Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Carrara S, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, De Luca L, Di Leo M, Conti Bellocchi MC, Spadaccini M, Dabizzi E, Auriemma F, Stigliano S, Ramai D, Calabrese F, Manfrin E, Paduano D, Hassan C, Repici A, Crinó SF. Establishing the optimal number of passes during EUS-FNB for diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions: Prospective multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E467-E473. [PMID: 38585018 PMCID: PMC10997423 DOI: 10.1055/a-2236-7654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The optimal number of needle passes during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is not yet established. We aimed to perform a per-pass analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB of solid pancreatic lesions using a 22G Franseen needle. Patients and methods Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions referred to 11 Italian centers were prospectively enrolled. Three needle passes were performed; specimens were collected after each pass and processed individually as standard histology following macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) by the endoscopist. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy of each sequential pass. Final diagnosis was established based on surgical pathology or a clinical course of at least 6 months. Secondary endpoints were specimen adequacy, MOSE reliability, factors impacting diagnostic accuracy, and procedure-related adverse events. Results A total of 504 samples from 168 patients were evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy was 90.5% (85.0%-94.1%) after one pass and 97.6% (94.1%-99.3%) after two passes ( P =0.01). Similarly, diagnostic sensitivity and sample adequacy were significantly higher adding the second needle pass (90.2%, 84.6%-94.3% vs 97.5%, 93.8%-99.3%, P =0.009 and 91.1%, 85.7%-94.9% vs 98.2%, 95.8%-99.3%, P =0.009, one pass vs two passes, respectively). Accuracy, sensitivity, and adequacy remained the same after the third pass. The concordance between MOSE and histological evaluation was 89.9%. The number of passes was the only factor associated with accuracy. One case of mild acute pancreatitis (0.6%) was managed conservatively. Conclusions At least two passes should be performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. MOSE is a reliable tool to predict the histological adequacy of specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Casa di Cura Privata SpA, Castellanza, Italy
| | | | | | - Carmelo Barbera
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino-Estense, Baggiovara di Modena (Mo), Italy
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | | | - Luca De Luca
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Spadaccini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Emanuele Dabizzi
- Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense di Baggiovara, Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
- Gastroenterologia, Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Serena Stigliano
- Operative Endoscopy Department, Campus Bio-Medico University, Roma, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Casa di Cura Privata SpA, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona Hospital Trust P.Le L.A. Scuro 10, Verona, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinó
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ishikawa T, Yamao K, Mizutani Y, Iida T, Kawashima H. Cutting edge of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2024; 51:209-217. [PMID: 37914883 PMCID: PMC11098899 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-023-01375-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
This article provides an extensive review of the advancements and future perspectives related to endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). EUS-TA, including fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has revolutionized the collection of specimens from intra-abdominal organs, including the pancreas. Improvements in the design of needles, collection methods, and specimen processing techniques have improved the diagnostic performance. This review highlights the latest findings regarding needle evolution, actuation number, sampling methods, specimen evaluation techniques, application of artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnostic purposes, and use of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). It acknowledges the rising use of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-FNB and emphasizes that the optimal number of actuations requires further study. Methods such as the door-knocking and fanning techniques have shown promise for increasing diagnostic performance. Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) is presented as a practical rapid specimen evaluation method, and the integration of AI is identified as a potentially impactful development. The study also underscores the importance of optimal sampling for CGP, which can enhance the precision of cancer treatment. Ongoing research and technological innovations will further improve the accuracy and efficacy of EUS-TA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan.
| | - Kentaro Yamao
- Department of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Mizutani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan
| | - Tadashi Iida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kawashima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang D, Wu C, Yang Z, Yin H, Liu Y, Li W, Huang H, Jin Z. The application of artificial intelligence in EUS. Endosc Ultrasound 2024; 13:65-75. [PMID: 38947752 PMCID: PMC11213611 DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is an epoch-making technology, among which the 2 most advanced parts are machine learning and deep learning algorithms that have been further developed by machine learning, and it has been partially applied to assist EUS diagnosis. AI-assisted EUS diagnosis has been reported to have great value in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors and chronic pancreatitis, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, esophageal early cancer, biliary tract, and liver lesions. The application of AI in EUS diagnosis still has some urgent problems to be solved. First, the development of sensitive AI diagnostic tools requires a large amount of high-quality training data. Second, there is overfitting and bias in the current AI algorithms, leading to poor diagnostic reliability. Third, the value of AI still needs to be determined in prospective studies. Fourth, the ethical risks of AI need to be considered and avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deyu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Chang Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Zhenghui Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Hua Yin
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China
| | - Yue Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Wanshun Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Haojie Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Zhendong Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Imaoka H, Ikeda M, Umemoto K, Sunakawa Y, Ueno M, Ueno H, Ozaka M, Kuwahara T, Okano N, Kanai M, Hisano T, Suzuki Y, Asagi A, Shioji K, Todaka A, Tsuji K, Ikezawa K, Miki I, Komatsu Y, Akutsu N, Yamashita T, Okuyama H, Furuse J, Nagano H. Comprehensive review of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas: from epidemiology to treatment. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:764-773. [PMID: 37325968 PMCID: PMC10473279 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer displaying no definitive direction of differentiation. UC has been reported as a highly aggressive malignant neoplasm, with a median overall survival of <1 year, except for several surgical series. On the other hand, UC tissue sometimes contains non-neoplastic osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs), and such cases have been reported to have relatively longer survival. Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification histologically distinguishes UC with OGCs (UCOGCs) from UC, and UCs were subclassified into three subtypes: anaplastic UC, sarcomatoid UC and carcinosarcoma. However, still less is known about UC due to its rarity, and such situations lead to further difficulties in treatment for UC. To date, only surgical resection can offer curative treatment for patients with UC, and no clear evidence for chemotherapy exists for them. However, a retrospective cohort study and case reports showed that relatively promising results paclitaxel-containing regimens for treatment of patients with unresectable UC. Furthermore, high programmed cell death protein 1 expression has been reported in sarcomatoid UCs and UCOGCs, and promising responses to anti-programmed death-ligand 1 therapy have been described in case reports of UCOGCs. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents and molecular technologies are opening up the possibilities for expanded treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Imaoka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Masafumi Ikeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Kumiko Umemoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yu Sunakawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takamichi Kuwahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Naohiro Okano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Kanai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Terumasa Hisano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuko Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Asagi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Shioji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Akiko Todaka
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Kenji Ikezawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ikuya Miki
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Akutsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okuyama
- Department of Medical Clinical Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, MikiKagawa, Japan
| | - Junji Furuse
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hu X, Yu F, Cao T, Chen X, Nie H, Zhang Z, Wang F, Wang H, Fang J, Zhao Q. Twenty versus 40 back-and-forth needle movements for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, crossover, randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 35:836-842. [PMID: 37395235 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid pancreatic mass lesions, the number of times the needle moves back and forth within the lesion might affect the collection of the sample and the subsequent diagnostic accuracy. Thus, this study was designed to compare the diagnostic adequacy between different numbers of back-and-forth movements in EUS-FNB. METHODS Fifty-five patients with solid pancreatic masses underwent EUS-FNB sampling with the needle (22-gauge) moved 20 times (MTT) and 40 times (MFT) randomly and sequentially for a total of four alternating passes. We compared the acquisition rate of appropriate and adequate specimens for histologic assessment and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS Finally, 55 patients (35 men and 20 women) were included in the study. We found that 56.4% (31/55) and 60% (33/55) of the specimens obtained using MTT and MFT, respectively, could be adequately diagnosed histologically (P = 0.815, McNemar test). The diagnostic accuracy of MTT and MFT was 72.7% (40/55) and 80% (44/55), respectively (P = 0.289, McNemar test). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 89.1%. CONCLUSION There was no significant statistical difference between the histopathological diagnostic samples obtained in MTT and those obtained in MFT. Therefore, a large number of back-and-forth movements of the needle should be avoided during EUS-FNB, which can help reduce the operation time and may reduce the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2000031106).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyi Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| | - Fang Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Department of Pathology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Tingting Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| | - Xiaojia Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| | - Haihang Nie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| | - Zhang Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| | - Fan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| | - Hongling Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| | - Jun Fang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| | - Qiu Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- Clinical Center and Key Lab of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases of Hubei Province
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yamada R, Tsuboi J, Murashima Y, Tanaka T, Nose K, Nakagawa H. Advances in the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Premalignant Pancreatic Lesions. Biomedicines 2023; 11:1687. [PMID: 37371782 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11061687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal human malignancies, in part because it is often diagnosed at late stages when surgery and systemic therapies are either unfeasible or ineffective. Therefore, diagnosing pancreatic cancer in earlier stages is important for effective treatment. However, because the signs and symptoms may be nonspecific and not apparent until the disease is at a late stage, the timely diagnoses of pancreatic cancer can be difficult to achieve. Recent studies have shown that selective screening and increased usage of biomarkers could improve the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In this review, we discuss recent advancements in the early detection of pancreatic ductal carcinoma and precancerous lesions. These include innovations in imaging modalities, the diagnostic utility of various biomarkers, biopsy techniques, and population-based surveillance approaches. Additionally, we discuss how machine learning methods are being applied to develop integrated methods of identifying individuals at high risk of developing pancreatic disease. In the future, the overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients could be improved by the development and adoption of these new methods and techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reiko Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Junya Tsuboi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Yumi Murashima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Takamitsu Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Kenji Nose
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Hayato Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kuo YT, Chu YL, Wong WF, Han ML, Chen CC, Jan IS, Cheng WC, Shun CT, Tsai MC, Cheng TY, Wang HP. Randomized trial of contrast-enhanced harmonic guidance versus fanning technique for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:732-740. [PMID: 36509113 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS For EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB) of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), the role of sampling strategy between targeted biopsy sampling and wide sampling has not been reported. This study aimed to investigate the benefits of the 2 sampling techniques on EUS-FNB using rapid on-site evaluation. METHODS Patients with SPLs were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo EUS-FNB using either contrast guidance or the fanning technique. The primary outcome was the total number of passes required to establish a diagnosis, and secondary outcomes were overall diagnostic accuracy and adverse event rates. RESULTS One hundred eighteen patients were enrolled from February 2019 to January 2021, with 59 patients assigned to each group. There was no significant difference in the total number of passes required to establish a diagnosis between the contrast and fanning groups (median, 1 [interquartile range, 1-1] vs 1 [interquartile range, 1-2], respectively; P = .629). The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy in the contrast group was 100%, 66.7%, and 98.3% and in the fanning group 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively (P = 1). An SPL <4 cm (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-5.81; P = .037) and macroscopic visible core length >1 cm (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-7.84; P = .037) were independently associated with increased cytologic and histologic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB with the fanning technique for SPLs was comparable with the contrast guidance technique. Without additional cost, EUS-FNB with the fanning technique may be preferred for SPLs. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04924725.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Ting Kuo
- Division of Endoscopy, Department of Integrated Diagnostics & Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Long Chu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Weng-Fai Wong
- Division of Endoscopy, Department of Integrated Diagnostics & Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Lun Han
- Division of Endoscopy, Department of Integrated Diagnostics & Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Chang Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Shiow Jan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wern-Cherng Cheng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Tung Shun
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chang Tsai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine and Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tsu-Yao Cheng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Po Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Crinò SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Di Mitri R, Inzani F, Rimbaș M, Lisotti A, Manfredi G, Teoh AYB, Mangiavillano B, Sendino O, Bernardoni L, Manfrin E, Scimeca D, Unti E, Carlino A, Voiosu T, Mateescu RB, Fusaroli P, Lega S, Buscarini E, Pergola L, Chan SM, Lamonaca L, Ginès À, Fernández-Esparrach G, Facciorusso A, Larghi A. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55:225-234. [PMID: 35915956 DOI: 10.1055/a-1915-1812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : It is unknown whether there is an advantage to using the wet-suction or slow-pull technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with new-generation needles. We aimed to compare the performance of each technique in EUS-FNB. METHODS This was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, crossover trial including patients with solid lesions of ≥ 1 cm. Four needle passes with 22 G fork-tip or Franseen-type needles were performed, alternating the wet-suction and slow-pull techniques in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the histological yield (samples containing an intact piece of tissue of at least 550 μm). Secondary end points were sample quality (tissue integrity and blood contamination), diagnostic accuracy, and adequate tumor fraction. RESULTS Overall, 210 patients with 146 pancreatic and 64 nonpancreatic lesions were analyzed. A tissue core was retrieved in 150 (71.4 %) and 129 (61.4 %) cases using the wet-suction and the slow-pull techniques, respectively (P = 0.03). The mean tissue integrity score was higher using wet suction (P = 0.02), as was the blood contamination of samples (P < 0.001). In the two subgroups of pancreatic and nonpancreatic lesions, tissue core rate and tissue integrity score were not statistically different using the two techniques, but blood contamination was higher with wet suction. Diagnostic accuracy and tumor fraction did not differ between the two techniques. CONCLUSION Overall, the wet-suction technique in EUS-FNB resulted in a higher tissue core procurement rate compared with the slow-pull method. Diagnostic accuracy and the rate of samples with adequate tumor fraction were similar between the two techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mihai Rimbaș
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Guido Manfredi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Anthony Y B Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Oriol Sendino
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Scimeca
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elettra Unti
- Pathology Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angela Carlino
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Theodor Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - R Bogdan Mateescu
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Buscarini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Lorena Pergola
- Pathology Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Shannon M Chan
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Àngels Ginès
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mangiavillano B, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo F, Barbera C, Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Carrara S, Spadaccini M, Auriemma F, Fabbri C, Binda C, Coluccio C, Marocchi G, Staiano T, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Eusebi LH, Cirota GG, De Nucci G, Stigliano S, Manes G, Bonanno G, Ofosu A, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Spatola F, Repici A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55:129-137. [PMID: 36044915 DOI: 10.1055/a-1915-5263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : The advantage of using the macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) performed with 22G Franseen needles has not been investigated. We aimed to compare EUS-FNB with MOSE vs. EUS-FNB performed with three needle passes. METHODS : This randomized trial involved 10 Italian referral centers. Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNB of pancreatic or nonpancreatic solid lesions were included in the study and randomized to the two groups. MOSE was performed by gross visualization of the collected material by the endoscopists and considered adequate when a white/yellowish aggregate core longer than 10 mm was retrieved. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were specimen adequacy, number of needle passes, and safety. RESULTS : 370 patients with 234 pancreatic lesions (63.2 %) and 136 nonpancreatic lesions (36.8 %) were randomized (190 EUS-FNB with MOSE and 180 with standard EUS-FNB). No statistically significant differences were found between EUS-FNB with MOSE and conventional EUS-FNB in terms of diagnostic accuracy (90.0 % [95 %CI 84.8 %-93.9 %] vs. 87.8 % [95 %CI 82.1 %-92.2 %]; P = 0.49), sample adequacy (93.1 % [95 %CI 88.6 %-96.3 %] vs. 95.5 % [95 %CI 91.4 %-98 %]; P = 0.31), and rate of adverse events (2.6 % vs. 1.1 %; P = 0.28). The median number of passes was significantly lower in the EUS-FNB with MOSE group (1 vs. 3; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS : The accuracy of EUS-FNB with MOSE is noninferior to that of EUS-FNB with three needle passes. MOSE reliably assesses sample adequacy and reduces the number of needle passes required to obtain the diagnosis with a 22G Franseen needle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy.,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Staiano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Laura Bernardoni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Leonardo Henri Eusebi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanna Grazia Cirota
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gianpiero Manes
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Bonanno
- Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas - Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mohan BP, Madhu D, Reddy N, Chara BS, Khan SR, Garg G, Kassab LL, Muthusamy AK, Singh A, Chandan S, Facciorusso A, Mangiavillano B, Repici A, Adler DG. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling by macroscopic on-site evaluation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:909-917.e11. [PMID: 35932815 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Assessment of EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) is gathering attention. Studies report good diagnostic parameters with MOSE; however, the overall data are limited. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to report on the pooled diagnostic assessment parameters of EUS-guided tissue acquisition by MOSE using fine-needle biopsy sampling (FNB). METHODS Multiple databases were searched (from inception to December 2021), and studies that reported on the diagnostic assessment of EUS-guided tissue acquisition by MOSE were selected. Pooled diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated by standard meta-analysis methods following the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included in the analysis, and 1508 lesions were biopsy sampled in 1489 patients undergoing EUS-guided tissue acquisition. MOSE definition included a visible core of tissue with opacity and "wormlike" features of adequate size and length (≥4 mm). The pooled accuracy of FNA and/or FNB specimens in yielding a pathologic diagnosis by MOSE was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.6-93.3; I2 = 66%), pooled sensitivity was 91.5% (95% CI, 88.6-93.6; I2 = 66%), pooled specificity was 98.9% (95% CI, 96.6-99.7; I2 = 80%), pooled positive predictive value was 98.8% (95% CI, 97.4-99.5; I2 = 33%), and pooled negative predictive value was 55.5% (95% CI, 46.9-63.9; I2 = 95%). Subgroup analyses by newer-generation FNB needles demonstrated similar pooled rates, with minimal adverse events (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.5-3.9; I2 = 21%). CONCLUSIONS Excellent pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters were demonstrated in EUS-guided tissue acquisition by FNB using the MOSE method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babu P Mohan
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Deepak Madhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Caritas Hospital, Kottayam, Kerala, India
| | - Nitin Reddy
- Department of Internal Medicine, PSG Institute of Medical Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Beatriz Sordi Chara
- Department of Medicine, University of Joinville, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Shahab R Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham's & Children Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gauri Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Lena L Kassab
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Arun Kumar Muthusamy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, Waterloo, Iowa, USA
| | - Achintya Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Humanitas University, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Department of Gastroenterology, Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tacelli M, Bina N, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A, Celsa C, Vanni AS, Fantin A, Antonini F, Falconi M, Monica F, Capurso G, Arcidiacono PG, Barresi L. Reliability of grading preoperative pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on EUS specimens: a systematic review with meta-analysis of aggregate and individual data. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:898-908.e23. [PMID: 35863518 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Therapy and prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are strictly related to the Ki-67 index, which defines tumor grading. The criterion standard for the assessment of grading of PanNETs is EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FBAFNA) or EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB). Because data on diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB are heterogeneous, we aimed to analyze the variability in concordance between EUS grading and surgical grading. METHODS The MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were searched until November 2021 to identify studies reporting the concordance rate between EUS grading and surgical grading. The study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Pooled events were calculated using a random-effects model and expressed in terms of pooled prevalence rates. A multivariate meta-regression was performed to find possible sources of heterogeneity. Where available, individual data were analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-six studies with 864 patients undergone EUS-FNA or EUS-FNB and surgical resection for PanNETs were included. The pooled estimate rate for the overall concordance of EUS grading and surgical grading was 80.3% (95% confidence interval, 75.6-85.1). Undergrading (EUS grading < surgical grading) was significantly more frequent with respect to overgrading (14.7% vs 3.5%, P < .001). Individual data analysis showed that among nonconcordant patients, the median Ki-67 difference was 3% (interquartile range, 2-6.15). The type of World Health Organization classification adopted and the median lesion diameter were significantly associated with heterogeneity at meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS EUS is an accurate technique in defining grading in patients with PanNETs, but a margin of error still exists, which should be the focus of future studies to minimize the risk of over- and/or undertreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Tacelli
- Division of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bina
- Division of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Ciro Celsa
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Sbrozzi Vanni
- Gastroenterology and Diagnostic and Operative Digestive Endoscopy, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Antonini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Augusto Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Monica
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, "Cattinara" Academic Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Division of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Division of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Barresi
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Karstensen JG, Vilmann P. Historical perspective on needle development: From the past to the future. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 60-61:101814. [PMID: 36577533 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2022.101814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
With the introduction of EUS, endoscopy was no longer limited to luminal indications. However, the method was unable to distinguish malignant from benign lesions. Consequently, needles designed for tissue acquisition under EUS-guidance was designed. Initially, the needles were designed for fine needle aspiration (FNA); nevertheless, with increased requirement for the precured tissue in terms of quality and quantity, newly design needles aimed at obtaining tissue cores for histological assessment were developed. Recent studies demonstrate superiority of these fine needle biopsy needles (FNB) compared to FNA needles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gásdal Karstensen
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Dept of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Peter Vilmann
- Dept of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Gastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee JS, Cho CM, Kwon YH, Seo AN, Bae HI, Han MH. Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc 2022; 55:637-644. [PMID: 35973440 PMCID: PMC9539288 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is integral to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs). The impact of different EUS-FNB tissue sampling techniques on specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy in SETs has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic outcomes of slow-pull (SP) and standard suction (SS) in patients with GI SETs. Methods In this retrospective comparative study, 54 patients were enrolled. Medical records were reviewed for location and size of the target lesion, FNB needle type/size, technical order, specimen adequacy, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. The acquisition rate of adequate specimens and diagnostic accuracy were compared according to EUS-FNB techniques. Results The mean lesion size was 42.6±36.4 mm, and most patients were diagnosed with GI stromal tumor (75.9%). The overall diagnostic accuracies of the SP and SS techniques were 83.3% and 81.5%, respectively (p=0.800). The rates of obtaining adequate core tissue were 79.6% and 75.9%, respectively (p=0.799). No significant clinical factors affected the rate of obtaining adequate core tissue, including lesion location and size, FNB needle size, and final diagnosis. Conclusions SP and SS had comparable diagnostic accuracies and adequate core tissue acquisition for GI SETs via EUS-FNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon Seop Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Chang Min Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yong Hwan Kwon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - An Na Seo
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Han Ik Bae
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Man-Hoon Han
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pu N, Yin H, Chen Q, Zhang J, Wu W, Lou W. Current status and future perspectives of clinical research in pancreatic cancer: Establishment of evidence by science. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:741-757. [PMID: 34514722 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive diseases in the world due to a lack of early detection, leading to an overall 5-year survival of only 10%. In recent years, clinical trials targeted pancreatic cancer in efforts to improve survival. These studies introduce new technologies, concepts, and evidence which have instilled new optimism for improving prognosis. This review summarizes the current status of the recent (5-year) clinical trials and describes contemporary research on pancreatic cancer, including surgical technology, diagnostic skills, traditional chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and precision medicine. Then, the future trend and direction of clinical trials on pancreatic cancer are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Pu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hanlin Yin
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiangda Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jicheng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenchuan Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenhui Lou
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abdallah MA, Ahmed K, Taha W, Musa A, Reardon EE, Abdalla AO, Trikudanathan G. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:2552-2561. [PMID: 34086166 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07066-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) are at a higher risk of developing pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared the general population with an estimated 5% risk of developing pancreatic cancer in 20 years. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL) has an excellent sensitivity (85-90%) and specificity (98-100%) for diagnosing pancreatic malignancy. However, data on the performance characteristics of EUS-FNA in CP are mixed. AIMS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to examine data from published studies on the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA in detecting pancreatic malignancy in CP. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus databases for studies published in English language that reported performance characteristics of EUS-FNA for SPL up to November 2020. Two reviewers independently conducted screening, full text review and data extraction according to the PRISMA guidelines. Quality of included studies was assessed using the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. The parameters of interest were sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive likelihood ratios. Cochran Q test and I statistics were used to determine the between-study heterogeneity. Funnel plots were used to describe publication bias. RESULTS A total of 6753 studies were identified on initial search. Studies that reported EUS-FNA of cystic pancreas lesions were excluded. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies were retrospective, and one was prospective. A total of 593 patients with CP underwent EUS-FNA for SPL. The pooled sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 65% (95% CI 52.6-75.6%, I2 = 44%), specificity was 96.8% (75-99.7%, I2 = 89%), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 41.4 (11.1-149.6, I2 = 70%), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) 24.1 (2.8-208, I2 = 90%). The pooled data from seven studies that compared 901 non-CP vs. 127 CP showed that the sensitivity of EUS-FNA in diagnosing pancreatic malignancy was 91.5 vs. 65.3% [OR (95% CI) 5.5 (2.9-10.2), I2: 31.8%]. The specificity pooled from six studies [333 non-CP vs. 357 CP] was 95.9% vs. 82.4%, [OR (95% CI) 1.3 (0.2-9.8), I2 = 73%]. The risk of bias was serious in one study, low in four studies and moderate in three studies. CONCLUSION This pooled meta-analysis shows a low sensitivity of EUS-FNA in diagnosing malignancy in CP patients with SPL in comparison to patients without CP. Modalities such as EUS-fine needle biopsy have high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing pancreatic cancer and should be considered in patients with CP and suspected pancreatic malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A Abdallah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, MMC 36, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| | - Khalid Ahmed
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Wright Center for Community Health, 01 S Washington Ave Suite 1000, Scranton, PA, USA
| | - Wesam Taha
- Department of Internal Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, 56-45 Main Street, Flushing, NY, 11355, USA
| | - Abdullahi Musa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Howard University, 2041 Georgia Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20060, USA
| | - Erin E Reardon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, MMC 36, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Abubaker O Abdalla
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Guru Trikudanathan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, MMC 36, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gkolfakis P, Crinò SF, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Carrara S, Repici A, Hassan C, Facciorusso A. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:1067-1077.e15. [PMID: 35124072 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Evidence is limited on the comparative diagnostic performance of newer end-cutting fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of available FNB needles for sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS A systematic literature review (Medline and Cochrane Database) was conducted for studies evaluating the accuracy of newer FNB needles in adults undergoing EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were sample adequacy, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and adverse event rate. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses and appraised the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS Overall, 16 RCTs (1934 patients) were identified. On network meta-analysis, Franseen needles (Acquire; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass, USA) significantly outperformed reverse-bevel needles (risk ratio [RR], 1.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.05-1.40] for accuracy and 1.31 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22] for adequacy) and FNA needles (RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01-1.25] for accuracy and 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.13] for adequacy). Likewise, the Fork-tip needle (SharkCore; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) was significantly superior to the reverse-bevel needle (RR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.03-1.33] for accuracy and 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.16] for adequacy) and to the FNA needle (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19] for accuracy and 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07] for adequacy). Other comparisons did not achieve statistical significance. As a consequence, Franseen (surface under the cumulative ranking score, .89 for accuracy and .94 for adequacy) and Fork-tip needles (surface under the cumulative ranking score, .76 for accuracy and .73 for adequacy) ranked as the 2 highest-performing FNB needles. When considering different needle sizes, 25-gauge Franseen and 25-gauge Fork-tip needles were not superior to 22-gauge reverse-bevel needles (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, .96-1.46] and 1.04 [95% CI, .62-1.52]). None of the tested needles was significantly superior to the other FNB devices or to FNA needles when rapid onsite cytologic evaluation was available. CONCLUSIONS Franseen and Fork-tip needles, particularly 22-gauge size, showed the highest performance for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses, with low confidence in estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yamada R, Nakane K, Kadoya N, Matsuda C, Imai H, Tsuboi J, Hamada Y, Tanaka K, Tawara I, Nakagawa H. Development of “Mathematical Technology for Cytopathology,” an Image Analysis Algorithm for Pancreatic Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051149. [PMID: 35626304 PMCID: PMC9139930 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The accuracy of a PDAC diagnosis based on endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology can be strengthened by performing a rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). However, ROSE can only be performed in a limited number of facilities, due to a relative lack of available resources or cytologists with sufficient training. Therefore, we developed the Mathematical Technology for Cytopathology (MTC) algorithm, which does not require teaching data or large-scale computing. We applied the MTC algorithm to support the cytological diagnosis of pancreatic cancer tissues, by converting medical images into structured data, which rendered them suitable for artificial intelligence (AI) analysis. Using this approach, we successfully clarified ambiguous cell boundaries by solving a reaction–diffusion system and quantitating the cell nucleus status. A diffusion coefficient (D) of 150 showed the highest accuracy (i.e., 74%), based on a univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis was performed using 120 combinations of evaluation indices, and the highest accuracies for each D value studied (50, 100, and 150) were all ≥70%. Thus, our findings indicate that MTC can help distinguish between adenocarcinoma and benign pancreatic tissues, and imply its potential for facilitating rapid progress in clinical diagnostic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reiko Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan; (Y.H.); (H.N.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-59-232-1111
| | - Kazuaki Nakane
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan;
| | - Chise Matsuda
- Department of Pathology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu 514-8507, Japan; (C.M.); (H.I.)
| | - Hiroshi Imai
- Department of Pathology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu 514-8507, Japan; (C.M.); (H.I.)
| | - Junya Tsuboi
- Department of Endoscopic Medicine, Mie University Hospital, Tsu 514-8507, Japan; (J.T.); (K.T.)
| | - Yasuhiko Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan; (Y.H.); (H.N.)
| | - Kyosuke Tanaka
- Department of Endoscopic Medicine, Mie University Hospital, Tsu 514-8507, Japan; (J.T.); (K.T.)
| | - Isao Tawara
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan;
| | - Hayato Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu 514-8507, Japan; (Y.H.); (H.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schutz HM, Quispel R, Veldt BJ, Smedts FM, Anten MPG, Hoogduin KJ, Honkoop P, van Nederveen FH, Hol L, Kliffen M, Fitzpatrick CE, Erler NS, Bruno MJ, van Driel LM. Cumulative sum learning curves guiding multicenter multidisciplinary quality improvement of EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E549-E557. [PMID: 35433206 PMCID: PMC9010081 DOI: 10.1055/a-1766-5259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims In this study, we evaluated the performance of community hospitals involved in the Dutch quality in endosonography team regarding yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (TA) of solid pancreatic lesions using cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curves. The aims were to assess trends in quality over time and explore potential benefits of CUSUM as a feedback-tool. Patients and methods All consecutive EUS-guided TA procedures for solid pancreatic lesions were registered in five community hospitals between 2015 and 2018. CUSUM learning curves were plotted for overall performance and for performance per center. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-defined key performance indicators, rate of adequate sample (RAS), and diagnostic yield of malignancy (DYM) were used for this purpose. Feedback regarding performance was provided on multiple occasions at regional interest group meetings during the study period. Results A total of 431 EUS-guided TA procedures in 403 patients were included in this study. The overall and per center CUSUM curves for RAS improved over time. CUSUM curves for DYM revealed gradual improvement, reaching the predefined performance target (70 %) overall, and in three of five contributing centers in 2018. Analysis of a sudden downslope development in the CUSUM curve of DYM in one center revealed temporary absence of a senior cytopathologist to have had a temporary negative impact on performance. Conclusions CUSUM-derived learning curves allow for assessment of best practices by comparison among peers in a multidisciplinary multicenter quality improvement initiative and proved to be a valuable and easy-to-interpret means to evaluate EUS performance over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M. Schutz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Bart J. Veldt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Frank M.M. Smedts
- Department of Cyto- and Histopathology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule G.F. Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Klaas J. Hoogduin
- Department of Cyto- and Histopathology, Pathan B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Honkoop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mike Kliffen
- Department of Cyto- and Histopathology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Claire E. Fitzpatrick
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole S. Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lydi M.J.W. van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Appelstrand A, Bergstedt F, Elf AK, Fagman H, Hedenström P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided side-fenestrated needle biopsy sampling is sensitive for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors but inadequate for tumor grading: a prospective study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5971. [PMID: 35396490 PMCID: PMC8993931 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09923-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate pretreatment grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is important to guide patient management. We aimed to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB) for the preoperative diagnosis and grading of PanNETs. In a tertiary-center setting, patients with suspected PanNETs were prospectively subjected to 22-gauge, reverse-bevel EUS-FNB. The EUS-FNB samples (Ki-67EUS) and corresponding surgical specimens (Ki-67SURG) were analyzed with Ki-67 indexing and thereafter tumor grading, (GRADEEUS) and (GRADESURG) respectively. In total 52 PanNET-patients [median age: 66 years; females: 25/52; surgical resection 22/52 (42%)] were included. EUS-FNB was diagnostic in 44/52 (85%). In 42 available FNB-slides, the median neoplastic cell count was 1034 (IQR: 504-3667) with 32/42 (76%), 22/42 (52%), and 14/42 (33%) cases exceeding 500, 1000, and 2000 neoplastic cells respectively. Ki-67SURG was significantly higher compared to Ki-67EUS with a moderate correlation comparing Ki-67EUS and Ki-67SURG (Pearson r = 0.60, r2 = 0.36, p = 0.011). The GRADEEUS had a weak level of agreement (κ = 0.08) compared with GRADESURG. Only 2/12 (17%) G2-tumors were correctly graded in EUS-FNB-samples. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling is sensitive for preoperative diagnosis of PanNET but biopsy quality is relatively poor. Therefore, the approach seems suboptimal for pretreatment grading of PanNET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Appelstrand
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Bergstedt
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna-Karin Elf
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Henrik Fagman
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Hedenström
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. .,Division of Medical Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Medicinmottagningen, Sahlgrenska Sjukhuset, Blå Stråket 3, 413 35, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The Utility of Endoscopic-Ultrasonography-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Solid Pancreatic Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030753. [PMID: 35328306 PMCID: PMC8947755 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic-ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has been widely performed for the definitive diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). As the puncture needles, puncture techniques, and sample processing methods have improved, EUS-TA has shown higher diagnostic yields and safety. Recently, several therapeutic target genomic biomarkers have been clarified in pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC). Although only a small proportion of patients with PDAC can benefit from precision medicine based on gene mutations at present, precision medicine will also be further developed for SPLs as more therapeutic target genomic biomarkers are identified. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques enable the examination of multiple genetic mutations in limited tissue samples. EUS-TA is also useful for NGS and will play a more important role in determining treatment strategies. In this review, we describe the utility of EUS-TA for SPLs.
Collapse
|
27
|
Crinò SF, Rizzatti G, Larghi A. Reply. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:657-658. [PMID: 34662581 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Gkolfakis P, Ramai D, Lisotti A, Papanikolaou IS, Mangiavillano B, Tarantino I, Anderloni A, Fabbri C, Triantafyllou K, Fusaroli P. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration for lymph nodes tissue acquisition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2022; 10:goac062. [PMCID: PMC9632631 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition represents the choice of methods for suspected lymph nodes (LNs) located next to the gastrointestinal tract. This study aimed to compare the pooled diagnostic performance of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for LNs sampling.
Methods
We searched PubMed/MedLine and Embase databases through August 2021. Primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy; secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, sample adequacy, optimal histological core procurement, number of passes, and adverse events. We performed a pairwise meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The results are presented as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference along with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results
We identified nine studies (1,276 patients) in this meta-analysis. Among these patients, 66.4% were male; the median age was 67 years. Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between the two approaches (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.81–2.10; P = 0.270). The accuracy of EUS-FNB was significantly higher when being performed with newer end-cutting needles (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.17–3.00; P = 0.009) and in abdominal LNs (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.52–4.05; P < 0.001) than that of EUS-FNA. No difference in terms of sample adequacy was observed between the two approaches (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.46–4.26; P = 0.550); however, histological core procurement and diagnostic sensitivity with EUS-FNB were significantly higher than those with EUS-FNA (OR, 6.15; 95% CI, 1.51–25.07; P = 0.010 and OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27–2.74, P = 0.001). The number of needle passes needed was significantly lower in the EUS-FNB group than in the EUS-FNA group (mean difference, −0.54; 95% CI, −0.97 to −0.12; P = 0.010).
Conclusions
EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB perform similarly in LN sampling; however, FNB performed with end-cutting needles outperformed FNA in terms of diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia , Foggia, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona , Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona , Verona, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) , Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna , Imola, Italy
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital , Athens, Greece
| | | | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT , Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS , Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna , Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital , Athens, Greece
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna , Imola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chu CS, Yang CY, Yeh CC, Lin RT, Chen CC, Bai LY, Hung MC, Lin CC, Wu CY, Lin JT. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy as a tool for studying the intra-tumoral microbiome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:107. [PMID: 34997106 PMCID: PMC8741880 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04095-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A new approach by investigating the intra-tumoral microbiome raised great interest because they may influence the host immune response and natural history of the disease. However, previous studies on the intra-tumoral microbiome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were mostly based on examining the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) as a complementary procedure of surgical biopsy to obtain adequate fresh pancreatic cancer tissue for intra-tumoral microbial research. This was a prospective pilot study performed at a single tertiary referral center. We obtained pancreatic cancer tissue by EUS-FNB and surgical biopsy, respectively. We amplified the V3-V4 hyper-variable region of bacterial 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) genes, constructed a pair-end library, and performed high-throughput sequencing. From August 2020 to November 2020, nine eligible patients with PDAC were enrolled in this study. The intra-tumoral microbiome profile was successfully generated from the PDAC cancer tissue obtained by EUS-FNB as well as by surgical biopsy. There was no significant difference in intra-tumoral alpha-diversity or bacterial taxonomic composition between tissues obtained by EUS-FNB and by surgical biopsy. EUS-FNB can collect sufficient fresh cancer tissue for microbiome analyses without complication. The intra-tumoral microbiome profile in tissues obtained by EUS-FNB had similar alpha-diversity and taxonomic profiles with those obtained by surgical biopsy. It implicated, except for surgical biopsy, EUS-FNB can be another valid and valuable tool for studying intra-tumoral microbiome in patients with resectable and unresectable PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Sheng Chu
- Digestive Medicine Center, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yuh-Der Road, Taichung, 404, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ying Yang
- Digestive Medicine Center, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yuh-Der Road, Taichung, 404, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chieh Yeh
- Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ro-Ting Lin
- College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ching Chen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Li-Yuan Bai
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Mien-Chie Hung
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chun-Che Lin
- Digestive Medicine Center, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yuh-Der Road, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ying Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Town Lin
- Digestive Medicine Center, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yuh-Der Road, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Ramai D, Fabbri C, Mangiavillano B, Lisotti A, Muscatiello N, Cotsoglou C, Fusaroli P. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in comparison to percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:51-57. [PMID: 34918578 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2020645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is still unclear whether endoscopic ultrasound liver biopsy (EUS-LB) determines superior results in comparison to percutaneous liver biopsy (PC-LB). Aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic outcomes of these two techniques. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Literature search was conducted through June 2021 and identified 7 studies. The primary outcome was total length of specimen. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference along with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Pooled total length of specimen was 29.9 mm (95% CI 24.1-35.7) in the EUS-LB group and 29.7 mm (95% CI 27.1-32.2) in the PC-LB group, with no difference between the two approaches (mean difference -0.35 mm, 95% CI -5.31 to 4.61; p = 0.89), although sensitivity analysis restricted to higher quality studies found a superior performance of PC-LB over EUS-LB. Pooled number of complete portal tracts was 12.9 (7.7-18) in the EUS-LB and 14.4 (10.7-18) in the PC-LB group, with no difference in direct comparison (mean difference -1.58, -5.98 to 2.81; p = 0.48). No difference between the two groups was observed in terms of severe adverse event rate (OR 1.11, 0.11-11.03; p = 0.93). CONCLUSION EUS-LB and PC-LB are comparable in terms of diagnostic performance and safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, Ospedali Riuniti Di Foggia, Foggia, Italy.,Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, the Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, the Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brooklyn Hospital Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, Ospedali Riuniti Di Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Facciorusso A, Ramai D, Gkolfakis P, Shapiro A, Arvanitakis M, Lisotti A, Triantafyllou K, Fusaroli P, Papanikolaou IS, Crinò SF. Through-the-needle biopsy of pancreatic cystic lesions: current evidence and implications for clinical practice. Expert Rev Med Devices 2021; 18:1165-1174. [PMID: 34842023 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.2012450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is increasing evidence to support the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided through-the-needle biopsy (TTNB) technique as a means of sampling pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). Results provide evidence demonstrating the benefits of this procedure over standard EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA), thus supporting a push for its widespread implementation in clinical practice. Though this technique has demonstrated advantages, achieving these advantages in clinical practice is contingent upon careful considerations to ensure safety and efficacy. AREAS COVERED The purpose of this review is to assess the level of evidence supporting the use of through-the-needle biopsy, revise its main technical and procedural characteristics, and to develop suggested guidelines outlining the safe assimilation of this device in clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION EUS-TTNB enables more definitive and accurate diagnosis of PCLs by providing higher-quality histological samples. However, EUS-TTNB is not appropriate for all PCLs. Selection of suitable patients as well as morphology and risk factors of the cystic lesion is a crucial component of achieving the described benefits of this procedure while minimizing risks of adverse effects. Subjects with weak or absent indications for this procedure are susceptible to a range of complications and may even result in fatality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.,Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Cub Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (Ulb), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Shapiro
- Department of Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, True Blue, Grenada
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Cub Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (Ulb), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Crinò SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Antonini F, Macarri G, Carrara S, Lamonaca L, Di Mitri R, Conte E, Fabbri C, Binda C, Ofosu A, Gasparini E, Turri C, Stornello C, Celsa C, Larghi A, Manfrin E, Gabbrielli A, Facciorusso A, Tacelli M. Impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic head lesions: A multicenter study. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10:440-447. [PMID: 34975042 PMCID: PMC8785671 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives There is no clear evidence of a negative impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing pancreatic head lesions. We aimed to evaluate the association between the presence of biliary stents and the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB. Materials and Methods A multicenter retrospective study including all jaundiced patients secondary to pancreatic head masses was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of a biliary stent placed before EUS-FNB. Pathological results were classified according to the Papanicolaou classification and compared against the final diagnosis. Diagnostic measures in the two groups were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analyses including potential factors affecting EUS-FNB accuracy were performed. Results Overall, 842 patients were included, 495 (58.8%) without and 347 (41.2%) with biliary stent. A plastic or a metal stent was placed in 217 (62.5%) and 130 (37.5%) cases, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher in patients without biliary stent than in those with stent (91.9% and 92.1% vs. 85.9% and 86.4%, P = 0.010 At multivariate analyses, lesion size (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.09, P = 0.01) and presence of biliary stent (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.32-0.89, P = 0.01) were independently associated with diagnostic accuracy. In the subgroup of patients with biliary stent, the type of stent (plastic vs. metal) did not impact EUS-FNB yield, whereas the use of larger bore needles enhanced diagnostic accuracy (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.28-4.12, P = 0.005). Conclusions In this large retrospective study, an indwelling biliary stent negatively impacted the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB. Preferably, EUS-FNB should precede endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, especially in the case of small tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Antonini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Augusto Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy
| | - Giampiero Macarri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Augusto Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Conte
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forli-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forli-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Enrico Gasparini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Turri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Caterina Stornello
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Ciro Celsa
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Tacelli
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kongkam P, Orprayoon T, Yooprasert S, Sirisub N, Klaikaew N, Sanpawat A, Safa S, Ridtitid W, Kullavanijaya P, Rerknimitr R. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) from peritoneal lesions: a prospective cohort pilot study. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:400. [PMID: 34689752 PMCID: PMC8542287 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01953-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diagnostic laparoscopy is often a necessary, albeit invasive, procedure to help resolve undiagnosed peritoneal diseases. Previous retrospective studies reported that EUS-FNA is feasible on peritoneal and omental lesions, however, EUS-FNA provided a limited amount of tissue for immunohistochemistry stain (IHC). Aim This pilot study aims to prospectively determine the effectiveness of EUS-FNB regarding adequacy of tissue for IHC staining, diagnostic rate and the avoidance rate of diagnostic laparoscopy or percutaneous biopsy in patients with these lesions. Methods From March 2017 to June 2018, patients with peritoneal or omental lesions identified by CT or MRI at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand were prospectively enrolled in the study. All Patients underwent EUS-FNB. For those with negative pathological results of EUS-FNB, percutaneous biopsy or diagnostic laparoscopy was planned. Analysis uses percentages only due to small sample sizes. Results A total of 30 EUS-FNB passes were completed, with a median of 3 passes (range 2–3 passes) per case. For EUS-FNB, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of EUS-FNB from peritoneal lesions were 63.6%, 100%, 100%, 20% and 66.7% respectively. Adequate tissue for IHC stain was found in 25/30 passes (80%). The tissues from EUS results were found malignant in 7/12 patients (58.3%). IHC could be done in 10/12 patients (83.3%). Among the five patients with negative EUS results, two underwent either liver biopsy of mass or abdominal paracentesis, showing gallbladder cancer and adenocarcinoma. Two patients refused laparoscopy due to advanced pancreatic cancer and worsening ovarian cancer. The fifth patient had post-surgical inflammation only with spontaneous resolution. The avoidance rate of laparoscopic diagnosis was 58.3%. No major adverse event was observed. Conclusions EUS-FNB from peritoneal lesions provided sufficient core tissue for diagnosis and IHC. Diagnostic laparoscopy can often be avoided in patients with peritoneal lesions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01953-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pradermchai Kongkam
- Excellence Center for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Pancreas Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Theerapat Orprayoon
- Excellence Center for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. .,Pancreas Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Sirilak Yooprasert
- Excellence Center for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nakarin Sirisub
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Naruemon Klaikaew
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anapat Sanpawat
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Shahram Safa
- Excellence Center for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Pancreas Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wiriyaporn Ridtitid
- Excellence Center for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pinit Kullavanijaya
- Excellence Center for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Excellence Center for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gu H, Liang H, Zhong J, Wei Y, Ma Y. How does the pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm confuse us: Analyzing from the point view of MRI-based radiomics? Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 85:38-43. [PMID: 34687847 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To construct MRI-based radiomics logistic model in differentiating solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) from three differential diseases containing adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor (NET), and cystadenoma of pancreas. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 21 SPNs and 140 differential diseases were enrolled. The MRI images of T1WI, T2WI, DWI, and contrast-enhanced (CE) sequences were taken to delineate the volume of interest, and the corresponding radiomics features were calculated. After the preprocess of data balance and image standardize, the data was divided into training set (6 SPNs and 42 differential diseases) and validation set (15 SPNs and 98 differential diseases) with a proportion of 7:3, randomly. Then after feature selection, four MRI-based logistic models included T1WI, T2WI, DWI, CE, and sum logistic models (Log-T1WI, Log-T2WI, Log-DWI, Log-CE, and Log-sum) were established. The receiver operation curve (ROC) was depicted to evaluate the efficacy of each model. RESULTS To the single MRI sequence, the AUCs of Log-T1WI, Log-T2WI, Log-DWI, and Log-CE were similar. Seemingly the AUCs of Log-T2WI were slightly higher with 0. 876 (95%CI, 0.797-0.956) in the training set and 0.853 (95%CI, 0.708-0.998) in the validation set. The Log-sum of four MRI sequences displayed better differentiating efficiency, with AUCs of 0.929 (95%CI, 0.877-0.980) in the training set and 0.925 (95%CI, 0.845-1.000) in the validation set. The Log-Ra/Clin model combined clinical information and radiomics showed the highest AUC of 0.962 (95%CI, 0.919-0.985). CONCLUSIONS MRI-based radiomics analysis helped to discern SPNs from radiologically misdiagnosed adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor, and cystadenoma of pancreas. The efficacy of single sequence logistic model was similar. The Log-sum combined four sequences and Log-Ra/Clin combined clinical information and radiomics demonstrated the better performance in distinction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongxian Gu
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310000 Hangzhou, China
| | - Hong Liang
- Hangzhou Medical College, 310000 Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianguo Zhong
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, 310000 Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuguo Wei
- Department of Pharmaceuticals Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, 310000 Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanqing Ma
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, 310000 Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Evaluation of preoperative diagnostic methods for resectable pancreatic cancer: a diagnostic capability and impact on the prognosis of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:382. [PMID: 34663214 PMCID: PMC8524976 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01955-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A pathological diagnosis of pancreatic cancer should be performed as much as possible to determine the appropriate treatment strategy, but priorities and algorithms for diagnostic methods have not yet been established. In recent years, the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the primary method of collecting tissues from pancreatic disease, but the effect of EUS-FNA on surgical results and prognosis has not been clarified. AIMS To evaluate the diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA and its effect on the preoperative diagnosis, surgical outcome, and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. METHODS Between January 2005 and June 2017, 293 patients who underwent surgical resection for pancreatic cancer were retrospectively evaluated. The outcomes of interest were the diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA and its influence on the surgical results and prognosis. RESULTS The diagnostic sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 94.4%, which was significantly higher than that of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (45.5%) (p < 0.001). The adverse event rate in ERCP was 10.2%, which was significantly higher than EUS-FNA (1.3%) (p = 0.001). Patients were divided into FNA group (N = 160) and non-FNA group (N = 133) for each preoperative diagnostic method. In the study of surgical curability R0 between the two groups, there was no significant difference in FNA group (65.0% [104/160]) and non-FNA group (64.7% [86/133], p = 1.000). In the prognostic study, 256 patients with curative R0 or R1 had a recurrence rate was 54.3% (70/129) in the FNA group and 57.4% (73/127) in the non-FNA group. Moreover peritoneal dissemination occurred in 34.3% (24/70) in the FNA group and in 21.9% (16/73) in the non-FNA group, neither of which showed a significant difference. The median survival times of the FNA and non-FNA groups were 955 days and 799 days, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.735). In the Cox proportional hazards model, factors influencing prognosis, staging, curability, and adjuvant chemotherapy were the dominant factors, but the preoperative diagnostic method (EUS-FNA) itself was not. CONCLUSIONS EUS-FNA is a safe procedure with a high diagnostic ability for the preoperative examination of pancreatic cancer. It was considered the first choice without the influence of surgical curability, postoperative recurrence, peritoneal dissemination and prognosis.
Collapse
|
36
|
Usefulness of a Fork-Tip Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy for Gastric Subepithelial Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11101883. [PMID: 34679581 PMCID: PMC8534775 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The sample adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) have been reported to be imperfect. To resolve these issues, a fork-tip needle as an EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle has been developed. This study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of a fork-tip needle in an EUS-FNB for gastric SELs. Seventy-nine patients who received an EUS-FNA or FNB using a fork-tip needle for gastric SELs were included in the study. The sample adequacy and diagnostic accuracy were compared between the EUS-FNB with the fork-tip needle group (fork-tip group, n = 13) and the EUS-FNA with FNA needle group (FNA group, n = 66). In addition, a multivariate analysis of the factors influencing diagnostic accuracy was conducted. Regarding sample adequacy, there was no significant difference between the groups (100% vs. 90.9%, respectively; p = 0.582). The diagnostic accuracy of the fork-tip group was numerically higher than that of the FNA group (92.3% vs. 81.8%, respectively; p = 0.682). In a multivariate analysis, the diagnostic accuracy was related to the tumor size and location of the SEL but not to the needle type. In conclusion, this study does not show statistical superiority, but suggests the useful potential of a fork-tip needle.
Collapse
|
37
|
Paik WH, Choi JH, Park Y, Lee JB, Park DH. Optimal Techniques for EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Solid Masses at Facilities without On-Site Cytopathology: Results from Two Prospective Randomised Trials. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204662. [PMID: 34682785 PMCID: PMC8540534 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has emerged as the primary modality for the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses. The aim of this study is to determine whether technical factors including suction (S), non-suction (NS), capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull (CSSS), and the number of needle actuations (to-and-fro needle movements) may affect the accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid masses at facilities without on-site cytopathology. Methods: The diagnostic yield of malignancy, blood contamination and cellularity at each sample acquired from EUS-FNA with or without S and different numbers of actuation (10, 15 and 20) were measured (study I). The optimal actuation number was determined and a head-to-head comparison trial between S and CSSS was performed (study II). Results: In study I, significant blood contamination was seen using S with 20 compared with 15 actuations (p = 0.002). Diagnostic yield of malignancy was not significantly different between 10, 15, and 20 actuations with S, whereas it was statistically higher for 15 actuations compared with 10 actuations with NS (p = 0.001). In study II, no difference was noted in diagnostic yield with 15 actuations between S and CSSS (88% vs. 90%, p = 0.74). Conclusions: Increasing actuation in NS resulted in a better diagnostic yield for EUS-FNA without significant blood contamination, whereas increasing actuation in S did not change the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA while causing significant blood contamination. With 15 actuations, the diagnostic yield was comparable between S and CSSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Hyun Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea;
| | - Joon Hyuk Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan 48108, Korea;
| | - Yangsoon Park
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea;
| | - Jung Bok Lee
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea;
| | - Do Hyun Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Digestive Diseases Research Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-3010-3194; Fax: 82-2-3010-8043
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
The Role of EUS-Guided FNA and FNB in Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11091653. [PMID: 34573995 PMCID: PMC8470670 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an increasingly recognized disease classified into two different subtypes based on histology. According to the International Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC), the diagnosis is achieved using a combination of different criteria. In patients presenting with a typical imaging appearance, the diagnosis may be straightforward, and steroid treatment is recommended, even without histological confirmation. In patients with atypical imaging or mass-forming appearance, the differential diagnosis with pancreatic cancer is challenging and crucial for treatment strategy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition has been proposed to achieve a histological diagnosis. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was first proposed to aspirate cells from pancreatic lesions. Despite excellent results in terms of sensitivity for pancreatic cancer, the data are disappointing regarding the diagnosis of AIP. The recent development of new needles allowing fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has been associated with improved diagnostic accuracy based on preserving the tissue architecture, which is necessary to detect the typical histological features of AIP. However, the published literature on the role of EUS-guided FNA and FNB is limited and mainly focused on type 1 AIP. The present study aimed to review the available literature on the role of EUS-guided FNA and FNB in the diagnosis of AIP.
Collapse
|
39
|
Crinò SF, Di Mitri R, Nguyen NQ, Tarantino I, de Nucci G, Deprez PH, Carrara S, Kitano M, Shami VM, Fernández-Esparrach G, Poley JW, Baldaque-Silva F, Itoi T, Manfrin E, Bernardoni L, Gabbrielli A, Conte E, Unti E, Naidu J, Ruszkiewicz A, Amata M, Liotta R, Manes G, Di Nuovo F, Borbath I, Komuta M, Lamonaca L, Rahal D, Hatamaru K, Itonaga M, Rizzatti G, Costamagna G, Inzani F, Curatolo M, Strand DS, Wang AY, Ginès À, Sendino O, Signoretti M, van Driel LMJW, Dolapcsiev K, Matsunami Y, van der Merwe S, van Malenstein H, Locatelli F, Correale L, Scarpa A, Larghi A. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:899-909.e5. [PMID: 34116031 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The benefit of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has never been evaluated in a randomized study. This trial aimed to test the hypothesis that in solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB without ROSE was not inferior to that of EUS-FNB with ROSE. METHODS A noninferiority study (noninferiority margin, 5%) was conducted at 14 centers in 8 countries. Patients with SPLs requiring tissue sampling were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo EUS-FNB with or without ROSE using new-generation FNB needles. The touch-imprint cytology technique was used to perform ROSE. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy, and secondary endpoints were safety, tissue core procurement, specimen quality, and sampling procedural time. RESULTS Eight hundred patients were randomized over an 18-month period, and 771 were analyzed (385 with ROSE and 386 without). Comparable diagnostic accuracies were obtained in both arms (96.4% with ROSE and 97.4% without ROSE, P = .396). Noninferiority of EUS-FNB without ROSE was confirmed with an absolute risk difference of 1.0% (1-sided 90% confidence interval, -1.1% to 3.1%; noninferiority P < .001). Safety and sample quality of histologic specimens were similar in both groups. A significantly higher tissue core rate was obtained by EUS-FNB without ROSE (70.7% vs. 78.0%, P = .021), with a significantly shorter mean sampling procedural time (17.9 ± 8.8 vs 11.7 ± 6.0 minutes, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS EUS-FNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in evaluating SPLs independently on execution of ROSE. When new-generation FNB needles are used, ROSE should not be routinely recommended. (ClinicalTrial.gov number NCT03322592.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Nam Q Nguyen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS-ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Germana de Nucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rho and Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Milano, Italy
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Vanessa M Shami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Department of Upper GI Diseases, Unit of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Conte
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elettra Unti
- Pathology Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Jeevinesh Naidu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia
| | | | - Michele Amata
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS-ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Rosa Liotta
- Pathology Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS - ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rho and Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Milano, Italy
| | - Franca Di Nuovo
- Pathology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese (MI), Italy
| | - Ivan Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Mina Komuta
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Daoud Rahal
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Keiichi Hatamaru
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; CERTT, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Mariangela Curatolo
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Daniel S Strand
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Àngels Ginès
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Sendino
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marianna Signoretti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Digestive and Liver Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Lydi M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karoly Dolapcsiev
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Laboratory, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yukitoshi Matsunami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Schalk van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hannah van Malenstein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesca Locatelli
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Loredana Correale
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Centre, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; CERTT, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mizukawa S, Kato H, Matsumoto K, Muro S, Akimoto Y, Uchida D, Tomoda T, Yamamoto N, Horiguchi S, Tsutsumi K, Inoue H, Tanaka N, Okada H. Effectiveness of Menghini-Type Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Masses. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:3171-3178. [PMID: 33078322 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06628-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutting needles are thought to be effective as biopsy needles. A few types of cutting needles are available for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and the Menghini-type needle is an end-type cutting needle. AIMS A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the results of EUS-FNA using a Menghini-type needle (needle M) versus a conventional needle (needle S). METHODS The main eligibility criteria were as follows: patients with a pancreatic mass referred for EUS-FNA, ≥ 20 years old, and a performance status < 4. The primary outcome was the sample quality. The secondary outcomes were factors associated with the sample quality, diagnostic accuracy, and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 97 patients were enrolled in this study. The sample quality for total puncture with needle M (92.8%) was significantly higher than that with needle S (81.4%) (p = 0.0305). The tumor size (p = 0.033) and type of needle (p = 0.031) were significant factors associated with adequate tissue collection in univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio [OR] 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-6.54; p = 0.027 for tumor size, and OR 2.93; 95% CI 1.23-8.21; p = 0.0153 for type of needle). The diagnostic accuracy of each needle was 88.7% (86/97) with needle M and 73.2% (71/97) with needle S. Adverse events occurred in 2 of the 97 patients (0.02%). CONCLUSION A Menghini-type needle was able to obtain core tissue for histology more effectively than a conventional aspiration needle. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS UMIN registration number of 000020668.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sho Mizukawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Hironari Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Kazuyuki Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Muro
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Yutaka Akimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Daisuke Uchida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Takeshi Tomoda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Naoki Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Shigeru Horiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Koichiro Tsutsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Inoue
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Tanaka
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chua TY, Kyanam Kabir Baig KR, Leung FW, Ashat M, Jamidar PA, Mulki R, Singh A, Yu JX, Lightdale JR. GIE Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2020. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:441-451. [PMID: 34147512 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board reviewed a systematic literature search of original endoscopy-related articles published during 2020 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and 10 other high-impact medical and gastroenterology journals. Votes from each individual board member were tallied to identify a consensus list of the 10 most significant topic areas in GI endoscopy over the calendar year of study using 4 criteria: significance, novelty, impact on national health, and impact on global health. The 10 areas identified were as follows: artificial intelligence in endoscopy, coronavirus disease 2019 and GI practice, third-space endoscopy, lumen-apposing metal stents, single-use duodenoscopes and other disposable equipment, endosonographic needle technology and techniques, endoscopic closure devices, advances in GI bleeding management, improvements in polypectomy techniques, and bariatric endoscopy. Each board member contributed a summary of important articles relevant to 1 to 2 topic areas, leading to a collective summary that is presented in this document of the "top 10" endoscopic advances of 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Chua
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Kondal R Kyanam Kabir Baig
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Felix W Leung
- VA Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, North Hills, California, USA
| | - Munish Ashat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Priya A Jamidar
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ramzi Mulki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Ajaypal Singh
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jessica X Yu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jenifer R Lightdale
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Muscatiello N, Gkolfakis P, Samanta J, Londoño Castillo J, Cotsoglou C, Ramai D. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration for Tissue Sampling of Abdominal Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparative Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174298. [PMID: 34503112 PMCID: PMC8428361 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Lymph node (LN) sampling or staging is crucial to the management of malignancies. The use of endoscopic ultrasound for lymph node sampling can be performed with EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or EUS fine-needle biopsy (FNB). However, it remains unclear whether EUS-FNA or EUS-FNB is superior for sampling of abdominal lymph nodes. In this study, we retrospectively compared a large volume of patients who underwent lymph node sampling using EUS-FNA or EUS-FNB. Most patients were diagnosed with metastatic colorectal disease. We found that EUS-FNB had a higher diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity compared to EUS-FNA. Both modalities had no adverse events. Thus, the results support the use of EUS-FNB for abdominal lymph node sampling. Abstract There is a paucity of evidence on the comparison between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for lymph node (LNs) sampling. The aim of this study was to compare these two approaches in a multicenter series of patients with abdominal tumors. Out of 502 patients undergoing EUS sampling, two groups following propensity score matching were compared: 105 undergoing EUS-FNB and 105 undergoing EUS-FNA. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, sample adequacy, optimal histological core procurement, number of passes, and adverse events. Median age was 64.6 years, and most patients were male in both groups. Final diagnosis was LN metastasis (mainly from colorectal cancer) in 70.4% of patients in the EUS-FNB group and 66.6% in the EUS-FNA group (p = 0.22). Diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the EUS-FNB group as compared to the EUS-FNA group (87.62% versus 75.24%, p = 0.02). EUS-FNB outperformed EUS-FNA also in terms of diagnostic sensitivity (84.71% vs. 70.11%; p = 0.01), whereas specificity was 100% in both groups (p = 0.6). Sample adequacy analysis showed a non-significant trend in favor of EUS-FNB (96.1% versus 89.5%, p = 0.06) whereas the histological core procurement rate was significantly higher with EUS-FNB (94.2% versus 51.4%; p < 0.001). No procedure-related adverse events were observed. These findings show that EUS-FNB is superior to EUS-FNA in tissue sampling of abdominal LNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (A.F.); (N.M.)
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (A.F.); (N.M.)
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India;
| | | | | | - Daryl Ramai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Imaoka H, Sasaki M, Hashimoto Y, Watanabe K, Miyazawa S, Shibuki T, Mitsunaga S, Ikeda M. Impact of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on Decision-Making in Precision Medicine for Pancreatic Cancer: Beyond Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1195. [PMID: 34209310 PMCID: PMC8307595 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine in cancer treatment refers to targeted therapy based on the evaluation of biomarkers. Although precision medicine for pancreatic cancer (PC) remains challenging, novel biomarker-based therapies, such as pembrolizumab, olaparib, and entrectinib, have been emerging. Most commonly, endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) had been used for the diagnosis of PC until now. However, advances in EUS-TA devices and biomarker testing, especially next-generation sequencing, have opened up the possibility of sequencing of various genes even in limited amounts of tissue samples obtained by EUS-TA, and identifying potential genetic alterations as therapeutic targets. Precision medicine benefits only a small population of patients with PC, but biomarker-based therapy has shown promising results in patients who once had no treatment options. Now, the role of EUS-TA has extended beyond diagnosis into decision-making regarding the treatment of PC. In this review, we mainly discuss tissue sampling by EUS-TA for biomarker testing and the current status of precision medicine for PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Imaoka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8577, Chiba, Japan; (M.S.); (Y.H.); (K.W.); (S.M.); (T.S.); (S.M.); (M.I.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Facciorusso A, Ramai D, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Manfrin E, Muscatiello N, Crinò SF. Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy in Comparison to Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: A Two-Center Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3062. [PMID: 34205389 PMCID: PMC8235406 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There is scarce and conflicting evidence on the comparison between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and percutaneous (PC)-guided liver biopsy (LB). The aim of this study was to compare the two approaches in a series of patients with parenchymal and focal liver lesions. Fifty-four patients undergoing EUS-LB in two high-volume centers between 2017 and 2021 were compared to 62 patients who underwent PC-LB. The primary outcome was diagnostic adequacy rate. The secondary outcomes were diagnostic accuracy, total sample length (TSL), number of complete portal tracts (CPTs), procedural duration, and adverse events. Variables were compared using the Chi-square and Mann-Whitney test. Median age was 56 years (interquartile range 48-69) in the EUS-LB group and 54 years (45-67) in the PC-LB group with most patients being male. Indication for LB was due to parenchymal disease in 50% of patients, whereas the other patients underwent LB due to focal liver lesions. Diagnostic adequacy was 100% in PC-LB and 94.4% in the EUS-LB group (p = 0.74), whereas diagnostic accuracy was 88.8% in the EUS-LB group and 100% in the PC-LB group (p = 0.82). Median TSL was significantly greater in the PC-LB group (27.4 mm, IQR 21-29) when compared to the EUS-LB group (18.5 mm, 10.1-22.4; p = 0.02). The number of complete portal tracts was 21 (11-24) in the PC-LB group and 18.5 (10-23.2) in EUS-LB group (p = 0.09). EUS-LB was a significantly longer procedure (7 min, 5-11 versus 1 min, 1-3 of PC-LB; p < 0.001) and no evidence of adverse events was observed in any of the study groups. These results were confirmed in the subgroup analysis performed according to an indication for LB (parenchymal disease versus focal lesion). Although PC-LB yielded specimens with greater TSL, diagnostic adequacy and accuracy were similar between the two procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, NY 11201, USA
| | - Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Diagnostic and Interventional Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10122638. [PMID: 34203922 PMCID: PMC8232656 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are relatively rare, but their incidence has increased significantly in the last decades. Precise diagnosis and prognostic stratification are crucial for proper patient management. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the modality of choice for diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors, showing a higher tumor detection rate than other imaging modalities, especially for small size lesions. EUS also serves as a guide for preoperative sampling and other interventions. EUS-tissue acquisition is a safe and highly accurate technique for cyto/histological diagnosis of PanNENs with a well-demonstrated correlation between Ki-67 proliferation index values and tumor grading on EUS and surgical specimens according to the WHO 2017 classification. Furthermore, the possibility of a preoperative EUS-guided fine needle tattooing or fiducial markers placement may help the surgeon to locate small and deep tumors, thus avoiding formal pancreatic resections in favor of parenchymal-sparing surgery. Finally, locoregional ablative treatments using either ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation have been proposed in recent studies with promising results in order to control symptoms or reduce tumor burden in selected patients unfit for surgery with functioning or non-functioning PanNENs. This article review highlights the current role of EUS in PanNENs management, focusing on the present and future applications of EUS-guided interventions.
Collapse
|
46
|
Huang C, Iovanna J, Santofimia-Castaño P. Targeting Fibrosis: The Bridge That Connects Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:4970. [PMID: 34067040 PMCID: PMC8124541 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic fibrosis is caused by the excessive deposits of extracellular matrix (ECM) and collagen fibers during repeated necrosis to repair damaged pancreatic tissue. Pancreatic fibrosis is frequently present in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic cancer (PC). Clinically, pancreatic fibrosis is a pathological feature of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. However, many new studies have found that pancreatic fibrosis is involved in the transformation from pancreatitis to pancreatic cancer. Thus, the role of fibrosis in the crosstalk between pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is critical and still elusive; therefore, it deserves more attention. Here, we review the development of pancreatic fibrosis in inflammation and cancer, and we discuss the therapeutic strategies for alleviating pancreatic fibrosis. We further propose that cellular stress response might be a key driver that links fibrosis to cancer initiation and progression. Therefore, targeting stress proteins, such as nuclear protein 1 (NUPR1), could be an interesting strategy for pancreatic fibrosis and PC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Patricia Santofimia-Castaño
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille Université and Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Parc Scientifique et Technologique de Luminy, 163 Avenue de Luminy, 13288 Marseille, France; (C.H.); (J.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Naito Y, Tsuneki M, Fukushima N, Koga Y, Higashi M, Notohara K, Aishima S, Ohike N, Tajiri T, Yamaguchi H, Fukumura Y, Kojima M, Hirabayashi K, Hamada Y, Norose T, Kai K, Omori Y, Sukeda A, Noguchi H, Uchino K, Itakura J, Okabe Y, Yamada Y, Akiba J, Kanavati F, Oda Y, Furukawa T, Yano H. A deep learning model to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy. Sci Rep 2021; 11:8454. [PMID: 33875703 PMCID: PMC8055968 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87748-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Histopathological diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) specimens has become the mainstay of preoperative pathological diagnosis. However, on EUS-FNB specimens, accurate histopathological evaluation is difficult due to low specimen volume with isolated cancer cells and high contamination of blood, inflammatory and digestive tract cells. In this study, we performed annotations for training sets by expert pancreatic pathologists and trained a deep learning model to assess PDAC on EUS-FNB of the pancreas in histopathological whole-slide images. We obtained a high receiver operator curve area under the curve of 0.984, accuracy of 0.9417, sensitivity of 0.9302 and specificity of 0.9706. Our model was able to accurately detect difficult cases of isolated and low volume cancer cells. If adopted as a supportive system in routine diagnosis of pancreatic EUS-FNB specimens, our model has the potential to aid pathologists diagnose difficult cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiki Naito
- Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, 830-0011, Japan.
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, 830-0011, Japan.
| | | | - Noriyoshi Fukushima
- Department of Pathology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Yutaka Koga
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Michiyo Higashi
- Department of Pathology, Research Field in Medicine and Health Sciences, Medical and Dental Sciences Area, Research and Education Assembly, Kagoshima University, Sakuragoaka, 890-8544, Japan
| | - Kenji Notohara
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, 710-8602, Japan
| | - Shinichi Aishima
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Saga University, Saga, 849-8501, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Saga University Hospital, Saga, 849-8501, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Ohike
- Department of Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Takuma Tajiri
- Department of Pathology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokyo, 192-0032, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yamaguchi
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| | - Yuki Fukumura
- Department of Human Pathology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - Motohiro Kojima
- Division of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Kenichi Hirabayashi
- Department of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Hamada
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Tomoko Norose
- Department of Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Keita Kai
- Department of Pathology, Saga University Hospital, Saga, 849-8501, Japan
| | - Yuko Omori
- Department of Investigative Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Aoi Sukeda
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Noguchi
- Department of Pathology, Research Field in Medicine and Health Sciences, Medical and Dental Sciences Area, Research and Education Assembly, Kagoshima University, Sakuragoaka, 890-8544, Japan
| | - Kaori Uchino
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, 710-8602, Japan
| | - Junya Itakura
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, 710-8602, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Okabe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, 830-0011, Japan
| | - Yuichi Yamada
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Jun Akiba
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, 830-0011, Japan
| | | | - Yoshinao Oda
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Toru Furukawa
- Department of Investigative Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Hirohisa Yano
- Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, 830-0011, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Biopsy Device for Lymphadenopathy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2021; 2021:6640862. [PMID: 33936195 PMCID: PMC8062193 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6640862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate diagnosis of benign and malignant lymphadenopathy is important for determining the appropriate treatment and prognosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with a conventional needle compared to endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with a Franseen needle for diagnosing lymphadenopathy. Methods Patients who underwent EUS-FNA or EUS-FNB for mediastinal or abdominal lymphadenopathy between July 2013 and August 2020 were enrolled in the study. The outcomes between EUS-FNA patients (July 2013 to January 2017; 22-gauge conventional needle; Group A) and EUS-FNB patients (February 2017 to August 2020; 22-gauge Franseen needle; Group B) were compared. Results A total of 154 patients (Group A: 83; Group B: 71) were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy (differentiating between malignant and benign lesions) was 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.2–93.3%) in Group A and 95.8% (95% CI, 88.3–98.8%) in Group B. Group B had high diagnostic accuracy, but there was no difference between the groups (p = 0.14). Group B had significantly fewer passes (median 2, interquartile range (IQR): 2-4) than Group A (median 3, IQR: 3-4) (p < 0.001). No procedural adverse events occurred in either group. Conclusions Although the diagnostic accuracy between the groups was not statistically significant, EUS-FNB with a Franseen needle provided high diagnostic accuracy and required fewer passes to establish a diagnosis. Thus, EUS-FNB is useful for diagnosing lymphadenopathy.
Collapse
|
49
|
Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions, Subepithelial Lesions, and Lymph Nodes Using Endoscopic Ultrasound. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10051076. [PMID: 33807558 PMCID: PMC7961381 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become widely accepted and has considerable advantages over computed tomography (CT) and other imaging modalities, given that it enables echostructure assessment in lesions with <1 cm diameter and permits high resolution imaging. EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) provides consistent results under ultrasound guidance and has been considered more effective compared to CT- or ultrasound-guided lesion biopsy. Moreover, complication rates, including pancreatitis and bleeding, have been extremely low, with <1% morbidity and mortality rates, thereby suggesting the exceptional overall safety of EUS-TA. The aggressive use of EUS for various lesions has been key in facilitating early diagnosis and therapy. This review summarizes the diagnostic ability of EUS for pancreatic solid lesions, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes where it is mainly used. EUS has played an important role in diagnosing these lesions and planning treatment strategies. Future developments in EUS imaging technology, such as producing images close to histopathological findings, are expected to further improve its diagnostic ability. Moreover, tissue acquisition via EUS is expected to be used for precision medicine, which facilitates the selection of an appropriate therapeutic agent by increasing the amount of tissue collected and improving genetic analysis.
Collapse
|
50
|
Crinò SF, Ammendola S, Meneghetti A, Bernardoni L, Conti Bellocchi MC, Gabbrielli A, Landoni L, Paiella S, Pin F, Parisi A, Mastrosimini MG, Amodio A, Frulloni L, Facciorusso A, Larghi A, Manfrin E. Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreatology 2021; 21:443-450. [PMID: 33390343 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Studies comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are lacking. We aimed at comparing EUS-FNA with EUS-FNB in terms of Ki-67 proliferative index (PI) estimation capability, cellularity of the samples, and reliability of Ki-67 PI/tumor grading compared with surgical specimens. METHODS Patients diagnosed with pNETs on EUS and/or surgical specimens were retrospectively identified. Specimens were re-evaluated to assess Ki-67 PI feasibility, sample cellularity by manual counting, and determination of Ki-67 PI value. Outcomes in the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB groups were compared. Kendall rank test was used for Ki-67 PI correlation between EUS and surgical specimens. Subgroup analysis including small (≤20 mm), non-functioning pNETs was performed. RESULTS Three-hundred samples from 292 lesions were evaluated: 69 EUS-FNA cytology and 231 EUS-FNB histology. Ki-67 PI feasibility was similar for EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB (91.3% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.15), while EUS-FNB performed significantly better in the subgroup of 179 small pNETs (88.2% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.04). Rate of poor cellulated (<500 cells) specimens was equal between EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB. A significant correlation for Ki-67 PI values between EUS and 92 correspondent surgical specimens was found in both groups, but it was stronger with EUS-FNB (tau = 0.626, p < 0.0001 vs. tau = 0.452, p = 0.031). Correct grading estimation was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.482). CONCLUSION Our study showed stronger correlation for Ki-67 values between EUS-FNB and surgical specimens, and that EUS-FNB outperformed EUS-FNA in the evaluation of small pNETs. EUS-FNB should become standard of care for grading assessment of suspected pNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| | - Serena Ammendola
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Anna Meneghetti
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Landoni
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Pin
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Alice Parisi
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Amodio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|