1
|
Lippi L, de Sire A, Aprile V, Calafiore D, Folli A, Refati F, Balduit A, Mangogna A, Ivanova M, Venetis K, Fusco N, Invernizzi M. Rehabilitation for Functioning and Quality of Life in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Scoping Review. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:4318-4337. [PMID: 39195305 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31080322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents a significant clinical challenge due to limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Beyond mere survivorship, setting up an effective framework to improve functioning and quality of life is an urgent need in the comprehensive management of MPM patients. Therefore, this study aims to review the current understanding of MPM sequelae and the effectiveness of rehabilitative interventions in the holistic approach to MPM. A narrative review was conducted to summarize MPM sequelae and their impact on functioning, disability, and quality of life, focusing on rehabilitation interventions in MPM management and highlighting gaps in knowledge and areas for further investigation. Our findings showed that MPM patients experience debilitating symptoms, including fatigue, dyspnea, pain, and reduced exercise tolerance, decreasing quality of life. Supportive and rehabilitative interventions, including pulmonary rehabilitation, physical exercise improvement, psychological support, pain management, and nutritional supplementation, seem promising approaches in relieving symptoms and improving quality of life but require further research. These programs emphasize the pivotal synergy among patient-tailored plans, multidisciplinary team involvement, and disease-specific focus. Despite advancements in therapeutic management, MPM remains a challenging disease with limited effective interventions that should be adapted to disease progressions. Rehabilitative strategies are essential to mitigate symptoms and improve the quality of life in MPM patients. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for rehabilitative interventions tailored to the unique needs of MPM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Lippi
- Department of Scientific Research, Off-Campus Semmelweis University of Budapest, Campus LUdeS Lugano (CH), 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Alessandro de Sire
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
- Research Center on Musculoskeletal Health, MusculoSkeletalHealth@UMG, University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Vittorio Aprile
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Dario Calafiore
- Department of Neurosciences, ASST Carlo Poma, 46100 Mantova, Italy
| | - Arianna Folli
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont "A. Avogadro", 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Fjorelo Refati
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont "A. Avogadro", 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Andrea Balduit
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Burlo Garofolo, 34100 Trieste, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mangogna
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Mariia Ivanova
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Venetis
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Invernizzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont "A. Avogadro", 28100 Novara, Italy
- Translational Medicine, Dipartimento Attività Integrate Ricerca e Innovazione (DAIRI), Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neilly MD, Pearson J, Thu AW, MacRae C, Blyth KG. Contemporary management of mesothelioma. Breathe (Sheff) 2024; 20:230175. [PMID: 39015660 PMCID: PMC11250169 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0175-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive asbestos-associated thoracic malignancy with a median survival of 12-18 months. Due to continued asbestos use in many nations, global incidence is rising. Causes due to non-occupational, environmental exposure are also rising in many countries despite utilisation bans. For many years, platinum--pemetrexed chemotherapy was the solitary licensed therapy, but first-line combination immune checkpoint blockade has recently demonstrated improved outcomes, with both regimes tested in predominantly late-stage cohorts. In the second-line setting, single-agent nivolumab has been shown to extend survival and is now available for routine use in some regions, while second-line chemotherapy has no proven role and opportunities for clinical trials should be maximised in relapsed disease. Surgery for "technically resectable" disease has been offered for decades in many expert centres, but the recent results from the phase III MARS2 trial have challenged this approach. There remains no robustly proven standard of care for early-stage PM. The clinical trial landscape for PM is complex and increasingly diverse, making further development of specialist PM multidisciplinary teams an important priority in all countries. The observation of improving outcomes in centres that have adopted this service model emphasises the importance of high-quality diagnostics and equitable access to therapies and trials. Novel therapies targeting a range of aberrations are being evaluated; however, a better understanding of the molecular drivers and their associated vulnerabilities is required to identify and prioritise treatment targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D.J. Neilly
- Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jennifer Pearson
- Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Akari Win Thu
- Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Carolyn MacRae
- Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kevin G. Blyth
- Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klotz LV, Zimmermann J, Müller K, Kovács J, Hassan M, Koller M, Schmid S, Huppertz G, Markowiak T, Passlick B, Hofmann HS, Winter H, Hatz RA, Eichhorn ME, Ried M. Multimodal Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy: Impact of Additive Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1587. [PMID: 38672669 PMCID: PMC11048892 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemoperfusion (HITOC) is a promising treatment strategy for pleural mesothelioma (PM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of this multimodal approach in combination with systemic treatment on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In this retrospective multicenter study, clinical data from patients after CRS and HITOC for PM at four high-volume thoracic surgery departments in Germany were analyzed. A total of 260 patients with MPM (220 epithelioid, 40 non-epithelioid) underwent CRS and HITOC as part of a multimodal treatment approach. HITOC was administered with cisplatin alone (58.5%) or cisplatin and doxorubicin (41.5%). In addition, 52.1% of patients received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 48 months (IQR = 38 to 58 months). In-hospital mortality was 3.5%. Both the resection status (macroscopic complete vs. incomplete resection) and histologic subtype (epithelioid vs. non-epithelioid) had significant impacts on DFS and OS. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy (neoadjuvant/adjuvant) significantly increased DFS (p = 0.003). CRS and HITOC within a multimodal treatment approach had positive impacts on the survival of patients with epithelioid PM after macroscopic complete resection. The addition of chemotherapy significantly prolonged the time to tumor recurrence or progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura V. Klotz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Zimmermann
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Asklepios Lung Clinic Gauting, 82131 Gauting, Germany; (J.Z.); (J.K.)
| | - Karolina Müller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Julia Kovács
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Asklepios Lung Clinic Gauting, 82131 Gauting, Germany; (J.Z.); (J.K.)
| | - Mohamed Hassan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Michael Koller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Severin Schmid
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Gunnar Huppertz
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Till Markowiak
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernward Passlick
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Hans-Stefan Hofmann
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, 93049 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hauke Winter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rudolf A. Hatz
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Asklepios Lung Clinic Gauting, 82131 Gauting, Germany; (J.Z.); (J.K.)
| | - Martin E. Eichhorn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Ried
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Henschke P, Guglielmetti LC, Hillinger S, Monsch GM, Schneiter D, Opitz I, Lauk O. Risk factors influencing postoperative pleural empyema in patients with pleural mesothelioma: a retrospective single-centre analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65:ezae137. [PMID: 38637940 PMCID: PMC11055398 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Postoperative empyema is a severe, potentially lethal complication also present, but poorly studied in patients undergoing surgery for pleural mesothelioma. We aimed to analyse which perioperative characteristics might be associated with an increased risk for postoperative empyema. METHODS From September 1999 to February 2023 a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for pleural mesothelioma at the University Hospital of Zurich was performed. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify associated risk factors of postoperative empyema after surgery. RESULTS A total of 400 PM patients were included in the analysis, of which n = 50 patients developed empyema after surgery (12.5%). Baseline demographics were comparable between patients with (Eyes) and without empyema (Eno). 39% (n = 156) patients underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), of whom 22% (n = 35) developed postoperative pleural empyema; 6% (n = 15) of the remaining 244 patients undergoing pleurectomy and decortication (n = 46), extended pleurectomy and decortication (n = 114), partial pleurectomy (n = 54) or explorative thoracotomy (n = 30) resulted in postoperative empyema. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, EPP (odds ratio 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.5-5.4, P = 0.002) emerged as the only risk factor associated with postoperative empyema when controlled for smoking status. Median overall survival was significantly worse for Eyes (16 months, interquartile range 5-27 months) than for Eno (18 months, interquartile range 8-35 months). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing EPP had a significantly higher risk of developing postoperative pleural empyema compared to patients undergoing other surgery types. Survival of patients with empyema was significantly shorter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Henschke
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Sven Hillinger
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gian-Marco Monsch
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Didier Schneiter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivia Lauk
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hasegawa S, Shintani Y, Takuwa T, Aoe K, Kato K, Fujimoto N, Hida Y, Morise M, Moriya Y, Morohoshi T, Suzuki H, Chida M, Endo S, Kadokura M, Okumura M, Hattori S, Date H, Yoshino I. Nationwide prospective registry database of patients with newly diagnosed untreated pleural mesothelioma in Japan. Cancer Sci 2024; 115:507-528. [PMID: 38047872 PMCID: PMC10859622 DOI: 10.1111/cas.16021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to the scarcity of large-sized prospective databases, the Japanese Joint Committee for Lung Cancer Registry conducted a nationwide prospective registry for newly diagnosed and untreated pleural mesothelioma. All new cases diagnosed pathologically as any subtype of pleural mesothelioma in Japan during the period between April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019, were included before treatment. Data on survival were collected in April 2021. The eligible 346 patients (285 men [82.3%]; 61 women [17.7%]; median age, 71.0 years [range, 44-88]) were included for analysis. Among these patients, 138 (39.9%) underwent surgery, 164 (47.4%) underwent non-surgical therapy, and the remaining 44 (12.7%) underwent best supportive care. The median overall survival for all 346 patients was 19.0 months. Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for all patients were, 62.8%, 42.3%, and 26.5%, respectively. Median overall survival was significantly different among patients undergoing surgery, non-surgical treatment, and best supportive care (32.2 months vs. 14.0 months vs. 3.8 months, p < 0.001). The median overall survival of patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy was 41.8 months and 25.0 months, respectively. Macroscopic complete resection resulted in longer overall survival than R2 resection and partial pleurectomy/exploratory thoracotomy (41.8 months vs. 32.2 months vs. 16.8 months, p < 0.001). Tumor shape, maximum tumor thickness, and sum of three level thickness were significant prognostic factors. The data in the prospective database would serve as a valuable reference for clinical practice and further studies for pleural mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiki Hasegawa
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryHyogo Medical UniversityHyogoJapan
| | - Yasushi Shintani
- Department of General Thoracic SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Teruhisa Takuwa
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryHyogo Medical UniversityHyogoJapan
| | - Keisuke Aoe
- Department of Medical OncologyNational Hospital Organization Yamaguchi‐Ube Medical CenterYamaguchiJapan
| | - Katsuya Kato
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology 2Kawasaki Medical SchoolOkayamaJapan
| | | | - Yasuhiro Hida
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic SurgeryHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineHokkaidoJapan
| | - Masahiro Morise
- Department of Respiratory MedicineNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineAichiJapan
| | - Yasumitsu Moriya
- Division of General Thoracic SurgeryChiba Rosai HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Takao Morohoshi
- Division of General Thoracic SurgeryYokosuka‐Kyosai HospitalKanagawaJapan
| | - Hidemi Suzuki
- Department of General Thoracic SurgeryChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Masayuki Chida
- Department of General Thoracic SurgeryDokkyo Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
| | - Shunsuke Endo
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryJichi Medical UniversityShimotsukeJapan
| | - Mitsutaka Kadokura
- Division of Chest Surgery, Department of SurgeryShowa University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Meinoshin Okumura
- Department of General Thoracic SurgeryOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Satoshi Hattori
- Department of Biomedical StatisticsOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan
| | - Hiroshi Date
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryKyoto University HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Ichiro Yoshino
- Department of General Thoracic SurgeryChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
John A, O'Sullivan H, Popat S. Updates in Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1758-1789. [PMID: 37975977 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01148-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos-associated thoracic malignancy that is usually incurable. As demonstrated in the landmark MARS2 trial, surgical resection does not improve survival outcomes and its role in managing MPM is limited. Whilst platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab was the standard first-line approach for unresectable disease, landmark phase 3 trials have now established the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in the upfront management of unresectable disease: either nivolumab-ipilimumab or carboplatin-pemetrexed-pembrolizumab. Patient selection for optimal strategy remains an ongoing question. For relapsed disease novel genomic-based therapies targeting a range of aberrations including losses of the tumour suppressor genes BAP1, CDKN2A and NF2, are being evaluated. Nonetheless, the future of MPM therapeutics holds promise. Here we overview current treatment strategies in the management of MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexius John
- The Lung Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Hazel O'Sullivan
- The Lung Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Sanjay Popat
- The Lung Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bedirhan MA, Seyrek Y, Yaran V, Sezen CB, Cansever L, Metin M. Does mediastinal lymph node involvement influence the surgical outcome in malign pleural mesothelioma? Acta Chir Belg 2023; 123:517-524. [PMID: 35815370 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2099558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examined the effect of metastatic mediastinal lymph node involvement on the prognosis of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or extended pleurectomy (E/P) and also to assess the effect of metastatic mediastinal lymph node involvement on the prognosis of patients with MPM in these group of patients. METHODS This retrospective study included 84 patients with MPM (66 men [78.6%] and 18 women [21.4%]) who underwent EPP (n = 44) or E/P (n = 40) at our institution between January 2001 and July 2019. Survival analyses were performed according to histopathology, nodal status, and surgical approach. RESULTS In the EPP group, patients with T2-N2 status had a significantly better mean survival (17 ± 2.1 months) than patients with T3-N2 (7.3 ± 1.6 months) or T4-N2 (3.2 ± 1.1 months) status (p = .001). In the E/P group, patients with T2-N2 status had a mean survival of 18 ± 1.1 months, while patients with T3-N2 and T4-N2 status had mean survival durations of 6.6 ± 1.6 and 4.8 ± 1.2 months, respectively (p = .159). In both treatment groups, the survival rates of patients with epithelial tumors were better than those of patients with non-epithelial tumors, independent of N status. None of the patients with N2 disease survived until 5 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION In summary, our results suggested that mediastinal lymph node metastasis negatively influenced the prognosis of patients with T3 MPM, regardless of treatment by EPP or E/P. Under these circumstances, preoperative cervical mediastinoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration may be considered for patients with high-stage MPM who are scheduled for surgery with curative intent. In our study, N2 status was spotted as a significant factor affecting survival, nevertheless its significance in survival of pleural mesothelioma patients should be analyzed in multi-centered studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Ali Bedirhan
- Depatment of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Yunus Seyrek
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Volkan Yaran
- Depatment of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Celal Buğra Sezen
- Depatment of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Cansever
- Depatment of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Muzaffer Metin
- Depatment of Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Buchalet C, Durdux C. Role of radiotherapy in the management of rare solid thoracic tumors of the adults. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:614-621. [PMID: 37558606 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Thoracic tumors include more than one hundred histopathological subtypes. Rare thoracic malignancies can be defined as representing less than 1% of all thoracic tumors. The European Rare Cancer Surveillance Project (RARECARE) identified rarity as an incidence less than 6 for 100,000 people, with significant difference of prevalence between them. Modalities of treatment for these pathologies include surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. In this article, we aim to discuss role and techniques of radiotherapy in management of rare solid thoracic tumors in adults, focusing on different anatomical locations such as lung parenchyma, mediastinum, vessels, chest wall and pleural cavity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Buchalet
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34000 Montpellier, France.
| | - C Durdux
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cangemi M, Montico M, Trovo M, Minatel E, Di Gregorio E, Corona G, Giordari F, Comaro E, Colizzi F, Baboçi L, Steffan A, Revelant A, Muraro E. Emerging Role of Immunomonitoring to Predict the Clinical Outcome of Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Treated With Radical Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:608-621. [PMID: 36202181 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study aimed at evaluating the baseline immune profile and the immunomodulating effects of radical hemithoracic radiation therapy (RT) in patients affected by malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) to identify potential predictive biomarkers of therapy response, toxicity development, and eligibility for further immunotherapeutic treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS Blood samples were collected from 55 patients with MPM, enrolled in a phase 3 trial comparing radical hemithoracic RT (interventional arm, n = 28) with local palliative RT (control arm, n = 27). Immunomonitoring was performed before RT, at the end of treatment, and 1 month after therapy, characterizing natural killer cells, B and T lymphocytes, activated CD4 and CD8 T cells, interferon-γ- and tumor necrosis factor-α-producing T helper (Th) 1 cells, regulatory T cells, and Th17 and Th22 lymphocytes, through flow cytometry. Serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6, -8, -10 and mesothelin were quantified through Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) assays at the same time points. Variations in the immune parameters were investigated by Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed rank post hoc test with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, while the prognostic effect of immune biomarkers was evaluated through Kaplan-Meier method and Spearman's correlation analysis. RESULTS Major immune variations were noticed after radical RT compared with palliative treatment, in particular an improvement in activated T cells and in interferon-γ-producing Th1 cells after RT. In the interventional arm, baseline high levels of Th22 and IL-10 and an increase in T cells were associated with an improved survival, whereas a fold increase in serum mesothelin correlated with the development of severe toxicity. An improvement of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells was observed in both arms of treatment. CONCLUSIONS The immunomonitoring performed in patients with MPM revealed potential prognostic biomarkers for radical hemithoracic RT treatment and identified specific immune signatures induced by RT immunomodulation, which could suggest a synergistic effect with an immunotherapeutic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Cangemi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marcella Montico
- Clinical Trial Office, Scientific Direction, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Marco Trovo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Udine General Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Emilio Minatel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Emanuela Di Gregorio
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Corona
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Fabiana Giordari
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Elisa Comaro
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Francesca Colizzi
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Lorena Baboçi
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Agostino Steffan
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Alberto Revelant
- Division of Radiation Oncology, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Elena Muraro
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The Impact of Adjuvant Hemithoracic Radiation on Outcomes in Patients With Stage I-III Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Dual Registry Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e648-e656. [PMID: 34091506 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcomes associated with receipt of adjuvant radiation in patients after surgery for MPM are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to use 2 registries to compare the outcomes of patients receiving adjuvant radiation or no radiation after definitive surgery for pathologic stage I-III MPM. METHODS Patients with resected pathologic stage I-III MPM were identified from the Duke University registry (1996-2016) and National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2015). The primary outcome was overall survival. Propensity score-matched and landmark subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 212 institutional and 1615 NCDB patients met criteria. In both cohorts, patients who underwent radiation were more likely to have margin-negative resection and more advanced pathologic stage. At a landmark time of 4.4 and 4.7 months from surgery, Duke [hazard ratio (HR) 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-2.11] and NCDB patients (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.81-1.17) who received adjuvant radiation did not experience improved survival compared to those who did not receive radiation in multivariable analysis. Duke patients who received radiation had similar incidence of recurrence and time to both overall recurrence and ipsilateral recurrence (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.43-1.77) compared to those who did not. Duke patients experienced 100 grade 1/2, 21 grade 3/4, and one grade 5 toxicity events during radiation. CONCLUSIONS In this dual registry analysis of patients with resected stage I-III MPM, the receipt of adjuvant hemithoracic radiation was not associated with improved survival compared to no radiation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Paajanen J, Jaklitsch MT, Bueno R. Contemporary issues in the surgical management of pleural mesothelioma. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:343-354. [PMID: 36630097 PMCID: PMC9839311 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The surgical management of pleural mesothelioma (PM) can be divided into diagnostic, staging, palliation, and cytoreductive surgery. In the cytoreductive surgical setting, the combination of different treatment modalities has led to better outcomes than surgery alone. The scarcity of high-quality studies has led to heterogeneity in management of PM across the mesothelioma treatment centers. Here, we review the literature regarding the most important open questions and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juuso Paajanen
- The Thoracic Surgery Oncology laboratory and the International Mesothelioma Program (www.impmeso.org), Division of Thoracic Surgery and the Lung Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Michael T. Jaklitsch
- The Thoracic Surgery Oncology laboratory and the International Mesothelioma Program (www.impmeso.org), Division of Thoracic Surgery and the Lung Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Raphael Bueno
- The Thoracic Surgery Oncology laboratory and the International Mesothelioma Program (www.impmeso.org), Division of Thoracic Surgery and the Lung Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
What's Current and What's New in Mesothelioma? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:771-780. [PMID: 36155156 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is a rare disease with limited treatment options. In malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), radical trimodality approaches, including surgery, radiotherapy and systemic chemo- and immunotherapy, have been delivered in some countries but remain controversial due to a lack of randomised evidence. Even in the unresectable scenario, surgery and radiotherapy play an important role in managing pleural effusions and pain, which may optimise wellbeing and maintain performance status. From the systemic treatment point of view, the recent incorporation of anti-angiogenics and, more importantly, immunotherapy has changed the standard of care in a space where chemotherapy with platinum and pemetrexed was the only therapeutic intervention with demonstrated benefits in overall survival. Histology is essential in determining an initial treatment plan as non-epithelioid MPMs may have a higher substantial survival improvement with dual immunotherapy compared with chemotherapy, whereas chemotherapy remains an option for epithelioid MPM; however, predictive biomarkers for systemic therapy are not entirely validated to guide the selection, as a subgroup of MPM patients might not benefit from immunotherapy. This overview approaches how the overall management of mesothelioma is evolving to incorporate the recent changes in the standards of care.
Collapse
|
13
|
Perera ND, Mansfield AS. The Evolving Therapeutic Landscape for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1413-1423. [PMID: 35657483 PMCID: PMC9613518 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01302-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW For patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, prognosis is poor with extremely low 5-year survival rates and limited therapeutic options. Here, we review the current treatment landscape for mesothelioma and highlight promising future therapeutic directions. RECENT FINDINGS Evolving frontline therapeutic options for mesothelioma include VEGF inhibition in combination with chemotherapy and dual immune checkpoint inhibition, with synergisms between the therapies and response prediction via biomarkers also being explored. Evolving experimental treatments for mesothelioma include PARP and ALK inhibitors, dendritic and CAR T-cell therapies, anti-mesothelin vaccines, and oncolytic viral therapies, representing timely advances in the field. The therapeutic landscape for malignant pleural mesothelioma is evolving and preferred treatment in the frontline and later settings will likely evolve with it. However, this does not preclude the evidence for including multi-modal therapies spanning angiogenesis and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and biomarker utilization, in current clinical trials and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirosha D Perera
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Aaron S Mansfield
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kuryk L, Rodella G, Staniszewska M, Pancer KW, Wieczorek M, Salmaso S, Caliceti P, Garofalo M. Novel Insights Into Mesothelioma Therapy: Emerging Avenues and Future Prospects. Front Oncol 2022; 12:916839. [PMID: 35785199 PMCID: PMC9247278 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.916839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer that develops in the thin layer surrounding the mesothelium and is mainly caused by asbestos exposure. Despite improvements in patient prognosis with conventional cancer treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, there are still no curative treatment modalities for advanced disease. In recent years, new therapeutic avenues have been explored. Improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying the dynamic tumor interaction with the immune system has led to the development of immunotherapeutic approaches. Numerous recent clinical trials have shown a desire to develop more effective treatments that can be used to fight against the disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic adenoviruses, and their combination represent a promising strategy that can be used to synergistically overcome immunosuppression in the mesothelioma tumor microenvironment. This review provides a synthesized overview of the current state of knowledge on new therapeutic options for mesothelioma with a focus on the results of clinical trials conducted in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukasz Kuryk
- Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health National Institute of Hygiene (NIH)—National Institute of Research, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Rodella
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Monika Staniszewska
- Centre for Advanced Materials and Technologies, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Wanda Pancer
- Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health National Institute of Hygiene (NIH)—National Institute of Research, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Wieczorek
- Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health National Institute of Hygiene (NIH)—National Institute of Research, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Stefano Salmaso
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Caliceti
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Mariangela Garofalo
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nakanishi-Imai M, Murai T, Onishi M, Mouri A, Komiyama T, Omura M, Kudo S, Miyamoto A, Hoshino M, Ogawa S, Ohashi S, Koizumi M, Omagari J, Mayahara H, Karasawa K, Okumura T, Shibamoto Y. Survey of malignant pleural mesothelioma treatment in Japan: Patterns of practice and clinical outcomes in tomotherapy facilities. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2022; 63:281-289. [PMID: 35138408 PMCID: PMC8944311 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a nationwide survey of tomotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in Japan. Fifty-six facilities were surveyed and data on 31 patients treated curatively between 2008 and 2017 were collected from 14 facilities. Twenty patients received hemithorax irradiation after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) (first group). Five patients received irradiation without EPP (second group), while six received salvage radiotherapy for local recurrence (salvage group). Among the seven patients not undergoing EPP, five (four in the second group and one in the salvage group) were treated with lung sparing pleural irradiation (LSPI) and two with irradiation to visible tumors. Two-year overall survival (OS) rates in the first and second groups were 33% and 60%, respectively (median, 13 vs 30 months, P = 0.82). In the first and second groups, 2-year local control (LC) rates were 53 and 67%, respectively (P = 0.54) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 16% and 60%, respectively (P = 0.07). Distant metastases occurred in 15 patients in the first group and three in the second group. In the salvage group, the median OS was 18 months. Recurrence was observed in the irradiated volume in four patients. The contralateral lung dose was higher in LSPI than in hemithorax irradiation plans (mean, 11.0 ± 2.2 vs 6.1 ± 3.1 Gy, P = 0.002). Grade 3 or 5 lung toxicity was observed in two patients receiving EPP and hemithorax irradiation, but not in those undergoing LSPI. In conclusion, outcomes of EPP and hemithorax irradiation were not satisfactory, whereas LSPI appeared promising and encouraging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikiko Nakanishi-Imai
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center, Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, 466-8650, Japan
| | - Taro Murai
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; Phone: (+81)52-853-8276; Fax: (+81)52-852-5244;
| | | | - Atsuto Mouri
- Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hidaka, 350-1298, Japan
| | - Takafumi Komiyama
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, 409-3898, Japan
| | - Motoko Omura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Shigehiro Kudo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan
| | - Akihiko Miyamoto
- Hokuto Hospital Department of Radiation Therapy, Obihiro, 080-0833, Japan
| | - Masaru Hoshino
- Northern Fukushima Medical Center, Date, 960-0502, Japan
| | - Shinichi Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Minokamo, 505-8503, Japan
| | - Shizuko Ohashi
- Department of Radiology, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, 918-8503, Japan
| | - Masahiko Koizumi
- Department of Radiology, Nozaki Tokushukai Hospital, Daito, 574-0074, Japan
| | - Junichi Omagari
- Department of Radiology, Koga Hospital 21, Fukuoka, 839-0801, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Mayahara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe Minimally-invasive Cancer Center, Kobe, 650-0046, Japan
| | | | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiology, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, Mito, 310-0015, Japan
| | - Yuta Shibamoto
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
- Narita Memorial Proton Center, Toyohashi, 441-8021, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Davis A, Ke H, Kao S, Pavlakis N. An Update on Emerging Therapeutic Options for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. LUNG CANCER (AUCKLAND, N.Z.) 2022; 13:1-12. [PMID: 35264891 PMCID: PMC8900635 DOI: 10.2147/lctt.s288535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The treatment paradigm for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has changed little in the last 18 years. Radical intent treatment, consisting of surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has been offered to a highly select few; however, there is little randomised evidence to validate this approach. Prior to 2020 chemotherapy with platinum and an anti-folate was the only intervention with randomised evidence to demonstrate improved overall survival (OS) in MPM. No systemic therapy had been demonstrated to improve OS in the second line setting until 2020. The publication of the Checkmate 743 trial in 2021 demonstrated a survival benefit of combination immunotherapy over standard chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with MPM. This finding was shortly followed by the CONFIRM trial which demonstrates a modest but significant survival benefit of second line nivolumab versus placebo in patients having previously received standard chemotherapy. The results of these trials, recent biomarker directed therapy and chemotherapy adjuncts are discussed within this review. The integration of immunotherapy for the few patients in whom radical surgical therapy is intended is currently the subject of clinical trials and offers the prospect of improving outcomes in this rare but devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Davis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Western Cancer Centre, Dubbo, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Ke
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Rhodes, NSW, Australia
| | - Steven Kao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Rhodes, NSW, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Nick Pavlakis
- School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Genesis Care, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tsao AS, Pass HI, Rimner A, Mansfield AS. New Era for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Updates on Therapeutic Options. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:681-692. [PMID: 34985934 PMCID: PMC8853621 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy with few treatment options. Recent advances have led to US Food and Drug Administration approvals and changes in the standard of care with a novel biomedical device approved for use with platinum-pemetrexed, and also for immunotherapy agents to be included as a frontline treatment option in unresectable disease. Although predictive biomarkers for systemic therapy are not currently in use in clinical practice, it is essential to correctly identify the MPM histology to determine an optimal treatment plan. Patients with nonepithelioid MPM may have a greater magnitude of benefit to dual immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors and this regimen should be preferred in the frontline setting for these patients. However, all patients with MPM can derive benefit from immunotherapy treatments, and these agents should ultimately be used at some point during their treatment journey. There are ongoing studies in the frontline unresectable setting that may further define the frontline therapy space, but a critical area of research will need to focus on the immunotherapy refractory population. This review article will describe the new developments in the areas of biology with genomics and chromothripsis, and also focus on updates in treatment strategies in radiology, surgery, radiation, and medical oncology with cellular therapies. These recent innovations are generating momentum to find better therapies for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne S. Tsao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic & Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Houston, TX
| | - Harvey I. Pass
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Popat S, Baas P, Faivre-Finn C, Girard N, Nicholson AG, Nowak AK, Opitz I, Scherpereel A, Reck M. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up ☆. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:129-142. [PMID: 34861373 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Popat
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Section of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; National Centre for Mesothelioma Research, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C Faivre-Finn
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - N Girard
- Thorax Institute Curie Montsouris, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A G Nicholson
- National Centre for Mesothelioma Research, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Histopathology, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| | - A K Nowak
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, Centre for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia; Medical School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - I Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A Scherpereel
- Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, University of Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1189, OncoThAI, Lille, France
| | - M Reck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, LungenClinic Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hajj GNM, Cavarson CH, Pinto CAL, Venturi G, Navarro JR, Lima VCCD. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update. J Bras Pneumol 2021; 47:e20210129. [PMID: 34909922 PMCID: PMC8836658 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant mesotheliomas are rare types of cancers that affect the mesothelial surfaces, usually the pleura and peritoneum. They are associated with asbestos exposure, but due to a latency period of more than 30 years and difficult diagnosis, most cases are not detected until they reach advanced stages. Treatment options for this tumor type are very limited and survival ranges from 12 to 36 months. This review discusses the molecular physiopathology, current diagnosis, and latest therapeutic options for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glaucia N M Hajj
- Instituto International de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| | - Carolina H Cavarson
- Instituto International de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| | | | - Gabriela Venturi
- Instituto International de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,BP Mirante, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| | | | - Vladmir C Cordeiro de Lima
- Instituto Nacional de Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Rede D'Or, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Soltermann A, Opitz I, Burger IA. Histology of the pleural rind at [ 18F]FDG PET/CT hot and cold spots in mesothelioma patients after talc pleurodesis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathol Res Pract 2021; 228:153660. [PMID: 34749212 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The role of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) in evaluating induction chemotherapy in pleural mesothelioma (PM) patients is debated. We compared histology at tumor sites with high versus low [18F]FDG uptake in order to define a morphologic correlate for persistent metabolic activity. Twenty PM patients with talc pleurodesis and induction chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pleuro-pneumonectomy (EPP, n = 17) or tumor debulking (n = 3) were included. All patients received a PET/CT scan prior to surgery. Orthogonal tissue sections of pleural rind (n total=86) were taken at areas of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax, n = 53) and of low [18F]FDG uptake (n = 33) and scored on hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical stainings. Total metabolic activity was scored semiquantitatively. Mean SUVmax of hot and cold spots correlated with total metabolic activity per patient, but no correlation was found with ypT and tumor cells were present in both hot and cold areas. SUVmax of only hot spots and cold versus hot spots as well as cold versus hot patients correlated with increased thickness of total pleural rind and fibrosis reaction, but not thickness of vital tumor cells or giant cell reaction. They further correlated with increased expression of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) in giant cells but not mesothelioma amount, density, vitality or vascularization. Biphasic histology was associated with SUVmax in only hot spots and higher total metabolic activity (all p-values <0.05). Interpretation of [18F]FDG PET/CT in PM patients is difficult after talc pleurodesis and induction chemotherapy. High glucose turnover is mostly related to fibro-inflammatory remodeling of the pleural rind and GLUT1 transporter expression in giant cells. Response assessment using this technology should only be done to assess extra-thoracic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Soltermann
- ADMED Pathology, Avenue de Bellevaux 4a, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aigner C, Brüning T, Eberhardt WEE, Härter M, Kaelberlah HP, Metzenmacher M, Shah R, Taube C, Thomas M. [The Current Therapy of Asbestos-Associated Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma - An Expert Consensus Paper]. Pneumologie 2021; 75:776-794. [PMID: 33946118 PMCID: PMC8523221 DOI: 10.1055/a-1404-1562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Asbestos-related mesotheliomas belong to the group of the most frequent occupational diseases in Germany, reaching about 1,000 new cases per year. The disease has a dismal prognosis because most tumors remain asymptomatic for a long time and therefore are diagnosed as incidental findings at later stages.During the last decade the German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV) has made considerable efforts to prepone the diagnosis in order to detect the disease at earliest possible stages. These efforts resulted in new findings showing that, in a high-risk group, a combination of the biomarkers calretinin and mesothelin was able to advance the diagnosis up to 12 months.Ideally, the diagnosis of a mesothelioma at an early stage has to be accompanied by the best possible individualized therapy. Standard therapeutic strategies are surgery and chemotherapy, added by radiotherapy and psycho-oncology. In recent years, several new therapeutic avenues are being explored. This review comprehensively presents both old and new therapeutic options in mesothelioma, based on international Leitlinien and new studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Aigner
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie und thorakale Endoskopie, Universitätsmedizin Essen - Ruhrlandklinik
| | - T Brüning
- Institut für Prävention und Arbeitsmedizin der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung (DGUV) - Institut der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
| | - W E E Eberhardt
- Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Ruhrlandklinik, Universitätsmedizin Essen
| | - M Härter
- Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie und Institut für Psychotherapie (IfP), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | | | - M Metzenmacher
- Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Ruhrlandklinik, Universitätsmedizin Essen
| | - R Shah
- Internistische Onkologie der Thoraxtumoren, Thoraxklinik - Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL)
| | - C Taube
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen - Ruhrlandklinik
| | - M Thomas
- Internistische Onkologie der Thoraxtumoren, Thoraxklinik - Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sam M Janes
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Doraid Alrifai
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| | - Dean A Fennell
- From the Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London (S.M.J., D.A.), the Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital (S.M.J.), London, and the University of Leicester, Leicester (D.A.F.) - all in the United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Luna J, Bobo A, Cabrera-Rodriguez JJ, Pagola M, Martín-Martín M, Ruiz MÁG, Montijano M, Rodríguez A, Pelari-Mici L, Corbacho A, Moreno M, Couñago F. GOECP/SEOR clinical guidelines on radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:581-608. [PMID: 34513595 PMCID: PMC8394157 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i8.581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumor with poor prognosis and rising incidence. Palliative care is common in MPM as radical treatment with curative intent is often not possible due to metastasis or extensive locoregional involvement. Numerous therapeutic advances have been made in recent years, including the use of less aggressive surgical techniques associated with lower morbidity and mortality (e.g., pleurectomy/decortication), technological advancements in the field of radiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, proton therapy), and developments in systemic therapies (chemotherapy and immunotherapy). These improvements have had as yet only a modest effect on local control and survival. Advances in the management of MPM and standardization of care are hampered by the evidence to date, limited by high heterogeneity among studies and small sample sizes. In this clinical guideline prepared by the oncological group for the study of lung cancer of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, we review clinical, histologic, and therapeutic aspects of MPM, with a particular focus on all aspects relating to radiotherapy, including the current evidence base, associations with chemotherapy and surgery, treatment volumes and planning, technological advances, and reradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Luna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncohealth, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Andrea Bobo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | | | - María Pagola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Onkologikoa/Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián 20014, Spain
| | - Margarita Martín-Martín
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - María Ángeles González Ruiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena, Sevilla 41009, Spain
| | - Miguel Montijano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Genesis care Spain, Madrid 28005, Spain
| | - Aurora Rodríguez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Lira Pelari-Mici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Almudena Corbacho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital de Mérida, Mérida 06800, Spain
| | - Marta Moreno
- Department of Oncology, Institution of University Navarra, Clinical University, Pamplona 31008, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud and Hospital LaLuz, European University of Madrid, Madrid 28028, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kruser TJ, Robinson C, Owen D, Salama JK, Daly ME. Strike or Spare? A Review of Lung-Sparing Therapies for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:257-260. [PMID: 33989566 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tim J Kruser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Turville Bay Radiation Oncology, SSM Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
| | - Clifford Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Megan E Daly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Haslam A, Gill J, Crain T, Herrera-Perez D, Chen EY, Hilal T, Kim MS, Prasad V. The frequency of medical reversals in a cross-sectional analysis of high-impact oncology journals, 2009-2018. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:889. [PMID: 34344325 PMCID: PMC8336285 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08632-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Identifying ineffective practices that have been used in oncology is important in reducing wasted resources and harm. We sought to examine the prevalence of practices that are being used but have been shown in RCTs to be ineffective (medical reversals) in published oncology studies. Methods We cross-sectionally analyzed studies published in three high-impact oncology medical journals (2009–2018). We abstracted data relating to the frequency and characterization of medical reversals. Results Of the 64 oncology reversals, medications (44%) represented the most common intervention type (39% were targeted). Fourteen (22%) were funded by pharmaceutical/industry only and 56% were funded by an organization other than pharmaceutical/industry. The median number of years that the practice had been in use prior to the reversal study was 9 years (range 1–50 years). Conclusion Here we show that oncology reversals most often involve the administration of medications, have been practiced for years, and are often identified through studies funded by non-industry organizations. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08632-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson Haslam
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | | | - Tyler Crain
- Department of Analytics, Northwest Permanente, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | - Talal Hilal
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Myung S Kim
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Vinay Prasad
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ke H, Kao S, Lee K, Takahashi K, Goh HP, Linton A. The minimum standard of care for managing malignant pleural mesothelioma in developing nations within the Asia-Pacific Region. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:177-190. [PMID: 34161674 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable malignancy associated with high symptom burden and poor prognosis. The relationship between asbestos exposure and MPM incidence is well-established. The incidence rate of MPM in Australia and New Zealand is among the highest globally. Matching the experience of other nations with legal restrictions on asbestos, incidence is expected to fall. In contrast, the incidence of MPM is rising in the developing nations of the Asia-Pacific as consumption and mining (albeit to a lesser extent) of asbestos continues. The incidence of MPM in these nations is currently low or unknown, reflecting insufficient latency periods since industrial use of asbestos, deficient resources for accurate diagnosis, and lack of occupational disease or cancer registries. The landscape of treatment for MPM is rapidly changing with combination immunotherapy now demonstrating improved survival in the first-line setting. Considering vast global inequity in access to anticancer treatments, establishing minimum standard of care for MPM in developing nations is of greater significance. Here, we review the evidence that form the basis of our minimum-standard recommendations for diagnosis, systemic treatment, management of recurrent pleural effusions, and symptom management. We also briefly review evidence-based treatment that may be considered for those with access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Ke
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven Kao
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth Lee
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Takahashi
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
| | - Hui Poh Goh
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei
| | - Anthony Linton
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Opitz I, Scherpereel A, Berghmans T, Psallidas I, Glatzer M, Rigau D, Astoul P, Bölükbas S, Boyd J, Coolen J, De Bondt C, De Ruysscher D, Durieux V, Faivre-Finn C, Fennell DA, Galateau-Salle F, Greillier L, Hoda MA, Klepetko W, Lacourt A, McElnay P, Maskell NA, Mutti L, Pairon JC, Van Schil P, van Meerbeeck JP, Waller D, Weder W, Putora PM, Cardillo G. ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 58:1-24. [PMID: 32448904 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) task force brought together experts to update previous 2009 ERS/ESTS guidelines on management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a rare cancer with globally poor outcome, after a systematic review of the 2009-2018 literature. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by this multidisciplinary group of experts. Diagnosis: pleural biopsies remain the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis, usually obtained by thoracoscopy but occasionally via image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cases of pleural symphysis or poor performance status. Pathology: standard staining procedures are insufficient in ∼10% of cases, justifying the use of specific markers, including BAP-1 and CDKN2A (p16) for the separation of atypical mesothelial proliferation from MPM. Staging: in the absence of a uniform, robust and validated staging system, we advise using the most recent 2016 8th TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) classification, with an algorithm for pretherapeutic assessment. Monitoring: patient's performance status, histological subtype and tumour volume are the main prognostic factors of clinical importance in routine MPM management. Other potential parameters should be recorded at baseline and reported in clinical trials. Treatment: (chemo)therapy has limited efficacy in MPM patients and only selected patients are candidates for radical surgery. New promising targeted therapies, immunotherapies and strategies have been reviewed. Because of limited data on the best combination treatment, we emphasize that patients who are considered candidates for a multimodal approach, including radical surgery, should be treated as part of clinical trials in MPM-dedicated centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Arnaud Scherpereel
- Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, French National Network of Clinical Expert Centers for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Management (Mesoclin), Lille, France.,Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, University Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1189, OncoThAI, Lille, France
| | | | - Ioannis Psallidas
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Markus Glatzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Astoul
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Pleural Diseases and Interventional Pulmonology, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Servet Bölükbas
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Johan Coolen
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte De Bondt
- Department of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW Research Institute, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Valerie Durieux
- Bibliothèque des Sciences de la Santé, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dean A Fennell
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester and University of Leicester Hospitals NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Francoise Galateau-Salle
- Department of Biopathology, National Reference Center for Pleural Malignant Mesothelioma and Rare Peritoneal Tumors MESOPATH, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Greillier
- Department of Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Inserm UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, Marseille, France
| | - Mir Ali Hoda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Walter Klepetko
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aude Lacourt
- University Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team EPICENE, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Luciano Mutti
- Teaching Hospital Vercelli/Gruppo Italiano, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Jean-Claude Pairon
- INSERM U955, GEIC2O, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Service de Pathologies professionnelles et de l'Environnement, Institut Santé -Travail Paris-Est, CHI Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Paul Van Schil
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jan P van Meerbeeck
- Department of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - David Waller
- Barts Thorax Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Walter Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Cardillo
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cavin S, Gkasti A, Faget J, Hao Y, Letovanec I, Reichenbach M, Gonzalez M, Krueger T, Dyson PJ, Meylan E, Perentes JY. Low-dose photodynamic therapy promotes a cytotoxic immunological response in a murine model of pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 58:783-791. [PMID: 32372095 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a deadly disease with limited treatment options. Approaches to enhance patient immunity against MPM have been tested but shown variable results. Previously, we have demonstrated interesting vascular modulating properties of low-dose photodynamic therapy (L-PDT) on MPM. Here, we hypothesized that L-PDT vascular modulation could favour immune cell extravasation in MPM and improve tumour control in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS First, we assessed the impact of L-PDT on vascular endothelial E-selectin expression, a key molecule for immune cell extravasation, in vitro and in a syngeneic murine model of MPM. Second, we characterized the tumour immune cell infiltrate by 15-colour flow cytometry analysis 2 and 7 days after L-PDT treatment of the murine MPM model. Third, we determined how L-PDT combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-CTLA4 affected tumour growth in a murine MPM model. RESULTS L-PDT significantly enhanced E-selectin expression by endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. This correlated with increased CD8+ T cells and activated antigen-presenting cells (CD11b+ dendritic cells and macrophages) infiltration in MPM. Also, compared to anti-CTLA4 that only affects tumour growth, the combination of L-PDT with anti-CTLA4 caused complete MPM regression in 37.5% of animals. CONCLUSIONS L-PDT enhances E-selectin expression in the MPM endothelium, which favours immune infiltration of tumours. The combination of L-PDT with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-CTLA4 allows best tumour control and regression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Cavin
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Aspasia Gkasti
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Julien Faget
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Yameng Hao
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Igor Letovanec
- Institute of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maxime Reichenbach
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michel Gonzalez
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thorsten Krueger
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paul J Dyson
- Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Etienne Meylan
- Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Y Perentes
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Voigt SL, Raman V, Jawitz OK, Bishawi M, Yang CFJ, Tong BC, D'Amico TA, Harpole DH. The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma-An Institutional and National Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 112:1118-1127. [PMID: 32011691 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no standard of care with respect to the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We performed an intention-to-treat analysis with data from a single institution and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify whether the use of NAC impacts survival in resectable MPM. METHODS Patients with MPM who had surgery with curative intent at Duke University from 1995 to 2017 were selected, and the 2004-2015 NCDB was used to identify MPM patients with clinical stage I-IIIB who underwent definitive surgery. For both cohorts, patients were stratified by receipt of NAC. Primary outcomes were overall survival and postresection survival (RS), which were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS A total of 257 patients met inclusion criteria in the Duke cohort. Compared with immediate resection (IR), NAC was associated with similar overall survival but an increased risk for postresection mortality in both unmatched (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21 to 2.83) and propensity-matched (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.55) cohorts. A total of 1949 NCDB patients were included: 1597 (81.9%) IR and 352 (18.1%) NAC. RS was worse for patients undergoing NAC in both unmatched (HR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.83) and propensity-matched (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.57) analyses compared with patients receiving IR. CONCLUSIONS In this intention-to-treat study, NAC was associated with worse RS compared with IR in patients with MPM. The risks and benefits of induction therapy should be weighed before offering it to patients with resectable MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soraya L Voigt
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Vignesh Raman
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Oliver K Jawitz
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Muath Bishawi
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Betty C Tong
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas A D'Amico
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David H Harpole
- Affiliations of authors: Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brcic L, Klikovits T, Megyesfalvi Z, Mosleh B, Sinn K, Hritcu R, Laszlo V, Cufer T, Rozman A, Kern I, Mohorcic K, Jakopovic M, Samarzija M, Seiwerth S, Kolek V, Fischer O, Jakubec P, Škarda J, Gieszer B, Hegedus B, Fillinger J, Renyi-Vamos F, Buder A, Bilecz A, Berger W, Grusch M, Hoetzenecker K, Klepetko W, Hoda MA, Filipits M, Dome B. Prognostic impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in malignant pleural mesothelioma: an international multicenter study. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:1594-1607. [PMID: 34012777 PMCID: PMC8107750 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Programmed cell death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune-checkpoint blockade is a promising new therapeutic strategy in cancer. However, expression patterns and prognostic significance of PD-L1 and PD-1 are still controversial in human malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). METHODS Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples from 203 MPM patients receiving standard treatment without immunotherapy were collected from 5 European centers. PD-L1 and PD-1 expression of tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were measured by immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinical parameters and long-term outcome. RESULTS High (>10%) PD-L1 TC and PD-1 TILs expressions were found in 18 (8%) and 39 (24%) patients, respectively. PD-L1 was rarely expressed by TILs [≥1%, n=13 (8%); >10%, n=1]. No significant associations were found between the PD-L1 or PD-1 expression of TCs or TILs and clinicopathological parameters such as stage or histological subtype. Notably, patients with high (>10%) TC-specific PD-L1 expression exhibited significantly worse median overall survival (OS) (6.3 vs. 15.1 months of those with low TC PD-L1 expression; HR: 2.51, P<0.001). In multivariate cox regression analysis adjusted for clinical parameters, high TC PD-L1 expression (>10%) proved to be an independent negative prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.486, P=0.005). There was no significant correlation between PD-L1 or PD-1 expression of TILs and OS. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter cohort study, we demonstrate that high (>10%) PD-L1 expression of TCs independently predicts worse OS in MPM. Further studies are warranted to investigate the value of PD-L1/PD-1 expression as a marker for treatment response in MPM patients receiving immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luka Brcic
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thomas Klikovits
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Zsolt Megyesfalvi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology-Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Berta Mosleh
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katharina Sinn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Hritcu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Viktoria Laszlo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tanja Cufer
- University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Ales Rozman
- University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Izidor Kern
- University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Katja Mohorcic
- University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Marko Jakopovic
- Department for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Miroslav Samarzija
- Department for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sven Seiwerth
- Department of Pathology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Vitezslav Kolek
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Ondřej Fischer
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Jakubec
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Jozef Škarda
- Institute of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Medical Faculty, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Balazs Gieszer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology-Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balazs Hegedus
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Duisburg-Essen, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Janos Fillinger
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology-Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Renyi-Vamos
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology-Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Anna Buder
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Agnes Bilecz
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Walter Berger
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Grusch
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Konrad Hoetzenecker
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Walter Klepetko
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mir Alireza Hoda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Filipits
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Balazs Dome
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology-Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hanna GG, John T, Ball DL. Controversies in the role of radiotherapy in pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:2079-2087. [PMID: 34012816 PMCID: PMC8107768 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an uncommon thoracic cancer with a relatively poor outcome, which has only seen modest improvements when compared to non-small cell lung cancer. The mainstays of treatment have been surgery and systemic therapy, with radiation reserved for palliation or as an adjunct. However, there is re-emergent interest in the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of mesothelioma, given recent technical advances in radiotherapy delivery which permit increased treatment accuracy. This overview article reviews the radiobiology of the mesothelioma and whether or not mesothelioma is an inherently radioresistant cancer and the potential impact that hypofractionation may have on different histological subtypes in mesothelioma. This overview also considers the role of radiation in palliation, as adjunct to surgical resection and as adjunct to pleural tract procedures. In particular we review the growing evidence that pleural tract or port site adjuvant radiotherapy provides no clinical benefit. This overview will also consider potential emerging therapeutic strategies such as pre-operative short course hypofractionated radiotherapy. The role of novel radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, image guided radiotherapy, proton therapy and the potential role of radiotherapy as an immune stimulating agent in combination of immunotherapy, will also be discussed. Finally, given the many unanswered questions, this review discusses some of the emerging and ongoing clinical trials of radiotherapy in the treatment of mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard G Hanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas John
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David L Ball
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kantor T, Wakeam E. Landmark Trials in the Surgical Management of Mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:2037-2047. [PMID: 33521898 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09589-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years. While surgery as a standalone treatment has fallen out of favor, the importance of multimodality treatment consisting of combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery have become more common in operable, fit patients. In this review, we discuss trials in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation that have shaped contemporary multimodality treatment of this difficult malignancy, and we touch on the new and emerging immunotherapeutic and targeted agents that may change the future treatment of this disease. We also review the multimodality treatment regimens, with particular attention to trimodality therapy and neoadjuvant hemithoracic radiation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Kantor
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elliot Wakeam
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Asciak R, George V, Rahman NM. Update on biology and management of mesothelioma. Eur Respir Rev 2021; 30:30/159/200226. [PMID: 33472960 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0226-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive, incurable cancer that is usually caused by asbestos exposure several decades before symptoms arise. Despite widespread prohibition of asbestos production and supply, its incidence continues to increase. It is heterogeneous in its presentation and behaviour, and diagnosis can be notoriously difficult. Identification of actionable gene mutations has proven challenging and current treatment options are largely ineffective, with a median survival of 10-12 months.However, the past few years have witnessed major advances in our understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of mesothelioma. This has also revealed the limitations of existing diagnostic algorithms and identified new treatment targets.Recent clinical trials have re-examined the role of surgery, provided new options for the management of associated pleural effusions and heralded the addition of targeted therapies. The increasing complexity of mesothelioma management, along with a desperate need for further research, means that a multidisciplinary team framework is essential for the delivery of contemporary mesothelioma care.This review provides a synthesised overview of the current state of knowledge and an update on the latest research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle Asciak
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK .,Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Vineeth George
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Najiib M Rahman
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cho BCJ, Donahoe L, Bradbury PA, Leighl N, Keshavjee S, Hope A, Pal P, Cabanero M, Czarnecka K, McRae K, Tsao MS, de Perrot M. Surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma after radiotherapy (SMART): final results from a single-centre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:190-197. [PMID: 33450184 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30606-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A novel approach for managing malignant pleural mesothelioma, surgery for mesothelioma after radiotherapy (SMART), consisting of a short accelerated course of high-dose, hemithoracic, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy was developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of the SMART protocol. METHODS In this single-centre, phase 2 trial, patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, with histologically proven, resectable, cT1-3N0M0 disease who had previously untreated malignant pleural mesothelioma were eligible for inclusion. Patients received 25 Gy in five daily fractions over 1 week to the entire ipsilateral hemithorax with a concomitant 5 Gy boost to high risk areas followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy within 1 week. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to patients with ypN+ disease on final pathology. The primary endpoint was feasibility, which was defined as the number of patients with 30-day perioperative treatment-related death (grade 5 events) or morbidity (grade 3 or 4 events). A key secondary endpoint was cumulative incidence of distant recurrence. The final analysis was done on an intention-to-treat basis (including all eligible patients). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00797719. FINDINGS Between Nov 1, 2008, and Oct 31, 2019, 102 patients were enrolled onto the trial and 96 eligible patients were treated with SMART on protocol and included in the analysis. Extrapleural pneumonectomy was done at a median of 5 days (range 2-12) after completing IMRT. 47 (49%) patients had 30-day perioperative grade 3-4 events and one (1%) patient died within 30 days perioperatively (grade 5 event; pneumonia). After a median follow-up of 46·8 months (IQR 13·4-61·2), the 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was 62 (63·3% [95% CI 52·3-74·4]). The most common first sites of recurrence were the contralateral chest (33 [46%] of 72 patients) and the peritoneal cavity (32 [44%]). INTERPRETATION Results from this study suggest that extrapleural pneumonectomy after radiotherapy can be done with good early and long-term results. However, minimising grade 4 events on the protocol is technically demanding and might affect survival beyond the post-operative period. FUNDING Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation Mesothelioma Research Fund.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B C John Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Laura Donahoe
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Penelope A Bradbury
- Division of Medical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Natasha Leighl
- Division of Medical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shaf Keshavjee
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Prodipto Pal
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Cabanero
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kasia Czarnecka
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karen McRae
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ming-Sound Tsao
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
SMART: logical radiotherapy and surgery beyond MARS. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:156-157. [PMID: 33450183 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30672-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
36
|
Hiltbrunner S, Britschgi C, Schuberth P, Bankel L, Nguyen-Kim T, Gulati P, Weder W, Opitz I, Lauk O, Caviezel C, Bachmann H, Tabor A, Schröder P, Knuth A, Münz C, Stahel R, Boyman O, Renner C, Petrausch U, Curioni-Fontecedro A. Local delivery of CAR T cells targeting fibroblast activation protein is safe in patients with pleural mesothelioma: first report of FAPME, a phase I clinical trial. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:120-121. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
37
|
Ghirardelli P, Franceschini D, D'Aveni A, Dominici L, Ravasio A, Marzo M, Villa E, Di Noia V, Scorsetti M, Vavassori V, Ceresoli GL. Salvage radiotherapy for oligo-progressive malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2020; 152:1-6. [PMID: 33310300 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES No standard treatment option is available for patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) progressing after upfront chemotherapy. We aimed to explore the role of focal radiotherapy (FRT) as a treatment modality for oligo-progressive MPM. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, consecutive patients pretreated with ≥1 lines of chemotherapy were included. Oligo-progressive MPM was defined as an unresectable disease with radiological progression at ≤3 sites according to a chest-abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Patients were treated with either stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT, ≥5 Gy per fraction) or hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (hypoRT, <5 Gy per fraction). Time to further systemic therapy (TFST) and local control (LC) after FRT were the primary endpoints. Biologically effective dose (BED) was calculated using three different alpha/beta models (1.5 Gy, 3 Gy and 10 Gy). RESULTS From April 2006 to March 2019, 37 patients were treated on 43 pleural lesions; 16/37 (43 %) had undergone upfront multimodality treatment (MMT) including surgery. FRT was given in 22/37 (59.5 %) after one line of chemotherapy. SBRT was delivered for 26/43 lesions (60.5 %), hypoRT for 17/43 (39.5 %). Median TFST was 6 months (95 % CI 4.9-7.1). LC at 6 months and 1 year was 84 % and 76 %, respectively. Median TFST was longer in patients treated after 1 vs >1 line of chemotherapy (9 vs 4 months, p = 0.001) and in patients pretreated with MMT (6 vs 3 months, p = 0.021). Six-month LC was better in patients treated with a BED > 100 using alpha/beta 1.5 and 3. No ≥ G3 acute or late toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION FRT was feasible in selected patients with oligo-progressive MPM, allowing delay of further systemic therapies, with no severe toxicity. FRT was more effective when performed at progression after one line of systemic therapy. Our results suggest a radio-resistant behavior of MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Ghirardelli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Via Gavazzeni 21, 24125, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro D'Aveni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Via Gavazzeni 21, 24125 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luca Dominici
- Department of Radiotherapy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ravasio
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Via Gavazzeni 21, 24125, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marco Marzo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Villa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Via Gavazzeni 21, 24125, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Noia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Via Gavazzeni 21, 24125 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittorio Vavassori
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Via Gavazzeni 21, 24125, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giovanni L Ceresoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Via Gavazzeni 21, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mummudi N, Khan A, Tibdewal A, Kumar R, Jiwnani S, Karimundackal G, Pramesh C, Agarwal JP. Trimodality treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma - Ordeal or real deal? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:876-881. [PMID: 32982593 PMCID: PMC7498860 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of MPM is complex and controversial as there is a paucity of good quality evidence. We report the toxicity and outcomes in patients who received trimodality treatment for non-metastatic MPM at our institution. METHODS & MATERIALS We reviewed the electronic medical records of surgically managed MPM patients at our institution in the last decade. Dosimetric parameters of target volume and organs at risk were documented by the treatment planning workstation. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Between January 2008 and October 2018, 21 patients underwent surgery for MPM - all but 2 patients underwent extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP); epithelioid MPM was the most common histology. All patients, except 2, received neoadjuvant Pemetrexed/platinum doublet chemotherapy. Fourteen patients received adjuvant hemithoracic RT; ten patients were treated with a conformal technique at our institute and dosimetric data was available for analysis. Average time to start RT after surgery was 51 days (range 32-82 days). All patients were treated with a conformal technique using IMRT/VMAT to a dose of 45Gy in 25 fractions. Mean overall RT duration was 35 days (range 30-42 days). Grade I/II Pneumonitis was seen in 4 patients. One patient developed grade III acute lung toxicity unrelated to RT. At a median follow up of 25 months, 8 patients had died, of whom six died due to the disease and two died in the immediate post op period. Two-year DFS and OS were 58% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSION In spite of the extensive surgery and complex hemithoracic RT, we demonstrated excellent dosimetry, toxicity profile and favorable outcomes in non-metastatic MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Mummudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
| | - Asfiya Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
| | - Anil Tibdewal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
| | - Rajiv Kumar
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
| | - Sabita Jiwnani
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
| | - George Karimundackal
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
| | - C.S. Pramesh
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
| | - Jai Prakash Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wright C, Verma V, Barsky AR, Haque W, Polamraju PV, Ludmir EB, Zaorsky NG, Lehrer EJ, Trifiletti DM, Grover S, Friedberg JS, Simone CB. Quantitation and predictors of short-term mortality following extrapleural pneumonectomy, pleurectomy/decortication, and nonoperative management for malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:6476-6493. [PMID: 33282350 PMCID: PMC7711390 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-1779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background For malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), the benefit of resection, as well as the optimal surgical technique, remain controversial. In efforts to better refine patient selection, this retrospective observational cohort study queried the National Cancer Database in an effort to quantify and evaluate predictors of 30- and 90-day mortality between extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D), as well as nonoperative management. Methods After applying selection criteria, cumulative incidences of mortality by treatment paradigm were graphed for the unadjusted and propensity-matched populations, as well as for six a priori age-based intervals (≤60, 61–65, 66–70, 71–75, 76–80, and ≥81 years). The interaction between age and hazard ratio (HR) for mortality between treatment paradigms was also graphed. Cox multivariable analysis ascertained factors independently associated with 30- and 90-day mortality. Results Of 10,723 patients, 2,125 (19.8%) received resection (n=438 EPP, n=1,687 P/D) and 8,598 (80.2%) underwent nonoperative management. The unadjusted 30/90-day mortality for EPP, P/D, and all operated cases was 3.0%/8.0%, 5.4%/14.1%, and 4.9%/12.8%, respectively. There were no short-term mortality differences between EPP and P/D following propensity-matching, within each age interval, or between age subgroups on interaction testing (P>0.05 for all). Nonoperative patients had a crude 30- and 90-day mortality of 9.9% and 24.6%, respectively. Several variables were identified as predictors of short-term mortality, notably patient age (HR 1.022, P<0.001), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index (HR 1.882, P<0.001), receipt of treatment at high-volume centers (HR 0.834, P=0.032) and induction chemotherapy (HR 1.735, P=0.025), among others. The patient (yearly) incremental increase in age conferred 2.0% (30 day) and 2.2% (90 day) increased risk of mortality (P<0.001). Conclusions Quantitative estimates of age-associated 30- and 90-day mortality of EPP and P/D should be considered when potentially operable patients are counseled regarding the risks and benefits of resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Praveen V Polamraju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph S Friedberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Arrieta O, Lozano-Ruiz F, Blake-Cerda M, Catalán R, Lara-Mejía L, Salinas MÁ, Maldonado-Magos F, Corona-Cruz JF. Locoregional control and toxicity after pleurectomy/decortication and intensity-modulated pleural radiation therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Thorac Cancer 2020; 11:3448-3455. [PMID: 33030313 PMCID: PMC7705616 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents a major challenge for oncologists. Multimodality treatment, which generally involves induction chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy have recently shown promising results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the locoregional control and toxicity of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after pleurectomy and decortication (P/D) as part of trimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced MPM. Methods We prospectively analyzed data from 20 patients with MPM treated at a single tertiary‐care institution. Initially every patient received induction chemotherapy with platinum‐based chemotherapy. After chemotherapy, patients without progression underwent P/D, and if feasible, hemi‐thoracic IMRT was administered at a planned dose of 50.4–54 Gy in 28–30 fractions and treated with 9–11 noncoplanar fields. Results A total of 15 of the 20 enrolled patients underwent P/D followed by IMRT to the hemi‐thoracic cavity. The median total radiotherapy dose was 48.7 Gy (23.4–54 Gy). Radiation pneumonitis (RP) developed in nine patients (60%), and of these, two patients (13.3%) experienced G3 or G4 RP. The estimated locoregional‐relapse‐free survival at two years was 75.9%, and the main pattern of recurrence was distant (72.7%). For the entire cohort median follow‐up was 22.7 months, median progression‐free survival was 18.9 months and median overall survival 23.6 months. Conclusions Platinum‐based chemotherapy followed by lung‐sparing surgery (P/D) and IMRT is a feasible and safe treatment modality that yields acceptable locoregional control in patients with locally advanced MPM; however, these results should be corroborated in larger studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Arrieta
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), México City, Mexico
| | - Francisco Lozano-Ruiz
- Radiation Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), México City, Mexico
| | - Monika Blake-Cerda
- Radiation Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), México City, Mexico
| | - Rodrigo Catalán
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), México City, Mexico
| | - Luis Lara-Mejía
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), México City, Mexico
| | - Miguel Ángel Salinas
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), México City, Mexico
| | | | - José F Corona-Cruz
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), México City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with radiation therapy has always been a technical challenge. For many years, radiation therapy was delivered after extrapleural pneumonectomy with acceptable results. As the utilization of pleurectomy/decortication increased, techniques, such as pleural intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have been introduced. The experience with these techniques have grown and multiple trials using IMRT, both in the setting of extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy, are being conducted to assess its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth E Rosenzweig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustav L. Levy Place - Box 1236, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cerciello F, Choi M, Sinicropi-Yao SL, Lomeo K, Amann JM, Felley-Bosco E, Stahel RA, Robinson BWS, Creaney J, Pass HI, Vitek O, Carbone DP. Verification of a Blood-Based Targeted Proteomics Signature for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:1973-1982. [PMID: 32732250 PMCID: PMC7541795 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have verified a mass spectrometry (MS)-based targeted proteomics signature for the detection of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) from the blood. METHODS A seven-peptide biomarker MPM signature by targeted proteomics in serum was identified in a previous independent study. Here, we have verified the predictive accuracy of a reduced version of that signature, now composed of six-peptide biomarkers. We have applied liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring (LC-SRM), also known as multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM), for the investigation of 402 serum samples from 213 patients with MPM and 189 cancer-free asbestos-exposed donors from the United States, Australia, and Europe. RESULTS Each of the biomarkers composing the signature was independently informative, with no apparent functional or physical relation to each other. The multiplexing possibility offered by MS proteomics allowed their integration into a single signature with a higher discriminating capacity than that of the single biomarkers alone. The strategy allowed in this way to increase their potential utility for clinical decisions. The signature discriminated patients with MPM and asbestos-exposed donors with AUC of 0.738. For early-stage MPM, AUC was 0.765. This signature was also prognostic, and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference between high- and low-risk groups with an HR of 1.659 (95% CI, 1.075-2.562; P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS Targeted proteomics allowed the development of a multianalyte signature with diagnostic and prognostic potential for MPM from the blood. IMPACT The proteomic signature represents an additional diagnostic approach for informing clinical decisions for patients at risk for MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando Cerciello
- James Thoracic Center, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| | - Meena Choi
- College of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara L Sinicropi-Yao
- James Thoracic Center, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Katie Lomeo
- James Thoracic Center, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joseph M Amann
- James Thoracic Center, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Emanuela Felley-Bosco
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Rolf A Stahel
- Department of Oncology, Center of Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Bruce W S Robinson
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Disease, University of Western Australia, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | - Jenette Creaney
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Disease, University of Western Australia, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | - Harvey I Pass
- New York University, Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Olga Vitek
- College of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David P Carbone
- James Thoracic Center, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lam SK, Yan S, Xu S, Ho JCM. Targeting polyamine as a novel therapy in xenograft models of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2020; 148:138-148. [PMID: 32911426 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inhalation of asbestos fibers is the key culprit in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Although the import and use of asbestos have been restricted, the incidence of MPM continues to increase globally due to the prolonged lag time in malignant transformation. The development of a novel adjuvant therapy for the minority of individuals with resectable early-stage disease and effective treatment for those with unresectable MPM are urgently needed. Our preliminary data revealed that ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) is highly expressed in MPM xenografts. This study aimed to determine the treatment effects of α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), a specific ODC inhibitor, in MPM xenografts. RESULTS In an "extended adjuvant DFMO treatment" setting, nude mice were fed with DFMO for 7 days prior to inoculation of 200,000 cells. DFMO suppressed tumor growth and increased median survival in both xenografts. In H226 xenograft, 43 % of treated mice had not reached the humane endpoint by day 132, mimicking long-term survival. DFMO decreased spermidine, increased nitrotyrosine and activated apoptosis in both xenografts. Furthermore, increase in nitrosocysteine, intratumoral IL-6, keratinocyte chemoattractant and TNFα, DNA lesion and inhibition of the Akt/mTOR pathway were induced by DFMO in H226 xenograft. In "DFMO treatment" setting, 107 cells were inoculated into nude mice and DFMO treatment commenced when tumor size reached ∼50-100 mm3. DFMO also suppressed tumor growth by similar mechanisms. Supplementation with spermidine reversed the therapeutic effect of DFMO. DFMO increased actin nitration at tyrosine 53 and inhibited actin polymerization. CONCLUSION DFMO is preclinically effective in treating MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sze-Kwan Lam
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Sheng Yan
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shi Xu
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - James Chung-Man Ho
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
He J, Xu S, Pan H, Li S, He J. Does size matter? -a population-based analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020; 9:1041-1052. [PMID: 32953483 PMCID: PMC7481612 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-19-488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background The 8th edition staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has been proposed. The size of tumor is not taken into consideration. We intend to elucidate the prognostic value of the size of MPM and evaluate the current staging system via the data of SEER database. Methods All cases of primary MPM were identified and extracted from the SEER database during the period of 2004–2016. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) which were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox regression were utilized to identify the prognostic factors. Results A total of 2,138 patients were included in the primary cohort. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of MPM were 39.4%, 11.8% and 3.8%. Older, male and advanced stage patients accounted for larger proportion of the cohort. Besides tumor extension, lymph node involvement and metastatic status, tumor size, pathological type and differentiation grade were significant prognostic factors. In the stratified analysis of tumor extension, size is a significant prognostic factor in T2 patients and indicates inferior survival outcomes. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiation can increase both OS and CSS in MPM patients. Triple combination treatments showed a superiority to other treatments. Conclusions Tumor size matters in the prognosis of MPM especially in the early stage of MPM patients. The adjusted TNM staging system incorporating tumor size has better accuracy than the 8th edition IMIG system. However, some stages had not been fully identified. More cases of early stages are warranted for essential revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxi He
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
| | - Songhui Xu
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hui Pan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuben Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianxing He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gelzinis TA. The 2019 ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO Guidelines on the Management of Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 35:378-388. [PMID: 32798169 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare aggressive cancer, with insidious growth, and is associated with poor outcomes that have not improved over the years. A task force made up of members of the European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) societies, who are experts in the field of malignant mesothelioma, reviewed the literature from 2009 to 2018 to update the 2009 guidelines concerning epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment, including surgical, radiotherapy, and medical management, as well as palliative care to provide the best evidence-based recommendations for this patient population.
Collapse
|
46
|
Pavic M, Bogowicz M, Kraft J, Vuong D, Mayinger M, Kroeze SGC, Friess M, Frauenfelder T, Andratschke N, Huellner M, Weder W, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S, Opitz I. FDG PET versus CT radiomics to predict outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:81. [PMID: 32661672 PMCID: PMC7359199 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00669-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Careful selection of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients for curative treatment is of highest importance, as the multimodal treatment regimen is challenging for patients and harbors a high risk of substantial toxicity. Radiomics-a quantitative method for image analysis-has shown its prognostic ability in different tumor entities and could therefore play an important role in optimizing patient selection for radical cancer treatment. So far, radiomics as a prognostic tool in MPM was not investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is based on 72 MPM patients treated with surgery in a curative intent at our institution between 2009 and 2017. Pre-treatment Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET and CT scans were used for radiomics outcome modeling. After extraction of 1404 CT and 1410 FDG PET features from each image, a preselection by principal component analysis was performed to include only robust, non-redundant features for the cox regression to predict the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS). Results were validated on a separate cohort. Additionally, SUVmax and SUVmean, and volume were tested for their prognostic ability for PFS and OS. RESULTS For the PFS a concordance index (c-index) of 0.67 (95% CI 0.52-0.82) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.78) for the training cohort (n = 36) and internal validation cohort (n = 36), respectively, were obtained for the PET radiomics model. The PFS advantage of the low-risk group translated also into an OS advantage. On CT images, no radiomics model could be trained. SUV max and SUV mean were also not prognostic in terms of PFS and OS. CONCLUSION We were able to build a successful FDG PET radiomics model for the prediction of PFS in MPM. Radiomics could serve as a tool to aid clinical decision support systems for treatment of MPM in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - M Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D Vuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Friess
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - T Frauenfelder
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Huellner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - W Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - I Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Scherpereel A, Opitz I, Berghmans T, Psallidas I, Glatzer M, Rigau D, Astoul P, Bölükbas S, Boyd J, Coolen J, De Bondt C, De Ruysscher D, Durieux V, Faivre-Finn C, Fennell D, Galateau-Salle F, Greillier L, Hoda MA, Klepetko W, Lacourt A, McElnay P, Maskell NA, Mutti L, Pairon JC, Van Schil P, van Meerbeeck JP, Waller D, Weder W, Cardillo G, Putora PM. ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur Respir J 2020; 55:13993003.00953-2019. [PMID: 32451346 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00953-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) task force brought together experts to update previous 2009 ERS/ESTS guidelines on management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a rare cancer with globally poor outcome, after a systematic review of the 2009-2018 literature. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by this multidisciplinary group of experts. Diagnosis: pleural biopsies remain the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis, usually obtained by thoracoscopy but occasionally via image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cases of pleural symphysis or poor performance status. Pathology: standard staining procedures are insufficient in ∼10% of cases, justifying the use of specific markers, including BAP-1 and CDKN2A (p16) for the separation of atypical mesothelial proliferation from MPM. Staging: in the absence of a uniform, robust and validated staging system, we advise using the most recent 2016 8th TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) classification, with an algorithm for pre-therapeutic assessment. Monitoring: patient's performance status, histological subtype and tumour volume are the main prognostic factors of clinical importance in routine MPM management. Other potential parameters should be recorded at baseline and reported in clinical trials. Treatment: (chemo)therapy has limited efficacy in MPM patients and only selected patients are candidates for radical surgery. New promising targeted therapies, immunotherapies and strategies have been reviewed. Because of limited data on the best combination treatment, we emphasise that patients who are considered candidates for a multimodal approach, including radical surgery, should be treated as part of clinical trials in MPM-dedicated centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Scherpereel
- Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1189, OncoThAI, Lille, France .,French National Network of Clinical Expert Centers for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Management (Mesoclin), Lille, France
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Dept of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Ioannis Psallidas
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Markus Glatzer
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Astoul
- Dept of Thoracic Oncology, Pleural Diseases and Interventional Pulmonology, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Servet Bölükbas
- Dept of Thoracic Surgery, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Johan Coolen
- Dept of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte De Bondt
- Dept of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Dept of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Valerie Durieux
- Bibliothèque des Sciences de la Santé, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dean Fennell
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester and University of Leicester Hospitals NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Francoise Galateau-Salle
- National Reference Center for Pleural Malignant Mesothelioma and Rare Peritoneal Tumors MESOPATH, Dept of Biopathology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Greillier
- Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Inserm UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, Dept of Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations, Marseille, France
| | - Mir Ali Hoda
- Dept of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Walter Klepetko
- Dept of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aude Lacourt
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, team EPICENE, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Luciano Mutti
- Teaching Hosp. Vercelli/Gruppo Italiano Mesotelioma, Italy
| | - Jean-Claude Pairon
- INSERM U955, Equipe 4, Université Paris-Est Créteil, and Service de Pathologies professionnelles et de l'Environnement, Institut Santé-Travail Paris-Est, CHI Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Paul Van Schil
- Dept Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jan P van Meerbeeck
- Dept of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - David Waller
- Barts Thorax Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Walter Weder
- Dept of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Cardillo
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Dept of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.,Dept of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Galateau Salle F, Le Stang N, Tirode F, Courtiol P, Nicholson AG, Tsao MS, Tazelaar HD, Churg A, Dacic S, Roggli V, Pissaloux D, Maussion C, Moarii M, Beasley MB, Begueret H, Chapel DB, Copin MC, Gibbs AR, Klebe S, Lantuejoul S, Nabeshima K, Vignaud JM, Attanoos R, Brcic L, Capron F, Chirieac LR, Damiola F, Sequeiros R, Cazes A, Damotte D, Foulet A, Giusiano-Courcambeck S, Hiroshima K, Hofman V, Husain AN, Kerr K, Marchevsky A, Paindavoine S, Picquenot JM, Rouquette I, Sagan C, Sauter J, Thivolet F, Brevet M, Rouvier P, Travis WD, Planchard G, Weynand B, Clozel T, Wainrib G, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Pairon JC, Rusch V, Girard N. Comprehensive Molecular and Pathologic Evaluation of Transitional Mesothelioma Assisted by Deep Learning Approach: A Multi-Institutional Study of the International Mesothelioma Panel from the MESOPATH Reference Center. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15:1037-1053. [PMID: 32165206 PMCID: PMC8864581 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Histologic subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma are a major prognostic indicator and decision denominator for all therapeutic strategies. In an ambiguous case, a rare transitional mesothelioma (TM) pattern may be diagnosed by pathologists either as epithelioid mesothelioma (EM), biphasic mesothelioma (BM), or sarcomatoid mesothelioma (SM). This study aimed to better characterize the TM subtype from a histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular standpoint. Deep learning of pathologic slides was applied to this cohort. METHODS A random selection of 49 representative digitalized sections from surgical biopsies of TM was reviewed by 16 panelists. We evaluated BAP1 expression and CDKN2A (p16) homozygous deletion. We conducted a comprehensive, integrated, transcriptomic analysis. An unsupervised deep learning algorithm was trained to classify tumors. RESULTS The 16 panelists recorded 784 diagnoses on the 49 cases. Even though a Kappa value of 0.42 is moderate, the presence of a TM component was diagnosed in 51%. In 49% of the histological evaluation, the reviewers classified the lesion as EM in 53%, SM in 33%, or BM in 14%. Median survival was 6.7 months. Loss of BAP1 observed in 44% was less frequent in TM than in EM and BM. p16 homozygous deletion was higher in TM (73%), followed by BM (63%) and SM (46%). RNA sequencing unsupervised clustering analysis revealed that TM grouped together and were closer to SM than to EM. Deep learning analysis achieved 94% accuracy for TM identification. CONCLUSION These results revealed that the TM pattern should be classified as non-EM or at minimum as a subgroup of the SM type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nolwenn Le Stang
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Franck Tirode
- University Claude Bernard Lyon, INSERM, CNRS, Research Cancer Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Andrew G Nicholson
- Department of Histopathology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ming-Sound Tsao
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Churg
- Columbia University and Department of Pathology Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sanja Dacic
- FISH and Developmental Laboratory at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Victor Roggli
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel Pissaloux
- Department of BioPathology-FISH Laboratory, Centre Leon Berard Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Mary Beth Beasley
- Mount-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York
| | - Hugues Begueret
- CHU Bordeaux, Haut Leveque Hospital, Department of Pathology, Bordeaux, France
| | - David B Chapel
- University of Chicago, Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Allen R Gibbs
- University of Wales, Department of Cellular Pathology, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Sonja Klebe
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sylvie Lantuejoul
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Kazuki Nabeshima
- Department of Pathology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine and Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Richard Attanoos
- University of Wales, Department of Cellular Pathology, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Francesca Damiola
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Ruth Sequeiros
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Aurélie Cazes
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Bichat Department of Pathology, University Paris VII, Paris, France
| | - Diane Damotte
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Cochin-Hotel Dieu, Department of Pathology, Paris, France
| | - Armelle Foulet
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CH Le Mans, Department of Pathology, Pays de la Loire, France
| | - Sophie Giusiano-Courcambeck
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Hospital Nord, Marseille, University Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Kenzo Hiroshima
- Tokyo Women's Medical University, Department of Pathology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Veronique Hofman
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; CHU Nice, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology (LPCE), Nice, France
| | - Aliya N Husain
- University of Chicago, Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Keith Kerr
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Department of Pathology, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Alberto Marchevsky
- Scotland Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Los Angeles, California
| | - Severine Paindavoine
- University Claude Bernard Lyon, INSERM, CNRS, Research Cancer Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Michel Picquenot
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Department of Pathology, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France
| | - Isabelle Rouquette
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; IUCT-Oncopôle, Department of Pathology, Toulouse, France
| | - Christine Sagan
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Nantes, INSERM, Thorax Institute, Hôpital Laënnec CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jennifer Sauter
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York
| | - Francoise Thivolet
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Hospices Civils, East Hospital Group, Department of Pathology, Lyon, France
| | - Marie Brevet
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Hospices Civils, East Hospital Group, Department of Pathology, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Rouvier
- CHU Pitié Salpétrière Paris, Department of Pathology, Paris, France
| | - William D Travis
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York
| | - Gaetane Planchard
- MESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Department of Pathology, CHU Caen, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | - Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta
- Genetic Cancer Susceptibility Group International Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Claude Pairon
- INSERM, UPEC, Faculty of Medicine and CHI Creteil, Professional Pathologies and Environment Department, IST-PE, Creteil, France
| | - Valerie Rusch
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Nicolas Girard
- Department of Thoracic Oncology Institute Curie Paris, France and European Reference Network EURACAN, Centre Leon Berard, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Thompson AB, Quinn TJ, Siddiqui ZA, Almahariq MF, Grills IS, Stevens CW. Addition of radiotherapy to surgery and chemotherapy improves survival in localized malignant pleural mesothelioma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study. Lung Cancer 2020; 146:120-126. [PMID: 32531717 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a devastating disease with poor survival outcomes for most patients. Optimizing therapeutic approaches is thus vital, but has been hampered by a dearth of randomized trials to guide decision making. We used a population-level database to evaluate the impact of radiotherapy as a component of trimodality therapy on overall survival (OS) in MPM. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the SEER Radiation/Chemotherapy database for patients with MPM who received surgery and chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy. A propensity score-matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed. Weight-adjusted univariate KM analysis was performed and doubly robust, IPTW-adjusted multivariable cox proportional hazards regression modeling was also performed to quantify the effect of radiotherapy on OS in trimodality therapy for MPM. RESULTS 1015 patients were identified. 678 patients received surgery and chemotherapy, and 337 patients received trimodality therapy. For patients with localized disease, OS was significantly improved with trimodality therapy (HR 0.56, CI 0.4 - 0.8, p = 0.001), which persisted with IPTW adjustment (HR 0.65, CI 0.49 - 0.95, p = 0.0248). No significant benefit was seen for patients with regional or distant disease. On multivariate analysis, positive predictors of survival after IPTW adjustment were female sex, diagnosis after 2005, and left-sided disease. CONCLUSIONS These findings support a significant benefit to OS by incorporating radiotherapy as a component of trimodality therapy for patients with localized MPM compared to only surgery and chemotherapy. It does not provide a significant overall survival benefit for patients with regional or metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Thompson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Thomas J Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Zaid A Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Muayad F Almahariq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Craig W Stevens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zeng J, Badiyan SN, Garces YI, Wong T, Zhang X, Simone CB, Chang JY, Knopf AC, Mori S, Iwata H, Meijers A, Li H, Bues M, Liu W, Schild SE, Rengan R. Consensus Statement on Proton Therapy in Mesothelioma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 11:119-133. [PMID: 32461036 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy for mesothelioma remains challenging, as normal tissue toxicity limits the amount of radiation that can be safely delivered to the pleural surfaces, especially radiation dose to the contralateral lung. The physical properties of proton therapy result in better sparing of normal tissues when treating the pleura, both in the postpneumonectomy setting and the lung-intact setting. Compared with photon radiation, there are dramatic reductions in dose to the contralateral lung, heart, liver, kidneys, and stomach. However, the tissue heterogeneity in the thorax, organ motion, and potential for changing anatomy during the treatment course all present challenges to optimal irradiation with protons. METHODS The clinical data underlying proton therapy in mesothelioma are reviewed here, including indications, advantages, and limitations. RESULTS The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Thoracic Subcommittee task group provides specific guidelines for the use of proton therapy for mesothelioma. CONCLUSIONS This consensus report can be used to guide clinical practice, insurance approval, and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Shahed N Badiyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Yolanda I Garces
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tony Wong
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Antje C Knopf
- Division of Radiotherapy, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Shinichiro Mori
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Division of Radiotherapy, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | | |
Collapse
|