Maintenance infusion rate of oxytocin after initial 1-IU bolus for elective Cesarean delivery: a dose-finding study

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to determine the minimum effective dose of oxytocin maintenance infusion required to maintain adequate uterine tone in 90% of patients (ED90) after administration of the initial bolus at elective Cesarean delivery (CD) under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, double-blind dose-finding study with biased coin up-down design. Immediately after delivery, a 1-IU oxytocin bolus was administered, followed by a maintenance infusion. The obstetrician assessed the uterine tone by palpation as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. In case of unsatisfactory response, the dose for the next patient was increased by 2 IU·hr-1. For satisfactory response, the dose for the next patient was either decreased by 2 IU·hr-1 with a probability of 1/9, or remained unchanged. The primary outcome was a satisfactory uterine tone from five minutes after delivery until discharge from postanesthesia care unit. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, need for additional uterotonics, and side effects.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 40 patients. The ED90 of oxytocin maintenance infusion was 4.5 IU·hr-1 (95% confidence interval, 3.3 to 5.5) based on the isotonic regression estimator. The median [interquartile range] blood loss was 861 [553-1,181] mL; 18% received additional uterotonics, and 38% developed hypotension post delivery.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this dose-finding study, we recommend a maintenance infusion rate of 4.5 IU·hr-1 following an oxytocin bolus of 1 IU for adequate uterine tone in pregnant patients undergoing elective CDs. This infusion rate is four-fold lower than that required without an initial bolus.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04946006 ); first submitted 25 June 2021.

Second-Line Uterotonics for Uterine Atony: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative efficacy of two of the most commonly used second-line uterotonics-methylergonovine maleate and carboprost tromethamine.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind randomized trial at two large academic perinatal centers in patients undergoing nonemergency cesarean delivery with uterine atony refractory to oxytocin, as diagnosed by the operating obstetrician. The intervention included administration of a single dose of intramuscular methylergonovine or carboprost intraoperatively at diagnosis. The primary outcome, uterine tone on a 0-10 numeric rating scale 10 minutes after study drug administration, was rated by operating obstetricians blinded to the drug administered. Secondary outcomes included uterine tone score at 5 minutes, administration of additional uterotonic agents, other interventions for uterine atony or hemorrhage, quantitative blood loss, urine output, postpartum change in serum hematocrit, transfusion, length of hospital stay, adverse drug or transfusion reactions, and postpartum hemorrhage complications. A sample size of 50 participants per group was planned to detect a 1-point difference (with estimated within-group SD of 1.5) in the mean primary outcome with 80% power at a two-sided α level of 0.05 while accounting for potential protocol violations.

RESULTS

A total of 1,040 participants were enrolled, with 100 randomized to receive one of the study interventions. Mean±SD 10-minute uterine tone scores were 7.3±1.7 after methylergonovine and 7.6±2.1 after carboprost, with an adjusted difference in means of -0.1 (95% CI, -0.8 to 0.6, P=.76). Additional second-line uterotonics were required in 30.0% of the methylergonovine arm and 34.0% in the carboprost arm (adjusted odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI, 0.27-1.89, P=.505), and geometric mean quantitative blood loss was 756 mL (95% CI, 636-898) and 708 mL (95% CI, 619-810) (adjusted ratio of geometric means 1.06, 95% CI, 0.86-1.31, P=.588), respectively. No differences were detected in the occurrence of other interventions for uterine atony or postpartum hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

No difference was detected in uterine tone scores 10 minutes after administration of either methylergonovine or carboprost for refractory uterine atony, indicating that either agent is acceptable.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03584854.

Oxytocin infusion dose-response to maintain uterine tone in obese elective cesarean patients: a randomized controlled trial

Background

For cesarean delivery (CD), the 90% effective dosage (ED90) of oxytocin for a first bolus has been established. It is not yet known how much oxytocin to inject into obese women undergoing elective discectomy to keep their uterine tone (UT) appropriate. We hypothesized that patients who are overweight need a greater dose of oxytocin infusion; thus, we aimed to determine how the dose-response curve for oxytocin infusion changes following an initial 1 international unit (IU) bolus in obese women undergoing elective CD.

Methods

One hundred parturients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 were randomly assigned to receive an infusion rate of 14, 18, 22, or 26 IU/h of oxytocin. When the uterine palpation is as hard as touching the forehead or tip of the nose, it is considered sufficient UT according to the criteria used by obstetricians. The median effective dose (ED50) and ED90 values were determined using probit analysis.

Results

We found the ED50 and ED90 values for the infusion dose of oxytocin were around 11.0 IU/h and 19.1 IU/h, respectively. Each group had a different number of parturients who needed rescued oxytocin: 14 IU/h for six, 18 IU/h for three, one for 22 IU/h, and none for 26 IU/h. The correlation between the frequency of rescued oxytocin administration and the amount of oxytocin infusion needed to avoid uterine atony was statistically significant (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

The present research showed that the most effective dosage of oxytocin infusion for obese parturients undergoing elective CD is 19.1 IU/h, following an initial loading dose of 1 IU. Patients with obesity should receive a greater dosage of prophylactic oxytocin, and further studies comparing patients with and without obesity (with higher BMI) are required.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=159951, identifier ChiCTR2200059582.

Oxytocin at Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Dose-Finding Study in Pregnant People With Twin Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Multiple pregnancy is associated with higher risk of uterine atony, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), blood transfusion, hysterectomy, and death. The optimal dose of oxytocin at cesarean delivery in people with twin pregnancy is unknown. We sought to determine the effective bolus dose of oxytocin required to initiate adequate uterine tone in 90% of people (ED90) with twin pregnancy undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Our hypothesis was that the dose of oxytocin would be higher than 0.5 international units (IU) but lower than 5 IU.

METHODS

A double-blind dose-finding study using the biased coin up-down method was undertaken in people with twin pregnancy ≥36 weeks gestational age undergoing elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia. Those with additional risk factors for PPH, apart from twin pregnancy, were excluded. Oxytocin was administered as an intravenous bolus over 1 minute on delivery of the second fetus. The first patient received 0.5 IU, and subsequent oxytocin doses were administered according to a sequential allocation scheme. The actual doses administered were 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 IU of oxytocin. The primary outcome was the response defined as the satisfactory uterine tone at 2 minutes after completion of administration of the oxytocin bolus, as assessed by the operating obstetrician. Secondary outcomes included need for rescue uterotonic drugs, adverse effects, and estimated blood loss. The ED90 was estimated using the Dixon-Mood and the isotonic regression methods.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included in study. The estimated ED90 of oxytocin was 4.38 IU (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.68-4.86 IU) and 3.41 IU (95% CI, 2.83-3.98 IU) by the isotonic regression and Dixon-Mood methods, respectively. Seven patients had inadequate tone at the 2-minute evaluation point and required rescue uterotonic drugs. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) estimated blood loss was 1031 mL (732-1462 mL) calculated by the change in 24-hour hematocrit. Incidence of hypotension after oxytocin administration was 27%, nausea 30%, and vomiting 17%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that people with twin pregnancy require a much higher dose of oxytocin than those with singleton pregnancies. We recommended people with twin pregnancies should receive an initial 5 IU bolus over at least 1 minute when undergoing elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

Oxytocin infusion for maintenance of uterine tone under prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in cesarean delivery: a prospective randomised double-blinded dose-finding study

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have shown that, when administered as an intravenous bolus to prevent uterine atony, prophylactic phenylephrine infusion increased the dose requirement of oxytocin and second-line uterotonics. For the prevention of uterine atony, oxytocin should be delivered by continuous infusion. Here, we aimed to determine the ED50 and ED90 parameters (the effective doses for 50 and 90% patients without uterine atony) of oxytocin for co-infusion with prophylactic phenylephrine during cesarean delivery.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized double-blinded dose-finding study, one hundred patients were divided into four groups to receive 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10 IU/h oxytocin infusion, after the umbilical cord was clamped during the study period. The uterine tone was evaluated and defined as either adequate or inadequate. Probit regression analysis was applied to calculate the ED50 and ED90 of oxytocin infusion. Uterine tone, the percentage of patients who needed additional oxytocin bolus, second-line uterotonics, side effects, estimated blood loss, and neonatal outcomes were monitored.

RESULTS

The estimated ED50 and ED90 values of the oxytocin infusion doses for the prevention of uterine atony were 1.9 IU/h (95% CI -4.6-3.8) IU/h and 9.3 IU/h (95% CI 7.3-16.2) IU/h, respectively. Across groups, there was a significant linear trend between the infusion dose and the percentage of patients who required additional oxytocin (p-value = 0.002). No differences were observed in the incidence of side effects and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions of this study, the ED90 of oxytocin infusion for the prevention of uterine atony was 9.3 IU/h, which is higher than the current recommendation. This finding is helpful for clinical practice, because of the routine use of phenylephrine in cesarean delivery. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate initial bolus of oxytocin after neonatal delivery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (register no. ChiCTR2200059556 ).

Effect of an oxytocin protocol on secondary uterotonic use in patients undergoing Cesarean delivery

PURPOSE

Protocol-driven oxytocin regimens can reduce oxytocin administration compared with a nonprotocol free-flow continuous infusion. Our aim was to compare secondary uterotonic use between a modified "rule of threes" oxytocin protocol and a free-flow continuous oxytocin infusion after Cesarean delivery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective before-and-after study to compare patients who underwent Cesarean delivery between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013 (preprotocol) with patients who underwent Cesarean delivery between 1 January 2015 and 31 August 2017 (postprotocol). The preprotocol group received free-flow oxytocin administration and the postprotocol group received oxytocin according to a modified rule of threes algorithm. The primary outcome was secondary uterotonic use and the secondary outcomes included blood transfusion, hemoglobin value < 8 g·dL-1, and estimated blood loss.

RESULTS

In total, 4,010 Cesarean deliveries were performed in 3,637 patients (2,262 preprotocol and 1,748 postprotocol). The odds of receiving secondary uterotonic drugs were increased in the postprotocol group (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.70; P = 0.02). Patients in the postprotocol group were less likely to receive a blood transfusion. Nevertheless, the two groups were similar for the composite end point of transfusion or hemoglobin < 8 g·dL-1 (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.11; P = 0.25). The odds of an estimated blood loss greater than 1,000 mL were reduced in the postprotocol group (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the modified rule of threes oxytocin protocol group were more likely to receive a secondary uterotonic than those in the preprotocol group. Estimated blood loss and transfusion outcomes were similar.

Hemodynamic Effects of Oxytocin and Carbetocin During Elective Cesarean Section in Preeclamptic Patients Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study

Background

Oxytocin and carbetocin are uterotonic medications that are used to decrease postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, there are not enough clinical data about the hemodynamic side effects of carbetocin.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare carbetocin and oxytocin hemodynamic effects in preeclamptic patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

Methods

In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, intravenous oxytocin or carbetocin was administered to 80 women (40 per group). The hemodynamic effects, such as blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen (O₂) saturation, were measured before the operation and after 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes of the administration of both drugs. Intragroup and intergroup comparisons were conducted during statistical analysis.

Results

Based on the intragroup comparison, there was a significant increase in HR and a reduction in BP from baseline to all intervals after the administration of both interventions. Moreover, based on the intergroup comparison, there was a significantly more increase in HR and a decline in BP and O₂ saturation in the oxytocin group than in the carbetocin group. There were three and seven cases that required another dose of carbetocin and oxytocin, respectively. Moreover, one case developed PPH in the carbetocin group; nevertheless, two cases developed PPH in the oxytocin group.

Conclusions

The minimal effect of carbetocin on patients' hemodynamics suggests extending the use of this drug instead of oxytocin as a uterotonic drug in patients with preeclampsia, hemorrhagic risk factors, and/or hypertension.

Intravenous oxytocin regimens in patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of cluster-based groups

Information on evaluations of different oxytocin regimens used to prevent post-partum hemorrhage during cesarean delivery is scarce, and there is a lack of statistically pooled results for comparative doses. In this review, we aimed to analyze the effectiveness of different oxytocin regimens used and rank them accordingly. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the incidence of additional uterotonic (AUT) use or amount of blood loss during cesarean delivery, where different oxytocin regimens were compared. Cluster analysis was used to define different clusters of oxytocin therapy based on the identified variable regimens. During the frequentist network meta-analysis, all clusters were compared to bolus clusters of dose range 3-5 IU. Data from 33 RCTs (6741 patients) to 26 RCTs (5422 patients) were assessed for AUT use and blood loss, respectively. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in the use of AUTs or blood loss was recorded for bolus-infusion combination regimens. The network meta-analysis found that combined bolus-infusion regimens of (i) 3-5 IU and 0.25-1 IU/min or (ii) 3-5 IU and < 0.25 IU/min had statistically significant results for lowest consumption of AUTs (Ranks 1 and 2, respectively); whereas with the latter's use, the lowest blood loss (Rank 2) was observed. In contrast, the dose range, > 5 IU regimen was associated with higher side effects (lowest rank). During cesarean delivery, a significant reduction in the use of AUTs or blood loss (Rank 2) was recorded for bolus-infusion combination regimens. High doses did not have enough evidence to draw meaningful conclusions.

Carbetocin vs. oxytocin at elective caesarean delivery: a double-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of low- and high-dose regimens

Carbetocin or oxytocin are given routinely as first-line uterotonic drugs following delivery of the neonate during caesarean delivery to prevent postpartum haemorrhage. Low doses may be as effective as high doses with a potential reduction in adverse effects. In this double-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, we assigned low-risk patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia to one of four groups: carbetocin 20 μg; carbetocin 100 μg; oxytocin 0.5 IU bolus + infusion; and oxytocin 5 IU bolus + infusion. The study drug was given intravenously after delivery of the neonate. Uterine tone was assessed by the obstetrician 2, 5 and 10 minutes after study drug administration according to an 11-point verbal numerical rating scale (0 = atonic, 10 = excellent tone). The primary outcome measure was uterine tone 2 min after study drug administration. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin was 1.2 points on the 11-point scale. Secondary outcomes included uterine tone after 5 and 10 minutes, use of additional uterotonics, blood loss and adverse effects. Data were available for 277 patients. Carbetocin 20 μg resulting in uterine tone of (median (IQR [range])) 8 (7-8 [1-10]) was non-inferior to carbetocin 100 μg with tone 8 (7-9 [3-10]), median (95%CI) difference 0 (-0.44-0.44). Similarly, oxytocin 0.5 IU with tone 7 (6-8 [3-10]) was non-inferior to oxytocin 5 IU with tone 8 (6-8 [2-10]), median (95%CI) difference 1 (0.11-1.89). Carbetocin 20 μg was also non-inferior to oxytocin 5 IU, and oxytocin 0.5 IU was non-inferior to carbetocin 100 μg. Uterine tone after 5 and 10 minutes, use of additional uterotonics, blood loss and adverse effects were similar in all groups.

Prophylactic Phenylephrine Increases the Dose Requirement of Oxytocin to Treat Uterine Atony During Cesarean Delivery: A Double-Blinded, Single-Center, Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Trial

Purpose: Studies involving mouse models and human uterine smooth muscle cells have shown that phenylephrine inhibits uterine contractions in non-pregnant mice and human in vitro cell via cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling. However, there has been no limited exploration to date of the effect of phenylephrine on uterine contractions in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare the dose requirement of oxytocin with or without the infusion of prophylactic phenylephrine to prevent post spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.

Methods: This was a double-blinded, single-center, randomized, control study. One hundred and sixty pregnant patients provided informed consent and were randomly allocated to the phenylephrine (phenylephrine infusion) and control (saline infusion) groups. Patients randomized to the phenylephrine group received an intravenous prophylactic phenylephrine infusion at a fixed rate of 0.5 μg/kg/min. The control group received a saline placebo at the same rate and used the same apparatus for delivery. After neonatal delivery and clamping of the umbilical cord, patients received a standard institutional oxytocin protocol. The primary outcome measure was the total dose of oxytocin administered during CD. Secondary outcomes including the proportion (%) of patients requiring a secondary uterotonic agent and estimated blood loss (EBL) in the first 24 h after surgery.

Results: The median oxytocin dose administered was significantly higher in the phenylephrine group than in the control group [6.9 ± 2.5 international standardized units (IU) vs. 5.4 ± 2.4 IU, p = 0.0004]. The number of patients that required a secondary uterotonic agent was significantly higher in the phenylephrine group than in the control group (24.2% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.034). The EBL in the first 24-h postoperatively was similar between the two groups (467 ± 47 ml vs. 392 ± 38 ml; p = 0.22).

Conclusions: Prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine used to prevent post-spinal hypotension during CD was associated with a higher dose of oxytocin. This has important clinical implications, as the suboptimal use of oxytocin is associated with an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage and increased maternal morbidity and mortality. Further studies are now needed to confirm these findings.

The Intraoperative Median Effective Dose of Oxytocin for Preventing Uterine Atony in Parturients with a Prior History of Caesarean Delivery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

While oxytocin is commonly used for the prevention of uterine atony, its pharmacology may be affected by a prior history of caesarean delivery. The objective of this study was to determine the 50% effective dose (ED₅₀) of bolus oxytocin after caesarean delivery in parturients with and without prior caesarean delivery.

METHODS

This was a parallel-group, double-blind, dose-response study using Dixon's up-and-down sequential allocation method to estimate the ED₅₀ of bolus-administered oxytocin in parturients having caesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSE). Twenty-seven parturients with a history of prior caesarean delivery (With-PCD group) and 26 parturients with no such history (Without-PCD group) were enrolled. Oxytocin was administered as an intravenous bolus at a starting dose of 0.5 units, which was then increased or decreased by 0.25 units at a time. Uterine tone was assessed by the obstetrician as either 'adequate' or 'inadequate' 3 min after delivery of the fetus. Adverse effects, administration of additional uterotonic agents, and estimated blood loss were recorded.

RESULTS

The ED₅₀ of oxytocin was greater in the With-PCD group than in the Without-PCD group (0.95 units [95% CI 0.82-1.08] vs. 0.55 units [95% CI 0.38-0.73], P < 0.001). The overall incidence of adverse effects was higher in the With-PCD group than in the Without-PCD group (33.3% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The initial bolus dose of oxytocin needed to prevent uterine atony was higher in parturients with prior caesarean delivery than in parturients without prior caesarean delivery. Uterine scarring may contribute to the increased oxytocin requirements of the former group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900023474; investigator: Wei CN; date of registration: 30 May 2019.

Maternal outcomes before and after new oxytocin protocol at cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to describe the incidence of post-partum hemorrhage at cesarean delivery before and after implementation of a new high dose oxytocin protocol at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital.

METHODS

This was a cross sectional retrospective record review 3 months before and 3 months after the implementation of a high dose oxytocin protocol. The study included all women that underwent cesarean delivery between 1 November 2016 and 30 April 2017 with a gestation of >24 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 4604 Cesarean deliveries were performed during the study period, 2162 before the implementation of the new protocol and 2442 after. The incidence of post-partum hemorrhage was 4.8% (n = 91) in the Before group and 3.9% (n = 89) in the After group (P = 0.17). There was a 17.9% change in incidence of postpartum hemorrhage between the groups (P = 0.17). There was no significant difference in uterine atony between the Before and After groups (21.8% and 30.1%, P = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at cesarean delivery after the implementation of a high dose oxytocin protocol.

Intravenous oxytocin dosing regimens for postpartum hemorrhage prevention following cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the available evidence on intravenous oxytocin dosing regimens for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage following cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Global Index Medicus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for eligible studies published until February 2020.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included any randomized or nonrandomized study published in peer-reviewed journals that compared at least 2 different dosing regimens of intravenous oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage prevention in women undergoing cesarean delivery.

METHODS

Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was incidence of postpartum hemorrhage ≥1000 mL. Other review outcomes included use of additional uterotonics, blood loss, and adverse maternal events. Data were analyzed according to the type of intravenous administration (bolus only, infusion only, or bolus plus infusion) and total oxytocin dose. A meta-analysis was performed on randomized trials and the results were reported as risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scale was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Findings from dose-finding trials and nonrandomized studies were reported narratively.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies (7333 women) met our inclusion criteria and included 30 randomized trials and 5 nonrandomized studies. There were limited data available from the trials for most outcomes, and the results were not conclusive. Compared with bolus plus infusion regimens, bolus only regimens probably result in slightly higher mean blood loss (mean difference, 52 mL; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-104 mL; moderate certainty). Among the bolus plus infusion regimens, initial bolus doses <5 IU may reduce nausea (risk ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.63; low certainty) when compared with doses of 5-9 IU. Total oxytocin doses of 5-9 IU vs total doses of 10-19 IU may increase the use of additional uterotonics (risk ratio, 13.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-96.37; low certainty). Effects on other outcomes were generally inconclusive.

CONCLUSION

There are limited data available for comparisons of IV oxytocin regimens for postpartum hemorrhage prevention following cesarean delivery. Bolus plus infusion regimens may lead to minor reductions in mean blood loss and initial bolus doses of <5 IU may minimize nausea. Bolus only regimens of 10 IU vs bolus only regimens of 5 IU may decrease the need for additional uterotonics, however, further comparative trials are required to understand the effects on other key outcomes, particularly hypotension.

Carbetocin for the prevention of post-partum hemorrhage after vaginal birth: a real-world application

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal outcomes using Carbetocin versus Oxytocin for the active management of the third stage of labor, given a temporary national shortage of Oxytocin.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study on a cohort of 866 women with vaginal deliveries at our center, >36 weeks of gestation, between November 2018 and March 2019. During the shortage period, each woman received a single slow intravenous injection of Carbetocin 100 µg at delivery of the anterior shoulder, rather than Oxytocin 5 UI, as postpartum hemorrhage prophylaxis. 146 (16.9%) patients received Carbetocin versus 720 (83.1%) receiving Oxytocin. The outcomes were rates of postpartum hemorrhage, severe postpartum hemorrhage, and placental retention.

RESULTS

Incidence rates of placental retention and postpartum hemorrhage were 4.9% and 9.4% respectively. Placenta retention was significantly more likely following Carbetocin administration (adjusted odds ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.2-5.0). Postpartum hemorrhage rates were not significantly different (adjusted odds ratio 1.1; 95% confidence interval 0.6-2.1), as were severe postpartum hemorrhage rates (adjusted odds ratio 0.7; 95% confidence interval 0.2-2.2).

CONCLUSION

Carbetocin is as effective as Oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage prevention. However, we would reserve it for use after placental delivery due to the increased retention rates.

Refractory uterine atony: still a problem after all these years

Postpartum hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, and uterine atony is the leading cause of postpartum hemorrhage. Risk factors for uterine atony include induced or augmented labor, preeclampsia, chorio-amnionitis, obesity, multiple gestation, polyhydramnios, and prolonged second stage of labor. Although a risk assessment is recommended for all parturients, many women with uterine atony do not have risk factors, making uterine atony difficult to predict. Oxytocin is the first-line drug for prevention and treatment of uterine atony. It is a routine component of the active management of the third stage of labor. An oxytocin bolus dose as low as 1 IU is sufficient to produce satisfactory uterine tone in almost all women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. However, a higher bolus dose (3 IU) or infusion rate is recommended for women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery. Carbetocin, available in many countries, is a synthetic oxytocin analog with a longer duration than oxytocin that allows bolus administration without an infusion. Second line uterotonic agents include ergot alkaloids (ergometrine and methylergonovine) and the prostaglandins, carboprost and misoprostol. These drugs work by a different mechanism to oxytocin and should be administered early for uterine atony refractory to oxytocin. Rigorous studies are lacking, but methylergonovine and carboprost are likely superior to misoprostol. Currently, the choice of second-line agent should be based on their adverse effect profile and patient comorbidities. Surgical and radiologic management of uterine atony includes uterine tamponade using balloon catheters and compression sutures, and percutaneous transcatheter arterial embolization.

Prophylactic Dose of Oxytocin for Uterine Atony during Caesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review

Objective-to overview, compare and generalize results of randomized clinical trials analyzing different oxytocin doses to prevent postpartum hemorrhage, initiate and maintain uterine contraction after Caesarean delivery. Methods-'PubMed', 'EMBASE', 'CENTRAL', and 'CINAHL' electronic databases were searched for clinical trials analyzing the effectiveness of different dose of oxytocin given intravenously during surgery for uterine contraction and to reduce postpartum hemorrhage. A systematic review of relevant literature sources was performed. Results-our search revealed 813 literature sources. A total of 15 randomized clinical trials, comparing different doses of oxytocin bolus and infusion used after caesarean delivery have met the selection criteria. Conclusion-oxytocin bolus 0.5-3 UI is considered an effective prophylactic dose. Recommended effective prophylactic oxytocin infusion dose is 7.72 IU/h, but it is unanswered whether we really need a prophylactic infusion of oxytocin if we choose effective bolus dose size and rate. Adverse hemodynamic effects were observed when a 5 UI oxytocin bolus was used. However, topics such as bolus dose size, infusion dose size and requirement as well as bolus injection rate, still remain unanswered. The doses that are recommended in the guidelines of peripartum hemorrhage prophylaxis are not confirmed by randomized controlled double-blind trials and more research should cover this topic.

Efficacy of different infusion rates of oxytocin for maintaining uterine tone during elective caesarean section: A randomised double blind trial

Most research in this field has focused on finding oxytocin doses for initiating uterine contractions. Only limited data are available regarding the optimal rate of oxytocin infusion to maintain adequate uterine tone. This randomised, double blind study included 120 healthy term pregnant patients with uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Following an initial 1 IU bolus, the patients received oxytocin infusion at 1.25 IU/hour (group 1.25), 2.5 IU/hour (group 2.5) or 5.0 IU/hour (group 5) for four hours. Uterine tone was assessed as adequate or inadequate at various intervals. If found inadequate, additional uterotonics were administered. Estimated blood loss was mean (standard deviation) 499 (172) ml, 454 (117) ml and 402 (151) ml in groups 1.25, 2.5 and 5, respectively (P value groups 1.25 versus 5 = 0.012). Oxytocin infusion at 5 IU/hour resulted in a significantly lower incidence of minor postpartum haemorrhage, defined as blood loss greater than 500 ml, than 1.25 IU/hour (P = 0.009). No patient had major/severe haemorrhage (>1000 ml blood loss). No significant difference was seen in haemoglobin levels (P = 0.677) and uterine tone. Fifteen, six and nine patients, respectively, required additional oxytocin (P = 0.151). The incidence of tachycardia (P = 0.726), hypotension (P = 0.321) and nausea/vomiting (P = 0.161) was comparable. To conclude, 5 IU/hour was more effective than 1.25 IU/hour in reducing total blood loss and the incidence of minor postpartum haemorrhage. Thus 5 IU/hour appears to be an optimal oxytocin infusion rate following 1 IU slow intravenous oxytocin injection for the maintenance of adequate uterine contraction in patients undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

The interrater reliability and agreement of a 0 to 10 uterine tone score in cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Postpartum hemorrhage is a leading source of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide with uterine atony identified as the underlying cause in up to 80% of cases. Several measures have been utilized to report uterine tone. The most commonly reported measure is a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale, but this scale has not been tested for reliability or agreement between different raters.

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability and agreement of the 0 to 10 visual numeric rating scale of uterine tone during cesarean delivery. A secondary purpose was to obtain estimates of scale responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference.

STUDY DESIGN

Between August and November of 2018, obstetricians used a 0 to 10 numeric rating score to independently rate uterine tone at 3 and 10 minutes after cesarean delivery by palpation of the uterus. Of note, "0" represented "no tone" and "10" represented excellent tone. Each obstetrician independently and blinded to the other's score pointed to a numeric rating scale held by the anesthesiologist through a clear sterile drape. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess interrater reliability and agreement, respectively. Standardized response mean and standard error of measurement were used to obtain estimates of responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 82 and 84 pairs of scores were collected at 3 and 10 minutes, respectively, from pairs of 62 unique obstetricians. The mean±standard deviation difference in scores between rater 1 and rater 2 was 0.4±1.4 at 3 minutes and 0.1±1.1 at 10 minutes. Intraclass correlation coefficients for a future single rater (intraclass correlation coefficient [1, 1]) at 3 and 10 minutes were 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.77) and 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.73), and for the average between 2 future raters (intraclass correlation coefficient [1, 2]), they were 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.87) and 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.84), indicating good and excellent reliability, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis estimated 95% limit of agreement between raters of -2.4 (95% confidence interval, -3.0 to -1.9) to 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 2.6-3.7) at 3 minutes and -2.1 (95% confidence interval, -2.5 to -1.7) to 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 2.0-2.8) at 10 minutes, consistent with good interrater agreement at both time points. The standardized response mean from 3 to 10 minutes after delivery was 1.1 (n=81). Standard error of measurement was 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.1) at 3 minutes and 0.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-0.9) at 10 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for uterine tone demonstrated good to excellent interrater reliability with 1 and 2 raters, respectively, and good interrater agreement. The scale was responsive to within-parturient change in tone, and preliminary estimates of the minimal clinically important difference were obtained. The 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for uterine tone may be a reliable, standardized tool for future research in reporting degree of uterotonic contraction during cesarean delivery.

The Effect of Carbetocin Dose on Transmural Dispersion of Myocardial Repolarization in Healthy Parturients Scheduled for Elective Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

QT interval prolongation is associated with torsade de pointes but remains a poor predictor of drug torsadogenicity. Increased transmural dispersion of myocardial repolarization (TDR), measured as the time interval between the peak and end of the T wave (Tp-e), is a more reliable predictor. Carbetocin is recommended as an uterotonic in patients undergoing cesarean delivery (CD), but its effect on Tp-e is unknown. We evaluated the effect of carbetocin dose on Tp-e and Bazett-corrected QT intervals (QTc) during elective CD under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

On patient consent, 50 healthy parturients undergoing elective CD with a standardized spinal anesthetic and phenylephrine infusion were randomized to receive an intravenous (IV) bolus of carbetocin 50 µg (C50) or 100 µg (C100) via an infusion pump over 1 minute. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained at baseline, 5 minutes after spinal anesthesia, then 5 and 10 minutes after carbetocin administration. A cardiologist blinded to group and timing of ECGs measured QTc and Tp-e using Emori's criteria. Primary outcome was the change in Tp-e at 5 minutes after carbetocin administration between the C50 and C100 groups and within each group compared to baseline values. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of arrhythmias, changes in QTc at 5 and 10 minutes after carbetocin, changes in both QTc and Tp-e after spinal anesthesia compared to baseline between and within groups.

RESULTS

Data from 41 parturients with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 39.0 (0.7) years and weight of 75.0 (12.0) kg were analyzed. Between groups, at 5 minutes after carbetocin administration, Tp-e in C100 was 4.1 milliseconds longer compared to C50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-7.5; P = .01). Within groups, at 5 minutes after carbetocin administration, C50 did not significantly increase Tp-e compared to baseline (mean difference [MD] 1.9 milliseconds; 95% CI, -0.95 to 4.81 milliseconds; P = .42) but C100 did (MD 5.1 milliseconds; 95% CI, 2.1-8.1; P = .003). QTc increased significantly within C50 and C100 groups at 5 and 10 minutes after carbetocin administration (all P < .001), with no between-group differences. There were no arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

Tp-e was unaffected by C50 IV given after CD in healthy parturients under spinal anesthesia, but minimally prolonged by C100. The increase in QTc after carbetocin administration was statistically significant, but with no apparent dose-dependent effect. The minimal Tp-e prolongation at the higher dose is unlikely to have any clinically significant impact on TDR and therefore the risk of inducing torsade de pointes is low.

A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not?

Background

Oxytocin administration regimens are arbitrary and highly subjective. Hence, it is essential to reinvestigate the appropriate dose for effective uterine contraction with minimal bleeding and adverse effects.

Aim

To determine the optimal dose of bolus oxytocin for uterine contractions for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

Methods

Ninety term mothers (37 to 41 weeks) undergoing caesarean section electively under spinal anaesthesia were considered for the trial and divided into three groups to receive oxytocin bolus of one, two or three units. The uterine tone was assessed at 2 min after oxytocin administration. Intraoperative blood loss, mean arterial pressure, heart rate and possible side effects were also compared. Paired t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with Scheffe multiple comparisons were used as inferential statistics.

Results

Adequate uterine contraction was seen in 66% of participants who received one unit of oxytocin, and in 83.3% of participants who received two units of oxytocin. All those who received three units of oxytocin had an adequate uterine contraction. Blood loss was inversely related to the bolus dose of oxytocin.

Conclusions

Lower bolus oxytocin doses of one and two units were inadequate for uterine contraction at elective caeserean section, while three units appeared to be effective in terms of adequate uterine contraction, reduced blood loss and stable haemodynamic system and absent side effects.

The Median Effective Dose of Oxytocin Needed to Prevent Uterine Atony During Cesarean Delivery in Elderly Parturients

Purpose

Oxytocin is the first-line agent to prevent and treat uterine atony during cesarean delivery (CD). We compared the effective dose in 50% of the parturients (ED₅₀) of a prophylactic oxytocin bolus during CD in young (<35 years) and old parturients (≥35 years) using Dixon’s up-and-down method.

Patients and Methods

Twenty-eight young parturients (young group) and 25 old parturients (old group) undergoing CD under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. The initial oxytocin bolus was 0.5 IU, with increments or decrements of 0.25 IU. Maternal adverse effects, requirement for additional uterotonic agents, and estimated blood loss were recorded.

Results

The ED₅₀ for oxytocin in the old group was higher than that in the young group (1.41 IU; 95% confidence interval, 0.63–2.19) vs 0.66 IU (0.04–1.29), P < 0.001). The total oxytocin dose in the old group was higher than in the young group (5.9 ± 2.9 vs 4.1 ± 2.1 IU, P = 0.01). The estimated blood loss in the older group and young group was 401.2 ± 204.5 mL and 289.3 ± 104.6 mL, respectively (P =0.01). The overall prevalence of adverse effects was higher in the old group than in the young group (68.0% vs 21.4%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The initial bolus and total requirement of oxytocin for preventing uterine atony were higher in old parturients than in young parturients during CD. Advanced maternal age may necessitate higher doses of oxytocin.

Oxytocin at elective caesarean delivery: a dose-finding study in women with obesity

Prophylactic oxytocin administration at the third stage of labour reduces blood loss and the need for additional uterotonic drugs. Obesity is known to be associated with an increased risk of uterine atony and postpartum haemorrhage. It is unknown whether women with obesity require higher doses of oxytocin in order to achieve adequate uterine tone after delivery. The purpose of this study was to establish the bolus dose of oxytocin required to initiate effective uterine contraction in 90% of women with obesity (the ED₉₀ ) at elective caesarean delivery. We conducted a double-blind dose-finding study using the biased coin up-down design method. Term pregnant women with a BMI ≥ 40 kg.m^-2 undergoing elective caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia were included. Those with conditions predisposing to postpartum haemorrhage were not included. Oxytocin was administered as an intravenous bolus over 1 minute upon delivery of the fetus. With the first woman receiving 0.5 IU, oxytocin doses were administered according to a sequential allocation scheme. The primary outcome measure was satisfactory uterine tone, as assessed by the operating obstetrician 2 minutes after administration of the oxytocin bolus. Secondary outcomes included the need for rescue uterotonic drugs, adverse effects and estimated blood loss. We studied 30 women with a mean (SD) BMI of 52.3 (7.6) kg.m^-2 . The ED₉₀ for oxytocin was 0.75 IU (95%CI 0.5-0.93 IU) by isotonic regression and 0.78 IU (95%CI 0.68-0.88 IU) by the Dixon and Mood method. Our results suggest that women with a BMI ≥ 40 kg.m^-2 require approximately twice as much oxytocin as those with a BMI < 40 kg.m^-2 , in whom an ED₉₀ of 0.35 IU (95%CI 0.15-0.52 IU) has previously been demonstrated.

A Randomized Control Trial of 3 IU IV Oxytocin Bolus with 7 IU Oxytocin Infusion versus 10 IU Oxytocin Infusion During Cesarean Section for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage

PURPOSE

Oxytocin is the preferred choice for prophylaxis and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Intravenous infusion has been a widely accepted route for Oxytocin administration. However, intravenous bolus route is not a readily preferred route due to apprehensions regarding hypotension that it may cause. This trial compares low dose 3 IU intravenous (IV) bolus Oxytocin along with 7 IU Oxytocin in intravenous infusion to 10IU Oxytocin intravenous infusion during cesarean section.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 250 term pregnant women were randomized to either 3 IU intravenous bolus with 7 IU intravenous infusion of Oxytocin or 10IU of intravenous Oxytocin infusion. The difference in pre- and post-operative hemoglobin levels, tone of the uterus, hemodynamic changes, adverse effects of the drug, need for additional uterotonics and need for blood transfusions were assessed.

RESULTS

There was 6.7% less blood loss in the 3 IU IV bolus Oxytocin with 7 IU Oxytocin infusion group in comparison to the Oxytocin infusion group. The tone of the uterus was firmer in IV bolus Oxytocin with Oxytocin infusion group at 5 minutes (p<0.001) than the Oxytocin infusion group. There was no significant difference in the hemodynamic changes, adverse effects or need for blood transfusions.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous bolus of 3 IU Oxytocin along with 7 IU infusion of Oxytocin is as safe and more effective than intravenous infusion of 10 IU of Oxytocin during cesarean section in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.

Uterotonic drugs to prevent postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Prophylactic uterotonic drugs can reduce blood loss and are routinely recommended. There are several uterotonic drugs for preventing PPH, but it is still debatable which drug or combination of drugs is the most effective.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most effective and cost-effective uterotonic drug(s) to prevent PPH, and generate a ranking according to their effectiveness and side-effect profile.

METHODS

The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (1 June 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO)'s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were searched for unpublished trial reports (30 June 2015). In addition, reference lists of retrieved studies (updated October 2017) were searched for randomised trials evaluating uterotonic drugs for preventing PPH. The study estimated relative effects and rankings for preventing PPH, defined as blood loss of ≥ 500 ml and ≥ 1000 ml. Pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analysis were performed to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available drugs and combinations thereof [ergometrine, misoprostol (Cytotec^®; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA), misoprostol plus oxytocin (Syntocinon^®; Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland), carbetocin (Pabal^®; Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Saint-Prex, Switzerland), ergometrine plus oxytocin (Syntometrine^®; Alliance Pharma plc, Chippenham, UK), oxytocin, and a placebo or no treatment]. Primary outcomes were stratified according to the mode of birth, prior risk of PPH, health-care setting, drug dosage, regimen and route of drug administration. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to study quality and funding source, among others. A model-based economic evaluation compared the relative cost-effectiveness separately for vaginal births and caesareans with or without including side effects.

RESULTS

From 137 randomised trials and 87,466 women, ergometrine plus oxytocin, carbetocin and misoprostol plus oxytocin were found to reduce the risk of PPH blood loss of ≥ 500 ml compared with the standard drug, oxytocin [ergometrine plus oxytocin: risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.83; carbetocin: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.00; misoprostol plus oxytocin: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9]. Each of these three strategies had 100% cumulative probability of being ranked first, second or third most effective. Oxytocin was ranked fourth, with an almost 0% cumulative probability of being ranked in the top three. Similar rankings were noted for the reduction of PPH blood loss of ≥ 1000 ml (ergometrine plus oxytocin: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.95; carbetocin: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.28; misoprostol plus oxytocin: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.14), and most secondary outcomes. Ergometrine plus oxytocin and misoprostol plus oxytocin had the poorest ranking for side effects. Carbetocin had a favourable side-effect profile, which was similar to oxytocin. However, the analysis was restricted to high-quality studies, carbetocin lost its ranking and was comparable to oxytocin. The relative cost-effectiveness of the alternative strategies is inconclusive, and the results are affected by both the uncertainty and inconsistency in the data reported on adverse events. For vaginal delivery, when assuming no adverse events, ergometrine plus oxytocin is less costly and more effective than all strategies except carbetocin. The strategy of carbetocin is both more effective and more costly than all other strategies. When taking adverse events into consideration, all prevention strategies, except oxytocin, are more costly and less effective than carbetocin. For delivery by caesarean section, with and without adverse events, the relative cost-effectiveness is different, again because of the uncertainty in the available data.

LIMITATIONS

There was considerable uncertainty in findings within the planned subgroup analyses, and subgroup effects cannot be ruled out.

CONCLUSIONS

Ergometrine plus oxytocin, carbetocin and misoprostol plus oxytocin are more effective uterotonic drug strategies for preventing PPH than the current standard, oxytocin. Ergometrine plus oxytocin and misoprostol plus oxytocin cause significant side effects. Carbetocin has a favourable side-effect profile, which was similar to oxytocin. However, most carbetocin trials are small and of poor quality. There is a need for a large high-quality trial comparing carbetocin with oxytocin; such a trial is currently being conducted by the WHO. The relative cost-effectiveness is inconclusive, and results are affected by uncertainty and inconsistency in adverse events data.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015020005; Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group (substudy) reference number 0871; PROSPERO-Cochrane (substudy) reference number CRD42015026568; and sponsor reference number ERN_13-1414 (University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK).

FUNDING

Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme in a research award to the University of Birmingham and supported by the UK charity Ammalife (UK-registered charity 1120236). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data synthesis, interpretation or writing of the report.

Type of anaesthesia for caesarean section and failure rate in Princess Marina Hospital, Botswana's largest referral hospital

BACKGROUND

Caesarean Section (CS) is a mode of delivery to decrease maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the type of anaesthesia used for CS among live-birth deliveries; and the failure rate of spinal anaesthesia (SA) in Princess Marina Referral Hospital, Botswana.

METHODS

Women who underwent CS from May-December 2017 were enrolled in the study. Data were recorded from anaesthesia charts and abstracted using Excel spreadsheet. We established the type of anaesthesia used, comparing the rate of elective versus emergency indications, and failure rate of SA using STATA. Fisher's exact test used to compare results.

RESULTS

Among 2775 live-birth deliveries, 30.2% (837/2775) was by CS. Of those, 95.2% (797/837) had had SA and 4.8% (40/837) were GA. Under SA, 27.4% (218/797) were elective, and 72.6% (579/797) were emergency. Under GA 10% (4/40) were elective and 90.0% (36/40) were emergency. The overall failure rate of SA was 2% (16/813), that is 0.9% (2/220) for elective and 2.4% (14/593) among emergency indications; Fisher's exact test p = 0.2959.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that single shot SA is the most commonly preferred type of anaesthesia for both elective and emergency CS. The overall failure rate of SA was less common in our settings than previously reported.

Comparison of Low Dose versus High Dose of Oxytocin for Initiating Uterine Contraction During Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial

Background

Oxytocin is used for initiating uterine contraction and preventing postpartum hemorrhage during caesarean delivery. Using a lower dosage of oxytocin may lower the risk of adverse effects while still being effective in stimulating initial uterine contraction. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and side effects of the standard 10 IU bolus of oxytocin with those of a 5 IU bolus during caesarean delivery.

Patients and Methods

We enrolled women in a randomized, double-blind, study comparing intravenous injections of high-dose (10 IU) and low-dose (5 IU) oxytocin administered after clamping of the umbilical cord. The primary outcome was adequate uterine contraction within the first 3 mins after administration. Secondary outcomes included uterine tone, use of additional uterotonic agents, additional obstetrics procedures, and oxytocin-related adverse events.

Results

A total of 155 women underwent randomization, with 78 in the low-dose group and 77 in the high-dose group. The proportion of women with adequate uterine contraction during the first 3 mins was 84.6% in the low-dose group and 77.9% in the high-dose group (relative risk, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.26). Methylergonovine maleate was used in 14.1% of cases in the low-dose group and 36.4% in the high-dose group (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.73). The necessity for additional obstetric procedures, estimated blood loss >500 mL, neonatal outcomes, and oxytocin-related adverse effects did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion

The 5 IU bolus of oxytocin was noninferior to the standard 10 IU bolus of oxytocin for initiating adequate uterine contraction, required fewer additional uterotonic agents, and led to fewer oxytocin-related adverse events.

Comparison of the benefits and hemodynamic side effects of oxytocin between intravenous infusion with and without bolus injection during caesarean section

The aim of this study was to compare the benefits and hemodynamic side effects of oxytocin between intravenous infusion with and without a bolus injection during a caesarean section. Women with singleton pregnancies who underwent caesarean sections under spinal anaesthesia were included. Oxytocin was administered by an iv bolus injection (5 U) followed by an intravenous infusion (10 U of oxytocin in 500 mL normal saline); this was switched to just an intravenous infusion. The amount of blood loss did not differ between the groups. In a multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratios for the risk of hypotension (≥20% reduction of systolic BP) and tachycardia (heart rate ≥100 bpm) were 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-12.5) and 3.7 (95%CI 1.9-7.2) in the iv bolus group, respectively, compared with the just the infusion group. The oxytocin administration by iv bolus injection did not decrease blood loss and increased the rate of hemodynamic side effects.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Oxytocin is used as the first-line uterotonic treatment to prevent a postpartum haemorrhage in women undergoing Caesarean Sections. Oxytocin is known to relax vascular smooth muscle, which can cause hypotension and tachycardia. The protocols for administering oxytocin during CS vary by institution.What do the results of this study add? Combined treatment with oxytocin by iv bolus injection (5 U) followed by iv infusion (10 U of oxytocin in 500 mL normal saline) during CS increased the risk of developing adverse hemodynamic side effects, including hypotension, tachycardia, and the need for vasopressors, without any benefit in the control of intraoperative blood loss in comparison to iv infusion alone.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? We should abandon the iv bolus injection of oxytocin during CS, especially for women undergoing an elective CS who are not in labour.

The ED50 and ED95 of oxytocin infusion rate for maintaining uterine tone during elective caesarean delivery: a dose-finding study

Background

The 90% effective dose (ED₉₀) of oxytocin infusion has been previously estimated to be 16.2 IU h^− 1. However, bolus administration of oxytocin prior to the infusion may decrease the infusion dose required. The aim of this study was to estimate the ED₉₅ for oxytocin infusion after a bolus at elective caesarean delivery (CD) in nonlaboring parturients.

Methods

We performed a randomized, triple blinded study in 150 healthy termparturients scheduled for elective CD under epidural anaesthesia. After delivery of the infant and i.v. administration of 1 IU oxytocin as a bolus, Participants were randomized to receive oxytocin infusion at a rate of 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, or 8 IU h^− 1, to be given for a total of 1 h. Uterine tone assessed by the blinded obstetrician as either adequate or inadequate. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), requirement for supplemental uterotonic agents, and development of side effects.

Results

The 95% effective dose (ED₉₅) of oxytocin infusion was estimated to be 7.72 IU h^− 1 (95% confidence interval 5.80–12.67 IU h^− 1). With increasing oxytocin infusion rate, the proportion of parturients who needed rescue oxytocin bolus or secondary uterotonic agents decreased. No significant among-group differences in the EBL and oxytocin-related side effects were observed.

Conclusions

In parturients who receive a 1 IU bolus of oxytocin during elective cesarean delivery, an infusion rate of oxytocin at 7.72 IU h^− 1 will produce adequate uterine tone in 95% of parturients. These results suggest that the total dose of oxytocin administered in the postpartum period can be decreased when administered as an infusion after oxytocin bolus.

Ten units intravenous oxytocin over 2-4 h is as effective as 30 units over 8-12 h in preventing postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES:

Currently, recommended high-dose oxytocin regimen for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following cesarean delivery (CD) is associated with maternal side effects frequency of which is greater with a higher cumulative dose and rapid administration of oxytocin. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of single-dose intravenous oxytocin over 2–4 h (total = 10 units) with oxytocin maintenance infusion for 8–12 h (total = 30 units) in postoperative CD women for the prevention of PPH.

METHODS:

The current double-blinded randomized controlled trial was carried out in a tertiary care institute in Southern India. The primary outcome measures included the following: (a) the need for additional uterotonics to control PPH and (b) significant deterioration of vital signs as assessed by pulse rate and blood pressure in the postoperative period. The secondary outcome measures were as follows: (a) significant difference (≥10% between preoperative and postoperative packed cell volume) and (b) need for blood transfusion.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS:

Two hundred and seventy-one women were randomized into Group A (oxytocin = 10 units; n = 135) and Group B (oxytocin = 30 units; n = 136). Both the groups were comparable with regard to demographic characteristics. There was no difference in any of primary or secondary outcome measures in the two groups. Thus, low-dose oxytocin regimen is as effective as high-dose oxytocin regimen in the prevention of PPH in postoperative CD women.

Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Prophylactic uterotonic agents can prevent PPH, and are routinely recommended. The current World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation for preventing PPH is 10 IU (international units) of intramuscular or intravenous oxytocin. There are several uterotonic agents for preventing PPH but there is still uncertainty about which agent is most effective with the least side effects. This is an update of a Cochrane Review which was first published in April 2018 and was updated to incorporate results from a recent large WHO trial.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most effective uterotonic agent(s) to prevent PPH with the least side effects, and generate a ranking according to their effectiveness and side-effect profile.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (24 May 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials or cluster-randomised trials comparing the effectiveness and side effects of uterotonic agents with other uterotonic agents, placebo or no treatment for preventing PPH were eligible for inclusion. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded. Randomised trials published only as abstracts were eligible if sufficient information could be retrieved.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We estimated the relative effects and rankings for preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL and PPH ≥ 1000 mL as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included blood loss and related outcomes, morbidity outcomes, maternal well-being and satisfaction and side effects. Primary outcomes were also reported for pre-specified subgroups, stratifying by mode of birth, prior risk of PPH, healthcare setting, dosage, regimen and route of administration. We performed pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analysis to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available agents.

MAIN RESULTS

The network meta-analysis included 196 trials (135,559 women) involving seven uterotonic agents and placebo or no treatment, conducted across 53 countries (including high-, middle- and low-income countries). Most trials were performed in a hospital setting (187/196, 95.4%) with women undergoing a vaginal birth (71.5%, 140/196).Relative effects from the network meta-analysis suggested that all agents were effective for preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL when compared with placebo or no treatment. The three highest ranked uterotonic agents for prevention of PPH ≥ 500 mL were ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, misoprostol plus oxytocin combination and carbetocin. There is evidence that ergometrine plus oxytocin (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84, moderate certainty), carbetocin (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.93, moderate certainty) and misoprostol plus oxytocin (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.86, low certainty) may reduce PPH ≥ 500 mL compared with oxytocin. Low-certainty evidence suggests that misoprostol, injectable prostaglandins, and ergometrine may make little or no difference to this outcome compared with oxytocin.All agents except ergometrine and injectable prostaglandins were effective for preventing PPH ≥ 1000 mL when compared with placebo or no treatment. High-certainty evidence suggests that ergometrine plus oxytocin (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.03) and misoprostol plus oxytocin (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.11) make little or no difference in the outcome of PPH ≥ 1000 mL compared with oxytocin. Low-certainty evidence suggests that ergometrine may make little or no difference to this outcome compared with oxytocin meanwhile the evidence on carbetocin was of very low certainty. High-certainty evidence suggests that misoprostol is less effective in preventing PPH ≥ 1000 mL when compared with oxytocin (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42). Despite the comparable relative treatment effects between all uterotonics (except misoprostol) and oxytocin, ergometrine plus oxytocin, misoprostol plus oxytocin combinations and carbetocin were the highest ranked agents for PPH ≥ 1000 mL.Misoprostol plus oxytocin reduces the use of additional uterotonics (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73, high certainty) and probably also reduces the risk of blood transfusion (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.70, moderate certainty) when compared with oxytocin. Carbetocin, injectable prostaglandins and ergometrine plus oxytocin may also reduce the use of additional uterotonics but the certainty of the evidence is low. No meaningful differences could be detected between all agents for maternal deaths or severe morbidity as these outcomes were rare in the included randomised trials where they were reported.The two combination regimens were associated with important side effects. When compared with oxytocin, misoprostol plus oxytocin combination increases the likelihood of vomiting (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.18, high certainty) and fever (RR 3.14, 95% CI 2.20 to 4.49, moderate certainty). Ergometrine plus oxytocin increases the likelihood of vomiting (RR 2.93, 95% CI 2.08 to 4.13, moderate certainty) and may make little or no difference to the risk of hypertension, however absolute effects varied considerably and the certainty of the evidence was low for this outcome.Subgroup analyses did not reveal important subgroup differences by mode of birth (caesarean versus vaginal birth), setting (hospital versus community), risk of PPH (high versus low risk for PPH), dose of misoprostol (≥ 600 mcg versus < 600 mcg) and regimen of oxytocin (bolus versus bolus plus infusion versus infusion only).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

All agents were generally effective for preventing PPH when compared with placebo or no treatment. Ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, carbetocin, and misoprostol plus oxytocin combination may have some additional desirable effects compared with the current standard oxytocin. The two combination regimens, however, are associated with significant side effects. Carbetocin may be more effective than oxytocin for some outcomes without an increase in side effects.

Efficacy and safety of carbetocin given as an intravenous bolus compared with short infusion for Caesarean section - double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Background

Carbetocin is a synthetic oxytocin-analogue, which should be administered as bolus according to manufacturer's recommendations. A higher speed of oxytocin administration leads to increased cardiovascular side-effects. It is unclear whether carbetocin administration as short infusion has the same efficacy on uterine tone compared with bolus administration and whether haemodynamic parameters differ.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, women undergoing planned or unplanned Caesarean section (CS) under regional anaesthesia received a bolus and a short infusion, only one of which contained carbetocin 100 mcg (double dummy). Obstetricians quantified uterine tone two, three, five and 10 min after cord-clamping by manual palpation using a linear analogue scale from 0 to 100. We evaluated whether the lower limit of the 95% CI of the difference in maximum uterine tone within the first five min after cord-clamping did not include the pre-specified non-inferiority limit of -10.

Results

Between December 2014 and November 2015, 69 patients were randomized to receive carbetocin as bolus and 71 to receive it as short infusion. Maximal uterine tone was 89 in the bolus and 88 in the short infusion group (mean difference -1.3, 95% CI -5.7 to 3.1). Bp, calculated blood loss, use of additional uterotonics, and side-effects were comparable.

Conclusions

Administration of carbetocin as short infusion does not compromise uterine tone and has similar cardiovascular side-effects as a slow i.v. bolus. In accordance with current recommendations for oxytocin, carbetocin can safely be administered as short -infusion during planned or unplanned CS.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02221531 and www.kofam.ch SNCTP000001197.

Paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic low-dose oxytocin protocols (<5 IU) compared with 5 IU in women undergoing elective caesarean section: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Uterotonic drug usage in Canada: a snapshot of the practice in obstetric units of university-affiliated hospitals

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the pattern of uterotonic drug usage in obstetric units of university-affiliated hospitals in Canada.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study conducted in the form of an electronic survey. The target group consisted of chiefs or directors of Obstetrics and Anaesthesia at university-affiliated hospitals across Canada. The survey was sent out between November 2016 and January 2017, using the program 'SurveyMonkey'. Data on institutional obstetric practices and usage of uterotonic agents were collected.

RESULTS

The survey was sent to 92 obstetricians and anesthesiologists from 46 institutions, of which 33 clinicians from 24 institutions responded. About 65% of clinicians were unaware of the rate of postpartum hemorrhage in their institution. The first-line agent for vaginal deliveries was reported as oxytocin by 94% and carbetocin by 6% of physicians. For women at low-risk for postpartum hemorrhage when undergoing cesarean deliveries (CD), 66% reported oxytocin as the first-line uterotonic, while 34% reported carbetocin. For CDs at high-risk of postpartum hemorrhage, 60% of physicians reported oxytocin and 40% reported using carbetocin initially. The use of second-line uterotonics was also variable. The choice of uterotonic was mainly based on perceived efficacy and Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada guidelines.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of a unified approach to the use of uterotonic drugs for postpartum hemorrhage management in Canada. To improve the management of postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony, an evidence-based approach to usage and consensus between obstetricians and anesthesiologists is warranted.

The effect of initiating intravenous oxytocin infusion before uterine incision on the blood loss during elective cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial

Objective: This study compares the effect of starting intravenous oxytocin infusion early before uterine incision versus late after umbilical cord clamping on the blood loss during elective cesarean section (CS). Methods: A single-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted on 200 pregnant women at term (>37 weeks) gestation scheduled for elective CS were assigned to either IV infusion of 30 IU of oxytocin started before uterine incision (Group I) or started immediately after clamping the umbilical cord (Group II). The primary outcome was the mean volume of blood loss during CS. The secondary outcomes included the mean volume of postoperative blood loss, the mean reduction in the hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, the need for additional uterotonics, blood transfusion and additional surgical procedures. Results: The baseline characteristics of both groups are quiet similar. No statistical significant difference between both groups as regard to pre- and postpartum hemoglobin levels (p = .06 and 0.24 respectively) and hematocrit values (p = .12 and .51 respectively). There was a significant reduction in the intraoperative blood loss in group I compared with group II (432.7 ± 90.6 versus 588.9 ± 96.3 mL respectively, p = .001). The need for additional uterotonics was more frequent in the group II (19 women) than in group I (seven women) with statistical significance (p = .002). No differences between both groups regarding the need for blood transfusion or additional surgical procedures. Conclusions: Initiating intravenous oxytocin infusion before uterine incision during elective CS could be associated with reduction in the intraoperative blood loss and the need for additional uterotonics.

Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Prophylactic uterotonic drugs can prevent PPH, and are routinely recommended. There are several uterotonic drugs for preventing PPH but it is still debatable which drug is best.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most effective uterotonic drug(s) to prevent PPH, and generate a ranking according to their effectiveness and side-effect profile.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (1 June 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for unpublished trial reports (30 June 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled comparisons or cluster trials of effectiveness or side-effects of uterotonic drugs for preventing PPH.Quasi-randomised trials and cross-over trials are not eligible for inclusion in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We estimated the relative effects and rankings for preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL and PPH ≥ 1000 mL as primary outcomes. We performed pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analysis to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available drugs. We stratified our primary outcomes according to mode of birth, prior risk of PPH, healthcare setting, dosage, regimen and route of drug administration, to detect subgroup effects.The absolute risks in the oxytocin are based on meta-analyses of proportions from the studies included in this review and the risks in the intervention groups were based on the assumed risk in the oxytocin group and the relative effects of the interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

This network meta-analysis included 140 randomised trials with data from 88,947 women. There are two large ongoing studies. The trials were mostly carried out in hospital settings and recruited women who were predominantly more than 37 weeks of gestation having a vaginal birth. The majority of trials were assessed to have uncertain risk of bias due to poor reporting of study design. This primarily impacted on our confidence in comparisons involving carbetocin trials more than other uterotonics.The three most effective drugs for prevention of PPH ≥ 500 mL were ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, carbetocin, and misoprostol plus oxytocin combination. These three options were more effective at preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL compared with oxytocin, the drug currently recommended by the WHO (ergometrine plus oxytocin risk ratio (RR) 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.83), moderate-quality evidence; carbetocin RR 0.72 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.00), very low-quality evidence; misoprostol plus oxytocin RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.90), moderate-quality evidence). Based on these results, about 10.5% women given oxytocin would experience a PPH of ≥ 500 mL compared with 7.2% given ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, 7.6% given carbetocin, and 7.7% given misoprostol plus oxytocin. Oxytocin was ranked fourth with close to 0% cumulative probability of being ranked in the top three for PPH ≥ 500 mL.The outcomes and rankings for the outcome of PPH ≥ 1000 mL were similar to those of PPH ≥ 500 mL. with the evidence for ergometrine plus oxytocin combination being more effective than oxytocin (RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.95), high-quality evidence) being more certain than that for carbetocin (RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.28), low-quality evidence), or misoprostol plus oxytocin combination (RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.14), moderate-quality evidence)There were no meaningful differences between all drugs for maternal deaths or severe morbidity as these outcomes were so rare in the included randomised trials.Two combination regimens had the poorest rankings for side-effects. Specifically, the ergometrine plus oxytocin combination had the higher risk for vomiting (RR 3.10 (95% CI 2.11 to 4.56), high-quality evidence; 1.9% versus 0.6%) and hypertension [RR 1.77 (95% CI 0.55 to 5.66), low-quality evidence; 1.2% versus 0.7%), while the misoprostol plus oxytocin combination had the higher risk for fever (RR 3.18 (95% CI 2.22 to 4.55), moderate-quality evidence; 11.4% versus 3.6%) when compared with oxytocin. Carbetocin had similar risk for side-effects compared with oxytocin although the quality evidence was very low for vomiting and for fever, and was low for hypertension.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, carbetocin, and misoprostol plus oxytocin combination were more effective for preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL than the current standard oxytocin. Ergometrine plus oxytocin combination was more effective for preventing PPH ≥ 1000 mL than oxytocin. Misoprostol plus oxytocin combination evidence is less consistent and may relate to different routes and doses of misoprostol used in the studies. Carbetocin had the most favourable side-effect profile amongst the top three options; however, most carbetocin trials were small and at high risk of bias.Amongst the 11 ongoing studies listed in this review there are two key studies that will inform a future update of this review. The first is a WHO-led multi-centre study comparing the effectiveness of a room temperature stable carbetocin versus oxytocin (administered intramuscularly) for preventing PPH in women having a vaginal birth. The trial includes around 30,000 women from 10 countries. The other is a UK-based trial recruiting more than 6000 women to a three-arm trial comparing carbetocin, oxytocin and ergometrine plus oxytocin combination. Both trials are expected to report in 2018.Consultation with our consumer group demonstrated the need for more research into PPH outcomes identified as priorities for women and their families, such as women's views regarding the drugs used, clinical signs of excessive blood loss, neonatal unit admissions and breastfeeding at discharge. To date, trials have rarely investigated these outcomes. Consumers also considered the side-effects of uterotonic drugs to be important but these were often not reported. A forthcoming set of core outcomes relating to PPH will identify outcomes to prioritise in trial reporting and will inform futures updates of this review. We urge all trialists to consider measuring these outcomes for each drug in all future randomised trials. Lastly, future evidence synthesis research could compare the effects of different dosages and routes of administration for the most effective drugs.

Effect of co-administration of different doses of phenylephrine with oxytocin on the prevention of oxytocin-induced hypotension in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Co-administration of phenylephrine prevents oxytocin-induced hypotension during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia (SA), but higher doses cause reflex bradycardia. This study compares the effects of co-administration of two different doses of phenylephrine on oxytocin-induced hypotension during caesarean section under SA.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind study, 90 parturients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 or 2, undergoing caesarean section under SA were randomised into Group A: oxytocin 3U and phenylephrine 50 μg, Group B: oxytocin 3U and phenylephrine 75 μg, Group C: oxytocin 3U and normal saline, administered intravenously over 5 min after baby extraction. The incidence of hypotension (the primary outcome), rescue vasopressor requirement and side effects were recorded. Statistical analyses were with analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Demographic parameters such as age, height, weight, level of sensory block at 20 min and duration of surgery were comparable in all the groups. The incidence of hypotension (Group A - 90%, Group B - 10%, Group C - 98%, P = 0.001), magnitude of fall in mean arterial pressure (Group A-15.03 ± 6.12 mm of Hg, Group B - 6.63 ± 4.49 mm of Hg and Group C-13.03 ± 3.39 mm of Hg, P < 0.001) and rescue vasopressor requirement (Group A-45 ± 15.25 mg, Group B-5 ± 15.25, Group C-91.66 ± 26.53, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in Group B compared to A and C.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of phenylephrine 75 μg with oxytocin 3U reduces the incidence of oxytocin-induced hypotension compared to phenylephrine 50 μg with oxytocin 3U during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.