Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device: peri-procedural outcomes from the EWOLUTION registry

Zero-contrast left atrial appendage closure, a feasible alternative for patients with a high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to reduce thrombotic risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This procedure conventionally requires the use of a contrast agent. A significant proportion of patients who undergo this procedure have chronic kidney disease, with a high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically review existing literature regarding the feasibility and safety of a zero-contrast LAAC technique.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies comparing a zero-contrast LAAC technique with conventional LAAC up to April 2024. From each study, we extracted baseline characteristics, feasibility, and safety outcomes. A random model meta-analysis was used to compare outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Five studies reporting data from 367 patients were included. A 100% successful implantation rate was reported in all the zero-contrast groups. The mean number of recaptures reached no significant difference between the groups (mean difference, -0.15; CI, -0.67 to 0.37; I2 = 0%; P = .58). The zero-contrast group had a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (mean difference, -4.03; CI, -7.72 to -0.34; I2 = 67%; P = .03). Complications related to the procedure, peridevice leak, and device-associated thrombus rates were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Zero-contrast LAAC is a feasible alternative. The success and complication rates are consistent with those of conventional LAAC. Aside from the inherent benefit of zero-contrast exposure, this technique allows a reduction in fluoroscopy time.

Left atrial appendage occlusion devices vs direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first line anticoagulation for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a new therapy and its safety and effectiveness compared with DOACs are still controversial.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies was conducted, focusing on patients with NVAF. Outcomes analyzed included: (1) all-cause mortality; (2) cardiovascular (CV) mortality; (3) thromboembolic events; (4) stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA); (5) bleeding events; and a (6) composite of death, hemorrhagic, and thromboembolic events. We performed a subgroup analysis of major bleeding according to different definitions: (1) Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC); (2) International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH); and (3) other definitions.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 18,507 patients were included, with 42.35 % undergoing LAAO. In pooled analysis, LAAO was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.50-0.80), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.45-0.70), and of the composite outcome (HR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.58-0.92). A trend towards lower stroke/TIA events was observed but not statistically significant. Overall bleeding events did not significantly differ between groups; using the ISTH definition, LAAO showed significantly lower incidence of bleeding events (HR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.43-0.91). No difference was found in thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSION

LAAO was associated with a significantly lower all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, as well as the composite of death, hemorrhagic or thromboembolic events, as compared with DOACs.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a valid alternative to oral anticoagulation to prevent ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.The devices approved in Europe and United States for percutaneous LAAC contain metal and temporary antithrombotic therapy is strongly recommended following implantation to prevent thrombus formation on the atrial device surface. There is still uncertainty regarding to the optimal antithrombotic drug regimen after device implantation for several reasons. Thus, this review aims at summarizing the available evidence and the remaining challenges related to the management of antithrombotic therapy in the context of LAAC procedure.

Retrieval of Embolized WATCHMAN® Flex Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device

This case report documents the management of a 66-year old man with atrial fibrillation with recent placement of a WATCHMAN® Flex atrial appendage occlusion device. The patient presented with renal failure, abdominal pain, and difficulty walking 2 months after placement. The WATCHMAN® Flex device was found to have embolized to his abdominal aorta at the level of the renal arteries with associated thrombus. Extensive workup revealed reduced left ventricular cardiac function and decreased renal function, both of which were felt to be potentially reversible with device removal. The patient then underwent retrieval of the device and all associated thrombus via an open retroperitoneal approach. This case demonstrates a potential consequence of implanting devices such as an atrial appendage occlusion device and describes a technique for removal.

LAA occlusion is effective and safe in very high-risk atrial fibrillation patients with prior stroke: results from the multicentre German LAARGE registry

BACKGROUND

Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) mitigates the risk of thromboembolic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with contraindication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). Patients with prior stroke have a relevantly increased risk of recurrent stroke, so the effectiveness of LAAO could be reduced in this specific very high-risk patient group.

AIM

This sub-study of the LAARGE registry investigates the effectiveness and safety of LAAO for secondary prevention in nonvalvular AF patients with a history of stroke.

METHODS

LAARGE is a prospective, non-randomised registry on the clinical reality of LAAO. The current sub-study employs data from index procedure and 1-year follow-up. Effectiveness and safety were assessed by documentation of all-cause mortality, non-fatal thromboembolism, procedure-related complications, and bleeding events.

RESULTS

A total of 638 patients were consecutively included from 38 hospitals in Germany and divided into two groups: 137 patients with a history of stroke (21.5%) and 501 patients without. Successful implantation was consistent between both groups (98.5% vs. 97.4%, p = NS), while peri-procedural MACCE and other complications were rare (0% vs. 0.6% and 4.4% vs. 4.0%, respectively; each p = NS). Kaplan-Meier estimate showed no significant difference in primary effectiveness outcome measure (freedom from all-cause death or non-fatal stroke) between both groups at follow-up (87.8% vs. 87.7%, p = NS). The incidence of transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism at follow-up was low (0% vs. 0.5% and 0.9% vs. 0%, respectively; each p = NS). Severe bleeding events after hospital discharge were rare (0% vs. 0.7%, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with prior stroke demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety profile for LAAO as compared to patients without prior stroke. LAAO could serve as a feasible alternative to OAC for secondary stroke prevention in this selected group of nonvalvular AF patients.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02230748.

Catheter based left atrial appendage closure in-hospital outcomes in Germany from 2016 to 2020

BACKGROUND

New and refined catheter based left atrial appendage (LAA) closure devices have been introduced in the past decade. The procedure can be performed using either an endocardial occlusion device or an epicardial loop stitch. We aimed to analyzed recent procedural safety.

METHODS

Catheter based LAA closures were identified in a complete nationwide German dataset via ICD and OPS codes from 2016 to 2020.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2020, 28,039 endocardial and 213 epicardial occlusions were performed. Numbers of endocardial procedures increased from 5259 in 2016 to 5917 in 2020 (p = 0.020) in 387 centers with shifting of patients' characteristics towards older age (β = 0.29, p < 0.001), more heart failure (β = 1.01, p < 0.001) and renal disease (β = 0.67, p = 0.001) and without a significant trend for in-hospital safety except more bleeding (β = 0.12, p = 0.05). In-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) or pericardial puncture were independent on center procedure numbers. The loop stitch procedure was performed in 15 centers. Patients were younger (76.17 ± 8.16 vs. 73.16 ± 8.99, p < 0.001) and had a lower comorbidity index (2.29 ± 1.93 vs. 1.92 ± 1.64, p = 0.005). Adjusted risk difference for pericardial effusion (8.04%; 95% CI 3.01-13.08%; p = 0.002) and pericardial puncture (6.60%; 95% CI 3.85-9.35%; p < 0.001) was higher for the loop stitch procedure, while risk of bleeding (- 1.85%; 95% CI - 3.01 to - 0.69%; p = 0.002), intracerebral bleeding (- 0.37%; 95% CI - 0.59 to - 0.15%; p = 0.001) and shock (- 1.41%; 95% CI - 2.44 to - 0.39%; p = 0.007) was lower. No significant difference was observed for in-hospital MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocardial occlusion was the major catheter based LAA closure procedure in Germany without improvements in in-hospital safety from 2016 to 2020. In-hospital MACCE was independent on endocardial LAAC center volumes. Conclusions on the comparison between the two procedure types must be made cautious as the LAA loop stitch occlusion was utilized limited in a minor number of centers.

Concurrent percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: State-of-the-art review

Stroke prevention and symptom control are two integral pillars in atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is effective at reducing stroke risk in high-risk patients with AF who cannot tolerate oral anticoagulant therapy, whilst catheter ablation is effective at reducing AF burden and improving quality-of-life in patients who remain symptomatic despite medical therapy. If both procedures are indicated in an individual patient, they have traditionally been performed on separate occasions, due to long cumulative procedural times, itself associated with thromboembolic risk. Recently, with the advancement of procedural techniques, the concept of concurrent LAAO and AF catheter ablation has gained traction. This review summarises the evidence for and against concurrent LAAO and AF catheter ablation, discussing procedural considerations, including procedural sequencing and post-procedural antithrombotic therapy, safety and efficacy outcomes, and future directions in the field.

Residual Stroke Risk Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Prescribed Oral Anticoagulants: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis From COMBINE AF

BACKGROUND

Despite oral anticoagulation, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain at risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (SE) events. For patients whose residual risk is sufficiently high, additional therapies might be useful to mitigate stroke risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Individual patient data from 5 landmark trials testing oral anticoagulation in AF were pooled in A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in AF (COMBINE AF). We calculated the rate of ischemic stroke/SE among oral anticoagulation-treated patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score≥2, across strata of CHA2DS2-VASc score, stroke history, and AF type, as either paroxysmal or nonparoxysmal. We included 71 794 patients with AF (median age 72 years, interquartile range, 13 years, 61.3% male) randomized to a direct oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist, and followed for a mean of 2.1 (±0.8) years. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 (interquartile range, 3-5), 18.8% had a prior stroke, and 76.4% had nonparoxysmal AF. The overall rate of stroke/SE was 1.33%/y (95% CI, 1.27-1.39); 1.38%/y (95% CI, 1.31-1.45) for nonparoxysmal AF, and 1.15%/y (95% CI, 1.05-1.27) for paroxysmal AF. The rate of ischemic stroke/SE increased by a rate ratio of 1.36 (95% CI, 1.32-1.41) per 1-point increase in CHA2DS2-VASc, reaching 1.67%/y (95% CI, 1.59-1.75) ≥4 CHA2DS2-VASc points. Patients with both nonparoxysmal AF and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥4 had a stroke/SE rate of 1.75%/y (95% CI, 1.66-1.85). In patients with a prior stroke, the risk was 2.51%/y (95% CI, 2.33-2.71).

CONCLUSIONS

AF type, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and stroke history can identify patients with AF, who despite oral anticoagulation have a residual stroke/SE risk of 1.5% to 2.5% per year. Evaluation of additional stroke/SE prevention strategies in high-risk patients is warranted.

Impact of occluder device configurations in in-silico left atrial hemodynamics for the analysis of device-related thrombus

Left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAO) are a feasible alternative for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of thromboembolic stroke and contraindication to antithrombotic therapies. However, optimal LAAO device configurations (i.e., size, type, location) remain unstandardized due to the large anatomical variability of the left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology, leading to a 4-6% incidence of device-related thrombus (DRT). In-silico simulations have the potential to assess DRT risk and identify the key factors, such as suboptimal device positioning. This work presents fluid simulation results computed on 20 patient-specific left atrial geometries, analysing different commercially available LAAO occluders, including plug-type and pacifier-type devices. In addition, we explored two distinct device positions: 1) the real post-LAAO intervention configuration derived from follow-up imaging; and 2) one covering the pulmonary ridge if it was not achieved during the implantation (13 out of 20). In total, 33 different configurations were analysed. In-silico indices indicating high risk of DRT (e.g., low blood flow velocities and flow complexity around the device) were combined with particle deposition analysis based on a discrete phase model. The obtained results revealed that covering the pulmonary ridge with the LAAO device may be one of the key factors to prevent DRT, resulting in higher velocities and reduced flow recirculations (e.g., mean velocities of 0.183 ± 0.12 m/s and 0.236 ± 0.16 m/s for uncovered versus covered positions in DRT patients). Moreover, disk-based devices exhibited enhanced adaptability to various LAA morphologies and, generally, demonstrated a lower risk of abnormal events after LAAO implantation.

Outcomes With the WATCHMAN FLX in Everyday Clinical Practice From the NCDR Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry

BACKGROUND

PINNACLE FLX (Protection Against Embolism for Nonvalvular AF Patients: Investigational Device Evaluation of the WATCHMAN FLX LAA Closure Technology) demonstrated improved outcomes and low incidence of adverse events with the WATCHMAN FLX device in a controlled setting. The National Cardiovascular Disease Registry's Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry was utilized to assess the safety and effectiveness of WATCHMAN FLX in contemporary clinical practice in the United States.

METHODS

The WATCHMAN FLX Device Surveillance Post Approval Analysis Plan used data from the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion registry to identify patients undergoing WATCHMAN FLX implantation between August 2020 and September 2022. The key safety end point was defined as all-cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device or procedure-related events requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention between device implantation and hospital discharge. Major adverse events were reported at hospital discharge, 45 days, and 1 year.

RESULTS

Among 97 185 patients in the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion registry undergoing WATCHMAN FLX, successful implantation occurred in 97.5% (n=94 784) of patients. The key safety end point occurred in 0.45% of patients. At 45 days post-procedure, all-cause death occurred in 0.81% patients, ischemic stroke in 0.23%, major bleeding in 3.1%, pericardial effusion requiring intervention in 0.50%, device-related thrombus in 0.44%, and device embolism in 0.04% patients. No peri-device leak was observed in 83.1% of patients at 45 days. At 1 year, the rate of all-cause death was 8.2%, the rate of any stroke was 1.5% (ischemic stroke, 1.2%), and major bleeding occurred in 6.4% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large contemporary cohort of patients with the WATCHMAN FLX device, the rates of implant success and clinical outcomes through 1 year were comparable with the PINNACLE FLX study, demonstrating that favorable outcomes achieved in the pivotal approval study can be replicated in routine clinical practice.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Single-Center Experience in a Population With a High Prevalence of End-Stage Renal Disease

Background Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative approach for mitigating thrombotic risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. However, existing registries often lack representation of the Hispanic population, motivating this study to elucidate the demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics, specifically among Hispanic patients undergoing this procedure. Methods Adult patients who underwent percutaneous LAAC between June 2017 and July 2022 at a high-complexity hospital in Bogotá, COL, were included. Baseline and procedural characteristics are reported. For patients with available follow-up data, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and cardiovascular mortality were assessed. A subgroup analysis was conducted for patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Results We included 33 patients. Follow-up data were available for 27 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 12.4 months. The median age of the cohort was 70 years (SD 9), with 58% being women. The median CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scores were 3 points (IQR 2 to 4) and 4 points (IQR 3 to 4), respectively. The 90-day cardiovascular mortality rate was 3.7%, whereas cardioembolic episodes and major bleeding events were reported at rates of 10.8 and 14.4 per 100 patient years, respectively. The long-term outcomes of patients on dialysis were comparable to those of nondialysis patients. Conclusions Our study reinforces existing evidence supporting the safety of LAAC, particularly in a multimorbid patient population with elevated bleeding and thrombotic risks. In this high-risk cohort, LAAC emerges as a feasible alternative for reducing thromboembolic risk. Notably, patients on dialysis demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes, suggesting the procedure's viability in this subgroup as well.

Clinical incidence and relevance of incomplete endothelialization in atrial fibrillation patients with Left Atrial Appendage Closure

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence, potential risk factors, and clinical outcomes of incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing Watchman left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

METHODS

In this study, 68 AF patients who underwent successful implantation of the Watchman device without peri-device leak (PDL) during follow-up were included. The endothelialization status was assessed using Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and LAA computed tomography angiography (CTA) at 6 weeks and 6 months post-implantation. Adverse cerebro-cardiac events were documented at one-year follow-up. Baseline characteristics, including age, device sizes, and clinical indicators, were analyzed as potential predictors for IDE.

RESULTS

IDE was observed in 70.6% and 67.6% of patients at 6 weeks and 6 months after implantation, respectively. Higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [odds ratio (OR): 15.109, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.637-139.478, p = 0.017 and OR: 11.015, 95% CI: 1.365-88.896, p = 0.024] and lower aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (OR 0.924, 95% CI: 0.865-0.986, p = 0.017 and OR: 0.930, 95% CI: 0.874-0.990, p = 0.023) at baseline were found to be significantly associated with IDE at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, although no significant difference in adverse cerebro-cardiac events was noted between incomplete and complete DE groups during 1-year follow-up CONCLUSIONS: IDE is found to be a prevalent occurrence in humans following LAAC. Elevated HDL-C and reduced AST levels are shown to be linked to an increased risk of IDE after LAAC.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Therapy Overview and Future Perspective

The left atrial appendage (LAA) has gained increasing attention in the field of cardiology as a potential site for intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of thromboembolic events. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy to mitigate the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, especially in individuals who are unsuitable candidates for long-term anticoagulation therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of LAAO, encompassing its anatomic considerations, procedural techniques, clinical outcomes, and future directions.

A Comprehensive Review of Percutaneous and Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, and is associated with a significant risk of thromboembolic events. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising alternative for patients with contraindications or intolerance to anticoagulant therapy. This review summarises the current evidence, indications, and technical advancements in surgical and percutaneous LAAO. Preprocedural planning relies on various imaging techniques, each with unique advantages and limitations. The existing randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses demonstrate favourable results for both percutaneous and surgical LAAO. Postprocedural management emphasises personalised anticoagulation strategies and comprehensive imaging surveillance to ensure device stability and detect complications. Future focus should be put on antithrombotic regimens, investigating predictors of device-related complications, and simplifying procedural aspects to enhance patient outcomes. In summary, LAAO is presented as a valuable therapeutic option for preventing AF-related thromboembolic events, with ongoing research aimed at refining techniques and improving patient care.

Feasibility study on atrial fibrillation ablation with pulsed field ablation and concomitant occlusion of the left atrial appendage

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are increasingly performed as individual procedures. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has significantly reduced procedure duration and may be advantageous for the combined approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We have launched a programme for simultaneous AF ablation using PFA and LAAO for patients qualifying for both treatments and excluding those with a complex anatomy. We compare procedure duration and fluoroscopy time against individual procedures (either AF ablation or LAAO alone), all performed by the same operators and using consistent technologies. We performed the combined procedure in 10 patients (50% males; median age 70 years) and excluded 2 patients (17%) because of a complex left atrial appendage anatomy. No death, stroke, or major bleeding events, including pericardial effusion, occurred. For single-procedure comparison, 207 AF ablation procedures and 61 LAAO procedures were available. The total median procedure duration was 79 min (range 60-125) for the combined procedure, 71 min (25-241) for individual AF ablation (51 min without and 78 min with 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping), and 47 min (15-162) for individual LAAO. The respective fluoroscopy times were 21 (15-26), 15 (5-44), and 10 (3-50) min. For the combined procedure, femoral vein access to last PFA application lasted 49 min (34-93) and LAAO added 20 min (15-37).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous PFA-based AF ablation and LAAO in carefully selected patients is feasible and safe and can be executed within a short overall procedure duration.

Challenges and advances in device-related thrombus in left atrial appendage occlusion

Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) is a mainstay for mitigating stroke and other embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the demonstrated efficacy of OAC in reducing events, many patients are unable to tolerate OAC due to bleeding risks. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices were developed as implantable technologies to moderate stroke risk in patients with intolerance to OAC. Despite clinical data supporting near-comparable protection against thromboembolic events with OAC, device-related thrombus formation has emerged as a critical complication following LAAO that remains a potential limitation to the safety and efficacy of LAAO. Improved biocompatibility of LAAO devices with fluoropolymers, a well-established stent-coating technology used to reduce thrombus formation and promote endothelialization, may optimize outcomes after LAAO.

Comparative Data of Procedural and Midterm Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Between the WATCHMAN FLX and WATCHMAN 2.5 Devices - Insight From the OCEAN-LAAC Registry

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding clinical outcomes after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX (WM-FLX) and WATCHMAN-2.5 (WM2.5) devices in Asian patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data of 1,464 consecutive patients (WM-FLX, n=909; WM2.5, n=555) were extracted from a Japanese multicenter registry, and clinical data were compared between the 2 groups. No in-hospital deaths, periprocedural stroke, or device embolization occurred. Procedural success was significantly higher in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group (95.8% vs. 91.9%; P=0.002) owing to the lower incidence of periprocedural pericardial effusion (0.55% vs. 1.8%; P=0.021). No significant differences in all-cause death, postprocedural stroke, and device-related thrombus were observed between the 2 groups. However, the cumulative bleeding rate at 1 year was substantially lower in the WM-FLX group (7.8% vs. 16.4%; P<0.001). Landmark analysis of bleeding events highlighted lower bleeding rates in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group within the first 6 months (6.4% vs. 14.8%; P<0.001), with comparable bleeding rates over the 6- to 12-month period (1.5% vs. 3.2%, respectively; P=0.065).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated higher early safety and lower 1-year bleeding rates in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group. The lower bleeding events with WM-FLX are likely due to multiple factors other than purely difference in devices, such as postprocedural drug regimen.

Pericardial Effusion After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Timing, Predictors, and Clinical Impact

BACKGROUND

Pericardial effusion (PE) is the most common serious left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) complication, but its mechanisms, time course, and prognostic impact are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the frequency, timing, predictors and clinical impact of PE after LAAC.

METHODS

Data on consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous LAAC between 2009 and 2022 were prospectively collected including the 1-year follow-up. Both single (Watchman 2.5/FLX, Boston Scientific) and double (Amplatzer Cardiac Plug or Amulet, St. Jude Medical/Abbott) LAAC devices were used. An imaging core laboratory adjudicated the PEs and categorized them as early (≤7 days) and late (8-365 days). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of early and overall PE.

RESULTS

Of 1,023 attempted LAAC procedures, PE was observed in 44 (4.3%) patients; PE was categorized as early in 34 (3.3%) and late in 10 (0.9%) patients. The majority of PEs occurred within 6 hours after LAAC (n = 25, 56.8%) and were clinically relevant (n = 28, 63.6%). Independent predictors of early PE were double-closure left atrial appendage devices (adjusted OR: 8.20; 95% CI: 1.09-61.69), female sex (adjusted OR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.50-7.73), the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) at baseline (adjusted OR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.11-6.09), and advanced age (adjusted OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.23), whereas female sex and OAC at baseline remained independent predictors of overall PE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large LAAC registry, PE was observed in <1 in 20 patients and usually occurred within 6 hours after procedure. The majority of early PEs were clinically relevant and occurred in the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug/Amulet procedures. Independent predictors included the use of double-closure devices, female sex, OAC at baseline, and advanced age. (LAAC-registry: Clinical Outcome After Echocardiography-guided LAA-closure; NCT04628078).

Incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman device

Introduction

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with Watchman device prevents thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, thrombus may develop on the atrial surface of the device.

Aim

To investigate the incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus (DRT) in patients with AF who were treated with LAAC.

Material and methods

Ninety-one consecutive patients with AF underwent LAAC procedure using first-generation Watchman 2.5 device followed by antiplatelet therapy. In our analysis we have included all patients (n = 78) who had clinical follow-up visits with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after the procedure.

Results

The median (IQR) CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 (4.0-6.0) and HAS-BLED score was 3 (3.0-4.0). DRTs were observed in 5 (6.4%) patients. When compared with patients without DRT, those with DRT presented more often with lower median ejection fraction (40% (23.5-45.5) versus 55% (48.0-60.0); p = 0.005), lower emptying velocity of LAA (25 cm/s (17.5-27.0) versus 53 cm/s (26.5-78.0); p = 0.009), and with greater depth of implantation (18 mm (14.0-20.5) versus 8 mm (5.0-11.0); p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with DRT had greater depth of LAA (35 mm (29.5-41.0) versus 29 mm (25.5-31.0); p = 0.003), greater mean (SD) dimension in 900 (22.4 mm (3.2) versus 19 mm (2.7); p = 0.02). Patients with DRT were also younger than those without DRT (67.4 years (7) versus 75 years (8.3), p = 0.045).

Conclusions

The DRT after Watchman device implantation remains a rare complication. Its formation was related to several patient and procedural characteristics, which need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Head-to-head comparison between left atrial appendage occlusion and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis study

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) was found to be non-inferior to warfarin. In non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), there is still a scarcity of data comparing LAAO versus non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Our purpose was to compare the clinical benefits between LAAO and NOACs in non-valvular AF patients. The patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome principles were used to develop the research question in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Literature searches were conducted in online scientific databases such as ProQuest, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. All important information was extracted. The random-effect model was applied to estimate all pooled effects. The Mantel-Haenszel statistical method was used to determine the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 4411 participants from 5 studies were involved. LAAO significantly decreased the cardiovascular mortality risk compared to NOACs (RR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.75; p <0.01). Major bleeding risk in the LAAO group was significantly lower than in the NOACs group (RR = 0.66; RR = 0.53 to 0.82; p <0.01). A significantly lower risk of major bleeding or non-major bleeding in the patients receiving LAAO than NOACs was also observed in this meta-analysis (RR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.81; p <0.01). LAAO was superior to the NOACs in reducing cardiovascular mortality, major bleeding, and major or non-major bleeding risks in non-valvular AF patients. In high-risk thromboembolism and bleeding patients, LAAO can be considered first as a long-term treatment strategy.

Outcomes Associated With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Via Implanted Device in Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) via implanted device vs no LAAO in a matched cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

This longitudinal retrospective cohort study was based on the national database covering hospital care for the entire French population. Adults (≥18 years of age) who had been hospitalized with AF (January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2020) who underwent LAAO were identified. Propensity score matching was used to control for potential confounders of the treatment-outcome relationship. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or all-cause death during follow-up.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 1216 patients with AF who were treated with LAAO were matched with 1216 controls (patients AF who were not treated with LAAO). Mean follow-up was 14.5 months (median, 13 months; IQR, 7-21 months). Patients with LAAO had a lower risk of the composite outcome (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.55). Total events (309 for LAAO vs 640 for controls) and event rates (23.3% vs 44.0%/year, respectively) were lower for LAAO, driven primarily by a decreased risk of all-cause death (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.46; P<.0001), whereas ischemic stroke risk was higher (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.64). Significant interactions were observed in subgroups with a history of ischemic stroke (P<.001) and of bleeding (P=.002).

CONCLUSION

Among AF patients at high bleeding risk, our nationwide study highlights a high risk of clinical events during follow-up. LAAO appeared less effective than no LAAO in preventing stroke but more effective in preventing death. Left atrial appendage occlusion is particularly effective in patients with previous ischemic stroke or any episode of bleeding.

Safety and Efficacy of Mini-Invasive Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Propensity-Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) for prevention of stroke is validated in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) contraindicated to oral anticoagulation. General anaesthesia (GA) is often used for procedural guidance by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE); however, its use may be challenging in some patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and the midterm efficacy of a mini-invasive LAAC strategy using micro-TEE under procedural sedation.

METHODS

Comparison by propensity score of 2 cohorts of consecutive patients who underwent LAAC: standard TEE-guided LAAC (3-dimensional [3D] TEE under GA) and mini-invasive LAAC strategy (micro-TEE under procedural sedation). The primary endpoint was a composite of embolic or bleeding events, significant per procedural complication, and cardiovascular deaths within 3 months after LAAC.

RESULTS

In total, 432 patients were included (78.7 ± 8 years old, 32.4% of women, CHA2DS2VASC score: 4.9 ± 1.1); 127 patients underwent mini-invasive LAAC strategy and were compared with 305 patients standard TEE-guided LAAC. The mini-invasive strategy was achieved in 122 of 127 (96.1%) planned patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 11.2% of patients from the mini-invasive LAAC strategy group and in 10.3% of patients from the standard TEE group (absolute difference = 0.9% [-6.4; 4.5], hazard ratio = 1.11 [0.56; 2.19], P = 0.76). Procedural times, fluoroscopy duration, and hospital stays were shorter in the mini-invasive LAAC strategy group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The mini-invasive LAAC strategy is safe and effective compared with the standard TEE-guided LAAC strategy. A mini-invasive LAAC strategy may also be an important tool to help physicians to treat more patients as LAAC indications evolve in the future.

Practical guide on left atrial appendage closure for the non-implanting physician: an international consensus paper

A significant proportion of patients who suffer from atrial fibrillation (AF) and are in need of thromboembolic protection are not treated with oral anticoagulation or discontinue this treatment shortly after its initiation. This undertreatment has not improved sufficiently despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants which are associated with less major bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Multiple reasons account for this, including bleeding events or ischaemic strokes whilst on anticoagulation, a serious risk of bleeding events, poor treatment compliance despite best educational attempts, or aversion to drug therapy. An alternative interventional therapy, which is not associated with long-term bleeding and is as effective as vitamin K anticoagulation, was introduced over 20 years ago. Because of significant improvements in procedural safety over the years, left atrial appendage closure, predominantly achieved using a catheter-based, device implantation approach, is increasingly favoured for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients who cannot achieve effective anticoagulation. This management strategy is well known to the interventional cardiologist/electrophysiologist but is not more widely appreciated within cardiology or internal medicine. This article introduces the devices and briefly explains the implantation technique. The indications and device follow-up are more comprehensively described. Almost all physicians who care for adult patients will have many with AF. This practical guide, written within guideline/guidance boundaries, is aimed at those non-implanting physicians who may need to refer patients for consideration of this new therapy, which is becoming increasingly popular.

Safety of Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Watchman Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative to chronic anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Multiple devices were used for LAA closure, with the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) and Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) being the most commonly used in clinical practice. In August 2021, the FDA approved the use of the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder. There is still a knowledge gap in the safety profile of the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder device in comparison to the Watchman device.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess and compare the safety profile peri-procedure and post-procedure between the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder and Watchman devices.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LAA closure using Watchman or Amulet devices from July 2015 to August 2020 at the American University of Beirut Medical Center were included in the analysis. Primary endpoints included peri-operative and post-procedural complications (thromboembolic events, bleeding complications, vascular access complications, pericardial effusion/tamponade, device positional complications and in-hospital death).

RESULTS

The study included 37 patients (21 had Watchman devices, 16 had Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder devices, and 28 were men, mean age 76.57 ± 9.3 years). Seven patients developed post-procedural iatrogenic atrial septal defects (four in the Watchman group vs three in the Amulet group, p-value=0.982). Three patients developed pericardial effusion (one in the Watchman vs two in the Amulet group, p-value=0.394). Only one patient developed peri-device leak (one in the Watchman group vs none in the Amulet group, p-value=0.283). One device could not be deployed (one in the Amulet group vs none in the Watchman group, p-value=0.191). None of the patients developed in-hospital death, cardiac tamponade, device embolism, device thrombosis, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), cranial bleeding, or arrhythmias after the procedure. The rate of peri-operative complications was similar between both groups. Both groups displayed low rates of adverse events in the peri-operative and post-operative periods.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the safety profile of Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluders and Watchman devices. There was a low incidence of peri-operative and post-operative adverse events with the implanted devices.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device: a systematic review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly observed arrhythmia in the world and its prevalence increases with age. The main and most severe complication of AF is ischemic stroke. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is the standard of care for stroke prevention in the high risk population. Initiation of this treatment is associated with a substantial risk of bleeding complications. Moreover, there is a group of patients who cannot tolerate OAC. In patients with AF the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of thrombus formation. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has become an important non-pharmacological intervention for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF. The procedure aims to reduce the risk of thromboembolism without increasing the risk of bleeding. Over the last few years, the safety and long-term efficacy of the procedure in specific populations have increased and more patients are being treated. The Watchman device is the most studied device in this field. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated non-inferiority of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN 2.5 device to OAC (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). The new generation device, WATCHMAN FLX, was introduced and its use was associated with fewer safety events and a higher success rate of effective appendage closure. Nevertheless, several unsolved problems remain, including device-related thrombosis, the post-LAAC antithrombotic regimen, and peri-device leakage. This review will focus on LAAC with the Watchman device for stroke prevention in AF patients. Current status, available literature, clinical safety and efficacy will be summarized.

Comparing safety and efficacy: MemoLefort versus watchman for left atrial appendage closure

BACKGROUND

The MemoLefort is a new plug occluder for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study compares the safety and efficacy of MemoLefort and the well-established Watchman occluder for LAAC.

METHODS

Between January 2021 and September 2022, a cohort of 189 consecutive patients who underwent LAAC with MemoLefort or Watchman at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were included. Patients with MemoLefort or Watchman devices were compared in terms of the primary safety endpoints encompassing major periprocedural complications and major bleeding events at follow-up, the primary efficacy endpoint of all-cause stroke, systemic embolism and cardiovascular/unexplained death, and the combined hazard endpoint, a composite of all the above-mentioned hazards.

RESULTS

Of the MemoLefort group (n = 83) and Watchman group (n = 106), the mean age, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and HAS-BLED score were 67.6 ± 9.2 vs. 69.0 ± 10.6 years, 3.9 ± 1.9 vs. 3.8 ± 1.9, and 1.6 ± 1.0 vs. 1.7 ± 1.2, respectively. After a median follow-up duration of 198 (99-329) vs. 334 (171-497) days, the primary endpoints of efficacy [2/49, 4.1% (MemoLefort) vs. 2/97, 2.1% (Watchman); hazard ratio (HR), 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20-11.08; P = 0.68] and safety (1/49, 2.0% vs. 5/97, 5.2%; HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.05-1.31; P = 0.19), as well as the combined hazard endpoint (3/49, 61% vs. 6/97, 6.2%; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.18-2.58; P = 0.59) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, LAAC with MemoLefort provided similar efficacy, safety, and net clinical benefit in comparison to Watchman devices.

Antithrombotic Therapy Following Structural Heart Disease Interventions: Current Status and Future Directions

Interventions in structural heart disease cover many catheter-based procedures for congenital and acquired conditions including valvular diseases, septal defects, arterial or venous obstructions, and fistulas. Among the available procedures, the most common are aortic valve implantation, mitral or tricuspid valve repair/implantation, left atrial appendage occlusion, and patent foramen ovale closure. Antithrombotic therapy for transcatheter structural heart disease interventions aims to prevent thromboembolic events and reduce the risk of short-term and long-term complications. The specific approach to antithrombotic therapy depends on the type of intervention and individual patient factors. In this review, we synopsize contemporary evidence on antithrombotic therapies for structural heart disease interventions and highlight the importance of a personalized approach. These recommendations may evolve over time as new evidence emerges and clinical guidelines are updated. Therefore, it's crucial for healthcare professionals to stay updated on the most recent guidelines and individualize therapy based on patient-specific factors and procedural considerations.

Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Residual leaks are not infrequent after left atrial appendage occlusion. However, there is still uncertainty regarding their prognostic implications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of residual leaks after left atrial appendage occlusion.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted until 19 February 2023. Residual leaks comprised peri-device leaks (PDLs) on transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or computed tomography (CT), as well as left atrial appendage patency on CT. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the clinical impact of residual leaks.

RESULTS

Overall 48 eligible studies (44 non-randomized/observational and 4 randomized studies) including 61 666 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion were analysed. Peri-device leak by TEE was present in 26.1% of patients. Computed tomography-based left atrial appendage patency and PDL were present in 54.9% and 57.3% of patients, respectively. Transoesophageal echocardiography-based PDL (i.e. any reported PDL regardless of its size) was significantly associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism [pooled odds ratio (pOR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52-2.74], all-cause mortality (pOR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08-1.24), and major bleeding (pOR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22), compared with no reported PDL. A positive graded association between PDL size and risk of thromboembolism was noted across TEE cut-offs. For any PDL of >0, >1, >3, and >5 mm, the pORs for thromboembolism were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.35-2.47), 2.13 (95% CI: 1.04-4.35), 4.14 (95% CI: 2.07-8.27), and 4.44 (95% CI: 2.09-9.43), respectively, compared with either no PDL or PDL smaller than each cut-off. Neither left atrial appendage patency, nor PDL by CT was associated with thromboembolism (pOR 1.45 and 1.04, 95% CI: 0.84-2.50 and 0.52-2.07, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-device leak detected by TEE was associated with adverse events, primarily thromboembolism. Residual leaks detected by CT were more frequent but lacked prognostic significance.

Is spontaneous echo contrast associated with device-related thrombus or embolic events after left atrial appendage occlusion? - Insights from the multicenter German LAARGE registry

BACKGROUND

Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for prophylaxis of thromboembolic events (TEs) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients, predominantly in those with high bleeding risk and contraindications for long-term OAC. Although spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) is a well-known risk factor for atrial thrombus formation, little is known about whether this means an increased risk of device-related thrombus (DRT) or TEs following LAAO.

METHODS

This substudy of the prospective, multicenter German LAARGE registry assessed two groups according to absence (SEC -) or presence of SEC (SEC +) in preprocedural cardiac imaging. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were registered up to 1 year after LAAO.

RESULTS

Five hundred eighty-eight patients (SEC - 85.5 vs. SEC + 14.5%) were included. More SEC + patients were implanted for OAC non-compliance (11.8 vs. 4.6%, p = 0.008) and a higher proportion received only antiplatelet therapy without OAC at hospital discharge (96.5 vs. 86.0%, p = 0.007). The SEC + patients had larger LA diameters (50 (47; 54) vs. 47 (43; 51) mm, p < 0.001), wider LAA ostia (21 (19; 23) vs. 20 (17; 22) mm at 45°, p = 0.011), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (50 (45; 60) vs. 60 (50; 60) %, p < 0.001) on admission. Procedural success was very high in both groups (98.1%, p = 1.00). Periprocedural major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and other major complications were rare in both groups (3.8 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.76). At follow-up, DRT was only detected in the SEC - group (3.8 vs. 0%, p = 1.00). The rates of TEs (SEC - 1.2 vs. SEC + 0%, p = 1.00) after hospital discharge and 1-year mortality (SEC - 12.0 vs. SEC + 11.8%, p = 0.96) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of SEC at baseline was not associated with an increased rate of DRT or TEs at 1-year follow-up after LAAO in LAARGE.

Review of Bleeding and Thrombotic Risks Associated With Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Structural Heart Interventions

Transcatheter structural heart interventions have drastically evolved over the past 2 decades. However, most catheterization procedures require the deployment of devices in the body; therefore, the adhesion of thrombi to those devices is a major problem, resulting in the requirement of a period of postprocedural antithrombotic regimen. However, in recent years, bleeding associated with these antithrombotic therapies has also become a major concern, attracting the attention of investigators. This is complicated by the fact that patients at high thrombotic risk are also at high bleeding risk, making the issue of administrating antithrombotic therapy challenging. The objective of this review was to identify the important issues and summarize the current status of postoperative antithrombotic therapy and assessment of the bleeding risk following transcatheter structural heart interventions such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, and transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion.

Antithrombotic Therapy after Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Evidence, Challenges and Future Directions

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been established in clinical practice as an attractive alternative to oral anticoagulation for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk. The devices approved in Europe and United States (US) for percutaneous LAAC contain metal and antithrombotic therapy is strongly recommended after their implantation to prevent apposition of thrombus on the atrial surface of the device during endothelialization. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the optimal antithrombotic drug regimen following device implantation in view of the incomplete understanding of the LAAC device healing process, the lack of randomized clinical trials comparing different antithrombotic agents after LAAC and the heterogeneous bleeding risk of patients undergoing LAAC. Thus, this review aims to evaluate the available evidence and the remaining challenges related to the post-LAAC antithrombotic regimens. Furthermore, common clinical scenarios associated with challenging management of antithrombotic therapy after LAAC and potential future directions, will be discussed.

Comparison of intracardiac vs. transesophageal echocardiography for "one-stop" procedures of combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Background and objective

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of "one-stop" procedures that combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device under the guidance of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) vs. transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods and results

In this study, we prospectively enrolled patients who underwent "one-stop" procedures under the guidance of ICE (n = 193, 109 men, 65.02 ± 8.47 years) or TEE (n = 109, 69 men, 64.23 ± 7.75 years) between January 2021 and October 2022. Intraprocedural thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage (LAA) was observed in 3 (1.46%) patients in the ICE group and 15 (11.63%) patients in the TEE group (P < 0.05) before LAAC. Total fluoroscopy time and dose in the ICE group were less than those in the TEE group. The total "one-stop" turnaround time and LAAC procedure time in the ICE group were significantly shorter than those in the TEE group (P < 0.05). Postoperative esophagus discomfort, nausea and vomiting, and hypotension were more often seen in the TEE group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in matched cases between ICE and fluoroscopy measurements (P = 0.082). The TEE results related to LAAC and clinical events were similar between the two groups during the follow-up (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The ICE-guided "one-stop" procedure was safe and feasible with less radiation exposure, shorter turnaround time, and fewer complications and intraoperative thrombus formations than the TEE group. ICE offered accurate measurements in the LAA dimension during LAAC. Echocardiography during the "one-stop" procedures was necessary to rule out the intraoperative thrombus.

Effectiveness and Safety of an Outpatient Program for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a safe and effective alternative to oral anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Technological development in devices and imaging techniques, as well as accumulated experience, have increased procedural success rates and decreased complications. Same-day discharge protocols have been proposed in the field of structural heart disease, but this approach has not been studied in detail for the LAAO procedure.

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of an outpatient program for LAAO when compared to the conventional treatment approach.

METHODS

We present a retrospective, non-randomized single-center study of 262 consecutive patients undergoing LAAO. Patients were divided into two groups, the first (n = 131) followed a conventional protocol (CP), and the second (n = 131) an outpatient protocol (OP). The primary composite endpoint comprised MACCE (death, stroke, and bleeding), cardiac tamponade, vascular complication, or attendance in the emergency department after hospital discharge at 30 days.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 99.6%, with a periprocedural complication rate of 2.29%. With regards to the CP versus OP group, there were no differences between incidences of the primary composite endpoint (6.1% PC vs. 3.0% PA, p = 0.24), or after an analysis, with propensity score matching. No differences were observed in the individual endpoints. There was a decrease in hospital length of stay in the same-day discharge group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A same-day discharge LAAO program is safe, effective, and feasible when compared to the conventional strategy. Moreover, it reduces hospital length of stay, which might have clinical and economic benefits.

Case report: pulmonary artery perforation during transseptal puncture for left atrial appendage closure requires emergency cardiac operation

Patients with atrial fibrillation who take a high bleeding risk and are not candidates for oral anticoagulation therapy are increasingly being referred for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) as an alternative method of stroke prevention. However, certain manipulations performed during the LAAC procedure, such as transseptal puncture (TSP), may potentially result in vessel injury and lead to cardiac tamponade or even fatality. Clinical significance and management strategies associated with these complications remain controversial. A 74-year-old female patient with atrial fibrillation was referred for left atrial appendage occlusion. During the puncture of the atrial septum, the catheter sheath inadvertently exited through the roof of the right atrium and continued to advance, resulting in pulmonary artery perforation. The patient underwent immediate pericardiocentesis and drainage, followed by surgical exploration for suturing the tear in the pulmonary artery and ligation of the left atrial appendage. This represents the first reported case of a pulmonary artery perforation occurring during a transseptal puncture procedure for left atrial appendage closure. The case exemplifies the feasibility of emergency cardiac surgery as a therapeutic intervention.

Safety and efficacy of ablation for atrial fibrillation in combination with left atrial appendage occlusion in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) combined with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a feasible approach for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Its role in octogenarians with AF is unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

In AF patients over 80 years, CA combined with LAAO is a feasible way in restoring sinus rhythm and preventing stroke.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients who underwent CA and LAAO in a single procedure between March 2018 and December 2020 were included. Efficacy endpoints included procedural success rate, AF recurrence rate, and thromboembolic events. Safety endpoints included pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, device-related thrombus (DRT), all-cause death, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Five hundred and five patients (mean age 69.5 ± 7.7 years; 230 [45.5%] female) were included, with 46 (9.1%) patients aged ≥80 years old (octogenarian group). Prevalence of paroxysmal AF (25 [54.3%] vs. 207 [45.1%], p < 0.001) and CHA2DS2VASc score (4.1 ± 1.3 vs. 3.1 ± 1.4, p < 0.0001) were higher in octogenarian patients. There were six cases (1.2%) of pericardial effusion (all in nonoctogenarian patients). At 3 months postprocedure, 437 patients underwent TEE/CT. Thirty-two (80%) octogenarian patients and 308 (77.6%) nonoctogenarian patients had no peri-device leak. After a mean follow-up of 26.9 ± 9.1 months, AF was documented in 10 (21.7%) patients in octogenarian group and in 103 (22.4%) patients in nonoctogenarian group (p = 0.99). The annual thromboembolic risk was 2.1% and 0.8% in the octogenarian group and nonoctogenarian group, respectively. Death occurred in 16 nonoctogenarian patients. One major bleeding was recorded in the octogenarian group.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CA and LAAO in a single procedure is a feasible treatment option in octogenarians with comparable efficacy and safety profile.

Computed Tomography Scan Evidence for Left Atrial Appendage Short-Term Remodeling Following Percutaneous Occlusion: Impact of Device Oversizing

Background The interrelationships between left atrial appendage (LAA) dimensions and device following implantation are unknown. We aimed to analyze the impact of Watchman device implantation on LAA dimensions following its percutaneous closure and potential predictors of remodeling. Methods and Results All consecutive LAA closure procedures performed at 2 centers between November 2017 and December 2020 were included in the WATCH-DUAL (Watchman 2.5 Versus Watchman FLX in a Dual-Center Left Atrial Appendage Closure Cohort) registry. This study included patients who had pre- and postintervention computed tomography scan analysis. The LAA and device dimensions were measured in a centralized core lab by 3-dimensional computed tomography scan reconstruction methods, focusing on the device landing zone. This analysis included 104 patients (age, 76.0 [range, 72.0-83.0] years; 72% men; 53% Watchman FLX; 47% Watchman 2.5). The baseline characteristics were comparable between Watchman 2.5 and Watchman FLX groups, except for the higher use of oversizing in the latter group. The median delay for computed tomography control was 49 (range, 43-64) days. The landing zone area (median, 446 [range, 363-523] versus 290 [222-366] mm2; P<0.001) and minimal diameter (median, 23.0 [range, 20.7-24.8] versus 16.7 [14.7-19.4] mm; P<0.001) significantly increased after implantation. The absolute (median, 157 [range, 98-220] versus 85 [18-148] mm2, P<0.001) and relative (median, 50% [range, 32%-79%] versus 26% [4%-50%]; P<0.001) increases in landing zone area were more pronounced in patients with oversized device. Baseline LAA dimensions were smaller, landing zone eccentricity larger, and oversized device more frequent in patients with significant overexpansion compared with the others. Conclusions LAA dimensions increased at the site of the Watchman prosthesis after implantation, suggesting a local positive remodeling after the procedure. This phenomenon was more pronounced in the case of oversized devices.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous atrial appendage closure followed by antiplatelet therapy in a high-risk population: single-center experience with a WATCHMAN device

Introduction

In our everyday practice we encounter many patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with either a contraindication to oral anticoagulation or with its inefficiency.

Aim

To investigate whether left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) followed by post-procedure antiplatelet therapy is safe and efficient in a high-risk population.

Material and methods

Ninety-one (48 males) consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) underwent an LAAC procedure using a first-generation WATCHMAN 2.5 device followed by antiplatelet therapy. Clinical and transesophageal echocardiography data were collected at baseline and at the follow-up visit.

Results

The median (IQR) CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5 (4.0-6.0) and the HAS-BLED score was 3 (3.0-4.0); the mean (SD) age was 74.4 (8.4). A bleeding history was observed in 89% of patients and 24.2% of patients had a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The procedure was successful in 98.9%. Post-procedure therapy was dual antiplatelet therapy in 85 patients; 3 patients received single antiplatelet therapy and the therapy was maintained until the follow-up visit. Peri-procedural complications were tamponade (3.3%), pericardial effusion (2.2%) and two deaths (2.2%) with no bleeding or vascular complications. The median follow-up was 67 (52.75-84.75) days. Primary safety endpoint (bleeding BARC type 3 or more, tamponade, pericardial effusion, and device embolization) and primary efficacy endpoint (stroke or TIA, hemorrhagic stroke, peripheral embolism, cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV death) were observed in 2 and 4 patients, respectively.

Conclusions

The LAAC procedure followed by antiplatelet therapy seems to be safe and efficient in the high-risk population. Further studies in this field are required.

Feasibility and safety of a percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic procedure for left atrial appendage closure in patients for whom fluoroscopy presents risk: a cohort study

Background

Most patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) are older adult individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) and many comorbidities, which may elevate the risk for complications associated with contrast agents with the fluoroscopic image-guided procedure. This retrospective cohort study of patients with AF at high risk for use of contrast agents compared the feasibility and safety of LAAC using percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic procedure with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the only image guidance relative to those under fluoroscopic image guidance.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 126 patients with AF who underwent LAAC from September 2017 to December 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the imaging guidance modality: a TEE group (n=32) and a fluoroscopic group (n=94). We analyzed the differences in complete closure rates and device- and procedure-related complications between the 2 groups. Continuous variables were assessed using the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test, while categorical variables were evaluated using Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher exact test. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust for baseline differences.

Results

Propensity-score matching yielded 25 pairs of patients with similarly distributed age (72.9±6.9 vs. 73.1±4.9 years; P=0.925), gender (10:15 vs. 11:14; P>0.99), weight (68.3±11.2 vs. 68.1±12.3 kg; P=0.948), and alanine aminotransferase level (20.0±9.8 vs. 22.5±14.2 U/L; P=0.482). The LAA was successfully occluded in all patients, and the TEE group showed similar results to the fluoroscopic group in terms of success rate (100% vs. 100%; P>0.99) and hospitalization duration [5.0 (IQ1-IQ3: 3.0-7.0) vs. 5.0 (IQ1-IQ3: 3.0-6.0) days; P=0.498]. The groups also demonstrated comparable complication rates, with 1 (4.2%) case of pericardial effusion and 1 (4.2%) case of residual shunt in the TEE group, and 5 (20%) cases of residual shunt, 1 (4.2%) case of pericardial effusion, 1 (4.2%) case of myocardial infarction, and 1 (4.2%) case of access-related complications in the fluoroscopic group. There were no deaths. The overall incidence rate of procedure-related complications (6.2% vs. 18.1%, P=0.153) at mean 22.2±4.5 months follow-up between the 2 groups was similar.

Conclusions

In patients with AF of high risk for use of contrast agents, LAAC under non-fluoroscopic guidance appears feasible and safe with similar outcomes to that under fluoroscopic guidance.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Among Patients With Diabetes (Insights from a National Database)

Atrial fibrillation is a major risk factor for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative to anticoagulation for patients with high risk of bleeding. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with adverse events after cardiac procedures. We sought to compare procedural and hospital outcomes in patients who underwent LAAC with and without DM. The Nationwide Inpatient Database was queried for patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was all adverse events that included in-hospital death, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, stroke, pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, pericardiocentesis, pericardial window, and postprocedural hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. Analysis included 62,220 patients who underwent LAAC from 2016 to 2019; 34.9% of patients had DM. There was a slight increase in the percentage of patients who underwent LAAC who had DM during the study period, from 29.92% to 34.93%. In unadjusted and adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in all adverse events between patients with and without DM who underwent LAAC (9.18% vs 8.77%, respectively, adjusted p = 0.63), and no difference in length of stay. Patients with DM have higher risk of acute kidney injury (3.75 vs 1.96%, p <0.001). This nationwide retrospective study demonstrates that DM is not associated with an increase in adverse event rates in patients who underwent LAAC.

Atrial Fibrillation in Kidney Failure: Challenges in Risk Assessment and Anticoagulation Management

Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a clinical conundrum in people with kidney failure. Stroke risk is disproportionately high, but clinicians have a limited armamentarium to improve outcomes in this population in whom there is a concurrently high bleeding risk. Direct oral anticoagulants may have a superior benefit-risk profile compared with vitamin K antagonists in people on hemodialysis. Although research has predominantly focused on identifying a safe and effective oral anticoagulation option to reduce stroke risk in people with kidney failure (and predominantly those on hemodialysis), it remains uncertain how clinicians discriminate between people who would derive net clinical benefit as opposed to net harm. The recommended CHA2DS2-VASc score cutoffs provide poor discriminatory value, and there is an urgent need to identify robust markers of thromboembolic risk in kidney failure. There is increasing data to challenge the prior dogma of risk equivalence across AF type, and the American Heart Association highlights moving beyond AF as a binary entity to consider the prognostic significance of AF burden. Implantable cardiac monitor studies reveal high rates and varied burden of subclinical and paroxysmal AF in people on hemodialysis. The association between AF burden and the proarrhythmic environment of hemodialysis with cyclical volume loading, offloading, and electrolyte changes is not well studied. We review the significance of AF burden as a contributor to thromboembolic risk, its potential as the missing link in risk assessment, and updated evidence for anticoagulation in people with kidney failure.

Non-Pharmacological Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide. It is associated with increased mortality and morbidity, especially due to the increased risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in these patients. For this reason, thromboembolism prevention is the cornerstone of managing AF, and oral anticoagulation is nowadays the first-line treatment. However, since most thrombi form in the left atrial appendage and anticoagulant therapy may have side effects and be contraindicated in some patients, surgical and percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) have emerged as a non-pharmacological alternative. This review summarizes all existing evidence on surgical and percutaneous LAAO.

Risk Stratification in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is effective in preventing thromboembolism. Risk stratification tools could help identify patients at risk for early mortality after LAAO. In this study, we validated and recalibrated a clinical risk score (CRS) to predict risk of all-cause mortality after LAAO. This study used data from patients who underwent LAAO in a single-center, tertiary hospital. A previously developed CRS using 5 variables (age, body mass index [BMI], diabetes, heart failure, and estimated glomerular filtration rate) was applied to each patient to assess risk of all-cause mortality at 1 and 2 years. The CRS was recalibrated to the present study cohort and compared with established atrial fibrillation-specific (CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED) and generalized (Walter index) risk scores. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk of mortality and discrimination was assessed by Harrel C-index. Among 223 patients, the 1- and 2-year mortality rates were 6.7% and 11.2%, respectively. With the original CRS, only low BMI (<23 kg/m2) was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI] 2.76 [1.03 to 7.35]; p = 0.04). With recalibration, BMI <29 kg/m2 and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were significantly associated with an increased risk of death (HR [95% CI] 3.24 [1.29 to 8.13] and 2.48 [1.07 to 5.74], respectively), with a trend toward significance noted for history of heart failure (HR [95% CI] 2.13 [0.97 to 4.67], p = 0.06). Recalibration improved the discriminative ability of the CRS from 0.65 to 0.70 and significantly outperformed established risk scores (CHA2DS2-VASc = 0.58, HAS-BLED = 0.55, Walter index = 0.62). In this single-center, observational study, the recalibrated CRS accurately risk stratified patients who underwent LAAO and significantly outperformed established atrial fibrillation-specific and generalized risk scores. In conclusion, clinical risk scores should be considered as an adjunct to standard of care when evaluating a patient's candidacy for LAAO.

Safety and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure-A Nationwide Analysis

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as a non-pharmacological alternative for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) not suitable for anticoagulation therapy. Real-world data on peri-procedural outcomes are limited. The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of peri-procedural safety and healthcare resource utilization in 11,240 adult patients undergoing LAAC in the United States between 2016 and 2019. Primary outcomes (safety) were in-hospital ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE), pericardial effusion (PE), major bleeding, device embolization and mortality. Secondary outcomes (resource utilization) were adverse discharge disposition, hospital length of stay (LOS) and costs. Logistic and Poisson regression models were used to analyze outcomes by adjusting for 10 confounders. SE decreased by 97% between 2016 and 2019 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0-0.24] (p = 0.003), while a trend to lower numbers of other peri-procedural complications was determined. In-hospital mortality (0.14%) remained stable. Hospital LOS decreased by 17% (0.78-0.87, p < 0.001) and adverse discharge rate by 41% (95% CI 0.41-0.86, p = 0.005) between 2016 and 2019, while hospital costs did not significantly change (p = 0.2). Female patients had a higher risk of PE (OR 2.86 [95% CI 2.41-6.39]) and SE (OR 5.0 [95% CI 1.28-43.6]) while multi-morbid patients had higher risks of major bleeding (p < 0.001) and mortality (p = 0.031), longer hospital LOS (p < 0.001) and increased treatment costs (p = 0.073). Significant differences in all outcomes were observed between male and female patients across US regions. In conclusion, LAAC has become a safer and more efficient procedure. Significant sex differences existed across US regions. Careful considerations should be taken when performing LAAC in female and comorbid patients.

The Canadian WATCHMAN Registry for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Background

Access to left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in Canada is limited, due to funding restrictions. This work aimed to assess Canadian clinical practice on patient selection, postprocedural antithrombotic therapy, and safety and/or efficacy with WATCHMAN device implantation.

Methods

Seven Canadian centres implanting the WATCHMAN device participated in this prospective multicentre, observational registry. All procedures were done under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiography guidance. Patients were prospectively followed for 2years. The long-term stroke rate was compared with the expected rate based on the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.

Results

A total of 272 patients who underwent LAAC with the WATCHMAN device between December 2013 and August 2019 (mean age: 75.4 years [standard deviation {SD}: 8.75]; male, 63.2%; CHA₂DS₂-VASc score: 4.35 [SD: 1.64]; HAS-BLED score: 3.55 [SD: 0.94]) were included. Most patients (90.4%) had prior history of bleeding (major, 80.5%; minor, 21.7%). The WATCHMAN device was successfully implanted in 269 patients (98.9%), with a few procedure-related complications, including 5 pericardial effusions requiring drainage (1.8%), and 1 death (0.4%; 22 days post-LAAC from respiratory failure). Post-LAAC antithrombotic therapy included dual antiplatelet therapy in 70.6%, single antiplatelet therapy in 18.4%, and oral anticoagulation in 13.6%. During the follow-up period (mean: 709.7 days [SD: 467.2]), an 81.4% reduction of the ischemic stroke rate occurred, based on the expected rate from the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (6.0% expected vs 1.1% observed). Device-related thrombus was detected in 1.8%.

Conclusions

The majority of Canadian patients who underwent LAAC had oral anticoagulation contraindication due to prior bleeding, and most were safely treated with antiplatelet therapy post-LAAC, with a low device-related thrombus incidence. Long-term follow-up demonstrated that LAAC achieved a significant reduction in ischemic stroke rate.

Impact of Preprocedural Computed Tomography on Left Atrial Appendage Closure Success: A Swiss-Apero Trial Subanalysis

BACKGROUND

The benefit related to the use of preprocedural computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on top of periprocedural echocardiography to plan percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to evaluate the impact of preprocedural CCTA on LAAC procedural success.

METHODS

In the investigator-initiated SWISS-APERO (Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet and Watchman Device in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure) trial, patients undergoing echocardiography-guided LAAC were randomly assigned to receive the Amulet (Abbott) or Watchman 2.5/FLX (Boston Scientific) device across 8 European centers. According to the study protocol ongoing at the time of the procedure, the first operators had (CCTA unblinded group) or did not have (CCTA blinded group) access to preprocedural CCTA images. In this post hoc analysis, we compared blinded vs unblinded procedures in terms of procedural success defined as complete left atrial appendage occlusion as evaluated at the end of LAAC (short-term) or at the 45-day follow-up (long-term) without procedural-related complications.

RESULTS

Among 219 LAACs preceded by CCTA, 92 (42.1%) and 127 (57.9%) were assigned to the CCTA unblinded and blinded group, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, operator unblinding to preprocedural CCTA remained associated with a higher rate of short-term procedural success (93.5% vs 81.1%; P = 0.009; adjusted OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.05-7.29; P = 0.040) and long-term procedural success (83.7% vs 72.4%; P = 0.050; adjusted OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.03-4.35; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective multicenter cohort of clinically indicated echocardiography-guided LAACs, unblinding of the first operators to preprocedural CCTA images was independently associated with a higher rate of both short- and long-term procedural success. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the impact of preprocedural CCTA on clinical outcomes.

Follow Up imaging After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion-Something or Nothing and for How Long?

Routine postprocedural imaging with transesophageal echocardiography or cardiac computed tomography angiography is the most commonly used imaging modality for follow-up surveillance usually performed 1 to 6 months after the procedure. Imaging enables recognition of well-suited and sealed devices in the left atrial appendage as well as of potential harmful complications such as peri-device leaks, device-related thrombus, and device embolization, which may lead to further surveillance observation with recurrent imaging, reinitiation of oral anticoagulants, or additional interventional procedures.

The Future of LAAC-In 5, 10, and 20 Years

Early experience with percutaneous LAA closure documented complication rates of ∼10%, with failure to implant devices in ∼10% of patients. These numbers are unrecognizable in contemporary practice due to the iterative changes made largely in the last 10 years. Here we look forward to ask what might change, and when, to bring percutaneous LAA closure out of the niche early adopter centers into routine use. We consider the opportunity to incorporate different technologies into LAAc devices in the context of managing patient with atrial fibrillation. Finally, we consider how to make the procedure safer and more effective.

Surgical and percutaneous left atrial appendage intervention: silent cerebral embolism considerations

OBJECTIVES

Left atrial appendage intervention is an alternative to oral anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of silent cerebral embolisms after surgical and percutaneous intervention and to identify the risk factors for procedure-related silent cerebral embolisms after intervention.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included consecutive atrial fibrillation patients from 2 independent cohorts (left atrial appendage excision (LAAE) cohort and left atrial appendage occlusion cohort) between September 2018 and December 2020. All patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging before and after the procedure. Silent cerebral embolism was defined as new focal hyperintense lesions detected only on postprocedural sequence.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients from the LAAE cohort and 42 patients from the occlusion cohort were enrolled. A significantly lower incidence of silent cerebral embolism was observed in the LAAE cohort as compared with occlusion (6.3% vs 54.8%, P < 0.001). In the left atrial appendage occlusion cohort, patients who developed silent cerebral embolism after the procedure had significantly higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores [odds ratio (OR) 2.172; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.149-4.104; P = 0.017], longer occlusion placement time (OR 1.067; 95% CI 1.018-1.118; P = 0.006) and lower peak activated clotting time level after transseptal puncture (OR 0.976; 95% CI 0.954-0.998; P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of procedure-related silent cerebral embolism was strikingly lower in patients with LAAE than in patients with occlusion. More cardiovascular comorbidities, longer occlusion placement time and lower activated clotting time level were significantly associated with the development of procedure-related silent cerebral embolism.