Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: decreased survival associated with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary Hypertension in Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a key complication in interstitial lung disease (ILD), with recent therapeutic advances.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the diagnostic evaluation, epidemiologic features, associated factors, prognostic significance, and outcome measures in interventional trials for PH in patients with ILD in the current literature?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for original research evaluating PH in participants with ILD of any cause. The definition of PH was based on the investigators' criteria.

RESULTS

Three hundred two studies were included, with varying diagnostic evaluations used to define PH. Commonly used diagnostic tests were right heart catheterization (56%) and transthoracic echocardiography (50%). The pooled prevalence for PH in general populations with ILD was 36% (95% CI, 30%-42%) using right heart catheterization and 34% (95% CI, 29%-38%) using transthoracic echocardiography. Lower diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, worse oxygenation status, reduced exercise capacity, increased pulmonary artery to aorta ratio and pulmonary artery diameter, and elevated serum brain natriuretic peptide consistently were associated with the presence of PH in at least 60% of reported studies. The presence of PH was associated with increased symptom burden and worse prognosis. Outcome measures in interventional trials of PH in ILD focused on changes in pulmonary vascular hemodynamics and 6-min walk distance.

INTERPRETATION

PH is a common complication in ILD with significant health impacts. A standardized definition with prospective evaluation of risk-stratified assessments for PH using identified associated risk factors is warranted. Our findings provide an evidence base for validation as surrogate end points in future PH interventional trials in ILD.

TRIAL REGISTRY

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42021255394; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 as a potential biomarker for distinguishing combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A retrospective study

Background

The presence of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is relatively common in patients with emphysema. This has been designated combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). CPFE had worse prognosis than emphysema alone. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels as a biomarker of alveolar type 2 epithelial cell injury, which is widely used to identify the presence of ILD, whether it can differentiate CPFE from COPD remains unknown.

Methods

259 patients from Xiangya Hospital with diagnosis of COPD, with or without ILD, and who had KL-6 tests were recruited for this retrospective analysis. Recorded data included demographic information, comorbidities, inflammatory biomarkers. Results of CT and pulmonary function tests were collected one week before or after KL-6 measurements.

Results

Among 259 patients, 52 patients were diagnosed with CPFE. The mean age was 67.39 ± 8.14 yeas. CPFE patients had higher ratio of rheumatic diseases (21.2 % vs 7.2 %, P = 0.003). CPFE patients exhibited higher values of FEV1 (1.97 vs 1.57, P = 0.002) and FEV1/FVC ratio (69.46 vs 57.64, P < 0.001) compared to COPD patients. CPFE patients had higher eosinophil counts, percentage of eosinophils, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin levels and lower platelet counts. Serum KL-6 levels were higher in CPFE group compared to COPD group (574.95 vs 339.30 U/mL, P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression showed that KL-6 level was an independent predictive factor for the presence of ILD among COPD patients. The AUC of serum KL-6 levels to differentiate CPFE was 0.711, with 95 % CI being 0.635 to 0.787. The cutoff point of KL-6 level was 550.95 U/mL with 57.7 % sensitivity and 79.7 % specificity for the discrimination of CPFE from COPD.

Conclusion

CPFE patients show higher KL-6 levels compared to isolated COPD, suggesting the potential of KL-6 as a practical screening tool for interstitial lung disease, specifically CPFE. A KL-6 threshold of 550.95 U/mL in COPD patients may indicate a high need for high-resolution chest computed tomography to detect fibrosis.

Clustering analysis of HRCT parameters measured using a texture-based automated system: relationship with clinical outcomes of IPF

PURPOSE

The extent of honeycombing and reticulation predict the clinical prognosis of IPF. Emphysema, consolidation, and ground glass opacity are visible in HRCT scans. To date, there have been few comprehensive studies that have used these parameters. We conducted automated quantitative analysis to identify predictive parameters for clinical outcomes and then grouped the subjects accordingly.

METHODS

CT images were obtained while patients held their breath at full inspiration. Parameters were analyzed using an automated lung texture quantification system. Cluster analysis was conducted on 159 IPF patients and clinical profiles were compared between clusters in terms of survival.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that survival rates declined as fibrosis, reticulation, honeycombing, consolidation, and emphysema scores increased. Cox regression analysis revealed that reticulation had the most significant impact on survival rate, followed by honeycombing, consolidation, and emphysema scores. Hierarchical and K-means cluster analyses revealed 3 clusters. Cluster 1 (n = 126) with the lowest values for all parameters had the longest survival duration, and relatively-well preserved FVC and DLCO. Cluster 2 (n = 15) with high reticulation and consolidation scores had the lowest FVC and DLCO values with a predominance of female, while cluster 3 (n = 18) with high honeycombing and emphysema scores predominantly consisted of male smokers. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that cluster 2 had the lowest survival rate, followed by cluster 3 and cluster 1.

CONCLUSION

Automated quantitative CT analysis provides valuable information for predicting clinical outcomes, and clustering based on these parameters may help identify the high-risk group for management.

Predictors of Mortality in Pulmonary Hypertension-Associated Chronic Lung Disease

Background/Objectives: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) often accompanies chronic lung diseases. Several chronic lung diseases with PH portends unfavorable outcomes. We investigated which variables in this cohort of patients with chronic lung disease and PH predicts mortality. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with chronic lung disease and PH at a single tertiary, academic center. The underlying lung disease included were COPD, IPF, other fibrotic ILD, non-fibrotic ILD, fibrotic sarcoidosis, and CPFE. All patients had right heart catheterization diagnostic of PH as well as pulmonary function testing data including 6 min walk testing. Univariable and multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify variables associated with mortality. Results: We identified 793 patients with chronic lung disease and PH. In total, 144 patients died prior to potential lung transplant. In multivariable Cox regression IPF, other fibrotic ILD, non-fibrotic ILD, and CPFE were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. Severe PH (PVR > 5 WU), FEV1 < 30% predicted, FVC < 40% predicted, 6 min walk distance < 150 m were also significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. Conclusions: Carrying a diagnosis of IPF, CPFE, fibrotic ILD, or non-fibrotic ILD with PH has an increased risk of mortality as compared to COPD with PH. Hemodynamic, PVR > 5 WU, 6 min walk test less than 150 m, as well as spirometric data including FEV1 < 30% and FVC < 40% predicted were independently associated with an increased risk of death.

Pulmonary Hypertension With Interstitial Pneumonia: Initial Treatment Effectiveness and Severity in a Japan Registry

Background

Recent guidelines discourage the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with respiratory diseases. Therefore, stratifications of the effectiveness of PAH-targeted therapies are important for this group.

Objectives

The authors aimed to identify phenotypes that might benefit from initial PAH-targeted therapies in patients with PH associated with interstitial pneumonia and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.

Methods

We categorized 270 patients with precapillary PH (192 interstitial pneumonia, 78 combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema) into severe and mild PH using a pulmonary vascular resistance of 5 WU. We investigated the prognostic factors and compared the prognoses of initial (within 2 months after diagnosis) and noninitial treatment groups, as well as responders (improvements in World Health Organization functional class, pulmonary vascular resistance, and 6-minute walk distance) and nonresponders.

Results

Among 239 treatment-naive patients, 46.0% had severe PH, 51.8% had mild ventilatory impairment (VI), and 40.6% received initial treatment. In the severe PH with mild VI subgroup, the initial treatment group had a favorable prognosis compared with the noninitial treatment group. The response rate in this group was significantly higher than the others (48.2% vs 21.8%, ratio 2.21 [95% CI: 1.17-4.16]). In multivariate analysis, initial treatment was a better prognostic factor for severe PH but not for mild PH. Within the severe PH subgroup, responders had a favorable prognosis.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated an increased number of responders to initial PAH-targeted therapy, with a favorable prognosis in severe PH cases with mild VI. A survival benefit was not observed in mild PH cases. (Multi-institutional Prospective Registry in Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Respiratory Disease; UMIN000011541).

Mortality surrogates in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with coexistent emphysema, termed combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) may associate with reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) declines compared to non-CPFE IPF patients. We examined associations between mortality and functional measures of disease progression in two IPF cohorts.

METHODS

Visual emphysema presence (>0% emphysema) scored on computed tomography identified CPFE patients (CPFE/non-CPFE: derivation cohort n=317/n=183, replication cohort n=358/n=152), who were subgrouped using 10% or 15% visual emphysema thresholds, and an unsupervised machine-learning model considering emphysema and interstitial lung disease extents. Baseline characteristics, 1-year relative FVC and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) decline (linear mixed-effects models), and their associations with mortality (multivariable Cox regression models) were compared across non-CPFE and CPFE subgroups.

RESULTS

In both IPF cohorts, CPFE patients with ≥10% emphysema had a greater smoking history and lower baseline D LCO compared to CPFE patients with <10% emphysema. Using multivariable Cox regression analyses in patients with ≥10% emphysema, 1-year D LCO decline showed stronger mortality associations than 1-year FVC decline. Results were maintained in patients suitable for therapeutic IPF trials and in subjects subgrouped by ≥15% emphysema and using unsupervised machine learning. Importantly, the unsupervised machine-learning approach identified CPFE patients in whom FVC decline did not associate strongly with mortality. In non-CPFE IPF patients, 1-year FVC declines ≥5% and ≥10% showed strong mortality associations.

CONCLUSION

When assessing disease progression in IPF, D LCO decline should be considered in patients with ≥10% emphysema and a ≥5% 1-year relative FVC decline threshold considered in non-CPFE IPF patients.

Pictorial Review of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease on High-Resolution CT Scan and Updated Classification

TOPIC IMPORTANCE

Given the recently expanded approval of antifibrotics for various fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), early and correct recognition of these diseases is imperative for physicians. Because high-resolution chest CT scan forms the backbone of diagnosis for ILD, this review will discuss evidence-based imaging findings of key fibrotic ILDs and an approach for differentiating these diseases.

REVIEW FINDINGS

(1) Imaging findings of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia may evolve over time and become indistinguishable from usual interstitial pneumonia. Therefore, if remote imaging can be reviewed, this would increase the likelihood of an accurate imaging diagnosis, particularly if findings appear to represent a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on the recent examination. (2) Given the difficulty and lack of objectivity in classifying patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis into acute, subacute, and chronic categories and that prognosis depends primarily on presence or absence of fibrosis, the new set of guidelines released in 2020 categorizes patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis as either nonfibrotic (purely inflammatory) or fibrotic (either purely fibrotic or mixed fibrotic/inflammatory) based on imaging and/or histologic findings, and the prior temporal terms are no longer used. (3) Interstitial lung abnormalities are incidental CT scan findings that may suggest early ILD in patients without clinical suspicion for ILD. Patients with high-risk features should undergo clinical evaluation for ILD and be actively monitored for disease progression.

SUMMARY

Fibrotic ILD on high-resolution chest CT scan is a complex topic, but with use of an evidence-based analysis and algorithm as provided in this article, the probability of a correct imaging diagnosis increases.

A formula for predicting emphysema extent in combined idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema

BACKGROUND

No single pulmonary function test captures the functional effect of emphysema in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Without experienced radiologists, other methods are needed to determine emphysema extent. Here, we report the development and validation of a formula to predict emphysema extent in patients with IPF and emphysema.

METHODS

The development cohort included 76 patients with combined IPF and emphysema at the Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom. The formula was derived using stepwise regression to generate the weighted combination of pulmonary function data that fitted best with emphysema extent on high-resolution computed tomography. Test cohorts included patients from two clinical trials (n = 455 [n = 174 with emphysema]; NCT00047645, NCT00075998) and a real-world cohort from the Royal Brompton Hospital (n = 191 [n = 110 with emphysema]). The formula is only applicable for patients with IPF and concomitant emphysema and accordingly was not used to detect the presence or absence of emphysema.

RESULTS

The formula was: predicted emphysema extent = 12.67 + (0.92 x percent predicted forced vital capacity) - (0.65 x percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second) - (0.52 x percent predicted carbon monoxide diffusing capacity). A significant relationship between the formula and observed emphysema extent was found in both cohorts (R2 = 0.25, P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.47, P < 0.0001, respectively). In both, the formula better predicted observed emphysema extent versus individual pulmonary function tests. A 15% emphysema extent threshold, calculated using the formula, identified a significant difference in absolute changes from baseline in forced vital capacity at Week 48 in patients with baseline-predicted emphysema extent < 15% versus ≥ 15% (P = 0.0105).

CONCLUSION

The formula, designed for use in patients with IPF and emphysema, demonstrated enhanced ability to predict emphysema extent versus individual pulmonary function tests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00047645; NCT00075998.

Pulmonary hypertension in the setting of interstitial lung disease: Approach to management and treatment. A consensus statement from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative-Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to interstitial lung disease (ILD), a commonly encountered complication of fibrotic ILDs, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Until recently, the studies of pulmonary vasodilator therapy in PH-ILD have been largely disappointing, with some even demonstrating the potential for harm. This paper is part of a series of Consensus Statements from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative for Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension, with prior publications covering pathogenesis, prevalence, clinical features, phenotyping, clinical trials, and impact of PH-ILD. It offers a comprehensive review of and a holistic approach to treatment of PH-ILD, including the management of underlying interstitial lung diseases, importance of treating the comorbidities, emphasis on importance of exercise and palliation of dyspnea, and review of the most up-to-date guidelines for referral for potential lung transplant work up. It also summarizes the prior, ongoing, and possibly future studies in treatment of the vascular derangement of this morbid condition.

Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Chronic Lung Disease

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of chronic lung diseases, particularly in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung diseases (ILD) and especially in advanced disease. It is associated with greater mortality and worse clinical course. Given the high prevalence of some respiratory disorders and because lung parenchymal abnormalities might be present in other PH groups, the appropriate diagnosis of PH associated with respiratory disease represents a clinical challenge. Patients with chronic lung disease presenting symptoms that exceed those expected by the pulmonary disease should be further evaluated by echocardiography. Confirmatory right heart catheterization is indicated in candidates to surgical treatments, suspected severe PH potentially amenable with targeted therapy, and, in general, in those conditions where the result of the hemodynamic assessment will determine treatment options. The treatment of choice for these patients who are hypoxemic is long-term oxygen therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation to improve symptoms. Lung transplant is the only curative therapy and can be considered in appropriate cases. Conventional vasodilators or drugs approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are not recommended in patients with mild-to-moderate PH because they may impair gas exchange and their lack of efficacy shown in randomized controlled trials. Patients with severe PH (as defined by pulmonary vascular resistance >5 Wood units) should be referred to a center with expertise in PH and lung diseases and ideally included in randomized controlled trials. Targeted PAH therapy might be considered in this subset of patients, with careful monitoring of gas exchange. In patients with ILD, inhaled treprostinil has been shown to improve functional ability and to delay clinical worsening.

Pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease: new insights into pathomechanisms, diagnosis, and management

Patients with chronic lung diseases, particularly interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, frequently develop pulmonary hypertension, which results in clinical deterioration, worsening of oxygen uptake, and an increased mortality risk. Pulmonary hypertension can develop and progress independently from the underlying lung disease. The pulmonary vasculopathy is distinct from that of other forms of pulmonary hypertension, with vascular ablation due to loss of small pulmonary vessels being a key feature. Long-term tobacco exposure might contribute to this type of pulmonary vascular remodelling. The distinct pathomechanisms together with the underlying lung disease might explain why treatment options for this condition remain scarce. Most drugs approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension have shown no or sometimes harmful effects in pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease. An exception is inhaled treprostinil, which improves exercise capacity in patients with interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension. There is a pressing need for safe, effective treatment options and for reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tools to detect and characterise pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic lung disease.

Involvement of langerin in the protective function of a keratan sulfate-based disaccharide in an emphysema mouse model

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis, is now the third cause of death worldwide, and COVID-19 infection has been reported as an exacerbation factor of them. In this study, we report that the intratracheal administration of the keratan sulfate-based disaccharide L4 mitigates the symptoms of elastase-induced emphysema in a mouse model. To know the molecular mechanisms, we performed a functional analysis of a C-type lectin receptor, langerin, a molecule that binds L4. Using mouse BMDCs (bone marrow-derived dendritic cells) as langerin-expressing cells, we observed the downregulation of IL-6 and TNFa and the upregulation of IL-10 after incubation with L4. We also identified CapG (a macrophage-capping protein) as a possible molecule that binds langerin by immunoprecipitation combined with a mass spectrometry analysis. We identified a portion of the CapG that was localized in the nucleus and binds to the promoter region of IL-6 and the TNFa gene in BMDCs, suggesting that CapG suppresses the gene expression of IL-6 and TNFa as an inhibitory transcriptional factor. To examine the effects of L4 in vivo, we also generated langerin-knockout mice by means of genome editing technology. In an emphysema mouse model, the administration of L4 did not mitigate the symptoms of emphysema as well as the inflammatory state of the lung in the langerin-knockout mice. These data suggest that the anti-inflammatory effect of L4 through the langerin-CapG axis represents a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of emphysema and COPD.

Tobacco smoking is associated with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema and worse outcomes in interstitial lung disease

Tobacco smoking is an established cause of pulmonary disease whose contribution to interstitial lung disease (ILD) is incompletely characterized. We hypothesized that compared with nonsmokers, subjects who smoked tobacco would differ in their clinical phenotype and have greater mortality. We performed a retrospective cohort study of tobacco smoking in ILD. We evaluated demographic and clinical characteristics, time to clinically meaningful lung function decline (LFD), and mortality in patients stratified by tobacco smoking status (ever vs. never) within a tertiary center ILD registry (2006-2021) and replicated mortality outcomes across four nontertiary medical centers. Data were analyzed by two-sided t tests, Poisson generalized linear models, and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), ILD subtype, antifibrotic therapy, and hospital center. Of 1,163 study participants, 651 were tobacco smokers. Smokers were more likely to be older, male, have idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), coronary artery disease, CT honeycombing and emphysema, higher FVC, and lower DLCO than nonsmokers (P < 0.01). Time to LFD in smokers was shorter (19.7 ± 20 mo vs. 24.8 ± 29 mo; P = 0.038) and survival time was decreased [10.75 (10.08-11.50) yr vs. 20 (18.67-21.25) yr; adjusted mortality HR = 1.50, 95%CI 1.17-1.92; P < 0.0001] compared with nonsmokers. Smokers had 12% greater odds of death for every additional 10 pack yr of smoking (P < 0.0001). Mortality outcomes remained consistent in the nontertiary cohort (HR = 1.51, 95%CI = 1.03-2.23; P = 0.036). Tobacco smokers with ILD have a distinct clinical phenotype strongly associated with the syndrome of combined PF and emphysema, shorter time to LFD, and decreased survival. Smoking prevention may improve ILD outcomes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Smoking in ILD is associated with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema and worse clinical outcomes.

Treatable traits: a comprehensive precision medicine approach in interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a diverse group of inflammatory and fibrotic lung conditions causing significant morbidity and mortality. A multitude of factors beyond the lungs influence symptoms, health-related quality of life, disease progression and survival in patients with ILD. Despite an increasing emphasis on multidisciplinary management in ILD, the absence of a framework for assessment and delivery of comprehensive patient care poses challenges in clinical practice. The treatable traits approach is a precision medicine care model that operates on the premise of individualised multidimensional assessment for distinct traits that can be targeted by specific interventions. The potential utility of this approach has been described in airway diseases, but has not been adequately considered in ILD. Given the similar disease heterogeneity and complexity between ILD and airway diseases, we explore the concept and potential application of the treatable traits approach in ILD. A framework of aetiological, pulmonary, extrapulmonary and behavioural and lifestyle treatable traits relevant to clinical care and outcomes for patients with ILD is proposed. We further describe key research directions to evaluate the application of the treatable traits approach towards advancing patient care and health outcomes in ILD.

An increased risk of pulmonary hypertension in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). Whether the incidence of PH is increased in CPFE compared with pure pulmonary fibrosis or emphysema remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of PH in patients with CPFE compared to those with IPF or COPD/emphysema.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases for relevant studies focusing on the incidence of PH in patients with CPFE and IPF or emphysema. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to evaluate the differences in the clinical characteristics presence and severity of PH between patients with CPFE, IPF, or emphysema. The survival impact of PH in patients with CPFE was assessed using hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

A total of 13 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 560, 720, and 316 patients with CPFE, IPF, and emphysema, respectively. Patients with CPFE had an increased PH risk with a higher frequency of pulmonary hypertension and higher estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (esPAP), compared with those with IPF (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.55-4.57; P < 0.01; SMD: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52-1.19; P < 0.01) or emphysema (OR: 3.19; 95% CI: 1.42-7.14; P < 0.01; SMD: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.50-0.96; P < 0.01). In addition, the patients with CPFE combined with PH had a poor prognosis than patients with CPFE without PH (HR: 6.16; 95% CI: 2.53-15.03; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that patients with CPFE were associated with a significantly higher risk of PH compared with those with IPF or emphysema alone. The presence of PH was a poor predictor of mortality.

Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: Comparative Evidence on a Complex Condition

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a clinical syndrome characterized by upper lobe emphysema and lower lobe fibrosis manifested by exercise hypoxemia, normal lung volumes, and severe reduction of diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide. It has varying prevalence worldwide with a male predominance, and with smoking history of more than 40 pack-years being a common risk factor. The unique imaging features of CPFE emphasize its distinct entity, aiding in the timely detection of pulmonary hypertension and lung cancer, both of which are common complications. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is an important diagnostic and prognostic tool, while lung cancer is an independent factor that alters the prognosis in CPFE patients. Treatment options for CPFE are limited, but smoking cessation, usual treatments of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, and avoidance of environmental exposures are encouraged.

Pulmonary Hypertension in Interstitial Lung Disease: Management Options to Move Beyond Supportive Care

Purpose of Review

This review delineates current diagnostic and management strategies for pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD).

Recent Findings

The INCREASE trial, a phase III multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated both improved 6-min walk distance and decreased disease progression with inhaled treprostinil. This pivotal trial led to inhaled treprostinil becoming the first FDA approved medication for treatment of PH-ILD. The availability of this treatment has generated subsequent recommendations for the screening for PH in patients with ILD. As a result, it is becoming increasingly important for clinicians to gain awareness and familiarity with the evolving management options for PH-ILD.

Summary

The management of PH-ILD has its roots in goal-directed treatment of the underlying lung disease. However, recent medication advances and ongoing clinical studies are opening opportunities for more disease-specific treatment.

Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: When Scylla and Charybdis Ally

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a recently recognized syndrome that, as its name indicates, involves the existence of both interstitial lung fibrosis and emphysema in one individual, and is often accompanied by pulmonary hypertension. This debilitating, progressive condition is most often encountered in males with an extensive smoking history, and is presented by dyspnea, preserved lung volumes, and contrastingly impaired gas exchange capacity. The diagnosis of the disease is based on computed tomography imaging, demonstrating the coexistence of emphysema and interstitial fibrosis in the lungs, which might be of various types and extents, in different areas of the lung and several relative positions to each other. CPFE bears high mortality and to date, specific and efficient treatment options do not exist. In this review, we will summarize current knowledge about the clinical attributes and manifestations of CPFE. Moreover, we will focus on pathophysiological and pathohistological lung phenomena and suspected etiological factors of this disease. Finally, since there is a paucity of preclinical research performed for this particular lung pathology, we will review existing animal studies and provide suggestions for the development of additional in vivo models of CPFE syndrome.

[Real-life survival of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with anti-fibrotic medication]

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an irreversible fibrosing disease with median survival at diagnosis of 2-5 years. That said, pirfenidone and nintedanib slow down the gradual decline in respiratory function. Clinical trials have shown that while they are not curative, these drugs reduce mortality and increase survival time compared to placebo. This objective of this work was to compare the real-life survival of patients with IPF diagnosed at the Tours University Hospital depending on whether or not they took anti-fibrotic medication.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective study involving 176 patients diagnosed with IPF starting from 1997. Out of these 176 patients, 100 were treated with anti-fibrotic agents and 76 did not receive any anti-fibrotic treatment.

RESULTS

Survival significantly increased in the group with anti-fibrotic medication, with median survival of 59 months [46-87] versus 39 months [29-65] (P=0.022). Predictive factors for death were neoplasia, IPF exacerbation and decreased DLCO.

CONCLUSION

Our study corroborates the beneficial result observed in clinical trials by showing longer survival in patients using anti-fibrotic agents.

Pathogenesis, clinical features, and phenotypes of pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease: A consensus statement from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative - Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a frequent complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Although PH has mostly been described in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, it can manifest in association with many other forms of ILD. Associated pathogenetic mechanisms are complex and incompletely understood but there is evidence of disruption of molecular and genetic pathways, with panvascular histopathologic changes, multiple pathophysiologic sequelae, and profound clinical ramifications. While there are some recognized clinical phenotypes such as combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema and some possible phenotypes such as connective tissue disease associated with ILD and PH, the identification of further phenotypes of PH in ILD has thus far proven elusive. This statement reviews the current evidence on the pathogenesis, recognized patterns, and useful diagnostic tools to detect phenotypes of PH in ILD. Distinct phenotypes warrant recognition if they are characterized through either a distinct presentation, clinical course, or treatment response. Furthermore, we propose a set of recommendations for future studies that might enable the recognition of new phenotypes.

Smoking-Related Interstitial Lung Diseases

Smoking-related interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a group of heterogeneous, diffuse pulmonary parenchymal disease processes associated with tobacco exposure. These disorders include pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis, respiratory bronchiolitis-associated ILD, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, acute eosinophilic pneumonia, and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. This review summarizes the current evidence of pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach, prognosis, and treatment modalities for these diseases. We also discuss the interstitial lung abnormalities incidentally detected in radiologic studies and smoking-related fibrosis identified on lung biopsies.

Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in Patients With Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a distinct clinical entity that can progress to end-stage lung disease. Patients with CPFE may develop pulmonary hypertension and face a predicted 1-year mortality of 60%. Lung transplantation is the only curative therapeutic option for CPFE. This report describes our experience after lung transplantation in patients with CPFE.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study describes short- and long-term outcomes for adult patients who underwent lung transplant for CPFE.

RESULTS

The study included 19 patients with explant pathology-proven diagnosis of CPFE. The patients were transplanted between July 2005 and December 2018. Sixteen recipients (84%) had pulmonary hypertension before transplant. Of the 19 patients, 7 (37%) had primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours post-transplant. 1-, 3-, and 5-year freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was 100%, 91% (95% CI, 75%-100%), and 82% (95% CI, 62%-100%), respectively. One-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 94% (95% CI, 84%-100%), 82% (95% CI, 65%-100%), and 74% (95% CI, 54%-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates the safety and feasibility of lung transplant for patients with CPFE. Significant morbidity and mortality without lung transplant coupled with favorable post-transplant outcomes merit prioritization of CPFE in the Lung Allocation Score algorithm for lung transplant candidacy.

Smoking-related interstitial lung disease

Exposure to smoke is associated with the development of diseases of the airways and lung parenchyma. Apart from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in some individuals, tobacco smoke can also trigger mechanisms of interstitial damage that result in various pathological changes and pulmonary fibrosis. A causal relation has been established between tobacco smoke and a group of entities that includes respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease (RB-ILD), desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), and acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP). Smoking is considered a risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); however, the role and impact of smoking in the development of this differentiated clinical entity, which has also been called combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) as well as nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NIP), remains to be determined. The definition of smoking-related interstitial fibrosis (SRIF) is relatively recent, with differentiated histological characteristics. The likely interconnection between the mechanisms involved in inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis in all these processes often results in an overlapping of clinical, radiological, and histological features in the same patient that can sometimes lead to radiological patterns of interstitial lung disease that are impossible to classify. For this reason, a combined approach to diagnosis is recommendable. This combined approach should be based on the joint interpretation of the histological and radiological findings while taking the clinical context into consideration. This paper aims to describe the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings in this group of disease entities in correlation with the clinical manifestations and histological changes underlying the radiological pattern.

Prognosis of acute exacerbation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with pulmonary emphysema: a retrospective cohort study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the clinical characteristics and prognosis of acute exacerbation (AE) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and pulmonary emphysema.

DESIGN

A multicentre retrospective cohort study SETTING: Two university hospitals in Japan PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to hospitals due to AE of IPF diagnosed based on a multidisciplinary discussion.

INTERVENTIONS

None PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 90-day mortality rate METHODS: We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients with AE of IPF, with or without pulmonary emphysema, admitted to two university hospitals between 2007 and 2018.

RESULTS

Among 62 patients (median age, 75 years; 48 men) admitted for AE of IPF, 29 patients (46%) presented with concomitant pulmonary emphysema. There was no significant difference in the arterial partial oxygen pressure/fraction of inhaled oxygen (P/F) ratio or other laboratory and radiographic data between patients with and without emphysema. The 90-day mortality rate was significantly lower in patients with emphysema than in those with IPF alone (23% vs 52%, p=0.03). The median survival time was significantly longer in patients with emphysema than in those with IPF alone (405 vs 242 days, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients with IPF and emphysema had better short-term survival after AE than those with non-emphysematous IPF.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Impact of number and type of identified antigen on transplant-free survival in hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Background

Identification of inciting antigen can affect diagnostic confidence, quality of life, and prognosis in patients with HP. It is unknown whether the number and type of antigen affect results of diagnostic testing or prognosis, whether antigen identified by clinical history alone affects prognosis, and whether feather exposure is associated with outcomes similar to those of other antigens.

Methods

To evaluate whether the number or type of antigen identified by clinical history alone affects clinical outcomes, we evaluated a retrospective cohort of patients with a high or definite probability of HP based on recent guidelines.

Results

In our retrospective cohort, 136 patients met high or definite probability of HP and were included in the analysis. Median transplant-free survival was better in patients with antigen identified on clinical history alone than patients without identified antigen. Feather exposure was associated with improved TFS compared to patients without antigen identified; there was no difference in TFS between patients with feather exposure and either mold or live bird exposure. Mold antigen was associated with increased risk of fibrotic HP compared to avian antigen. Among patients with identified antigen, the number and type of antigen did not affect TFS.

Discussion

Our study suggests that clinical history is adequate for providing prognostic information to patients with HP and classifying the diagnostic probability of HP according to recent guidelines. Feather exposure should be considered an inciting antigen in patients with ILD.

Raucherassoziierte interstitielle Lungenerkrankungen

Klinisches Problem

Raucherassoziierte interstitielle Lungenerkrankungen umfassen heterogene pulmonale Pathologien, deren korrekte Diagnostik prognostische und therapeutische Konsequenzen hat. In diesem Artikel werden die gängigsten raucherassoziierten interstitiellen Lungenerkrankungen beschrieben sowie eine strukturierte Herangehensweise präsentiert, welche den diagnostischen Arbeitsprozess erleichtern kann.

Empfehlungen für die Praxis

Die Computertomographie (CT) besitzt einen hohen Stellenwert in der Diagnose der raucherassoziierten interstitiellen Lungenerkrankungen und kann dazu beitragen, Lungenbiopsien zu verhindern. Um eine hohe diagnostische Genauigkeit zu erreichen, sollten standardisierte Untersuchungsprotokolle sowie eine strukturierte Herangehensweise in der Befundung zur Anwendung kommen. In den entzündlich dominierten Stadien der respiratorischen Bronchiolitis (RB), der respiratorischen Bronchiolitis mit interstitieller Lungenerkrankung (RB-ILD) sowie der desquamativen interstitiellen Pneumonie (DIP) haben die Beendigung des Rauchens sowie Steroide den größten therapeutischen Effekt. Bei fibrotischen Veränderungen (z. B. im Rahmen einer idiopathischen pulmonalen Fibrose [IPF]) können antifibrotische Therapien mit Pirfenidon und Nintedanib zum Einsatz kommen. Patienten mit dem Verdacht auf raucherassoziierte interstitielle Lungenerkrankung sollten in multidisziplinären Boards abgeklärt und behandelt werden.

Syndrome of Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Research Statement

Background: The presence of emphysema is relatively common in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease. This has been designated combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). The lack of consensus over definitions and diagnostic criteria has limited CPFE research. Goals: The objectives of this task force were to review the terminology, definition, characteristics, pathophysiology, and research priorities of CPFE and to explore whether CPFE is a syndrome. Methods: This research statement was developed by a committee including 19 pulmonologists, 5 radiologists, 3 pathologists, 2 methodologists, and 2 patient representatives. The final document was supported by a focused systematic review that identified and summarized all recent publications related to CPFE. Results: This task force identified that patients with CPFE are predominantly male, with a history of smoking, severe dyspnea, relatively preserved airflow rates and lung volumes on spirometry, severely impaired DlCO, exertional hypoxemia, frequent pulmonary hypertension, and a dismal prognosis. The committee proposes to identify CPFE as a syndrome, given the clustering of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, shared pathogenetic pathways, unique considerations related to disease progression, increased risk of complications (pulmonary hypertension, lung cancer, and/or mortality), and implications for clinical trial design. There are varying features of interstitial lung disease and emphysema in CPFE. The committee offers a research definition and classification criteria and proposes that studies on CPFE include a comprehensive description of radiologic and, when available, pathological patterns, including some recently described patterns such as smoking-related interstitial fibrosis. Conclusions: This statement delineates the syndrome of CPFE and highlights research priorities.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - 2021 update. Full-length version

BACKGROUND

Since the latest 2017 French guidelines, knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has evolved considerably.

METHODS

Practical guidelines were drafted on the initiative of the Coordinating Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, led by the French Language Pulmonology Society (SPLF), by a coordinating group, a writing group, and a review group, with the involvement of the entire OrphaLung network, pulmonologists practicing in various settings, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a health manager, and a patient association. The method followed the "Clinical Practice Guidelines" process of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), including an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After a literature review, 54 guidelines were formulated, improved, and then validated by the working groups. These guidelines addressed multiple aspects of the disease: epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT scans, lung biopsy indication and procedures, etiological workup, methods and indications for family screening and genetic testing, assessment of the functional impairment and prognosis, indication and use of antifibrotic agents, lung transplantation, management of symptoms, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to guide the diagnosis and practical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Screening Strategies for Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Multidisciplinary Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is associated with worse outcomes and increased mortality. Evaluation of PH is recommended in lung transplant candidates, but there are currently no standardized screening approaches. Trials have identified therapies that are effective in this setting, providing another rationale to routinely screen patients with ILD for PH.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What screening strategies for identifying PH in patients with ILD are supported by expert consensus?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The study convened a panel of 16 pulmonologists with expertise in PH and ILD, and used a modified Delphi consensus process with three surveys to identify PH screening strategies. Survey 1 consisted primarily of open-ended questions. Surveys 2 and 3 were developed from responses to survey 1 and contained statements about PH screening that panelists rated from -5 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

RESULTS

Panelists reached consensus on several triggers for suspicion of PH including the following: symptoms, clinical signs, findings on chest CT scan or other imaging, abnormalities in pulse oximetry, elevations in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and unexplained worsening in pulmonary function tests or 6-min walk distance. Echocardiography and BNP/NT-proBNP were identified as screening tools for PH. Right heart catheterization was deemed essential for confirming PH.

INTERPRETATION

Many patients with ILD may benefit from early evaluation of PH now that an approved therapy is available. Protocols to evaluate patients with ILD often overlap with evaluations for pulmonary hypertension-interstitial lung disease and can be used to assess the risk of PH. Because standardized approaches are lacking, this consensus statement is intended to aid physicians in the identification of patients with ILD and possible PH, and provide guidance for timely right heart catheterization.

Clinical, radiologic and physiologic features of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with and without emphysema

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can combine with emphysema, a condition termed as IPF with emphysema (IPFE). We compared the clinical, radiologic and physiologic features of IPF and IPFE.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Newly diagnosed IPF (n=57) and IPFE (n=44) were recruited between January 2018 and September 2020. Symptoms, high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function test (PFT) data, composite physiologic index (CPI), gender-age-physiology (GAP) scores, and follow-up data were obtained.

RESULTS

The IPFE group had greater proportion of male smoking subjects, and of lung cancer cases. The IPFE group had higher VC, FVC FEV₁, and lower FEV₁/FVC and DL_CO and lower percent fibrosis on HRCT. Both groups had similar symptoms and mortality. Mortality rate was associated with inability to perform PFT, CPI, GAP scores, percent fibrosis, VC, FVC, FEV₁ and DL_CO, serum SCC-Ag and CA125, and anti-fibrotic therapy (≥12months) in IPF, while it was associated with inability to perform PFT, CPI, percent fibrosis, DL_CO, serum CEA, CYFRA21-1 and CA125, and anti-fibrotic therapy (≥12months) in IPFE.

CONCLUSION

IPF and IPFE patients are different in smoking history, physiologic indices, HRCT patterns and prognostic factors, however, they have similar mortality. Anti-fibrotic therapy could improve the survival rate in both IPF and IPFE.

Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension: From Bench to Bedside

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) because of chronic lung disease is categorized as Group 3 PH in the most recent classification system. Prevalence of these diseases is increasing over time, creating a growing need for effective therapeutic options. Recent approval of the first pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy for the treatment of Group 3 PH related to interstitial lung disease represents an encouraging advancement. This review focuses on molecular mechanisms contributing to pulmonary vasculopathy in chronic hypoxia, the pathology and epidemiology of Group 3 PH, the right ventricular dysfunction observed in this population and clinical trial data that inform the use of pulmonary vasodilators in Group 3 PH.

Riociguat for Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension: Results of a 1-Year Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Riociguat is effective in delaying the time to clinical worsening (TCW) in patients with groups 1 and 4 pulmonary hypertension.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is riociguat more effective than placebo in prolonging TCW in sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH)?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients with SAPH confirmed by right heart catheterization were randomized 1:1 to riociguat or placebo. Patients underwent 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and spirometry testing every 8 weeks. The primary end point was TCW, which was defined by the time to the first of the following: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) need for hospitalization because of worsening cardiopulmonary status attributable to progression of disease, (3) > 50 m decrease in the 6MWD test, or (4) worsening of World Health Organization functional class.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were randomized to riociguat (n = 8) or placebo (n = 8). No difference was found in pulmonary artery mean, pulmonary vascular resistance, initial 6MWD, or FVC between the two groups. Five of eight patients who received placebo met TCW criteria, whereas none of the patients who received riociguat experienced a qualifying event. By log-rank analysis, patients who received riociguat were in the study for a significantly longer period (χ ² = 6.259; P = .0124). The 6MWD decreased in the placebo group (median, -55.9 m; range, -176.8 to 60 m), but rose in the riociguat group (median, +42.7 m; range, -7.5 to +91.4 m; P = .0149), with a placebo-corrected difference of 94 m (P < .01). Four of eight patients who received riociguat, but only 1 of 8 patients who received placebo, showed a > 30-m improvement in 6MWD (P > .05). No significant adverse events associated with riociguat occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Over the 1 year of the study, riociguat was effective in preventing clinical worsening and improving exercise capacity in patients with SAPH.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02625558; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Combined Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema in the IPF-PRO Registry

Purpose

To assess the impact of concomitant emphysema on outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

Methods

The IPF-PRO Registry is a US registry of patients with IPF. The presence of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) at enrollment was determined by investigators’ review of an HRCT scan. Associations between emphysema and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Of 934 patients, 119 (12.7%) had CPFE. Compared with patients with IPF alone, patients with CPFE were older (median 72 vs 70 years); higher proportions were current/former smokers (88.2% vs 63.7%), used oxygen with activity (49.6% vs 31.9%) or at rest (30.8% vs 18.4%), had congestive heart failure (13.6% vs 4.8%) and had prior respiratory hospitalization (25.0% vs 16.7%); they had higher FVC (median 71.8 vs 69.4% predicted) and lower DLco (median 35.3 vs 43.6% predicted). In patients with CPFE and IPF alone, respectively, at 1 year, rates of death or lung transplant were 17.5% (95% CI: 11.7, 25.8) and 11.2% (9.2, 13.6) and rates of hospitalization were 21.6% (14.6, 29.6) and 20.6% (17.9, 23.5). There were no significant associations between emphysema and any outcome after adjustment for baseline variables. No baseline variable predicted outcomes better in IPF alone than in CPFE.

Conclusion

Approximately 13% of patients in the IPF-PRO Registry had CPFE. Physiologic characteristics and comorbidities of patients with CPFE differed from those of patients with IPF alone, but the presence of emphysema did not drive outcomes after adjustment for baseline covariates.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01915511; registered August 5, 2013.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00408-021-00506-x.

Mortality and survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There are substantial advances in diagnosis and treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but without much evidence available on recent mortality and survival trends.

Methods

A narrative synthesis approach was used to investigate the mortality trends, then meta-analyses for survival trends were carried out based on various time periods.

Results

Six studies reported the mortality data for IPF in 22 countries, and 62 studies (covering 63 307 patients from 20 countries) reported survival data for IPF. Age-standardised mortality for IPF varied from ∼0.5 to ∼12 per 100 000 population per year after year 2000. There were increased mortality trends for IPF in Australia, Brazil, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and UK, while Austria, Croatia, Denmark, Romania and the USA showed decreased mortality trends. The overall 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates (CSRs) were 61.8% (95% CI 58.7-64.9; I2=97.1%) and 45.6% (95% CI 41.5-49.7; I2=97.7%), respectively. Prior to 2010, the pooled 3-year CSR was 59.9% (95% CI 55.8-64.1; I2=95.8%), then not significantly (p=0.067) increased to 66.2% (95% CI 62.9-69.5; I2=92.6%) in the 2010s decade. After excluding three studies in which no patients received antifibrotics after year 2010, the pooled 3-year CSRs significantly (p=0.039) increased to 67.4% (95% CI 63.9-70.9; I2=93.1%) in the 2010s decade.

Discussion

IPF is a diagnosis associated with high mortality. There was no observed increasing survival trend for patients with IPF before year 2010, with then a switch to an improvement, which is probably multifactorial.

Immune infiltration landscape and immune-marker molecular typing of pulmonary fibrosis with pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PH) secondary to pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is one of the most common complications in PF patients, it causes severe disease and usually have a poor prognosis. Whether the combination of PH and PF is a unique disease phenotype is unclear. We aimed to screen the key modules associated with PH-PF immune infiltration based on WGCNA and identify the hub genes for molecular typing.

METHOD

Using the gene expression profile GSE24988 of PF patients with or without PH from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, we evaluated immune cell infiltration using Cibersortx and immune cell gene signature files. Different immune cell types were screened using the Wilcoxon test; differentially expressed genes were screened using samr. The molecular pathways implicated in these differential responses were identified using Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes functional enrichment analyses. A weighted co-expression network of the differential genes was constructed, relevant co-expression modules were identified, and relationships between modules and differential immune cell infiltration were calculated. The modules most relevant to this disease were identified using weighted correlation network analysis. From these, we constructed a co-expression network; using the STRING database, we integrated the values into the human protein-protein interaction network before constructing a co-expression interaction subnet, screening genes associated with immunity and unsupervised molecular typing, and analyzing the immune cell infiltration and expression of key genes in each disease type.

RESULTS

Of the 22 immune cell types from the PF GEO data, 20 different immune cell types were identified. There were 1622 differentially expressed genes (295 upregulated and 1327 downregulated). The resulting weighted co-expression network identified six co-expression modules. These were screened to identify the modules most relevant to the disease phenotype (the green module). By calculating the correlations between modules and the differentially infiltrated immune cells, extracting the green module co-expression network (46 genes), extracting 25 key genes using gene significance and module-membership thresholds, and combining these with the 10 key genes in the human protein-protein interaction network, we identified five immune cell-related marker genes that might be applied as biomarkers. Using these marker genes, we evaluated these disease samples using unsupervised clustering molecular typing.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that all PF combined with PH samples belonged to four categories. Studies on the five key genes are required to validate their diagnostic and prognostic value.

Development of a nomogram for predicting the presence of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema

Background

In the clinical management of patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), early recognition and appropriate treatment is essential. This study was designed to develop an accurate prognostic nomogram model to predict the presence of CPFE.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 85 patients with CPFE and 128 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) between January 2015 and January 2020. Clinical characteristics were compared between groups. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for CPFE. Then, and a nomogram to predict the presence of CPFE was constructed for clinical use. Concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration plot was used to evaluate the efficiency of the nomogram.

Results

Compared to the IPF group, the proportion of patients with male, smoking and allergies were significantly higher in the CPFE group. In terms of pulmonary function tests, patients with CPFE had lower FEV1/FVC%, DLCO/VA% pred, and higher RV, RV%pred, VC, VC%pred, TLC%pred, VA, TLC, TLC%pred, FVC, FVC%pred and FEV1 with significant difference than the other group. Positive correlation was found between DLCO and VA%, RV%, TLC% in patients with IPF but not in patients with CPFE. By multivariate analysis, male, smoking, allergies, FEV1/FVC% and DLCO/VA%pred were identified as independent predictors of the presence of CPFE. The nomogram was then developed using these five variables. After 1000 internal validations of bootstrap resampling, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.863 (95% CI 0.795–0.931) and the AUC was 0.839 (95% CI 0.764–0.913). Moreover, the calibration plot showed good concordance of incidence of CPFE between nomogram prediction and actual observation (Hosmer–Lemeshow test: P = 0.307).

Conclusions

Patients of CPFE have a characteristic lung function profile including relatively preserved lung volumes and ventilating function, contrasting with a disproportionate reduction of carbon monoxide transfer. By incorporating clinical risk factors, we created a nomogram to predict the presence of CPFE, which may serve as a potential tool to guide personalized treatment.

DSP rs2076295 variants influence nintedanib and pirfenidone outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The antifibrotic drugs nintedanib and pirfenidone are used for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We analysed the association of common profibrotic polymorphisms in MUC5B (mucin 5B, rs35705950) and DSP (desmoplakin, rs2076295) on antifibrotic treatment outcomes in IPF.

METHODS

MUC5B rs35705950 and DSP rs2076295 were assessed in IPF patients (n = 210, 139 men/71 women) from the Czech EMPIRE registry and age- or sex-matched healthy individuals (n = 205, 125 men/80 women). Genetic data were collated with overall survival (OS), acute exacerbation episodes, worsening lung function and antifibrotic treatment.

RESULTS

We confirmed overexpression of the MUC5B rs35705950*T allele (55.2% versus 20.9%, p < 0.001) and the DSP rs2076295*G allele (80.4% versus 68.3%, p < 0.001) in IPF compared with controls. On antifibrotic drugs, lower mortability was observed in IPF patients with DSP G* allele (p = 0.016) and MUC5B T* allele (p = 0.079). Carriers of the DSP rs2076295*G allele benefitted from nintedanib treatment compared with TT genotype by a longer OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 7.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.56-40.90; p = 0.013] and a slower decline in lung function (HR = 8.51; 95% CI = 1.68-43.14; p = 0.010). Patients with a TT genotype (rs2076295) benefitted from treatment with pirfenidone by prolonged OS (p = 0.040; HR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.13-0.95) compared with nintedanib treatment. Both associations were confirmed by cross-validation analysis. After stratifying by MUC5B rs35705950*T allele carriage, no difference in treatment outcome was observed for nintedanib or pirfenidone (p = 0.784). In the multivariate model, smoking, age, forced vital capacity (FVC) and DL_CO (diffuse lung capacity) at the IPF diagnosis were associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world study showed that IPF patients with MUC5B T* allele or DSP G* allele profit from antifibrotic treatment by lower mortability. Moreover, carriers of the DSP rs2076295*G allele benefit from treatment with nintedanib, and TT genotype from treatment with pirfenidone. MUC5B rs35705950 did not impact the outcome of treatment with either nintedanib or pirfenidone. Our single-registry pilot study should be confirmed with an independent patient cohort.

Mortality in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema patients is determined by the sum of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema

Emphysema is one of the most common pulmonary comorbidities of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), presenting in about one-third of IPF patients [1]. The term combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) has been used to describe a potential phenotype characterised by the coexistence of upper lobe-predominant emphysema, lower lobe-predominant fibrosis and relative preservation of lung volumes (forced vital capacity; FVC) in the context of a disproportionately reduced gas transfer (diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; D_LCO) [1–3]. With regard to patient survival, it remains unclear whether mortality in patients with CPFE reflects the cumulative effects of two disease processes (emphysema and fibrosis), or whether CPFE represents a distinct disease phenotype where outcome is worse than the sum of disease parts (emphysema and fibrosis).

In patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, emphysema and fibrosis do not have a synergistic effect that results in worsened survival when compared to IPF patients without emphysemahttps://bit.ly/35EJMo6

Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension: A Review of Diagnostics and Clinical Trials

Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a known sequelae of chronic lung disease. Diagnosis and classification can be challenging in the background of chronic lung disease and often requires expert interpretation of numerous diagnostic studies to ascertain the true nature of the PH. Stabilization of the underlying lung disease and adjunctive therapies such as oxygen remain the mainstays of therapy, as there are no Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for group 3 PH. Referral to PH centers for individualized management and clinical trial enrollment is paramount.

Personalized Medicine for Pulmonary Hypertension:: The Future Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Requires a New Taxonomy

Pulmonary hypertension is a convergent phenotype that presents late in the natural history of the condition. The current clinical classification of patients lacks granularity, and this impacts on the development and deployment of treatment. Deep molecular phenotyping using platform 'omic' technologies is beginning to reveal the genetic and molecular architecture that underlies the phenotype, promising better targeting of patients with new treatments. The future treatment of pulmonary hypertension depends on the integration of clinical and molecular information to create a new taxonomy that defines patient groups coupled to druggable targets.

Automated Diseased Lung Volume Percentage Calculation in Quantitative CT Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

Several software-based quantitative computed tomography (CT) analysis methods have been developed for assessing emphysema and interstitial lung disease. Although the texture classification method appeared to be more successful than the other methods, the software programs are not commercially available, to our knowledge. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the usefulness of a commercially available software program for quantitative CT analyses.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 80 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

RESULTS

The percentage of low attenuation volume and high attenuation volume had high sensitivity and high specificity for detecting emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis, respectively. The percentage of diseased lung volume (DLV%) was significantly correlated with the lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide in all patients with COPD and IPF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative CT analysis may improve the precision of the assessment of DLV%, which itself could be a useful tool in predicting lung diffusion capacity in patients with the clinical diagnosis of COPD or IPF.

Clinical features and outcomes of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is recognized as a characteristic syndrome of smoking-related interstitial lung disease that has a worse prognosis than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, outcomes after lung transplantation for CPFE have not been reported. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical features and outcomes of CPFE after lung transplantation.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the clinical features and outcomes of CPFE after lung transplantation?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with CPFE and IPF who underwent lung transplantation at our center between January 2011 and December 2016. We defined CPFE as ≥ 10% emphysema in the upper lung fields combined with fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography scan. We characterized the clinical features of patients with CPFE and compared their outcomes after lung transplantation to those with IPF.

RESULTS

27 of 172 (16%) patients with IPF met criteria for CPFE. Severe pulmonary hypertension was present in 16 of 27 (59%) patients with CPFE. On logistic regression analysis, CPFE was significantly associated with primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 (odds ratio: 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-8.37, p=0.02). On competing risk regression analysis, CPFE was associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥ A2, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.10-3.25, p=0.02, HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.02-3.77, p=0.04, respectively). 5-year survival was 79.0% for the CPFE group and 75.4% for the IPF group, respectively (log rank p = 0.684).

INTERPRETATION

After transplant, patients with CPFE were more likely to develop PGD, ACR, and CLAD compared to those with IPF. However, survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis Emphysema: Role of Cigarette Smoking and Pulmonary Hypertension in a Rural Cohort

Background

Disease heterogeneity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) often complicates the systematic study of disease, management of patients and clinical investigations.

Objective

To describe combined pulmonary fibrosis emphysema (CPFE) phenotype in a rural Appalachian IPF cohort with the highest smoking rates in the United States.

Methods

CPFE patients (n = 60) in a developed IPF cohort (n = 153) were characterized. Groups (CPFE vs IPF without emphysema) were categorized based on the predominant HRCT patterns of UIP (n = 109). Demographics, clinical variables, and treatment details were recorded. Kaplan–Meier survival and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.

Results

The prevalence of CPFE in our IPF cohort was 45% (n = 49). The CPFE group was younger (73.9 vs 78.2), had a more extensive smoking history (93.9% vs 53.3%) with greater mean smoking pack years (49.09 vs 15.39) and had lower percentage predicted DL_CO on presentation (38.35 vs 51.09) compared to IPF without emphysema group. Both groups shared equivalent higher burden of comorbidities, including pulmonary hypertension (PH) (46.9% vs 33.3%). One-fifth of patients were prescribed antifibrotics and only a subset (5%) of patients underwent lung transplantation. There was a non-significant trend towards reduced survival in CPFE (p = 0.076). Smoking status and DL_CO predicted CPFE in our cohort. Body mass index (BMI), PH, and pirfenidone use were significant predictors of mortality.

Conclusion

CPFE was highly prevalent in our rural IPF cohort. In contrast to previous studies, CPFE group was older and had higher female (approx. 30%) occurrence. A greater exposure to cigarette smoke and reduced DL_CO at diagnosis predicted CPFE. Lower BMI and PH predicted higher mortality whereas use of pirfenidone improved survival in our cohort. This study highlights a complex interaction of cigarette smoking, advanced fibrosis of UIP, PH and potential utility of antifibrotic agents in CPFE phenotype. Substantial burden of comorbidities, older age, and the limited utilization of advanced therapeutics in the cohort emphasize the challenges faced by rural Appalachian patients.

Comorbidities of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Four Latin American Countries. Are There Differences by Country and Altitude?

Background: Comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) affect quality of life, symptoms, disease progression and survival. It is unknown what are the comorbidities in patients with IPF in Latin America (LA) and if there are differences between countries. Our objective was to compare IPF comorbidities in four countries and analyze possible differences by altitude. Methods: Patients with IPF according 2012 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines, from two cities with an altitude of ≥2,250 m: Mexico City (Mexico) and Bogotá (Colombia) and from three at sea level: Buenos Aires (Argentina) and Lima and Trujillo (Peru). Comorbidities and pulmonary function tests were taken from clinical records. Possible pulmonary hypertension (PH) was defined by findings in the transthoracic echocardiogram of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) >36 mmHg or indirect signs of PH in the absence of other causes of PH. Emphysema as the concomitant finding of IPF criteria on chest tomography plus emphysema in the upper lobes. ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis and χ²-tests were used for comparison. Results: Two hundred and seventy-six patients were included, 50 from Argentina, 86 from Colombia, 91 from Mexico and 49 from Peru. There prevalence of PH was higher in Colombia and Mexico (p < 0.001), systemic arterial hypertension in Argentina (p < 0.015), gastro-esophageal reflux and dyslipidemia in Colombia and Argentina (p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus in Mexico (p < 0.007). Other comorbidities were obesity (28.4%), coronary artery disease (15.2%) and emphysema (14.9%), with no differences between countries. There was more PH in the altitude cities than those at sea level (51.7 vs. 15.3%, p < 0.001). In patients from Bogotá and Mexico City, arterial oxygen pressure, saturation (p < 0.001) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (p = 0.004) were significantly lower than in cities at sea level. Conclusions: In this study with a significant number of patients, we were able to describe and compare the comorbidities of IPF in four LA countries, which contributes to the epidemiological data of this disease in the region. The main results were the differences in comorbidities between the countries and more PH in the subjects residing in the cities of higher altitude, a finding that should be validated in future studies.

Pulmonary hypertension in interstitial lung disease: screening, diagnosis and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary vascular disease resulting in pulmonary hypertension in the context of interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) is a common complication that presents many challenges in clinical practice. Despite recent advances, the pathogenetic interplay between parenchymal and vascular disease in ILD is not fully understood. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge and recent advances in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials employing the phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitor sildenafil delivered negative results whereas riociguat showed harmful effects in the PH-ILD population. More recently, inhaled treprostinil showed positive effects on the primary endpoint (six-min walk-distance) in the largest prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial to date in this patient population. Additionally, a pilot trial of ambulatory inhaled nitric oxide suggests beneficial effects based on the novel endpoint of actigraphy.

SUMMARY

In view of these novel developments this review provides an overview of the status quo of screening, diagnosis and management of pulmonary vascular disease and PH in patients with ILD.

Clusters of comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Comorbidities are common in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and negatively impact health-related quality of life, health-care costs and mortality. Retrospective studies have focused on individual comorbidities, but clusters of multiple comorbidities have rarely been analysed. This study aimed to comprehensively and prospectively assess comorbidities in a multicentre, real-world cohort of patients with IPF, including prespecified conditions of special interest and to analyse clusters of comorbidities and examine characteristics, disease course and mortality of the clusters.

METHODS

Several measurements, questionnaires, medications and medical history were combined to assess comorbidities. Using self-organizing maps, clusters of comorbidities were identified and phenotypes characterized. Disease course was assessed using mixed effects models and mortality using Cox regression.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fifty IPF patients were included prospectively. All except one patient suffered from at least one comorbidity and multimorbidity was common. Arterial hypertension, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, hypercholesterolemia, emphysema and obstructive sleep apnea were most prevalent. Four comorbidity clusters were identified. Each cluster had distinct comorbidity profiles, patient characteristics, symptom burden and disease severity. Patients with fewer comorbidities had better exercise capacity and less dyspnea at baseline, but a trend towards faster deterioration was observed. Mortality analyses showed no significant differences between clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimorbidity is prevalent in patients with IPF. Four specific clusters of comorbidities may represent phenotypes in IPF. A trend towards faster decline in exercise capacity and dyspnea was observed in patients with fewer comorbidities. Increased knowledge of comorbidities facilitates prevention and treatment of comorbidities in patients with IPF.