Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

Angiotensin-converting enzyme and cardiovascular disease risk

The published studies of the association of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotype with cardiovascular disease have used many different diagnostic criteria for cardiovascular disease and have drawn their samples from different patient groups and different populations. This review examines the association of the ACE DD genotype with cardiovascular disease risk in studies grouped by their case criterion, the geographical region of the population samples, and by the cardiovascular risk level of the patient sample. In studies where the underlying odds ratios are determined to be homogeneous, the overall odds ratios for myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease with regard to the ACE DD genotype are estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Effects of the insurmountable angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan and the surmountable antagonist losartan on ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat hearts

Two angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists with different receptor binding characteristics, candesartan (insurmountable antagonism) and losartan (surmountable antagonism), were compared as regards their effects on angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction and on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. In isolated rat hearts perfused under constant flow, it was found that at equipotent concentrations candesartan (10 nM) and losartan (3 microM) almost completely inhibited the angiotensin II-induced increase in coronary perfusion pressure. However, if a washout period was introduced before the angiotensin II challenge, the effect of losartan quickly vanished, while that of candesartan remained. In hearts subjected to 25 min of global ischemia and 45 min of reperfusion, pre-treatment with candesartan (10 nM) or losartan (3 microM) immediately prior to ischemia improved the recovery of left ventricular developed pressure as compared to the effect of vehicle (69 +/- 3.2 and 64 +/- 2.3 vs. 44 +/- 6.2%, respectively; mean +/- S.E.M, P < 0.05). When ischemia was initiated following 30 min of washout after drug administration, the recovery of left ventricular developed pressure was higher in the candesartan group (73 +/- 3.2%, P < 0.05), but not in the losartan group (63 +/- 2.8%), than in the vehicle group (58 +/- 4.8%). The cumulative creatine kinase release during the first 30 min of reperfusion in the washout experiments was lower in the candesartan group (28.5 +/- 2.30 U, P < 0.05), but not in the losartan (40.8 +/- 6.73 U) group, than in the vehicle group (48.1 +/- 4.35 U). No significant difference between groups in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and coronary perfusion pressure was found. The present results demonstrate that angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists at equipotent concentrations could differ in their cardioprotective effects in hearts subjected to ischemia/reperfusion. It is suggested that the insurmountable AT1 receptor characteristics of candesartan could provide more persistent cardioprotection than the surmountable receptor characteristics of losartan.

Bradykinin-induced preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether administration of bradykinin reproduces the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning (PC) in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies suggest that activation of the bradykinin B2 receptor is an important trigger of ischemic PC. However, it is unknown whether bradykinin can precondition human myocardium against ischemia in vivo. Multicenter clinical trials have demonstrated an anti-ischemic effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, which has been postulated to result from potentiation of bradykinin; however, direct evidence for an anti-ischemic action of bradykinin in patients is lacking.

METHODS

Thirty patients were randomized to receive a 10-min intracoronary infusion of bradykinin (2.5 microg/min) or normal saline. Ten minutes later they underwent PTCA (three 2-min balloon inflations 5 min apart).

RESULTS

In control patients, the ST-segment shift on the intracoronary and surface electrocardiogram was significantly greater during the first inflation than during the second and third inflations, consistent with ischemic PC. In bradykinin-treated patients, the ST-segment shift during the first inflation was significantly smaller than in the control group, and there were no appreciable differences in ST-segment shift during the three inflations. Measurements of chest pain score and regional wall motion during inflation (quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography) paralleled those of ST-segment shift. Infusion of bradykinin had no hemodynamic effects and no significant adverse effects. Thus, intracoronary infusion of bradykinin before PTCA rendered the myocardium relatively resistant to subsequent ischemia, and the degree of this cardioprotective effect was comparable to that afforded by the ischemia associated with the first balloon inflation in control subjects. In a separate cohort of seven patients given the same dose of bradykinin, coronary hyperemia resolved completely within 10 min after the end of the infusion, indicating that bradykinin-induced vasodilation cannot account for the protective effects observed during the first balloon inflation.

CONCLUSIONS

Bradykinin preconditions human myocardium against ischemia in vivo in the absence of systemic hemodynamic changes. Pretreatment with bradykinin appears to be just as effective as ischemic PC and could be used prophylactically to attenuate ischemia in selected patients undergoing PTCA.

Practical considerations of the pharmacology of angiotensin receptor blockers

A review of the drug class of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as well as the ARBs currently available by prescription in the United States is presented. The importance of angiotensin II production by non-angiotensin-converting enzyme (non-ACE) pathways, particularly human chymase, is discussed. Emphasis is placed on the mechanism of action of ARBs and the different binding kinetics of these agents. Although all ARBs, as a group, block the AT1 receptor, they may differ in the pharmacological characteristics of their binding and be classified as either surmountable or insurmountable antagonists. Mechanisms of surmountable and insurmountable antagonism as well as possible benefits of these blocking characteristics are discussed in relation to the various ARBs. The cardiovascular effects of activation of the two main subtypes of angiotensin receptors (AT1 and AT2) are presented. In addition to their treatment of hypertension, ACE inhibitors are recognized as being effective in the management of heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, recurrent myocardial infarctions, and renal disease. ARBs are currently indicated only for the treatment of hypertension; however, in vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies as well as preliminary clinical data suggest that ARBs, like ACE inhibitors, may also provide effective protection against end-organ damage in these conditions.

New insights into the renin-angiotensin system and hypertensive renal disease

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in hypertension and end organ damage has long been recognized. Recent advances in genetic models and newly available pharmacologic tools have allowed dissection of the mechanisms of actions of the renin-angiotensin system in hypertensive kidney disease. The newly cloned AT(2) receptor is now recognized to oppose many of the AT(1) receptor"s actions. The renin-angiotensin system is now recognized to be linked to induction of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), possibly via the AT(4) receptor, thus promoting both thrombosis and fibrosis. Interactions of the renin-angiotensin system with aldosterone and bradykinin may have impact on both blood pressure and tissue injury. The effects of angiotensin 1 converting enzyme inhibitors versus those of the newly available AT(1) receptor antagonists on blood pressure and organ damage are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. Finally, polymorphisms of genes relevant to the renin-angiotensin system appear to affect response to treatment, although this effect varies in different populations.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists in the treatment of heart failure caused by left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in left ventricular systolic dysfunction is a critically important determinant in the pathophysiologic processes that lead to progression of heart failure and sudden death. Angiotensin II, acting at the specific angiotensin receptor (AT1-R), activates a series of intracellular signaling sequences which are ultimately expressed within the cardiovascular system as vasoconstriction and associated vascular hypertrophy and remodeling. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition leads to increases in the vasodilatory peptides bradykinin and substance P and at least an initial reduction in angiotensin II concentrations. AT1-R blocking drugs prevent access of angiotensin II to the AT1-R and thus prevent cellular activation. ACE inhibitors have clearly been demonstrated through a large number of clinical trials to increase survival in congestive heart failure, primarily by reducing the rate of progression of left ventricular dilatation and decompensation. However, this beneficial effect diminishes over time. Preliminary short-term clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of AT1-R blocking drugs in the treatment of heart failure have suggested that they elicit similar hemodynamic and neuroendocrine effects as do the ACE inhibitors. The combination ACE inhibitors and AT1-R blocking drugs offer the theoretical advantage of increasing bradykinin while blocking the actions of angiotensin II, and thus possibly show a synergistic effect. Again, preliminary studies have yielded encouraging results that are difficult to interpret because neither ACE inhibitor nor the AT1-R blocking drug doses were titrated to tolerance. Pharmacological manipulation of the RAAS has led to better understanding of its role in heart failure and improved clinical outcomes.