Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy

A phase II study of irinotecan in combination with doxifluridine, an intermediate form of capecitabine, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of a combination treatment of sequential irinotecan and doxifluridine, an intermediate of capecitabine, evaluated by the response rate and safety in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In all, 60 metastatic colorectal cancer patients with measurable disease were enrolled. The schedule of the treatment consisted of a 90 min intravenous (IV) infusion of irinotecan 150 mg/m2 for on days 1 and 15, and 600-1,000 mg/body of oral doxifluridine on days 3-14 and 17-28. Cycles were repeated every 35 days. A median of three cycles of the combination therapy (range 1-14 cycles) was administered. A total of 57 patients (95%) completed at least two cycles of the therapy without any dose reductions. There was one complete response and 23 partial responses with an overall response rate of 40% [95% confidence interval (CI): 28-53%]. A total of 19 patients had stable disease, 43(72%) achieved disease control. The median time to progression was 5.9 months and the median overall survival was 20.5 months. Ten (17%) and 17 (28%) patients developed Grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia, respectively. Grade 3-4 fatigue was observed in 7(12%) patients, nausea in five (8%), vomiting in four (7%), and diarrhea,in three (5%) patients. No treatment-related deaths were noted during the study. From these results, the combination of sequential irinotecan and doxifluridine is considered to be an effective, easy-to-administer regimen with acceptable tolerability.

Clinical efficacy of capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer--how low can you go?

Sixty-three patients received capecitabine at 1000 mg/m2 twice daily every 2 out of 3 weeks as first-line treatment for advanced disease at our institution. Forty-five patients (71%) had previously received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median number of capecitabine cycles administered was 5(1-40). Forty-eight patients had measurable disease with response rate (RR) of 29%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 18(2-122) weeks. Seven patients (11%) had TTP of >1 yr, four of whom received more than 10(24-40) cycles of capecitabine. Thirty-seven percent of patients still needed dose reductions. Our retrospective audit is consistent with a previously published study which used a higher starting dose of capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy. For a subgroup of patients, capecitabine can result in a long TTP with minimal toxicity. The benefit of continuing capecitabine beyond a fixed number of cycles should be investigated further. Schedules using even lower doses of capecitabine for longer periods may also be of interest.

Les enjeux de l’observance pour les nouvelles chimiothérapies par voie orale : intérêt du modèle pharmacocinétique-pharmacodynamique

Nowadays, more and more oral anticancer chemotherapies are developed either for cytotoxic or new targeted drugs. But this relatively new route of administration in oncology drives to new problems in treatment management and particularly to non-compliance, i.e. the deviance of the actual way patients take their treatment with the prescription. Population PK-PD models and Monte-Carlo simulations allow to study the impact of non-compliance on toxicities. After a brief review on recent developments about oral chemotherapies, this work presents a simulation where non-compliance, modelled with a two state Markov chain defining four compliance profiles from excellent to poor, is linked to two dose-toxicity (continuous or categorical) population models. Simulated patients with the lowest compliance level were less exposed to treatment and therefore experienced less toxicity with shorter events. Nevertheless treatment efficacy is also lower, and this loss of efficacy may compromise patient's outcome. These results foresee the necessity of global simulations, combining compliance, toxicity and efficacy modelling.

A phase I study of an all-oral combination of vinorelbine/capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes

BACKGROUND

Few overlapping toxicities and oral formulations make capecitabine plus oral vinorelbine an attractive new combination for treating patients with breast cancer. An all-oral regimen minimizes inconvenience for the patient and saves medical resources.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To determine the recommended dose for this all-oral combination, we conducted a phase I study in 21 patients with metastatic breast cancer after failure of previous chemotherapy with anthracylines and/or taxanes for advanced disease. Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily was given on days 2-7 and 9-14. Vinorelbine was administered at escalating doses of 40-80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of vinorelbine was performed in cohorts of 3 patients, but the dose of vinorelbine could also be increased to the next level in the same patient after 3 cycles if there were no dose-limiting toxicities. In total, 173 cycles were administered (median, 8 cycles; range 1-21+ cycles).

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated: there were no grade 4 toxicities, and the only grade 3 toxicities in > 1 cycle were hand-foot syndrome and neutropenia (2% of cycles each). The maximum tolerated dose could not be determined using predefined criteria. However, in this heavily pretreated patient population, intrapatient vinorelbine dose escalation > 60 mg/m2 was rarely achieved. Thus, we considered vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 to offer the best dose level-toxicity ratio. At this dose, grade 3 toxicities occurred in only 7% of the 58 cycles administered. Among 19 evaluable patients, 7 exhibited response or stable disease lasting > 6 months, giving a clinical benefit rate of 37%. Duration of response in the 2 responding patients was 5 months and > 16 months.

CONCLUSION

The all-oral combination of capecitabine/vinorelbine is well tolerated and active in heavily pretreated patients. Oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 is recommended in combination with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for further evaluation.

Prescribing oral chemotherapy

Standardised dosing can improve the safety of prescribing

FOLFOX-4 Stop and Go and Capecitabine Maintenance Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC) usually receive FOLFOX-4, or other oxaliplatin (L-HOP)-based regimens, until the occurrence of progressive disease, with an increase in the incidence of neurotoxicity which is correlated to the cumulative dose of L-HOP. The aim of this study was to evaluate if FOLFOX-4 stop and go and capecitabine maintenance chemotherapy is associated with a low incidence of severe neurotoxicity in the treatment of MCC patients.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients were treated with FOLFOX-4 (L-HOP 85 mg/m(2) day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 22 h 600 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks). Patients who achieved objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) then received oral capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2) days 1-14 every 3 weeks; L-HOP was reintroduced as soon as progression occurred.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of the 29 patients who achieved OR or SD then received capecitabine. FOLFOX-4 was reintroduced in 18 patients (56.2%). The median response duration (RD) was 9.2 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months. Twenty-eight patients (87.5%) had peripheral neuropathy during treatment, but grade 3 neurotoxicity was observed in only 1 patient (3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOX-4 stop and go and capecitabine maintenance chemotherapy was associated with a very low incidence of grade 3 neurotoxicity. Although the number of patients enrolled was far too low for a definite conclusion, RD and PFS were comparable to those usually reported in the treatment of MCC patients.

Oral Anticancer Drugs in the Elderly

The increasing number of elderly people in the world population has led to a parallel increase in the number of older cancer patients, with over 45% of all cancers in Europe occurring in patients >70 years of age. The increasing tendency to use oral chemotherapy is thus of interest in the elderly, given that both elderly patients and their physicians prefer to use less complex and toxic regimens when such treatments have equivalent efficacy to more complex regimens. However, data from studies designed to evaluate these therapies in the elderly are currently limited. Factors that must be considered before prescribing oral agents to this subset of patients include age-related physiological changes affecting clinical pharmacology, adherence, the patient's capability to self-administer medications, and safety issues concerning the older patient and his or her caregivers. The idea that elderly patients may benefit from the introduction of oral chemotherapy is very fashionable, but to date there is no proof that this approach is as effective as intravenous therapy in this age group, particularly since randomised trials are lacking. This review discusses these issues and reviews current information about the use of specific oral chemotherapeutic drugs for major neoplastic diseases in the elderly.

Oral vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: rationale and implications for patient management

Vinorelbine is an established treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), both as a single agent and in combination chemotherapy. Recently, an oral form of this agent has been developed. Before accepting an established agent in a different administration form, rigorous testing is required to answer such questions as reliable bioavailability, continued safety and preservation of efficacy. In addition, an oral agent must provide patient convenience and acceptance, while being an economically sound approach. Oral vinorelbine was found to have acceptable and reliable pharmacokinetic profiles at clinically relevant dosage levels. Oral vinorelbine was found to have approximately 40% bioavailability; thus, a dose of 80 mg/m(2) orally is the equivalent of 30 mg/m(2) intravenously, and 60 mg/m(2) orally is the equivalent of 25 mg/m(2) intravenously. Studies also concluded a lack of food effect on the administration of oral vinorelbine. In addition, no drug-drug interactions were found with a variety of commonly used antineoplastic agents.Vinorelbine, either orally or intravenously, has been investigated in randomised phase II trials as a single agent and in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with NSCLC. In general, response and survival results with oral vinorelbine appeared similar to the intravenous agent. Adverse-effect profiles were also similar for the two formulations. Clearly, the issue of venous irritation does not exist with oral vinorelbine; however, nausea and vomiting were more frequent when vinorelbine was administered orally compared with intravenously when no planned antiemetic therapy is given.

Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

For patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), further chemotherapy is routinely considered at relapse after first-line therapy. However, proof of clinical benefit has not been documented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study randomly assigned patients with relapsed SCLC not considered as candidates for standard intravenous therapy to best supportive care (BSC) alone (n = 70) or oral topotecan (2.3 mg/m2/d, days 1 through 5, every 21 days) plus BSC (topotecan; n = 71).

RESULTS

In the intent-to-treat population, survival (primary end point) was prolonged in the topotecan group (log-rank P = .0104). Median survival with BSC was 13.9 weeks (95% CI, 11.1 to 18.6) and with topotecan, 25.9 weeks (95% CI, 18.3 to 31.6). Statistical significance for survival was maintained in a subgroup of patients with a short treatment-free interval (< or = 60 days). Response to topotecan was 7% partial and 44% stable disease. Patients on topotecan had slower quality of life deterioration and greater symptom control. Principal toxicities with topotecan were hematological: grade 4 neutropenia, 33%; grade 4 thrombocytopenia, 7%; and grade 3/4 anemia, 25%. Comparing topotecan with BSC, infection grade 2 was 14% versus 12% and sepsis 4% versus 1%; other grade 3/4 events included vomiting 3% versus 0, diarrhea 6% versus 0, dyspnea 3% versus 9%, and pain 3% versus 6%. Toxic deaths occurred in four patients (6%) in the topotecan arm. All cause mortality within 30 days of random assignment was 13% on BSC and 7% on topotecan.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy with oral topotecan is associated with prolongation of survival and quality of life benefit in patients with relapsed SCLC.

Update on capecitabine in colorectal cancer

In combination chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can be replaced by oral 5-FU (in the form of capecitabine or another orally available analogue) without negatively affecting overall toxicity and without remarkably reducing the efficacy of treatment in terms of response rate or overall survival. Preclinical evidence of synergy has led to promising early and successfully completed studies combining capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with bevacizumab, cetuximab, and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The use of preoperative capecitabine plus radiation is achieving good rates of pathological complete response in rectal cancer. While capecitabine is generally well tolerated, its potential toxicities need careful management and may require individual dose adaption.

Developing a strategic approach for IV therapy in the community

The development of home intravenous therapy (IVT) services is of benefit to patients and organizations, particularly as it can facilitate early discharge from hospital or avoid hospital admission. However in providing an IVT education/refresher programme to local primary care trusts, we have found that not all of them, by their own admission, could engage in the expansion of IVT services as they did not have measures in place to support robust service delivery. Building on the authors' recent experience of assisting staff, via an education/refresher programme, to update their services, this article offers direction to other PCTs who may be struggling to update their services in times of reform and unprecedented change within the health service.

Capecitabine for the oral treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Women with metastatic breast cancer require tailored chemotherapy that improves outcomes without compromising quality of life. Capecitabine, a pro-drug of 5-fluorouracil, is an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is sequentially activated in a three-step process. This results in the preferential production of 5-fluorouracil in tumors rather than in normal surrounding tissue, improving the tolerability and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil. In combination with docetaxel, capecitabine is the first agent that has shown superior activity to single-agent docetaxel, and it is a particularly appropriate option for younger, fitter patients with rapidly progressing disease and/or visceral metastases. However, for older patients and those with comorbidities and/or after progression to taxanes, single-agent capecitabine may be the best option. Its role in earlier disease stages (adjuvant therapy) is being investigated.

Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated

We retrospectively evaluated acute toxicity in 88 patients that were treated with capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy to the upper abdomen. These patients included 28 (32%) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 18 (20%) with cholangiocarcinoma, 11 (13%) with ampullary carcinoma, 11 (13%) with other primary tumors, 14 (16%) with liver metastases, and 6 (7%) with metastases at other sites. The median dose of radiotherapy was 45 Gy (range 30–72 Gy). The median dose of capecitabine was 850 mg/m² twice daily, with 77% receiving 800–900 mg/m² twice daily. The highest grade of acute toxicity was Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) grade 0 in 5 (6%), grade 1 in 60 (68%), grade 2 in 18 (20%), and grade 3 in 5 (6%) patients. No patient had CTC grade 4 toxicity. The most common grade 2 toxicities were nausea, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, anorexia and diarrhea. The grade 3 toxicities included nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Three patients (3%) required hospitalization due to grade 3 acute toxicity. Capecitabine was interrupted, discontinued or given at an adjusted dose in 13 (15%) patients because of acute toxicity. Therefore, capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy to the upper abdomen appears to be well tolerated. Capecitabine may serve as an alternative to bolus or infusional 5-FU during chemoradiation for upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Advances in oral therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma

Conventional IV chemotherapy regimens used for induction chemotherapy or salvage therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) are cumbersome, with a negative impact on patient quality of life. A number of new oral drugs, including immunomodulatory agents such as thalidomide and lenalidomide, have demonstrated potent antimyeloma activity in relapsed and refractory as well as newly diagnosed MM. Clinically, response rates of 56%-72% have been reported with the combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed disease; however, the combination is associated with a higher incidence of side effects, including constipation, somnolence, peripheral neuropathy, and thromboembolic complications. In contrast, preliminary safety and efficacy data from clinical studies of lenalidomide show promise. Response rates as high as 83% have been reported in patients with newly diagnosed MM, and the most common adverse event is manageable myelosuppression, which is reversible with dose reduction. Lenalidomide has different toxicities than thalidomide, exhibiting greater myelosuppression but virtually no constipation, somnolence, or peripheral neuropathy. Oncology nurses play a key role in monitoring patients for side effects and pain control and educating them about emerging treatment options. This article reviews the nursing experience with oral agents in the treatment of MM.

Alternating intravenous and oral vinorelbine plus epirubicin with pegfilgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced breast cancer

In order to downstage locally advanced breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m plus epirubicin 75 mg/m given on day 1 and oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m on day 8 was administered every 3 weeks for four courses. On day 2, all patients received a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (6 mg). From March 2004 to June 2005, 22 patients were enrolled. Patients characteristics were: median age, 53 years (range: 39-70 years); postmenopausal, 7/22; clinical TNM stage, T2 (n=14), T3 (n=8), N0 (n=17) and N1 (n=5). The median number of courses was four (range: two to six courses) with full dose intensity. National Cancer Institute grade 3 haematological toxicities observed were neutropenia in 9% of patients, anaemia in 13% of patients and thrombocytopenia in 9% of patients; no toxicity grade 4 occurred. Two patients (9%) registered grade 2 polyneuropathy; no cardiac failure was observed. Conservative surgery was performed in 14 patients (63%). All patients were evaluable for response: complete pathological response was documented in three patients (13.6%); three patients (13.6%) obtained more than 75% of tumour size reduction; 11 other patients (50%) had 50% of tumour size reduction; stable disease was observed in five patients (22.7%). The present findings indicate that vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin is an effective and safe treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: this regimen obtained more than 50% of tumour size reduction in 77% of patients; the use of pegfilgrastim allowed full dose intensity. Oral vinorelbine on day 8 offers greater convenience to the patient by reducing the need for intravenous injection and the time spent in hospital.

Patient preference for oral or intravenous chemotherapy: a randomised cross-over trial comparing capecitabine and Nordic fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer

Until recently, fluorouracil (F) and leucovorin (L) had been considered the standard therapy for patients with colorectal cancer. However, several studies have shown that oral therapy with UFT/L or capecitabine is as effective as intravenous (i.v.) therapy and in addition it is claimed that patients prefer oral to i.v. therapy as long as efficacy is not compromised. In a previous crossover study by Borner et al., it was shown that 26 out of 31 patients preferred oral therapy with UFT/L to i.v. FL (Mayo regimen) [Borner M, Schöffski P, de Wit R, et al. Patient preferences and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:349-58]. The objective of the present study was to investigate patient preference between i.v. FL and oral capecitabine using the design described by Borner. The Nordic FL schedule is a bolus regimen with efficacy comparable to other i.v. regimens and at the same time a very tolerable and easy administered regimen. We randomised 60 patients with colorectal cancer (53 patients received adjuvant therapy and seven patients received palliative therapy) to start therapy with either oral capecitabine or Nordic bolus FL. After 6 weeks of therapy (two courses of capecitabine or three courses of Nordic FL) patients were crossed over to the other regimen. After having completed 12 weeks of therapy the patients (49 evaluable patients) were asked to choose one of the regimens for a further 12 weeks of therapy. Patients had more side-effect when treated with capecitabine and a total of 30 out of 49 (61%) preferred the Nordic FL regimen and 19 (39%) preferred capecitabine. We conclude that patients prefer the regimen with less toxicity and that it is of minor importance whether the medication is administrated orally at home or i.v. at the hospital.

Capecitabine monotherapy: safe and effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer

Optimal management for metastatic breast cancer frequently involves cytotoxic chemotherapy. Over the years, several complex multidrug regimens have been developed that were based upon a rationale of synergistic antitumor activity and nonoverlapping toxicities. However, recently the clinical value of these complex regimens has been called into question as several drugs used alone (monotherapy) or in sequence (serial single agent) have been shown to be both efficacious and better tolerated. Capecitabine (an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate) is one such agent that has been proven to be effective when used alone for metastatic breast cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, and adjuvant colon cancer. In this review, published (or reported in abstract form) data examining various aspects of clinical response and tolerability with single-agent capecitabine for (primarily) first- and second-line metastatic breast cancer are examined. For the most part, response rates are comparable with those of the more complex regimens. Dose reductions from the labeled dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily are relatively common. Toxicities (following dose reductions if needed) are generally manageable, even by more frail patients. Elderly patients are more likely to have impaired renal function or be receiving warfarin treatment, and special attention to these factors is warranted. Nonetheless, the drug administered alone is a reasonable choice when single-agent chemotherapy is entertained as a treatment option for metastatic breast cancer, including in the first-line setting.

Results from an observational trial with oral vinorelbine and trastuzumab in advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of oral vinorelbine plus trastuzumab (OV + T) in Her2 positive advanced breast cancer as first line chemotherapy or after progressing on earlier treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (median age: 59 years) were included. Patients received OV in a dose of 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8, q=21, without dose escalation. Trastuzumab was administered every 3 weeks at a dose of 6 mg/kg bodyweight after a loading dose of 8 mg/kg. Response was evaluated every three cycles using UICC criteria. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate factors potentially influencing response rate and TTP.

RESULTS

Median time of observation was 20 months. We observed a complete response in 18% of patients, partial remission in 50%, stable disease >or= 6 months in 21%, and progressive disease in 11%. TTP was median 9 months. OS was not reached. Response rate and TTP were influenced by line of treatment only. The main toxicities consisted of neutropenia and nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

OV + T appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in advanced breast cancer at the dose and schedule chosen.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes' C colon cancer: the X-ACT trial

Oral capecitabine (Xeloda®) is an effective drug with favourable safety in adjuvant and metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin-based therapy is becoming standard for Dukes' C colon cancer in patients suitable for combination therapy, but is not yet approved by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the adjuvant setting. Adjuvant capecitabine is at least as effective as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV), with significant superiority in relapse-free survival and a trend towards improved disease-free and overall survival. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant capecitabine from payer (UK National Health Service (NHS)) and societal perspectives. We used clinical trial data and published sources to estimate incremental direct and societal costs and gains in quality-adjusted life months (QALMs). Acquisition costs were higher for capecitabine than 5-FU/LV, but higher 5-FU/LV administration costs resulted in 57% lower chemotherapy costs for capecitabine. Capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV-associated adverse events required fewer medications and hospitalisations (cost savings £3653). Societal costs, including patient travel/time costs, were reduced by >75% with capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV (cost savings £1318), with lifetime gain in QALMs of 9 months. Medical resource utilisation is significantly decreased with capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV, with cost savings to the NHS and society. Capecitabine is also projected to increase life expectancy vs 5-FU/LV. Cost savings and better outcomes make capecitabine a preferred adjuvant therapy for Dukes' C colon cancer. This pharmacoeconomic analysis strongly supports replacing 5-FU/LV with capecitabine in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer in the UK.

A Phase II trial of oral capecitabine in patients with platinum – and taxane – refractory ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life of capecitabine (Xeloda), an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, in patients with chemorefractory recurrent mullerian cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with chemorefractory persistent or recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer with measurable disease were enrolled. Capecitabine was administered beginning at 2000 mg/m2/day orally in two divided doses with meals on a 21-day cycle: 14 days of capecitabine followed by a 7-day rest period. One dose escalation or reduction was allowed. Response was assessed after cycle 2 and cycle 4 and every third cycle thereafter. Standard evaluation included two-dimensional measurement of evaluable disease. Standard criteria for response were used. Therapy was discontinued if progression occurred after at least two cycles of therapy. Quality of life and symptoms were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were enrolled. Ninety-two percent of patients had >2 previous chemotherapy regimens. All patients had platinum- and taxane-resistant disease. Thirty-six patients were evaluable for response. Three patients had a partial response, with a median response duration of five cycles. Twenty-two patients had stable disease for 3 to 11 cycles (median, 6 cycles). Eleven had progressive disease. The only grade 4 toxicity was abdominal pain (n = 2). The most common grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (n = 19), hand-foot syndrome (n = 11), abdominal pain (n = 7), and diarrhea (n = 4). One patient had a grade 3 hematologic toxicity (anemia).

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine at the dosages used in this study is well tolerated and has minimal hematologic toxicity.

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of oral misoprostol and intramuscular syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labor

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 400 mug with intramuscular syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Three hundred and fifty-five women randomized to receive either oral misoprostol 400 mug or intramuscular syntometrine in the third stage of labor were studied. The change in hemoglobin level from before to 48 h after delivery, use of additional oxytocics and treatment related side effects were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the change in hemoglobin level and mean blood loss. The incidence of shivering was significantly higher in the misoprostol group whilst that of vomiting was significantly higher in the syntometrine group. There were no differences in the incidence of nausea, headache, diarrhea and pyrexia between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Orally administered misoprostol at a dose of 400 mug is an acceptable alternative in preventing post-partum blood loss, as measured by the peri-partum change in hemoglobin level and was not associated with an increased incidence of side effects.

Capecitabine: a new adjuvant option for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer continues to pose a major public health threat in the United States. Without postsurgical adjuvant therapy, approximately 50% of patients will have recurrent disease and die within five years. Since 1990, five new chemotherapy agents have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium for management of colorectal cancer, and agents traditionally used to treat metastatic and advanced disease increasingly are being applied in the adjuvant setting. One such treatment, capecitabine, offers patients the benefit of oral dosing and permits at-home self-management. A phase III randomized trial, Xeloda in Adjuvant Colorectal Cancer Treatment, demonstrated that treatment with single-agent capecitabine was equivalent to bolus 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin with respect to disease-free survival and overall survival, with significantly less diarrhea, stomatitis, neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. This article reviews the findings and discusses how oncology nurses can help provide effective education and monitoring for patients using oral treatment in the adjuvant setting.

After going through chemotherapy I can't see another needle

Needle anxiety not only impacts on a patient's quality of life but can delay or prevent future medical care. Our survey of women with breast cancer indicated that 78/208 women (37.5%) reported feeling anxious about injections. Patients who reported needle anxiety were significantly younger (t(206)=3.72; P<0.01), with a lower body mass index (BMI) (t(182)=2.16; P<0.05), experience of chemotherapy (chi(2)(1)=8.29; P<0.01), a lower internal health locus of control (t(187)=2.28; P<0.05) and higher levels of state (t(197)=-3.58; P<0.01) and trait anxiety (t(197)=-2.30; P<0.05). Patients repeatedly highlighted the experience of chemotherapy as having caused their needle anxiety. Patient discourse suggests that chemotherapy related needle anxiety is a result of physical (e.g. finding a suitable vein) and environmental (e.g. the chemotherapy room) factors. Patients with cancer require psychosocial support during all stages of care, this should include the application of techniques to prevent or ameliorate the development of anxiety caused by certain aspects of cancer treatments, such as the development of chemotherapy-related needle anxiety.

A phase II Study of the global dose and schedule of capecitabine in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although the standard 3-week capecitabine regimen (1250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest) has shown superior activity and improved safety over bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in two large randomized phase III trials in Europe and in the United States, only a 4-week regimen of capecitabine (828 mg/m(2) twice daily for 3 weeks) has been studied in Japan. Therefore, we performed a phase II study to investigate the 3-week regimen of capecitabine in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with MCRC received oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Blood and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 35% [95% confidence interval (CI), 23-48%], and 52% of patients had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.7 months). The median overall survival was 20.2 months (95% CI, 16.6-27.8 months). The most frequently occurring adverse drug reaction was hand-foot syndrome (all-grade 73%; grade 3 13%). Diarrhea, anorexia, nausea and stomatitis were each seen in 37% of patients. The pharmacokinetic profiles of capecitabine and its metabolites were similar to those reported in Caucasian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-week regimen of capecitabine was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with MCRC as well, and could be used as the basic regimen for future combination therapies.

Sequential therapy with capecitabine followed by vinorelbine/cisplatin in patients with anthracycline/taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no standard treatment for patients with anthracycline and taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Capecitabine or vinorelbine plus cisplatin is an effective palliative regimen for taxane-refractory MBC. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of sequential therapy with capecitabine followed by biweekly vinorelbine plus cisplatin in 37 patients with anthracycline and taxane-refractory MBC in Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

METHODS

Capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest) was repeated every 3 weeks until the disease progressed. Patients then received biweekly vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (40 mg/m2) (arm A, n = 17) or best supportive care (BSC) (arm B, n = 20) in accordance with patient preference and clinical judgment. The clinical variables and response to capecitabine were well balanced in both arms.

RESULTS

The overall response rate to capecitabine was 32%, with a complete response rate of 5% and a partial response rate of 27%. Stable disease was achieved in an additional 46%. The disease control rate with capecitabine was 78%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival with capecitabine were 5.9 and 9.5 months, respectively. There was a trend toward better overall survival in arm A patients compared with arm B (BSC) patients, though statistical significance was not reached (10.4 vs. 7.4 months; p = 0.08); however, a significantly better overall survival rate was observed in the subgroup with capecitabine-controlled disease (10.8 vs. 6.9 months; p = 0.015). The safety profile of vinorelbine/cisplatin was acceptable: only 6% developed grade 4 neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that sequential therapy is not necessarily effective compared with capecitabine alone, but is probably effective in patients initially controllable with capecitabine.

Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

There is an increasing need to redefine treatment strategies in elderly patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma since they constitute more than 50% of newly diagnosed patients. Taking into account that the vast majority of clinical trials in advanced colorectal carcinoma include patients up to 75 years old, it seems reasonable to consider those patients over 75 years as elderly. In general, 20% of patients have favorable factors (fewer than four liver nodules less than 5 cm in size) and are suitable for local treatments (surgery or local-ablative therapies). Additionally, 40% of patients have poor performance status or are severely disabled owing to geriatric syndromes and/or comorbid diseases (advanced stage) that preclude any treatment strategies. The remainder of patients (fit elderly patients not suitable for radical treatments) constitute the focus of this review.

Preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer: Retrospective comparison between capecitabine and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil

BACKGROUND

We compared the efficacy and toxicity of oral capecitabine and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the preoperative chemoradiation treatment of patients with rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The files of 89 patients with rectal cancer, 43 treated preoperatively with oral capecitabine and 46 with intravenous 5-FU, were reviewed, and the outcome of the groups was compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the complete pathological response rate between the capecitabine and the 5-FU groups (30% vs. 17%, P = 0.15). The downstaging rate was higher in the capecitabine group (77% vs. 50%, P = 0.009). Toxicity was mild in both groups. The rate of Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was similar in the two groups (diarrhea 2% vs. 4%, proctitis 5% vs. 7%), except for one patient in the 5-FU group (2%) who developed a rectovaginal fistula. In the capecitabine group, one patient (2%) had Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome, and another had an acute myocardial infarction. In the 5-FU group, two patients (4%) had Grade 3 hematological toxicity, and three (6%) had complications from Port-a-Cath insertion.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral capecitabine appears to be safe and well tolerated, and at least as good as continuous 5-FU.

Role of the nurse in patient education and follow-up of people receiving oral chemotherapy treatment in Turkey

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this study was to identify the nursing role in providing education and follow-ups of patients who were taking oral chemotherapy (CT) treatment in oncology clinics in Turkey. This study arises from the fact that an increasing number of oral CT agents are being developed and used in clinical practice.

METHODS

One hundred and two nurses from various centers completed a 16-item questionnaire.

RESULTS

Nearly half of the nurses work in outpatient/ambulatory clinics (46.1%); the most commonly used oral CT agents were etoposide, capecitabine, methotrexate, hydroxyurea, melphalan, and uracil plus tegafur; 86.3% of the nurses had not received any education on the oral drugs; 72.6% of the nurses stated there was no guideline/protocol for oral CT administration in their unit; and 91.2% of the subjects reported the lack of educational materials specifically for oral CT agents. Half of the subjects reported providing some patient education, mostly giving information about "timing," among them 42.3% reported not giving any information on drug safety, side effects, or symptom management. The reasons for the nurses not being involved in oral CT education and follow-ups were because the physicians plan oral CT and follow-ups of the patients and because of a lack of knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses and physicians describe the role of the nurse as "giving intravenous CT." Given that the number of oral CT agents is on the rise, nurses must begin to take an active role in patient education and follow-up.

Characterization of 5-fluorouracil microspheres for colonic delivery

The purpose of this investigation was to prepare and evaluate the colon-specific microspheres of 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of colon cancer. Core microspheres of alginate were prepared by the modified emulsification method in liquid paraffin and by cross-linking with calcium chloride. The core microspheres were coated with Eudragit S-100 by the solvent evaporation technique to prevent drug release in the stomach and small intestine. The microspheres were characterized by shape, size, surface morphology, size distribution, incorporation efficiency, and in vitro drug release studies. The outer surfaces of the core and coated microspheres, which were spherical in shape, were rough and smooth, respectively. The size of the core microspheres ranged from 22 to 55 microm, and the size of the coated microspheres ranged from 103 to 185 microm. The core microspheres sustained the drug release for 10 hours. The release studies of coated microspheres were performed in a pH progression medium mimicking the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Release was sustained for up to 20 hours in formulations with core microspheres to a Eudragit S-100 coat ratio of 1:7, and there were no changes in the size, shape, drug content, differential scanning calorimetry thermogram, and in vitro drug release after storage at 40 degrees C/75% relative humidity for 6 months.

Informed consent and sedation

The concept of autonomy was not included in the Hippocratic Oath. Nowadays the principle of respect for autonomy is an important right. The basic paradigm of autonomy in health-care, politics and other contexts is expressed as informed consent. In the palliative-care setting, there can be some difficulties in getting informed consent, especially at the end-of-life stage. Can it be good for the patient, always? Could there be some exceptions? At the time of agonizing pain, getting informed consent could become an additional burden for the patient. This present article attempts to shed light on this issue. In our experience, it is not necessary to obtain written consent for a patient who has already expressed his priorities in advance. We believe that this is a good stance for patients as well as doctors.

Concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine and weekly irinotecan as preoperative treatment for rectal cancer: results from a phase I/II study

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiation using capecitabine and irinotecan as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with rectal cancer. Conventional radiation was given at daily fractions of 1.8 Gy on 5 days a week for a total dose of 55.8 (50.4+5.4) Gy. Concurrently, irinotecan 40 mg m⁻² once weekly and capecitabine continuously at dose levels of 500, 650, 750 and 825 mg m⁻² twice daily were administered. Surgery was performed 4–6 weeks following completion of chemoradiation. A total of 28 patients (3 UICC II, 25 UICC III) were enrolled and all received treatment. Dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhoea grade IV and hand–foot syndrome at the 825 mg m⁻² dose level. The maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine was 750 mg m⁻². Diarrhoea was the most common toxicity: grade III in nine patients. Two patients died, one due to pneumonia and one due to sudden cardiac death. A complete response and only microfocal residual tumour disease was achieved in four and three patients (27%). In all, 25 of 28 patients undergoing surgery, 24 (96%) had R0 resection. Preoperative chemoradiation based on continuous daily capecitabine and weekly irinotecan appears to tolerated and effective in patients with rectal cancer.

Innovative schedule of oral idarubicin in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: comprehensive results of a phase II multi-institutional study with pharmacokinetic drug monitoring

BACKGROUND

To determine if protracted low-dose oral idarubicin (IDA), feasible in a previous dose-finding study, would result in similar activity and a better toxicity profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Elderly women (> or=65 years) with metastatic breast carcinoma were treated with 7.5 mg/day for 21 consecutive days, every 4 weeks. After the first fourteen patients, due to excessive toxicity, the protocol was amended to 5 mg/day. IDA and Idarubicinol (IDOL) plasma concentrations (C(trough)) were investigated in all patients.

RESULTS

Between April 1999 and June 2004, 47 elderly patients were accrued in this two-part study (14 and 33 patients respectively). The median age was 74 and 75 years respectively. Visceral involvement was present in most patients. A partial response was noted in 7/31 patients (22%; 95% CI, 9.6-41.1%). Eleven patients had stable disease (33%). At the dose of 5 mg/day the treatment was well tolerated. Neutropenia grade 4 was present in only 6% of patients; alopecia > grade 1 and cardiotoxicity did not occur. The median time to progression was 3 months and the median overall survival was 17 months. IDA C(trough) and IDOL C(trough) levels were significantly associated with haematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that idarubicin at the dose of 5 mg/day for 21 consecutive days is feasible and effective in elderly breast cancer patients but do not demonstrate an improvement in efficacy. A determination of the IDA and IDOL plasma levels (C(trough)) is predictive for toxicity.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel : recent developments

Docetaxel belongs to the class of taxane antineoplastic agents that act by inducing microtubular stability and disrupting the dynamics of the microtubular network. The drug has shown a broad spectrum of antitumour activity in preclinical models as well as clinically, with responses observed in various disease types, including advanced breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of docetaxel are extremely complex and have been the subject of intensive investigation in recent years. Docetaxel is subject to extensive metabolic conversion by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isoenzymes, which results in several pharmacologically inactive oxidation products. Elimination routes of docetaxel are also dependent on the presence of drug-transporting proteins, notably P-glycoprotein, present on the bile canalicular membrane. The various processes mediating drug elimination, either through metabolic breakdown or excretion, impact substantially on interindividual variability in drug handling. Strategies to individualise docetaxel administration schedules based on phenotypic or genotype-dependent differences in CYP3A expression are underway and may ultimately lead to more selective chemotherapeutic use of this agent.

Should continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil become the standard of care in the USA as it is in Europe?

The mechanism of action of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its pharmacologic behavior are influenced by its mode of administration. Several clinical studies have been conducted with the purpose of evaluating the difference between the continuous (CI 5-FU) and the bolus infusion of 5-FU (BI 5-FU). We focus our review on the studies relevant to the treatment of colorectal cancer, both in the adjuvant and metastatic setting. While individual trials fail to show a survival benefit for CI 5-FU, a meta-analyses of 7 trials shows an improvement in overall survival (OS) over BI 5-FU in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment. All trials in the same setting reveal a different toxicity profile for CI 5-FU that is generally more favorable than BI 5-FU. In the adjuvant setting, CI 5-FU allows the duration of therapy to be shortened by half without compromising the efficacy. CI 5-FU is the regimen of choice when given concurrently with radiation. When given in combination with other cytotoxic agents, CI 5-FU seems to be associated with less toxicity and potentially higher efficacy. Oral fluoropyrimidines, especially capecitabine, appear to behave in similar manner to CI 5-FU and may offer a convenient alternative to the usage of infusion pumps and indwelling catheters. While clinical trials are ongoing to compare capecitabine to CI 5-FU, we believe that CI 5-FU should be offered to patients in the United States given its favorable toxicity profile and higher efficacy in several settings.

XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) as first-line treatment for elderly patients over 70 years of age with advanced colorectal cancer

The purpose of this phase II trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of the XELOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) regimen as first-line therapy in the elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). A total of 50 patients with MCRC aged > or = 70 years received oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1 followed by oral capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. Patients with creatinine clearance 30-50 ml min(-1) received a reduced dose of capecitabine (750 mg m(-2) twice daily). By intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 36% (95% CI, 28-49%), with three (6%) complete and 15 (30%) partial responses. In total, 18 patients (36%) had stable disease and 14 (28%) progressed. The median times to disease progression and overall survival were 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.8 months) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 7.6-16.9 months), respectively. Capecitabine was well tolerated: grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 14 (28%) patients: 11 (22%) diarrhoea, eight (16%) asthenia, seven (14%) nausea/vomiting, three (6%) neutropenia, three (6%) thrombocytopenia, and two (4%) hand-foot syndrome. There was one treatment-related death from diarrhoea and sepsis. In conclusion, XELOX is well tolerated in elderly patients, with respectable efficacy and a meaningful clinical benefit response. Given its ease of administration compared with combinations of oxaliplatin with 5-FU/LV, it represents a good therapeutic option in the elderly.

Advances in oral therapy for multiple myeloma

Conventional intravenous chemotherapy regimens are toxic, cumbersome, and negatively affect patients' quality of life, with oral treatment preferable to most patients with cancer. Multiple myeloma is the second most common haematological malignant disease, but cannot be cured with conventional and high-dose chemotherapy. New oral treatments that target myeloma cells or bone marrow are being developed that are highly effective yet have low toxic effects, such as the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide. Several treatments in early development have shown antimyeloma activity, including: CHIR-258, which inhibits fibroblast growth factor receptor 3; NVP-ADW742, which inhibits insulin-like growth factor receptor 1; and PTK787, which inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor. Additional drugs aimed at switching off silenced genes include histone deacetylase inhibitors. The availability of these various oral treatments is hoped to improve regimens that, if used sequentially or in combination, offer the potential of making multiple myeloma a chronic disease, thereby extending patients' lifespans and improving quality of life.

UFT in combination with oxaliplatin: clinical phase I study in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

This phase I trial evaluated the combination of oxaliplatin plus UFT in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose limiting-toxicity for future phase II trials. Eligible patients (N = 27) were treated in sequential cohorts of three to six patients. The starting doses for oxaliplatin and UFT were 70 mg/m2 and 250 mg/m2/day respectively, and five dose levels were designed up to 85 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2/day. Oxaliplatin was administered i.v. on day 1 and 15, and oral UFT was given daily in three divided doses on days 1-21 followed by 1 week rest of a 28-day cycle. At the recommended dose, six additional patients were entered. In total, 79 courses were administered with a median of 3 (range 1-6). MTD was not reached; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 and 15 plus UFT 400 mg/m2/day for 21 days was considered the optimum combination for phase II trials. Gastrointestinal toxicity and asthenia were the most common adverse events. Eight out of 13 patients (61.5%) with metastatic colorectal cancer achieved stable disease. UFT plus oxaliplatin is a feasible and safe combination. A phase II trial in first-line advanced colorectal cancer is ongoing.

Phase II trial of oral vinorelbine for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients ≥65 years of age: an NCCTG study

BACKGROUND

A one-stage phase II trial was conducted to assess the tumor response rate and toxicity profile of single agent oral vinorelbine as first or second-line chemotherapy for women at least 65 years of age with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with metastatic breast cancer aged > or = 65 years of age were enrolled to receive oral vinorelbine on a weekly basis. The oral vinorelbine was given at 60 mg/m2 weekly for the first four doses and was increased to 70 mg/m2 for the subsequent administrations if there was no grade 4 neutropenia or no more than one episode of grade 3 neutropenia. Therapy was continued until progression or intolerable toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included and evaluable for analysis. One patient (4%) achieved a partial response (PR) that lasted for more than 13 months. Two additional patients remained stable for at least 6 months for a clinical benefit rate (PR + stable disease) of 12%. The 1-year survival rate was estimated to be 48% (95% CI 30% to 74.5%). Median time to progression was estimated to be 4.7 months (95% CI 2.0-5.5 months) and the 9-month disease progression-free rate was estimated to be 8% (95% CI 30.9% to 74.5%). The treatment was fairly well tolerated with grade 3 neutropenia in 12.5%, fatigue in 12.5% of the patients, and grade 2 neuromotor and neurosensory toxicities in 12.5% and 8.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oral vinorelbine as a single agent at these dose and schedule in this population of women > or = 65 years is well tolerated but has a low level of objective efficacy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Phase I Trial with BMS-275183, a Novel Oral Taxane with Promising Antitumor Activity

PURPOSE

BMS-275183 is an orally administered C-4 methyl carbonate analogue of paclitaxel. We did a dose-escalating phase I study to investigate its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and possible antitumor activity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A cycle consisted of four weekly doses of BMS-275183. The starting dose was 5 mg, which was increased by 100% increments (i.e., 5, 10, 20 mg/m2, etc.) in each new cohort consisting of one patient. Cohorts were expanded when toxicity was encountered, and 20 patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Plasma pharmacokinetics were done on days 1 and 15.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were enrolled in this trial. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, and neutropenia. First cycle severe neuropathy was reported in four patients treated at 320 (n = 1), 240 (n = 2), and 160 mg/m2 (n = 1), whereas eight patients treated at dose levels ranging from 160 to 320 mg/m2 experienced grade 2 neuropathy in cycle one. The MTD was 200 mg/m2, as 3 of 20 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity in cycle one [fatigue (n = 2), and neutropenia/diarrhea (n = 1)]. BMS-275183 was rapidly absorbed with a mean plasma half-life of 22 hours. We observed a significant correlation between drug-exposure and toxicity. Tumor responses were observed in 9 of 38 evaluable patients with non-small cell lung cancer, prostate carcinoma, and other tumor types.

CONCLUSIONS

BMS-275183 is generally well tolerated on a weekly schedule. The main toxicity is peripheral neuropathy, and the MTD is 200 mg/m2. Promising activity was observed in several tumor types, and a phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer has been initiated.

[Oral vinorelbine: pharmacology and treatment outcome in non-small cell bronchial carcinoma and breast carcinoma]

The development of an oral formulation of vinorelbine (Navelbine softgelatine capsules, Pierre Fabre Pharma, Freiburg i.Br., Germany) represents a significant advance in the treatment of patients with cancer. Oral chemotherapy is more convenient for the patients and brings significant time savings. Vinorelbine is rapidly absorbed after oral ingestion. The bioavailability is in the range of 33 to 43% and is not affected by concomitant food intake or by vomiting occuring 1.5 h or later after dosing. No significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of oral vinorelbine were observed between elderly (> or =70 years) and younger patients. The recommended dose schedule for oral vinorelbine is 60 mg/m(2) weekly for the initial 3 weeks (cycle 1) and 80 mg/m(2) weekly thereafter. However, if severe neutropenia is encountered during the first cycle, treatment is continued with weekly doses of 60 mg/m(2). Bioavailability studies have demonstrated that oral vinorelbine doses of 60 and 80 mg/m(2) are comparable to intravenous doses of 25 and 30 mg/m(2), respectively. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that the new oral formulation of vinorelbine can be safely administered, even to elderly patients, and is comparable in activity to intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A randomized phase II comparison of oral vinorelbine at the recommended dose schedule vs. intravenous vinorelbine at 30 mg/(2) in patients with advanced NSCLC found no significant differences in response rate, progression-free and overall survival between the two treatments. In studies of combination chemotherapy using vinorelbine plus cisplatin or carboplatin in advanced NSCLC, or vinorelbine plus taxanes, capecitabine,epirubicin, or the monoclonal HER2/neu antibody trastuzumab in MBC, intravenous vinorelbine could be completely or partially replaced by oral vinorelbine, resulting in maintained efficacy, good tolerability and improved patient convenience. Concurrent chemoradiation with oral vinorelbine and cisplatin was shown to be well tolerated and produced significant down-staging in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Metronomic chemotherapy is a new treatment approach designed to maximize the antiangiogenic effect. Oral vinorelbine given every other day at low doses is currently evaluated in patients with refractory solid tumors. Oral vinorelbine has also proven useful as a substitute for intravenous vinorelbine in patients experiencing intractable acute tumor pain during or after intravenous infusion of vinorelbine.

'A phase II study of oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin combined with oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer'

This phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new combination of Uracil/Ftorafur (UFT)/leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Between February 2002 and October 2002, 64 patients received UFT 300 mg m(-2) day(-1) and LV 90 mg day(-1) from day 1 to day 14 combined with oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1, every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for safety analysis and 58 of 64 patients were eligible for efficacy. Responses were reviewed by an independent review committee. Of the 58 per-protocol defined assessable patients, 1 complete response and 20 partial responses were observed yielding a response rate of 34% (95% CI: 22-47). The median response duration was 8.74 months (range 1.6-14). The median time to progression and the median survival were 5.88 months (95% CI: 4.34-8.21) and 18.2 months (95% CI: 10-20.7), respectively. Diarrhoea and peripheral neuropathy were the most frequent and predictable toxicities. These events were reversible, noncumulative and manageable. Grade 3 diarrhoea occurred in only 11% of the patients. No grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity was reported in the study. The incidence of grade 3/4 (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2: NCI-CTC 2) peripheral neuropathy was 15%. Haematological toxicity was of mild to moderate intensity with 10% of the patients with Grade 3/4 neutropenia without any episode of complication. The TEGAFOX regimen, a new combination using UFT/LV and oxaliplatin every 3 weeks is feasible on an outpatient basis. The combination is safe and active and may offer a promising alternative to the intravenous route. Nevertheless this efficacy results should be confirmed by randomized phase III trials.

Drug Insight: Metastatic colorectal cancer--oral fluoropyrimidines and new perspectives in the adjuvant setting

Capecitabine and uracil/ftorafur (UFT) are prodrugs of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) that can be administered orally. Both drugs have been shown to be as effective as bolus 5-FU and folinic acid (FA), both as adjuvant treatment, and for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. However, as the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU has been shown to improve disease-free survival in adjuvant therapy, oxaliplatin/5-FU is currently regarded as the standard adjuvant treatment, rather than fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. For the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, improved response rates and prolonged survival have been reported when irinotecan or oxaliplatin was added to 5-FU/FA; a further increase in efficacy was shown when bevacizumab, an antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, was added to chemotherapy. Studies investigating the substitution of infusional 5-FU with oral compounds in combination therapy (e.g. FOLFOX versus capecitabine/oxaliplatin) are ongoing, but preliminary results in metastatic patients advise caution because of increased toxicity when used with irinotecan, and statistically non-significant trends of a decreased efficacy when used with oxaliplatin. Therefore, the combined use of oral 5-FU prodrugs plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin is not recommended at present. Oral 5-FU prodrugs, however, offer a convenient and less toxic treatment option in adjuvant treatment and in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma in patients who do not want an intensified regimen, those that have contraindications for implanted venous access devices, and those who are not candidates for a combination therapy with irinotecan and oxaliplatin.

Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of an all-oral combination regimen of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine for patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximal tolerated dose, recommended doses (RDs), safety and efficacy of oral vinorelbine when combined with capecitabine in an all-oral chemotherapy regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with pharmacokinetic blood sampling to investigate potential drug-drug interactions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with MBC received as first- or second-line chemotherapy, oral vinorelbine at a dose of 60 or 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (and 15) with escalating doses of capecitabine from 1650 to 2500 mg/m2/day days 1-14 every 3 or 4 weeks. Three schedules were tested: day 1, day 8 and weekly regimens of oral vinorelbine with a 14-day course of capecitabine every 3 weeks; and a days 1 and 8 regimen of oral vinorelbine with a 14-day course of capecitabine every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

With oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m2, the RDs were established as oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 2250 mg/m2/day days 1-14 and oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2/week plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14. With oral vinorelbine at 80 mg/m2, the RD was oral vinorelbine 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity of the combination; it was reported in 40 patients (90.9%), with grade 3 in 14 patients (31.8%) and 6.2% of cycles, and grade 4 in 12 patients (27.3%) and 4.3% of cycles. Complications were rare with only three patients experiencing febrile neutropenia (one episode each). The most frequent non-haematological toxicity was gastrointestinal; however, the incidence of grade 3 was low, with no episode of grade 4. Hand-foot syndrome was reported in 14 patients (31.8%) and 22.6% of cycles, with grade 2 in two patients (4.5%) and 1.2% of cycles (two episodes each). No episode of grade 3 was observed. Objective responses were reported in 18 patients (three complete responses and 15 partial responses), yielding a response rate of 40.9% in the intention-to-treat population according to the investigator assessment. Results from the pharmacokinetic study demonstrated the absence of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions when both drugs were co-administered.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine is safe and easy to administer in an outpatient setting. This all-oral combination chemotherapy may offer a good alternative to the intravenous route for patients with MBC. Based on these promising results, a phase II study has started using oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2/week with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14 every 3 weeks as first-line chemotherapy in patients with MBC.