The DRESS syndrome: a literature review

Diphenylhydantoin Induced DRESS Syndrome: A Case Report

Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms" (DRESS) syndrome is a severe adverse drug reaction. The drugs most often implicated are anti-convulsants, bupropion, sulfonamides, sulfasalazine, allopurinol, minocycline, abacavir and neviparine. There are also immune and infectious causes that can lead to DRESS syndrome. A 70-year-old female patient had undergone endovascular coil embolization for intracranial aneurysm and experienced a generalised seizure postoperatively. She had been given diphenylhidantoin (DPH). Six days after DPH therapy, the patient had complained of widespread skin rash. Although DPH was replaced with levetiracetam afterwards, the skin rash deteriorated, causing facial oedema and swelling of the tongue. She had severe facial oedema with swelling of the tongue, causing disturbance of breathing. On the second day in the critical care unit, the patient's breathing deteriorated, leading successively to intubation and mechanical ventilation. The patient's rash was still persistent and the results of a punch biopsy taken from the lesions revealed superficial perivascular dermatitis involving spongiotic eosinophils compatible with spongiotic drug eruption. As a result, it is important to realise that medications we use can be the cause of a range of reactions ranging from simple rash to life threatening syndromes.

Nitrofurantoin: cause of DRESS syndrome

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common pathological entity among elderly patients. The widespread use of antibiotics for uncomplicated UTIs has gained many opponents mainly due to the increasing drug resistance observed. Nitrofurantoin is a commonly used antibacterial drug because it has low side effects and a good antiurinary bacterial profile. However, in this paper, we present a case of a nitrofurantoin-induced DRESS (drug reaction/rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome in a 77-year-old woman. During UTI treatment, the patient developed an acute skin rash which spread all over the body and a considerable decrease in urine volume. At the emergency department, we found her developing eosinophilic pneumonia, anaemia and renal impairment that we relate to nitrofurantoin administration. To our knowledge, this is the second published case report which evokes nitrofurantoin as a possible cause of DRESS syndrome.

Drug-induced severe adverse reaction enhanced by human herpes virus-6 reactivation

Reactivation of certain latent viruses has been linked with a more severe course of drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). For example, reactivation of human herpes virus (HHV)-6 is associated with severe organ involvement and a prolonged course of disease. The present study discusses an HSR developed in a previously healthy male exposed to ceftriaxone, doxycycline, vancomycin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole; TMP/SMX). Initially, the patient presented clinical manifestations of HSR, as well as clinical and laboratory measurements compatible with liver and renal failure. Moreover, the patient presented skin desquamation compatible with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis. During the reaction, it was observed HHV-6 reactivation. The severity of clinical symptoms is correlated with HHV-6 titer, as well as with results of the in vitro lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA). Serum levels of a large panel of cytokines are compared between the patient, a large population of SJS patients, and a cohort of healthy controls, using data collected by our laboratory over the years. HHV-6 was measured in the cell culture media from lymphocytes incubated with each of the 4 drugs. Moreover, we describe a new assay using cytokines released by patient lymphocytes following in vitro exposure to the incriminated drugs as biomarkers of HSR. Based on LTA results, HHV-6 reactivation and cytokine measurements, we establish that only doxycycline and TMP/SMX were involved in the HSR. As result of this analysis, the patient could continue to use the other 2 antibiotics safely.

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in patients receiving strontium ranelate

We have reviewed 47 drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) cases associated to strontium ranelate reported up to March 2011 to the Marketing Holder. The main signs were skin rash, fever, face oedema hypereosinophilia and liver involvement. For ten patients, persistence of DRESS symptoms was reported at the latest news obtained, and DRESS was identified as the direct cause of death in one case. The maximum incidence of DRESS associated with strontium ranelate was 1/24,112 [95 % CI (1/14,859; 1/42,194)] newly treated patients in France. Because DRESS is a severe drug reaction, the occurrence of a rash in a patient treated with strontium ranelate should lead to prompt and permanent treatment discontinuation.

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to describe cases of DRESS reported to the Marketing Authorisation Holder worldwide for patients receiving strontium ranelate by practitioner or by regulatory authorities.

METHODS

Spontaneously reported hypersensitivity events from the strontium ranelate pharmacovigilance database since marketing authorisation (2004) to March 2011 were reviewed by an expert committee. Cases of DRESS were classified as established, probable, possible or no DRESS according to expert judgement. National incidences of DRESS were estimated in relation to the number of newly treated patients.

RESULTS

Up to March 2011, 325 cases of strontium ranelate-induced hypersensitivity events were assessed from which 47 DRESS cases were confirmed. Mean age was 68.7 years and besides skin rash, the main signs and symptoms were hypereosinophilia, liver involvement, fever and face oedema. Median time to skin reaction was 33.5 days after treatment start. Most patients (62 %) recovered at the time of reporting or were recovering. For ten patients, persistence of DRESS symptoms was reported at the latest news obtained. Relapses were observed in a single case. The mortality rate was 8.5 %. The maximum incidence of DRESS associated with strontium ranelate was 1/24,112 [95 % CI (1/14,859; 1/42,194)] newly treated patients in France.

CONCLUSION

DRESS is a well-identified and characterised adverse reaction to strontium ranelate. This risk should be integrated in the risk-benefit balance evaluation of patient treatment, and the occurrence of a rash should lead to prompt and permanent treatment discontinuation with careful follow-up.

Characteristics of liver injury in drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity reactions

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most commonly involved internal organ in drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity. However, data obtained from these patients have yet to be analyzed in depth with respect to liver injury.

METHODS

The medical records of 136 patients who developed delayed-type drug hypersensitivity were reviewed at a tertiary referral hospital. Culprit drugs, the pattern and degree of liver injury, and the effect of systemic corticosteroids were evaluated in the group of patients with drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity and liver dysfunction (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase ≥80 IU/L). Clinical characteristics of patients with drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity and liver injury were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 61 patients with drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity and liver dysfunction, the clinical phenotypes were drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (n = 29, 48%), Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (n = 11, 18%), and maculopapular rash (n = 17, 28%). Antibiotics (n = 27, 44%) were the most common cause of drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity with liver dysfunction. Whereas patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis had mild hepatocellular-type liver injury of relatively brief duration, those with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome had more severe and prolonged hepatocellular injury in addition to moderate to severe cholestatic-type liver injury. The use of systemic corticosteroids did not significantly affect either recovery from liver injury or mortality.

LIMITATIONS

This study was retrospective and the number of subjects was small.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the severity, pattern, and duration of liver injury differ according to the drug-hypersensitivity phenotype. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of systemic corticosteroids in drug-induced systemic hypersensitivity and liver injury.

Acute blistering diseases on the burn ward: Beyond Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

OBJECTIVE

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis are on a spectrum of rare reactions primarily attributable to drugs. Timely diagnosis, cessation of the offending drug and burn center care are associated with favorable outcomes. Acute blistering disease has a wide differential diagnosis, including autoimmune bullous disease and other drug reactions. The aim of our study was to identify the final diagnosis in patients transferred for widespread blistering disease and to identify clinical features at admission predicting final diagnosis.

METHODS

We performed a 5-year retrospective chart review (2006-2011) of the clinical features at admission of patients transferred to a burn ward with widespread blistering disease. Clinical features at admission were compared between patients.

RESULTS

12 patients had a final diagnosis of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and 7 patients had an alternative final diagnosis. Skin detachment surface area at admission was superior in the Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis group. Presence of tense bullae and pustules was associated with an alternative final diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Extensive skin detachment surface and morphological features (tense bullae, pustules) were statistically significant clinical clues to final diagnosis. Patients transferred for widespread blistering disease should be thoroughly evaluated in order to exclude other causes of acute blistering disease.

Successful Treatment of Antiepileptic Drug-Induced DRESS Syndrome with Pulse Methylprednisolone

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare but potentially life-threatening syndrome characterized by skin rash, fever, lymph node enlargement, and involvement of internal organs. It is most commonly induced by aromatic anticonvulsants and antibiotics. Nonaromatic anticonvulsants are rarely encountered as the causes of DRESS syndrome. In the present report, three discrete cases with DRESS syndrome developing due to three antiepileptic drugs, including valproic acid (nonaromatic), carbamazepine (aromatic), and lamotrigine (aromatic), and their treatment modalities were aimed to be discussed in light of the literature. To the best of our knowledge, our cases are the first children to be treated with pulse methylprednisolone in the literature.

Pediatrician! Do you know the symptoms of DRESS syndrome? A case report of a 4-year-old girl

Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and may be observed after administration of many drugs. Clinical symptoms usually occur 2 to 8 weeks after drug introduction. Because DRESS syndrome is potentially life threatening, it is especially important to diagnose it early. Withdrawal of the drug which induced symptoms is the most important therapeutic option. DRESS syndrome appears mostly in adults. There are relatively few articles on the DRESS syndrome in children. The article presents a case of a 4-year-old girl with a life-threatening clinical course of DRESS syndrome with massive pulmonary involvement. The knowledge of DRESS syndrome clinical symptoms is essential for doctors of various specialties. It is especially important that general practitioners, pediatricians, and pediatric neurologists should be able to take this life-threatening syndrome into consideration for differential diagnosis.

Idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: current concepts

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for patients; they also markedly increase the uncertainty of drug development. The major targets are skin, liver, and bone marrow. Clinical characteristics suggest that IDRs are immune mediated, and there is substantive evidence that most, but not all, IDRs are caused by chemically reactive species. However, rigorous mechanistic studies are very difficult to perform, especially in the absence of valid animal models. Models to explain how drugs or reactive metabolites interact with the MHC/T-cell receptor complex include the hapten and P-I models, and most recently it was found that abacavir can interact reversibly with MHC to alter the endogenous peptides that are presented to T cells. The discovery of HLA molecules as important risk factors for some IDRs has also significantly contributed to our understanding of these adverse reactions, but it is not yet clear what fraction of IDRs have a strong HLA dependence. In addition, with the exception of abacavir, most patients who have the HLA that confers a higher IDR risk with a specific drug will not have an IDR when treated with that drug. Interindividual differences in T-cell receptors and other factors also presumably play a role in determining which patients will have an IDR. The immune response represents a delicate balance, and immune tolerance may be the dominant response to a drug that can cause IDRs.

Severe DRESS syndrome managed with therapeutic plasma exchange

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare but increasingly described phenomenon of immune activation and organ dysfunction in association with a wide variety of medications. This reaction shows a broad spectrum of clinical presentation and severity, ranging from mild to lethal. Treatment strategies of immune suppression appear be helpful in some cases, but treatment failures occur frequently with reported mortality rates of 5% to 10%. We present a pediatric case of DRESS syndrome associated with either lamotrigine or bupropion, leading to multiorgan involvement and life-threatening complications of respiratory failure and cardiac arrest. After failing to improve with removal of these medications and administration of systemic corticosteroids, our patient showed dramatic, sustained clinical response to therapeutic plasma exchange. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of therapeutic plasma exchange used for life-threatening DRESS syndrome in a pediatric patient. This case suggests needed research for this therapeutic option in life-threatening DRESS syndrome resistant to high-dose steroids.

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for human leukocyte antigen-B genotype and allopurinol dosing

Allopurinol is the most commonly used drug for the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout. However, allopurinol is also one of the most common causes of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), which include drug hypersensitivity syndrome, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. A variant allele of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B, HLA-B*58:01, associates strongly with allopurinolinduced SCAR. We have summarized the evidence from the published literature and developed peer-reviewed guidelines for allopurinol use based on HLA-B genotype.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome in a patient taking phenytoin and levetiracetam: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome is a potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction with rash, fever, and internal organ involvement, often hepatitis, occurring most commonly two to eight weeks after initiation of a medication. The present case is an example of severe and potentially life-threatening hepatitis as a manifestation of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of anti-epileptic-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome in an 18-year-old African-American man who presented with a five-day history of rash, periorbital and upper extremity edema, hepatitis and fever. Laboratory findings revealed an atypical lymphocytosis, eosinophilia, and elevated serum transaminases. No drug allergies were reported at the time of presentation, but phenytoin and levetiracetam therapy had been initiated five weeks prior to hospital admission for new-onset seizures. Both medications were discontinued on hospital admission, and after three days of high-dose corticosteroid therapy the patient experienced resolution of both his symptoms and laboratory markers of inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Given the significant mortality attributed to drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome, medical personnel should be aware of the potential for this severe hypersensitivity reaction and should ensure close follow-up and offer anticipatory guidance when beginning any new medication, particularly anti-epileptic therapy. Early recognition of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome and initiation of appropriate therapy are imperative in limiting morbidity.

Hepatic necrosis associated with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS; also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms [DRESS]) is a life-threatening condition first described by Chaiken et al. in 1950. It is characterized by extensive mucocutaneous rash; fever; lymphadenopathy; hepatitis; hematological abnormalities; damage to several organs such as kidney, heart, lungs, and pancreas; and possible reactivation of human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) or other herpes virus. Rare and severe cases may present hepatic necrosis, and about 15% of them result in death or liver transplantation. A hallmark of this syndrome is the late onset of symptoms after the drug exposure. The most common culprit drugs are the aromatic anticonvulsants (in almost 30% of the cases) and the antibiotics (which in some series represent 20% of the cases). The authors report a case of a 41-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with erythroderma, acute hepatitis, acute pancreatitis and acute renal failure, and was then treated with corticosteroid after the diagnosis of DIHS/DRESS. A specific culprit drug could not confidently be determined due to the presence of multiple drugs used by the patient. The clinical and laboratory outcome was apparently satisfactory, but unexpectedly, on the sixth day of hospitalization, the patient complained of nonspecific malaise, drowsiness, which progressed in a few hours with signs and symptoms of hepatic failure, refractory shock, and death. The autopsy findings showed submassive hepatic necrosis, and the immediate cause of death was attributed to hepatic failure.

[An atypical presentation of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease]

INTRODUCTION

Histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease) is a rare clinical entity characterized by the association of enlarged lymph nodes in the posterior cervical region and fever. The disease is more frequent in young women.

CASE REPORT

We report a 41-year-old African patient who presented with atypical features of Kikuchi's disease including cutaneous lupus, haemophagocytosis, and lymphocytic meningitis. The ethnic origin and the clinical presentation were initially suggestive of tuberculous meningitis. However, microbiological analyses remained negative, histological findings were suggestive of Kikuchi's disease and HHV6 DNA integration was documented in our patient.

CONCLUSION

Kikuchi's disease should be suspected in an African patient when lymphocytic meningitis is associated with enlarged cervical lymph nodes, hemophagocytosis and HHV6 DNA integration.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome associated myocarditis: a survival experience after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Myocarditis that develops because of the drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a life-threatening disease. We report a case of DRESS-associated myocarditis with cardiac failure that required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for cardiovascular support.

CASE SUMMARY

A 14-year-old boy experienced DRESS-associated myocarditis after anticonvulsive therapy with carbamazepine, clonazepam and phenytoin. The clinical signs included hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia and poor left ventricular (LV) performance. Laboratory investigations showed elevated levels of cardiac enzymes. Systemic corticosteroid pulse therapy for 3 days was administered for treating the DRESS syndrome. The patient required inotropic drugs including dopamine, dobutamine and milrinone because of refractory hypotension and poor LV function. He was placed on ECMO support, and intra-aortic balloon pumping was initiated because of poor response to inotropic drugs and stasis of blood flow in the ventricle on hospital day 17. Plasma exchanges for four separate times over 8 days were also performed during ECMO support on day 22. His condition stabilized 13 days after ECMO support was initiated. The patient was discharged on hospital day 50, and the seizure was controlled by the oral form clonazepam, phenobarbital, topiramate and levetiracetam. Three months later, an echocardiogram showed mild dilated cardiomyopathy.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms-associated fulminant myocarditis is a life-threatening disease. Traditionally, systemic corticosteroid administration, plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin infusion and ventricular assist device implantation have been used for the treatment of this disease. To our knowledge, this is the first case of DRESS-associated fulminant myocarditis treated successfully with ECMO support. However, echocardiogram should be followed regularly because dilated cardiomyopathy may be the late sequela.

Antituberculosis drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and its association with human leukocyte antigen

Antituberculosis drug (ATD)-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (HSS) is a serious adverse reaction to ATDs, but much remains to be determined regarding its characteristics and genetic risk factors. In this study, we have collected cases of ATD-induced HSS and their clinical features, and investigated the associations of ATD-induced HSS with human leukocyte antigen (HLA). Subjects with ATD-induced HSS and ATD-tolerant controls were recruited through analysis of a multicenter adverse drug reaction registry in Korea. HLA allele frequencies were compared between subjects with ATD-induced HSS (n = 14) and two control groups: ATD-tolerant controls (n = 166) and the general population (n = 485). The number of enrolled subjects with ATD-induced HSS (n = 14) was comparable to those of patients with HSS induced by other common drugs such as allopurinol during the recruitment period. The frequency of Cw*0401 was much higher in the cases (50.0%) compared with ATD-tolerant controls (12.7%, Pc = 0.0204, OR = 6.90) and the general population (12.8%, Pc = 0.0132, OR = 6.82). Our results suggest that ATD is an important causative agent inducing HSS with distinct clinical features. The strong association of Cw*0401 with the risk for ATD-induced HSS suggests immunological involvement in the development of this syndrome.

Synovial fluid eosinophilia: a case series with a long follow-up and literature review

OBJECTIVES

To establish the frequency and describe the characteristics of a cohort of patients with SF eosinophilia (SFE) and a long clinical follow-up. A systematic review of the literature on this topic was performed.

METHODS

From November 2005 to May 2010, 982 consecutive arthrocentesis procedures performed at a tertiary care hospital were reviewed. Clinical and analytical data of patients with SFE at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up until 31 January 2012, were recorded. According to the percentage of eosinophils in SF, SFE was classified as minor (<10%) or major (>10%). Also, a literature search of all publications on eosinophilic synovitis found in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science without publication date restrictions was performed.

RESULTS

Eosinophils in SF were found in 10 of 982 (1.02%) patients: minor SFE was recorded in three patients, all of them with haemorrhagic fluid and without peripheral eosinophilia. Major SFE was found in seven patients, and only two of them had peripheral eosinophilia. In six patients, an underlying cause of the arthritis was found. Only one patient was classified as having idiopathic SFE. Most SFE promptly resolved with NSAIDs without relapses or new deformities. The literature search identified 56 patients with SFE; 49 of them (88%) had major SFE and 7 (12%) had minor SFE.

CONCLUSIONS

Eosinophils are infrequently found in SF, and in most cases peripheral eosinophilia was not detected. Most patients with SFE had a benign course with prompt resolution and few relapses.

DRESS: clinicopathological features of 10 cases from an University Hospital in São Paulo

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms is a severe form of drug-induced reaction with multiorgan involvement. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the epidemiological, clinical and pathological features and prognosis of this drug reaction among patients seen at a dermatology service. METHOD: Retrospective review of medical records of ten patients diagnosed with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms at the Federal University of São Paulo, from august 2008 to may 2011. RESULTS: Phenytoin was the leading cause of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in our cases, followed by allopurinol. Abnormal liver function tests were observed in 7 patients and renal function impairment in 2 patients. In all cases, patients were hospitalized and the culprit drug was withdrawn. The main treatment was systemic corticosteroid. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms resulted in death in 2 cases. The causes of death were septic shock and hepatic failure. CONCLUSION: Our mortality rate of 20%, supports that drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms is a severe form of drug-induced reaction and must be recognized by all dermatologists.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis, DRESS, AGEP: do overlap cases exist?

Background

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs (SCARs) include acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome–toxic epidermal necrolysis [SJS-TEN]). Because of the varied initial presentation of such adverse drug reactions, diagnosis may be difficult and suggests overlap among SCARs. Overlapping SCARs are defined as cases fulfilling the criteria for definite or probable diagnosis of at least 2 ADRs according to scoring systems for AGEP, DRESS and SJS-TEN. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of overlap among SCARs among cases in the referral hospital in France.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data for 216 patients hospitalized in the referral centre over 7 years with a discharge diagnosis of AGEP (n = 45), DRESS (n = 47), SJS-TEN (n = 80) or “drug rash” (n = 44). Each case with detailed clinical data and a skin biopsy specimen was scored for AGEP, DRESS and SJS-TEN by use of diagnostic scores elaborated by the RegiSCAR group.

Results

In total, 45 of 216 cases (21%) had at least 2 possible diagnoses: 35 had a single predominant diagnosis (definite or probable), 7 had several possible diagnoses and 3 (2.1% of 145 confirmed SCARs) were overlap SCARs.

Conclusions

Despite ambiguities among SCARs, confirmed overlap cases are rare. This study did not avoid pitfalls linked to its retrospective nature and selection bias. In the acute stage of disease, early identification of severe ADRs can be difficult because of clinical or biologic overlapping features and missing data on histology, biology and evolution. Retrospectively analyzing cases by use of diagnostic algorithms can lead to reliable discrimination among AGEP, DRESS and SJS-TEN.

Evaluation and differential diagnosis of marked, persistent eosinophilia

High-grade eosinophilia can be a diagnostic dilemma, as the etiologies are extensive and varied. Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a group of heterogeneous disorders, many of which remain poorly defined. By definition, HES must be distinguished from other disorders with persistently elevated eosinophilia with a defined cause. Although marked eosinophilia worldwide is most commonly caused by helminth (worm) infections, non-infectious causes must be considered, and include drug reactions, malignancies, and immunologic, inflammatory and allergic diseases.

Allopurinol-induced DRESS syndrome

A 70-year-old man was admitted to our clinic with complaints of fever, jaundice, dyspnea, and generalized rash after 3 months of allopurinol treatment for gout. On physical examination, he was found to have fever (38.5°C), jaundice, and generalized maculopapular rash. Leukocytosis, eosinophilia, elevation of liver enzymes, and hyperbilirubinemia were detected in his blood analysis. Skin biopsy was consistent with drug-induced hypersensitivity. He was diagnosed as Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS). Allopurinol treatment was stopped and steroid treatment was launched. At day 24 of admission, the patient died because of multiple organ failure.

Levetiracetam-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of levetiracetam-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome.

CASE SUMMARY

A 31-year-old white male with a low-grade astrocytoma presenting with tonic-clonic seizures was treated with levetiracetam 1 g twice daily and dexamethasone (initial dosage 12 mg/day, tapered down to 2 mg/day). On day 45 after levetiracetam initiation, dexamethasone was discontinued and levetiracetam continued. The patient developed fever and dyspnea on day 46 and was admitted to the hospital on day 49. A chest X-ray showed bilateral pulmonary interstitial infiltrates, and laboratory tests showed elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; 288 U/L [reference range <204]), ferritin (223 ng/mL [13-178]), and C-reactive protein (CRP; 3.1 mg/dL [<0.5]). Neurologic fever was suspected and the reinitiation of dexamethasone at 6 mg/day was followed by improvement of all symptoms; the patient was discharged on day 55 with dexamethasone 4 mg/day for 2 more days. On day 59, 2 days after the withdrawal of dexamethasone for the second time, the patient presented with a pruritic erythematous maculopapular rash along with recurrence of fever and dyspnea, and was admitted to the hospital. A chest X-ray showed reappearance of the bilateral pulmonary interstitial infiltrates, and laboratory tests showed impaired liver function (alanine aminotransferase 60 U/L [reference range <56], aspartate aminotransferase 53 U/L [<30], LDH 516 U/L, ferritin 419 ng/mL, and CRP 2.6). A diagnosis of DRESS syndrome was suspected and levetiracetam was discontinued. Upon levetiracetam withdrawal, the patient's symptoms resolved by day 66, and radiological images showed resolution of the interstitial infiltrate by day 68. The patient was discharged on day 68. Low-grade fever persisted until day 71, with no other symptoms. During a 2-month follow-up period, liver function test results returned to normal.

DISCUSSION

DRESS is a hypersensitivity reaction to several drugs, mainly antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), characterized by cutaneous, hematologic, and visceral involvement. Levetiracetam is structurally and pharmacologically unrelated to other AEDs. Previously, only one case of levetiracetam-induced DRESS syndrome had been reported, which required corticosteroids to control symptoms. We describe a case of levetiracetam-induced DRESS syndrome presenting with pneumonitis and hepatitis that resolved with levetiracetam withdrawal. Our patient was classified as a definitive DRESS case according to the RegiSCAR scoring system, which grades DRESS cases. According to the Naranjo probability scale, the adverse drug reaction was considered probable.

CONCLUSIONS

Although levetiracetam is usually well tolerated, clinicians should be aware of the potential for it to cause DRESS syndrome.

Immunomodulatory effects of antimicrobial agents. Part I: antibacterial and antiviral agents

Despite impressive therapeutic progresses in the battle against infections, microorganisms are still a threat to mankind. With hundreds of antibacterial molecules, major concerns remain about the emergence of resistant and multidrug-resistant pathogens. On the other hand, the antiviral drug armamentarium is comprised of only a few dozens of compounds which are highly pathogen specific, and resistance is also a concern. According to Arturo Casadevall (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, USA), we have now entered the third era of anti-infective strategy, which intends to favor the interplay between active molecules and the immune system. The first part of this review focuses on the potential immunomodulating properties of anti-infective agents, beginning with antibacterial and antiviral agents.

Antibiotic-associated eosinophilic and occlusive arteritis in calves complicating preclinical studies of left ventricular assist devices

Repeated bolus intravenous (IV) administration of large doses of beta-lactams and aminoglycosides has previously been associated with the development of eosinophilic and occlusive arterial lesions limited to the lungs in calves. Reviewing 13 years worth of records from left ventricular assist device implantation studies, morphologically identical segmental arterial lesions were present in 32 of the 56 calves receiving IV antibiotics, affecting lungs (6/50), kidneys (12/56), or lungs and kidneys (14/50). In 16 of these calves, renal arterial lesions spatially colocalized with renal cortical infarctions. Lesions were noted in additional abdominal organs in 4 of the 50 calves and were exclusively present in the liver in a single calf. Similar arterial lesions were also noted in the lungs (3/4), kidneys (1/4), liver (1/4), and spleen (1/4) of unimplanted calves receiving similar IV antibiotic regimens for bacterial infections. Lesions were observed with therapeutic IV doses of cephalosporins with or without aminoglycosides over shorter intervals than previously implicated. Lesions were significantly associated with increased peripheral eosinophil counts and mildly elevated, not reduced, arterial pulse pressures. This report documents the features of an idiosyncratic drug reaction with features strongly suggestive of an acute type-I hypersensitivity in this species.

Drug reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) / Drug-induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome (DIHS): a review of current concepts

The Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms syndrome, also known as Drug Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome presents clinically as an extensive mucocutaneous rash, accompanied by fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatitis, hematologic abnormalities with eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytes, and may involve other organs with eosinophilic infiltration, causing damage to several systems, especially to the kidneys, heart, lungs, and pancreas. Recognition of this syndrome is of paramount importance, since the mortality rate is about 10% to 20%, and a specific therapy may be necessary. The pathogenesis is related to specific drugs, especially the aromatic anticonvulsants, altered immune response, sequential reactivation of herpes virus and association with HLA alleles. Early recognition of the syndrome and withdrawal of the offending drug are the most important and essential steps in the treatment of affected patients. Corticosteroids are the basis of the treatment of the syndrome, which may be associated with intravenous immunoglobulin and, in selected cases, Ganciclovir. The article reviews the current concepts involving this important manifestation of adverse drug reaction.