Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†

Everolimus after failure of one prior VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Final results of the MARC-2 trial

MARC-2, a prospective, multicenter phase IV trial, aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with everolimus after failure of one initial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) therapy and to identify subgroups benefiting most, based on clinical characteristics and biomarkers. Patients with clear cell mRCC failing one initial VEGFR-TKI received everolimus until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (6moPFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. Between 2011 and 2015, 63 patients were enrolled. Median age was 65.4 years (range 43.3-81.1). 6moPFS was 39.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.0-51.3) overall, 54.4% (95% CI, 35.2-70.1) vs 23.7% (95% CI, 10.5-39.9) for patients aged ≥65 vs <65 years and 51.4% (95% CI, 34.7-65.7) vs 18.2% (95% CI, 5.7-36.3) for patients with body mass index (BMI) >25 vs ≤25 kg/m² . A Cox proportional hazards model confirmed a longer PFS for patients aged ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.80) and a longer OS for patients with BMI >25 kg/m² (HR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.71). Median PFS and median OS were 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.2) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.3-24.3). ORR was 7.9% and disease control rate was 60.3%. No new safety signals emerged. Most common adverse events were stomatitis (31.7%), fatigue (31.7%), and anemia (30.2%). One patient died from treatment-related upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Everolimus remains a safe and effective treatment option for mRCC patients after one prior VEGFR-TKI therapy. Patients aged ≥65 years and patients with BMI >25 kg/m² benefited most.

Comparison of T2N0M0 and T3aN0M0 in Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: To investigate the prognostic role of tumor size in patients with pathological T2N0M0 and T3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated by radical surgery. Methods: A total of 3,662 cases were retrospectively analyzed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) from 2010 to 2012. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) data were obtained. The log-rank test was used to compare survival distributions and Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. Results: In the low-risk T3aN0M0 (perinephric fatty infiltration or sinus fatty infiltration only) group, patients with tumor size ≤ 7 cm were associated with a better OS (P = 0.009) and CSS (P < 0.001) than those with tumor size >7 cm. However, there was no difference in OS (P = 0.129) and CSS (P = 0.539) between T2bN0M0 patients and low-risk T3aN0M0 patients with tumor size ≤ 7 cm. A new T classification grouping patients with both T2bN0M0 and T3aN0M0 with tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm into the same staging category (pT2aN0M0, pT2bN0M0+low-risk pT3aN0M0 [tumor diameter ≤ 7cm], low-risk pT3aN0M0 [tumor diameter >7 cm], high-risk pT3aN0M0) was proposed and it was found as an independent predictive variable for OS and CSS. Conclusions: Findings from the present study suggest that the reclassification of pT2N0M0 and pT3aN0M0 RCC can lead to better prediction of OS and CSS.

Perspectives From an Onconephrology Interest Group: Conference Report

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Onconephrology is a new and evolving field that deals with kidney complications in patients with cancer as well as the management of cancer in patients with preexisting kidney disease. With increasing numbers of patients with cancer with kidney-related complications, the field has garnered increased attention. Thus, an annual Greater Toronto Area Onconephrology Interest Group symposium was held in May 2019. The objective of the meeting was to demonstrate the junctures between oncology and nephrology by highlighting recent data regarding (1) kidney impairment in solid organ malignancies, (2) management and treatment of kidney cancer, (3) kidney impairment in hematologic malignancies, (4) malignancy and kidney transplantation, and (5) hyponatremia in patients with cancer.

METHODS AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Through a structured presentation, the group explored key topics discussed at a Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference on Onconephrology. Expert opinions, clinical trial findings, and publication summaries were used to illustrate patient and treatment-related considerations in onconephrology.

KEY FINDINGS

Kidney complications in patients with cancer are a central theme in onconephrology. An estimated 12% to 25% of patients with solid organ malignancies have chronic kidney disease (CKD), although in certain cancers, the prevalence of CKD is higher. Kidney impairment is also a common complication of some hematologic malignancies. The incidence of renal failure in patients with multiple myeloma is estimated at 18% to 56% and light chain cast nephropathy is seen in approximately 30% of these patients. In addition, there appears to be a bidirectional relationship between kidney cancer and CKD, with some data sets suggesting the risk increases as kidney function declines. Cancer is also of concern in patients with preexisting kidney disease. Kidney transplant recipients have a greater risk of cancer and a higher risk of cancer-related mortality. Kidney complications have also been associated with novel cancer therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. An estimated 2% to 4% of patients initiating an immune checkpoint inhibitor may develop nephrotoxicity, whereas up to 40% of patients on CAR T-cell therapy experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Tumor lysis syndrome and electrolyte abnormalities, such as hyponatremia, have also been reported with CAR T-cell therapy. While the incidence and prevalence of hyponatremia vary depending on the cancer type and serum sodium cutoff point, hyponatremia may be seen in up to 46% of patients hospitalized in cancer centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Onconephrology is a developing field and the themes arising from this meeting indicate a need for greater collaboration between oncologists and nephrologists. Educational symposia and onconephrology fellowship programs may allow for improved cancer care for patients with kidney disease.

Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Several comparative randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed including combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors since the publication of a Cochrane Review on targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in 2008. This review represents an update of that original review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of targeted therapies for clear cell mRCC in patients naïve to systemic therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search with no restrictions on language or publication status. The date of the latest search was 18 June 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials, recruiting patients with clear cell mRCC naïve to previous systemic treatment. The index intervention was any TKI-based targeted therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the included studies and extracted data for the primary outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and serious adverse events (SAEs); and the secondary outcomes: health-related quality of life (QoL), response rate and minor adverse events (AEs). We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and rated the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs reporting on 11,590 participants randomised across 18 comparisons. This abstract focuses on the primary outcomes of select comparisons. 1. Pazopanib versus sunitinib Pazopanib may result in little to no difference in PFS as compared to sunitinib (hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 1.23; 1 study, 1110 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 420 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this corresponds to 18 fewer participants experiencing PFS (95% CI 76 fewer to 38 more) per 1000 participants. Pazopanib may result in little to no difference in OS compared to sunitinib (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.06; 1 study, 1110 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 550 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this corresponds to 27 more OSs (95% CI 19 fewer to 70 more) per 1000 participants. Pazopanib may result in little to no difference in SAEs as compared to sunitinib (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.09; 1 study, 1102 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 734 per 1000 in this trial, this corresponds to 7 more participants experiencing SAEs (95% CI 44 fewer to 66 more) per 1000 participants. 2. Sunitinib versus avelumab and axitinib Sunitinib probably reduces PFS as compared to avelumab plus axitinib (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.80; 1 study, 886 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 550 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this corresponds to 130 fewer participants experiencing PFS (95% CI 209 fewer to 53 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.79; 1 study, 886 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 890 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this would result in 29 fewer OSs (95% CI 78 fewer to 8 more) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib may result in little to no difference in SAEs (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.10; 1 study, 873 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 705 per 1000 in this trial, this corresponds to 7 more SAEs (95% CI 49 fewer to 71 more) per 1000 participants.  3. Sunitinib versus pembrolizumab and axitinib Sunitinib probably reduces PFS as compared to pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.76; 1 study, 861 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 590 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this corresponds to 125 fewer participants experiencing PFS (95% CI 195 fewer to 56 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib probably reduces OS (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.65; 1 study, 861 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 880 per 1000 in this trial at 12 months, this would result in 96 fewer OSs (95% CI 167 fewer to 40 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib may reduce SAEs as compared to pembrolizumab plus axitinib (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.02; 1 study, 854 participants; low-certainty evidence) although the CI includes the possibility of no effect. Based on the control event risk of 604 per 1000 in this trial, this corresponds to 60 fewer SAEs (95% CI 115 fewer to 12 more) per 1000 participants.  4. Sunitinib versus nivolumab and ipilimumab Sunitinib may reduce PFS as compared to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.52; 1 study, 847 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 280 per 1000 in this trial at 30 months' follow-up, this corresponds to 89 fewer PFSs (95% CI 136 fewer to 37 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib reduces OS (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.89; 1 study, 847 participants; high-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk 600 per 1000 in this trial at 30 months, this would result in 140 fewer OSs (95% CI 219 fewer to 67 fewer) per 1000 participants. Sunitinib probably increases SAEs (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.53; 1 study, 1082 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on the control event risk of 457 per 1000 in this trial, this corresponds to 169 more SAEs (95% CI 101 more to 242 more) per 1000 participants.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the low to high certainty of evidence, several combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to be superior to single-agent targeted therapy in terms of PFS and OS, and with a favourable AE profile. Some single-agent targeted therapies demonstrated a similar or improved oncological outcome compared to others; minor differences were observed for AE within this group. The certainty of evidence was variable ranging from high to very low and all comparisons were based on single trials.

Analysis of expression, epigenetic, and genetic changes of HNF1B in 130 kidney tumours

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF1B) is a transcription factor which plays a crucial role in nephronogenesis, and its germline mutations have been associated with kidney developmental disorders. However, the effects of HNF1B somatic exonic mutations and its role in the pathogenesis of kidney tumours has not yet been elucidated. Depending on the type of the tumour HNF1B may act as a tumour suppressor or oncogene, although the exact mechanism by which HNF1B participates in the process of cancerogenesis is unknown. Using an immunohistochemical approach, and methylation and mutation analysis, we have investigated the expression, epigenetic, and genetic changes of HNF1B in 130 cases of renal tumours (121 renal cell carcinomas, 9 oncocytomas). In the subset of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), decreased HNF1B expression was associated with a higher tumour grade and higher T stage. The mutation analysis revealed no mutations in the analysed samples. Promoter methylation was detected in two ccRCCs and one oncocytoma. The results of our work on a limited sample set suggest that while in papillary renal cell carcinoma HNF1B functions as an oncogene, in ccRCC and chRCC it may act in a tumour suppressive fashion.

c-Met expression in renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases

•

Bone is a common metastatic site in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

•

HGF/c-Met pathway is particularly relevant in tumors with bone metastases.

•

c-Met/HGF pathway is involved in RCC progression, conferring poor prognosis.

•

Several c-Met targeting therapies are currently in clinical development.

•

c-Met expression is an important therapeutic target in RCC with bone metastases.

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-Met pathway is implicated in embryogenesis and organ development and differentiation. Germline or somatic mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, gene amplification, and transcriptional upregulation in MET or alterations in autocrine or paracrine c-Met signalling have been associated with cancer cell proliferation and survival, including in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and associated with disease progression. HGF/c-Met pathway has been shown to be particularly relevant in tumors with bone metastases (BMs). However, the efficacy of targeting c-Met in bone metastatic disease, including in RCC, has not been proven. Therefore, further investigation is required focusing the particular role of HGF/c-Met pathway in bone microenvironment (BME) and how to effectively target this pathway in the context of bone metastatic disease.

Computed tomography-guided biopsy for small renal masses before or immediately after tumor ablation: factors affecting diagnostic yield

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic yield of percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB) before and after ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 333 renal masses in 332 consecutive patients underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies and were included in this study. All biopsies were performed with 18-gauge core needles with CT fluoroscopic guidance before ablation (n  =  234) or immediately after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n  =  40) or cryoablation (CA) (n  =  59). The safety and diagnostic yield of RMB were evaluated. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors affecting diagnostic yield.

RESULTS

No major complication occurred. The 281 specimens (84%) were diagnostic. There were 257 renal cell carcinomas (77%), 21 benign masses (6%), and 3 metastases (1%). The remaining 52 specimens (16%) were nondiagnostic. The diagnostic yields before ablation, after RFA, and CA were 91% (212/234), 80% (32/40), and 63% (37/59), respectively. Small masses (P  =  0.050 and 0.006), cystic masses (P < 0.001 and < 0.001), and post-CA (P < 0.001 and < 0.001) were independent and significant factors affecting the nondiagnostic results in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided RMB can be nondiagnostic when the tumor is small, cystic, or biopsied immediately after CA.

NF-κB and pSTAT3 synergistically drive G6PD overexpression and facilitate sensitivity to G6PD inhibition in ccRCC

Background

Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) serves key roles in cancer cell metabolic reprogramming, and has been reported to be involved in certain carcinogenesis. Previous results from our laboratory demonstrated that overexpressed G6PD was a potential prognostic biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common subtype of kidney cancer. G6PD could stimulate ccRCC growth and invasion through facilitating reactive oxygen species (ROS)-phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) activation and ROS-MAPK-MMP2 axis pathway, respectively. However, the reasons for ectopic G6PD overexpression and the proliferation repressive effect of G6PD inhibition in ccRCC are still unclear.

Methods

The impact of ROS accumulation on NF-κB signaling pathway and G6PD expression was determined by real-time RT-PCR and Western blot in ccRCC cells following treatment with ROS stimulator or scavenger. The regulatory function of NF-κB signaling pathway in G6PD transcription was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR, Western blot, luciferase and ChIP assay in ccRCC cells following treatment with NF-κB signaling activator/inhibitor or lentivirus infection. ChIP and Co-IP assay was performed to demonstrate protein-DNA and protein-protein interaction of NF-κB and pSTAT3, respectively. MTS assay, human tissue detection and xenograft model were conducted to characterize the association between NF-κB, pSTAT3, G6PD expression level and proliferation functions.

Results

ROS-stimulated NF-κB and pSTAT3 signaling over-activation could activate each other, and exhibit cross-talks in G6PD aberrant transcriptional regulation. The underlying mechanism was that NF-κB signaling pathway facilitated G6PD transcription via direct DNA-protein interaction with p65 instead of p50. p65 and pSTAT3 formed a p65/pSTAT3 complex, occupied the pSTAT3-binding site on G6PD promoter, and contributed to ccRCC proliferation following facilitated G6PD overexpression. G6PD, pSTAT3, and p65 were highly expressed and positively correlated with each other in ccRCC tissues, confirming that NF-κB and pSTAT3 synergistically promote G6PD overexpression. Moreover, G6PD inhibitor exhibited tumor-suppressor activities in ccRCC and attenuated the growth of ccRCC cells both in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusion

ROS-stimulated aberrations of NF-κB and pSTAT3 signaling pathway synergistically drive G6PD transcription through forming a p65/pSTAT3 complex. Moreover, G6PD activity inhibition may be a promising therapeutic strategy for ccRCC treatment.

Twenty-year survival after iterative surgery for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic approach of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a real challenge for clinicians, because of the variable clinical course; the recent availability of numerous targeted therapies that have significantly improved overall oncological results, but still with a low percentage of complete responses; and the increasing role of metastasectomy (MSX) as an effective strategy to achieve a durable cure, or at least defer initiation of systemic therapies, in selected patients and in the context of multimodality treatment strategies.

CASE SUMMARY

We report here the case of a 40-year-old man who was referred to our unit in November 2004 with lung and mediastinal lymph nodes metastases identified during periodic surveillance 6 years after a radical nephrectomy for RCC; he underwent MSX of multiple lung nodules and mediastinal lymphadenectomy, with subsequent systemic therapy with Fluorouracil, Interferon-alpha and Interleukin 2. The subsequent clinical course was characterized by multiple sequential abdominal and thoracic recurrences, successfully treated with multiple systemic treatments, repeated local treatments, including two pancreatic resections, conservative resection and ablation of multiple bilobar liver metastases, resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy of multiple lung metastases. He is alive without evidence of recurrence 20 years after initial nephrectomy and sequential treatment of recurrences in multiple sites, including resection of more than 38 metastases, and 5 years after his last MSX.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights that effective multimodality therapeutic strategies, including multiple systemic treatments and iterative aggressive surgical resection, can be safely performed with long-term survival in selected patients with multiple metachronous sequential metastases from RCC.

Patient selection and risk factors in the changing treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The approval of combination treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) represents a major change in the clinical management of this malignancy. Updated treatment guidelines differentiate first-line mRCC treatment by patient risk group as defined by prognostic models and the number of risk factors.

AREAS COVERED

Current prognostic models, with a focus on the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center models, the heterogeneity of the intermediate risk group, and first- and second-line mRCC treatment outcomes according to patient risk group are discussed. Consideration is given to the future direction of treatment selection strategies including refinement of prognostic factors, genetic biomarkers and gene signatures.

EXPERT OPINION

Current prognostic models require updating, but initial data suggests they are effective in stratifying patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or combination therapy. Treatment selection for patients with 1-2 risk factors may require further consideration due to the heterogeneous nature of the intermediate risk group. Future prognostic models may benefit from inclusion of gene signatures and stratification by molecular subtype. Prognostic risk factors are not the only consideration in treatment selection; tumor burden, location of metastases, and comorbidities, among other factors, should also be considered.

Temsirolimus versus Pazopanib (TemPa) in Patients with Advanced Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Poor-risk Features: A Randomized Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

Temsirolimus has level 1 evidence for initial treatment of poor-risk patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but its efficacy has not been directly compared with an antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor [VEGFR TKi]) in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate temsirolimus versus pazopanib as first-line therapy in patients with mRCC, predominant clear-cell features, and clinical characteristics of a poor prognosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A randomized (1:1) phase II trial in 69 treatment-naïve mRCC patients and with three or more predictors of short survival for temsirolimus was conducted during 2012-2017 in a single academic cancer center. Crossover to the alternative treatment upon discontinuation of the first-line agent was permitted.

INTERVENTION

Mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor temsirolimus and VEGFR TKi pazopanib.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Radiographic response was assessed by blinded radiologists. Efficacy outcomes were adjusted by prior nephrectomy status, prior interleukin-2 treatment, and the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Thirty-five patients received temsirolimus and 34 received pazopanib upfront; 72% overall had poor risk by IMDC. Median PFS in the first line was 2.7mo with temsirolimus and 5.2mo with pazopanib (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-2.22; p=0.210). Median OS was 7.1mo with temsirolimus and 11.9mo with pazopanib (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.70-1.93; p=0.558), and ORRs were 5.9% and 21.2%, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 5.2, 95% CI 0.9-29.3; p=0.062). PRO measures favored pazopanib. Five patients discontinued first-line therapy due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Temsirolimus and pazopanib had modest activity in patients with poor-risk clear-cell mRCC, and therefore their use should be discouraged in this setting.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We evaluated outcomes of advanced renal cell carcinoma patients presenting with aggressive features when treated with temsirolimus or pazopanib as first-line therapy. Survival was <1yr for most, suggesting that more efficacious alternative treatments should be favored for these patients.

Tolerability of Alternative Dosing Schedules for Sunitinib: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The standard schedule for sunitinib treatment is 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off (4/2) in first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Schedule modifications, including 2 weeks on and 1 week off (2/1), appear to reduce the total number of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) without compromising efficacy. Even though TRAEs can qualitatively differ from each other, it is not clear as to what effects a 2/1 schedule has on individual TRAEs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis included one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four non-randomized controlled studies (non-RCTs) that compared the two schedules in parallel. The primary objective was to estimate risk of individual adverse events (AEs) with a sunitinib 2/1 schedule versus a 4/2 schedule. Seven representative AEs were evaluated as standard data for the RCT and as weighted pooling data of the non-RCTs. Random effects modelling with Review Manager v5.3 was used to pool study-level data using the inverse-variance of each study as the weight.

RESULTS

The five selected studies included a total of 484 patients with mRCC. Risk ratios for fatigue for a 2/1 schedule were significantly lower than those for a 4/2 schedule {0.69 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.51, 0.95] in the RCT and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63, 0.94) in the non-RCTs}. Other TRAEs, except diarrhea and anorexia, also tended to decrease in both sets. Efficacy outcomes were comparable between 2/1 and standard schedules.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that a 2/1 schedule of sunitinib lowers the risk of fatigue and the occurrence other AEs without compromising efficacy.

Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the U.S

BACKGROUND

The data from the phase III clinical trial KEYNOTE-426 indicated that pembrolizumab plus axitinib compared with sunitinib could generate clinical benefits in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Given the incremental clinical benefits, we examined the potential cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in the first-line setting for patients with advanced RCC from the U.S. payers' perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cost and health outcomes were estimated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 to $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed by varying potentially modifiable parameters, and additional subgroup analyses were performed as well.

RESULTS

Upon our analyses, the total treatment costs in the pembrolizumab plus axitinib and sunitinib groups were $522,796 and $348,424 and the QALYs gained 2.90 and 1.72, respectively. In the base-case analysis, compared with receiving sunitinib, patients with advanced RCC receiving pembrolizumab plus axitinib gained 1.18 more QALYs at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $148,676/QALY. The results of subgroup analyses demonstrated that pembrolizumab plus axitinib was most cost-effective for patients who had one organ with metastasis.

CONCLUSION

First-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus axitinib, compared with sunitinib, is a cost-effective strategy when the value of WTP is from $100,000 to $150,000 per QALY in patients with advanced RCC. For patients with one-organ metastasis and those in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor risk group, first-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus axitinib is more cost-effective than others.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This was the first study to examine the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study found that first-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus axitinib is a cost-effective strategy when the value of willingness-to-pay is from $100,000 to $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year in patients with advanced RCC from the U.S. payers' perspective.

Carbonic Anhydrase IX in Renal Cell Carcinoma, Implications for Disease Management

Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CAIX) is a well-described enzyme in renal cell carcinoma, with its expression being regulated by the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha, it is known for interfering with hypoxia processes. Renal carcinoma encompasses a broad spectrum of histological entities and is also described as a heterogeneous malignant tumor. Recently, various combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have been validated to manage this disease. Reliable markers to confirm the diagnosis, estimate the prognosis, predict or monitor the treatment response are required. Molecular imaging developments allow a comprehensive analysis of the tumor, overcoming the spatial heterogeneity issue. CAIX, being highly expressed at the tumor cell surfaces of clear cell renal carcinoma, also represents a potential treatment target. In this manuscript we reviewed the current knowledge from the literature on the pathophysiological interactions between renal cell carcinoma and CAIX, the role of CAIX as a marker for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment monitoring and molecular imaging, and the potential target for therapeutic strategies.

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Recent case reports and series have demonstrated the usefulness of Ga/F-PSMA PET/CT in restaging recurrent renal cancer after nephrectomy. We presented a case of a patient with renal mass who had undergone both F-FDG and Ga-PSMA PET/CT for diagnosis and staging. Concordant tracer uptake in the primary tumor and metastatic lesions was demonstrated by both radiotracers. Final histopathological reports revealed clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, unusual left metacarpal bone metastasis was also detected.

PD-L1 and VEGFR-2 expression in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy following cytoreductive nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have independently investigated the population of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (smRCC). In this study, we evaluated programmed death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) expression in primary tumor tissue of smRCC.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients with smRCC who were treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by targeted therapy from January 2006 to January 2013 were identified. PD-L1 and VEGFR-2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods were used for analysis.

RESULTS

PD-L1 and VEGFR-2 protein immunopositivity were observed in 39.6% (38 of 96) and 58.3% (56 of 96) of patients, respectively. A significant correlation was detected between VEGFR-2 and PD-L1 expression (P = 0.030). Based on PD-L1 and VEGFR-2 expression, patients with intermediate-risk disease (n = 63) were divided into 4 subgroups including patients who were PD-L1 (+) VEGFR-2 (+) (n = 21), PD-L1 (+) VEGFR-2 (-) (n = 11), PD-L1 (-) VEGFR-2 (+) (n = 15) and PD-L1 (-) VEGFR-2 (-) (n = 16). Compared to the PD-L1 (-) VEGFR-2 (+), PD-L1 (+) VEGFR-2 (+) and PD-L1 (-) VEGFR-2 (-) groups, patients in the PD-L1 (+) VEGFR-2 (-) group had shorter progression-free survival (median, 9.0 vs. 20.0, 16.0 and 15.5 months, P < 0.05) and overall survival (median, 14.0 vs. 33.0, 24.0 and 26.5 months, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermediate-risk smRCC patients with PD-L1-positive and VEGFR-2-negative expression who were treated with targeted therapy following cytoreductive nephrectomy had poor prognoses. We suggest that other treatments beyond sunitinib or sorafenib may be explored in this subgroup.

The Role of Daily Adaptive Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Renal Cell Cancer

Simple Summary

Standard treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. Stereotactic radiotherapy given in a few high dose fractions is a promising treatment for this indication and could be an alternative option for patients unsuitable for surgery. Stereotactic MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is clinically implemented as a new technique for precise treatment delivery of abdominal tumors, like RCC. In this study, we evaluated the clinical impact of stereotactic MRgRT given in five fractions of 8 Gy and routine plan re-optimization for 36 patients with large primary RCCs. Our evaluation showed good oncological results with minimal side-effects. Even in this group with large tumors, daily plan re-optimization was only needed in a minority of patients who can be identified upfront. This is a favorable result since online MRgRT plan adaptation is a time-consuming procedure. In these patients, MRgRT delivery will be faster, and these patients could be candidates for even less fractions per treatment.

Abstract

Novel magnetic-resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) permits real-time soft-tissue visualization, respiratory-gated delivery with minimal safety margins, and time-consuming daily plan re-optimisation. We report on early clinical outcomes of MRgRT and routine plan re-optimization for large primary renal cell cancer (RCC). Thirty-six patients were treated with MRgRT in 40 Gy/5 fractions. Prior to each fraction, re-contouring of tumor and normal organs on a pretreatment MR-scan allowed daily plan re-optimization. Treatment-induced toxicity and radiological responses were scored, which was followed by an offline analysis to evaluate the need for such daily re-optimization in 180 fractions. Mean age and tumor diameter were 78.1 years and 5.6 cm, respectively. All patients completed MRgRT with an average fraction duration of 45 min. Local control (LC) and overall survival rates at one year were 95.2% and 91.2%. No grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. Plans without re-optimization met institutional radiotherapy constraints in 83.9% of 180 fractions. Thus, daily plan re-optimization was required for only a minority of patients, who can be identified upfront by a higher volume of normal organs receiving 25 Gy in baseline plans. In conclusion, stereotactic MRgRT for large primary RCC showed low toxicity and high LC, while daily plan re-optimization was required only in a minority of patients.

Consensus paper: current state of first- and second-line therapy in advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

The therapy of advanced (clear-cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has recently experienced tremendous changes. Several new treatments have been developed, with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibition being the backbone of therapy. Diverse immunotherapy combinations change current first-line standards. These changes also require new approaches in subsequent lines of therapy. In an expert panel, we discussed the new treatment options and how they change clinical practice. While first-line immunotherapies introduce a new level of response rates, data on second-line therapies remains poor. This scenario poses a challenge for clinicians as guideline recommendations are based on historical patient cohorts and agents may lack the appropriate label for their in guidelines recommended use. Here, we summarize relevant clinical data and consider appropriate treatment strategies.

Avelumab and axitinib combination therapy for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Owing to an improved understanding of the immunobiological profile of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the past few years have ushered in significant changes in systemic therapies for advanced stage RCC. First-line treatment with single-agent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has been virtually replaced for most patients by immunotherapy combinations. The first of such treatments was the dual immune checkpoint inhibitor combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab. More recently, the combination of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and a TKI has also moved into the first-line setting. This review summarizes the pharmacologic properties, evidence for use and safety of avelumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor and axitinib a small-molecule TKI, each as monotherapy, and in combination for the management of metastatic RCC.

Fatal hyperprogression induced by nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features: a case report

In the past few years, the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab has become standard of care in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) progressing after antiangiogenic agents. To date, neither expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) nor any other biomarker can be used to predict responses to ICIs, although intermediate-poor International Metastatic Database of Renal Carcinoma (IMDC) risk patients and those with sarcomatoid tumors appear to achieve superior benefit from immunotherapy. Paradoxically, ICIs may sometimes increase the speed of tumor growth. This rare phenomenon, called hyperprogression, has first been described in patients with melanoma and lung cancer treated with ICIs and is associated with poor survival. Here, we present the case of a patient affected by an intermediate IMDC risk mRCC with diffuse sarcomatoid features who achieved long disease control with first-line sunitinib and then started a second-line treatment with nivolumab. Unexpectedly, he experienced a dramatic acceleration of tumor growth and died soon after the third infusion of nivolumab. Then, we review the frequency of hyperprogression in mRCC and discuss the biological peculiarity of sarcomatoid RCC in terms of different responses to ICIs and antiangiogenic agents.

First-line pazopanib in intermediate- and poor-risk patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Final results of the FLIPPER trial

Temsirolimus has long been the only approved first-line standard of care (SOC) with overall survival (OS) benefit in poor-risk patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). However, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also commonly used in clinical practice. Pazopanib is an SOC for first-line mRCC treatment, but for poor-risk patients data are scarce. The FLIPPER (First-Line Pazopanib in Poor-Risk Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma) study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of first-line pazopanib in poor-risk mRCC patients. FLIPPER was a single-arm, multicenter, Phase IV trial. Key inclusion criteria were treatment-naive clear cell, inoperable advanced or mRCC, poor-risk according to MSKCC with slight modification, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥60% and adequate organ function. Oral pazopanib 800 mg was given daily. Primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6). Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR) and safety. For analysis, descriptive statistics were used. Between 2012 and 2016, 60 patients had been included. Forty-three patients qualified for safety analyses, 34 for efficacy. Median age was 66 years, 64.7% of patients were poor-risk, 82.4% had a KPS ≤70%. PFS6 was 35.3% (95% CI, 19.7-53.5). Median PFS and OS were 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.6-7.8) and 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.6-22.2), respectively. ORR was 32.4% (95% CI, 17.4-50.5), median DOR 9.7 months (95% CI, 1.8-12.4). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse event reported in 4.7% of patients was hypertension. No treatment-related death occurred. Since pazopanib is active and well tolerated in poor-risk patients with clear cell mRCC, our results support its use as first-line treatment in this setting.

Model-based assessment of pharmacokinetic changes of sunitinib, tacrolimus, and everolimus in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after renal transplantation

The safety of the coadministration of sunitinib with tacrolimus and everolimus with regard to therapeutic drug monitoring has not been demonstrated. Here, we report a patient who showed high sunitinib concentrations, in addition to pharmacokinetic changes in tacrolimus and everolimus after sunitinib therapy. A living-donor renal transplant patient treated with tacrolimus and everolimus was diagnosed with pulmonary and pleural metastases of renal cell carcinoma. The patient received sunitinib therapy (37.5 mg/day, 2 weeks on and 1 week off). This patient exhibited a high total sunitinib concentration (sunitinib, 105.8 ng/mL; N-desethyl sunitinib, 27.9 ng/mL) on day 10 postinitiation and experienced grade 3 diarrhea. The observed sunitinib concentrations were a little higher than those reported in the 421C>A polymorphism of the ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 gene carrier. The observed concentrations of both tacrolimus and everolimus gradually decreased compared with the Bayesian-predicted values after the onset of sunitinib therapy, and the doses of tacrolimus and everolimus were increased. Careful therapeutic drug monitoring of sunitinib, tacrolimus, and everolimus concentrations is necessary during combination therapy, especially after episodes of diarrhea.

Cabozantinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A phase II, open-label, single-arm study of Japanese patients

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib, through a bridging study to METEOR, in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Methods

This phase II, open‐label, single‐arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03339219) included adult Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and measurable disease who had received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients received cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily while there was clinical benefit, or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end‐point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1. Secondary end‐points included clinical benefit rate (complete or partial response, or ≥8‐week stable disease), progression‐free survival, overall survival and safety.

Results

Of the 35 patients enrolled, 68.6%, 22.9% and 8.6% had previously received one, two and three prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors, respectively. The median duration of cabozantinib exposure was 27.0 weeks (range 5.1–43.0 weeks). The objective response rate was 20.0% (90% confidence interval 9.8–34.3%), and the clinical benefit rate was 85.7% (95% confidence interval 69.7–95.2%). The 6‐month estimated progression‐free survival was 72.3% (95% confidence interval 53.3–84.6%); the median progression‐free survival and overall survival were not reached. All patients reported adverse events, which were manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification; two patients (5.7%) discontinued therapy due to adverse events.

Conclusions

The results showed that findings from METEOR can be extrapolated, and that cabozantinib 60 mg/day is a viable treatment option in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had progressed after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Real-world use of temsirolimus in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: recent consideration based on the results of a post-marketing, all-case surveillance study

OBJECTIVE

A prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma in Japan.

METHODS

Patients prescribed temsirolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma were registered and received temsirolimus (25 mg weekly, intravenous infusion for 30-60 minutes) in routine clinical settings (observation period: 96 weeks).

RESULTS

Among 1001 patients included in the safety analysis data set (median age, 65.0 years; men, 74.8%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, 69.6%), 778 (77.7%) reported adverse drug reactions. The most common (≥10%) all-grade adverse drug reactions were stomatitis (26.7%), interstitial lung disease (17.3%) and platelet count decreased (11.1%). The incidence rate of grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease was 4.5%. The onset of interstitial lung disease was more frequent after 4-8 weeks of treatment or in patients with lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (21.6% for score 0 vs 8.3% for score 4, P < 0.001). Among 654 patients in the effectiveness analysis data set, the response and clinical benefit rates were 6.7% (95% confidence interval 4.9-8.9) and 53.2% (95% confidence interval 49.3-57.1), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 18.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 16.9-21.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness profile of temsirolimus observed in this study was similar to that observed in the multinational phase 3 study. The results are generalizable to the real-world scenario at the time of this research, and safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus as a subsequent anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma warrants further investigation. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01210482, NCT01420601).

Randomised Phase II study comparing alternating cycles of sunitinib and everolimus vs standard sequential administration in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma (SUNRISES study)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of alternating cycles of sunitinib and everolimus vs standard sequential treatment of sunitinib followed by everolimus in first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), as alternating blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways could potentially prevent the occurrence of resistance to anti-VEGFR therapy in mRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SUNRISES, a randomised open-label Phase II study, investigated the efficacy of alternating cycles of sunitinib and everolimus vs standard sequential treatment of sunitinib followed by everolimus upon progression. Treatment-naïve patients with clear-cell mRCC were included. Alternating treatment consisted on 12 weeks of sunitinib, followed by 12 weeks of everolimus. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1 year. The secondary endpoints included the median PFS, overall survival (OS), response rate, and safety.

RESULTS

Accrual was low due to the advent of new-generation therapies, and the study was stopped prematurely. Only 41 patients out of the planned 102 patients were accrued, and randomised in a 2:1 ratio (15 patients to the control arm, 26 to the experimental arm). In all, 60.9% of patients had performance status (PS) 0 and 39% PS 1; 63% had a favourable prognostic risk profile, while 36% were intermediate risk. The primary endpoint was not met. The 1-year PFS rate was 49.7% (experimental arm) vs 84.62% (control arm; P = 0.11). There was a trend towards fewer Grade ≥3 adverse events with the alternating approach (50% vs 73.3%; P = 0.14). The median OS was similar in both treatment arms. The other secondary endpoints favoured the control arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The study failed to show any benefit of alternating cycles of sunitinib and everolimus in patients with mRCC. The alternating approach using an mTOR inhibitor does not seem to prevent the occurrence of resistance to VEGFR blockade.

Efficacy of Savolitinib vs Sunitinib in Patients With MET-Driven Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SAVOIR Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is the most common type of non-clear cell RCC. Because some cases of PRCC are MET-driven, MET inhibition could be a targeted treatment approach. In previous studies, savolitinib (AZD6094, HMPL-504, volitinib), a highly selective MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in this patient group.

Objective

To determine whether savolitinib is a better treatment option for this patient population, vs standard of care, sunitinib.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The SAVOIR phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial was a multicenter study carried out in 32 centers in 7 countries between July 2017 and the data cutoff in August 2019. Overall, 360 to 450 patients were to be screened to randomize approximately 180 patients. Patients were adults with MET-driven (centrally confirmed), metastatic PRCC, with 1 or more measurable lesions. Exclusion criteria included prior receipt of sunitinib or MET inhibitor treatment. Overall, 254 patients were screened.

Interventions

Patients received 600 mg of savolitinib orally once daily (qd), or 50 mg of sunitinib orally qd for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS, assessed by investigator and confirmed by blinded independent central review). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and safety/tolerability.

Results

At data cutoff, 60 patients were randomized (savolitinib n = 33; sunitinib n = 27); most patients had chromosome 7 gain (savolitinib, 30 [91%]; sunitinib, 26 [96%]) and no prior therapy (savolitinib, 28 [85%]; sunitinib, 25 [93%]). For savolitinib and sunitinib, 4 (12%) and 10 (37%) patients were women, and the median (range) age was 60 (23-78) and 65 (31-77) years, respectively. Following availability of external data on PFS with sunitinib in patients with MET-driven disease, study enrollment was closed. Progression-free survival, OS, and ORR were numerically greater with savolitinib vs sunitinib. Median PFS was not statistically different between the 2 groups: 7.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-not calculated) for savolitinib and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.9) for sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.37-1.36; P = .31). For savolitinib and sunitinib respectively, grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were reported in 14 (42%) and 22 (81%) of patients and AE-related dose modifications in 10 (30%) and 20 (74%). After discontinuation, 12 (36%) and 5 (19%) of patients on savolitinib and sunitinib respectively, received subsequent anticancer therapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although patient numbers and follow-up were limited, savolitinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy vs sunitinib, with fewer grade 3 or higher AEs and dose modifications. Further investigation of savolitinib as a treatment option for MET-driven PRCC is warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03091192.

Combinations in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer: regulatory aspects

The therapeutic landscape in the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer has evolved over the last 2 years with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In 2018 and 2019, marketing authorisations valid throughout the European Union were issued for nivolumab and ipilimumab dual checkpoint inhibition and pembrolizumab or avelumab in combination with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib. These applications presented numerous regulatory challenges.In this paper, we summarise the main regulatory considerations, originating from the assessment of the dossiers submitted from the applicants for the three combinations. The regulatory issues are grouped in four sections: clinical pharmacology, efficacy, biomarkers and safety. In each section, we describe the issues raised during the regulatory evaluation performed by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessors. The CHMP assessments determine whether the medicines concerned meet the necessary quality, safety and efficacy requirements, and whether the benefit-risk balance is positive.In summary, although the overall benefit-risk was considered positive for the three combinations, the immaturity of the outcome data and the absence of long-term safety data remain issues to be addressed. Postauthorisation efficacy studies have been required to confirm the effects of the new combinations.

Identification and Comprehensive Validation of a DNA Methylation-Driven Gene-Based Prognostic Model for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent renal malignancy in adults with generally poor prognosis. This study aimed to establish a DNA methylation-driven gene-based prognostic model for ccRCC. We collected DNA methylation and gene expression profiles of over 1500 ccRCC samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, four Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) dataset, and cancer cell lines from Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia database and performed comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. As a result, a total of 31 differentially expressed methylation-driven genes (DEMDGs) were identified. After univariate Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and multivariate Cox regression analyses, four (NFE2L3, HHLA2, IFI16, and ZNF582) were finally selected to construct a risk score prognostic model. The high-risk group demonstrated significantly poor prognosis than the low-risk group did in TCGA training (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.533, p < 0.001), TCGA internal, and GEO external validation datasets. Furthermore, the nomogram, including the prognostic model and clinical factors, showed promising prognostic value (HR = 5.756, p < 0.001, and area under the curve at 1 year = 0.856). In addition, the model was found to be significantly associated with drug sensitivity of eight targeted agents. These findings provided a novel and reliable four DEMDG-based prognostic model for ccRCC.

The Value of PD-L1 Expression as Predictive Biomarker in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are soluble antibodies that have dramatically changed the outcomes including overall survival in a subset of kidney tumors, specifically in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To date, there is no a single predictive biomarker approved to be used to select the patients that achieve benefit from ICIs targeting. It seems reasonable to analyze whether the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression could be useful. To assess the role of PD-L1 expression as a potential predictive biomarker for benefit of ICIs in RCC patients, we performed a search of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ICIs (monotherapy or in combination with other therapies) to standard of care in metastatic RCC patients according to PRISMA guidelines. Trials must have included subgroup analyses evaluating the selected outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) in different subsets of patients according to PD-L1 expression on tumor samples. Hazard ratios with confidence intervals were used as the measure of efficacy between groups. A total of 4635 patients (six studies) were included (ICIs arm: 2367 patients; standard of care arm: 2268 patients). Globally, PFS and OS results favored ICIs. Differential expression of PD-L1 on tumor samples could select a subset of patients who could benefit more in terms of PFS (those with higher levels; p-value for difference between subgroups: <0.0001) but it did not seem to impact in OS results (p-value for difference: 0.63). As different methods to assess PD-L1 positivity were used among trials, this heterogeneity could have an influence on the results. PD-L1 could represent a biomarker to test PFS in clinical trials but its value for OS is less clear. In this meta-analysis, the usefulness of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker to select treatment in metastatic RCC patients was not clearly shown.

[Impact of molecular signatures on the choice of systemic treatment for metastatic kidney cancer]

The standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has changed dramatically over the past decades thanks to the increasing number of treatments: anti-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), mTOR inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): anti PD(L)-1 used as monotherapy or in combination with anti CTLA-4 or anti angiogenic therapies. In the face of rising therapeutic options, the question of the therapeutic sequences arises: which treatment for which patient? Actually, there is a lack of predictive biomarkers. A greater understanding of the cancer biology and its interaction with the microenvironment has allowed the development of genomic signatures which could perhaps be used as predictive biomarker. This review will give an insight on some robust genomic signatures assessed in mccRCC and will have a closer look at BIONIKK phase II trial, which is the first trial to adapt treatments according to the molecular characteristics of the tumor in the context of mccRCC.

Complete response of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC)-associated renal cell carcinoma to nivolumab and ipilimumab combination immunotherapy by: a case report

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder that results from a germline mutation in the fumarate hydratase gene (FH). Individuals with FH mutations are at risk of developing renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients with HLRCC-associated RCC (HLRCC-RCC) have aggressive clinical courses, but there is as yet no standardized therapy for advanced HLRCC-RCC. We report an aggressive RCC case in a 49-year-old man. Nine weeks after undergoing a total nephroureterectomy of the right kidney, he had a metastasectomy at port site. Within 14 weeks of the initial surgery, multiple recurrent tumors developed in the right retroperitoneal space. The pathological diagnosis was FH-deficient RCC. Genetic testing identified a heterozygous germline mutation of FH (c.641_642delTA), which confirmed the diagnosis of HLRCC-RCC. He received combination therapy with the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) nivolumab and ipilimumab as the first-line therapy. After 31 weeks of ICI treatment, a complete response was achieved. The disease-free condition has been prolonged for 24 months since the initial surgical treatment. This is the first case report of successful treatment of HLRCC-RCC with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. This combination immunotherapy is expected to be an effective approach to treat patients with advanced-stage HLRCC-RCC.

Synergistic effects of low‑dose chemotherapy and T cells in renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not sensitive to conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and the effectiveness rate of molecular targeted therapy is low. Therefore, it is urgent to identify new treatment methods. Recently, adoptive T‑cell therapy has provided a new option for cancer treatment. Furthermore, low‑dose chemotherapy not only has no evident side effects and inhibitory effects on the human immune system, but can also enhance the immune activity of some effector cells. Therefore, it is surmised that the combination of different mechanisms of chemotherapy and immunotherapy could be a new treatment concept. In the present study, the effects of low‑dose chemotherapy combined with T cells in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma were explored using cytotoxicity assays, enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), western blot analysis and flow cytometric analysis. The results revealed that low‑dose chemotherapy and T cells had synergistic effects on tumor cell elimination in vitro. The transforming growth factor (TGF)‑β signaling pathway may be involved in the inhibition of T‑cell functions. The targeted inhibition of TGF‑β signals may be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of renal cancer. The present results provided a novel strategy for the combination of low‑dose chemotherapy and T cells to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of RCC treatment.

Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management: an expert panel recommendation from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG)

PURPOSE

The outcome of RCC has improved considerably in the last few years, and the treatment options have increased. LACOG-GU and LARCG held a consensus meeting to develop guidelines to support the clinical decisions of physicians and other health professionals involved in the care of RCC patients.

METHODS

Eighty questions addressing relevant advanced RCC treatments were previously formulated by a panel of experts. The voting panel comprised 26 specialists from the LACOG-GU/LARCG. Consensus was determined as 75% agreement. For questions with less than 75% agreement, a new discussion was held, and consensus was determined by the majority of votes after the second voting session.

RESULTS

The recommendations were based on the highest level of scientific evidence or by the opinion of the RCC experts when no relevant research data were available.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript provides guidance for advanced RCC treatment according to the LACOG-GU/LARCG expert recommendations.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on treatment patterns in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus pandemic has provoked discussions among healthcare providers how to manage cancer patients when faced with the threat of severe acute respiratory syndrome related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) containing regimens are standard of care in the majority of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) patients. It remains unclear whether therapies should be modified in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We performed an online survey among physicians involved in the treatment of mccRCC, and 41 experts responded. Questions focused on criteria relevant for treatment decision outside the pandemic and the modifications of systemic therapy during COVID-19.

FINDINGS

For the majority of experts (73%), the combination of International metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category and patient fitness are two important factors for decision-making. The main treatment choice in fit, favourable risk patients outside the pandemic is pembrolizumab/axitinib for 53%, avelumab/axitinib, sunitinib or pazopanib for 13% of experts each. During the pandemic, ICI-containing regimens are chosen less often in favour of a tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) monotherapy, mainly sunitinib or pazopanib (35%).In fit, intermediate/poor-risk patients outside the pandemic, over 80% of experts choose ipilimumab/nivolumab, in contrast to only 41% of physicians during COVID-19, instead more TKI monotherapies are given. In patients responding to established therapies with ICI/ICI or ICI/TKI combinations, most participants modify treatment regimen by extending cycle length, holding one ICI or even both.

CONCLUSION

mccRCC treatment modifications in light of the coronavirus pandemic are variable, with a shift from ICI/ICI to ICI/TKI or TKI monotherapy.

Plasma Extracellular Vesicle-Derived TIMP-1 mRNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Study

The tumor microenvironment has gained a lot of attention from the scientific community since it has a proven impact in the development of tumor progression and metastasis. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are now considered one of the key players of tumor microenvironment modulation. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most lethal urological neoplasia and presents a high metastatic potential, which reinforces the need for the development of more effective predictive biomarkers. Our goal was to evaluate the applicability of EV-derived matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) as prognostic biomarkers for ccRCC. To do so, we studied the plasma EV content of 32 patients with localized ccRCC and 29 patients with metastatic ccRCC. We observed that patients with localized disease and tumors larger than 7 cm presented higher levels of plasma EV-derived TIMP-1 mRNA when compared with patients presenting smaller tumors (p = 0.020). Moreover, patients with metastatic disease presented higher levels of EV-derived TIMP-1 mRNA when compared with patients with localized disease (p = 0.002) and when we stratified those patients in high and low levels of TIMP-1 EV-derived mRNA, the ones presenting higher levels had a lower overall survival (p = 0.030). EV-derived TIMP-1 mRNA may be a good prognostic biomarker candidate for ccRCC.

Is percutaneous image-guided renal tumour ablation ready for prime time?

In the last few decades, thermal ablation (TA) techniques have been increasingly applied to treat small localised renal cell carcinomas. Despite this trend, there is still an underuse of TA compared to surgery and a substantial lack of high-quality evidence derived from large, prospective, randomised controlled trials comparing the long-term oncologic outcomes of TA and surgery. Therefore, in this narrative review, we assess published guidelines and recent literature concerning the diagnosis and management of kidney-confined renal cell carcinoma to understand whether percutaneous image-guided TA is ready to be proposed as a first-line treatment.

Image-guided thermal ablation of central renal tumors with retrograde cold pyeloperfusion technique: a monocentric experience

Purpose: To evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of image-guided thermal ablations associated with retrograde pyeloperfusion in patients with centrally located renal tumors.Materials and methods: 48 patients (15 women, 33 men, mean age 69.1 ± 11.8) were treated with image-guided thermal ablation associated with pyeloperfusion for 58 centrally located renal tumors (mean diameter 32.3 ± 7.32 mm). 7 patients had a single kidney. Microwave and radiofrequency ablation were used. All treatments were performed with ultrasound, CT, or fusion imaging guidance under general anesthesia and simultaneous retrograde cold pyeloperfusion technique.Results: Procedure was feasible in all cases. Technical success and primary technical efficacy were reached in 51/58 (88%) and 45/54 tumors (83%). With a second ablation performed in 5 tumors, secondary technical efficacy was achieved in 50/50 (100%) tumors. Minor and major complications occurred in 8/58 (13%) and 5/58 (8%) tumors. No significative change in renal function occurred after treatment.During follow-up, 5 recurrences occurred, that were retreated with a second ablation. At last follow up (mean 32.2 ± 22.0 months), 41/48 (85%) treated patients were free from disease. The median TTP and PFS were 27.0 (range, 2.3-80.0) and 26.5 months (range, 2.3-80.0), respectively.Conclusion: Image-guided thermal ablation associated with protective pyeloperfusion is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option for patients with central renal tumors with a minimal impact on renal function and relevant potential to avoid nephrectomy.

Safety, efficacy and prognostic impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older patients with genitourinary cancers

INTRODUCTION

Immunosenescence might impact immunotherapy (IT) in patients with advanced age. However, pivotal studies were not powered for this clinical question. Our aim is to explore toxicity (primary objective) and activity (secondary objective) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with renal cell (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) older than 75 years compared to the younger population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients treated at our tertiary care Uro-oncology Department with atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab or ipilimumab were retrospectively analyzed. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were determined and graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v.4.0). Disease Control rate (DCR) was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). IrAEs and DCR were compared between patients ≥75 vs. <75 years, chi-squared test. Impact of age and other key clinical parameters on irAEs and DCR were tested in a binary logistic regression employing a backward selection. Impact of irAEs on oncological prognosis was assessed in log-rank and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

We included 99 patients treated between 11/2015 and 01/2019. Frequency of irAEs (36.4% vs. 39.4%) and DCR (59.4% vs. 41.0%) was comparable between patients ≥75 vs. <75 years. Advanced age was not associated with irAEs or worse DCR. IrAEs occurrence correlated with better disease-specific survival in the univariate and multivariate analyses. IrAEs could be successfully treated with corticosteroids in 78.9% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs seem to be both safe and efficacious in an aging population with metastatic RCC or UC. Occurrence of irAEs predicted better prognosis.

A Rare Case of Missing Primary in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can present with a myriad of clinical symptoms and signs. It is also notorious for its initial presentation with distant metastasis. We report a case of a 42-year-old male diagnosed with papillary RCC (PRCC) presenting with pleural and nodal metastases in the absence of a radiographically-detected tumor primary. PRCC was diagnosed on immunohistochemical analysis of the tissue from the pleura and mediastinal lymph nodes and confirmed by gene expression profiling studies. As per treatment guidelines for metastatic RCC, the patient was started on sunitinib with evidence of disease progression after two cycles and palliative care approach was recommended due to rapidly declining performance status. Prospective data on the optimal management of metastatic PRCC are lacking, but drugs used are similar to the treatment of clear cell carcinomas (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors) and checkpoint inhibitors. Further molecular study of these rare tumors is warranted to detect drivers of oncogenesis and identify targets for therapeutic intervention.

A Randomized Phase IIa Trial with Temsirolimus versus Sunitinib in Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Intergroup Study of the CESAR Central European Society for Anticancer Drug Research-EWIV and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Cell Cancer (IAGN) of the German Cancer Society

BACKGROUND

Non-clear cell renal cell cancers (nccRCC) are rare entities, and the optimal therapy in metastatic disease has still to be defined.

METHODS

In this small prospectively randomized phase IIa multicenter trial, we investigated temsirolimus (TEM) versus sunitinib (SUN) as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic nccRCC. The patients were randomized 1:1 to either TEM in a dose of 25 mg i.v. once a week or SUN with 50 mg p.o. daily for 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). In total, 22 patients were included with predominantly papillary RCC (16/22) followed by chromophobe RCC and others.

RESULTS

The male to female ratio was 16:6. The tumor control rate (CR + PR + SD) was 58% for TEM and 90% for SUN-treated patients. There was also a trend for improved PFS with 9.3 versus 13.2 months (HR 1.64; 95% CI 0.65-4.18) in favor of SUN. There was no trend for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite this trial had to be terminated earlier due to low recruitment, the results match the other studies published so far with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and SUN, which show a trend in favor of SUN for ORR and PFS.

Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the Phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 374 Study

BACKGROUND

The open-label, phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 374 study (NCT02596035) was conducted to validate the safety and efficacy of flat-dose nivolumab monotherapy 240 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) in previously treated advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Three cohorts included patients with predominantly clear cell histology, non-clear cell histologies, or brain metastases. We report safety and efficacy from the CheckMate 374 advanced clear cell RCC (ccRCC) cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients received prior treatment regimens (1-2 antiangiogenic; 0-3 systemic) with progression on/after last treatment and ≤ 6 months of enrollment. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg Q2W for ≤ 24 months or until confirmed progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of high-grade (grade 3-5) immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs). Exploratory endpoints included objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients had advanced predominantly ccRCC; 75.3% received only 1 prior systemic regimen in the advanced/metastatic setting. After a median follow-up of 17 months (range, 0.4-26.9 months), no grade 5 IMAEs occurred, and 9.3% of patients reported grade 3/4 IMAEs (hepatitis, 4.1%; diabetes mellitus, 2.1%; nephritis and renal dysfunction, 1.0%; rash, 1.0%; adrenal insufficiency, 1.0%). The objective response rate was 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.8%-32.3%). Three patients had a complete response; 19 had partial responses. The median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.5 months). The median overall survival was 21.8 months (95% CI, 17.4 months to not estimable).

CONCLUSIONS

This study validates the safety and efficacy of nivolumab 240 mg Q2W flat-dose monotherapy for previously treated advanced ccRCC and adds to previous safety and efficacy data using the 3 mg/kg Q2W dose.

Safety of sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma following nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

The safety profile characteristics of sunitinib were evaluated in patients who underwent nephrectomy for kidney cancer.

AREAS COVERED

In this literature review, safety data were evaluated from phase III trials investigating sunitinib following nephrectomy, either in the more recent adjuvant setting after nephrectomy or in the metastatic setting, with a focus on new data from the CARMENA and SURTIME trials. In particular, the aim was to determine the specificity of toxicity in the adjuvant setting.

EXPERT OPINION

In the adjuvant setting, even if the toxicity profile of sunitinib does not differ significantly from that in the metastatic setting, the importance of the dose intensity and, thus, exposure has been emphasized. Consequently, as described mainly in the metastatic setting, management of the adverse effects of sunitinib remains critical.

A Population Study to Identify Candidates for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients with Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

BACKGROUND This population study aimed to identify suitable candidates for cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MATERIAL AND METHODS Demographic and clinical data from 1,229 patients with metastatic sarcomatoid RCC were retrieved from the SEER database. Patients were divided into the cytoreductive nephrectomy group (n=937) and the no surgery group (n=292). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified factors associated with overall survival (OS) and propensity score matching identified factors that significantly impacted the OS. Survival of propensity score-matched subgroups of patients with metastatic sarcomatoid RCC treated by cytoreductive nephrectomy or no surgery was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS Of the 1,229 patients with metastatic sarcomatoid RCC retrieved from the SEER database, age, tumor size, T stage, and N stage were independent risk factors for patient survival. There were no significant differences in age, N stage, and tumor size between the cytoreductive nephrectomy-treated and non-surgically treated T stage cases following propensity score matching. OS benefits were found in cases with stage T1 (12 months increase), T2 (7.5 months increase), T3a (2 months increase), and T4 (3 months increase), but not in the T3b or T3c subgroups treated by cytoreductive nephrectomy, compared with patients with no surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS Data from the SEER database showed that cytoreductive nephrectomy improved OS in patients with T1 and T2 metastatic sarcomatoid RCC with a significant long-term survival benefit of >6 months.

Extracellular Vesicles Enriched in hsa-miR-301a-3p and hsa-miR-1293 Dynamics in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: Potential Biomarkers of Metastatic Disease

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most aggressive subtype of kidney cancer and up to 40% of patients submitted to surgery with a curative intent will relapse. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the applicability of an Extracellular vesicle (EV) derived miRNA profile as potential prognosis biomarkers in ccRCC patients. We analyzed a nine-miRNA profile in plasma EVs from 32 ccRCC patients with localized disease (before and after surgery) and in 37 patients with metastatic disease. We observed that the levels of EV-derived hsa-miR-25-3p, hsa-miR-126-5p, hsa-miR-200c-3p, and hsa-miR-301a-3p decreased after surgery, whereas hsa-miR-1293 EV-levels increased. Furthermore, metastatic patients presented higher levels of hsa-miR-301a-3p and lower levels of hsa-miR-1293 when compared to patients with localized disease after surgery. Functional enrichment analysis of the targets of the four miRNAs that decreased after surgery resulted in an enrichment of terms related to cell cycle, proliferation, and metabolism, suggesting that EV-miRNA enrichment in the presence of the tumor could represent an epigenetic mechanism to sustain tumor development. Taken together, these results suggest that EVs content varies depending on the presence or absence of the disease and that an increase of EV-derived hsa-miR-301a-3p, and decrease of EV-derived hsa-miR-1293, may be potential biomarkers of metastatic ccRCC.

Management of oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma: state of the art and future directions

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this paper was to perform a narrative review of the literature on the available approaches in the treatment of two emerging subpopulations of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients: the oligometastatic disease (less than 5 metastasis) and the oligoprogressive disease, defined as worsening in maximum 3-5 sites while all other tumor sites are controlled by systemic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

We explore all possible approaches in these settings of patients: the role of local therapies, considering both surgical metastasectomy and/or ablative techniques, the efficacy of systemic therapies and the rationale behind active surveillance. We also discuss ongoing clinical trials in these settings.

EXPERT OPINION

Two different strategies are emerging as the most promising for the approach to the oligometastatic/oligoprogressive mRCC patient: (1) the use of immunocheckpoint inhibitors following metastasectomy; (2) the use of stereotactic radiotherapy alone or combined with immunotherapy for oligometastatic disease. The lack of validated biomarkers of response in these mRCC patient subpopulations is opening the way to the employment of novel technologies. Among them, the use of artificial intelligence seems to be the candidate to contribute to precision oncology in patients with mRCC.

Imaging activity possibly signalling missed diagnostic opportunities in bladder and kidney cancer: A longitudinal data-linkage study using primary care electronic health records

INTRODUCTION

Sub-optimal use or interpretation of imaging investigations prior to diagnosis of certain cancers may be associated with less timely diagnosis, but pre-diagnostic imaging activity for urological cancer is unknown.

METHOD

We analysed linked data derived from primary and secondary care records and cancer registration to evaluate the use of clinically relevant imaging tests pre-diagnosis, in patients with bladder and kidney cancer diagnosed in 2012-15 in England. As pre-diagnostic imaging activity increased from background rate 8 months pre-diagnosis, we used logistic regression to determine factors associated with first imaging test occurring 4-8 months pre-diagnosis, considering that such instances may reflect possible missed opportunities for expediting the diagnosis.

RESULTS

1963 patients with bladder or kidney cancer had at least one imaging test in the 8 months pre-diagnosis. 420 (21%) of patients had their first imaging test 4-8 months pre-diagnosis, that being ultrasound, CT and X-ray in 48%, 43% and 9% of those cases, respectively. Factors associated with greater risk of a first imaging test 4-8 months pre-diagnosis were kidney cancer, diagnosis at stages other than stage IV, first imaging having been an X-ray, test requested by GP and absence of haematuria before the imaging request.

CONCLUSION

About 1 in 5 patients with urological cancers receive relevant first imaging investigations 4-8 months prior to diagnosis, which may represent potential missed diagnostic opportunities for earlier diagnosis.