The more the merrier? Evidence and efficacy of immune checkpoint- and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations in advanced solid cancers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have gained therapeutical significance in cancer therapy over the last years. Due to the high efficacy of each substance group, additive or complementary effects are considered, and combinations are the subject of multiple prospective trials in different tumor entities. The majority of available data results from clinical phase I and II trials. Although regarded as well-tolerated therapies ICI-TKI combinations have higher toxicities compared to monotherapies of one of the substance classes and some combinations were shown to be excessively toxic leading to discontinuation of trials. So far, ICI-TKI combinations with nivolumab + cabozantinib, pembrolizumab + axitinib, avelumab + axitinib, pembrolizumab + lenvatinib have been approved in advanced renal cell (RCC), with pembrolizumab + lenvatinib in endometrial carcinoma and with camrelizumab + rivoceranib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several ICI-TKI combinations are currently investigated in phase I to III trials in various other cancer entities. Further, the optimal sequence of ICI-TKI combinations is an important subject of investigation, as cross-resistances between the substance classes were observed. This review reports on clinical trials with ICI-TKI combinations in different cancer entities, their efficacy and toxicity.

Integrative Analyses of Tumor and Peripheral Biomarkers in the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

The phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (N = 886) with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line avelumab + axitinib (A+Ax) versus sunitinib. We report novel findings from integrated analyses of longitudinal blood samples and baseline tumor tissue. PFS was associated with elevated lymphocyte levels in the sunitinib arm and an abundance of innate immune subsets in the A+Ax arm. Treatment with A+Ax led to greater T-cell repertoire modulation and less change in T-cell numbers versus sunitinib. In the A+Ax arm, patients with tumors harboring mutations in ≥2 of 10 previously identified PFS-associated genes (double mutants) had distinct circulating and tumor-infiltrating immunologic profiles versus those with wild-type or single-mutant tumors, suggesting a role for non-T-cell-mediated and non-natural killer cell-mediated mechanisms in double-mutant tumors. We provide evidence for different immunomodulatory mechanisms based on treatment (A+Ax vs. sunitinib) and tumor molecular subtypes.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings provide novel insights into the different immunomodulatory mechanisms governing responses in patients treated with avelumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) + axitinib or sunitinib (both VEGF inhibitors), highlighting the contribution of tumor biology to the complexity of the roles and interactions of infiltrating immune cells in response to these treatment regimens. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 384.

Comprehensive analyses of mitophagy-related genes and mitophagy-related lncRNAs for patients with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Both mitophagy and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play crucial roles in ovarian cancer (OC). We sought to explore the characteristics of mitophagy-related gene (MRG) and mitophagy-related lncRNAs (MRL) to facilitate treatment and prognosis of OC.

METHODS

The processed data were extracted from public databases (TCGA, GTEx, GEO and GeneCards). The highly synergistic lncRNA modules and MRLs were identified using weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Using LASSO Cox regression analysis, the MRL-model was first established based on TCGA and then validated with four external GEO datasets. The independent prognostic value of the MRL-model was evaluated by Multivariate Cox regression analysis. Characteristics of functional pathways, somatic mutations, immunity features, and anti-tumor therapy related to the MRL-model were evaluated using abundant algorithms, such as GSEA, ssGSEA, GSVA, maftools, CIBERSORT, xCELL, MCPcounter, ESTIMATE, TIDE, pRRophetic and so on.

RESULTS

We found 52 differentially expressed MRGs and 22 prognostic MRGs in OC. Enrichment analysis revealed that MRGs were involved in mitophagy. Nine prognostic MRLs were identified and eight optimal MRLs combinations were screened to establish the MRL-model. The MRL-model stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups and remained a prognostic factor (P < 0.05) with independent value (P < 0.05) in TCGA and GEO. We observed that OC patients in the high-risk group also had the unfavorable survival in consideration of clinicopathological parameters. The Nomogram was plotted to make the prediction results more intuitive and readable. The two risk groups were enriched in discrepant functional pathways (such as Wnt signaling pathway) and immunity features. Besides, patients in the low-risk group may be more sensitive to immunotherapy (P = 0.01). Several chemotherapeutic drugs (Paclitaxel, Veliparib, Rucaparib, Axitinib, Linsitinib, Saracatinib, Motesanib, Ponatinib, Imatinib and so on) were found with variant sensitivity between the two risk groups. The established ceRNA network indicated the underlying mechanisms of MRLs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed the roles of MRLs and MRL-model in expression, prognosis, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and molecular mechanism of OC. Our findings were able to stratify OC patients with high risk, unfavorable prognosis and variant treatment sensitivity, thus improving clinical outcomes for OC patients.

Construction and validation of molecular subtype and signature of immune cell-related telomeric genes and prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer (OVC) has emerged as a fatal gynecological malignancy as a result of a lack of reliable methods for early detection, limited biomarkers and few treatment options. Immune cell-related telomeric genes (ICRTGs) show promise as potential biomarkers.

METHODS

ICRTGs were discovered using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). ICRTGs were screened for significant prognosis using one-way Cox regression analysis. Subsequently, molecular subtypes of prognosis-relevant ICRTGs were constructed and validated for OVC, and the immune microenvironment's landscape across subtypes was compared. OVC prognostic models were built and validated using prognosis-relevant ICRTGs. Additionally, chemotherapy susceptibility drugs for OVC patients in the low- and high-risk groups of ICRTGs were screened using genomics of drug susceptibility to cancer (GDSC). Finally, the immunotherapy response in the low- and high-risk groups was detected using the data from GSE78220. We conducted an immune index correlation analysis of ICRTGs with significant prognoses. The MAP3K4 gene, for which the prognostic correlation coefficient is the highest, was validated using tissue microarrays for a prognostic-immune index correlation.

RESULTS

WGCNA analysis constructed a gene set of ICRTGs and screened 22 genes with prognostic significance. Unsupervised clustering analysis revealed the best molecular typing for two subtypes. The Gene Set Variation Analysis algorithm was used to calculate telomere scores and validate the molecular subtyping. A prognostic model was constructed using 17 ICRTGs. In the The Cancer Genome Atlas-OVC training set and the Gene Expression Omnibus validation set (GSE30161), the risk score model's predicted risk groups and the actual prognosis were shown to be significantly correlated. GDSC screened Axitinib, Bexarotene, Embelin and the GSE78220 datasets and demonstrated that ICRTGs effectively distinguished the group that responds to immunotherapy from the non-responsive group. Additionally, tissue microarray validation results revealed that MAP3K4 significantly predicted patient prognosis. Furthermore, MAP3K4 exhibited a positive association with PD-L1 and a negative relationship with the M1 macrophage markers CD86 and INOS.

CONCLUSIONS

ICRTGs may be reliable biomarkers for the molecular typing of patients with OVC, enabling the prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy.

Perioperative Complications and Oncologic Outcomes of Nephrectomy Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: A Multicenter Collaborative Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management with five current Food and Drug Administration-approved regimens. However, data regarding nephrectomy outcomes following an ICI are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and outcomes of nephrectomy following an ICI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective review was performed of patients with primary locally advanced or metastatic RCC undergoing nephrectomy following an ICI in five US academic centers between January 2011 and September 2021.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Clinical data, perioperative outcomes, and 90-d complications/readmissions were recorded and evaluated by univariate and logistic regression models. Recurrence-free and overall survival probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 113 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 63 (56-69) yr were included. The main ICI regimens were nivolumab ± ipilimumab (n = 85) and pembrolizumab ± axitinib (n = 24). Risk groups included 95% intermediate- and 5% poor-risk patients. Surgical procedures were 109 radical and four partial nephrectomies, including 60 open, 38 robotic, and 14 laparoscopic with five (10%) conversions. Two intraoperative complications were reported (bowel and pancreatic injury). The median operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were 3 h, 250 ml, and 3 d, respectively. A complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) was noted in six (5%) patients. The 90-d complication rate was 24%, with 12 (11%) patients requiring readmission. On a multivariable analysis, two or more risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 2.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09, 7.42) and pathologic T stage ≥T3 (OR 4.21, 95% CI: 1.13-15.8) were independently associated with a higher 90-d complication rate. The 3-yr estimated overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 82% and 47%, respectively. Limitations include the retrospective nature and heterogeneous cohort in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics and ICI regimens received.

CONCLUSIONS

Nephrectomy following ICI therapy is feasible and a potential consolidative therapy option in select patients. Further research in the neoadjuvant setting is also warranted.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study evaluates the outcomes of kidney surgery following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (mainly nivolumab and ipilimumab or pembrolizumab and axitinib) for patients with advanced kidney cancer. We utilized data from five academic centers across the USA and found that surgery in this setting did not have more complications or returns to the hospital than similar surgeries, indicating that it is a safe and feasible procedure at this time.

Bioisosteric replacements of tyrosine kinases inhibitors to make potent and safe chemotherapy against malignant cells

The liver function test is an imperative element in chemotherapy management due to the idiosyncratic reaction of chemotherapy drugs. This study primly aimed to replace the toxic fragments of known protein tyrosine kinases inhibitors (PTKi) to develop safe and effective chemotherapy. All the current PTKi's were docked with the tyrosine kinases and metabolic enzymes to study the affinities on the target. It resulted from most of the PTKi's found higher affinity and efficacy with metabolic enzymes lead the hepatic cells damage. To overcome this limitation of PTKi's, a bioisosteric replacement strategy was achieved and conceptual analogs were designed. Specifically, the Generated pose of the Axitinib molecule showed that axitinib fragments C = C-, -C = O and NH2 produced clashes with active site residues of tyrosine kinases protein and good affinity with metabolic enzyme primes to the liver toxicity. The above said fragments were replaced with various bioisosteric groups and efficacy was measured. The resulting molecule shows improved affinity with tyrosine kinases enzyme and less interactions with metabolic enzyme were imminent molecule for the treatment of malignant cells with outside effects.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Degradable Hydrogel for Sustained Localized Delivery of Anti-Tumor Drugs

Disadvantages of systemically administered immunomodulatory anti-tumor therapies include poor efficacy and high toxicity. Direct intratumoral injection of a drug is often associated with rapid efflux from the site of administration, thus reducing local exposure and therapeutic efficacy, while potentially increasing systemic adverse events. To address this, a sustained release prodrug technology was developed using a transient conjugation (TransConTM) technology to provide long-term high local drug exposure after injection in the tumor while minimizing systemic exposure. TransCon technology for systemic delivery is clinically validated, with multiple compounds in late-stage clinical development and approval of a once-weekly growth hormone for pediatric growth hormone deficiency. As a further application of this technology, this report describes the design, preparation, and functional characterization of hydrogel microspheres as insoluble, yet degradable carrier system. Microspheres were obtained after reaction of PEG-based polyamine dendrimers and bifunctional crosslinkers. Resiquimod, a TLR7/8 agonist, and axitinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were chosen as anti-cancer drugs. The drugs were covalently attached to the carrier by linkers, which released the drugs under physiological conditions. Essentially all resiquimod or axitinib was released over weeks before physical degradation of the hydrogel microsphere was observed. In summary, TransCon Hydrogel technology allows localized sustained-release drug delivery for cancer therapy enabling high local drug concentrations while at the same time ensuring low systemic drug exposure over weeks with a single injection, which may improve the therapeutic index and improve efficacy, while minimizing systemic adverse events. A hydrogel prodrug of resiquimod, TransCon TLR7/8 agonist, is currently being investigated in clinical trials of patients with solid tumors (NCT04799054).

Multi-center validation of an immune-related lncRNA signature for predicting survival and immune status of patients with renal cell carcinoma: an integrating machine learning-derived study

BACKGROUND

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to play an important role in tumor immune modification. Nonetheless, the clinical implication of immune-associated lncRNAs in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains to be further explored.

METHODS

76 combinations of machine learning algorithms were integrated to develop and validate a machine learning-derived immune-related lncRNA signature (MDILS) in five independent cohorts (n = 801). We collected 28 published signatures and collated clinical variables for comparison with MDILS to verify its efficacy. Subsequently, molecular mechanisms, immune status, mutation landscape, and pharmacological profile were further investigated in different stratified patients.

RESULTS

Patients with high MDILS displayed worse overall survival than those with low MDILS. The MDILS could independently predict overall survival and convey robust performance across five cohorts. MDILS has a significantly better performance compared with traditional clinical variables and 28 published signatures. Patients with low MDILS exhibited more abundant immune infiltration and higher potency of immunotherapeutic response, while patients with high MDILS might be more sensitive to multiple chemotherapeutic drugs (e.g., sunitinib and axitinib).

CONCLUSION

MDILS is a robust and promising tool to facilitate clinical decision-making and precision treatment of RCC.

pH-Activatable copper-axitinib coordinated multifunctional nanoparticles for synergistic chemo-chemodynamic therapy against aggressive cancers

Chemodynamic therapy (CDT) is an emerging oncological treatment that eliminates tumor cells by generating lethal hydroxyl radicals (˙OH) through Fenton or Fenton-like reactions within tumors. However, the effectiveness of CDT is limited by the overexpression of glutathione (GSH) and low reaction efficiency in the tumor microenvironment (TME). To address these challenges and enhance tumor treatment, we developed a novel pH-activatable metal ion-drug coordinated nanoparticle (Cu-AXB NPs) system, incorporating a CDT agent (Cu2+) and a chemotherapeutic agent (axitinib, AXB). The obtained Cu-AXB NPs exhibited exceptional characteristics, including ultrahigh drug loading capacity (87.55%) and an average size of 180 nm. These nanoparticles also demonstrated excellent plasma stability and pH-responsive drug release, enabling prolonged circulation in the bloodstream and targeted therapy at weakly acidic tumor sites. Upon release, AXB acted as a chemotherapeutic agent, effectively eliminating tumor cells, while Cu2+ ions were reduced to Cu+ by GSH, further generating toxic ˙OH with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for CDT through a Fenton-like reaction. Additionally, the Cu-AXB NPs efficiently disrupted the copper metabolic balance and increased the intracellular Cu content, further amplifying the therapeutic impact of CDT. In vitro studies assessing cytotoxicity and apoptosis confirmed the superior tumor cell-killing efficacy of the Cu-AXB NPs. This enhanced efficacy can be attributed to the synergistic effect of CDT and chemotherapy. Moreover, the Cu-AXB NPs exhibited excellent tumor targeting capabilities, resulting in significant tumor inhibition (77.53% inhibition) while maintaining favorable biocompatibility in tumor-bearing mice. In conclusion, this study presents a promising and safe strategy for cancer therapy by combining CDT with chemotherapy, offering a potential breakthrough in the field of oncology.

A Podcast Discussion on the Current Treatment Landscape for Renal Cell Carcinoma

During the last 15 years, tremendous efforts have been made in the medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Immune-oncological (IO) combinations are the current standard of care in the first-line setting of mRCC. Here, the current phase 3 trials CM214 (nivolumab/ipilimumab vs. sunitinib), KN426 (axitinib/pembrolizumab vs. sunitinib), Javelin-ren-101 (axitinib/avelumab vs. sunitinib), CM9ER (cabozantinib/nivolumab vs. sunitinib), and CLEAR (lenvatinib/pembrolizumab vs. sunitinib) were discussed. In the mentioned phase 3 trials, primary and secondary endpoints were discussed. Strengths and weaknesses of each trial were reflected in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, objective remission, health quality of life, and safety. Reflecting on the data, as well as the current ESMO guidelines, we discuss choosing the appropriate medical treatment for patients' individualized treatment journey and relay the strength and weaknesses of each combination-starting with the appropriate first-line therapy.

Influence of two anti-tumor drugs, pazopanib, and axitinib, on the development and thyroid-axis of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos/larvae

Introduction

In recent years, the potential toxicities of different pharmaceuticals toward the thyroid system have received increasing attention. In this study, we aim to evaluate the toxic effects of pazopanib and axitinib, two anti-tumor drugs with widespread clinical use, on thyroid function in the zebrafish model.

Methods

We measured levels of thyroid-related hormones using the commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit. Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) analysis was employed to detect target gene expression changes. Morphology of the thyroid were evaluated by using transgenic Tg (tg: EGFP) fish line under a confocal microscope. The relative mRNA expression of key genes was verified through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT‒qPCR). The size and number of the follicles was quantified whereby Hematoxylin-Eosin (H & E) staining under a light microscope.

Results

The results revealed that fertilized zebrafish embryos were incubated in pazopanib or axitinib for 96 hours, development and survival were significantly affected, which was accompanied by significant disturbances in thyroid endocrine system (e.g., increased thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) content and decreased triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) content, as well as transcription changes of genes associated with the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis. Moreover, based on whole-mount in situ hybridization staining of tg and histopathological examination of zebrafish embryos treated with pazopanib and axitinib, we observed a significantly abnormal development of thyroid follicles in the Tg (tg: EGFP) zebrafish transgenic line.

Conclusion

Collectively, these findings indicate that pazopanib and axitinib may have toxic effects on thyroid development and function, at least partially, by influencing the regulation of the HPT axis. Thus, we believe that the potential thyroid toxicities of pazopanib and axitinib in their clinical applications should receive greater attention.

Cost Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has significantly evolved in recent years. Without direct comparator trials, factors such as cost effectiveness (CE) are important to guide decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the CE of guideline-recommended approved first- and second-line treatment regimens.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A comprehensive Markov model was developed to analyze the CE of the five current National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended first-line therapies with appropriate second-line therapy for patient cohorts with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium favorable and intermediate/poor risk.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and total accumulated costs were estimated using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In patients with favorable risk, pembrolizumab + lenvatinib followed by cabozantinib added $32 935 in costs and yielded 0.28 QALYs, resulting in an incremental CE ratio (ICER) of $117 625 per QALY in comparison to pembrolizumab + axitinib followed by cabozantinib. In patients with intermediate/poor risk, nivolumab + ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib added $2252 in costs and yielded 0.60 QALYs compared to cabozantinib followed by nivolumab, yielding an ICER of $4184. Limitations include differences in median follow-up duration between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib followed by cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab + axitinib followed by cabozantinib were cost-effective treatment sequences for patients with favorable-risk mRCC. Nivolumab +ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib was the most cost-effective treatment sequence for patients with intermediate-/poor-risk mRCC, dominating all preferred treatments.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Because new treatments for kidney cancer have not been compared head to head, comparison of their cost and efficacy can help in making decisions about the best treatments to use first. Our model showed that patients with a favorable risk profile are most likely to benefit from pembrolizumab and lenvatinib or axitinib followed by cabozantinib, while patients with an intermediate or poor risk profile will probably benefit most from nivolumab and ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib.

First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Since the approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, the treatment landscape for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed fundamentally. Today, combined therapies from different drug categories have a firm place in a complex first-line therapy. Due to the large number of drugs available, it is necessary to identify the most effective therapies, whilst considering their side effects and impact on quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the benefits and harms of first-line therapies for adults with advanced RCC, and to produce a clinically relevant ranking of therapies. Secondary objectives were to maintain the currency of the evidence by conducting continuous update searches, using a living systematic review approach, and to incorporate data from clinical study reports (CSRs).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, conference proceedings and relevant trial registries up until 9 February 2022. We searched several data platforms to identify CSRs.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating at least one targeted therapy or immunotherapy for first-line treatment of adults with advanced RCC. We excluded trials evaluating only interleukin-2 versus interferon-alpha as well as trials with an adjuvant treatment setting. We also excluded trials with adults who received prior systemic anticancer therapy if more than 10% of participants were previously treated, or if data for untreated participants were not separately extractable.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All necessary review steps (i.e. screening and study selection, data extraction, risk of bias and certainty assessments) were conducted independently by at least two review authors. Our outcomes were overall survival (OS), QoL, serious adverse events (SAEs), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), the number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE, and the time to initiation of first subsequent therapy. Where possible, analyses were conducted for the different risk groups (favourable, intermediate, poor) according to the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Score (IMDC) or the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. Our main comparator was sunitinib (SUN). A hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) lower than 1.0 is in favour of the experimental arm.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 36 RCTs and 15,177 participants (11,061 males and 4116 females). Risk of bias was predominantly judged as being 'high' or 'some concerns' across most trials and outcomes. This was mainly due to a lack of information about the randomisation process, the blinding of outcome assessors, and methods for outcome measurements and analyses. Additionally, study protocols and statistical analysis plans were rarely available. Here we present the results for our primary outcomes OS, QoL, and SAEs, and for all risk groups combined for contemporary treatments: pembrolizumab + axitinib (PEM+AXI), avelumab + axitinib (AVE+AXI), nivolumab + cabozantinib (NIV+CAB), lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (LEN+PEM), nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIV+IPI), CAB, and pazopanib (PAZ). Results per risk group and results for our secondary outcomes are reported in the summary of findings tables and in the full text of this review. The evidence on other treatments and comparisons can also be found in the full text. Overall survival (OS) Across risk groups, PEM+AXI (HR 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 1.07, moderate certainty) and NIV+IPI (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.00, moderate certainty) probably improve OS, compared to SUN, respectively. LEN+PEM may improve OS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.03, low certainty), compared to SUN. There is probably little or no difference in OS between PAZ and SUN (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.32, moderate certainty), and we are uncertain whether CAB improves OS when compared to SUN (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.64, very low certainty). The median survival is 28 months when treated with SUN. Survival may improve to 43 months with LEN+PEM, and probably improves to: 41 months with NIV+IPI, 39 months with PEM+AXI, and 31 months with PAZ. We are uncertain whether survival improves to 34 months with CAB. Comparison data were not available for AVE+AXI and NIV+CAB. Quality of life (QoL) One RCT measured QoL using FACIT-F (score range 0 to 52; higher scores mean better QoL) and reported that the mean post-score was 9.00 points higher (9.86 lower to 27.86 higher, very low certainty) with PAZ than with SUN. Comparison data were not available for PEM+AXI, AVE+AXI, NIV+CAB, LEN+PEM, NIV+IPI, and CAB. Serious adverse events (SAEs) Across risk groups, PEM+AXI probably increases slightly the risk for SAEs (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.85, moderate certainty) compared to SUN. LEN+PEM (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.19, moderate certainty) and NIV+IPI (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.97, moderate certainty) probably increase the risk for SAEs, compared to SUN, respectively. There is probably little or no difference in the risk for SAEs between PAZ and SUN (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.31, moderate certainty). We are uncertain whether CAB reduces or increases the risk for SAEs (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.43, very low certainty) when compared to SUN. People have a mean risk of 40% for experiencing SAEs when treated with SUN. The risk increases probably to: 61% with LEN+PEM, 57% with NIV+IPI, and 52% with PEM+AXI. It probably remains at 40% with PAZ. We are uncertain whether the risk reduces to 37% with CAB. Comparison data were not available for AVE+AXI and NIV+CAB.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Findings concerning the main treatments of interest comes from direct evidence of one trial only, thus results should be interpreted with caution. More trials are needed where these interventions and combinations are compared head-to-head, rather than just to SUN. Moreover, assessing the effect of immunotherapies and targeted therapies on different subgroups is essential and studies should focus on assessing and reporting relevant subgroup data. The evidence in this review mostly applies to advanced clear cell RCC.

Pathogenesis of Port-Wine Stains: Directions for Future Therapies

Port-wine stains (PWSs) are congenital vascular malformations that involve the skin and mucosa. To date, the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis and progression of PWSs are yet to be clearly elucidated. The potential reasons for dilated vessels are as follows: (1) somatic GNAQ (R183Q) mutations that form enlarged capillary malformation-like vessels through angiopoietin-2, (2) decreased perivascular nerve elements, (3) the coexistence of Eph receptor B1 and ephrin B2, and (4) the deficiency of αSMA expression in pericytes. In addition, ERK, c-JNK, P70S6K, AKT, PI3K, and PKC are assumed to be involved in PWS development. Although pulsed-dye laser (PDL) remains the gold standard for treating PWSs, the recurrence rate is high. Topical drugs, including imiquimod, axitinib, and rapamycin, combined with PDL treatments, are expected to alter the recurrence rate and reduce the number of PDL sessions for PWSs. For the deep vascular plexus, photosensitizers or photothermal transduction agents encapsulated by nanocarriers conjugated to surface markers (CD133/CD166/VEGFR-2) possess a promising therapeutic potential in photodynamic therapy or photothermal therapy for PWSs. The pathogenesis, progression, and treatment of PWSs should be extensively investigated.

Verification of Ferroptosis Subcluster-Associated Genes Related to Osteosarcoma and Exploration of Immune Targeted Therapy

Background

Despite tremendous advances in treating osteosarcoma (OS), the survival rates of patients have failed to improve dramatically over the past decades. Ferroptosis, a newly discovered iron-dependent type of regulated cell death, is implicated in tumors, and its features in OS remain unascertained. We designed to determine the involvement of ferroptosis subcluster-related modular genes in OS progression and prognosis.

Methods

The OS-related datasets retrieved from GEO and TARGET database were clustered for identifying molecular subclusters with different ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) expression patterns. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) was applied to identify modular genes from FRG subclusters. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm and multivariable Cox regression analysis were adopted to develop the prognostic model. Potential mechanisms of development and prognosis in OS were explored by gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Then, a comprehensive analysis was conducted for immune checkpoint markers and assessment of predictive power to drug response. The protein expression levels of the three ferroptosis subcluster-related modular genes were verified by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Two independent subclusters presenting diverse expression profiles of FRGs were obtained, with significantly different survival states. Ferroptosis subcluster-related modular genes were screened with WGCNA, and the GESA results showed that ferroptosis subcluster-related modular genes could affect the cellular energy metabolism, thus influencing the development and prognosis of osteosarcoma. A prognostic model was established by incorporating three ferroptosis subcluster-related modular genes (LRRC1, ACO2, and CTNNBIP1) and a nomogram by integrating clinical features, and they were evaluated for the predictive power on OS prognosis. The 20 immune checkpoint-related genes confirmed the insensitivity to tumor immunotherapy in high-risk patients. IC50s of Axitinib and Cytarabine suggested a higher sensitivity to the targeted drug. Finally, the quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry were consistent with bioinformatics analysis.

Conclusion

Ferroptosis are closely associated with the OS prognosis. The risk-scoring model incorporating three ferroptosis subcluster-related modular genes has shown outstanding advantages in predicting patient prognosis.

Comprehensive analysis of cellular senescence-related genes in the prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapy/chemotherapy of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Background

The transcriptome public database and advances in biological discoveries contributed to significant progresses in identifying the drivers of cancer progression. Cellular senescence (CS) is considered as a leading factor resulting in cancer development. The purpose of this study was to explore the significance of CS-related genes in the molecular classification and survival outcome of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods

CS-related genes were obtained from the CellAge database, and patients from TCGA-KIRC dataset and ICGC dataset were clustered by ConsesusClusterPlus. The characteristics of overall survival (OS), genomic variation, and tumor microenvironment (TME) of each cluster were analyzed. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was conducted to develop a CS-related risk model to score ccRCC patients and assess the risk scores in predicting patients’ response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. A nomogram based on the risk model was established to improve the risk stratification of patients.

Results

CcRCC was divided into three molecular subtypes based on CS-related genes. The three molecular phenotypes showed different OS and clinical manifestations, mutation patterns, and TME states. Five genes were obtained from nine differentially expressed CS-related genes in the three molecular subtypes to develop a risk model. Patients with ccRCC were divided into high- and low-risk subgroups. The former showed an unfavorable OS, with a significantly higher genomic variation rate, TME score, and numerous immune checkpoint expressions when compared to the low-risk subgroup. Risk score reflected the response of patients to axitinib, bortezomib, sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus.

Conclusions

In general, CS-related genes divided ccRCC into three molecular subtypes with distinct OS, mutation patterns, and TME states. The risk model based on the five CS-related genes can predict the prognosis and therapeutic outcome of ccRCC patients, providing a theoretical basis for further study on the molecular mechanism of CS-related ccRCC.

Prognostic stratification based on m5C regulators acts as a novel biomarker for immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Immunotherapy is a promising anti-cancer strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, a limited number of patients can benefit from it. There are currently no reliable biomarkers available to find the potential beneficiaries. Methylcytosine (m⁵C) is crucial in HCC, but its role in forecasting clinical responses to immunotherapy has not been fully clarified.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed 371 HCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and investigated the expression of 18 m⁵C regulators. We selected 6 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to construct a prognostic risk model as well as 2 m⁵C-related diagnostic models.

Results

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year area under the curve (AUC) of m⁵C scores for the overall survival (OS) was 0.781/0.762/0.711, indicating the m⁵C score system had an ideal distinction of prognostic prediction for HCC. The survival analysis showed that patients with high-risk scores present a worse prognosis than the patients with low-risk scores (p< 0.0001). We got consistent results in 6 public cohorts and validated them in Xiangya real-world cohort by quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays. The high-m⁵C score group was predicted to be in an immune evasion state and showed low sensitivity to immunotherapy, but high sensitivity to chemotherapy and potential targeted drugs and agents, such as sepantronium bromide (YM-155), axitinib, vinblastine and docetaxel. Meanwhile, we also constructed two diagnostic models to distinguish HCC tumors from normal liver tissues or liver cirrhosis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study helps to early screen HCC patients and select patients who can benefit from immunotherapy. Step forwardly, for the less likely beneficiaries, this study provides them with new potential targeted drugs and agents for choice to improve their prognosis.

An Injectable Hydrogel to Modulate T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy

T cell exhaustion caused by mitochondrial dysfunction is the major obstacle of T cells-based cancer immunotherapy. Besides exhausted T cells, the insufficient major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) on tumor cells leads to inefficient T cell recognition of tumor cells, compromising therapeutic efficacy. Therapeutic platform to regulate T cell exhaustion and MHC I expression for boosting T cells-based cancer immunotherapy has not been realized up to date. Herein, an injectable hydrogel is designed to simultaneously tune T cell exhaustion and MHC I expression for amplified cancer immunotherapy. The hydrogel is in situ constructed in tumor site by utilizing oxidized sodium alginate-modified tumor cell membrane vesicle (O-TMV) as a gelator, where axitinib is encapsulated in the lipid bilayer of O-TMV while 4-1BB antibody and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor PF-06446846 nanoparticles are present in the cavities of hydrogel. After immune response trigged by O-TMV antigen, the 4-1BB antibody-promoted T cell mitochondrial biogenesis and the axitinib-lowered hypoxia synergistically reverse T cell exhaustion while the PF-06446846-amplified MHC I expression facilitates T cell recognition of tumor cells, demonstrating a powerful immunotherapeutic efficacy. This strategy on reprograming T cell exhaustion and improving T cell potency offers new concept for T cells-based cancer immunotherapy.

[A Case of Pleural Empyema with Fistula Caused by Endobronchial Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma]

A 52-year-old man complained of asymptomatic gross hematuria and cough. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a right renal tumor, mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and right endobronchial metastasis. The right endobronchial metastasis was causing obstructive atelectasis in the lower lobe of the right lung. After tumor biopsy, the pathological diagnosis was clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab was initiated, but CT showed enlargement of the metastatic lesion and lung abscess after two courses of treatment. The therapy was then switched to axitinib. Six days after initiation of axitinib, the lung abscess perforated into the pleural cavity, which resulted in the formation of pleural empyema with fistula. Ten days after initiation of axitinib, obstruction of the bronchus was relieved due to shrinkage of the right endobronchial metastasis, which resulted in development of a pneumothorax. Placement of a thoracic drainage tube and administration of an antimicrobial agent improved the pneumothorax and inflammatory response, but the drainage tube could not be removed. Long-term insertion of the thoracic drainage tube considerably diminished the patient's quality of life, and after 4 months, he was transferred to another hospital to receive the best supportive care.

[Successful Re-Administration of Nivolumab in Patient with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma : A Case Report]

A 46-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a left-sided renal tumor pointed out by ultrasonography at the time of a medical checkup．Computed tomography revealed a mass measuring 88×77×68 mm on the upper pole of the left kidney. She was diagnosed with cT2aN0M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic left nephrectomy was performed uneventfully. Histopathological diagnosis was clear cell renal cell carcinoma, G2, v1, pT2. Four months after surgery, lung metastases appeared, and systemic therapy was given sequentially as follows ; sunitinib for 2 months, nivolumab for 8 months, axitinib for 17 months, and pazopanib for 2 months．However, metastases progressed, and a re-administration of nivolumab was planned. The nivolumab re-treatment resulted in a marked reduction in multiple lung metastases despite the previous failure by nivolumab treatment. There are few reports on the therapeutic effect of re-administration of nivolumab. We report a case of successful treatment by re-administration of nivolumab.

Adverse events of systemic immune-based combination therapies in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To compare the safety profiles of systemic immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies that were evaluated in the first-line setting of the management of patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Six phase III randomized control trials comparing first-line immune-based combination therapies to sunitinib in previously untreated patients with mRCC. Network meta-analyses were conducted to compare treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), treatment discontinuation, and treatment-related mortality.

SUMMARY

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was associated with the highest likelihood of grade ≥3 TRAEs, and treatment discontinuation rates. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with the lowest rates of grade ≥3 TRAEs. However, it was associated with a higher likelihood of endocrine-related adverse events (AEs). A higher likelihood of high-grade diarrhea was associated with pembrolizumab plus axitinib and avelumab plus axitinib. All combinations showed low rates of hematological AEs.

Clinical Results and Biomarker Analyses of Axitinib and TRC105 versus Axitinib Alone in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (TRAXAR)

LESSONS LEARNED

The combination of carotuximab with axitinib did not provide a benefit over axitinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma who had previously progressed on one or more vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapies. Exploratory evaluation of pretreatment circulating biomarkers suggested the combination might benefit patients who have low baseline VEGF levels.

BACKGROUND

Endoglin is an angiogenic receptor expressed on proliferating tumor vessels and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stem cells that is implicated as a mechanism of resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors. This study evaluated an antiendoglin monoclonal antibody (carotuximab, TRC105) combined with axitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) who had progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitors.

METHODS

TRAXAR was a multicenter, international randomized 1:1 (stratified by ECOG, 0 vs. 1), phase II study of carotuximab combined with axitinib versus axitinib alone in mccRCC patients who had progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent central review (ICR) per RECIST 1.1 RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were randomized. The combination therapy resulted in shorter median PFS by RECIST 1.1 than axitinib monotherapy (6.7 vs. 11.4 months). The combination was tolerated similarly to axitinib monotherapy, and there were no treatment related deaths. Exploratory evaluation of pretreatment circulating biomarkers suggested the combination might benefit patients who have low baseline VEGF levels.

CONCLUSION

The combination of carotuximab with axitinib did not demonstrate additional efficacy over single agent axitinib in patients with mccRCC who progressed following one or more prior VEGF inhibitor treatment.

Updated efficacy results from the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial: first-line avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006) demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report updated efficacy data from the second interim analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with aRCC were randomized (1 : 1) to receive avelumab (10 mg/kg) intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib (5 mg) orally twice daily or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The two independent primary end points were PFS and overall survival (OS) among patients with programmed death ligand 1-positive (PD-L1+) tumors. Key secondary end points were OS and PFS in the overall population.

RESULTS

Of 886 patients, 442 were randomized to the avelumab plus axitinib arm and 444 to the sunitinib arm; 270 and 290 had PD-L1+ tumors, respectively. After a minimum follow-up of 13 months (data cut-off 28 January 2019), PFS was significantly longer in the avelumab plus axitinib arm than in the sunitinib arm {PD-L1+ population: hazard ratio (HR) 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.490-0.777]}; one-sided P < 0.0001; median 13.8 (95% CI 10.1-20.7) versus 7.0 months (95% CI 5.7-9.6); overall population: HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.574-0.825); one-sided P < 0.0001; median 13.3 (95% CI 11.1-15.3) versus 8.0 months (95% CI 6.7-9.8)]. OS data were immature [PD-L1+ population: HR 0.828 (95% CI 0.596-1.151); one-sided P = 0.1301; overall population: HR 0.796 (95% CI 0.616-1.027); one-sided P = 0.0392].

CONCLUSION

Among patients with previously untreated aRCC, treatment with avelumab plus axitinib continued to result in a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus sunitinib; OS data were still immature.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT02684006.

Combinations in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer: regulatory aspects

The therapeutic landscape in the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer has evolved over the last 2 years with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In 2018 and 2019, marketing authorisations valid throughout the European Union were issued for nivolumab and ipilimumab dual checkpoint inhibition and pembrolizumab or avelumab in combination with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib. These applications presented numerous regulatory challenges.In this paper, we summarise the main regulatory considerations, originating from the assessment of the dossiers submitted from the applicants for the three combinations. The regulatory issues are grouped in four sections: clinical pharmacology, efficacy, biomarkers and safety. In each section, we describe the issues raised during the regulatory evaluation performed by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessors. The CHMP assessments determine whether the medicines concerned meet the necessary quality, safety and efficacy requirements, and whether the benefit-risk balance is positive.In summary, although the overall benefit-risk was considered positive for the three combinations, the immaturity of the outcome data and the absence of long-term safety data remain issues to be addressed. Postauthorisation efficacy studies have been required to confirm the effects of the new combinations.

Checkpoint Inhibitor-TKI Combos Effective in RCC

Pembrolizumab or avelumab plus axitinib may be effective first-line treatments for clear-cell advanced renal cell carcinoma. In a pair of phase III trials, the checkpoint inhibitor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations extended progression-free survival compared with sunitinib and were associated with relatively manageable side effects.

Copy Number Alterations in Tumor Genomes Deleting Antineoplastic Drug Targets Partially Compensated by Complementary Amplifications

BACKGROUND/AIM

Genomic DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) are frequent in tumors and have been catalogued by The Cancer Genome Atlas project. Emergence of chemoresistance frequently renders drug therapies ineffective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed how CNAs recurrently found in the genomes of TCGA patients of thirty-one tumor types affect protein targets of antineoplastic (AN) agents.

RESULTS

CNA deletions more frequently affected the targets of AN agents than CNA amplifications. Interestingly, in seven tumors we observed signs of compensatory CNAs. For example, in glioblastoma multiforme, two target genes (FLT1, FLT3) of the experimental drug sorafenib were recurrently deleted, whereas another target (KDR) of sorafenib was recurrently amplified. In renal clear cell carcinoma, the target FLT1 of pazopanib, sunitinib, sorafenib, and axitinib was recurrently deleted, whereas FLT4 bound by the same drugs, was recurrently amplified.

CONCLUSION

Deletions of AN target proteins can be compensated by amplification of alternative targets.

Targeting Endoglin to Treat Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Lessons from Osler-Weber-Rendu Syndrome

This commentary reviews the novel mechanism of action of TRC105 in the context of treatments currently available for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, highlighting the recent findings of Choueiri and colleagues.

The multi-receptor inhibitor axitinib reverses tumor-induced immunosuppression and potentiates treatment with immune-modulatory antibodies in preclinical murine models

Cancer immunotherapies have significantly improved the prognosis of cancer patients. Despite the clinical success of targeting inhibitory checkpoint receptors, including PD-1 and/or CTLA-4 on T cells, only a minority of patients derive benefit from these therapies. New strategies to improve cancer immunotherapy are therefore needed. Combination therapy of checkpoint inhibitors with targeted agents has promisingly shown to increase the efficacy of immunotherapy. Here, we analyzed the immunomodulatory effects of the multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib and its efficacy in combination with immunotherapies. In different syngeneic murine tumor models, axitinib showed therapeutic efficacy that was not only mediated by VEGF-VEGFR inhibition, but also through the induction of anti-cancer immunity. Mechanistically, a significant reduction of immune-suppressive cells, including a decrease of tumor-promoting mast cells and tumor-associated macrophages was observed upon axitinib treatment. Inhibition of mast cells by axitinib as well as their experimental depletion led to reduced tumor growth. Of note, treatment with axitinib led to an improved T cell response, while the latter was pivotal for the therapeutic efficacy. Combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors anti-PD-1 and anti-TIM-3 and/or agonistic engagement of the activating receptor CD137 resulted in a synergistic therapeutic efficacy. This demonstrates non-redundant immune activation induced by axitinib via modulation of myeloid and mast cells. These findings provide important mechanistic insights into axitinib-mediated anti-cancer immunity and provide rationale for clinical combinations of axitinib with different immunotherapeutic modalities.

[Continuation of Axitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma by The Application of Homecare Urology - A Case Report and Literature Review]

A 56-year-old man with advanced RCC and a past medical history of type 2 diabetes underwent a radical left nephrectomy following a histological diagnosis of papillary RCC, G2, INF b, pT3, V1 in 1999. In 2008, sorafenib was started to treat multiple pulmonary metastases of RCC. In 2011, sorafenib was switched to sunitinib when radiologic progression was observed. In 2014, sunitinib was switched to axitinib when further radiologic progression was observed. In 2015, the patient was referred to Yazawa clinic for homecare urology when hospital visits became difficult due to cancer pain and bilateral lower-extremity muscle weakness. Cancer pain was controlled using acetaminophen and a fentanyl patch. During the administration of axitinib, a CTCAE grade 1 vocal disorder was detected. We reduced the axitinib dose from 10 mg to 6 mg, and valsartan and an antiflatulent were administered due to CTCAE grade 2 hypertension and diarrhea, respectively. Axitinib administration continued until the patient died. He had survived more than 11 years following the detection of lung metastasis. In this patient, a good balance between cancer treatment and palliative care was achieved through the application of homecare urology. In a super-aged society such as Japan, urologists with an awareness of Zaitaku Medicine, a Japanese style of homecare that provides continuing appropriate medical treatment and welfare support to patients with access barriers to hospital treatment to enable them to live out the remainder of their lives with dignity, may play a key role in the development of Zaitaku Medicine.

The Additional Costs per Month of Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival: An Economic Model Comparing Everolimus with Cabozantinib, Nivolumab, and Axitinib for Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

When considering optimal second-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), clinicians and payers seek to understand the relative clinical benefits and costs of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To use an economic model to compare the additional cost per month of overall survival (OS) and of progression-free survival (PFS) for cabozantinib, nivolumab, and axitinib with everolimus for the second-line treatment of mRCC from a third-party U.S. payer perspective.

METHODS

The model evaluated mean OS and PFS and costs associated with drug acquisition/administration; adverse event (AE) treatment; monitoring; and postprogression (third-line treatment, monitoring, and end-of-life costs) over 1- and 2-year horizons. Efficacy, safety, and treatment duration inputs were estimated from regimens' pivotal clinical trials; for everolimus, results were weighted across trials. Mean 1- and 2-year OS and mean 1-year PFS were estimated using regimens' reported OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier curves. Dosing and administration inputs were consistent with approved prescribing information and the clinical trials used to estimate efficacy and safety inputs. Cost inputs came from published literature and public data. Additional cost per additional month of OS or PFS was calculated using the ratio of the cost difference per treated patient and the corresponding difference in mean OS or PFS between everolimus and each comparator. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying efficacy and cost inputs.

RESULTS

Compared with everolimus, cabozantinib, nivolumab, and axitinib were associated with 1.6, 0.3, and 0.5 additional months of PFS, respectively, over 1 year. Cabozantinib and nivolumab were associated with additional months of OS compared with everolimus (1 year: 0.7 and 0.8 months; 2 years: 1.6 and 2.3 months; respectively); axitinib was associated with fewer months (1 year: -0.2 months; 2 years: -0.7 months). The additional costs of treatment with cabozantinib, nivolumab, or axitinib versus everolimus over 1 year were $34,141, $19,371, and $17,506 higher, respectively. Everolimus had similar OS and lower costs compared with axitinib. The additional cost per month of OS was $48,773 for cabozantinib and $24,214 for nivolumab versus everolimus. The additional treatment cost with cabozantinib, nivolumab, or axitinib versus everolimus for each additional month of PFS was estimated at $21,338, $64,570, and $35,012, respectively. Over 2 years, the additional costs per additional month of OS for nivolumab and axitinib versus everolimus were similar to the 1-year analysis; for cabozantinib, the cost was lower. Results were sensitive to changes in mean OS, mean PFS, therapy duration, and drug costs estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus for second-line mRCC was associated with similar OS and lower costs compared with axitinib over 1- and 2-year horizons. The additional cost per additional month of OS and PFS associated with cabozantinib or nivolumab versus everolimus creates a metric for evaluating the cost of second-line therapies in relation to their respective treatment effects.

DISCLOSURES

Funding for this research was provided by Novartis, which was involved in all stages of study research and manuscript preparation. Ghate and Perez are employees of Novartis and own stock/stock options. Swallow, Messali, McDonald, and Duchesneau are employees of Analysis Group, which has received consultancy fees from Novartis. Study concept and design were contributed by Swallow, Messali, Ghate, and Perez, along with McDonald and Duchesneau. Swallow, Messali, McDonald, and Duchesneau collected the data, and all authors participated in data interpretation. The manuscript was written by Swallow, Messali, and Ghate, along with the other authors, and revised by Swallow, Messali, Ghate, and Perez. A synopsis of the current research was presented in poster format at the 15th International Kidney Cancer Symposium on November 4-5, 2016, in Miami, Florida.

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Axitinib Derivatives

Axitinib is an approved kinase inhibitor for the therapy of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). It prevents angiogenesis, cellular adhesion, and induces apoptosis of cancer cells. Here, nine axitinib derivatives were designed by replacing the C=C moiety with the N=N group, and the substituted benzene or pyrrole analogs were considered to replace the pyridine ring. Biological activity results showed that most of nascent derivatives exhibited favorable VEGFR-2 kinase inhibitory activities, and TM6, 7, 9, and 11 behaved more potent anti-proliferative activities than axitinib. This novel series of compounds shows a potential for the treatment of solid tumors and other diseases where angiogenesis plays an important role.

Axitinib plus Pembrolizumab Is Effective in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Axitinib plus pembrolizumab has a 73% response rate in previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: experience in clinical practice

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to describe our clinical experience with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and to evaluate their efficacy and tolerability in patients with iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

METHODS

There were 17 patients (47.1% women, mean age: 65.7) with DTC iodine-refractory (9 papillary, 2 follicular and 3 Hürthle cell), treated with TKIs: 16 with sorafenib and 1 with lenvatinib as first-line treatment; 7 required second-line treatment (4 lenvatinib and 3 axitinib). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and radiographic response (determinate at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the initiation of treatment) and second endpoints were determining differences in baseline characteristics depending on clinical course and describing toxicities and tolerability.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 18 months. During the first 24 months of treatment with TKIs PR rate was 35.3% (only 5.8% ≥ 6 months) and SD ≥ 6 months was observed in 58.8%. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients with good and poor evolution. Adverse events (AEs) were present in 100% of patients, but most of them were grade 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population of patients with iodine-refractory DTC, treatment with sorafenib, lenvatinib, and axitinib allows the stabilization of the disease in a high percentage of cases, with acceptable tolerability.

Real-world costs and outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted therapies: a cohort study from the French health insurance database

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns, survival, healthcare use and costs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in a real-world setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used the National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database for the Ile-de-France region to perform a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with mRCC treated by a first-line targeted therapy. Treatment naïve patients were identified combining the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes (C64 & C77-C79) and a first prescription of targeted therapies. Descriptive analyses were performed on treatment patterns and patients' characteristics. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival analysis. All healthcare resource use and costs were estimated on a per patient per month (PPPM) basis (€2016).

RESULTS

A total of 327 treatment naïve patients with mRCC were included. Median follow-up was 13.4 months. Sunitinib accounted for 73% of first-line treatments. The most frequently observed treatment sequence for the first two lines was sunitinib-everolimus (16%; n = 137) and for the first three lines sunitinib-everolimus-axitinib (20%; n = 49). First-line PFS for sunitinib, everolimus, pazopanib, sorafenib and other was 8.7, 6.2, 10.7, 5.7 and 11.2 months, respectively. Median OS for patients treated by first-line sunitinib, everolimus, pazopanib, sorafenib and other was respectively 14.7, 8.1, 21.1, 8.9 and 14.0 months. From the NHI's perspective, the mean PPPM was €5546. The average PPPM in pre-progression was €5597 compared to €5541 beyond progression of the disease. Oral targeted therapies accounted for 53% of the total PPPM.

CONCLUSION

This descriptive study showed that the economic burden of mRCC is substantial with oral targeted therapies accounting for 53% of the PPPM. OS and PFS in real life are poorer than observed in clinical trials.

Axitinib treatment in advanced RAI-resistant differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and refractory medullary thyroid cancer (MTC)

BACKGROUND

Axitinib, an antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor (MKI), was evaluated in the compassionate use programme (CUP) in Spain (October 2012-November 2014).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

47 patients with advanced radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC, n = 34) or medullary thyroid cancer (MTC, n = 13) with documented disease progression were treated with axitinib 5 mg b.i.d. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) were secondary objectives. Regulatory authorities validated the CUP, and all patients signed informed consent form.

RESULTS

Axitinib was administered as first-line therapy in 17 patients (36.2%), as second-line in 18 patients (38.3%) and as third/fourth-line in 12 patients (25.5%). With a median follow-up of 11.5 months (0-24.3), ORR was 27.7% (DTC: 29.4% and MTC: 23.1%) and median PFS was 8.1 months (95% CI: 4.1-12.2) (DTC: 7.4 months (95% CI: 3.1-11.8) and MTC: 9.4 months (95% CI: 4.8-13.9)). Better outcomes were reported with first-line axitinib, with an ORR of 53% and a median PFS of 13.6 months compared with 16.7% and 10.6 months as second-line treatment. Twelve (25.5%) patients required dose reduction to 3 mg b.i.d. All-grade AEs included asthenia (53.2%), diarrhoea (36.2%), hypertension (31.9%) and mucositis (29.8%); grade 3/4 AEs included anorexia (6.4%), diarrhoea (4.3%) and cardiac toxicity (4.3%).

CONCLUSION

Axitinib had a tolerable safety profile and clinically meaningful activity in refractory and progressive thyroid cancer regardless of histology as first-line therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first time that cross-resistance between MKIs is suggested in thyroid cancer, highlighting the importance of prospective sequential clinical studies.

The Effects of Neoadjuvant Axitinib on Anthropometric Parameters in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect that neoadjuvant axitinib for the treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma has on body compartment composition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was based on a single-institution, single-arm clinical trial that enrolled 24 patients with locally advanced non-metastatic biopsy-proven clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients received axitinib orally for up to 12 weeks. Computed tomography scans were completed before the start of treatment, after 7 weeks of treatment and at the completion of 12 weeks of treatment. Patients underwent nephrectomy after axitinib treatment. The primary outcome of the current study was change in body compartment composition. Secondary outcomes included development of new-onset sarcopenia and changes in body weight.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients had a complete set of imaging for evaluation, of which 19 (82.6%) lost weight. Median weight loss was 4.5 kg (P <.001). Seven patients (30.4%) had sarcopenia before treatment, with an additional 5 (21.7%) developing sarcopenia during treatment. Median decrease in skeletal muscle was 2.9 cm²/m² (P <.001), visceral adipose tissue was 4.9 cm²/m² (P = .132), and subcutaneous adipose tissue was 1.0 cm²/m² (P = .043). Ten of the 16 patients (62.5%) without baseline sarcopenia achieved a partial response, whereas only 1 of the 7 patients (14.3%) with baseline pretreatment sarcopenia achieved a partial response (P = .069).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant axitinib resulted in a decrease in skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue, as well as weight loss. Patients with baseline sarcopenia tended to have a lower response rate to neoadjuvant axitinib.

Evaluation of treatment response and resistance in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) using integrated 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI); The REMAP study

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the first line standard of care for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Accurate response assessment in the setting of antiangiogenic therapies remains suboptimal as standard size-related response criteria do not necessarily accurately reflect clinical benefit, as they may be less pronounced or occur later in therapy than devascularisation. The challenge for imaging is providing timely assessment of disease status allowing therapies to be tailored to ensure ongoing clinical benefit. We propose that combined assessment of morphological, physiological and metabolic imaging parameters using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) will better reflect disease behaviour, improving assessment of response/non-response/relapse.

METHODS/DESIGN

The REMAP study is a single-centre prospective observational study. Eligible patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, planned for systemic therapy, with at least 2 lesions will undergo an integrated 18F-FDG PET and MRI whole body imaging with diffusion weighted and contrast-enhanced multiphasic as well as standard anatomical MRI sequences at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks of systemic therapy allowing 18F-FDG standardised uptake value (SUV), apparent diffusion co-efficient (ADC) and normalised signal intensity (SI) parameters to be obtained. Standard of care contrast-enhanced computed tomography CT scans will be performed at equivalent time-points. CT response categorisation will be performed using RECIST 1.1 and alternative (modified)Choi and MASS criteria. The reference standard for disease status will be by consensus panel taking into account clinical, biochemical and conventional imaging parameters. Intra- and inter-tumoural heterogeneity in vascular, diffusion and metabolic response/non-response will be assessed by image texture analysis. Imaging will also inform the development of computational methods for automated disease status categorisation.

DISCUSSION

The REMAP study will demonstrate the ability of integrated 18F-FDG PET-MRI to provide a more personalised approach to therapy. We suggest that 18F-FDG PET/MRI will provide superior sensitivity and specificity in early response/non-response categorisation when compared to standard CT (using RECIST 1.1 and alternative (modified)Choi or MASS criteria) thus facilitating more timely and better informed treatment decisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is approved by the Southeast London Research Ethics Committee reference 16/LO/1499 and registered on the NIHR clinical research network portfolio ISRCTN12114913 .

Overall survival of first-line axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Japanese subgroup analysis from phase II study

Subgroup analyses of a randomized global phase II study of axitinib showed objective response rate of 66% and median progression-free survival of 27.6 months in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) and safety in 44 Japanese patients and compared the results with 169 non-Japanese patients. In addition, baseline characteristics for predictive factors that may influence OS in first-line metastatic RCC were explored in all patients using a Cox proportional hazard model. With median follow-up of 33 months, fewer than half (16 of 44) of the Japanese patients had died and median OS was not reached (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.8 months-not estimable), whereas 107 of 169 (63%) non-Japanese patients had died and median OS was 33.9 months (95% CI, 28.9-42.7). Estimated 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival probability (95% CI) was 86.4% (76.2-96.5), 75.0% (62.2-87.8) and 68.2% (54.4-81.9), respectively, in Japanese patients, and was higher than that in non-Japanese patients (75.1% [68.4-81.8], 62.1% [54.5-69.7] and 47.2% [39.3-55.1], respectively). The updated safety analysis did not reveal any new adverse events of concern among Japanese or non-Japanese patients. The multivariate analysis identified that lower baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lower baseline tumor burden, and longer time from histopathological diagnosis to treatment were significant positive predictors of OS. The current analysis confirmed the clinical activity of axitinib in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with metastatic RCC, with an acceptable toxicity profile.

A Pharmacometric Framework for Axitinib Exposure, Efficacy, and Safety in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients

The relationships between exposure, biomarkers (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble VEGF receptors (sVEGFR)-1, -2, -3, and soluble stem cell factor receptor (sKIT)), tumor sum of longest diameters (SLD), diastolic blood pressure (dBP), and overall survival (OS) were investigated in a modeling framework. The dataset included 64 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients (mRCC) treated with oral axitinib. Biomarker timecourses were described by indirect response (IDR) models where axitinib inhibits sVEGFR-1, -2, and -3 production, and VEGF degradation. No effect was identified on sKIT. A tumor model using sVEGFR-3 dynamics as driver predicted SLD data well. An IDR model, with axitinib exposure stimulating the response, characterized dBP increase. In a time-to-event model the SLD timecourse predicted OS better than exposure, biomarker- or dBP-related metrics. This type of framework can be used to relate pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety to long-term clinical outcome in mRCC patients treated with VEGFR inhibitors. (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT00569946.).

Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Axitinib

BACKGROUND

Axitinib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors, is approved as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Agents targeting the VEGF pathway may induce renal toxicities, which may be influenced by pre-existing renal dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to characterize axitinib pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with renal impairment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Effect of renal function (baseline creatinine clearance [CrCL]) on axitinib clearance was evaluated in a population pharmacokinetic model in 207 patients with advanced solid tumors who received a standard axitinib starting dose, and in 383 healthy volunteers. Axitinib safety according to baseline CrCL was assessed in previously treated patients with RCC (n = 350) who received axitinib in the phase 3 AXIS study.

RESULTS

Median axitinib clearance was 14.0, 10.7, 12.3, 7.81, and 12.6 L/h, respectively, in individuals with normal renal function (≥90 ml/min; n = 381), mild renal impairment (60-89 ml/min; n = 139), moderate renal impairment (30-59 ml/min; n = 64), severe renal impairment (15-29 ml/min; n = 5), and end-stage renal disease (<15 ml/min; n = 1). The population pharmacokinetic model adequately predicted axitinib clearance in individuals with severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 63 % of patients with normal renal function or mild impairment, 77 % with moderate impairment, and 50 % with severe impairment; study discontinuations due to AEs were 10 %, 11 %, and 0 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Axitinib pharmacokinetics and safety were similar regardless of baseline renal function; no starting-dose adjustment is needed for patients with pre-existing mild to severe renal impairment.

Systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Current systemic treatment of targeted therapies, namely the vascular endothelial growth factor-antibody (VEGF-AB), VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, have improved progression-free survival and replaced non-specific immunotherapy with cytokines in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

A panel of experts convened to review currently available phase 3 data for mRCC treatment of approved agents, in addition to available EAU guideline data for a collaborative review as the plurality of substances offers different options of first-, second- and third-line treatment with potential sequencing.

RESULTS

Sunitinib and pazopanib are approved treatments in first-line therapy for patients with favorable- or intermediate-risk clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Temsirolimus has proven benefit over interferon-alfa (IFN-α) in patients with non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC). In the second-line treatment TKIs or mTOR inhibitors are treatment choices. Therapy options after TKI failure consist of everolimus and axitinib. Available third-line options consist of everolimus and sorafenib. Recently, nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD1) checkpoint inhibitor, improved overall survival benefit compared to everolimus after failure of one or two VEGFR-targeted therapies, which is likely to become the first established checkpoint inhibitor in mRCC. Data for the sequencing of agents remain limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high level of evidence for first and second-line treatment in mRCC, data for third-line therapy are limited. Possible sequences include TKI-mTOR-TKI or TKI-TKI-mTOR with the upcoming checkpoint inhibitors in perspective, which might settle a new standard of care after previous TKI therapy.

Visualization and Quantification of Browning Using a Ucp1-2A-Luciferase Knock-in Mouse Model

Both mammals and adult humans possess classic brown adipocytes and beige adipocytes, and the amount and activity of these adipocytes are considered key factors in combating obesity and its associated metabolic diseases. Uncoupling protein 1 (Ucp1) is the functional marker of both brown and beige adipocytes. To facilitate a reliable, easy, and sensitive measurement of Ucp1 expression both in vivo and in vitro, we generated a Ucp1-2A-luciferase knock-in mouse by deleting the stop codon for the mouse Ucp1 gene and replacing it with a 2A peptide. This peptide was followed by the luciferase coding sequence to recapitulate the expression of the Ucp1 gene at the transcriptional and translational levels. With this mouse, we discovered a cold-sensitive brown/beige adipose depot underneath the skin of the ears, which we named uBAT. Because of the sensitivity and high dynamic range of luciferase activity, the Ucp1-2A-luciferase mouse is useful for both in vitro quantitative determination and in vivo visualization of nonshivering thermogenesis. With the use of this model, we identified and characterized axitinib, an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as an effective browning agent.

The DART Study: Results from the Dose-Escalation and Expansion Cohorts Evaluating the Combination of Dalantercept plus Axitinib in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: Activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) is a novel target in angiogenesis. Concurrent targeting of ALK1 and VEGF signaling results in augmented inhibition of tumor growth in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenograft models. Dalantercept is an ALK1-receptor fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap for bone morphogenetic proteins 9 and 10. The DART Study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of dalantercept plus axitinib in patients with advanced RCC and determined the optimal dose for further testing.Experimental Design: Patients received dalantercept 0.6, 0.9, or 1.2 mg/kg subcutaneously every 3 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg by mouth twice daily until disease progression or intolerance.Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in the dose escalation (n = 15) and expansion (n = 14) cohorts. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or grade 4/5 treatment-related adverse events. In addition to common VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor effects, such as fatigue and diarrhea, commonly seen treatment-related adverse events were peripheral edema, epistaxis, pericardial effusion, and telangiectasia. The objective response rate by RECIST v1.1 was 25% with responses seen at all dose levels. The overall median progression-free survival was 8.3 months.Conclusions: The combination of dalantercept plus axitinib is well tolerated and associated with clinical activity. On the basis of safety and efficacy results, the 0.9 mg/kg dose level was chosen for further study in a randomized phase II trial of dalantercept plus axitinib versus placebo plus axitinib. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3557-65. ©2016 AACR.