Clinical progression, survival, and immune recovery during antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus coinfection: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Role of hepatitis C virus genotype in the development of severe transaminase elevation after the introduction of antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of different hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in the development of transaminase elevation after treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study at one referral HIV outpatient clinic.

METHODS

HCV genotype was determined in plasma samples from all consecutive HCV-HIV coinfected patients initiating HAART between March 1998 and January 2000. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded during the following 9 months. Severe transaminase elevation was defined as > or = fivefold increase over upper normal limits (AIDS Clinical Trials Group grades 3 or 4) when baseline alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) values were normal, and as > or = 3.5-fold increase above baseline ALT and AST values if they were abnormal.

RESULTS

Twelve of 70 subjects (17%) developed severe transaminase elevation. Their HCV genotypes were distributed as follows: type 1, 5/39 (13%); type 2, 0/3 (0%); type 3, 7/21 (33%); and type 4, 0/7 (0%). The incidence of severe transaminase elevation was significantly higher among subjects with HCV genotype 3 (HCV-3) compared with those with non-type 3 (OR, 4.4 [95%CI, 1.2-16.1]; P =.02). In the multivariate analysis, HCV-3 remained associated with severe transaminase elevation when adjusted for baseline HCV viral load and degree of immune recovery seen during follow-up evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV-3 is an independent risk factor for developing severe transaminase elevation after HAART. HCV genotyping before initiating antiretroviral therapy may be useful for assessing the risk of hepatotoxicity and for choosing the most appropriate drugs to prescribe for HIV-HCV coinfected patients. Given that the best response to interferon plus ribavirin occurs in patients with HCV-3, treatment should be specially encouraged in coinfected persons carrying HCV-3.

Hepatitis C Virus prevalence among patients infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: a cross-sectional analysis of the US adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has emerged as an important etiologic agent of liver injury and failure in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The prevalence and characteristics of HCV in a representative cohort of HIV-infected patients have not been described. Therefore, a representative sample of 1687 HIV-infected patients was studied; a 213-sample subcohort was selected by use of risk-based sampling from 2 large prospective US Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group clinical trials. HCV prevalence, HCV RNA level, and genotype were determined. The weighted overall estimate of HCV prevalence in the study cohort was 16.1% (95% weighted confidence interval, 14.3%-17.8%), with significant variability depending on risk factors and HIV RNA levels. Among patients defined as being "at risk", 72.7% were HCV positive, whereas, among low-risk patients, the positivity rate was 3.5%. Genotype 1 was found in 83.3% of infected patients. Median HCV RNA level was 6.08x106 IU/mL. High virus loads and genotype 1 prevalence may be important to interferon-based antiviral response rates among coinfected patients.

New developments in laboratory monitoring of HIV-1 infection

The laboratory tests currently available to the clinician for day-to-day management of HIV infection are generally limited to the measurement of the viral load and of the CD4 cell count. More recently, analysis of drug resistance and of plasma drug levels have been added to the monitoring armamentarium. There are, however, numerous other techniques currently available to researchers that may in the future be incorporated into clinical routine. These include the analysis of human and viral genetic determinants of disease evolution, detailed analyses of immune recovery and reserve, pharmacogenetic determinants of treatment response, and toxicity. These approaches may in the future provide highly individualized disease management.

Management of chronic viral hepatitis in HIV-infected patients: Spanish Consensus Conference. October 2000

Co-infection by human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B and C viruses is quite common because they share similar routes of transmission. The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy has significantly improved the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients in the last few years. However, chronic viral hepatitis represents an emerging cause of morbidity and mortality in this population, either as a result of end-stage liver disease or as a consequence of hepatotoxicity induced by antiretroviral drugs. The main goal of the Consensus Conference was to establish specific recommendations for the management of chronic viral hepatitis B and C in HIV-infected patients. The role of orthotopic liver transplantation for co-infected individuals with end-stage liver disease was also assessed.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-hepatitis C virus coinfection: intraindividual comparison of cellular immune responses against two persistent viruses

Both human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) lead to chronic infection in a high percentage of persons, and an expanding epidemic of HIV-1-HCV coinfection has recently been identified. These individuals provide an opportunity for simultaneous assessment of immune responses to two viral infections associated with chronic plasma viremia. In this study we analyzed the breadth and magnitude of the CD8(+)- and CD4(+)-T-lymphocyte responses in 22 individuals infected with both HIV-1 and HCV. A CD8(+)-T-lymphocyte response against HIV-1 was readily detected in all subjects over a broad range of viral loads. In marked contrast, HCV-specific CD8(+)-T-lymphocyte responses were rarely detected, despite viral loads in plasma that were on average 1,000-fold higher. The few HCV-specific responses that were observed were relatively weak and limited in breadth. CD4-proliferative responses against HIV-1 were detected in about half of the coinfected subjects tested, but no proliferative response against any HCV protein was found in these coinfected persons. These data demonstrate a major discordance in immune responses to two persistent RNA viruses. In addition, they show a consistent and profound impairment in cellular immune responses to HCV compared to HIV-1 in HIV-1-HCV-coinfected persons.

HIV coinfection does not compromise liver histological response to interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE

Although discrepancies between histological and virological responses to anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy are well-established in HIV-negative patients, the liver histological outcome has never been assessed in HIV-HCV co-infected patients receiving anti-HCV therapy. We compared histological responses to interferon (IFN) alpha therapy between HIV-positive and HIV-negative injecting drug users (IDU) and determined factors associated with histological response.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Hepatology unit of a tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS

Seventy-nine HCV-infected IDU (32 HIV-positive) receiving a 6-month course of IFN-alpha2b therapy, 3 x 106 U three times a week.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Histological response, defined by a > or =2 point decrease in total Knodell score measured on paired liver biopsies over a 2-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

The sustained response rate to IFN therapy was lower in HIV-positive patients than in HIV-negative patients (6.2% versus 29.8%;P = 0.012). Conversely, the rates of histological response (40.6% versus 36.2%) were not different between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. Independent factors associated with histological response were first total Knodell score (P = 0.0007) and sustained response to IFN therapy (odds ratio, 12.34; P = 0.005). Histological response was observed in 25% of IFN non-responders whatever their HIV status. In HIV-positive patients, the CD4 cell count did not influence the histological response.

CONCLUSIONS

in HIV-HCV co-infected patients treated with IFN, liver histological improvement is frequently observed, similarly to that observed in HIV-negative patients. Such beneficial effect of interferon therapy supports early treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients.

High prevalence of HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus coinfection among injection drug users in the southeastern region of Yunnan, China

The southeastern region of Yunnan province is a key site for drug trafficking and HIV-1 infection spread from the west of Yunnan and Laos to southeastern China. To investigate the prevalence of HIV-1 infection and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection among injection drug users (IDUs) in southeastern Yunnan, three cohorts of 285 addicts, including 242 IDUs and 43 oral drug users, living in the cities of Gejiu and Kaiyuan and the county of Yanshan were studied. HIV-1 and HCV infections were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and/or polymerase chain reaction. Data on the age, sex, risk behavior, drug use history, employment, ethnic background, and marriage status were obtained by interview. The overall prevalence of HIV-1 infection was 71.9%. The rate of HCV coinfection among 138 HIV-1-infected IDUs was 99.3%. Most HIV-infected IDUs were 20 to 35 years old (86.7%) and were ethnic Han (75.9%), suggesting that the epidemic in Yunnan is no longer confined to non-Han ethnic minorities. HIV prevalence in female IDUs (81.2%) was significantly higher than in male IDUs (68.2%) ( p <.05). The prevalence of HIV infection reached 68.4% after 1 year of injection drug use. Needle/syringe sharing is the major high risk factor for the spread of HIV-1 and HCV infections. Large-scale educational campaigns are urgently needed to reduce the spread of HIV and HCV infection in these regions.

Virologic and Immunologic Response to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) delays clinical progression to AIDS by suppressing viral replication, allowing the immune system to reconstitute. These virologic and immunologic consequences do not occur uniformly among HAART users; markers of HIV disease stage at the time of HAART initiation are critical determinants of the progression while under HAART. In this paper, we review studies describing the heterogeneous virologic and immunologic progression following the initiation of HAART, and update findings obtained in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study that show that CD4 cell count and history of antiretroviral therapy at the time of initiation are independent determinants of response.

Response to antiretroviral treatment in HIV-1-infected individuals with allelic variants of the multidrug resistance transporter 1: a pharmacogenetics study

BACKGROUND

HIV-1-infected patients vary considerably by their response to antiretroviral treatment, drug concentrations in plasma, toxic events, and rate of immune recovery. This variability could have a genetic basis. We did a pharmacogenetics study to analyse the association between response to antiretroviral treatment and allelic variants of several genes.

METHODS

In 123 patients, we did PCR analyses of the gene for the multidrug-resistance transporter (MDR1), which codes for P-glycoprotein, of genes coding for isoenzymes of cytochrome P450, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19, and of the gene for the chemokine receptor CCR5. We measured concentrations in plasma of the antiretroviral agents efavirenz and nelfinavir by high-performance liquid-chromatography, and measured levels of P-glycoprotein expression, CD4-cell count, and HIV-1 viraemia.

FINDINGS

Median drug concentrations in patients with the MDR1 3435 TT, CT, and CC genotypes were at the 30th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively (p=0.0001). In patients with CYP2D6 extensive-metaboliser or poor-metaboliser alleles, median drug concentrations were at percentiles 45 and 62.5, respectively (p=0.04). Patients with the MDR1 TT genotype 6 months after starting treatment had a greater rise in CD4-cell count (257 cells/microL) than patients with the CT (165 cells/microL) and CC (121 cells/microL) genotype (p=0.0048), and the best recovery of naïve CD4-cells.

INTERPRETATION

The polymorphism MDR1 3435 C/T predicts immune recovery after initiation of antiretroviral treatment. This finding suggests that P-glycoprotein has an important role in admittance of antiretroviral drugs to restricted compartments in vivo.

Hepatitis C and human immune deficiency coinfection at the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Interactions between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been widely studied before the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART). We reviewed the potential impact of HAART on hepatitis C as well as the interactions between HIV and HCV therapies. Physicians should be aware of the potential risk of: (i) symptomatic liver disease in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients at the era of triple antiretroviral therapy; (ii) potential liver deterioration paralleling immune restoration; (iii) lack of impact of triple antiretroviral therapy on HCV load; and (iv) potential drug-related hepatitis which may modify the natural history of HCV-related liver disease. Liver biopsies should be performed regularly in these patients in order to identify patients with severe liver disease who require early initiation of anti-HCV therapy under close monitoring of their immune status. Treatment is, to date, based on the combination of ribavirin and interferon with an expected sustained response rate around 25%. An important unresolved issue is to better delineate the temporal place of anti-HCV and anti-HIV antiviral therapies. At least in coinfected patients with significant liver disease, namely necro-inflammatory activity and/or fibrosis >or= 2, we believe that anti-HCV therapy is the priority since it lessens the risk of drug-induced hepatitis and of hepatitis due to immune restoration.

Hepatotoxicity development during antiretroviral therapy containing protease inhibitors in patients with HIV: the role of hepatitis B and C virus infection

To evaluate the occurrence of hepatotoxicity in patients during antiretroviral therapy (ART) that contains protease inhibitors and the role of hepatitis viruses in its development, we performed a retrospective study including 1325 HIV-infected patients treated with ART for at least 6 months. Presence or absence of hepatitis viruses, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, CD4 cell count, and plasma HIV RNA levels were evaluated. Hepatotoxicity developed in a few study subjects without coinfection, whereas it was significantly higher in coinfected patients. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that viral hepatitis coinfections are independent risk factors for hepatotoxicity. After 6 months of treatment, ritonavir was associated with higher rates of severe hepatotoxicity in the coinfected group; in fact, ritonavir seems to be the most strongly hepatotoxic agent among coinfected patients. After 12 months of therapy, hepatotoxicity occurred more frequently in patients with hepatitis C virus who did not respond to antiretroviral therapy (ART), whereas patients who did respond to ART showed decreased ALT levels. Hepatotoxicity is not exclusively an effect of drug toxicity, and the presence of hepatitis coinfection is an independent risk factor. Moreover, chronic hepatotoxicity mainly occurs in patients who did not respond to therapy. Conversely, patients who did respond to ART seemed to show improvement of chronic liver infection.

The impact of HIV therapy on co-infection with hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses

Improving survival for people with HIV has brought management of co-morbidities into focus. In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, co-infection with either hepatitis B virus and/or hepatitis C virus, and HIV therapies themselves, have increased liver disease-related morbidity and mortality. The dual anti-HIV and anti-hepatitis B activity of several established and emerging therapeutic agents provides the opportunity to both restore immune function and prevent liver disease progression in people with HIV-hepatitis B virus co-infection. Improving hepatitis C antiviral therapy also provides optimism around management of liver disease in people with HIV-hepatitis C virus co-infection. However, formulation of appropriate therapeutic strategies for HIV-hepatitis B and HIV-hepatitis C co-infection requires further research, including clinical trials of combination antiviral therapy with specific anti-hepatitis B and anti-hepatitis C activity. A possible role may also exist for combined antiviral and immune-based therapies.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infections

Hepatitis C coinfection is common in patients with HIV, particularly in injection-drug users. Hepatitis C virus levels tend to be higher in coinfected patients, and histologic progression is more rapid than in patients with HCV alone. The efficacy of interferon monotherapy in HIV patients with an adequate CD4 cell count is comparable to that observed in patients without HIV. The combination of interferon plus ribavirin and pegylated interferon will further improve response rates. Interferon therapy is associated with leukopenia and a decrease in absolute CD4 cell count. Some concern remains that ribavirin might reduce the activity of pyrimidine analogues such as zidovudine and stavudine, and HIV-RNA levels should be followed when these medications are given concurrently. It is hoped that in time, new drug development will make the multiple-drug therapeutic strategy that has been highly successful in the management of HIV feasible for the treatment of HCV.

Infection with GB virus C and reduced mortality among HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

The flavivirus GB virus C (GBV-C, also designated hepatitis G virus) was identified in a search for hepatitis viruses, but no disease is currently known to be associated with it. We investigated the relation between coinfection with GBV-C and the long-term outcome in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

METHODS

A total of 197 HIV-positive patients were followed prospectively beginning in 1993 or 1994. Of these patients, 33 (16.8 percent) tested positive for GBV-C RNA, 112 (56.9 percent) had detectable antibodies against the GBV-C envelope protein E2, and 52 (26.4 percent) had no marker of GBV-C infection and were considered unexposed. We assessed the relation between GBV-C infection and the progression of HIV disease. We also tested 169 GBV-C-positive plasma samples with a quantitative branched-chain DNA (bDNA) assay in order to investigate possible correlations between GBV-C viral load and both the CD4+ cell count and the HIV load.

RESULTS

Among the patients who tested positive for GBV-C RNA, survival was significantly longer, and there was a slower progression to the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Survival after the development of AIDS was also better among the GBV-C-positive patients. The association of GBV-C viremia with reduced mortality remained significant in analyses stratified according to age and CD4+ cell count. In an analysis restricted to the years after highly active antiretroviral therapy became available, the presence of GBV-C RNA remained predictive of longer survival (P=0.02). The HIV load was lower in the GBV-C-positive patients than in the GBV-C-negative patients. The GBV-C load correlated inversely with the HIV load (r=-0.33, P<0.001) but did not correlate with the CD4+ cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

Coinfection with GBV-C is associated with a reduced mortality rate in HIV-infected patients. GBV-C is not known to cause any disease, but it is possible that its presence leads to an inhibition of HIV replication. However, GBV-C infection could also be a marker for the presence of other factors that lead to a favorable HIV response.

Human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C coinfection: swapping new problems for newer ones

Recent successes in HIV therapy have uncovered other health problems for HIV-infected individuals. Hepatitis C has become an especially significant problem, partly due to its faster progression in an immunocompromised setting. In addition, the higher viral loads in coinfected patients likely result in more efficient perinatal and perhaps even sexual transmission. Therapy has largely been neglected, despite data suggesting its efficacy in HIV-HCV coinfected patients. Studies of combination interferon and ribavirin studies are lacking, although underway. A major concern is the potential inactivation of certain thymidine analogues by ribavirin. Some antiretroviral therapies, such as ritonavir, indinavir and nevirapine, may enhance liver toxicity in coinfected patients and should be avoided if possible. The role of chronic low-grade liver function abnormalities remains uncertain and requires further investigation.

Decreased recovery of CD4 lymphocytes in older HIV-infected patients beginning highly active antiretroviral therapy

Among virological responders, the area under the curve of the CD4 count minus baseline (AUCMB) after 3, 9, 15 and 18 months of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was less in individuals 55 years or older (P < 0.05). Fewer older individuals achieved increases of 50, 100, or over 150 CD4 cells/l. A random quadratic time course model estimated that the AUCMB decreased 35 cells/year for each 10 years of additional age during the first 12 months after HAART (P < 0.005).

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C co-infection in patients with HIV

HAART has increased the life expectancy of patients with HIV. However, as their life expectancy increases, it becomes increasingly important to focus on the management of concurrent illnesses such as chronic HBV and HCV infections which have the potential to increase mid to long term morbidity and mortality. Shared epidemiological risks have resulted in the HIV infected population having a higher incidence of both HBV and HCV than those uninfected with HIV. Co-infection with HIV modifies the natural history of HBV infection, increasing the rate of viral replication, risk of carriage and chronic hepatitis but without increasing liver necroinflammatory processes. In chronic HCV infection, the presence of HIV enhances the risk of severe liver disease. There is no evidence as yet that HBV directly impacts on HIV disease progression but HCV infection increases the risk of death or an AIDS defining illness and impairs CD4+ T cell recovery during antiretroviral therapy. Treatment of either hepatitis virus is complex because of pharmacokinetic interactions with components of HAART regimens.

Differences in HIV disease progression by injection drug use and by sex in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has reduced the incidence of most AIDS-related opportunistic illnesses (OI) and death in HIV-infected individuals. We investigated whether there are demographic disparities in HIV disease progression in the HAART era compared with before.

METHODS

HIV-infected patients in an urban HIV clinical practice in the USA were compared using survival methods for time to a new AIDS-defining OI or death in therapeutic era 1 (monotherapy and combination therapy; 1990--1995; n = 2016) versus era 2 (HAART; 1996--1999; n = 2165).

RESULTS

A total of 1037 (51.4%) events occurred in era 1; 666 (30.8%) events occurred in era 2. In women, the median disease-free survival time increased by 14% (CD4 cell counts > 200 cells/mm(3) at baseline) and 34% (CD4 cell counts < or = 200) in era 2 compared with era 1, whereas for men it increased by 43 and 100%. The relative hazard (RH) of progression for women compared with men in era 2 compared with era 1 was 1.34. For injecting drug use (IDU), disease-free survival time increased by 16% and 34% in era 2 compared with era 1, whereas non-IDU improved by 65 and 135%. The RH of progression for IDU compared with non-IDU in era 2 compared with era 1 was 1.39. No significant differences were detected by race or other HIV transmission risk group.

CONCLUSION

Disease-free survival time was extended with the use of HAART, but these gains were not equally distributed by sex and IDU in our cohort.

Immunologic and virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate prior antiretroviral therapy experience and host characteristics as determinants of immunologic and virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

We studied 397 men from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) who initiated HAART between October 1995 and March 1999. CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA responses to HAART were measured at the first visit following HAART (short-term) and extending from the first visit to approximately 33 months after HAART (long-term). Prior antiretroviral experience was classified into three groups based on antiretroviral therapy use during the 5 years prior to HAART. Age, race and host genetic characteristics also were assessed for their effects on treatment response.

RESULTS

Better short- and long-term CD4 cell and HIV-1 RNA responses were observed in the treatment-naive users. Intermittently and consistently experienced users did not significantly differ in response. Whereas race did not independently affect response, among those initiating HAART with > 400 x 10(6) CD4 cells/l, younger age and the Delta32 CCR5 genotype were associated with a better short-term CD4 cell response. There was a suggestion that having the protective CCR5 genotype also was associated with a better long-term CD4 cell response.

CONCLUSION

Immunologic and virologic response to HAART was stronger in individuals who had no prior experience with the antiretroviral therapy agents subsequently included in their initial HAART regimen. Age, level of immune competence and immunogenetics appeared to play a role in the subsequent immune reconstitution following use of highly effective HIV therapy.

Emerging concepts in gastrointestinal aspects of HIV-1 pathogenesis and management

GASTROENTROLOGY 2001;120:607-621