Cardiovascular and Cancer Risk with Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Editorial: response to tofacitinib is associated with high rates of long-term treatment persistence

This article is linked to Panaccione et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16848

Oral surveillance and JAK inhibitor safety: the theory of relativity

The published results of the post-marketing ORAL Surveillance study, which compared the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor tofacitinib with anti-TNF therapy in older patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have cardiovascular risk factors, have led to changes in the recommendations for the use of JAK inhibitors. Although new safety signals have emerged for tofacitinib, namely malignancy and cardiovascular disease, it should be noted that these signals are relative to those seen with TNF blockers. The new data further raise our intrigue that venous thromboembolism might be a true risk related to JAK inhibition. Reassuringly, the totality of the findings from this newly published study and the other data collected to date suggest that JAK inhibitors can be used safely at approved doses by many patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib versus leflunomide with glucocorticoids treatment in Takayasu arteritis: A prospective study

To investigate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide (LEF) versus tofacitinib (TOF) in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients. Sixty-seven active patients were recruited from an ongoing observational TAK cohort, including 35 patients treated with glucocorticoids (GCs) and LEF and 32 patients treated with GCs and TOF. The observation period was 12 months. The effectiveness rate (ER), remission rate, inflammatory parameters reduction, vascular imaging changes, GCs tapering, disease relapse and side-effects were evaluated between two groups. These aspects were also assessed separately among treatment-naïve or -refractory patients. The ER at 6 and 12 months was 88.57% (31/35) vs. 87.50% (28/32) (p = 1.00) and 71.43% (25/35) vs. 71.88% (23/32) (p = 1.00) in the LEF and TOF group. The percentage of patients with persistent remission from 6th to 12th months and GCs≤7.5 mg/day at 12 months was higher in TOF group (15 (46.88%) vs. 6 (17.14%) p = 0.02). The relapse prevalence was 6 (17.14%) and 7 (21.88%) (p = 0.76), respectively. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was decreased significantly at 6 months in both groups (p<0.05), whereas C-reactive protein (CRP) level was reduced significantly at 6 months only in the TOF group (p = 0.007). The proportion of patients with imaging improvement was higher in the TOF group (eight (25.00%) and two (5.71%), p = 0.04). Side-effect prevalence was higher in the LEF group (11 (31.43%) vs. 3 (9.38%), p = 0.04). In conclusion, LEF and TOF were comparable for TAK treatment. TOF might be a potential agent to maintain disease remission at a low dose of glucocorticoids in TAK.

Emerging therapies for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in the medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC), a subgroup of patients does not respond to currently available therapies. A number of novel drugs are in late stages of clinical development or have recently received regulatory approval for UC.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on three drug classes that have recently been approved or are awaiting approval for UC: antibodies against interleukin (IL)-23, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators, and selective inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAK). We provide an overview of their mechanism of action and summarize available evidence for their efficacy and safety. Finally, we discuss expected future challenges in UC management.

EXPERT OPINION

The evaluated drugs have demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. IL-23 antagonists appear to be safest with very few (serious) adverse events, while the use of S1PR modulators or JAK inhibitors has been associated with infectious and cardiovascular/thromboembolic events, albeit in low numbers. Although advances in drug development are promising, there is an urgent need for (validated) biomarkers to guide rational treatment selection. The scarcity of head-to-head trials also complicates comparisons between available drugs. Breaking the therapeutic ceiling of efficacy in UC will require marked advances in management extending well beyond drug development.

Perspectives of JAK Inhibitors for Large Vessel Vasculitis

Vasculitis is an inflammation of the blood vessels caused by autoimmunity and/or autoinflammation, and recent advances in research have led to a better understanding of its pathogenesis. Glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide have long been the standard of care. However, B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab has become available for treating antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). More recently, avacopan, an inhibitor of the complement 5a receptor, was shown to have high efficacy in remission induction against AAV. Thus, treatment options for AAV have been expanded. In contrast, in large vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis, tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor antagonist, was shown to be effective in suppressing relapse and has steroid-sparing effects. However, the relapse rate remains high, and other therapeutic options have long been awaited. In the last decade, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as therapeutic options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Their efficacy has been proven in multiple studies; thus, JAK inhibitors are expected to be promising agents for treating other rheumatic diseases, including LVV. This mini-review briefly introduces the mechanism of action of JAK inhibitors and their efficacy in patients with RA. Then, the pathophysiology of LVV is updated, and a rationale for treating LVV with JAK inhibitors is provided with a brief introduction of our preliminary results using a mouse model. Finally, we discuss the newly raised safety concerns regarding JAK inhibitors and future perspectives for treating LVV.

Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis: Methotrexate and beyond

For the last several decades, the standard of care for the initial management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been methotrexate. Methotrexate is effective as monotherapy and in combination with conventional, biologic, and targeted-synthetic therapies. Methotrexate is generally well-tolerated, but has important, albeit uncommon, potential side-effects including a risk of liver toxicity and cytopenias. Some studies suggest that more active monitoring in patients with fatty liver disease may be appropriate. With reassuring safety data, more rapid dose escalation and use of subcutaneous therapy may provide even greater success. Some off-target benefits such as a reduction in cardiovascular disease risk have also been demonstrated, though these studies may suffer from confounding. Recent published guidelines continue to endorse methotrexate as first-line therapy. Methotrexate is a low-cost, safe, and effective therapy for RA that should not be overlooked nor too quickly abandoned.

Therapeutic Targets for Ankylosing Spondylitis - Recent Insights and Future Prospects

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease belonging to the axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), a group of diseases that affects the axial skeleton and causes severe pain and disability. An early diagnosis and appropriate treatment can reduce the severity of the disease and the risk of progression. TNF-α inhibitors demonstrated efficacy and effectiveness in axSpA patients by reducing disease activity, minimizing inflammation and improving the quality of life. More recently, new insights in pathogenesis of axSpA, including the discovery of the role of IL-23/IL-17 axis and intracellular pathways, led to the development of new biologics and small molecules that improve our therapeutic armamentarium. New alternatives are also being soon available. The aim of this paper is to narratively review the recent insights and future prospects in the treatment of AS and, more in general, axSpA.

Nonresolving inflammation redux

Nonresolving inflammation contributes to many diseases, including COVID-19 in its fatal and long forms. Our understanding of inflammation is rapidly evolving. Like the immune system of which it is a part, inflammation can now be seen as an interactive component of a homeostatic network with the endocrine and nervous systems. This review samples emerging insights regarding inflammatory memory, inflammatory aging, inflammatory cell death, inflammatory DNA, inflammation-regulating cells and metabolites, approaches to resolving or modulating inflammation, and inflammatory inequity.

Relationships of dermatologic symptoms and quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis: analysis of two tofacitinib phase III studies

Objectives Evaluate relationships between changes in dermatologic assessments and quality of life (QoL) measures; quantify dermatologic symptom severity impacts on QoL in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with tofacitinib.Methods Data were from two phase III studies; patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), adalimumab 40 mg every other week, or placebo advancing to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID at Month 3. Repeated measures longitudinal models assessed relationships between dermatologic assessments (predictors) Itch Severity Item (ISI), Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO), and Patient's Global Joint and Skin Assessment-Visual Analog Scale-Psoriasis question (PGJS-VAS-PsO), and QoL measures (outcomes) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2). Models included one predictor and one outcome.Results Direct, approximately linear relationships existed between predictors and outcomes. ISI/PGA-PsO/PGJS-VAS-PsO improvements from baseline of ≥3/≥2/≥40-mm VAS corresponded with clinically meaningful DLQI improvements; improvements from baseline of ≥4/≥3/≥40-mm VAS generally corresponded with clinically meaningful improvements across component scores and all SF-36v2 domains.Conclusion Substantial links exist between dermatologic symptoms and QoL in patients with PsA, potentially informing patient-centered care and research. Rheumatologists should be aware of dermatologic manifestations and QoL impacts in patients with PsA.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01877668; NCT01882439.

Oral Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs with Antineoplastic Potential: a Review

There is an increasing trend of malignancy worldwide. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the cornerstones for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), but risk of malignancy is a major concern for patients receiving DMARDs. In addition, many IMIDs already carry higher background risks of neoplasms. Recently, the black box warning of malignancies has been added for Janus kinase inhibitors. Also, the use of biologic DMARDs in patients with established malignancies is usually discouraged owing to exclusion of such patients in pivotal studies and, hence, lack of evidence. In contrast, some conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) have been reported to show antineoplastic properties and can be beneficial for patients with cancer. Among the csDMARDs, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been the most extensively studied, and methotrexate is an established chemotherapeutic agent. Even cyclosporine A, a well-known drug associated with cancer risk, can potentiate the effect of some chemotherapeutic agents. We review the possible mechanisms behind and clinical evidence of the antineoplastic activities of csDMARDs, including chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid, methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and thiopurines. This knowledge may guide physicians in the choice of csDMARDs for patients with concurrent IMIDs and malignancies.

Reversal of immune-checkpoint inhibitor fulminant myocarditis using personalized-dose-adjusted abatacept and ruxolitinib: proof of concept

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer therapy but are associated with infrequent but lethal myocarditis, for which management remains uncertain. Abatacept, a CTLA-4 fusion protein targeting CD86 on antigen presenting cells and leading to global T-cell anergy, has been described as a potential treatment in individual reports. Yet, abatacept treatment dosage, schedule and optimal combination with other immunosuppressive therapies are unclear. We describe a 25-year-old man who developed pembrolizumab (anti-PD1)-induced myocarditis 14 days after first injection for thymoma treatment, which deteriorated into cardiogenic shock, with sustained ventricular arrhythmia, requiring urgent extracorporeal life support implantation, despite prompt initiation of corticosteroids and mycophenolate-mofetil. Using a strategy of serial measurement ensuring with a target of >80% CD86 receptor occupancy on circulating monocytes, abatacept dose was adjusted and combined with ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone. This strategy resulted in high-dose of abatacept: 60 mg/kg in three doses (20 mg/kg each) within the first 10 days, followed by two doses. Clinical improvement occurred within 7 days, with resolution of systolic cardiac dysfunction, and ventricular arrhythmias resulting in successful discharge from hospital. We reversed a case of nearly lethal ICI-myocarditis, using specific patient-dose adjusted abatacept, which may serve as basis for personalized treatment of patients with severe ICI-adverse events. Trial registration number: NCT04294771.

[Inflammatory bowel diseases - therapy update 2022]

Growing insights into the underlying immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have led to the advent of targeted therapies, which selectively target pivotal mediators of the inflammatory process. This has enabled us to define and achieve novel therapeutic outcomes to prevent disease-associated complications and halt the progressive course of disease. In addition to already available treatment options, the selective Janus kinase type 1 inhibitor filgotinib and the selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator Ozanimod have recently been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis patients. Furthermore, positive phase 2/3 induction and maintenance trial results have been reported for representatives of the class of IL-23p19 inhibitors, which are expected to further increase our therapeutic possibilities. All these agents can be applied as first-line or also subsequent treatment options and recent head-to-head trials have helped us to position these substances in our therapeutic algorithm. Nevertheless, there is still the currently unmet clinical need do establish predictive markers of response to identify the subgroup of IBD patients, that have a heightened probability of response to each therapy. In the following, we will give an overview of the recently approved or in late-stage clinical development tested substances and discuss their positioning in our therapeutic armamentarium.

Selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease

Recent significant advances have been made in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases with initiation of the era of biologics. However, an unmet medical need still exists for novel targeted therapies. Compared with biologics, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are a new drug class of orally administered small molecules that have been shown to efficiently modulate complex cytokine-driven inflammation in preclinical models and human studies. Unfortunately, serious adverse effects have been reported with the first introduced pan-JAKi, tofacitinib. Here, we review tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) signaling in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), examine mechanisms of action of selective TYK2 inhibitors (TYK2is), and discuss the potential for these inhibitors in efforts to balance benefits and harms.

Evaluating the use of JAK inhibitors in inflammatory connective tissue diseases in pediatric patients: an update

INTRODUCTION

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are a category of conditions that affect tissues that support and provide structure to the body. These diseases include rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and sclerosing diseases. CTDs can be caused by dysregulation of inflammatory pathways, specifically an upregulation of interferons and JAK/STAT pathway activation.

AREAS COVERED

While CTDs have historically been treated with broadly immunosuppressant medications such as corticosteroids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS), newer and more targeted immunomodulating medications called Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), have emerged as potential treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

While most studies regarding JAKi for CTDs have focused on adult populations, pediatric patients with CTDs may also benefit from JAKi therapy. Moreover, the JAK/STAT inhibitor tofacitinib has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of active polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis. In this review, we have summarized what has been published on the use of JAKi for various pediatric CTDs.

The Use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Current Insights

Current pharmacological treatments of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biological agents, including TNFα inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors. Despite the availability of these agents, many patients either fail to respond adequately, lose their initial therapeutic response over time, or develop undesirable side effects, thus highlighting the need for new treatment options. Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) are a group of intracellular kinases that play a role in the signaling pathway induced by cytokines and certain growth factors associated with the inflammatory process of axSpA. There are several lines of evidence implicating the JAK–STAT pathway in the pathophysiological process of axSpA, including genetic data, the use of certain JAK in the intracellular signal of specific cytokines involved in axSpA (IL-23, IL-22, and IL-6), and data from experimental models of SpA. This provides a rationale for the assessment of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in clinical trials with patients with axSpA. In this review, we examine the role of JAK–STAT signaling in the pathogenesis of axSpA and summarize the results from recent clinical trials of JAKi (tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib) in patients with axSpA.

Affecting the effectors: JAK inhibitors modulation of immune cell numbers and functions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

The Janus kinase family includes four members - JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, TYK2 that are selectively associated with type I and II cytokine receptors. Jak-inhibitors (Jakinibs) are a new class of drugs for treating inflammatory diseases. Five Jakinibs are currently available for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib. Considering the role of cytokines and growth factors in immune cell survival and activation, the anti-proliferative and suppressive effects of Jakinibs on these cells are predictable.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes Jakinibs' effects of on immune populations in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, Jakinibs affected T and B lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and dendritic cell proliferation. T helper, B cell differentiation and cytokine secretion was impaired. Accordingly, changes in the number of lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells and neutrophils have been reported during the randomized clinical trials with all the Jakinibs, reverting after drug withdrawal.

EXPERT OPINION

In vitro and in vivo studies showed that the numbers and the function of immune cells are influenced by Jakinibs. Nonetheless, their effects do not seem to represent a major safety issue as these changes do not correlate with the onset of serious infection despite the increased rates of herpes zoster reactivation.

Waiting for JAK inhibitor safety data

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently added a new 'black box warning' on all currently approved Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors indicated for the treatment of arthritis and other inflammatory conditions based on results from the ORAL Surveillance study of tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. This is a warning difficult to ignore because the data, being from a randomised controlled trial, are of high fidelity and hard to reproach. It is especially problematic because safety data for all the other JAK inhibitors will be pending for several years. So how might we proceed, without being bound by our stasis? The lack of absolute certainty seems to require a pragmatic approach to the routine care use of JAK inhibitors. The patients who were at greatest risk were older and had other risk factors for the corresponding adverse events, in keeping with effect modification. This highlights the need to focus on risk stratification when tailoring therapy. In this viewpoint, we propose a simple illustration to guide clinical decision-making. First, identify general risk factors for venous thromboembolic event (VTE), major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and cancer (age>65 years and smoking) and whether there is a previous history of VTE, MACE or cancer. Then, evaluate risk based on the number of other risk factors for VTE and the number of other risk factors for MACE. Ultimately, 'treat-to-target' will in the end always be 'treat-to-agreement'. As we have done in the past, and will do in the future, the optimal treatment strategy will have to be tailored based on individual patient risk factors and preferences in a shared-decision process.

A Review of Safety Outcomes from Clinical Trials of Baricitinib in Rheumatology, Dermatology and COVID-19

Baricitinib is an oral, selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 that transiently and reversibly inhibits many proinflammatory cytokines. This mechanism is a key mediator in a number of chronic inflammatory diseases; accordingly, baricitinib has been studied and approved for the treatment of several rheumatological and dermatological disorders, as well as COVID-19. This narrative review summarises and discusses the safety profile of baricitinib across these diseases, with special focus on adverse events of special interest (AESI) for JAK inhibitors, using integrated safety data sets of clinical trial data, and puts findings into context with the underlying risk in the respective disease populations, using supporting literature. We show that rates of infection with baricitinib generally reflected the inherent risk of the disease populations being treated, with serious infections and herpes zoster being more frequent in rheumatic diseases than in dermatological disorders, and herpes simplex being reported particularly in atopic dermatitis. Similarly, rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancies were generally within or below the ranges reported for the respective disease populations, thereby reflecting the underlying risk; these events were therefore more frequent in patients with rheumatic diseases than in those with dermatological disorders, the latter of whom generally had low absolute risk. AESI were usually more common in patients with risk factors specific for each event. When a population similar to that of ORAL Surveillance was considered, the incidence rate of MACE with baricitinib was numerically lower than that reported with tofacitinib and similar to that of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. No safety concerns were observed in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who received baricitinib for up to 14 days. Identifying the patterns and likelihoods of AEs that occur during treatment in large groups of patients with different diseases can help the physician and patient better contextualise the benefit-to-risk ratio for the individual patient.

Comprehensive Review Exploring Novel Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis from 2016 to 2021

Over the past decade, numerous novel therapies have been approved for use in the seronegative spondyloarthritides, including psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. With large variability seen in the spondyloarthritides with respect to presentation and perhaps pathogenesis, potential therapies continue to be discovered and trialled in the hope of better controlling disease activity. This review details therapies that have emerged for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis from 2016 to 2021. We discuss those that have been approved for use in the USA and those that remain under investigation.

Stimulatory Effect of Tofacitinib on Bone Marrow Adipocytes Differentiation

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation is the main factor underlying secondary osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), such as tofacitinib (Tofa), can control systemic inflammation and may have beneficial effects on bone in various models. This might be due to direct effects on the bone microenvironment and not exclusively based on their anti-inflammatory function. Bone marrow adipocytes (BMAds) are abundant in the bone microenvironment. The effect of JAKi on BMAds is unknown, but evidence suggests that there is competition between human bone marrow-derived stromal cell (hBMSC) differentiation routes towards BMAds and osteoblasts (Ob) in osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study are to determine whether Tofa influences BMAds and Ob derived from hBMSCs and to investigate the potential effects of Tofa on bone marrow adiposity in RA patients.

METHODS

To determine the effect of Tofa on cellular commitment, hBMSCs were differentiated to BMAds or OBs for 3 days together with Tofa at 200, 400, or 800 nM and TNFα. This study was also conducted using differentiated BMAds. The impact of Tofa was determined by gene and protein expression analysis and cell density monitoring. In parallel, in a pilot study of 9 RA patients treated with Tofa 5 mg twice a day (NCT04175886), the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was measured using MRI at the lumbar spine at baseline and at 6 months.

RESULTS

In non-inflammatory conditions, the gene expression of Runx2 and Dlx5 decreased in Ob treated with Tofa (p <0.05). The gene expression of PPARγ2, C/EBPα, and Perilipin 1 were increased compared to controls (p <0.05) in BMAds treated with Tofa. Under inflammatory conditions, Tofa did not change the expression profiles of Ob compared to TNFα controls. In contrast, Tofa limited the negative effect of TNFα on BMAd differentiation (p <0.05). An increase in the density of differentiated BMAds treated with Tofa under TNFα was noted (p <0.001). These findings were consolidated by an increase in PDFF at 6 months of treatment with Tofa in RA patients (46.3 ± 7.0% versus 53.2 ± 9.2% p <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Together, these results suggest a stimulatory effect of Tofa on BMAd commitment and differentiation, which does not support a positive effect of Tofa on bone.

Immunosenescence: an unexplored role in glomerulonephritis

Immunosenescence is a natural ageing phenomenon with alterations in innate and especially adaptive immunity and contributes to reduced antimicrobial defence and chronic low‐grade inflammation. This is mostly reflected by an increase in organ‐directed and/or circulating reactive and cytolytic terminally differentiated T cells that have lost their expression of the costimulatory receptor CD28. Apart from being induced by a genetic predisposition, ageing or viral infections (particularly cytomegalovirus infection), immunosenescence is accelerated in many inflammatory diseases and uraemia. This translates into an enhancement of vascular inflammation and cardiovascular disease varying from endothelial dysfunction to plaque rupture. Emerging data point to a mechanistic role of CD28^null T cells in glomerulonephritis, where they initiate and propagate local inflammation in concordance with dendritic cells and macrophages. They are suitably equipped to escape immunological dampening by the absence of homing to lymph nodes, anti‐apoptotic properties and resistance to suppression by regulatory T cells. Early accumulation of senescent CD28^null T cells precedes glomerular or vascular injury, and targeting these cells could open avenues for early treatment interventions that aim at abrogating a detrimental vicious cycle.