Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency. The Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group

Renoprotective therapy in patients with nondiabetic nephropathies

End-stage renal failure (ESRF) represents a major health problem. Early diagnosis and effective measures to slow or to stop renal damage are essential goals for nephrologists to prevent or delay progression to ESRF. Identifying mechanisms of progressive parenchymal injury is instrumental in developing renoprotective strategies. Protein traffic through the glomerular barrier is an important determinant of progression in chronic nephropathies and proteinuria is the best predictor of renal outcome. At the moment, ACE inhibition is the most effective treatment in patients with chronic nondiabetic proteinuric nephropathies, reducing protein traffic, urinary protein excretion rate and progression to ESRF more effectively than conventional treatment. Low sodium diet and/or diuretic treatment may help to increase the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibitors by maximally activating the renin-angiotensin system. Intensified blood pressure control, whatever treatment is employed, also enhances the antiproteinuric response to ACE inhibitors. However, since this is not always sufficient to normalise urinary proteins and fully prevent renal damage, additional treatments may be needed in patients poorly or not responding to ACE inhibitors. These may include angiotensin II receptor antagonists, non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists and perhaps low doses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Preliminary data on multidrug treatments including these additional antiproteinuric agents are encouraging, but additional studies in larger patient numbers are needed to better define the risk/benefit profile of this innovative approach.

Choices and goals in the treatment of the diabetic hypertensive patient

The number of people living in the United States who have diabetes and high blood pressure is over 11 million and rising. Together, these two diseases are devastating to the whole body if not aggressively controlled. The tight recommendations put forth by the Joint National Committee VI for better control of blood pressure and control of proteinuria have helped diminish further organ failure in patients with hypertension and diabetes. Combination therapy has been found to be very effective, and one arm should be an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.

What is the optimal strategy to intensify blood pressure control and prevent progression of renal failure?

Recent clinical trials clearly demonstrate that patients with diabetes and hypertension, and patients with renal disease and hypertension, should have their blood pressure lowered intensively. A recent analysis of long-term clinical trials over the past 8 years clearly demonstrates that the lower the blood pressure over a range of values, the greater the preservation of renal function. It is also readily apparent that monotherapy does not suffice in attaining these more intensified goals. A review of five clinical trials in the recent National Kidney Foundation consensus report demonstrates that patients randomized to the lower level of blood pressure required an average of 3.2 different antihypertensive medications taken daily. Consequently, it is evident that the question is no longer what the initial preferred monotherapy should be, but rather what should be the optimal drug to add to an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. In this paper we review data from several recent studies clearly indicating that to achieve goal blood pressure in the clinical setting of metabolic disarray and hyperglycemia, long-acting calcium antagonists constitute an excellent add-on agent for enhancing efficacy. We anticipate that the data that will accrue from the IDNT and RENAAL studies will further delineate the renal effects of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists.

A random comparison of fosinopril and nifedipine GITS in patients with primary renal disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate in a random comparison the capacity of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (fosinopril), and that of a long-acting dihydropiridine (nifedipine GITS) to modify the decay in renal function in patients with primary renal disease, exhibiting a progressive increase in serum creatinine during the previous 2 years.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, multicenter study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. A total of 241 patients were included in the study. All of them were hypertensive and had a 25% or at least 0.5 mg/dl increase in the value of serum creatinine during the 24 months prior to entering the study. Initial doses of fosinopril and nifedipine GITS were 10 and 30 mg respectively, and titration to 30 and 60 mg was performed if needed to obtain the expected blood pressure goal (< 140/90 mmHg). Furosemide, atenolol, and doxazosin were added as second, third, and fourth drugs if necessary, for blood pressure control. The primary end-point of the study was the appearance of double the serum creatinine values and/or the need to enter a dialysis programme. Secondary end-points were cardiovascular events, death, changes in 24 h proteinuria, and the evolution of serum creatinine. Data reflect the analysis performed by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Mean age of the group was 54 +/- 14, and 59% were males. Primary glomerulonephritis (31%), nephrosclerosis (26%) and polycystic kidney disease (19%) were the three most frequent diagnostic findings. After 3 years of follow-up, 21% (27/127) of patients treated with fosinopril, and 36% (40/112) of those receiving nifedipine GITS presented a primary end-point, (OR 0.47, 95% confidence intervals 0.26-0.84, P = 0.01). Renal survival was significantly better when fosinopril constituted the first step therapy (P = 0.002). These results did not seem to be influenced by the type of primary renal disease. Proteinuria decreased at the end of the study by a mean of 57% in the fosinopril group and increased by 7% in the group receiving dihydropiridine. Blood pressure control did not differ among groups for diastolic values. During follow-up, however, the patients receiving ACEi showed systolic blood pressure values 4-6 mmHg lower.

CONCLUSION

In patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension due to primary renal disease, fosinopril significantly differed from nifedipine GITS by its capacity to slow the progressive decay in renal function. The drugs also differed by their capacity to lower blood pressure. The better control, in particular of systolic blood pressure, in the fosinopril arm could have contributed in a relevant manner to the attainment of a better outcome when the ACEi was employed.

Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Interruption of the renin-angiotensin system slows the progression of renal disease in patients with type 1 diabetes, but similar data are not available for patients with type 2, the most common form of diabetes. We assessed the role of the angiotensin-II-receptor antagonist losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

METHODS

A total of 1513 patients were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study comparing losartan (50 to 100 mg once daily) with placebo, both taken in addition to conventional antihypertensive treatment (calcium-channel antagonists, diuretics, alpha-blockers, beta-blockers, and centrally acting agents), for a mean of 3.4 years. The primary outcome was the composite of a doubling of the base-line serum creatinine concentration, end-stage renal disease, or death. Secondary end points included a composite of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes, proteinuria, and the rate of progression of renal disease.

RESULTS

A total of 327 patients in the losartan group reached the primary end point, as compared with 359 in the placebo group (risk reduction, 16 percent; P=0.02). Losartan reduced the incidence of a doubling of the serum creatinine concentration (risk reduction, 25 percent; P=0.006) and end-stage renal disease (risk reduction, 28 percent; P=0.002) but had no effect on the rate of death. The benefit exceeded that attributable to changes in blood pressure. The composite of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes was similar in the two groups, although the rate of first hospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower with losartan (risk reduction, 32 percent; P=0.005). The level of proteinuria declined by 35 percent with losartan (P<0.001 for the comparison with placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan conferred significant renal benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, and it was generally well tolerated.

Clinical features and long-term outcome of obesity-associated focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Several cases of obesity-associated focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (OB-FSG) have been reported but little is known about the clinico-pathological features of this entity and its long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We studied 15 obese patients (BMI 35+/-5.2 kg/m(2)) with biopsy-proven FSG. They were compared with a control group of 15 non-obese patients with idiopathic FSG (I-FSG).

RESULTS

Mean proteinuria at the time of renal biopsy was 3.1+/-2 g/24 h in OB-FSG; it reached the nephrotic range (> or =3.5 g/24 h) during follow-up in 12 patients (80%), but none of them had oedema, hypoproteinaemia, or hypoalbuminaemia. Proteinuria was more marked amongst I-FSG (6.5+/-4.2 g/24 h) and most of them developed oedema and biochemical nephrotic syndrome. Glomerulomegaly was observed in all renal biopsies from OB-FSG patients (mean glomerular diameter 256+/-24 microm in OB-FSG vs 199+/-26 microm in I-FSG, P<0.001). Twelve OB-FSG patients (80%) were treated with ACE inhibitors (ACEI) and proteinuria significantly decreased within the first 6 months of treatment but showed a later increase. None of the obese patients achieved a sustained weight loss. Seven (46%) patients with OB-FSG experienced a progressive renal insufficiency and five of them started intermittent dialysis. Kaplan-Meier estimated probabilities of renal survival after 5 and 10 years were 77 and 51%, respectively, in OB-FSG patients, and 52 and 30% in I-FSG (P<0.05). The risk of developing progressive renal failure among OB-FSG patients was statistically correlated with serum creatinine and creatinine clearance at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

OB-FSG indicates a poor prognosis with almost one-half of patients developing advanced renal failure. Knowledge of the clinico-pathological features of this entity (obesity, FSG lesions with glomerulomegaly, absence of nephrotic syndrome despite nephrotic-range proteinuria) should be helpful in establishing an accurate and early diagnosis.

Proteinuria as a modifiable risk factor for the progression of non-diabetic renal disease

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce urine protein excretion and slow the progression of renal disease. The beneficial effect in slowing the progression of renal disease is greater in patients with higher urine protein excretion at the onset of treatment. We hypothesized that the greater beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors on the progression of renal disease in patients with higher baseline levels of proteinuria is due to their greater antiproteinuric effect in these patients.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 1860 patients enrolled in 11 randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of antihypertensive regimens, including ACE inhibitors to regimens not including ACE inhibitors on the progression of non-diabetic renal disease. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the level of proteinuria at baseline and changes in urine protein excretion during follow-up. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the relationship between changes in urine protein excretion during follow-up and the effect of ACE inhibitors on the time to doubling of baseline serum creatinine values or onset of end-stage renal disease.

RESULTS

Mean (median) baseline urine protein excretion was 1.8 (0.94) g/day. Patients with higher baseline urine protein excretion values had a greater reduction in proteinuria during the follow-up in association with treatment with ACE inhibitors and in association with lowering systolic and diastolic blood pressures (interaction P < 0.001 for all). A higher level of urine protein excretion during follow-up (baseline minus change) was associated with a greater risk of progression [relative risk 5.56 (3.87 to 7.98) for each 1.0 g/day higher protein excretion]. After controlling for the current level of urine protein excretion, the beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors remained significant [relative risk for ACE inhibitors vs. control was 0.66 (0.52 to 0.83)], but there was no significant interaction between the beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors and the baseline level of urine protein excretion.

CONCLUSIONS

The antiproteinuric effects of ACE inhibitors and lowering blood pressure are greater in patients with a higher baseline urine protein excretion. The greater beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors on renal disease progression in patients with higher baseline proteinuria can be explained by their greater antiproteinuric effects in these patients. The current level of urine protein excretion is a modifiable risk factor for the progression of non-diabetic renal disease. ACE inhibitors provide greater beneficial effect at all levels of current urine protein excretion.

ACE inhibitors and appearance of renal events in hypertensive nephrosclerosis

Nephrosclerosis constitutes a major cause of end-stage renal disease. Independently of blood pressure control, ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) are considered to be more nephroprotective than other antihypertensive agents. We have reviewed the long-term evolution of renal function in our series of essential hypertensive patients diagnosed as having nephrosclerosis when first seen in our unit. The analysis was performed depending on whether or not their antihypertensive therapy contained an ACEI alone or in combination for the whole follow-up. The end point was defined as the confirmation of a 50% reduction in creatinine clearance or entry in a dialysis program. A historical cohort of 295 patients was included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 7.4+/-3.9 years. Diabetes prevalence was higher in ACEI-treated patients (25.7% versus 7.1%, P=0.000), but the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy could not be confirmed on clinical grounds, including renal biopsy. Twenty-three out of 183 (12.6%) patients in the ACEI group and 23 out of 112 (20.5%) patients in the non-ACEI group experienced a renal event (P=0.0104 by log rank test). Similar results were observed when only nondiabetic patients were considered for the analysis. Cox regression analysis showed that baseline serum creatinine, absence of ACEI administration, mean proteinuria during follow-up, and age were independent predictors for the development of a renal event. In hypertensive nephrosclerosis, therapy containing an ACEI alone or in combination significantly reduces the incidence of renal events. This effect is independent of blood pressure control.

Angiotensin receptor blockers and the kidney: possible advantages over ACE inhibition?

This review deals with similarities and differences between the effects of ACE inhibitors and AT1-receptor blockers in the kidney. Specific receptor blockade has demonstrated that the beneficial effects of AT1 blockers arise from two mechanisms: the reduction of the AT1 receptor mediated response and the increase in plasma levels of Ang II through the AT1-receptor blockade, which leads to increased stimulation of the AT2 receptor (the so-called yin-yang effect). Both ACE inhibition and AT1-receptor blockade provide significant renal protection in the majority of experimental animal models of kidney diseases. AT1 receptor blockade may offer additional clinical benefits over ACE inhibitor treatment, particularly in the kidney, where AT1-receptor blockade does not cause the fall in glomerular filtration rate seen with ACE inhibitor treatment. A number of long-term clinical studies currently running should show the real value of this new class of compounds in the management of hypertension and associated cardiorenal diseases.

Significance of ACE genotypes and medical treatments in childhood focal glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND

There is little information on the significance of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genotypes and medical treatments in children with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was performed on the role of ACE genotypes and medical treatments in 43 Japanese children with FSGS (20 males and 23 females), including 17 children who progressed to end-stage renal failure during the mean observation period of 6.9 +/- (SD) 5.0 years.

RESULTS

The incidence of the D allele of the ACE gene was higher in the whole group of 43 children with FSGS and in a subgroup of 28 steroid-resistant FSGS children (p < 0.05) than in the 130 children of the healthy control group (0.48, 0.48, and 0.33, respectively). ACE genotypes did not affect renal survival in the whole FSGS group nor in the steroid-resistant subgroup. Among the 28 steroid-resistant children, treatment with ciclosporin was effective in delaying the development of end-stage renal failure (p = 0.044), independently of other treatment regimens.

CONCLUSION

The present study of Japanese children with FSGS showed that the D allele of the ACE gene is associated with the development of FSGS, but not associated with the progression of FSGS which was greatly ameliorated with ciclosporin, irrespective of ACE genotypes.

Structural changes in the kidney induced by coarctation hypertension

We investigated structural alterations in renal tissue identifying the morphological and histological changes in the non-ischemic kidney (NIK) and their potential significance in aortic coarctation-hypertensive rats (HR). HR's mean arterial pressure (MAP) was higher compared with sham operated rats (SR). An oral 10 mg/kg/day losartan (LOS) dose diminished but not reverted MAP. Hypertrophy was noted in HR NIK's with significant weight increase (p<0.01). The ratio IK/NIK in HR's decreased 22% (p<0.01). LOS proved to cause no ischemic kidney (IK) modification nor did it revert NIK hypertrophy. NIK in HR's presented glomerulosclerosis, mesangial proliferation and arteriolar thickening reverted by LOS. The stereological study of afferent NIK arterioles showed hypertrophy and an increase in the wall/lumen ratio without lumen modification. LOS diminished wall thickness. LOS-induced decrease of NIK alterations might result from arteriosclerosis regression, the media/lumen ratio. glomerulosclerosis and mesangial proliferation dependent on angiotensin 11.

The African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK): new findings

In September, 2000, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health called an early halt to the amlodipine arm of the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) trial after careful deliberation by an independent data and safety monitoring board. An interim analysis of the AASK at 3 years revealed a renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril as compared to the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DHP-CCB) amlodipine in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. This differential effect was independent of the blood pressure (BP) levels reached and was evident in proteinuric patients and suggestive in patients with baseline proteinuria < 300 mg/d, but was not conclusive. The AASK trial data suggest that DHP-CCBs should be used cautiously in the presence of mild to moderate renal insufficiency. Judgment should be reserved for the use of other CCBs, such as verapamil or diltiazem, since these are fundamentally different CCBs with the potential for a different impact on hypertensive nephrosclerosis. The blinded observation period for AASK will be completed at the end of September, 2001, at which time additional, clinically useful information is expected to become available. (c)2001 Le Jacq Communications, Inc.

Coadministration of losartan and enalapril exerts additive antiproteinuric effect in IgA nephropathy

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and AT1-receptor antagonists (ARAs) are widely administered to reduce urinary protein loss and slow the progression of proteinuric nephropathy to end-stage renal failure. Our group recently observed that the combination of ACE inhibitors and ARAs may have an additive antiproteinuric effect, which may occur because ACE inhibitors do not completely reduce angiotensin II (Ang II) production. Ang II is also produced by chymase. Thus, combination therapy better antagonizes the effects of Ang II. The purpose of this study is to ascertain whether the additive antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibitors plus ARAs is dose dependent and related to the drug-induced reduction in systemic blood pressure. Therefore, enalapril (E; 10 mg/d) and losartan (LOS; 50 mg/d) were randomly administered alone and then in association; initial dosages were doubled when drugs were administered alone and in association. To determine the influence of the drug-dependent effect on reducing blood pressure and the reduction in urinary proteinuria, both ambulatory and office blood pressures were recorded. E and LOS administered alone reduced proteinuria by the same extent; no further reduction was observed when E and LOS alone were administered at a doubled dose. When E and LOS were coadministered, proteinuria decreased by a greater extent compared with E and LOS alone; an additional reduction in proteinuria was observed when combined therapy doses were doubled. The reduction in proteinuria was not correlated with clinical through blood pressure; however, reductions in diastolic and mean ambulatory blood pressures significantly correlated with the decrease in proteinuria, as well as with creatinine clearance. In conclusion, this study shows that combination therapy with E and LOS has an additive dose-dependent antiproteinuric effect that is likely induced by the drug-related reduction in systemic blood pressure. In normotensive proteinuric patients, it is likely that even a small reduction in systemic blood pressure may affect intraglomerular hemodynamics by a great extent because efferent arteriole regulation is hampered more completely by the coadministration of ACE inhibitors and ARAs.

Diabetics with hypertension not controlled with ACE inhibitors: alternate therapies

If hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus type II is not adequately controlled by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-i), a beta-blocker is frequently added as second-line therapy. Recently, large randomized trials demonstrated the beneficial effect of second-generation dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers in these patients. These compounds are increasingly being used to replace beta-blockers. Withdrawal of beta-blockers may influence diabetic control and may cause rebound hypertension. Any rebound hypertension from beta-blocker withdrawal may not occur if the beta-blocker is replaced with a calcium-channel blocker. A calcium-channel blocker will influence vascular resistance (VR) and blood pressure differently than a beta-blocker. Thirty-four patients with diabetes mellitus type II and a resting diastolic blood pressure above 90 mm Hg despite enalapril 10 mg daily (or equipotent dosages of other ACE-i) for at least 3 months were treated in an open label sequential comparison with the same ACE-i in combination with the beta-blocker metoprolol 100 mg for 3 months, and, subsequently for 3 more months with the same ACE-i in combination with the dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker lercanidipine 10 mg once daily. After 6 weeks, patients with a diastolic blood pressure above 90 mm Hg were titrated up to 200 mg metoprolol or 20 mg lercanidipine once daily. Patients were examined every 6 weeks during the trial, and after 2 weeks while receiving lercanidipine. In addition to blood pressure measurements, VR was measured by iridium strain gauge plethysmography and expressed in units (1 unit = 1 mm Hg/mL blood/100 mL tissue per minute). Two of 34 patients did not complete the protocol because of non-compliance with the lercanidipine treatment in the first 2 weeks of treatment. Their data are included in the analysis. No rebound hypertension 14 days after the change-over of therapies was observed. (Mean arterial pressures [MAPs] were not significantly different from the point of withdrawal of the beta-blockers.) However, heart rate rose from 69+/-7 to 94+/-10 beats/min (p < 0.001). After 3 months on lercanidipine, MAP fell by 6+/-10 mm Hg (p = 0.002) compared to the point of withdrawal of the beta-blocker. Vascular resistance fell by 6.28+/-11.91 units (p<0.01), while glucosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) rose by 0.4+/-0.5% (p<0.001) and body weight rose by 0.6+/-0.6 kg (p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis revealed significant associations between decrease in VR, increase in HbAlc, and decrease in MAP, and partial dependence of these variables on one another. In hypertensive patients with diabetes type II, replacement of ACE-i and metoprolol with ACE-i and lercanidipine does not appreciably influence metabolic control and does not cause rebound hypertension. Lercanidipine was more effective than metoprolol as a second-line antihypertensive drug in these patients. At least two mechanisms may be involved: withdrawal of a pressor effect from the beta-blocker, and calcium-channel-mediated vasodilation.

The natural history of renal disease in Australian Aborigines. Part 1. Changes in albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate over time

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to describe changes over time in albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in a cohort of Australian Aborigines from a community with high rates of renal disease and renal failure.

METHODS

Participants were 486 adult community members (20+ years at first exam) who were screened for renal disease and related factors on at least two occasions (mean 2.7 occasions), at least a year apart, between 1990 and 1997. Renal function was assessed by the albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR; g/mol) on a random urine specimen and by the GFR estimated from the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Evolution over time was expressed as the average annual changes in these parameters.

RESULTS

On baseline examination, 70% of participants had albuminuria (ACR 1.1+ g/mol) There was a significant net increase in ACR and a fall in GFR in the cohort over time. Among individuals, however, changes were strongly correlated with ACR levels at baseline. There was no loss of GFR in persons with normal renal parameters at baseline and a rapid loss of GFR in those with substantial levels of albuminuria at baseline. Other factors significantly correlated with progression of ACR included age, baseline body mass index and systolic blood pressure, the presence of diabetes (or levels of fasting glucose), and elevated levels of serum gamma glutamyl transferase. Factors significantly associated with loss of GFR included body mass index, diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, microscopic hematuria, and marginally high cholesterol levels.

CONCLUSION

Albuminuria progresses and GFR is lost over time in individuals in this community, at rates that are strongly dependent on levels of pre-existing albuminuria. Much loss of GFR and all renal failure should be avoided by preventing the development of albuminuria and minimizing its progression. This depends on improving the weight, blood pressure, and metabolic profile of the entire community and reducing infections. Modification of the course in people with established disease depends on vigorous control of blood pressure and the metabolic profile and the specific use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Cilnidipine is as effective as benazepril for control of blood pressure and proteinuria in hypertensive patients with benign nephrosclerosis

To investigate the beneficial effects of cilnidipine, a calcium channel blocker that shows high selectivity for N-type receptors, on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency, we compared the efficacy of cilnidipine to that of benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with known renal protective effects, in a one-year trial evaluating hypertensive control, serum creatinine, and albuminuria in a cohort of patients. Given the seeming importance of the etiology of chronic renal insufficiency in determining drug efficacy, we limited our study to 20 patients with a single common condition, benign nephrosclerosis. The average age of the patients was 62+/-4 years old. The changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the course of the study year revealed a similar reduction with cilnidipine and benazepril. Both cilnidipine and benazepril induced similar reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the course of the study year. The baseline levels of serum creatinine were 1.40+/-0.2 mg/dl and urinary excretion of albumin was 168+/-10 mg daily. The levels of serum creatinine were not significantly changed throughout the study in either group, although the levels of urinary excretion of albumin were significantly decreased in both groups. There were no significant differences in either of these values between the two groups. In conclusion, both cilnidipine and benazepril equally and effectively reduced blood pressure and albuminuria in hypertensive patients with benign nephrosclerosis in a one-year trial.

Evolving strategies for renoprotection: non-diabetic chronic renal disease

Experimental and clinical studies over the past two decades have identified several interventions for slowing the progression of chronic renal disease towards end-stage renal failure. In this paper we review the experimental and clinical evidence in support of dietary protein restriction, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, control of systemic hypertension, reduction of proteinuria, treatment of hyperlipidemia and smoking cessation. We also consider potential future renoprotective therapies. Finally we propose a comprehensive strategy for achieving maximal renoprotection with available interventions and monitoring.

The long-term effect of simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation on native renal function

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether patients with heart failure and renal insufficiency should receive a simultaneous heart and kidney transplant or whether a single heart transplantation is sufficient to restore native renal function.

METHODS

We analyzed the renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration of the native and transplant kidneys in eight patients long term after simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation using a dynamic MAG3 radioisotope scan and serum creatinine determinations. All subjects had been hemodialysis dependent before transplantation. Seven patients suffered from an intrinsic renal disease that were diabetic nephropathy in three cases, small fibrotic kidneys of undetermined origin in two cases, one lupus nephritis, and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in one patient who had a previous heart transplant. In one patient renal insufficiency was considered to be solely due to renal hypoperfusion because no intrinsic renal disease could be detected.

RESULTS

All patients were on cyclosporine-based triple immunosuppression, transplanted for 4 to 10 years, exhibited cardiac ejection fractions of more than 50% and had normal serum creatinine values. Radioisotopic scan showed no function of the native kidneys in all seven patients with intrinsic renal disease but exhibited normal function of the native kidneys as well as the renal transplant in the patient without intrinsic kidney disease before transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that a simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation is necessary in patients with cardiomyopathy and renal insufficiency due to primary kidney disease, but not in those with hemodynamically mediated renal failure, even if an immunosuppressive regimen with calcineurin inhibitors is used.

Using Bayesian inference to perform meta-analysis

Bayesian modeling offers an elegant approach to meta-analysis that efficiently incorporates all sources of variability and relevant quantifiable external information. It provides a more informative summary of the likely value of parameters after observing the data than do non-Bayesian approaches. This leads to direct probabilistic inference about model parameters such as the average treatment effect, the between-study variance, and individual study treatment effects. The latter are weighted averages of the common mean and individual study means with weights reflecting the amount of information provided by each study relative to the others. Homogeneity among these posterior study estimates indicates that pooling these studies is appropriate; heterogeneity suggests that some cause of between-study variation should be explored. The author describes the construction of such models and shows how to use them to estimate a common mean and regression slopes. Two examples illustrate the additional inferences available with the Bayesian methodology.

Clinical course of patients with IgA nephropathy between combined treatment of immunosuppressive agents and ACE inhibitor and ACE inhibitor alone

BACKGROUND

It has not been clear whether immunosuppressive therapy favorably influences renal function and proteinuria in IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) has an anti-proteinuric effect in IgAN. A retrospective study was done to see whether the addition of immunosuppressive therapy to ACEi produces a more excellent anti-proteinuric effect and preserves better renal function than ACEi alone.

METHODS

A total of 49 patients with proteinuria > 1.0 g/day and serum creatinine concentrations < 1.5 mg/dL were followed-up from at least 1 year to 9 years. Among them, 25 patients were treated with the combination of cyclophosphamide, prednisolone and ACEi while the other 24 were treated with ACEi alone.

RESULTS

The combination therapy or ACEi alone both reduced proteinuria with significant value (the combination group: from 5.74 +/- 5.08 to 2.29 +/- 2.77 g/day, ACEi group: from 3.85 +/- 2.54 to 1.68 +/- 1.91 g/day), while no significant differences in reduction of proteinuria were noticed between the two groups. There was no significant elevation of serum creatinine in both groups during follow-up (the combination group: from 0.91 +/- 0.20 to 1.03 +/- 0.38 mg/dL, ACEi group: from 0.93 +/- 0.27 to 0.99 +/- 0.37 mg/dL). This study showed no significant differences in the change in slope of 1/serum creatinine levels during the follow-up period between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that immunosuppressive therapy may not be beneficial in patients with proteinuric IgAN. ACEi may be a valuable therapeutic agent avoiding serious side effects of immunosuppressive agents.

Progression, remission, regression of chronic renal diseases

The prevalence of chronic renal disease is increasing worldwide. Most chronic nephropathies lack a specific treatment and progress relentlessly to end-stage renal disease. However, research in animals and people has helped our understanding of the mechanisms of this progression and has indicated possible preventive methods. The notion of renoprotection is developing into a combined approach to renal diseases, the main measures being pharmacological control of blood pressure and reduction of proteinuria. Lowering of blood lipids, smoking cessation, and tight glucose control for diabetes also form part of the multimodal protocol for management of renal patients. With available treatments, dialysis can be postponed for many patients with chronic nephropathies, but the real goal has to be less dialysis-in other words remission of disease and regression of structural damage to the kidney. Experimental and clinical data lend support to the notion that less dialysis (and maybe none for some patients) is at least possible.

Renal tubular peptide catabolism in chronic vascular rejection

Chronic vascular rejection (CR) is the commonest cause of renal transplant loss, with few clues to etiology, but proteinuria is a common feature. In diseased native kidneys, proteinuria and progression to failure are linked. We proposed a pathogenic role for this excess protein at a tubular level in kidney diseases of dissimilar origin. We demonstrated in both nephrotic patients with normal function and in those with failing kidneys increased renal tubular catabolism and turnover rates of a peptide marker, Aprotinin (Apr), linked to increased ammonia excretion and tubular injury. These potentially injurious processes were suppressed by reducing proteinuria with Lisinopril. Do similar mechanisms of renal injury and such a linkage also occur in proteinuric transplanted patients with CR, and if so, is Lisinopril then of beneficial value? We now examine these aspects in 11 patients with moderate/severe renal impairment (51CrEDTA clearance 26.2+/-3.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), proteinuria (6.1+/-1.5 g/24 h) and biopsy proven CR. Lisinopril (10-40 mg) was given daily for 2 months in 7 patients. Four others were given oral sodium bicarbonate (Na HCO3) for 2 months before adding Lisinopril. Renal tubular catabolism of intravenous 99mTc-Apr (Apr* 0.5 mg, 80MBq), was measured before and after Lisinopril by gamma-ray renal imaging and urinary radioactivity of the free radiolabel over 26 h. Fractional degradation was calculated from these data. Total 24 h urinary N-acetyl-beta-glucoaminidase (NAG) and ammonia excretion in fresh timed urine collections were also measured every two weeks from two months before treatment. After Lisinopril proteinuria fell significantly (from 7.8+/-2.2 to 3.4+/-1.9 g/24 h, p<0.05). This was associated with a reduction in metabolism of Apr* over 26 h (from 0.5+/-0.05 to 0.3+/-0.005% dose/h, p < 0.02), and in fractional degradation (from 0.04+/-0.009 to 0.02+/-0.005/h, p<0.01). Urinary ammonia fell, but surprisingly not significantly and this was explained by the increased clinical acidosis after Lisinopril, (plasma bicarbonate fell from 19.1+/-0.7 to 17.4+/-0.8 mmol/L, p < 0.01), an original observation. Total urinary NAG did fall significantly from a median of 2108 (range 1044-3816) to 1008 (76-2147) micromol/L, p < 0.05. There was no significant change in blood pressure or in measurements of glomerular hemodynamics. In the 4 patients who were given Na HCO3 before adding Lisinopril, both acidosis (and hyperkalemia) were reversed and neither recurred after adding Lisinopril. These observations in proteinuric transplanted patients after Lisinopril treatment have not been previously described.

Effect of Lisinopril on the progression of renal insufficiency in mild proteinuric non-diabetic nephropathies

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine whether Lisinopril, an ACE-inhibitor (ACEi), was more effective than other antihypertensive agents in slowing the progression of non-diabetic chronic renal diseases in patients with baseline proteinuria < or =1.0 g/day.

METHODS

In an open, multicentre study all eligible patients entered a 3 months run-in phase during which antihypertensive therapy (with exclusion of ACEi) was adjusted in order to obtain a supine diastolic blood pressure < or =90 mmHg and urinary protein excretion and renal function stability were verified. One hundred and thirty-one patients with chronic renal insufficiency (Clcr between 20-50 ml/min) because of primary renoparenchymal diseases and proteinuria < or =1.0 g/day, were randomized to Lisinopril (L=66) or alternative antihypertensive therapy (C=65). Changes in renal function were assessed by inulin (Clin) clearance.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period of 22.5+/-5.6 months, Clin did not change significantly in group L (-1.31+/-0.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) differing significantly from group C in which it declined markedly (-6.71+/-3.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) (P<0.04). Seven patients experienced adverse events that prompted discontinuation of treatment: four in group L and three in group C; in addition seven patients showed severe deterioration in renal function requiring dialysis: two in group L and five in group C. The overall risk of the combined end-points: need for dialysis or halving of GFR was significantly higher in group C versus group L. During the study the mean value for systolic blood pressure was 137.8+/-14.6 SD mmHg in group L and 140.8+/-14.1 SD mmHg in group C; the mean difference between groups, during and at the end of the study, was 2 mmHg (NS). The mean diastolic blood pressure during the study was 83.8+/-8.6 SD mmHg in group L and 84.3+/-7.56 SD mmHg in group C; during and at the end of the study the mean diastolic difference between groups was 1 mmHG:

CONCLUSION

This study, employing a sensitive measurement of renal function and with similar blood pressure in both groups, provides support to the hypothesis that ACEi have a specific renoprotective effect, in addition to blood pressure control, also in patients with mild proteinuria.

Role of proteinuria reduction in the progression of IgA nephropathy

Proteinuria has been shown to play a causal role in the progression towards ESRD of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We demonstrated that steroids are effective in reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function.

AIM

to evaluate the long-term effect of steroids in IgAN patients (6th year evaluation) and better clarify the role of proteinuria reduction in slowing down the progression.

METHODS

multicenter randomized controlled trial of 86 adult IgAN patients with serum creatinine < or = 1.5 mg/ dL and moderate proteinuria. They received either supportive therapy or methylprednisolone 1-g i.v. for three days at months 1, 3, and 5, plus oral prednisone (0.5 mg/kg every other day for six months).

RESULTS

Proteinuria significantly decreased in the treated patients (from 2.0+/-0.60 g/24 h at baseline to 1.0+/-0.68 g/24 h at six months) and remained stable till the 6th year (0.67+/-0.5 g/24 h), it slightly decreased in the control group. Six-year renal survival was significantly better in the steroid than in the control group: 9 patient (20.9%) in the steroid group and 15 (34.8%) in the control group reached the primary end-point of a 50% increase in serum creatinine from baseline. Five controls and none of the steroid-treated patients started dialysis. Steroid-treated patients did not experience any major side effects during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroids significantly reduce proteinuria and protect against renal function deterioration in IgAN patients. Early reduction of proteinuria could also be marker of a persistent reduction in its levels over time and of a better outcome in the long term.

The effect of ACE inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor antagonist therapy on serum uric acid levels and potassium homeostasis in hypertensive renal transplant recipients treated with CsA

BACKGROUND

The angiotensin II (AT II) type I receptor antagonist losartan has been reported to increase urinary uric acid and potassium excretion. These effects might be beneficial in cyclosporin (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients, who frequently suffer from hyperuricaemia and hyperkalaemia.

METHODS

In this prospective, open, randomized, two-way cross-over study we included 13 hypertensive CsA-treated patients after renal transplantation and administered either the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors enalapril or losartan. Laboratory parameters, 24-h urinary protein excretion, and mean 24-h arterial blood pressure (MAP) were checked after 3 weeks treatment with enalapril, after a wash-out period of 2 weeks, and before and after a 3-week treatment course with losartan.

RESULTS

Both drugs slightly reduced MAP (losartan from 97+/-6 to 94+/-9 and enalapril to 93+/-8 mmHg). Serum potassium levels significantly increased during enalapril therapy (from 4.3+/-0.5 to 4.8+/-0.4 mmol/l, P<0.05), as did, although not significantly, uric acid concentrations (from 7.8+/-1.9 to 8.2+/-1.8 mg/dl, P=0.5). Losartan, on the contrary, only mildly affected serum potassium (4.3+/-0.5 vs 4.5+/-0.5 mmol/l, P=0.25) and serum uric acid decreased (from 7.8+/-2.4 to 7.3+/-1.8 mg/dl, P=0.6). Serum aldosterone and urinary aldosterone excretion were significantly reduced only during ACE inhibitor treatment, which might explain the variable effects on potassium homeostasis.

CONCLUSION

Losartan may be a useful agent to reduce blood pressure and serum uric acid levels in renal transplant recipients treated with CSA: Furthermore, in this high-risk population, the effects on serum potassium levels are less marked with losartan than with enalapril.

Update in pharmacologic treatment of hypertension

Initial pharmacologic therapy for hypertension is low-dose thiazide diuretics, beta-blockers, and ACE inhibitors. Increasing data have confirmed that ACE inhibitors have specific benefit in patients with diabetes, atherosclerosis, left ventricular dysfunction, and renal insufficiency. CCBs are alternative agents for ISH in the elderly and appear to decrease stroke with perhaps less protection against progression of renal insufficiency and proteinuria, CAD mortality and new onset heart failure versus other initial agents, especially ACE inhibitors. ARBs are well tolerated and effective blood pressure lowering agents but have not been confirmed as effective as ACE inhibitors for reducing renal progression, clinical events, or mortality from heart failure. Effective pharmacologic antihypertensive therapy may avoid disabling and undetected cerebrovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction, and disturbing symptoms of elevated blood pressure. Vasopeptidase inhibitor, such as omapatrilat, and endothelin-1 antagonist, such as bosentan, may become future agents approved for the reduction of morbidity and mortality with hypertension. The ALLHAT trial continues to examine the potential benefits and harms of amlodipine versus chlorthalidone and lisinopril in a diverse high-risk population. Based on ALLHAT data, however, doxazosin is no longer an acceptable initial pharmacological agent. Intensive pharmacologic treatment with blood pressure lowering to less than 130/85 mm Hg is recommended with diabetes, renal insufficiency, and heart failure with additional goal of less than 125/75 mm Hg with renal failure and proteinuria greater than 1 g/24 h, based on multiple outcome studies.

Effects of calcium antagonist, benidipine, on the progression of chronic renal failure in the elderly: a 1-year follow-up

The number of patients who needs for dialysis therapy is increasing rapidly among the older population. Although control of hypertension can delay or arrest the progression of renal failure, there are lacking of studies about antihypertensive treatment of chronic renal failure in the elderly. We have studied the effects of treating hypertension with a calcium antagonist, benidipine, on renal function and blood pressure in 58 patients (mean age: 71 +/- 9) with hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency (the levels of creatinine ranging from 1.5 to 4.0 mg/dl). The underlying disease included glomerulopathies (in 33), diabetic nephropathy (in 15), and other causes (in 10). Forty two patients who had been treated with other antihypertensive drugs other than angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, antihypertensive drugs were withdrawn 2 weeks before the entry. At the entry, patients should have sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) of above 160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of above 90 mmHg. In total, both SBP and DBP decreased from 169/95+/-12.5/8.9 to 148/81+/-16.1/8.0 mmHg (p<0.001) with remaining the serum creatinine levels from 2.2+/-0.8 vs 2.4+/-1.3 mg/dl (P>0.05). Retrospective analysis revealed that in 4 of 4 patients treated with benidipine and 2 of 3 patients with benidipine and ACE inhibitors with systolic blood pressure more than 160 mmHg at the end of the study, the levels of serum creatinine increased from 2.5+/-0.3 to 2.8+/-0.4 with significance (P<0.05). If systolic blood pressure was reduced less than 159 mmHg, 38 of 48 patients did not show any deterioration of renal function. Compared to the significance of SBP in preserving renal function, DBP did not associate with the changes in renal function. No patients died during the study. One patient had transient ischemic attack and one patient had stroke in benidipine treated group. One patient had angina pectoris in benidipine-ACE inhibitors treated group. The results of our trial seem to give some support for the idea that long-acting calcium antagonists such as benidipine are renoprotective through reduction of SBP in the elderly people with hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency. However, if systolic blood pressure was not reduced below 160 mmHg throughout a year, the substantial declines in renal function would be expected.

Renoprotection: one or many therapies?

BACKGROUND

Renal disease that progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) imposes a great burden on the affected individual and on society, which mainly bears the cost of ESRD (currently more than $10 billion to treat about 333,000 patients annually in the U.S.). Thus, there is a great need to identify therapies that arrest the progression mechanisms common to all forms of renal disease. Progress is being made. Perhaps the most visible advance is the randomized controlled trials (RCT) demonstrating the renoprotective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. There are also numerous other promising renoprotective therapies. Unfortunately, testing each therapy in RCT is not feasible. Thus the nephrologist has two choices: restrict renoprotective therapy to those shown to be effective in RCT, or expand the use of renoprotective therapies to include those that, although unproven, are plausibly effective and prudent to use. The goal of this work is to provide the documentation needed for the nephrologist to choose between these strategies.

METHODS

This work first describes the mechanisms believed to be involved in the progression of renal disease. Based largely on this information, 18 separate interventions that slow the progression are described. Each intervention is assigned a level of recommendation (Level 1 is the highest and Level 3 the lowest) according to the strength of evidence supporting its renoprotective efficacy.

RESULTS

The number of interventions at each level of recommendation are: Level 1, N = 4; Level 2, N = 4; Level 3, N = 10. Our own experience with the multiple-risk-factor intervention is that most patients can achieve the majority of the Level 1 and 2 interventions, and many of the Level 3 interventions. We recommend the expanded renoprotection strategy.

CONCLUSION

This work advances the hypothesis that, until better information becomes available, a broad-based, multiple-risk-factor intervention intended to slow the progression of renal disease can be justified in those with progressive nephropathies. This work is intended primarily for clinical nephrologists and thus each recommended intervention is described in substantial practical detail.

Blood pressure in diabetic nephropathy--current controversies

Hypertension has been recognized as an early and constant feature of diabetic nephropathy, but recent studies also suggest that a genetic predisposition to hypertension is an important risk factor for diabetic nephropathy. Antihypertensive treatment attenuates progression in diabetic nephropathy, but there is increasing evidence that very early treatment and very low target blood pressures should be implemented. There is also evidence for local activation of the renin system in the kidney as a result of hyperglycaemia. Apart from blood pressure, proteinuria should be monitored and dosing of ACE inhibitors should be guided, also by reduction of protein excretion.

Treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

The prognosis of untreated patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is poor, as the disease progress to end-stage renal disease in approximately 50--70% of nephrotic patients. Although focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was initially considered to be a steroid-resistant disease, several studies have shown a better responsiveness to more prolonged courses of steroids. For patients with steroid-resistant or -dependent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, cyclosporine A and cytotoxic agents have shown efficacy in clinical trials. Plasmapheresis or LDL-apheresis may represent a rescue treatment in patients who do not respond to other therapies. The role of other agents used in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, including azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, pefloxacin or vitamin E is still poorly defined.

Comparison of the effects of an ACE inhibitor and alphabeta blocker on the progression of renal failure with left ventricular hypertrophy: preliminary report

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and alphabeta blocker in combination with a calcium antagonist on the progression of renal function and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with chronic renal insufficiency and hypertension. The 65 subjects in this study were recruited from a cohort of 316 patients. The main criteria for inclusion were echocardiographic diagnosis of LVH (posterior wall thickness >12 mm) and serum creatinine of more than 1.5 mg/dl. Antihypertensive treatments were switched to the combination of amlodipine at a dose of 5 mg and benazepril at a dose of 2.5 mg daily or the combination of amlodipine at a dose of 5 mg and arotinolol at a dose of 20 mg daily at random irrespective of whether or not patients had been previously treated. The follow-up period was 2 years. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly reduced from 150/90 +/- 15/11 mmHg to 130/75 +/- 11/9 mmHg (ACE) and the levels of serum creatinine were increased significantly from 1.8 +/- 0.3 to 2.0 +/- 0.4 mg/dl (ACE). In the alphabeta-blocker group, these two values were similar and no significant changes were found. PWT was decreased from 14.2 +/- 0.6 to 12.9 +/- 0.3 cm in alphabeta blocker but was not significantly decreased in the ACE inhibitor group. In conclusion, combination therapy with a calcium antagonist and abeta blocker might be effective treatment for hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Late escape from the antiproteinuric effect of ace inhibitors in nondiabetic renal disease

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors exert a renoprotective effect in both diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease with variable efficacy. Proteinuric patients with nondiabetic renal disease, normotension, and restricted protein and sodium intake were treated with ACE inhibitors without diuretics. Fifty-nine patients were treated with either lisinopril (10 mg/d; 36 patients) or enalapril (5 mg/d; 23 patients) over a period of 37.7 +/- 20.7 months. Urinary protein excretion decreased to less than 50% of pretreatment values after 1 to 37 months (6.9 +/- 8.8 months) of therapy in 33 patients (56%); in 29 patients, it reached less than 0.5 g/d of protein. Urinary protein levels remained low in 19 of the 33 patients (57.5%) throughout the entire posttreatment period (30.8 +/- 17.7 months). However, in the remaining 14 patients, escape from the antiproteinuric effect was detected after 19.2 +/- 13.4 months, evidenced by a decrease in the rate of change in creatinine clearance from 0.052 +/- 0.114 mL/min/mon during the low-proteinuria period to -0.697 +/- 1.101 mL/min/mon after the lapse of antiproteinuric effect (P: < 0.001). Although ACE inhibitors reduce the severity of proteinuria in patients with nondiabetic renal disease, our results show that a proportion of patients escape the antiproteinuric effect and subsequently develop an exacerbation of renal dysfunction.

Effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor benazepril in cats with induced renal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

To determine effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor benazepril in cats with induced renal insufficiency.

ANIMALS

32 cats.

PROCEDURE

Renal mass was surgically reduced, and cats were assigned to 1 of 4 eight-cat groups. Group 1 received placebo, whereas groups 2, 3, and 4 received benazepril hydrochloride orally once daily for approximately 6.5 months at the following doses: group 2, 0.25 to 0.50 mg/kg of body weight; group 3, 0.50 to 1.00 mg/kg; and group 4, 1.00 to 2.00 mg/kg. Arterial blood pressures, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and renal plasma flow were determined before treatment and during the treatment period. Other determinants of renal hemodynamics were measured by use of micropuncture techniques. Renal biopsy specimens were examined microscopically.

RESULTS

Compared with cats that received placebo, mean systolic arterial blood pressure was significantly less and GFR significantly greater in cats that received benazepril. Glomerular capillary pressure and the ratio of efferent to afferent arteriolar vascular resistance were also significantly less in treated cats. However, histologic differences in renal specimens were not detected.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Treatment with benazepril sustained single nephron GFR in remnant nephrons of cats with induced renal insufficiency. Administration of benazepril was also associated with a small but significant reduction in degree of systemic hypertension and an increase in whole kidney GFR. Benazepril may be an effective treatment to slow the rate of progression of renal failure in cats with renal disease.

Diuretics versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Hypertension, which occurs commonly and early in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), affects both renal and patient outcome. However, there is no consensus about the type of antihypertensive therapy that is most appropriate for patients with ADPKD. This historical prospective, nonrandomized study was designed to investigate the effect on renal function of diuretics versus angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in hypertensive patients with ADPKD who entered the study with comparable renal function. Among hypertensive ADPKD patients followed in our center, patients taking diuretics without any ACE inhibitors were included in the diuretic group (n = 14, male/female ratio 5/9, mean age 47 years), whereas patients taking ACE inhibitors but no diuretics were included in the ACE inhibitor (ACEI) group (n = 19, male/female ratio 11/8, mean age 41 years). For comparable blood pressure control, 21% of the ACEI group and 64% of the diuretic group (p < 0.05) needed additional antihypertensive medications. After an average follow-up period of 5.2 years, the creatinine clearance decreased significantly in the diuretic group (74 vs. 46 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.0001) and in the ACEI group (83 vs. 71 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.0005). The decrement in creatinine clearance was significantly larger in the diuretic group than the ACEI group (p < 0.05). The annual decrease in creatinine clearance was 5.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the diuretic group and 2.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the ACEI group (p < 0.05). A significant increase in urinary protein excretion occurred in the diuretic but not in the ACEI group. Hypertensive ADPKD patients treated with diuretics had a faster loss of renal function as compared with patients treated with ACE inhibitors, despite similar blood pressure control. This result will need to be further examined in a randomized study.

Effects of AT1 receptor antagonist on proteoglycan gene expression in hypertensive rats

Proteoglycans are an important component of the extracellular matrix, and are thought to play multiple roles not only in kidney remodeling, but also in regulating glomerular permeability, and in modulating the activity of other cytokines and growth factors. The aim of this study was to examine the gene expressions of proteoglycan core proteins in hypertensive rat kidneys, and their modulation by AT1 receptor antagonist. SHRSP/Izm rats and normotensive control WKY/Izm rats on a normal salt diet were treated with or without the AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan cilexetil (1 mg/kg/day) from 10 weeks to 22 weeks. At the end of the treatment period, renal tissue was excised, and gene expressions of the proteoglycan core proteins versican, perlecan, decorin, and biglycan were examined by Northern blot analysis and RT-PCR. Treatment with candesartan cilexetil caused significant decreases in blood pressure and amelioration of proteinuria and renal histological scores in the SHRSP/Izm rats. Compared to WKY/Izm rats, expression of biglycan mRNA showed a small increase in SHRSP/Izm rats which did not attain statistical significance. On the other hand, treatment with candesartan caused significant reductions in biglycan and decorin mRNA in the SHRSP/Izm rats. In contrast, the level of versican mRNA appeared to be increased after candesartan treatment. These results suggest that treatment with AT1 receptor antagonist was associated with diverse changes in renal proteoglycan gene expression in SHRSP/Izm rats. These changes could contribute to the beneficial effects of AT1 receptor antagonist on tissue remodeling and inhibition of disease progression in hypertensive rat kidneys.

Valsartan and the kidney: review of preclinical and clinical data

In both diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease, reducing blood pressure with antihypertensive therapy has beneficial effects on renal function. The key role of the renin-angiotensin system in blood pressure and volume homeostasis has long been established, but its importance for the overall normal functioning of the kidney itself is also increasingly being recognized. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, widely and successfully used in the treatment of hypertension, may also provide renal protection independent of blood pressure reduction; however, their relatively nonspecific mode of action in blocking an early metabolic step entails major clinical disadvantages, such as accumulation of bradykinin and substance P, that may cause the characteristic ACE-inhibitor side effects of persistent dry cough and, more rarely, angioneurotic edema. Angiotensin II antagonists or receptor blockers, a new class of antihypertensive agent, selectively antagonize the AT1 receptor subtype and, because of greater specificity, do not give rise to the side effects associated with ACE inhibitors. More important, these new drugs may have mechanistic advantages over other antihypertensives, including ACE inhibitors.

Tryptophan glycoconjugate as a novel marker of renal function

PURPOSE

Neither serum creatinine concentration nor creatinine clearance assess renal function accurately. Serum creatinine concentration is affected by muscle mass, and the creatinine clearance overestimates the glomerular filtration rate because of tubular secretion of creatinine. The present study was designed to determine whether serum concentrations of 2-(alpha-mannopyranosyl)-L-tryptophan (MPT), a tryptophan glycoconjugate, can be used as a marker of renal function.

METHODS

Clearances of MPT and of inulin were compared in normal rats and in rats with cisplatin-induced acute renal failure. We also compared the clearances of MPT and of creatinine with inulin clearance in 25 patients with chronic renal disease. Serum concentrations of MPT and creatinine as a function of MPT clearance were determined in 108 patients with chronic renal disease.

RESULTS

There was strong linear correlation between clearances of MPT and inulin in rats (r = 0.97) and humans (r = 0.87), indicating that renal handling of MPT is similar to that of inulin. In humans, linear regression analyses indicated that MPT was a better indicator of inulin clearance than was creatinine clearance. At the same level of renal function, serum creatinine concentrations tended to be lower in patients with less muscle mass (as indicated by a urinary creatinine excretion <1,000 mg in 24 hours) than in those who excreted >1,000 mg in 24 hours, whereas serum MPT concentrations were not affected by creatinine excretion.

CONCLUSION

MPT clearance can replace inulin clearance in the clinical setting. The serum MPT concentration is an accurate measure of renal function even in patients with diminished muscle mass, and thus is a better indicator of renal function than is the serum creatinine concentration.

New Aspects of the Treatment of Nephrotic Syndrome

Abstract.The nephrotic syndrome, caused by glomerulonephritis, diabetes mellitus, or amyloidosis, is still a therapeutic challenge. Newer therapeutic approaches may be sought in the fields of immunosuppression, nonspecific supportive measures, heparinoid administration, and removal of a supposed glomerular basement membrane toxic factor. In immunosuppression, the newer drugs now used in organ transplantation (cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil) can also be used in the treatment of glomerulonephritis. In nonspecific supportive treatment, angiotensin II receptor antagonists are now used in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Positive effects of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on the nephrotic syndrome have not yet been proven. Cyclooxygenase II inhibitors must be tested but probably have too many renal side effects, similar to those of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Heparinoids or glycosaminoglycans serve as polyanions and thus have protective effects on the negative charge of the glomerular basement membrane. They can now be administered as oral medications. The removal of a supposed glomerular basement membrane toxic factor that induces proteinuria has been attempted for 20 yr and now is usually performed using immunoadsorption. Especially in cases of recurrent nephrotic syndrome after renal transplantation for patients with glomerulonephritis, this approach has been successful in decreasing proteinuria, although in most cases its effect is not lasting but must be continuously renewed.

Captopril restores transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor and sensitivity to transforming growth factor-beta in murine renal cell cancer cells

PURPOSE

Captopril is known to inhibit the growth of renal cancer but the mechanism involved has been unclear. The current study elucidates the mechanism of captopril induced inhibition of the growth of the Renca mouse renal cancer cell line involving transforming growth factor-beta, which is known to be a growth inhibitory cytokine in epithelial cells and tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Transforming growth factor-beta in conditioned medium was measured by bioassay. Levels of transforming growth factor-beta and transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor expression messenger RNA were determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. Cell viability was determined by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and tetrazolium bromide assay.

RESULTS

Captopril (0.01 to 1 mM.) showed no significant effect on transforming growth factor-beta synthesis or transforming growth factor-beta messenger RNA in Renca cells. On the other hand, 1 mM. captopril significantly inhibited Renca cell growth. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry showed that 1 mM. captopril up-regulated type II receptor expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that captopril restores transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor expression and inhibits the growth of Renca cells by increasing their sensitivity to transforming growth factor-beta.

Mechanisms underlying renoprotection during renin-angiotensin system blockade

Potential determinants of chronic renal disease (CRD) progression were studied in male Munich-Wistar rats subjected to 5/6 nephrectomy and treated with candesartan (Csn; n = 30) or enalapril (Ena; n = 27) from 5 wk postsurgery. Despite control of systolic blood pressure (SBP; 24 wk: Csn = 143 +/- 9; Ena = 148 +/- 8 mmHg), urinary protein excretion rates (U(pr)V) increased over 24 wk (Csn = 92 +/- 10; Ena = 99 +/- 8mg/day). Glomerulosclerosis scores (GS) at 24 wk were similar for Csn (42 +/- 7%) vs. Ena (42 +/- 4%), values close to those of untreated controls at 12 wk (43 +/- 4%). At 24 wk, SBP and UprV correlated strongly with GS, together accounting for 72% of the variance in GS. Renal cortex mRNA levels (determined by competitive RT-PCR) for transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 were elevated in Csn and Ena at 12 wk and remained higher at 24 wk vs. sham. Strong correlations were evident among TGF-beta1, MCP-1, and interleukin-1beta and renal injury at 24 wk. Cns and Ena are thus equally effective renoprotective agents in this model. During renin-angiotensin system inhibition, renoprotection is dependent on control of both SBP and UprV. Incomplete suppression of renal cytokine gene expression may also contribute to CRD progression.

Renoprotective effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in experimental chronic renal failure

We compared the antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker verapamil in the rat with chronic renal failure. One month after five-sixths nephrectomy, male WKY rats were treated for 2 months with either losartan or verapamil. Both resulted in a similar reduction in blood pressure: from 147.1 to 112 mm Hg in losartan-treated and from 155 to 118 mm Hg (p = NS) in verapamil-treated rats. Losartan improved the creatinine clearance (difference + 17.1% as compared with + 6.6% for verapamil, p = 0.039) and prevented the increase in proteinuria: 12.26 +/- (SE) 2.33 mg/day before and 18.48 +/- 2.19 mg/day (p = NS) after therapy in the losartan-treated and 17.27 +/- 2.73 mg/day before and 32.27 +/- 10.29 mg/day after therapy (p = 0.0484) in the verapamil-treated group. In addition, losartan resulted in minimal mesangial proliferation and significantly less glomerular sclerosis and thickening of the small arterial and arteriolar walls. The changes in interstitial fibrosis and tubular hypertrophy, however, were similar in both the verapamil- and losartan-treated groups. Treatment with losartan 1 month after five-sixths nephrectomy in male WKY rats resulted in reduced blood pressure, similar to that of the verapamil-treated group. However, despite similar antihypertensive properties, losartan improved creatinine clearance and reduced proteinuria. The losartan-treated group also had a marked reduction in mesangial proliferation and less glomerular sclerosis and less reduced vascular wall thickness in renal small arteries and arterioles. However, losartan did not totally eliminate nephrosclerosis. The tubular and interstitial changes were fewer in the losartan-treated group. Thus losartan has an additional, although only partial, renoprotective effect when compared with verapamil.