Treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Overview of Current Immunotherapies Targeting Mutated KRAS Cancers

The occurrence of somatic substitution mutations of the KRAS proto-oncogene is highly prevalent in certain cancer types, which often leads to constant activation of proliferative pathways and subsequent neoplastic transformation. It is often seen as a gateway mutation in carcinogenesis and has been commonly deemed as a predictive biomarker for poor prognosis and relapse when conventional chemotherapeutics are employed. Additionally, its mutational status also renders EGFR targeted therapies ineffective owing to its downstream location. Efforts to discover new approaches targeting this menacing culprit have been ongoing for years without much success, and with incidences of KRAS positive cancer patients being on the rise, researchers are now turning towards immunotherapies as the way forward. In this scoping review, recent immunotherapeutic developments and advances in both preclinical and clinical studies targeting K-ras directly or indirectly via its downstream signal transduction machinery will be discussed. Additionally, some of the challenges and limitations of various K-ras targeting immunotherapeutic approaches such as vaccines, adoptive T cell therapies, and checkpoint inhibitors against KRAS positive cancers will be deliberated.

[Cancer patients in operative intensive care medicine]

Die Prävalenz onkologischer Erkrankungen ist in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten stetig angestiegen. Durch neue Therapieoptionen können immer mehr Patienten mit einem kurativen Therapieansatz behandelt werden. Diese individualisierten und teilweise sehr aggressiven Therapien können jedoch auch zu schweren Nebenwirkungen führen. Diese sollten als wichtige Differenzialdiagnosen zu anderen vitalbedrohlichen Krankheitsbildern auch dem im OP und als Intensivmediziner tätigen Anästhesisten bekannt sein. Krebspatienten werden häufig auf operativen Intensivstationen aufgenommen, um Komplikationen der malignen Grunderkrankung oder auch Nebenwirkungen einer operativen oder konservativen Therapie zu behandeln. Aktuelle Untersuchungen zeigen, dass die maligne Grunderkrankung entgegen bisheriger Annahme keinen wesentlichen Einfluss auf das Intensivüberleben hat. Bei der Aufnahme eines onkologischen Patienten sollte daher die akut vorliegende Organdysfunktion zunächst im Vordergrund stehen. Bei der Therapiezielplanung gilt es, nicht zu übersehen, wann ein kuratives in ein palliatives Konzept übergehen muss. Hierfür müssen neue Aufnahmestrategien und -kriterien entwickelt und evaluiert werden. In diesem Übersichtsartikel werden Diagnosen und Therapien häufiger intensivmedizinischer Krankheitsbilder von onkologischen Patienten sowie Nebenwirkungen moderner onkologischer Therapien dargelegt und Aufnahmestrategien für Patienten mit malignen Erkrankungen vorgestellt.

New and emerging systemic therapy options for well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Introduction: Well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with a wide range of clinical behavior. Multiple treatment modalities exist, including novel and emerging systemic options, and an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each is imperative for optimizing the outcomes of patients with GEP-NETs.Areas covered: While surgical resection remains the preferred treatment for localized well-differentiated GEP-NETs, treatment of unresectable disease depends on its extent, location, and distribution as well as underlying aspects of tumor biology. Isolated hepatic metastases can be successfully treated with liver-directed therapies such as hepatic arterial based therapies or ablation. Diffuse metastatic disease often requires systemic treatments such as molecular-targeted therapeutics, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), or traditional chemotherapy. Somatostatin analogs are often the primary treatment option capable of simultaneously inhibiting hormone production and slowing tumor growth.Expert opinion: Recent advances in systemic treatment options for advanced well-differentiated GEP-NETs have emerged due to an improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for tumor development and progression. Future research is needed to determine the optimal indications for and sequencing of these novel therapies.

Metabolic gene alterations impact the clinical aggressiveness and drug responses of 32 human cancers

Malignant cells reconfigure their metabolism to support oncogenic processes such as accelerated growth and proliferation. The mechanisms by which this occurs likely involve alterations to genes that encode metabolic enzymes. Here, using genomics data for 10,528 tumours of 32 different cancer types, we characterise the alterations of genes involved in various metabolic pathways. We find that mutations and copy number variations of metabolic genes are pervasive across all human cancers. Based on the frequencies of metabolic gene alterations, we further find that there are two distinct cancer supertypes that tend to be associated with different clinical outcomes. By utilising the known dose-response profiles of 825 cancer cell lines, we infer that cancers belonging to these supertypes are likely to respond differently to various anticancer drugs. Collectively our analyses define the foundational metabolic features of different cancer supertypes and subtypes upon which discriminatory strategies for treating particular tumours could be constructed.

Thermal Ablation of Metastatic Colon Cancer to the Liver

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is responsible for approximately 10% of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. Liver metastases are frequently seen at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease. Surgical resection is often considered as it provides long-term survival; however, few patients are candidates for resection. Percutaneous ablative therapies are also used in the management of this patient population. Different thermal ablation (TA) technologies are available including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation (MWA), laser, and cryoablation. There is growing evidence about the role of interventional oncology and image-guided percutaneous ablation in the management of metastatic colorectal liver disease. This article aims to outline the technical considerations, outcomes, and rational of TA in the management of patients with CRC liver metastases, focusing on the emerging role of MWA.

Increased Risk of Hypertension with Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Hypertension is associated with enzalutamide in the treatment of prostate cancer. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to determine the risk of hypertension. Databases including Pubmed and Google scholar were searched to identify randomized clinical trials with enzalutamide. A total of seven studies including 7347 patients were selected. The overall incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypertension were 11.9% (95%% CI: 8.8-16.0%) and 4.9% (95%% CI: 3.5-6.8%) respectively, with a relative risk of 2.82 (95%% CI: 2.34-3.38, p < 0.001) for all-grade and 2.27 (95%% CI: 1.73-2.96, p < 0.001) for high-grade. There was a significant risk of developing hypertension with enzalutamide.

Texture features of colorectal liver metastases on pretreatment contrast-enhanced CT may predict response and prognosis in patients treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy: a pilot study including comparison with standard chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Bevacizumab added to chemotherapy can improve survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but no predictive factors of efficacy are available in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to assess the predictive and prognostic value of texture analysis on pretreatment contrast-enhanced CT in patients affected by colorectal liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients with colorectal liver metastases were retrospectively included in the study: 23 treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy (group A), and 20 with standard chemotherapy (group B). Target liver lesions were analyzed by texture analysis of pretreatment contrast-enhanced CT. Texture analysis produced the parameter uniformity, describing lesion heterogeneity. Radiological response was classified after 3 months according to RECIST-1.1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were considered to be outcome indicators. Multivariable logistic regression and survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Uniformity was lower in responders than in nonresponders (p < 0.001) in group A but not in group B. Lesion CT density was lower in nonresponders in both groups (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). In group A, uniformity was independently correlated with radiological response (odds ratio = 20, p = 0.01), OS and PFS (relative risks 6.94 and 5.05, respectively; p = 0.005 and p = 0.004, respectively). In group B, no variables were correlated with radiological response, OS or PFS.

CONCLUSION

Texture analysis on contrast-enhanced CT stratified response probability and prognosis in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy. This result was specific for the bevacizumab group.

Incidence and Risk of Fatal Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Agents: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background/Aim: Agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway have dramatically improved the outlook of cancer treatment. Meanwhile, it is well-known that they are associated with increases in the risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs). Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-targeted drugs have been approved for the treatment of several malignancies. However, little is known regarding the FAEs induced by VEGFR2-targeted agents across different tumor types and treatment regimens. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase database from January 1966 to April 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to calculate the incidence and relative risks (RRs) of FAE. Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 6,982 subjects with solid tumors were included in this study. The overall incidence of FAEs associated with VEGFR2-targeted agents was 1.7% (95% CI: 0.9-2.4%). Compared with controls, the administration of VEGFR2-targeted agents did not increase the risk of FAEs (RR, 1.29; 95% CI: 0.90-1.86). No significant association was found between FAE and VEGFR2-targeted agents in subgroup analyses based on tumor type, treatment strategy, clinical phase, masking method, median treatment duration, and approval status. Additionally, FAEs occurred in the major organ systems dispersedly. Trial sequential analysis revealed that our results are solid and further studies are unlikely to change this. Conclusions: VEGFR2-targeted agents were not associated with an increased risk of FAEs.

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Infants With Retinopathy of Prematurity by Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Among extremely preterm infants, we evaluated whether bevacizumab therapy compared with surgery for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is associated with adverse outcomes in early childhood.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on preterm (22-26 + 6/7 weeks' gestational age) infants admitted to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers who received bevacizumab or surgery exclusively for ROP. The primary outcome was death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 18 to 26 months' corrected age (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition cognitive or motor composite score <70, Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale level ≥2, bilateral blindness or hearing impairment).

RESULTS

The cohort (N = 405; 214 [53%] boys; median [interquartile range] gestational age: 24.6 [23.9-25.3] weeks) included 181 (45%) infants who received bevacizumab and 224 (55%) who underwent ROP surgery. Infants treated with bevacizumab had a lower median (interquartile range) birth weight (640 [541-709] vs 660 [572.5-750] g; P = .02) and longer durations of conventional ventilation (35 [21-58] vs 33 [18-49] days; P = .04) and supplemental oxygen (112 [94-120] vs 105 [84.5-120] days; P = .01). Death or severe NDI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 2.14) and severe NDI (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.70) did not differ between groups. Odds of death (aOR 2.54 [95% CI 1.42 to 4.55]; P = .002), a cognitive score <85 (aOR 1.78 [95% CI 1.09 to 2.91]; P = .02), and a Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale level ≥2 (aOR 1.73 [95% CI 1.04 to 2.88]; P = .04) were significantly higher with bevacizumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter cohort of preterm infants, ROP treatment modality was not associated with differences in death or NDI, but the bevacizumab group had higher mortality and poor cognitive outcomes in early childhood. These data reveal the need for a rigorous appraisal of ROP therapy.

A Pilot Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin Combined with Bevacizumab followed by Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Kaposi Sarcoma

PURPOSE

VEGF-A is important in the pathogenesis of Kaposi sarcoma, and bevacizumab has a response rate of 31%. We explored the combination of bevacizumab with liposomal doxorubicin in patients with Kaposi sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with Kaposi sarcoma requiring systemic therapy were enrolled in one of two cohorts. Cohort 1 included patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative Kaposi sarcoma or with HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma who would not be expected to respond to antiretroviral therapy (ART) alone (i.e., either stable or progressive Kaposi sarcoma on ART). Cohort 2 included all other patients with HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma. Patients were treated with six cycles of liposomal doxorubicin with bevacizumab every 3 weeks followed by up to 11 cycles of bevacizumab alone.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled: 10 (two HIV negative) in cohort 1 and six in cohort 2. Fourteen patients had advanced disease (AIDS Clinical Trials Group T1). Overall response rate (complete and partial responses) was 56% [80% confidence interval (CI), 38%-74%] for all patients and were similar in the two cohorts. Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.5 months-not estimable). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events attributed to therapy included hypertension (n = 5), neutropenia (n = 6), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 1), and cerebral ischemia (n = 1). There was a significant decrease in VEGF-A levels from baseline to the end of six cycles of combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with bevacizumab has activity in advanced Kaposi sarcoma, but it is unclear whether the combination yields better outcomes than liposomal doxorubicin used alone.

Risk of Adverse Vascular Events in Patients with Malignant Glioma Treated with Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab plus irinotecan is a new beneficial chemotherapy strategy for patients with malignant glioma. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the risk of adverse vascular events in adults with malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed were searched, and relevant trials were identified up to June 2018. Two investigators screened all titles and abstracts for possible inclusion and extracted data independently. Six studies were included, and 5 of them in the control group using bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab with temozolomide. Three systems were used to assess the quality of evidence and the level of recommendation. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence (2009) system was used to classify the evidence into 5 levels (classes I-V). The star system from the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodological quality. The GRADE profiler was used to evaluate the overall body of evidence.

RESULTS

Our data show that bevacizumab plus irinotecan therapy does not significantly affect the risk of systemic adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-3.18). Patients treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan had a similar risk of hematotoxicity (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.26-4.38), thrombocytopenia (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.25-4.63), and hypertension (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.28-6.36) compared with the control group (those treated without irinotecan). Thrombosis occurred more frequently in patients treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan compared with the control group (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.47-7.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of systemic adverse events was not significantly different between patients with malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan and the control group. The risks of hematotoxicity, thrombocytopenia, and hypertension were similar in the 2 groups. The risk of thrombosis was higher in patients treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan. Monitoring for thrombosis and administering anticoagulant therapy as necessary merit promotion for patients with malignant glioma receiving treatment with bevacizumab plus irinotecan.

Use of Bevacizumab for Elderly Patients With Stage IV Colon Cancer: Analysis of SEER-Medicare Data

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab is used for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer in conjunction with first-line chemotherapy. In this study, we examined receipt of first-line bevacizumab and predictors of its use among older patients with stage IV colon cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset to identify patients with stage IV colon cancer diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 who received FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan) as first-line therapy. We used multivariable regression analysis to determine demographic and clinical factors associated with use of concomitant bevacizumab.

RESULTS

We identified 3785 patients with stage IV colon cancer who met our eligibility criteria. Of these, 2352 (62.1%) received bevacizumab. Bevacizumab use has decreased over time from 68.2% in 2005 to 57.6% in 2013 (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.97). Patients were less likely to receive bevacizumab if they were older (compared with 65-69 years, ≥ 80 years: OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80), or had multiple comorbidities (compared with comorbidity score of 0, score of 1: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89).

CONCLUSION

Over one-half of elderly patients received bevacizumab as part of their first-line therapy for stage IV colon cancer. Bevacizumab use has been slowly decreasing since 2005. Newer anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments have not been supplanting bevacizumab, as first-line biologic use in general has also decreased during this time period.

Antiangiogenic Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal carcinoma is the third most common cancer worldwide. Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer will have metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis, and approximately 30% to 50% of patients with primary colon cancer will relapse and die of metastatic cancer. The 5-year survival rate of metastatic colorectal cancer remains disappointing at approximately 10%.Angiogenesis plays a significant role in tumor growth and metastasis in colorectal carcinoma. There are currently 4 US Food and Drug Administration-approved antiangiogenic agents for metastatic colorectal cancer. Bevacizumab is the only antiangiogenic agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Other antiangiogenic agents include ramucirumab, ziv-aflibercept, and regorafenib. We review the data supporting the use of antiangiogenics in this disease.

Risk of hypertension in cancer patients treated with abiraterone: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is one of the major side effects associated with abiraterone in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The specific contribution of abiraterone to hypertension has not been defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to determine its overall risk.

METHODS

Databases including Pubmed (up to July 2018) and Google scholar (up to July 2018) were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were prospective randomized clinical trials with prostate cancer treated with abiraterone and prednisone. The incidence and relative risk (RR) of hypertension was calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects model depending on the heterogeneity of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of five studies including 5445 patients were selected for analysis. Among patients receiving abiraterone, the overall incidences of all grade and high grade (grade 3 and 4) were 21.9% (95% CI: 13.6-33.2%) and 10.2% % (95% CI: 6.9-11.6%). Abiraterone was associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension of all grade with a relative risk of 1.80 (95% CI: 1.47-2.19%, p < 0.001) and high grade with a relative risk of 2.11 (95%CI: 1.66-2.68%, p < 0.001) in comparison with controls. The risk of hypertension may be affected by concurrent use of prednisone with 5 mg daily is associated with higher incidence than that of prednisone 5 mg twice daily (32.4% vs 16.5%).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant increase of developing hypertension in prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone. Appropriate monitoring and management is strongly recommended to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and treatment interruptions.

Risk of hypertension in Cancer patients treated with Abiraterone: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is one of the major side effects associated with abiraterone in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The specific contribution of abiraterone to hypertension has not been defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to determine its overall risk.

METHODS

Databases including Pubmed (up to July 2018) and Google scholar (up to July 2018) were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were prospective randomized clinical trials with prostate cancer treated with abiraterone and prednisone. The incidence and relative risk (RR) of hypertension was calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects model depending on the heterogeneity of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of five studies including 5445 patients were selected for analysis. Among patients receiving abiraterone, the overall incidences of all grade and high grade (grade 3 and 4) were 21.9% (95% CI: 13.6-33.2%) and 10.2% % (95% CI: 6.9-11.6%). Abiraterone was associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension of all grade with a relative risk of 1.80 (95% CI: 1.47-2.19%, p < 0.001) and high grade with a relative risk of 2.11 (95%CI: 1.66-2.68%, p < 0.001) in comparison with controls. The risk of hypertension may be affected by concurrent use of prednisone with 5 mg daily is associated with higher incidence than that of prednisone 5 mg twice daily (32.4% vs 16.5%).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant increase of developing hypertension in prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone. Appropriate monitoring and management is strongly recommended to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and treatment interruptions.

The emerging role of targeted therapies for advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are unique and complex neoplasms, exhibiting a wide spectrum of diverse clinical behaviors. The contemporary management of well-differentiated GEP-NETs is marked by the availability of a wide range of targeted therapies. Areas Covered: For patients with localized or oligometastatic disease, surgical resection remains the preferred approach and is associated with excellent long-term outcomes. For patients with unresectable but isolated liver metastases, multiple liver-directed therapies, including hepatic arterial based therapies and ablative techniques, exist. For patients with metastatic and progressive disease, a number of systemic therapies exist: molecular targeted agents, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and systemic chemotherapy. Furthermore, somatostatin analogs (SSA) are an important component of therapy, both effectively controlling symptoms of hormonal overproduction and contributing to slowing tumor progression. Expert Opinion: In the near future, advances in our understanding of tumor biology, genetics, immunology, nanotechnology, and radiation pharmacology should only continue to expand the availability of targeted therapies, improving the outcomes of patients with GEP-NETs. We herein review the management of advanced well-differentiated GEP-NETS with a particular emphasis on the role of targeted therapies.

Risk of serious adverse event and fatal adverse event with molecular target anticancer drugs in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Molecular target anticancer drugs are commonly used in various forms of cancers. It is a concern that the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) and fatal adverse events (FAEs) of molecular target drugs are increasing. An up-to-date meta-analysis of all Phase II/III/IV randomized trials of molecular target anticancer drugs was conducted to calculate the increased risk of SAEs and FAEs. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to April 6, 2017, was conducted. The study enrolled Phase II/III/IV randomized trials of cancer that compared molecular target drugs alone versus placebo or performed single-arm analysis of molecular target drugs. Data on SAEs and FAEs were extracted from the included studies and pooled to compute risk ratio (RR), the overall incidence, and 95% confidence interval (CI). In this meta-analysis, a total of 19,965 and 26,642 patients in randomized 53 and 65 Phase II/II/IV trials were included in the analysis of SAEs and FAEs associated with molecular target anticancer drug, respectively. There were significant differences in the relationship of molecular target anticancer drugs with SAEs (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.35-1.82, P < 0.01, I2 = 81%) and FAEs (RR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.19-1.91, P < 0.01, I2 = 0%) compared to placebo. The overall incidence of SAEs and FAEs was 0.269 (95% CI = 0.262-0.276, P < 0.01) and 0.023 (95% CI = 0.020-0.025, P < 0.01), respectively. Molecular target anticancer drugs significantly increased the risk of SAEs and FAEs. For patients taking molecular target drugs, efforts are needed to prevent the occurrence of SAEs and FAEs.

Risk of Systemic Adverse Events Associated with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema in Routine Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pharmacotherapy has become standard of care for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). The systemic safety profile of this treatment in routine clinical practice remains incompletely understood. We used a large claims database to investigate the risk of systemic serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients receiving anti-VEGF for DME compared with controls treated with macular laser photocoagulation or intravitreal corticosteroid.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

By using a large U.S. insurance database, we identified privately insured and Medicare Advantage patients aged ≥18 years treated with anti-VEGF for DME between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015, along with control patients receiving macular laser or corticosteroid. We included patients with 1 year of medical coverage before initial DME treatment.

METHODS

We assessed associations between treatment modalities and predefined systemic outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression. We performed 2 separate comparisons, one between anti-VEGF and macular laser and one between anti-VEGF and corticosteroid. We used inverse propensity score weighting for the first comparison to account for treatment selection bias. For the second, we used 2:1 propensity score matching on demographics, year, and baseline comorbidities because of the smaller number of corticosteroid-treated patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk of cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and all-cause hospitalization occurring within 6 months of initial DME treatment as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 23 348 patients receiving treatment for DME met inclusion criteria; 13 365 received macular laser, 9219 received intravitreal anti-VEGF, and 764 received intravitreal corticosteroid as initial treatment. Anti-VEGF pharmacotherapy was not associated with an increased hazard of cerebrovascular disease (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65-1.41; P = 0.83), major bleeding (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.76-1.99; P = 0.41), or myocardial infarction (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.73-1.44; P = 0.88) when compared with macular laser for DME; however, there was an increased hazard of post-treatment all-cause hospital admission (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.30; P = 0.01). The rates of all primary systemic SAE outcomes were similar after treatment with anti-VEGF versus corticosteroid (P > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified no increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding within 6 months after intravitreal anti-VEGF pharmacotherapy for the treatment of DME in routine clinical practice. A potential difference in all-cause hospitalization may merit further investigation.

Clinical outcomes and factors related to colonic perforations in patients receiving self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although colonic perforation is a dreadful adverse event associated with stent placement, data on this topic are sparse. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of colonic perforation and factors related to its occurrence in patients who received self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for malignant colorectal obstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 474 patients with malignant colorectal obstruction who received endoscopic SEMS insertion from April 2004 to May 2011 in Severance Hospital and Gangnam Severance Hospital. Early perforation, defined as perforation occurring within 2 weeks, was assessed in bridge-to-surgery (n = 164) and palliative stent placement patient groups (n = 310). Delayed perforation was analyzed using data from the palliative stent placement group alone.

RESULTS

The technical and clinical success rates were 90.5% and 81.0%, respectively. Early and delayed perforations occurred in 2.7% (13/474) and 2.7% (8/301) of patients, respectively. Among 21 patients with perforation, 14 (66.7%) received emergency surgery and 5 (23.8%) died within 30 days after perforation. Regarding the perforation-related factors, age ≥70 years (odds ratio, 3.276; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.041-10.309) and sigmoid colonic location (odds ratio, 7.706; 95% CI, 1.681-35.317) were independently associated with occurrence of early perforation. Stent location in the flexure (hazard ratio, 17.573; 95% CI, 2.004-154.093) and absence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (hazard ratio, 6.139; 95% CI, 1.150-32.776) were significantly associated with delayed perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

The perforation-related 30-day mortality rate was 23.8%. Older age and sigmoid colonic location were significantly associated with occurrence of early perforation, whereas flexure location and absence of peritoneal carcinomatosis were related to delayed perforation.

Nerve/Glial Antigen 2: A Novel Target for Anti-Tumor Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To identify cell surface markers selectively expressed by tumor cells and tumor vasculature is the current goal for tumor therapy. One such marker is nerve/glial antigen 2 (NG2), which is a transmembrane glycoprotein. We aimed to investigate the expression of NG2 in colorectal cancer (CRC) and its association with clinicopathological parameters.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining of NG2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and CD34 in 65 patients diagnosed with CRC over a 5-year period was performed. NG2 expression in both tumor cells and tumor vasculature was scored according to the German Reactive Scoring System. The association between NG2 and patient and tumor characteristics was analyzed.

RESULTS

NG2 was expressed by tumor cells in 56.9%, tumor vasculature in 43%, and simultaneously by both in 27.6% of the cases. Tumor cell NG2 was more common in elderly patients (p = 0.023) and vascular NG2 was associated with better tumor differentiation (p = 0.035). Notably, vascular NG2 was expressed in half of the patients with left colon cancer, although it was not expressed in a majority of those with right colon cancer (50.9 vs. 17.7%, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Both tumor cell and vascular NG2 expression were shown to be present in a significant number of patients with CRC and this makes NG2 a double target for anti-tumor therapies. Such therapies might be more effective for elderly patients with well-differentiated left colon cancer.

The use of and adherence to CTCAE v3.0 in cancer clinical trial publications

Background

The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) was released in 2003, and has been widely used as the predominant set of toxicity criteria for cancer clinical trials and scientific meetings. However, the degree to which the elements of CTCAE v3.0 are followed in oncology publications has not been comprehensively evaluated.

Methods

We reviewed phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating systemic cancer therapies, published between Jan 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013, to identify eligible studies that explicitly mentioned using CTCAE v3.0 as the toxicity criteria. A 10-point score based on adherence to CTCAE v3.0 was used to assess the studies. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify features associated with improved adherence.

Results

In total, 104 publications reporting data on 86,957 patients were included in this analysis. The mean total score for adherence to all four elements of CTCAE v3.0 was 4.03 on a 10-point scale (range, 1 to 9), with 16 publications (15%) having total scores ≤2. Highly heterogeneous and unstandardized adverse event terms were frequently used. In addition, Supra-ordinate terms, terms using ‘Other, specify’, and Grades were often used incorrectly. The multivariate regression model revealed that the absence of a placebo (P=0.003) and a higher total number of AE terms in the table (P<0.001) were independent predictors of a lower total score.

Conclusion

Given the importance of understanding the toxicity of new treatments, better adherence to CTCAE v3.0 should be encouraged to ensure the consistency and comparability of toxicity data across different studies.

The efficacy of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are at tremendous risk of metastatic diseases. To improve the prognoses of LARC patients, the efficacy of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy has been investigated by many researchers but remains controversial. A literature search of relevant databases was conducted through December 2016, 804 studies were identified and 32 investigations were ultimately included. A total of 1196 patients from 31 cohorts of 29 studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis in this single‐arm setting meta‐analysis. As pathologic complete response (pCR) shows promise as a prognosis indicator, we focused on pCR rates to evaluate whether adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapies improves the outcome of LARC patients. In our study, we revealed pooled estimates of pCR of 27% (95%CI, 21–34%) and 14% (95%CI, 9–21%) for bevacizumab‐relevant cohorts and cetuximab‐relevant cohorts, respectively. The safety of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy was also evaluated by pooling the data of Grade 3/4 toxicity. In conclusion, our study revealed that adding bevacizumab to the neoadjuvant therapy regimens provides appreciable pCR for LARC patients. Meanwhile, the efficacy of cetuximab remains inconclusive, RCTs with larger scale and better study design that stress more on mutational status are needed.

The impact of PD-L1 on survival and value of the immune check point inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer; proposal, policies and perspective

BACKGROUND

The impact of programmed death receptor-ligand1 (PD-L1) on costs and value of the immune check point inhibitors (ICPI) has received minimal attention.

OBJECTIVES

1- Design a sliding scale to grade survival in 2nd-line non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 2- Compare costs and value of Nivolumab (Nivo), Atezolizumab (Atezo) and Pembrolizumab (Pembro) vs. Docetaxel (Doc).

METHODS

Previously reported median overall survival (OS) and prices posted by parent company were utilized. The OS gains over controls in days were graded (gr) from A+ to D. Docetaxel costs were calculated for 6-12 cycles and the ICPI for 1 year. Adverse events treatment costs (AEsTC) were reported separately. The cost/life-year gain (C/LYG) was computed as drug yearly-cost/OS gain over control in days × 360 days. The relative value of the ICPI were expressed as $100,000/C/LYG.

RESULTS

Costs of Doc 6 cycles were $23,868, OS/gr 87/C, AEs gr ¾ > 20%, AEsTC $1978 and 6- 12 cycle C/LYG $98,764 -$197,528. Nivo, Atezo and Pembro gr ¾ were < 20% at average costs of $1480. In non-squamous NSCLC, Nivo demonstrated OS/g 84/C and C/LYG $558,326 as compared with 264/A and $177,645 in PD-L1 > 10%. Atezolizumab OS/g were 87/B and C/LYG $551,407 improving in enriched PD-L1 to 162/A and $332,020 respectively. Pembrolizumab in PD-L1 > 1.0% demonstrated OS/g 57/C and C/LYG $659,059 improving in > 50% PD-L1 to 201/A and $186,897. PD-L1 enrichment increased RV of Nivo from 0.18 to 0.56, Atezo from 0.16 to 0.66 and Pembro from 0.15 to 0.53.

CONCLUSIONS

Simplified methodology to grade OS and weigh value of anticancer drugs was proposed. In 2nd-line non-squamous NSCLC, value of Doc, Nivo, Atezo and Pembro regardless of PDL-1 expression were limited and modest. Enrichment of PD-L1 resulted in unprecedented OS, improved grades and enhanced value at seemingly justifiable costs.

Co-delivery of doxorubicin and itraconazole by Pluronic® P123 coated liposomes to enhance the anticancer effect in breast cancers

A Pluronic® P123 modified liposome-based co-delivery system of hydrophilic doxorubicin and hydrophobic itraconazole for enhanced anticancer effect in breast cancers.

[Cancer patients in operative intensive care medicine]

Die Prävalenz onkologischer Erkrankungen ist in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten stetig angestiegen. Durch neue Therapieoptionen können immer mehr Patienten mit einem kurativen Therapieansatz behandelt werden. Diese individualisierten und teilweise sehr aggressiven Therapien können jedoch auch zu schweren Nebenwirkungen führen. Diese sollten als wichtige Differenzialdiagnosen zu anderen vitalbedrohlichen Krankheitsbildern auch dem im OP und als Intensivmediziner tätigen Anästhesisten bekannt sein. Krebspatienten werden häufig auf operativen Intensivstationen aufgenommen, um Komplikationen der malignen Grunderkrankung oder auch Nebenwirkungen einer operativen oder konservativen Therapie zu behandeln. Aktuelle Untersuchungen zeigen, dass die maligne Grunderkrankung entgegen bisheriger Annahme keinen wesentlichen Einfluss auf das Intensivüberleben hat. Bei der Aufnahme eines onkologischen Patienten sollte daher die akut vorliegende Organdysfunktion zunächst im Vordergrund stehen. Bei der Therapiezielplanung gilt es, nicht zu übersehen, wann ein kuratives in ein palliatives Konzept übergehen muss. Hierfür müssen neue Aufnahmestrategien und -kriterien entwickelt und evaluiert werden. In diesem Übersichtsartikel werden Diagnosen und Therapien häufiger intensivmedizinischer Krankheitsbilder von onkologischen Patienten sowie Nebenwirkungen moderner onkologischer Therapien dargelegt und Aufnahmestrategien für Patienten mit malignen Erkrankungen vorgestellt.

Retrospective analysis on the clinical efficacy of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX4 in the first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Objectives The addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy has been improved survival outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the combination of bevacizumab with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment showed limited survival benefit. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of the combination of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) in the first-line treatment of patient with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods Between December 2004 and September 2009, medical records of patients who were diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer and received the first line chemotherapy with bevacizumab and FOLFOX4, were retrospectively reviewed. Results A total of forty patients were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 33-80), and 55% was male. The patients received a total of 206 cycles of therapy (median 4 cycles per patient; range 1 – 15 cycles). Of these 40 patients, none achieved complete response (CR) and 15 achieved a partial response (PR), for the overall response rate (ORR) 37.5% (95% CI, 22.5-52.5). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% CI, 3.4-10.5) and median overall survival (OS) was 22.6 months (95% CI, 17.3-27.8The most common grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity and non-hematologic toxicity were neutropenia (10.0%) and diarrhea (10.0%), respectively. Two patients experienced gastrointestinal perforation. Conclusions In this study, the combination bevacizumab with FOLFOX4 was associated with favorable OS, but did not showed favorable PFS and ORR.

Risk of serious adverse events and fatal adverse events with sorafenib in patients with solid cancer: a meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials†

Background

Sorafenib is a multikinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitor commonly used in a variety of cancers. There are concerns about the increased risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) and fatal adverse events (FAEs) with sorafenib. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis of all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of sorafenib to quantify the increased risk of SAEs and FAEs.

Patients and methods

We carried out a systematic search of electronic databases for studies published from inception to February 2016 without any restrictions. Eligibility criteria included phase 3 RCTs of solid tumors comparing sorafenib, alone or in combination with nontargeted chemotherapy (Sorafenib arm) versus placebo or nontargeted chemotherapy (control arm). Data on SAEs and FAEs for both the arms were extracted from each study and pooled to determine the overall incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs).

Results

Of 471 studies identified, a total of 12 phase 3 RCTs involving 6797 solid cancer patients comparing sorafenib with control met the eligibility criteria and were included. The overall incidence of SAEs and FAEs with sorafenib were 26.4% (95% CI, 18.0-36.9%) and 1.3% (95% CI: 0.8-2.2%), respectively. Compared with control, sorafenib use significantly increased the risk of both SAEs (RR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.18-1.89, P = 0.001) and FAEs (RR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.05-3.14, P = 0.033). This association varied significantly with cancer types (P < 0.001) and approval status (P = 0.012) for SAEs but no evidence of heterogeneity was found for FAEs.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis of phase 3 RCTs demonstrates an increased risk of both SAEs and FAEs with sorafenib use in adult patients with solid cancers. This quantification of increased risks of SAEs and FAEs will be important in considering the trade-off of sorafenib treatment during shared decision-making.

The efficacy and safety of paclitaxel and carboplatin with versus without bevacizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To investigate the efficacy and safety of Bevacizumab (Bev) used in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC), compared with PC alone in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese Biomedical Literature electronic databases, to identify randomized controlled trials of PC plus Bev versus PC alone for the treatment of NSCLC. The meta-analysis was performed using Reviewer Manager Version 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), the incidence of severe adverse events and treatment-related deaths.

Results

The final analysis included 5 trials with a total of 1486 patients. Compared with PC alone, the regimen of PC plus Bev resulted in significantly longer PFS (HR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.71; p < 0.00001), longer OS (HR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.92; p = 0.0009) and higher response rates (RR = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.73 to 2.44; p < 0.00001). However, grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, haemoptysis, hypertension, proteinuria and bleeding events were more common among patients who received Bev, and these patients also experienced increased rates of treatment-related death.

Conclusions

Compared with PC alone, the combination of PC with Bev could prolong PFS, OS and RR for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. However, this combination could lead to a higher toxicity profile. Therefore, the benefits and risks should be considered before making treatment decisions.

Rare upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage of cetuximab: A case report

RATIONALE

cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, is a targeted therapeutic regimen of colorectal cancers. Several common adverse effects have been found, such as cutaneous or gastrointestinal toxicity. However, according to the articles had been published, upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is considered to be rare and its mechanism remains unclear.

PATIENT CONCERNS

In this report, we presented a 42-year-old male patient with advanced recto-sigmoid cancer. After palliative operation, the patient suffered from complete upper gastrointestinal (GI) obstruction, which was induced by extensive abdominal metastasis of the tumor. Considering his poor condition, we chose the targeted drug, cetuximab, as his further treatment. But after the application of cetuximab, the UGIB immediately happened twice in this patient.

DIAGNOSIS

UGIB, as a rare complication of cetuximab, occured to the patient.

INTERVENTIONS

We stopped the bleeding with thrombin, hemocoagulase and somatostatin and suspended the subsequent treatment plan of cetuximab. At the same time, anti-shock treatment was given immediately.

OUTCOMES

He was died of respiratory and circulatory failure caused by UGIB and advanced tumor eventually.

LESSONS

UGIB should be considered as a rare but severe complication of cetuximab. When cetuximab is applied for patients with advanced colon tumors, more cautions should be required if the patients are accompanied by upper gastrointestinal obstruction. In addition, for those patients who suffered from UGIB recently, cetuximab should be prohibited if the Rockall score ranged > 5 points.

Arg-Leu-Tyr-Glu tetrapeptide inhibits tumor progression by suppressing angiogenesis and vascular permeability via VEGF receptor-2 antagonism

The tetrapeptide Arg-Leu-Tyr-Glu (RLYE) is known to inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A)-induced angiogenesis in vitro. Herein, we examined its underlying mechanism and antitumor activity associated with vascular remodeling. RLYE inhibited VEGF-A-induced angiogenesis in a mouse model and suppressed VEGF-A-induced angiogenic signal cascades in human endothelial cells. However, RLYE showed no inhibitory effect on VEGF-A-induced proliferation and migration of multiple myeloma cells expressing VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1, but not VEGFR-2. In addition, RLYE showed no inhibitory effect on angiogenic activities induced by VEGF-B, basic fibroblast growth factor, epithermal growth factor, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and placental growth factor. RLYE bound specifically to VEGFR-2 at the VEGF-A binding site, thereby blocking VEGF-A-VEGFR-2 binding and VEGF-A-induced VEGFR-2 internalization. The RLYE peptide inhibited tumor growth and metastasis via suppression of tumor angiogenesis in tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, RLYE showed a synergistic effect of the cytotoxic agent irinotecan on tumor cell apoptosis and tumor progression via tumor vessel normalization due to stabilization of VE-cadherin-mediated adherens junction, improvement of pericyte coverage, and inhibition of vascular leakage in tumors. Our results suggest that RLYE can be used as an antiangiogenic and tumor blood vessel remodeling agent for inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis by antagonizing VEGFR-2, with the synergistic anti-cancer effect via enhancement of drug delivery and therapeutic efficacy.

Bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A critical review of phase III studies

Bevacizumab (BV) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and it is the first molecular-targeted agent to be used for the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC). Randomized Phase III trials evaluated the combination of BV plus standard chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced OC and for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrent OC. These trials reported a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival but not in overall survival. Furthermore, BV effectively improved the quality of life with regard to abdominal symptoms in recurrent OC patients. Bevacizumab is associated with adverse events such as hypertension, bleeding, thromboembolism, proteinuria, delayed wound healing, and gastrointestinal events. However, most of these events can be adequately managed. This review describes the latest evidence for BV treatment of OC and selection of patients for personalized treatment.

Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients With Cancer Treated With Bevacizumab: A Meta-Analysis of More Than 20 000 Patients

Background

The monoclonal antibody bevacizumab effectively inhibits angiogenesis in several types of cancers by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor. However, life‐threatening cardiovascular adverse effects could limit its use and may warrant specific follow‐up strategies.

Methods and Results

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials published until November 2016 that assessed patients with cancer treated with or without bevacizumab in addition to standard chemotherapy. A total of 20 050 patients with a broad range of cancer types from 22 studies were included in this analysis (10 394 in the bevacizumab group and 9656 in the control group). The risks of arterial and venous adverse events were higher in the bevacizumab groups (relative risk [RR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10–1.70 [P=0.004] and RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12–1.47 [P<0.001], respectively), and more arterial adverse events occurred in patients taking high‐dose bevacizumab regimens. Bevacizumab treatment was associated with the highest risk of cardiac and cerebral ischemia in the high‐dose bevacizumab groups (RR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.59–12.70 [P=0.004] and RR, 6.67; 95% CI, 2.17–20.66 [P=0.001], respectively). In addition, the risk of bleeding and arterial hypertension were higher in the bevacizumab groups (RR, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.38–3.15 [P<0.001] and RR, 4.73; 95% CI, 4.15–5.39 [P<0.00001], respectively), with higher values for patiens taking high‐dose regimens.

Conclusions

Treatment with bevacizumab increases the risk of arterial adverse events, particularly cardiac and cerebral ischemia, venous adverse events, bleeding, and arterial hypertension. This risk is additionally increased with high doses of bevacizumab. Further studies should determine the appropriate options for cardio‐oncology management.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk. Unique identifier: PROSPERO(CRD42016054305).

Molecular and Clinical Approach to Intra-abdominal Adverse Effects of Targeted Cancer Therapies

Targeted cancer therapies encompass an exponentially growing number of agents that involve a myriad of molecular pathways. To excel within this rapidly changing field of clinical oncology, radiologists must eschew traditional organ system-based approaches of cataloging adverse effects in favor of a conceptual framework that incorporates molecular mechanisms and associated clinical outcomes. Understanding molecular mechanisms that underlie imaging manifestations of adverse effects and known associations with treatment response allows radiologists to more effectively recognize adverse effects and differentiate them from tumor progression. Radiologists can therefore more effectively guide oncologists in the management of adverse effects and treatment decisions regarding continuation or cessation of drug therapy. Adverse effects from targeted cancer therapies can be classified into four categories: (a) category 1, on-target adverse effects associated with treatment response; (b) category 2, on-target adverse effects without associated treatment response; (c) category 3, off-target adverse effects; and (d) category 4, tumor necrosis-related adverse effects. This review focuses on adverse effects primarily within the abdomen and pelvis classified according to established or hypothesized molecular mechanisms and illustrated with images of classic examples and several potential emerging toxic effects. ^©RSNA, 2017.

Risk of treatment-related mortality in cancer patients treated with ipilimumab: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fatal adverse events (FAEs) have been reported in cancer patients receiving ipilimumab-a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, but the risk of treatment-related mortality is unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ipilimumab to determine the overall risk of FAEs associated with ipilimumab.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrial.gov and conference proceedings from inception to December 2016, for prospective trials that randomly assigned patients to ipilimumab treatment (with or without concurrent therapy) or controls with available data regarding incidence of FAEs. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Incidence of FAEs was pooled using a random effects model, and the risk of FAEs associated with ipilimumab was estimated using Peto odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

A total of 5775 patients with solid tumours included in 12 RCTs (10 from journal reports and 2 from ClinicalTrials.gov) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of FAEs for patients treated with ipilimumab was 1.13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.86), compared with 0.22% in the control arms. Ipilimumab was associated with statistically significantly increased risk of FAEs, with a pooled Peto OR of 2.3 (95% CI, 1.4-3.6; P < 0.001). Analyses according to cancer type (melanoma versus other cancers); treatment mode (combination therapy or monotherapy); control type (active control versus placebo/best supportive care only); ipilimumab dose (high versus low dose [10 versus 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks]) found no statistically significantly differential effect by subgroups. Among the specific causes of FAEs, ipilimumab was associated with an increased risk of fatal gastrointestinal toxicity, with an OR of 4.5 (95% CI, 1.5-13.6).

CONCLUSION

The use of ipilimumab, compared with controls, was associated with increased risk of treatment-related mortality.

Outcome of lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with previous anti-fibrotic therapy

BACKGROUND

Anti-fibrotic drugs may interfere with wound-healing after major surgery, theoretically preventing sufficient bronchial anastomosis formation after lung transplantation (LTx). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of previous treatment with pirfenidone and nintedanib on outcomes after LTx in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

METHODS

All patients with IPF undergoing LTx at the University of Munich between January 2012 and November 2016 were retrospectively screened for previous use of anti-fibrotics. Post-transplant outcome and survival of patients with and without anti-fibrotic treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients with IPF were transplanted (lung allocation score [mean ± SD] 53.1 ± 16.1). Of these, 23 (37.1%) received pirfenidone and 7 (11.3%) received nintedanib before LTx; the remaining 32 (51.6%) did not receive any anti-fibrotic drug (control group). Patients receiving anti-fibrotics were significantly older (p = 0.004) and their carbon monoxide diffusion capacity was significantly higher (p = 0.008) than in controls. Previous anti-fibrotic treatment did not increase blood product utilization, wound-healing or anastomotic complications after LTx. Post-transplant surgical revisions due to bleeding and/or impaired wound-healing were necessary in 18 (29.0%) patients (pirfenidone 30.4%, nintedanib 14.3%, control 31.3%; p = 0.66). Anastomosis insufficiency occurred in 2 (3.2%) patients, both in the control group. No patient died within the first 30 days post-LTx, and no significant differences regarding survival were seen during the follow-up (12-month survival: pirfenidone 77.0%, nintedanib 100%, control 90.6%; p = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Our data show that previous use of anti-fibrotic therapy does not increase surgical complications or post-operative mortality after LTx.

[Not Available]

Zusammenfassung. Zusammenfassung: Eine gute interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit ist in der Behandlung von Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs oder gynäkologisch-onkologischen Tumoren entscheidend. Meistens finden parallel zur onkologischen Behandlung regelmässige Konsultationen beim Allgemeinpraktiker und niedergelassenen Gynäkologen statt. Die Erkennung und frühe Behandlung potenzieller Nebenwirkungen von zielgerichteten onkologischen Therapien ist daher in der allgemeinen Praxis sehr wichtig. In diesem Artikel soll ein Überblick über die wichtigsten Nebenwirkungen zielgerichteter onkologischer Therapien in der gynäkologischen Onkologie und Brustkrebsbehandlung und deren Management gegeben werden.

Tumor angiogenesis revisited: Regulators and clinical implications

Since Judah Folkman hypothesized in 1971 that angiogenesis is required for solid tumor growth, numerous studies have been conducted to unravel the angiogenesis process, analyze its role in primary tumor growth, metastasis and angiogenic diseases, and to develop inhibitors of proangiogenic factors. These studies have led in 2004 to the approval of the first antiangiogenic agent (bevacizumab, a humanized antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor) for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This approval launched great expectations for the use of antiangiogenic therapy for malignant diseases. However, these expectations have not been met and, as knowledge of blood vessel formation accumulates, many of the original paradigms no longer hold. Therefore, the regulators and clinical implications of angiogenesis need to be revisited. In this review, we discuss recently identified angiogenesis mediators and pathways, new concepts that have emerged over the past 10 years, tumor resistance and toxicity associated with the use of currently available antiangiogenic treatment and potentially new targets and/or approaches for malignant and nonmalignant neovascular diseases.

Key points to optimizing management and research on cancer-associated thrombosis

Despite the fact that thromboembolism is relatively common in oncology patients and that the interrelationship between thrombotic risk and specific mechanisms of tumorigenesis has long been known, many cardinal elements of prevention and treatment remain unresolved. Among the existing knowledge gaps, the need to validate the Ay scale and compare it to the Khorana index, develop, and standardize the use of predictive biomarkers for thrombotic risk, conduct clinical trials in thromboprophylaxis adapted to thrombotic risk, evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct anticoagulants, select patients who can benefit from anticoagulants for antitumor treatment, validate the EPIPHANY study decision tree to choose patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism, and accumulate more practical experience in special situations (rethrombosis, prolonged therapy beyond 6 months, etc.) are especially remarkable. These gray areas surrounding cancer-related thromboembolism explain why it continues to be a relatively common cause of serious events, at times interfering significantly with the development of new tumor-fighting strategies.

Emerging growth factor receptor antagonists for the treatment of advanced melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Therapy for metastatic melanoma has undergone a rapid transformation over the past 5-10 years. Advances in immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors, including both anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1, have led to durable responses in up to 50% of patients. As our understanding of the processes driving the transformation of melanocytes has improved, progress in targeted therapies has also continued. Areas covered: Angiogenesis and the tumor's dependence on an expanded vascular supply has been a target for novel therapies since the 1970's, as this tissue is derived from endothelial cells that are genetically stable in adults. A phase II trial studying combined therapy with bevacizumab (an inhibitor of angiogenesis) and ipilimumab found promising results. Other agents such as sorafenib have not been as successful, failing to extend progression free or overall survival in clinical trials. In this paper other targeted growth factor inhibitors will also be discussed. Expert opinion: Ultimately, melanoma may not be vulnerable solely to chemotherapy or targeted therapy, but may be efficaciously treated with immunotherapy due to its high mutational rate resulting in the expression of numerous neo-antigens. Therapies with combinations of agents including growth factor receptor and either other targeted therapies or immunotherapy may be a promising complimentary approach.

Treatment-related severe and fatal adverse events with molecular targeted agents in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the incidence and risk of severe adverse events (AEs) with molecular targeted agents (MTAs) in advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for related trials published up to December 2015 was performed. Eligible studies were Phase III RCTs of advanced/metastatic GC patients assigned to MTAs or control group. Data were extracted by two authors for severe and fatal AEs (FAEs).

RESULTS

A total of nine Phase III RCTs involved 4,934 GC patients were ultimately identified. The pooled results demonstrated that the addition of TAs to therapies in advanced GC significantly increased the risk of developing severe AEs (relative risk: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.24, P=0.02), but not for FAEs (relative risk: 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.65-1.45, P=0.88). Additionally, the most common causes of FAEs with MTAs were infections (16.3%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (8.2%), and arterial thromboembolic events (8.2%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

With available evidence, the use of TAs in GC patients was associated with an increased risk of severe AEs, but not for FAE. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of severe AEs with the administration of these drugs in these patients.

New drugs, new toxicities: severe side effects of modern targeted and immunotherapy of cancer and their management

Pharmacological and cellular treatment of cancer is changing dramatically with benefits for patient outcome and comfort, but also with new toxicity profiles. The majority of adverse events can be classified as mild or moderate, but severe and life-threatening complications requiring ICU admission also occur. This review will focus on pathophysiology, symptoms, and management of these events based on the available literature.While standard antineoplastic therapy is associated with immunosuppression and infections, some of the recent approaches induce overwhelming inflammation and autoimmunity. Cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) describes a complex of symptoms including fever, hypotension, and skin reactions as well as lab abnormalities. CRS may occur after the infusion of monoclonal or bispecific antibodies (MABs, BABs) targeting immune effectors and tumor cells and is a major concern in recipients of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T lymphocytes as well. BAB and CAR T-cell treatment may also be compromised by central nervous system (CNS) toxicities such as encephalopathy, cerebellar alteration, disturbed consciousness, or seizures. While CRS is known to be induced by exceedingly high levels of inflammatory cytokines, the pathophysiology of CNS events is still unclear. Treatment with antibodies against inhibiting immune checkpoints can lead to immune-related adverse events (IRAEs); colitis, diarrhea, and endocrine disorders are often the cause for ICU admissions.Respiratory distress is the main reason for ICU treatment in cancer patients and is attributable to infectious agents in most cases. In addition, some of the new drugs are reported to cause non-infectious lung complications. While drug-induced interstitial pneumonitis was observed in a substantial number of patients treated with phosphoinositol-3-kinase inhibitors, IRAEs may also affect the lungs.Inhibitors of angiogenetic pathways have increased the antineoplastic portfolio. However, vessel formation is also essential for regeneration and tissue repair. Therefore, severe vascular side effects, including thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation, hypertension, and congestive heart failure, compromise antitumor efficacy.The limited knowledge of the pathophysiology and management of life-threatening complications relating to new cancer drugs presents a need to provide ICU staff, oncologists, and organ specialists with evidence-based algorithms.