Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Previously Treated With Sorafenib: The CheckMate 040 Randomized Clinical Trial

Advancements in second-line treatment research for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. Due to its insidious onset, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, often missing the opportunity for surgical resection. Consequently, systemic treatments play a pivotal role. In recent years, an increasing number of drugs have been approved for first-line systemic treatment of HCC. However, their efficacy is limited, and some patients develop drug resistance after a period of treatment. For such patients, there is currently a lack of standard second-line systemic treatment options. This review summarizes the latest advancements in second-line systemic treatment research for HCC patients who have developed resistance to various first-line systemic treatments, aiming to provide more rational and personalized second-line treatment strategies.

Nanomaterials for liver cancer targeting: research progress and future prospects

The incidence and mortality rates of liver cancer in China remain elevated. Although early-stage liver cancer is amenable to surgical resection, a significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Currently, in addition to surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, the primary treatment modalities predominantly include chemotherapy. The widespread use of chemotherapy, which non-selectively targets both malignant and healthy cells, often results in substantial immunosuppression. Simultaneously, the accumulation of chemotherapeutic agents can readily induce drug resistance upon reaching the physiological threshold, thereby diminishing the efficacy of these treatments. Besides chemotherapy, there exist targeted therapy, immunotherapy and other therapeutic approaches. Nevertheless, the development of drug resistance remains an inevitable challenge. To address these challenges, we turn to nanomedicine, an emerging and widely utilized discipline that significantly influences medical imaging, antimicrobial strategies, drug delivery systems, and other related areas. Stable and safe nanomaterials serve as effective carriers for delivering anticancer drugs. They enhance the precision of drug targeting, improve bioavailability, and minimize damage to healthy cells. This review focuses on common nanomaterial carriers used in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment over the past five years. The following is a summary of the three drugs: Sorafenib, Gefitinib, and lenvatinib. Each drug employs distinct nanomaterial delivery systems, which result in varying levels of bioavailability, drug release rates, and therapeutic efficacy.

Sophisticated roles of tumor microenvironment in resistance to immune checkpoint blockade therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a serious threat to global health, with rising incidence and mortality rates. Therapeutic options for advanced HCC are quite limited, and the overall prognosis remains poor. Recent advancements in immunotherapy, particularly immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting anti-PD1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4, have facilitated a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, demonstrating substantial survival benefits across various cancer types, including HCC. However, only a subset of HCC patients exhibit a favorable response to ICB therapy, and its efficacy is often hindered by the development of resistance. There are many studies to explore the underlying mechanisms of ICB response. In this review, we compiled the latest progression in immunotherapies for HCC and systematically summarized the sophisticated mechanisms by which components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) regulate resistance to ICB therapy. Additionally, we also outlined some scientific rationale strategies to boost antitumor immunity and enhance the efficacy of ICB in HCC. These insights may serve as a roadmap for future research and help improve outcomes for HCC patients.

Advances in Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Over the past several years, the therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma has been transformed by the incorporation of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy into the treatment paradigm. Frontline systemic treatment options have expanded beyond anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib, to a combination of immunotherapy approaches, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab, both of which have demonstrated superior response and survival to sorafenib. Additionally, combination treatments with checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been investigated with variable success. In this review, we discuss these advances in systemic treatment with immunotherapy, with a focus on understanding both the underlying biology and mechanism of these strategies and their efficacy outcomes in clinical trials. We also review challenges in identifying predictive biomarkers of treatments and discuss future directions with novel immunotherapy targets.

Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy alone in HER2(-) locally advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare the efficacy between neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant triplet vs . doublet chemotherapeutic regimens in locally advanced gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer (LAGC).

METHODS

We included LAGC patients from 47 hospitals in China's National Cancer Information Database (NCID) from January 2019 to December 2022. Using propensity score matching (PSM), we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy between neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy alone, and neoadjuvant triplet vs . doublet chemotherapeutic regimens. The primary study result was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary study results were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 1205 LAGC patients were included. After PSM, the ICIs plus chemotherapy and the chemotherapy cohorts had 184 patients each, while the doublet and triplet chemotherapy cohorts had 246 patients each. The pCR rate (14.13% vs . 7.61%, χ2 = 4.039, P = 0.044), and the 2-year (77.60% vs . 61.02%, HR = 0.67, 95% con-fidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.98, P = 0.048) and 3-year (70.55% vs . 61.02%, HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.32-0.93, P = 0.048) DFS rates in the ICIs plus chemotherapy cohort were improved compared to those in the chemotherapy cohort. No significant increase was observed in the OS rates at both 1 year and 2 years. The pCR rates, DFS rates at 1-3 years, and OS rates at 1-2 years did not differ significantly between the doublet and triplet cohorts, respectively. No differences were observed in postoperative complications between any of the group comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy improved the pCR rate and 2-3 years DFS rates of LAGC compared to chemotherapy alone, but whether short-term benefit could translate into long-term efficacy is unclear. The triplet regimen was not superior to the doublet regimen in terms of efficacy. The safety after surgery was similar between either ICIs plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy or the triplet and the doublet regimen.

Immunotherapy and MASLD-Related HCC: Should We Reconsider the Role of Etiology in the Therapeutic Approach to HCC?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of primary liver cancers and typically arises in the context of chronic liver disease. With the increasing prevalence of metabolic disorders, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has become the leading cause of chronic liver disease and the most rapidly increasing cause of HCC. The role of dysfunctional innate and adaptive immune responses in the development and progression of HCC is well-established, prompting numerous trials to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in targeting tumor cells. These trials have yielded promising results, and ICIs, in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies, are now approved as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic or unresectable HCC, irrespective of the underlying liver disease. Notably, MASLD itself is characterized by immune system dysfunction, as metabolic inflammation plays a central role in its onset and progression. However, clinical studies and post-hoc analyses suggest that immunotherapy may be less effective in MASLD-associated HCC compared to viral-related HCC. This emerging evidence raises the question of whether the underlying liver disease influences the therapeutic response to ICIs in HCC. It may be time to consider tailoring therapeutic strategies for HCC based on the specific etiological, histological, and genotypical subgroups.

Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

METHODS

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

RESULTS

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

Identification of HES4 as a novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hairy and enhancer of Split 4 (HES4) is thought to have a substantial impact on the pathogenesis and progression of malignancies. However, the prognostic significance and mechanism of HES4 have not been reported in Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of HES4 expression, clinicopathological characteristics, tumor microenvironment status, and drug sensitivity were performed based on TCGA, GTEx, and GEO. Paired HCC samples and cell lines were used to validate the dysfunction of HES4 in vitro. The expression of HES4 at both mRNA and protein levels was significantly upregulated in HCC tissues. High level of HES4 was associated with unfavorable outcomes. Enrichment analysis demonstrated strong associations of HES4 with HCC progression pathways. In addition, elevated HES4 expression was positively correlated with increased sensitivity to various chemotherapy drugs and associated with resistance to immunotherapy. As a transcription factor, the target genes regulated by HES4 were mostly risky genes, and a novel prediction model based on HES4 target genes was generated for HCC risk stratification. The AUCs of 1-, 3-, and 5-year year overall survival (OS) were 0.829, 0.732, and 0.700, respectively. HES4 overexpression is associated with poor clinical outcomes and tumor progression. HES4 may serve as a novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target in HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: signaling pathways and therapeutic advances

Liver cancer represents a major global health concern, with projections indicating that the number of new cases could surpass 1 million annually by 2025. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitutes around 90% of liver cancer cases and is primarily linked to factors incluidng aflatoxin, hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV), and metabolic disorders. There are no obvious symptoms in the early stage of HCC, which often leads to delays in diagnosis. Therefore, HCC patients usually present with tumors in advanced and incurable stages. Several signaling pathways are dis-regulated in HCC and cause uncontrolled cell propagation, metastasis, and recurrence of HCC. Beyond the frequently altered and therapeutically targeted receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways in HCC, pathways involved in cell differentiation, telomere regulation, epigenetic modification and stress response also provide therapeutic potential. Investigating the key signaling pathways and their inhibitors is pivotal for achieving therapeutic advancements in the management of HCC. At present, the primary therapeutic approaches for advanced HCC are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and combination regimens. New trials are investigating combination therapies involving ICIs and TKIs or anti-VEGF (endothelial growth factor) therapies, as well as combinations of two immunotherapy regimens. The outcomes of these trials are expected to revolutionize HCC management across all stages. Here, we provide here a comprehensive review of cellular signaling pathways, their therapeutic potential, evidence derived from late-stage clinical trials in HCC and discuss the concepts underlying earlier clinical trials, biomarker identification, and the development of more effective therapeutics for HCC.

Tolerability and Effectiveness of Regorafenib Treatment in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-World Data from the United States

Introduction

While several systemic therapies are available for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), there is a lack of granular real-world evidence to support the efficacy and safety of these therapies. The REFINE study evaluated safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in a global population under real-world practice conditions. This sub-analysis describes the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib among the United States (US) subset of patients in the REFINE study relative to patients in the non-US subset.

Materials and Methods

REFINE was an international, prospective, multicenter observational study. Eligible patients were those with uHCC for whom a decision to treat with regorafenib had already been made. The primary study endpoint was the frequency of documented treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Additional endpoints included overall survival and progression-free survival. Groups were compared descriptively.

Results

Of 1005 patients, 65 were from the US and 940 were from other countries. 91% of patients in the US subset (n=59) and 92% in the non-US subset (n=862) experienced ≥1 TEAE. Common adverse events (AEs) included gastrointestinal disorders, fatigue, and hand-foot skin reaction. Median overall survival for patients in the US subset was 11.4 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.7-25.4) and 13.2 months (IQR: 5.8-26.3) in the non-US subset. Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (IQR: 2.4-6.1) for patients in the US subset and 3.9 months (IQR: 2.2-8.5) in the non-US subset.

Conclusion

Regorafenib was associated with similar safety and effectiveness outcomes for patients in the US and non-US subsets of the REFINE study. Differences in the incidence of certain AEs may be due to differences in treatment management between study sites or baseline disease status. These findings are consistent with the phase 3 RESORCE trial and corroborate the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib as a subsequent-line treatment in US patients with uHCC.

The anti-PD-L1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody KN046 plus lenvatinib in advanced unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II trial

This open-label phase II trial (NCT04542837) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KN046 combined with lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and explore the potential response biomarkers. Participants received KN046 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks and lenvatinib 12 or 8 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. A total of fifty-five participants were enrolled. The results meet the pre-specified primary endpoints. No DLT was observed in the safety run-in period. The incidence of serious adverse events and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 30.9% and 47.3%, respectively. Grade ≥3 immunotherapy-related adverse events occurred in 3 (5.5%) participants. Five (9.1%) participants discontinued treatment due to TRAEs, all of which were grade 1-2. The ORR was 45.5% (95% CI, 31.97-59.45). The median progression-free survival was 11.0 (95% CI, 8.21-15.24) months. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.4 (95% CI, 11.20-not estimable) months, and 12-month OS rate was 60.0% (95% CI, 45.87-71.55). Circulating tumor DNA status before the third cycle of treatment was associated with prognosis. In conclusion, First-line KN046 plus lenvatinib shows promising efficacy for advanced unresectable or metastatic HCC.

Immune-related adverse events as prognostic biomarkers in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving PD-L1 inhibitor: A post-hoc analysis of the multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been associated with better therapeutic outcomes in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across various cancers. This study investigates the association between irAEs and ICI outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC).

METHODS

A post hoc analysis was performed on 153 patients with R/M NPC who received anti-PD-L1 inhibitors between February 26, 2019, and January 13, 2021. These patients were enrolled in a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial, which represents the largest study to date evaluating anti-PD-L1 therapy in previously treated R/M NPC.

RESULTS

Patients who experienced irAEs had significantly higher overall response rates (ORR) and diseade control rates (DCR) compared to those without irAEs (31.2 % vs. 17.1 %, p = 0.039; 66.7 % vs. 44.8 %, p = 0.017). Additionally, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in patients with irAEs (129 days vs. 56 days, p = 0.007). Patients with endocrine-related irAEs exhibited higher DCR (71.8 % vs. 46.2 %, p = 0.012), and longer PFS (144 days vs. 69 days, p = 0.02) and overall survival (OS: 746 days vs. 438 days, p = 0.02). In contrast, patients with grade ≥ 3 irAEs or thoserequiring systemic steroid therapy had shorter median OS (179 days vs. 466 days, p = 0.03; 166 days vs. 462 days, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of irAEs, particularly those involving the endocrine system, is associated with enhanced efficacy of anti-PD-L1 therapy and extended survival in patients with R/M NPC, highlighting their potential as prognostic biomarkers.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: updates on epidemiology, surveillance, diagnosis and treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global burden, ranking as the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. HCC due to chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or C virus (HCV) infection has decreased due to universal vaccination for HBV and effective antiviral therapy for both HBV and HCV, but HCC related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease is increasing. Biannual liver ultrasonography and serum α-fetoprotein are the primary surveillance tools for early HCC detection among high-risk patients (e.g., cirrhosis, chronic HBV). Alternative surveillance tools such as blood-based biomarker panels and abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are being investigated. Multiphasic computed tomography or MRI is the standard for HCC diagnosis, but histological confirmation should be considered, especially when inconclusive findings are seen on cross-sectional imaging. Staging and treatment decisions are complex and should be made in multidisciplinary settings, incorporating multiple factors including tumor burden, degree of liver dysfunction, patient performance status, available expertise, and patient preferences. Early-stage HCC is best treated with curative options such as resection, ablation, or transplantation. For intermediate-stage disease, locoregional therapies are primarily recommended although systemic therapies may be preferred for patients with large intrahepatic tumor burden. In advanced-stage disease, immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy is the preferred treatment regimen. In this review article, we discuss the recent global epidemiology, risk factors, and HCC care continuum encompassing surveillance, diagnosis, staging, and treatments.

Hepatic Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Between Liver and Non-Liver Malignancies in Hepatitis B Endemic Areas

BACKGROUND

Notable advances have been made in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer treatment. However, the adverse effects of ICIs, especially hepatotoxicity, remain a challenging problem. Whether patients in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-endemic areas are prone to developing hepatic adverse events during ICI treatment warrants further exploration.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2020, the data of all patients with cancer who received ICI treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of and risk factors for hepatic adverse events, including hepatitis flare, immune-related hepatitis (irHepatitis) and HBV reactivation (HBVr), were analysed through a Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 1283 patients with cancer (190 hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] patients and 1093 patients with non-HCC malignancies) were eligible for analysis, of whom 283 (22.1%) were HBsAg-positive. The incidence of hepatitis flare events of any grade was significantly higher in HCC patients than in non-HCC patients (45.8% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001). HCC and baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 40 U/L were independent risk factors for ≥ grade 3 hepatitis flare events. No difference was observed in irHepatitis risk between HCC patients and non-HCC patients. ALT > 40 U/L was an independent risk factor for irHepatitis. Among 283 HBsAg-positive patients, six patients (2.1%) experienced HBVr. HCC patients had a higher risk of HBVr than non-HCC patients (4.4% vs. 0.6%). No specific risk factor for HBVr could be identified. However, none of the patients under nucleos/tide analogue (NUC) prophylaxis experienced HBVr in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Under ICI treatment, HCC patients had a higher risk of hepatitis flare events than non-HCC patients. Abnormal baseline ALT levels are a risk factor for hepatic adverse events. NUC prophylaxis can minimise the risk of HBVr.

Advancements in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The advent of immune-based combinations, primarily leveraging immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current scenario features multiple therapies that have shown superiority over tyrosine kinase inhibitors; however, the absence of direct comparisons and validated prognostic biomarkers complicates therapeutic decision-making. Additionally, a significant proportion of patients still exhibit primary or secondary resistance to existing immunotherapies, underscoring the ongoing need for novel therapeutic strategies.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review discusses current strategies aimed at improving the efficacy of immunotherapy for HCC, focusing on the following aspects: available therapeutic options, identification of prognostic biomarkers, approaches to overcoming resistance (including the development of neoantigen vaccines), and the exploration of adjuvant and neoadjuvant strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

The future of systemic therapies for HCC is likely to be driven by advancements in immunotherapy. Key areas of exploration for the coming years include the discovery of novel checkpoint inhibitors or complementary agents to enhance tumor response when combined with existing treatments, a shift toward neoadjuvant/perioperative trials instead of traditional adjuvant approaches, and the development of personalized neoantigen vaccines.

Management of Chronic Liver Disease in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Management of cirrhosis sequelae is critical in providing the most options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Compensated liver disease is the ideal state for HCC patients who may require resection, locoregional therapies, or liver transplantation. Portal hypertension complications, suboptimal nutrition, and frailty are common barriers to various HCC treatments. For patients with advanced HCC, systemic therapies are altering the approach to multifocal, unresectable HCC, but similar barriers exist related to managing cirrhosis complications. Frequently, managing the underlying liver disease etiology is a key component to enabling HCC treatment.

Advances and challenges in molecular understanding, early detection, and targeted treatment of liver cancer

In this review, we explore the application of next-generation sequencing in liver cancer research, highlighting its potential in modern oncology. Liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, is driven by a complex interplay of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. Key genetic alterations, such as mutations in TERT, TP53, and CTNNB1, alongside epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone remodeling, disrupt regulatory pathways and promote tumorigenesis. Environmental factors, including viral infections, alcohol consumption, and metabolic disorders such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, enhance hepatocarcinogenesis. The tumor microenvironment plays a pivotal role in liver cancer progression and therapy resistance, with immune cell infiltration, fibrosis, and angiogenesis supporting cancer cell survival. Advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies have shown potential, but the unique immunosuppressive milieu in liver cancer presents challenges. Dysregulation in pathways such as Wnt/β-catenin underscores the need for targeted therapeutic strategies. Next-generation sequencing is accelerating the identification of genetic and epigenetic alterations, enabling more precise diagnosis and personalized treatment plans. A deeper understanding of these molecular mechanisms is essential for advancing early detection and developing effective therapies against liver cancer.

Dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in metastatic basal cell carcinoma

We report the basal cell cancer (BCC) cohort of the SWOG/NCI 1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART), a phase II prospective, multicenter basket trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Sixteen patients with advanced/metastatic BCC were evaluable. The ORR was 31% (95% CI, 19-50%), and the 12-month OS, 75% (95% CI, 57-100%). Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 3.3-NA). Of 15 patients evaluable for clinical benefit, five partial responses (PRs) and five stable disease >6 months (total = 10/15 (66.7%)) were seen. The most common toxicities included fatigue (37.5%), pruritis (31.3%), and diarrhea (25%). In patients with advanced/metastatic BCC, ipilimumab and nivolumab produced an ORR of 31% and prolonged (>6 months) PFS in 73% of patients, with seven PFS/iPFS of >1 year, including one with prior anti-PD-1. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02834013 (Registered 7/15/2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02834013 ).

Structural insights into antibody-based immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of primary liver cancer and remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. While traditional approaches like surgical resection and tyrosine kinase inhibitors struggle against the tumor's immune evasion, monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based immunotherapies have emerged as promising alternatives. Several therapeutic antibodies that counter the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, leading to FDA approvals for advanced HCC treatment. A crucial aspect of advancing these therapies lies in understanding the structural interactions between antibodies and their targets. Recent findings indicate that mAbs and bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) can target different, non-overlapping epitopes on immune checkpoints such as PD-1 and CTLA-4. This review delves into the epitope-paratope interactions of structurally unresolved mAbs and bsAbs, and discusses the potential for combination therapies based on their non-overlapping epitopes. By leveraging this unique feature, combination therapies could enhance immune activation, reduce resistance, and improve overall efficacy, marking a new direction for antibody-based immunotherapy in HCC.

CA19-9-related macrophage polarization drives poor prognosis in HCC after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

Background

Elevated levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels are known to worsen outcomes in various tumors by influencing immune responses. However, the role of CA19-9 in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poorly understood.

Methods

This study included 621 patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2017 to March 2023. During immunotherapy, CA19-9 levels were measured and classified as either elevated (≥35 U/mL) or normal (<35 U/mL) for clinical analysis.

Results

Patients with elevated CA19-9 levels had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 53.3% and 29.1% in the normal CA19-9 group compared to 16.9% and 11.3% in the elevated group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 90.5% and 75.5% in the normal group versus 64.0% and 36.5% in the elevated group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed CA19-9 was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. Bioinformatic analysis indicated that FUT3, a key gene in CA19-9 synthesis, correlated with increased macrophage infiltration. And increased M2 macrophage levels and reduced M1 macrophage levels were noted in HCC samples with elevated CA19-9 levels. Further in vivo experiments indicated blocking CA19-9 improved the efficacy of PD-1 treatment through inducing the M1-like polarization of macrophages.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that elevated CA19-9 levels during immunotherapy are associated with poor survival outcomes in HCC patients. These findings highlight the crucial role of CA19-9 in shaping the tumor immune environment, particularly through its effect on macrophage polarization, and suggest that targeting CA19-9 may improve immunotherapy outcomes.

Bile acid synthesis impedes tumor-specific T cell responses during liver cancer

The metabolic landscape of cancer greatly influences antitumor immunity, yet it remains unclear how organ-specific metabolites in the tumor microenvironment influence immunosurveillance. We found that accumulation of primary conjugated and secondary bile acids (BAs) are metabolic features of human hepatocellular carcinoma and experimental liver cancer models. Inhibiting conjugated BA synthesis in hepatocytes through deletion of the BA-conjugating enzyme bile acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase (BAAT) enhanced tumor-specific T cell responses, reduced tumor growth, and sensitized tumors to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapy. Furthermore, different BAs regulated CD8+ T cells differently; primary BAs induced oxidative stress, whereas the secondary BA lithocholic acid inhibited T cell function through endoplasmic reticulum stress, which was countered by ursodeoxycholic acid. We demonstrate that modifying BA synthesis or dietary intake of ursodeoxycholic acid could improve tumor immunotherapy in liver cancer model systems.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a significant global health burden, and the need for more effective treatment options is exceptionally pressing. The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in treating GI cancers.

Methods

A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was conducted for articles on the treatment of GI cancers with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab, published from 2014 up to 30 August 2024. The inclusion criteria were designed according to the principles of Participants, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS). The control group was chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab in combination with other drugs. We extracted data from 10 randomized controlled trials and utilized a random effects model to assess the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), median duration of response (mDOR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The data analysis was conducted using Review Manager version 5.4 and Stata version 12.0.

Results

Overall, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated superior outcomes, including a higher ORR (OR = 1.69, P = 0.01), prolonged mOS (MD = 1.74, P = 0.04) and extended mDOR (MD = 5.64, P < 0.00001) compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the ORR (OR = 1.75, P = 0.02) and mOS (MD = 5.02, P = 0.003) were significantly improved in patients with esophageal cancer. Notably, the ORR in patients with biliary cancer was significantly lower (OR = 0.11, P = 0.04). Additionally, the ORR was significantly higher in the NIVO1 + IPI3group (OR = 2.82, P = 0.01) and NIVO3 + IPI1 group (OR = 1.62, P = 0.01). Regarding safety, there was no statistically significant difference between the combination regimen and the control group in terms of any grade (OR = 0.72, P = 0.26) or grade 3-4 TRAEs (OR = 1.36, P = 0.14).

Conclusions

Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab demonstrated significant efficacy in GI cancers (especially esophageal cancer) without causing more adverse reactions. However, its efficacy in biliary cancer still needs to be further proven.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024590994.

The guided fire from within: intratumoral administration of mRNA-based vaccines to mobilize memory immunity and direct immune responses against pathogen to target solid tumors

We investigated a novel cancer immunotherapy strategy that effectively suppresses tumor growth in multiple solid tumor models and significantly extends the lifespan of tumor-bearing mice by introducing pathogen antigens into tumors via mRNA-lipid nanoparticles. The pre-existing immunity against the pathogen antigen can significantly enhance the efficacy of this approach. In mice previously immunized with BNT162b2, an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine encoding the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, intratumoral injections of the same vaccine efficiently tagged the tumor cells with mRNA-expressed spike protein. This action rapidly mobilized the pre-existing memory immunity against SARS-CoV-2 to kill the cancer cells displaying the spike protein, while concurrently reprogramming the tumor microenvironment (TME) by attracting immune cells. The partial elimination of tumor cells in a normalized TME further triggered extensive tumor antigen-specific T cell responses through antigen spreading, eventually resulting in potent and systemic tumor-targeting immune responses. Moreover, combining BNT162b2 treatment with anti-PD-L1 therapy yielded a more substantial therapeutic impact, even in "cold tumor" types that are typically less responsive to treatment. Given that the majority of the global population has acquired memory immunity against various pathogens through infection or vaccination, we believe that, in addition to utilizing the widely held immune memory against SARS-CoV-2 via COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA vaccines against other pathogens, such as Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Common Human Coronaviruses (HCoVs), and the influenza virus, could be rapidly transitioned into clinical use and holds great promise in treating different types of cancer. The extensive selection of pathogen antigens expands therapeutic opportunities and may also overcome potential drug resistance.

Polymeric Multivalent Fc Binding Peptides-Fabricated Clinical Compounding Bispecific Antibody Potentiates Dual Immunotherapy Targeting PD1 and CTLA-4

Dual Opdivo plus Yervoy immunotherapy, targeting the immune checkpoints PD1 and CTLA-4, is successful in clinical use. However, it is associated with a high incidence of adverse events, and its therapeutic efficacy needs improving. In this study, polymeric multivalent Fc-binding peptides (PLG-Fc-III-4C) are employed to fabricate a bispecific antibody (PD1/CTLA-4 BsAb) to potentiate dual immunotherapy targeting PD1 and CTLA-4. The PD1/CTLA-4 BsAb is prepared by mixing PLG-Fc-III-4C with aPD1 and aCTLA-4 in an aqueous solution for 3 h using the clinically optimal 3:1 proportion of aPD1 to aCTLA-4. PD1/CTLA-4 BsAb significantly inhibits tumors in MC38 colon cancer-bearing mice more effectively than the combination of aPD1 and aCTLA-4, with tumor suppression rates of 96.8% and 77.3%, respectively. It also induces a higher percentage of CD8+ T cells and increases the secretion of effector cytokines while reducing Treg levels in tumors compared to phosphate-buffered saline, indicating significant tumor immunity regulation. Mechanistically, a 6.3-fold increase in PD1/CTLA-4 BsAb accumulation in tumors due to the tumor targeting ability of aPD1, and the PD1/CTLA-4 BsAb significantly reduces the adverse colitis event in healthy mice, compared to aPD1 and aCTLA-4. Thus, these findings provide a novel approach to enhance antitumor therapy using aPD1 and aCTLA-4.

Application and Expectations for Immune Checkpoint Blockade of LAG3 and TIGIT

Immune checkpoint blockade targeting the novel targets of the lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) and the T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domains (TIGIT) has marked a significant advancement in oncology, offering new therapeutic opportunities to fight diverse malignancies. This review covers the biological basis and clinical application of LAG3 and TIGIT inhibitors, highlighting pivotal trials and therapeutic outcomes. We underscore the use of dual therapy immune checkpoint blockade in enhancing antitumor immunity, particularly in settings where monotherapy has shown limited efficacy. Additionally, we address the emerging challenges such as treatment resistance and adverse effects. We explore the strategic integration of LAG3 and TIGIT blockade within the broader immunotherapy landscape, emphasizing innovative combinations and the quest for predictive biomarkers to optimize patient selection and treatment efficacy.

WEE Family Kinase Inhibitors Combined with Sorafenib Can Selectively Inhibit HCC Cell Proliferation

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is currently the first choice for the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, but its therapeutic effect is still limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to examine whether WEE family kinase inhibitors can enhance the anticancer effect of sorafenib.

METHODS

We analyzed the expression levels of PKMYT1 kinase and WEE1 kinase in HCC, studied the inhibitory effect of PKMYT1 kinase inhibitor RP-6306, WEE1 kinase inhibitor adavosertib combined with sorafenib on the proliferation of HCC cells, and detected the effect of drug combination on CDK1 phosphorylation.

RESULTS

We found that PKMYT1 and WEE1 were upregulated in HCC and were detrimental to patient survival. Cell experiments showed that both RP-6306 and adavosertib (1-100 μM) inhibited the proliferation of HCC cell lines in a dose-dependent manner alone, and the combination of the two drugs had a synergistic effect. In HCC cell lines, sorafenib combined with RP-6306 or adavosertib showed a synergistic antiproliferation effect and less toxicity to normal cells. Sorafenib combined with RP-6306 and adavosertib further inhibited the proliferation of HCC cells and caused complete dephosphorylation of CDK1.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our findings provide experimental evidence for the future use of sorafenib in combination with RP-6306 or adavosertib for the treatment of HCC.

Tumor response assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy: imaging biomarkers for clinical decision-making

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of 1D and 3D tumor response assessment for predicting median overall survival (mOS) in patients who underwent immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Patients with HCC who underwent immunotherapy between 2017 and 2023 and received multi-phasic contrast-enhanced MRIs pre- and post-treatment were included in this retrospective study. Tumor response was measured using 1D, RECIST 1.1, and mRECIST, and 3D, volumetric, and percentage quantitative EASL (vqEASL and %qEASL). Patients were grouped into disease control vs progression and responders vs non-responders. Kaplan-Meier curves analyzed with log-rank tests assessed the predictive value for mOS. Cox regression modeling evaluated the association of clinical baseline parameters with mOS.

RESULTS

This study included 37 patients (mean age, 69.1 years [SD, 8.0]; 33 men). The mOS was 16.9 months. 3D vqEASL and %qEASL successfully stratified patients into disease control and progression (vqEASL: HR 0.21, CI: 0.55-0.08, p < 0.001; %qEASL: HR 0.18, CI: 0.83-0.04, p = 0.013), as well as responder and nonresponder (vqEASL: HR 0.25, CI: 0.08-0.74, p = 0.007; %qEASL: HR 0.17, CI: 0.04-0.72, p = 0.007) for predicting mOS. The 1D criteria, mRECIST stratified into disease control and progression only (HR 0.24, CI: 0.65-0.09, p = 0.002), and RECIST 1.1 showed no predictive value in either stratification. Multivariate Cox regression identified alpha-fetoprotein > 500 ng/mL as a predictor for poor mOS (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The 3D quantitative enhancement-based response assessment tool qEASL can predict overall survival in patients undergoing immunotherapy for HCC and could identify non-responders.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Using 3D quantitative enhancement-based tumor response criteria (qEASL), radiologists' predictions of tumor response in patients undergoing immunotherapy for HCC can be further improved.

KEY POINTS

MRI-based tumor response criteria predict immunotherapy survival benefits in HCC patients. 3D tumor response assessment methods surpass current evaluation criteria in predicting overall survival during HCC immunotherapy. Enhancement-based 3D tumor response criteria are robust prognosticators of survival for HCC patients on immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa in 2 phase I expansion cohorts with advanced HCC

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Simultaneous inhibition of the TGF-β and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 pathways provides a potential novel treatment approach. Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed cell death 1 ligand 1, was evaluated in patients with advanced HCC.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

In this global, open-label, phase I study (NCT02517398), patients with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1-unselected HCC who failed or were intolerant to ≥1 line of sorafenib received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg every 2 weeks in a dose-escalation (n = 38) or dose-expansion (n = 68) cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the best overall response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by an independent review committee. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed best overall response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Median follow-up times (range) were 41.4 (39.8-44.2) and 38.6 (33.5-39.7) months in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts, respectively. The objective response rate was below the prespecified 20% objective response rate threshold set to evaluate the efficacy of bintrafusp alfa in both cohorts (10.5% and 8.8%, respectively). Median overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively, were 13.8 and 1.5 months in the dose-escalation cohort and 13.5 and 1.4 months in the dose-expansion cohort. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 78.9% and 64.7% of patients in the respective cohorts (grade ≥3 in 18.4% and 25.0% of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Bintrafusp alfa showed moderate clinical activity and a safety profile consistent with previous studies of bintrafusp alfa in patients with advanced HCC.

Balancing anticancer therapy efficacy and safety in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant health problem associated with several risk factors, increasingly driven by non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and metabolic syndrome. This association poses a challenge for the primary treatments of HCC, which may include immune checkpoint inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, due to their potential cardiotoxic effect. Therefore, it is imperative to balance the therapeutic effects of these agents with their potential cardiovascular adverse events.

Case Description

We describe the case of a man in his seventies with advanced HCC and significant cardiovascular comorbidities who was treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Despite achieving a clinical and radiologic complete response, the patient experienced a deterioration in cardiac function after 16 months, necessitating the discontinuation of bevacizumab. The patient continued to respond well to atezolizumab, but unfortunately, he passed away due to a cardiac event after 4 years of follow-up.

Conclusions

Careful risk stratification and optimization of modifiable risk factors is of uttermost importance in management of HCC. Close monitoring, comprehensive patient management in a cardio-oncology clinic is also vital, particularly for patients at high risk of developing cardiovascular adverse events. The delicate balance between the efficacy of cancer treatments and their potential cardiotoxicity is one of the principal determinants of outcomes of patients diagnosed with HCC.

Global research on nanomaterials for liver cancer from 2004 to 2023: a bibliometric and visual analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, is one of the most common gastrointestinal cancers. An increasing number of studies indicate that nanomaterials play a significant role in the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. However, despite the extensive and diverse research on nanomaterials and liver cancer, bibliometric studies in this field have not yet been reported. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the application prospects and development trends of nanomaterials in primary liver cancer over the past 20 years. By elucidating the current state of research on liver cancer, we intend to provide valuable reference information for researchers in this field.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection for publications related to liver cancer and nanomaterials from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023. Relevant literature was selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. These selected publications were subsequently analyzed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and the R package "bibliometrix" to identify trends, influential countries, institutions, authors, journals, and research hotspots in this field.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 1641 publications, with an annual growth rate of 25.45%. China and the United States are leading in this field, accounting for 67.46% and 11.27% of the total publications, respectively. The Chinese Academy of Sciences and Shao D are the most cited institution and author, respectively. The International Journal of Nanomedicine is the most influential journal in this field, while Biomaterials is the most highly cited and co-cited journal. Research hotspots mainly focus on improving drug delivery efficiency, inducing cancer cell apoptosis, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and combination treatments. Emerging research directions include the tumor microenvironment, polyethylene glycol, and immunogenic cell death.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the application of nanomaterials in the field of liver cancer is gradually becoming a significant research area, with a focus on improving drug delivery efficiency, enhancing therapeutic efficacy, and reducing side effects.

Exploring a new chapter in traditional Chinese medicine: The potential of Calculus bovis in liver cancer treatment

In the ongoing quest for new treatments in medicine, traditional Chinese medicine offers unique insights and potential. Recently, studies on the ability of Calculus bovis to inhibit M2-type tumour-associated macrophage polarisation by modulating the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway to suppress liver cancer have undoubtedly revealed new benefits and hope for this field of research. The purpose of this article is to comment on this study and explore its strengths and weaknesses, thereby providing ideas for the future treatment of liver cancer.

Research Progress on the Anti-Liver Cancer Mechanism and Toxicity of Rhubarb Anthraquinone

Ethnopharmacological Relevance

Rhubarb has the effect of breaking blood stasis and abnormal mass, and was often used to treat various tumor diseases including liver cancer in ancient China. Recipes containing rhubarb have anti-liver cancer properties and are still used today. However, the main components and mechanism of action of rhubarb against liver cancer are still unclear.

Aim of the Review

To conduct a review of the anti-liver cancer effects and toxicity of rhubarb anthraquinones (AQs).

Materials and Methods

This article reviewed the effects of rhubarb AQs in the treatment of liver cancer and the signaling pathways involved, and discussed the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of rhubarb AQs by searching the Web of Science, PubMed and CNKI databases.

Results

Rhubarb (Rhei Radix et Rhizoma) is a traditional Chinese medicine that has been existed for thousands of years and is used as an anti-cancer drug. Modern pharmacological research shows that rhubarb AQs, as the main component of rhubarb, contains emodin, rhein, chrysophanol, physcione and aloe-emodin, which has anti-liver cancer effects and can be considered as a potential therapeutic drug for liver cancer. However, many modern studies have shown that rhubarb AQs have certain toxicity, which hinders in-depth research on rhubarb AQs.

Conclusion

Rhubarb AQs can be used as a potential anti-liver cancer drug, but its research still has many limitations. Strengthening research on related experiments and finding a balance between toxicity and efficacy are all directions worth studying in the future.

Personalized neoantigen hydrogel vaccine combined with PD-1 and CTLA-4 double blockade elicits antitumor response in liver metastases by activating intratumoral CD8+CD69+ T cells

BACKGROUND

Liver metastasis is highly aggressive and immune tolerant, and lacks effective treatment strategies. This study aimed to develop a neoantigen hydrogel vaccine (NPT-gels) with high clinical feasibility and further investigate its efficacy and antitumor molecular mechanisms in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of liver metastases.

METHODS

The effects of liver metastasis on survival and intratumor T-cell subpopulation infiltration in patients with advanced tumors were investigated using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database and immunofluorescence staining, respectively. NPT-gels were prepared using hyaluronic acid, screened neoantigen peptides, and dual clinical adjuvants [Poly(I:C) and thymosin α-1]. Then, the efficacy and corresponding antitumor molecular mechanisms of NPT-gels combined with programmed death receptor 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 double blockade (PCDB) for the treatment of liver metastases were investigated using various preclinical liver metastasis models.

RESULTS

Liver metastases are associated with poorer 5-year overall survival, characterized by low infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and high infiltration of regulatory T cells (Tregs). NPT-gels overcame the challenges faced by conventional neoantigen peptide vaccines by sustaining a durable, high-intensity immune response with a single injection and significantly improving the infiltration of neoantigen-specific T-cell subpopulations in different mice subcutaneous tumor models. Importantly, NPT-gels further combined with PCDB could enhance neoantigen-specific T-cell infiltration and effectively unlock the immunosuppressive microenvironment of liver metastases, showing superior antitumor efficacy and inducing long-term immune memory in various preclinical liver metastasis models without obvious toxicity. Mechanistically, the combined strategy can inhibit Tregs, induce the production and infiltration of neoantigen-specific CD8+CD69+ T cells to enhance the immune response, and potentially elicit antigen-presenting effects in Naïve B_Ighd+ cells and M1-type macrophages.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that NPT-gels combined with PCDB could exert a durable and powerful antitumor immunity by enhancing the recruitment and activation of CD8+CD69+ T cells, which supports the rationale and clinical translation of this combination strategy and provides important evidence for further improving the immunotherapy efficacy of liver metastases in the future.

Second-line therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab: multicenter single institution cohort experience

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.

Prognostic significance of combined PD-L1 expression in malignant and infiltrating cells in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab

Background

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is abundant not only in malignant cells but also in infiltrating cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study explored the association between PD-L1 expression in TME and outcomes in HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB), emphasizing the implications of PD-L1 expression in both malignant and tumor-infiltrating cells.

Methods

This study included 72 patients with HCC who underwent percutaneous core needle liver biopsy before AB treatment between September 2020 and December 2023. PD-L1 expression on tumor tissues was assessed using the combined positive score (CPS) with cutoff values of 1 and 10, utilizing antibody clone 22C3 (Dako).

Results

The distribution of PD-L1 CPS included 24 patients with CPS <1, 33 patients with CPS 1-10, and 15 patients with CPS ≥10. Significant differences in overall survival (OS) were observed across the three groups, with CPS ≥10 showing the highest survival rates (p = 0.010). Patients with CPS ≥10 had better OS than those with CPS <10 (median OS 14.8 vs. 8.3 months, P = 0.046), and CPS ≥1 had better OS than CPS <1 (P = 0.021). For progression-free survival (mPFS), the CPS ≥10 group had the highest median PFS of 11.0 months among the three groups (P = 0.044). Objective response rates (ORR) were higher in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 group than in the 1-10 and <1 group (53.3%, 27.3%, and 16.7%, respectively; P = .047). Multivariate analysis identified that PD-L1 expression ≥10 and ≥1 were associated with favorable outcomes regarding OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.283, P = .027 and HR 0.303, P = .006, respectively).

Conclusions

Combined analysis of PD-L1 expression in malignant and tumor-infiltrating cells can be a promising biomarker for the prognosis of HCC patients treated with AB.

Chemotherapy combined with cadonilimab (AK104) as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a single-arm, phase II clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to be effective and recommended as the standard treatment option in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (G/GOJ) cancer. In this study, we will explore the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with cadonilimab, a programmed death-1/cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 bispecific antibody, in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced G/GOJ adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial that will enrol 37 patients in total. Eligible patients will be registered and receive three cycles of oxaliplatin and S-1 (SOX) regimen in combination with cadonilimab. Radical D2 (D2 lymphadenectomy) gastrectomy will be performed within 4 weeks after the last administration of chemotherapy plus cadonilimab. The primary endpoint is the pathological complete response rate. Secondary endpoints are R0 resection rate, major pathological response, 2-year disease-free survival rate, 2-year overall survival rate and safety. The first participant was recruited on 1 September 2023 and the enrolment will be completed in July 2025.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Written informed consent will be required from and provided by all the patients enrolled. The study protocol (V.3.0, 28 April 2023) has been approved by the independent ethics committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval number: 2023526) and conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki. The results of the study may provide more evidence for neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced G/GOJ adenocarcinoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05948449.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cells: A New Era for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and a worldwide health concern that requires novel treatment approaches. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) are the current standard of care; however, their clinical benefits are limited in some advanced and metastatic patients. With the help of gene engineering techniques, a novel adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) called chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells was recently introduced for treating HCC. A plethora of current clinical and preclinical studies are attempting to improve the efficacy of CAR-T cells by dominating the immunosuppressive environment of HCC and finding the best tumor-specific antigens (TSAs). The future of care for HCC patients might be drastically improved due to the convergence of novel therapeutic methods and the continuous progress in ACT research. However, the clinical application of CAR-T cells in solid tumors is still facing several challenges. In this study, we provide an overview of the advancement and prospects of CAR-T cell immunotherapy in HCC, as well as an investigation of how cutting-edge engineering could improve CAR-T cell efficacy and safety profile.

Promising PD-1 antagonists for liver cancer: an evaluation of phase II and III results

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver cancer, is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Limited treatment options for advanced stages highlight the need for effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), specifically PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 inhibitors, as emerging treatments for advanced HCC. It discusses data from phase II and III trials evaluating ICI combinations with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), anti-angiogenic agents, and locoregional treatments like Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE). Clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival and response rates, were analyzed alongside the incidence and management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). A systematic review approach ensured comprehensive, high-quality study inclusion.

EXPERT OPINION

ICI-based therapies and their combinations are transforming advanced HCC treatment, offering improved outcomes and potential survival benefits. However, these therapies need optimization in sequencing and selection, particularly considering variations in liver function and disease stage. Effective management of adverse effects is critical to maximize clinical benefits. Further research is required to develop personalized strategies, tailoring treatments to patient-specific factors and enhancing safety and effectiveness in HCC management.

Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of molecular diagnostics in hepatobiliary cancers (2024 edition)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) are significant health challenges in China because of their high prevalence and mortality rates. Advances in molecular diagnostics have opened new avenues for personalized treatment strategies. This consensus provides a comprehensive update on the clinical applications of molecular diagnostics in HCC and BTC and addresses the urgent need for personalized treatment strategies tailored to the Chinese population, emphasizing the importance of molecular markers in guiding targeted therapies and immunotherapies. By employing the Delphi method and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, the expert panel formulated evidence-based recommendations for the use of molecular diagnostics in the clinical management of HCC and BTC. Key molecular markers, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), BRAF V600E, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), rearranged during transfection (RET), and neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), are highlighted for their roles in optimizing treatment regimens. The consensus also explores the significance of emerging biomarkers, such as tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability, in predicting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The recommendations aim to enhance precision medicine approaches, improve patient outcomes, and foster the integration of molecular diagnostics into routine clinical practice.

Sequencing of systemic therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

For patients with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), safe and effective therapies are urgently needed to improve their long-term prognosis. Although the guidelines recommend first-line treatments such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, and atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab (T+A) and second-line treatments such as regorafenib, the efficacy comparison between drugs is lacking, that is, a treatment is not recommended as the optimal or alternative choice for a specific patient population. Therefore, we will conduct a high-quality network meta-analysis based on Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to systematically evaluate and compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and serious adverse events (SAE) of different treatment protocols in the context of first-line and second-line therapies, which are critical for clinical decision making and prognostic improvement in advanced HCC patients.

METHODS

The studies of interest were Phase III RCTs evaluating the efficacy or safety of first- or second-line therapies in patients with unresectable or advanced HCC. Literature published in English from the four databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was comprehensively searched from the inception to May 23, 2022. Outcomes of interest included OS, PFS, ORR, and SAE. A league table was developed to show the results of the comparison between different treatments. A histogram of cumulative probability was drawn to discuss the ranking probability of treatments based on different outcomes. The effectiveness and safety of various treatments were comprehensively considered and the two-dimensional diagram was plotted to guide clinical practice. The Gemtc package in R Studio was used for network meta-analysis in a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

The results showed that HAIC-FO was superior to T+A regimen, regardless of OS, PFS or ORR. TACE combined with lenvatinib performed better than T+A in PFS, and ORR. In addition to the T+A regimen, Sintilimab combined with IBI305 and camrelizumab combined with apatinib were also associated with longer OS, PFS, and ORR, and their SAE incidence was not higher than that of T+A, especially for camrelizumab combined with apatinib, its safety was better than that of T+A regimen. There were no new treatments or combinations that were more effective than regorafenib. It was important to note that for PFS, the efficacy of apatinib and cabozantinib was not statistically different from that of regorafenib, so these two treatments could be used as alternative treatment options in cases where regorafenib was not tolerated or treatment failed.

CONCLUSIONS

We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple treatment modalities by integrating the results of direct and indirect comparisons. This study included high-quality multicenter Phase III RCTs, collated and summarized all treatments involved in advanced or unresectable HCC in first-line and second-line settings, and compared with T+A and regorafenib, respectively, and ranked based on efficacy and safety to support clinical decision making.

Efficacy and safety of durvalumab rechallenge in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to prior anti-PD-1 therapy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Recently, anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) and anti-PD-L1 therapies were approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effectiveness of rechallenging with one immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after failure of another remains unclear. This study explores the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-L1 rechallenge in patients who failed anti-PD-1 therapy.

METHODS

From January 2016 to December 2023, 65 advanced HCC patients previously treated with anti-PD-1 therapy were retrospectively enrolled and rechallenged with durvalumab (480 mg IV every 2 weeks).

RESULTS

Overall, 86.2% of patients received nivolumab and 13.8% pembrolizumab as prior anti-PD-1 therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) to durvalumab was 13.8%. Patients who responded to prior anti-PD-1 had a higher ORR compared to non-responders (31.3% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.04). Patients with any grade of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from durvalumab had a higher ORR than those without irAEs (35.3% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.01). The median PFS was 5.4 months, and the median OS was 9.6 months. Responders to prior anti-PD-1 showed longer OS (33.9 vs. 8.2 months, p < 0.01) and a trend toward longer PFS (13.8 vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.07) compared to non-responders. Multivariate analysis identified prior anti-PD-1 response (HR: 0.31) as the only protective factor for death. Common irAEs were skin toxicity (13.8%) and hepatitis (7.7%); no correlation was found between irAEs from prior anti-PD-1 and durvalumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first, concrete evidence that durvalumab rechallenge is effective for HCC patients who are refractory to anti-PD-1 therapy, especially for those who previously responded to anti-PD-1 treatment.

Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Clinical Implications and Potential Strategies to Overcome the Resistance

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and the development of effective treatment strategies remains a significant challenge in the management of advanced HCC patients. The emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been a significant advancement in the treatment of HCC, as these targeted therapies have shown promise in prolonging the survival of patients with advanced disease. Although immunotherapy is currently considered as the first line of treatment for advanced HCC patients, many such patients do not meet the clinical criteria to be eligible for immunotherapy, and in many parts of the world there is still lack of accessibility to immunotherapy. As such, TKIs still serve as the first line of treatment and play a major role in the treatment repertoire for advanced HCC patients. However, the development of resistance to these agents is a major obstacle that must be overcome. In this review, we explore the underlying mechanisms of resistance to TKIs in HCC, the clinical implications of this resistance, and the potential strategies to overcome or prevent the emergence of resistance.

Lenvatinib, sintilimab combined interventional treatment vs bevacizumab, sintilimab combined interventional treatment for intermediate-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab and sintilimab combined interventional treatment (BeSiIT) and L envatinib and sintilimab combined interventional treatment (LeSiIT) are two commonly used therapeutic regimens for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical practice.

AIM

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of BeSiIT and LeSiIT for the treatment of intermediate and advanced HCC.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with intermediate-advanced HCC and initially treated with BeSiIT or LeSiIT in the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between February 2020 and July 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rate, and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Total 127 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups. Twenty-eight and fifty patients in the BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups, respectively, were assessed after 1:2 propensity score matching. PFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the two groups. No significant variations were noted in ORRs or DCRs according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and modified RECIST. BeSiIT group showed a better conversion rate than the LeSiIT group (P = 0.043). Both groups showed manageable toxicity profiles. Multivariate analysis showed that the independent factors associated with PFS were alpha-fetoprotein levels and carcinoembryonic antigen score.

CONCLUSION

In intermediate-to-advanced HCC, the BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups exhibited acceptable toxicities and comparable PFS, OS, and ORR.

Adenosine Receptor 3 in Liver Cancer: Expression Variability, Epigenetic Modulation, and Enhanced Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Effects

Background and Aims

Primary liver cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), has low response rates to existing treatments, highlighting the urgent need for novel treatment options. Adenosine A3 receptor (ADORA3) signaling has emerged as a potential target. Namodenoson, an ADORA3 agonist, has shown promise in early clinical trials for HCC. However, further data are required to clarify ADORA3 expression patterns in liver cancer, mechanisms of action, and the potential for combination therapies to inform patient selection for future clinical trials.

Methods

Patient-derived tissue microarrays and RNA-sequencing were employed to investigate ADORA3 expression. Cellular responses to ADORA3 stimulation and combination treatments were studied in HCC and CCA cell lines and patient-derived organoids (PDOs). Genome-wide RNA-Seq analysis, mRNA analysis, and DigiWest protein profiling were performed.

Results

Tissue microarray analysis revealed higher ADORA3 expression in nonmalignant samples and a subset of tumors with weak or absent ADORA3 expression. This was supported by RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and needle biopsy samples. Cell lines and PDOs exhibited antiproliferative effects with the ADORA3 agonist Namodenoson, confirmed by receptor dependency tests with specific antagonists and siRNA experiments. Genome-wide RNA-Seq analysis suggested chromatin remodeling events after ADORA3 stimulation. mRNA expression and DigiWest profiling identified downregulation of histone deacetylases and histone H3 modifications. Combination treatments with different ADORA3 agonists and histone deacetylase inhibitors significantly enhanced antiproliferative effects in almost all selected combinations, supported by investigations in PDOs.

Conclusion

ADORA3 expression varies considerably in HCC or CCA, ranging from high to absent receptor detection. This observation might help to identify patients for clinical studies. Additionally, Namodenoson's epigenetic modulating activity suggests epigenetic drugs as promising candidates for combination treatment.

Hepatocellular carcinoma systemic treatment update: From early to advanced stage

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks the sixth most common malignancy but the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. Significant breakthroughs have been made in systemic treatment for HCC over the past two decades, which have improved treatment outcomes. In addition to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic drugs are increasingly being applied. The combination of ICI and antiangiogenic or dual ICIs has become the new standard of care due to remarkable response rates. However, currently available systemic regimens are primarily reserved for certain patients in the intermediate and advanced stages who will not benefit from locoregional treatments. Evidence supporting the use of systemic treatment as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies in patients with early-stage HCC, especially the high risk of recurrence after curative treatments, remains limited. This review identified recent developments in systemic therapy, including mTKIs and ICIs, considering results on first- and second-line treatment, role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and combination with loco-regional therapy. Various ongoing clinical trials regarding the role of systemic therapies and potential novel targets in patients with early-, intermediate-, and advanced-stage HCC were also summarized and revealed that systemic therapy is no longer limited to advanced-stage HCC. Moreover, the introduction of T-cell redirecting strategies, including bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, has revolutionized the treatment landscape for HCC. Future research should focus on an in-depth exploration of the mechanisms governing the establishment of tumor barriers.

Immunotherapy Responses in Viral Hepatitis-Induced HCC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent liver cancer with poor prognosis, often linked to hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) infections. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of immunotherapy in HCC, particularly in cases arising from viral hepatitis. Methods: In adherence to PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines, the immunotherapeutic outcomes comprised objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed from randomized controlled trials up to April 2024 using the fixed-effects models in R (V.4.3.3.) and RevMan (Cochrane). Results: This study included 9 trials with 5316 patients. The ORR was slightly higher in the viral group at 27.93% compared to 24.07% in the non-viral group, though this difference was not significant (p = 0.15). Viral HCC patients exhibited a median PFS of 7.3 months (IQR: 6.2-8.4) compared to 5.8 months (IQR: 5.48-6.13) in non-viral patients, a significant improvement (p = 0.005). Similarly, median OS was longer in the viral group at 16.8 months (IQR: 12.99-20.61) versus 15.2 months (IQR: 13.25-17.15) for non-viral HCC, which was also significant (p < 0.0001). The median OS for viral HCC was 16.8 months (IQR: 14.11-19.49 months), with HBV patients experiencing slightly higher survival at 17.15 months (IQR: 14.3-20 months) compared to 16.8 months (IQR: 12.99-20.61 months) for HCV patients; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.89). Conclusions: Immunotherapy shows potential in treating HCC, with significantly better outcomes in viral HCC, particularly HBV-associated cases. The heterogeneity highlights the need for personalized treatment approaches based on the viral background of HCC patients. Further research should aim to optimize these therapies to improve survival rates.

IMM2520, a novel anti-CD47/PD-L1 bispecific antibody for cancer immune therapy

PD-1/PD-L1 is an important signaling pathway in the adaptive immune system. The CD47/SIRPα signaling pathway is a crucial "do not eat me" signal for innate immunity. This study evaluated the anti-tumor mechanism of IMM2520 in vitro and in vivo. IMM2520 was generated using the "mab-trap" platform. IMM2520 showed high affinity to PD-L1 and relatively lower affinity to CD47, displaying preferential binding to PD-L1 on tumor cells. IMM2520 had the potent ability to inhibit the PD-1/PD-L1 and CD47/SIRPα signaling pathways and killed tumor cells through ADCC and ADCP. Importantly, IMM2520 did not bind to human red blood cells or induce erythrocyte agglutination. IMM2520 demonstrated a tendency to bind to CD47+/PD-L1+ tumor cells, reducing its binding to CD47 single-positive cells. In mouse transplantation models, compared with the first-generation CD47/PD-L1 BsAb (IMM2505), IMM2520 exhibited stronger and dose-dependent antitumor activity. These findings imply that IMM2520 may offer a novel therapeutic alternative for cancer patients.