Effect of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With pIIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Complete Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy: The Phase 3 PORT-C Randomized Clinical Trial

Molecular risk factors for locoregional recurrence in resected non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Locoregional recurrence is of high risk and is associated with a poor prognosis in terms of OS for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Local control is essential for radical cure of NSCLC. Previous studies have investigated the clinicopathological risk factors for locoregional recurrence, but the genomic biomarkers associated with locoregional recurrence have been inadequately studied.

METHODS

A total of 118 patients who underwent tumor resection with mutation-detected tumor specimens were included. Tumor samples at surgery and pretreatment/postoperative blood samples were collected for mutational profiling.

RESULTS

Among 48 patients with disease recurrence, 46% developed locoregional recurrence (LR) and 75% developed distant metastasis (DM). The 3-year actuarial risk of LR and DM was 25% and 43%, respectively. The first sites of failure were locoregional only (29%), locoregional and distant (10%), and distant only (61%). Patients with LR showed significantly higher ctDNA level than those with only DM at the time of initial recurrence. On multivariate analysis of baseline risk factors, the presence of allele frequency heterogeneity and baseline ctDNA shedding were found to be independently associated with a higher risk of LR. Patients with disruptive TP53 mutations had significantly lower LR-free survival as compared to patients with wild-type TP53 or nondisruptive mutations. EGFR mutations showed a favorable prognostic value for LR and is not induced by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Both disruptive TP53 mutation and EGFR mutation remained the significant prognostic factor after adjustment for histological type, pathologic nodal stage and adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of disease recurrences after surgery for NSCC involved locoregional sites. We identified genomic biomarkers from baseline tumor and ctDNA samples which showed promising prognostic value for LR only. This can help identify patients who had a higher risk of locoregional recurrence regardless of the risk of distant metastasis.

[Updated Interpretation of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (Version 3. 2023) for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality in China. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the main pathological subtype of lung cancer. On April 13, 2023, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) released the third edition of the 2023 NCCN Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, which reflects the latest advances in international lung cancer research. This article will interpret the main updated contents of the new edition of the guidelines, and compare it with the third edition of the NCCN guidelines in 2022, so as to provide references about the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC for clinical medical personnel in China.
.

The impact of postoperative radiotherapy on the survival of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A CONSORT-compliant analysis using the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is commonly used to treat patients with resected stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its effectiveness remains uncertain. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the impact of PORT on overall survival (OS) and evaluate its heterogeneity among subgroups of patients.

METHODS

A total of 6305 patients with resected stage III NSCLC were included in this study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics between the patients who received PORT and those who did not. OS was used as the primary outcome. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify which patient subgroups might benefit more from PORT.

RESULTS

Overall, no significant difference was observed in OS between the 2 groups with or without propensity score matching. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that PORT improved OS in patients with certain characteristics, including stage IIIA/N2, stage IIIB, squamous cell carcinoma, tumor grade III-IV, or lymph node ratio (LNR) > 1/3. Multivariate analysis showed that several variables were associated with adverse prognostic factors for OS, such as marital status (others), race (white), male gender, squamous cell carcinoma, elderly age, advanced stage, poor histological differentiation grade, high LNR, and not receiving chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In patients with resected stage III NSCLC, PORT may not be beneficial for all patients. However, it may improve survival time in certain patient subgroups, such as those with stage IIIA/N2, stage IIIB, squamous cell carcinoma, tumor grade III to IV, or LNR > 1/3. These findings provide important information for clinical decision-making and future research regarding the use of PORT in patients with resected stage III NSCLC.

Role of consolidative thoracic radiation in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with first-line chemoimmunotherapy: a retrospective study from a single cancer center

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of consolidative thoracic radiation (TRT) in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) receiving first-line chemo-immunotherapy followed by immunotherapy maintenance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Outcomes of patients without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed (January 2020 to December 2021). Based on TRT or not, patients were allocated to TRT group or non-TRT group. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and local-recurrence free survival (LRFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients, 47 received TRT and 53 non-TRT. The median follow-up was 20.3 months. The median PFS and OS in TRT were 9.1 months and 21.8 months, versus 8.8 months (p = 0.93) and 24.3 months (p = 0.63), respectively, in non-TRT. The median LRFS time in TRT was not reached, but significantly longer than 10.8 months in non-TRT (HR = 0.27, p < 0.01). Second-line chemotherapy significantly prolonged survival compared to that with chemo-free patients (mOS: 24.5 vs. 21.4 months, p = 0.026). The subgroup analysis showed a trend of patients with brain metastases benefit from TRT (21.8 versus 13.7 months, HR 0.61, p = 0.38) while liver metastases did not. Of 47 patients with TRT, only 10.6% of patients experienced grade 3 radiation-induced pneumonitis, while no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Consolidative TRT in the period of immunotherapy maintenance followed first-line chemo-immunotherapy did not prolong OS and PFS but associated with improved LRFS in ES-SCLC.

Treatment Decisions for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Balancing Less With More?

For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the outcomes for patients with resectable disease are historically poor compared with other solid organ malignancies. In recent years, there have been significant advances in multidisciplinary care, which have resulted in improved outcomes. Innovations in surgical oncology include the use of limited resection and minimally invasive techniques. Recent data in radiation oncology have suggested refinements in pre- and postoperative radiation therapy, resulting in optimization of techniques in the curative setting. Finally, the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in the advanced setting has paved the way for inclusion in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, resulting in recent regulatory approvals for four regimens (CheckMate-816, IMpower010, PEARLS, ADAURA). In this review, we will provide an overview of the seminal studies informing advancements in optimal surgical resection, radiation treatment, and systemic therapy for resectable NSCLC. We will summarize the key data on survival outcomes, biomarker analyses, and future directions for perioperative studies.

Development and validation of a novel nomogram to predict the overall survival of patients with large cell lung cancer: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results population-based study

Background

Large cell lung cancer (LCLC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and little is known about its clinical and biological characteristics.

Methods

LCLC patient data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. All patients were randomly divided into a training group and a validation group at a ratio of 7:3. The independent prognostic factors that were identified (P < 0.01) by stepwise multivariate Cox analysis were incorporated into an overall survival (OS) prediction nomogram, and risk-stratification systems, C-index, time-ROC, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to evaluate the quality of the model.

Results

Nine factors were incorporated into the nomogram: age, sex, race, marital status, 6th AJCC stage, chemotherapy, radiation, surgery and tumor size. The C-index of the predicting OS model in the training dataset and in the test dataset was 0.757 ± 0.006 and 0.764 ± 0.009, respectively. The time-AUCs exceeded 0.8. The DCA curve showed that the nomogram has better clinical value than the TNM staging system.

Conclusions

Our study summarized the clinical characteristics and survival probability of LCLC patients, and a visual nomogram was developed to predict the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS of LCLC patients. This provides more accurate OS assessments for LCLC patients and helps clinicians make personal management decisions.

ASTRO Radiation Therapy Summary of the ASCO Guideline on Management of Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To develop a radiation therapy summary of recommendations on the management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on the Management of Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline, which was endorsed by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASTRO, and the American College of Chest Physicians convened a multidisciplinary panel to develop a guideline based on a systematic review of the literature and a formal consensus process, that has been separately published. A new panel consisting of radiation oncologists from the original guideline as well as additional ASTRO members was formed to provide further guidance to the radiation oncology community. A total of 127 articles met the eligibility criteria to answer 5 clinical questions. This summary focuses on the 3 radiation therapy questions (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and unresectable settings).

RESULTS

Radiation-specific recommendations are summarized with additional relevant commentary on specific questions regarding the management of preoperative radiation, postoperative radiation, and combined chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage III NSCLC who are planned for surgical resection, should receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. The addition of neoadjuvant treatment is particularly important in patients planned for surgery in the N2 or superior sulcus settings. Postoperatively, patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of postoperative radiation for completely resected N2 disease is not routinely recommended. Unresectable patients with stage III NSCLC should ideally be managed with combined concurrent chemoradiation using a platinum-based doublet with a standard radiation dose of 60 Gy followed by consolidation durvalumab in patients without progression after initial therapy. Patients who cannot tolerate a concurrent chemoradiation approach can be managed either by sequential chemotherapy followed by radiation or by dose-escalated or hypofractionated radiation alone.

The Evolving Role for Systemic Therapy in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

During the last 2 decades, the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved from a purely histologic classification system to a more complex model synthesizing clinical, histologic, and molecular data. Biomarker-driven targeted therapies have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring specific driver alterations in EGFR, HER2, KRAS, BRAF, MET, ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK. Novel immuno-oncology agents have contributed to improvements in NSCLC-related survival at the population-level. However, only in recent years has this nuanced understanding of NSCLC permeated into the systemic management of patients with resectable tumors.

Charge reversal yolk-shell liposome co-loaded JQ1 and doxorubicin with high drug loading and optimal ratio for synergistically enhanced tumor chemo-immunotherapy via blockade PD-L1 pathway

Antitumor immunotherapy has become a powerful therapeutic modality to identify and kill various malignant tumors by harnessing the immune system. However, it is hampered by the immunosuppressive microenvironment and poor immunogenicity in malignant tumors. Herein, in order to achieve multi-loading of drugs with different pharmacokinetic properties and targets, a charge reversal yolk-shell liposome co-loaded with JQ1 and doxorubicin (DOX) into the poly (D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) yolk and the lumen of the liposome respectively was engineered to increase hydrophobic drug loading capacity and stability under physiological conditions and further enhance tumor chemotherapy via blockade programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway. This nanoplatform could release less JQ1 compared to traditional liposomes to avoid drug leakage under physiological conditions due to the protection of liposomes on JQ1 loaded PLGA nanoparticles while the release of JQ1 increased in an acidic environment. In the tumor microenvironment, released DOX promoted immunogenic cell death (ICD), and JQ1 blocked the PD-L1 pathway to strengthen chemo-immunotherapy. The in vivo antitumor results demonstrated the collaborative treatment of DOX and JQ1 in B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice models with minimized systemic toxicity. Furthermore, the orchestrated yolk-shell nanoparticle system could enhance the ICD effect, caspase 3 activation, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte infiltration while inhibiting PD-L1 expression, provoking a strong antitumor effect, whereas yolk-shell liposomes encapsulating only JQ1 or DOX showed modest tumor therapeutic effects. Hence, the cooperative yolk-shell liposome strategy provides a potential candidate for enhancement of hydrophobic drug loading and stability, showing potential for clinic application and synergistic cancer chemo-immunotherapy.

Superiority of integrated cervicothoracic immobilization in the setup of lung cancer patients treated with supraclavicular station irradiation

Objective

To investigate the superiority of the integrated cervicothoracic immobilization devices (ICTID) on the mobility of the supraclavicular station in lung cancer patients requiring both primary lung lesion and positive supraclavicular lymph nodes irradiation.

Methods

One hundred patients with lung cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study. The following four different fixation methods are used for CT simulation positioning: thoracoabdominal flat immobilization device fixation with arms lifting (TAFID group), head-neck-shoulder immobilization device fixation with arms on the body sides (HNSID group), ICTID fixation with arms on the body sides (ICTID arms-down group), and n ICTID fixation with arms lifting (ICTID arms-up group). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are taken daily or weekly before treatment, to assess anatomical changes during the radiotherapy course.

Results

The translation errors in X (left-right direction), Y (head-foot direction), and Z (abdomen-back direction) directions of the ICTID arms-up, TAFID, ICTID arms-down and HNSID groups were (0.15 ± 0.18) cm, (0.15 ± 0.16) cm, (0.16 ± 0.16) cm, and (0.15 ± 0.20) cm; (0.15 ± 0.15) cm, (0.21 ± 0.25) cm, (0.28 ± 0.23) cm, and (0.27 ± 0.21) cm; (0.13 ± 0.14) cm, (0.15 ± 0.14) cm, (0.17 ± 0.13) cm, and (0.16 ± 0.14) cm, respectively. Among them, the ICTID arms-up group had the minimal setup errors in X direction than those in ICTID arms-down (p=0.001) and HNSID groups (p=0.001), and in Y direction than those in TAFID (p<0.001), and in Z direction than those in ICTID arms-down (p<0.001) and TAFID groups (p=0.034). For the rotational errors of the four groups in the directions of sagittal plane, transverse plane, and coronal plane, the ICTID arms-up group had the smallest setup errors in the sagittal plane than that of TAFID groups and similar rotation setup errors with those of the other three groups.

Conclusion

For patients requiring radiation of primary lung lesion and positive supraclavicular lymph nodes, an integrated frame fixation device is preferred the ICTID arms-up methods provide the smallest set up error and satisfied repeatability of body position, compared with TAFID and HNSID.

Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Overview of Treatment Options

Lung cancer is the second-most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The most common histological type is non-small-cell lung cancer, accounting for 85% of all lung cancer cases. About one out of three new cases of non-small-cell lung cancer are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage—mainly stage III—consisting of a widely heterogeneous group of patients presenting significant differences in terms of tumor volume, local diffusion, and lymph nodal involvement. Stage III NSCLC therapy is based on the pivotal role of multimodal treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, and a wide-ranging option of systemic treatments. Radical surgery is indicated in the case of hilar lymphnodal involvement or single station mediastinal ipsilateral involvement, possibly after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the best appropriate treatment for multistation mediastinal lymph node involvement still represents a matter of debate. Although the main scope of treatments in this setting is potentially curative, the overall survival rates are still poor, ranging from 36% to 26% and 13% in stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, respectively. The aim of this article is to provide an up-to-date, comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art treatments for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Is a New Era Coming?

The Viepoint discusses several points regarding whether there is enough data to accept neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a daily practice for patients with operable non–small cell lung cancer.

Toxicities and Deaths From Intercurrent Disease Following Contemporary Postoperative Radiotherapy in Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with resected locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial due to the radiation techniques used in randomized trials. We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating contemporary PORT techniques to evaluate the safety of PORT and risk of death from intercurrent disease .

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed consecutive patients with NSCLC treated in a single center that underwent PORT for pN2 disease and/or positive margin, with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy , or proton RT (PRT), between 2008 and 2019. Clinical details were collected including intercurrent deaths, defined as death without cancer recurrence. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-Proportional Hazards Models were used.

RESULTS

Of 119 patients, 21 (17.6%) received 3DRT, 47 (39.5%) intensity modulated radiotherapy, and 51 (42.9%) PRT. Median follow-up was 40 months (range 8-136) and median RT dose was 5040cGy. Most patients (65.5%) received sequential adjuvant chemoRT; 18.5% received concurrent chemoRT. The rate of grade 3 toxicities was 9.2%. There were 13 (10.9%) deaths from intercurrent diseases, including 6 from second primary cancers and 2 from cardiopulmonary diseases. There were 2 additional deaths from cardiopulmonary disease in patients with cancer progression at time of death. Mean, V5Gy, V30Gy heart doses and mean lung doses were significantly lower with PRT. Three-year OS and disease-free-survival were 70.1% and 49.9%.

CONCLUSION

PORT using contemporary techniques was well tolerated with acceptable toxicity and low rates of intercurrent deaths. Proton therapy significantly reduced heart and lung doses, but radiotherapy modality was not associated with differences in intercurrent disease.

Integration of artificial intelligence in lung cancer: Rise of the machine

The goal of oncology is to provide the longest possible survival outcomes with the therapeutics that are currently available without sacrificing patients' quality of life. In lung cancer, several data points over a patient's diagnostic and treatment course are relevant to optimizing outcomes in the form of precision medicine, and artificial intelligence (AI) provides the opportunity to use available data from molecular information to radiomics, in combination with patient and tumor characteristics, to help clinicians provide individualized care. In doing so, AI can help create models to identify cancer early in diagnosis and deliver tailored therapy on the basis of available information, both at the time of diagnosis and in real time as they are undergoing treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature in AI specific to lung cancer and how it applies to the multidisciplinary team taking care of these complex patients.

Evolving Therapeutic Scenario of Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death with an incidence that continues to increase in both sexes and all ages. However, 80% to 90% of lung cancers are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the remaining 10% to 20% are small cell lung cancer. Adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic subtype of lung cancer worldwide. More frequently, lung cancer diagnosis is made in advanced stages. Stage III NSCLC refers to locoregionally advanced disease without metastases and represents about 30% NSCLC cases. Despite the absence of metastases at diagnosis, the outcome is generally poor. Stage III comprises a heterogeneous group and optimal management requires the input of a multidisciplinary team. All modalities of oncologic treatment are involved: surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and more recently, immunotherapy and targeted therapy. We will discuss the different therapeutic options in stage III NSCLC, both in operable and inoperable scenarios, and the role of immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

Cardiac and Pulmonary Dosimetric Parameters in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Radiation Therapy Across a Statewide Consortium

PURPOSE

The recently published Lung Adjuvant Radiotherapy Trial (Lung ART) reported increased rates of cardiac and pulmonary toxic effects in the postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) arm. It remains unknown whether the dosimetric parameters reported in Lung ART are representative of contemporary real-world practice, which remains relevant for patients undergoing PORT for positive surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to examine heart and lung dose exposure in patients receiving PORT for non-small cell lung cancer across a statewide consortium.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2012 to 2022, demographic and dosimetric data were prospectively collected for 377 patients at 27 academic and community centers within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium undergoing PORT for nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Dosimetric parameters for target coverage and organ-at-risk exposure were calculated using data from dose-volume histograms, and rates of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) utilization were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one percent of patients in this cohort had N2 disease at the time of surgery, and 25% had a positive margin. Sixty-six percent of patients were treated with IMRT compared with 32% with 3D-CRT. The planning target volume was significantly smaller in patients treated with 3D-CRT (149.2 vs 265.4 cm³; P < .0001). The median mean heart dose for all patients was 8.7 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 3.5-15.3 Gy), the median heart volume receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) was 35.2% (IQR, 18.5%-60.2%), and the median heart volume receiving at least 35 Gy (V35) was 9% (IQR, 3.2%-17.7%). The median mean lung dose was 11.4 Gy (IQR, 8.1-14.3 Gy), and the median lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20) was 19.6% (IQR, 12.7%-25.4%). These dosimetric parameters did not significantly differ by treatment modality (IMRT vs 3D-CRT) or in patients with positive versus negative surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

With increased rates of IMRT use, cardiac and lung dosimetric parameters in this statewide consortium were slightly lower than those reported in Lung ART. These data provide useful benchmarks for treatment planning in patients undergoing PORT for positive surgical margins.

Treatment patterns and long-term survival outcomes for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

AIM

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Australia with poor long-term survival outcomes. Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly heterogenous group with diverse tumor characteristics and multiple, possible treatment options. We present retrospective data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and long-term outcomes in stage III NSCLC patients treated at a single cancer center in New South Wales, Australia.

METHODS

Stage III NSCLC patients were identified from the 'Nepean Cancer Research Biobank'. Patient demographics, cancer-related information, and long-term follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were eligible for analysis with 61% of them diagnosed as stage IIIA, 35% IIIB, and 4% IIIC. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 20% of the patients. Overall, 48% of the study population underwent surgery, and 38% underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Both median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were superior in stage IIIA patients in comparison to stage IIIB (and IIIC) patients (22 vs. 11 months, p = .018; and 58 vs. 19 months, p = .048, respectively). Patients who were younger (<65 years old), good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS <2), and females had better prognosis on univariate analysis. There was a nonstatistically significant trend toward better median OS with CCRT in comparison to surgery (58 vs. 37 months, p = .87).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes remain poor, and hence better treatment strategies are urgently needed in stage III NSCLC. Equally, more robust, prospective studies would help delineate the optimal treatment modality in these patients.

The association of postoperative radiotherapy with survival in resected N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The current staging system for completely resected pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy is not suitable for distinguishing those patients most likely to benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). This study aimed to construct a survival prediction model that will enable individualized prediction of the net survival benefit of PORT in patients with completely resected N2 NSCLC treated with chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 3,094 cases from between 2002 and 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patient characteristics were included as covariates, and their association with overall survival (OS) with and without PORT was assessed. Data from 602 patients from China were included for external validation.

Results

Age, sex, the number of examined/positive lymph nodes, tumor size, the extent of surgery, and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) were significantly associated with OS (P<0.05). Two nomograms were developed based on clinical variables to estimate individuals' net survival difference attributable to PORT. The calibration curve showed excellent agreement between the OS predicted by the prediction model and that actually observed. In the training cohort, the C-index for OS was 0.619 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.598-0.641] in the PORT group and 0.627 (95% CI: 0.605-0.648) in the non-PORT group. Results showed that PORT could improve OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.861; P=0.044] for patients with a positive PORT net survival difference.

Conclusions

Our practical survival prediction model can be used to make an individualized estimate of the net survival benefit of PORT for patients with completely resected N2 NSCLC who have been treated with chemotherapy.

Real world practice of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a national survey of radiation oncologists in China

BACKGROUND

Results from Lung ART and PORT-C trials suggest that postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) cannot routinely be recommended as standard treatment in completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC patients, but their effects on the real-world practice of PORT in China remain unclear.

METHODS

A national cross-section survey was conducted by using an online survey service. Participants were voluntarily recruited using a river sampling strategy. A link to the survey was posted on websites of radiation oncologist associations and tweets from public WeChat accounts. The survey collected the real names of participants to ensure that they were board-certified radiation oncologists.

RESULTS

A total of 484 radiation oncologists were included with a median age of 40 years (IQR, 35-47). A total of 377 (77.9%) participants were male, and 282 (58.1%) had more than 10 years of clinical experience practicing thoracic radiotherapy. Before Lung ART and PORT-C trials were published, 313 (64.7%) respondents recommended PORT, 11 (2.3%) did not recommend it, and 160 (33.1%) reported that they made decisions based on risk factors. After the presentation of two trials, only 42 (8.7%) did not recommend PORT, while 108 (22.3%) recommended it, and 334 (69.0%) made decisions based on risk factors. The five most commonly considered risk factors among these 334 respondents were as follows: nodal extracapsular extension, the highest lymph node (LN) station involved, the number of dissected mediastinal LN stations, the number of positive mediastinal LN stations, and surgical approaches. In addition, the majority of all 484 respondents recommended a total dose of 50 Gy, lung stump + ipsilateral hilus + regions containing positive LNs as the targeted region, lung V20 < 25%, and heart V30 < 40% as dose constraints for PORT.

CONCLUSION

Most Chinese radiation oncologists recommended PORT for completely resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients based on risk factors, especially status of LN station.

Progress on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer and potential biomarkers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly concerned in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), represented by inhibitors of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), and inhibitors of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). The introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment of perioperative NSCLC has improved the prognosis to a great extent, as demonstrated by several phase II and III clinical trials. The target population for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC is still under discussion, and the biomarkers for neoadjuvant immunotherapy population selection are the next pending problem. The predictive efficacy of many potential makers is still being explored, including PD-L1 expression levels, tumor mutation burden, circulating tumor DNA, components of the tumor microenvironment, and several clinical factors. We summarize key findings on the utility of ICIs in clinical trials of preoperative NSCLC patients and conclude analyses of relevant biomarkers to provide a better understanding of potentially predictive biomarkers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Survival outcome of upfront surgery for clinical single-station N2 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pathological N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is diverse; its treatment depends on the clinical N (cN) status. We aimed to determine the efficacy of upfront surgery for cN2pN2 NSCLC.

METHODS

The study included 43 cN2pN2 NSCLC patients who underwent upfront surgery at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2002 and 2017. Survival outcome, focusing on cN2 status, was retrospectively investigated. Mediastinal lymph nodes were pre-operatively evaluated using computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Surgical eligibility criteria included single-station cN2. N2 with N1 and skip N2 were defined as N2 with and without ipsilateral hilar lymph node metastasis, respectively. A platinum-doublet regimen was used for adjuvant chemotherapy. Survival curves were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

Clinical-skip N2 and cN2 with N1 cases included 22 and 21 patients, respectively. Twenty-three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up duration was 73 months. Clinical-skip N2 had a significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) than cN2 with N1 (58.3 vs 28.6%, P = 0.038) and was an independent favorable RFS predictor. Recurrence within 18 months occurred in 71% of cN2 with N1 cases. Five-year overall survival and RFS rates in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy vs those without adjuvant chemotherapy were 82.2 vs 41.9% (P = 0.019) and 56.5 vs 28.0% (P = 0.049), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical-skip N2 had an excellent prognosis, and upfront surgery was acceptable. Conversely, upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy is not recommended for cN2 with N1 patients because of early recurrence.

Research progress of extracellular vesicles as biomarkers in immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most severe forms of malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, of which non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most primary type observed in the clinic. NSCLC is mainly treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Additionally, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have also shown promising results. Several immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been developed for clinical use and have benefited patients with NSCLC. However, immunotherapy faces several challenges like poor response and unknown effective population. It is essential to identify novel predictive markers to further advance precision immunotherapy for NSCLC. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) present an important research direction. In this review, we focus on the role of EVs as a biomarker in NSCLC immunotherapy considering various perspectives, including the definition and properties of EVs, their role as biomarkers in current NSCLC immunotherapy, and different EV components as biomarkers in NSCLC immunotherapy research. We describe the cross-talk between the role of EVs as biomarkers and novel technical approaches or research concepts in NSCLC immunotherapy, such as neoadjuvants, multi-omics analysis, and the tumour microenvironment. This review will provide a reference for future research to improve the benefits of immunotherapy for patients with NSCLC.

[Postoperative radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIA - N2: Focus and perspectives]

Patients with resectable stage IIIA - N2 lung cancer represent a very heterogeneous population with variable risks of postoperative recurrence depending on the type of N2 involvement (unisite N2, multisite N2, bulky N2, extra-capsular rupture, incomplete resection…). This heterogeneity associated with the difficulty of carrying out prospective randomized studies with sufficient power in stages IIIA - 2, results in the absence of clear and consensual recommendations (except for stages IIIA - N2 resectable R0, since LungART and PORT-C studies). The objective of this article is to make an update on the place of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of stages IIIA - N2 following the publication of two recent randomized trials (PORT-C and LungART) but also compare them fort a better understanding of the current issues raised by these first published results. Indeed, these two trials do not find any benefit in terms of progression free survival and overall survival of postoperative radiotherapy but exploratory analyzes from these two studies seem to show a potential benefit of postoperative in some pN2 populations at high risk of locoregional recurrence (N2 multisite, N2 bulky…). In addition, the advent of immunotherapy (atezolizumab or pembrolizumab) and targeted therapies (osimertinib) in the adjuvant situation are redebating the place of a possible indication for postoperative radiotherapy in stage IIIA - 2.

ER predicts poor prognosis in male lung squamous cell cancer of stage IIIA-N2 disease after sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Introduction

The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is still unclear in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pIIIA-N2 disease. Estrogen receptor (ER) was proven significantly associated with poor clinical outcome of male lung squamous cell cancer (LUSC) after R0 resection in our previous study.

Methods

A total of 124 male pIIIA-N2 LUSC patients who completed four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT after complete resection were eligible for enrollment in this study from October 2016 to December 2021. ER expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry assay.

Results

The median follow-up was 29.7 months. Among 124 patients, 46 (37.1%) were ER positive (stained tumor cells≥1%), and the rest 78 (62.9%) were ER negative. Eleven clinical factors considered in this study were well balanced between ER+ and ER- groups. ER expression significantly predicted a poor prognosis in disease-free survival (DFS, HR=2.507; 95% CI: 1.629-3.857; log-rank p=1.60×10^-5). The 3-year DFS rates were 37.8% with ER- vs. 5.7% with ER+, with median DFS 25.9 vs. 12.6 months, respectively. The significant prognostic advantage in ER- patients was also observed in overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). The 3-year OS rates were 59.7% with ER- vs. 48.2% with ER+ (HR, 1.859; 95% CI: 1.132-3.053; log-rank p=0.013), the 3-year LRFS rates were 44.1% vs. 15.3% (HR=2.616; 95% CI: 1.685-4.061; log-rank p=8.80×10^-6), and the 3-year DMFS rates were 45.3% vs. 31.8% (HR=1.628; 95% CI: 1.019-2.601; log-rank p=0.039). Cox regression analyses indicated that ER status was the only significant factor for DFS (p=2.940×10^-5), OS (p=0.014), LRFS (p=1.825×10^-5) and DMFS (p=0.041) among other 11 clinical factors.

Conclusions

PORT might be more beneficial for ER negative LUSCs in male, and the examination of ER status might be helpful in identifying patients suitable for PORT.

The Value of Radiotherapy in Patients With Resectable Stage IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Individualized Treatment: A Population-Based Analysis

INTRODUCTION

No consensus has been achieved on the benefit of radiotherapy for resected stage IIIA NSCLC patients. The division of stage IIIA has changed significantly in 2017. This study aims to explore the effects of radiotherapy on the survival of patients with resectable stage IIIA NSCLC in the new era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 2010 and 2018 were identified in the 8th edition TNM classification from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A nomogram was developed by integrating all independent predictors for lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). The Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and subgroup analysis were applied to mitigate potential bias. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2632 stage IIIA NSCLC patients were enrolled. The C-index of the nomogram for the prediction of LCSS was 0.636 (95% CI, 0.616-0.656). In the group of patients with N2 stage who featured more than 5 positive regional lymph nodes, compared with non-PORT, PORT did prolong postoperative survival time (50 vs. 31 months; P= .005). N2 patients with visceral pleural invasion (VPI), older (age >65), or had a larger tumor (size >3 cm) could also benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment protocol for stage IIIA NSCLC patients should be individualized. Based on our findings, N2 patients with more than 5 positive regional lymph nodes, VPI, larger tumor size (greater than 3 cm), and older (age above 65) could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Further well-designed randomized trials are warranted.

The prognostic value of postoperative radiotherapy in right tumor for lung related death: based on SEER database and real-world data

Background

Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is a therapeutic strategy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, some studies suggesting PORT does not improve overall survival (OS) including Lung ART phase III trial. The role of PORT and high-risk groups need to be confirmed.

Methods

Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) from 2004 to 2015 were eligible. Aged ≥18 years with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, accepted PORT or not were considered for the study. Cox regression analyses and multivariate competing risk model were performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. Data from a single-center study in China were used for validation.

Results

In all patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC, death from respiratory illness increased year by year, with right lung-related deaths accounting for the main proportion. In SEER database, PORT was detrimental for OS after PSM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.088; 95% CI, 1.088-1.174; P = 0.031), with a same trend for death from the lungs (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22; P = 0.005). Right tumor receiving PORT were prone to death from lung disease(HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.27; P = 0.018). In China single-center cohort, PORT was significantly correlated with deteriorated OS (HR 1.356; 95% CI 1.127-1.632; P <0.01), especially in the right laterality (HR 1.365; 95% CI 1.062-1.755; P = 0.015).

Conclusions

PORT was a risk factor for stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients, particularly with characters of right laterality, male sex, age ≥65 years, and advanced tumor stage. These patients are more likely to death from lung disease after PORT.

New and effective EGFR-targeted fluorescence imaging technology for intraoperative rapid determination of lung cancer in freshly isolated tissue

PURPOSE

During lung cancer surgery, it is very important to define tumor boundaries and determine the surgical margin distance. In previous research, systemically application of fluorescent probes can help medical professionals determine the boundaries of tumors and find small tumors and metastases, thereby improving the accuracy of surgical resection. However, there are very few safe and effective probes that can be applied to clinical trials up to now, which limits the clinical application of fluorescence imaging. Here we developed a new technology that can quickly identify the tumor area in the resected lung tissue during the operation and distinguish the tumor boundary and metastatic lymph nodes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

For animal studies, a PDX model of lung cancer was established. The tumors, lungs, and peritumoral muscle tissues of tumor-bearing mice were surgically removed and incubated with a probe targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for 20 min, and then imaged by a closed-field near-infrared two-zone (NIR-II) fluorescence imaging system. For clinical samples, ten surgically removed lung tissues and 60 lymph nodes from 10 lung cancer patients undergoing radical resection were incubated with the targeting probe immediately after intraoperative resection and imaged to identify the tumor area and distinguish the tumor boundary and metastatic lymph nodes. The accuracy of fluorescence imaging was confirmed by HE staining and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The ex vivo animal imaging experiments showed a fluorescence enhancement of tumor tissue. For clinical samples, our results showed that this new technology yielded more than 85.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity in identifying the tumor area in the resected lung tissue. The average fluorescence tumor-to-background ratio was 2.5 ± 1.3. Furthermore, we also used this technique to image metastatic lymph nodes intraoperatively and showed that metastatic lymph nodes have brighter fluorescence than normal lymph nodes, as the average fluorescence tumor-to-background signal ratio was 2.7 ± 1.1. Calculations on the results of the fluorescence signal in relation to the number of metastatic lymph nodes yielded values of 77.8% for sensitivity and 92.1% for specificity. We expect this new technology to be a useful diagnostic tool for rapid intraoperative pathological detection and margin determination.

CONCLUSIONS

By using fluorescently labeled anti-human EGFR recombinant antibody scFv fragment to incubate freshly isolated tissues during surgery, the probes can quickly accumulate in lung cancer tissues, which can be used to quickly identify tumor areas in the resected lung tissues and distinguish tumor boundaries and find metastases in lymph nodes. This technology is expected to be used for rapid intraoperative pathological detection and margin determination.

Update on Adjuvant Treatment in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Potential Biomarkers Predicting Postoperative Relapse

A significant proportion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is diagnosed in the early and resectable stage. Despite the use of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, there was only a marginal increase in overall survival and a 15% decrease in relapse. With the advents of immunotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), the landscape of adjuvant treatment in completely resectable NSCLC is changing. Postoperative radiotherapy can be beneficial to patients who underwent surgical resection in certain clinical settings. In addition, new biomarkers that predict efficacy of EGFR TKI and immunotherapy as adjuvant treatment are also necessary. In this review, recent updates in adjuvant treatment in resectable NSCLC were briefly explained.

[Review for N2 Sub-staging in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were heterogeneous groups and required further stratification. The International Society for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) divided N2 into three sub-stages: N2 at a single station without N1 involvement (N2a1), N2 at a single station with N1 involvement (N2a2), and N2 at multiple stations (N2b). These new descriptors significantly distinguished the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern of patients with different N2 sub-stages. The OS and DFS of N2a1 were not sufficiently distinguished from N1 at multiple stations (N1b). The OS and DFS of N2a2 were intermediate between those of N2a1 and N2b. Current evidence did not support the further subdivision of the N2b. The main recurrence pattern of N2a1, N2a2 and N2b were distant metastasis, and the risks of distant metastasis increased successively. N2a1 patients were at low risk of locoregional recurrence, which could not be reduced by postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). N2a2 and N2b patients had a similar higher risk of locoregional recurrence, which could be reduced to a similar level of N2a1 patients by PORT.
.

Uncertain resection of highest mediastinal lymph node positive among pN2 non-small cell lung cancer patients: survival analysis of postoperative radiotherapy and driver gene mutations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in uncertain resection of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with highest mediastinal lymph node positive has not been determined. We aim to evaluate the effect of PORT and driver gene mutation status (DGMS) on survival in such patients.

METHODS

140 selected patients were grouped according to whether they received PORT and their DGMS. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) of each group were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analyses. COX regression was used to evaluate the effects of various factors on DFS and OS.

RESULTS

Of 140 patients, thirty-four patients (24.3%) received PORT, and forty (28.6%) had positive driver gene mutation status (DGp). PORT significantly prolonged LRFS (p = 0.002), DFS (p = 0.019) and OS (p = 0.02), but not DMFS (p = 0.062). By subgroup analysis, in patients with negative driver gene mutation status (DGn), those receiving PORT had notably longer LRFS (p = 0.022) and DFS (p = 0.033), but not DMFS (p = 0.060) or OS (p = 0.215), compared to those not receiving PORT. Cox analysis showed that the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) and administration of PORT were independent prognostic factors of DFS, and pathology, PLNs, and DGMS may be prognostic factors of OS (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative radiotherapy may improve locoregional recurrence-free and disease-free survival in patients with pN2 NSCLC with positive highest mediastinal lymph nodes, while driver gene mutation status impacted OS significantly. Only patients with positive driver gene mutations experienced significant overall survival benefits from postoperative radiotherapy.

Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Survival in Patients with Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Following Pneumonectomy

Background: Pneumonectomy is a drastic but sometimes inevitable treatment option for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to improve their chances for long-term survival. However, the optimal adjuvant radiotherapy used for patients with N2 NSCLC following pneumonectomy remains unclear in the literature. Methods: T1-4N0-2M0 NSCLC patients registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was applied to balance the assignment of patients. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan−Meier analyses were used to identify the factors related to overall survival rates. Restricted cubic splines were used to detect the possible nonlinear dependency of the relationship between the risk of survival and age. Results: A total of 4308 NSCLC patients were enrolled in this study. In N2 patients, the long-term outcome of the chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy groups was the worst (p = 0.014). Subgroup analyses showed that the influence of age on survival outcome was confined to patients who received chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.004). Meanwhile, patients >65 years of age who received chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy had significantly worse prognoses than those in the chemotherapy group (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our results show that neoadjuvant radiotherapy may have potential benefits in patients aged ≤ 65 years who are scheduled for pneumonectomy, but not in elderly patients.

The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

The controversy over the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has existed for a long time. The present study reassessed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) data to investigate whether PORT can improve survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The following databases were used to perform literature search: PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Embase (from January 1, 1986 to July 5, 2021). The results of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated as hazard ratio (HR). Confidence intervals are chosen with 95% confidence intervals. A total of 12 RCTs and 19 retrospective cohort studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. A significant DFS improvement was detected in the PORT group (4111 patients from 15 studies), although statistical difference was not detected for OS between the non-PORT and PORT groups (31 studies, 49,342 total patients). PORT prolonged OS in patients undergoing PORT plus postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and in pN2 patients. Patients with a median radiation dose of 50.4 Gy and a median radiation dose of 54 Gy had a better OS after PORT. However, if the total radiotherapy dose went up to 60 Gy, PORT increased the risk of death in NSCLC patients. Significant difference in OS was not found in the results of studies with regard to treatment methods, pathologic stages, study type, radiation beam quality, and radiation dose. Patients undergoing postoperative chemoradiotherapy and pN2 patients can benefit from PORT. Patients exposed to median radiation doses of 50.4 and 54 Gy demonstrated relatively good efficacy. For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, PORT has not been proven to extend OS, but its effect on DFS remains strong.

The Multidisciplinary Approach in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer over Ten Years: From Radiation Therapy Optimisation to Innovative Systemic Treatments

Background: About 30% of new non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage, which includes a highly heterogeneous group of patients with a wide spectrum of treatment options. The management of stage III NSCLC involves a multidisciplinary team, adequate staging, and a careful patient selection for surgery or radiation therapy integrated with systemic treatment. Methods: This is a single-center observational retrospective and prospective study including a consecutive series of stage III NSCLC patients who were referred to the Veneto Institute of Oncology and University Hospital of Padova (Italy) between 2012 and 2021. We described clinico-pathological characteristics, therapeutic pathways, and treatment responses in terms of radiological response in the entire study population and in terms of pathological response in patients who underwent surgery after induction therapy. Furthermore, we analysed survival outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 301 patients were included. The majority of patients received surgical multimodality treatment (n = 223, 74.1%), while the remaining patients (n = 78, 25.9%) underwent definitive CRT followed or not by durvalumab as consolidation therapy. At data cut-off, 188 patients (62.5%) relapsed and the median RFS (mRFS) of the entire population was 18.2 months (95% CI: 15.83−20.57). At the time of analyses 140 patients (46.5%) were alive and the median OS (mOS) was 44.7 months (95% CI: 38.4−51.0). A statistically significant difference both in mRFS (p = 0.002) and in mOS (p < 0.001) was observed according to the therapeutic pathway in the entire population, and selecting patients treated after 2018, a significant difference in mRFS (p = 0.006) and mOS (p < 0.001) was observed according to treatment modality. Furthermore, considering only patients diagnosed with stage IIIB-C (N = 131, 43.5%), there were significant differences both in mRFS (p = 0.047) and in mOS (p = 0.022) as per the treatment algorithm. The mRFS of the unresectable population was 16.3 months (95% CI: 11.48−21.12), with a significant difference among subgroups (p = 0.030) in favour of patients who underwent the PACIFIC-regimen; while the mOS was 46.5 months (95% CI: 26.46−66.65), with a significant difference between two subgroups (p = 0.003) in favour of consolidation immunotherapy. Conclusions: Our work provides insights into the management and the survival outcomes of stage III NSCLC over about 10 years. We found that the choice of radical treatment impacts on outcome, thus suggesting the importance of appropriate staging at diagnosis, patient selection, and of the multidisciplinary approach in the decision-making process. Our results confirmed that the PACIFIC trial and the following introduction of durvalumab as consolidation treatment may be considered as a turning point for several improvements in the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway of stage III NSCLC patients.

Research landscape and trends of lung cancer radiotherapy: A bibliometric analysis

Background

radiotherapy is one of the major treatments for lung cancer and has been a hot research area for years. This bibliometric analysis aims to present the research trends on lung cancer radiotherapy.

Method

On August 31, 2022, the authors identified 9868 articles on lung cancer radiotherapy by the Web of Science (Science Citation Indexing Expanded database) and extracted their general information and the total number of citations. A bibliometric analysis was carried out to present the research landscape, demonstrate the research trends, and determine the most cited papers (top-papers) as well as top-journals on lung cancer radiotherapy. After that, the authors analyzed the recent research hotspots based on the latest publications in top-journals.

Results

These 9868 papers were cited a total of 268,068 times. “Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non–small-cell lung cancer” published in 2017 by Antonia et al.was the most cited article (2110 citations). Among the journals, New England Journal of Medicine was most influential. Moreover, J. Clin. Oncol. and Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. was both influential and productive. Corresponding authors represented the USA (2610 articles) and China mainland (2060 articles) took part in most publications and articles with corresponding authors from Netherlands were most cited (46.12 citations per paper). Chemoradiotherapy was the hottest research area, and stereotactic body radiotherapy has become a research hotspot since 2006. Radiotherapy plus immunotherapy has been highly focused since 2019.

Conclusions

This bibliometric analysis comprehensively and quantitatively presents the research trends and hotspots based on 9868 relevant articles, and further suggests future research directions. The researchers can benefit in selecting journals and in finding potential collaborators. This study can help researchers gain a comprehensive picture of the research landscape, historical development, and recent hotspots in lung cancer radiotherapy and can provide inspiration for future research.

Adjuvant radiation therapy improves survival in stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer with persistent N2 disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Role of adjuvant radiation therapy in stage III (N2) non-small cell lung cancer has been controversial over the decades. Recent large, randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant radiation did not improve overall survival or disease-free survival; however, the trials either excluded or enrolled very few cases that have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Role of adjuvant radiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. Whether the use of adjuvant radiation is associated with improved overall survival in those who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially in a subgroup of patients with persistent N2, is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with clinical stage III (N2) non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed from 2004 through 2017 were queried to National Cancer Database. Eligibility criteria included completely resected (R0), pathological diagnosis, neoadjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy, information regarding post-surgical N2 status (persistent versus downstaged to pN0-1), adjuvant radiation (45 Gy+ versus none), and American Joint Commission on Cancer staging version (6th versus 7th). Those who have received neoadjuvant radiation with any dose or adjuvant radiation with less than 45 Gy total dose were excluded. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for survival analyses. Propensity-score matching analysis was used for validation. All statistical analyses were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was required for statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 1,855 patients met the eligibility criteria for analysis. In the overall cohort, there was a significant difference in overall survival between persistent N2 (Cohort P: N = 854, median survival 50.7 months) and downstaged N (Cohort D: N = 1,001, median survival 82.7 months). The use of adjuvant radiation showed a non-significant detrimental effect in overall survival in the overall and Cohort D (univariate p-values 0.27 and 0.077, respectively); however, both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival in Cohort P (p = 0.004 and 0.028, respectively). These findings are also verified by propensity-score matching analysis (p = 0.0347).

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale retrospective analysis suggests that adjuvant radiation may still have a role in persistent N2 disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further investigations are warranted.

Postoperative radiotherapy with modern techniques does not improve survival for operable stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate whether postoperative radiotherapy using newer techniques (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT]) is associated with improved survival for patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent complete resection.

METHODS

The overall survival of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC who received postoperative IMRT versus no postoperative IMRT following induction chemotherapy and lobectomy in the National Cancer Database from 2010-2018 was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Additional survival analyses were also conducted in patients with completely resected stage IIIA-pN2 NSCLC who had upfront lobectomy (without induction therapy) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy alone or adjuvant chemotherapy with postoperative IMRT. Only patients receiving IMRT, which is a newer, more conformal radiotherapy technique, were included. Patients with positive surgical margins were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 3203 patients with stage IIA-N2 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy were included. Five hundred eighty-eight (18.4%) patients underwent induction chemotherapy followed by lobectomy, and 2615 (82%) underwent lobectomy followed by chemotherapy. In unadjusted, multivariable-adjusted, and propensity score--matched analyses, there were no significant differences in overall survival between the patients who also received postoperative IMRT versus those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, the use of postoperative IMRT was not associated with improved survival in patients with completely resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with or without induction chemotherapy.

A Cast of Shadow on Postoperative Radiotherapy for pIIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

This Viewpoint discusses 2 recent randomized clinical trials evaluating the role of mediastinal postoperative radiotherapy in patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

Utilization of model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence frameworks in oncology: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being utilized in oncology research for use in the clinic. However, while more complicated models may provide improvements in predictive or prognostic power, a hurdle to their adoption are limits of model interpretability, wherein the inner workings can be perceived as a "black box". Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) frameworks including Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are novel, model-agnostic approaches that aim to provide insight into the inner workings of the "black box" by producing quantitative visualizations of how model predictions are calculated. In doing so, XAI can transform complicated ML models into easily understandable charts and interpretable sets of rules, which can give providers with an intuitive understanding of the knowledge generated, thus facilitating the deployment of such models in routine clinical workflows.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive, non-systematic review of the latest literature to define use cases of model-agnostic XAI frameworks in oncologic research. The examined database was PubMed/MEDLINE. The last search was run on May 1, 2022.

Key Content and Findings

In this review, we identified several fields in oncology research where ML models and XAI were utilized to improve interpretability, including prognostication, diagnosis, radiomics, pathology, treatment selection, radiation treatment workflows, and epidemiology. Within these fields, XAI facilitates determination of feature importance in the overall model, visualization of relationships and/or interactions, evaluation of how individual predictions are produced, feature selection, identification of prognostic and/or predictive thresholds, and overall confidence in the models, among other benefits. These examples provide a basis for future work to expand on, which can facilitate adoption in the clinic when the complexity of such modeling would otherwise be prohibitive.

Conclusions

Model-agnostic XAI frameworks offer an intuitive and effective means of describing oncology ML models, with applications including prognostication and determination of optimal treatment regimens. Using such frameworks presents an opportunity to improve understanding of ML models, which is a critical step to their adoption in the clinic.

Trends in Postoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Use and Its Association With Survival Among Patients With Incompletely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

IMPORTANCE

National guidelines allow consideration of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) among patients with incompletely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is a paucity of prospective data because recently completed trials excluded patients with positive surgical margins. In addition, unlike for locally advanced NSCLC, the role of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for PORT remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trends of IMRT use for PORT in the US and the association of IMRT with survival outcomes among patients with incompletely resected NSCLC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database for patients diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2019 with incompletely resected NSCLC who underwent upfront surgery with positive surgical margins followed by PORT.

EXPOSURES

IMRT vs 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for PORT.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was overall survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the association of IMRT vs 3DCRT with overall survival. Multivariable logistic regression identified variables associated with IMRT. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on variables of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 4483 patients (2439 men [54.4%]; median age, 67 years [IQR, 60-73 years]) were included in the analysis. Of those, 2116 (47.2%) underwent 3DCRT and 2367 (52.8%) underwent IMRT. Median follow-up was 48.5 months (IQR, 31.1-77.2 months). The proportion of patients who underwent IMRT increased from 14.3% (13 of 91 patients) in 2004 to 70.7% (33 of 471 patients) in 2019 (P < .001). IMRT was associated with improved overall survival compared with 3DCRT (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91; P < .001). Similar findings were observed for 1463 propensity score-matched pairs; IMRT was associated with improved 5-year overall survival compared with 3DCRT (37.3% vs 32.2%; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P = .003). IMRT use was associated with receipt of treatment at an academic facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.33; P = .049), having T4 stage tumors (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13-1.99; P = .005) or N2 or N3 stage tumors (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.51; P = .02), and receipt of pneumonectomy (aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.80; P = .04).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that use of IMRT for PORT among patients with incompletely resected NSCLC increased in the US from 2004 to 2019 and was associated with improved survival compared with 3DCRT. Further studies are warranted to investigate the role of different radiation therapy techniques for PORT.

Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a robust predictor of survival and benefits from postoperative radiotherapy in stage IIIA‐N2 resected non‐small cell lung cancer

Background

The significance of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) on the survival of resected IIIA‐N2 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Here, we aimed to determine the predictive value of the three nodal classifications which might aid in PORT decision‐making.

Methods

A total of 4797 patients with stage IIIA‐N2 resected NSCLC were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and were grouped by whether PORT was administered. Survival analysis was used to identify the patient groups who can benefit from PORT. Multivariate analysis was performed to confirm the independent risk factors for lung cancer‐specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS). A validation cohort of 1184 patients from three medical centers in China were also included.

Results

PORT was not associated with better LCSS and OS in the entire cohort after propensity score matching (PSM). However, in the subgroups of positive lymph nodes 4 (PLN4), lymph node ratio 4 (LNR4), and log odds of positive lymph nodes 4 (LODDS4), PORT exhibited its role in improving LCSS (p < 0.05). Although the three nodal classifications were all identified as independent predictors of LCSS and OS, LODDS classification had the best discriminatory ability and prognostic accuracy for stage IIIA‐N2 patients. Similar results were also obtained in the validation cohort.

Conclusions

The LODDS classification not only exhibited the best prognostic performance in predicting LCSS and OS in stage IIIA‐N2 disease, but also could help tailor individualized PORT.

Current challenges of unresectable stage III NSCLC: are we ready to break the glass ceiling of the PACIFIC trial?

Consolidation anti-programmed death-ligand 1 has become a new standard of care in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT), based on the results of two phase III trials. Advances remain however needed, in particular to reduce the risk of distant relapse and for treatment personalization. Newer strategies are currently being tested, including consolidation with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concurrent chemo-radioimmunotherapy and (chemo)-immunotherapy induction before CTRT. One randomized phase II reported better outcomes with a double ICI consolidation as compared with durvalumab alone. Three nonrandomized phase II trials also suggested that concurrent ICI-CTRT was feasible. Within this review, we summarize the current evidence, highlight ongoing trials and discuss challenges that will ideally lead to a cure for more patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Construction and Validation of a Recurrent Risk Nomogram Model for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer within 1 Year after Radical Resection

Objective

To explore the risk factors of recurrence within 1 year after radical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and construct the nomogram model.

Methods

The clinical data of 186 patients with NSCLC treated with radical surgery in Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities of Baise were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to analyze the risk factors of recurrence within 1 year after radical resection of NSCLC. The R language (R 4.0.3 software package) was used in constructing the nomogram model, and the predictive value of the model was evaluated.

Results

The recurrence rate of 186 patients within 1 year after radical surgery was 29.57%. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, pathological stage, number of lymph node metastasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), postoperative plasma D-dimer, and carcinoembryonic antigen were independent factors for recurrence within 1 year after radical resection of NSCLC (P < 0.05). Based on the above independent risk factors, a nomogram model was established, with the distinction of AUC = 0.891 (95% CI: 0.819–0.964) and sensitivity and specificity of 70.3% and 97.8%, respectively. The calibration curve was close to the ideal curve. External validation of the model showed AUC = 0.801 (95% CI: 0.674–0.928), and sensitivity and specificity were 66.7% and 84.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

The recurrence of NSCLC within 1 year after radical surgery was related to a variety of factors, and the nomogram model constructed based on risk factors had good goodness of fit, calibration, consistency of prediction, and prediction efficiency.

Postoperative radiotherapy in pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science databases, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched to extract randomized control trials comparing PORT with observation in pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients until October 2021. Main outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and local recurrence.

RESULTS

Three-phase 3 randomized control trials involving 902 patients were included: 455 patients in the PORT group and 447 patients in the observation group. The methodological quality of the 3 randomized control trials were high quality. The pooled analysis revealed that PORT decreased local recurrence rate (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.76). However, PORT did not improve median DFS (hazard ratio = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-1.00) and OS (hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.68-1.52).

CONCLUSIONS

PORT decreased the incidence of local recurrence. However, PORT did not improve DFS and OS.

The effect of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on survival after R0 resection for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after R0 resection, and it is still controversial whether conventional adjuvant radiotherapy is needed. We used meta-analysis to try to answer whether adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) can bring survival benefits to patients with stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after R0 resection.

METHODS

Up to June 25, 2021, the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched, and clinical studies on POCRT for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer were included. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 8959 patients were included in 5 randomized controlled trials and 17 retrospective studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed that POCRT could improve 3 and 5 years overall survival (OS) rate (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.05-2.20; OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.16-1.46), 3 and 5 years disease-free survival (DFS) rate (OR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.01-1.76; OR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.43-2.12), and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate (OR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.76-4.11) in patients with stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer compared with adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) alone. But could not improve 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate (OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.52-2.52). The results of subgroup analysis showed that postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy could improve the 3 and 5 years OS rate (OR = 2.06, 95%CI: 1.22-3.46; OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.21-1.59). Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can improve the 3 and 5 years OS rate (OR = 1.80, 95%CI: 1.09-2.99; OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.04-1.66). In addition, POCRT could improve the 3-year OS rate (OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.21-2.92) in patients with N2 single-station lymph node metastasis compared with POCT alone.

CONCLUSION

Compared with POCT alone, adjuvant POCRT can significantly improve the overall survival rate of patients with NSCLC after R0 resection of stage III-N2, especially in patients with N2 single-station lymph node metastasis. Accurate radiotherapy techniques such as 3DCRT or IMRT are recommended, and postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy is the best treatment mode.

Adjuvant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials & methods: Eligible phase II/III randomized controlled trials were included for the network meta-analyses (PROSPERO CRD42021275150). Results: Nine records and 831 patients were involved. Adjuvant chemotherapy followed with osimertinib significantly prolonged disease-free survival compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.14-0.29), chemotherapy followed with erlotinib (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18-0.6), chemotherapy followed with gefitinib (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16-0.82), gefitinib (HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.17-0.41) and icotinib (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.3-0.98). Icotinib was the least likely to cause grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion: Chemotherapy followed with osimertinib brings about the best disease-free survival. Icotinib monotherapy shows the best safety.

Practice changing data and emerging concepts from recent radiation therapy randomised clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Oncology treatments are constantly and rapidly evolving. We aimed at highlighting the latest radiation therapy practice changing trials and emerging concepts, through an overview of recent randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Requests were performed in the Medline database to identify all publications reporting radiation therapy RCTs from 2018 to 2021.

RESULTS

Recent RCTs sustained the role of newer combinatorial strategies through radioimmunotherapy for early stage or metastatic lung cancer, newer pro-apoptotic agents (e.g. debio 1143 in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) or nanoparticles (e.g. NBTXR3 in locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma). High-tech radiotherapy allows intensifying treatments and gaining ground in some indications through the development of stereotactic body radiotherapy for example. First randomised evidence on personalised radiation therapy through imaging-based (¹⁸FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography for lung cancer or early stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma, PMSA positron emission tomography-computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for high-risk prostate cancer) or biological biomarkers (PSA for prostate cancer, HPV for head and neck cancer, etc) were conducted to more tailored treatments, with more favourable outcomes. Patients' quality of life and satisfaction appeared to be increasing aims. RCTs have validated (ultra)hypofractionated schemes in many indications as for breast, prostate or rectal cancer, resulting in equivalent outcomes and toxicities, more convenient for patients and favouring shared decision making.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy is a dynamic field of research, and many RCTs have greatly impacted therapeutic standards over the last years. Investments in radiotherapy research should facilitate the transfer of innovation to clinic.

A decision support framework for postoperative radiotherapy in patients with pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) plays a highly controversial role in pathological N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) disease. Recent studies reveal that not all patients can benefit from PORT. Further research is needed to identify predictors of PORT.

METHODS

A total of 1044 pathologic stage T1-3N2M0 NSCLC patients were analyzed. Risk factors of distant metastasis were identified by the log-rank tests and the multivariable Cox models. We integrated risk factors of distant metastasis and our previously published loco-regional recurrence (LRR) related prognostic index into a decision support framework (DSF) to predict the outcomes of PORT. An independent cohort was used to validate the DSF.

RESULTS

We defined patients with more than two of three identified LRR-related features (heavy cigarette smoking history, clinical N2 status, and more than four positive lymph nodes) as a high LRR risk group. We found the high-intermediate-risk histological type (with micropapillary and/or solid components) was associated with a higher risk of distant metastasis (HR=1.207, 95% CI 1.062 to 1.371, P=0.0129), but not LRR. We built the DSF by combining these two types of features. Patients were stratified into four groups by using the DSF. PORT significantly improved OS only in the subgroup without high-risk histological features (without micropapillary or solid components) and with a high risk for LRR (three-year OS: 66.7% in the PORT group vs. 50.2% in the non-PORT group; P=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

A particular pN2 subgroup with a high risk of LRR and without micropapillary or solid components could benefit from PORT.