Serious infections among adult Medicaid beneficiaries with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis

Risk factors for serious infections in inpatients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the risk factors for serious infections among hospitalized systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, and to provide the advice for preventing serious infections in SLE patients.

METHODS

Information of SLE patients hospitalized from March 2017 to February 2019 at the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University was obtained. The patients were assigned into a serious infection group and a non-serious infection group. The risk factors for serious infections among SLE inpatients were identified by comparison between the 2 groups and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There were 463 SLE inpatients in total, and 144 were in the serious infection group and 319 in the non-serious infection group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥54.50 years old (OR=4.958, P<0.001), cardiovascular involvement (OR=6.287, P<0.001), hematologic involvement (OR=2.643, P=0.003), serum albumin <20 g/L (OR=2.340, P=0.036), C-reaction protein (CRP)/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)≥0.12 (OR=2.430, P=0.002), glucocorticoid dose ≥8.75 mg/d prednisone-equivalent (OR=2.465, P=0.002), and the combined use of immunosuppressive agents (OR=2.847, P=0.037) were the risk factors for serious infections in SLE inpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

SLE patients with older age, cardiovascular involvement, hematologic involvement, low serum albumin are prone to suffering serious infections. Increased CRP/ESR ratio indicates serious infections in SLE inpatients. High-dose glucocorticoid and the combined use of immunosuppressive agents can increase the risk of serious infections in SLE inpatients.

Combining C reactive protein and serum albumin to predict 90-day mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus with serious community-acquired infections

Objective

Serious infections in SLE are common and have emerged as the major cause of death. However, effective methods to identify poor prognosis are still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to determine the predictive value of C reactive protein (CRP) plus albumin (ALB) in SLE with serious infections.

Methods

From May 2015 to December 2018, consecutive patients with SLE presenting with serious infections in our emergency department were prospectively recruited. Serum CRP and ALB were measured within 24 hours of admission. The outcome was defined as mortality rate at 90 days. A CRP plus ALB score (2–6) was assigned based on the CRP and ALB concentrations. We performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses to detect the independent effects of CRP plus ALB on 90-day mortality (all-cause and infection-related). Subgroup analyses were used to show the effects stratified by lupus nephritis.

Results

A total of 150 patients were included, and the all-cause 90-day mortality rate was 38% (n=57), 41 of which was infection-related. The predominant infection sites were pulmonary (79.3%) and bloodstream infection (20.7%). Serum CRP and ALB levels were significantly different in non-surviving patients compared with those in surviving patients (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, the CRP plus ALB score was associated with decreased 90-day survival (adjusted OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.13; p=0.017).

Conclusions

CRP plus ALB was associated with the risk of all-cause and infection-related 90-day mortality in SLE with serious infections. Although this finding requires further verification, the two parameters may be useful for predicting poor outcomes in such patients.

Management of lupus nephritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the joint EULAR and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations

Objectives

To analyse the current evidence for the management of lupus nephritis (LN) informing the 2019 update of the EULAR/European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association recommendations.

Methods

According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a PubMed systematic literature review was performed, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. Since this was an update of the 2012 recommendations, the final level of evidence (LoE) and grading of recommendations considered the total body of evidence, including literature prior to 2012.

Results

We identified 387 relevant articles. High-quality randomised evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive treatment for class III and class IV LN (LoE 1a), and moderate-level evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive treatment for pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria (LoE 2b). Treatment should aim for at least 25% reduction in proteinuria at 3 months, 50% at 6 months and complete renal response (<500–700 mg/day) at 12 months (LoE 2a-2b). High-quality evidence supports the use of mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid (MMF/MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) as initial treatment of active class III/IV LN (LoE 1a). Combination of tacrolimus with MMF/MPA and high-dose CY are alternatives in specific circumstances (LoE 1a). There is low-quality level evidence to guide optimal duration of immunosuppression in LN (LoE 3). In end-stage kidney disease, all methods of kidney replacement treatment can be used, with transplantation having the most favourable outcomes (LoE 2b).

Conclusions

There is high-quality evidence to guide the initial and subsequent phases of class III/IV LN treatment, but low-to-moderate quality evidence to guide treatment of class V LN, monitoring and optimal duration of immunosuppression.

American College of Rheumatology Guidance for the Management of Pediatric Rheumatic Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Version 2

OBJECTIVE

To provide clinical guidance to rheumatology providers who treat children with pediatric rheumatic disease (PRD) in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

The task force, consisting of 7 pediatric rheumatologists, 2 pediatric infectious disease physicians, 1 adult rheumatologist, and 1 pediatric nurse practitioner, was convened on May 21, 2020. Clinical questions and subsequent guidance statements were drafted based on a review of the queries posed by the patients as well as the families and healthcare providers of children with PRD. An evidence report was generated and disseminated to task force members to assist with 3 rounds of asynchronous, anonymous voting by email using a modified Delphi approach. Voting was completed using a 9-point numeric scoring system with predefined levels of agreement (categorized as disagreement, uncertainty, or agreement, with median scores of 1-3, 4-6, and 7-9, respectively) and consensus (categorized as low, moderate, or high). To be approved as a guidance statement, median vote ratings were required to fall into the highest tertile for agreement, with either moderate or high levels of consensus.

RESULTS

To date, 39 guidance statements have been approved by the task force. Those with similar recommendations were combined to form a total of 33 final guidance statements, all of which received median vote ratings within the highest tertile of agreement and were associated with either moderate consensus (n = 5) or high consensus (n = 28).

CONCLUSION

These guidance statements have been generated based on review of the available literature, indicating that children with PRD do not appear to be at increased risk for susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This guidance is presented as a "living document," recognizing that the literature on COVID-19 is rapidly evolving, with future updates anticipated.

Inflammatory arthritis in patients with COVID-19

Patients with inflammatory arthritis represent a possible high-risk group to COVID-19 due to their immunosuppressive regimen designed to maintain low disease activity. Thus, substantial effort has been put forth to understand the impact of COVID-19 on these patients. Patients with rheumatic diseases as a whole do not appear to be more susceptible to acquiring COVID-19. Furthermore, immunosuppression generally did not increase the likelihood of developing severe COVID-19, with the important exception of medium and high-dose glucocorticoid use. In addition, a small number of COVID-19 patients have developed new inflammatory arthritis; whether this represents an unmasking of previous subclinical disease or a bone fide virus-induced arthritis is unclear. Nevertheless, it appears that inflammatory arthritis patients currently on immunosuppression should continue their medication to prevent future flares and limit glucocorticoid usage. While this continues to be a rapidly evolving field, these data are reassuring to both patients with and providers treating inflammatory arthritides.

Association of antimalarial drugs with decreased overall and cause specific mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association and dose-response pattern between antimalarial drugs and overall and cause specific mortality in SLE patients.

METHODS

Medical records including information on HCQ/chloroquine (CQ) prescription were extracted from Jiangsu Lupus database. The database was designed to collect data from SLE patients that first-hospitalized during 1999-2009 in Jiangsu province, China, and a follow-up for survival status was performed in 2010 and 2015. Cox and restricted cubic spline models were used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% CI.

RESULTS

We identified 221 deaths among 2446 SLE patients in total. Compared with non-users, decreased overall mortality was associated with either HCQ or CQ users, with adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.49 (0.35, 0.67) and 0.49 (0.27, 0.87), respectively. The association between HCQ/CQ and overall mortality was similar across subgroups, such as patients with comorbidities and organ involvements. Interestingly, both the time and the daily dosage of HCQ/CQ use were related to decreased mortality of SLE in a linear dose-response relationship. In cause specific analyses, HCQ/CQ was inversely associated with death from renal insufficiency and other organ (cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal and haematological) involvements, with adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.23 (0.09, 0.55) and 0.25 (0.10, 0.62), respectively, yet it was not significantly associated with mortality from infection and neuropsychiatric involvements.

CONCLUSION

Antimalarial drugs were associated with lower risk of SLE mortality, especially renal insufficiency- and other organ involvement-related death. The protective effects for survival might be augmented by adherence and full dosage of these drugs.

Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis prevents major infective episodes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus on immunosuppressants: A non-concurrent cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prevents pneumocystis jirovecii infection in SLE on immunosuppression. Its role in preventing other major infections in immuno suppressed SLE patients is unknown.

METHODS

A non-concurrent cohort study was conducted on patients of SLE fulfilling SLICC and/or ACR 1997 criteria, who received tapering dose of steroid starting with ≥0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisolone or equivalent dose of deflazacort and mycophenolate mofetil ≥1 g/day (or equivalent dose of mycophenolate sodium) at least for the preceding 1 year. Interviewing patients & documenting relevant data from hospital electronic Medical records (EMR), followed by comparison of Incidence densities of major infections between those on prophylactic Trimethoprim 160 mg + Sulfamethoxazole 800 mg and those not on it, was done by student 't' test. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for independent risk of any major infection between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of 228 patients, 162 did not receive TMP-SMX prophylaxis, and 66 had received. The incidence density of major infection was found to be significantly lower in TMP-SMX group (1.25 per 100 person year) as compared to those not on TMP-SMX group (11.201 per 100 person year); P < 0.001 (95% CI 0.027 - 0.449) and odds ratio of 0.03 (CI 0 - 0.24).

CONCLUSION

Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in SLE patients on immunosuppression prevents major infections.

Mortality in a cohort of Egyptian systemic lupus erythematosus patients: retrospective two-center study

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a debilitating autoimmune disease with major contribution to the worldwide morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate the causes of mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and the relation between clinical activity, disease-associated end-organ damage, laboratory markers and mortality.

Results

Among the 771 patients who were successfully followed up, 34 patients (4.4%) died. The leading causes of death were infectious causes (35.29%), cardiopulmonary causes (26.48%), renal causes (14.7%), unknown causes (14.7%), neuropsychiatric causes (5.88%), and lastly gastrointestinal causes (2.94%). Subjects who died had lower complement 3 level, more anemia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, decreased glomerular filtration rate, higher incidence of infection, end-stage renal disease, and cardiopulmonary complications. Higher glucocorticoid dosage with more immunosuppressant (mofetil and cyclophosphamide) treatment was observed in patients who died. SLE disease Activity Index and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics damage index were both significantly higher in deceased persons. Multivariable hazards regression analysis revealed that lymphopenia (p = 0.017), decreased glomerular filtration rate < 50% (p = 0.002) with end-stage renal disease (p = 0.001), and high steroid daily use of > 40 mg (p = 0.016) were independent risk factors for the mortality of SLE patients.

Conclusion

Infections and cardiopulmonary complications are the leading causes of death in two centers caring for Egyptian SLE patients. Lymphopenia, end-stage renal failure, and high steroid daily use were associated with poor outcomes.

The Use of Glucocorticoids in Lupus Nephritis: New Pathways for an Old Drug

Glucocorticoids therapy has greatly improved the outcome of lupus nephritis patients. Since their discovery, their adverse effects have counterbalanced their beneficial anti-inflammatory effects. Glucocorticoids exert their effects through both genomic and non-genomic pathways. Differential activation of these pathways is clinically relevant in terms of benefit and adverse effects. Ongoing aims in lupus nephritis treatment development focus on a better use of glucocorticoids combined with immunosuppressant drugs and biologics. Newer regimens aim to decrease the peak glucocorticoid dose, allow a rapid glucocorticoid tapering, and intend to control disease activity with a lower cumulative glucocorticoid exposure. In this review we discuss the mechanisms, adverse effects and recent strategies to limit glucocorticoid exposure without compromising treatment efficacy.

Development of a Set of Lupus-Specific, Ambulatory Care-Sensitive, Potentially Preventable Adverse Conditions: A Delphi Consensus Study

OBJECTIVE

Individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at high risk for infections and SLE- and medication-related complications. The present study was undertaken to define a set of SLE-specific adverse outcomes that could be prevented, or their complications minimized, if timely, effective ambulatory care had been received.

METHODS

We used a modified Delphi process beginning with a literature review and key informant interviews to select initial SLE-specific potentially preventable conditions. We assembled a panel of 16 nationally recognized US-based experts from 8 subspecialties. Guided by the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method, we held 2 survey rounds with controlled feedback and an interactive webinar to reach consensus regarding preventability and importance on a population level for a set of SLE-specific adverse conditions. In a final round, the panelists endorsed the potentially preventable conditions.

RESULTS

Thirty-five potential conditions were initially proposed; 62 conditions were ultimately considered during the Delphi process. The response rate was 100% for both survey rounds, 88% for the webinar, and 94% for final approval. The 25 SLE-specific conditions meeting consensus as potentially preventable and important on a population level fell into 4 categories: vaccine-preventable illnesses (6 conditions), medication-related complications (8 conditions), reproductive health-related complications (6 conditions), and SLE-related complications (5 conditions).

CONCLUSION

We reached consensus on a diverse set of adverse outcomes relevant to SLE patients that may be preventable if patients receive high-quality ambulatory care. This set of outcomes may be studied at the health system level to determine how to best allocate resources and improve quality to reduce avoidable outcomes and disparities among those at highest risk.

Infection-related hospitalization after intensive immunosuppressive therapy among lupus nephritis and ANCA glomerulonephritis patients

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of infection-related hospitalization (IRH) in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) and ANCA glomerulonephritis after intensive immunosuppressive therapy.Methods: Patients diagnosed with LN or ANCA glomerulonephritis who received intensive immunosuppressive therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 2005 to 2014 were enrolled. Demographics, laboratory parameters, immunosuppressive agents, and IRH details were collected. Multivariable Cox regression was used, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.Results: Totally, 872 patients with 806 LN and 66 ANCA glomerulonephritis were enrolled, and 304 (34.9%) patients with 433 episodes of IRH were recorded. ANCA glomerulonephritis patients were more vulnerable to IRH than LN patients (53.0% vs. 33.4%, p = .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that ANCA glomerulonephritis (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06-2.49, p = .027), diabetes (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.03-3.22, p = .039) and a higher initial dose of prednisone (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, p = .013) were associated with a higher likelihood of IRH. Higher albumin (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98, p < .001), globulin (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99, p = .008), and eGFR (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99-1.00, p < .001), were associated with a lower likelihood of IRH. The rates of transfer to ICU and mortality for ANCA glomerulonephritis patients were higher than those for LN patients (22.9% vs. 1.9%, p < .001, and 20.0% vs. 0.7%, p < .001, respectively).Conclusions: ANCA glomerulonephritis patients had a higher risk of IRH and poorer outcome once infected after intensive immunosuppressive therapy than LN patients. More strict control for infection risks is required for ANCA glomerulonephritis patients who undergo intensive immunosuppressive therapy.

Predicting lupus flares: epidemiological and disease related risk factors

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder, characterized by a relapsing and remitting pattern of disease activity in majority of the patients. Areas covered: This narrative review provides an overview of flare definition, major flare mimics, and the burden of flares in SLE. The authors highlight epidemiology and disease-related risk factor for flares and discuss strategies to reduce flares in SLE. Articles were selected from Pubmed searches conducted between June 2020 and September 2020. Expert opinion: Prolonged clinical remission is observed in approximately 20% of SLE patients flare over the course of the disease. Studies have shown that low disease activity is a good target in SLE, with similar risk of flares, mortality, and quality of life when compared to patients in remission. Clinical and immunological features have shown inconsistent results to identify patients at risk of flares in different cohorts. Cytokine, in serum and urine, has shown promising results to predict flares. However to be useful in clinical practice, they have to be simple, easy, and cost-effective. Future efforts in this direction will allow a more personalized treatment plan for SLE patients, reducing the burden associated with flares.

The Main Challenges in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Where Do We Stand?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an immune-mediated multi-systemic disease characterized by a wide variability of clinical manifestations and a course frequently subject to unpredictable flares. Despite significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology and optimization of medical care, patients with SLE still have significant mortality and carry a risk of progressive organ damage accrual and reduced health-related quality of life. New tools allow earlier classification of SLE, whereas tailored early intervention and treatment strategies targeted to clinical remission or low disease activity could offer the opportunity to reduce damage, thus improving long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, the early diagnosis of SLE is still an unmet need for many patients. Further disentangling the SLE susceptibility and complex pathogenesis will allow to identify more accurate biomarkers and implement new ways to measure disease activity. This could represent a major step forward to find new trials modalities for developing new drugs, optimizing the use of currently available therapeutics and minimizing glucocorticoids. Preventing and treating comorbidities in SLE, improving the management of hard-to-treat manifestations including management of SLE during pregnancy are among the remaining major unmet needs. This review provides insights and a research agenda for the main challenges in SLE.

Predictive models of infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Having reliable predictive models of prognosis/the risk of infection in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients would allow this problem to be addressed on an individual basis to study and implement possible preventive or therapeutic interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and analyze all predictive models of prognosis/the risk of infection in patients with SLE that exist in medical literature.

METHODS

A structured search in PubMed, Embase, and LILACS databases was carried out until May 9, 2020. In addition, a search for abstracts in the American Congress of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) annual meetings' archives published over the past eight years was also conducted. Studies on developing, validating or updating predictive prognostic models carried out in patients with SLE, in which the outcome to be predicted is some type of infection, that were generated in any clinical context and with any time horizon were included. There were no restrictions on language, date, or status of the publication. To carry out the systematic review, the CHARMS (Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies) guideline recommendations were followed. The PROBAST tool (A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies) was used to assess the risk of bias and the applicability of each model.

RESULTS

We identified four models of infection prognosis in patients with SLE. Mostly, there were very few events per candidate predictor. In addition, to construct the models, an initial selection was made based on univariate analyses with no contraction of the estimated coefficients being carried out. This suggests that the proposed models have a high probability of overfitting and being optimistic.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, very few prognostic models have been published on the infection of SLE patients. These models are very heterogeneous and are rated as having a high risk of bias and methodological weaknesses. Despite the widespread recognition of the frequency and severity of infections in SLE patients, there is no reliable predictive prognostic model that facilitates the study and implementation of personalized preventive or therapeutic measures.Protocol registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020171638.

The risk of infections in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the magnitude of infection risk in patients with SLE and evaluate the effect of general and SLE-related factors on infection risk.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to July 2018, screening for observational studies that evaluated infection risk in patients with SLE compared with the general population/healthy controls. Outcomes of interest included overall severe infection, herpes zoster infection/reactivation, opportunistic infections, pneumonia and tuberculosis. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) for each type of infection. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of removing studies with high risk of bias.

Results

Eleven retrospective or prospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis: overall severe infection (n = 4), pneumonia (n = 6), tuberculosis (n = 3) and herpes zoster (n = 2). Pooled RRs for overall severe infection significantly increased for patients with SLE compared with the general population/healthy controls [RR 2.96 (95% CI 1.28, 6.83)]. Pooled RRs for pneumonia, herpes zoster and tuberculosis showed significantly increased risk compared with the general population/healthy controls [RR 2.58 (1.80, 3.70), 2.50 (2.36, 2.65) and 6.11 (3.61, 10.33), respectively]. Heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias were present for all analyses, except herpes zoster. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of the results.

Conclusion

Patients with SLE have significantly higher risk of infection compared with the general population/healthy controls. Efforts to strengthen strategies aimed at preventing infections in SLE are needed.

Protocol registration

PROSPERO number: CRD42018109425.

Prevalence of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy using 2018 Royal College of Ophthalmologists diagnostic criteria

INTRODUCTION

To measure the prevalence of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy in patients attending a hydroxychloroquine monitoring service using 2018 Royal College of Ophthalmologists diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

A service evaluation audit of a hydroxychloroquine retinopathy monitoring service was undertaken. Results of Humphrey 10-2 field tests, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence were collected with data on dose, weight, duration of treatment, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and concurrent tamoxifen therapy. Visual field tests were assessed as reliable or unreliable, and classified as normal, hydroxychloroquine-like, poor test or related to other pathology. Cases of definite and possible retinopathy were identified using the 2018 RCOphth criteria.

RESULTS

There were 1976 attendances over two years of 1597 patients. Seven hundred and twenty-eight patients had taken hydroxychloroquine for less than 5 years and 869 had taken hydroxychloroquine for 5 years or more. Fourteen patients were identified with definite hydroxychloroquine retinopathy (1.6%), and 41 patients with possible retinopathy (4.7%). Sixty-seven per cent of 861 visual fields were performed reliably, with 66.9% classified as normal, 24.9% as poor test, 5.2% hydroxychloroquine-like and 3.0% abnormal due to other pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

The 1.6% prevalence of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy is lower than the previously reported prevalence of 7.5% as reported by Melles and Marmor JAMA Ophthalmol 132: 1453-60 (2014). This is because of a difference in the diagnostic criteria. Both definite and possible retinopathy would meet the diagnostic criteria of the Melles and Marmor study; 6.3% in our data, compared with 7.5%, a much smaller difference and likely to be explained by differences in the risk characteristics of the two groups.

Infection-Related Acute Care Events among Patients with Glomerular Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Infections contribute to patient morbidity and mortality in glomerular disease. We sought to describe the incidence of, and identify risk factors for, infection-related acute care events among Cure Glomerulonephropathy Network (CureGN) study participants.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

CureGN is a prospective, multicenter, cohort study of children and adults with biopsy sample-proven minimal change disease, FSGS, membranous nephropathy, or IgA nephropathy/vasculitis. Risk factors for time to first infection-related acute care events (hospitalization or emergency department visit) were identified using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of 1741 participants (43% female, 41% <18 years, 68% White), 163 (9%) experienced infection-related acute care events over a median follow-up of 17 months (interquartile range, 9-26 months). Unadjusted incidence rates of infection-related acute care events were 13.2 and 6.2 events per 100 person-years among pediatric and adult participants, respectively. Among participants with versus without corticosteroid exposure at enrollment, unadjusted incidence rates were 50.6 and 28.6 per 100 person-years, respectively, during the first year of follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio for time to first infection, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.93), and 4.1 and 1.1 per 100 person-years, respectively, after 1 year of follow-up (hazard ratio, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.54 to 5.79). Hypoalbuminemia combined with nephrotic-range proteinuria (serum albumin ≤2.5 g/dl and urinary protein-creatinine ratio >3.5 mg/mg), compared with serum albumin >2.5 g/dl and urinary protein-creatinine ratio ≤3.5 mg/mg, was associated with higher risk of time to first infection (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.51 to 4.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Among CureGN participants, infection-related acute care events were common and associated with younger age, corticosteroid exposure, and hypoalbuminemia with proteinuria.

Differential parameters between activity flare and acute infection in pediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are vulnerable to infections. We aim to explore the approach to differentiate active infection from disease activity in pediatric SLE patients. Fifty pediatric SLE patients presenting with 185 clinical visits were collected. The associations between both clinical and laboratory parameters and the outcome groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEEs). These 185 visits were divided into 4 outcome groups: infected-active (n = 102), infected-inactive (n = 11), noninfected-active (n = 59), and noninfected-inactive (n = 13) visits. Multivariate GEE (generalized estimating equation) analysis showed that SDI, SLEDAI-2K, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), hemoglobin, platelet, RDW-to-platelet ratio (RPR), and C3 are predictive of flare (combined calculated AUC of 0.8964 and with sensitivity of 82.2% and specificity of 90.9%). Multivariate GEE analysis showed that SDI, fever temperature, CRP, procalcitonin (PCT), lymphocyte percentage, NLR, hemoglobin, and renal score in SLEDAI-2k are predictive of infection (combined calculated AUC of 0.7886 and with sensitivity of 63.5% and specificity of 89.2%). We can simultaneously predict 4 different outcome with accuracy of 70.13% for infected-active group, 10% for infected-inactive group, 59.57% for noninfected-active group, and 84.62% for noninfected-inactive group, respectively. Combination of parameters from four different domains simultaneously, including inflammation (CRP, ESR, PCT), hematology (Lymphocyte percentage, NLR, PLR), complement (C3, C4), and clinical status (SLEDAI, SDI) is objective and effective to differentiate flares from infections in pediatric SLE patients.

Hospitalized Infections in Lupus: A Nationwide Study of Types of Infections, Time Trends, Health Care Utilization, and In-Hospital Mortality

OBJECTIVE

To examine the time trends in hospitalized infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and the factors associated with health care utilization and in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

US National Inpatient Sample data from 1998-2016 were used to examine the epidemiology, time trends, and outcomes of 5 common hospitalized infections in patients with SLE, namely, pneumonia, sepsis/bacteremia, urinary tract infection (UTI), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), and opportunistic infections (OIs). Time trends were compared using the Cochran-Armitage test. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to examine the factors associated with health care utilization (hospital stay >3 days, hospital charges above the median, or discharge to a nonhome setting) and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Hospitalization rates per 100,000 claims among SLE patients in 1998-2000 versus in 2015-2016 were as follows: for OIs, 1.13 versus 1.61 (1.2-fold increase); for SSTIs, 4.78 versus 12.2 (2.5-fold increase); for UTI, 1.94 versus 6.12 (3.2-fold increase); for pneumonia, 15.09 versus 17.05 (1.1-fold increase); and for sepsis, 6.31 versus 39.64 (6.3-fold increase). In 2011-2012, sepsis surpassed pneumonia as the most common hospitalized infection in patients with SLE. In multivariable-adjusted models, a diagnosis of sepsis, older age, a Deyo-Charlson common comorbidities score of ≥2, having Medicare or Medicaid insurance, and urban hospital location were significantly associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality and with all health care utilization outcomes. African American race was significantly associated with increased odds of health care utilization.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the rates of hospitalized infections increased over time in patients with SLE, and that pneumonia was surpassed by sepsis as the most common hospitalized infection. In addition, associations of risk factors with poorer outcomes were identified. These findings may help inform patients, providers, and policy makers with regard to the burden of infection in SLE, and could lead to interventions/pathways to improve outcomes.

[Cytomegalovirus infection in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. A series of 12 case reports and literature review]

INTRODUCTION

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, due to the disease itself or to drug-induced immunosuppression. Also, active CMV infection may trigger or worsen SLE flare-up.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, we reported all adult inpatients with a diagnosis of SLE, presenting with active and confirmed CMV infection. The goal was to describe their characteristics and outcomes (evolution of CMV infection, secondary infections and SLE flare-up), and to review the existing literature.

RESULTS

We identified 400 patients with confirmed SLE, including 12 who presented with active CMV infection. Severe CMV manifestations were present in 7 patients treated with immunosuppressive regimen out of 10, and in one patient out of two without immunosuppressive therapy. Six patients developed other infections, and 3 showed characterised SLE flare-up over the 3-month follow-up. All patients were alive at end of follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Among patients with SLE, CMV infection affected more frequently those treated with immunosuppressive drugs, but treatment-free patients were sometimes severely affected. CMV infection was associated with an increased incidence of SLE flare-up and infectious complications. Our results suggest that early anti-viral chemotherapy may be beneficial in these patients.

Disparities in Lupus and Lupus Nephritis Care and Outcomes Among US Medicaid Beneficiaries

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a serious chronic autoimmune disease with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although improved diagnostics and therapeutics have contributed to declining mortality rates, important disparities exist in SLE survival rates by race, ethnicity, gender, age, country, and social disadvantage. This review highlights the burden of SLE and lupus nephritis among Medicaid beneficiaries, outlines barriers in access to high-quality SLE care and medication adherence in the Medicaid SLE population, and summarizes disparities in adverse outcomes among SLE patients enrolled in Medicaid.

American College of Rheumatology Guidance for the Management of Pediatric Rheumatic Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Version 1

Objective

To provide clinical guidance to rheumatology providers who treat children with pediatric rheumatic disease (PRD) in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic.

Methods

The task force, consisting of 7 pediatric rheumatologists, 2 pediatric infectious disease physicians, 1 adult rheumatologist, and 1 pediatric nurse practitioner, was convened on May 21, 2020. Clinical questions and subsequent guidance statements were drafted based on a review of the queries posed by the patients as well as the families and healthcare providers of children with PRD. An evidence report was generated and disseminated to task force members to assist with 3 rounds of asynchronous, anonymous voting by email using a modified Delphi approach. Voting was completed using a 9‐point numeric scoring system with predefined levels of agreement (categorized as disagreement, uncertainty, or agreement, with median scores of 1–3, 4–6, and 7–9, respectively) and consensus (categorized as low, moderate, or high). To be approved as a guidance statement, median vote ratings were required to fall into the highest tertile for agreement, with either moderate or high levels of consensus.

Results

The task force drafted 33 guidance statements, which were voted upon during the second and third rounds of voting. Of these 33 statements, all received median vote ratings within the highest tertile of agreement and were associated with either moderate consensus (n = 6) or high consensus (n = 27). Statements with similar recommendations were combined, resulting in 27 final guidance statements.

Conclusion

These guidance statements have been generated based on review of the available literature, indicating that children with PRD do not appear to be at increased risk for susceptibility to SARS–CoV‐2 infection. This guidance is presented as a “living document,” recognizing that the literature on COVID‐19 is rapidly evolving, with future updates anticipated.

Bacterial infections in a pediatric cohort of primary and acquired complement deficiencies

BACKGROUND

Acquired complement deficiency can occur in the setting of autoimmune syndromes, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with very low or, occasionally, undetectable C3 levels. Based on inherited complement defects, patients with transiently low complement may be at similar risk for serious bacterial infection, but the degree of risk related to C3 level and temporal association is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including pediatric patients with undetectable total complement activity or absent individual complement components measured at our institution from 2002 to 2018. We assessed annual rate of serious bacterial infection (SBI) defined as requiring hospitalization and/or parenteral antibiotics by manual chart review. Among included SLE patients, we assessed the 30-day probability of SBI for given C3 measurements using a logistic regression model to determine risk. Primary complement deficiency was analyzed for SBI rate as comparison. Covariates included age, level of immune suppression and history of lupus nephritis.

RESULTS

Acquired complement deficiency secondary to SLE-related disease [n = 44] was the most common underlying diagnosis associated with depressed complement levels and were compared to a cohort of primary complement deficient patients [n = 18]. SBI per 100 person-years and cohort demographics were described in parallel. Our logistic regression analysis of pediatric patients with SLE showed low C3 level was temporally associated with having an SBI event. Given equivalent immunosuppression, patients with an SBI had lower C3 levels at the beginning of the observation period relative to patients without SBI.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients with the diagnosis of SLE can develop very low C3 levels that associate with risk of serious bacterial infection comparable to that of patients with primary complement deficiency. Patients prone to severe complement consumption may particularly be at risk.

Multicentre retrospective cohort study assessing the incidence of serious infections in patients with lupus nephritis, compared with non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives

The incidence of serious infections is poorly defined in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). It is also unclear if LN influences risk of serious infections in a longitudinal analysis. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of serious infections in patients with SLE and LN, compared with patients with SLE without LN.

Methods

A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with LN identified at two tertiary centres were matched where possible with age and gender-matched patients with SLE without LN.

Any infection requiring inpatient admission, occurring in the 6 months following index clinical visit, was considered serious. Cox regression was employed to investigate the association between risk of serious infection and LN status, and other relevant covariates.

Results

A total of 173 patients were included within the analysis (n=87 LN, n=86 SLE only). A total of 9.2% (n=8) of patients with LN experienced at least one serious infection within the study period, compared with 5.8% (n=5) of patients without LN, equivalent to 19.5 and 12.0 infections per 100 patient-years with and without LN, respectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses found no significant increased risk of serious infection in patients with LN versus controls (HR 1.61; 95% CI 0.53 to 4.92 and adjusted HR (aHR) 0.91; 95% CI 0.27 to 3.06, respectively). Increased prednisone dose and modified SLE comorbidity index were strongly associated with serious infection (aHR (per 5 mg) 1.21; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.37; p=0.003 and aHR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25; p=0.018, respectively).

Conclusions

In this cohort, adjusting for cofactors, the presence of LN alone does not appear to increase the risk of serious infections compared with patients with SLE without LN. However, increased prednisone dose at baseline visit and increasing comorbidity were independently associated with the incidence of serious infection.

Evaluation of a patient self-stratification methodology to identify those in need of shielding during COVID-19

The logistical challenges of rapidly and accurately identifying those patients who needed to shield during the COVID-19 pandemic were unprecedented. We report our experiences of meeting this challenge for >9,000 patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease at our centre, incorporating an element of guided patient self-stratification. Our results indicate that patients are able to stratify their own risk accurately using the BSR COVID-19 risk stratification guidance.

Risk of first and recurrent serious infection in sarcoidosis: a Swedish register-based cohort study

Serious infections impair quality of life and increase costs. Our aim was to determine if sarcoidosis is associated with a higher rate of serious infection and whether this varies by age, sex, time since diagnosis or treatment status around diagnosis.

We compared individuals with sarcoidosis (at least two International Classification of Diseases codes in the Swedish National Patient Register 2003–2013; n=8737) and general population comparators matched 10:1 on age, sex and residential location (n=86 376). Patients diagnosed in 2006–2013 who were dispensed at least one immunosuppressant ±3 months from diagnosis (Swedish Prescribed Drug Register) were identified. Cases and comparators were followed in the National Patient Register for hospitalisations for infection. Using Cox and flexible parametric models, we estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals for first and recurrent serious infections (new serious infection >30 days after previous).

We identified 895 first serious infections in sarcoidosis patients and 3881 in comparators. The rate of serious infection was increased 1.8-fold in sarcoidosis compared to the general population (aHR 1.81, 95% CI 1.65–1.98). The aHR was higher in females than males and during the first 2 years of follow-up. Sarcoidosis cases treated with immunosuppressants around diagnosis had a three-fold increased risk, whereas nontreated patients had a 50% increased risk. The rate of serious infection recurrence was 2.8-fold higher in cases than in comparators.

Serious infections are more common in sarcoidosis than in the general population, particularly during the first few years after diagnosis. Patients who need immunosuppressant treatment around diagnosis are twice as likely to develop a serious infection than those who do not.

Sarcoidosis is associated with an increased risk of serious infections, especially during the first 2 years after diagnosis. Patients in need of immunosuppressants around diagnosis are twice as likely to develop serious infections than those who do not.https://bit.ly/2VFOvSo

Neurological immunotherapy in the era of COVID-19 - looking for consensus in the literature

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is concerning for patients with neuroimmunological diseases who are receiving immunotherapy. Uncertainty remains about whether immunotherapies increase the risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or increase the risk of severe disease and death upon infection. National and international societies have developed guidelines and statements, but consensus does not exist in several areas. In this Review, we attempt to clarify where consensus exists and where uncertainty remains to inform management approaches based on the first principles of neuroimmunology. We identified key questions that have been addressed in the literature and collated the recommendations to generate a consensus calculation in a Delphi-like approach to summarize the information. We summarize the international recommendations, discuss them in light of the first available data from patients with COVID-19 receiving immunotherapy and provide an overview of management approaches in the COVID-19 era. We stress the principles of medicine in general and neuroimmunology in particular because, although the risk of viral infection has become more relevant, most of the considerations apply to the general management of neurological immunotherapy. We also give special consideration to immunosuppressive treatment and cell-depleting therapies that might increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection but reduce the risk of severe COVID-19.

The risk of hospitalized infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with hydroxychloroquine

Objective

To compare the risk of hospitalized infection (HI) between users and non-users of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

Using claims data, patients were defined as SLE cases by the following criteria: 1) they had at least one SLE diagnostic code; 2) they had a prescription for specific drugs, including corticosteroids, steroid pulse therapy, and immunosuppressive drugs; and 3) they were at least 16 years old between September 2015 and July 2017 (n = 17,483). The SLE cases with at least one prescription for HCQ were defined as the HCQ group (n = 1,431), while the others were defined as the non-HCQ group. Among the SLE cases, propensity score-matched cases were observed for 1 year (n = 1,095 in each group).

Results

The median age and proportion of female patients in both groups were about 42 years and 88%, respectively. The proportions of cases with HIs were similar (HCQ group, 4.5%; non-HCQ group, 5.6%; p = 0.240, McNemar test). The hazard ratio of the HCQ group for HIs after adjusting for patients’ characteristics was not significant at 0.9 (0.6–1.3).

Conclusion

The use of HCQ was not associated with a risk of HIs in patients with SLE.

Laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection in systemic lupus erythematosus: Risk profiling and short-term mortality

OBJECTIVES

To delineate laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBI), analyze risk factors for its occurrence and predictors for its short-term mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.Methods A single center, retrospective, case-controlled study was performed in 159 SLE patients (2013-2019) to identify risk factors of LCBI by comparing patients with LCBI (n = 39) to those without infection (n = 120). The predictors associated with 30-day mortality in LCBI patients were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Altogether 40 bacteria strains were isolated in 39 LCBI patients with a predominance of the gram-negative bacilli (24 strains, 60.0%). Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were the leading Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms, respectively. Occurrence of LCBI was independently predicted by: SLE disease duration >4 years, SLEDAI score >4 points, glucocorticoids dose >7.5 mg/d and the previous or concomitant occurrence of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) or thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Based on the identified risk factors, we developed a matrix model for the risk of future LCBI. The 30-day mortality (39 cases) was 23.1% and healthcare-associated LCBI was a predictor for 30-day mortality in SLE patients compared with community-acquired LCBI.

CONCLUSION

Longer duration, higher disease activity and glucocorticoids dose, and occurrence of AIHA or TMA were risk factors of LCBI in SLE and its poor short-term prognosis may attribute to healthcare-associated LCBI.

WITHDRAWN: Analysis of Infection Factors and Nerve Conduction Velocity in Patients with Chronic Glomerular Disease Based on Information Health Data and Electromyography

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Seventy years after Hench’s Nobel prize: revisiting the use of glucocorticoids in systemic lupus erythematosus

In 1950, Hench, Kendall and Reichstein were awarded with the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine for the isolation and first therapeutic use of glucocorticoids. Since then, they have become one of the main agents in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The use of high-dose oral glucocorticoids (usually 1 mg/kg/day of prednisone equivalent) have become the rule for treating moderate to severe lupus activity. In addition, tapering schemes have not been well defined, all this leading to prolonged exposures to potentially damaging amounts of glucocorticoids. Several studies have shown that glucocorticoids are a major cause of toxicity in SLE in a dose-dependent manner, with prolonged doses greater than 7.5 mg/day being associated with damage accrual. Thus, there is an urgent need for different therapeutic schedules that can achieve a rapid and durable control of lupus activity while reducing the many unwanted effects of glucocorticoids. Recent data show that pulses of methyl-prednisolone are an effective first-line therapy to treat lupus flares (not only severe ones) without major short or long-term toxicity and allowing a reduction in oral prednisone doses. Universal use of hydroxychloroquine – always recommended, infrequently accomplished – and early therapy with immunosuppressive drugs also help control SLE and reduce prednisone load. Results from observational studies confirm the more rapid achievement of remission and the reduction of long-term damage using these combination schedules with reduced prednisone doses. Seventy years after their first therapeutic use, we are learning to use glucocorticoids in a more efficient and safe manner.

Predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-neutrophil ratio, and neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio in lupus nephritis

Objective

To evaluate the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR), platelet-to-monocyte ratio (PMR), and neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR) as predictors for lupus nephritis (LN) patients without infection or as biomarkers for distinguishing between infection or flare with LN patients.

Methods

LN patients were divided into three groups: LN without infection, LN with infection, and LN with flare. A total of 57 healthy subjects were enrolled as controls. The differentiation was analyzed between LN without infection and control group, and LN with infection and LN with flare. Correlations among variables were assessed in the LN group without infection. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed in two comparable groups.

Results

NLR, PLR, and MLR were increased significantly in the LN group without infection as compared with those in healthy controls. NLR (area under the curve (AUC): 0.75) and MLR (AUC: 0.79) were useful for distinguishing between LN patients without infection and healthy subjects. In differentiating LN patients without infection from the controls, optimal cutoffs of NLR and MLR were 3.43 (sensitivity: 45.6%, specificity: 96.5%, and overall accuracy: 68.8%) and 0.24 (sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 73.7%, and overall accuracy: 73.6%), respectively. In addition, NLR ( r = 0.322, p = 0.011) and PLR ( r = 0.283, p = 0.026) were positively correlated with CRP. Importantly, NLR and NMR were increased while PNR was decreased in the LN group with infection in comparison with those in the LN group with flare. NLR (AUC: 0.80), NMR (AUC: 0.78), and PNR (AUC: 0.74) were useful in differentiating LN patients with infection and flare, and their optimal cutoffs were 4.02 (sensitivity: 82.6%, specificity: 69.6%, and overall accuracy: 75.5%), 12.19 (sensitivity: 80.4%, specificity: 73.9%, and overall accuracy: 77.5%), and 28.26 (sensitivity: 65.2%, specificity: 76.8%, and overall accuracy: 71.6%), respectively.

Conclusions

We demonstrated, for the first time, that MLR or NMR had the best accuracy in differentiating LN patients without infection from healthy subjects, or differentiating infection from flare in LN patients, respectively. Our results implied that NLR, MLR, PNR, and NMR may be useful biomarkers in predicting LN.

Systemic lupus erythematosus and risk of infection

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder that affects almost every organ system and it is treated with immunomodulation and immunosuppression. SLE patients have an intrinsically dysfunctional immune system which is exacerbated by disease activity and leaves them vulnerable to infection. Treatment with immunosuppression increases susceptibility to infection, while hydroxychloroquine use decreases this risk. Infectious diseases are a leading cause of hospitalization and death.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review provides an overview of recent epidemiology and predictors of infections in SLE, delineates the risk of infection by therapeutic agent, and provides suggestions for risk mitigation. Articles were selected from Pubmed searches conducted between September 2019 and January 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the large burden of infection, effective and safe preventative care such as universal hydroxychloroquine use and vaccination are underutilized. Future efforts should be directed to quality improvement, glucocorticoid reduction, and validation of risk indices that identify patients at the highest risk of infection.

Complement, infection, and autoimmunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Complement system dysfunction in terms of upregulation, downregulation, or dysregulation can create an imbalance of both host defense and inflammatory response leading to autoimmunity. In this review, we aimed at describing the role of complement system in host defense to inflection and in autoimmunity starting from the evidence from primary and secondary complement system deficiencies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Complement system has a determinant role in defense against infections: deficiencies of complement components are associated with increased susceptibility to infections. Primary complement system deficiencies are rare disorders that predispose to both infections and autoimmune diseases. Secondary complement system deficiencies are the result of the complement system activation with consumption. Complement system role in enhancing risk of infective diseases in secondary deficiencies has been demonstrated in patients affected by systemic autoimmune disorders, mainly systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis.

SUMMARY

The relationship between the complement system and autoimmunity appears paradoxical as both the deficiency and the activation contribute to inducing autoimmune diseases. In these conditions, the presence of complement deposition in affected tissues, decreased levels of complement proteins, and high levels of complement activation fragments in the blood and vessels have been documented.

Severe pneumonia in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with severe pneumonia in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients from China.

Method

We performed a retrospective study in 112 hospitalized SLE patients who had had pneumonia for 8 years. The primary outcome was severe pneumonia, followed by descriptive analysis, group comparison and bivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 28 SLE patients were diagnosed with severe pneumonia, with a ratio of 5:23 between men and women. The mean age at diagnosis was 44.36 ± 12.389 years. The median disease duration was 72 months, and the median SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2K) score was 8. The haematological system was the most affected, with an incidence of anaemia in 85.7% of cases and thrombocytopenia in 75% of cases, followed by lupus nephritis in 50% of cases and central nervous system involvement in 10.71% of cases. Cultured sputum specimens were positive in 17 (68%) SLE patients with severe pneumonia, of whom nine (36%) were cases of fungal infection, five (20%) were cases of bacterial infection and three (12%) were cases of mixed infection. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, we concluded that a daily dosage of prednisone (>10 mg; odds ratio (OR) = 3.193, p = 0.005), a low percentage of CD4+ T lymphocytes (OR = 0.909, p = 0.000), a high SLEDAI 2K score (OR = 1.182, p = 0.001) and anaemia (OR = 1.182, p = 0.001) were all independent risk factors for pneumonia in SLE patients, while a low percentage of CD4+ T lymphocytes (OR = 0.908, p = 0.033), a daily dose of prednisone of >10 mg (OR = 35.67, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for severe pneumonia in SLE patients.

Conclusion

Severe pneumonia is not rare in lupus, and is associated with high mortality and poor prognosis. Monitoring CD4+ T-cell counts and giving a small dose of glucocorticoids can reduce the occurrence of severe pneumonia and improve the prognosis of patients with lupus.

Hydroxychloroquine may reduce risk of Pneumocystis pneumonia in lupus patients: a Nationwide, population-based case-control study

Background

Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is increasingly being diagnosed in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been found to possess antifungal activities. We hence aimed to investigate the association between HCQ and PCP risk among patients with SLE.

Methods

Using the 1997–2013 nationwide claim data, we identified 24,343 newly-diagnosed SLE patients. We then identified 58 PCP cases and selected 348 non-PCP controls matching (1:6) by age, sex, disease duration and the year of PCP diagnosis date. The risk of PCP was assessed by determing odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using multivariable conditional logistic regression.

Results

The risk of PCP was associated with moderate to severe renal disease (OR 6.73, 95% CI 1.98–22.92), higher doses of glucocorticoids (≤5 mg/day, reference; 5–10 mg/day, OR 25.88, 95% CI 2.97–225.33; > 10 mg/day, OR 286.58, 95% CI 28.58–> 999), higher 3-month cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide (not use, reference; ≤1.4 g, OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.14–3.01; > 1.4 g, OR 11.52, 95% CI 1.97–67.39) and use of mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid (OR 50.79, 95% CI 5.32–484.77), whereas 3-month cumulative dose of HCQ was associated with a reduced risk of PCP among patients with SLE (not use, reference; ≤14 g, OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.21–2.24; > 14 g, OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.71).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated incident PCP was associated with mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid use and higher doses of cyclophosphamide or glucocorticoid, whereas the use of a higher dose of HCQ was associated with a reduced risk of PCP in lupus patients.

Septicaemia is associated with increased disease activity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective analysis from Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate how septicaemia, non-septicaemia infection and the disease itself are associated with disease activity and mortality in inpatients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Taiwan.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1115 patients and enrolled 427 with SLE admitted for lupus flare-ups and co-morbidities. Disease activity and infection type/site were recorded and categorized according to the causes of admission and mortality into three categories, of which two were specified as follows: (a) septicaemia admissions, non-septicaemia admissions; and (b) septicaemia mortality, non-septicaemia infection mortality and non-infection mortality. The relationships between lupus flare-ups and mortality in different groups were analysed using an unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Septicaemia was the major cause of mortality in SLE inpatients. There were 98 (22.95%) mortality patients among all 427 SLE patients. The septicaemia admissions had higher disease activity (SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 = 13.00 ± 7.98) than the non-septicaemia admissions (9.77 ± 5.72; p < 0.01). The mean current SLEDAI score of the septicaemia mortality group (14.91 ± 8.01) was higher than that of the non-septicaemia infection mortality group (10.05 ± 5.75; p = 0.02), in spite of the similar mean earlier SLEDAI score. The risk of mortality in the septicaemia mortality group due to previous septicaemia admissions was 13.2 times (odds ratio) higher than in the non-septicaemia infection mortality group and 15.6 times higher than in the non-infection mortality group.

CONCLUSION

Septicaemia relates to increased lupus disease activity and is associated with a greater risk of mortality in the SLE patients than other causes of admission. Fewer previous septicaemia admissions decrease the risk of septicaemia mortality.

[Acute exacerbation of the underlying disease or infection : Which diagnostics are warranted in patients with immunosuppressive treatment for inflammatory rheumatic diseases?]

Infectious diseases always have to be considered in the differential diagnosis of new symptoms in patients with immunosuppressive treatment for established inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Knowledge about the specific frequency and type of infections that can be expected under immunosuppressive treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases as well as the diagnostic value of laboratory tests and imaging results can facilitate the often difficult differential diagnosis.

A review of non-immune mediated kidney disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: A hypothetical model of putative risk factors

About half of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are diagnosed with lupus nephritis (LN). Patients with SLE are also at increased risk for diabetes, hypertension and obesity, which together account for >70% of end-stage renal disease in the general population. The frequencies of non-LN related causes of kidney disease, and their contribution to kidney disease development and progression among patients with SLE have been inadequately studied. We hypothesize that a substantial, and increasing proportion of kidney pathology in patients with SLE might not directly relate to LN but instead might be explained by non-immune mediated factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. The goal of the manuscript is to draw attention to hypertension, diabetes and obesity as potential alternative causes of kidney damage in patients with SLE. Further, we suggest that misclassification of kidney disease etiology in patients with SLE might have important ramifications for clinical trial recruitment, epidemiologic investigation, and clinical care. Future studies aiming to elucidate and distinguish discrete causes of kidney disease - both clinically and histologically - among patients with SLE are desperately needed as improved understanding of disease mechanisms is paramount to advancing therapeutic discovery. Collaboration among rheumatologists, pathologists, nephrologists, and endocrinologists, and the availability of dedicated research funding, will be critical to the success of such efforts.

Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine Ameliorates Murine Lupus

Current guidelines encourage administering pneumococcal vaccine Prevnar-13 to patients with lupus, but whether such vaccinations affect disease severity is unclear. To address this issue, we treated 3-month-old MRL-lpr mice, that spontaneously develop a lupus-like syndrome, with Prevnar-13 or vehicle control. After 3 months, we quantified circulating anti-Pneumococcal polysaccharide capsule (PPS) antibodies and signs of disease severity, including albuminuria, renal histology and skin severity score. We also compared immunophenotypes and function of T and B cells from treated and untreated animals. Prevnar-13 elicited the formation of anti-pneumococcal IgM and IgG. Prevnar-13 treated animals showed reduced albuminuria, renal histological lesions, and milder dermatitis compared to vehicle-treated controls. Mitigated disease severity was associated with reduced and increased T follicular helper cells (T_FH) and T follicular regulatory cells (T_FR), respectively, in Prevnar-treated animals. T cells from Prevnar-13 vaccinated mice showed differential cytokine production after aCD3/aCD28 stimulation, with significantly decreased IL-17 and IL-4, and increased IL-10 production compared to non-vaccinated mice. In conclusion, pneumococcal vaccination elicits anti-pneumococcal antibody response and ameliorates disease severity in MRL-lpr mice, which associates with fewer T_FH and increased T_FR. Together, the data support use of Prevnar vaccination in individuals with SLE.

Triggers of Autoimmunity: The Role of Bacterial Infections in the Extracellular Exposure of Lupus Nuclear Autoantigens

Infections are considered important environmental triggers of autoimmunity and can contribute to autoimmune disease onset and severity. Nucleic acids and the complexes that they form with proteins—including chromatin and ribonucleoproteins—are the main autoantigens in the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). How these nuclear molecules become available to the immune system for recognition, presentation, and targeting is an area of research where complexities remain to be disentangled. In this review, we discuss how bacterial infections participate in the exposure of nuclear autoantigens to the immune system in SLE. Infections can instigate pro-inflammatory cell death programs including pyroptosis and NETosis, induce extracellular release of host nuclear autoantigens, and promote their recognition in an immunogenic context by activating the innate and adaptive immune systems. Moreover, bacterial infections can release bacterial DNA associated with other bacterial molecules, complexes that can elicit autoimmunity by acting as innate stimuli of pattern recognition receptors and activating autoreactive B cells through molecular mimicry. Recent studies have highlighted SLE disease activity-associated alterations of the gut commensals and the expansion of pathobionts that can contribute to chronic exposure to extracellular nuclear autoantigens. A novel field in the study of autoimmunity is the contribution of bacterial biofilms to the pathogenesis of autoimmunity. Biofilms are multicellular communities of bacteria that promote colonization during chronic infections. We review the very recent literature highlighting a role for bacterial biofilms, and their major components, amyloid/DNA complexes, in the generation of anti-nuclear autoantibodies and their ability to stimulate the autoreactive immune response. The best studied bacterial amyloid is curli, produced by enteric bacteria that commonly cause infections in SLE patients, including Escherichia coli and Salmonella spps. Evidence suggests that curli/DNA complexes can trigger autoimmunity by acting as danger signals, molecular mimickers, and microbial chaperones of nucleic acids.

Mortality risk prediction in lupus patients complicated with invasive infection in the emergency department: LUPHAS score

Background:

Infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aimed to establish a clinical prediction model for the 3-month all-cause mortality of invasive infection events in patients with SLE in the emergency department.

Methods:

SLE patients complicated with invasive infection admitted into the emergency department were included in this study. Patient’s demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics on admission were retrospectively collected as baseline data and compared between the deceased and the survivors. Independent predictors were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis. A prediction model for all-cause mortality was established and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results:

A total of 130 eligible patients were collected with a cumulative 38.5% 3-month mortality. Lymphocyte count <800/ul, urea >7.6mmol/l, maximum prednisone dose in the past ⩾60 mg/d, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, and age at baseline were independent predictors for all-cause mortality (LUPHAS). In contrast, a history of hydroxychloroquine use was protective. In a combined, odds ratio-weighted LUPHAS scoring system (score 3–22), patients were categorized to three groups: low-risk (score 3–9), medium-risk (score 10–15), and high-risk (score 16–22), with mortalities of 4.9% (2/41), 45.9% (28/61), and 78.3% (18/23) respectively. ROC curve analysis indicated that a LUPHAS score could effectively predict all-cause mortality [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86, CI 95% 0.79–0.92]. In addition, LUPHAS score performed better than the qSOFA score alone (AUC = 0.69, CI 95% 0.59–0.78), or CURB-65 score (AUC = 0.69, CI 95% 0.59–0.80) in the subgroup of lung infections (n = 108).

Conclusions:

Based on a large emergency cohort of lupus patients complicated with invasive infection, the LUPHAS score was established to predict the short-term all-cause mortality, which could be a promising applicable tool for risk stratification in clinical practice.

Does SLE widen or narrow race/ethnic disparities in the risk of five co-morbid conditions? Evidence from a community-based outpatient care system

OBJECTIVE

The heterogeneous spectrum of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often presents with secondary complications such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), infections and neoplasms. Our study assessed whether the presence of SLE independently increases or reduces the disparities, accounting for the already higher risk of these outcomes among racial/ethnic minority groups without SLE.

METHODS

We defined a cohort using electronic health records data (2005-2016) from a mixed-payer community-based outpatient setting in California serving patients of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds. The eligible population included adult patients with SLE and matched non-SLE patients (≥18 years old). SLE was the primary exposure. The following outcomes were identified: pneumonia, other infections, CVD and neoplasms. For each racial/ethnic group, we calculated the proportion of incident co-morbidities by SLE exposure, followed by logistic regression for each outcome with SLE as the exposure. We evaluated interaction on the additive and multiplicative scales by calculating the relative excess risk due to interaction and estimating the cross-product term in each model.

RESULTS

We identified 1036 SLE cases and 8875 controls. The incidence for all outcomes was higher among the SLE exposed. We found little difference in the odds of the outcomes associated with SLE across racial/ethnic groups, even after multivariable adjustment. This finding was consistent on the multiplicative and additive scales.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that SLE status does not independently confer substantial interaction or heterogeneity by race/ethnicity toward the risk of pneumonia, other infections, CVD or neoplasms. Further studies in larger datasets are necessary to validate this novel finding.

Lipid Testing and Statin Prescriptions Among Medicaid Recipients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Diabetes Mellitus and the General Medicaid Population

OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are similar to those in diabetes mellitus (DM). We investigated whether the numbers of lipid tests and statin prescriptions in patients with SLE are comparable with those in patients with DM and those in individuals without either disease.

METHODS

Using Analytic eXtract files from 29 states for 2007-2010, we identified a cohort of US Medicaid beneficiaries, ages 18-65 years, with prevalent SLE. Each SLE patient was matched for age and sex with 2 patients with DM and 4 individuals in the general Medicaid population who did not have either SLE or DM. We compared the proportions of patients in each cohort who received ≥1 lipid test and ≥1 statin prescription during 1-year follow-up. We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate the odds of lipid testing and receiving prescriptions for statins and conditional logistic regression to compare the matched cohorts.

RESULTS

We identified 3 Medicaid cohorts: 25,950 patients with SLE, 51,900 patients with DM, and 103,800 Medicaid recipients without either condition. In these cohorts, lipid testing was performed in 24% of patients in the SLE group, 43% of patients in the DM group, and 16% of individuals in the group with neither condition, and statin prescriptions were dispensed in 11%, 33%, and 7% of these groups, respectively. SLE patients were 66% less likely (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.34-0.35) to have lipid tests and 82% less likely (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.18-0.18) to fill a statin prescription compared with DM patients. SLE patients were also less likely (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.94) to fill a statin prescription compared with individuals in the general Medicaid population.

CONCLUSION

Despite having an elevated risk of CVD, SLE patients received less lipid testing and received fewer statin prescriptions compared with age- and sex-matched DM patients and individuals in the general Medicaid population; this gap should be a target for improvement.

Comparing the burdens of opportunistic infections among patients with systemic rheumatic diseases: a nationally representative cohort study

Objective

To estimate and compare the burdens of opportunistic infections and herpes zoster in real-world practice among patients with various systemic rheumatic diseases.

Methods

This 13-year cohort study used national health insurance data to compare the incidence rates (IRs) of nine opportunistic infections among patients with five rheumatic diseases. The analyses were stratified according to follow-up duration using Poisson regression, and Cox models were used to compare the risk of first opportunistic infection.

Results

During 2000–2013, we identified 76,966 patients who had polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM, 2270 cases), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 15,961 cases), systemic sclerosis (SSc, 2071 cases), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, 38,355 cases), or primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS, 18,309 cases). The IR of opportunistic infections was highest for PM/DM cases (61.3/1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 56.6–66.2), followed by SLE cases (43.1/1000 person-years, 95% CI 41.7–44.5), SSc cases (31.6/1000 person-years, 95% CI 28.3–35.1), RA cases (25.0/1000 person-years, 95% CI 24.4–25.7), and pSS cases (24.1/1000 person-years, 95% CI 23.1–25.2). Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that, relative to SLE, PM/DM was associated with a significantly higher risk of opportunistic infections (hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.08–1.29). The risk of opportunistic infections was highest during the first year after the diagnosis of all five rheumatic diseases.

Conclusions

The risk of opportunistic infection was highest for PM/DM, followed by SLE, SSc, RA, and pSS. Careful observation and preventive therapy for opportunistic infections may be warranted in selected PM/DM patients, especially during the first year after the diagnosis.

Baseline Retinal Examinations in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Newly Initiating Hydroxychloroquine Treatment in a US Medicaid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Population, 2000-2010

OBJECTIVE

Baseline retinal examinations have long been recommended for patients beginning treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), but it is unknown how well this guideline is followed. We investigated baseline eye examinations among US SLE patients enrolled in Medicaid in whom HCQ treatment was newly initiated.

METHODS

Using billing codes, we identified SLE patients ages 18-65 years who were enrolled in Medicaid and residing in the 29 most populated US states, from 2000 to 2010. New users of HCQ were identified by filled prescriptions, with none filled in the preceding 12 months. Retinal examinations that were performed within 30 days before to 1 year after the index prescription were identified. We examined the proportions of patients receiving retinal examinations over the study years and compared the characteristics of those who did and those who did not receive examinations, using bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 12,755 SLE patients newly starting HCQ treatment, 32.5% received baseline dilated eye examinations. The proportions of patients receiving baseline eye examinations did not significantly change from 2000 to 2010 (31.0-34.4%; P for linear trend = 0.12). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of having an examination included female sex, Asian versus white race, and a higher number of laboratory tests performed during the preceding year. Compared with white patients, lower proportions of black and Native American patients with SLE had baseline retinal examinations.

CONCLUSION

Only one-third of patients with SLE enrolled in Medicaid and in whom HCQ was newly initiated received the recommended baseline retinal examinations, and this proportion did not significantly increase from 2000 to 2010. The sociodemographic variation in this recommended care has been observed for other recommended medical care in SLE and requires both further investigation and interventions to address it.

Factors predictive of serious infections over time in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: data from a multi-ethnic, multi-national, Latin American lupus cohort

Aim

The aim of this study was to identify factors predictive of serious infections over time in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

A multi-ethnic, multi-national Latin American SLE cohort was studied. Serious infection was defined as one that required hospitalization, occurred during a hospitalization or led to death. Potential predictors included were sociodemographic factors, clinical manifestations (per organ involved, lymphopenia and leukopenia, independently) and previous infections at baseline. Disease activity (SLEDAI), damage (SLICC/ACR Damage Index), non-serious infections, glucocorticoids, antimalarials (users and non-users), and immunosuppressive drugs use; the last six variables were examined as time-dependent covariates. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the predictors of serious infections using a backward elimination procedure. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

Results

Of the 1243 patients included, 1116 (89.8%) were female. The median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis and follow-up time were 27 (20–37) years and 47.8 (17.9–68.6) months, respectively. The incidence rate of serious infections was 3.8 cases per 100 person-years. Antimalarial use (hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48–0.99; p = 0.0440) was protective, while doses of prednisone >15 and ≤60 mg/day (hazard ratio: 4.18; 95 %CI: 1.69–10.31; p = 0.0019) and >60 mg/day (hazard ratio: 4.71; 95% CI: 1.35–16.49; p = 0.0153), use of methylprednisolone pulses (hazard ratio: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.10–2.13; p = 0.0124), increase in disease activity (hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01–1.04; p = 0.0016) and damage accrual (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11–1.34; p < 0.0001) were predictive factors of serious infections.

Conclusions

Over time, prednisone doses higher than 15 mg/day, use of methylprednisolone pulses, increase in disease activity and damage accrual were predictive of infections, whereas antimalarial use was protective against them in SLE patients.