Nonsmall cell lung cancer presenting with synchronous solitary brain metastasis

Local consolidative therapy versus maintenance therapy or observation for patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without progression after first-line systemic therapy: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Evidence from retrospective studies suggests that disease progression after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occurs most often at sites of disease known to exist at baseline. However, the potential effect of aggressive local consolidative therapy for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC is unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of local consolidative therapy on progression-free survival.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study, eligible patients from three hospitals had histological confirmation of stage IV NSCLC, three or fewer metastatic disease lesions after first-line systemic therapy, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less, had received standard first-line systemic therapy, and had no disease progression before randomisation. First-line therapy was four or more cycles of platinum doublet therapy or 3 or more months of EGFR or ALK inhibitors for patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either local consolidative therapy ([chemo]radiotherapy or resection of all lesions) with or without subsequent maintenance treatment or to maintenance treatment alone, which could be observation only. Maintenance treatment was recommended based on a list of approved regimens, and observation was defined as close surveillance without cytotoxic treatment. Randomisation was not masked and was balanced dynamically on five factors: number of metastases, response to initial therapy, CNS metastases, intrathoracic nodal status, and EGFR and ALK status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival analysed in all patients who were treated and had at least one post-baseline imaging assessment. The study is ongoing but not recruiting participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01725165.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 28, 2012, and Jan 19, 2016, 74 patients were enrolled either during or at the completion of first-line systemic therapy. The study was terminated early after randomisation of 49 patients (25 in the local consolidative therapy group and 24 in the maintenance treatment group) as part of the annual analyses done by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee of all randomised trials at MD Anderson Cancer Center, and before a planned interim analysis of 44 events. At a median follow-up time for all randomised patients of 12·39 months (IQR 5·52-20·30), the median progression-free survival in the local consolidative therapy group was 11·9 months (90% CI 5·7-20·9) versus 3·9 months (2·3-6·6) in the maintenance treatment group (hazard ratio 0·35 [90% CI 0·18-0·66], log-rank p=0·0054). Adverse events were similar between groups, with no grade 4 adverse events or deaths due to treatment. Grade 3 adverse events in the maintenance therapy group were fatigue (n=1) and anaemia (n=1) and in the local consolidative therapy group were oesophagitis (n=2), anaemia (n=1), pneumothorax (n=1), and abdominal pain (n=1, unlikely related).

INTERPRETATION

Local consolidative therapy with or without maintenance therapy for patients with three or fewer metastases from NSCLC that did not progress after initial systemic therapy improved progression-free survival compared with maintenance therapy alone. These findings suggest that aggressive local therapy should be further explored in phase 3 trials as a standard treatment option in this clinical scenario.

FUNDING

MD Anderson Lung Cancer Priority Fund, MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shot Initiative, and Cancer Center Support (Core), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Pulmonary Resection for Synchronous M1b-cStage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

We wanted to assess the efficacy of curative intent pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with synchronous M1b-distant metastases in a single organ or lesion.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2015, 23 consecutive synchronous M1b-cStage IV NSCLC patients who underwent any treatment for metastases and curative intent pulmonary resection were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were men and 7 were women, with a median age of 56 years (range: 41 to 76 years). There were 17 adenocarcinoma, 4 large-cell carcinoma, 1 large-cell neuroendocrine cancer, and 1 carcinosarcoma. Thirteen patients had no lymph node metastasis. Fourteen patients received preoperative chemotherapy, and 10 received postoperative chemotherapy. The metastatic sites were the brain in 13 patients; bone in 3 patients; adrenal glands and extrathoracic lymph nodes in 2 patients each; and the liver, small intestine, and subcutaneous tissue in 1 patient each. Nineteen patients underwent lobectomy, and the other 4 patients underwent pneumonectomy. Seventeen patients experienced recurrence as follows: local recurrence in 3 patients, distant recurrence in 13 patients, and both in 1 patient. The 5-year progression-free survival rates in the 23 patients was14.5% (95% confidence interval: 0% to 30.6%), and the 5-year overall survival rate was 41.7% (95% confidence interval: 19.6% to 63.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Some M1b-cStage IV NSCLC patients achieved longer survival than others with the same stage disease by using local treatment for distant metastases and curative intent pulmonary resection. Oligometastatic patients might have been inadvertently included in the present cohort. However, at present, the optimum method for patient selection remains unclear.

Oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: current treatment strategies

The oligometastatic disease theory was initially described in 1995 by Heilman and Weichselbaum. Since then, much work has been performed to investigate its existence in many solid tumors. This has led to subclassifications of stage IV cancer, which could redefine our treatment approaches and the therapeutic outcomes for this historically “incurable” entity. With a high incidence of stage IV disease, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a difficult cancer to treat and cure. Recent work has proven the existence of an oligometastatic state in NSCLC in terms of properly selecting patients who may benefit from aggressive therapy and experience long-term overall survival. This review discusses the current treatment approaches used in oligometastatic NSCLC and provides the evidence and rationale for each approach. The prognostic factors of many trials are discussed, which can be used to properly select patients for aggressive treatment regimens. Future advances in both molecular profiling of NSCLC to find targetable mutations and investigating patient selection may increase the number of patients diagnosed with oligometastatic NSCLC. As this disease entity increases, it is of utmost importance for oncologists treating NSCLC to be aware of the current treatment strategies that exist and the potential advantages/disadvantages of each.

Surgery in oligometastatic NSCLC patients in the targeted therapy era

More than 50% of NSCLC patients present with metastatic disease at first diagnosis, with a median survival of 8-11 months. However, selected patients with oligometastatic disease who receive appropriate local therapy for both the primary lesion and metastases enjoy long-term survival or are even cured. The new (eighth) edition of the tumor, node and metastasis classification of lung cancer suggests that patients with a single metastatic lesion in one distant organ should be placed into a new category, M1b, which will certainly lead to more applications of local therapy in such subpopulations. Moreover, as the applications of targeted therapy increase, surgery will play an evermore critical role in eliminating drug-resistant cancer clones of patients who exhibit mixed responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The lung, brain and adrenal gland are the most common oligometastatic organs, and are reviewed separately.

Prognosis and predictors of site of first metastasis after definitive radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Background and purpose Evidence suggests that distinct biologic phenomenon produce different patterns of distant metastatic (DM) failures. We attempted to identify prognostically poor sites of first DM and to define factors predictive of their development. Methods and materials A total of 1074 patients treated with ≥60 Gy definitive radiation for initially non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were analyzed. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression was utilized to associate clinical factors with DM site, and metastatic site with overall survival (OS). To account for competing events, multivariate Fine and Gray regression was utilized to identify treatment and disease factors predictive of site-specific metastases. Results Sites of first DM associated with worse survival were liver (median OS: 5 months after DM) and bone (median OS: 6.7 months after DM). Multivariate regression identified non-squamous histology to be associated with first DM within the liver (HR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.16-3.60, p = 0.01), while delay between diagnosis and RT (third vs. first tertile: HR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.26-4.21, p = 0.007) in addition to advanced stage (stage III vs. II/I: HR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.11-5.06, p = 0.03) were associated with first DM within bone. Conclusions Liver and bone as site of first DM is associated with worse prognosis and are predicted by different disease and treatment factors.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Whole-Body and Intracranial Activity With Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Chemotherapy and Crizotinib: Results From ASCEND-2

PURPOSE

Phase I data (ASCEND-1) showed ceritinib efficacy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of brain metastases status and with or without prior therapy with an inhibitor of the ALK protein. Data are presented from a phase II trial (ASCEND-2) in which ceritinib efficacy and safety were evaluated in patients who had ALK-rearranged NSCLC previously treated with at least one platinum-based chemotherapy and who had experienced progression during crizotinib treatment as their last prior therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic or neurologically stable baseline brain metastases, received oral ceritinib 750 mg/d. Whole-body and intracranial responses were investigator assessed (according to RECIST version 1.1). Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer surveys (the core-30 and the 13-item lung cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires).

RESULTS

All 140 patients enrolled had received two or more previous treatment regimens, and all patients had received crizotinib. The median duration of exposure and the follow-up time with ceritinib were 8.8 months (range, 0.1 to 19.4 months) and 11.3 months (range, 0.1 to 18.9 months), respectively. Investigator-assessed overall response rate was 38.6% (95% CI, 30.5% to 47.2%). Secondary end points, all investigator assessed, included disease control rate (77.1%; 95% CI, 69.3% to 83.8%), time to response (median, 1.8 months; range, 1.6 to 5.6 months), duration of response (median, 9.7 months; 95% CI, 7.1 to 11.1 months), and progression-free survival (median, 5.7 months; 95% CI, 5.4 to 7.6 months). Of 100 patients with baseline brain metastases, 20 had active target lesions at baseline; investigator-assessed intracranial overall response rate was 45.0% (95% CI, 23.1% to 68.5%). The most common adverse events (majority, grade 1 or 2) for all treated patients were nausea (81.4%), diarrhea (80.0%), and vomiting (62.9%). Patient-reported outcomes showed a trend toward improved symptom burden. The global quality-of-life score was maintained during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with its activity in ASCEND-1, ceritinib treatment provided clinically meaningful and durable responses with manageable tolerability in chemotherapy- and crizotinib-pretreated patients, including those with brain metastases.

Risk factors and management of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with close to half of all patients presenting with metastatic disease. A proportion of these patients with limited metastatic disease, termed oligometastatic disease, have been shown to benefit from a definitive treatment approach. Synchronous and metachronous presentation of oligometastatic disease have prognostic significance, with current belief that metachronous disease is more favorable. Surgical excision of intracranial and extracranial oligometastatic disease has been shown to improve survival, especially in patients with lymph node-negative disease, adenocarcinoma histology and smaller thoracic tumors. Definitive radiation to sites of oligometastatic disease and initial thoracic disease has also been shown to have a similar impact on survival for both intracranial and extracranial disease. Recent studies have reported on the use of targeted agents combined with ablative doses of radiation in the oligometastatic setting with promising outcomes. In this review, we present the historical and current literature describing surgical and radiation treatment options for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC.

Curative intent therapy in oligometastatic lung cancer with an unresectable primary with N3 nodes: case report and review of the literature

Untreated NSCLC patients with brain metastases have a median survival of approximately 2 months; locally advanced stage III NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiation have a median survival of 16-19 months. Select patients with oligometastatic disease may have a prolonged survival if managed aggressively. We present the case of a 47-year-old woman with lung adenocarcinoma, cT2aN3M1a, (supraclavicular lymph node, solitary brain metastasis). She underwent brain metastasectomy, whole brain radiation, induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. She relapsed in the brain and locoregionally and was treated with brain re-irradiation, and systemic chemotherapy. Her progression-free survival was 32 months and she is alive with recurrent disease 63 months after diagnosis. Systemic therapy is an important tool in the multimodality management of patients with oligometastatic disease.

Approach for oligometastasis in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a limited number of distant metastases, referred to as the oligometastatic state, has been indicated for surgery for the past several decades. However, whether the strategy of surgical treatment results in a survival benefit for such patients remains controversial. Experientially, however, thoracic surgeons often encounter long-term survivors among surgically resected oligometastatic NSCLC patients. In this article, the current situation of surgical approach and potential future perspective for oligometastatic NSCLC are reviewed.

Effect of synchronous solitary bone metastasectomy and lung cancer resection on non-small cell lung cancer patients

Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-associated mortality among men and women globally. The skeleton is one of the most common metastatic sites. The majority of patients exhibiting bone metastases are treated using systemic therapy or symptom-based palliative approaches without surgery. The present study attempted to improve the therapeutic effects of synchronous surgeries in resectable non-small cell lung cancer patients exhibiting solitary bone metastasis. A total of 5 patients underwent synchronous lung cancer resections and solitary bone metastasectomies between October 2009 and November 2011 in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China). All patients had received fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography or bone scintigraphy to demonstrate the presence of solitary bone metastasis and to exclude the presence of metastases at alternative sites. The patients received standard lung cancer and mediastinal lymph node resections. In addition, bone lesions were assessed by orthopedists and operated on synchronously with standard procedures. Following surgery, all patients were administered standard chemotherapeutic regimens. Perioperative indicators, including time for thoracic drainage, length of hospital stay, incidence of post-operative complications and progression-free survival (PFS) time, were observed. The average time for post-operative drainage was 4.6±1.1 days, and the average length of post-operative hospitalization was 8.8±2.2 days. All procedures were performed safely with no serious complications. The PFS of the patients was 13.2±7.7 months. While 2 patients presenting with spinal metastases succumbed at ~1 year post-surgery, the remaining 3 patients presenting with limb bone metastases survived for >16 months post-surgery, and were alive at the last follow-up. In conclusion, the present study indicated that a synchronous metastasectomy and lung tumor resection is a safe method of treatment. The PFS time and survival results demonstrated that on the rare occasion that a patient exhibits solitary bone metastasis, aggressive surgical treatment may be a potential therapeutic option.

Treatment: Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of treating all stages of lung cancer. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) has emerged as a standard treatment option for stage I-II patients with medically inoperable disease. Stage IIIA-IIIB disease is typically managed with definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has enabled delivery of more potent RT dose while greatly limiting dose to surrounding normal organs, including lung, esophagus, and heart. SABR may have an expanding role in the treatment of stage IV patients, with new clinical trials exploring its combination with systemic immuotherapies.

Outcome of surgical resection for brain metastases and radical treatment of the primary tumor in Chinese non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Purpose

Brain metastasis is the most common complication of brain cancer; nevertheless, primary lung cancer accounts for approximately 20%–40% of brain metastases cases. Surgical resection is the preferred treatment for brain metastases. However, no studies have reported the outcome of surgical resection of brain metastases from non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the People’s Republic of China. Moreover, the optimal treatment for primary NSCLC in patients with synchronous brain metastases is hitherto controversial.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of NSCLC patients with brain metastases who underwent neurosurgical resection at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, and assessed the efficacy of surgical resection and the necessity of aggressive treatment for primary NSCLC in synchronous brain metastases patients.

Results

A total of 62 patients, including 47 men and 15 women, with brain metastases from NSCLC were enrolled in the study. The median age at the time of craniotomy was 54 years (range 29–76 years). At the final follow-up evaluation, 50 patients had died. The median OS time was 15.1 months, and the survival rates were 70% and 37% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median OS time of synchronous brain metastases patients was 12.5 months. Univariate analysis revealed that radical treatment of primary NSCLC was positively correlated with survival, and it was an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Surgical resection is an effective treatment for brain metastases. Besides craniotomy, radical therapy is necessary for the management of primary NSCLC in patients with synchronous brain metastases.

Surgical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

More than 75% of the cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed in advanced stages (IIIA-IV). Although in these patients the role of surgery is unclear, complete tumor resection can be achieved in selected cases, with good long-term survival. In this review, current indications for surgery in advanced NSCLC are discussed. In stage IIIA (N2), surgery after induction chemotherapy seems to be the best option. The indication of induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy is debatable due to potential postoperative complications but recently reported experiences have not shown a higher postoperative risk in patients after chemo and radiotherapy induction even if pneumonectomy is performed. In cases of unexpected N2 found during thoracotomy, lobectomy plus systematic nodal dissection is recommended mostly for patients with single station disease. In stage IIIB, surgery is only the choice for resectable T4N0-1 cases and should not be indicated in cases of N2 disease. Favorable outcomes are reported after extended resections to the spine and mediastinal structures. Thorough and individualized discussion of each stage IIIB case is encouraged in the context of a multidisciplinary team. For stage IV oligometastatic cases, surgery can still be included when planning multimodality treatment. Brain and adrenal gland are the two most common sites of oligometastases considered for local ablative therapy.

Lung cancer surgery: an up to date

According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) GLOBOCAN World Cancer Report, lung cancer affects more than 1 million people a year worldwide. In Greece according to the 2008 GLOBOCAN report, there were 6,667 cases recorded, 18% of the total incidence of all cancers in the population. Furthermore, there were 6,402 deaths due to lung cancer, 23.5% of all deaths due to cancer. Therefore, in our country, lung cancer is the most common and deadly form of cancer for the male population. The most important prognostic indicator in lung cancer is the extent of disease. The Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging (AJCC) developed the tumour, node, and metastases (TNM) staging system which attempts to define those patients who might be suitable for radical surgery or radical radiotherapy, from the majority, who will only be suitable for palliative measures. Surgery has an important part for the therapy of patients with lung cancer. "Lobectomy is the gold standard treatment". This statement may be challenged in cases of stage Ia cancer or in patients with limited pulmonary function. In these cases an anatomical segmentectomy with lymph node dissection is an acceptable alternative. Chest wall invasion is not a contraindication to resection. En-bloc rib resection and reconstruction is the treatment of choice. N2 disease represents both a spectrum of disease and the interface between surgical and non-surgical treatment of lung cancer Evidence from trials suggests that multizone or unresectable N2 disease should be treated primarily by chemoradiotherapy. There may be a role for surgery if N2 is downstaged to N0 and lobectomy is possible, but pneumonectomy is avoidable. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered a systemic disease at diagnosis, because the potential for hematogenous and lymphogenic metastases is very high. The efficacy of surgical intervention for SCLC is not clear. Lung cancer resection can be performed using several surgical techniques. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is a safe, efficient, well accepted and widespread technique among thoracic surgeons. The 5-year survival rate following complete resection of lung cancer is stage dependent. Incomplete resection rarely is useful and cures the patient.

Aggressive therapy for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma and synchronous brain-only oligometastatic disease is associated with long-term survival

OBJECTIVES

Optimal therapy for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) presenting with synchronous brain-only oligometastases (SBO) is not well defined. We sought to analyze the effect of differing therapeutic paradigms in this subpopulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed NSCLC patients with 1-4 SBO diagnosed between 1/2000 and 1/2011 at our institution. Patients with T0 tumors or documented Karnofsky Performance Status <70 were excluded. Aggressive thoracic therapy (ATT) was defined as resection of the primary disease or chemoradiotherapy whose total radiation dose exceeded 45 Gy. Cox proportional hazards and competing risks models were used to analyze factors affecting survival and first recurrence in the brain.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included. Median follow-up was 31.9 months. Intrathoracic disease extent included 9 stage I, 10 stage II and 47 stage III patients. Thirty-eight patients received ATT, 28 did not. Patients receiving ATT were younger (median age 55 vs. 60.5 years, p=0.027) but were otherwise similar to those who did not. Receipt of ATT was associated with prolonged median overall survival (OS) (26.4 vs. 10.5 months; p<0.001) with actuarial 2-year rates of 54% vs. 26%. ATT remained associated with OS after controlling for age, thoracic stage, performance status and initial brain therapy (HR 0.40, p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, the risk of first failure in the brain was associated with receipt of ATT (HR 3.62, p=0.032) and initial combined modality brain therapy (HR 0.34, p=0.046).

CONCLUSION

Aggressive management of thoracic disease in NSCLC patients with SBO is associated with improved survival. Careful management of brain disease remains important, especially for those treated aggressively.

Prognostic significance of Ki67 proliferation index, HIF1 alpha index and microvascular density in patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Survival upon diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is highly variable and established prognostic scores do not include tissue-based parameters.

METHODS

Patients who underwent neurosurgical resection as first-line therapy for newly diagnosed NSCLC BM were included. Microvascular density (MVD), Ki67 tumor cell proliferation index and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) index were determined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

NSCLC BM specimens from 230 patients (151 male, 79 female; median age 56 years; 199 nonsquamous histology) and 53/230 (23.0%) matched primary tumor samples were available. Adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was given to 153/230 (66.5%) patients after neurosurgical resection. MVD and HIF-1 alpha indices were significantly higher in BM than in matched primary tumors. In patients treated with adjuvant WBRT, low BM HIF-1 alpha expression was associated with favorable overall survival (OS), while among patients not treated with adjuvant WBRT, BM HIF-1 alpha expression did not correlate with OS. Low diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment score (DS-GPA), low Ki67 index, high MVD, low HIF-1 alpha index and administration of adjuvant WBRT were independently associated with favorable OS. Incorporation of tissue-based parameters into the commonly used DS-GPA allowed refined discrimination of prognostic subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Ki67 index, MVD and HIF-1 alpha index have promising prognostic value in BM and should be validated in further studies.

Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline updates the second edition and addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations, including Pancoast tumors, T4 N0,1 M0 tumors, additional nodules in the same lobe (T3), ipsilateral different lobe (T4) or contralateral lung (M1a), synchronous and metachronous second primary lung cancers, solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, meta-analyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. To ensure that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications appropriate to the topics covered in this article were obtained by performing a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. Where possible, we also reference other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guidelines panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach appears to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. Carefully selected patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon, but surgical resection appears to be beneficial as part of their treatment rather than definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with lung cancer and an additional malignant nodule are difficult to categorize, and the current stage classification rules are ambiguous. Such patients should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team to determine whether the additional lesion represents a second primary lung cancer or an additional tumor nodule corresponding to the dominant cancer. Highly selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit from resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, provided that the tumor can be completely resected and N2 nodal disease is absent, primary surgical resection should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with more uncommon presentations of lung cancer may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

Prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

Brain metastasis has a poor prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we evaluated the prognosis of NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

We analyzed a total of 313 NSCLC patients with brain metastasis. We compared the prognoses between a group of less than four (group A) and a group of more than four or equal to four (≥4) (group B) brain metastases.

RESULTS

The median survival time was 334 days (group A, 164 patients, 52.4%) and 234 days (group B, 149 patients, 47.6%). Univariate analysis showed that the number of metastases, age at diagnosis of brain metastasis, smoking history, histologic type, and former stage of primary lung cancer before brain metastasis, had a significant influence. In addition, treatment for primary lung cancer lesions and brain metastasis also affected the overall survival (p < .0001). However, there was no difference in the overall survival between the two groups in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the number of brain metastases, classified by group A (<4) or group B (≥4) did not influence the overall survival of NSCLC patients. However, the overall survival in group A was better than in group B when analyzed, except for local brain treatment modalities in sub-group analysis, suggesting that non-optimized local treatment strategies might cause an unexpected prognosis result in this retrospective study. We suggest that more prospective studies might be needed for the optimal standard treatment for brain metastasis.

Treatment outcome for patients with primary NSCLC and synchronous solitary metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with synchronous solitary metastasis were generally considered as stage IV and believed to be incurable. Recently, growing evidence has indicated that surgical treatment may provide these patients with a survival benefit. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the effectiveness of different treatments for primary tumors and solitary metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients older than 18 years with histologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC and a confirmed synchronous solitary metastasis that diagnosed within 2 months of primary NSCLC. Patients with uncontrolled massive pleural effusion were excluded. Between February 2002 and October 2010, 213 patients were considered eligible and enrolled in this cohort.

RESULTS

The median survival time (MST) for the 213 patients was 12.6 months. Forty-five patients received primary pulmonary tumor surgery in the entire cohort. The MSTs of patients who received primary tumor resection and those who did not were 31.8 and 11.4 months (p < 0.01). The MST of the patients with solitary brain metastasis was 12.3 months. Forty-one patients who received brain surgical treatment or SRS had a MST of 15.4 months and others who only received WBRT had a MST of 11.5 months (p = 0.002). Gender, the stage of the primary tumor, PS and whether the primary tumor was removed all affected prognosis independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive local and metastasis treatments could lead to better clinical outcomes and thus provide an option for clinicians in the future management of patients with NSCLC and synchronous solitary metastasis.

Psoas muscle metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. and often spreads via lymphatics or through hematogenous metastasis to the brain, bone and adrenal glands. Isolated metastases to skeletal muscle, including the psoas muscles, are very uncommon. The present report is a case series of three patients with psoas metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a review of the relevant literature. Three patients presented with psoas muscle metastases from NSCLC detected on diagnostic imaging. All patients were treated with radiotherapy to the psoas muscle, and two patients were treated with curative intent on an oligometastatic paradigm. Radiotherapy to the psoas muscle was effective and well tolerated.

A novel paradigm in the treatment of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is thought to uniformly carry a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 1 year and 5-year survival of less than 5%. In patients with a low volume (i.e. single site) of distant disease, the prognosis is slightly more favorable than that of more advanced (i.e. multiple sites of metastases) disease. For those with limited metastases, we developed a paradigm of adding concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy to the primary tumor once the tumor demonstrated chemotherapy sensitivity.

METHODS

Charts of patients from 1999-2006 with non-small cell lung cancer were reviewed to find those with a single extra-thoracic site of disease treated with combined modality therapy. We found nine patients of 640 who met these criteria. Initial treatment consisted of induction chemotherapy, except for brain metastases which were managed first (n=1). If patients experienced a response to chemotherapy without new metastases, the extra-thoracic site was treated for total control with curative dose chemoradiotherapy to the primary site. Survival, time to progression, and sites of progression were assessed.

RESULTS

Median survival was 28 months (95% CI 18-50 mo) with median time to progression of 15 months (95% CI 8-24 mo). All except one patient progressed in the CNS, either with brain metastases (n=7) or leptomeningeal disease (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Such an approach offers the potential for enhanced quality and quantity of survival by incorporating aggressive RT for select patients without disease progression after induction chemotherapy. Patients tended to fail in the CNS, suggesting the importance of continued surveillance of the neuraxis or possibly prophylactic cranial irradiation. Future plans will correlate outcomes with molecular markers.

Oligometastatic disease at presentation or recurrence for nonsmall cell lung cancer

Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) presents a unique opportunity for potential curative therapy. Improved cancer staging using PET/CT, MRI, and future cellular and molecular staging with circulating tumor cells and/or molecular markers will identify more patients with truly oligometastasis disease that will benefit from definitive local treatment. Recent development of noninvasive local ablative therapy such as stereotactic radiotherapy makes it possible to eradicate multiple local diseases with minimal side effect. Novel systemic therapy may also control systemic spread and therefore make it possible to improve survival by eliminating local diseases. More research, particularly prospective studies, is ideally randomized studies are needed to validate the concept of oligometastasis.

Radiochemotherapy in special populations with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY The evidence to date confirms that concurrent radiochemotherapy (RT–ChT) is the treatment of choice in small-cell lung cancer and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. But these patients require a good performance status and an interdisciplinary group of clinicians, which is hard to find at some facilities around the world. Socioeconomic differences worldwide, inadequate tolerance to RT–ChT, tobacco comorbidities, the high percentage of elderly patients and their low level of recruitment in clinical trials could explain, in part, the reason why lung cancer still remains the leading cause of cancer-related death around the world. This review focuses on RT–ChT in a special population of eldery, comorbid patients and populations with limited resources from developing countries with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and limited-disease small-cell lung cancer.

Five-year tumor-free survival after aggressive trimodality therapy for T3N0M1b non-small cell lung cancer with synchronous solitary brain metastasis

Several recent studies have demonstrated that some patients might benefit from aggressive therapy for thoracic stage I lung cancer and synchronous solitary brain metastasis. However, the indication for the patients with advanced T-stage is still unclear. We herein present a patient with synchronous solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer who survived without recurrence for 5 years following surgery after chemotherapy, even though the primary tumor was T3N0 thoracic stage II. Aggressive treatment for both the primary site and brain metastasis may therefore be an effective treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with synchronous solitary brain metastasis.

Prognostic impact of radiation therapy to the primary tumor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and oligometastasis at diagnosis

PURPOSE

We investigated prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and oligometastatic disease at diagnosis, particularly the influence of local treatment to the primary site on prognosis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 2000 through June 2011, 78 consecutive patients with oligometastatic NSCLC (<5 metastases) at diagnosis underwent definitive chemoradiation therapy (≥45 Gy) to the primary site. Forty-four of these patients also received definitive local treatment for the oligometastases. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed better overall survival (OS) for those patients who received at least 63 Gy of radiation to the primary site (P=.002), received definitive local treatment for oligometastasis (P=.041), had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score >80 (P=.007), had a gross tumor volume ≤124 cm³ (P=.002), had adenocarcinoma histology (P=.002), or had no history of respiratory disease (P=.016). On multivariate analysis, radiation dose, performance status, and tumor volume retained significance (P=.004, P=.006, and P<.001, respectively). The radiation dose also maintained significance when patients with and without brain metastases were analyzed separately.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor volume, KPS, and receipt of at least 63 Gy to the primary tumor are associated with improved OS in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC at diagnosis. Our results suggest that a subset of such patients may benefit from definitive local therapy.

Results of a surgical resection for patients with stage IV non--small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of surgical treatment for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

SUBJECTS

There were 36 patients who underwent surgical resection for stage IV NSCLC between 1999 and 2008.

RESULTS

The patients included 22 males and 14 females. All patients had either synchronous distant metastasis or pleural dissemination. The mean age of the patients was 65.8 years (range, 18 to 90 years). The histological types included 29 adenocarcinomas, 5 squamous-cell carcinomas and 2 large-cell carcinomas. The organs of metastasis were bone in 5 patients, brain in 4, adrenal gland in 4, axillary lymph nodes in 3, liver in 2, and 1 patient had a contralateral pulmonary metastasis. The number of metastases was one site in 13, two sites in 3, three sites in 1, and five sites in 2 patients. The patients with bone metastasis were treated with radiation, and the patients with brain metastasis underwent stereotaxic radiosurgery. The patients with either adrenal metastasis, axillary lymph node metastasis, or contralateral lung metastasis underwent surgical resection. Among the patients with distant metastasis, the 5-year survival rate was 30.1 %. There were 17 patients with pleural dissemination. The 5-year survival rate in these patients was 25.3%. The overall 5-year survival rate after surgery in the patients with stage IV disease was 26.8%.

CONCLUSION

Selected patients who can undergo surgical resection for the primary tumor and effective local therapy for metastatic lesions still have a chance to obtain long-term survival. Surgical treatment for NSCLC with oligometastatic disease can be considered as one arm of multidisciplinary treatment.

Long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastasis treated with whole-brain radiotherapy and thoracic chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases occur in 30-50% of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and confer a worse prognosis and quality of life. These patients are usually treated with Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by systemic therapy. Few studies have evaluated the role of chemoradiotherapy to the primary tumor after WBRT as definitive treatment in the management of these patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcome of 30 patients with primary NSCLC and brain metastasis at diagnosis without evidence of other metastatic sites. Patients were treated with WBRT and after induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin for two cycles. In the absence of progression, concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the primary tumor with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin was indicated, with a total effective dose of 60 Gy. If disease progression was ruled out, four chemotherapy cycles followed.

RESULTS

Median Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) were 8.43 ± 1.5 and 31.8 ± 15.8 months, respectively. PFS was 39.5% at 1 year and 24.7% at 2 years. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 71.1 and 60.2%, respectively. Three-year OS was significantly superior for patients with N0-N1 stage disease vs. N2-N3 (60 vs. 24%, respectively; Response rate [RR], 0.03; p= 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NSCLC and brain metastasis might benefit from treatment with WBRT and concurrent thoracic chemoradiotherapy. The subgroup of N0-N1 patients appears to achieve the greatest benefit. The result of this study warrants a prospective trial to confirm the benefit of this treatment.

Mind-mapping for lung cancer: towards a personalized therapeutics approach

There were over 220,000 people diagnosed with lung cancer and over 160,000 people dying of lung cancer during 2010 alone in the United States. In order to arrive at better control, prevention, diagnosis, and therapeutics for lung cancer, we must be able to personalize the approach towards the disease. Mind-mapping has existed for centuries for physicians to properly think about various "flows" of personalized medicine. We include here the epidemiology, diagnosis, histology, and treatment of lung cancer-in particular, non-small cell lung cancer. As we have new molecular signatures for lung cancer, this is further detailed. This review is not meant to be a comprehensive review, but rather its purpose is to highlight important aspects of lung cancer diagnosis, management, and personalized treatment options.

Treatment of brain metastasis from lung cancer

Brain metastases are not only the most common intracranial neoplasm in adults but also very prevalent in patients with lung cancer. Patients have been grouped into different classes based on the presence of prognostic factors such as control of the primary tumor, functional performance status, age, and number of brain metastases. Patients with good prognosis may benefit from more aggressive treatment because of the potential for prolonged survival for some of them. In this review, we will comprehensively discuss the therapeutic options for treating brain metastases, which arise mostly from a lung cancer primary. In particular, we will focus on the patient selection for combined modality treatment of brain metastases, such as surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) combined with whole brain irradiation; the use of radiosensitizers; and the neurocognitive deficits after whole brain irradiation with or without SRS. The benefit of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and its potentially associated neuro-toxicity for both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are also discussed, along with the combined treatment of intrathoracic primary disease and solitary brain metastasis. The roles of SRS to the surgical bed, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, WBRT with an integrated boost to the gross brain metastases, as well as combining WBRT with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, are explored as well.

Time for reappraisal of extracranial treatment options? Synchronous brain metastases from nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of the primary tumor in patients with brain metastases (BM) from newly diagnosed nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. The authors aimed to identify patient groups with synchronous BM for whom radical treatment of the primary site may be appropriate.

METHODS

The medical records of 167 patients treated at our center between November 2000 and June 2009 for newly diagnosed NSCLC and synchronous BM were reviewed. All patients underwent surgery/radiosurgery (n = 86) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT; n = 81) for BM. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed prognostic factors significant for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median OS of patients undergoing surgery/radiosurgery for BM was 12.1 months. Those undergoing "radical" thoracic treatment (n = 24) had a longer median OS (28.4 months) than those undergoing chemotherapy (n = 74; 12.1 months) or supportive therapy (n = 69; 5.6 months, P < .01). Patients with stage I thoracic disease (n = 23) had a longer median OS (18.5 months) than those with stage III (n = 43; 9.4 months) or with intra/extra-thoracic metastases other than BM (stage IV; n = 20; 2.7 months, P < .01). Median OS of WBRT patients was 3.7 months. One patient underwent radical thoracic treatment. Patients undergoing chemotherapy (n = 42) had a longer median OS (5.7 months) than patients undergoing supportive therapy only (n = 38; 1.6 months, P < .01). Performance status and age were also associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical thoracic treatments may be justified in selected patients <65-years-old, eligible to undergo surgery/radiosurgery for synchronous BM from NSCLC, even when stage III thoracic disease is present.

Outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with non-small cell lung cancer metastatic to the brain

We evaluated the treatment outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone, allowing for salvage with repeat SRS or fractionated radiotherapy, for managing patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From October 1998 through November 2008, 84 patients with NSCLC metastatic to the brain were treated with linac SRS. The marginal dose of SRS ranged from 12 to 20 Gy. Twenty-one patients underwent salvage radiotherapy and repeat SRS was used for 12. The 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 38% and 11%, respectively, and the median survival time was 9 months. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 77% and 52%, respectively, and the median time of local control was 9 months. The most common cause of death was active extracranial disease, and central nervous system (CNS) failure was determined in 16%. Chronic CNS toxicity of grade 4 was observed in 2 patients. Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed that factors significantly affecting overall survival were the presence of active extracranial disease (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.003, respectively), performance status (P = 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively), and number of brain metastases (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.019, respectively). There were 15 long-term survivors, surviving more than 2 years. A large proportion (87%) had a single brain metastasis initially and few intracranial distant metastases afterwards (20%). SRS alone allowing for salvage radiotherapy was effective for managing brain metastases and avoiding CNS failure from NSCLC. In consideration of appropriate prognostic factors and the so-called oligometastases situation for patient selection, the use of upfront whole brain radiotherapy might improve outcome.

Aggressive Trimodality Therapy for T1N2M1 Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with Synchronous Solitary Brain Metastasis: Case Report and Rationale

Aggressive treatment, including resection of both metastasis and primary tumor, has been studied for non-small cell lung cancer patients with synchronous solitary brain metastasis. Involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes is considered a poor prognostic factor and a contraindication to surgical resection of the primary lung tumor after treatment for brain metastasis. Here we present the case of a patient who presented with a Stage IV T1N2M1 non-small cell lung cancer with synchronous solitary brain metastasis. He is alive and without evidence of disease two years after aggressive, multimodality treatment that included craniotomy, whole-brain radiation therapy, thoracic surgery, chemotherapy, and mediastinal radiation therapy.

A retrospective evaluation of the effects of deuterium depleted water consumption on 4 patients with brain metastases from lung cancer

HYPOTHESES

Because of the number of sufferers and high mortality rate, the standard care and new therapeutic options in the treatment of brain metastasis from lung cancer are the subject of intense research. A new concept based on the different chemical and physical behavior of protium and deuterium affecting cell signaling and tumor growth has been introduced in the treatment of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of deuterium depleted water (DDW) consumption in addition to conventional forms of therapy on the survival of lung cancer patients with brain metastasis.

STUDY DESIGN

A series of 4 case histories was retrospectively evaluated. The patients were diagnosed with brain metastasis deriving from a primary lung tumor and started consuming DDW at the time of or after the diagnosis of the brain metastasis, which was inoperable or the surgical intervention did not result in complete regression. The primary objective was survival.

METHODS

The daily water intake of the patients was replaced with DDW, which complemented the conventional forms of treatment. Patients were consuming DDW for at least 3 months. The treatment was continued with DDW of 10 to 15 to 20 ppm lower deuterium (D) content every 1 to 2 months and thus a gradual decrease was maintained in the D-concentration in the patient's body.

RESULTS

DDW consumption integrated into conventional treatments resulted in a survival time of 26.6, 54.6, 21.9, and 33.4 months in the 4 patients, respectively. The brain metastasis of 2 patients showed complete response (CR), whereas partial response (PR) was detected in 1 patient, and the tumor growth was halted (no change or NC) in 1 case. The primary tumor of 2 patients indicated CR, and the lung tumor in 2 patients showed PR.

CONCLUSIONS

DDW was administered as an oral anticancer agent in addition to conventional therapy, and noticeably prolonged the survival time of all 4 lung cancer patients with brain metastasis. We suggest that DDW treatment, when integrated into other forms of cancer treatment, might provide a new therapeutic option.

Lung adenocarcinoma presenting as obstructive jaundice: a case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is known to metastasize to the pancreas with several case reports found in the literature, however, most patients are at an advanced stage and receive palliative treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the case of a 56 year old male patient who presented with a picture of obstructive jaundice. Investigations revealed an obstructing lesion in the pancreas and a further lesion in the lung with benign appearances. The patient underwent a pancreatectomy and, unexpectedly, the histology of the resected specimen demonstrated metastatic adenocarcinoma of bronchogenic origin. He was referred to a cardiothoracic team who proceeded to resect the patient's thoracic lesion before administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient was reviewed 18 months post operatively and remains symptom free with no clinical or radiological evidence of recurrence. We were unable to identify any previous case reports (of lung adenocarcinoma) with such a presentation which were ultimately treated with resection of both lesions.

CONCLUSION

Similar situations are bound to arise again in the future and we believe that this report could demonstrate that there is a case for aggressive surgical management in a highly selected group of patients: those with NSCLC and a synchronous solitary pancreatic deposit.

Long-term survival in patients with synchronous, solitary brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer treated with radiosurgery

PURPOSE

To report the outcome of patients with synchronous, solitary brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients diagnosed with synchronous, solitary brain metastasis from NSCLC were treated with GKSRS between 1993 and 2006. The median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 90. Patients had thoracic Stage I-III disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002 guidelines). Definitive thoracic therapy was delivered to 26/42 (62%) patients; 9 patients underwent chemotherapy and radiation, 12 patients had surgical resection, and 5 patients underwent preoperative chemoradiation and surgical resection.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year actuarial OS rates were 71.3%, 34.1%, and 21%, respectively. For patients who underwent definitive thoracic therapy, the median OS was 26.4 months compared with 13.1 months for those who had nondefinitive therapy, and the 5-year actuarial OS was 34.6% vs. 0% (p < 0.0001). Median OS was significantly longer for patients with a KPS >or=90 vs. KPS < 90 (27.8 months vs. 13.1 months, p < 0.0001). The prognostic factors significant on multivariate analysis were definitive thoracic therapy (p = 0.020) and KPS (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the largest series of patients diagnosed with synchronous, solitary brain metastasis from NSCLC treated with GKSRS. Definitive thoracic therapy and KPS significantly impacted OS. The 5-year OS of 21% demonstrates the potential for long-term survival in patients treated with GKSRS; therefore, patients with good KPS should be considered for definitive thoracic therapy.

EUS-guided alcohol ablation of left adrenal metastasis from non-small-cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

EUS presents an alternative access to the left adrenal, making it possible to perform echo-guided needle biopsies.

OBJECTIVES

We present a case of EUS-guided therapy as alcohol ablation of left adrenal metastases.

DESIGN AND PATIENT

A 52-year-old man was admitted to the hospital complaining of abdominal pain. CT scan revealed an invasive process in the left upper lobe of the lung and a mass in the left adrenal area that was considered highly suspicious for left adrenal metastases from the patient's lung carcinoma. Cytopathologic examination of EUS-guided FNA confirmed the diagnosis of left adrenal metastasis. Because the patient's main clinical symptom was disabling abdominal pain, we considered the possibility of injection of alcohol into the left adrenal metastases under EUS guidance to ablate the metastatic lesion and potentially relieve the abdominal pain. EUS-guided alcohol ablation was performed successfully. RESULTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: On follow-up 3 days after EUS-guided left adrenal ablation, the patient had no abdominal pain. He remained without abdominal pain after 30 and 60 days of follow-up.

LIMITATION

New technique with limited data.

CONCLUSION

EUS-guided alcohol ablation of left adrenal metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer may provide palliation of cancer-related abdominal pain. There may be potential for combining this (minimally invasive and easily performed EUS-guided therapeutic) technique for ablation of solitary adrenal metastasis in patients with lung cancer with other modalities (e.g., surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy) directed toward the primary pulmonary malignancy and adjacent mediastinal disease.

Surgical management of brain metastases

Metastatic brain tumors continue to increase in incidence as patients with cancer live longer. The options for management continue to evolve as well, with advances in radiation-based treatment, chemotherapy, and surgery. Although metastatic brain tumors are frequently treated without surgical intervention, there continues to be a significant role for surgery in caring for patients with these lesions. Study data have proven that surgery has a positive effect on survival and quality of life in properly selected patients. Those with a suitable age, functional status, systemic disease control, and several metastases may be suitable for surgical treatment. Advances in preoperative imaging and planning as well as intraoperative surgical adjuncts have lowered the morbidity associated with resection. With proper patient selection and operative and postoperative management, resection continues to play a significant and evolving role in the care of patients with metastatic brain tumor.

Surgery versus radiosurgery for patients with a solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the developed countries. Patients die of local progression, disseminated disease or both. Brain metastases are often seen in non-small cell lung cancer patients and although they are frequently multiple, a subset of patients with a solitary brain metastasis (with controlled primary tumour) is regularly seen in clinical practice. Treatment of a solitary brain metastasis has usually been surgery, when possible, but the development of new stereotactic techniques of radiotherapy using a linear accelerator or the 'gamma knife' have provided new treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of surgery with that of radiosurgery, either combined with whole brain radiotherapy or administered alone, for patients with a solitary brain metastasis from successfully treated non-small cell lung cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2004 issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to present), EMBASE (1974 to present), CINAHL (1982 to present). Finally the Cochrane Lung Cancer Specialised Register was also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and controlled trials that compared surgery (with or without whole brain irradiation) with all types of radiosurgery (with or without whole brain irradiation) for solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer. All other types of studies i.e.prospective or retrospective cohort studies were not considered appropriate.Studies including patients with multiple brain metastasis or diagnosed without the support of CT scan/MRI diagnostic imaging were also excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the search results to identify suitable trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Despite extensive searching no randomised trials were found. Electronic search identified 686 references. A total of 47 were selected for further evaluation but none was relevant to this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The reviewers felt that the inclusion of studies less rigorous than randomised trials would result in misleading findings. Cohort or single arm studies only provide partial information and have the risk of significant bias. From the evaluated studies, we found that a variety of different criteria were used for the definition of solitary brain metastasis. We observed that the term "single brain metastasis" was misused as synonymous with solitary brain metastasis. Some of the single arm or cohort studies come from single institutions where the availability of both techniques (radiosurgery and surgery) is not described. Therefore, a tendency to use the most accessible technique could be suspected. Finally, in order to determine which technique is superior for patients with a solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer, an appropriate randomised trial should be designed. Based on the available evidence a meaningful conclusion cannot be drawn.