Acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation: variability, morbidity, and mortality

Acute rejection in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients: The great conundrum

1. In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients, treatment of acute rejection is associated with worse outcomes (increased risk of allograft cirrhosis and mortality). 2. Whether patients with HCV are at higher risk for rejection remains controversial. 3. The mechanisms mediating acute rejection and recurrence of HCV are distinct, and as such, it should be possible to develop techniques based on these molecular differences that are diagnostically useful. 4. Liver biopsy is considered the gold-standard for diagnosing acute rejection and recurrent HCV; however, given histopathological similarities between the two conditions, discrimination can be extremely difficult. 5. At the present time, there are no reliable, noninvasive tools available to distinguish between HCV recurrence alone and acute rejection plus HCV recurrence. 6. Mild rejection per se is not associated with graft loss and treatment of rejection with steroids and OKT3 is associated with worse outcome in HCV; thus, it seems logical that we should no longer treat mild rejection.

A novel approach to managing variation: outpatient therapeutic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitor blood levels in liver transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

To apply the principles of statistical process control (SPC) to manage calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) blood levels. We hypothesized that the use of SPC would increase the proportion of CNI blood levels in the target range.

STUDY DESIGN

The study population consisted of 217 patients more than 3 months after liver transplantation. After demonstration of proof of concept using the rapid cycle improvement process, SPC was applied to the entire population. The change package included definition of target ranges for CNI, implementation of a web-based tool that displayed CNI blood levels on a control chart, and implementation of a protocol and a checklist for management of CNI blood levels. The principal outcome measure was the proportion of CNI blood levels in the target range.

RESULTS

In the pilot study, the proportion of CNI blood levels in the target range increased from 50% to 85%. When the protocol was spread to the entire population, the proportion of drug levels in the target range increased to 77% from 50% (P < .001), whereas the range of CNI levels decreased. The rate of allograft rejection did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of SPC increased the proportion of CNI blood levels in target range. These observations may be applicable to the care of other chronic healthcare problems.

Predictors of length of stay for pediatric liver transplant recipients

The resources that are directed towards the care of liver transplant recipients are substantial. Approximately 100 million dollars are spent on the hospitalization of the 400-500 children in the United States who undergo liver transplantation each year. Using length of stay as a surrogate marker for hospital resource use, we sought to identify factors that impact length of stay and assess the trends of hospitalization after liver transplantation for a representative population of pediatric liver transplant recipients. The study population was comprised of 956 patients who underwent primary liver transplantation between 1995 and 2003 and survived at least 90 days. Data were retrieved from the Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation data registry. The primary outcome was the length of initial hospitalization after liver transplantation. Independent variables were age, gender, race, pediatric end-stage liver disease score (PELD), year of transplantation, organ type, primary disease, length of operation, and insurance status. The mean and standard deviation of length of stay after liver transplantation was 24.0 +/- 24.5 days. Multivariate analyses showed that increased hospital stay was associated with infants less than 1 year of age, fulminant liver failure, receiving a technical variant organ from a cadaveric donor, government insurance, and transplant era (before 1999 vs. 1999 or later). Decreasing height z-scores and increasing length of operation were also associated with increased hospital stay. In conclusion, these parameters accounted for only 11% of the total variance, suggesting that post-transplant complications and course account for much of the variability of resource use in the immediate post-transplant period.

Outcomes of acute rejection after interferon therapy in liver transplant recipients

Interferon alfa has been increasingly used against recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) disease in post-liver transplant (LT) recipients. A serious potential adverse effect is acute rejection. We reviewed our experience using interferon-based therapy (interferon or pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin) for treating recurrent HCV in LT recipients. Forty-four LT recipients were treated with interferon for recurrent HCV. Five of the 44 patients developed acute rejection during interferon-based therapy. These 5 patients started treatment of 42.4 +/- 33.89 months (mean +/- SD) after LT. Mean (+/- SD) histological activity index and fibrosis scores before initiating antiviral therapy were 8.8 (+/- 1.92) and 2.6 (+/- 0.55), respectively. Patients were treated for 3.3 +/- 2.28 months (mean +/- SD) prior to rejection. At the time of rejection, HCV load was not detectable in 4 of the 5 recipients. All 5 patients had tolerated interferon therapy, and none had stopped therapy because of adverse effects. The rejection was successfully treated in 3 patients. In 2 of those 3 patients, cirrhosis eventually developed. In the 2 patients who did not respond to rejection treatment, immediate graft failure occurred, leading to re-LT in 1 patient and death from sepsis in the other. In conclusion, the results indicate that further studies are needed to assess the safety of interferon in LT recipients. Interferon-based therapy may lead to acute rejection and subsequent graft loss and should therefore be used with caution. Treated recipients may also develop progressive cirrhosis despite achieving a sustained virological response.

The incidence and significance of late acute cellular rejection (>1000 days) after liver transplantation

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation occurs in as much as 70% of patients within the first year. There is very little known about ACR that occurs more than 1 yr after transplant, and it is generally believed that late occurring ACR may be more resistant to medical treatment and is associated with a higher rate of chronic ductopenic rejection and graft loss. A total of 532 recipients with more than 1000 d follow-up and who did not have hepatitis C were identified. Forty-three (8.1%) had biopsy proven late ACR at a mean of 1545 +/- 441 d post-transplant. Additionally, 38 of the 43 (88.4%) patients with late ACR had earlier episodes of ACR before 1000 d post-transplant vs. only 295 of the 488 patients (60.5%) that did not have late ACR (p < 0.01). The incidence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) was 32.6% among patients with late ACR and 11.1% among patients without late ACR (p < 0.01). The overall patient survival for patients who had late ACR (n = 43) is 81.4% while for patients without late ACR (n = 488) it is 82.0% (p = ns). Patients remain at risk for ACR even after 1000 d post-transplant, particularly those with PSC.

Leukocyte reduction during orthotopic liver transplantation and postoperative outcome: a pilot study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of intraoperative leukocyte reduction of administered blood products on the incidence of acute cellular rejection and postoperative patient outcome.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, historical control study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

The study group (Group 1) consisted of 30 consecutive adult patients with end-stage liver disease scheduled to undergo orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) between 1998 and 2000. The historical control group (Group 2) consisted of 30 adult patients with end-stage liver disease matched to study group patients as closely as possible for age, gender, and etiology of liver disease who underwent OLT between 1995 and 1999.

INTERVENTIONS

Group 1 patients had all intraoperative allogeneic and cell salvaged blood products leukocyte reduced before administration. Group 2 patients underwent OLT without leukocyte filtration of any administered blood products.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic data were collected for both patient groups and included age, gender, etiology of liver disease, and both intraoperative and postoperative immunosuppression. Demographic allograft donor data for both patient groups were collected and included age, gender, use of vasopressors during procurement, and cold and warm donor organ ischemic times. Outcome variables measured included incidence of acute cellular rejection, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and length of hospital stay, incidence of both graft loss and retransplantation, and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

The incidence of acute cellular rejection was 40% in Group 1 and 66.7% in Group 2 (p = 0.037). Length of ICU stay was 3.0 (2.0, 5.0) days in Group 1 and 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) days in Group 2 (p = 0.16). Length of hospital stay was 14.0 (11.0, 18.0) days in Group 1 and 18.0 (14.0, 27.0) days in Group 2 (p = 0.035). One allograft was lost in Group 2 because of primary nonfunction requiring retransplantation (p = 0.31), and three postoperative deaths occurred in Group 1 as a result of multisystem organ failure (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Coincident with leukocyte reduction of all administered blood products during OLT, an improved outcome was observed in Group 1 patients as demonstrated by both a decreased incidence of acute cellular rejection and length of hospital stay.

The natural history of acute histologic rejection without biochemical graft dysfunction in orthotopic liver transplantation: a systematic review

Protocol biopsy results in the first few weeks after liver transplantation sometimes display histologic features of acute cellular rejection (ACR), even in the absence of significant clinical or biochemical dysfunction. At present there is no clear consensus about the need to treat such cases with adjuvant immunosuppression. This systematic review describes, from the available evidence, the natural history of untreated histologic ACR in the absence of biochemical graft dysfunction. An electronic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to select studies that reported protocol liver biopsies in the early posttransplant period from 1983 to 2000. Studies that identified patients with ACR on protocol biopsy who were not treated with adjuvant immunosuppression formed the basis of the study group. Data from individual studies were extracted using standardized pro forma and pooled for descriptive analysis. The search identified 3431 studies, of which 516 were cited in full. Of these, 15 studies met all of the inclusion criteria. These 15 studies reported on 1566 patients who had protocol biopsies performed in the early posttransplant period, of which 1048 (67%) had histologic evidence of ACR. Three hundred and thirty one (32%) patients with histologic ACR on protocol biopsy had no associated biochemical graft dysfunction. Without treatment, only 14% of these patients subsequently developed biochemical graft dysfunction requiring adjuvant immunosuppression. Steroid-resistant rejection and chronic rejection both had a prevalence of 4% in patients with untreated histologic ACR and no biochemical graft dysfunction. Withholding adjuvant immunosuppression from patients with histologic ACR and no biochemical graft dysfunction seems to be safe, as long as graft function is carefully monitored. The rationale for performing protocol biopsies in the absence of biochemical graft dysfunction is questionable.

Single-agent immunosuppression after liver transplantation: what is possible?

Orthotopic liver transplantation is a life saving and life enhancing procedure. The development of immunosuppressive drugs has contributed to the high rate of success in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, the considerable adverse effects of these therapies are affecting long-term outcomes of transplant recipients. Complications related to immunosuppression are responsible for the majority of deaths in patients surviving more than 1 year. Therefore, the search for an optimal immunosuppressive regimen has become of paramount importance. The liver has proved to be an 'immunologically privileged' organ, capable in several animal models to be accepted as an allograft without any intervention on the immune system of the recipient. In some human liver allografts acceptance of the new organ is recognised after withdrawal of immunosuppressants, but prior identification of such individuals is not yet possible, thus negating this management option. Graft-recipient interaction is peculiar in liver transplantation: acute cellular rejection does not always need to be treated, and if it is not severe, appears to be associated with a better survival of both patient and graft. In the last decade there has been an evolution of immunosuppressive protocols, driven by empirical observation and a deeper understanding of immunological events after transplant. However, most modifications have been made because of the necessity to reduce long-term drug related morbidity and mortality. Withdrawal of corticosteroids has proven to be safely achievable in most patients, with no deleterious effects on patient or graft survival but with a great benefit in terms of reduction of incidence of metabolic and cardiovascular complications. Long-term 'steroid-free' regimens are therefore now widely used. Patients with stable graft function can be easily maintained using a single drug usually after 6 or 12 months and usually with a calcineurin inhibitor. The more evolved step of using monotherapy ab initio has also proven to be effective in a few studies and needs to be explored further. In the future new strategies will be designed to help the development of tolerance of the allograft, selectively stimulating instead of suppressing the immune reaction of the recipient.

Acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients under cyclosporine immunosuppression: predictive factors of response to antirejection therapy

BACKGROUND

Predictive factors of response to antirejection therapy in acute cellular rejection (ACR) in liver transplantation are not well established.

METHODS

To investigate the possible existence of these factors, we reviewed 111 consecutive episodes of ACR fulfilling the following criteria: histologically confirmed ACR; cyclosporine-based immunosuppression; initial antirejection treatment with high-dose steroid boluses; minimum follow-up of 2 weeks after treatment; and no other graft complication interfering with evaluation of therapeutic response. ACR episodes not responding to initial steroid therapy were given additional treatment (OKT3 and/or repeated steroid boluses). We analyzed the association of the response to the antirejection treatment with different clinical, laboratory, histological, and donor-recipient compatibility variables at two times: after the initial antirejection therapy, and after all the antirejection therapy administered.

RESULTS

Eighty episodes of ACR (72%) resolved after the initial therapy with high-dose steroid boluses, and another 18 (16%), initially steroid-resistant, resolved with additional antirejection treatment. Thirteen episodes (12%) were refractory to all antirejection treatment administered. Variables with independent predictive value of nonresponse to initial therapy with steroid boluses were late-onset ACR (>2 months after transplantation), high serum bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase, low blood cyclosporine concentration in the week before antirejection treatment, and severe histological endothelialitis. Late-onset ACR and high serum bilirubin were also independent predictors of refractoriness to all the treatment administered.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to antirejection treatment in ACR in liver transplantation can be predicted by several clinical and laboratory data. ACR episodes with factors predictive of therapeutic unresponsiveness could benefit from more aggressive antirejection treatment.

Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Pediatric liver transplantation is a fast-growing and challenging field. Healthcare providers must stay informed of advancements in the management of liver transplant candidates and recipients. The goal of this paper is to provide nurses who care for pediatric liver transplant candidates and recipients with a review of the basic medical management of these patients, from the preoperative evaluation to postoperative care.

Comparison between two high-dose methylprednisolone schedules in the treatment of acute hepatic cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: a controlled clinical trial

Intravenous methylprednisolone is used in most liver transplant centers as first-line therapy of acute hepatic cellular rejection in patients who undergo liver transplant. However, no controlled study has been performed to date to define the optimal dose and duration of the steroid regimen. The schedules that actually are used in most transplant centers are drawn from those that were developed empirically for the treatment of acute renal graft rejection. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare two schedules of steroid treatment of acute hepatic cellular rejection among those most widely used. Thirty-eight eligible patients with grade II or III acute hepatic cellular rejection were randomized to receive two different high-dose methylprednisolone schedules. Eighteen patients were randomized in group A (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d). Twenty patients were randomized in group B (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days). The response to treatment was evaluated by means of a second liver biopsy. The treatment of group A proved to be more effective than treatment of group B. The resolution of acute hepatic cellular rejection was observed in 83.3% of cases in group A and 50.0% of cases in group B (P <.05). The treatment of group A proved to be safer also than treatment of group B. Patients randomized in group B showed a higher prevalence of infections (90.0% of cases versus 55.5% of cases; P <.01) mainly because of bacterial (80.0% versus 50.0%; P <.05) and viral (50.0% versus 16.6%; P <.05) agents. In conclusion, the study shows that intravenous administration of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d is more effective and safer than intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days in the treatment of acute cellular rejection in patients with liver transplantation.

Predictors of cost of liver transplantation in children: a single center study

OBJECTIVE

Efforts to decrease the cost of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) must address the impact of specific interventions on clinical outcome. We hypothesized that an intervention designed to decrease the length of hospitalization would reduce costs without jeopardizing clinical outcome. We further sought to identify predictors of length of stay and cost for hospitalization after liver transplantation.

METHODS

The study group included 47 children who underwent OLT from September 1996 to April 1999, and the control group included 36 children who underwent OLT from March 1994 to August 1996. The intervention was a transition to home program in which patients were discharged to a family living center when they met established clinical criteria and their families met predefined educational goals. We analyzed patients who survived 3 months after OLT.

RESULTS

For the intervention group, the mean length of stay, total costs, and surgical costs were 29%, 36%, and 34% lower, respectively. Organ type, height z score, race, hepatic artery thrombosis, early allograft rejection, and participation in the transition to home program predicted length of stay and total costs.

CONCLUSION

An early discharge program based on defined criteria can be used to decrease length of stay and cost after OLT without jeopardizing clinical outcome.

Prognostic model for early acute rejection after liver transplantation

Hepatic graft rejection is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT), with a maximum incidence within the first weeks. The identification of high-risk patients for early acute rejection (EAR) might be useful for clinicians. A series of 133 liver graft recipients treated with calcineurin inhibitors was retrospectively assessed to identify predisposing factors for EAR and develop a mathematical model to predict the individual risk of each patient. The incidence of EAR (< or =45 days after LT) was 35.3%. Multivariate analysis showed that recipient age, underlying liver disease, and Child's class before LT were independently associated with the development of EAR. Combining these 3 variables, the following risk score for the development of EAR was obtained: EAR score [F(x)] = 2.44 + (1.14 x hepatitis C virus cirrhosis) + (2.78 x immunologic cirrhosis) + (2.51 x metabolic cirrhosis)--(0.08 x recipient age in years) + (1.65 x Child's class A) [corrected]. Risk for rejection = e(F(x))/1 + e(F(x)). The combination of age, cause of liver disease, and Child's class may allow us to predict the risk for EAR.

Acute rejection of hepatic allografts from HLA-DR13 (Allele DRB1(*)1301)-positive donors

Acute rejection of hepatic allografts does not show consistent association with the number of mismatches of HLA classes I and II. Therefore, we investigated the relation between specific donor or recipient HLA antigens and the occurrence of acute rejection. HLA typing of 35 liver transplant recipients and donors was performed by serological standard technique, with confirmation and subtyping by polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers. HLA class I antigens were not associated with the occurrence of acute rejection. The graft was positive for HLA-DR13 in 8 of 13 transplant recipients (62%) with acute rejection, but only 4 of 22 recipients (18%; P =.024; P(Bonferroni-corrected) =.33, not significant) without rejection. The graft was positive for DRB1*1301 in 7 of 13 recipients (54%) with acute rejection, but only 1 of 22 recipients (5%) without rejection (P =.002; P(Bonferroni-corrected )=.028). This patient had experienced long-lasting bacterial sepsis, which markedly reduced the risk for acute rejection. We speculate that the expression of donor DRB1*1301 (if mismatched) may increase the risk for acute hepatic allograft rejection.

The effect of polymorphisms in tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10, and transforming growth factor-beta1 genes in acute hepatic allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of acute rejection in orthotopic liver transplantation is unpredictable. The role of cytokines in the process of rejection is not entirely clear. We investigated polymorphisms in the genes encoding tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-10, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1, which affect the amount of cytokine produced in vitro, in a liver transplant population to determine any association with acute rejection.

METHOD

DNA was extracted from whole blood of liver transplant patients. After amplification with polymerase chain reactions, the polymorphisms at TNF-alpha -308, IL-10 -1082, and TGF-beta1 +869 and +915 were determined using sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes. Acute cellular rejection was a clinical and histological diagnosis.

RESULTS

Acute cellular rejection requiring treatment occurred in 68 (48%) of 144 patients. Acute cellular rejection was significantly associated with the TNF-alpha -308 A/A genotype (P<0.02). There was no significant association with either IL-10 or TGF-beta1 polymorphisms in acute rejection.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a homozygous TNF-alpha -308 genotype A/A are more likely to suffer from acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation.

The prediction of acute cellular rejection in orthotopic liver transplantation

The occurrence of acute cellular rejection after orthotopic liver transplantation is common. At present, no allowance is made in immunosuppressive regimens for parameters other than weight. We investigated parameters in 121 consecutive patients receiving their primary allograft to determine if there are pretransplantation factors predicting the occurrence of acute cellular rejection after transplantation. The case notes and dietetic notes of these patients were reviewed for age at transplantation, cause of liver disease, preoperative albumin and creatinine levels, lymphocyte count, anthropometric measurements, donor age, HLA DR mismatch, and cold ischemia time. Acute cellular rejection was more likely to occur in younger patients, patients with Child's class A disease, and those with normal midarm muscle circumference. Acute rejection was increased in transplant recipients from donors aged younger than 30 and older than 50 years. Acute cellular rejection was less likely to occur in patients who underwent transplantation for alcoholic liver disease. Chronic rejection was significantly increased in women and those patients who experienced recurrent acute rejection. On multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor was the decreased likelihood of acute rejection in patients with depleted midarm muscle circumference. In conclusion, it may be possible to individualize immunosuppressive regimens on the basis of pretransplantation characteristics.

Costs and outcomes of liver transplantation in adults: a prospective, 1-year, follow-up study. GRETHECO study group

BACKGROUND

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is widely used to treat patients with end-stage liver disease. However, data on the cost of the procedure are fragmentary. We evaluated the costs, as calculated from resource use, and outcomes of OLT in adults, from registration on the transplant waiting list to the end of the 1st-year of follow-up after the transplant.

METHODS

Two parallel cohort studies were conducted from 1994 to 95. All patients ages 18 years and older, on the waiting list (n=33) according to national criteria or having undergone transplants (n=38) were followed for 1 year or until either the transplant (waiting list cohort) or death (waiting list and transplantation cohorts).

RESULTS

Eighty percent of the patients undergoing transplants were alive after 1 year, and no patient died while on the waiting list. However, the estimated cost of the procedure was high: more than 55,000 pound silver for the 1st year after OLT, to be added to 5,500 pound silver for evaluation and further costs motivated by the planned transplant during an average 6.5 months on the waiting list. Age over 40 and a baseline Child-Pugh score of 10 and over were predictive of high costs. The proportion of costs associated with immunosuppressive therapy and rejection were very high.

CONCLUSIONS

This medical and economic cohort study suggests that OLT is still expensive; the study identifies sources of extra cost that could be limited either by improved selection of patients or, in the future, by technological advances in immunosuppressive therapy that help avoid medical complications. It also suggests the situation is precarious, with outcomes and costs being very sensitive to variation in graft availability.

Early complications after orthotopic liver transplantation

The cost and impact of early post-transplant complications continue to be high. Diagnosis and management involves a high index of suspicion, rapid diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and elimination of technical problems. Preoperative assessment of the donor and recipient medical condition and meticulous attention to detail during the technical performance of OLTx are the mainstays in achieving a good outcome.

Intrahepatic proliferation of 'naive' and 'memory' T cells during liver allograft rejection: primary immune response within the allograft

Liver allograft rejection is mediated by a primary response of T lymphocytes, followed by infiltration of the graft with a mixed inflammatory reaction. Using single and double label immunocytochemistry, we examined the proliferation index and the phenotype of leukocytes on liver biopsies from 10 patients with acute rejection before and after treatment with i.v. steroids, 10 patients with chronic rejection, 10 patients without rejection posttransplant, and 15 nongrafted, nonimmunosuppressed patients. Proliferation of mononuclear leukocytes (assessed by expression of Ki-67, a nuclear antigen associated with the cell cycle) inside the allograft was a prominent feature of acute and chronic rejection and was down-regulated by steroid treatment. Leukocytes in cell cycle were located predominantly in the portal tracts at the site of the inflammatory infiltrate. The majority of 'naive' (CD45RA+) and 'memory' (CD45RO+) CD4+ T lymphocytes were also periportally distributed. In contrast, CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD57+ natural killer cells, and CD68+ macrophages were located intraparenchymally throughout the liver lobules, whereas CD20+ B lymphocytes were only present in some of the portal tracts. Predominantly CD4+ and occasionally CD8+ lymphocytes were proliferating (assessed by double staining). The proliferating CD4+ cells were of both naive (CD4+, CD45RA+) and memory (CD4+, CD45RO+) phenotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first description of proliferating naive T lymphocytes in situ in liver allografts. These findings suggest that there may be a primary immune response generated within the allograft as well as in draining lymphatic tissue. This implicates not only intrahepatic proliferation of T lymphocytes as a prominent feature of rejection, but also suggests that the liver has a special immunological status comparable to that of lymphatic tissue.

Allograft rejection after liver transplantation for autoimmune liver diseases

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) may progress to liver failure, requiring liver transplantation as definitive therapy, and these immune-mediated disorders may predispose the patient to more frequent graft rejection. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of preexisting AILD on the incidence of allograft rejection after liver transplantation. Sixty-three patients who underwent liver transplantation between March 1988 and December 1994 for AILDs that included autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 33) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC; n = 30) were retrospectively compared with 47 patients who underwent liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis during the same time period. There was a lower incidence of acute allograft rejection in patients with AILD who received tacrolimus-based compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (50% v 85.5%; P = .02). However, patients with AILDs overall had a higher incidence of acute rejection than patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (81% v 46.8%; P < .001), regardless of the type of immunosuppression. In addition, steroid-resistant rejection occurred more frequently in patients with AILDs than in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (38.1% v 12.8%; P = .003). There was also a trend toward a higher incidence of chronic rejection in patients with AILDs compared with patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (11.1% v 2.1%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Patient and graft survivals at 1 and 3 years were similar between patients with AILDs and alcoholic liver disease. Compared with alcoholic cirrhosis, preexisting AILDs are associated with a higher incidence of acute allograft rejection and a trend toward more frequent chronic rejection.