A multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of pergolide as an adjunct to Sinemet in Parkinson's disease

Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) and the Movement Disorder Society-European Section (MDS-ES). Part II: late (complicated) Parkinson's disease

To provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of late (complicated) Parkinson's disease (PD), based on a review of the literature. Complicated PD refers to patients suffering from the classical motor syndrome of PD along with other motor or non-motor complications, either disease-related (e.g. freezing) or treatment-related (e.g. dyskinesias or hallucinations). MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and INAHTA database literature searches were conducted. National guidelines were requested from all EFNS societies. Non-European guidelines were searched for using MEDLINE. Part II of the guidelines deals with treatment of motor and neuropsychiatric complications and autonomic disturbances. For each topic, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence. Following this, recommendations for management are given, alongside ratings of efficacy. Classifications of evidence and ratings of efficacy are made according to EFNS guidance. In cases where there is insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement ('good practice point') is made.

Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients: The PELMOPET study

Dopamine agonists are used as initial treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to reduce incidence and severity of motor complications. This paradigm is based on long-term studies, allowing "rescue" therapy with levodopa. The present strict monotherapy study (PELMOPET, the acronym for the pergolide-versus-L-dopa-monotherapy-and-positron-emission-tomography trial) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus levodopa without levodopa "rescue" medication. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 3-year trial compared pergolide monotherapy (n=148) with levodopa monotherapy (n=146) in dopamine-naive patients with early PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.5). Primary efficacy measures were clinical efficacy, severity and time to onset of motor complications, and disease progression. During the 3 years, severity of motor complications was significantly lower and time to onset of dyskinesia was significantly delayed in the group receiving pergolide (3.23 mg/day) compared with those receiving levodopa (504 mg/day). However, time to onset of motor complications was not longer in patients receiving pergolide after 3 years. Symptomatic relief (assessed by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS], UPDRS II, and III, Clinical Global Impressions [CGI] severity, and CGI and Patient Global Impressions [PGI] improvement) was significantly greater in patients receiving levodopa. Adverse events led to discontinuation of therapy in 17.6% of pergolide patients and 9.6% of levodopa patients. This is the first study comparing strict monotherapy with a dopamine agonist versus levodopa in previously untreated early PD. In principle, both levodopa and a dopamine agonist such as pergolide seem to be suitable options as initial PD therapy. The choice remains with the treating physician based on the different efficacy and adverse event profiles.

A review of the receptor-binding and pharmacokinetic properties of dopamine agonists

BACKGROUND

Dopamine agonists (DAs), which can be categorized as ergot derived and non-ergot derived, are used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVES

This review describes the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of selected DAs and relates these characteristics to clinical outcomes, with an emphasis on adverse events.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified through a search of MEDLINE (to May 2006) using the terms dopamine agonists (or each individual drug name) and pbarmacokinetics, metabolism, drug-drug interaction, interactions, CYP450, fibrosis, valvular heart disease, tremor, clinical trials, reviews, and meta-analyses. Abstracts from recent sessions of the International Congress of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders were also examined. Clinical studies with <20 patients overall or <10 patients per treatment group in the final analysis were excluded. All DAs that were graded at least possibly useful with respect to at least 3 of 4 items connected to the treatment/prevention of motor symptoms/complications in the most recent evidence-based medical review update were included. This resulted in a focus on the ergot-derived DAs bromocriptine, cabergoline, and pergolide, and the non-ergot-derived DAs pramipexole and ropinirole.

RESULTS

Bromocriptine, cabergoline, pergolide, and ropinirole, but not pramipexole, have the potential for drug-drug interactions mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. The occurrence of dyskinesia may be linked to stimulation of the dopamine D(1) receptor, for which cabergoline and pergolide have a similar and relatively high affinity; bromocriptine, pramipexole, and ropinirole have been associated with a lower risk of dyskinesias. The valvular heart disease (VHD) and pulmonary and retroperitoneal fibrosis seen with long-term use appear to represent a class effect of the ergot-derived DAs that may be related to stimulation of serotonin 5-HT(2B) (and possibly 5-HT(2A)) receptors. The incidence of valvular regurgitation was 31% to 47% with ergot-derived DAs, 10% with non-ergot-derived DAs, and 13% with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

As reflected in the results of the clinical trials included in this review, dyskinesia associated with DA therapy may be linked to stimulation of the D(1) receptor. Fibrosis (including VHD) seemed to be a class effect of the ergot-derived DAs. Each of the DAs except pramipexole has the potential to interact with other drugs via the CYP enzyme system.

Sensorimotor effects of pergolide, a dopamine agonist, in healthy subjects: a lateralized readiness potential study

OBJECTIVE

The major purpose of the present study was to further elucidate dopaminergic modulation of sensorimotor processing in healthy human subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To more specifically analyze dopaminergic effects on premotor and motor stages of sensorimotor processing, lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) were obtained. In a randomized double-blind crossover design, either 0.075 mg of the D1/D2 dopamine (DA) agonist pergolide or placebo were administered to 12 healthy male volunteers ranging from 19 to 25 years in age. The subjects performed a two-choice visual reaction time task. In addition to behavioral measures, such as response speed and error rate, stimulus-locked LRP (S-LRP) and response-locked LRP (LRP-R) latencies were determined. To better dissociate potential central and peripheral motor effects, measures of response dynamics and response-locked electromyogram (EMG-R) recordings were also obtained.

OBSERVATIONS

Pergolide reliably enhanced speed of stimulus-related information processing as indicated by shorter S-LRP latencies while LRP-R latencies, reaction time, and indicators of response dynamics were not influenced by DA agonistic treatment. Furthermore, lower EMG-R amplitudes and an increased number of wrong-hand responses were observed under pergolide compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that dopaminergic neurotransmission effectively modulates early perceptual and cognitive stages of information processing as suggested by neural network models of the functional role of prefrontal DA. The lack of an effect on aspects of motor processing may be due to a higher capacity of the nigrostriatal compared to the mesocortical DA system to compensate pharmacologically induced changes in dopaminergic activity.

New therapeutic approaches to Parkinson's disease including neural transplants

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder of the brain and typically presents with a disorder of movement. The core pathological event underlying the condition is the loss of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway with the formation of alpha-synuclein positive Lewy bodies. As a result, drugs that target the degenerating dopaminergic network within the brain work well at least in the early stages of the disease. Unfortunately, with time these therapies fail and produce their own unique side-effect profile, and this, coupled with the more diffuse pathological and clinical findings in advancing disease, has led to a search for more effective therapies. In this review, the authors will briefly discuss the emerging new drug therapies in PD before concentrating on a more detailed discussion on the state of cell therapies to cure PD.

High doses of pergolide improve clinical global impression in advanced Parkinson's disease—A preliminary open label study

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of high-dose pergolide treatment in patients with moderate to severe Parkinson's disease (PD) in an open-label multicenter clinical trial. The primary objective was to assess the amount of reduction in levodopa, the improvement in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and adverse reactions. We treated 32 patients with PD presenting with motor fluctuations. Pergolide treatment started with a dose escalation period of 12 weeks followed by a 12-week continuation period. Pergolide doses were increased up to a maximum of 12 mg/day in combination with a simultaneous decrease of levodopa doses in 100mg steps. Levodopa was reduced from 500 mg/day (median) to 250 mg/day. Mean UPDRS part III improved significantly (p=0.01). Clinical global impression improved significantly after 24 weeks (p<0.01). Most frequent adverse events were hallucinations, asthenia, anxiety, abdominal pain, and peripheral edema. Twenty-two patients finished the complete study according to protocol. A possible relationship to the study medication was assumed for two serious adverse events reporting psychosis. We conclude that high doses of pergolide are efficacious in advanced stages of PD if given in appropriate regimens.

Pergolide: multiple-dose pharmacokinetics in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson disease

The primary objective of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of oral pergolide in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson disease using a new high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. A secondary objective was to investigate the relationship between plasma concentrations and efficacy. Fourteen patients with a diagnosis of Parkinson disease completed this multicenter, open-label, dose-escalating study. Pergolide was administered for 58 days, using increasing daily doses from 0.05 mg daily up to 1 mg three times daily and then tapering the dose. The steady-state pharmacokinetic profile and motor score were determined at dose levels of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg three times a day and during elimination after the last dose. Pergolide was absorbed with a median time to maximum concentration of 2 to 3 hours across the dose range. Systemic exposure appeared to increase proportionally with dose over the range of 0.25 to 1 mg three times daily within a patient, but there was a large variability in exposures between patients (interpatient coefficients of variation were 56.4% for the area under the curve). Pergolide was widely distributed (volume of distribution, approximately 14,000 L) and was eliminated with a mean half-life of 21 hours. Motor scores improved as both peak plasma pergolide concentrations and exposure increased. No unexpected safety concerns were identified. Pergolide is absorbed relatively quickly into the systemic circulation, has a large apparent volume of distribution, and has a relatively long half-life (mean, 21 hours). This prolonged half-life is of particular interest, given the current hypothesis that more continuous dopaminergic receptor stimulation may reduce motor complications in patients with Parkinson disease.

High-dose treatment with pergolide in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias

Motor complications arising after long-term treatment with levodopa remain one of the main challenges in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Monotherapy with dopamine agonists may delay the onset of motor complications or reduce their severity when added to levodopa treatment. Here, we retrospectively analyzed data from 62 patients with advanced PD who presented with moderate to severe response fluctuations in whom we increased the dose of oral treatment with pergolide beyond 4.5mg daily. Patients had been treated with levodopa for 10.7+/-4.8 years. Pergolide was increased to 8.2+/-4.3 mg per day over a median titration period of 13.5 weeks. Mean daily dose of levodopa prior to pergolide high-dose treatment was 733+/-468 mg and decreased to 348+/-186 mg after pergolide titration. The duration of OFF times decreased from 7.3+/-3.8 to 1.7+/-0.9 h per day (p < 0.001) measured by patients' diaries. Dyskinesias, present for 5.0+/-3.3 h per day at baseline, were reduced to 1.4+/-0.8 h per day (p < 0.001) and the total daily duration of motor fluctuations (off-time duration plus dyskinesia duration) decreased from 10.5+/-7.0 to 2.8+/-2.2 h (p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in parkinsonian symptoms (baseline to endpoint reduction of UPDRS III from a median of 36 to 8; p < 0.001). To reduce gastrointestinal side effects 23 patients required concomitant treatment with domperidone. Seven patients developed hallucinations during the titration period, six patients required treatment with clozapine. Our data indicate that increasing the dose of pergolide above 5mg per day can dramatically reduce the need for levodopa, motor fluctuations and severity of clinical symptoms. Controlled trials are needed to further substantiate the efficacy and safety of this treatment strategy.

Dopamine Agonist Pergolide Prevents Levodopa-Induced Quinoprotein Formation in Parkinsonian Striatum and Shows Quenching Effects on Dopamine-Semiquinone Generated in Vitro

The neurotoxicity of dopamine (DA) quinones that appears in dopaminergic neuron-specific oxidative stress has recently been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis and/or progression of Parkinson disease. To clarify the effects of a DA agonist, pergolide, on the levodopa-induced elevation of quinones, the authors examined striatal changes in quinoprotein using a hemi-parkinsonian mouse model. The level of striatal quinoprotein was significantly elevated specifically on the parkinsonian side, but not on the control side, after repeated levodopa administration. This levodopa-induced increase in striatal quinoprotein was almost completely suppressed by adjunctive administration with pergolide on the lesioned side. Furthermore, it was clarified that pergolide scavenged DA-semiquinones generated in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. These suppressive and quenching effects of pergolide against cytotoxic DA quinones may play a key role in its neuroprotective mechanism in the parkinsonian brain.

Role of COMT inhibitors and dopamine agonists in the treatment of motor fluctuations

Although levodopa remains the most effective drug for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), there are significant limitations to its chronic use. Growing preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that the severity of motor fluctuations is influenced both by PD severity and pulsatile stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors. Current management of motor fluctuations is based primarily on strategies to prolong the effects of dopaminergic stimulation. This prolongation is accomplished either through the use of long-acting dopaminergic drugs or prolonging of the effects of levodopa. During the past decade, the armamentarium of dopamine agonists increased and agents that prolong the plasma half-life of levodopa became available. Furthermore, recent clinical trials provide evidence-based approaches to improve the management of motor fluctuations in patients with advanced and early PD.

Pergolide Mesylate, a Dopaminergic Receptor Agonist, Applied With l-DOPA Enhances Serum Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Parkinson Disease

The aim of this study was to compare patients with Parkinson disease (PD) patients treated with pergolide mesylate (PM), a dopaminergic receptor agonist, together with L-DOPA and those these treated with L-DOPA alone on the concentration of free radicals (FR), glutathione, and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase in the serum. The study was carried out using 16 age-matched control subjects, 16 PD patients treated with L-DOPA at a dose of 1 to 1.5 g daily, and 16 PD patients treated with L-DOPA 1 to 1.5 g daily with PM 0.75 to 1.25 mg daily. The mean duration of treatment of PD was 6 years (range, 2-8 years) with l-DOPA, and 2 years with PM + L-DOPA or L-DOPA alone. Although there was no significant difference in lipid peroxidation products among the 3 groups, patients treated with L-DOPA showed high levels of FR as determined by dichlorofluorescein. Although catalase and SOD activities were elevated in both groups of PD patients, additional treatment with PM further enhanced catalase activity compared with those treated with l-DOPA alone. Interestingly, patients treated with PM + L-DOPA showed a significantly increased level of glutathione compared with those treated with L-DOPA alone. Collectively, these data suggest that PM + L-DOPA is a more efficient therapy in maintaining an antioxidative defense in PD patients compared with treatment with L-DOPA alone.

The monoamine reuptake inhibitor BTS 74 398 fails to evoke established dyskinesia but does not synergise with levodopa in MPTP-treated primates

Long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with levodopa (L-dopa) induces dyskinesia that, once established, is provoked by each dose of L-dopa or a dopamine (DA) agonist. In contrast, monoamine reuptake inhibitors may reverse motor deficits in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated primates without provoking established involuntary movements. We now examine whether the potent monoamine reuptake blocker BTS 74 398 induces established dyskinesia in MPTP-treated common marmosets primed previously with L-dopa and whether co-administration of BTS 74 398 with L-dopa potentiates motor behaviour and dyskinesia induced by acute L-dopa treatment. Administration of BTS 74 398 (2.5, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg, p.o.) in MPTP-treated common marmosets increased locomotor activity and reduced motor disability in a dose-related manner but did not provoke involuntary movements. BTS 74 398 (2.5, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg p.o.) co-administered with a threshold dose of L-dopa (2.5 mg/kg p.o.) did not evoke a motor response or induce dyskinesia. Similarly, concomitant administration of BTS 74 398 (5.0 mg/kg p.o.) with a submaximal L-dopa dose (12.5 mg/kg p.o.) did not potentiate the motor response produced by L-dopa alone and there was no alteration in the dyskinesia provoked by L-dopa challenge. BTS 74 398 reverses motor abnormalities in MPTP-treated marmosets without evoking established dyskinesia but no additive improvement occurs when administered in combination with L-dopa. The lack of synergy with L-dopa may suggest different sites of drug action.

Zydis selegiline reduces off time in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations: a 3-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Zydis selegiline dissolves on contact with saliva and undergoes pregastric absorption. This minimizes first-pass metabolism and provides high plasma concentrations of selegiline. In this study, the efficacy and safety of Zydis selegiline was assessed in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients who were experiencing motor fluctuations with levodopa. Patients were randomly assigned to either drug or placebo in a 2:1 ratio in this double-blind, multicenter trial. Significant reductions in daily off time occurred at 4 to 6 weeks with the 1.25 mg dose (9.9%, P = 0.003) and 10 to 12 weeks with the 2.5 mg dose (13.2%, P < 0.001). The total number of off hours was reduced by 2.2 hours at Week 12 from baseline (compared with 0.6 hours in the placebo group). The average number of dyskinesia-free on hours for the Zydis selegiline patients increased by 1.8 hours at Week 12. There was no change in mean percentage of "Asleep" time throughout the study. No apparent differences were detected in the occurrence of drug-related adverse events between the Zydis selegiline group and placebo-treated groups. Adverse events were consistent with known effects of levodopa therapy. Zydis selegiline safely reduces daily off time when used as adjunctive therapy with levodopa in patients with PD.

Comparing dopamine agonists in Parkinsonʼs disease

Dopamine agonists are effective in the management of both advanced and early-stage Parkinson's disease. Unfortunately, randomized head-to-head comparative studies between the many different dopamine agonists now available are sparse. Indirect comparisons of dopamine agonists show that ergot derivatives, such as pergolide and cabergoline, are as effective as non-ergot derivatives, such as ropinirole and pramipexole, in ameliorating Parkinson's disease symptoms in patients in early or advanced stages of the condition. As far as safety and tolerability are concerned, no significant differences between dopamine agonists are found. However, some specific adverse events, such as somnolence and sleep attacks, seem less frequent in monotherapy studies with pergolide than in those with the non-ergot dopamine agonists; however, because of the lack of direct-comparison studies this cannot be proved conclusively. Randomized, controlled comparative studies between dopamine agonists are necessary to verify any possible differences in their effectiveness and tolerability in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Appropriate dosing of pergolide in monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in Parkinsonʼs disease

Pergolide is one of the most well-tested and widely used dopamine agonists for the treatment of Parkinson's disease; however, there is worrying evidence that sub-therapeutic dosing of pergolide is widespread in clinical practice. Clinical studies in Caucasians suggest that a pergolide dose of 3 mg/day provides the optimal efficacy to tolerability ratio and that, in Japanese patients, a dose in excess of 2.25 mg/day may be ideal. Whether pergolide is used early in patients with de-novo Parkinson's disease or as adjunctive therapy later in the disease, in order to optimize its clinical efficacy, it is recommended that practitioners aim to achieve at least these doses, or higher ones, if the drug is well tolerated.

Dopamine agonists, receptor selectivity and dyskinesia induction in Parkinsonʼs disease

Levodopa and the dopamine agonists are effective symptomatic treatments for Parkinson's disease, and all patients receive at least one of these agents during their illness. Long-term use of levodopa is commonly associated with motor complications such as dyskinesia, and both the dosing frequency and total daily dose of levodopa determine the rate of onset and severity. Dopamine agonists have gained popularity as first-line monotherapy in Parkinson's disease, as they effectively reverse motor deficits and reduce the risk of motor complications. Long-acting dopamine agonists providing continuous, rather than pulsatile, dopaminergic stimulation appear able to avoid dyskinesia induction. Current treatments act predominantly on D2 receptors, but drugs acting on both the D1 and D2 receptor families may produce an additive motor response, although this remains to be proven in patients with Parkinson's disease. Most currently used dopamine agonists are selective for D2-like receptors, with only pergolide and apomorphine potentially interacting with D1 receptor populations.

Levodopa-induced response fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease: strategies for management

Fluctuations in response to levodopa in patients in the advanced stages of idiopathic Parkinson's disease occur frequently and are a difficult problem to treat. Patients who are treated with levodopa have an additional 10% risk of experiencing response fluctuations with each year of treatment: 50% of patients have this problem after 5 years of receiving levodopa therapy and almost 100% of patients after 10 years. The mechanisms by which response fluctuations occur are only partially understood and can be divided into three main types: (i) presynaptic neuronal degeneration leading to a lack of buffering of released levodopa, which is mainly related to wearing-off phenomena; (ii) postsynaptic changes in dopamine receptor sensitivity and number, partially caused by the presynaptic changes, which are clinically related to at-random response fluctuations; and (iii) pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic influences of exogenously administered dopaminergic agents. Several oral and parenteral treatment strategies are recommended to manage response fluctuations, such as optimisation of dopamine receptor agonist therapy in combination with a reduction of the levodopa load; use of slow-release levodopa formulations; use of catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors; an increase of levodopa dose frequency; use of high-dose amantadine; and intermittent or continuous use of apomorphine and/or levodopa. Continuous stimulation of dopamine receptors with dopaminergic agents is one of the crucial basic steps in the treatment of patients at an advanced stage of Parkinson's disease, and the preferential use of dopamine receptor agonists has proven to be successful in the prevention and treatment of response fluctuations.

Sleepiness in Parkinson's disease: a controlled study

Sudden-onset sleep episodes while driving have been reported in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, and termed sleep attacks because they were reported to be irresistible and to occur without warning. We postulate that these episodes are due to excessive daytime sleepiness secondary to the high frequency of sleep disorders in PD patients and the sedative effects of dopaminergic medications. We assessed the frequency and relationship between excess daytime sleepiness and sleep episodes while driving (SE) in patients with PD. We evaluated 101 consecutive PD patients presenting to the Movement Disorder Center at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine using a questionnaire that incorporated a subjective estimate of sleepiness, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and information on disease severity and dopaminergic medications. One hundred age-matched respondents without PD served as a control population. Excess daytime sleepiness was reported in 76% of PD patients compared to 47% of controls (P < 0.05). The mean ESS scores for PD patients was 9.1 +/- 6.1 versus 5.7 +/- 4.4 in controls (P < 0.001). ESS scores > or =10 were observed in 40.6% of PD patients compared to 19% of controls (P < 0.01) and 24% of PD patients had scores > or =15, compared to 5% of controls (P < 0.001). Sleep episodes while driving were experienced by 20.8% of PD drivers compared to 6% of control drivers (P < 0.05). The mean daily levodopa (L-dopa) dose equivalent was 1,142 +/- 858 mg in PD drivers who experienced a SE while driving compared to 626 +/- 667 mg in those who had not (P < 0.05). Similarly, ESS was significantly greater in drivers with a SE than in those without (11.6 +/- 6.4 vs. 8.4 +/- 4.1; P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ESS and mean daily L-dopa dose equivalents were predictors of sleep episodes while driving, whereas age, gender, disease severity, and individual dopaminergic agents were not. These findings support the notion that sleep episodes while driving in PD patients are related to excess daytime sleepiness and dopaminergic load. Physicians should advise and treat patients accordingly.

Alterations in striatal neuropeptide mRNA produced by repeated administration of L-DOPA, ropinirole or bromocriptine correlate with dyskinesia induction in MPTP-treated common marmosets

Chronic administration of L-DOPA to MPTP-treated common marmosets induces marked dyskinesia while repeated administration of equivalent antiparkisonian doses of ropinirole and bromocriptine produces only mild involuntary movements. The occurrence of dyskinesia has been associated with an altered balance between the direct and indirect striatal output pathways. Using in situ hybridisation histochemistry, we now compare the effects of these drug treatments on striatal preproenkephalin-A (PPE-A) and adenosine A(2a) receptor mRNA expression as markers of the indirect pathway and striatal preprotachykinin (PPT) mRNA and preproenkephalin-B (PPE-B, prodynorphin) mRNA expression as markers of the direct pathway.The equivalent marked losses of specific [3H]mazindol binding in the striatum of all drug treatment groups confirmed the identical nature of the nigral cell loss produced by MPTP treatment. MPTP-induced destruction of the nigro-striatal pathway markedly increased the level of PPE-A mRNA in the caudate nucleus and putamen and decreased the levels of PPT and PPE-B mRNA relative to normal animals. Repeated treatment with L-DOPA for 30 days produced marked dyskinesia but had no effect on the MPTP-induced increase in PPE-A mRNA in the caudate nucleus and putamen. In contrast, L-DOPA treatment normalised the MPTP-induced decrease in the level of PPT and PPE-B mRNA. Repeated treatment with ropinirole produced little or no dyskinesia but markedly reversed the MPTP-induced elevation in PPE-A mRNA in the caudate nucleus and putamen. However, it had no effect on the decrease in PPT or PPE-B mRNA. Similarly, bromocriptine treatment which induced only mild dyskinesia attenuated the MPTP-induced elevation in PPE-A mRNA in the caudate nucleus and putamen with no effect on reduced striatal PPT or PPE-B mRNA. Neither MPTP treatment nor treatment with L-DOPA, bromocriptine or ropinirole had any effect on adenosine A(2a) receptor mRNA in the striatum. These patterns of alteration in striatal PPE-A and PPT and PPE-B mRNA produced by L-DOPA, bromocriptine and ropinirole show differential involvement of markers of the direct and indirect striatal output pathways related to improvement of locomotor activity and mirror the relative abilities of the drugs to induce dyskinesia.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that demands a holistic approach to treatment. Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions play an important role in the comprehensive management of this disorder. While levodopa remains the single most effective medication for symptomatic treatment, dopamine agonists are playing an increasingly important role. Motor complications of dopaminergic therapy are a significant issue, particularly in patients with more advanced disease who have been on levodopa for several years. All therapeutic interventions must be tailored to the individual and modified as the disease progresses, with the goal of minimizing significant functional disability as much as possible.

Dopamine, but not norepinephrine or serotonin, reuptake inhibition reverses motor deficits in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-treated primates

Monoamine reuptake inhibitors that do not discriminate between the transporters for dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin) can reverse locomotor deficits and motor disability in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated common marmosets. DA reuptake inhibition is presumed to be primarily responsible, but the role played by inhibition of NE and 5-HT reuptake is unknown. We now evaluate the efficacy of a range of monoamine reuptake inhibitors either alone or in combination in MPTP-treated common marmosets to determine the actions required for effective antiparkinsonian activity. Monoamine reuptake inhibitors not discriminating between the DA, NE, and 5-HT transporters [1-[1-(3,4-dichlororphenyl)cyclobutyl]-2-(3-diaminethylaminopropylthio)ethanone monocitrate (BTS 74 398) and nomifensine] reversed locomotor deficits and motor disability in MPTP-treated marmosets but bupropion was without effect. The selective DA reuptake inhibitor 1-(2-(bis-(4-fluorophenyl)-methoxy)ethyl)-4-(3-phenylpropyl) piperazine) dihydrochloride (GBR 12909) also reversed these motor deficits. The relative efficacy of the compounds (BTS 74 398 > GBR 12909 > nomifensine >> bupropion) paralleled their potency in inhibiting DA uptake in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, the selective NE reuptake inhibitor nisoxetine and the 5-HT reuptake inhibitor sertraline administered alone failed to improve motor function and tended to worsen the deficits. Coadministration of nisoxetine attenuated the improvement in motor deficits produced by GBR 12909. Coadministration of sertraline also abolished the reversal of motor deficits produced by GBR 12909. Coadministration of both sertraline and nisoxetine similarly abolished the improvement of motor deficits produced by GBR 12909. Molecules possessing potent DA reuptake inhibitory activity may be useful in the treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. In contrast, there seems to be no role for NE or 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, and they may impair antiparkinsonian activity mediated through dopaminergic mechanisms.

'Sleep attacks' or 'unintended sleep episodes' occur with dopamine agonists: is this a class effect?

Controversial reports of sudden onset 'sleep attacks' resulting in road traffic accidents have recently been reported in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) taking the non-ergot dopamine D(2 )/D(3) receptor agonists pramipexole and ropinirole. These reports have generated considerable debate as the concept of 'sleep attacks' is disputed amongst sleep specialists and most believe that isolated 'sleep attacks' not preceded by warning on the background of chronic sleepiness or 'unintended sleepiness' do not exist. A series of case reports suggested that this phenomenon may not be exclusive to the non-ergot dopamine agonists such as pramipexole or ropinirole and indeed may occur with most dopaminergic agents. Recent evidence suggest that a 'sleepiness' or 'hypoactivity' reaction to dopaminergic therapy may be related to underlying dopamine deficiency of PD rather than a drug effect. In this report we provide the evidence for the phenomenon being a class effect attributable to all dopamine agonists currently employed in the management of PD. Controversy surrounding excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in PD and the use of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in relation to PD is also discussed. In spite of variable reports, EDS is recognised to be common in PD and is likely to be related to both the disease process and drug therapy. Studies using multiple sleep latency tests have also reported differing results in PD although a recent study indicated that a subset of 'sleepy' patients with PD may experience pathological somnolence with resultant detrimental consequence on daytime and cognitive functions. We recommend that the issue of 'sleepiness' or 'sleep attacks' in PD should be routinely checked in all patients with PD and indirectly assessed by using either the ESS or the recently introduced Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale. Those with reported 'sleep attacks' or 'unintended sleep episodes' and excessive daytime sleepiness while taking dopamine agonists or dopaminergic agents such as levodopa should have a review of their medication, should not be driving a car on their own and some may merit formal sleep architecture studies. The latter may identify sleep disorders such as secondary narcolepsy which may benefit from the use of a wakefulness promoting agent.

Excessive daytime sleepiness in de novo and treated Parkinson's disease

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is due to either treatment-related factors or the disease itself. The study of this disturbing phenomenon in de novo parkinsonian patients may contribute to a better understanding of its pathophysiology. We conducted a case control study in which we compared 25 PD patients who had never been treated before with dopaminergic drugs (de novo PD), 50 PD patients being treated with dopaminergic drugs (treated PD), and 25 healthy control subjects, all of whom were matched for age and gender. EDS was measured by means of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and quality of sleep by means of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). ESS and PSQI scores were not statistically different between de novo PD patients and controls, whereas they were significantly higher in treated PD. Differences in ESS score variability were best explained by the treatment effect, whereas there was no clear correlation between PSQI and any of the clinical variables considered.

Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Current research in Parkinson's disease (PD) focuses on symptomatic therapy and neuroprotective interventions. Drugs that have been used for symptomatic therapy are levodopa, usually combined with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, synthetic dopamine receptor agonists, centrally-acting antimuscarinic drugs, amantadine, monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors. Drugs for which there is at least some evidence for neuroprotective effect are certain dopamine agonists, amantadine and MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline). Levodopa remains the most effective drug for the treatment of PD. Several factors contribute to the complex clinical pharmacokinetics of levodopa: erratic absorption, short half-life, peripheral O-methylation and facilitated transport across the blood-brain barrier. In patients with response fluctuations to levodopa, the concentration-effect curve becomes steeper and shifts to the right compared with patients with stable response. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling can affect decisions regarding therapeutic strategies. The dopamine agonists include ergot derivatives (bromocriptine, pergolide, lisuride and cabergoline), non-ergoline derivatives (pramipexole, ropinirole and piribedil) and apomorphine. Most dopamine agonists have their specific pharmacological profile. They are used in monotherapy and as an adjunct to levodopa in early and advanced PD. Few pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are available regarding centrally acting antimuscarinic drugs. They are characterised by rapid absorption after oral intake, large volume of distribution and low clearance relative to hepatic blood flow, with extensive metabolism. The mechanism of action of amantadine remains elusive. It is well absorbed and widely distributed. Since elimination is primarily by renal clearance, accumulation of the drug can occur in patients with renal dysfunction and dosage reduction must be envisaged. The COMT inhibitors entacapone and tolcapone dose-dependently inhibit the formation of the major metabolite of levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa, and improve the bioavailability and reduce the clearance of levodopa without significantly affecting its absorption. They are useful adjuncts to levodopa in patients with end-of-dose fluctuations. The MAO-B inhibitor selegiline may have a dual effect: reducing the catabolism of dopamine and limiting the formation of neurotoxic free radicals. The pharmacokinetics of selegiline are highly variable; it has low bioavailability and large volume of distribution. The oral clearance is many-fold higher than the hepatic blood flow and the drug is extensively metabolised into several metabolites, some of them being active. Despite the introduction of several new drugs to the antiparkinsonian armamentarium, no single best treatment exists for an individual patient with PD. Particularly in the advanced stage of the disease, treatment should be individually tailored.

Pramipexole in patients with Parkinson's disease and marked drug resistant tremor: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the tremorlytic properties of pramipexole, a non-ergoline dopamine agonist to those of placebo as add on medication in patients with Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

Eighty four patients with early or advanced Parkinson's disease and marked, drug resistant tremor under a stable and optimised antiparkinsonian medication were included in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre study and assigned to add on treatment (7 week dose titration interval, 4 week maintenance period) with either pramipexole (n=44) or placebo (n=40) as adjunct. The primary end point was the absolute change in tremor score, defined as the sum of tremor related items (16, 20, 21) of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) in "on" periods. Secondary end points included the percentage change in tremor score, the absolute and percentage changes in long term EMG tremor registration, and the change in tremor self rating scales. Safety and tolerability were assessed on the basis of adverse events, laboratory tests, ECG, and vital signs.

RESULTS

Pramipexole was significantly superior to placebo with a difference between treatment groups in the mean absolute change in tremor score of -4.4 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) -6.2 to -2.5) (p<0.0001), corresponding to a difference in the mean percentage change of -34.7% in favour of pramipexole. The secondary end points were consistent with the significant change in tremor score and provided further evidence for the benefit of pramipexole compared with placebo. Long term EMG registration as an objective measure showed a difference in mean absolute change in tremor occurrence of -15.2% (95%CI -21.4 to -9.0) (p<0.0001), and a difference in the mean percentage change of -45.7% in favour of pramipexole. The treatment effects increased during dose titration and remained stable during the 4 week maintenance dose period until the end of the study. The average daily pramipexole dose during maintenance was 4.1 (SD 0.9) mg. Safety analysis showed an increased rate of fatigue, insomnia, nausea, abdominal pain, and headache under pramipexole, comparable with previous studies.

CONCLUSION

Pramipexole proved to be an effective agent for patients with Parkinson's disease and drug resistant tremor.

Treatment interventions for Parkinson's disease: an evidence based assessment

We did a systematic review, with a uniform method of assessment of efficacy and safety, to assess the different interventions available for the management of Parkinson's disease (drugs, surgical interventions, and physical treatments) with respect to the following indications: prevention of disease progression, symptomatic treatment of motor features (parkinsonism), symptomatic control of motor complications, prevention of motor complications, and symptomatic treatment of non-motor features. Our aim was not to define practice guidelines, but rather to improve clinicians' knowledge of the presently available published clinical evidence, based mainly on randomised controlled trials. We hope that our review will help doctors to incorporate this background into their own decision-making strategy to make appropriate choices with respect to the treatment of individual patients with Parkinson's disease.

Increased risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Recent case reports and letters have alerted practitioners to the risk of sleep attacks, usually preceded by somnolence, in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with pramipexole and ropinirole.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and Cochrane Library, contacted experts and pharmaceutical manufacturers, and manually reviewed all references retrieved to identify possible articles to include. Information on randomisation, blinding, type of treatment and reporting of somnolence were abstracted by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a third author.

ANALYSIS

We made 2 separate analyses. The first analysis compared the risk of somnolence in patients taking either pramipexole or ropinirole to that in patients taking placebo. The second analysis compared the risk of somnolence with these drugs (plus levodopa) versus that with levodopa alone. We calculated pooled relative risk estimates using the random effects model and when no heterogeneity was detected we used the fixed effects model.

RESULTS

Four trials were included in the analysis of patients taking pramipexole or ropinirole compared with those taking placebo. The pooled relative risk of somnolence in this analysis was 4.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.79 to 13.89]. Seven trials were included in the analysis of patients taking levodopa and pramipexole or ropinirole compared with those taking levodopa alone. The pooled relative risk was 2.06 (95% CI 1.47 to 2.88).

CONCLUSION

Patients with Parkinson's disease using pramipexole or ropinirole are at higher risk of experiencing somnolence relative to patients taking placebo. Patients taking levodopa plus either one of these dopamine agonists are at higher risk than those taking levodopa alone. Clinicians should carefully weigh this risk against the benefit of these agents when prescribing these drugs.

Pergolide in the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Introduced on the market in 1989, pergolide, a D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, is still widely prescribed for the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, pergolide was introduced as an adjunct therapy to levodopa treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor responses and dyskinesias. Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials in de novo patients with PD show that pergolide is able to improve parkinsonian symptoms when used as monotherapy. Moreover, preliminary results of a long-term monotherapy study in early PD suggest that pergolide is as effective as levodopa, and that a significant delay in the time of the onset of levodopa-induced motor complications can be obtained. A number of randomized studies have shown that pergolide is more effective than bromocriptine as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD; the greater benefit found with pergolide could be ascribed to its action on both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. However, controlled comparative studies with new dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, cabergoline, and pramipexole, have not been performed yet. Interestingly, few open studies in patients with complicated PD have shown that high doses of pergolide (> 6 mg/d) are able to improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesias through a dramatic reduction of levodopa dosage. The side-effect profile of pergolide is similar to that of other dopamine agonists, and complications such as sleep attack and serosal fibrosis have been rarely reported.

Neurotoxicity of MPTP

After the discovery of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), we acquired a good animal model of Parkinson's disease. The extraordinary recent growth in knowledge using MPTP parkinsonism has fostered increased understanding of Parkinson's disease. In the present paper, the discovery of MPTP and the biochemical, pathological, and clinical findings of MPTP parkinsonism are first reviewed briefly. Next, using MPTP parkinsonism, unresolved issuses such as the apoptosis of MPTP, levodopa toxicity, and neuroprotective effects of monoamine oxidase inhibitors or dopamine agonists are discussed. Finally, environmental factors such as the etiology of Parkinson's disease are examined. Some genetic factors that lead to familial Parkinson's disease have recently been reported, but most cases of Parkinson's disease are sporadic. Recent epidemiological evidence emphasizes an etiological relation of 18th and 19th century industrialization to Parkinson's disease. Man-made toxins, such as industrial chemicals and herbicides/pesticides, have been suggested to increase the risk of developing Parkinson's disease. I would like to highlight the significance of re-examination of environmental factors in the etiology of Parkinson's disease.

Long-term Medical Treatment for Parkinson's Disease

The authors of this paper view Parkinson's disease (PD) as a clinically defined progressive syndrome of resting limb tremor, bradykinesia, muscle rigidity, and a shuffling unsteady gait that responds well to dopaminergic medications. Parkinson's disease is a not a single entity, but rather a syndrome with diverse causes, with both genetic and environmental risk factors. The clinician's concern is to rule out other entities, especially those having another specific treatment, and to give PD patients the best short- and long-term benefit, with the least possible unwanted side effects.

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson disease: benefits observed in levodopa-intolerant patients

OBJECT

A blinded evaluation of the effects of subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation was performed in levodopa-intolerant patients with Parkinson disease (PD). These patients (Group I, seven patients) were moderately or severely disabled (Hoehn and Yahr Stages III-V during the off period), but were receiving only a small dose of medication (levodopa-equivalent dose [LED] 0-400 mg/day) because they suffered unbearable side effects. The results were analyzed in comparison with those obtained in patients with advanced PD (Group II, seven patients) who were severely disabled (Hoehn and Yahr Stages IV and V during the off period), but were treated with a large dose of medication (500-990 mg/day).

METHODS

The patients were evaluated twice at 6 to 8 months after surgery. To determine the actual benefits afforded by STN stimulation to their overall daily activities, the patients were maintained on their medication regimen with optimal doses and schedules. Stimulation was turned off overnight for at least 12 hours. It was turned on in the morning (or remained turned off), and each patient's best and worst scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale during waking daytime activity were recorded as on- and off-period scores, respectively. The order of assessment with respect to whether stimulation was occurring was determined randomly. The STN stimulation markedly improved daily activity and total motor scores in Group I patients. The percentage time of immobility (Hoehn and Yahr Stages IV and V) became 0% in patients who were intermittently immobile while not receiving stimulation. Improvements were demonstrated in tremor, rigidity. akinesia, and gait subscores. The STN stimulation produced less marked but still noticeable improvements in the daily activity and total motor scores in Group II patients. The percentage time of immobility as well as the LED was reduced in patients who displayed intermittent immobility with pronounced motor fluctuations while not receiving stimulation. Improvements were demonstrated in tremor, rigidity, and dyskinesia subscores in these patients. In contrast, STN stimulation did not improve the overall daily activities at all in patients who had become unresponsive to a tolerable dose of levodopa and were continuously immobile, even though these patients' tremor and rigidity subscores were still improved by stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with earlier findings, the great benefit of STN stimulation in levodopa-intolerant patients is that STN stimulation can reduce the level of required levodopa medication. This suggests that STN stimulation could be a therapeutic option for patients with less-advanced PD by allowing levodopa medication to be maintained at as low a dose as possible, and to prevent adverse reactions to the continued use of large-dose levodopa.

The use of pramipexole in Parkinson's disease: are its actions D(3) mediated?

Pramipexole is a non-ergot dopamine agonist recently approved for the treatment of early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). It has preferential affinity for the D(3) dopamine receptor, compared to previous dopamine agonists that have higher affinity for D(2) dopamine receptors. The ultimate question is whether its efficacy is linked to its action at the D(3) dopamine site or due to its binding to D(2) dopamine receptors. There is no direct experimental evidence available to answer this question. Based on a review of the pharmacological literature, it is likely that the motor benefits of pramipexole in PD patients are due to D(2) stimulation, whereas its putative effects on mood and apathy may be related to its D(3) agonist properties.

Quick titration of pergolide in cotreatment with domperidone is safe and effective

The purpose of the study was to analyze efficacy and safety of quick pergolide titration combined with domperidone. In an open-label prospective study, pergolide was titrated in 16 days to a maximum of 3 mg/d doses as adjunctive treatment to L-Dopa in 10 elderly patients with Parkinson's disease. Sixty milligrams domperidone was started 2 days before and and continued during the pergolide titration period to prevent side effects. Adverse events were studied for 6 weeks. Efficacy was measured with the motor part ("on" condition) of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the 2-minute walking test, the Timed Up and Go test, and the Postural-Locomotor-Manual test. After quick titration of pergolide with domperidone cotreatment, no symptomatic side effects were seen except for lightheadedness in one patient, which disappeared after dose reduction. The UPDRS motor score improved significantly from 21 +/- 8 at baseline to 16 +/- 7 and 12 +/- 7 after 1 and 2 weeks, respectively. The 2-minute walking distance improved significantly from 123 +/- 36 m at baseline to 136 +/- 41 m after 6 weeks. The Timed Up and Go and Postural-Locomotor-Manual test results, overall, did not show significant changes. Quick titration of pergolide to a maximum of 3 mg/d with domperidone cotreatment is safe and effective. Therefore, we recommend domperidone cotreatment in the titration period to prevent unnecessary failure of dopamine agonist treatment because of adverse effects.

5: Movement disorders I: parkinsonism and the akinetic-rigid syndromes

The major features of akinetic-rigid syndromes are bradykinesia (small, slow movements), rigidity and tremor, often summarised as "parkinsonism". Approximately 80% of akinetic-rigid syndromes are due to Parkinson's disease. Treatment of Parkinson's disease should be determined by level of disability and handicap. The combination of levodopa and peripheral dopadecarboxylase inhibitor is the most efficacious symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease. Motor fluctuations appear after 2-3 years of levodopa treatment, and affect at least 50% of patients after five years. Surgery can relieve refractory tremor and dyskinesias, but does not alter disease progression or need for drug therapy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease in Japan

BACKGROUND

Dopamine agonists such as bromocriptine or pergolide are often used in Japan to treat Parkinson's disease. Dopamine agonists are relatively expensive drugs; economic evaluations are required.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of dopamine agonists for the treatment of Parkinson's disease in Japan.

DESIGN AND SETTING

We used a Markov model to simulate the course of Parkinson's disease and to compare the cost effectiveness of dopamine agonists added to levodopa with that of levodopa alone in Japan. The model assumed that 60-year-old men with Parkinson's disease in Hoehn-Yahr (HY) stages 2 to 5 using levodopa were administered dopamine agonists or continued on levodopa alone. The incremental cost effectiveness of dopamine agonists used for 10 years was then estimated.

STUDY PERSPECTIVE

Societal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

In the patients in HY stage 2, the incremental cost effectiveness of dopamine agonists was 18,610,000 to 19,320,000 yen per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) [$US 172,300 to $US 178,900/QALY; 1998 values] . In patients in HY stage 3 or higher, the use of dopamine agonists was dominant over levodopa alone mainly due to reduced cost for care. In sensitivity analyses, costs and effectiveness of dopamine agonists significantly influenced the results. The use of a generic formulation of bromocriptine was dominant over levodopa alone even in the patients with HY stage 2 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Dopamine agonists appear to be cost effective in advanced Parkinson's disease, although their use is sensitive to the costs and effectiveness of dopamine agonists. If factors discouraging the prescription of generic drugs in Japan were removed, the treatment of Parkinson's disease would become more cost effective.

Economic and health-related quality of life considerations of new therapies in Parkinson's disease

The progressive disability of Parkinson's disease results in substantial burdens for patients, their families and society in terms of increased health resource use, poorer quality of life, caregiver burden, disrupted family relationships, decreases in social and leisure activities, deteriorating emotional well-being, and direct and indirect costs of illness. Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) measures have been used successfully in cross-sectional studies to identify and characterise these burdens; however, there is not yet substantial evidence that these instruments will be responsive to changes in patients over time and that the results will provide patients and health professionals with clinically meaningful information useful in making decisions about treatment strategies. The few studies documenting direct and indirect costs indicate increased use of ancillary health and community services, significant adaptations in home and transportation, increased use of mobility and self-care aids, and lack of access to appropriate healthcare providers. Patients with Parkinson's disease incur higher hospital expenses, have increased number of prescriptions, and experience earnings loss; the latter also applies to family caregivers. The choice, intensity and timing of therapy are determined by a variety of factors: presenting symptoms, age, employment status, comorbidity, cognitive impairment and level of functional impairment. Choices must be individually tailored to a patient's physical and personal needs. To be useful for patients with Parkinson's disease in clinical practice, clinicians should be able to use HR-QOL measures to identify appropriate medical interventions or socio-behavioural modifications to modify the HR-QOL deficits. However, while the interplay of interventions and clinical outcomes are often well understood, the effects of interventions on HR-QOL outcomes have not been studied extensively. Little research has been done that explicitly links the signs and symptoms of Parkinson's disease to the HR-QOL outcomes. The only Parkinson's disease cost-effectiveness study as yet performed indicated higher costs for patients receiving pramipexole than for those not taking the drug, but additional quality life-years were gained. Longer term effectiveness of many treatment strategies, and the usefulness of HR-QOL instruments to assess these treatments for individual patients over time, are critical areas for future research.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease

The aim of current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to ameliorate the symptoms while seeking to lessen the potential development of late levodopa complications. To this end, there is ample evidence that the early use of dopamine agonists is beneficial in younger Parkinsonian patients but monotherapy with dopamine agonists is for only a select few. Nonergot dopamine agonists offer the potential for fewer side effects. Lower dose levodopa therapy delays the onset and reduces severity of dyskinesia and end of dose failure. However levodopa remains the treatment of choice in Parkinson's disease and should not be restricted unnecessarily in patients with disability. There is no evidence that levodopa is toxic to dopaminergic neurons in people with Parkinson's disease. As yet, no drugs are of proven neuroprotective value. Dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, amantadine and apomorphine have differing but beneficial roles in the management of levodopa side effects. Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation of thalamus, globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus are increasingly available but choice of procedure depends not just on patient symptomatology, but also on local experience and results. Ideally, deep brain stimulation is the treatment of choice as it offers less morbidity than bilateral ablative surgery, the possibility of postoperative adjustments and the potential for reversibility if better treatments become available.

Dopamine agonists: the treatment for Parkinson's disease in the XXI century?

Levodopa combined with a peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DCI) has been considered the therapy of choice for Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa is nearly always effective, but has a high incidence of adverse effects with long term use, including response fluctuations (on/off phenomena) and dyskinesias. Dopaminergic agonists, acting directly at the receptor level, would be able to decrease the incidence of these motor complications.In progressive neurodegenerative diseases, such as PD, modification of the rate of disease progression (often referred to as neuroprotection) is currently a highly debated topic. Increased oxidative stress is thought to be involved in nigral cell death, that is characteristic of PD. This oxidative stress may be further exacerbated by levodopa therapy. These mechanisms have been proven in vitro and animal models, but it's relevance in humans remains speculative.Based on the considerations above, the emerging therapeutic strategies for PD advocate early use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of PD. A number of recent well-controlled studies have proven the efficacy of dopamine agonists used as monotherapy. Moreover, as predicted by animal studies, on the long term, dopaminergic agonists induce significantly less motor complications than levodopa.In the last 2years, three new dopamine agonists have been launched, including ropinirole, pramipexole and cabergoline. These new agonists have been added, as therapeutical options to well-established drugs, like pergolide, bromocriptine or talipexole. The recently launched compounds have proven efficacy in monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Unfortunately, only a very limited amount of comparative data among the different agonists is available. Pergolide has proven to be a superior drug to bromocriptine as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in a significant number of studies and is considered the gold standard dopamine agonist. Nevertheless, none of the recently launched compounds has compared itself against pergolide.A comparison of monotherapy trials is difficult, because of differences in design and populations. In a recently completed trial pergolide was statistically significantly better than placebo in all the efficacy parameters tested, with 57% of pergolide treated patients improving over 30% in the motor section of the UPDRS, as compared to 17% in the placebo arm. Interestingly, these results were obtained in the absence of any other antiparkinsonian drug during the trial. Recent monotherapy trials done with ropinirole and pramipexole achieved also significant improvements as monotherapy, but in these cases selegeline, a drug that causes a symptomatic improvement in PD, was allowed as co-medications during the trial. Not all trials used the same efficacy measures, i.e. monotherapy trials with pergolide and ropinirole used a "responder" based analysis (responder were all patients that improved 30% or more on the motor section of UPDRS), as well as a baseline to endpoint improvement in motor scores. Pramipexole monotherapy trials used only the latter approach, which is clinically less powerful than a responder analysis.Even with the difficulties mentioned above, all the recent trials with dopamine agonists have proven that these drugs are a useful symptomatic long term treatment for PD with or without levodopa and that the early use of dopamine agonists reduces the incidence of motor complications as compared to levodopa.

Continuous dopamine-receptor stimulation in early Parkinson's disease

Chronic L-dopa therapy is associated with the development of motor complications in the majority of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Although the precise mechanism responsible for these events is not known, increasing laboratory and clinical evidence points to a sequence of events that is initiated by abnormal pulsatile stimulation of dopamine receptors by the intermittent administration of agents with short half-lives such as L-dopa. Initiating therapy with a long-acting dopamine agonist has been shown to delay the onset and reduce the severity of motor complications in MPTP monkeys and PD patients. Administering L-dopa with a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor to block its peripheral metabolism increases its plasma half-life and might have a similar effect. Thus, a rational strategy for treating PD would be to initiate therapy with a long-acting dopamine-receptor agonist and supplement at the appropriate time with L-dopa combined with a COMT inhibitor.

A comparison of dopamine agonists and catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors in Parkinson's disease

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of three dopamine agonists--pergolide (PRG), pramipexole (PRX), and ropinirole (ROP)-and two catechol-O-methyltranferase (COMT) inhibitors-tolcapone (TOL) and entacapone (ENT)-as add-on therapies to levodopa (L-Dopa) in Parkinson's disease, we analyzed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies. To our knowledge, they had not yet been evaluated in comparison with each other. Statistical analyses used odds ratios, numbers needed to harm, and Fisher's inverse chi2 method. Seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria included treatment of 1,756 patients. The common efficacy measures were the reduction of L-Dopa dose and "off' duration. The reported reduction in L-Dopa dose was significant for all drugs in relation to placebo, but was most significant for PRX and ENT (p < 0.0001). The most significant reduction in "off' duration was with PRG, PRX, and ENT (p < 0.001). The common tolerability measures were the percentage of patients withdrawn because of side effects, because of any reason, and because of the development of dyskinesias. Ropinirole, PRX, and ENT caused fewer withdrawals related to side effects. Pergolide was better than other analyzed drugs concerning withdrawals for any reason. All drugs caused more dyskinesias than placebo (p < 0.0001), with overlapping confidence intervals, except for TOL 600 mg, which caused more dyskinesias than dopamine agonists and ENT. Pramipexole and ENT had the best efficacy and tolerability profile in this analysis.

Apomorphine: an underutilized therapy for Parkinson's disease

Apomorphine was the first dopaminergic drug ever used to treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease. While powerful antiparkinsonian effects had been observed as early as 1951, the potential of treating fluctuating Parkinson's disease by subcutaneous administration of apomorphine has only recently become the subject of systematic study. A number of small scale clinical trials have unequivocally shown that intermittent subcutaneous apomorphine injections produce antiparkinsonian benefit close if not identical to that seen with levodopa and that apomorphine rescue injections can reliably revert off-periods even in patients with complex on-off motor swings. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusions can reduce daily off-time by more than 50% in this group of patients, which appears to be a stronger effect than that generally seen with add-on therapy with oral dopamine agonists or COMT inhibitors. Extended follow-up studies of up to 8 years have demonstrated long-term persistence of apomorphine efficacy. In addition, there is convincing clinical evidence that monotherapy with continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusions is associated with marked reductions of preexisting levodopa-induced dyskinesias. The main side effects of subcutaneous apomorphine treatment are related to cutaneous tolerability problems, whereas sedation and psychiatric complications play a lesser role. Given the marked degree of efficacy of subcutaneous apomorphine treatment in fluctuating Parkinson's disease, this approach seems to deserve more widespread clinical use.

Pramipexole-induced somnolence and episodes of daytime sleep

Pramipexole is a non-ergot dopamine agonist used to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). Because of concern regarding driving safety, we evaluated the incidence and nature of somnolence experienced by patients receiving pramipexole in clinical trials at our center. A retrospective chart review was performed and structured interviews were conducted with patients who had reported moderate or severe somnolence. In addition, two patients underwent polysomnography (PSG) and multiple sleep latency tests (MSLT) while on and 2 weeks after discontinuation of pramipexole. Forty patients with PD participating in pramipexole clinical trials were identified. In the double-blind phases of the studies, 22 patients were randomized to pramipexole and 18 were randomized to placebo. Six patients assigned to pramipexole reported somnolence as an adverse event (1 moderate, 5 mild) compared with two patients assigned to placebo (1 severe, 1 moderate; p = 0.19, one-tailed Fisher's exact test). Thirty-seven patients participated in open-label extension studies. Twenty-one (57%) reported somnolence as an adverse event. Eleven (30%) patients reported moderate somnolence and three (8%) patients reported severe somnolence. For patients with moderate or severe somnolence, the onset of worst-reported somnolence occurred at a mean (+/- standard error) pramipexole dose of 4.0 +/- 0.4 mg (range, 0.75-4.5 mg) per day. Patients had been taking pramipexole for a total of 10.0 +/- 1.5 months (range, .03-22 mos) and at their maximal dose for 6.7 +/- 1.5 months (range, .03-20 mos). During structured interviews with 12 of the 14 patients reporting moderate or severe somnolence, seven reported falling asleep while driving and two reported minor motor vehicle accidents caused by falling asleep. Most patients reported relatively continuous drowsiness that led to falling asleep without acute warning during periods of inactivity. Three patients reported discreet waves of irresistible sleepiness heralded by prodromal symptoms occurring against a background of normal wakefulness. MSLT in two of these patients revealed decreased latency to sleep without early onset of rapid eye movements. Sleep latency normalized after withdrawal of pramipexole. Intensive patient education is necessary to prevent motor vehicle accidents in patients taking pramipexole. We recommend that patients who are experiencing generalized drowsiness and falling asleep during periods of inactivity be instructed not to drive because these patients do fall asleep without acute warning. Somnolence usually resolves with pramipexole dose reduction or discontinuation. Patients should also be alerted to pull over and stop driving immediately if they feel a wave of sleepiness coming on. Patient education and compliance are critical to maximize safety.

Pre-clinical studies of pramipexole: clinical relevance

This paper reviews the preclinical study of the novel dopamine agonist pramipexole and its use in early Parkinson's disease (PD). Emphasis will be given to those properties distinguishing this drug from other dopamine agonists, the relevance of the preclinical data to clinical trial results in early PD, and the putative neuroprotective properties of the compound. The conventional dopamine agonists are ergot-derived compounds that are most widely used as adjunctive therapies in advancing Parkinson's disease (PD). Examples of conventional agonists are bromocriptine and pergolide. Pramipexole is an aminobenzothiazole compound, recently introduced for the treatment of both early and advanced PD. Its nonergot structure may reduce the risk of side-effects, considered unique to ergot drugs, such as membranous fibrosis. Pramipexole is a full dopamine agonist with high selectivity for the D2 dopamine receptor family. This family includes the D2, D3 and D4 receptor subtypes. Pramipexole has a 5- to 7-fold greater affinity for the D3 receptor subtype with lower affinities for the D2 and D4 receptor subtypes. The drug has only minimal alpha2-adrenoceptor activity and virtually no other receptor agonism or antagonism. The optimal dopamine receptor activation for the safe and effective treatment of PD is not known. Findings in animal models and clinical studies indicate that activation of the postsynaptic D2 receptor subtype provides the most robust symptomatic improvement in PD. Given its pharmacological profile, it is not surprising that pramipexole was found to be effective in ameliorating parkinsonian signs in animal models. This therapeutic effect has been confirmed in clinical trials in both early and advanced PD. In early disease, it provides a clear reduction in the chief motor manifestations of PD and improved activities of daily living. Perhaps most striking is the large number of clinical trial patients who have remained on pramipexole monotherapy for many months. The majority of these subjects have been maintained on pramipexole for an excess of 24 months without requiring additional symptomatic treatment with levodopa. This is in contrast to the general clinical experience with older conventional agonists. Pramipexole also has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. It is rapidly absorbed with peak levels appearing in the bloodstream within 2 h of oral dosing. It has a high absolute bioavailability of > 90% and can be administered without regard to meals. It has no significant effects on other antiparkinson drugs such as levodopa or selegiline. Its excretion is primarily renal and, thus, has little or no impact on hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes or other related metabolic pathways. Pramipexole has also been theorized to have 'neuroprotectant' properties. Oxyradical generation is posited as a cause or accelerant of brain nigral cell death in PD. Pramipexole stimulates brain dopamine autoreceptors and reduces dopamine synthesis and turnover which may minimize oxidative stress due to dopamine metabolism. Furthermore, the compound has a low oxidation potential that may serve as an oxyradical scavenger in the PD brain. In summary, pramipexole is a new antiparkinson medication found to have unique dopamine agonist characteristics and putative neuroprotective properties.

Emergency department presentations of patients with Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurological disorder characterized by tremor, muscle rigidity, slowness of movement (bradykinesia), and gait instability. In early disease, PD is well managed in an office setting, however, as the disease progresses, a variety of syndromes may result in emergency department visits. The scenarios most likely to require an emergent evaluation are severe motor "off" periods with immobility, involuntary movements (dyskinesia), psychosis, acute confusion, panic disorder, and pain. Other less frequent presentations are also discussed. This article uses illustrative cases to provide a framework to discuss emergency department diagnosis and management issues in caring for these patients.