Discriminative stimulus properties of amphetamine and structurally related phenalkylamines

Increased drug sensitivity in the drug discrimination procedure afforded by drug versus drug training

Rats were trained to discriminate norfenfluramine (NF) 1.4 mg/kg from its vehicle or amphetamine (AMPH) 0.8 mg/kg or pentobarbital (PB) 6.0 mg/kg in order to determine the role that drug combination training plays in the rate of learning and sensitivity to lower drug doses. The results suggest that drug versus drug training can increase the rate of drug discrimination learning for some drugs that are learned slowly when trained in a drug versus vehicle training procedure, whereas drug versus drug training does not increase the rate of learning for other drugs that are learned rapidly. Drug versus drug training does, however, appear to increase the level of stimulus control of the training drug for all drugs examined in this study.

Animal models of drug withdrawal symptoms

There have been few attempts to model subjective symptoms of drug withdrawal using animals as subjects. Two approaches for developing such models are reviewed. First, using drug discrimination methodology, it may be possible to train animals to detect the effects of withdrawal. This method has two difficulties: 1) the only discriminations trained to date involve precipitated withdrawal, and 2) the stimulus controlling behavior is difficult to specify. Second, withdrawal from many drugs of abuse produces the symptom of anxiety, and it seems likely that animal models of anxiety could be useful for studying drug withdrawal. This hypothesis has been explored most fully using subjects trained to detect the discriminative stimulus properties of the putative anxiogenic drug pentylenetetrazole (PTZ). Withdrawal from benzodiazepines or ethanol substitutes fully for PTZ, and withdrawal from cocaine, morphine, and nicotine substitutes partially for PTZ. Emerging data suggest that other animal models of anxiety may also be useful for detecting drug withdrawal. The final portion of this review examines a behavioral test that is very sensitive for detecting physical signs of withdrawal in animals. In subjects maintained on an operant baseline using food as a reinforcer, withdrawal from a drug of dependence frequently is associated with disruption of that operant behavior. For example, tetrahydrocannabinol and cocaine, drugs that are not traditionally seen as having significant withdrawal signs, produce disruption of operant responding when high-dose administration is terminated, and their readministration reverses this behavioral disruption. Based on the observation that withdrawal is associated with anxiogenic stimuli, we suggest a method to determine if disruption of operant behavior may be related to these stimuli.

Temporal parameters of cathinone, amphetamine and cocaine

Rats were trained to discriminate intraperitoneally administered 0.8 mg/kg 1-cathinone from its vehicle in a two-lever operant procedure. The normal injection-to-session interval was fifteen minutes. When tested in session at 2-180 min postadministration, cathinone discrimination was seen to have a rapid onset (5 minutes) and offset (60 minutes). When the same rats were tested with either 0.8 mg/kg d-amphetamine or 10.0 mg/kg cocaine at the same postinjection time periods, the peak discriminative generalization to each of these other psychostimulants was observed to be later, i.e., an onset of action at 15-30 minutes with a slightly longer duration of action. The results indicate that cathinone exerts discriminative response control within five minutes of intraperitoneal injection and that it has a shorter duration than amphetamine and cocaine.

Hallucinogenic and stimulatory amphetamine derivatives: fingerprinting DOM, DOI, DOB, MDMA, and MBDB by spectral analysis of brain field potentials in the freely moving rat (Tele-Stereo-EEG)

Telemetric recordings of field potentials from frontal cortex, hippocampus, striatum and reticular formation of freely moving rats were analysed before and after injection of the enantiomeric hallucinogenic amphetamine derivatives R-DOB [(-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromophenyl)-2-aminopropane], R-DOM [(-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-amino-propane] and R-DOI [(-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane] as well as the nonhallucinogenic amphetamine derivatives S-MBDB [(+)-N-methyl-1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)butanamine] and S-MDMA [(+)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine] and S-(+)-amphetamine. The frequency analysis of the field potentials revealed a clearcut difference between them. The spectral patterns emerging after injection of the non-hallucinogens were characterized by a general decrease of power, the changes in the alpha2 and delta band being the most prominent, whereas only after the application of the hallucinogenic compounds was a contrasting increase of power observed in the alpha 1 frequency band, especially in the striatum. As increases in alpha 1 power have been correlated in the same pharmacological model to serotonergic control mechanisms, the results are in line with the hypothesis that 5-HT2 receptors, predominantly occurring in the striatum, might be involved in the hallucinogenic action of drugs.

Serotonergic-dopaminergic mediation of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy")

A series of three experiments were conducted to investigate the possible serotonergic and dopaminergic mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties of the "designer" drug MDMA. In Experiment 1, rats trained to discriminate 1.5 mg/kg (+/-)-MDMA from its vehicle at 20 min postadministration were shown to generalize to another drug of abuse, N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDE) and to the serotonergically-active agents norfenfluramine and TFMPP. In contrast, testing of various dopaminergically-active agonists did not result in MDMA-like responding. In Experiment 2, dopaminergic and serotonergic antagonist were employed to observe their effect upon MDMA discrimination at 20 min postinjection. The serotonin antagonist pirenperone significantly decreased MDMA discrimination, whereas the dopamine decreasing drugs CGS 10746B and haloperidol had no effect. In Experiment 3, another group of rats were trained to discriminate MDMA at 105 min postadministration to investigate if, at this (later) time, the dopaminergic properties of MDMA may be more salient. Indeed, the dopaminergically-active drugs had a heightened effect upon MDMA at this later time, although the serotonergic component of the MDMA discriminative stimulus was predominant. The results suggest that the effects of MDMA at 20 min postadministration are solely serotonergic in nature. At 105 min postinjection there appears to be the presence of a weak dopaminergic component. This biphasic serotonergic-then-dopaminergic action of MDMA may explain the reported human experience with the drug, as well as the often controversial results in the literature.

Norfenfluramine, the fenfluramine metabolite, provides stimulus control: evidence for serotonergic mediation

Nine male rats were trained to discriminate 1.4 mg/kg norfenfluramine (NF) from its vehicle using a two-lever, food-motivated, operant discrimination task. Once trained, the rats showed a dose-dependent decrease in responding on the NF-correct lever following decreased doses of NF (ED50 = 0.71 mg/kg). Administration of 2.0 mg/kg fenfluramine (FEN) produced 100% responding on the NF-correct lever and decreasing doses of FEN, likewise, produced a dose-dependent decrease in responding on the NF-correct lever (ED50 = 1.30 mg/kg). Time-course data indicated that NF has a fast onset and a peak effect at 20-60 min after administration. Analysis of the time-course data provided a half-life of approximately 8 hr. In contrast, FEN did not show the rapid onset that was observed with NF. However, NF had a similar peak effect and half-life. These results indicate a pharmacological similarity between NF and FEN. However, the difference in onset of action suggests a possible difference between the parent drug and its metabolite. The serotonergic agonists mCPP, DOI, 5-MeODMT and LSD generalized to 1.4 mg/kg NF, whereas neither TFMPP nor 8-OHDPAT generalized to NF. The dopaminergic agonist AMPH also did not generalize to NF. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Lack of generalization of nisoxetine with amphetamine in the rat

Rats were trained to discriminate between the stimulus properties of intraperitoneally administered d-amphetamine (0.8 mg/kg) and its vehicle in a two-lever, food-motivated operant task. Once trained, doses of the norepinephrine reuptake inhibiting agent nisoxetine, ranging from 10 to 20 mg/kg, were administered to investigate if the amphetamine-trained rats would generalize to this agent. This did not, however, occur. Thus, it would seem that noradrenergic mechanisms have a negligible role in the production of the amphetamine-induced discriminative stimulus cue in the rat. Previous evidence that indicated a noradrenergic mediation of amphetamine discrimination in the mouse contrasted with the present results in rats and this discrepancy should warrant caution in comparing results of discriminative studies in these two species.

CGS 10746B is able to attenuate the effects of amphetamine: further evidence for dopaminergic mediation

Previous results indicate that agents which either decreases synthesis or block postsynaptic dopamine receptors will attenuate the discriminative stimulus produced by d-amphetamine. CGS 10746B has been reported to decrease dopamine release without changing its metabolism or occupying its receptors. In the present study, rats successfully trained to discriminate intraperitoneally administered (0.8 mg/kg) d-amphetamine in a two-lever, food-motivated operant task were observed to be unable to discriminate amphetamine when pretreated with 30 mg/kg CGS 10746B. This antagonism was shown to be dose-responsive and constitutes a third mechanism, i.e., dopamine release inhibition, that evidences the dopaminergic mediation of amphetamine in the discriminative paradigm. When both cathinone (0.8 mg/kg) and cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) were administered to the amphetamine-trained rats they each were recognized as amphetamine and are, thus, considered to generalize to the amphetamine discriminative stimulus. Coadministration of CGS 10746B and cathinone totally antagonized this generalization, whereas pretreatment with CGS 10746B prior to cocaine significantly reduced cocaine's effects. These results implicate dopamine mechanisms in the discriminative stimulus properties of the psychostimulants amphetamine, cathinone and cocaine.

The role of dopamine and serotonin receptors in the mediation of the ethanol interoceptive cue

The drug discrimination paradigm was used to evaluate the contribution of dopamine or serotonin receptors in the mediation of the stimulus properties of ethanol. Briefly, rats were trained to discriminate between ethanol (600 mg/kg, IP) and water vehicle. Dose-response relationships were observed for ethanol and rats were tested with various dopamine and serotonin receptor agonists and antagonists. The specific dopamine receptor agonists SKF 38393 (DA1) and LY 171555 (DA2) failed to produce appreciable ethanol-like stimulus effects. Furthermore, the dopamine receptor antagonists SCH 23390 (DA1) and haloperidol (DA2) did not affect ethanol-appropriate responding when administered in combination with the training dose of ethanol. A number of specific serotonergic receptor ligands were also tested. Quipazine, 5-MeODMT, buspirone, 8-OH-DPAT elicited intermediate ethanol-like stimulus properties in rats. The serotonin receptor blockers pizotifen, pirenperone and (-)propranolol were ineffective in blocking the interoceptive cue produced by 600 mg/kg ethanol. However, TFMPP produced strong ethanol-like discriminative properties and completely substituted for the training dose of ethanol. These results indicate that the stimulus properties of TFMPP are similar to those of a low dose of ethanol.

Stimulus properties of 1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDA) analogs

Using a standard two-lever operant procedure, groups of rats were trained to discriminate intraperitoneal doses of the phenylisopropylamines (+)amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) or racemic 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM; 1.0 mg/kg) from saline using a VI 15-sec schedule of reinforcement for food reward. Once trained, the animals were administered doses of several methylenedioxy analogs (MDAs) of phenylisopropylamine including the N-monomethyl [S(+)MDMA and R(-)MDMA], N-monoethyl [(+/-)MDE, S(+)MDE, and R(-)MDE], and the N-hydroxyl [(+/-)N-OH MDA] derivatives. The DOM-stimulus did not generalize to any of these agents. The amphetamine-stimulus generalized to S(+)MDMA, S(+)N-ethylamphetamine and (+/-)N-hydroxyamphetamine, but not to R(-)MDMA, (+/-)MDE, S(+)MDE, R(-)MDE, or N-OH MDA. The present results are consistent with other reports in the literature suggesting that the psychoactive effects of certain MDA derivatives may be other than simply amphetamine- or DOM-like.

Chlorphentermine may produce dual stimulus effects: a preliminary investigation

1. Rats were trained to discriminate injections of either (+)-amphetamine (0.75 mg/kg) or (+/-)-fenfluramine (1.5 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task. 2. After stable discrimination performances were attained in each group, stimulus generalization studies were conducted with amphetamine, fenfluramine, and chlorphentermine. 3. Stimulus generalization (substitution) did not occur between amphetamine and fenfluramine when either drug was used as the training stimulus. 4. In contrast, both the amphetamine stimulus and the fenfluramine stimulus generalized completely to chlorphentermine. 5. Taken together, the results suggest that chlorphentermine may be capable of producing dual stimulus effects in animals.

Behavioral effects of several new anxiolytics and putative anxiolytics

The behavioral effects of several new anxiolytics and putative anxiolytics were evaluated in two tests sensitive for anxiolytic activity. In the first test, rats were trained to lever-respond for sweetened milk under a multiple variable-interval fixed-ratio (VI-FR) schedule of reinforcement. In the FR component a brief electric shock coincided with the presentation of reward (i.e. conflict procedure). Treatment of these rats with diazepam, tracazolate, CGS-9896, and the pyrimidinylpiperazine derivatives buspirone, gepirone and ipsapirone (TVX Q 7821) significantly increased responding that was suppressed by foot-shock. A common metabolite of the pyrimidinylpiperazines, l-PP, had no affect on punished responding. A second group of rats was trained to discriminate diazepam from saline using a two-lever operant choice procedure. Diazepam-stimulus generalization occurred to CGS-9896, CL 218,872, zopiclone and tracazolate, but not to buspirone, gepirone, ipsapirone or l-PP. It was concluded that while all of the new compounds examined appear to share an anxiolytic effect as demonstrated by their activity in the conflict procedure, the pyrimidinylpiperazine agents do not share discriminative stimulus properties which are common to drugs which act via the benzodiazepine receptor.

MDMA as a discriminative stimulus: isomeric comparisons

Using a two-lever, food-motivated discrimination procedure, eight male rats were trained to discriminate 1.5 mg/kg of racemic 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) from its vehicle, distilled water. Once trained, the rats demonstrated a dose-related decrease in discriminative performance after administration of lower doses of MDMA (ED50 = 0.27 mg/kg). Racemic MDMA-stimulus generalization occurred with both isomers of MDMA with the ED50 of the (+) isomer calculated as 0.50 mg/kg and for the (-) isomer being 1.07. Time-course data indicate that racemic MDMA has a peak effect from 20-60 min post-injection with a declining effect from 120-240 min. This time-course closely resembles that observed by subjective reports in human abusers and, together with previous data, would indicate that the discriminative paradigm would be useful in investigations as to the neurochemical effects of MDMA.

Methcathinone: a new and potent amphetamine-like agent

The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the effect of N-monomethylation of phenylisopropylamine derivatives on amphetamine-like activity. In tests of stimulus generalization using rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of (+)-amphetamine from saline, the N-monomethyl derivatives of 1-(X-phenyl)-2-aminopropane, where X = 2,4-dimethoxy (2,4-DMA), 3,4-dimethoxy (3,4-DMA), 2,4,5-trimethoxy (2,4,5,-TMA), and 2-methoxy-4,5-methylenedioxy (MMDA-2), did not produce amphetamine-appropriate responding at the doses evaluated. However, the N-monomethyl derivative of cathinone (i.e., methcathinone), like cathinone, resulted in stimulus generalization. Further studies with this agent revealed that (a) in the amphetamine-trained animals, methcathinone (ED50 = 0.37 mg/kg) is more potent than racemic cathinone or racemic amphetamine (ED50 = 0.71 mg/kg in both cases), (b) methcathinone is capable of inducing release of radioactivity from [3H]dopamine-prelabeled tissue of rat caudate nucleus in a manner similar to that observed with cathinone, amphetamine, and methamphetamine, and (c) methcathinone is more potent than cathinone as a locomotor stimulant in mice as determined by their effect on spontaneous activity. The results of the present study provide evidence for a structural analogy between the prototypic psychostimulants amphetamine/methamphetamine and cathinone/methcathinone, and lend further support to the concept that amphetamine and cathinone correspond in their pharmacological effects.

Amfonelic acid: similarity to other dopamine agonists

Rats were trained to discriminate between the stimulus properties of intraperitoneally administered 0.8 mg/kg amfonelic acid and its vehicle in a two-lever, food-motivated operant task. Once trained, rats showed a dose-related decrease in discriminative performance with lower amfonelic acid doses and analysis of the dose-response curve indicated an ED50 of 0.11 mg/kg. Administration of 0.08-0.6 mg/kg d-amphetamine produced a pattern of responding similar to that observed with amfonelic acid, with an ED50 of 0.10 mg/kg and a non-parallel dose-response curve. Likewise, the discriminative stimulus properties of amfonelic acid were shown to generalize to both d,l-cathinone and cocaine but not to apomorphine. The results suggest that amfonelic acid, as well as other non-amphetamine stimulants, acts by a different mechanism of action than does amphetamine and biochemical studies are reviewed to further evidence this observation.

Further evidence for an amphetamine-like mechanism of action of the alkaloid cathinone

The alkaloid (-)cathinone is a potent stimulant with pharmacological properties closely resembling those of (+)amphetamine. Since (-)cathinone is capable of inducing release at physiological catecholamine storage sites, it has been suggested that (-)cathinone and (+)amphetamine have the same mechanism of action. In the present study, the potency of (-)cathinone in inducing the release of radioactivity from 3H-dopamine prelabelled tissue of the rat caudate nucleus was compared to that of several structural analogs, i.e. to that of four other aminophenones. (-)Cathinone was found to be the most potent of the compounds under investigation, and among these only demethylcathinone had an effect that was within the same order of magnitude as that of (-)cathinone. Furthermore, (-)cathinone and two of its analogs were evaluated in behavioral experiments with regard to their ability to substitute for (+)amphetamine in rats trained to discriminate between (+)amphetamine and saline. It was found that, unlike the other aminophenones, (-)cathinone is capable of producing (+)amphetamine-like stimulus effects, and these can be antagonized by haloperidol in a dose-related manner. Taken together, these findings support the hypothesis that (+)amphetamine and (-)cathinone produce their central stimulant effect via the same dopaminergic mechanism.