A critique of surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer

Current surgical management of ovarian cancer

Surgical management of ovarian cancer requires excellent judgment and mastery of a wide array of procedures. Involvement of a gynecologic oncologist improves outcomes. Staging of apparent stage I disease is important. Minimally invasive techniques provide advantages. Primary debulking surgery provides the best long-term survival of any strategy in advanced ovarian cancer. Aggressive surgical paradigms have the greatest success. Further cytoreductive surgery may be appropriate. Most relapsed patients require management of bowel obstruction at some point. Palliative intervention can enhance quality of life. Surgical correction may extend survival. For end-stage patients with progressive disease, the treating gynecologic oncologist must manage expectations.

Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer among women. In addition to diagnosis and staging, primary surgery is performed to achieve optimal cytoreduction (surgical efforts aimed at removing the bulk of the tumour) as the amount of residual tumour is one of the most important prognostic factors for survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. An optimal outcome of cytoreductive surgery remains a subject of controversy to many practising gynae-oncologists. The Gynaecologic Oncology group (GOG) currently defines 'optimal' as having residual tumour nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter, with complete cytoreduction (microscopic disease) being the ideal surgical outcome. Although the size of residual tumour masses after surgery has been shown to be an important prognostic factor for advanced ovarian cancer, it is unclear whether it is the surgical procedure that is directly responsible for the superior outcome that is associated with less residual disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal primary cytoreductive surgery for women with surgically staged advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (stages III and IV).To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between zero and 2 cm, on overall survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3) and the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE (up to August 2010). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Retrospective data on residual disease from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective and retrospective observational studies which included a multivariate analysis of 100 or more adult women with surgically staged advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no RCTs or prospective non-RCTs identified that were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgery when performed as a primary procedure in advanced stage ovarian cancer.We found 11 retrospective studies that included a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. Analyses showed the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction, where the residual disease was microscopic that is no visible disease, as overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly prolonged in these groups of women. PFS was not reported in all of the studies but was sufficiently documented to allow firm conclusions to be drawn.When we compared suboptimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction the survival estimates were attenuated but remained statistically significant in favour of the lower volume disease group There was no significant difference in OS and only a borderline difference in PFS when residual disease of > 2 cm and < 2 cm were compared (hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.31; and HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.61, P = 0.05 for OS and PFS respectively).There was a high risk of bias due to the retrospective nature of these studies where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection bias was still likely to be of particular concern.Adverse events, quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness were not reported by treatment arm or to a satisfactory level in any of the studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

During primary surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer all attempts should be made to achieve complete cytoreduction. When this is not achievable, the surgical goal should be optimal (< 1 cm) residual disease. Due to the high risk of bias in the current evidence, randomised controlled trials should be performed to determine whether it is the surgical intervention or patient-related and disease-related factors that are associated with the improved survival in these groups of women. The findings of this review that women with residual disease < 1 cm still do better than women with residual disease > 1 cm should prompt the surgical community to retain this category and consider re-defining it as 'near optimal' cytoreduction, reserving the term 'suboptimal' cytoreduction to cases where the residual disease is > 1 cm (optimal/near optimal/suboptimal instead of complete/optimal/suboptimal).

How to improve training in bowel surgery for gynecological oncologists-experience from a single center in the United kingdom

INTRODUCTION

There is now a growing realization of the lack of experience of gynecological oncology trainees in gastrointestinal surgery. Advanced fellowship programs in gastrointestinal surgery have been suggested as a potential solution to this problem.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present data relating to gastrointestinal procedures performed by the gynecological oncology trainee during a fellowship program over a 3-year period in a single gynecological oncology center in the United Kingdom.

RESULTS

Over a 36-month period, 369 cases of invasive ovarian cancer were diagnosed in our institute, of which 278 (75.3%) were stage III/IV disease. Bowel surgery was performed in 86 patients (30.9%) with stage III/IV ovarian cancer. A total of 121 gastrointestinal procedures were performed during the study period, as some patients had more than one procedure. We present the procedures the gynecological oncology fellow performed and assisted during this period.

DISCUSSION

To improve competencies in performing bowel surgery among gynecological oncology trainees, we suggest sustained exposure in bowel surgery over the entire duration of the training program.

The impact of disease distribution on survival in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer cytoreduced to microscopic residual: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the survival impact of initial disease distribution on patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cytoreduced to microscopic residual.

METHODS

We reviewed data from 417 stage III EOC patients cytoreduced to microscopic disease and given adjuvant intravenous platinum/paclitaxel on one of three randomized Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials. We subdivided patients into three groups based on preoperative disease burden: (1) minimal disease (MD) defined by pelvic tumor and retroperitoneal metastasis (2) abdominal peritoneal disease (APD) with disease limited to the pelvis, retroperitoneum, lower abdomen and omentum; and (3) upper abdominal disease (UAD) with disease affecting the diaphragm, spleen, liver or pancreas. We assessed the survival impact of potential prognostic factors, focusing on initial disease distribution using a proportional hazards model and estimated Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

The study groups had similar clinicopathologic characteristics. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in MD patients compared to 80 and 56 months in the APD and UAD groups (P<0.05). The five-year survival percentages for MD, APD, and UAD were 67%, 63%, and 45%. In multivariate analysis, the UAD group had a significantly worse prognosis than MD and APD both individually and combined (Progression Free Survival (PFS) Hazards Ratio (HR) 1.44; P=0.008 and OS HR 1.77; P=0.0004 compared to MD+APD).

CONCLUSION

Stage III EOC patients with initial disease in the upper abdomen have a worse prognosis despite cytoreductive surgery to microscopic residual implying that factors beyond cytoreductive effort are important in predicting survival.

Reappraisal of the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of ovarian cancer: a single institutional experience

The peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian cancer led to the development of optimal cytoreduction surgery completed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The main goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, tolerance and efficacy of this technique in patients with ovarian cancer. A retrospective monocentric study has evaluated 43 patients with HIPEC procedures from 1995 to 2009. After a complete cytoreduction surgery, a HIPEC procedure with cisplatin is performed. Data on complications and survival parameters were collected. Prognostic factors were also analyzed. Post-surgery complications included one death due to a septic shock (2.3%) and six patients have presented major complications (13.9%). The median of overall survival and progression free survival were 53.6 and 39 months, respectively. Patients with a primary complete surgical cytoreduction of the peritoneal carcinomatosis presented overall survival length of 131 months versus 84 months without initial complete resection (P < 0.0001). Surgical cytoreduction combined with HIPEC is a feasible procedure with acceptable morbid-mortality rates. The initial complete resection of the peritoneal carcinomatosis significantly increases survival and represents a strong prognostic factor.

Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer among women and the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological malignancies. Opinions differ regarding the role of ultra-radical (extensive) cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer treatment. 

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity associated with ultra-radical/extensive surgery in the management of advanced stage ovarian cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 4), MEDLINE and EMBASE (up to November 2010). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies, analysed using multivariate methods, that compared ultra-radical/extensive and standard surgery in adult women with advanced primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. One non-randomised study was identified so no meta-analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

One non-randomised study met our inclusion criteria. It analysed retrospective data for 194 women with stage IIIC advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent either ultra-radical (extensive) or standard surgery and reported disease specific overall survival and perioperative mortality. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for prognostic factors, identified better disease specific survival among women receiving ultra-radical surgery, although this was not statistically significant (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40 to 1.04). In a subset of 144 women with carcinomatosis, those who underwent ultra-radical surgery had significantly better disease specific survival than women who underwent standard surgery (adjusted HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.98). Progression-free survival and quality of life (QoL) were not reported and adverse events were incompletely documented. The study was at high risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found only low quality evidence comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery in women with advanced ovarian cancer and carcinomatosis. The evidence suggested that ultra-radical surgery may result in better survival.  It was unclear whether there were any differences in progression-free survival, QoL and morbidity between the two groups. The cost-effectiveness of this intervention has not been investigated. We are, therefore, unable to reach definite conclusions about the relative benefits and adverse effects of the two types of surgery.In order to determine the role of ultra-radical surgery in the management of advanced stage ovarian cancer, a sufficiently powered randomised controlled trial comparing ultra-radical and standard surgery or well-designed non-randomised studies would be required.

Ovarian cancer cytoreduction induces changes in T cell population subsets reducing immunosuppression

Surgery is the primary therapeutic strategy for most solid tumours; however, modern oncology has established that neoplasms are frequently systemic diseases. Being however a local treatment, the mechanisms through which surgery plays its systemic role remain unknown. We have investigated the influence of cytoreduction on the immune system of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer. All ovarian cancer patients show an increase in CD4⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺ circulating cells (CD4 T_reg). CD4/CD8 ratio is increased in primary tumours, but not in recurrent neoplasms. Primary cytoreduction is able to increase circulating CD4 and CD8 effector cells and decrease CD4 naïve T cells. CD4⁺ T_reg cells rapidly decreased after primary tumour debulking, while CD8⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺ (CD8 T_reg) cells are not detectable in peripheral blood. Similar results on CD4 T_reg were observed with chemical debulking in women subjected to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CD4 and CD8 T_reg cells are both present in neoplastic tissue. Interleukin (IL)-10 serum levels decrease after surgery, while no changes are observed in transforming growth factor-β₁ and IL-6 levels. Surgically induced reduction of the immunosuppressive environment results in an increased capacity of CD8⁺ T cells to respond to the recall antigens. None of these changes was observed in patients previously subjected to chemotherapy or affected by recurrent disease. In conclusion, we demonstrate in ovarian cancer that primary debulking is associated with a reduction of circulating T_reg and an increase in CD8 T-cell function. Debulking plays a beneficial systemic effect by reverting immunosuppression and restoring immunological fitness.

Comparison between serous and non-serous ovarian cancer as a prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma after primary debulking surgery

BACKGROUND

Residual tumor size after primary surgery is the most important prognostic factor in advanced ovarian cancer. We conducted a retrospective study in Japanese women to evaluate the association of various residual disease diameters and histological subtypes with overall survival (OS) in patients with residual disease ≥1 cm.

METHODS

Demographic and clinicopathological data were obtained from the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group; 294 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III and IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had undergone primary debulking surgery between 1986 and 2007 and had ≥1 cm residual tumor were identified. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of prognostic factors with OS.

RESULTS

Non-serous advanced ovarian cancer was associated with a significant increase in the risk of death. For serous ovarian cancer, residual tumor size was not an independent prognostic factor [multivariate hazard ratio (HR) = 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-2.79 (2-5 cm); HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.72-2.17 (>5 cm); trend P = 0.480], whereas taxane-based chemotherapy was associated with a better prognosis (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44-0.99, P = 0.046). For non-serous ovarian cancer, in contrast, residual tumor size was associated with an increased risk of death [multivariate HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.36-2.14 (2-5 cm); HR = 2.21, 95% CI = 0.96-5.08 (>5 cm); trend P = 0.067], whereas taxane-based chemotherapy was not a prognostic factor [HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.29-1.65, P = 0.409 (taxane-based)].

CONCLUSIONS

Although primary maximal cytoreduction is essential to improving OS in advanced ovarian cancer, our findings suggest the management of patients with suboptimal residual tumor should take into account differences between histological subtypes.

Prognostic significance of splenectomy as part of initial cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

We sought to examine how splenectomy as part of up-front cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer influences the postoperative course and affects survival.

METHODS

We reviewed cases of ovarian cancer diagnosed at Massachusetts General Hospital from 1994 to 2008 and found 44 patients who had a splenectomy as part of their up-front cytoreductive surgery. These were compared to 171 patients who did not undergo splenectomy. We evaluated age at diagnosis, estimated blood loss, percentage of patients whose disease was optimally cytoreduced (<1 cm), reason for splenectomy (oncologic vs. surgical), length of stay, time to first chemotherapy treatment, and survival.

RESULTS

In the splenectomy cohort, the mean age at diagnosis was 64 (44-83) years. A total of 37 of 44 (84%) patients were optimally cytoreduced. Mean estimated blood loss was 1326 ml. The purpose of splenectomy was to accomplish an optimal cytoreduction (oncologic) in 82% of cases. Median length of stay was 13 (6-76) days. Median time to first chemotherapy was 13.5 (5-54) days. The median disease-free interval and overall survival of the splenectomy cohort were 8 and 30 months, respectively. The median overall survival for patients whose disease was optimally cytoreduced in the splenectomy cohort compared to the no-splenectomy group was 30 and 45 months (P < 0.045), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of splenectomy to up-front cytoreductive surgery was feasible and safe. However, it appears to carry with it a shortened survival that is unrelated to postoperative morbidity. Our data raise the questions that splenectomy is needed for optimal cytoreduction in more biologically aggressive disease and that splenectomy may be an independent prognostic factor related to depressed immune function.

Uterine metastases in ovarian carcinoma: frequency and survival in women who underwent hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Possible reasons for hysterectomy in the initial surgical management of advanced invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) might be a high frequency of uterine involvement and its impact on survival. The aim of the present study was to describe the frequency of uterine involvement and its association with survival in an unselected population of EOC patients who underwent hysterectomy.

METHODS

All incident cases of EOC diagnosed in Israeli Jewish women between March 1994 to June 1999, were identified within the framework of a nationwide case-control epidemiological study. The target population of the present report includes all stage II-IV EOC patients who had a uterus at the time of diagnosis. Of the 822 such patients, 695 fulfilled the inclusion criterion. Excluded were 141 patients for various reasons. The present analysis is based on the remaining 554 patients.

RESULTS

Uterine involvement was present in 291 (52.5%) of the patients and it was macroscopic in only 78 (14.1%). The serosa was the most common site of isolated metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that advanced stage significantly increased the risk for uterine involvement. The overall median survival with any uterine involvement was significantly lower compared to those with no involvement (38.9 months vs. 58.0 months; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is an association between uterine involvement, whether macro- or microscopic, and lower survival even after hysterectomy although residual tumor could not be included in the analysis. Further studies are required to establish whether uterine involvement itself is an unfavorable risk factor or merely a marker of other unfavorable prognostic factors.

Correlation Between Macroscopic and Microscopic Diseases on Splenectomies Performed in the Surgical Management of Ovarian Cancer

Background:

Surgical management of primary or recurrent ovarian cancer with extensive upper abdominal disease may require splenectomy to achieve complete cytoreduction. The aims of this series were to correlate the macroscopic exploration with the microscopic analysis of the spleen and to evaluate the morbidity of patients submitted to this procedure for primary and recurrent disease.

Methods:

Data concerning patients who underwent splenectomy at the time of management of the primary (initial group) or recurrent disease were reviewed. The characteristics and survival of patients were analyzed. The correlation between macroscopic suspected lesion and histological results and morbidity according to the Dindo classification was studied.

Results:

From 1995 to 2008, 58 patients (42 in the initial group and 16 in the recurrence group) underwent a splenectomy in our institution. Except for 3 cases requiring splenectomy for hemostatic reasons, the macroscopically suspected splenic lesion was confirmed by histology in 32 (80%) of 40 cases in the initial group and in 14 (93%) of 15 cases in the recurrence group. Eighteen patients (26.5%) had a morbidity grade strictly superior to 2, and in all the factors we tested, only pelvic posterior exenteration was a risk factor for high morbidity (P = 0.02).

Conclusions:

When splenic lesions are macroscopically suspected during cytoreductive surgery for an ovarian cancer, most of the time the disease is confirmed by histology. When required to accomplish complete cytoreduction, splenectomy seemed to be justified.

Patterns of care in surgery for ovarian cancer in Europe

Quality of surgery is one of the most important determinants of the outcome in ovarian cancer patients. Surgery by a gynaecological oncologist in a specialised, high-volume environment and removal of all visible tumours are associated with a higher likelihood of favourable outcome for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Population-based studies in Europe however show that a substantial number of patients do not receive optimal surgical care. Less than half of the patients suffering from advanced-stage ovarian cancer are operated by a gynaecological oncologists. Also the proportion of patients operated in a high-volume or specialised hospital is lower than 50%. In a substantial number of patients, minimum standard procedures are not performed and optimal tumor debulking is not achieved. To improve the quality of care, efforts are needed to develop and implement robust evidence-based European guidelines, provide surgical training for gynaecological oncologists and establish comprehensive cancer networks with sufficient resources.

Ten years experience of managing the primary tumours in patients with stage IV colorectal cancers

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer have metastases at the time of presentation. Such patients are often offered systemic chemotherapy but debate continues as to whether these patients benefit from resection of the primary tumour. We describe our ten years experience of managing the primary tumours in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the overall survival of patients undergoing surgery in these circumstances and to determine whether any prognostic indicators could be identified.

PATIENTS & METHODS

920 consecutive patients presenting with stage IV colorectal cancer disease were identified from the Leicester Colorectal Cancer database. Patients undergoing resection of the primary tumour (Resection Group) with the residual metastatic disease were compared to those patients who had not their primary tumour excised (Non-Resection Group). Various different variables in two groups were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to compare the overall survivals. Univariate analysis was performed for each group to elicit the significant prognostic factors whereas Cox regression model was used to identify the independent predictors of overall survival.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of two groups showed prolonged survival for Resection Group compared to the Non-Resection Group (median; 14.5 Vs 5.83 months, p = <0.005). The multivariate analysis of different survival predicting variables, revealed the resection of the primary tumour as an independent predictor of overall survival (p < 0.001). The univariate analysis of resection group identified age at presentation, tumour site, tumour stage (pT), lymph nodal stage (pN), complete histological resection, tumour fixity, ASA grade, mode of surgery, post-operative chemotherapy and sites of metastasis as significant factors (p < 0.05) for survival prediction. When these factors were used in Cox-Regression model, only the age at presentation (p = 0.001), tumour fixity (p = 0.012) and lymph nodal involvement (p = 0.042) were independent predictors for overall survival. Treatment with post-operative chemotherapy and a smaller volume of liver metastases were associated with prolonged survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of primary tumour for stage IV colorectal cancers is associated with prolonged survival for selected patients. Age at presentation, extent of liver involvement, tumour fixity and ASA grade can help to decide the patients who will benefit from surgery.

Surgical procedures and morbidities of diaphragmatic surgery in patients undergoing initial or interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of advanced-stage ovarian cancer (ASOC) can require diaphragmatic surgery (DS) to achieve complete cytoreduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate modalities and morbidities of DS at the time of initial surgery (INS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS; performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of patients undergoing (unilateral or bilateral) DS at the time of INS or IDS for ASOC.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2008, 63 patients were studied. Treatment of the diaphragm was unilateral in 31 patients and bilateral in 32 patients. DS was performed respectively at the time of INS in 22 patients (35%) and IDS in 41 (65%) patients. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 95% (21 of 22 in the INS group and 39 of 41 in the IDS group). Surgical procedures used during DS were (in the INS and IDS groups, respectively) stripping in 14 (64%) and 16 (39%), coagulation in 2 (9%) and 10 (24%), and both procedures in 6 (27%) and 15 (37%). An intraoperative chest tube was placed in 14% of patients in each group. Postoperative chest complications requiring treatment occurred in 6 cases: pulmonary embolism (3 cases), symptomatic pleural effusion requiring chest drainage (1 case), and pneumothorax necessitating chest drainage (2 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Rate of overall morbidity related to DS was not statistically different in patients undergoing INS and IDS. Surgical treatment of this upper part of the abdomen is key to achieving complete cytoreductive surgery in ASOC.

Prognostic impact of additional extended surgical procedures in advanced-stage primary ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment of advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma includes radical cytoreductive surgery, which aims at removing all visible tumor tissue followed by platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Complete tumor resection may require extended surgical procedures. This paper reports on the prognostic impact of extensive surgery and surgical morbidity in patients with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with ovarian carcinoma [Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) stage IIIB-IV] undergoing primary surgery in our tertiary gynecologic oncology unit between 1997 and 2007 were eligible for this study. The impact of established prognostic factors and the interaction with extent of surgical procedures on survival were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients aged between 29 and 88 years (median 64 years) were eligible for this study. Overall survival time was improved in patients who underwent complete tumor resection [hazard ratio (HR) 3.61 (1.91-6.61), P < 0.001]. No significant survival difference was observed between completely operated patients in whom extended or standard surgical procedures were applied [HR 1.37 (0.70-2.69), P = 0.358], and severe surgical complications were found to be equally distributed between the two patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results may encourage the application of extended surgical procedures in patients who would otherwise be rendered incompletely debulked after primary cytoreduction. We could demonstrate an impact of complete tumor resection on patient prognosis and this was not traded off for extensive additional surgical morbidity.

When should surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer take place?

Initial surgical management is commonly accepted to date as paramount in the treatment of women presenting with epithelial ovarian cancer and permits the assessment of the disease (staging), the histological confirmation of disease type and grade, and the practice of maximal debulking preceding platinum-based chemotherapy. Many studies have shown that the volume of residual disease after initial surgical cytoreduction inversely correlates with survival. Thus, women with optimal debulking performed by a trained specialist have improved median survival. In this review, we will focus on the answers gleaned from clinical trials on primary and interval surgery, which prompts the question on the timing of surgery in respect to chemotherapy. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) is secondary cytoreduction following primary debulking and is carried out in between the courses of chemotherapy. The major clinical trials and the latest systematic reviews seem unable to give any definitive guidance or recommendation for clinical practice. The choice of aggressive primary cytoreduction or upfront chemotherapy followed by second line surgical cytoreduction seems among others to have to be individualized according to tumour load, prediction of its resectability, and response to chemotherapy. The role of tumour biology must also be kept in mind. Finally, concrete answers are awaited on the timing of surgery from the ongoing prospective randomized control trials (CHORUS and EORTC 55971) though preliminary data from the latter have already been presented at major meetings (IGCS 2008; SGO 2009) and ignited strong debate.

The optimal debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: proposal based on interval look during upfront surgery setting treatment

OBJECTIVE

The optimal goal of interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains undefined. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal goal of IDS following NAC on the basis of long-term survival by the disease status at the end of interval look surgery (ILS) or IDS during the treatment in the setting of upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS).

METHODS

From January 1986 through December 2000, we performed treatment in the setting of upfront PDS in 128 patients with Stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Sixty-six patients with residual disease (RD) at PDS underwent interval surgery (IS) such as ILS or IDS; 4 patients after two cycles of chemotherapy and 62 after three or more cycles. We investigated how disease status at the end of IS was associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rates for no, minimal and gross RD were not available (n = 0), 67% (n = 3) and 0% (n = 1) after two cycles, and 47% (n = 42), 0% (n = 18) and 0% (n = 2) after three or more cycles, respectively. No visible tumors at the end of IS after three or more cycles of chemotherapy were necessary for 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

If the optimal goal of IDS is defined as the surgery that is expected to result in long-term survival in the NAC setting treatment, our data on the assessment of peritoneal findings during the upfront PDS setting treatment suggest that only complete resection with no RD could be the optimal goal of IDS in the NAC setting treatment.

Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO)

BACKGROUND

Primary surgery followed by platinum-taxane based chemotherapy has been the standard therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. However, the prognostic role of complete and so-called optimal and suboptimal debulking and its interaction with biological factors has not been not fully defined.

METHODS

Exploratory analysis was conducted of 3 prospective randomized trials (AGO-OVAR 3, 5, and 7) investigating platinum-taxane based chemotherapy regimens in advanced ovarian cancer conducted between 1995 and 2002.

RESULTS

A total of 3126 patients were analyzed. Approximately one-third each fulfilled criteria for complete resection (group A), small residual tumor burden of 1-10 mm (group B), or macroscopic residual disease exceeding 1 cm in diameter (group C). Multivariate analysis showed improved progression-free and overall survival for group A with complete resection compared with groups B or C (P<.0001). The impact of so-called optimal debulking as in group B showed a smaller prognostic impact compared with group C. Further independent prognostic factors for overall survival were age, performance status, grade, FIGO stage, and histology, namely the mucinous subtype. An interaction between residual tumor and some biologic factors was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

The goal of primary surgery should be complete resection. The prognostic impact of tumor biology seemed to be partially overruled by residual tumor and further evaluation of biologic factors should stratify for residual tumor.

Effects of a nursing intervention on quality of life outcomes in post-surgical women with gynecological cancers

OBJECTIVE

Women with gynecological cancers have reported poor health-related quality of life (QOL), with complex physical and psychological needs post-surgery and during chemotherapy treatment. There are no studies reporting interventions addressing these needs post-hospital discharge in this population.

METHODS

Patients were randomized into two groups. The intervention group received 6 months of specialized care by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN); in addition, women with high distress were evaluated and monitored by a psychiatric consultation-liaison nurse (PCLN). The attention control group was assisted with symptom management by a research assistant. The effects of the 6-month intervention were evaluated using self-report questionnaires at baseline (24-48 h after surgery), 1, 3, and 6 months post- surgery. QOL assessments included the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale , the ambiguity subscale of the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale , the Symptom Distress Scale, and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). The sample for the longitudinal analysis included 123 who completed QOL outcome measures across three occasions post-surgery.

RESULTS

The APN intervention resulted in significantly less uncertainty than the attention control intervention 6 months after surgery. When the sub-group who received the APN plus PCLN intervention was compared with the total attention control group, the sub-group had significantly less uncertainty, less symptom distress, and better SF-12 mental and physical QOL over time.

CONCLUSION

Nurse tailored interventions that target both physical and psychological aspects of QOL in women recovering from cancer surgery and undergoing chemotherapy produce stronger outcomes than interventions that target solely one QOL aspect.

Pharmaceutical management of ovarian cancer : current status

Over recent decades, truly impressive progress has been made in the outcome associated with the pharmacological antineoplastic management of women with advanced ovarian cancer. Following initial surgery, the large majority of patients with this malignancy will receive a chemotherapy regimen that includes a platinum drug (carboplatin or cisplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Currently, objective responses are observed in approximately 60-80% of patients treated in the front-line setting, with documented improvements in overall survival compared with prior non-platinum and taxane programmes. Unfortunately, despite the high response rate to initial chemotherapy, the majority of women with advanced disease will experience recurrence of the malignant process and be candidates for a variety of possible second-line therapeutic options. It is well recognized that ovarian cancer patients who are documented to experience an initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy but where the disease recurs approximately 6 or more months following the completion of primary therapy, may have another clinically meaningful response (both objective and subjective) to a second platinum-based strategy. However, an optimal management approach in this setting remains to be defined. Furthermore, the malignant cell populations in all ovarian cancer patients who experience an initial relapse of the disease process will eventually be resistant to the platinum agents. In this setting, multiple drugs have been shown to be biologically active. Again, an optimal strategy to be employed in the platinum-resistant setting has yet to be demonstrated through the conduct of evidence-based trials. Reasonable goals of therapy in women with recurrent or resistant ovarian cancer are to improve overall survival, reduce the severity (and delay the occurrence) of symptoms and optimize overall quality of life.

Influence of palliative surgical resection on overall survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective single institutional study

BACKGROUND

The role of palliative surgical resection in patients presenting with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. Resection is often limited to symptomatic management of bleeding, obstruction, perforation or for relief of pain, in patients with an adequate performance status and an expected life span of over several weeks. An exploratory analysis to evaluate the influence of a palliative surgical resection on survival outcome in patients with advanced CRC is reported.

METHOD

A retrospective review of medical records of all patients diagnosed with advanced CRC at our institution between the years 1998 and 2003 was undertaken. Tumour registry data were reviewed to identify age, gender, modalities of therapy [i.e. surgery (S), chemotherapy (C), radiation] and overall survival. IRB approval was obtained for this study.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-five patients were identified. Median age was 67 years (range 30-99). M:F ratio was 1:1. Sixty-two per cent of patients (115/185) underwent a palliative surgical intervention. Median survival of patients who underwent S and those that did not undergo S was 22 and 3 months respectively (P < 0.0001). Forty-eight per cent of patients (79/184) underwent systemic C. Median survival of patients who received C + S, and patients who received C alone was 30 and 15 months respectively (P < 0.0004). Fifty-one per cent of patients who underwent S, received C; 30% of patients who did not undergo S, received C. Chemotherapy data were available on 46 of 79 patients. Patients treated with S + C, and C without S, received a median of 9 and 6 months of therapy respectively. The median number of regimens used were similar in both.

CONCLUSION

These exploratory data suggest a positive influence of a palliative resection performed during the disease course of patients with advanced CRC. The increased frequency of utilization and the more prolonged duration of C in the surgically treated patients may in part contribute to this improved survival. This may also be reflective of performance status at the time of diagnosis. Future trials enrolling patients with advanced CRC should prospectively stratify for surgical intervention to further clarify the influence of this modality on the outcome of systemic therapy in this disease.

Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: clinical and laboratory characteristics

BACKGROUND

Primary peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma (PPPSC) is an uncommon primary malignancy of the peritoneum. The aim of our study is to present the characteristics of such a rare entity through our case series.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study of nine cases of PPPSC who were treated between January 2002 and April 2007 in METAXA Memorial Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece. Medical files and histopathological diagnosis of each patient were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 63 years ranging from 44 up to 74 years. Clinically PPPSC presented with general abdominal discomfort in all of the patients. Three out of nine patients presented with constipation, 5/9 with distention, and 7/9 with ascites. All of the patients referred loss of appetite with weight gaining due to ascites. All the patients had pathological values of CA125 (over 35 U/ml) ranging from 125 up to 1,255 U/ml with median value 565 U/ml. Optimal debulking was possible in 3/9 of patients who were consequently treated with standard taxol-platin chemotherapy. Complete response was achieved in one woman. The median disease-free survival was 7 months and the median overall survival rate was 2.5 years.

CONCLUSION

PPPSC mimics ovarian papillary serous carcinoma regarding the clinical and laboratory characteristics but it has worse prognosis.

Aggressive surgical strategies in advanced ovarian cancer: a monocentric study of 203 stage IIIC and IV patients

AIMS

The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer consists of cytoreductive surgery associated with a platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, there is still the question as to the extent and timing of the surgical debulking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the place of surgery in the therapeutic sequence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed data from all consecutive patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer, operated on at our institution between 1990 and 2005. Patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the position of surgery in the therapeutic sequence. Patients in group 1 received initial debulking surgery. Group 2 consisted of patients having received their first debulking after initial chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three patients were identified and frequently underwent aggressive surgery, in particular, digestive surgery with bowel resections. Perioperative mortality and morbidity rates were low (2% and 14%, respectively) and there was no difference between the groups. Overall survival in group 1 for patients with complete cytoreduction (residual disease (RD)=0), optimal surgery (RD<1cm) or sub-optimal surgery (RD>1cm) was 50%, 30% and 14%, respectively. In group 2, overall survival following complete surgery was 30%, and no long-term survival was observed when surgery was not complete at the time of interval surgery. Survival was worse for patients who had received more than 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the importance of surgery in the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer. Only the patient subgroup that underwent complete initial or interval surgery was associated with a prolonged remission. Optimal surgery with a controlled morbidity can be achieved in many cases, even if bowel resection is needed, at the time of primary debulking. In the interval cytoreductive surgery subgroup, the response to initial chemotherapy and surgery was found to be essential for prognosis.

Centralisation of services for the management of ovarian cancer: arguments against

In 2000, the Commissioning Guidance for gynaecological cancer services relied on a subset analysis within a retrospective study to support its requirement that surgery for carcinoma of the ovary be centralised. We have reviewed the literature covering this issue, especially that published in the past 6 years. There is no evidence for an advantage for specialist gynaecological oncologists over general gynaecologists for these women; studies that suggest that one exists fail to separate patients presenting to general surgeons, whose patients are at a clear disadvantage, from those seen by gynaecologists. There is evidence for the need for appropriate surgery in women with less extensive disease where the diagnostic difficulties are greatest. We argue for investment in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer and the provision of services for its medical treatment over a prolonged period.

The prognostic value of nuclear morphometric analysis in serous ovarian carcinoma

The objective of this study was to determine whether nuclear morphometric data can predict survival, disease progression, and chemotherapeutic response in ovarian serous carcinoma. Nuclear morphometric parameters were determined from archival hematoxylin and eosin sections of 132 serous tumors. Clinicopathologic and morphometric parameters were evaluated as to their individual and independent prognostic value and prediction of chemotherapy response. Nuclear parameters were found to strongly correlate with extent of disease residuum, tumor grade, and FIGO stage. Univariate analysis revealed stage, grade, preoperative CA125, presence of ascites, extent of disease residuum, standard deviation of nuclear area (SDNA), nuclear perimeter (NP), SDNP, nuclear length (NL), nuclear breadth (NB), orthoferet, and equivalent diameter (ED) to be significant predictors of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Grade, stage, extent of disease residuum, presence of ascites, SDNA, NP, NL, NB, and orthoferet were found to be significant predictors of chemotherapy response. Multivariate analysis revealed extent of disease residuum (P <or= 0.01) and ED (P = 0.002) to be significant predictors for OS. FIGO stage (P <or= 0.01) and ED (P = 0.039) were significant predictors of DFS. NL (P = 0.041) and extent of residual disease (P = 0.003) were the strongest predictors of chemotherapy response with correct classification rates of 68.8% and 70.3%, respectively. In all stages, nuclear morphometry was easy to perform and highly reproducible. Independent prognostic significance was achieved for OS and DFS analysis. Results also suggest that nuclear morphometry can provide significant information to predict chemotherapy response in platinum-treated serous ovarian cancer.

Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma

Surgery plays a critical role in the optimal management of all stages of ovarian carcinoma. In apparent early-stage ovarian cancer, a comprehensive surgical evaluation allows stratification of patients into low- and high-risk categories. Low-risk patients may be candidates for fertility-sparing surgery and can safely avoid chemotherapy and be observed. Treatment of patients with high-risk early- or advanced-stage ovarian cancer usually requires a combined modality approach. Although it is well known that epithelial ovarian cancer is moderately chemosensitive, what distinguishes it most from other metastatic solid tumors is that surgical cytoreduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with prolongation of patient survival. Procedures such as radical pelvic surgery, bowel resection, and aggressive upper abdominal surgery are commonly required to achieve optimal cytoreduction. Women who develop recurrent disease may be eligible for a secondary cytoreductive surgery or may require a surgical intervention to palliate disease-related symptoms. For women at high risk of ovarian cancer, prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces the incidence of this disease. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the surgical management of ovarian carcinoma. The roles of primary, interval, and secondary cytoreductive surgeries; second-look procedures; and palliative surgery are reviewed. The indications for fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery as well as the current guidelines for prophylactic surgery in high-risk mutation carriers are also discussed.

The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients

The aim of the study is to determine the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program reported between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for analysis. Of 13 918 women with stage III–IV epithelial ovarian cancer (median age: 64 years), 87.9% were Caucasian, 5.6% African Americans, and 4.4% Asians. A total of 4260 (30.6%) underwent lymph node dissections with a median number of six nodes reported. For all patients, a more extensive lymph node dissection (0, 1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 nodes) was associated with an improved 5-year disease-specific survival of 26.1, 35.2, 42.6, 48.4, 47.5, and 47.8%, respectively (P<0.001). Of the stage IIIC patients with nodal metastases, the extent of nodal resection (1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 nodes) was associated with improved survivals of 36.9, 45.0, 47.8, 48.7, and 51.1%, respectively (P=0.023). On multivariate analysis, the extent of lymph node dissection and number of positive nodes were significant independent prognosticators after adjusting for age, year at diagnosis, stage, and grade of disease. The extent of lymphadenectomy is associated with an improved disease-specific survival of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

The role of gene expression profiling in the clinical management of ovarian cancer

Several studies have addressed the clinical value of gene expression profiling in the field of ovarian cancer. This paper reviews the current status of knowledge that can be derived from such studies. Gene expression profiles can be used to reveal sets of genes that can distinguish normal ovarian tissue from invasive ovarian carcinomas. Independent validation of these sets may result in the identification of (a set of) markers valuable for the detection in an early stage. Microarray analysis has shown that different histological subtypes of ovarian cancer might be partly reflected by a different aetiology through the deregulation and activation of different pathways. In addition, this heterogeneity could therefore also lead to different tumour behaviours. Worldwide, the combination of paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy has been incorporated in the standard protocol for the management of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer, although the outcome in individual patients is uncertain. Gene expression profiling was found to be a prognostic tool with respect to chemosensitivity and had a predictive performance of 78-86%. With increasing numbers of data from published reports, access to these data for the reproducibility of its results and pooling becomes more and more important and will possibly lead to more individualisation of therapy.

“Optimal” cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A commentary

OBJECTIVE

To derive the most appropriate threshold to classify primary cytoreductive operations as "optimal" and address the clinical significance of this issue.

METHODS

Criteria used to classify primary cytoreductive outcomes are reviewed. Survival outcomes are analyzed to address relative influences of the completeness of cytoreduction and "biological aggressiveness", as manifested by the extent of intra-abdominal metastases.

RESULTS

Most cohorts analyzing relative influences of metastatic tumor burden and the dimension of residual disease on survival report completeness of cytoreduction to influence the prognosis more significantly than tumor burden, with necessity to perform various procedures having minimal or no influence. Equivalent survival is reported for completely cytoreduced patients with stage III disease whether substages IIIa/b (smaller tumor burden) are excluded or included. However, some stage IIIc series report more favorable median and 5-year survivals for small fractions of completely cytoreduced patients than series with a large visibly disease-free fraction. Increasing fractions of complete cytoreduction are reported in recent cohorts, without increase in morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete primary cytoreduction improves the prognosis for survival significantly more than a small dimension of residual disease. Although prospective randomized trials addressing surgical issues have not been undertaken and numerous variables may reflect "biological aggressiveness" by influencing the prognosis, available data justify elimination of macroscopic disease to be the most appropriate objective of primary cytoreductive surgery. Stratification of survival by dimensions of residual disease in an investigational setting should include a visibly disease-free subgroup and if used, the term "optimal" should be applied to patients undergoing complete cytoreduction.

Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) DESKTOP OVAR Trial

BACKGROUND

The role of cytoreductive surgery in relapsed ovarian cancer is not clearly defined. Therefore, patient selection remains arbitrary and depends on the center's preference rather than on established selection criteria. The Descriptive Evaluation of preoperative Selection KriTeria for OPerability in recurrent OVARian cancer (DESKTOP OVAR) trial was undertaken to form a hypothesis for a panel of criteria for selecting patients who might benefit from surgery in relapsed ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The DESKTOP trial was an exploratory study based on data from a retrospective analysis of hospital records. Twenty-five member institutions of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Committee (AGO OC) and AGO-OVAR boards collected data on their patients with cytoreductive surgery for relapsed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer performed in 2000-2003.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-seven patients were included. Complete resection was associated with significantly longer survival compared with surgery leaving any postoperative residuals [median 45.2 vs. 19.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27-6.05; P < .0001]. Variables associated with complete resection were performance status (PS) [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 vs. > 0; P < .001], International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage at initial diagnosis (FIGO I/II vs. III/IV, P = .036), residual tumor after primary surgery (none vs. present, P <.001), and absence of ascites > 500 ml (P < .001). A combination of PS, early FIGO stage initially or no residual tumor after first surgery, and absence of ascites could predict complete resection in 79% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Only complete resection was associated with prolonged survival in recurrent ovarian cancer. The identified criteria panel will be verified in a prospective trial (AGO-DESKTOP II) evaluating whether it will render a useful tool for selecting the right patients for cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Class III beta-tubulin overexpression is a marker of poor clinical outcome in advanced ovarian cancer patients

PURPOSE

Overexpression of beta III tubulin has been involved in paclitaxel resistance in several experimental models. We investigated the role of beta III tubulin as predictor of clinical outcome in ovarian cancer patients given platinum/paclitaxel treatment. We also investigated whether beta III tubulin expression could be modified after the selective pressure represented by chemotherapy in vivo.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The study was designed to include a series of consecutive ovarian cancer patients with unresectable disease at time of first surgery, who underwent interval debulking surgery with pathologic assessment of response to treatment with platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Immunostaining was done on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from pretreatment and posttreatment tissue biopsies by using the polyclonal rabbit anti-class III beta-tubulin antibody.

RESULTS

beta III Tubulin immunoreaction was observed in 51 of 62 (82.2%) cases. beta III Tubulin positivity was neither associated with clinicopathologic variables nor with pathologic response to chemotherapy. Significantly lower percentages of beta III tubulin positivity were observed in posttreatment (range, 5-80%; median, 20%) versus pretreatment (range 10-100%; median, 40%) tissue biopsies (P = 0.0011). Cases with high beta III tubulin expression showed a worse overall survival with respect to cases with low beta III tubulin expression (median overall survival, 25 versus 46 months; P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that high content of beta III tubulin remains independently associated with a worse prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of beta III tubulin could be useful to identify poor prognosis ovarian cancer patients candidates to more aggressive and/or targeted therapy.

Bowel resection at the time of primary debulking for epithelial ovarian carcinoma: outcomes in patients treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to determine the morbidity, disease-free survival, and overall survival of patients with bowel resection at primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma in the era of platinum and taxane chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing bowel resection at the time of primary cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma, who subsequently received platinum and taxane chemotherapy, from 1996 to 2001. Data collected included demographics, stage, histology, debulking status, surgical morbidity, recurrence, and survival. Survival analysis and comparisons were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 48 patients (45 stage III; 3 stage IV), 25 patients (52%) were optimally debulked to < 1 cm of residual disease; the remaining 23 patients had residual disease > 1 cm. Four-year disease-free survival in the optimally debulked group was 24% versus 12% in the suboptimally debulked group (p=0.009). Four-year overall survival was 81% in the optimally debulked group versus 54% in the suboptimally debulked group (p=0.162). Five patients (10%) experienced a major postoperative complication including stroke, small bowel obstruction, anastomotic leak, entercutaneous fistula, and pelvic abscess. Two perioperative deaths occurred in the suboptimally debulked group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma who undergo bowel resection as part of optimal cytoreduction and receive platinum and taxane chemotherapy have improved disease-free survival and a trend toward improved overall survival. Bowel resection at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery is associated with acceptable perioperative morbidity.

The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the survival impact of adding extensive upper abdominal surgical cytoreduction to standard surgical techniques for advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The records of all patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery at our institution from 1998 to 2003 were reviewed. The cohort was divided into 3 groups. Group 1 patients required extensive upper abdominal surgery, such as diaphragm peritonectomy/resection, resection of parenchymal liver or porta hepatis disease and/or splenectomy with or without distal pancreatectomy, to achieve optimal cytoreduction (residual disease<or=1 cm). Group 2 patients were optimally cytoreduced by standard surgical techniques, including hysterectomy, oophorectomy, omentectomy, and bowel resection. Group 3 patients were suboptimally cytoreduced. Primary outcome measures were response to primary chemotherapy, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The cohort of 262 patients was divided as follows: Group 1, 57 patients; Group 2, 122 patients; and Group 3, 83 patients. The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 1-94 months). Frequency of clinical complete response in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 82%, 78%, and 57%, respectively. The median progression-free survival for Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 24, 23, and 11 months, respectively. Progression-free survival for Groups 1 and 2 were equivalent (P=0.53) and were significantly longer than for Group 3 (P<0.001). The median overall survival was 84 and 38 months for Groups 2 and 3, respectively, and had not been reached for Group 1 by 68 months. Patients in Group 1 had equivalent overall survival to patients in Group 2 (P=0.74) and improved survival over patients in Group 3 (P<0.001). Prognostic factors significant on multivariate analysis included stage, optimal status, and ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring extensive upper abdominal procedures to achieve optimal cytoreduction demonstrated a similar initial response, progression-free survival, and overall survival to patients optimally cytoreduced by standard surgical techniques. The presence of bulky upper abdominal disease alone did not appear to indicate poor tumor biology. This initial maximal surgical effort was associated with improved survival in patients who would have otherwise been suboptimally cytoreduced.

Improved short-term survival for advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer patients operated at teaching hospitals

The aim of this study was to study the impact of hospital level and surgical skill on short-term survival of advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer patients in a prospective population-based study. All 198 women with a diagnosis of advanced epithelial invasive ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer in Norway who underwent surgery during 2002 were included in this study. The data were derived from notifications to the Norwegian Cancer Registry and from medical, surgical, and histopathologic records. The hospitals were grouped into teaching and nonteaching hospitals (NTH), and the operating physicians were classified according to specialty (specialist gynecologist, gynecologist, and surgeon). The follow-up period was from 455 to 820 days. The short-term survival at 450 days was 79% for women operated at teaching hospitals (TH) and 62% at NTH (P= 0.02). After simultaneous adjustment for seven prognostic factors and residual disease, the risk of death within 600 days at NTH was unchanged compared to TH, hazard ratio 1.83. The women operated on by specialist compared to general gynecologists had a 20% increased short-term survival (P < 0.0001). TH and specialist gynecologists achieved better short-term survival of patients operated for advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer. Centralization and specialization of ovarian cancer surgery might improve the outcome for this patient group.

The role of surgery in ovarian cancer with special emphasis on cytoreductive surgery for recurrence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer has not clearly been defined, and randomized trials are lacking. Some series have reported favorable outcomes for selected patients. This review summarizes the available evidence for selecting patients and the results of cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

A Medline search identified 23 series including 1795 patients (21-285 patients per study). Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for recurrence were highly selected. Complete tumor resection was feasible in 9 to 82% of patients and was commonly associated with prolonged survival. A variety of predictive and prognostic factors for complete resection were reported. Good performance status, disease characteristics (e.g. peritoneal carcinosis), and outcome of prior surgery seemed to have an impact on surgical outcome. By contrast, disease-free survival played only a minor role, especially in patients with recurrence later than 6 months after primary treatment.

SUMMARY

Prospective evaluation of predictive scores for successful cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer is urgently needed. In a second step, randomized trials evaluating the role of surgery in the treatment strategy of recurrent ovarian cancer should be initiated. Until then, experienced and trained surgeons might offer surgery for recurrent disease to individually selected patients after giving information about the potential benefit and about the limited available evidence regarding this strategy.

What is the role of conservative primary surgical management of epithelial ovarian cancer: the United States experience and debate

Certification in Gynecologic Oncology and creation of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists in the United States have led to the development of a specialty with individuals capable of performing complex abdominal and pelvic operations in the management of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. These operations can be divided into two types. 1) A staging operation to assess the extent of disease through careful palpation, histologic and cytologic assessment of all peritoneal surfaces along with removal of the uterus, ovaries and fallopian tubes, omentum, together with a bilateral pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy. Such information allows the clinician to determine prognosis and if postoperative adjuvant therapy is indicated. 2) A debulking operation designed to resect or reduce the size of metastatic lesions as well as to remove the primary tumor including a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. This operation is designed to improve survival and cure. In spite of this apparently clear paradigm, there has been a steady debate as to the apparent justification of these operations, especially when the former is performed in a women who has not completed her childbearing and especially when the latter requires "ultraradical" procedures. Many feel that the pendulum is now swinging toward fertility-sparing surgery among young women with early invasive cancers and toward either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or less than ultraradical debulking among women with advanced ovarian cancer. The purpose of this study is not to provide an exhaustive review but rather to outline this debate and focus on the American experience with conservative surgery in the management of epithelial ovarian carcinoma.