Review: amino acid domains involved in constitutive activation of G-protein-coupled receptors

Inverse agonism at heptahelical receptors: concept, experimental approach and therapeutic potential

Inverse agonists (negative antagonists) are ligands that stabilize the inactive conformation (R) of receptors according to the two-state receptor model. The active conformation (R*) of heptahelical receptors, i.e. G protein-coupled receptors, has high affinity for G proteins. According to ternary complex models of receptor activation, the R*G complex is in equilibrium with R + G, with spontaneous activity in the absence of agonist. Inverse agonists, having a higher affinity for R, shift R*G towards R + G, decreasing the spontaneous activity of receptors. Agonists have the opposite effect, with a higher affinity for R*. Neutral antagonists have the same affinity for R and R* and compete for both agonists and inverse agonists. Inverse agonists have been recently proposed for a variety of heptahelical receptors. Methods to detect inverse agonists among antagonists are based on the determination of ligand affinity at R and R* with binding experiments, and on the modulation of G protein activity (GTP binding and hydrolysis) or of effector activity. Receptor inverse agonists, but also G protein antagonists and GTPase inhibitors, decrease spontaneous G protein activity corresponding to R*G. Receptor agonists, G protein agonists and GTPase inhibitors increase effector basal activity, but receptor inverse agonists decrease it. The therapeutic potential of inverse agonists is proposed in human diseases ascribed to constitutively active mutant receptors and may be extended to diseases related to wild-type receptor over-expression leading to the increase of R*. Some of the therapeutic effects of presently used receptor antagonists may be related to their inverse agonist properties. Inverse agonists lead to receptor upregulation, offering new approaches to tolerance and dependence to drugs.

Agonist-induced phosphorylation of the angiotensin II (AT(1A)) receptor requires generation of a conformation that is distinct from the inositol phosphate-signaling state

G protein-coupled receptors are thought to isomerize between distinct inactive and active conformations, an idea supported by receptor mutations that induce constitutive (agonist-independent) activation. The agonist-promoted active state initiates signaling and, presumably, is then phosphorylated and internalized to terminate the signal. In this study, we examined the phosphorylation and internalization of wild type and constitutively active mutants (N111A and N111G) of the type 1 (AT(1A)) angiotensin II receptor. Cells expressing these receptors were stimulated with angiotensin II (AngII) and [Sar(1),Ile(4),Ile(8)]AngII, an analog that only activates signaling through the constitutive receptors. Wild type AT(1A) receptors displayed a basal level of phosphorylation, which was stimulated by AngII. Unexpectedly, the constitutively active AT(1A) receptors did not exhibit an increase in basal phosphorylation nor was phosphorylation enhanced by AngII stimulation. Phosphorylation of the constitutively active receptors was unaffected by pretreatment with the non-peptide AT(1) receptor inverse agonist, EXP3174, and was not stimulated by the selective ligand, [Sar(1),Ile(4),Ile(8)]AngII. Paradoxically, [Sar(1),Ile(4), Ile(8)]AngII produced a robust ( approximately 85% of AngII), dose-dependent phosphorylation of the wild type AT(1A) receptor at sites in the carboxyl terminus similar to those phosphorylated by AngII. Moreover, internalization of both wild type and constitutive receptors was induced by AngII, but not [Sar(1),Ile(4),Ile(8)]AngII, providing a differentiation between the phosphorylated and internalized states. These data suggest that the AT(1A) receptor can attain a conformation for phosphorylation without going through the conformation required for inositol phosphate signaling and provide evidence for a transition of the receptor through multiple states, each associated with separate stages of receptor activation and regulation. Separate transition states may be a common paradigm for G protein-coupled receptors.

Role of the highly conserved Asp-Arg-Tyr motif in signal transduction of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor

The DRY motif, at the junction of transmembrane helix 3 and intracellular loop 2 of G protein-coupled receptors, is highly conserved. Mutations were introduced into the CB2 cannabinoid receptor to study the role of this motif in CB2 signaling. D mutations (DRY130-132AAA and D130A) markedly reduced binding of cannabinoid agonists, while no significant reduction was observed with R131A or Y132A. Mutating R (R131A) only partially reduced, and mutating Y (Y132A) more efficiently reduced the cannabinoid-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Thus, in CB2, D130 is involved in agonist binding, whereas Y seems to have a role in receptor downstream signaling.

Drug discrimination in neurobiology

Areas of neurobiological interest are identified towards which drug discrimination (DD) studies have made important contributions. DD allows ligand actions to be analyzed at the whole organism level, with a neurobiological specificity that is exquisite and often unrivalled. DD analyses have thus been made of a vast array of CNS agents acting on receptors, enzymes, or ion channels, including most drugs of abuse. DD uniquely offers access to the study of subjective drug effects in animals, using a methodology that also is transposable to humans and has generated unprecedented models of pathology (e.g., chronic pain, opiate addiction). Parametric studies of such independent variables as training dose and reinforcement provide refined insights into the dynamic psychophysiological mechanisms of both drug effects and behavior. Three different mechanisms have been identified by which discriminative, and perhaps other behaviors, can come about. DD also is superbly sensitive to small, partial activation of molecular substrates; this has enabled DD analyses to pioneer the unravelling of molecular mechanisms of drug action (attributing, f.ex., LSD's particular subjective effects to an unusual, partial activation of 5-HT, and perhaps other receptors). DD has both oriented and served as a tool to conduct drug discovery research (e.g., pirenperone-risperidone, loperamide). The DD response arguably constitutes a quantal, rather than graded, variable, and as such allows a comprehension of molecular, pharmacological, and behavioral mechanisms that would have been otherwise inaccessible. Perhaps most important are the following further contributions. One is the notion that particular, different levels of receptor activation are associated with qualities of neurobiological actions that also differ and are unique, this notion arguably constituting the most significant addition to affinity and intrinsic activity since the earliest theoretical conceptions of molecular pharmacology. Another contribution consists of studies that render redundant the notion of tolerance and identify fundamental mechanisms of signal transduction; these mechanisms account for apparent tolerance, dependence, addiction, and sensitization, and appear to operate ubiquitously in a bewildering array of biological systems.

Ceramide triggers intracellular calcium release via the IP(3) receptor in Xenopus laevis oocytes

Ceramide, a product of sphingomyelin turnover, is a lipid second messenger that mediates diverse signaling pathways, including those leading to cell cycle arrest and differentiation. The mechanism(s) by which ceramide signals downstream events have not been fully elucidated. Here we show that, in Xenopus laevis oocytes, ceramide-induced maturation is associated with the release of intracellular calcium stores. Ceramide caused a dose-dependent elevation in the second messenger inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) via activation of G(q/11)alpha and phospholipase C-betaX. Elevation of IP(3), in turn, activated the IP(3) receptor calcium release channel on the endoplasmic reticulum, resulting in a rise in cytoplasmic calcium. Thus our study demonstrates that cross talk between the ceramide and phosphoinositide signaling pathways modulates intracellular calcium homeostasis.

The 5-HT4 receptor antagonist ML10375 inhibits the constitutive activity of human 5-HT4(c) receptor

Transient expression in COS-7 cells of the recombinant human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) h5-HT4(c) receptor isoform led to constitutive activity of the receptor. The 5-HT4 receptor antagonist 2-(cis-3,5-dimethylpiperidino)ethyl 4-amino-5-chloro-2-methoxybenzoate (ML10375) at 1 microM completely abolished the 5-HT (1 microM)-mediated increase in adenylyl cyclase activity in COS-7 cells expressing the h5-HT4(c) receptor. Moreover, ML10375 also reduced basal cAMP levels in cells over-expressing the receptor, even in the absence of agonist. The inhibitory effect of ML10375 on basal adenylyl cyclase activity was not modified by pre-treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin, indicating that ML10375 acts through inactivation of spontaneously active h5-HT4(c) receptors rather than through a Gi/Go regulatory pathway. We conclude that ML10375 acts as an inverse agonist on the h5-HT4(c) receptor.