51
|
Tomisaki I, Ikuta H, Higashijima K, Onishi R, Minato A, Fujimoto N. Oncological Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy without Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Localized Prostate Cancer: Follow-up Results in a Single Institution. Cancer Invest 2019; 37:524-530. [PMID: 31597501 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2019.1675076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The oncological benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is still debatable because data on clinical outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) without PLND are lacking. In this study, we reported oncological outcome in consecutive 146 patients who underwent RP without PLND. Although 27% of our patients developed biochemical recurrence, the estimated 5-year overall survival rates were 100%, 96.3%, and 95.7% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. These data in our patients were not inferior to those in previous reports that investigated the survivals in patients who received PLND during RP. The therapeutic significance of PLND should be re-evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikko Tomisaki
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu City, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Ikuta
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu City, Japan
| | - Katsuyoshi Higashijima
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu City, Japan
| | - Rei Onishi
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu City, Japan
| | - Akinori Minato
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu City, Japan
| | - Naohiro Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu City, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Kuten J, Fahoum I, Savin Z, Shamni O, Gitstein G, Hershkovitz D, Mabjeesh NJ, Yossepowitch O, Mishani E, Even-Sapir E. Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Staging Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology and Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Reference Standard. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:527-532. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
53
|
Domachevsky L, Bernstine H, Goldberg N, Nidam M, Catalano OA, Groshar D. Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:328-336. [PMID: 31332559 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06353-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the advantages of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/MR over PSMA-PET/CT, its relatively long scanning time and suboptimal PET attenuation correction necessitate careful assessment of the most appropriate setting for this type of study. We assessed lesion agreement between PSMA-PET/MR and PSMA-PET/CT in patients undergoing initial evaluation of prostate cancer. METHODS This was a prospective study of consecutive patients with histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent pelvic PSMA-PET/MR followed by whole-body PSMA-PET/CT. All conspicuous PSMA-avid foci were counted on PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR with CT or MR correlation. Analysis was performed for intra-prostatic lesions, capsular invasion, seminal vesicle involvement and lymph node and bone involvement. Incidental and significant findings seen on PSMA-PET/CT outside the PSMA-PET/MR field of view were also analysed. Agreements between PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR findings were performed using Cohen's kappa test. RESULTS Image analysis was performed on 140 patients (mean age, 67.3 ± 8.2 years). Agreement between PSMA PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR was very good for intra-prostatic PSMA-avid foci (K = 0.85) and pelvic lymph nodes (K = 0.98), good for PSMA-avid bone metastases (K = 0.76) and fair for prostatic capsular invasion (K = 0.25) and seminal vesicle involvement (K = 0.31). Twelve patients (8.5%) had incidental findings and two patients (1.4%) had clinically significant findings. CONCLUSION Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR has very good agreement with PET/CT regarding PSMA-avid prostatic, regional lymph nodes and bone lesions, and is superior to PET/CT with regard to capsular invasion and seminal vesicle involvement. KEY POINTS • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR is superior to whole-body PSMA-PET/CT in detecting extensions of localised disease, mainly due to the high soft tissue resolution of MR. • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR may be useful for initial evaluation of histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer. • Further studies are warranted to evaluate limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR for screening and active surveillance in selected populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liran Domachevsky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Centers, 20 Habarzel Street, 6971028, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hanna Bernstine
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Centers, 20 Habarzel Street, 6971028, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Natalia Goldberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Centers, 20 Habarzel Street, 6971028, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Meital Nidam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Centers, 20 Habarzel Street, 6971028, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - David Groshar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Centers, 20 Habarzel Street, 6971028, Tel Aviv, Israel. .,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Integration of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in Radiotherapy Planning for Prostate Cancer Patients. Clin Nucl Med 2019; 44:e510-e516. [DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
55
|
A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial of 68Gallium PSMA HBED-CC PET-CT Restaging in Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Carcinoma: Oligometastatic Rate and Distribution Compared With Standard Imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:801-808. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
56
|
Petersen LJ, Nielsen JB, Langkilde NC, Petersen A, Afshar-Oromieh A, De Souza NM, De Paepe K, Fisker RV, Arp DT, Carl J, Haberkorn U, Zacho HD. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT compared with MRI/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for primary lymph node staging prior to definitive radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study. World J Urol 2019; 38:939-948. [PMID: 31190153 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02846-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT with conventional cross-sectional imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) for detecting lymph node metastasis (LNM) to stage prostate cancer patients. Twenty consecutive, newly- diagnosed prostate cancer patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, anatomical MRI or contrast-enhanced CT, and DW-MRI prior to laparoscopic, template-based, extended lymph node dissection. Histopathological findings served as the reference test. RESULTS Histopathology showed LNM in 13 of 20 patients (19 high-risk, 1 intermediate risk). Five patients had metastasis-suspected lymph nodes on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Patient-based analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity for detecting LNM were 39% and 100% with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 8% and 100% with MRI/CT, and 36% and 83% with DW-MRI, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 49% with 68Ga-PSMA PET/C, 100% and 37% with MRI/CT, and 80% and 42% with DW-MRI. Of 573 dissected lymph nodes, 33 were LNM from 26 regions. True-positive LNM on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was 9-11 mm in diameter, whereas false-negative LNM had a median diameter of 4 mm, with only 3 of 30 lymph nodes being larger than 10 mm. LNM were positive for PSMA by immunostaining. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was notably better than that of MRI/CT and comparable to that of DW-MRI. Some false positive findings with DW-MRI reduced its specificity and positive predictive value compared with those of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars J Petersen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Julie B Nielsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Niels C Langkilde
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Astrid Petersen
- Department of Pathology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nandita M De Souza
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Katja De Paepe
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rune V Fisker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Dennis T Arp
- Department of Medical Physics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jesper Carl
- Department of Medical Physics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Naestved Sygehus, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2019; 44:365-376. [PMID: 30888999 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE PET/CT using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and choline radiotracers is widely used for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, the roles of and differences in diagnostic performance between these 2 radiotracers for prostate cancer are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the staging and restaging performance of Ga-labeled PSMA and F-choline PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer. METHODS A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed for studies reporting the staging performance of Ga-PSMA and F-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer from the inception of the database to October 1, 2018, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Thirty-five studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of patient- and lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for Ga-PSMA and F-choline PET/CT were calculated alongside 95% confidence intervals. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was determined alongside the Q* index. RESULTS The patient-based overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC of Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging in prostate cancer (13 studies) were 0.92, 0.94, 7.91, 0.14, 79.04, and 0.96, respectively, whereas those of F-choline PET/CT (16 studies) were 0.93, 0.83, 4.98, 0.10, 68.27, and 0.95. The lesion-based overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC of Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging in prostate cancer (9 studies) were 0.83, 0.95, 23.30, 0.17, 153.58, and 0.94, respectively, and those of F-choline PET/CT (4 studies) were 0.81, 0.92, 8.59, 0.20, 44.82, and 0.98. In both patient- and lesion-based imaging, there was no statistically significant difference in the abilities of detecting or excluding prostate cancer between Ga-PSMA PET/CT and F-choline PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS For staging and restaging performance in patients with prostate cancer, there was no significant difference between Ga-PSMA PET/CT and F-choline PET/CT. Ga-PSMA PET/CT and F-choline PET/CT have demonstrated high diagnostic performance for accurate staging and restaging in patients with prostate cancer, and thus both should be considered for staging in this disease.
Collapse
|
58
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent years, a large number of reports have been published on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)/PET in prostate cancer (PCa). This review highlights advances in PSMA PET in PCa during the past year. RECENT FINDINGS PSMA PET/computed tomography (CT) is useful in detection of biochemical recurrence, especially at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. The detection rate of PSMA PET is influenced by PSA level. For primary PCa, PSMA PET/CT shows promise for tumour localization in the prostate, especially in combination with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). For primary staging, PSMA PET/CT can be used in intermediate and high-risk PCa. Intraoperative PSMA radioligand guidance seems promising for detection of malignant lymph nodes. While the use of PSMA PET/MRI in primary localized disease is limited to high and intermediate-risk patients and localized staging, in the recurrence setting, PET/MRI can be particularly helpful when the lesions are subtle. PSMA PET/CT is superior to choline PET/CT and other conventional imaging modalities. SUMMARY Molecular imaging with PSMA PET continues to pave the way for personalized medicine in PCa.However, large prospective clinical studies are still needed to fully evaluate the role of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in the clinical workflow of PCa.
Collapse
|
59
|
Wu H, Xu T, Wang X, Yu YB, Fan ZY, Li DX, Luo L, Yang XC, Jiao W, Niu HT. Diagnostic Performance of 68Gallium Labelled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging the Prostate Cancer with Intermediate or High Risk Prior to Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Mens Health 2019; 38:208-219. [PMID: 31081294 PMCID: PMC7076316 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.180124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 01/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the diagnostic efficiency of 68Gallium labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for staging the lymph node metastases (LNMs) in the prostate cancer. Materials and Methods A broad search of scientific databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database, and Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (updated prior to November 1st, 2018) was conducted systematically by two reviewers. In this paper, we evaluated the methodological quality of each included article independently and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to reveal the summary of the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET and MRI in properly identifying LNMs of intermediate- and/or high-risk prostate cancer. Results Thirteen eligible articles comprising 1,597 patients were included. For LNMs detection, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA PET were 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.79) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97), respectively, while the corresponding values of MRI were 0.41 (95% CI: 0.26–0.57) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95). The area under the symmetric receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curve for 68Ga-PSMA PET and MRI were 0.92 and 0.83, respectively. Conclusions In intermediate- or high-risk pre-treatment prostate cancer, 68Ga-PSMA PET had a higher sensitivity and a slightly different specificity in probing the LNMs when comparing with MRI. Moreover, the area under the SROC curve indicated that 68Ga-PSMA PET was a more effective weapon for predicting the LNMs prior to radical surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China
| | - Ting Xu
- Department of Geratology, The 971th Hospital of PLA, Qingdao, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China
| | - Yong Bo Yu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China
| | - Zhong Yuan Fan
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China
| | - Dan Xia Li
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China
| | - Lei Luo
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China
| | - Xue Cheng Yang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China
| | - Wei Jiao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China.
| | - Hai Tao Niu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. .,Key Laboratory of Urinary System Diseases, Qingdao, China.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, Williams M, Udovicich C, Vela I, Christidis D, Bolton D, Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DG. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2019; 77:403-417. [PMID: 30773328 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 586] [Impact Index Per Article: 117.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Accurate staging of high-risk localised, advanced, and metastatic prostate cancer is becoming increasingly more important in guiding local and systemic treatment. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) has increasingly been utilised globally to assess the local and metastatic burden of prostate cancer, typically in biochemically recurrent or advanced disease. Following our previous meta-analysis, a high-volume series has been reported highlighting the utility of 68Ga-PSMA PET in this setting. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to update reported predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET according to prior therapy and proportion of positivity in various anatomical locations with sensitivity and specificity profiles. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed critical reviews of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Libraries, and Web of Science databases in July 2018 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Quality assessment was performed using Quality Assessment if Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using a random-effect model. Summary sensitivity and specificity values were obtained by fitting bivariate hierarchical regression models. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 37 articles including 4790 patients were analysed. For patients with biochemical recurrence, positive 68Ga-PSMA PET scans increased with higher pre-PET prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. For PSA categories 0-0.19, 0.2-0.49, 0.5-0.99, 1-1.99, and ≥2ng/ml, the percentages of positive scans were 33%, 45%, 59%, 75%, and 95%, respectively. No significant differences in positivity were noted between Gleason sums ≤7 and ≥8. Significant differences in positivity after biochemical recurrence in the prostate bed were noted between radical prostatectomy (22%) and radiotherapy (52%) patients. On per-node analysis, high sensitivity (75%) and specificity (99%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS Ga-68-PSMA PET improves detection of metastases with biochemical recurrence, particularly at low pre-PET PSA levels of >0.2ng/ml (33%) and 0.2-0.5ng/ml (45%). Ga-68-PSMA-PET produces favourable sensitivity and specificity profiles on meta-analysis of pooled data. This analysis highlights different anatomic patterns of metastatic spread according to PSMA PET in the primary and biochemically recurrent settings. PATIENT SUMMARY Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography is now an established imaging technique that has been developed in response to inadequacies in standard of care imaging modalities to improve the detection of metastatic disease in prostate cancer, particularly in the setting of disease recurrence. To date, this imaging modality in the setting of primary staging is controversial, given the paucity of data. In light of the growing body of evidence, we summarised the data to date to provide clinicians with an overview of this imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Nathan Papa
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Roberts
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Williams
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Cristian Udovicich
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian Vela
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Australian Prostate Cancer Research Center QLD, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Daniel Christidis
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Centre for Molecular Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
|
62
|
Demirci E, Kabasakal L, Şahin OE, Akgün E, Gültekin MH, Doğanca T, Tuna MB, Öbek C, Kiliç M, Esen T, Kural AR. Can SUVmax values of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT scan predict the clinically significant prostate cancer? Nucl Med Commun 2019; 40:86-91. [PMID: 30395048 PMCID: PMC6282663 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The intensity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression increases as the tumor grade increases and the uptake of Ga-68-PSMA is higher in high-grade tumors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation of preoperative tracer uptake of primary tumor to Gleason Score in patients who underwent prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 141 patients who had Ga-68-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging and who underwent prostatectomy. All patients had a diagnosis of prostate cancer on the basis of 10-24 cores transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx). Histological assessment was performed according to the New Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System. All patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measurement within maximum of 28 days before Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT. Region of interests were drawn manually around the prostate gland, avoiding the bladder activity, to calculate the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) values. RESULTS The median PSA values for all patients were 10.0 ng/ml. PSA values for low-risk patients were significantly lower than those of high-risk patients (P<0.001). There were 41.1% upgrades and 7.8% downgrades following prostatectomy in terms of Grade Groups. According to the final pathology reports, 21% (n=16) of patients moved from a low-risk level (grade groups 1+2) to a high-risk level (grade groups 3+4+5). The median SUVmax value was 8.8, ranging from 2.1 to 62.4. There was a strong correlation between SUVmax values and grade groups (Pearson ρ=0.66) (P<0.001). The mean SUVmax values of high-risk patients were significantly higher than those of low-risk patients (18.9±12.1 vs. 7.16±6.2, respectively) (P<0.001). Receiver operation characteristic curve analysis of SUVmax at the cut-off value of 9.1 showed a high sensitivity (78%) and specificity (81%) for detection of high risk disease. CONCLUSION SUVmax values correlate significantly with the grade groups of the primary tumor. The intraprostatic accumulation sites may predict clinically significant cancer and potentially serve as a target for biopsy sampling in conjunction with mpMRI in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Demirci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yeditepe University Medical Faculty
| | - Levent Kabasakal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University
| | - Onur E. Şahin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University
| | - Elife Akgün
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University
| | | | - Tünkut Doğanca
- Department of Urology/Uro-Onkology, Acıbadem Health Group, Taksim Hospital
| | - Mustafa B. Tuna
- Department of Urology, Acıbadem Health Group, Maslak Hospital
| | - Can Öbek
- Department of Urology/Uro-Onkology, Acıbadem Health Group, Taksim Hospital
| | - Mert Kiliç
- Department of Urology, V.K.V. American Hospital
| | - Tarik Esen
- Department of Urology, Koç University Medical Faculty
| | - Ali R. Kural
- Department of Urology, Acıbadem University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Gandaglia G, Soligo M, Battaglia A, Muilwijk T, Robesti D, Mazzone E, Barletta F, Fossati N, Moschini M, Bandini M, Joniau S, Karnes RJ, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Which Patients with Clinically Node-positive Prostate Cancer Should Be Considered for Radical Prostatectomy as Part of Multimodal Treatment? The Impact of Nodal Burden on Long-term Outcomes. Eur Urol 2018; 75:817-825. [PMID: 30409676 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A role for local therapies including radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with clinical lymphadenopathies has been proposed. However, no data are available to identify men who would benefit from RP in this setting. OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of clinical recurrence (CR) in surgically managed PCa patients with clinical lymphadenopathies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We identified 162 patients with lymphadenopathies treated with RP and lymph node dissection at three referral centers. OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES CR was defined as the onset of metastases detected by conventional imaging. Kaplan-Maier analyses assessed time to CR after stratifying patients according to the site of lymphadenopathies and nodal burden. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups on the basis of their preoperative characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 80% of patients had lymphadenopathies in the pelvis alone and 20% in the retroperitoneum±pelvis. The median size of positive nodes was 13mm. A total of 84 patients (52%) received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and 127 (78%) had pathological lymph node invasion. The median follow-up for survivors was 64 mo. The 8-yr CR-free and CSM-free survival rates were 59% and 80%, respectively. Biopsy grade group and preoperative nodal burden should identify patients more likely to experience CR. While <10% of men with biopsy grade group 1-3 and two or fewer clinical lymphadenopathies developed CR, up to 60% of patients with biopsy grade group 4-5 and retroperitoneal node involvement ultimately experienced CR at 8 yr after RP. The discrimination of the regression tree was 76% according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Our study is limited by potential unmeasured confounders and the relatively small sample size. CONCLUSIONS Surgery in a multimodal setting might play a role in PCa patients with biopsy grade group 1-3 and/or enlarged nodes in the pelvis. Conversely, grade group 4-5 PCa and lymphadenopathies in the retroperitoneum are associated with worse oncologic outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY Approximately half of prostate cancer patients with clinical lymphadenopathies treated with radical prostatectomy are free from metastases at 8-yr follow-up. Radical prostatectomy with or without systemic therapies might play a role in selected patients with biopsy grade group 1-3 disease and/or enlarged nodes in the pelvis. Conversely, a higher grade group and the presence of lymphadenopathies in the retroperitoneum should identify candidates for systemic therapies upfront.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Matteo Soligo
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Bandini
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Keidar Z, Gill R, Goshen E, Israel O, Davidson T, Morgulis M, Pirmisashvili N, Ben-Haim S. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients - patterns of disease, benign findings and pitfalls. Cancer Imaging 2018; 18:39. [PMID: 30382889 PMCID: PMC6211573 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-018-0175-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has an important role in assessment of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence and is evolving in staging high- and intermediate risk disease. The aim of present study was to describe the metastatic patterns and frequency of involved sites of prostate cancer and to assess the incidence of benign Ga68-PSMA avid PET/CT findings in a large patient population. Methods 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT studies performed in two tertiary medical centers over a period of 24 months were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence and location of pathological 68Ga-PSMA avid foci, suspicious to represent malignancy, as well as those of unexpected benign foci of increased 68Ga-PSMA activity were documented and analyzed. Results There were 445 68Ga-PSMA studies in 438 men (mean age 72.4, range 51–92 years) with prostate cancer referred for biochemical failure (n = 270, 61%), staging high-risk disease (n = 112, 25%), response assessment (n = 30, 7%), follow-up (n = 22, 5%) and suspected bone metastases (n = 11, 2%). 68Ga-PSMA avid disease sites were observed in 319 studies (72%), in 181 studies (67%) for biochemical recurrence, 94 studies for staging (84%) (p < 0.05), in 22 studies for response assessment (73%), 10 follow up studies (45%) and in five patients with suspected bone metastases (45%). 68Ga-PSMA avid lesions were most commonly detected in the prostate (n = 193, 43%), loco-regional spread (n = 51, 11%), abdomino-pelvic nodes (n = 129, 29%) and distant metastases (n = 158, 36%), including bone metastases (n = 11, 25%), distant lymphadenopathy (n = 29, 7%) and other organs (n = 18, 4%). Distant 68Ga-PSMA-avid metastases were commonly seen in patients with biochemical recurrence (14/21 lesions), but were not seen in patient referred for staging (p < 0.013). There were 96 non-malignant 68Ga-PSMA avid foci in 81 studies, most common in reactive lymph nodes (n = 36, 38%), nonmalignant bone lesions (n = 21, 22%), thyroid nodules (n = 9, 9%), ganglions (n = 9, 9%) and lung findings (n = 8, 8%). Conclusion The distribution of 68Ga-PSMA avid metastatic lesions is similar to data previously reported mainly from autopsy with comparable detection rates, indicating 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is an accurate detection tool in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. If confirmed by further prospective studies 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT should be included in the guidelines to evaluate disease extent in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zohar Keidar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. .,The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Ronit Gill
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Elinor Goshen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ora Israel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.,The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Tima Davidson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Maryna Morgulis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | - Simona Ben-Haim
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.,University College London and UCL Hospitals, NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
deSouza NM, Tempany CM. A risk-based approach to identifying oligometastatic disease on imaging. Int J Cancer 2018; 144:422-430. [PMID: 30098215 PMCID: PMC6492106 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recognition of <3 metastases in <2 organs, particularly in cancers with a known predisposition to oligometastatic disease (OMD) (colorectal, prostate, renal, sarcoma and lung), offers the opportunity to focally treat the lesions identified and confers a survival advantage. The reliability with which OMD is identified depends on the sensitivity of the imaging technique used for detection and may be predicted from phenotypic and genetic factors of the primary tumour, which determine metastatic risk. Whole‐body or organ‐specific imaging to identify oligometastases requires optimization to achieve maximal sensitivity. Metastatic lesions at multiple locations may require a variety of imaging modalities for best visualisation because the optimal image contrast is determined by tumour biology. Newer imaging techniques used for this purpose require validation. Additionally, rationalisation of imaging strategies is needed, particularly with regard to timing of imaging and follow‐up studies. This article reviews the current evidence for the use of imaging for recognising OMD and proposes a risk‐based roadmap for identifying patients with true OMD, or at risk of metastatic disease likely to be OM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandita M deSouza
- Cancer Research UK Imaging Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Clare M Tempany
- Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Zamboglou C, Eiber M, Fassbender TR, Eder M, Kirste S, Bock M, Schilling O, Reichel K, van der Heide UA, Grosu AL. Multimodal imaging for radiation therapy planning in patients with primary prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:8-16. [PMID: 33458410 PMCID: PMC7807571 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) planning of patients with primary prostate cancer demands several preconditions: accurate staging of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor mass, robust delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) and a reproducible characterization of the prostate cancer's biological properties. In the current review we searched for the currently available imaging techniques and we discussed their ability to fulfill these preconditions. We found that current pretreatment imaging was mainly performed with mpMRI and/or Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging. Both techniques offered an accurate detection of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor burden and had a major impact on RT concepts. However, some studies postulated that mpMRI and PSMA PET had complementary information for intraprostatic GTV detection. Moreover, interobserver differences for intraprostatic tumor delineation based on mpMRI were observed. It is currently unclear whether PET based GTV delineation underlies also interobserver heterogeneity. Further research is warranted to answer whether multimodal imaging is able to visualize biological processes related to prostate cancer pathophysiology and radiation resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas R. Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eder
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Schilling
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Reichel
- Department of Urology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Uulke A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Importance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in hospital practice. View of the radiation oncologist. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2018.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
68
|
Couñago F, Artigas C, Sancho G, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Gómez-Caamaño A, Maldonado A, Caballero B, López-Campos F, Recio M, Del Cerro E, Henríquez I. Importance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in hospital practice. View of the radiation oncologist. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2018; 37:302-314. [PMID: 30139594 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a treatment with curative intent, both in patients with primary diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and in patients presenting with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Moreover, the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy as a metastasis directed therapy in patients with oligometastatic PCa has significantly increased in the recent years. Conventional imaging techniques, including transrectal ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), morphologic magnetic resonance and bone scintigraphy have traditionally played a minor role in all those clinical scenarios due to its low diagnostic accuracy. The recent development of the positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer 68Ga-PSMA binding to the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in PCa cells, has shown promising results. Detection rates for PCa lesions are higher than CT and higher than the best technique available, the PET/CT with choline. Its superiority has been demonstrated even at very low PSA levels (<1 ng/ml). This increase in diagnostic accuracy represents a potential impact on patient management, especially in radiotherapy. Even if this imaging technique is already available for routine clinical practice in some European countries, in Spain, unfortunately, there is very limited access. In this review, we analyze the main studies that investigate the usefulness of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with PCa and its potential impact on radiotherapy treatments. In addition, we compared the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, with the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and the PET/CT with choline, in the different clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Couñago
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España.
| | - C Artigas
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear y Terapias Metabólicas, Jules Bordet Institute, Bruselas, Bélgica
| | - G Sancho
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - A Gómez-Iturriaga
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, España
| | - A Gómez-Caamaño
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, España
| | - A Maldonado
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, España
| | - B Caballero
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, España
| | - F López-Campos
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España
| | - M Recio
- Departamento de Radiología, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, España
| | - E Del Cerro
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - I Henríquez
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de Sant Joan, Institute d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), Reus, España
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Abstract
Treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) is challenging. Local staging and metastatic evaluation are important for the patient management. Recently, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging modalities such as PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI have received significant attention for detection of recurrent prostate cancer sites with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, after therapy. Current evidence suggests that these imaging modalities may also have a role for the management of patients with HRPCa. In this review, we discuss PSMA-based imaging modalities in the management of patients with HRPCa.
Collapse
|
70
|
Rogasch JM, Cash H, Zschaeck S, Elezkurtaj S, Brenner W, Hamm B, Makowski M, Amthauer H, Furth C, Baur ADJ. Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT in treatment-naïve patients with prostate cancer: Which clinical parameters and risk stratification systems best predict PSMA-positive metastases? Prostate 2018; 78:1103-1110. [PMID: 29978529 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of clinical parameters and established pre-treatment risk stratification systems for prostate cancer (PCa) in predicting PSMA-positive metastases in men undergoing Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT as initial staging examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis in 108 consecutive treatment-naïve patients with biopsy-proven PCa undergoing Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT (median age, 72 years [range, 49-82 years]) was performed. Prediction of PSMA-positive metastases by serum PSA, clinical T stage (cT), ISUP group, percentage of positive biopsy cores, and derived risk scores (D'Amico risk classification system, Roach [RF], Yale formula [YF], and Briganti nomogram [BN]) was examined with ROC analysis. RESULTS Any PSMA-positive metastases were found in 36 of 108 patients, including LN metastases in 28 patients, extrapelvic LN metastases in 15 patients, and organ metastases in 19 patients (bone, 19; lung, 1). AUCs for PSA, cT, ISUP, and percentage of positive biopsy cores regarding PSMA-positive metastases did not differ significantly (range, 0.6-0.8; each P > 0.05). D'Amico (AUC, 0.61-0.64) was inferior to RF (0.76-0.83), YF (0.81-0.86), and BN (0.73 to 0.88; each P < 0.05). Among the 89 high-risk patients (D'Amico), decision for or against PET imaging based on RF (cut-off, >18.0), YF (>10.8), or BN (>8.0) would have prevented PSMA PET/CT in 4 (5%), 15 (17%), or 18 patients (20%), respectively, while preserving a sensitivity ≥95% for PSMA-positive metastases. CONCLUSIONS Clinical parameters and established risk stratification systems for PCa can predict Ga-68-PSMA PET-positive metastases in treatment-naïve patients. Especially YF and BN may improve identification of patients with the highest probability of metastatic disease detected by Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian M Rogasch
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hannes Cash
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Urologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sefer Elezkurtaj
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institut für Pathologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Deutsches Krebsforschungzentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Radiologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Makowski
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Radiologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander D J Baur
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Klinik für Radiologie, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Park SY, Zacharias C, Harrison C, Fan RE, Kunder C, Hatami N, Giesel F, Ghanouni P, Daniel B, Loening AM, Sonn GA, Iagaru A. Gallium 68 PSMA-11 PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2018; 288:495-505. [PMID: 29786490 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To report the results of dual-time-point gallium 68 (68Ga) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging prior to prostatectomy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk cancer. Materials and Methods Thirty-three men who underwent conventional imaging as clinically indicated and who were scheduled for radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection were recruited for this study. A mean dose of 4.1 mCi ± 0.7 (151.7 MBq ± 25.9) of 68Ga-PSMA-11 was administered. Whole-body images were acquired starting 41-61 minutes after injection by using a GE SIGNA PET/MR imaging unit, followed by an additional pelvic PET/MR imaging acquisition at 87-125 minutes after injection. PET/MR imaging findings were compared with findings at multiparametric MR imaging (including diffusion-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast material-enhanced imaging) and were correlated with results of final whole-mount pathologic examination and pelvic nodal dissection to yield sensitivity and specificity. Dual-time-point metabolic parameters (eg, maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]) were compared by using a paired t test and were correlated with clinical and histopathologic variables including prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, and tumor volume. Results Prostate cancer was seen at 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in all 33 patients, whereas multiparametric MR imaging depicted Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions in 26 patients and PI-RADS 3 lesions in four patients. Focal uptake was seen in the pelvic lymph nodes in five patients. Pathologic examination confirmed prostate cancer in all patients, as well as nodal metastasis in three. All patients with normal pelvic nodes in PET/MR imaging had no metastases at pathologic examination. The accumulation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 increased at later acquisition times, with higher mean SUVmax (15.3 vs 12.3, P < .001). One additional prostate cancer was identified only at delayed imaging. Conclusion This study found that 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET can be used to identify prostate cancer, while MR imaging provides detailed anatomic guidance. Hence, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR imaging provides valuable diagnostic information and may inform the need for and extent of pelvic node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonya Youngju Park
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Claudia Zacharias
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Caitlyn Harrison
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Richard E Fan
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Christian Kunder
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Negin Hatami
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Frederik Giesel
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Pejman Ghanouni
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Bruce Daniel
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Andreas M Loening
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Geoffrey A Sonn
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (S.Y.P., C.Z., C.H., N.H., A.I.) and Departments of Urology (R.E.F., G.A.S.), Pathology (C.K.), and Radiology (P.G., B.D., A.M.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2200, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (F.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Zschaeck S, Lohaus F, Beck M, Habl G, Kroeze S, Zamboglou C, Koerber SA, Debus J, Hölscher T, Wust P, Ganswindt U, Baur ADJ, Zöphel K, Cihoric N, Guckenberger M, Combs SE, Grosu AL, Ghadjar P, Belka C. PSMA-PET based radiotherapy: a review of initial experiences, survey on current practice and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:90. [PMID: 29751842 PMCID: PMC5948793 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1047-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
68Gallium prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography (PET) is an increasingly used imaging modality in prostate cancer, especially in cases of tumor recurrence after curative intended therapy. Owed to the novelty of the PSMA-targeting tracers, clinical evidence on the value of PSMA-PET is moderate but rapidly increasing. State of the art imaging is pivotal for radiotherapy treatment planning as it may affect dose prescription, target delineation and use of concomitant therapy. This review summarizes the evidence on PSMA-PET imaging from a radiation oncologist’s point of view. Additionally a short survey containing twelve examples of patients and 6 additional questions was performed in seven mayor academic centers with experience in PSMA ligand imaging and the findings are reported here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. .,Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gregor Habl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), München, Germany
| | - Stephanie Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Alexander Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German cancer research center (DKFZ) and german consortium for translational cancer research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German cancer research center (DKFZ) and german consortium for translational cancer research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Klaus Zöphel
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nikola Cihoric
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, München, Switzerland
| | | | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), München, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Dresden, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Calais J, Kishan AU, Cao M, Fendler WP, Eiber M, Herrmann K, Ceci F, Reiter RE, Rettig MB, Hegde JV, Shaverdian N, King CR, Steinberg ML, Czernin J, Nickols NG. Potential Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on the Planning of Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2018; 59:1714-1721. [PMID: 29653978 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.209387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Standard-of-care imaging for initial staging of prostate cancer (PCa) underestimates disease burden. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT detects PCa metastasis with superior accuracy, having a potential impact on the planning of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for nonmetastatic PCa. Our objectives were to determine how often definitive RT planning based on standard target volumes covers 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-defined disease and to assess the potential impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on definitive RT planning. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of an intention-to-treat population of 73 patients with localized PCa without prior local therapy who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for initial staging as part of an investigational new drug trial. Eleven of the 73 were intermediate-risk (15%), 33 were high-risk (45%), 22 were very-high-risk (30%), and 7 were N1 (9.5%). Clinical target volumes (CTVs), which included the prostate, seminal vesicles, and (in accord with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus guidelines) pelvic lymph nodes (LNs), were contoured on the CT portion of the PET/CT images by a radiation oncologist masked to the PET findings. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT images were analyzed by a nuclear medicine physician. 68Ga-PSMA-11-positive lesions not covered by planning volumes based on the CTVs were considered to have a major potential impact on treatment planning. Results: All patients had one or more 68Ga-PSMA-11-positive primary prostate lesions. Twenty-five (34%) and 7 (9.5%) of the 73 patients had 68Ga-PSMA-11-positive pelvic LN and distant metastases, respectively. The sites of LN metastases in decreasing order of frequency were external iliac (20.5%), common iliac (13.5%), internal iliac (12.5%) obturator (12.5%), perirectal (4%), abdominal (4%), upper diaphragm (4%), and presacral (1.5%). The median size of the LN lesions was 6 mm (range, 4-24 mm). RT planning based on the CTVs covered 69 (94.5%) of the 73 primary lesions and 20 (80%) of the 25 pelvic LN lesions, on a per-patient analysis. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had a major impact on intended definitive RT planning for PCa in 12 (16.5%) of the 73 patients whose RT fields covered the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvic LNs and in 25 (37%) of the 66 patients whose RT fields covered the prostate and seminal vesicles but not the pelvic LNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - John V Hegde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Chris R King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicholas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California .,Department of Urology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California; and.,Department of Radiation Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Pasoglou V, Michoux N, Larbi A, Van Nieuwenhove S, Lecouvet F. Whole Body MRI and oncology: recent major advances. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170664. [PMID: 29334236 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI is a very attractive approach for tumour detection and oncological staging with its absence of ionizing radiation, high soft tissue contrast and spatial resolution. Less than 10 years ago the use of Whole Body MRI (WB-MRI) protocols was uncommon due to many limitations, such as the forbidding acquisition times and limited availability. This decade has marked substantial progress in WB-MRI protocols. This very promising technique is rapidly arising from the research world and is becoming a commonly used examination for tumour detection due to recent technological developments and validation of WB-MRI by multiple studies and consensus papers. As a result, WB-MRI is progressively proposed by radiologists as an efficient examination for an expanding range of indications. As the spectrum of its uses becomes wider, radiologists will soon be confronted with the challenges of this technique and be urged to be trained in order to accurately read and report these examinations. The aim of this review is to summarize the validated indications of WB-MRI and present an overview of its most recent advances. This paper will briefly discuss how this examination is performed and which are the recommended sequences along with the future perspectives in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vassiliki Pasoglou
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| | - Nicolas Michoux
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| | - Ahmed Larbi
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium.,2 Department of Radiology, Nimes University Hospital , Nimes , France
| | - Sandy Van Nieuwenhove
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| | - Frédéric Lecouvet
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
deSouza NM, Liu Y, Chiti A, Oprea-Lager D, Gebhart G, Van Beers BE, Herrmann K, Lecouvet FE. Strategies and technical challenges for imaging oligometastatic disease: Recommendations from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer imaging group. Eur J Cancer 2018; 91:153-163. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
76
|
Pasoglou V, Michoux N, Larbi A, Van Nieuwenhove S, Lecouvet F. Whole Body MRI and oncology: recent major advances. Br J Radiol 2018. [PMID: 29334236 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170664%0a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI is a very attractive approach for tumour detection and oncological staging with its absence of ionizing radiation, high soft tissue contrast and spatial resolution. Less than 10 years ago the use of Whole Body MRI (WB-MRI) protocols was uncommon due to many limitations, such as the forbidding acquisition times and limited availability. This decade has marked substantial progress in WB-MRI protocols. This very promising technique is rapidly arising from the research world and is becoming a commonly used examination for tumour detection due to recent technological developments and validation of WB-MRI by multiple studies and consensus papers. As a result, WB-MRI is progressively proposed by radiologists as an efficient examination for an expanding range of indications. As the spectrum of its uses becomes wider, radiologists will soon be confronted with the challenges of this technique and be urged to be trained in order to accurately read and report these examinations. The aim of this review is to summarize the validated indications of WB-MRI and present an overview of its most recent advances. This paper will briefly discuss how this examination is performed and which are the recommended sequences along with the future perspectives in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vassiliki Pasoglou
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| | - Nicolas Michoux
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| | - Ahmed Larbi
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium.,2 Department of Radiology, Nimes University Hospital , Nimes , France
| | - Sandy Van Nieuwenhove
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| | - Frédéric Lecouvet
- 1 Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer et Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common male malignant tumor in Germany, which thus places growing demands on differentiated imaging and risk-adapted therapeutic approaches. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate enables reliable detection of clinically significant cancers and is currently the leading imaging modality for the detection, characterization, and local staging of prostate cancer. According to the German S3 guideline, mpMRI of the prostate is currently primarily recommended in patients with previous negative TRUS biopsies and persisting tumor suspicion. The serial use of mpMRI in the pretherapeutic setting can support individual therapy planning of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer in the near future.
Collapse
|
78
|
Hicks RJ, Murphy DG, Williams SG. Seduction by Sensitivity: Reality, Illusion, or Delusion? The Challenge of Assessing Outcomes after PSMA Imaging Selection of Patients for Treatment. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:1969-1971. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.198812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
|