Lack of association between lipoprotein (a) concentrations and coronary heart disease mortality in diabetes: the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy

The role of lipoprotein(a) in the vascular complications of diabetes mellitus

Lipoprotein(a) has been identified as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease in non-diabetic populations. Because of its potential role in the pathogenesis of both microvascular and macrovascular complications in diabetes, there have recently been many reports on lipoprotein(a) in diabetic populations. Some studies indicate an association between elevated lipoprotein(a) and macrovascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), but this link has not been found with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). In IDDM, elevated lipoprotein(a) has been found in groups with diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy, raising the possibility that it plays a causative role. The relationship between glycaemic control and the lipoprotein(a) level has not been fully resolved. Most studies have not found any connection in NIDDM, but some found higher lipoprotein(a) levels in hyperglycaemic IDDM patients. Potentially, lipoprotein(a) is an important factor linking the microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes.

Effect of insulin treatment on serum lipoprotein(a) in non-insulin-dependent diabetes

In order to evaluate whether Lp(a), a lipoprotein that is potentially thrombogenic and atherogenic, is a potential risk factor for CAD in non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM), we compared the Lp(a) and its distribution in 145 NIDDM patients with that in 94 healthy control subjects. Furthermore, we studied the effect of insulin treatment on serum Lp(a) in 108 patients with NIDDM. Male and female NIDDM patients had similar Lp(a) concentrations to healthy controls (median value 167 mg L-1, range 15-1550 mg L-1 vs. 157 mg L-1, range 15-919 mg L-1, NS and 92, range 15-1190 mg L-1 vs. 103 mg L-1, range 15-842 mg L-1, NS). Also, the cumulative distribution of Lp(a) did not differ between the NIDDM patients and healthy subjects. Insulin treatment increased Lp(a) in diabetics with a Lp(a) concentration of less than 300 mg L-1, but this effect was not related to the concomitant improvement in metabolic control (mean change (+/- SEM) of HbA1c from 9.80 +/- 0.15 to 8.00 +/- 0.12; P < 0.001). In subjects with elevated Lp(a) concentrations (> 300 mg L-1) the Lp(a) concentration was unaffected by insulin, despite a similar improvement in glycaemic control. These results suggest that insulin may modulate the concentration of Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a) in type 1 diabetic patients with renal disease

Lp(a) was measured in 64 normoalbuminuric, 52 microalbuminuric, and 37 proteinuric Type 1 diabetic patients and 54 healthy subjects. Microalbuminuric and proteinuric Type 1 diabetic patients had higher median Lp(a) values (133 (16-1932) and 169 (17-1149) mg l-1) than patients with normal AER (73 (15-1078) mg l-1; p = 0.048 and p = 0.027). Lp(a) in healthy subjects (110 (15-1630)mg l-1) did not differ from the diabetic subgroups. The frequency of Lp(a) values in the upper quarter of the normal distribution was similar in the diabetic groups and did not differ between diabetic and control subjects. The cumulative distribution of Lp(a) was similar in all groups. Lp(a) concentrations were not related to AER, age, gender, duration of diabetes, body mass index, glycaemic control, serum creatinine, free insulin or systolic blood pressure. Cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and apo B were higher in microalbuminuric and proteinuric than in normoalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients. Lp(a) was independently related to diastolic blood pressure, fibrinogen, and macroangiopathy. In conclusion, median Lp(a) concentrations tend to be higher in Type 1 diabetic patients with early and established renal disease, although the differences are small and the overlap between groups large. Lp(a) is related to diastolic blood pressure and fibrinogen, and this association of powerful risk factors suggests that Lp(a) may play a role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in Type 1 diabetic patients with proteinuria. Whether Lp(a) is an independent determinant of increased cardiovascular risk in these patients needs to be elucidated by prospective studies.

Lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for diabetic retinopathy in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether serum lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for diabetic retinopathy in the elderly.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Outpatient diabetic clinic.

PATIENTS

One hundred four noninsulin-dependent diabetic patients (35 males, 69 females). Twenty-three were less than 60 years of age (middle-aged), and 81 were 60 years or older (elderly).

MEASUREMENT

Levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and lipids were measured in fasting serum. HbA1c was also measured as an indicator of diabetic control. Other indicators possibly related to retinopathy were also checked. Retinopathy was estimated by photographs of fundi.

RESULTS

Significantly higher indicators in the group with retinopathy than in the group without were: HbA1c, Lp(a), duration of diabetes, and systolic blood pressure (BP) in the total cases; HbA1c, duration of diabetes, and Lp(a) in the middle-aged; HbA1c, systolic BP, and Lp(a) in the elderly. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only HbA1c and Lp(a) were independent risk factors for retinopathy in all cases and in the elderly. The incidence of retinopathy was positively correlated to serum Lp(a) levels.

CONCLUSION

Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for diabetic retinopathy.

Lipids and Lp(a) lipoprotein levels and coronary artery disease in subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether increased Lp(a) lipoprotein levels are associated with either non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) or coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with NIDDM and to examine the relationship between Lp(a) levels and glycemic control.

DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional study of subjects with NIDDM who were participants in the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study and healthy control subjects from the population of Rochester, Minnesota.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Lipids and Lp(a) lipoprotein levels were compared in 227 subjects with NIDDM and 163 control subjects and, among the subjects with NIDDM, in those with (N = 96) and without (N = 131) CAD. The correlation between Lp(a) levels and glycosylated hemoglobin was investigated.

RESULTS

Subjects with NIDDM had higher triglyceride and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than did control subjects. Subjects with NIDDM and CAD had higher total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than did subjects with NIDDM without CAD. Subjects with NIDDM had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than did control subjects, but subjects with NIDDM and CAD did not have significantly higher Lp(a) levels than did those without CAD. Among subjects with NIDDM, the level of Lp(a) was not significantly correlated with glycosylated hemoglobin.

CONCLUSION

Although subjects with NIDDM have higher Lp(a) levels than do control subjects, Lp(a) does not seem to be associated with CAD in subjects with NIDDM. In this study, no association was found between Lp(a) level and glycemic control.

Serum lipids and apolipoproteins and their relationship with macrovascular disease in type 1 diabetes

In order to examine the relationship between serum lipids and apolipoproteins and macrovascular disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, 50 patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus attending the diabetic clinics at St Mary's and St Charles' Hospitals, London were recruited into a cross-sectional study. B-mode ultrasound was used to measure intima-media thickness and define an arterial ultrasound score for each patient as a non-invasive indicator of atherosclerotic change. Intima-medial (i-m) thickness was significantly higher in those subjects with clinical evidence of macrovascular disease compared to those without macrovascular disease (0.865 +/- 0.191 vs 0.695 +/- 0.162 mm, p = 0.0038). In the study group there were significant correlations between i-m thickness and age (r = 0.65, p < 0.01), total serum cholesterol (r = 0.32, p < 0.01), and serum fibrinogen (r = 0.43, p < 0.01) but no other lipid or apolipoprotein variable. When i-m thickness was corrected for age there were significant correlations with total cholesterol (r = 0.43, p < 0.01) and LDL-cholesterol (r = 0.42, p < 0.01). Whereas total and LDL-cholesterol and serum fibrinogen concentrations were related to the extent of atherosclerotic disease by ultrasound techniques, there was no relationship with high density lipoprotein (HDL) or subfraction cholesterol concentrations. HDL-cholesterol may not be a useful marker for cardiovascular disease in Type 1 diabetes.

Serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration and outcome of thrombolytic treatment for myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Lp(a) lipoprotein has structural homology with plasminogen and has been shown to inhibit plasminogen activation in vitro.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the serum concentration of Lp(a) lipoprotein present when streptokinase was given in acute myocardial infarction influenced the outcome as judged by electrocardiographic methods.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

Serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration was measured in 135 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction who received streptokinase treatment. Recovery from myocardial injury was assessed by the reduction in the sum of ST segment elevation measured from the J point (STJ) in the electrocardiogram immediately before streptokinase was given compared with that three hours later.

RESULTS

The serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentrations were measured within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction and were higher than in healthy reference populations. Recovery from myocardial infarction could be assessed from the STJ in 116 patients (86% of the series). Those in whom it could not had bundle branch block, left ventricular hypertrophy, did not survive three hours, or had started intravenous nitrate treatment or some other clinical procedure before or at the time the second electrocardiogram was to be recorded. Patients with reductions in STJ after streptokinase that were > 4 mm (the median decrease) had mean (range) serum Lp(a) lipoprotein concentrations of 41.0 (0.8-220) mg/dl and those with a smaller reduction in STJ had concentrations of 29.1 (1.7-151) mg/dl. The difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In this study Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration did not significantly influence the outcome of thrombolytic treatment with streptokinase.

Lipoprotein disorders in diabetes mellitus

In IDDM or NIDDM, the total plasma cholesterol and triglycerides are usually within normal limits when the blood glucose is controlled. Marked hypertriglyceridemia can develop with loss of glycemic control and is often due to superimposed genetic abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism. Tight control in IDDM usually reduces LDL and VLDL to normal levels and may raise HDL above the normal range. Low HDL cholesterol and mild to moderate elevations of VLDL triglyceride are common in NIDDM if obesity or proteinuria is also present. Both HDL and LDL may be smaller and more dense and may be enriched with triglyceride as compared with cholesterol. These abnormalities may require weight loss for control. The increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in diabetes is unexplained but is amplified by the well-defined cardiovascular risk factors. The new American Diabetes Association guidelines call for treatment of high triglycerides and LDL cholesterol to be aggressively reduced. Triglycerides should be under 200 mg/dL, are considered borderline high between 200 and 400 mg/dL, and high when above 400 mg/dL. Low HDL is defined as less than 35 mg/dL. Control of obesity with diet and exercise and reduced intake of saturated fat and cholesterol are important first steps. If needed, drug therapy is appropriate to reduce LDL to levels below 130 mg/dL in all adult diabetics and below 100 mg/dL in those with cardiovascular disease.

Lp(a) concentrations and phenotypes in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) have an increased incidence of coronary heart disease. Several studies have suggested that Lp(a) levels may be increased in IDDM subjects, although these studies have been limited by the lack of information on apo(a) phenotype and urinary albumin excretion. We compared Lp(a) concentrations in 66 children with IDDM and 18 non-diabetic children; all were non-Hispanic whites and none had detectable albuminuria. Lp(a) concentrations (mg/dl) were lower in subjects with IDDM than in non-diabetic subjects (12.0 +/- 2.2 vs. 20.0 +/- 6.1, respectively), although these means were not significantly different (P = 0.276). Postpubertal subjects, particularly males, had increased Lp(a) concentrations relative to prepubertal subjects (P = 0.041). Higher apo(a) molecular weight was associated with decreased Lp(a) concentrations in both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. However, apo(a) size was not different in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Lp(a) concentrations were not significantly correlated with glycosylated hemoglobin levels in diabetic subjects (r = 0.11, P = NS). We also found similar Lp(a) concentrations in postpubertal IDDM subjects compared with adult non-Hispanic white non-diabetic subjects (n = 208) from the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based study. These observations do not support increased Lp(a) concentrations in young normoalbuminuric IDDM subjects.

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes and serum lipoprotein(a) levels in maintenance hemodialysis patients with/without diabetes mellitus

We studied the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a function of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes in 152 patients (123 males, 29 females) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) with or without diabetes mellitus (DM), in 101 patients with diabetes mellitus without hemodialysis (58 males, 43 females), and in 421 normal controls (333 males, 88 females). Serum Lp(a) levels were significantly (P < 0.01) higher in patients than in controls (26.2 +/- 18.3 mg/dl in HD with DM, 26.4 +/- 22.0 mg/dl in HD without DM, 27.1 +/- 27.3 mg/dl in DM without HD, and 14.9 +/- 13.7 mg/dl in controls, respectively). Apo(a) phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high resolution technique using SDS-agarose/gradient (3 to 6%) PAGE. In normal controls, the molecular weights of apo(a) isoforms were inversely correlated with plasma Lp(a) levels, and the same tendency was found in patients who were undergoing hemodialysis and/or who had diabetes mellitus. We assumed the differences in apo(a) phenotypes detectable with our method reflected consecutive differences in molecular weights of apo(a). The results of an analysis of covariance and a least square means comparison indicated that the regression lines between serum Lp(a) levels [log Lp(a)] and apo(a) phenotypes in patient groups were significantly (P < 0.01) elevated for every apo(a) phenotype, as compared to the regression line of the control group. Even after the low molecular weight apo(a) phenotypes (A1-A8) were omitted, the same tendency was observed. However, no differences were observed between the patient groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Improved blood glucose control by insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients has no effect on lipoprotein(a) levels

The effects of improved blood glucose control by insulin therapy on lipoprotein(a) and other lipoproteins were studied in 54 patients with Type 2 diabetes (mean +/- SD: age 67 +/- 9 years, body mass index 26.1 +/- 4.4 kg m-2, median duration of diabetes 10 (range 1-37) years, 23 males, 31 females), who were poorly controlled despite diet and maximal doses of oral hypoglycaemic agents. After 6 months of insulin treatment, mean fasting blood glucose concentrations had decreased from 14.1 +/- 2.2 mmol l-1 to 8.4 +/- 1.8 mmol l-1 (p < 0.001), and HbA1c had fallen from 11.1 +/- 1.4% to 8.2 +/- 1.1% (p < 0.001). Significant decreases of total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, and free fatty acids were observed, while HDL-cholesterol and apoA1 increased by 10%. Baseline serum Lp(a) levels were elevated compared to non-diabetic subjects of similar age (median 283, range 8-3050 mg l-1, vs 101, range 8-1747 mg l-1, p < 0.05), but did not change with insulin, and there was no correlation with the degree of metabolic improvement and changes in Lp(a) levels. It is concluded that improved blood glucose control by insulin therapy does not alter elevated Lp(a) levels in Type 2 diabetic patients, but has favourable effects on the other lipoproteins.

Apolipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with and without diabetic nephropathy

The relative mortality from cardiovascular disease is on average increased five-fold in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy compared to non-diabetic subjects. We assessed the possible contribution of dyslipidaemia in general and elevated serum apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) in particular. Type 2 diabetic patients with normo-, micro- and macroalbuminuria were compared with healthy subjects. Each group consisted of 37 subjects matched for age, sex and diabetes duration. Serum creatinine in the nephropathy group was 105 (54-740) mumol/l. The prevalence of ischaemic heart disease (resting ECG, Minnesota, Rating Scale) was 57, 35, 19 and 2% in macro-, micro- and normoalbuminuric diabetic patients and healthy subjects, respectively. The prevalence of ischaemic heart disease was higher in all diabetic groups as compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.05), and higher in macroalbuminuric as compared to normoalbuminuric diabetic patients (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between apo(a) in the four groups: 161 (10-1370), 191 (10-2080), 147 (10-942), 102 (10-1440) U/l (median (range)) in macro-, micro- and normoalbuminuric groups and healthy subjects. Serum total-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were not significantly different when comparing healthy subjects and each diabetic group. Apolipoprotein A-I was lower (p < 0.05) in all diabetic groups as compared to healthy subjects (nephropathy vs healthy subjects): 1.50 +/- 0.25 vs 1.69 +/- 0.32 g/l (mean +/- SD). Triglyceride was higher (p < 0.05) in patients with nephropathy and microalbuminuria as compared to healthy subjects (nephropathy vs healthy subjects): 2.01 (0.66-14.7) vs 1.09 (0.41-2.75) mmol/l (median (range)).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Plasma apolipoprotein (a) is increased in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with microalbuminuria

Patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus complicated by microalbuminuria or albuminuria, have an increased risk of developing macrovascular disease and of early mortality. Because lipoprotein abnormalities have been associated with diabetic nephropathy, this study tested the hypothesis that levels of apolipoprotein (a) are elevated in patients with Type 2 diabetes and increased levels of urinary albumin loss. Levels of apolipoprotein (a) in diabetic patients with microalbuminuria (n = 26, geometric mean 195 U/l, 95% confidence interval 117-324) and albuminuria (n = 19, 281 U/l, 165-479) were higher than in non-diabetic control subjects (n = 140, 107 U/l, 85-134, p < 0.05), and in the albuminuric group than diabetic patients without urinary albumin loss (n = 58, 114 U/l, 76-169, p < 0.05). Patients with microalbuminuria and albuminuria had levels comparable with patients undergoing elective coronary artery graft surgery (n = 40, 193 U/l, 126-298). Apolipoprotein (a) levels were higher in diabetic patients with macrovascular disease than in those without (n = 49, 209 U/l, 143-306 vs n = 54, 116 U/l, 78-173, p < 0.05). These preliminary results suggest that raised apolipoprotein (a) levels of Type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria and albuminuria may contribute to their propensity to macrovascular disease and early mortality.