Reliability of polymerase chain reaction for detection of hepatitis C virus

Hepatitis C screening strategies in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, with an estimated yearly incidence of 0.2% and prevalence between 8% and 10%. Although a screening strategy based on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values is currently recommended, this strategy has not been evaluated for cost-effectiveness compared with other potential screening strategies. A comparison therefore was made using a decision-analysis model of a simulated cohort of 5,000 hemodialysis patients followed up for 5 years. Using direct medical costs, three strategies were evaluated, including: (1) ALT values with confirmatory testing (biochemical), (2) serial enzyme-linked immunosorbent and strip immunoblot assay testing (serological), and (3) polymerase chain reaction (viral). Under baseline assumptions, the per-patient cost of screening hemodialysis patients for HCV was $378 for biochemical-based testing, $195 for serological-based testing, and $696 for viral-based testing. Our model was robust when varying the costs of testing, as well as the incidence and prevalence of HCV infection. Results of sensitivity analysis by varying costs, HCV incidence, and HCV prevalence indicated that serological-based screening was less costly than biochemical testing. Biochemical testing was in turn less costly than viral-based screening. Serological-based testing was also more effective in the diagnosis of de novo HCV infection, with a likelihood ratio of 85, in contrast to the likelihood ratio of 44 with biochemical-based testing using viral-based screening as the gold standard. A serological-based screening strategy is less costly and more effective than biochemical-based screening in the diagnosis of de novo HCV infection. Serological-based screening should be considered for HCV screening in hemodialysis populations.

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation

The hepatitis C virus is a common cause of chronic hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We evaluated 95 consecutive patients who underwent OLT at our institute between March 1988 and November 1992 and who had a follow-up period longer than 3 months. All patients had a second-generation test (ELISA + RIBA) for HCV antibodies (HCV Ab) before and monthly after OLT; all had a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of viral RNA after the operation. Whenever biochemical abnormalities (hypertransaminasemia 2 times the normal range) were seen, a percutaneous liver biopsy was performed. Forty-two HCV Ab+ patients before OLT remained positive after OLT. In this group the PCR test was positive in 32 cases (78.5%). In 13/42 (30.9%) cases (all PCR+) with hypertransaminasemia histological examination showed signs of viral C hepatitis (score of Knodell minimum 3, maximum 12, median 5.5). Of 53 HCV Ab patients before OLT, only 1 became HCV Ab+ and PCR+ 15 months after OLT. In the remaining 52 patients 15 were PCR+. Twenty of 53 patients (37.7%) had a liver biopsy because of hypertransaminasemia: in no case did histology show any signs of hepatitis C. In conclusion, viral C recurs often after OLT for post-hepatitic C cirrhosis. The histological graft lesions are in most cases moderate. We did not observe any deaths related to viral C infection in grafted patients. According to our results post-hepatic C cirrhosis remains a good indication for OLT.

Iscador Qu for chronic hepatitis C: an exploratory study

Five patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated for one year with the herbal immunomodulatory agent Iscador (Weleda, Schwäbisch Gmünd Germany). Two patients showed 6-20 fold decreases in viral load and normalisation of liver inflammation. The treatment was well tolerated; no serious side effects were observed. The quality of life improved on average. Iscador may have potential as a non toxic therapy for chronic hepatitis C treatment.

Sensitivity and specificity of third-generation hepatitis C virus antibody detection assays: an analysis of the literature

This study assessed the sensitivity and specificity of third-generation serological hepatitis C diagnostic tests from an analysis of the literature. The literature analysis was run using criteria from McMaster University for the assessment of diagnostic tests. The selected studies were grouped according to the type of population at high and low risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and to the type of reference test. The homogeneity of the sensitivity and the specificity was tested in each group using a Fisher's exact test. Of 132 studies, 10 were selected. When the estimates were homogeneous, summary point estimates and confidence intervals were computed; when the estimates were heterogeneous, subgroup analysis was performed. The sensitivity of third-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA3) was estimated at 98.9% (95% CI: 94-100%) in patients with chronic liver disease and at 97.2% (95% CI: 92-99%) in panels of sera. ELISA3 specificity was found at 100% in patients with chronic liver disease. The sensitivity of the third generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA3) was assessed at 78.8% (95% CI: 65-89%) in haemodialysed patients. This analysis provides evidence for the good sensitivity and specificity of ELISA3 assays particularly in high risk patient groups and confirms their use for screening in these populations. Further studies are needed to assess properly RIBA3 in general population and in risk patients.

[Hepatitis C]

It has been estimated that 3% of the world population is infected with the hepatitis C virus. Those who are blood product recipients or have been illicit drug users are at risk. Dental and medical procedures as well as tattooing and acupuncture are also risk factors. Chronic infection occurs in up to 85% of infected cases but they may remain without symptoms during years or even decades, and clinical presentation varies. Determination of anti-HCV in sera is a fairly sensitive tool for the diagnosis, and confirmation requires the identification of HCV-RNA. Staging of the liver disease as well as definition of its present activity can be graded by liver biopsy. The aim of treatment is to stop the progression of the hepatic disease by inhibiting viral replication. Due to the low therapeutic efficacy combined with important side-effects, the administration of interferon and ribavirin have specific indications and contraindications. Predictive factors of therapeutic response, particularly viral load and genotypes of HCV, are useful in the evaluation of patients.

Validation and standardisation of nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays for the detection of viral contamination of blood and blood products

Standardisation of NAT assays is necessary before the introduction of such assays for routine screening of blood and blood products for viral contaminants such as HBV, HCV, and HIV-1. Standardisation can be achieved by the use of well-characterised reference materials (working reagents) to validate each assay run. Working reagents for HCV, HIV-1, HBV, HAV, and human parvovirus B19 have been established by the NIBSC. Such reagents and reference panels are also available from other official medicinal control laboratories and commercial organisations. However, the nucleic acid content of these reagents are expressed in many different units, e. g. genome equivalents/ml, copies/ml, PCR detectable units/ml, making comparisons of results from laboratories using different reagents difficult. The establishment of internationally accepted standards against which all working reagents could be calibrated, using a common standard unit of measurement, IU, would overcome this major problem. The first International Standard for HCV RNA assays was established in 1997. This reagent, 96/790, is a lyophilised preparation of a genotype 1 isolate and the concentration of the standard is 10(5) IU/ml. Two further International Standards have since been established; for HIV-1 and HBV, containing 10(5) IU/ml and 10(6) IU/ml respectively. The establishment of the HCV International Standard has been critical in the introduction of mandatory testing. Since 1st July 1999, all batches of blood products marketed in Europe have to be prepared from plasma pools tested and found non-reactive for HCV RNA using a validated assay which can detect a sample containing 100 IU/ml of HCV RNA. In Germany, screening of blood donations for HCV RNA by NAT has been mandatory since 1st April 1999. The minimum sensitivity of assays should be 5000 IU/ml for a single donation.

Standardization of hepatitis C virus RNA quantification

It was recently recommended that hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification be used to tailor the duration of combined interferon alfa (IFN-alpha)/ribavirin therapy in patients infected by HCV genotypes 1, 4, and 5. This recommendation has been difficult to implement in the absence of standardized quantitative units for HCV RNA. The aim of this work was to define clinically relevant HCV RNA loads in standardized international units (IU), for use in routine clinical and research applications based on standardized quantitative assays. Two hepatitis C virus RNA quantitative assays were used: (1) the Superquant assay (National Genetics Institute, Los Angeles, CA), for which possibly relevant thresholds were established; and (2) the semi-automated Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor assay version 2.0 (Cobas v2.0, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA) that measures HCV RNA loads in IU/mL. Quantification in the Cobas v2.0 assay was linear over the entire range of values tested, including viral loads higher than 850,000 IU/mL after 100-fold dilution. The accuracy and precision of the measures in IU/mL were satisfactory with Cobas v2.0. The results obtained with Superquant and Cobas v2.0 correlated (r =.932; P <.0001). A value of 2,000,000 copies/mL (6.3 log(10) copies/mL) with Superquant was converted to nearly 800,000 IU/mL (5.9 log(10) IU/mL). In conclusion, all HCV RNA quantitative assays should give HCV RNA loads in international units and be validated with appropriate calibrated panels; 800,000 IU/mL in any of these assays should be used as the decision threshold to tailor the IFN-alpha/ribavirin treatment duration in patients infected by HCV genotypes 1, 4, and 5.

Evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay for hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen with clinical sensitivity approximating that of genomic amplification of HCV RNA

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical performance of a new enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen in comparison with the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A total of 310 patients with acute or chronic hepatitis C, and 132 HCV-negative controls were studied. Chemiluminescence EIA with monoclonal anti-HCV core antigen was used, and qualitative and quantitative commercial RT-PCRs and an in-house nested RT-PCR were performed. Compared with nested RT-PCR, the core antigen assay showed 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity in 75 patients with chronic hepatitis C and 132 controls. HCV core antigen was positive in 16 (94%) of 17 patients with acute hepatitis C at initial consultation. In 3 persons prospectively followed, core antigen was detected in the first available (1-3 weeks) post-transfusion sample. In 167 anti-HCV-positive individuals, 129 (77%) were viremic; core antigen was detected in 126 (98%) compared with 129 (100%) for nested RT-PCR and 121 (94%) for the commercial RT-PCR. In 48 patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon alfa, the concentration of core antigen before treatment was significantly (P <.002) lower in patients with sustained response than in nonresponders. All responders had a sustained loss of core antigen, whereas all nonresponders remained core antigen positive. The concentrations of HCV core antigen and HCV RNA correlated significantly (n = 48, r =.627, P <.001). In conclusion, the HCV core antigen assay is useful for the diagnosis of acute and chronic hepatitis C, and for predicting and monitoring the effect of interferon alfa treatment.

Development of a quantitative real-time detection assay for hepatitis B virus DNA and comparison with two commercial assays

A highly reproducible and sensitive real-time detection assay based on TaqMan technology was developed for the detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and compared with two commercially available assays. The assay was validated with the Viral Quality Control panel, which also includes EUROHEP HBV DNA standards. This real-time PCR detection system had a dynamic range of 373 to 10(10) genome copies per ml and showed an excellent correlation with both the commercial HBV Digene Hybrid Capture II microplate assay (Digene Diagnostics) and the HBV MONITOR assay (Roche Diagnostics). To demonstrate its clinical utility, four chronically HBV-infected patients treated with lamuvidine were monitored using the three different assays. From the results we concluded that this assay is an excellent alternative for monitoring of HBV-infected patients in routine diagnostics and clinical practice, enabling the analysis of a large dynamic range of HBV DNA in a single, undiluted sample.

Evaluation of automated nucleic acid extraction devices for application in HCV NAT

BACKGROUND

To further improve the safety of the blood supply, various national blood transfusion organizations presently use or are in the process of implementing routine HCV NAT in minipools. According to the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) of the European Union, the HCV NAT detection limit of the assay should be 100 IU per mL (270 geq/mL) for testing initial plasma pools. Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) regulations stipulate that 5000 IU per mL (13,500 geq/mL) must be detected to calculate the amount contributed by individual donations composing the minipool. The sensitivity for HCV RNA extraction achieved by three commercially available laboratory kits was compared.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Nucleic acids from 1-in-3 serial dilutions of an HCV RNA run control (Pelispy, CLB) were extracted with three kits (Cobas Amplicor, Roche Diagnostic Systems; BioRobot 9604, Qiagen; and NucliSens Extractor, Organon Teknika). HCV PCR of all extracts was performed using a second-generation Cobas Amplicor HCV test and the Cobas Amplicor analyzer.

RESULTS

The manual Cobas Amplicor, the BioRobot 9604, and the NucliSens Extractor setups allow a 95-percent HCV RNA detection limit of 129, 82, and 12 geq per mL, respectively. The maximal pool size for the manual Cobas Amplicor, the BioRobot 9604, and the NucliSens Extractor kits that would still meet the PEI criteria for HCV NAT in minipools was calculated at 104, 164, and 1125 donations, respectively.

CONCLUSION

All three HCV NAT kits evaluated meet the criteria set by CPMP and PEI. The highest sensitivity for HCV NAT screening can be achieved with the high-volume NucliSens Extractor method in combination with the Cobas Amplicor HCV v2.0 test on the Cobas Amplicor analyzer.

Serotyping and genotyping of hepatitis C virus in Taiwanese patients with type C chronic liver disease and uraemic patients on maintenance haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate a recombinant immunoblot hepatitis C virus (HCV) serotyping assay, which determines HCV serotypes 1, 2, and 3 by detecting type-specific antibodies to core-and NS-4-derived peptides.

METHODS

Immunoreactivity of type-specific antibodies among 173 chronic hepatitis C patients and 43 haemodialysis patients in Taiwan was examined and the serotyping results were compared with genotyping by Okamoto's method. Serial specimens from 29 patients undergoing interferon-alpha therapy were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 205 specimens for which genotyping data were available, 51.2% were of serotype 1, 31.7% of serotype 2, 1.0% of serotype 3, 2.4% of either serotype 1 or 3, and the remaining 13.7% were untypable. The serotypable rate was significantly lower in haemodialysis patients than in chronic hepatitis C patients (70.0% vs 94.9%; P < 0.001). Serotyping of genotype 2b specimens was significantly more dependent on core peptide bands than other genotypes. Using genotyping as the reference, the overall sensitivity, specificity and concordance of the recombinant immunoblot HCV serotyping assay were 86.3%, 97.2% and 83.9%, respectively. However, the serotyping assay had significantly lower sensitivity (69.2%), specificity (77.8%) and concordance (53.8%) for genotype 2b specimens. Of nine HCV complete responders, one lost type-specific antibodies 6 months after the cessation of interferon-alpha treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that, except for less than optimal performance with immunocompromised or genotype 2b patients, the HCV serotyping assay is a practical and useful method for HCV typing in the clinical setting in Taiwan.

Performance of the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, version 2.0, an automated reverse transcription-PCR quantitative system for hepatitis C virus load determination

A clinical evaluation of an automated quantitative PCR assay, the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, version 2.0 (v2.0), was carried out to assess the performance of this test in comparison with that of the previous, manual version, the AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, and with that of nested PCR. Serial dilutions of serum samples infected with genotype 1b, 2a, or 3, as well as synthetic RNA transcripts and serum samples derived from 87 patients with chronic hepatitis C and infected with genotype 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4, or 5, were analyzed to determine the ability of the system to efficiently quantify various hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. These experiments showed that the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, v2.0, has mean intra-assay, interassay, and interoperator coefficients of variation that range from 22 to 34.5% and a 3-logarithm dynamic range, which spans from 10(3) to 10(6) copies/ml. Compared to the previous, manual version of the test, the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, v2.0, showed an improved efficacy for all genotypes, especially genotypes 2, 3, and 4, whose estimated concentrations were on average 1 logarithm higher. When used to monitor patients under treatment, however, both versions showed the same patterns of viremia, indicating that the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test, v2.0, and the AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test were equally effective at detecting relative viremia changes in serial samples. As expected, the automated test was less sensitive than nested PCR; among specimens from a cohort of patients treated with interferon, nested PCR identified three more viremic specimens, which probably contained very low concentrations of HCV RNA.

A multicenter study evaluation of the digene hybrid capture II signal amplification technique for detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum samples and testing of EUROHEP standards

We have evaluated the new Digene Hybrid Capture II HBV DNA Test (HCII HBV), which is a 96-well microtiter plate-based signal amplification assay. This test uses hybrid capture technology that specifically detects RNA-DNA hybrids. HCII HBV is able to quantify hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA at between 1.4 x 10(5) and 1.7 x 10(9) HBV copies per ml in a standard format. By using a modified sample preparation method, which allows the input of 30-fold more serum for an ultrasensitive format, the sensitivity of the assay can be increased reproducibly to approximately 8,000 copies of HBV per ml. By using a combination of these two formats, the assay can quantify over a total range of 6 logs. In our multicenter evaluation study, the mean laboratory-to-laboratory coefficients of variation were 22, 7, and 12% at the three sites, respectively, with a combined specificity of 98.4%. The linearities of both the standard test and the ultrasensitive test were excellent, with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.997 and 0.999, respectively. Furthermore, the intra-assay reproducibility for the standard assay gave coefficients of variation of from 13 to 33, 9 to 21, and 3 to 8% at the three sites, respectively. HCII HBV was shown to be genotype independent when the EUROHEP standards for genotypes A and D were used. This assay allows the accurate measurement of HBV DNA levels in serum and can be clinically used for the monitoring of responses to antiviral agents for patients chronically infected with HBV.

Serotyping strip immunoblot assay for assessing hepatitis C virus strains in dialysis patients

Recent accumulated evidence shows that dialysis patients are a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Assessment of HCV genotype distribution among dialysis patients may be important because specific viral genotypes are associated with different clinical manifestations, disease progression, and response to antiviral therapy. However, polymerase chain reaction-based methods are cumbersome and unsuitable for analyzing large cohorts of dialysis patients with HCV. Instead, this information can be obtained by using a novel recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) recently developed for determining HCV serotype. The RIBA HCV serotyping strip immunoblot assay (SIA; Chiron Corporation, Emeryville, CA), is based on an immunoblot strip with five lanes of immobilized serotype-specific HCV peptides from the nonstructural (NS4) and core regions of the genomes of HCV types 1, 2, and 3. HCV serotype is deduced by determining the greatest intensity of reactivity to the NS4 serotype-specific HCV peptide band in relation to the internal control band (human immunoglobulin G) intensity on each strip. HCV core peptide reactivity is used only in the absence of NS4 reactivity. We compared RIBA HCV serotyping SIA with genotyping using sera from a large (n = 107) cohort of HCV-infected patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD). We successfully serotyped 79 of 107 patients (74%) undergoing HD. We found a remarkable concordance (65 of 70 results; 93%) between RIBA HCV serotyping SIA and genotyping (line probe assay [LiPA]) techniques (kappa = 0.786) with sera from viremic patients infected with a known genotype. Only 5 of 70 patients (7%) had apparently discordant results. In a subset of patients (28 of 107 patients; 26%) not typed by RIBA HCV serotyping SIA, most (24 of 28 patients; 86%) were successfully genotyped by LiPA technology. It was possible to assess serotype reactivity in some patients (9 of 107 patients; 7%) who could not be genotyped. The distribution of HCV serotypes was associated with the antibody response against HCV proteins and the patterns of reactivity by RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA. In conclusion, (1) we found good agreement between serotyping and genotyping methods in our large cohort of dialysis patients infected with HCV; (2) the impaired immunocompetence conferred by uremia may limit serotyping analysis in some HCV-infected patients undergoing HD; (3) RIBA HCV serotyping SIA may be useful in tracking transmission routes for HD patients who cleared the virus and have only anti-HCV antibody; and (4) the distribution of HCV serotypes was associated with the antibody response against HCV proteins and the patterns of reactivity by RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA. Assessment of HCV strains appears to be very useful in the routine clinical activity of nephrologists within HD units because consistent biological differences among HCV strains exist. RIBA serotyping SIA is a simple, inexpensive, and highly reproducible assay to obtain information about HCV types in the HD setting.

Tailoring interferon dose and monitoring viral load in hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infected patients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Complete [biochemical and virological) primary response remains the first goal of any antiviral therapy and its early assessment could be particularly useful in the management of the high viral load, genotype 1b infected patients, who have the worst chance of response. We evaluated whether tailoring interferon dose according to pre-treatment viral load and early monitoring of quantitative HCV-RNA could either improve or predict the results of recombinant alpha-2a interferon treatment in these patients.

PATIENTS

Fifty-three consecutive genotype 1b HCV-infected patients, stratified in two groups by viral load (cut off 6 MEq/ml), received randomly 6 or 9 MU of recombinant alpha-2a interferon thrice weekly for 6 months, followed by 6 MU for another 6 months.

METHODS

HCV-RNA was measured [b-DNA] assay) two months apart prior to therapy, at baseline, after 2 weeks of therapy and monthly thereafter.

RESULTS

In the high viraemic group, complete primary response was observed in 80% of patients treated with high dose recombinant alpha 2a interferon and only in 14.3% of low dose treated patients [p<0.03]. In low viraemic patients, complete primary response was 53. 8% in low dose patients and 80% (8 out of 10) in the high dose group. Sustained response was 60% in high viraemic patients treated with high dose and absent in those treated with low dose [p<0.05]. One log viral load decrease at 2 or 4 weeks showed 0.87 and 0.80 positive predictive values, 0.95 and 1.0 negative predictive values with 96% and 100% sensitivities and 83% and 70% specificities.

CONCLUSIONS

6 MU recombinant alpha-2a interferon thrice weekly schedules were completely ineffective in the large majority (85.7%) of patients with viral load above 6 million HCV-RNA copies/ml and the treatment failure could be predicted by lack of one log viral load decrease after 2-4 weeks of treatment.

Hepatitis C: an update on the silent epidemic

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) currently infects an estimated 2-3 million people in the United States and 175 million people globally. Over 80% of infected patients go on to develop chronic disease. Most patients remain asymptomatic despite silent, insidious progression of the disease. The sequelae of HCV-induced chronic liver disease accounts for 8,000-10,000 deaths annually in the United States and is currently the leading indication for liver transplantation. The cost of this epidemic to the United States was estimated in 1991 at $600 million in terms of medical expenses (excluding costs related to liver transplantation) and work lost. Over the last decade, since the viral genome of HCV was first sequenced in 1989, there has been a great increase in understanding of this infection. This review summarizes current knowledge about the hepatitis C epidemic with particular reference to epidemiology of infection, viral characteristics, risk factors for disease, diagnostic testing, clinical manifestations, and current, as well as potential, therapeutic options.

Lessons from a multicentre study of the detectability of viral genomes based on a two-round quality control of GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV) polymerase chain reaction assay

The aim of this study was to determine whether multicentre quality controls for the detectability of viral genomes could contribute to the improvement of diagnostic performance in the participating laboratories. The study was carried out during two successive rounds, during which 18 laboratories specialized in nucleic acid testing analyzed, through a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, a common panel of GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA-positive and -negative samples. During the first round, the laboratories used either an 'in-house' PCR procedure or a partly standardized commercial test. After decoding the results of the first round, the procedures of the participating laboratories were compared in order to establish a consensus procedure deduced from those of the laboratories which provided the best results. During the second round, each participating laboratory could use the resulting consensus procedure, or its own procedure, or both. The results of this quality control study indicated that, whatever method used, even specialized and trained laboratories may give false-negative or false-positive results. The commercial assay did not guarantee a systematic high quality level of results. The striking heterogeneity of results observed among laboratories using the same commercial assay confirm that molecular biology methods need skilled technicians. The results of this quality control study suggest that full standardization of viral genome detection, including all steps of the procedure, is necessary and that the laboratories performing PCR should participate in repeated quality control studies, whatever technique is being used.

Hepatitis C virus quantitation: optimization of strategies for detecting low-level viremia

A long-term assessment of quantitative hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing was performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. The Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 branched-chain DNA (bDNA) assay (Bayer Diagnostics) for hepatitis C viral load determination was used to test 3,471 specimens. bDNA-negative samples were also tested by an in-house qualitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR assay with a measured sensitivity of fewer than 100 HCV genome equivalents per milliliter. Of 1,239 bDNA-negative specimens, 74.1% were negative and 25.9% were positive by RT-PCR, indicating the presence of viremia in a significant proportion of bDNA-negative samples. We discuss the medical and economic implications of these results and propose two alternatives for clinical laboratories to consider in approaching quantitative HCV testing. For laboratories able to perform a sensitive RT-PCR assay for </=40% of the bDNA test cost, prescreening bDNA requests by RT-PCR may be the most cost-effective approach.

Diagnostic tests for hepatitis C

Two categories of virological assays are in practice used for the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, including serological and molecular biology-based assays. Serological assays include: screening tests based on enzyme immunoassays (EIAs); supplemental "analytical" assays based on immunoblot testing; and serological assays detecting genotype-specific antibodies for the serological determination of HCV genotype, so-called "serotyping" assays. Molecular assays include: qualitative assays, detecting HCV RNA in body fluids; quantitative assays measuring HCV viral load, a parameter that estimates the level of HCV replication in the liver; and tests analyzing the sequence of HCV genomes (genotyping assays).

Standardization: a progress report

The introduction of nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays for the detection of viral contamination of blood and blood products requires the availability of well-characterized reference reagents. Working reagents for hepatitis C virus RNA, hepatitis B virus DNA, HIV-1 RNA and human parvovirus B19 DNA have been established at NIBSC and at many other laboratories (both official medicinal control laboratories and commercial laboratories). However, as these reagents have been characterised independently, it is difficult to compare results from assays using different working reagents. Recently, a WHO International Standard was established for HCV RNA NAT assays. This standard has been calibrated in International Units (IU) and provides a common standard against which all working reagents can be calibrated. Collaborative studies to characterise two further candidate International Standards for HBV DNA and HIV-1 RNA NAT assays have been completed.

Introduction of the gene amplification technique to decrease the risk of hepatitis C virus transmission by plasma products

The viral safety of plasma-derived products with respect to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is assured by selection of donors, screening of individual donations for antibodies to HCV and the incorporation of effective viral inactivation-removal steps into manufacturing processes. As antibody screening of single donations is not sufficient to completely eliminate HCV RNA positive plasmas from plasma pools, testing for HCV RNA by gene amplification techniques may be necessary to identify positive donations. Using modern molecular biology techniques, we developed a specific, sensitive and reproducible method for routine PCR screening for HCV RNA in plasma pools.

Establishment of the first international standard for nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays for HCV RNA. WHO Collaborative Study Group

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were the establishment of a WHO International standard for HCV RNA for nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays and the determination of the HCV RNA content of the candidate standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two laboratories evaluated three candidate materials (two lyophilised, AA and BB, which were derived from the same source and one a liquid preparation, CC). All samples were HCV genotype 1 with a concentration of approximately 10(5) genome equivalents/ml. The methods used included the Roche Amplicor assay (version 1), Chiron Quantiplex (bDNA) assay, Organon Teknika NASBA assay, Transcription Mediated assay and various in-house assays, using single or nested primers.

RESULTS

There was reasonable agreement between the overall mean NAT detectable units/ml obtained by the different assays except for some of the in-house assays using single primers which gave substantially lower estimates. These titres were 5.0 log10 for samples AA and BB and 4.6 log10 for sample CC.

CONCLUSIONS

Sample AA was accepted as the candidate standard and assigned a titre of 10(5) international units (IU)/ml. The International Standard consists of a batch of vials each containing 50,000 IU/vial. Preliminary studies indicated that the material is stable at +4 degrees C and +20 degrees C for up to 200 days.

Hepatitis viruses and the safety of blood donations

Since the beginning of blood transfusions concomitant transmission of viral hepatitis has been a frequent and serious side-effect. A first measure to reduce the frequency of transmission was the screening of blood donors for elevated levels of liver enzymes in the blood, which was introduced in Germany in the 1960s, but not in most other countries. After the discovery of hepatitis B virus (HBV), donors in all countries have been screened since the 1970s for its surface antigen (HBsAg). When it was realized that there was at least one other type of virus that was even more frequently transmitted, screening for liver enzymes and HBV antibodies (anti-HBc) was introduced as a surrogate marker in most, but not all, countries in the 1980s. Furthermore, donors at risk for parenterally transmitted viruses were excluded. The discovery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome and the development of sensitive anti-HCV assays has meant that reliable detection of persistently infected HCV carriers has been possible since 1991. Recently infected donors, however, are infectious for several weeks or months before anti-HCV is detectable. Therefore, starting in April 1999 all donations in Germany have to be tested, by nucleic acid amplification tests, for the presence of HCV RNA, although preliminary experience shows that such recent HCV infections are very rare. Newly detected viruses, named GBV-C or HGV and TTV, have been detected in patients with non-A-E post-transfusion hepatitis, but their association with the disease seems to be coincidental. These viruses cause persistent viraemia and are quite prevalent world-wide, but do not cause any known disease. At present, transfusion-transmitted hepatitis has been virtually eliminated, and any improvement in safety will be very small and will require huge costs.

Screening for HBV, HCV and HIV genomes in blood donations: shortcomings of pooling revealed by a multicentre study simulating real-time testing

This study was undertaken in order to determine whether screening of viremic blood donations by testing of pooled donor samples could constitute a technically feasible transfusional safety measure. A pilot study of real-time simulation, on a day-to-day basis, of screening of three viral genomes (hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)) was conducted by five French Blood Centers on plasma samples collected from blood donors and studied within undiluted samples and within sample pools of various sizes. This study was carried out within time conditions compatible with the release of platelets. For the detection of HCV and HIV genomes, the five laboratories achieved a sensitivity that decreased with the size of the sample pool. Four were successful in detecting all undiluted samples. In the 1/10 diluted samples, four failed to detect one HIV or HCV sample. In the 1/100 diluted samples, all laboratories failed to detect one or more HIV or HCV samples. For HBV genome, no participating laboratories detected all of the samples of the panel, even undiluted samples, and the sample pooling considerably affected sensitivity. The improvement and standardization of assays needs to be attained, and training of laboratories appears to be a step crucial for routine screening of viral genomes in blood donations.

Multicenter quality assessment of PCR methods for detection of enteroviruses

We conducted a multicenter evaluation of commercial and in-house PCR methods for the detection of enteroviruses. Three coded panels of test and control RNA samples, artificial clinical specimens, and representative enterovirus serotypes were used to assess amplification methods, RNA extraction methods, and reactivities with different enterovirus serotypes. Despite several differences between PCR methods, there was good agreement, although some variation in sensitivity was observed. Most PCR methods were able to detect enterovirus RNA derived from 0.01 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) and were able to detect at least 1 TCID50 of enterovirus in cerebrospinal fluid, stool, or throat swab specimens. Most were also able to detect a wide range of enterovirus serotypes, although serotypic identification was not possible. Some laboratories experienced false-positive results due to PCR contamination, which appeared to result mainly from cross-contamination of specimens during RNA extraction. Provided that this problem is overcome, these PCR methods will prove to be a sensitive and rapid alternative to cell culture for the diagnosis of enterovirus infection.

The effect of saliva specimen collection, handling and storage protocols on hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA detection by PCR

OBJECTIVES

Commercial assays can now be adapted to detect salivary anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies, increasing the potential of saliva as a non-invasive diagnostic specimen suited to surveillance and epidemiological studies. However, current diagnostic algorithms involve confirmation of HCV infection by RT-PCR. Manipulation and storage conditions of serum can influence the stability of viral RNA. This study examined whether varying specimen collection, handling and storage protocols also affected subsequent HCV RNA detection by RT-PCR applied to saliva specimens.

METHODS

Whole unstimulated saliva, together with saliva samples collected in two commercially available devices (Salivette and Omnisal) were obtained from 50 HCV seropositive intravenous drug users. The specimens were subjected to a number of handling and storage conditions, including heat treatment and prolonged storage, then examined for HCV RNA by RT-PCR using primers derived from the 5' non-coding region (5'NCR).

RESULTS

HCV RNA was detected in saliva samples from 25 (50%) of the patients. No single collection device or handling procedure identified all the subjects with HCV RNA positive saliva though whole saliva yielded the greatest number of positive results.

CONCLUSIONS

Collection and processing of saliva specimens for RT-PCR analysis is complex. At present, detection of salivary HCV RNA by PCR is not sufficiently sensitive for use as a diagnostic tool in epidemiological studies.

Persistence of viremia and the importance of long-term follow-up after acute hepatitis C infection

The purpose of this investigation was to prospectively characterize acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections and to evaluate the hypothesis that the outcome is affected by identifiable clinical or viral factors. One hundred forty-two people with a history of illicit drug use who were HCV antibody-negative in 1988 were followed semiannually through 1996. HCV seroconversion (second generation enzyme immunoassay and recombinant immunoblot assay) was recognized in 43 (30%) of the participants, who were followed up for a median of 72 months. HCV RNA was detected and quantified by polymerase chain reaction in a median of 10 specimens per participant and showed two distinct patterns of viremia: viral clearance was noted in 6 (14%) of the participants, and viral persistence was observed in 37 (86%) of the participants. Subjects with viral clearance were more likely to be white (P =.004), have jaundice (P =.03), and have lower peak viral titer (P =.003). However, the outcome for a given person could not be predicted by clinical features, RNA level, or HCV subtype (as ascertained by analysis of core-E1 complementary DNA sequence). No acute infections were recognized by health care providers. At the time of seroconversion, HCV RNA was detectable in 81% of participants, and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) was positive in 85% of participants. We conclude that approximately 85% of people with acute hepatitis C develop persistent viremia. However, acute infections are uncommonly recognized clinically, underscoring the importance of screening individuals at risk. Long-term follow-up, but no single laboratory test, is necessary to ascertain the outcome and in some cases make the diagnosis of acute HCV infection.

Comparative evaluation of hepatitis C virus RNA quantitation by branched DNA, NASBA, and monitor assays

Several studies have shown a relationship between pretreatment hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load and the response to interferon (IFN) therapy, creating a need for quantitative HCV-RNA assays. Here, we compared three commercial methods: nucleic acid sequence-based amplification NASBA (Organon), branched DNA 2.0 (bDNA) (Chiron), and Monitor (Roche), with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the reference. We assessed sensitivity and reproducibility on a well-characterized panel of sera (EUROHEP), a Chimp Rodney plasma pool, and samples from IFN-treated and -untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C caused by different HCV genotypes. The reproducibility of the NASBA and bDNA methods was slightly better than that of Monitor, especially for genotypes 2 and 4. NASBA had the highest sensitivity (99% vs. 94% and 88% with Monitor and bDNA, respectively), especially for the follow-up of patients on IFN. NASBA gave the highest HCV-RNA concentrations, which were approximately 10-fold more than with the bDNA assay and 100-fold more than with the Monitor kit. The linearity, tested on the chimp Rodney plasma pool, was better with bDNA for high viral load than with NASBA and Monitor, although for low concentration of HCV RNA, bDNA was negative. Pretreatment viral load was lower in patients who had a sustained virological response to IFN, although the bDNA method was not sensitive enough to quantify all pretreatment samples. This study indicates that gene amplification methods (NASBA or Monitor) have better sensitivity than bDNA assays for quantification of HCV RNA in patients with chronic HCV infection, although the bDNA and NASBA methods are more likely to quantify all genotypes. Prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the usefulness of quantitative assays for the follow-up of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Evaluation of AMPLILINK software for the COBAS AMPLICOR system

The use of AMPLILINK version 1.0 software was evaluated for the operation and control of one COBAS AMPLICOR instrument and for two COBAS AMPLICOR instruments run simultaneously to perform and detect nucleic acid amplification reactions. A total of 3,384 results were analyzed. The initial accuracy of the results was 99.91%. Three errors of omission of transfer of data from the COBAS AMPLICOR to the AMPLILINK system were observed. Two of these errors were from a single specimen, where both the analyte and internal control results were not transmitted. These errors did not interfere with the correctness of any other data. There were no interruptions of runs, and no data were mixed. AMPLILINK increased convenience, saved labor, and was found to be a very useful addition for clinical laboratories performing molecular-diagnostic procedures with the COBAS AMPLICOR system.

Quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C: comparison between Amplicor HCV monitor system and branched DNA signal amplification assay

Quantitative measurement of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is important in predicting and monitoring the therapeutic effects of interferon in treating patients with chronic hepatitis C. We compared two commercial available assays, Roche Amplicor HCV Monitor test kits and Chiron branched DNA signal amplification (bDNA) assay, in quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in 74 patients with chronic hepatitis C. The serum HCV RNA of each of these patients was qualitatively positive by conventional reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction. Serum HCV RNA was detected positive by the Amplicor test kits in 63 (85%) patients and by the bDNA assay in 58 (78%) patients (P > 0.05). The quantitative results of HCV RNA detected by both assays showed a good linear correlation (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). Amplicor test kits detected 5 patients with low viremia which were below the detection limit of the bDNA assay (2.0 x 10(5) genome equivalents/ml). However, the mean HCV RNA values detected by the Amplicor test kits was 1.26 log lower than that of the bDNA assay. The Amplicor test kits detected only 5 samples (8%) with a HCV RNA value greater than 5 x 10(6) copies/ml, while the bDNA assay detected 23 samples (40%) with a HCV RNA value greater than 5 x 10(6) genome equivalents/ml (P < 0.01). HCV genotype did not affect the positive rate of HCV RNA measurement detected by both assays. However, a significantly higher mean serum HCV RNA value was noted in HCV genotype 1b as compared with the other genotypes. We concluded that the Roche Amplicor HCV Monitor test kits and the Chiron branched DNA signal amplification assay are equally sensitive in the quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C and can be reliably used in measuring HCV viremia clinically.

Screening blood donations for viral genomes: multicenter study of real-time simulation using pooled samples on the model of hepatitis C virus RNA detection

BACKGROUND

The systematic screening for several blood-borne viral genomes in blood donations is a complementary safety measure planned or discussed by the national authorities of several countries.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To appreciate the feasibility of such screening using pooled samples, a multicenter study of real-time simulation has been performed on the model of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Four blood transfusion center laboratories and two research and diagnosis laboratories simultaneously screened, by several HCV RNA polymerase chain reaction assays, a panel of plasma sample pools of different sizes (500, 100, and 10 samples), collected from HCV-infected or HCV-uninfected blood donors. One viremic plasma was introduced in each pool. HCV RNA was detected by in-house polymerase chain reaction procedures or by standardized manual or semi-automated polymerase chain reaction assays.

RESULTS

The results indicate the feasibility of sample pooling, which renders the screening for viral genomes by molecular biology techniques applicable in the short term and the importance of the experience of laboratory personnel in the use of molecular biology tools.

CONCLUSION

The improvement of standardized assays needs to be continued, and training of laboratory staff members appears to be a crucial step before systematic screening of blood donations for viral genomes by molecular biology techniques can occur.

Hepatitis G Virus RNA and Hepatitis G Virus-E2 Antibodies in Dutch Hemophilia Patients in Relation to Transfusion History

The prevalence of hepatitis G virus (HGV)-RNA and HGV-E2 antibodies was studied in a cohort of Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to clotting products used, age, and coinfection with hepatitis C. Between 1991 and 1995, blood samples were taken from 294 patients with hemophilia A, B, or von Willebrand disease. From each patient one fresh frozen sample was tested for HGV cDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and HCV cDNA PCR. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) tests were performed on plasma samples of all patients. The presence of HGV-E2 antibodies was tested on plasma samples from a subset of 169 patients representing all age groups. Based on the origin and viral safety of the products used, three subgroups of patients were distinguished. Group A: patients who used viral noninactivated factors derived from small and large donor pools; group B: patients who used factors prepared with inadequate viral inactivation techniques derived from small and large donor pools; and group C: patients treated only with optimally viral inactivated large pool clotting factor or recombinant clotting factor concentrate. The prevalence of HGV-RNA was 18%. In group A patients the prevalence was 71%, in group B 50%, and in group C 6%. When related to age, the highest prevalence of HGV-RNA (35%) was seen in patients born between 1980 and 1989. The prevalence of HGV-E2 antibodies increased with age. Of HGV-RNA–negative patients born before 1950, 96% tested positive. HGV viremia did not affect ALT levels, neither in HCV-RNA positive nor in HCV-RNA negative patients. HGV infection is frequently seen in patients with hemophilia. In older age groups a lower rate of HGV-RNA positivity is seen coinciding with a higher rate of antienvelope antibodies.

© 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

Hepatitis G Virus RNA and Hepatitis G Virus-E2 Antibodies in Dutch Hemophilia Patients in Relation to Transfusion History

The prevalence of hepatitis G virus (HGV)-RNA and HGV-E2 antibodies was studied in a cohort of Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to clotting products used, age, and coinfection with hepatitis C. Between 1991 and 1995, blood samples were taken from 294 patients with hemophilia A, B, or von Willebrand disease. From each patient one fresh frozen sample was tested for HGV cDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and HCV cDNA PCR. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) tests were performed on plasma samples of all patients. The presence of HGV-E2 antibodies was tested on plasma samples from a subset of 169 patients representing all age groups. Based on the origin and viral safety of the products used, three subgroups of patients were distinguished. Group A: patients who used viral noninactivated factors derived from small and large donor pools; group B: patients who used factors prepared with inadequate viral inactivation techniques derived from small and large donor pools; and group C: patients treated only with optimally viral inactivated large pool clotting factor or recombinant clotting factor concentrate. The prevalence of HGV-RNA was 18%. In group A patients the prevalence was 71%, in group B 50%, and in group C 6%. When related to age, the highest prevalence of HGV-RNA (35%) was seen in patients born between 1980 and 1989. The prevalence of HGV-E2 antibodies increased with age. Of HGV-RNA–negative patients born before 1950, 96% tested positive. HGV viremia did not affect ALT levels, neither in HCV-RNA positive nor in HCV-RNA negative patients. HGV infection is frequently seen in patients with hemophilia. In older age groups a lower rate of HGV-RNA positivity is seen coinciding with a higher rate of antienvelope antibodies.

© 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

A quantitative HCV-PCR test for routine diagnostics

The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and simple method for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-PCR using standard, automated laboratory equipment. HCV-RNA was extracted from serum and amplified in a single PCR with an internal standard. The PCR product was detected using fluoroimmunoassay. Quantification was based on external and internal standards. Linearity was observed over a wide range (10-10(7) geq). Mean inter and intra serial coefficients of variation were 35% and 23%, respectively. The limit of quantification was 1000 geq/ml based on intra and inter serial variations, while levels of 110 geq/ml were always detectable. Lower concentrations were intermittently positive. The ability to separate HCV-signals in healthy and infected persons was good, based on the distribution of HCV-signals from 353 random blood donors and 191 patient samples. To illustrate the applicability of the test, HCV-RNA quantification was performed in 11 patients during treatment with interferon alpha-2b. Ten of 11 patients showed a decline in HCV-RNA within the first few weeks of treatment. After four weeks most patients were still HCV-RNA positive but below the limit of quantification. The present method for quantification of HCV-RNA was shown to have sensitivity at the level of nested PCR techniques. Until now HCV-PCR has been complicated, time-consuming and costly, and therefore not suitable for routine diagnostics. The PCR method described here is easy to perform, fast and cost-effective.

New prognostic factors in melanoma: mRNA tumour markers

Circulating tumour cells in the peripheral blood may be important for haematogenous spread of malignant disease. Monitoring these cells may therefore be of prognostic value. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assays to detect occult neoplastic cells offer the highest sensitivity for the study of tumour dissemination and minimal residual disease. This review summarises technical considerations and clinical investigations in melanoma patients of various disease stages. The clinical data are promising, but to clearly define the clinical usefulness of messenger RNA (mRNA) tumour markers, methodological issues must be resolved and the clinical value must be assessed prospectively in sufficiently large patient cohorts.

Hepatitis C virus RNA testing by nested PCR in blood preparations in Yugoslavia

Patients receiving any kind of human blood preparations are in permanent danger of any infection including hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Testing for the presence of HCV in blood preparations is one of the steps towards safe medical treatment. One of the approaches for this testing is a detection of HCV nucleic acid. In this paper we describe a simple method for isolation of HCV RNA from blood preparations and control of HCV RNA presence in 19 intravenous and intramuscular products, manufactured in the National Blood Transfusion Institute in Belgrade. RT-PCR was performed according the rules saving RNA. Primers were located in 5' conserved region. Seven out of 19 batches of gamma-globulin, albumin, anti-tetanus and anti-rabies immunoglobulin preparations were found to be HCV RNA positive. For the time being, the PCR method is too expensive for routine HCV RNA testing of hundreds of blood donors per day. Serological screening test of blood donors and nested PCR testing for HCV RNA in blood preparations could be an efficient combination of tests in prevention of posttransfusion hepatitis C.

Efficacy of interferon dose and prediction of response in chronic hepatitis C: Benelux study in 336 patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In an attempt to improve the limited efficacy of treatment of chronic hepatitis C with interferon-alpha 3 MU tiw, we studied the effects of double-dose therapy followed by downward titration, and analyzed the pre- and pertreatment factors associated with response or non-response.

METHODS

Three hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients in 19 centers were randomized to interferon-alpha 3 MU tiw for 6 months or 6 MU tiw for 8 weeks followed by down-titration (3,1 MU tiw) till alanine aminotransferase remained normal and plasma HCV RNA was repeatedly undetectable. The primary outcome measure was sustained alanine aminotransferase and HCV RNA response 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-six patients received treatment. The sustained response rate for patients receiving 3 MU tiw for 6 months was 14% (9-21%,) and for patients receiving double dose tiw for 8 weeks and thereafter titrated therapy 15% (10-21%) (p=0.8). Pretreatment factors associated with a sustained alanine aminotransferase plus HCV RNA response were the absence of cirrhosis, presence of genotype 2 or 3, a low viral load and, in addition, a low alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase ratio; a model was developed to allow estimation of the chance of response for the individual patient. The most powerful predictor of sustained response, however, was plasma HCV RNA at week 4; a positive test virtually precluded a sustained response (1.7%, 0.4-5.0%). If week 4 HCV RNA was not detectable, the chance of a sustained response was 21% (12-34%) for genotype 1 versus 40% (28-54%) for the others (p=0.02). Six MU tiw led to a significantly higher week 4 HCV RNA response (47% not detectable) than 3 MU (37%) (p=0.02). During down-titration this difference in viral on-treatment response was lost.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of hepatitis C, an early HCV RNA response is a prerequisite for long-term efficacy. Doubling the initial interferon dose increases this early response, but subsequent downward titration negates this effect, especially in genotype 1.

Hepatitis C virus infections in dialysis centers in The Netherlands: a national survey by serological and molecular methods

A national survey of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections among dialysis patients in The Netherlands was performed. The study involved 2,653 patients (2,108 hemodialysis patients and 545 chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD] patients) from 39 of the 49 dialysis centers in the country. Patient sera were analyzed by both serological and molecular methods. Screening by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA) yielded 79 reactive sera. The presence of anti-HCV antibodies was confirmed in 70 patients by a line immunoassay. All seropositive samples were tested by reverse transcriptase PCR, and 57 samples were found to contain HCV RNA. Of the nine EIA-positive and line immunoassay-negative or indeterminate samples, four were HCV RNA positive. All seronegative samples were screened for the presence of HCV RNA in pools of five sera. Of 2,576 antibody-negative samples, 6 contained HCV RNA. All antibody-positive and RNA-positive samples were also tested by a second serological assay. The prevalence of HCV infections among Dutch dialysis patients as determined by serology or the presence of HCV RNA was 3% (80 of 2,653), i.e., 3.5% (73 of 2,108) in patients treated on hemodialysis and 1.3% (7 of 545) in patients on CAPD. Of these 80 HCV-infected dialysis patients, 67 (84%) were HCV RNA positive. Serological screening alone would have diagnosed only 70 infected patients. Therefore, antibody screening combined with detection of HCV RNA should be considered as the "gold standard" for diagnosing HCV infection in dialysis patients. The prevalence of HCV-infected patients in Dutch dialysis centers ranged from 0 to 8%, suggesting the existence of local risk factors for acquiring HCV infection. Genotyping analysis by reverse hybridization line probe assay revealed the presence of genotypes la (23%), 1b (46%), 2 (3%), 2a (13%), 2b (1%), 3a (7%), and 4a (4%). In four (6%) samples multiple genotypes were detected. The genotype distribution of HCV isolates among Dutch dialysis patients was similar to the distribution among nondialysis patients from the Benelux, except for subtype 1a, which was significantly more prevalent among dialysis patients. In only one center, a high prevalence of an uncommon genotype was suggestive of infection from a common source.

Quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C: comparison between Amplicor HCV monitor system and branched DNA signal amplification assay

Quantitative measurement of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is important in predicting and monitoring the therapeutic effects of interferon in treating patients with chronic hepatitis C. We compared two commercial available assays, Roche Amplicor HCV Monitor test kits and Chiron branched DNA signal amplification (bDNA) assay, in quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in 74 patients with chronic hepatitis C. The serum HCV RNA of each of these patients was qualitatively positive by conventional reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction. Serum HCV RNA was detected positive by the Amplicor test kits in 63 (85%) patients and by the bDNA assay in 58 (78%) patients (P > 0.05). The quantitative results of HCV RNA detected by both assays showed a good linear correlation (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). Amplicor test kits detected 5 patients with low viremia which were below the detection limit of the bDNA assay (2.0 x 10(5) genome equivalents/ml). However, the mean HCV RNA values detected by the Amplicor test kits was 1.26 log lower than that of the bDNA assay. The Amplicor test kits detected only 5 samples (8%) with a HCV RNA value greater than 5 x 10(6) copies/ml, while the bDNA assay detected 23 samples (40%) with a HCV RNA value greater than 5 x 10(6) genome equivalents/ml (P < 0.01). HCV genotype did not affect the positive rate of HCV RNA measurement detected by both assays. However, a significantly higher mean serum HCV RNA value was noted in HCV genotype 1b as compared with the other genotypes. We concluded that the Roche Amplicor HCV Monitor test kits and the Chiron branched DNA signal amplification assay are equally sensitive in the quantitative measurement of serum HCV RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C and can be reliably used in measuring HCV viremia clinically.

Multicenter evaluation of the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV assay, an integrated PCR system for rapid detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in the diagnostic laboratory

The benefits shown by the recent introduction of PCR for the in vitro diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has prompted the development of standardized, ready-to-use assays that can be implemented in routine clinical laboratories. We have evaluated the clinical performance of COBAS AMPLICOR HCV (COBAS), the first instrument system that allows the automation of HCV RNA amplification and detection, to determine its performance in the routine laboratory setting. More than 2,000 specimens collected at five centers were analyzed in parallel by the COBAS and the manual AMPLICOR HCV (AMPLICOR) tests, and the results were compared with the results for biochemical and serological markers of HCV. In this study the two PCR systems showed the same accuracy, with a concordance rate of 99.8%. As expected, the correlation between serology and PCR was not absolute because the presence of anti-HCV antibodies may be associated with a latent or past infection. On the other hand, if the presence of confirmed anti-HCV antibodies and elevated alanine aminotransferase levels are taken as the "gold standard," indicating an active, ongoing infection, the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests show high and comparable sensitivities (100%) and specificities (98%), with positive and negative predictive values of 100 and 97%, respectively. During the study no false-positive reactions were detected. The use of an internal control allowed the identification of inhibitory substances that prevented amplification for 0.3 and 0.4% of samples tested by the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests, respectively. Compared to the manual system, the COBAS system allowed a significant reduction of hands-on time and could improve the overall laboratory work flow. In conclusion, these results support the use of the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests for the molecular diagnosis of active HCV infections.

Reliability of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assays for the detection of circulating tumour cells: a quality-assurance initiative of the EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assays detecting occult neoplastic cells are increasingly being used for the study of tumour dissemination and minimal residual disease. However, different methods are employed by various research groups and the results are heterogenous. We prospectively assessed the results from nine laboratories performing tyrosinase RT-PCR assays for the detection of melanoma cells on a series of blind samples. After complete analysis, the results were compared for sensitivity and specificity. All laboratories reported correct results for cDNA standards. Five laboratories attained acceptable specificity and a sensitivity detecting 10 cells in 10 ml of whole blood. Four laboratories had unacceptable specificity and/or sensitivity. This blind study highlights the difficulty of RT-PCR data interpretation and the need for quality assurance between laboratories. Measures to increase the reliability of RT-PCR assays are proposed, which have to be prospectively evaluated in future studies.

Quantification of the initial decline of serum hepatitis C virus RNA and response to interferon alfa

Although several virus- and host-related predictive factors for the response to interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) have been defined in patients with chronic hepatitis C, no pretreatment parameter can definitely predict the response to antiviral treatment. Assessment of the initial response by quantification of serum hepatitis C virus RNA before and 4 weeks after initiation of therapy may be a clinically applicable and reliable parameter to predict long-term response. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to test the predictive value of a decline in HCV RNA of at least 3 log in the first 4 weeks of treatment (deltaHCV RNA) in patients treated with 3 x 10(6) units of recombinant IFN-alpha2a (rIFN-alpha2a) three times per week subcutaneously and to compare deltaHCV RNA with other established predictive factors, such as HCV genotype and pretreatment viremia. Serum HCV RNA was measured by a validated quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Geno/subtyping of HCV was performed by direct sequencing of the nonstructural (NS) 5B region of PCR-amplified isolates and subsequent phylogenetic analysis. Stable HCV RNA levels (deltaHCV RNA < or = 1 log) within the first 4 weeks of IFN-alpha treatment were present in 42 of 70 patients. A decline in HCV RNA levels between 1 to 3 log and more than 3 log was observed in 9 (13%) and 19 patients (27%), respectively. In 21 of 70 patients (30%), HCV RNA was not detectable at the end of 12 months' treatment. Three of 26 patients (11%) with a pretreatment viremia of < or = 10(6) copies/mL (all HCV subtype 3a) and 6 of 44 patients (14%) with a pretreatment viremia of > 10(6) copies/mL (HCV subtypes 1b, 2a, 2c, 3a [two patients], and 4) achieved a virological sustained response to interferon-alpha2a treatment. All patients with a virological sustained response had an initial deltaHCV RNA of more than 3 log. In a stepwise discriminant-function analysis, the initial deltaHCV RNA was confirmed as the strongest predictor of virological sustained response (P < .0001). In conclusion, the data of the present study suggest that IFN-alpha treatment can be terminated after 4 weeks in patients with a decrease in HCV RNA levels of less than 3 log, when apparent HCV eradication is considered the therapeutic target. The predictive value of deltaHCV RNA clearly exceeds the significance of HCV genotype and pretreatment viremia as predictors of successful IFN-alpha treatment.

Hepatitis viruses: genetic variants and clinical significance

Variants of hepatitis B, C, and delta virus have been identified in patients both with acute and chronic infections. In the hepatitis B virus genome, naturally occurring mutations have been found in all viral genes, most notably in the genes coding for the structural envelope and nucleocapsid proteins. In the hepatitis C virus genome, the regions coding for the structural envelope proteins E1 and E2, as well as the 3'-contiguous non-structural region NS1, were found to be hypervariable. Viral variants may be associated with a specific clinical course of the infection, e.g., acute, fulminant or chronic hepatitis. Specific mutations may reduce viral clearance by immune mechanisms ('vaccine escape' and 'immune escape'), response to antiviral therapy ('therapy escape'), as well as detection ('diagnosis escape'). The exact contribution, however, of specific mutations to the pathogenesis and natural course of hepatitis B, C, or delta virus infection, including hepatocellular carcinoma development, and the response to antiviral treatment remains to be established.

Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection afflicts millions of people in the United States and worldwide. We examine the epidemiology of HCV infection, the molecular biology of the virus, the pathophysiology of infection, the clinical diagnosis and manifestations of infection, and the treatment of HCV infection.