A controlled trial of prednisolone treatment in primary biliary cirrhosis. Three-year results

Medical treatment of cholestatic liver disease

In most cholestatic liver diseases the cause of the disease is not known and therapy can only be directed toward suppression of the pathogenetic processes and amelioration of the consequences of cholestasis. The recognition of adaptive-compensatory responses to cholestasis has become of major importance. They tend to minimize retention of bile acids and other potentially toxic solutes in the hepatocyte by limiting hepatocellular uptake, reducing bile acid synthesis, stimulating detoxification, and up-regulating alternative pathways for excretion. Some of the drugs used for the treatment of cholestatic liver diseases in an empiric way turned out to be modulators of nuclear receptors, which regulate these adaptive-compensatory responses. New drugs are being designed and tested along these lines and may be regarded as treatment opportunities of the future.

Primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic and slowly progressive cholestatic liver disease of autoimmune etiology characterized by injury of the intrahepatic bile ducts that may eventually lead to liver failure. Affected individuals are usually in their fifth to seventh decades of life at time of diagnosis, and 90% are women. Annual incidence is estimated between 0.7 and 49 cases per million-population and prevalence between 6.7 and 940 cases per million-population (depending on age and sex). The majority of patients are asymptomatic at diagnosis, however, some patients present with symptoms of fatigue and/or pruritus. Patients may even present with ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and/or esophageal variceal hemorrhage. PBC is associated with other autoimmune diseases such as Sjogren's syndrome, scleroderma, Raynaud's phenomenon and CREST syndrome and is regarded as an organ specific autoimmune disease. Genetic susceptibility as a predisposing factor for PBC has been suggested. Environmental factors may have potential causative role (infection, chemicals, smoking). Diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical features, abnormal liver biochemical pattern in a cholestatic picture persisting for more than six months and presence of detectable antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) in serum. All AMA negative patients with cholestatic liver disease should be carefully evaluated with cholangiography and liver biopsy. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only currently known medication that can slow the disease progression. Patients, particularly those who start UDCA treatment at early-stage disease and who respond in terms of improvement of the liver biochemistry, have a good prognosis. Liver transplantation is usually an option for patients with liver failure and the outcome is 70% survival at 7 years. Recently, animal models have been discovered that may provide a new insight into the pathogenesis of this disease and facilitate appreciation for novel treatment in PBC.

Overlap syndromes with autoimmune hepatitis in chronic cholestatic liver diseases

Conditions exhibiting features of two different autoimmune liver diseases are commonly designated overlap syndromes, although there is no current agreement on what constitutes an overlap syndrome or specific diagnostic criteria. As in the classic autoimmune liver diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), the etiology is unknown but presumed to be related to alterations of immune regulation. Distinction of these clinical entities is important for management as outcomes may differ from outcomes of patients with diagnosis of classic autoimmune liver diseases. Due to their presumed rarity, no large therapeutic trials are available and treatment of overlap conditions is empirical and based upon extrapolation of data from the primary autoimmune liver diseases. PBC-AIH overlap is the most frequently described overlap syndrome and may be associated with a poor prognosis. This may represent an important and unrecognized cause of resistance to ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with PBC. PSC-AIH overlap is less commonly reported. Prognosis may be better than in patients with PSC alone; however, worse than in patients with AIH alone. Further studies are needed for determining diagnosis, natural history and optimal therapeutic strategies of overlap syndromes of autoimmune liver disease.

Protective effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid on primary culture of rat hepatocytes

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently, we reported on the beneficial clinical effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) who were unresponsive to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). In this study we examined the effect of EPA on rat hepatocytes in primary culture.

METHODS

Hepatocytes were isolated from rat liver by perfusion of collagenase and cultured with or without EPA. Cell damage induced by chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) was assessed by WST-8 assay and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. PGE(2) and LTB(4) concentrations in the culture medium were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). cDNA was made from total RNA that was extracted from hepatocytes, and TaqMan polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to assess the expression of CuZn and Mn superoxide dismutase (SOD) mRNA.

RESULTS

When rat hepatocytes were cultured in the presence of EPA, the damage caused by CDCA was significantly decreased compared with cells cultured without EPA. Cytotoxicity significantly decreased in the presence of EPA. Furthermore, SOD mRNA expression was increased by adding EPA. These findings indicated that EPA protects cells by scavenging superoxide radicals ((*)O(2-)) mediated by SOD production.

CONCLUSION

EPA has a direct protective effect on rat hepatocytes, which is in agreement with the clinical efficacy of EPA in PBC patients.

Cyclosporin A for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporin A has been used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, but the therapeutic responses in randomised clinical trials have been heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of cyclosporin A for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant randomised clinical trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, The Chinese Biomedical Database, and LILACS, and manual searches of bibliographies to June 2006. We contacted authors of trials and the company producing cyclosporin A.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing cyclosporin A with placebo, no intervention, or another drug were included irrespective of blinding, language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were mortality, and mortality or liver transplantation. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and if appropriate, Peto odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). We examined intervention effects by random-effects and fixed-effect models.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three trials with 390 patients that compared cyclosporin A versus placebo. Two of them were assessed methodologically adequate with low-bias risk. Cyclosporin A did not significantly reduce mortality risk (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.45), and mortality or liver transplantation (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.20). Cyclosporin A significantly improved pruritus (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.14), but not fatigue. Cyclosporin A significantly reduced alanine aminotransferase (WMD -41 U/L, 95% CI -63 to -18) and increased serum albumin level (WMD 1.66 g/L, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.05). Significantly more patients experienced adverse events in the cyclosporin A group than in the placebo group, especially renal dysfunction (Peto odds ratio 5.56, 95% CI 2.52 to 12.27) and hypertension (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.48).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence supporting or refuting that cyclosporin A may delay death, death or liver transplantation, or progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. Cyclosporin A caused more adverse events than placebo, like renal dysfunction and hypertension. We do not recommend the use of cyclosporin A outside randomised clinical trials.

Azathioprine for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, but the therapeutic responses in randomised clinical trials have been conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of azathioprine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised clinical trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, The Chinese Biomedical Database, and LILACS, and manual searches of bibliographies to September 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing azathioprine versus placebo, no intervention, or another drug were included irrespective of blinding, language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were mortality, and mortality or liver transplantation. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). We examined the intervention effects by random-effects and fixed-effect models.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two randomised clinical trials with 293 patients. Only one of the trials was regarded as having low bias risk. Azathioprine did not significantly decrease mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.31, 2 trials). Azathioprine did not improve pruritus at one-year intervention (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.84, 1 trial), cirrhosis development, or quality of life. Patients given azathioprine experienced significantly more adverse events than patients given no intervention or placebo (RR 2.44, 95% CI 1.14 to 5.20, 2 trials). The common adverse events were rash, severe diarrhoea, and bone marrow depression.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support the use of azathioprine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Researchers who are interested in performing further randomised clinical trials should be aware of the risks of adverse events.

Matrix metalloproteinase gene delivery for liver fibrosis

The resolution of advanced liver fibrosis has been recently recognized to be possible, if the causative stimuli are successfully removed. However, whether complete resolution from cirrhosis, the end stage of liver fibrosis, can be achieved is still questionable. Delivery of interstitial collagenases, such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, in the liver could be an attractive strategy to treat advanced hepatic fibrosis from the view point that the imbalance between too few interstitial collagenases and too many of their inhibitors is the main obstacle to the resolution from fibrosis. Remodeling of hepatic extracellular matrix by delivered interstitial collagenases also facilitates the disappearance of activated hepatic stellate cells, the main matrix-producing cells in the liver, and promotes the proliferation of hepatocytes. This review will focus on the impact of the gene delivery of MMPs for the treatment of advanced liver fibrosis while discussing other current therapeutic strategies for liver fibrosis, and on the need for the development of a safe and effective delivery system of MMPs.

Risk of lymphoma in primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A number of immunosuppressive therapies have not been associated with clinical benefit in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The use of more potent immunomodulatory therapies, however, could raise concerns over the risk of adverse effects such as the development of lymphoma. Therefore, we sought to describe the frequency, clinical spectrum, and outcomes among patients with PBC and a concomitant diagnosis of lymphoma.

METHODS

Patients with PBC evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between January 1, 1976-December 31, 1997 comprised the study cohort. Medical records were abstracted for demographic and clinical information including the temporal relationship between diagnoses and potential risk factors for lymphoma.

RESULTS

From a total of 2192 patients, the frequency of lymphoma was observed at 0.6% (13 cases). The majority of patients (54%) had PBC before they were diagnosed with lymphoma, whereas 23% of cases were diagnosed in conjunction with PBC. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (69%) was observed in most cases with disease involvement above the diaphragm (38%). Treatment in the form of chemotherapy (n = 3), radiation (n = 2), and surgery (n = 6) was provided for 11 patients. Seven (54%) patients did not have evidence for recurrent disease, whereas 3 (23%) patients died of progressive lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline risk for lymphoma in patients with PBC is estimated at <1%. Clinical trials with potent immunosuppressive therapies for PBC should not be prohibited on the basis of concerns regarding a baseline predisposition for lymphoma in this population.

Pharmacokinetics and bone effects of budesonide in primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate the safety of budesonide in primary biliary cirrhosis.

METHODS

77 primary biliary cirrhosis patients, with stages I-III at entry, were randomized to use either budesonide 6 mg and ursodeoxycholic acid 15 mg/kg (group A), or ursodeoxycholic acid alone (group B) daily for 3 years. In 22 patients, budesonide pharmacokinetics was determined after 3 years. Bone mass density was measured in 62 patients at baseline and 3 years; in 57 patients also liver biopsies were performed.

RESULTS

At 3 years, no significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of budesonide were found between the patients with stages 0-I, II and III primary biliary cirrhosis. In group A, bone mass density in femoral neck and lumbar spine were decreased by 3.6% (P = 0.0002) and 2.8% (P = 0.003) from the baseline. In group B, the corresponding decreases were 1.9% (P = 0.029) and 0.7% (P = 0.25), but the differences between the groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.16 for femoral neck and P = 0.08 for lumbar spine).

CONCLUSIONS

The plasma concentrations of budesonide do not significantly differ within stages I-III primary biliary cirrhosis patients. The combination of budesonide and ursodeoxycholic acid may decrease bone mass density in the femoral neck and lumbar spine in some primary biliary cirrhosis patients, and bone mass density is recommended to be monitored during budesonide therapy.

Reversal of fibrosis: no longer a pipe dream?

The reversal of liver fibrosis is not a new phenomenon. Treatment of the primary disease remains the most effective strategy, but new approaches to promote resolution of fibrosis are being built on the foundations that were provided by research into the basic mechanisms of fibrogenesis. A return to normal hepatic architecture from advanced fibrosis is achievable in some cases, and cirrhosis itself may be partly remediable.

Principles of hepatic organic anion transporter regulation during cholestasis, inflammation and liver regeneration

Hepatic uptake and biliary excretion of organic anions (e.g., bile acids and bilirubin) is mediated by hepatobiliary transport systems. Defects in transporter expression and function can cause or maintain cholestasis and jaundice. Recruitment of alternative export transporters in coordination with phase I and II detoxifying pathways provides alternative pathways to counteract accumulation of potentially toxic biliary constituents in cholestasis. The genes encoding for organic anion uptake (NTCP, OATPs), canalicular export (BSEP, MRP2) and alternative basolateral export (MRP3, MRP4) in liver are regulated by a complex interacting network of hepatocyte nuclear factors (HNF1, 3, 4) and nuclear (orphan) receptors (e.g., FXR, PXR, CAR, RAR, LRH-1, SHP, GR). Bile acids, proinflammatory cytokines, hormones and drugs mediate causative and adaptive transporter changes at a transcriptional level by interacting with these nuclear factors and receptors. Unraveling the underlying regulatory mechanisms may therefore not only allow a better understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of cholestatic liver diseases but should also identify potential pharmacological strategies targeting these regulatory networks. This review is focused on general principles of transcriptional basolateral and canalicular transporter regulation in inflammation-induced cholestasis, ethinylestradiol- and pregnancy-associated cholestasis, obstructive cholestasis and liver regeneration. Moreover, the potential therapeutic role of nuclear receptor agonists for the management of liver diseases is highlighted.

Emerging therapies for liver fibrosis

Liver fibrosis occurs as a result of a wide range of injurious processes and in its end-stage results in cirrhosis. This gross disruption of liver architecture is associated with impaired hepatic function, portal hypertension and significant resultant morbidity and mortality. Indeed, liver fibrosis and cirrhosis represent a major worldwide healthcare burden. Recent progress in liver transplantation, the management of portal hypertension and the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis have had an important impact. However, these approaches are not without their limitations - in particular, issues regarding organ availability for transplantation - and serve to highlight the urgent requirement to influence pharmacologically the underlying fibrotic process in many patients. Liver fibrosis has been shown to be a bidirectional process and increasing data from laboratory and clinical studies reveal that even advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis are potentially reversible. Exploration of the molecular mechanisms underlying this bi-directionality will lead to char acterisation of the essential attributes of an antifibrotic therapy. In this review, these mechanisms are highlighted and the growing number of emerging antifibrotic agents discussed.

Methotrexate for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate, a folic acid antagonist with immunosuppressive properties, has been used to treat patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The therapeutic responses to methotrexate in randomised clinical trials have been heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of methotrexate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant randomised clinical trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (June 2004), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2004), EMBASE (January 1980 to August 2004), and manual searches of bibliographies. We contacted authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing methotrexate with placebo, no intervention, or another drug were included irrespective of blinding, language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) if applicable. Continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD). We examined intervention effects by using both a random-effects model and a fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four trials (370 patients) that compared methotrexate with placebo with or without ursodeoxycholic acid as co-intervention. One additional trial (87 patients) compared methotrexate with colchicine without and later with ursodeoxycholic acid as co-intervention. The methodological quality of the trials was low. We did not find significant effects of methotrexate on pruritus, fatigue, liver complications, liver biochemistry, liver histology, or adverse events. The pruritus score (WMD - 0.68, 95% CI - 1.11 to - 0.25), the levels of serum alkaline phosphatases (WMD - 0.41, 95% CI - 0.70 to - 0.12) and plasma immunoglobulin M (WMD - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.74 to - 0.20) were significantly lower in the patients receiving methotrexate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate increased mortality in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We do not recommend methotrexate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis outside randomised trials.

Glucocorticosteroids for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cirrhosis is a chronic progressive cholestatic liver disease of presumed autoimmune etiology, characterised by the destruction of small intrahepatic bile ducts and the eventual development of cirrhosis and liver failure. Its progression may be influenced by immunosuppression. Glucocorticosteroids are potent immunosuppressive agents, but they are associated with significant adverse effects, including osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of glucocorticosteroids versus placebo or no intervention for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Controlled Trials Register,The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the full text of the identified studies were searched until June 2004. The search strategy included terms for primary biliary cirrhosis and glucocorticosteroids (including the names of frequently used preparations). Previous research groups and manufacturers were contacted for additional references. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind, single-blind, or unblinded randomised clinical trials evaluating any preparation of glucocorticosteroids versus placebo or no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis diagnosed by abnormal liver function tests and either anti-mitochondrial antibodies or histology were included. Additional agents were allowed if they were administered to both groups equally.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by methodology components (generation of allocation sequence; allocation concealment; blinding; follow up). Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method with missing data being accounted for by imputation.

MAIN RESULTS

Only two underpowered trials (reporting 36 and 40 patients) were identified. These differed markedly in their inclusion criteria and treatment protocols. Both stated that they used placebo. However, allocation concealment was unclear. Only one trial reported any patient deaths. No significant improvement in mortality was identified (odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 1.76). Improvements in serum markers of liver inflammation and liver histology were identified. Potentially prognostically linked markers such as bilirubin and albumin were incompletely reported. Bone mineral density (weighted mean difference -2.84%, 95% CI -4.16 to -1.53) and the number of patients with any adverse event (OR 8.99, 95% CI 2.15 to 37.58) were significantly increased in the glucocorticosteroid group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient data to support or reject the use of glucocorticosteroids for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. It may be appropriate to consider a large prospective randomised clinical trial on this topic.

Hydrodynamic-based in vivo transfection of retinoic X receptor-alpha gene can enhance vitamin A-induced attenuation of liver fibrosis in mice

BACKGROUND/AIM

In hepatic stellate cells isolated from rat fibrotic livers, the amount of retinoid X receptor-alpha (RXR-alpha) mRNA is greatly reduced. However, the effectiveness of retinoids in the treatment of liver fibrosis is controversial. We hypothesized that increasing the expression levels of RXR-alpha in livers will improve the response of liver fibrosis to retinoids treatment.

METHODS

pTracer-CMV2 vector harboring both green fluorescent protein and RXR-alpha genes was given to mice with carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4))-induced liver fibrosis, by hydrodynamic-based in vivo transfection. Vitamin A was simultaneously administered to the mice. Sirius red staining and measurement of hydroxyproline content were performed to evaluate liver fibrosis. The incorporation of 5-bromo-2-deoxyribouridine (BrdU) was carried out to determine liver cell proliferation.

RESULTS

Successful transfection and expression of exogenous RXR-alpha gene in the liver was determined by observance of green fluorescence under a confocal microscope, and detection of RXR-alpha protein by immunohistochemistry. Hepatic fibrosis, evaluated by both Sirius red staining with image analysis and quantity of hydroxyproline in livers of RXR-alpha-transfected group, tapered off remarkably. The hydroxyproline content and Sirius red-positive staining area on liver sections from RXR-alpha-transfected mice decreased by 34.3% and 54.63%, respectively, compared with the control group receiving empty vector. The labeling index of BrdU in non-parenchymal cells was much lower in livers from the RXR-alpha-transfected group than that of empty vector-transfected group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrodynamic-based in vivo transfection of the RXR-alpha gene can enhance the vitamin A-induced attenuation of liver fibrosis in mice. One of the possible mechanisms of action for this gene treatment is inhibition of non-parenchymal cell proliferation mainly composed of hepatic stellate cells in fibrotic livers.

D-penicillamine for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

D-penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its hepatic copper decreasing and immunomodulatory potentials. The results from randomised clinical trials have been inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the beneficial and harmful effects of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (September 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2003), The Chinese Biomedical CD Database (January 1979 to August 2003), and LILACS (1982 to 2003); through manual searches of bibliographies; and by contacting authors of the trials and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials comparing D-penicillamine with placebo/no intervention or other control intervention irrespective of language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the trials and extracted data, validated by a third reviewer. The primary outcomes were 1) mortality and 2) a combination of those who died or underwent liver transplantation. We analysed dichotomous outcomes as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by a fixed effect model and a random effects model. We investigated sources of heterogeneity by subgroup analyses and tested the robustness of our findings by sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven trials randomising 706 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. D-penicillamine compared with placebo/no intervention tended to increase mortality (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.64, fixed; RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.50, random). However, there was substantial heterogeneity. No significant differences were detected regarding the risks of mortality or liver transplantation, pruritus, liver complications, progression of liver histological stage, or the levels of liver biochemical variables (except alanine aminotransferase). D-penicillamine versus placebo/no intervention significantly increased the risk of adverse events (RR 3.11, 95% CI 2.33 to 4.16, fixed; RR 4.18, 95% CI 1.38 to 12.69, random).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

D-penicillamine did not appear to reduce the risk of mortality, but significantly increased the occurrences of adverse events in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We do not support the use of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

[Primary biliary liver cirrhosis and overlap syndrome. Diagnosis and therapy]

Primary biliary cirrhosis represents a chronic cholestatic liver disease of unknown etiology. It primarily affects females, is associated with extrahepatic immune-mediated syndromes, shows an immunogenetic association with HLA DR8, and displays serum autoantibodies, which makes an autoimmune etiology likely. The diagnosis is reached in patients with elevated alkaline phosphatase, gamma glutamyl transferase and bilirubin levels who exhibit normal bile ducts upon ultrasound examination, and in whom specific antimitochondrial autoantibodies are detectable. Half of all PBC patients additionally show specific antinuclear autoantibodies. Immunosuppressive therapy is ineffective; steroids, transplant immunosuppressants, colchicine, d-penicillamine and methotrexate are of limited clinical benefit. Ursodeoxycholic acid has few side effects and leads to a biochemical response and a delay of disease progression in most cases. When ursodeoxycholic acid therapy is ineffective an overlap syndrome with autoimmune hepatitis can be present, which can respond to steroid treatment. The only curative option is liver transplantation which should be considered when bilirubin levels exceed 100 microM/l.

Clinical and pathological characteristics of the autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The defining of the autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) overlap syndrome as a separate clinicopathological entity has been controversial and temporally and geographically subjective.

METHODS

From 1979 until 2000, 227 patients diagnosed with AIH, PBC or the overlap thereof were treated. Cases with genuine AIH/PBC overlap syndrome were sorted out using close clinical follow up and serial liver biopsies.

RESULTS

Of the 227 patients, 19 (8.4%) were diagnosed with the AIH/PBC overlap syndrome. They all cleared a score >10 for the diagnosis of AIH, and tested positive for antimitochondrial antibodies during their courses. Long-term follow up with frequent histological examinations, however, established the diagnosis of AIH/PBC overlap syndrome in only two (0.8%) patients. The most powerful factor distinguishing AIH from PBC was acidophilic bodies in lobules that were detected significantly more frequently in patients with AIH than PBC or spurious overlap syndrome (39/46 [85%]vs 3/85 [4%], P < 0.001). It was more reliable than bile-duct lesions for the distinction of PBC from AIH.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AIH/PBC overlap syndrome does exist, it is infrequent and needs to be diagnosed carefully using close clinical and histological follow up to enable timely and effective treatment.

Tamoxifen: a novel treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis?

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease, which predominantly affects women. It is characterised histologically by necroinflammation of small intrahepatic bile ducts and biochemically by elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, levels of which at diagnosis predict survival. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only treatment shown to improve liver biochemistry and survival. We report two patients with PBC who show a fall in serum alkaline phosphates levels whilst receiving tamoxifen therapy. Tamoxifen may exert this effect, which warrants further study, either via cholangiocyte estrogen receptors, inhibiting cholangiocyte proliferation and inducing apoptosis or by activating pregnane X receptor, analogous to the mode of action of UDCA.

Primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune cholangiopathy

AMA are detected in the serum of 92% to 95% of patients with PBC using indirect immunofluorescent methods. AIC is the term used to describe the 5% to 8% of AMA-negative PBC patients who uniformly have ANA and SMA. Recent applications of more sensitive and specific tests to detect serum AMA have shown that most, if not all, patients with AIC actually do have AMA. Emerging evidence that AMA and mitochondrial autoantigens play important roles in the immunopathogenesis of NSDC also suggests that AIC and PBC are likely to be a single disease, exhibiting variation in the types of autoantibodies and in both the concentrations and immunoglobulin isotypes of AMA.

Colchicine for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Colchicine has been used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis because of its immunomodulatory and antifibrotic potential. The therapeutical responses to colchicine in randomised clinical trials were inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of colchicine in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE (September 2003), and manual searches of bibliographies. We contacted authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing colchicine with any kind of control therapy were included irrespective of language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were the number of deaths and the number of death and/or patients who underwent liver transplantation. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We examined intervention effects by using both a fixed effect model and a random effects model. Heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven randomised clinical trials involving 716 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No significant differences were detected between colchicine and placebo/no intervention on the number of deaths (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.06), the number of deaths and/or patients who underwent liver transplantation (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.49), liver complications, liver biochemical variables, liver histological measurements, and adverse events. Trial methodology was generally low and some trials had high drop-out rate. A best-worst-case-scenario analysis showed no significant effect of colchicine on mortality (RR 0.59, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.15), while a worst-best-case-scenario analysis showed a significant detrimental effect of colchicine on mortality (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.44). Colchicine significantly decreased the number of patients without improvement of pruritus (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87). However, this estimate was based on only 156 patients from three trials. The effect of the combined treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid was not significantly different from that of colchicine alone.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence either to support or refute the use of colchicine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. As we are not able to exclude a detrimental effect of colchicine, we suggest that it is only used in randomised clinical trials.

Primary biliary cirrhosis: specific treatment

No single agent or combination of agents has been shown to unequivocally delay the need for liver transplantation or reduce mortality in patients with PBC. Given this uncertainty, what, if any, specific therapy should be recommended? The agents with the strongest scientific proof of efficacy in well-designed clinical trials are ursodiol, azathioprine, and cyclosporine. Ursodiol is clearly the least toxic of these three. Other agents, such as methotrexate, have shown impressive results in anecdotal studies but have never been adequately tested in randomized clinical trials. Thus, based on the current evidence, imperfect as it is, ursodiol appears to be the safest and potentiaily the most effective specific therapy for patients with PBC. Azathioprine and methotrexate may be the best alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate or do not respond to ursodiol therapy, primarily because their safety has been established in large and lengthy clinical trials. Cylosporine could be considered in patients who fail other treatments (Table 3). We can hope that a safe, highly-effective treatment for patients with PBC will ultimately be discovered. Trials to unequivocally demonstrate the efficacy of new agents will have to be extremely well designed, however, and will require large numbers of patients followed for an extended period of time.

Primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease of adults. This disorder is characterised histologically by chronic non-suppurative destruction of interlobular bile ducts leading to advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver failure. The precise aetiopathogenesis of primary biliary cirrhosis remains unknown, although dysregulation of the immune system and genetic susceptibility both seem to be important. Affected patients are typically middle-aged women with abnormal serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase. Presence of antimitochondrial antibody in serum is almost diagnostic of the disorder. Identification of primary biliary cirrhosis is important, because effective treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid has been shown to halt disease progression and improve survival without need for liver transplantation. However, therapeutic options for disease-related complications-including fatigue and metabolic bone disease-remain unavailable. Mathematical models have been developed that accurately predict the natural history of primary biliary cirrhosis in individuals. Despite advances in understanding of the disease, it remains one of the major indications for liver transplantation worldwide.

Review article: pruritus in cholestatic and other liver diseases

Pruritus is often the most troublesome symptom in patients with chronic liver disease, particularly when cholestasis is a prominent feature. The exact pathogenesis is unknown, but empirical treatment, such as cholestyramine, based on a liver-based origin of pruritus, has been used for many years. Recently, evidence for a central mechanism for pruritus has been obtained and opioid antagonists have been tried clinically with some benefit, but their use is not widespread. In addition, the pruritus associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy can now be alleviated in many cases by ursodeoxycholic acid. As it also improves foetal outcome, this should become first-line therapy. We review the pathogenesis and therapy of pruritus, highlighting practical aspects to help with patients with seemingly intractable pruritus.

Oxidant stress is a significant feature of primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic disorder characterised by an immunological, and often granulomatous, attack on bile ducts leading to fibrosis, cirrhosis, liver failure and death. Animal and human studies suggest that oxidant stress plays a key role in progression of other liver diseases, but no comprehensive investigation has been performed previously in PBC. A wide range of lipid peroxidation and antioxidant markers were measured in the blood and urine of 41 patients with histologically confirmed PBC. Lipid peroxidation markers were significantly elevated [plasma and urinary 8-isoprostane, P<0.001; plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), P=0.007] compared to age- and sex-matched controls. The most striking antioxidant depletion occurred with plasma total glutathione where levels were significantly reduced (30% of controls). Total serum antioxidant levels were decreased (P=0.013) and serum selenium and vitamin A were also lower (both P<0.001); vitamins C and E were normal. Most patients had early disease biochemically and were Child-Pugh grade A. Urinary 8-isoprostane correlated positively with Ludwig stage and markers of hepatic injury and cholestasis. This study clearly demonstrates that oxidant stress, as reflected in a comprehensive spectrum of lipid peroxidation and antioxidant markers, is a significant feature of early-stage PBC.

Primary biliary cirrhosis with additional features of autoimmune hepatitis: response to therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid

Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) may have additional features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Corticosteroids usually contraindicated in PBC have been advocated for these patients. Patients with antimitochondrial antibody (AMA)-positive PBC from two previous randomized, controlled trials were assessed for features of AIH. Their biochemical, immunologic, and histologic responses to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus placebo were compared with those without AIH features. The survival of patients testing positive or negative for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) was also examined. Features of AIH were defined by the presence of 2 or more of the following: 1) alanine transaminase (ALT) > 5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN); 2) immunoglobulin G (IgG) > 2 x ULN or positive anti-smooth muscle antibody (ASMA); and 3) moderate to severe lobular inflammation on pretreatment liver biopsy. Testing for AMA, ASMA, and ANA was done by immunofluorescence. The change in serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), transaminases, IgM, and IgG from baseline to 2 years was compared. Of the 331 patients randomized, 16 (4.8%) had features of AIH (12 UDCA, 4 placebo). The median percent change in serum biochemistry and immunoglobulin values were similar in patients with PBC +/- features of AIH after 2 years of therapy with UDCA. Over 2 years, little change in histologic features of AIH was observed. Survival was similar for patients with PBC with and without ANA. In conclusion, features of AIH in PBC may be transient and response to UDCA therapy similar to patients with PBC without features of AIH.

Increased rate of bone loss at the femoral neck in patients with chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) have an increased prevalence of osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the rate of bone loss and potential predictors of increased bone loss in a cohort of patients with CLD.

DESIGN

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline and at follow-up by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (31 female, 12 male) were available for a second measurement of BMD, with a median of 25 months (range 18-41) between the measurements. Mean annual bone loss at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck, respectively, was 0.6 +/- 2.0% and 1.5 +/- 2.4% in females and 0.8 +/- 1.9% and 2.9 +/- 2.0% in males. The BMD Z score decreased significantly over time at the femoral neck (P = 0.005 and P = 0.02 for females and males, respectively). Bone loss was increased significantly at the lumbar spine in patients classified as Child-Pugh B + C compared with those classified as Child-Pugh A (P = 0.04). Serum levels of bilirubin correlated independently and positively, and 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 levels negatively, with bone loss at the femoral neck.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CLD have increased bone loss at the femoral neck. Advanced liver disease is associated with increased bone loss, and hyperbilirubinaemia and low levels of vitamin D3 are predictors of increased bone loss.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cirrhosis is a rare autoimmune liver disease and an effective treatment has been difficult to establish. Some randomised clinical trials have found an effect of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the beneficial effects and adverse effects of peroral ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis versus placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Controlled Trials Register of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the full text of the identified studies were searched until April 2001. The electronic searches were done by entering the search terms 'ursodeoxycholic acid', 'UDCA', 'primary biliary cirrhosis', and 'PBC'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials evaluating ursodeoxycholic acid administered perorally at any dose versus placebo or no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis diagnosed by any method. Only trials using an adequate method for randomisation were included, regardless of blinding and language.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodologic quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by components and the Jadad-score. The following outcomes were extracted: mortality, liver transplantation, pruritus, other clinical symptoms (jaundice, portal pressure, (bleeding) oesophageal varices, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepato-renal syndrome, autoimmune conditions), liver biochemistry, liver function, liver biopsy findings, quality of life, and adverse events. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 16 randomised clinical trials evaluating ursodeoxycholic acid against placebo (n = 15) or no intervention (n = 1) in 1422 patients were identified. The median Jadad-score was 3 (range 1-5). A number of trials described as double blind had problems with the blinding. Neither mortality (odds ratio = 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.48), liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.32), mortality or liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.90; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.26), pruritus, fatigue, autoimmune conditions, quality of life, liver histology, or portal pressure were significantly affected by ursodeoxycholic acid (given in doses of 8-15 mg/kg/day for three months to five years). However, ursodeoxycholic acid significantly (P < 0.05) reduced ascites, jaundice, and biochemical variables such as serum bilirubin and liver enzymes. Ursodeoxycholic acid was not significantly associated with adverse events. Including data after patients had been switched onto open label ursodeoxycholic acid confirmed the findings regarding the lack of a significant effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. A significant (P = 0.04) effect was, however, observed on the incidence of liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.68; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.98).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Ursodeoxycholic acid has a marginal therapeutic effect for primary biliary cirrhosis. On the positive side, ursodeoxycholic acid has few side effects. The general usage of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis needs reevaluation.

T cell repertoire in primary biliary cirrhosis: a common T cell clone and repertoire change after treatment

T cell repertoire was analyzed in three early-stage primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients, using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation polymorphism. Multiple expanded clones were demonstrated in livers and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of all three patients. Comparison of the repertoire of different parts of the liver demonstrated the presence of common clones in various Vbeta families. Comparison of the repertoire between the liver and PBL demonstrated that both CD4 and CD8 T cell clones were expanded. Sequence analysis of complementarity determining region 3 of the expanded clones revealed that relatively conserved amino acids were utilized in each patient and that an identical CD4 T cell clone having Vbeta16 was present in all three patients. The number of expanded T cell clones in PBL decreased markedly after the treatment with prednisolone. These results suggest that common T cell clones may play a pathogenic role in PBC.

Changes in titers of antimitochondrial and antinuclear antibodies during the course of primary biliary cirrhosis

A case of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) in whom a complete biochemical (serum bilirubin, transaminases and alkaline phosphatase) remission was noted after combination treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and corticosteroid is reported. The antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) detected by indirect immunofluorescence was initially positive, and the antinuclear antibody (ANA) was negative, but these two antibodies subsequently fluctuated independently (AMA-positive/ANA-negative, AMA-negative/ANA-negative, AMA-negative/ANA-positive, AMA-positive/ANA-positive, and again AMA-negative/ANA-positive) in spite of a lack of histopathological improvement in the liver after treatment. The clinical presentation in our case suggests that in some cases the diagnosis of PBC or so-called autoimmune cholangitis (AIC) might depend on the 'phase' of the same disease. Our results also suggest that detailed immunoreactive profiles against 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex (2-OADC) enzymes by using immunoblotting, together with a serial histological examination, should provide more precise information for a diagnosis of PBC.

Primary biliary cirrhosis with features of autoimmune hepatitis

The diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is made via a composite of clinical, laboratory, serologic, and histologic assessments, but within each parameter there exists a wide spectrum, so that the features of PBC are not always uniform. PBC is just one of several liver diseases thought to have an autoimmune basis. Therefore, it is not surprising, given the complexity of the immune response, that some patients thought to have PBC may have features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Whether such patients have PBC with features of AIH, or antimitochondrial antibody-negative PBC, or another disease altogether, remains unclear.

Autoantibodies Associated with Rheumatic Diseases

The identification of circulating autoantibodies contributes to the correct diagnosis as well as to the follow-up of rheumatic diseases. Some autoantibodies are even included in diagnostic and classification criteria for these types of autoimmune diseases. There are several relatively specific screening and identification methods for the measurement of autoantibodies available. The type of assay crucially influences the diagnostic value of the parameters. In general, routine laboratories should prefer enzyme immunoassays (ELISA) using well characterized antigens, although ELISA tests tend to produce more false-positive and true weakly positive results, which reduce their positive predictive value. Therefore one should be aware that laboratory results can only be properly interpreted when there is a correlation with the clinical situation and when the limitations of the technologies used for autoantibody identification have been taken into consideration. A diagnostic algorithm consisting of screening and identification steps should be established by each laboratory in order to create a rational, evidence-based and cost-effective basis for the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases.

Treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a presumed autoimmune disease of the liver, which predominantly affects middle age women. Most patients are diagnosed when asymptomatic. The disease is characterised by chronic, granulomatous inflammation of the small bile ducts, which leads to progressive ductopenia, cholestasis, fibrosis, cirrhosis and eventual liver failure. All PBC patients with abnormal liver biochemistry should be considered for therapy. Ursodeoxycholic acid (URSO) treatment reduces intracellular hydrophobic bile acid levels and thereby may have a cytoprotective effect on cell membranes. URSO may also act as an immunomodulating agent. Multicenter randomised controlled trials proved that the treatment is associated with a marked improvement in serum biochemical markers of cholestasis, i.e. bilirubin, ALP, GGT, including fall in serum cholesterol levels. Treatment does not seem to benefit the symptoms of fatigue, pruritus, and osteoporosis. UDCA has been shown when given in a dose of 15 mg/kg daily for up to 4 years to prolong the time to liver transplantation or death. Immunosuppressive therapy: based on the immunological abnormalities, several immunosuppressive drugs have been tested. Neither azathioprine nor cyclosporine was found in large enough trials to show beneficial effect on survival. D-penicillamine, cholchicin, methotrexát, prednisolone were found without significant long-term benefit. Combination therapy with URSO and budenoside appears to add some benefit to URSO monotherapy, but further studies are needed. Liver transplantation. The most crucial question is the timing. Serum bilirubin, Mayo risk score and some other factors such as uncontrollable pruritus and severe osteoporosis influence the decision. Recurrence of PBC in allograft is rare, the progress is slow, and is no reason for not recommending transplantation. Symptomatic treatment of pruritus, sicca syndrome and preventive treatment of osteoporosis, neuropathy and fat soluble vitamin deficiency is also important.

Immunopathogenesis of cholestatic autoimmune liver diseases

Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are well recognized chronic cholestatic liver diseases that are considered to have an autoimmune basis. Recent progress in the study of autoimmune liver diseases has improved the recognition and characterization of these conditions. An important component of this progress has been the identification of liver disease-associated autoantibodies and their respective target antigens, and the development of specific assays for these autoantibodies. In addition, some nonhumoral immunological findings imply an involvement of specific immunopathogenic mechanisms in the development of these conditions. Furthermore, immunogenetic factors associated with increased susceptibility to some of these diseases have been identified. This article reviews the most relevant information relating to the postulated autoimmune pathogenesis of these diseases, with special emphasis on their associated humoral and cellular immunological abnormalities and immunopathogenetic factors. Some of the remaining important unresolved issues relating to the pathogenesis of these diseases, that need to be addressed in further research, are highlighted.

Treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis

Although primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is generally a progressive disease, the rate of progression varies greatly from one patient to another. The terminal phase is characterized by hyperbilirubinaemia (>100 micromol/l), a major decrease in the number of intrahepatic bile ducts, and extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis. It is now well established that orthotopic liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients entering the terminal phase of the disease.A variety of therapeutic agents have been proposed for treatment of patients with PBC. However, most have been found ineffective or too toxic to be widely used. In contrast, there is accumulating evidence from large therapeutic trials that long-term administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is safe and prolongs survival free of liver transplantation. Treatment with UDCA slows the histological progression and delays the onset of cirrhosis. In patients who have a sub-optimal response to UDCA therapy alone, the combination of colchicine or methotrexate with UDCA has minimal or no additional benefit, whereas that with corticosteroids is more promising but not yet demonstrated. Among causes of non-response to UDCA therapy, the most common is the PBC-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome. The benefit from the combination of corticosteroids and UDCA in this setting is obvious.Further studies are needed to define the patients who are most likely to respond to UDCA therapy and to assess the benefit of combined medical treatments.

Management of osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

Osteoporosis is not a significant problem in the majority of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, substantial bone-related morbidity may occur in patients with advanced disease, in particular after liver transplantation. The cause of osteoporosis in PBC is multifactorial, and pathophysiological mechanisms specifically related to PBC have not been defined. In general, the principles of management followed in post-menopausal osteoporosis also apply in chronic liver disease. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry is currently the method of choice for monitoring bone mineral density. Avoidance of conditions with potential negative effects on bone mass, and maintaining adequate serum vitamin D levels and calcium intake form the cornerstone in preventing osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates are the most logical choice when specific medical treatment of PBC-associated osteoporosis is indicated, as well as for preventing bone loss during glucocorticoid treatment and after liver transplantation. Recent studies suggest that active vitamin D analogues are effective alternatives in the post-transplant setting.

Management of primary biliary cirrhosis. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases practice guidelines

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a presumed autoimmune disease of the liver, which predominantly affects women once over the age of 20 years. Most cases are diagnosed when asymptomatic (60%). The antimitochondrial antibody is present in serum in most, but not in all, patients with PBC. The disease generally progresses slowly but survival is less than an age- and gender-matched general population. The symptomatic patient may have fatigue, generalized pruritus, portal hypertension, osteoporosis, skin xanthomata, fat soluble vitamin deficiencies, and/or recurrent asymptomatic urinary tract infections. Many nonhepatic autoimmune diseases are found in association with PBC and may prompt initial presentation. To date, immunosuppressive therapy has not been shown to prolong survival in PBC. The hydrophilic bile acid, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), has been shown when given in a dose of 13 to 15 mg/kg daily for up to 4 years to delay the time to liver transplantation or death. This therapy also causes a significant improvement of all the biochemical markers of cholestasis but has no beneficial effects on any of the symptoms or associated disorders. Treatment with UDCA does not obviate the need for liver transplantation. Therapies to prevent complications arising from malabsorption, portal hypertension, and/or osteoporosis are required as well. Good control of pruritus can be achieved in most patients. PBC is diagnosed with increasing frequency, but the agent(s) responsible for this slowly progressive destruction of the interlobular bile ducts remains elusive and hence a specific therapy remains unavailable.

Primary biliary cirrhosis: new perspectives in diagnosis and treatment

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by cholestatic liver function tests, antimitochondrial antibodies, and abnormal liver histology. Early descriptions of a rare rapidly progressive disease no longer reflect the more indolent progress often seen today. Many patients have significant long term morbidity through symptoms such as fatigue and itch with a minority progressing to liver failure and need for transplantation. The current data on the diagnosis, clinical progression, and treatment of PBC are reviewed.

Oral budesonide in the treatment of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis with a suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a safe and effective medical therapy for most patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, some patients show an incomplete response to UDCA therapy. Treatment with corticosteroids may be of benefit although at the expense of systemic side effects. Budesonide, a corticosteroid with an extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism appeared promising for the treatment of PBC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and estimate the efficacy of budesonide in patients with PBC, who have shown a suboptimal response to UDCA. Twenty-two patients with PBC, 16 women, median age of 50 who had been on UDCA (13-15 mg/kg/d) for a mean of 46 months (range 6-108 months) and had shown a persistent elevation of alkaline phosphatase activity at least 2 times the upper limit of normal were enrolled. Oral budesonide, 9 mg daily was administered for 1 year and patients continued on the same dosage of UDCA. There was a significant, but transitory improvement in serum levels of total bilirubin (P =.001) and a significant, but marginal improvement in serum alkaline phsophatase (P =.001) with combination therapy. The Mayo risk score increased significantly (P =.02) and there was a significant loss of bone mass (P <.001) of the lumbar spine. Budesonide-induced hyperglycemia and cosmetic adverse effects were noted in 2 patients. In conclusion, oral budesonide appears to add minimal, if any, additional benefit to UDCA, and it is associated with a significant worsening of osteoporosis in patients with PBC.

Oral budesonide and ursodeoxycholic acid for treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a prospective double-blind trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is used for treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Previous studies showed that, compared with UDCA monotherapy, bile salts plus prednisolone had no further effect on laboratory data but improved liver histology. Thirty percent of these patients had prednisolone-related side effects. Budesonide is a glucocorticoid with a high receptor affinity and a high first-pass metabolism. In this study we investigated whether budesonide and UDCA are superior to UDCA monotherapy.

METHODS

A 2-year prospective, controlled double-blind trial was performed. Twenty patients (mainly with early-stage disease) were treated with UDCA at a dose of 10-15 mg/kg daily in addition to 3 mg budesonide 3 times daily (group A), and 19 patients (1 dropped out for personal reasons) were treated with UDCA plus placebo (group B). Liver biopsy specimens were taken before, after 12 months, and at the end of study. Glucose tolerance tests, serum cortisol levels, and adrenocorticotropin-stimulated cortisol secretion were assessed at regular intervals. Bone mass density was measured by dual-energy photon absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Compared with pretreatment values, liver enzyme and immunoglobulin M and G levels decreased significantly in both groups. Improvement in group A was significantly more pronounced (P < 0.05) than in group B. Titers of antimitochondrial antibodies did not change. In group A, the point score of liver histology improved by 30.3%; in group B, it deteriorated by 3.5% (P < 0.001). Changes in bone mineral density after 2 years were -1.747% in group A and -0.983% in group B (P = 0.43). Budesonide had little influence on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. One patient in group A had budesonide-related side effects; in 3 patients in group B, complications of liver disease developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with UDCA and budesonide is superior to UDCA and placebo.

Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the most common chronic cholestatic liver diseases in adults that lead to biliary cirrhosis and its inherent complications such as portal hypertension and liver failure. Although important advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of these conditions have been accomplished in the last two decades, much work is needed to uncover the interaction of genetic and immunologic mechanisms involved in their pathogenesis. Ursodeoxycholic acid at dosage of 13 to 15 mg/kg/d is the only agent that can currently be recommended in the treatment of PBC. No medical therapy aimed at disrupting disease progression is available for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, although several agents with different properties are currently under evaluation. Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis with end-stage liver disease.

Autoimmune cholangiopathy

Currently available evidence is insufficient to classify PBC and AIC as separate diseases. The ultimate answer to the question of whether AIC, defined as AMA-negative PBC with ANA or SMA, is a disease distinct from AMA-positive PBC with or without ANA will require a detailed comparison of etiologic factors and pathogenetic mechanisms, once they are elucidated. It is intriguing to consider the suggestion of Heathcote that the term autoimmune cholangitis be adopted to describe PBC with or without detectable AMA. However, it is improbable that the venerable term PBC will be supplanted. Hepatologists will probably continue to use the terms AIC and AMA-negative PBC interchangeably, with little risk of being misunderstood.