Spironolactone-induced renal insufficiency and hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure

Long-term use of aldosterone-receptor antagonists in uncontrolled hypertension: a retrospective analysis

Background. The long-term efficacy of aldosterone-receptor antagonists (ARAs) as add-on treatment in uncontrolled hypertension has not yet been reported. Methods. Data from 123 patients (21 with primary aldosteronism, 102 with essential hypertension) with difficult-to-treat hypertension who received an ARA between May 2005 and September 2009 were analyzed retrospectively for their blood pressure (BP) and biochemical response at first followup after start with ARA and the last follow-up available. Results. Systolic BP decreased by 22 ± 20 and diastolic BP by 9.4 ± 12 mmHg after a median treatment duration of 25 months. In patients that received treatment >5 years, SBP was 33 ± 20 and DBP was 16 ± 13 mmHg lower than at baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline BP and follow-up duration were positively correlated with BP response. Conclusion. Add-on ARA treatment in difficult-to-treat hypertension results in a profound and sustained BP reduction.

Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol in Treatment of Heart Failure with Chronic Kidney Disease

Background—

The safety and efficacy of different types of β-blocker therapy in patients with non–dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and systolic heart failure (HF) are not well described. We assessed whether treatment of systolic HF with carvedilol is efficacious and safe in adults with CKD.

Methods and Results—

We performed a post hoc analysis of pooled individual patient data (n=4217) from 2 multinational, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trials, CAPRICORN (Carvedilol Postinfarct Survival Control in Left Ventricular Dysfunction Study) and COPERNICUS (Carvedilol Prospective Randomized, Cumulative Survival study). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, HF mortality, first HF hospitalization, the composite of cardiovascular mortality or first HF hospitalization, and sudden cardiac death. Non–dialysis-dependent CKD was defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. CKD was present in 2566 of 4217 (60.8%) of the cohort, 50.4% of whom were randomly assigned to carvedilol therapy. Within the CKD group, treatment with carvedilol decreased the risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.93; P =0.007), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.94; P =0.011), HF mortality (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.88; P =0.003), first hospitalization for HF (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.88; P =0.0009), and the composite of cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.87; P <0.001) but was without significant effect on sudden cardiac death (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.05; P =0.098). There was no significant interaction between treatment arm and study type. Carvedilol was generally well tolerated by both groups of patients, with an increased relative incidence in transient increase in serum creatinine without need for dialysis and other electrolyte changes in the CKD patients. However, in a sensitivity analysis among HF subjects with estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (CKD stage 3b), the efficacy of carvedilol was not significantly different from placebo.

Conclusions—

This analysis suggests that the benefits of carvedilol therapy in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction with or without symptoms of HF are consistent even in the presence of mild to moderate CKD. Whether carvedilol therapy is similarly efficacious in HF patients with more advanced kidney disease requires further study.

Heart failure in subjects with chronic kidney disease: Best management practices

Renal dysfunction is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and can complicate HF therapy. Treating patients with HF and kidney disease is difficult and requires careful assessment, monitoring and balancing of risk between potential benefits of treatment and adverse impact on renal function. In this review, we address the pathophysiological contexts and management options in this adversarial relation between the heart and the kidney, which exists in a substantial proportion of HF patients. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and β-blockers are associated with similar reductions in mortality in patients with and without renal insufficiency but usually are less often prescribed in patients with renal insufficiency. Careful monitoring of side effects and renal function should be done in all patients with renal insufficiency and prompt measures should be adopted to prevent further complications.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade effects on the kidney in the elderly: benefits and limitations

The proportion of the population that is elderly (age>or=65 years) is growing across the world. The increasing longevity of humans results in a higher number of elderly patients' presenting with multiple chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). These problems increase morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Overactivity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is associated with the development of hypertension, cardiovascular events, and CKD, so targeting the RAAS is a logical therapeutic approach. Elderly patients present special concerns regarding the benefits versus risks of using RAAS blockers. Plasma renin activity declines with age, which has been attributed to the effect of age-associated nephrosclerosis. Plasma aldosterone is also reduced with age, resulting in a greater risk for hyperkalemia in older individuals, especially when coupled with the age-associated decline in GFR. Moreover, the elderly have a higher frequency of concurrent conditions and are on many medications, which may further increase the risk for adverse effects of RAAS blocking agents. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of literature that is specifically aimed at studying elderly using the RAAS blockers. We present in our in-depth review data regarding benefits and limitations of the use of the RAAS blockades on the various sites along the RAAS pathway for elderly patients. Specific attention was given to the role of combination RAAS blockade therapy and higher monotherapy dosing in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly.

Mechanisms of the cardiorenal syndromes

The kidney and heart have essential roles in maintaining blood volume homeostasis and in the regulation of systemic blood pressure. Acute or chronic dysfunction in either the heart or kidneys can induce dysfunction in the other organ, resulting in the so-called cardiorenal syndromes, which are classified into five different types. Abrupt worsening of cardiac function predisposes an individual to acute kidney injury from renal hypoperfusion or renal congestion. Progressive, sometimes permanent, chronic kidney impairment can result from chronic renal hypoperfusion or congestion. Heart failure is common in patients with acute kidney injury. Chronic kidney disease predisposes individuals to atherosclerotic, arteriosclerotic and cardiomyopathic disease. Finally, both cardiac and renal disease can also occur secondary to systemic conditions, such as diabetes or autoimmune disease. This Review examines the mechanisms presiding over the first four types of cardiorenal syndromes. These mechanisms provide a template that accounts for the heart-kidney interactions that occur in patients whose concomitant cardiac and renal conditions result from a third cause.

Pharmacologic therapy in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease: a complex issue

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with chronic heart failure and has important clinical implications. The coexistence of these two syndromes is associated with a higher risk of adverse outcome and increases the difficulties of heart failure treatment because of the complex interplay between renal dysfunction and pharmacologic therapy. The underrepresentation of patients with chronic kidney disease in most heart failure trials contributes to the suboptimal treatment of this high-risk population in clinical practice. In the present review, we briefly examine the pathophysiologic mechanisms connecting chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure and discuss the therapeutic approach to patients affected by both conditions.

Aldosterone-receptor antagonism in hypertension

The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in hypertension has since long been recognized and aldosterone has been acknowledged as one of the key hormones in the pathophysiology, not only in primary aldosteronism but also in essential hypertension and drug-resistant hypertension. Aldosterone-receptor antagonists (ARAs) are increasingly used in patients with resistant hypertension, often with impressive results. However, definitive evidence for the benefit of ARAs in these patients from randomized, controlled trials is lacking. This review gives an overview of the current data on this topic. Future studies should focus on the identification of factors that are able to predict the response to treatment, as to select patients who will benefit most from treatment with ARAs. On the basis of the current knowledge, we recommend prescription of ARAs to patients with primary aldosteronism, resistant hypertension and patients with hypertension and hypokalemia.

Incidence of risk factors for developing hyperkalemia when using ACE inhibitors in cardiovascular diseases

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of and the risk factors associated with hyperkalemia, induced by ACEI-drug interactions among cardiac patients.

SETTING

Five medical and cardiology wards of a tertiary care center in Malaysia.

SUBJECTS

Five hundred cardiac inpatients, who received ACEIs concomitantly with other interacting drugs.

METHOD

This was a prospective cohort study of 500 patients with cardiovascular diseases admitted to Penang Hospital between January to August 2006, who received ACEIs concomitantly with other interacting drugs. ACEI-drug interactions of clinical significance were identified using available drug information resources. Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) was used to assess the causality of association between ACEI-drug interactions and the adverse outcome (hyperkalemia).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Hyperkalemia as an adverse clinical outcome of the interaction was identified from laboratory investigations.

RESULTS

Of the 489 patients included in the analysis, 48 (9.8%) had hyperkalemia thought to be associated with ACEI-drug interactions. Univariate analysis using binary logistic regression revealed that advanced age (60 years or more), and taking more than 15 medications were independent risk factors significantly associated with hyperkalemia. However, current and previous smoking history appeared to be a protective factor. Risk factors identified as predictors of hyperkalemia secondary to ACEI-drug interactions by multi-logistic regression were: advanced age (adjusted OR 2.3, CI 1.07-5.01); renal disease (adjusted OR 4.7, CI 2.37-9.39); hepatic disease (adjusted OR 5.2, CI 1.08-25.03); taking 15-20 medications (adjusted OR 4.4, CI 2.08-9.19); and taking 21-26 medications (adjusted OR 9.0, CI 1.64-49.74).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac patients receiving ACEIs concomitantly with potentially interacting drugs are at high risk of experiencing hyperkalemia. Old age, renal disease, hepatic disease, and receiving large number of medications are factors that may significantly increase their vulnerability towards this adverse outcome; thus, frequent monitoring is advocated.

Safety of spironolactone use in ambulatory heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

Since the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES), the use of spironolactone is recommended in systolic heart failure (HF) patients that have been in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV. There is limited information on the use, side effects, and withdrawal rate of spironolactone in routine clinical practice.

HYPOTHESIS

Side effects related to spironolactone use are more common than reported in clinical trials.

METHODS

Patients who had moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) under optimized medical therapy were included. We introduced spironolactone in those with serum potassium (K+) < or = 5 meq/L, and serum creatinine (Cr) < or = 2.5 mg/dL. Spironolactone was withdrawn if serum K + > or = 5.5 meq/L, serum Cr increased more than 30%- 50% of the baseline value, and/or if the patient had gynecomastia.

RESULTS

We selected 134 patients followed in an HF clinic. In our sample, 56.7% of the patients (76 out of 134) were currently or had formerly been on spironolactone therapy. The rate of spironolactone withdrawal was 25% (19 out of 76). Reasons for suspension were hyperkalemia (17.1%), renal function deterioration (14.5%), gynecomastia (5.3% of males), and other reasons (1.3%).

CONCLUSION

Spironolactone side effects are common and are mostly related to effects on the angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Our results reinforce the need to closely monitor serum K+ and Cr levels in patients treated with spironolactone, as its side effects are more common than reported in clinical trials.

A comparison of the aldosterone-blocking agents eplerenone and spironolactone

Improved understanding of the adverse pharmacological properties of aldosterone has prompted investigation of the clinical benefits of blocking aldosterone at the receptor level. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of the two available blocking agents, spironolactone and eplerenone. A Medline search identified clinical studies assessing spironolactone and eplerenone. Priority was given to large, well-controlled, clinical trials and comparative studies. Pharmacological differences between spironolactone and eplerenone include lower affinity of eplerenone for progesterone, androgen, and glucocorticoid receptors; more consistently demonstrated nongenomic properties for eplerenone; and the presence of long-acting metabolites for spironolactone. Both agents effectively treat hypertension and heart failure but comparisons are complicated by the deficiency of head-to-head trials and differences between patient populations. There are differences in the tolerability profiles; spironolactone is associated with dose-dependent sexual side effects. Both agents produce dose-dependent increases in potassium concentrations, although the effect with spironolactone appears to be greater when both agents are administered at recommended doses. Choice of a specific agent should be based on individual patient issues, such as the nature of heart failure and patient concerns about adverse events.

Emergency management and commonly encountered outpatient scenarios in patients with hyperkalemia

Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disorder with potentially lethal consequences. Severe hyperkalemia can lead to life-threatening cardiac dysrhythmias, making a clear understanding of emergency management crucial. Recognition of patients at risk for cardiac arrhythmias should be followed by effective strategies for reduction in serum potassium levels. In the outpatient setting, diagnosis of hyperkalemia can be complicated by factitious elevations in serum potassium levels. True elevations in serum potassium levels are commonly due to medications used for cardiovascular disease in the setting of impaired glomerular filtration rate. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease is steadily increasing, likely leading to increases in risk of hyperkalemia. A systematic approach will aid in timely diagnosis and management of hyperkalemia.

Laboratory evaluation of potassium and creatinine among ambulatory patients prescribed spironolactone: are we monitoring for hyperkalemia?

BACKGROUND

Serum potassium and creatinine evaluation is recommended in patients prescribed spironolactone, yet the proportion of ambulatory patients chronically dispensed spironolactone receiving evaluation is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the rate of potassium and creatinine evaluation and identify factors associated with conducting these tests among ambulatory patients dispensed spironolactone.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate patients at 10 health maintenance organizations with ongoing spironolactone dispensing for one year (N = 2257). Potassium and creatinine evaluation were determined from administrative data. Associations between patient characteristics and laboratory testing were assessed, using logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Serum creatinine and potassium were evaluated in 72.3% of patients during a 13 month period. The likelihood of potassium and creatinine monitoring was greater among patients who were older (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.41 per decade of life); male (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.54); had diabetes (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.31 to 2.03); received concomitant therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.74 to 2.87), potassium supplements (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.51 to 2.54), or digoxin (OR 2.10 95% CI 1.48 to 2.98); or had more outpatient visits (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.44). Among patients with heart failure (n = 790), factors associated with the incidence of laboratory testing were diabetes (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.34), outpatient visits (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.41), and digoxin therapy (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-fourths of ambulatory patients dispensed spironolactone receive recommended laboratory evaluation, with monitoring more likely to be completed in patients prescribed concomitant therapy with drugs that increase hyperkalemia risk, older patients, and those with diabetes.

Antihypertensive Therapy and Its Effects on Potassium Homeostasis

The role of potassium in cardiovascular disease and the importance of preserving potassium balance have emerged as clinical hot points, particularly as they relate to cardioprotective and renoprotective therapies that secondarily promote potassium retention. Antihypertensive medications that most commonly influence serum potassium levels and/or total body potassium include beta blockers and potassium-wasting and potassium-sparing diuretics as well as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Uncertainty exists as to the best way to monitor potassium levels when any of these drug therapies are used, particularly in the setting of chronic kidney disease and/or heart failure. Guidelines for the monitoring of serum potassium levels in the setting of antihypertensive therapy are at best makeshift and often drawn from the know-how of the treating physician.

Spironolactone treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with systolic dysfunction and mild heart failure symptoms: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of spironolactone on clinical outcomes in patients with mild heart failure is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 482 consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40% and New York Heart Association I-II symptoms. Major cardiac event (MCE) was defined as death, left ventricular assist device implantation, or United Network of Organ Sharing 1 cardiac transplantation. Proportional hazards analysis was used to determine predictors of MCE and to derive an adjusted hazard for spironolactone therapy. Spironolactone was prescribed to 279 (58%) patients and mean follow-up was 1029 days. After controlling for predictors of clinical events, spironolactone treatment was associated with a trend for lower risk of MCE or heart failure rehospitalization (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43-1.07; P = .095). Exploration of interaction terms between medications revealed that treatment with the combination of spironolactone and thiazide diuretics was associated with lower risk of clinical events (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12-0.89; P = .029).

CONCLUSION

In subjects with mild heart failure treated with a thiazide diuretic, the use of spironolactone is associated with reduced risk of MCE or heart failure rehospitalization. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to accurately define the clinical effects of spironolactone in patients with mild heart failure.

Combination therapy with aldosterone blockade and renin-angiotensin inhibitors confers organ protection

There is increasing evidence that aldosterone exerts major adverse cardiovascular effects through classical mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) in nonepithelial tissues such as the brain and heart. This nonepithelial role of aldosterone has been underscored by the recent Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) and the Eplerenone Post-AMI Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS). These studies also showed that when using MR antagonist as an "organ protecting" drug, further organ protection could be derived by the addition of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB). The long-term effect of aldosterone was not inhibited in some subjects, so the possibility of organ damage due to so-called "breakthrough" aldosterone cannot be ignored. Nonepithelial MR-mediated effects played a major role in this aldosterone effect. These effects can be inhibited by MR antagonist at a small dose, not lower blood pressure. Therefore, the idea is now to combine a small dose of MR antagonist with an ACE inhibitor or ARB. However, warnings have been given recently due to the emergence of hyperkalemia and other adverse effects associated with inappropriate combination therapy. It is important to note that, if the eligibility criteria of RALES and EPHESUS are fulfilled, the potassium level will rarely become problematic. Therefore, the recent increase in the incidence of adverse effects can be attributed to the incorrect application of combination therapy. Elderly patients or those with dehydration, renal dysfunction, and aggravated heart failure require further close monitoring or termination of spironolactone administration. The combination of an MR antagonist and renin-angiotensin inhibitors should be a useful strategy if subjects are carefully selected, and carefully monitored. Adverse effects will occur only if the usage recommendations based on previous researches are not followed.

Therapy Insight: how changes in renal function with increasing age affect cardiovascular drug prescribing

Age is well recognized as a powerful prognostic factor in the setting of cardiovascular disease. With the aging of the US population, it is projected that more than 50 million people will be aged over 65 years by the year 2020. This growing elderly population has increased rates of morbidity and mortality owing to cardiovascular disease; however, proven therapies for prevention and treatment are often underused in older patients, largely because physicians perceive them as being frail and have limited understanding of age-related unique adverse and therapeutic effects. Advancing age is associated with a number of physiologic and pathophysiologic changes that impact the toxic effects, efficacy and dosing of many medications. Decreases in lean muscle mass affect the volume of distribution, and reductions in hepatic function affect the metabolism of many medications. Age-related reductions in renal function might have the most profound impact on the safety profile and dosing of medications in elderly patients. The strong association between renal and cardiovascular disease makes recognition of renal dysfunction and appropriate dose adjustment particularly important in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. This article reviews current approaches to the estimation of renal function, and unique considerations related to prescribing medication for elderly patients with concomitant renal and cardiovascular disease.

Aldosterone antagonists in the treatment and prevention of heart failure

Aldosterone is elevated in heart failure and exerts multiple detrimental effects. In addition to playing key roles in sodium and volume regulation, aldosterone is involved in regulation of autonomic tone, endothelial dysfunction, tissue collagen turnover, myocyte fibrosis, and release of inflammatory modulators. Aldosterone receptor antagonists have proven to be a valuable treatment tool in the management of heart failure due to systolic dysfunction. Blocking the effects of aldosterone can improve many of the functions that are deranged in patients with heart failure, as well as promote excretion of sodium and water and preservation of potassium and hydrogen in the distal renal tubule. These medications can be especially effective at removing fluid from the periphery and soft tissues. Prevention of hypokalemia, which may predispose patients to arrhythmia, is an added benefit. Spironolactone and eplerenone are the two agents in this class that have been studied in patients with heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. However, aldosterone antagonist therapy may not be appropriate for all patients with heart failure. Therefore, guidelines in managing patients on these medications should be followed to avoid serious electrolyte abnormalities and renal dysfunction. This review examines some of the mechanisms of action and the usefulness of aldosterone blockade in the management of heart failure.

The Role of Aldosterone Blockers in the Management of Chronic Heart Failure

The neurohormonal model of congestive heart failure (CHF) has replaced the previously accepted hemodynamic model. A shift in this paradigm has allowed alterations in therapy of CHF such that agents that target the neurohormonal axis and specifically the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, with drugs such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and beta-blockers, are utilized. Employment of these drugs markedly improves survival in patients with CHF. Recent animal and human data demonstrate that aldosterone is directly pathogenic in this disease process and is insufficiently suppressed by these agents. Furthermore, when aldosterone is directly antagonized, vascular and myocardial damage is greatly ameliorated in both experimental animals and humans. Significant mortality benefits of aldosterone antagonists in patients with CHF from systolic dysfunction have been subsequently witnessed. Herein, the pathophysiology of CHF, the beneficial role of aldosterone antagonists in this disease process, and potential adverse consequences of these agents are reviewed.

Practical recommendations for the use of ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: Putting guidelines into practice

Surveys of prescribing patterns in both hospitals and primary care have usually shown delays in translating the evidence from clinical trials of pharmacological agents into clinical practice, thereby denying patients with heart failure (HF) the benefits of drug treatments proven to improve well-being and prolong life. This may be due to unfamiliarity with the evidence-base for these therapies, the clinical guidelines recommending the use of these treatments or both, as well as concerns regarding adverse events. ACE inhibitors have long been the cornerstone of therapy for systolic HF irrespective of aetiology. Recent trials have now shown that treatment with beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers also leads to substantial improvements in outcome. In order to accelerate the safe uptake of these treatments and to ensure that all eligible patients receive the most appropriate medications, a clear and concise set of clinical recommendations has been prepared by a group of clinicians with practical expertise in the management of HF. The objective of these recommendations is to provide practical guidance for non-specialists, in order to increase the use of evidenced based therapy for HF. These practical recommendations are meant to serve as a supplement to, rather than replacement of, existing HF guidelines.

The risks and benefits of aldosterone antagonists

Spironolactone and eplerenone are mineralocorticoid- blocking agents used for their ability to block a host of epithelial and nonepithelial actions of aldosterone. These compounds are of proven benefit in reducing blood pressure and urine protein excretion, and in conferring cardiovascular gain in diverse circumstances of heart failure. However, as enthusiasm grows for use of mineralocorticoid-blocking agents, the risks inherent to use of such drugs become more pertinent. Whereas the endocrine side effects of spironolactone are in reality little more than a cosmetic disfigurement, the potassium-sparing properties of spironolactone and eplerenone can prove life-threatening if hyperkalemia develops. However, for most patients the risk of developing hyperkalemia should not dissuade the prudent clinician from use of these compounds. Hyperkalemia should be considered as a possibility in any patient receiving these medications and as such is best addressed preemptively.

Adverse cardiorenal effects of aldosterone: is aldosterone antagonism beneficial?

Aldosterone has recently been recognized as an important factor in the development and progression of cardiorenal disease. Animal and human data suggest that aldosterone contributes importantly to several disease states. These include congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease and progression of kidney disease. Recently, the discovery that aldosterone antagonists decrease pathologic injury in the kidneys and nonepithelial tissues, such as the myocardium and endothelium, has generated great controversy regarding the actual mechanisms of benefit of these agents. The available data is reviewed and conclusions drawn regarding the relative benefits of modulating aldosterone effects in the cardiovascular system and the kidney. In particular, the authors review their effects on reductions in cardiovascular events and progression of chronic kidney disease, as well as the safety and tolerability of these agents.