Meta-analysis of gene-level associations for rare variants based on single-variant statistics

Improving power for robust trans-ethnic meta-analysis of rare and low-frequency variants with a partitioning approach

While genome-wide association studies have discovered numerous bona fide variants that are associated with common diseases and complex traits; these variants tend to be common in the population and explain only a small proportion of the phenotype variance. The search for the missing heritability has thus switched to rare and low-frequency variants, defined as <5% in the population, but which are expected to have a bigger impact on phenotypic outcomes. The rarer nature of these variants coupled with the curse of testing multiple variants across the genome meant that large sample sizes will still be required despite the assumption of bigger effect sizes. Combining data from multiple studies in a meta-analysis will continue to be the natural approach in boosting sample sizes. However, the population genetics of rare variants suggests that allelic and effect size heterogeneity across populations of different ancestries is likely to pose a greater challenge to trans-ethnic meta-analysis of rare variants than to similar analyses of common variants. Here, we introduce a novel method to perform trans-ethnic meta-analysis of rare and low-frequency variants. The approach is centered on partitioning the studies into distinct clusters using local inference of genomic similarity between population groups, with the aim to minimize both the number of clusters and between-study heterogeneity in each cluster. Through a series of simulations, we show that our approach either performs similarly to or outperforms conventional and recently introduced meta-analysis strategies, particularly in the presence of allelic heterogeneity.

Meta-analysis of sequencing studies with heterogeneous genetic associations

Recent advances in sequencing technologies have made it possible to explore the influence of rare variants on complex diseases and traits. Meta-analysis is essential to this exploration because large sample sizes are required to detect rare variants. Several methods are available to conduct meta-analysis for rare variants under fixed-effects models, which assume that the genetic effects are the same across all studies. In practice, genetic associations are likely to be heterogeneous among studies because of differences in population composition, environmental factors, phenotype and genotype measurements, or analysis method. We propose random-effects models which allow the genetic effects to vary among studies and develop the corresponding meta-analysis methods for gene-level association tests. Our methods take score statistics, rather than individual participant data, as input and thus can accommodate any study designs and any phenotypes. We produce the random-effects versions of all commonly used gene-level association tests, including burden, variable threshold, and variance-component tests. We demonstrate through extensive simulation studies that our random-effects tests are substantially more powerful than the fixed-effects tests in the presence of moderate and high between-study heterogeneity and achieve similar power to the latter when the heterogeneity is low. The usefulness of the proposed methods is further illustrated with data from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Project (NHLBI ESP). The relevant software is freely available.

Meta-analysis of gene-level tests for rare variant association

The majority of reported complex disease associations for common genetic variants have been identified through meta-analysis, a powerful approach that enables the use of large sample sizes while protecting against common artifacts due to population structure and repeated small-sample analyses sharing individual-level data. As the focus of genetic association studies shifts to rare variants, genes and other functional units are becoming the focus of analysis. Here we propose and evaluate new approaches for performing meta-analysis of rare variant association tests, including burden tests, weighted burden tests, variable-threshold tests and tests that allow variants with opposite effects to be grouped together. We show that our approach retains useful features from single-variant meta-analysis approaches and demonstrate its use in a study of blood lipid levels in ∼18,500 individuals genotyped with exome arrays.