51
|
Shaw T, Chan SH, Teo JX, Chong ST, Li ST, Courtney E, Ishak D, Sankar H, Ang ZLT, Chiang J, Loh M, Zhou L, Lee SC, Yeh HY, Kolinjivadi AM, Lim WK, Ngeow J. Investigation into the origins of an ancient BRCA1 founder mutation identified among Chinese families in Singapore. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:637-645. [PMID: 32745242 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Identification of ancestry-specific pathogenic variants is imperative for diagnostic, treatment, management and prevention strategies, and to understand penetrance/modifiers on risk. Our study aimed to determine the clinical significance of a recurrent BRCA1 c.442-22_442-13del variant of unknown significance identified among 13 carriers from six Chinese families, all with a significant history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. We further aimed to establish whether this was due to a founder effect and explore its origins. Haplotype analysis, using nine microsatellite markers encompassing 2.5 megabase pairs around the BRCA1 locus, identified a common haploblock specific to the variant carriers, confirming a founder effect. Variant age was estimated to date back 77.9 generations to 69 bc using the Gamma approach. On principal component analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms merged with 1000 Genomes dataset, variant carriers were observed to overlap predominantly with the southern Han Chinese population. To determine pathogenicity of the variant, we assessed the functional effect on RAD51 foci formation as well as replication fork stability upon induction of DNA damage and observed an impaired DNA repair response associated with the variant. In summary, we identified an ancient Chinese founder mutation dating back 77.9 generations, possibly common among individuals of southern Han Chinese descent. Using evidence from phenotypic/family history studies, segregation analysis and functional characterization, the BRCA1 variant was reclassified from uncertain significance to pathogenic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarryn Shaw
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sock Hoai Chan
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jing Xian Teo
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore
| | - Siao Ting Chong
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shao-Tzu Li
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eliza Courtney
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Diana Ishak
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Haresh Sankar
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Zoe Li Ting Ang
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jianbang Chiang
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marie Loh
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Li Zhou
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Soo Chin Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hui-Yuan Yeh
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | | | - Weng Khong Lim
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Le Page C, Amuzu S, Rahimi K, Gotlieb W, Ragoussis J, Tonin PN. Lessons learned from understanding chemotherapy resistance in epithelial tubo-ovarian carcinoma from BRCA1and BRCA2mutation carriers. Semin Cancer Biol 2020; 77:110-126. [PMID: 32827632 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are multi-functional proteins and key factors for maintaining genomic stability through their roles in DNA double strand break repair by homologous recombination, rescuing stalled or damaged DNA replication forks, and regulation of cell cycle DNA damage checkpoints. Impairment of any of these critical roles results in genomic instability, a phenotypic hallmark of many cancers including breast and epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOC). Damaging, usually loss of function germline and somatic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, are important drivers of the development, progression, and management of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). However, mutations in these genes render patients particularly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, and to the more innovative targeted therapies with poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) that are targeted to BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers. Here, we reviewed the literature on the responsiveness of BRCA1/2-associated HGSOC to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARPis, and propose mechanisms underlying the frequent development of resistance to these therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Le Page
- McGill Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Setor Amuzu
- McGill Genome Centre, and Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kurosh Rahimi
- Department of Pathology du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Walter Gotlieb
- Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Lady Davis Research Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jiannis Ragoussis
- McGill Genome Centre, and Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia N Tonin
- Departments of Medicine and Human Genetics, McGill University, Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Bouwman P, van der Heijden I, van der Gulden H, de Bruijn R, Braspenning ME, Moghadasi S, Wessels LFA, Vreeswijk MPG, Jonkers J. Functional Categorization of BRCA1 Variants of Uncertain Clinical Significance in Homologous Recombination Repair Complementation Assays. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4559-4568. [PMID: 32546644 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Because BRCA1 is a high-risk breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1 sequence variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) complicate genetic counseling. As most VUS are rare, reliable classification based on clinical and genetic data is often impossible. However, all pathogenic BRCA1 variants analyzed result in defective homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR). Thus, BRCA1 VUS may be categorized based on their functional impact on this pathway. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Two hundred thirty-eight BRCA1 VUS-comprising most BRCA1 VUS known in the Netherlands and Belgium-were tested for their ability to complement Brca1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells in HRR, using cisplatin and olaparib sensitivity assays and a direct repeat GFP (DR-GFP) HRR assay. Assays were validated using 25 known benign and 25 known pathogenic BRCA1 variants. For assessment of pathogenicity by a multifactorial likelihood analysis method, we collected clinical and genetic data for functionally deleterious VUS and VUS occurring in three or more families. RESULTS All three assays showed 100% sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval, 83%-100%). Out of 238 VUS, 45 showed functional defects, 26 of which were deleterious in all three assays. For 13 of these 26 variants, we could calculate the probability of pathogenicity using clinical and genetic data, resulting in the identification of 7 (likely) pathogenic variants. CONCLUSIONS We have functionally categorized 238 BRCA1 VUS using three different HRR-related assays. Classification based on clinical and genetic data alone for a subset of these variants confirmed the high sensitivity and specificity of our functional assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bouwman
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Ingrid van der Heijden
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van der Gulden
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roebi de Bruijn
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Merel E Braspenning
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Setareh Moghadasi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maaike P G Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jos Jonkers
- Oncode Institute and Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Consolidated BRCA1/2 Variant Interpretation by MH BRCA Correlates with Predicted PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Association by MH Guide. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21113895. [PMID: 32486089 PMCID: PMC7312854 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1/2 variants are prognostic biomarkers for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and predictive biomarkers for PARP inhibition. In this study, we benchmarked the classification of BRCA1/2 variants from patients with HBOC-related cancer using MH BRCA, a novel computational technology that combines the ACMG guidelines with expert-curated variant annotations. Evaluation of BRCA1/2 variants (n = 1040) taken from four HBOC studies showed strong concordance within the pathogenic (98.1%) subset. Comparison of MH BRCA’s ACMG classification to ClinVar submitter content from ENIGMA, the international consortium of investigators on the clinical significance of BRCA1/2 variants, the ARUP laboratories, a clinical testing lab of the University of UTAH, and the German Cancer Consortium showed 99.98% concordance (4975 out of 4976 variants) in the pathogenic subset. In our patient cohort, refinement of patients with variants of unknown significance reduced the uncertainty of cancer-predisposing syndromes by 64.7% and identified three cases with potential family risk to HBOC due to a likely pathogenic variant BRCA1 p.V1653L (NM_007294.3:c.4957G > T; rs80357261). To assess whether classification results predict PARP inhibitor efficacy, contextualization with functional impact information on DNA repair activity were performed, using MH Guide. We found a strong correlation between treatment efficacy association and MH BRCA classifications. Importantly, low efficacy to PARP inhibition was predicted in 3.95% of pathogenic variants from four examined HBOC studies and our patient cohort, indicating the clinical relevance of the consolidated variant interpretation.
Collapse
|
55
|
Pauly R, Schwartz CE. The Future of Clinical Diagnosis: Moving Functional Genomics Approaches to the Bedside. Clin Lab Med 2020; 40:221-230. [PMID: 32439070 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rini Pauly
- Greenwood Genetic Center, JC Self Research Institute, 113 Gregor Mendel Circle, Greenwood, SC 29646, USA.
| | - Charles E Schwartz
- Greenwood Genetic Center, JC Self Research Institute, 113 Gregor Mendel Circle, Greenwood, SC 29646, USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
High-throughput functional evaluation of BRCA2 variants of unknown significance. Nat Commun 2020; 11:2573. [PMID: 32444794 PMCID: PMC7244490 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16141-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerous nontruncating missense variants of the BRCA2 gene have been identified, but there is a lack of convincing evidence, such as familial data, demonstrating their clinical relevance and they thus remain unactionable. To assess the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance (VUSs) within BRCA2, here we develop a method, the MANO-B method, for high-throughput functional evaluation utilizing BRCA2-deficient cells and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of this assay compared to those of the International Agency for Research on Cancer classification system is 95% and 95% (95% confidence intervals: 77–100% and 82–99%), respectively. We classify the functional impact of 186 BRCA2 VUSs with our computational pipeline, resulting in the classification of 126 variants as normal/likely normal, 23 as intermediate, and 37 as abnormal/likely abnormal. We further describe a simplified, on-demand annotation system that could be used as a companion diagnostic for PARP inhibitors in patients with unknown BRCA2 VUSs. Many germline variants are found in the BRCA2 gene, some of which pre-dispose women to breast and ovarian cancer. Here, the authors develop a method to determine the functional significance of BRCA2 variants and show that it is comparable to the IARC system of classifying variants.
Collapse
|
57
|
Hart SN, Polley EC, Shimelis H, Yadav S, Couch FJ. Prediction of the functional impact of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 with BRCA-ML. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:13. [PMID: 32377563 PMCID: PMC7190647 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0159-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
In silico predictions of missense variants is an important consideration when interpreting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. We trained and evaluated hundreds of machine learning algorithms based on results from validated functional assays to better predict missense variants in these genes as damaging or neutral. This new optimal "BRCA-ML" model yielded a substantially more accurate method than current algorithms for interpreting the functional impact of variants in these genes, making BRCA-ML a valuable addition to data sources for VUS classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven N. Hart
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Eric C. Polley
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Hermella Shimelis
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | | | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Pangallo J, Kiladjian JJ, Cassinat B, Renneville A, Taylor J, Polaski JT, North K, Abdel-Wahab O, Bradley RK. Rare and private spliceosomal gene mutations drive partial, complete, and dual phenocopies of hotspot alterations. Blood 2020; 135:1032-1043. [PMID: 31961934 PMCID: PMC7099330 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019002894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Genes encoding the RNA splicing factors SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1 are subject to frequent missense mutations in clonal hematopoiesis and diverse neoplastic diseases. Most "spliceosomal" mutations affect specific hotspot residues, resulting in splicing changes that promote disease pathophysiology. However, a subset of patients carries spliceosomal mutations that affect non-hotspot residues, whose potential functional contributions to disease are unstudied. Here, we undertook a systematic characterization of diverse rare and private spliceosomal mutations to infer their likely disease relevance. We used isogenic cell lines and primary patient materials to discover that 11 of 14 studied rare and private mutations in SRSF2 and U2AF1 induced distinct splicing alterations, including partially or completely phenocopying the alterations in exon and splice site recognition induced by hotspot mutations or driving "dual" phenocopies that mimicked 2 co-occurring hotspot mutations. Our data suggest that many rare and private spliceosomal mutations contribute to disease pathogenesis and illustrate the utility of molecular assays to inform precision medicine by inferring the potential disease relevance of newly discovered mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Pangallo
- Computational Biology Program, Public Health Sciences Division, and
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jean-Jacques Kiladjian
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé 1131, Institut Universitaire d'Hématologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Cassinat
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé 1131, Institut Universitaire d'Hématologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Aline Renneville
- Hematology Laboratory, Biology and Pathology Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Lille, France; University of Lille Nord de France, Lille, France; UMR-S 1172, Team 3, Cancer Research Institute of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Justin Taylor
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program and Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Jacob T Polaski
- Computational Biology Program, Public Health Sciences Division, and
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Khrystyna North
- Computational Biology Program, Public Health Sciences Division, and
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Omar Abdel-Wahab
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program and Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and
| | - Robert K Bradley
- Computational Biology Program, Public Health Sciences Division, and
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Murillo J, Spetale F, Guillaume S, Bulacio P, Garcia Labari I, Cailloux O, Destercke S, Tapia E. Consistency of the Tools That Predict the Impact of Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) on Gene Functionality: The BRCA1 Gene. Biomolecules 2020; 10:E475. [PMID: 32244891 PMCID: PMC7175253 DOI: 10.3390/biom10030475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) occurring in a protein coding gene may disrupt its function in multiple ways. Predicting this disruption has been recognized as an important problem in bioinformatics research. Many tools, hereafter p-tools, have been designed to perform these predictions and many of them are now of common use in scientific research, even in clinical applications. This highlights the importance of understanding the semantics of their outputs. To shed light on this issue, two questions are formulated, (i) do p-tools provide similar predictions? (inner consistency), and (ii) are these predictions consistent with the literature? (outer consistency). To answer these, six p-tools are evaluated with exhaustive SNV datasets from the BRCA1 gene. Two indices, called K a l l and K s t r o n g , are proposed to quantify the inner consistency of pairs of p-tools while the outer consistency is quantified by standard information retrieval metrics. While the inner consistency analysis reveals that most of the p-tools are not consistent with each other, the outer consistency analysis reveals they are characterized by a low prediction performance. Although this result highlights the need of improving the prediction performance of individual p-tools, the inner consistency results pave the way to the systematic design of truly diverse ensembles of p-tools that can overcome the limitations of individual members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Murillo
- Centro Internacional Franco Argentino de Ciencias de la Información y de Sistemas (CIFASIS-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Rosario, CP 2000 Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; (F.S.); (P.B.); (I.G.L.); (E.T.)
| | - Flavio Spetale
- Centro Internacional Franco Argentino de Ciencias de la Información y de Sistemas (CIFASIS-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Rosario, CP 2000 Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; (F.S.); (P.B.); (I.G.L.); (E.T.)
| | - Serge Guillaume
- ITAP, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France;
| | - Pilar Bulacio
- Centro Internacional Franco Argentino de Ciencias de la Información y de Sistemas (CIFASIS-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Rosario, CP 2000 Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; (F.S.); (P.B.); (I.G.L.); (E.T.)
| | - Ignacio Garcia Labari
- Centro Internacional Franco Argentino de Ciencias de la Información y de Sistemas (CIFASIS-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Rosario, CP 2000 Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; (F.S.); (P.B.); (I.G.L.); (E.T.)
| | - Olivier Cailloux
- Université Paris-Dauphine, Université PSL, CNRS, LAMSADE, 75016 Paris, France;
| | | | - Elizabeth Tapia
- Centro Internacional Franco Argentino de Ciencias de la Información y de Sistemas (CIFASIS-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Rosario, CP 2000 Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; (F.S.); (P.B.); (I.G.L.); (E.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Monteiro AN, Bouwman P, Kousholt AN, Eccles DM, Millot GA, Masson JY, Schmidt MK, Sharan SK, Scully R, Wiesmüller L, Couch F, Vreeswijk MPG. Variants of uncertain clinical significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes: best practices in functional analysis for clinical annotation. J Med Genet 2020; 57:509-518. [PMID: 32152249 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alvaro N Monteiro
- Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Bouwman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arne N Kousholt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Gael A Millot
- Hub-DBC, Institut Pasteur, USR 3756 CNRS, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Masson
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Oncology Division, Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shyam K Sharan
- National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Ralph Scully
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Variants of uncertain significance in the era of high-throughput genome sequencing: a lesson from breast and ovary cancers. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2020; 39:46. [PMID: 32127026 PMCID: PMC7055088 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-020-01554-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The promising expectations about personalized medicine have opened the path to routine large-scale sequencing and increased the importance of genetic counseling for hereditary cancers, among which hereditary breast and ovary cancers (HBOC) have a major impact. High-throughput sequencing, or Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), has improved cancer patient management, ameliorating diagnosis and treatment decisions. In addition to its undeniable clinical utility, NGS is also unveiling a large number of variants that we are still not able to clearly define and classify, the variants of uncertain significance (VUS), which account for about 40% of total variants. At present, VUS use in the clinical context is challenging. Medical reports may omit this kind of data and, even when included, they limit the clinical utility of genetic information. This has prompted the scientific community to seek easily applicable tests to accurately classify VUS and increase the amount of usable information from NGS data. In this review, we will focus on NGS and classification systems for VUS investigation, with particular attention on HBOC-related genes and in vitro functional tests developed for ameliorating and accelerating variant classification in cancer.
Collapse
|
62
|
Germline mutations of multiple breast cancer-related genes are differentially associated with triple-negative breast cancers and prognostic factors. J Hum Genet 2020; 65:577-587. [PMID: 32029870 DOI: 10.1038/s10038-020-0729-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations has become the standard clinical practice. Recent findings suggest the clinical significance of multigene panel testing of BRCA1/2 and other cancer-related genes. However, the clinical features of patients with breast cancer with germline mutations identified using multigene panels remain unclear. In this study, DNA samples from 583 Chinese women with breast cancer were subjected to target sequencing for 54 cancer-related genes using a pre-capture pooling method followed by next-generation sequencing. We identified 79 pathogenic germline mutations in 21 cancer-related genes. Forty-five patients (7.7%) harbored BRCA1/2 mutations, and 38 patients (6.5%) carried pathogenic mutations in the remaining 19 genes. PALB2 was the most commonly (1.2%) mutated gene other than BRCA1/2. Most of the identified pathogenic mutations were novel, suggesting mutation screening by using multigene panel testing is important particularly for non-European populations. Mutations in BRCA1/2 and the other cancer-related genes were differentially associated with clinical features. BRCA1 mutation carriers were strongly associated with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), whereas BRCA2 mutation carriers were not. Tumors in BRCA1-mutation carriers had a high histological grade. Patients with BRCA2-mutated breast cancers were likely to develop E-cadherin-negative tumors with bone metastases. Furthermore, mutations in PALB2 were strongly associated with TNBC. We demonstrated the usefulness of multigene panel testing and observed that a substantial proportion of patients with breast cancer had hereditary risk factors. Identifying differential associations between mutation status and clinical features will advance our understanding regarding the pathologies of this heterogeneous disease.
Collapse
|
63
|
Abstract
Cancer is a multi-step process during which cells acquire mutations that eventually lead to uncontrolled cell growth and division and evasion of programmed cell death. The oncogenes such as Ras and c-Myc may be responsible in all three major stages of cancer i.e., early, intermediate, and late. The NF-κB has been shown to control the expression of genes linked with tumor pathways such as chronic inflammation, tumor cell survival, anti-apoptosis, proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis. In the last few decades, various biomarker pathways have been identified that play a critical role in carcinogenesis such as Ras, NF-κB and DNA damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Ahmad
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Mohali, India.,Department of Nano-Therapeutics, Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST), Habitat Centre, Mohali, India
| | - Haseeb Ahsan
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Miyahira AK, Sharp A, Ellis L, Jones J, Kaochar S, Larman HB, Quigley DA, Ye H, Simons JW, Pienta KJ, Soule HR. Prostate cancer research: The next generation; report from the 2019 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting. Prostate 2020; 80:113-132. [PMID: 31825540 PMCID: PMC7301761 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 2019 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy (CHPCA) Meeting, "Prostate Cancer Research: The Next Generation," was held 20 to 23 June, 2019, in Los Angeles, California. METHODS The CHPCA Meeting is an annual conference held by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, that is uniquely structured to stimulate intense discussion surrounding topics most critical to accelerating prostate cancer research and the discovery of new life-extending treatments for patients. The 7th Annual CHPCA Meeting was attended by 86 investigators and concentrated on many of the most promising new treatment opportunities and next-generation research technologies. RESULTS The topics of focus at the meeting included: new treatment strategies and novel agents for targeted therapies and precision medicine, new treatment strategies that may synergize with checkpoint immunotherapy, next-generation technologies that visualize tumor microenvironment (TME) and molecular pathology in situ, multi-omics and tumor heterogeneity using single cells, 3D and TME models, and the role of extracellular vesicles in cancer and their potential as biomarkers. DISCUSSION This meeting report provides a comprehensive summary of the talks and discussions held at the 2019 CHPCA Meeting, for the purpose of globally disseminating this knowledge and ultimately accelerating new treatments and diagnostics for patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea K. Miyahira
- Science Department, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, California
| | - Adam Sharp
- Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Leigh Ellis
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Womenʼs Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Jones
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Salma Kaochar
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - H. Benjamin Larman
- Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David A. Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Huihui Ye
- Department of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jonathan W. Simons
- Science Department, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, California
| | - Kenneth J. Pienta
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Howard R. Soule
- Science Department, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, California
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Impact of proactive high-throughput functional assay data on BRCA1 variant interpretation in 3684 patients with breast or ovarian cancer. J Hum Genet 2020; 65:209-220. [PMID: 31907386 DOI: 10.1038/s10038-019-0713-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The clinical utility of BRCA1/2 genotyping was recently extended from the selection of subjects at high risk for hereditary breast and ovary cancer to the identification of candidates for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. This underscores the importance of accurate interpretation of BRCA1/2 genetic variants and of reducing the number of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). Two recent studies by Findlay et al. and Starita et al. introduced high-throughput functional assays, and proactively analyzed variants in specific regions regardless of whether they had been previously observed. We retrospectively reviewed all BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline genetic test reports from patients with breast or ovarian cancer examined at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between September 2011 and December 2018. Variants were assigned pathogenic or benign strong evidence codes according to the functional classification and were reclassified according to the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines. Among 3684 patients with available BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline genetic test reports, 429 unique variants (181 from BRCA1) were identified. Of 34 BRCA1 variants intersecting with the data reported by Findlay et al., three missense single-nucleotide variants from four patients (0.11%, 4/3684) were reclassified from VUSs to likely pathogenic variants. Four variants scored as functional were reclassified into benign or likely benign variants. Three variants that overlapped with the data reported by Starita et al. could not be reclassified. In conclusion, proactive high-throughput functional study data are useful for the reclassification of clinically observed VUSs. Integrating additional evidence, including functional assay results, may help reduce the number of VUSs.
Collapse
|
66
|
Mathé E, Zhang C, Wang K, Ning X, Guo Y, Zhao Z. The International Conference on Intelligent Biology and Medicine 2019 (ICIBM 2019): conference summary and innovations in genomics. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:1005. [PMID: 31888451 PMCID: PMC6936133 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6326-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The goal of this editorial is to summarize the 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Biology and Medicine (ICIBM 2019) conference that took place on June 9–11, 2019 in The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, and to provide an introductory summary of the seven articles presented in this supplement issue. ICIBM 2019 hosted four keynote speakers, four eminent scholar speakers, five tutorials and workshops, twelve concurrent sessions and a poster session, totaling 23 posters, spanning state-of-the-art developments in bioinformatics, genomics, next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis, scientific databases, cancer and medical genomics, and computational drug discovery. A total of 105 original manuscripts were submitted to ICIBM 2019, and after careful review, seven were selected for this supplement issue. These articles cover methods and applications for functional annotations of miRNA targeting, clonal evolution of bacterial cells, gene co-expression networks that describe a given phenotype, functional binding site analysis of RNA-binding proteins, normalization of genome architecture mapping data, sample predictions based on multiple NGS data types, and prediction of an individual’s genetic admixture given exonic single nucleotide polymorphisms data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewy Mathé
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210, USA.
| | - Chi Zhang
- Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, USA
| | - Kai Wang
- Raymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Xia Ning
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210, USA
| | - Yan Guo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA
| | - Zhongming Zhao
- Center for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Human Genetics Center, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
González-Acosta M, Hinrichsen I, Fernández A, Lázaro C, Pineda M, Plotz G, Capellá G. Validation of an in Vitro Mismatch Repair Assay Used in the Functional Characterization of Mismatch Repair Variants. J Mol Diagn 2019; 22:376-385. [PMID: 31881334 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
A significant proportion of DNA-mismatch repair (MMR) variants are classified as of unknown significance, precluding diagnosis. The in vitro MMR assay is used to assess their MMR capability, likely the most important function of an MMR protein. However, the robustness of the assay, crucial for its use in the clinical setting, has been rarely evaluated. The aim of the present work was to validate an in vitro MMR assay approach to the functional characterization of MMR variants, as a first step to meeting quality standards of diagnostic laboratories. The MMR assay was optimized by testing a variety of reagents and experimental conditions. Reference materials and standard operating procedures were established. To determine the intra- and interexperimental variability of the assay and its reproducibility among centers, independent transfections of six previously characterized MLH1 variants were performed in two independent laboratories. Reagents and conditions optimal for performing the in vitro MMR assay were determined. The validated assay demonstrated no significant intra- or interexperimental variability and good reproducibility between centers. We set up a robust in vitro MMR assay that can provide relevant in vitro functional evidence for MMR variant pathogenicity assessment, eventually improving the molecular diagnosis of hereditary cancer syndromes associated with MMR deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maribel González-Acosta
- Hereditary Cancer Program, the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Ciber Oncología (CIBERONC) Instituto Salud Carlos III, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Inga Hinrichsen
- Biomedical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Anna Fernández
- Hereditary Cancer Program, the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Ciber Oncología (CIBERONC) Instituto Salud Carlos III, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Ciber Oncología (CIBERONC) Instituto Salud Carlos III, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Pineda
- Hereditary Cancer Program, the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Ciber Oncología (CIBERONC) Instituto Salud Carlos III, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Guido Plotz
- Biomedical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gabriel Capellá
- Hereditary Cancer Program, the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Ciber Oncología (CIBERONC) Instituto Salud Carlos III, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Gelman H, Dines JN, Berg J, Berger AH, Brnich S, Hisama FM, James RG, Rubin AF, Shendure J, Shirts B, Fowler DM, Starita LM. Recommendations for the collection and use of multiplexed functional data for clinical variant interpretation. Genome Med 2019; 11:85. [PMID: 31862013 PMCID: PMC6925490 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-019-0698-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Variants of uncertain significance represent a massive challenge to medical genetics. Multiplexed functional assays, in which the functional effects of thousands of genomic variants are assessed simultaneously, are increasingly generating data that can be used as additional evidence for or against variant pathogenicity. Such assays have the potential to resolve variants of uncertain significance, thereby increasing the clinical utility of genomic testing. Existing standards from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and new guidelines from the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) establish the role of functional data in variant interpretation, but do not address the specific challenges or advantages of using functional data derived from multiplexed assays. Here, we build on these existing guidelines to provide recommendations to experimentalists for the production and reporting of multiplexed functional data and to clinicians for the evaluation and use of such data. By following these recommendations, experimentalists can produce transparent, complete, and well-validated datasets that are primed for clinical uptake. Our recommendations to clinicians and diagnostic labs on how to evaluate the quality of multiplexed functional datasets, and how different datasets could be incorporated into the ACMG/AMP variant-interpretation framework, will hopefully clarify whether and how such data should be used. The recommendations that we provide are designed to enhance the quality and utility of multiplexed functional data, and to promote their judicious use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Gelman
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Current affiliation: Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA
| | - Jennifer N Dines
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Current affiliation: Adaptive Biotechnologies, Eastlake Avenue E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA
| | - Jonathan Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,, Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Alice H Berger
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Fairview Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Sarah Brnich
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,, Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Fuki M Hisama
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Richard G James
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Center for Immunity and Immunotherapies, Seattle Children, Research Institute, Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98145, USA
| | - Alan F Rubin
- Bioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Bioinformatics and Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Jay Shendure
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Brian Shirts
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Douglas M Fowler
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Lea M Starita
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, 15th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Identifying pathogenic variation underlying pediatric developmental disease is critical for medical management, therapeutic development, and family planning. This review summarizes current genetic testing options along with their potential benefits and limitations. We also describe results from large-scale genomic sequencing projects in pediatric and neonatal populations with a focus on clinical utility. RECENT FINDINGS Recent advances in DNA sequencing technology have made genomic sequencing a feasible and effective testing option in a variety of clinical settings. These cutting-edge tests offer much promise to both medical providers and patients as it has been demonstrated to detect causal genetic variation in ∼25% or more of previously unresolved cases. Efforts aimed at promoting data sharing across clinical genetics laboratories and systematic reanalysis of existing genomic sequencing data have further improved diagnostic rates and reduced the number of unsolved cases. SUMMARY Genomic sequencing is a powerful and increasingly cost-effective alternative to current genetic tests and will continue to grow in clinical utility as more of the genome is understood and as analytical methods are improved. The evolution of genomic sequencing is changing the landscape of clinical testing and requires medical professionals who are adept at understanding and returning genomic results to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B. Neu
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Scientist Training Program, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
70
|
Boonen RACM, Rodrigue A, Stoepker C, Wiegant WW, Vroling B, Sharma M, Rother MB, Celosse N, Vreeswijk MPG, Couch F, Simard J, Devilee P, Masson JY, van Attikum H. Functional analysis of genetic variants in the high-risk breast cancer susceptibility gene PALB2. Nat Commun 2019; 10:5296. [PMID: 31757951 PMCID: PMC6876638 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13194-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Heterozygous carriers of germ-line loss-of-function variants in the DNA repair gene PALB2 are at a highly increased lifetime risk for developing breast cancer. While truncating variants in PALB2 are known to increase cancer risk, the interpretation of missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) is in its infancy. Here we describe the development of a relatively fast and easy cDNA-based system for the semi high-throughput functional analysis of 48 VUS in human PALB2. By assessing the ability of PALB2 VUS to rescue the DNA repair and checkpoint defects in Palb2 knockout mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells, we identify various VUS in PALB2 that impair its function. Three VUS in the coiled-coil domain of PALB2 abrogate the interaction with BRCA1, whereas several VUS in the WD40 domain dramatically reduce protein stability. Thus, our functional assays identify damaging VUS in PALB2 that may increase cancer risk. PALB2 is an established breast cancer risk gene but the pathogenicity of many variants remains uncharacterised. Here, the authors present a cDNA-based system for the functional analysis of PALB2 variants of unknown significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick A C M Boonen
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands
| | - Amélie Rodrigue
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Québec City, QC, G1R 3S3, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Chantal Stoepker
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter W Wiegant
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Vroling
- Bio-Prodict, Nijmegen, 6511 AA, The Netherlands
| | - Milan Sharma
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands
| | - Magdalena B Rother
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands
| | - Nandi Celosse
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike P G Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands
| | - Fergus Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jacques Simard
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Québec City, QC, G1R 3S3, Canada.,CHU de Québec Research Center, Endocrinology and Nephrology Division, Québec City, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Yves Masson
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Oncology Division, Québec City, QC, G1R 3S3, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Haico van Attikum
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 ZC, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Esposito D, Weile J, Shendure J, Starita LM, Papenfuss AT, Roth FP, Fowler DM, Rubin AF. MaveDB: an open-source platform to distribute and interpret data from multiplexed assays of variant effect. Genome Biol 2019; 20:223. [PMID: 31679514 PMCID: PMC6827219 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1845-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiplex assays of variant effect (MAVEs), such as deep mutational scans and massively parallel reporter assays, test thousands of sequence variants in a single experiment. Despite the importance of MAVE data for basic and clinical research, there is no standard resource for their discovery and distribution. Here, we present MaveDB ( https://www.mavedb.org ), a public repository for large-scale measurements of sequence variant impact, designed for interoperability with applications to interpret these datasets. We also describe the first such application, MaveVis, which retrieves, visualizes, and contextualizes variant effect maps. Together, the database and applications will empower the community to mine these powerful datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Esposito
- Bioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jochen Weile
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jay Shendure
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lea M Starita
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anthony T Papenfuss
- Bioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Bioinformatics and Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Frederick P Roth
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Douglas M Fowler
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Alan F Rubin
- Bioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Bioinformatics and Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Karam R, Conner B, LaDuca H, McGoldrick K, Krempely K, Richardson ME, Zimmermann H, Gutierrez S, Reineke P, Hoang L, Allen K, Yussuf A, Farber-Katz S, Rana HQ, Culver S, Lee J, Nashed S, Toppmeyer D, Collins D, Haynes G, Pesaran T, Dolinsky JS, Tippin Davis B, Elliott A, Chao E. Assessment of Diagnostic Outcomes of RNA Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1913900. [PMID: 31642931 PMCID: PMC6820040 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Performing DNA genetic testing (DGT) for hereditary cancer genes is now a well-accepted clinical practice; however, the interpretation of DNA variation remains a challenge for laboratories and clinicians. Adding RNA genetic testing (RGT) enhances DGT by clarifying the clinical actionability of hereditary cancer gene variants, thus improving clinicians' ability to accurately apply strategies for cancer risk reduction and treatment. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether RGT is associated with improvement in the diagnostic outcome of DGT and in the delivery of personalized cancer risk management for patients with hereditary cancer predisposition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Diagnostic study in which patients and/or families with inconclusive variants detected by DGT in genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and hereditary diffuse gastric cancer sent blood samples for RGT from March 2016 to April 2018. Clinicians who ordered genetic testing and received a reclassification report for these variants were surveyed to assess whether RGT-related variant reclassifications changed clinical management of these patients. To quantify the potential number of tested individuals who could benefit from RGT, a cohort of 307 812 patients who underwent DGT for hereditary cancer were separately queried to identify variants predicted to affect splicing. Data analysis was conducted from March 2016 and September 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Variant reclassification outcomes following RGT, clinical management changes associated with RGT-related variant reclassifications, and the proportion of patients who would likely be affected by a concurrent DGT and RGT multigene panel testing approach. RESULTS In total, 93 if 909 eligible families (10.2%) submitted samples for RGT. Evidence from RGT clarified the interpretation of 49 of 56 inconclusive cases (88%) studied; 26 (47%) were reclassified as clinically actionable and 23 (41%) were clarified as benign. Variant reclassifications based on RGT results changed clinical management recommendations for 8 of 18 patients (44%) and 14 of 18 families (78%), based on responses from 18 of 45 clinicians (40%) surveyed. A total of 7265 of 307 812 patients who underwent DGT had likely pathogenic variants or variants of uncertain significance potentially affecting splicing, indicating that approximately 1 in 43 individuals could benefit from RGT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this diagnostic study, conducting RNA testing resolved a substantial proportion of variants of uncertain significance in a cohort of individuals previously tested for cancer predisposition by DGT. Performing RGT might change the diagnostic outcome of at least 1 in 43 patients if performed in all individuals undergoing genetic evaluation for hereditary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Suzette Farber-Katz
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California
- now with Merck Research Laboratories, South San Francisco, California
| | - Huma Q. Rana
- Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samantha Culver
- Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John Lee
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sarah Nashed
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Deborah Toppmeyer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elizabeth Chao
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Target discovery using biobanks and human genetics. Drug Discov Today 2019; 25:438-445. [PMID: 31562982 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 08/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Large-scale biobanks can yield unprecedented insights into our health and provide discoveries of new and potentially targetable biomarkers. Several protective loss-of-function alleles have been identified, including variants that protect against cardiovascular disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and asthma and allergic diseases. These alleles serve as indicators of efficacy, mimicking the effects of drugs and suggesting that inhibiting these genes could provide therapeutic benefit, as has been observed for PCSK9. We provide a context for these findings through a multifaceted review covering the use of genetics in drug discovery efforts through genome-wide and phenome-wide association studies, linking deep mutation scanning data to molecular function and highlighting some additional tools that might help in the interpretation of newly discovered variants.
Collapse
|
74
|
Bamshad MJ, Nickerson DA, Chong JX. Mendelian Gene Discovery: Fast and Furious with No End in Sight. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 105:448-455. [PMID: 31491408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Gene discovery for Mendelian conditions (MCs) offers a direct path to understanding genome function. Approaches based on next-generation sequencing applied at scale have dramatically accelerated gene discovery and transformed genetic medicine. Finding the genetic basis of ∼6,000-13,000 MCs yet to be delineated will require both technical and computational innovation, but will rely to a larger extent on meaningful data sharing.
Collapse
|
75
|
Parsons MT, Tudini E, Li H, Hahnen E, Wappenschmidt B, Feliubadaló L, Aalfs CM, Agata S, Aittomäki K, Alducci E, Alonso‐Cerezo MC, Arnold N, Auber B, Austin R, Azzollini J, Balmaña J, Barbieri E, Bartram CR, Blanco A, Blümcke B, Bonache S, Bonanni B, Borg Å, Bortesi B, Brunet J, Bruzzone C, Bucksch K, Cagnoli G, Caldés T, Caliebe A, Caligo MA, Calvello M, Capone GL, Caputo SM, Carnevali I, Carrasco E, Caux‐Moncoutier V, Cavalli P, Cini G, Clarke EM, Concolino P, Cops EJ, Cortesi L, Couch FJ, Darder E, de la Hoya M, Dean M, Debatin I, Del Valle J, Delnatte C, Derive N, Diez O, Ditsch N, Domchek SM, Dutrannoy V, Eccles DM, Ehrencrona H, Enders U, Evans DG, Farra C, Faust U, Felbor U, Feroce I, Fine M, Foulkes WD, Galvao HC, Gambino G, Gehrig A, Gensini F, Gerdes A, Germani A, Giesecke J, Gismondi V, Gómez C, Gómez Garcia EB, González S, Grau E, Grill S, Gross E, Guerrieri‐Gonzaga A, Guillaud‐Bataille M, Gutiérrez‐Enríquez S, Haaf T, Hackmann K, Hansen TV, Harris M, Hauke J, Heinrich T, Hellebrand H, Herold KN, Honisch E, Horvath J, Houdayer C, Hübbel V, Iglesias S, Izquierdo A, James PA, Janssen LA, Jeschke U, Kaulfuß S, Keupp K, Kiechle M, Kölbl A, Krieger S, Kruse TA, Kvist A, Lalloo F, Larsen M, Lattimore VL, Lautrup C, Ledig S, Leinert E, Lewis AL, Lim J, Loeffler M, López‐Fernández A, Lucci‐Cordisco E, Maass N, Manoukian S, Marabelli M, Matricardi L, Meindl A, Michelli RD, Moghadasi S, Moles‐Fernández A, Montagna M, Montalban G, Monteiro AN, Montes E, Mori L, Moserle L, Müller CR, Mundhenke C, Naldi N, Nathanson KL, Navarro M, Nevanlinna H, Nichols CB, Niederacher D, Nielsen HR, Ong K, Pachter N, Palmero EI, Papi L, Pedersen IS, Peissel B, Perez‐Segura P, Pfeifer K, Pineda M, Pohl‐Rescigno E, Poplawski NK, Porfirio B, Quante AS, Ramser J, Reis RM, Revillion F, Rhiem K, Riboli B, Ritter J, Rivera D, Rofes P, Rump A, Salinas M, Sánchez de Abajo AM, Schmidt G, Schoenwiese U, Seggewiß J, Solanes A, Steinemann D, Stiller M, Stoppa‐Lyonnet D, Sullivan KJ, Susman R, Sutter C, Tavtigian SV, Teo SH, Teulé A, Thomassen M, Tibiletti MG, Tischkowitz M, Tognazzo S, Toland AE, Tornero E, Törngren T, Torres‐Esquius S, Toss A, Trainer AH, Tucker KM, van Asperen CJ, van Mackelenbergh MT, Varesco L, Vargas‐Parra G, Varon R, Vega A, Velasco Á, Vesper A, Viel A, Vreeswijk MPG, Wagner SA, Waha A, Walker LC, Walters RJ, Wang‐Gohrke S, Weber BHF, Weichert W, Wieland K, Wiesmüller L, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Woodward ER, Zachariae S, Zampiga V, Zeder‐Göß C, Investigators KC, Lázaro C, De Nicolo A, Radice P, Engel C, Schmutzler RK, Goldgar DE, Spurdle AB. Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification. Hum Mutat 2019; 40:1557-1578. [PMID: 31131967 PMCID: PMC6772163 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The multifactorial likelihood analysis method has demonstrated utility for quantitative assessment of variant pathogenicity for multiple cancer syndrome genes. Independent data types currently incorporated in the model for assessing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants include clinically calibrated prior probability of pathogenicity based on variant location and bioinformatic prediction of variant effect, co-segregation, family cancer history profile, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the same gene, breast tumor pathology, and case-control information. Research and clinical data for multifactorial likelihood analysis were collated for 1,395 BRCA1/2 predominantly intronic and missense variants, enabling classification based on posterior probability of pathogenicity for 734 variants: 447 variants were classified as (likely) benign, and 94 as (likely) pathogenic; and 248 classifications were new or considerably altered relative to ClinVar submissions. Classifications were compared with information not yet included in the likelihood model, and evidence strengths aligned to those recommended for ACMG/AMP classification codes. Altered mRNA splicing or function relative to known nonpathogenic variant controls were moderately to strongly predictive of variant pathogenicity. Variant absence in population datasets provided supporting evidence for variant pathogenicity. These findings have direct relevance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant evaluation, and justify the need for gene-specific calibration of evidence types used for variant classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Emma Tudini
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Hongyan Li
- Cancer Control and Population Science, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Cora M. Aalfs
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Simona Agata
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Elisa Alducci
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | | | - Norbert Arnold
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | - Bernd Auber
- Institute of Human GeneticsHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Rachel Austin
- Genetic Health QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Judith Balmaña
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyBarcelonaSpain
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity Hospital of Vall d'HebronBarcelonaSpain
| | - Elena Barbieri
- Department of Oncology and HaematologyUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Claus R. Bartram
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
| | - Ana Blanco
- Fundación Pública galega Medicina Xenómica‐SERGASGrupo de Medicina Xenómica‐USC, CIBERER, IDISSantiago de CompostelaSpain
| | - Britta Blümcke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Sandra Bonache
- Oncogenetics GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEOEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | | | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Carla Bruzzone
- Unit of Hereditary CancerIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Karolin Bucksch
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Giulia Cagnoli
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Trinidad Caldés
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Almuth Caliebe
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | | | - Mariarosaria Calvello
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEOEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Gabriele L. Capone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics UnitUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Sandrine M. Caputo
- Service de GénétiqueInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Paris Sciences Lettres Research UniversityParisFrance
| | - Ileana Carnevali
- UO Anatomia PatologicaOspedale di Circolo ASST SettelaghiVareseItaly
| | - Estela Carrasco
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyBarcelonaSpain
| | | | | | - Giulia Cini
- Division of Functional Onco‐genomics and Genetics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO)IRCCSAvianoItaly
| | - Edward M. Clarke
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Paola Concolino
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.GemelliIRCCSRomeItaly
| | - Elisa J. Cops
- Parkville Familial Cancer CentrePeter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and HaematologyUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesota
| | - Esther Darder
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Michael Dean
- Laboratory of Translational Genomics, DCEGNational Cancer InstituteGaithersburgMaryland
| | - Irmgard Debatin
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | - Jesús Del Valle
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Nicolas Derive
- Service de GénétiqueInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Paris Sciences Lettres Research UniversityParisFrance
| | - Orland Diez
- Oncogenetics GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)BarcelonaSpain
- Clinical and Molecular Genetics AreaUniversity Hospital Vall d'HebronBarcelonaSpain
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Susan M. Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | - Véronique Dutrannoy
- Institute of Medical and Human GeneticsCharité –Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | | | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Laboratory MedicineOffice for Medical Services ‐ Region SkåneLundSweden
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Ute Enders
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
- Genomic Medicine, North West Genomics hub, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
| | - Chantal Farra
- Medical GeneticsAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterBeirutLebanon
| | - Ulrike Faust
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied GenomicsUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - Ute Felbor
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Medicine GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany
| | - Irene Feroce
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEOEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Miriam Fine
- Adult Genetics UnitRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia
| | - William D. Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and OncologyMcGill UniversityMontréalQCCanada
| | | | | | - Andrea Gehrig
- Department of Human GeneticsUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Francesca Gensini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics UnitUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Anne‐Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Aldo Germani
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea University HospitalSapienza UniversityRomeItaly
| | - Jutta Giesecke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Viviana Gismondi
- Unit of Hereditary CancerIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Carolina Gómez
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Encarna B. Gómez Garcia
- Department of Clinical GeneticsMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Sara González
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Elia Grau
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Sabine Grill
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Eva Gross
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Haaf
- Department of Human GeneticsUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Karl Hackmann
- Institute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTU DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Thomas V.O. Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | | | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Tilman Heinrich
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied GenomicsUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - Heide Hellebrand
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | | | - Ellen Honisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital DüsseldorfHeinrich‐Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Judit Horvath
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Claude Houdayer
- Department of Genetics, F76000 and Normandy University, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized MedicineRouen University HospitalRouenFrance
| | - Verena Hübbel
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Silvia Iglesias
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Angel Izquierdo
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Paul A. James
- Parkville Familial Cancer CentrePeter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Linda A.M. Janssen
- Department of Clinical GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Udo Jeschke
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Silke Kaulfuß
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Medical Center GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Katharina Keupp
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Alexandra Kölbl
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Sophie Krieger
- Laboratoire de Biologie Clinique et OncologiqueCentre Francois BaclesseCaenFrance
- Genomics and Personalized Medecine in Cancer and Neurological DisordersNormandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized MedicineRouenFrance
- Normandie UniversitéUNICAENCaenFrance
| | - Torben A. Kruse
- Department of Clinical GeneticsOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
| | - Anders Kvist
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Genomic Medicine, North West Genomics hub, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
| | - Mirjam Larsen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Vanessa L. Lattimore
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical ScienceUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Charlotte Lautrup
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Clinical Cancer Research CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | - Susanne Ledig
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | | | - Joanna Lim
- Breast Cancer Research ProgrammeCancer Research MalaysiaSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
| | - Markus Loeffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Adrià López‐Fernández
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyBarcelonaSpain
| | - Emanuela Lucci‐Cordisco
- UOC Genetica Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS and Istituto di Medicina GenomicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Monica Marabelli
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEOEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Laura Matricardi
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
| | | | - Setareh Moghadasi
- Department of Clinical GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Gemma Montalban
- Oncogenetics GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)BarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Eva Montes
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Luigi Mori
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Science, University of Brescia c/o 2nd Internal MedicineHospital of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Lidia Moserle
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | | | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | - Nadia Naldi
- Division of OncologyUniversity Hospital of ParmaParmaItaly
| | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania
| | - Matilde Navarro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Cassandra B. Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western AustraliaKing Edward Memorial HospitalPerthAustralia
| | - Dieter Niederacher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital DüsseldorfHeinrich‐Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | | | - Kai‐ren Ong
- West Midlands Regional Genetics ServiceBirmingham Women's Hospital Healthcare NHS TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western AustraliaKing Edward Memorial HospitalPerthAustralia
- Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
| | - Edenir I. Palmero
- Molecular Oncology Research CenterBarretos Cancer HospitalSão PauloBrazil
- Barretos School of Health SciencesDr. Paulo Prata ‐ FACISBSão PauloBrazil
| | - Laura Papi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics UnitUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Clinical Cancer Research CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Molecular DiagnosticsAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Pedro Perez‐Segura
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San CarlosIdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Katharina Pfeifer
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Marta Pineda
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Esther Pohl‐Rescigno
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Nicola K. Poplawski
- Adult Genetics UnitRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia
- School of Paediatrics and Reproductive HealthUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
| | - Berardino Porfirio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics UnitUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Anne S. Quante
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Juliane Ramser
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TechnischenUniversität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Rui M. Reis
- Molecular Oncology Research CenterBarretos Cancer HospitalSão PauloBrazil
- Health Sciences SchoolUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
- ICVS/3B's‐PT Government Associate LaboratoryBragaPortugal
| | - Françoise Revillion
- Laboratoire d'Oncogenetique Moleculaire HumaineCentre Oscar LambretLilleFrance
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | | | - Julia Ritter
- Institute of Medical and Human GeneticsCharité –Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Daniela Rivera
- Unit of Hereditary CancerIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Paula Rofes
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Andreas Rump
- Institute for Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTU DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Monica Salinas
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Ana María Sánchez de Abajo
- Servicio de Análisis Clínicos y Bioquímica Clínica, Complejo HospitalarioUniversitario Insular Materno‐Infantil de Gran CanariaLas Palmas de Gran CanaríaSpain
| | - Gunnar Schmidt
- Institute of Human GeneticsHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Ulrike Schoenwiese
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Jochen Seggewiß
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Ares Solanes
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Doris Steinemann
- Institute of Human GeneticsHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Mathias Stiller
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Hospital LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Dominique Stoppa‐Lyonnet
- Service de GénétiqueInstitut CurieParisFrance
- Department of Tumour BiologyINSERM U830ParisFrance
- Université Paris DescartesParisFrance
| | - Kelly J. Sullivan
- Genetic Health Service NZ‐ Northern HubAuckland District Health BoardAucklandNew Zealand
| | - Rachel Susman
- Genetic Health QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
| | - Sean V. Tavtigian
- Department of Oncological ServicesUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtah
- Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Soo H. Teo
- Breast Cancer Research ProgrammeCancer Research MalaysiaSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Alex Teulé
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical GeneticsOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
| | | | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical GeneticsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Silvia Tognazzo
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOVIRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Amanda E. Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and GeneticsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhio
| | - Eva Tornero
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Therese Törngren
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Sara Torres‐Esquius
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention GroupVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyBarcelonaSpain
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and HaematologyUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Alison H. Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer CentrePeter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of medicineUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Katherine M. Tucker
- Prince of Wales Clinical SchoolUniversity of NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical OncologyPrince of Wales HospitalRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Marion T. van Mackelenbergh
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts University KielKielGermany
| | - Liliana Varesco
- Unit of Hereditary CancerIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Gardenia Vargas‐Parra
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Raymonda Varon
- Institute of Medical and Human GeneticsCharité –Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública galega Medicina Xenómica‐SERGASGrupo de Medicina Xenómica‐USC, CIBERER, IDISSantiago de CompostelaSpain
| | - Ángela Velasco
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | - Anne‐Sophie Vesper
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital DüsseldorfHeinrich‐Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Functional Onco‐genomics and Genetics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO)IRCCSAvianoItaly
| | | | - Sebastian A. Wagner
- Department of MedicineHematology/Oncology, Goethe‐University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
| | - Anke Waha
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Logan C. Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical ScienceUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Rhiannon J. Walters
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Shan Wang‐Gohrke
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | | | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of PathologyTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany
| | - Kerstin Wieland
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Lisa Wiesmüller
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of GynecologyUniversity Medical Center HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Emma R. Woodward
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
- Genomic Medicine, North West Genomics hub, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Universities Foundation TrustSt. Mary's HospitalManchesterUK
| | - Silke Zachariae
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Valentina Zampiga
- Biosciences LaboratoryIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCSMeldolaItaly
| | | | - KConFab Investigators
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Research DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDIBGI‐IGTP, Catalan Institute of OncologyCIBERONCBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of ResearchFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - David E. Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Amanda B. Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Kinney JB, McCandlish DM. Massively Parallel Assays and Quantitative Sequence-Function Relationships. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2019; 20:99-127. [PMID: 31091417 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-014845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Over the last decade, a rich variety of massively parallel assays have revolutionized our understanding of how biological sequences encode quantitative molecular phenotypes. These assays include deep mutational scanning, high-throughput SELEX, and massively parallel reporter assays. Here, we review these experimental methods and how the data they produce can be used to quantitatively model sequence-function relationships. In doing so, we touch on a diverse range of topics, including the identification of clinically relevant genomic variants, the modeling of transcription factor binding to DNA, the functional and evolutionary landscapes of proteins, and cis-regulatory mechanisms in both transcription and mRNA splicing. We further describe a unified conceptual framework and a core set of mathematical modeling strategies that studies in these diverse areas can make use of. Finally, we highlight key aspects of experimental design and mathematical modeling that are important for the results of such studies to be interpretable and reproducible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin B Kinney
- Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA; ,
| | - David M McCandlish
- Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Germline Missense Variants in BRCA1: New Trends and Challenges for Clinical Annotation. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11040522. [PMID: 31013702 PMCID: PMC6520942 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing allows for the identification of germline DNA variations, which are associated with a significant increase in the risk of developing breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Detection of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant triggers several clinical management actions, which may include increased surveillance and prophylactic surgery for healthy carriers or treatment with the PARP inhibitor therapy for carriers diagnosed with cancer. Thus, standardized validated criteria for the annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants according to their pathogenicity are necessary to support clinical decision-making and ensure improved outcomes. Upon detection, variants whose pathogenicity can be inferred by the genetic code are typically classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, likely benign, or benign. Variants whose impact on function cannot be directly inferred by the genetic code are labeled as variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) and are evaluated by multifactorial likelihood models that use personal and family history of cancer, segregation data, prediction tools, and co-occurrence with a pathogenic BRCA variant. Missense variants, coding alterations that replace a single amino acid residue with another, are a class of variants for which determination of clinical relevance is particularly challenging. Here, we discuss current issues in the missense variant classification by following a typical life cycle of a BRCA1 missense variant through detection, annotation and information dissemination. Advances in massively parallel sequencing have led to a substantial increase in VUS findings. Although the comprehensive assessment and classification of missense variants according to their pathogenicity remains the bottleneck, new developments in functional analysis, high throughput assays, data sharing, and statistical models are rapidly changing this scenario.
Collapse
|
78
|
Functional analysis of BARD1 missense variants in homology-directed repair and damage sensitivity. PLoS Genet 2019; 15:e1008049. [PMID: 30925164 PMCID: PMC6457558 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The BARD1 protein, which heterodimerizes with BRCA1, is encoded by a known breast cancer susceptibility gene. While several BARD1 variants have been identified as pathogenic, many more missense variants exist that do not occur frequently enough to assign a clinical risk. In this paper, whole exome sequencing of over 10,000 cancer samples from 33 cancer types identified from somatic mutations and loss of heterozygosity in tumors 76 potentially cancer-associated BARD1 missense and truncation variants. These variants were tested in a functional assay for homology-directed repair (HDR), as HDR deficiencies have been shown to correlate with clinical pathogenicity for BRCA1 variants. From these 76 variants, 4 in the ankyrin repeat domain and 5 in the BRCT domain were found to be non-functional in HDR. Two known benign variants were found to be functional in HDR, and three known pathogenic variants were non-functional, supporting the notion that the HDR assay can be used to predict the clinical risk of BARD1 variants. The identification of HDR-deficient variants in the ankyrin repeat domain indicates there are DNA repair functions associated with this domain that have not been closely examined. In order to examine whether BARD1-associated loss of HDR function results in DNA damage sensitivity, cells expressing non-functional BARD1 variants were treated with ionizing radiation or cisplatin. These cells were found to be more sensitive to DNA damage, and variations in the residual HDR function of non-functional variants did not correlate with variations in sensitivity. These findings improve the understanding of BARD1 functional domains in DNA repair and support that this functional assay is useful for predicting the cancer association of BARD1 variants. BARD1 is a breast cancer susceptibility gene encoding a protein that primarily interacts with BRCA1 in DNA repair. Although several BARD1 variants are known to be pathogenic, many more variants do not occur frequently enough to assign a clinical risk. In this paper, we identified 76 potentially cancer-associated BARD1 variants from analysis of over 10,000 tissue samples from people with cancer. It has previously been shown that if a BRCA1 variant cannot repair damaged DNA, then it is likely to cause cancer. We tested BARD1 variants for DNA repair function and identified several non-functional variants that were localized in parts of the BARD1 protein not previously associated with DNA repair. Known benign BARD1 variants were found to be functional and known pathogenic variants were non-functional, showing that examining DNA repair function predicted variant pathogenicity. Cells expressing repair-defective BARD1 variants were also more sensitive to DNA damaging agents. These findings help us better understand how BARD1 is involved in DNA repair and show that examining the DNA repair function of BARD1 variants is useful for predicting their cancer risk.
Collapse
|
79
|
On fitness: how do mutations shape the biology of cancer? Biochem Soc Trans 2019; 47:559-569. [DOI: 10.1042/bst20180224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The theory of evolution by natural selection shapes our understanding of the living world. While natural selection has given rise to all the intricacies of life on the planet, those responsible for treating cancer have a darker view of adaptation and selection. Revolutionary changes in DNA sequencing technology have allowed us to survey the complexities that constitute the cancer genome, while advances in genetic engineering are allowing us to functionally interrogate these alterations. These approaches are providing new insights into how mutations influence cancer biology. It is possible that with time, this new knowledge will allow us to take control of the evolutionary processes that shape the disease, to develop more effective treatments.
Collapse
|
80
|
Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer. J Pers Med 2019; 9:jpm9010015. [PMID: 30832243 PMCID: PMC6462925 DOI: 10.3390/jpm9010015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer screening modalities and guidelines continue to evolve and are increasingly based on risk factors, including genetic risk and a personal or family history of cancer. Here, we review genetic testing of high-penetrance hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, for the purpose of identifying high-risk individuals who would benefit from earlier screening and more sensitive methods such as magnetic resonance imaging. We also consider risk-based screening in the general population, including whether every woman should be genetically tested for high-risk genes and the potential use of polygenic risk scores. In addition to enabling early detection, the results of genetic screens of breast cancer susceptibility genes can be utilized to guide decision-making about when to elect prophylactic surgeries that reduce cancer risk and the choice of therapeutic options. Variants of uncertain significance, especially missense variants, are being identified during panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A finding of a variant of uncertain significance does not provide a basis for increased cancer surveillance or prophylactic procedures. Given that variant classification is often challenging, we also consider the role of multifactorial statistical analyses by large consortia and functional tests for this purpose.
Collapse
|
81
|
Langerud J, Jarhelle E, Van Ghelue M, Ariansen SL, Iversen N. Trans-activation-based risk assessment of BRCA1 BRCT variants with unknown clinical significance. Hum Genomics 2018; 12:51. [PMID: 30458859 PMCID: PMC6247502 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0183-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deleterious variants in the tumour suppressor BRCA1 are known to cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Missense variants in BRCA1 pose a challenge in clinical care, as their effect on protein functionality often remains unknown. Many of the pathogenic missense variants found in BRCA1 are located in the BRCA1 C-terminal (BRCT) domains, domains that are known to be vital for key functions such as homologous recombination repair, protein-protein interactions and trans-activation (TA). We investigated the TA activity of 12 BRCA1 variants of unknown clinical significance (VUSs) located in the BRCT domains to aid in the classification of these variants. Results Twelve BRCA1 VUSs were investigated using a modified version of the dual luciferase TA activity assay (TA assay) that yielded increased sensitivity and sample throughput. Variants were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria using TA assay results and available data. In combining our TA-assay results and available data, in accordance with the ACMG guidelines for variant classification, we proposed the following variant classifications: c.5100A>G, c.5326C>T, c.5348T>C and c.5477A>T as likely benign (class 2) variants. c.5075A>C, c.5116G>A and c.5513T>G were likely pathogenic (class 4), whereas c.5096G>A likely represents a likely pathogenic variant with moderate penetrance. Variants c.5123C>T, c.5125G>A, c.5131A>C and c.5504G>A remained classified as VUSs (class 3). Conclusions The modified TA assay provides efficient risk assessment of rare missense variants found in the BRCA1 BRCT-domains. We also report that increased post-transfection incubation time yielded a significant increase in TA assay sensitivity. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40246-018-0183-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Langerud
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Jarhelle
- Department of Medical Genetics, Division of Child and Adolescent Health, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Marijke Van Ghelue
- Department of Medical Genetics, Division of Child and Adolescent Health, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Nina Iversen
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Findlay GM, Daza RM, Martin B, Zhang MD, Leith AP, Gasperini M, Janizek JD, Huang X, Starita LM, Shendure J. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature 2018; 562:217-222. [PMID: 30209399 PMCID: PMC6181777 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0461-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 492] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Variants of uncertain significance fundamentally limit the clinical utility of genetic information. The challenge they pose is epitomized by BRCA1, a tumour suppressor gene in which germline loss-of-function variants predispose women to breast and ovarian cancer. Although BRCA1 has been sequenced in millions of women, the risk associated with most newly observed variants cannot be definitively assigned. Here we use saturation genome editing to assay 96.5% of all possible single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in 13 exons that encode functionally critical domains of BRCA1. Functional effects for nearly 4,000 SNVs are bimodally distributed and almost perfectly concordant with established assessments of pathogenicity. Over 400 non-functional missense SNVs are identified, as well as around 300 SNVs that disrupt expression. We predict that these results will be immediately useful for the clinical interpretation of BRCA1 variants, and that this approach can be extended to overcome the challenge of variants of uncertain significance in additional clinically actionable genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M Findlay
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Riza M Daza
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Beth Martin
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Melissa D Zhang
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anh P Leith
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Molly Gasperini
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph D Janizek
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Xingfan Huang
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lea M Starita
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Jay Shendure
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
|
84
|
Multiplexed assays of variant effects contribute to a growing genotype-phenotype atlas. Hum Genet 2018; 137:665-678. [PMID: 30073413 PMCID: PMC6153521 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-018-1916-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Given the constantly improving cost and speed of genome sequencing, it is reasonable to expect that personal genomes will soon be known for many millions of humans. This stands in stark contrast with our limited ability to interpret the sequence variants which we find. Although it is, perhaps, easiest to interpret variants in coding regions, knowledge of functional impact is unknown for the vast majority of missense variants. While many computational approaches can predict the impact of coding variants, they are given a little weight in the current guidelines for interpreting clinical variants. Laboratory assays produce comparatively more trustworthy results, but until recently did not scale to the space of all possible mutations. The development of deep mutational scanning and other multiplexed assays of variant effect has now brought feasibility of this endeavour within view. Here, we review progress in this field over the last decade, break down the different approaches into their components, and compare methodological differences.
Collapse
|