Rapid heterologous desensitization of antinociceptive activity between mu or delta opioid receptors and chemokine receptors in rats

Delta opioid receptor analgesia: recent contributions from pharmacology and molecular approaches

Delta opioid receptors represent a promising target for the development of novel analgesics. A number of tools have been developed recently that have significantly improved our knowledge of δ receptor function in pain control. These include several novel δ agonists with potent analgesic properties, and genetic mouse models with targeted mutations in the δ opioid receptor gene. Also, recent findings have further documented the regulation of δ receptor function at cellular level, which impacts on the pain-reducing activity of the receptor. These regulatory mechanisms occur at transcriptional and post-translational levels, along agonist-induced receptor activation, signaling and trafficking, or in interaction with other receptors and neuromodulatory systems. All these tools for in-vivo research, and proposed mechanisms at molecular level, have tremendously increased our understanding of δ receptor physiology, and contribute to designing innovative strategies for the treatment of chronic pain and other diseases such as mood disorders.

Differential antinociceptive effects of buprenorphine and methadone in the presence of HIV-gp120

BACKGROUND

We showed recently that elevated brain levels of the chemokine stromal cell-derived growth factor-1α (SDF-1α/CXCL12, a ligand for the human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] co-receptor CXCR4) diminish the antinociceptive effect of morphine, but failed to influence buprenorphine-induced antinociception.

AIMS

Because the HIV-1 coat protein, glycoprotein 120 (gp120) T-tropic strain, binds to the same receptor as SDF-1α/CXCL12, the present experiments were designed to investigate the consequence of administering gp120 to rat brain on buprenorphine-induced antinociception in the 54°C hot plate test. For comparative purposes, the effect of gp120 on an equi-antinociceptive dose of methadone was also examined.

METHODS

A sterilized stainless-steel C313G guide cannula was implanted into the periaqueductal grey (PAG), a brain region critical for the processing of pain signals, and a primary site of action of many analgesics. Rats were pretreated with gp120, administered into the PAG.

RESULTS

The subsequent antinociception associated with methadone was diminished whereas buprenorphine-induced antinociception was unaffected. Buprenorphine thus appears to be a more effective analgesic than methadone in the presence of gp120 in the brain, a condition that is associated with HIV-related pain and infection.

The effect of gp120 on morphine's antinociceptive and neurophysiological actions

Recently, we have shown that morphine's analgesic activity can be attenuated by chemokines, specifically CCL5 and CXCL12. Because the HIV-1 coat protein, glycoprotein 120 (gp120), binds to the same receptors as do CCL5 and CXCL12, experiments were designed to investigate the effect of gp120 in the brain on antinociception induced by morphine in the cold-water (-3°C) tail-flick (CWT) and hot-plate (+54°C) tests. In addition, mu-opioid-receptor-mediated effects in brain periaqueductal grey (PAG) slices were examined with whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. The results showed that (1) pretreatment with gp120 itself (10, 25, 50, 100 or 133 ng, PAG) had no nociceptive effect in the CWT; (2) pretreatment with gp120 (25 or 100 ng) dose-dependently reduced antinociception induced by subcutaneous (sc) injection of morphine (3 or 6 mg/kg) or PAG injection of morphine (100 ng) in the CWT; (3) a PAG injection of gp120 (133 ng), given 30 min before sc injection of morphine (6 mg/kg), similarly reduced morphine antinociception in the hot-plate test; (4) the inhibitory effect of gp120 on morphine-induced antinociception in the CWT was reversed by AMD3100, an antagonist of CXCR4; (5) pretreatment of slices with gp120 (200 pM) prevented morphine (10 μM)-induced hyperpolarization and reduction of input resistance in PAG neurons. Electrophysiology studies paralleled gp120-induced desensitization of a mu-opioid-receptor-mediated response in PAG neurons at the single-cell level. These studies are the first to demonstrate that the analgesic activity of morphine can be reduced by the presence of gp120 in the PAG and that pretreatment with AMD3100 is able to restore the analgesic effects of morphine.

Exploring the neuroimmunopharmacology of opioids: an integrative review of mechanisms of central immune signaling and their implications for opioid analgesia

Vastly stimulated by the discovery of opioid receptors in the early 1970s, preclinical and clinical research was directed at the study of stereoselective neuronal actions of opioids, especially those played in their crucial analgesic role. However, during the past decade, a new appreciation of the non-neuronal actions of opioids has emerged from preclinical research, with specific appreciation for the nonclassic and nonstereoselective sites of action. Opioid activity at Toll-like receptors, newly recognized innate immune pattern recognition receptors, adds substantially to this unfolding story. It is now apparent from molecular and rodent data that these newly identified signaling events significantly modify the pharmacodynamics of opioids by eliciting proinflammatory reactivity from glia, the immunocompetent cells of the central nervous system. These central immune signaling events, including the release of cytokines and chemokines and the associated disruption of glutamate homeostasis, cause elevated neuronal excitability, which subsequently decreases opioid analgesic efficacy and leads to heightened pain states. This review will examine the current preclinical literature of opioid-induced central immune signaling mediated by classic and nonclassic opioid receptors. A unification of the preclinical pharmacology, neuroscience, and immunology of opioids now provides new insights into common mechanisms of chronic pain, naive tolerance, analgesic tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and allodynia. Novel pharmacological targets for future drug development are discussed in the hope that disease-modifying chronic pain treatments arising from the appreciation of opioid-induced central immune signaling may become practical.

Spatiotemporal CCR1, CCL3(MIP-1α), CXCR4, CXCL12(SDF-1α) expression patterns in a rat spinal cord injury model of posttraumatic neuropathic pain

Object

Central neuropathic pain is a frequent challenging complication after spinal cord injury (SCI), and specific therapeutic approaches remain elusive. The purpose of the present investigations was to identify potential key mediators of these pain syndromes by analyzing detailed expression profiles of important chemokines in an experimental SCI paradigm of posttraumatic neuropathic pain in rats.

Methods

Expression of CCR1, CCL3(MIP-1α), CXCR4, and CXCL12(SDF-1α) was investigated in parallel with behavioral testing for mechanical and thermal nociceptive thresholds after standardized SCI; 100-kdyn (moderate injury) and 200-kdyn (severe injury) force-defined thoracic spinal cord contusion lesions were applied via an Infinite Horizon Impactor at the T-9 level. Sham controls received laminectomies. Hindlimb locomotor function as well as mechanical and thermal sensitivities were monitored weekly by standardized behavioral testing after SCI. Chemokine expression was analyzed by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in the early (7 days postoperatively) and late (42 days postoperatively) time courses after SCI, and immunohistochemical analysis (anatomical and quantitative) was performed 2, 7, 14, and 42 days after lesioning. Double staining with cellular markers and pain-related peptides (substance P and CGRP) or receptors (TRPV-1, TRPV-2, VRL-1, and TLR-4) was performed. Based on data obtained from behavioral testing, quantified immunohistochemical chemokine expressions in individual animals were correlated with the respective mechanical and thermal sensitivity thresholds 6 weeks after SCI.

Results

After 200-kdyn lesions, the animals exhibited prolonged reduction in their nociceptive thresholds, while 100-kdyn groups showed pain-related behaviors only in the early time course after SCI. Investigated chemokines were widely induced after SCI, involving cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal cord levels far beyond the lesion core. CCR1 and CCL3 were induced significantly in the dorsal horns 2 days after lesioning and remained at high levels after SCI with significantly higher intensities after 200-kdyn than 100-kdyn contusions. CXCR4 and CXCL12 levels continuously increased from 2 to 42 days after moderate and severe lesions. Additionally, chemokines were induced significantly in dorsal columns, with highest density levels 42 days after 200-kdyn lesions. In dorsal horns, CCR1 was coexpressed with TRPV-1 while CXCR4 and CXCL12 were partially coexpressed with substance P and CGRP. In dorsal columns, CCL3/CCR1 colabeled with GFAP, TRPV-2, TRPV-1, TLR-4; CXCR4/CXCL12 coexpressed with GFAP, CD68/ED1, and TLR4. Chemokine immunoreactivity density levels, especially CCL3 and its receptor, correlated in part significantly with nociceptive thresholds.

Conclusions

The authors report lesion grade–dependent upregulation of different chemokines/chemokine receptors after spinal cord contusion lesions in pain-processing spinal cord regions in a clinically relevant model of traumatic SCI in rats. Prolonged chemokine induction further correlated with below-level pain development in the delayed time course after severe SCI and was coexpressed with pain-associated peptides and receptors, suggesting that chemokines play a crucial role in chronic central pain mechanisms after SCI.

CXCR4 signaling mediates morphine-induced tactile hyperalgesia

Morphine and related compounds are the first line of therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe pain. Over time, individuals taking opioids can develop an increasing sensitivity to noxious stimuli, even evolving into a painful response to previously non-noxious stimuli (opioid-induced hyperalgesia; OIH). The mechanism underlying OIH is not well understood although complex intracellular neural mechanisms, including opioid receptor desensitization and down-regulation, are believed to be major mechanisms underlying OIH. However, OIH may also be associated with changes in gene expression. A growing body of evidence suggests that cellular exposure to mu agonists upregulate chemokines/receptors and recent work from our laboratory implicates chemokine upregulation in a variety of neuropathic pain behaviors. Here we characterized the degree to which chemokines/receptors signaling is increased in primary afferent neurons of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) following chronic morphine sulfate treatment and correlated these changes with tactile hyperalgesic behavior in rodents. We demonstrate that mRNA expression of the chemokine, stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF1/CXCL12) is upregulated following morphine treatment in sensory neurons of the rat. The release of SDF1 was found to be constitutive when compared with the activity dependent release of the C-C chemokine, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1/CCL2) in a line of F11 neuroblastoma-sensory neuron hybrid cells. We further determined that there is pronounced CXCR4 expression in satellite glial cells and following morphine treatment, increased functional CXCR4 expression in sensory neurons of the DRG. Moreover, intraperitoneal administration of the specific CXCR4 antagonist, AMD3100, completely reversed OIH in the rat. Taken together; the data suggest that opioid-induced SDF1/CXCR4 signaling is central to the development of long lasting OIH and that receptor antagonists represent a promising novel approach to the management of the side effects associated with the use of opioids for chronic pain management.

The chemokine receptor CCR5 in the central nervous system

The expression and the role of the chemokine receptor CCR5 have been mainly studied in the context of HIV infection. However, this protein is also expressed in the brain, where it can be crucial in determining the outcome in response to different insults. CCR5 expression can be deleterious or protective in controlling the progression of certain infections in the CNS, but it is also emerging that it could play a role in non-infectious diseases. In particular, it appears that, in addition to modulating immune responses, CCR5 can influence neuronal survival. Here, we summarize the present knowledge about the expression of CCR5 in the brain and highlight recent findings suggesting its possible involvement in neuroprotective mechanisms.

Morphine induces the release of CCL5 from astrocytes: potential neuroprotective mechanism against the HIV protein gp120

A number of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV) positive subjects are also opiate abusers. These individuals are at high risk to develop neurological complications. However, little is still known about the molecular mechanism(s) linking opiates and HIV neurotoxicity. To learn more, we exposed rat neuronal/glial cultures prepared from different brain areas to opiate agonists and HIV envelope glycoproteins gp120IIIB or BaL. These strains bind to CXCR4 and CCR5 chemokine receptors, respectively, and promote neuronal death. Morphine did not synergize the toxic effect of gp120IIIB but inhibited the cytotoxic property of gp120BaL. This effect was blocked by naloxone and reproduced by the mu opioid receptor agonist DAMGO. To examine the potential mechanism(s) of neuroprotection, we determined the effect of morphine on the release of chemokines CCL5 and CXCL12 in neurons, astrocytes, and microglia cultures. CCL5 has been shown to prevent gp120BaL neurotoxicity while CXCL12 decreases neuronal survival. Morphine elicited a time-dependent release of CCL5 but failed to affect the release of CXCL12. This effect was observed only in primary cultures of astrocytes. To examine the role of endogenous CCL5 in the neuroprotective activity of morphine, mixed cerebellar neurons/glial cells were immunoneutralized against CCL5 prior to morphine and gp120 treatment. In these cells the neuroprotective effect of opiate agonists was blocked. Our data suggest that morphine may exhibit a neuroprotective activity against M-tropic gp120 through the release of CCL5 from astrocytes.

Adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclohexyl-adenosine induced phosphorylation of delta opioid receptor and desensitization of its signaling

AIM

To define the effect of adenosine A(1) receptor (A(1)R) on delta opioid receptor (DOR)-mediated signal transduction.

METHODS

CHO cells stably expressing HA-tagged A(1)R and DOR-CFP fusion protein were used. The localization of receptors was observed using confocal microscope. DOR-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase was measured using cyclic AMP assay. Western blots were employed to detect the phosphorylation of Akt and the DOR. The effect of A(1)R agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) on DOR down-regulation was assessed using radioligand binding assay.

RESULTS

CHA 1 micromol/L time-dependently attenuated DOR agonist [D-Pen(2,5)]enkephalin (DPDPE)-induced inhibition of intracellular cAMP accumulation with a t(1/2)=2.56 (2.09-3.31) h. Pretreatment with 1 micromol/L CHA for 24 h caused a right shift of the dose-response curve of DPDPE-mediated inhibition of cAMP accumulation, with a significant increase in EC(50) but no change in E(max). Pretreatment with 1 micromol/L CHA for 1 h also induced a significant attenuation of DPDPE-stimulated phosphorylation of Akt. Moreover, CHA time-dependently phosphorylated DOR (Ser363), and this effect was inhibited by A(1)R antagonist 1,3-Dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) but not by DOR antagonist naloxone. However, CHA failed to produce the down-regulation of DOR, as neither receptor affinity (K(d)) nor receptor density (B(max)) of DOR showed significant change after chronic CHA exposure.

CONCLUSION

Activation of A(1)R by its agonist caused heterologous desensitization of DOR-mediated inhibition of intracellular cAMP accumulation and phosphorylation of Akt. Activation of A(1)R by its agonist also induced heterologous phosphorylation but not down-regulation of DOR.

Cytokine and chemokine regulation of sensory neuron function

Pain normally subserves a vital role in the survival of the organism, prompting the avoidance of situations associated with tissue damage. However, the sensation of pain can become dissociated from its normal physiological role. In conditions of neuropathic pain, spontaneous or hypersensitive pain behavior occurs in the absence of the appropriate stimuli. Our incomplete understanding of the mechanisms underlying chronic pain hypersensitivity accounts for the general ineffectiveness of currently available options for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. Despite its complex pathophysiological nature, it is clear that neuropathic pain is associated with short- and long-term changes in the excitability of sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) as well as their central connections. Recent evidence suggests that the upregulated expression of inflammatory cytokines in association with tissue damage or infection triggers the observed hyperexcitability of pain sensory neurons. The actions of inflammatory cytokines synthesized by DRG neurons and associated glial cells, as well as by astrocytes and microglia in the spinal cord, can produce changes in the excitability of nociceptive sensory neurons. These changes include rapid alterations in the properties of ion channels expressed by these neurons, as well as longer-term changes resulting from new gene transcription. In this chapter we review the diverse changes produced by inflammatory cytokines in the behavior of sensory neurons in the context of chronic pain syndromes.

Physiological evidence for interaction between the HIV-1 co-receptor CXCR4 and the cannabinoid system in the brain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The chemokine, stromal cell-derived growth factor-1alpha (SDF-1alpha/CXCL12), a member of the CXC chemokine family, and the ligand for CXCR4, the co-receptor involved in the entry of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), was tested for its possible interaction with a physiological response to a cannabinoid.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The cannabinoid agonist, an aminoalkylindole, (+)-WIN 55,212-2 [(4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphthalenyl-carbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo[3,2,1ij]quinolin-6-one], was infused directly into the preoptic anterior hypothalamus (POAH), the primary brain area involved in thermoregulation.

KEY RESULTS

WIN 55,212-2 (5-15 microg) evoked a dose-related hypothermia, which was attenuated by SDF-1alpha/CXCL12 microinjected directly into the POAH. The inhibitory effect of SDF-1alpha/CXCL12 on WIN 55,212-2-induced hypothermia was reversed by 1,1'-[1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane] octohydrobromide dihydrate, an antagonist of SDF-1alpha/CXCL12, acting at its receptor, CXCR4.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

This study provides the first in vivo evidence for a thermoregulatory interaction between the HIV-1 co-receptor and the cannabinoid system in the brain.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2007

This paper is the thirtieth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2007 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia; stress and social status; tolerance and dependence; learning and memory; eating and drinking; alcohol and drugs of abuse; sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology; mental illness and mood; seizures and neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity and neurophysiology; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunological responses.

The association of persistent pain with out-patient addiction treatment outcomes and service utilization

AIMS

To estimate the prevalence of persistent pain among veterans in out-patient addiction treatment and examine associated addiction treatment outcomes and medical and psychiatric service use.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Analysis of data from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing on-site versus referral primary care of veterans with substance dependence (n = 582), excluding opioid dependence who had at least one follow-up interview during the 12-month study period in a Veterans Affairs (VA) out-patient addiction treatment center.

MEASUREMENTS

Pain status was classified as persistent (pain was rated moderate to very severe at all time-points), low (pain was rated none to mild at all time-points) or intermittent (all others). Main outcome measures were addiction treatment retention, addiction severity index (ASI) alcohol and drug composite scores, VA service utilization and treatment costs.

FINDINGS

A total of 33.2% of veterans reported persistent pain and 47.3% reported intermittent pain. All groups benefited from addiction treatment, but veterans with persistent pain were in treatment for an estimated 35.1 fewer days [95% confidence interval (CI) = -64.1, -6.1, P = 0.018], less likely to be abstinent from alcohol or drugs at 12 months [odds ratio (OR)(adj) = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.30,0.89; P = 0.018], had worse ASI alcohol composite scores at 12 months (beta(adj) = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.02,0.15; P = 0.007), were more likely to be medically hospitalized (OR(adj) = 2.70; 95% CI = 1.02,7.13; P = 0.046) and had higher total service costs compared to those with low pain ($17 766 versus $13 261, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent pain is common among veterans in out-patient addiction treatment and is associated with poorer rates of abstinence, worse alcohol use severity and greater service utilization and costs than those with low pain.

Bi-directional heterologous desensitization between the major HIV-1 co-receptor CXCR4 and the kappa-opioid receptor

We previously characterized multiple interactions between chemokine and opioid G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), and we found both mu and delta-opioid receptors cross-desensitize CCR1, CCR2, CCR5, but not CXCR4. Here we report that the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) is able to cross-desensitize CXCR4, and this phenomenon is bi-directional. Chemotactic responses by KOR activation are diminished with prior activation of CXCR4. Additionally, calcium mobilization assays show these cross-desensitization processes occur within seconds of receptor activation, and target receptor internalization is not responsible for desensitization between these receptors. These results have implications for several essential processes including neuronal and lymphocyte development, inflammatory responses, and pain/sensitivity.

Chemokines and the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain

Chemokines and chemokine receptors are widely expressed by cells of the immune and nervous systems. This review focuses on our current knowledge concerning the role of chemokines in the pathophysiology of chronic pain syndromes. Injury- or disease-induced changes in the expression of diverse chemokines and their receptors have been demonstrated in the neural and nonneural elements of pain pathways. Under these circumstances, chemokines have been shown to modulate the electrical activity of neurons by multiple regulatory pathways including increases in neurotransmitter release through Ca-dependent mechanisms and transactivation of transient receptor channels. Either of these mechanisms alone, or in combination, may contribute to sustained excitability of primary afferent and secondary neurons within spinal pain pathways. Another manner in which chemokines may influence sustained neuronal excitability may be their ability to function as excitatory neurotransmitters within the peripheral and central nervous system. As is the case for traditional neurotransmitters, injury-induced up-regulated chemokines are found within synaptic vesicles. Chemokines released after depolarization of the cell membrane can then act on other chemokine receptor-bearing neurons, glia, or immune cells. Because up-regulation of chemokines and their receptors may be one of the mechanisms that directly or indirectly contribute to the development and maintenance of chronic pain, these molecules may then represent novel targets for therapeutic intervention in chronic pain states.

The chemokine CX3CL1/fractalkine interferes with the antinociceptive effect induced by opioid agonists in the periaqueductal grey of rats

We have reported that there is heterologous interaction between the mu, delta or kappa opioid receptors and the receptors for the chemokines CCL5/RANTES or CXCL12/SDF-1 in the regulation of antinociception in rats. CX3CL1/fractalkine, a chemokine that exclusively binds to CX3CR1, has been found to affect morphine analgesia and tolerance in the spinal cord. The purpose of the present study was to see if the interaction between the chemokine CX3CL1/fractalkine receptor and mu, delta or kappa opioid receptors occurs in the periaqueductal grey (PAG) of adult male S-D rats. The cold-water tail-flick (CWT) test was used to measure antinociception. The results showed that intra-PAG injection of 100 ng CX3CL1/fractalkine 30 min before administration of 400 ng DAMGO, 100 ng DPDPE or 20 microg dynorphin significantly reduced the antinociception induced by each of these peptides. These results demonstrate that activation of the CX3CL1 receptor diminishes the effect of mu, delta and kappa opioid agonists on their receptors in the PAG of rats.