51
|
Su L, She L, Shen L. The Current Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 10:585046. [PMID: 33747895 PMCID: PMC7970762 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.585046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the head and neck, and it originates from the mucous epithelium of the nasopharynx. Because it is "hidden", the symptoms of NPC can easily be missed, and more than 70% of patients present with locally advanced disease at diagnosis. Concurrent radiation therapy with chemotherapy can significantly improve regional control of NPC. At present, distant metastasis is the main cause of treatment failure. At the end of the 20th century, clinical trial No. IG0099 in the United States confirmed the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for the first time. However, in the past 20 years, various clinical trials and meta-analyses conducted globally have yielded contradictory results regarding the effect of AC on locally advanced NPC. AC has changed from category 1 to the current category 2A in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, and it remains controversial whether AC can significantly improve the survival of NPC patients. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the role of AC in locally advanced NPC by comparing some treatment methods. We conclude the role of AC in treating locally advanced NPC, based on the studies presented, remains undefined but is associated with increased toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Su
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lei She
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, China
| | - Liangfang Shen
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Fang L, Shi L, Wang W, Hu T, Rao X. Which treatment is better than concurrent chemoradiotherapy about survival for stage III or IV locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? An updated Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:3633-3642. [PMID: 33598731 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06614-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To speculate whether induction chemotherapy (IC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) could obtain better survival benefit for stage III or IV locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). METHODS Only randomized controlled trials were incorporated. There were five treatments (CCRT, IC + CCRT, CCRT + AC, IC + RT and RT alone) recruited for analysis. Overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) with a hazard ratio (HR) were selected as endpoints. First of all, we performed a traditional meta-analysis and subsequently conducted network meta-analysis based on the Bayesian method. RESULTS Totally, 15 studies, including 6182 patients, were incorporated for analysis. There was a statistically significant benefits in favor of IC + CCRT, compared with CCRT alone, for OS [HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63-0.89], LRFS [HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.56-0.86], and DMFS [HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54-0.78]. What's more, we did not observed any significant differences between CCRT + AC and CCRT alone for all the endpoints. Unsurprisingly, it was RT alone that demonstrate the poorest survival benefit. Strange to say, survival benefit, between IC + CCRT and IC + RT, or between IC + CCRT and CCRT + AC, did not significantly exist. CONCLUSION Induction chemotherapy IC + CCRT provided better survival benefit than CCRT alone. CCRT + AC failed to increase survival benefit significantly compared to CCRT alone. More research about comparing IC + CCRT with IC + RT or CCRT + AC are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucheng Fang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Licai Shi
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wen Wang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tingting Hu
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xingwang Rao
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Chen YP, Ismaila N, Chua MLK, Colevas AD, Haddad R, Huang SH, Wee JTS, Whitley AC, Yi JL, Yom SS, Chan ATC, Hu CS, Lang JY, Le QT, Lee AWM, Lee N, Lin JC, Ma B, Morgan TJ, Shah J, Sun Y, Ma J. Chemotherapy in Combination With Radiotherapy for Definitive-Intent Treatment of Stage II-IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:840-859. [PMID: 33405943 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on definitive-intent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage II-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) and ASCO convened an expert panel of radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgery, and advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, distant and locoregional disease control, and quality of life. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 108 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Five overarching clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy sequence, and concurrent, induction, and adjuvant chemotherapy options. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address aspects of care related to chemotherapy in combination with RT for the definitive-intent treatment of stage II to IVA NPC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Pei Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Melvin L K Chua
- National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | | | - Shao Hui Huang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph T S Wee
- National Cancer Centre Singapore/Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Jun-Lin Yi
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao-Su Hu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Yi Lang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chengdu, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Anne W M Lee
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, People's Republic of China, and The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Nancy Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Brigette Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Jatin Shah
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ying Sun
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Tao HY, Zhan ZJ, Qiu WZ, Liao K, Yuan YW, Yuan TZ, Zheng RH. Clinical value of docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) induction chemotherapy followed by TP concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer 2021; 12:18-27. [PMID: 33391399 PMCID: PMC7738834 DOI: 10.7150/jca.49944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical value of induction chemotherapy (IC) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with TP in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: A total of 544 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC that was newly diagnosed from January 2009 to December 2015 were included in this study. Among these patients, 251 were treated with TP induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT with cisplatin (DDP) alone (TP + DDP group), 167 were treated with TP followed by CCRT with TP (TP + TP group), and 126 were treated with docetaxel, DDP and fluorouracil (TPF) followed by CCRT with DDP alone (TPF + DDP group). Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Survival analysis showed that the 5-year OS, PFS and DMFS rates in the TP + DDP group were significantly lower than those in the TP + TP group after propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate analysis revealed that CCRT with TP was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS and DMFS. During CCRT, the incidence rates of grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, oral mucositis, leukocytopenia and neutropenia were significantly increased in the TP + TP group compared with the TP + DDP group (all P < 0.05). To further explore the value of TP + TP, we performed PSM again with the TPF + DDP group. After PSM, there were 100 patients in each group. Survival analysis showed no significant differences in the 5-year OS, PFS, DMFS and LRRFS rates between the two groups. During IC and CCRT, the rate of grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting in the TPF + DDP group was higher than that in the TP+TP group (9.0% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.030; 18.0% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.036, respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was found between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: TP + TP can reduce the distant metastasis of locoregionally advanced NPC and improve OS compared with TP + DDP; TP + TP has the same effect as TPF + DDP and is clinically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Yun Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510090, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Ze-Jiang Zhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510090, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Ze Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510090, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Kai Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510090, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Ya-Wei Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510090, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Tai-Ze Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510045, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Rong-Hui Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510090, Guangdong, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Zhang LL, Xu F, Song D, Huang MY, Huang YS, Deng QL, Li YY, Shao JY. Development of a Nomogram Model for Treatment of Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2029882. [PMID: 33306119 PMCID: PMC7733160 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Because of tumor heterogeneity, overall survival (OS) differs significantly among individuals with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), even among those with the same clinical stage. Relying solely on TNM staging to guide treatment remains imperfect. OBJECTIVES To establish a comprehensive nomogram to estimate individualized OS and to explore stratified treatment regimens for risk subgroups in nonmetastatic NPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included 8093 patients diagnosed with NPC at a single center in China from April 2009 to December 2015. The sample was split into a training cohort (5398 participants [66.7%]) and validation cohort (2695 [33.3%]). Data were analyzed in May 2020. EXPOSURES Age, T stage, N stage, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA level, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and albumin (ALB) levels. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was OS. The nomogram for estimating OS was generated based on multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. The performance of the nomogram was quantified using Harrell concordance index (C index), the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, and a calibration curve. OS rates were established using the Kaplan-Meier method, and intersubgroup differences were examined by the log-rank test. RESULTS Among the 8093 participants, 5688 (70.3%) were men, and the median age at diagnosis was 45 years (range, 7-85 years). Six variables (age, T stage, N stage, EBV DNA levels, LDH levels, and ALB levels) were identified through multivariate Cox regression and incorporated into a nomogram to estimate OS. The resulting nomogram showed excellent discriminative ability and significantly outperformed the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system for estimating OS (C index, 0.716 [95% CI, 0.698-0.734] vs 0.643 [95% CI, 0.624-0.661]; P < .001; AUC, 0.717 [95% CI, 0.698-0.737] vs 0.643 [95% CI, 0.623-0.662]; P < .001), and the calibration curves showed satisfactory agreement between the actual and nomogram-estimated OS rates. The validation cohort confirmed the results. Patients were stratified into 4 risk groups based on the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile score values estimated from the nomogram. The 4 nomogram-defined risk groups demonstrated significantly different intergroup OS (3-year OS rates: risk group 1, 1328 of 1345 [98.7%]; risk group 2, 1289 of 1341 [96.1%]; risk group 3, 1222 of 1321 [92.5%]; risk group 4, 1173 of 1391 [84.3%]; P < .001). These risk groups were associated with the efficacy of different treatment regimens. For example, for risk group 4, induction chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was associated with a significantly better OS than concurrent chemoradiotherapy (log-rank P = .008) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone (log-rank P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, the proposed nomogram model enabled individualized prognostication of OS and could help to guide risk-adapted treatment for patients with nonmetastatic NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu-Lu Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fei Xu
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Di Song
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Meng-Yao Huang
- Sun Yat-Sen University School of Mathematics, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yong-Shi Huang
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi-Ling Deng
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi-Yang Li
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian-Yong Shao
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Ma BBY, Chen YP, Hui EP, Liu X, Chan AKC, Chan ATC, Ma J. Recent Advances in the Development of Biomarkers and Chemoradiotherapeutic Approaches for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2020; 40:1-11. [PMID: 32191137 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_280747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic in Southern China, and the prognosis of this cancer has improved in part due to advances in radiotherapy (RT) techniques, broadened therapeutic options, and more precise prognostic stratification of patients. RT is the primary curative treatment of NPC, and the incorporation of chemotherapy (induction, concurrent, adjuvant) to RT has contributed to improved survival in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in combination with adjuvant or induction chemotherapy is now the standard treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC, but the ideal CCRT therapeutic strategy for NPC remains controversial. Plasma EBV DNA is the archetypal tumor-derived DNA in NPC, and three generations of studies have gradually expanded its clinical applications. Recently, the advent of whole exome/genome sequencing of NPC and the promising clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors have also spurred interest in the development of newer biomarkers. This review will focus on two clinical advances in NPC research that have made substantial impact on the contemporary management of NPC: (1) The integration of plasma EBV DNA in an expanding spectrum of clinical indications, and the development of promising immune-related biomarkers; (2) the current development of CCRT with special emphasis on the use of induction and adjuvant chemotherapy, as well as the potential applications of metronomic chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of locoregionally advanced NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigette B Y Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Pei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Edwin P Hui
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Allen K C Chan
- Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
The emerging data on choice of optimal therapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol 2020; 32:187-195. [PMID: 32175925 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We focus on the emerging data from randomized clinical trials for optimal integration of induction, concurrent, and/or adjuvant chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and the use of plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA for risk stratification. RECENT FINDINGS Several phase 3 trials have shown that induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) improved overall survival or disease-free survival when compared to CRT alone in stage III/IV NPC who is at high risk of distant metastases. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following CRT when compared to CRT alone is uncertain. There are increasing clinical data supporting the use of plasma EBV DNA for risk stratification. There are growing clinical data supporting the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors into the induction, concurrent, and/or adjuvant/maintenance phase of treatment in locally advanced NPC. SUMMARY Concurrent chemoradiation remains the standard treatment backbone in locally advanced NPC. There is level 1 evidence for induction chemotherapy followed by CRT in stage III/IV NPC. There is increasing evidence against the indiscriminate use of adjuvant chemotherapy following CRT. With the increasing treatment intensification, future treatment algorithm in NPC should incorporate plasma EBV DNA and other biomarkers for risk stratification and treatment selection.
Collapse
|
58
|
Association between outcome disparities and pragmatic features related to clinical trial and real-world settings in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A population-based retrospective cohort study, 2006-2016. Radiother Oncol 2020; 151:306-313. [PMID: 32866562 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognosis often differs between trial participants and nontrial (pragmatic) patients in similar clinical scenarios, raising a concern that results of trials may not represent those in real-world practice. METHODS AND MATERIALS Individual patient data were extracted from three phase III randomized controlled trials and a big-data real-world database (n = 10,126). Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT [control]: 2438 vs. 519) or induction chemotherapy plus CCRT (experimental) were included. Propensity score matching and correspondence analysis were used for data mining. RESULTS Compared with the real-world CCRT cohort, clinical trials preferred to include cases with T4 (25.3-43.3% vs. 18.8%) and N2 (44.4-60.7% vs. 38.9%) categories. Real-world patients were more likely to undergo shorter irradiation time (44 vs. 46-49 days), inadequate chemotherapy cycles (70.6% vs. 25.2-43.9%), other chemotherapy (36.4% vs. 0.0%), and flexible regimens (≥3 vs. 1). Although real-world patients had better survival than trial participants, the survival disparities disappeared in the matched cohorts, except for in one trial with the lowest pragmatism assessment caused by stringent eligibility criteria and low flexibility of delivery. Stage specification, year of treatment, and Epstein-Barr virus DNA were related to survival disparities (all P ≤ 0.034). The influence of pragmatic features on survival mainly affected the control (all P ≤ 0.043) rather than the experimental group. CONCLUSION Special attention should be paid to the control group when interpreting trial results. Assessing whether the pragmatic features of studies deviate from routine practice will lead to better conversion of trial findings into clinical guidelines.
Collapse
|
59
|
Tseng M, Ho F, Leong YH, Wong LC, Tham IW, Cheo T, Lee AW. Emerging radiotherapy technologies and trends in nasopharyngeal cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2020; 40:395-405. [PMID: 32745354 PMCID: PMC7494066 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Technology has always driven advances in radiotherapy treatment. In this review, we describe the main technological advances in radiotherapy over the past decades for the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and highlight some of the pressing issues and challenges that remain. We aim to identify emerging trends in radiation medicine. These include advances in personalized medicine and advanced imaging modalities, standardization of planning and delineation, assessment of treatment response and adaptive re‐planning, impact of particle therapy, and role of artificial intelligence or automation in clinical care. In conclusion, we expect significant improvement in the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy treatment for NPC over the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Tseng
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Francis Ho
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Yiat Horng Leong
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Lea Choung Wong
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Ivan Wk Tham
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Timothy Cheo
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Mt Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore, 329563, Singapore
| | - Anne Wm Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Two-year outcome of concurrent chemoradiation with carboplatin with or without adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil in nasopharyngeal cancer: A multicenter randomized trial. Curr Probl Cancer 2020; 45:100620. [PMID: 32713518 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the noninferiority result of chemoradiation with carboplatin in our previous nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) study along with the inconclusive data on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we designed to assess the role of adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil following CCRT with carboplatin in locoregionally advanced NPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicenter randomized trial was conducted at 5 cancer centers in Thailand. We enrolled in stage T2N0M0-T4N2M0 (American Joint Cancer Committee 7th edition) WHO Type 2 NPC patients. N3 or metastatic disease patients were excluded. Participants were randomized into 2 groups: CCRT plus AC group vs the CCRT alone group. Patients in both groups received weekly carboplatin 100 mg/m2 for 6 cycles concurrently with radiotherapy 69.96-70 Gy. Patients in the AC group subsequently received 3 cycles of carboplatin area under curve-5 plus 1000 mg/m2/day of fluorouracil infusion within 96 hours every 3 weeks. We report the 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Treatment-related toxicities and compliance were also explored. RESULTS Of 175 patients, 82 (46.9%) were assigned to the AC group, and 93 (53.1%) to the CCRT group. The compliance rate during CCRT was 90% and 86% in the AC and CCRT group, whereas 81.7% during adjuvant treatment in the AC group. With a median follow-up time of 24.4 months (interquartile range 17.9-24.4), the 2-year OS rate was 89.6% in the AC group and 81.8% in the CCRT group (P= 0.167). The 2-year DFS rate was 86.8% in the AC group and 74.6% in the CCRT group (P = 0.042). The 2-year LRFS rate was 91.5% in the AC group and 88.2% in the CCRT group (P = 0.443). The 2-year DMFS rate was 85.4% in the AC group and 79.6% in the CCRT group (P = 0.294). The most frequent serious (grade 3/4) nonhematologic toxicity was acute mucositis, which occurred 5% in the AC group vs 4% in the CCRT group (P = 0.498). For hematologic toxicity, grade 3-4 leukopenia were found 10% and 5% in the adjuvant and CCRT groups, respectively (P = 0.003). Multivariate analyses determined stage N2 disease was an adverse prognostic factor associated with shorter OS, DFS, and DMFS. And the adjuvant treatment was a significant protective factor for only DFS. CONCLUSIONS The addition of adjuvant carboplatin/fluorouracil following CCRT with carboplatin significantly improved 2-year DFS in stage T2N0M0-T4N2M0 NPC albeit there was a nonsignificant trend in favor of a higher 2-year OS, LRFS, and DMFS. Long-term efficacy and late toxicities of AC still require exploration.
Collapse
|
61
|
McDowell L, Corry J, Ringash J, Rischin D. Quality of Life, Toxicity and Unmet Needs in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Survivors. Front Oncol 2020; 10:930. [PMID: 32596155 PMCID: PMC7303258 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Concerted research efforts over the last three decades have resulted in improved survival and outcomes for patients diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The evolution of radiotherapy techniques has facilitated improved dose delivery to target volumes while reducing dose to the surrounding normal tissue, improving both disease control and quality of life (QoL). In parallel, clinical trials focusing on determining the optimal systemic therapy to use in conjunction with radiotherapy have been largely successful, resulting in improved locoregional, and distant control. As a consequence, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy has recently emerged as the preferred standard for patients with locally advanced NPC. Two of the major challenges in interpreting toxicity and QoL data from the published literature have been the reliance on: (1) clinician rather than patient reported outcomes; and (2) reporting statistical rather than clinical meaningful differences in measures. Despite the lower rates of toxicity that have been achieved with highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, survivors remain at moderate risk of persistent and long-lasting treatment effects, and the development of late radiation toxicities such as hearing loss, cranial neuropathies and cognitive impairment many years after successful treatment can herald a significant decline in QoL. Future approaches to reduce long-term toxicity will rely on: (1) identifying individual patients most likely to benefit from NACT; (2) development of response-adapted radiation strategies following NACT; and (3) anticipated further dose reductions to organs at risk with proton and particle therapy. With increasing numbers of survivors, many in the prime of their adult life, research to identify, and strategies to address the unmet needs of NPC survivors are required. This contemporary review will summarize our current knowledge of long-term toxicity, QoL and unmet needs of this survivorship group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lachlan McDowell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - June Corry
- GenesisCare Radiation Oncology, Division Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medicine St Vincent's, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jolie Ringash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danny Rischin
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Lee AWM, Ngan RKC, Ng WT, Tung SY, Cheng AAC, Kwong DLW, Lu TX, Chan ATC, Sze HCK, Yiu HHY, Wong FCS, Yuen KT, Chappell R, Choi HCW. NPC-0501 trial on the value of changing chemoradiotherapy sequence, replacing 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine, and altering fractionation for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2020; 126:3674-3688. [PMID: 32497261 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A current recommendation for the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent cisplatin followed by adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF). This randomized NPC-0501 trial evaluated the therapeutic effect of changing to an induction-concurrent sequence or accelerated-fractionation sequence, and/or replacing 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine (X). METHODS Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer stage III to stage IVB NPC initially were randomly allocated to 1 of 6 treatment arms (6-arm full-randomization cohort). The protocol was amended in 2009 to permit centers to opt out of randomization regarding fractionation (3-arm chemotherapy cohort). RESULTS A total of 803 patients were accrued (1 of whom was nonevaluable) from 2006 to 2012. Based on the overall comparisons, neither changing the chemotherapy sequence nor accelerated fractionation improved treatment outcome. However, secondary analyses demonstrated that when adjusted for RT parameters and other significant factors, the induction-concurrent sequence, especially the induction-PX regimen, achieved significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Efficacy varied among different RT groups: although no impact was observed in the accelerated-fractionation group and the 3-arm chemotherapy cohort, a comparison of the induction-concurrent versus concurrent-adjuvant sequence in the conventional-fractionation group demonstrated a significant benefit in PFS (78% vs 62% at 5 years; P = .015) and a marginal benefit in overall survival (84% vs 72%; P = .042) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Comparison of the induction-PX versus the adjuvant-PF regimen demonstrated better PFS (78% vs 62%; P = .027) without an increase in overall late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS For patients irradiated using conventional fractionation, changing the chemotherapy sequence from a concurrent-adjuvant to an induction-concurrent sequence, particularly using induction cisplatin and capecitabine, potentially could improve efficacy without an adverse impact on late toxicity. However, further validation is needed for confirmation of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong, China.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Roger K C Ngan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Wai-Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Stewart Y Tung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ashley A C Cheng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Dora L W Kwong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Tai-Xiang Lu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Henry C K Sze
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Harry H Y Yiu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Frank C S Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Kam-Tong Yuen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Rick Chappell
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Horace C W Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Wang BC, Xiao BY, Lin GH, Wang C, Liu Q. The efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:393. [PMID: 32375701 PMCID: PMC7204295 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06912-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been recommended as the first-line therapy for locoregional nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Due to the different chemotherapeutic drugs used in the IC and CCRT, the results remain controversial. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically retrieved to search potentially eligible clinical trials up to Sep 11, 2019. Eligible studies were registered and prospective randomized controlled clinical trials. RESULTS From 526 records, nine articles including seven randomized controlled clinical trials were eligible, with a total of 2311 locoregional advanced NPC patients. IC + CCRT had significantly lower risks of death (3-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003; 5-year HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94, p = 0.01), disease progression (3-year HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80, p < 0.001; 5-year HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (3-year HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.74, p < 0.0001; 5-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.87, p = 0.001) and locoregional relapse (3-year HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p = 0.02; 5-year HR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.86, p = 0.002) than CCRT. Compared with CCRT, IC + CCRT showed higher relative risks of grade 3 or more neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and hepatotoxicity throughout the course of treatment, and higher relative risks of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia and vomiting during CCRT. CONCLUSION IC combined with CCRT significantly improved the survival in locoregional advanced NPC patients. Moreover, toxicities were well tolerated during IC and CCRT. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bi-Cheng Wang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
| | - Bo-Ya Xiao
- Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, People's Republic of China
| | - Guo-He Lin
- Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, China
| | - Chang Wang
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Quentin Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes and Sequelae Between Children and Adult Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:848-856. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
65
|
Current management of stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma without distant metastasis. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 85:101995. [PMID: 32113080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Up to one in four patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma present with non-metastatic stage IV disease (i.e. T4 or N3). Distinct failure patterns exist, despite the routine adoption of contemporary treatment modalities such as intensity modulated radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT are commonly employed in this setting, with the latter emerging as the preferred option. Additionally, emerging radiation technologies like proton therapy has become available offering new opportunities for prevention of radiation-induced side effects. This article reviews not only the current treatment strategies, but also discusses novel ways to tackle this challenging disease with respect to the patterns of failure.
Collapse
|
66
|
Liang ZG, Zhang F, Yu BB, Li L, Qu S, Li Y, Guan Y, Liang RB, Han L, Zhu XD. The Double-Edge Role of the Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:801-812. [PMID: 32099476 PMCID: PMC7007778 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s236128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To construct a prognostic index (PI) for overall survival (OS) to stratify nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) into high-risk and low-risk groups. We also applied the model to investigate the role of the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) regimens for the treatment of NPC. Methods A prognostic model was established based on a retrospective study of 362 patients from January 2008 to June 2011. The discriminative and calibration abilities of the model were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index), and calibration curves. Bootstrapping was used to perform for internal validation. External validation was conducted using 324 patients diagnosed with NPC from July 2011 to December 2012 at the same institution. Survival analyses were performed between CCRT-AC and CCRT alone groups for the high-risk and low-risk groups. Results The primary PI comprised covariates that were associated with OS in the training cohort, including T stage, N stage, age, and plasma alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Internal and external validation showed that the discrimination of the PI for OS was significantly better than that of the 8th edition AJCC staging system. Discretization by using a fixed PI score cut-off of 407.96 determined from the training data set yielded high- and low-risk subgroups with distinct OS outcomes in the validation cohort. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS in high-risk patients (HR 0.620, 95% CI 0.408 to 0.941; P = 0.023) but increased the risk of distant metastasis (HR, 4.222, 95% CI, 0.959 to 18.585; P = 0.038) in low-risk patients. Conclusion The proposed prognostic model achieved good prediction and calibration of OS for patients with NPC. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy might be a double-edged sword, bringing survival benefit to high-risk patients but greater risk of distant metastasis to low-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-Guo Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Zhang
- Microbiome Research Centre, St George and Sutherland Clinical School, The University of New South Wales Sydney, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Bin-Bin Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Song Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Ren-Ba Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Jiang Y, Qu S, Pan X, Huang S, Zhu X. Prognostic Nomogram For Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Sci Rep 2020; 10:861. [PMID: 31965045 PMCID: PMC6972859 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57968-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The TNM staging system of NPC is the most important model for survival prediction. However, this model does not consider the biological variability of the tumor itself. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the overall survival of loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. 487 Patients with confimed nasopharyngeal carcinoma who underwent IMRT and chemotherapy were included in this study. We established prognostic nomogram for overall survival (OS) based on the Cox proportional hazards model. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were measured using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. Nomogram was validated externally by assessing discrimination and calibration using an independent data set. Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to analyze whether nomogram improve the prediction of survival than TNM stage system. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to stratifying risk of patients. Age, T-stage, N-stage, NLR, LDH were included in the nomogram for OS. The C-index of the nomogram for OS were 0.726 (95% CI, 0.690 to 0.762); The calibration curve showed the nomogram was able to predict 5-year OS accurately. The nomogram had a higher C-index than the TNM stage system (0.726 VS 0.632, P-value < 0.001). The NRI was 0.235 (95% CI: 0.129 to 0.396, P < 0.001), the IDI was 0.079 (95% CI: 0.034 to 0.396, p < 0.001). RPA was performed to stratify patients into three risk group, OS was significantly different between all three risk groups. High risk groups can be benefited survival from adjuvant chemotherapy. The nomogram outperformed the TNM staging system in predicting the OS of loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanming Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Cancer Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Song Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Cancer Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xinbin Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Cancer Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Shiting Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Cancer Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xiaodong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Cancer Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Krok-Schoen JL, Canin B, Parker I, MacKenzie AR, Koll T, Vankina R, Hsu CD, Jang B, Pan K, Lund JL, Starbuck E, Shahrokni A. The underreporting of phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data of older patients with cancer: A systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:369-379. [PMID: 31932259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Inspired by the American Society of Clinical Oncology's recommendations to strengthen the evidence base for older adults with cancer, the purpose of this systematic review is to identify the reporting of treatment efficacy and adverse events specific to older adults with cancer in Phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trials. This review also investigates the frequency with which these data points were reported in the literature to identify gaps in reporting and opportunities to expand the knowledge base on clinical outcomes for older adults with cancer. METHODS Chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data published from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 was reviewed. Manuscripts (n = 929) were identified based on keyword searches of EMBASE and PubMed. After removal of duplicates (n = 116) and articles that did not meet this study's inclusion criteria (n = 654), 159 articles were identified for review. RESULTS Reviewed papers were published in 36 different scientific journals and included twenty-five different cancer types. Of the 159 articles, 117 (73.6%) reported age-specific medians and 75 (47.2%) included stratifications of data by age. Treatment efficacy was reported in 96.2% of the articles with 39.9% reporting effectiveness of treatment by age. Reporting of adverse events was included in 84.9% of the articles with only 8.9% reporting these events stratified by age. CONCLUSION Results suggest inadequate reporting of treatment efficacy and adverse events as well as basic descriptive statistics about the age distribution of study subjects. Conscious efforts are needed to address these deficiencies at every level of planning and conducting clinical trials as wells as reporting outcomes stratified by age. Ultimately, standardized reporting could lead to improved treatment decisions and outcomes for older adults with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Thuy Koll
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, USA
| | | | | | - Brian Jang
- Tulane University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | | | - Edith Starbuck
- University of Cincinnati Libraries, University of Cincinnati, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
69
|
Siano M, Dulguerov P, Broglie MA, Henke G, Putora PM, Simon C, Zwahlen D, Huber GF, Ballerini G, Beffa L, Giger R, Rothschild S, Negri SV, Elicin O. A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 3 (Medical Oncology). Front Oncol 2019; 9:1127. [PMID: 31709187 PMCID: PMC6822020 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Head and Neck Cancer Working Group of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) has investigated the level of consensus (LOC) and discrepancy in everyday practice of diagnosis and treatment in head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods: An online survey was iteratively generated with 10 Swiss university and teaching hospitals. LOC below 50% was defined as no agreement, while higher LOC were arbitrarily categorized as low (51–74%), moderate (75–84%), and high (≥85%). Results: Any LOC was achieved in 62% of topics (n = 60). High, moderate, and low LOC were found in 18, 20, and 23%, respectively. Regarding Head and Neck Surgery, Radiation Oncology, Medical Oncology, and biomarkers, LOC was achieved in 50, 57, 83, and 43%, respectively. Conclusions: Consensus on clinical topics is rather low for surgeons and radiation oncologists. The questions discussed might highlight discrepancies, stimulate standardization of practice, and prioritize topics for future clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Siano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vevey, Switzerland
| | - Pavel Dulguerov
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Martina A Broglie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guido Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christian Simon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Gerhard F Huber
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Giorgio Ballerini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Luganese SA, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Lorenza Beffa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sacha Rothschild
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sandro V Negri
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Lindenhofspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Zong J, Xu H, Chen B, Guo Q, Xu Y, Chen C, Weng Y, Zheng W, Pan J, Lin S. Maintenance chemotherapy using S-1 following definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:182. [PMID: 31640719 PMCID: PMC6806566 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1387-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with N3 stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are at high risk for treatment failure. This study aims to assess the efficacy of maintenance chemotherapy (MC) using S-1 (MC-S1), a novel oral fluoropyrimidine agent, following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (N3-NPC). METHODS A retrospective review was conducted for all N3-NPC treated with CRT with MC (CRT-MC) or without MC (CRT-non-MC) during 2014-2016. Toxicities with MC were recorded. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) were compared between CRT-MC vs. CRT-non-MC cohorts. RESULTS A total of 130 N3 patients were identified, of whom 21 (16.2%) were treated with CRT-MC, and 109 (83.8%) with CRT-non-MC. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the CRT-MC and CRT-non-MC groups, with the exception of the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Following IMRT 69 patients achieved a complete response (CR) (CRT-MC: 10; CRT-non-MC: 59), 61 had a partial response (PR) (11 vs. 50), and none maintained stable disease (SD) or developed progression of disease (PD). After a median follow-up of 41 months for surviving patients, a significant differences in OS (76.3% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.046) and DMFS (70.3% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.043) but not LFFS (84.9% vs. 100%, p = 0.091) at 3 years were observed between the CRT-non-MC and CRT-MC groups. Skin hyperpigmentation, leucopenia, fatigue, neutropenia, anorexia and nausea were the common but not severe (grade 1-2) toxicities of MC. CONCLUSIONS Using MC-S1 in N3-NPC patients following IMRT achieved superior survival to the CRT-non-MC patients. The toxicities of MC-S1 were mild and tolerable. Further clinical trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of MC-S1 in N3-NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingfeng Zong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Hanchuan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Bijuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Qiaojuan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Yun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Chuanben Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Youliang Weng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Jianji Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Shaojun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Zhang B, Li MM, Chen WH, Zhao JF, Chen WQ, Dong YH, Gong X, Chen QY, Zhang L, Mo XK, Luo XN, Tian J, Zhang SX. Association of Chemoradiotherapy Regimens and Survival Among Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1913619. [PMID: 31626318 PMCID: PMC6813597 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The role of induction chemotherapy (IC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains controversial. OBJECTIVES To update meta-analyses on the association of survival outcomes with IC and AC regimens in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC and assess whether the current evidence is conclusive by a trial sequential analysis (TSA) approach. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for articles published from inception until June 1, 2019. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials that assessed the efficacy of radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy among previously untreated patients and patients with nondistant metastatic NPC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted by 2 investigators from each trial independently and synthesized by the 2 investigators. All trial results were combined and analyzed by a fixed- or random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). RESULTS A total of 8036 patients (median age, 46.5 years; 5872 [73.1%] male) from 28 randomized clinical trials were included in the analysis. Pooled analyses revealed that concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was significantly associated with improved OS, PFS, DMFS, and LRFS compared with radiotherapy across all subgroups. The TSA confirmed the treatment outcomes of CCRT compared with radiotherapy. The additional IC regimen was associated with an improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95), PFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84), DMFS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.78), and LRFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.85). These findings were consistent in subgroup analyses of multicenter trials with sample sizes greater than 250, years of survival rate of 5 or greater, median follow-up longer than 5 years, or low risk of bias. However, the additional AC regimen was not associated with a survival benefit in OS (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78-1.23), PFS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07), DMFS (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.10), or LRFS (HR, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.59-1.09). The TSA provided sound evidence on the additional benefit of IC but not AC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These data suggest a significant association of survival outcomes with CCRT in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. The addition of IC instead of AC could achieve survival benefits. The potential therapeutic gain of AC should be explored in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Min Min Li
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wen Hui Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jian Fu Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Qi Chen
- Big Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yu Hao Dong
- Department of Catheterization Laboratory, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiao Gong
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiu Ying Chen
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiao Kai Mo
- Department of Head and Neck Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiao Ning Luo
- Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie Tian
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shui Xing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Zhu J, Duan B, Shi H, Li Y, Ai P, Tian J, Chen N. Comparison of GP and TPF induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2019; 97:37-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
73
|
Patil VM, Joshi A, Noronha V, Talreja V, Simha V, Dhumal S, Bandekar B, Chandrasekharan A, Prabhash K. Palliative chemotherapy in carcinoma nasopharynx. South Asian J Cancer 2019; 8:173-177. [PMID: 31489292 PMCID: PMC6699237 DOI: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_230_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare malignancy. We conducted an audit of systemic therapies received in palliative setting in carcinoma nasopharynx and studied their outcomes. Methods Patients who underwent first-line palliative systemic chemotherapy between January 2014 and April 2017 for carcinoma nasopharynx at the department of medical oncology at authors' institute were selected for this analysis. Toxicities, responses, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. In addition, a Quality-Adjusted Time without Symptoms or Toxicity analysis with threshold utility analysis was performed. Results Fifty-one patients were included in this analysis. The indication of palliative chemotherapy was locoregionally recurrent disease in 25 (49.0%) patients and metastatic disease in 26 (51.0%) patients. The overall response rate was 62.0% (n = 33). The median PFS was 225 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 164-274 days) and median OS was 513 days (95% CI: 286-931 days). The restricted mean TOX state duration was 2.6 days (95% CI: 0.3-4.9), restricted mean TWiST duration was 219.2 days (95% CI: 184.0-254.4), and restricted mean REL duration was 74.3 days (95% CI: 38.1-110.4). Conclusion Systemic cytotoxic therapy in nasopharyngeal cancers is associated with high response rates and clinically meaningful PFS; with low duration of time spent in adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay M Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikas Talreja
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vijai Simha
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sachin Dhumal
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Bhavesh Bandekar
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Arun Chandrasekharan
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, HBNI, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Yang Q, Cao SM, Guo L, Hua YJ, Huang PY, Zhang XL, Lin M, You R, Zou X, Liu YP, Xie YL, Wang ZQ, Mai HQ, Chen QY, Tang LQ, Mo HY, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Zhao C, Xiang YQ, Zhang XP, Lin ZX, Li WX, Liu Q, Li JB, Ling L, Guo X, Hong MH, Chen MY. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term results of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2019; 119:87-96. [PMID: 31425966 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Revised: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Initial 3-year results from our clinical trial in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients showed that induction chemotherapy (IC) with cisplatin and fluorouracil resulted in improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a marginally significant effect on distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), but the effect of IC on locoregional relapse-free survival and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly. Here, we present 5-year follow-up results. PATIENTS AND METHODS Our trial was a randomised, open-label phase III trial comparing IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone in patients with stage III-IVB (except T3N0-1) NPC. The IC followed by CCRT group received cisplatin (80 mg/m2 d1) and fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 d1-5) every 3 weeks for two cycles before CCRT. Both groups were treated with 80 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary end-points were DFS and DMFS. We did efficacy analyses in the 476 randomised patients (intention-to-treat population). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 82.6 months, the 5-year DFS rate was 73.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.7-79.1) in the IC followed by CCRT group and 63.1% (95% CI 56.8-69.4) in the CCRT alone group (p = 0.007). The 5-year DMFS rate was also significantly higher in the IC followed by CCRT group (82.8%, 95% CI 77.9-87.7) than in the CCRT alone group (73.1%, 95% CI 67.2-79.0, p = 0.014). Our updated analysis revealed an OS benefit of IC: the 5-year OS rate was 80.8% in the IC followed by CCRT group versus 76.8% in the CCRT alone group (p = 0.040). The proportion of patients with eye damage was significantly higher in the CCRT alone group than the IC followed by CCRT group (16.4% [39/238] versus 9.7% [23/238], p = 0.029). CONCLUSION IC followed by CCRT provides long-term DFS, DMFS and OS benefits compared with CCRT alone in locoregionally advanced NPC and, therefore, can be recommended for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Su-Mei Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Cancer Prevention Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ling Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Jun Hua
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei-Yu Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Long Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mei Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui You
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiong Zou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - You-Ping Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Long Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Qiang Mai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Yan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin-Quan Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao-Yuan Mo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ka-Jia Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chong Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan-Qun Xiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiu-Ping Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Xiong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Wei-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Cancer Prevention Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Clinical Trial Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Ling
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Ming-Huang Hong
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Clinical Trial Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Ming-Yuan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Zhao Z, Wen J, Peng L, Liu H. Upregulation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor (IGF-1R) Reverses the Inhibitory Effect of Let-7g-5p on Migration and Invasion of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25:5747-5756. [PMID: 31374070 PMCID: PMC6689202 DOI: 10.12659/msm.914555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Let-7 microRNAs (miRNAs) have the effects of inhibiting tumor growth and metastasis, however, the research in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is limited. This study focused on the effects of Let-7 on NPC migration and invasion and the mechanism of action. Material/Methods Plasmid transfection was used to upregulate the expression levels of Let-7g-5p and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was applied to test the cell viability. Scratch assay and Transwell assay were performed to detect the migration and invasion abilities. Bioinformatics prediction and luciferase reporter assay were used to determine and verify the downstream target genes for Let-7g-5p. Protein and mRNA were detected by western blot and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), respectively. Results Let-7g-5p was under-expressed in human NPC cells. Overexpression of Let-7g-5p could inhibit cell viability and inhibit the migration and invasion of SUNE1 cells. The dual-luciferase reporter assay showed that IGF-1R was a direct target gene of Let-7g-5p, which was directly regulated IGF-1R expression by 3′UTR. Let-7g-5p overexpression could inhibit the expression of IGF-1R gene, and upregulation of IGF-1R gene expression reversed the inhibitory effect of Let-7g-5p on cell viability and epithelial-mesenchymal transition processes. Conclusions Let-7g-5p is lowly expressed in NPC and it was the first to discover that IGF-1R was a target gene of let-7g-5p in NPC. Upregulation of IGF-1R reversed the inhibitory effect of Let-7g-5p on epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhecheng Zhao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China (mainland)
| | - Jianxue Wen
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China (mainland)
| | - Lihua Peng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China (mainland)
| | - Hanbo Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 2019; 394:64-80. [PMID: 31178151 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30956-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1596] [Impact Index Per Article: 319.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is characterised by distinct geographical distribution and is particularly prevalent in east and southeast Asia. Epidemiological trends in the past decade have shown that its incidence has declined gradually but progressively, and mortality has been reduced substantially. These findings probably reflect lifestyle and environmental changes, enhanced understanding of the pathogenesis and risk factors, population screening, advancements in imaging techniques, and individualised comprehensive chemoradiotherapy strategies. In particular, plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA has been used for population screening, prognostication, predicting treatment response for therapeutic adaptation, and disease surveillance. Moreover, the widespread application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and optimisation of chemotherapy strategies (induction, concurrent, adjuvant) have contributed to improved survival with reduced toxicities. Among the existing developments in novel therapeutics, immune checkpoint therapies have achieved breakthroughs for treating recurrent or metastatic disease and represent a promising future direction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Pei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Anthony T C Chan
- Partner State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sir Y K Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute and Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy; Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Peng L, Liu JQ, Chen YP, Ma J. The next decade of clinical trials in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20181031. [PMID: 31112398 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20181031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials are powerful weapons in the battle against nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Based on clinical trials conducted in the past two decades, concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy or induction chemotherapy has been recommended as the standard treatment for locoregionally advanced NPC in various guidelines. However, there remain shortcomings concerning current treatment modalities that should be refined in future research. In this article, we review the achievements of published clinical trials for locoregionally advanced NPC and propose future directions for subsequent clinical trials. We believe that refinement of current regimens of chemotherapy, de-intensification of treatment for specific groups of patients, developing personalized treatment based on predictors ( e.g. applying plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA) and investigating novel therapies, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy, should be applied with the highest priority when designing clinical trials for locoregionally advanced NPC in the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Pei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Wang Z, Zhu Z, Lin Z, Luo Y, Liang Z, Zhang C, Chen J, Peng P. miR-429 suppresses cell proliferation, migration and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by downregulation of TLN1. Cancer Cell Int 2019; 19:115. [PMID: 31068760 PMCID: PMC6492405 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-019-0831-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background miR-429 and TLN1 have been shown to affect the biological behaviours of many carcinomas. However, their effects in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are not yet clear. Here, we investigated their regulatory relationships and effects on NPC cells. Methods TargetScan was used to predict the regulatory relationships of miR-429 and TLN1 in NPC cells. Then, Western blotting and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) were performed to examine TLN1 levels, and qPCR was used to determine miR-429 levels in NPC cell lines with different metastatic characteristics (5-8F, CNE-2, CNE-1, 6-10B and NP69), to investigate whether TLN1 and miR-429 are correlated with the metastatic characteristics of these cells. Next, we upregulated or downregulated miR-429 in 5-8F and 6-10B cells, which have different tumourigenicity and transferability, and examined TLN1 expression by western blotting and qPCR after transfection. QPCR was also performed to confirm successful transfection of miR-429 mimic into 5-8F and 6-10B cells. Dual luciferase reporter gene assay was performed to investigate whether miR-429 regulates TLN1 by binding to its 3′UTR. After transfection, Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) and IncuCyte were used to examine the proliferation of these cells, and wound-healing assay, Transwell migration assay, and invasion assays were performed to investigate the changes in migration and invasion after transfection. Results Western blotting and qPCR analyses showed that the protein level of TLN1 was negatively correlated with miR-429 in NPC cell lines (P < 0.05), while the mRNA level showed no relation with miR429 expression (P > 0.05). In addition, cells with high transferability showed high TLN1 expression at the protein level, while miR429 expression showed the opposite trend (P < 0.05), but there were no differences at the mRNA level between the different cell lines. Overexpression of miR429 in 5-8F and 6-10B cells was accompanied by downregulation of TLN1 at the protein level (P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences at the mRNA level (P > 0.05). In addition, transferability, proliferation, and invasion were downregulated by miR429 overexpression (P < 0.05). However, dual-luciferase reporter gene assay indicated that TLN1 was not a direct target of miR-429. Conclusion This study showed that miR-429 functions as a tumour suppressor in NPC by downregulation of TLN1, although the relationship is not direct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihui Wang
- 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Cancer Center of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong China
| | - Zhiquan Zhu
- 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Cancer Center of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong China
| | - Zhong Lin
- 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Cancer Center of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong China
| | - Youli Luo
- 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Cancer Center of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong China
| | - Zibin Liang
- 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Cancer Center of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong China
| | - Caibin Zhang
- 2Department of Neurology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong China
| | - Jianxu Chen
- 3Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong China
| | - Peijian Peng
- 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Cancer Center of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong China
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Xu J, Ying Y, Xiong G, Lai L, Wang Q, Yang Y. Knockdown of serpin peptidase inhibitor clade C member 1 inhibits the growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Mol Med Rep 2019; 19:3658-3666. [PMID: 30896875 PMCID: PMC6471593 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a type of cancer originating in the nasopharynx. There are no NPC‑specific treatments available at present. Serpin peptidase inhibitor clade C member 1 (SERPINC1) serves roles in anticoagulation and anti‑inflammation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of SERPINC1 in the proliferation and apoptosis of NPC cells. Tumor and adjacent healthy tissue samples were collected from patients with NPC. Additionally, the SERPINC1 gene was silenced in the HNE3 cell line using short interfering RNA targeted against SERPINC1 (SERPINC1‑siRNA). Cell viability was determined via a Cell Counting Kit‑8 assay; furthermore, proliferation and apoptosis were investigated via flow cytometry. Western blotting and reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis were performed to determine the expression levels of protein and mRNA. It was revealed that the expression levels of SERPINC1 mRNA and protein were increased in NPC tumor tissues compared with in adjacent healthy tissues. The expression of SERPINC1 mRNA and protein in HNE3 cells decreased following SERPINC1‑siRNA transfection. Furthermore, knockdown of SERPINC1 promoted apoptosis and inhibited proliferation. It was also demonstrated that silencing SERPINC1 upregulated the expression of B‑cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl‑2)‑associated X protein and p53 mRNA and protein, and downregulated that of Bcl‑2, survivin and cyclin D1. Downregulation of SERPINC1 reduced the phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol 3‑kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (Akt) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Thus, SERPINC1 knockdown may promote the apoptosis of HNE3 cells and inhibit proliferation via the suppression of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Xu
- Department of ENT, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, P.R. China
| | - Yin Ying
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, P.R. China
| | - Gaoyun Xiong
- Department of ENT, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, P.R. China
| | - Liqin Lai
- Department of Pathology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, P.R. China
| | - Qingliang Wang
- Department of ENT, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, P.R. China
| | - Yue Yang
- Department of Pathology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Akbaba S, Held T, Lang K, Forster T, Federspil P, Herfarth K, Häfner M, Plinkert P, Rieken S, Debus J, Adeberg S. Bimodal Radiotherapy with Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in High-Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Results in Excellent Local Control. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11030379. [PMID: 30884910 PMCID: PMC6468442 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11030379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In this analysis, we aimed to present the first results of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), which is known for its conformal dose distribution and increased biological effectiveness in the treatment of high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed twenty-six consecutive patients who had been treated at our center with CIRT for high-risk NPC between 2009 and 2018. Carbon ion (C12) boost was applied in a bimodal setting combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) base plan. The median cumulative total dose was 74 Gy (RBE), and patients with inoperable (n = 17, 65%) or incompletely resected (n = 7, 27%) tumors were included in the analysis. Overall, 81% received concomitant chemotherapy (n = 21). Results: The median follow-up time was 40 months (range 10–97 months) for all patients. At the last follow-up, 92% of the patients were still alive. We could identify excellent tumor response with complete tumor remission (CR) in 60% (n = 15/25), partial tumor remission (PR) in 20% (n = 5/25), and stable disease (SD) in 12% (n = 3/25) of the patients according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. Despite unfavorable tumor characteristics, only one patient showed a locally in-field recurrence after 56 months (4%) and another patient a locoregional recurrence in the unilateral cervical lymph nodes after 21 months (4%). The 2-year local control (LC), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS) were 95%, 93%, and 100% and the estimated 5-year LC, DPFS, and OS were 90%, 86%, and 86%, respectively. Overall, treatment was tolerated well with 20% acute and 16% chronic grade 3 side effects. No toxicity greater than grade 3 occurred. Conclusion: Bimodal radiotherapy including IMRT and active raster-scanning CIRT for high-risk nasopharyngeal cancer is a safe treatment method resulting in moderate toxicity and excellent local control. A larger patient number and longer follow-up time would be necessary to strengthen the current findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Philippe Federspil
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Matthias Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Li WF, Chen NY, Zhang N, Hu GQ, Xie FY, Sun Y, Chen XZ, Li JG, Zhu XD, Hu CS, Xu XY, Chen YY, Hu WH, Guo L, Mo HY, Chen L, Mao YP, Sun R, Ai P, Liang SB, Long GX, Zheng BM, Feng XL, Gong XC, Li L, Shen CY, Xu JY, Guo Y, Chen YM, Zhang F, Lin L, Tang LL, Liu MZ, Ma J, Sun Y. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with/without induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Long-term results of phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:295-305. [PMID: 30613964 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
To report long-term results of a randomized controlled trial that compared cisplatin/fluorouracil/docetaxel (TPF) induction chemotherapy (IC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with CCRT alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Patients with stage III-IVB (except T3-4 N0) NPC were randomly assigned to receive IC plus CCRT (n = 241) or CCRT alone (n = 239). IC included three cycles of docetaxel (60 mg/m2 d1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 d1), and fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 /d civ d1-5) every 3 weeks. Patients from both groups received intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrently with three cycles of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks. After a median follow-up of 71.5 months, the IC plus CCRT group showed significantly better 5-year failure-free survival (FFS, 77.4% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.019), overall survival (OS, 85.6% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.042), distant failure-free survival (88% vs. 79.8%, p = 0.030), and locoregional failure-free survival (90.7% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.044) compared to the CCRT alone group. Post hoc subgroup analyses revealed that beneficial effects on FFS were primarily observed in patients with N1, stage IVA, pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase ≥170 U/l, or pretreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA ≥6000 copies/mL. Two nomograms were further developed to predict the potential FFS and OS benefit of TPF IC. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 late toxicities was 8.8% (21/239) in the IC plus CCRT group and 9.2% (22/238) in the CCRT alone group. Long-term follow-up confirmed that TPF IC plus CCRT significantly improved survival in locoregionally advanced NPC with no marked increase in late toxicities and could be an option of treatment for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Fei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Nian-Yong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Guo-Qing Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Fang-Yun Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Zhong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Gao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao-Su Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang-Ying Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei-Han Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Guo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao-Yuan Mo
- Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shao-Bo Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Guo-Xian Long
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Bao-Min Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing-Lai Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Chang Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun-Ying Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian-Yu Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Guo
- Clinical Trials Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Ming Chen
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Meng-Zhong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Li L, Liang W, Zhu JX, Dong CJ, Zou YM, Ye BC, Gao L. Evolutionary role of chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a literature-based network meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:501-512. [PMID: 30655701 PMCID: PMC6324614 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s185932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The role of chemotherapy has evolved greatly in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We undertook this network meta-analysis to establish the optimal chemotherapy strategy in advanced NPC. Materials and methods This network meta-analysis recruited randomized clinical trials involving patients with advanced NPC randomly allocated to induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT; induction + CRT), CRT plus adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT + adjuvant), CRT or radiotherapy (RT) alone. Pairwise meta-analysis was first conducted, then network meta-analysis was performed using the frequentist approach. Effect size was expressed as HR and 95% CI. Results In total, we analyzed 15 studies involving 4,067 patients with 880 (21.6%) patients receiving induction + CRT, 897 (22.1%) receiving CRT + adjuvant, 1,421 (34.9%) receiving CRT, and 869 (21.4%) receiving RT alone. Induction + CRT achieved significantly better distant failure-free survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53–0.86) and locoregional failure-free survival (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54–0.89) than CRT, and CRT + adjuvant achieved better overall survival than CRT (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67–1.00). However, no significant survival difference was found between the induction + CRT and CRT + adjuvant groups. Additionally, RT alone is always worse than the other three treatments. In terms of P-score, induction + CRT ranked best for distant and locoregional failure-free survival, while CRT + adjuvant ranked best for overall survival. Conclusion Both induction + CRT and CRT + adjuvant were equally effective and feasible choices for patients with advanced NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Wei Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Jin-Xian Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Chun-Jie Dong
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Second Hospital of Fushun, Fushun, Liaoning, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan-Mei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Bi-Cui Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Lin Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Zhang J, Peng H, Li WF, Zhang Y, Liu LZ, Tian L, Lin AH, Sun Y, Ma J. Individualized induction chemotherapy by pre-treatment plasma Epstein-Barr viral DNA in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1276. [PMID: 30567511 PMCID: PMC6299978 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5177-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 04/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The role of pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA (pre-DNA) for individualized induction chemotherapy (IC) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) still remains unknown. We aimed to address this clinical issue. Methods In total, data on 6218 patient with newly diagnosed LA-NPC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without IC were retrospectively reviewed. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was adopted to calculate the cut-off value of pre-DNA based on disease-free survival (DFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) method was adopted to balance prognostic factors and match patients. Survival outcomes between IC + CCRT and CCRT groups were compared. Results Among the original cohort, no survival difference between IC + CCRT and CCRT groups was found. The cut-off value of pre-DNA was 4650 copies/ml (area under curve [AUC], 0.620; sensitivity, 0.6224; specificity, 0.5673). For patients with Pre-DNA ≤ 4650 copies/ml, the IC + CCRT and CCRT groups also achieved comparable survival outcomes (P > 0.05 for all rates). However, IC + CCRT was associated with significantly improved 3-year DFS (78.6% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.03), overall survival (OS; 91.4% vs. 87.5%, P = 0.002) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 86.0% vs. 82.2%, P = 0.036) for patient with pre-DNA > 4650 copies/ml. Multivariate analysis also confirm that IC + CCRT was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR, 0.817; 95% CI, 0.683–0.977; P = 0.027), OS (HR, 0.675; 95% CI, 0.537–0.848; P = 0.001) and DMFS (HR, 0.782; 95% CI, 0.626–0.976; P = 0.03). Conclusions Pre-DNA may be a feasible and powerful consideration for individualized IC apart from other baseline clinical characteristics in LA-NPC. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5177-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Fei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Li-Zhi Liu
- Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Tian
- Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ai-Hua Lin
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. .,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Liu M, You W, Song YB, Miao JD, Zhong XB, Cai DK, Xu L, Xie LF, Gao Y. The Changing Role of Chemotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Updated Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2018; 8:597. [PMID: 30619740 PMCID: PMC6305856 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: Both induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT; IC+CCRT) and CCRT plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC; CCRT+AC) are standard treatments for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, no prospective randomized trials comparing these two approaches have been published yet. We conducted this network meta-analysis to address this clinical question. Method: We recruited randomized clinical trials involving patients with advanced NPC randomly allocated to IC+CCRT, CCRT+AC, CCRT, or radiotherapy (RT) alone. Pairwise meta-analysis was first conducted, then network meta-analysis was performed using the frequentist approach. Effect size was expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Overall, 12 trials involving 3,248 patients were recruited for this study, with 555 receiving IC+CCRT, 840 receiving CCRT+AC, 1,039 receiving CCRT, and 814 receiving radiotherapy (RT) alone. IC+CCRT achieved significantly better overall survival ([HR], 0.69; 95% [CI], 0.51–0.92), distant metastasis-free survival (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44–0.78), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47–0.98) than CCRT. However, survival outcomes did not significantly differ between IC+CCRT and CCRT+AC, or between CCRT+AC and CCRT arms for all the endpoints. As expected, RT alone is the poorest treatment. In terms of P-score, IC+CCRT ranked best for overall survival (96.1%), distant metastasis-free survival (99.0%) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (87.1%). Conclusions: IC+CCRT may be a better and more promising treatment strategy for advanced NPC; however, head-to-head randomized trials comparing IC-CCRT with CCRT-AC are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Liu
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| | - Wei You
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| | - Yi-Bing Song
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| | - Ji-Dong Miao
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| | - Xiu-Bo Zhong
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| | - Dian-Kun Cai
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| | - Lun Xu
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| | - Lu-Feng Xie
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| | - Yang Gao
- Department of Oncology, Zigong NO. 4 People's Hospital, Zigong, China
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
[Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine after radiochemotherapy with curative intent does not improve relapse-free survival in nasopharyngeal cancer patients with persistently detectable EBV DNA]. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:90-91. [PMID: 30411241 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1393-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
86
|
Ernani V. Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Chemotherapy or No Chemotherapy? J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:607-608. [PMID: 30312561 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vinicius Ernani
- Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Park JC, Chan AW, Wirth LJ. Controversies Regarding the Management of Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Are We Asking the Right Questions? J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:603-605. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Chul Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Annie W. Chan
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lori J. Wirth
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Lee VH, Lam KO, Chang AT, Lam TC, Chiang CL, So TH, Choi CW, Lee AW. Management of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Is Adjuvant Therapy Needed? J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:594-602. [PMID: 30312564 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma of the undifferentiated histologic subtype is endemic and prevalent in southeast Asia. The dramatic improvement of treatment outcomes and overall prognosis during the past few decades has been attributed to advances in disease screening and diagnosis, diagnostic imaging, radiotherapy techniques, use of combination systemic therapy, and dedicated clinical and biomarker surveillance. The current practice of treating patients with advanced locoregional disease using cisplatin concurrent with conventional fractionated radiotherapy, followed by adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil, was established in 1998 when the landmark Intergroup-0099 Study demonstrated a survival benefit with the addition of systemic therapy. There is little doubt regarding the need for concurrent chemotherapy, but there has been uncertainty about the magnitude of the benefit attributed to the adjuvant phase. Furthermore, instead of one-size-fits-all recommendations, it will be ideal if we can tailor adjuvant therapy to high-risk patients only to avoid unnecessary toxicities. In addition, recent evidence suggests that induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiation can achieve better outcomes, especially in distant control, even in the modern era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. This article provides a comprehensive review of key literature on the current management of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and highlights future research directions to unravel these controversies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor H. Lee
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region; and The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ka-On Lam
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region; and The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Amy T. Chang
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region; and The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tai-Chung Lam
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region; and The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chi-Leung Chiang
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region; and The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tsz-Him So
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region; and The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Cheuk-Wai Choi
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region; and The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Anne W. Lee
- The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region; and The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Current Role of Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2018; 2018:3725837. [PMID: 30364069 PMCID: PMC6188855 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3725837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is highly radio- and chemosensitive tumor with its unique clinical and biological behavior. Treatment of stage I disease is radical radiotherapy alone. For stage II disease treatment is radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. The standard of care for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (stages III-IVB) is concurrent chemoradiation. Optimum timing and sequence of chemotherapy are not yet well-defined. The role of adjuvant and induction chemotherapy is debatable. Here we are going to highlight the role of chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, its benefit, and controversies regarding timing and sequences.
Collapse
|
90
|
Value of early evaluation of treatment response using 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and the Epstein-Barr virus DNA load for prediction of outcome in patients with primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:650-660. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4172-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
91
|
OuYang PY, You KY, Zhang LN, Xiao Y, Zhang XM, Xie FY. External validity of a prognostic nomogram for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2018; 38:55. [PMID: 30176932 PMCID: PMC6122160 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-018-0324-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system does not perform well for guiding individualized induction or adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We attempted to externally validate the Pan's nomogram, developed based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system, for patients with locoregionally advanced disease. In addition, we investigated the reliability of Pan's nomogram for selection of participants in future clinical trials. METHODS This study included 535 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC who were treated between March 2007 and January 2012. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with predicted outcomes. The calibration was tested using calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Discrimination ability, which was assessed using the concordance index, as compared with other predictors. RESULTS Pan's nomogram was observed to underestimate the 5-year OS of the entire cohort by 8.65% [95% confidence interval (CI) - 9.70 to - 7.60%, P < 0.001] and underestimated the 5-year OS of each risk group. The differences between the predicted and observed 5-year OS rates were smallest among low-risk patients (< 135 points calculated using Pan's nomogram; which predicted minus observed OS, - 6.41%, 95% CI - 6.75 to - 6.07%, P < 0.001) and were largest among high-risk patients (≥ 160 points) (- 13.56%, 95% CI - 15.48 to - 11.63%, P < 0.001). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test suggested that the predicted and observed 5-year OS rates had no ideal relationship (P < 0.001). Pan's nomogram had better discriminatory ability compared with the levels of Epstein-Barr virus DNA acid (EBV DNA) and the 7th or 8th AJCC/UICC staging system, although not better compared with the combination of EBV DNA and the 8th staging system. Additionally, Pan's nomogram was marginally inferior to our predictive model, which included the 8th AJCC/UICC N-classification, age, gross primary tumor volume, lactate dehydrogenase, and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS Pan's nomogram underestimated the 5-year OS of patients with locoregionally advanced NPC at our cancer center, and may not be a precise tool for selecting participants for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pu-Yun OuYang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P.R. China
| | - Kai-Yun You
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P.R. China
| | - Lu-Ning Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510080 Guangdong P.R. China
| | - Yao Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Min Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P.R. China
| | - Fang-Yun Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Huang J, Yuan X, Pang Q, Zhang H, Yu J, Yang B, Zhou L, Zhang F, Liu F. Radiosensitivity enhancement by combined treatment of nimotuzumab and celecoxib on nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2018; 12:2223-2231. [PMID: 30038488 PMCID: PMC6052925 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s163595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction In this study, the radiation-enhancing effects of combined treatment with nimotuzumab, a humanized EGFR-blocking antibody, and celecoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cells were investigated. Materials and methods 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and clonogenic survival assays were done to evaluate the combined cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effects of nimotuzumab or celecoxib or the combination on CNE1 and CNE2 cells. Western blot analysis was performed to identify the effect of nimotuzumab and/or celecoxib with or without irradiation on the cytoplasmic and nuclear EGFR signaling pathways in CNE2 cells. Results Our results demonstrated that concurrent administration of nimotuzumab and celecoxib cooperatively enhanced the cytotoxicity and radiosensitivity of CNE2 cells but not CNE1 cells. The combination of both drugs with or without irradiation also cooperatively inhibited cytoplasmic and nuclear EGFR signaling pathways in CNE2 cells. Conclusion Our results suggest a promising approach for the treatment of poorly differentiated NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianfeng Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Xiaopeng Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingfeng Pang
- Department of Physiopathology, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Haowen Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou, People's Republic of China,
| | - Jiahua Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou, People's Republic of China,
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Leyuan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Fuzheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People's Republic of China,
| | - Fenju Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Chan ATC, Hui EP, Ngan RKC, Tung SY, Cheng ACK, Ng WT, Lee VHF, Ma BBY, Cheng HC, Wong FCS, Loong HHF, Tong M, Poon DMC, Ahuja AT, King AD, Wang K, Mo F, Zee BCY, Chan KCA, Lo YMD. Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Nasopharyngeal Cancer After Chemoradiation to Identify High-Risk Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO2018777847. [PMID: 29989858 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.77.7847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The contribution of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) remains controversial. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a potential biomarker of subclinical residual disease in NPC. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we used plasma EBV DNA to identify patients with NPC at a higher risk of relapse for adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients with histologically confirmed NPC of Union for International Cancer Control stage IIB to IVB, adequate organ function, and no locoregional disease or distant metastasis were screened by plasma EBV DNA at 6 to 8 weeks after radiotherapy (RT). Patients with undetectable plasma EBV DNA underwent standard surveillance. Patients with detectable plasma EBV DNA were randomly assigned to either adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine for six cycles (arm 1) or observation (arm 2). Patients were stratified for primary treatment (RT v CRT) and stage (II/III v IV). The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Results Seven hundred eighty-nine patients underwent EBV DNA screening. Plasma EBV DNA was undetectable in 573 (72.6%) and detectable in 216 (27.4%); 104 (13.2%) with detectable EBV DNA were randomly assigned to arms 1 (n = 52) and 2 (n = 52). After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, no significant difference was found in 5-year RFS rate between arms 1 and 2 (49.3% v 54.7%; P = .75; hazard ratio for relapse or death, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.89). The level of post-RT plasma EBV DNA correlated significantly with the hazards of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and death. Conclusion In patients with NPC with detectable post-RT plasma EBV DNA, adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine did not improve RFS. Post-RT plasma EBV DNA level should be incorporated as the selection factor in future clinical trials of adjuvant therapy in NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony T C Chan
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Edwin P Hui
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Roger K C Ngan
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Stewart Y Tung
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Ashley C K Cheng
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Wai T Ng
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Victor H F Lee
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Brigette B Y Ma
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Hoi C Cheng
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Frank C S Wong
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Herbert H F Loong
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Macy Tong
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Anil T Ahuja
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Ann D King
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Ki Wang
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Frankie Mo
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Benny C Y Zee
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - K C Allen Chan
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Y M Dennis Lo
- Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Macy Tong, and Darren M.C. Poon, Prince of Wales Hospital; Roger K.C. Ngan and Hoi C. Cheng, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Stewart Y. Tung and Frank C.S. Wong, Tuen Mun Hospital; Ashley C.K. Cheng, Princess Margaret Hospital; Wai T. Ng, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Victor H.F. Lee, Queen Mary Hospital; and Anthony T.C. Chan, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B.Y. Ma, Herbert H.F. Loong, Anil T. Ahuja, Ann D. King, Ki Wang, Frankie Mo, Benny C.Y. Zee, K.C. Allen Chan, and Y.M. Dennis Lo, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Lertbutsayanukul C, Kannarunimit D, Netsawang B, Kitpanit S, Chakkabat C, Hansasuta P, Prayongrat A. Optimal plasma pretreatment EBV DNA cut-off point for nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2018. [PMID: 29522203 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA concentration at the time of diagnosis (pre-EBV) can be used to stratify risk for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients. However, pre-EBV cut-off values vary among studies. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of 208 NPC patients from a phase II/III study comparing sequential (SEQ) vs. simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiation therapy. The objective was to identify the optimal pre-EBV cut-off value to predict overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and distant metastatic free survival (DMFS) rates. Results The pre-EBV and post-treatment EBV DNA (post-EBV) were detectable in 59.1% and 3.8% of the patients, respectively. A new pre-EBV cut-off value of 2300 copies/ml was identified by the receiver operating characteristics analysis. This cut-off value showed 82% sensitivity, 59% specificity and 31.7% positive and 93.5% negative predictive values in predicting OS. The 3-year OS, PFS and DMFS were 95.6 vs. 73.8%, 89.8 vs. 55.3% and 93 vs. 70.1% for pre-EBV < vs. ≥2300 copies/ml, respectively. Older age group (≥45 years), high pre-EBV and detectable post-EBV concentration were independent predictors for OS, PFS and DMFS in a multivariate analysis. When the stage grouping and pre-EBV value were combined, a subgroup of patients with stage II-III and pre-EBV values <2300 copies/ml. had the best survival outcomes, while the worst survival subgroup was the patients with stage III-IVb with pre-EBV values ≥2300 copies/ml. Conclusions Pre-EBV cut-off of 2300 copies/ml is an optimal value predicting OS, PFS and DMFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chawalit Lertbutsayanukul
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Danita Kannarunimit
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Buntipa Netsawang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chakkapong Chakkabat
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pokrath Hansasuta
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Anussara Prayongrat
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Prognostic Value of Plasma EBV DNA for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients during Treatment with Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy. Radiol Oncol 2018; 52:195-203. [PMID: 30018524 PMCID: PMC6043877 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2018-0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 02/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Plasma EBV DNA concentrations at the time of diagnosis (pre-EBV) and post treatment (post-EBV) have significant value for predicting the clinical outcome of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients. However, the prognostic value of the EBV concentration during radiation therapy (mid-EBV) has not been vigorously studied. Patients and methods This was a post hoc analysis of 105 detectable pre-EBV NPC patients from a phase II/III study comparing sequential (SEQ) versus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Plasma EBV DNA concentrations were measured by PCR before commencement of IMRT, at the 5th week of radiation therapy and 3 months after the completion of IMRT. The objective was to identify the prognostic value of mid-EBV to predict overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Results A median pre-EBV was 6880 copies/ml. Mid-EBV and post-EBV were detectable in 14.3% and 6.7% of the patients, respectively. The median follow-up time was 45.3 months. The 3-year OS, PFS and DMFS rates were 86.0% vs. 66.7% (p = 0.043), 81.5% vs. 52.5% (p = 0.006), 86.1% vs. 76.6% (p = 0.150), respectively, for those with undetectable mid-EBV vs. persistently detectable mid-EBV. However, in the multivariate analysis, only persistently detectable post-EBV was significantly associated with a worse OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 6.881, 95% confident interval (CI) 1.699-27.867, p = 0.007), PFS (HR = 5.117, 95% CI 1.562–16.768, p = 0.007) and DMFS (HR = 129.071, 95%CI 19.031–875.364, p < 0.001). Conclusions Detectable post-EBV was the most powerful adverse prognostic factor for OS, PFS and DMFS; however, detectable mid-EBV was associated with worse OS, PFS especially Local-PFS (LPFS) and may facilitate adaptive treatment during the radiation treatment period.
Collapse
|
96
|
Peng H, Tang LL, Chen BB, Chen L, Li WF, Mao YP, Liu X, Zhang Y, Liu LZ, Tian L, Guo Y, Sun Y, Ma J. Optimizing the induction chemotherapy regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A big-data intelligence platform-based analysis. Oral Oncol 2018; 79:40-46. [PMID: 29598949 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed at identifying the optimal induction chemotherapy regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified eligible patients with newly-diagnosed stage III-IVA NPC (excluding T3N0) between September 2009 and May 2015. Survival outcomes and grade 3-4 toxicities were compared between different IC regimen groups. RESULTS In total, 3738 patients were eligible for this study, with 1572 (42.1%), 1085 (29.0%) and 1081 (28.9%) receiving TPF, PF and TP, respectively. In the whole population, multivariate analysis found that TPF seems to be better than PF and TP. Howerver, subgroup analysis revealed TPF and TP had same effectiveness in patients receiving a cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) ≥200mg/m2 in concurrent chemotherapy, while TPF shows relatively better survival benefit in patients receiving CCD<200mg/m2. Grade 3-4 toxicities were similar between TPF and TP groups, but were relatively higher than that in PF group. CONCLUSIONS Our study concluded that induction TP regimen may be enough for patients receiving a CCD≥200mg/m2, while TPF may be superior to TP and PF for patients receiving a CCD<200mg/m2, although grade 3-4 toxic events were more common but tolerable. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Ling-Long Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Bin-Bin Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Wen-Fei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Yan-Ping Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Xu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Li-Zhi Liu
- Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Li Tian
- Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Ying Guo
- Department of Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Wei Y, Yang P, Cao S, Zhao L. The combination of curcumin and 5-fluorouracil in cancer therapy. Arch Pharm Res 2017; 41:1-13. [PMID: 29230689 DOI: 10.1007/s12272-017-0979-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) alone or in combination with other therapeutic drugs has been widely used for clinical treatment of various cancers. However, 5-FU-based chemotherapy has limited anticancer efficacy in clinic due to multidrug resistance and dose-limiting cytotoxicity. Some molecules and genes in cancer cells, such as nuclear factor kappa B, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclooxygenase-2, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten and Bcl-2 etc. are related to the chemoresistance and sensitivity of cancer cells to 5-FU. The activation of these molecules and genes expressions in cancer cells will be increased or decreased with long-term exposure of 5-FU. Curcumin has been found to be able to negatively regulate these processes. In order to overcome the problems of 5-FU, curcumin has been used to combine with 5-FU in cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumeng Wei
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, No.3-5, Zhongshan Road, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, 646000, China
| | - Panjing Yang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, 646099, China
| | - Shousong Cao
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, 3-319 Zhongshan Road, Luzhou, Sichuan, 646000, China.
| | - Ling Zhao
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, No.3-5, Zhongshan Road, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, 646000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
You R, Cao YS, Huang PY, Chen L, Yang Q, Liu YP, Zou X, Zhang YN, Jiang R, Zhang MX, Duan CY, Lin AH, Hong MH, Chen MY. The Changing Therapeutic Role of Chemo-radiotherapy for Loco-regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma from Two/Three-Dimensional Radiotherapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis. Theranostics 2017; 7:4825-4835. [PMID: 29187906 PMCID: PMC5706102 DOI: 10.7150/thno.21815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: We used randomized trials of radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma to investigate the survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy regimens between two/three-dimensional radiotherapy (2D/3D RT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods: Overall, 27 trials and 7,940 patients were included. Treatments were grouped into seven categories including RT alone, induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by RT (IC-RT), RT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (RT-AC), IC followed by RT followed by AC (IC-RT-AC), concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CRT), IC followed by CRT (IC-CRT), and CRT followed by AC (CRT-AC). To distinguish between 2D/3D RT and IMRT, three categories in IMRT were newly added, including CRT in IMRT, IC-CRT in IMRT, and CRT-AC in IMRT. The P score was used to rank the treatments. Results: Both fixed- and random-effects frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analysis models were applied, which provided similar results and the same ranking. IC-CRT was the most effective regimen compared with CRT-AC and CRT in the IMRT era for overall survival (OS) (HR, 95% CI, IC-CRT vs. CRT-AC, 0.61 (0.45, 0.82); IC-CRT vs. CRT 0.65 (0.47, 0.91)), progression-free survival (PFS) (0.69 (0.54, 0.88); 0.63 (0.49, 0.80)), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (0.58 (0.28, 1.21); 0.60 (0.42, 0.85)). CRT-AC achieved the highest survival benefit compared with CRT, and IC-CRT for loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) (0.44 (0.15, 1.28); 0.72 (0.22, 2.33)). Among these 10 categories, after distinguishing between 2D/3D RT and IMRT, IC-CRT in IMRT ranked first for OS, PFS, and DMFS, and CRT-AC in IMRT ranked first for LRRFS. Conclusion: IC-CRT should be the most suitable regimen for loco-regionally advanced NPC in the IMRT era.
Collapse
|
99
|
Lee AWM, Tung SY, Ng WT, Lee V, Ngan RKC, Choi HCW, Chan LLK, Siu LL, Ng AWY, Leung TW, Yiu HHY, O'Sullivan B, Chappell R. A multicenter, phase 3, randomized trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: 10-year outcomes for efficacy and toxicity. Cancer 2017; 123:4147-4157. [PMID: 28662313 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anne W. M. Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology; University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital; Hong Kong China
| | | | - Wai Tong Ng
- Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Hong Kong China
| | - Victor Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology; University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital; Hong Kong China
| | | | - Horace C. W. Choi
- Department of Clinical Oncology; University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital; Hong Kong China
| | | | - Lillian L. Siu
- Ontario Cancer Institute; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Toronto Ontario Canada
| | | | | | | | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Ontario Cancer Institute; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Rick Chappell
- Department of Biostatistics; University of Wisconsin Medical School; Madison Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|