Cytoreduction combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer patients: The experience of National Cancer Institute of Milan

Reappraisal of the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of ovarian cancer: a single institutional experience

The peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian cancer led to the development of optimal cytoreduction surgery completed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The main goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, tolerance and efficacy of this technique in patients with ovarian cancer. A retrospective monocentric study has evaluated 43 patients with HIPEC procedures from 1995 to 2009. After a complete cytoreduction surgery, a HIPEC procedure with cisplatin is performed. Data on complications and survival parameters were collected. Prognostic factors were also analyzed. Post-surgery complications included one death due to a septic shock (2.3%) and six patients have presented major complications (13.9%). The median of overall survival and progression free survival were 53.6 and 39 months, respectively. Patients with a primary complete surgical cytoreduction of the peritoneal carcinomatosis presented overall survival length of 131 months versus 84 months without initial complete resection (P < 0.0001). Surgical cytoreduction combined with HIPEC is a feasible procedure with acceptable morbid-mortality rates. The initial complete resection of the peritoneal carcinomatosis significantly increases survival and represents a strong prognostic factor.

Salvage cytoreduction for chemorefractory ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a last chance or futile efforts?

BACKGROUND

The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer in the presence of carcinomatosis is increasingly accepted as being an effective management strategy for selected patients. However, in patients with chemorefractory disease, the role of cytoreduction remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate if cytoreduction of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with chemorefractory recurrent ovarian cancer as salvage treatment confers any survival benefits.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients with chemorefractory ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent cytoreduction as a salvage treatment. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed to examine potential prognostic factors using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were identified, of which 15 patients (94%) had FIGO Stage III ovarian cancer at initial diagnosis. The initial surgical effort was optimal in one patient (6%), and 13 patients (62%) had been on at least two lines of chemotherapy. The median progression-free and overall survival was 18 (95% CI 0-42) months and 36 (95% CI 14-58) months, respectively. The 1-, 3-year survival rate was 73% and 23%, respectively. ECOG status zero (P = 0.023) and younger patients (age < 51) (P = 0.066) appeared to be associated with an improved overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage cytoreduction may be considered a last chance effort to prolong survival in this group of patients with chemorefractory ovarian cancer who have a 'poor prognosis' and would otherwise not have been candidates for any proven or effective therapy.

Oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in primary or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: A pilot study of 31 patients

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and safety of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) associated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) was assessed in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis resulting from primary advanced or relapsing epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Thirty-one patients received neoadjuvant platin-based chemotherapy followed by oxaliplatin-based HIPEC associated with CRS as consolidation of primary therapy (n = 19) or for relapsing disease (n = 12). Grade 3/4 complications were recorded according to National Cancer Institute definitions.

RESULTS

Median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 2.7 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Mean duration of surgery was 352 min (range 105-614) and median hospital stay was 11 days (range 6-87). Grade 3 toxicity was observed in nine patients: five required repeat surgery, two an invasive procedure, four rehospitalization, and three a return to the ICU. No grade 4 toxicity occurred, excepted one hypokalemia. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for primary advanced EOC was 13.2 months and 1-year PFS was 59.3%. Median PFS for relapsing patients was 14.3 months and 1-year PFS was 54.4%.

CONCLUSION

CRS with oxaliplatin-based HIPEC is feasible and relatively safe in recurrent and primary EOC. HIPEC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the PCI and decreases the number of surgical procedures and morbidity. Further evaluations of this procedure are required to assess the survival benefits.

Comparison of hyperthermia and adrenaline to enhance the intratumoral accumulation of cisplatin in a murine model of peritoneal carcinomatosis

Background

The best method to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer is not well defined. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of hyperthermia and adrenaline to enhance the intratumoral accumulation of cisplatin in a rat model of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Methods

Four groups of 5 BDIX rats with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis underwent IPC with 30 mg/l of cisplatin according to the following conditions: normothermia at 37° for 1 or 2 hours, hyperthermia at 42°C for 1 hour or normothermia at 37°C for 2 hours with 2 mg/l adrenaline. Tissue platinum content was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The effect of hyperthermia, adrenaline and the duration of exposure to the drug was measured in vivo (tissue concentration of platinum in tumor, abdominal and extra abdominal tissues) and in vitro (cytotoxicity on human ovarian cancer cells).

Results

In vitro, hyperthermia and longer exposure enhanced the accumulation and the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin on cancer cells. In vivo, only the 2 hours treatment with adrenaline resulted in increased platinum concentrations. The rats treated with adrenaline showed significantly lower concentrations of cisplatin in extra peritoneal tissues than those treated with hyperthermia.

Conclusion

Adrenaline is more effective than hyperthermia in order to enhance the intratumoral concentration of cisplatin in rats with peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian origin. It may also decrease the systemic absorption of the drug.

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: state of the art and future developments

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) had long been regarded as a terminal disease, characterized by a very poor survival and worth treating with palliative therapy. A new strategy combining maximal surgery (cytoreductive surgery, CRS), with maximal regional chemotherapy (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC), has been proposed to treat PC, resulting in long-term survival rates in selected patients. The emerging trend is to view localised peritoneal carcinomatosis, in the absence of other metastases, as a regional metastatic disease that is amenable to locoregional therapy. In spite of the need for more high quality studies, many international experts now agree that the use of this new strategy is a gold standard for treating selected patients with PC with the intent of curing. The best results are achieved in patients with limited disease who have completed macroscopic tumor removal. To offer a comprehensive review, we summarized the present status and possible future progress of this treatment modality, in particular outlining its rationale, current practice and general outcome.

Safety and potential benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in peritoneal carcinomatosis from primary or recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from primary (45 cases) and recurrent (8 cases) ovarian cancer were previously treated by systemic chemotherapy with platinum and taxanes and then submitted to surgical cytoreduction and HIPEC (cisplatin and mitomycin-C) with a closed abdomen technique. The median follow-up period was 27 months (range: 3-107).

RESULTS

At the end of operation a complete cytoreduction (CCR-0) was obtained in 37 patients (70%). Major morbidity occurred in 12 patients (23%); reoperation was necessary in 2 patients (4%), and no postoperative mortality was observed. Overall 5-year survival probability was 55%; it was 71% in CCR-0, 44% in CCR-1, and none in patients with CCR-2 or CCR-3 residual tumor (log-rank test: P = 0.017). The cumulative risk of recurrence in 37 CCR-0 cases was 54% at 5 years from operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study indicate the feasibility and the potential benefit of a protocol including systemic chemotherapy, surgical cytoreduction and HIPEC in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer. A phase III trial to compare this approach with conventional treatment is needed.

Advanced cytoreduction as surgical standard of care and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as promising treatment in epithelial ovarian cancer

Favorable oncological outcomes have been reported in several trials with the introduction of Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC). However most of the studies testing the combined approach are observational and have been conducted in inhomogeneous series so that the evidence supporting the performance of this combined treatment is still poor. Median Overall and Disease Free Survivals of up to 64 months and 57 months, respectively have been reported. Although a rate of morbidity of up to 40% has been observed in some series the CRS + HIPEC continues to gain an increased popularity. Several prospective randomized trials are ongoing using the procedure in various time points of the disease. In this review several issues such as the impact of cytoreduction and residual disease (RD) on outcomes as well as the role of HIPEC will be updated from the literature evidence. Some controversial points HIPEC related will also be discussed. Recent experiences regarding the introduction of a more aggressive surgical approach to upper abdomen to resect peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) allowed increased rates of optimal cytoreduction and has demonstrated an apparent better outcome. This evidence associated with the positive results phase III trial testing normothermic intraperitoneal as first-line chemotherapy is guiding some investigators to propose the CRS + HIPEC in the primary setting. Several prospective phase II and III trials have recently been launched to validate the role of the combined treatment in various time points of disease natural evolution.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and without adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIC ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) without adjuvant chemotherapy for relapsed or persistent advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This observational study included stage IIIC ovarian cancer patients due to undergo CRS (interval debulking or recurrent surgery) followed by HIPEC with oxaliplatin (460 mg/m2) for 30 min.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (12 interval debulking procedures and 10 recurrence procedures) were enrolled between September 2003 and September 2007. HIPEC was not performed in four patients because of operative findings. No patient received adjuvant chemotherapy after HIPEC. Patients were followed up routinely until recurrence or death. Median peritoneal cancer index at surgery was 6 (range: 1-18). Before HIPEC, all patients had completeness of cytoreduction scores of 0 or 1. Median length of hospital stay was 21 days (range 13-65). Ten patients (55.6%) had CTCAE grade 3-4 toxicity, including three patients (16.7%) requiring reoperation. No postoperative mortality was observed. With a median follow-up of 38 months (CI 95% 23.8-39.2), median overall survival was not reached. The 3-year overall survival rate was 83% (CI 95% 54-95). Median disease-free survival was, respectively, 16.9 months (CI 95% 10.2-23.2) and 10 months (CI 95% 4.5-11.3) for patients undergoing interval debulking or recurrence surgery.

CONCLUSION

HIPEC without adjuvant chemotherapy is both feasible and safe, but with a high rate of grade 3-5 toxicity. Survival results are encouraging but should be confirmed in a randomized trial.

[Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer]

The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer consist in complete surgical debulking and intravenous platin and taxane based chemotherapy. Despite research efforts, a lot of patients still die from peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aim of our work was to present the state of art about intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC): three multi-institutional randomised trials showed that platin based IPC gave better results in term of overall and disease free survival when compared to standard intravenous treatment. Even so, IPC is not yet becoming a new international standard of treatment because a high rate of morbidity. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represents an innovative alternative to IPC. HIPEC is based on a complete surgical debulking without any visible mass and an intraperitoneal chemotherapy with synergy of hyperthermia. Phase II trails have shown its feasibility. Randomised trials are needed to assess its efficiency in improving survival.

Peritoneal-based Malignancies and Their Treatment

Introduction: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) usually have dismal prognoses, even with traditional systemic therapy. Peritonectomy or cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been used to treat selected patients. It is also commonly used in the management of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), often in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Methods and Results: In the present review article, the indications for CRS and HIPEC are examined, along with its technical aspects, resulting morbidity and mortality. Patients with documented peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal and ovarian cancer or PMP, absence of extra-abdominal metastases and liver parenchymal metastases and with an ECOG performance status of <2 should be considered for CRS and HIPEC. Conclusion: It is important to recognise the role of and indications for CRS and HIPEC. Biologic factors of the disease and completeness of resection are important prognostic factors. Cytoreductive surgery, combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy, can improve survival in selected patients with peritoneal-based malignancies. Key words: Cytoreductive surgery, Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, Peritonectomy, Peritoneal carcinomatosis, Pseudomyxoma peritone

Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of current results

BACKGROUND

Advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer results in extensive spread of tumor on the peritoneal surfaces of the abdomen and pelvis. We collectively review studies in the literature that report the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis.

METHODS

An electronic search of all relevant studies published in peer-reviewed journals before May 2009 was performed on three databases. The quality of each study was independently assessed and classified according to the time point of HIPEC use in various setting of ovarian cancer from the consensus statement of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group. Clinical efficacy was synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of the results of each included study.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies each of more than ten patients reporting treatment results of HIPEC of patients with both advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer were included and data were extracted. All studies were observational case series. The overall rate of severe perioperative morbidity ranged from 0 to 40% and mortality rate varied from 0 to 10%. The overall median survival following treatment with HIPEC ranged from 22 to 64 months with a median disease-free survival ranging from 10 to 57 months. In patients with optimal cytoreduction, a 5-year survival rate ranging from 12 to 66% could be achieved.

CONCLUSION

Despite the heterogeneity of the studies reviewed, current evidence suggest that complete CRS and HIPEC may be a feasible option with potential benefits that are comparable with the current standard of care. A randomized trial is required to establish the role of HIPEC in ovarian cancer.

The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer

Overall outcomes for women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain relatively poor, and superior methods of treatment are needed. EOC is a peritoneal surface malignancy that is relatively sensitive to chemotherapy agents, making it a good target for i.p. chemotherapy. Because there is strong laboratory data demonstrating the ability of hyperthermia to increase the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents, the addition of hyperthermia to i.p. chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), makes theoretical sense. This article reviews the current literature and discusses the possible role for HIPEC in EOC at significant natural history time points: front line, at the time of interval debulking, in consolidation, and for recurrent disease. The conclusion is that much further research is needed but that HIPEC could sensibly be researched at all the natural history time points in EOC.

Cytoreductive surgery and modified heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer -- 12-year single center experience

BACKGROUND

The present study reviews our 12-year results with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in patients with advanced primary and recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

During the period from January 1995 to December 2007, 56 patients (31 with primary and 25 with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer) underwent cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC (Doxorubicin intra-operatively, and cisplatin next 1-5 postoperative days) at our department.

RESULTS

52 (92.8%) patients had no gross residual disease after the complete surgical procedure (Sugarbaker completeness of cytoreduction CC, score 0-1), and 4 patients had macroscopic residual disease (CC-2 or CC-3) Average PCI (peritoneal cancer index) was 13.4 (4-28). Mean follow-up was 56 months (range, 1-135). The median operation time was 279min (range 190 + or - 500min). Median total blood loss was 850mL (range 250 + or - 1550mL). The median survival time was 34.1 months for primary, 40.1 for recurrent ovarian cancer without statistically significance difference (p>0.05) and median disease-free survival was 26.2 months. The PCI was equal or less than 12 in 31 patients and their median survival time was statistically significant longer than median survival time of months for the 25 patients with PCI greater then 12 (p<0.01). Morbidity and mortality rate were 17.8% (10/56) and 1.8% (1/56).

CONCLUSION

This series indicates that in the majority of patients with primary and recurrent advanced ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC can lead to a substantial increase in subsequent rates of disease-free and overall survival.

Drugs, carrier solutions and temperature in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

At the Fifth International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancy, in Milan, the consensus on technical aspects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal surface malignancy was obtained through the Delphi process. Conflicting points concerning drugs, carrier solution and optimal temperature for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were discussed.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with and without cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer

Women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) usually present with advanced disease and overall only just over half survive 5 years. Even following a complete response to front-line treatment two-thirds will recur, with a resultant dismal prognosis. We review and discuss the role of surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in EOC and present the results of the ovary consensus panel (OCP) convened for the 5th International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancy.

Cytoreductive surgery (peritonectomy procedures) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Because of scarce data from larger series and nonhomogeneous selection criteria, further information is needed on peritonectomy with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in managing patients with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis.

METHODS

In an open, prospective, single-center nonrandomized phase 2 study conducted from November 2000 to April 2007, 47 patients with primary advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer and diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis were enrolled; 22 underwent primary and 25 secondary cytoreduction plus immediate HIPEC followed by systemic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The overall mean Sugarbaker peritoneal cancer index was 14.9 (range, 6-28). A mean of 6 surgical procedures were required per patient (range, 4-10). In 87.3% of the patients debulking achieved optimal cytoreduction (Sugarbaker completeness of cytoreduction [CC] score 0-1), whereas in 12.7% it left macroscopic residual disease (CC-2 or CC-3). Major complications developed in 21.3% of the patients and the in-hospital mortality rate was 4.2%. The mean overall survival was 30.4 months, median survival was 24 months, and mean disease-free survival was 27.4 months. Five-year survival was 16.7%. Univariate (log-rank test and analysis of variance) and multivariate analyses (Cox proportional-hazard model) identified the CC score as the main factor capable of independently influencing survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritonectomy procedures combined with HIPEC offer promising long-term survival in patients with diffuse peritoneal ovarian carcinomatosis. They achieve high adequate primary and secondary surgical cytoreduction rates with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

A pharmacologic analysis of intraoperative intracavitary cancer chemotherapy with doxorubicin

PURPOSE

A pharmacologic analysis of intracavitary doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with intracavitary cancer dissemination was performed to further evaluate the possible benefits of this treatment modality.

METHODS

Twenty appendiceal malignancy patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), three appendiceal malignancy patients with direct extension into the pleural cavity, 20 patients with peritoneal mesothelioma and one patient with pleural mesothelioma were available for pharmacologic monitoring. After intraperitoneal or intrapleural administration of doxorubicin, plasma and peritoneal fluid samples were obtained at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min in all patients. After intrapleural administration, plasma and pleural fluid samples were collected at similar intervals. Tumor and normal tissues were obtained when available. Doxorubicin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

Intraperitoneal doxorubicin showed a prolonged retention in the peritoneal cavity. Doxorubicin concentrations in tumor tissue were consistently elevated above intraperitoneal concentrations from 30 through 90 min. For appendiceal malignancy, the concentrations of doxorubicin were significantly higher in minimally aggressive mucinous tumors. Pleural chemotherapy solutions retained doxorubicin to a greater extent than peritoneal fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

Doxorubicin shows characteristics favorable for intracavitary administration with sequestration of doxorubicin in cancer nodules.

Postoperative adverse events and long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is fatal without special combined cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC). This study was designed to identify factors that may increase the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality from combined CRS and IPC interventions for PC. Survival based on primary tumour type and extent of surgery is reported.

METHODS

Between May 1991 and November 2004, 123 patients were treated with CRS and IPC for PC. Based on the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for grade 3 and 4, data on 30 days postoperative morbidity and 90 days mortality were analysed.

RESULTS

Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 51 patients (41%) and were associated with stoma formation, duration of surgery, peroperative blood loss and peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Excision, or electrocautery evaporation, of tumour from small bowel surface was correlated to bowel morbidity. Five patients had treatment-related mortality (4%) within 90 days. Survival was associated with macroscopic radical surgery, prior surgical score, PCI and primary tumour type.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS and IPC for PC are associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, in light of the potential benefit indicated by long-term survival, the adverse event from this treatment is considered acceptable.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been recommended as a treatment option for ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Although its treatment duration is significantly shorter, intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC) has several advantages over simple intraperitoneal instillation chemotherapy. While platinum compounds have usually been used, only a few have administered paclitaxel during HIPEC. Its large molecular weight suggests a much more favorable pharmacokinetic profile than that of platinum compounds. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel during and after HIPEC have not been studied before.

METHODS

Thirteen women, mainly with ovarian cancer, underwent cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel for 2 h. Morbidity was noted. Peritoneal fluid samples and blood samples were harvested during and until 5 days after HIPEC for pharmacokinetic study in ten patients.

RESULTS

No treatment-related mortality was noted. Overall morbidity was 38% (two wound infections, one deep venous thrombosis, two grade 1 thrombopenia, one grade 2 neutropenia, and one grade 3 pancytopenia). Mean maximal intraperitoneal paclitaxel concentration was 101 mg/L, which was an average of 1178 times higher than the peak plasma levels. The peritoneal fluid versus plasma AUC ratio was 1462 for the 2-h HIPEC duration and 366 for the total 5-day study period. Cytotoxic drug concentrations were detected in peritoneal fluid for a mean period of 2.7 days, despite drainage of the drug solution after 2 h of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

HIPEC with paclitaxel following cytoreductive surgery is feasible, relatively safe, and associated with a highly favorable pharmacokinetic profile, despite its short treatment duration. Larger studies with a more homogenous patient cohort and adequate follow-up should be performed to demonstrate its efficacy.

Swedish experience with peritonectomy and HIPEC. HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Peritonectomy with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown a survival benefit in selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This prospective non-randomized study was designed to identify factors associated with postoperative morbidity and survival after peritonectomy HIPEC in patients with this condition.

METHOD

Data were prospectively collected from all patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated by means of peritonectomy and HIPEC at Uppsala University Hospital between October 2003 and September 2006. Depending on the primary tumor, mitomycin C or a platinum compound was used as a chemotherapeutic agent for perfusion.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were treated. Primary tumors were pseudomyxoma peritonei (47 patients), colorectal cancer (38 patients), gastric cancer (6 patients), ovarian cancer (6 patients) and mesothelioma (5 patients). Postoperative morbidity was 56.3% and was significantly lower in patients treated with mitomycin C for pseudomyxoma peritonei (42%) than in those with another diagnosis treated with platinum compound (71%, P < 0.05). Postoperative mortality was less than 1%. At 2 years, overall survival was estimated to be 72.3%, and disease-free survival was 33.5%. Factors influencing overall and disease-free survival were tumor type and optimal cytoreduction.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative morbidity is dependent mainly on a tumor type; however, the chemotherapeutic agent used might also influence morbidity. Survival is determined by optimal cytoreduction and tumor type. Irrespective of age, patients with good performance status benefit from this treatment.

Systematic review of cytoreductive surgery and heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in primary and recurrent ovarian cancer

The aim of this systematic review is to critically evaluate cytoreductive surgery combined with heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer. A systematic review of all manuscripts published in the English literature that met predetermined inclusion criteria was carried out. Data concerning cytoreductive surgery, method and agents for administration of heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, morbidity, mortality, hospital stay and survival were extracted, critically reviewed and tabulated. Fourteen studies were analyzed. A wide variety of drug doses, methods of intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration and volume of chemotherapy solution were used. Seven studies showed that patients with complete cytoreduction had the greatest benefit. The median overall survival for primary and recurrent disease ranged from 22 to 54 months and the median disease-free survival from 10 to 26 months. The rates of significant morbidity associated with this combined treatment were low, ranging from 5% to 36%. The median mortality was 3% (range 0%-10%). Cytoreductive surgery combined with heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a treatment option for patients with ovarian cancer that is worthy of further investigation. Selection criteria for patients most likely to benefit need to be defined.

Treatment of ovarian cancer with paclitaxel- or carboplatin-based intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy during secondary surgery

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of treating advanced ovarian cancer with paclitaxel or carboplatin in intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) during secondary surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical data of 96 eligible patients with stage Ic-IIIc epithelial ovarian cancer. After primary staging operation and 6-12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, 22 patients were treated with IPHC-paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and 45 patients were treated with IPHC-carboplatin (350 mg/m(2)) during secondary surgery. Survival rates were compared with those of 29 patients treated with only conventional therapy (control group).

RESULTS

In stage III diseases, 5-year survival rates were 84.6% in IPHC-paclitaxel, 63.0% in IPHC-carboplatin (P=0.4098) and 32.8% in control group (vs. IPHC, P=0.0003). Three-year progression-free survival rates in stage III diseases were both 56.3% in IPHC-paclitaxel and IPHC-carboplatin (P=0.8911) and 16.7% in control group (vs. IPHC, P=0.0028). For the relative risk of disease progression yielded from multivariate analyses, hazard ratio of IPHC-paclitaxel was 0.281 (P=0.0039) and that of IPHC-carboplatin was 0.443 (P=0.0083). Like carboplatin (hazard ratio: 0.396, P=0.0004), IPHC-paclitaxel considerably decreased the risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.197, P=0.0253).

CONCLUSION

In advanced ovarian cancer, IPHC using paclitaxel or carboplatin during secondary surgery could be a candidate for regional consolidation therapy to prolong survival and hinder disease progression.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare condition, which is known for its high mortality when not treated properly. The first step to improve prognosis of these patients is to recognize this clinical syndrome preferably in an early stage. Knowledge of pathogenesis and common diagnostic tools is essential in this regard. Treatment strategy for PMP should pursue complete cytoreduction and prevention of recurrence or progression. Combined modality treatment, consisting of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, seems very efficient in this regard. This approach is currently carried out in many centers throughout the world with promising results and seems to win ground as the standard treatment approach.