51
|
Pitman BM, Ariyaratnam J, Williams K, Evans M, Reid-Smith N, Wilson L, Teo K, Young GD, Roberts-Thomson KC, Wong CX, Sanders P, Lau DH. The Burden of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Checks in the Peri-MRI Setting: The CHECK-MRI Study. Heart Lung Circ 2023; 32:252-260. [PMID: 36443175 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most modern cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) systems are now compatible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The requirement for both pre- and post-MRI CIED checks imposes significant workload to the cardiac electrophysiology service. Here, we sought to determine the burden of CIED checks associated with MRI scans. METHODS We identified all CIED checks performed peri-MRI scans at our institution over a 3-year period between 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2020, comprising three separate financial years (FY). Device check reports, MRI scan reports and clinical summaries were collated. The workload burden was determined by assessing the occasions and duration of service. Analysis was performed to determine cost burden/projections for this service and identify factors contributing to the workload. RESULTS A total of 739 CIED checks were performed in the peri-MRI scan setting (370 pre- and 369 post-MRI scan), including 5% (n=39) that were performed outside of routine hours (weekday <8 am or >5 pm, and weekends). MRIs were performed for 295 patients (75±13 years old, 64% male) with a CIED (88% permanent pacemaker, and 12% high voltage device), including 49 who had more than one MRI scan. The proportion of total MRI scans for patients with a CIED in-situ increased each FY (from 0.5% of all MRIs in FY1, to 0.9% in FY2, to 1.0% in FY3). The weekly workload increased (R2=0.2, p<0.001), but with week-to-week variability due to ad hoc scheduling (209 days with only one MRI vs 78 days with ≥2 MRIs for CIED patients). The projected annual cost of this service will increase to AUD$161,695 in 10 years for an estimated annual 546 MRI scans for CIED patients. CONCLUSIONS There is an increasing workload burden and expense associated with CIED checks in the peri-MRI setting. Appropriate budgeting, staff allocation and standardisation of automated CIED pre-programming features among manufacturers are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley M Pitman
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia. http://www.twitter.com/pitmabm
| | - Jonathan Ariyaratnam
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Kerry Williams
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Michelle Evans
- Southern Area Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nicole Reid-Smith
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Lauren Wilson
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Karen Teo
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Glenn D Young
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Kurt C Roberts-Thomson
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Christopher X Wong
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Dennis H Lau
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Goodwin E, Fogelson B, Cox JW, Mahlow WJ. An algorithm for pacing and cardioverting electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: The PACED-MRI protocol. Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 96:44-49. [PMID: 36441043 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have traditionally been a contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, there is an increasing amount of literature to suggest that MRI can be safely performed in select patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators by following a standardized protocol. We created an institutional protocol, made accessible as an online form, that is primarily technologist-driven and does not require direct electrophysiologist supervision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the PACEDMRI protocol for screening and completing MRI in patients with MR conditional CIEDs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS After the implementation of our standardized PACED-MRI protocol, patients with MR conditional CIEDs who were referred for MRI were included in the study. On the day of the MRI, the device company representative utilized our protocol accessed through PACEDMRI.com. If all parameters and criteria within the protocol were met, the examination proceeded. The device representative programed the CIED to the appropriate mode for MRI as instructed by the PACED-MRI protocol. CIED interrogation was performed immediately before and after MRI. The on-call electrophysiology nurse practitioner was notified only if the protocol instructed the team to not proceed with MRI. CIED programming changes, malfunctions, and intraprocedural events were documented. Additionally, any adverse outcomes were recorded including peri-MRI symptom onset, arrhythmia, and death. RESULTS One hundred thirty-eight MRI examinations were performed on patients with MR conditional CIEDs (100 pacemakers: 38 implantable cardiac defibrillators). There was no incidence of symptom onset requiring early termination of the MRI, death, or arrhythmic events during or after MRI. No significant changes in lead parameters, including sensing amplitudes, lead thresholds, or lead impedances were noted on post-MRI device interrogation. Out of the 138 completed MRIs, the on-call electrophysiology provider was notified on one, non-urgent occasion. CONCLUSION The implementation of the standardized, technologists-driven PACED-MRI protocol allowed for a multidisciplinary approach to MRI for patients with MR conditional CIEDs. This study demonstrates that the PACED-MRI protocol can be used for patients with MR conditional CIEDs undergoing MRI without the need for direct electrophysiologist supervision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliott Goodwin
- Department of Cardiology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
| | - Benjamin Fogelson
- Department of Cardiology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - James W Cox
- Department of Cardiology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - William J Mahlow
- Department of Cardiology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Xu B, Wang Y, Tse G, Chen J, Li G, Korantzopoulos P, Liu T. Radiotherapy-induced malfunctions of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:689-698. [PMID: 36708909 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy (RT) may pose acute and long-term risks for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between RT and PM/ICD malfunctions in patients with cancer. METHODS We searched the literature using the PubMed, the Cochrane Library the Web of Science, and Embase for relative publications until April 2022. Of the 550 initially identified studies, 17 retrospective observational studies including 2454 patients were finally analyzed. RESULTS The meta-analysis showed that RT was associated with an increased risk of ICD malfunctions (odds ratio [OR] 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-4.33). Five studies were included in the subgroup analysis regarding photon beam energy, showing that radiation-induced CIED failure was more likely to occur in ICDs when beam energy was ≥10 MV (OR 5.28; 95% CI 2.14-13.03). Neutron-generating RT significantly increased the risk of CIED malfunctions (OR 3.97; 95% CI 1.70-9.26), especially the risk of reset (OR 5.79; 95% CI 2.37-14.12; P = .0001). We did not find significant differences in the risk of CIED failure between chest RT and other RT sites (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.63-1.88). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis suggests that ICDs are more likely to be affected by RT than PMs. These adverse events, especially reset, in patients with cancer were associated with neutron-generating RT and beam energy ≥10 MV. Given the increasing requirement for RT in several patients with cancer as well as the increasing implantation rates of CIEDs, a better risk stratification is needed in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beizheng Xu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yueying Wang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Gary Tse
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; Epidemiology Research Unit, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong, China-UK Collaboration, Hong Kong; Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom; School of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jiayi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guangping Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | | | - Tong Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Teixeira RA, Fagundes AA, Baggio Junior JM, Oliveira JCD, Medeiros PDTJ, Valdigem BP, Teno LAC, Silva RT, Melo CSD, Elias Neto J, Moraes Júnior AV, Pedrosa AAA, Porto FM, Brito Júnior HLD, Souza TGSE, Mateos JCP, Moraes LGBD, Forno ARJD, D'Avila ALB, Cavaco DADM, Kuniyoshi RR, Pimentel M, Camanho LEM, Saad EB, Zimerman LI, Oliveira EB, Scanavacca MI, Martinelli Filho M, Lima CEBD, Peixoto GDL, Darrieux FCDC, Duarte JDOP, Galvão Filho SDS, Costa ERB, Mateo EIP, Melo SLD, Rodrigues TDR, Rocha EA, Hachul DT, Lorga Filho AM, Nishioka SAD, Gadelha EB, Costa R, Andrade VSD, Torres GG, Oliveira Neto NRD, Lucchese FA, Murad H, Wanderley Neto J, Brofman PRS, Almeida RMS, Leal JCF. Brazilian Guidelines for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices - 2023. Arq Bras Cardiol 2023; 120:e20220892. [PMID: 36700596 PMCID: PMC10389103 DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rodrigo Tavares Silva
- Universidade de Franca (UNIFRAN), Franca, SP - Brasil
- Centro Universitário Municipal de Franca (Uni-FACEF), Franca, SP - Brasil
| | | | - Jorge Elias Neto
- Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES - Brasil
| | - Antonio Vitor Moraes Júnior
- Santa Casa de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP - Brasil
- Unimed de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP - Brasil
| | - Anisio Alexandre Andrade Pedrosa
- Instituto do Coração (Incor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | - Luis Gustavo Belo de Moraes
- Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | - Mauricio Pimentel
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil
| | | | - Eduardo Benchimol Saad
- Hospital Pró-Cardíaco, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil
- Hospital Samaritano, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil
| | | | | | - Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca
- Instituto do Coração (Incor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | - Martino Martinelli Filho
- Instituto do Coração (Incor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | - Carlos Eduardo Batista de Lima
- Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI - Brasil
- Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares (EBSERH), Brasília, DF - Brasil
| | | | - Francisco Carlos da Costa Darrieux
- Instituto do Coração (Incor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | - Sissy Lara De Melo
- Instituto do Coração (Incor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | | | - Eduardo Arrais Rocha
- Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE - Brasil
| | - Denise Tessariol Hachul
- Instituto do Coração (Incor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | | | - Silvana Angelina D'Orio Nishioka
- Instituto do Coração (Incor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | | | - Roberto Costa
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP - Brasil
| | | | - Gustavo Gomes Torres
- Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN - Brasil
| | | | | | - Henrique Murad
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil
| | | | | | - Rui M S Almeida
- Centro Universitário Fundação Assis Gurgacz, Cascavel, PR - Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Xiao Z, He J, Du A, Yang D, An Y, Li X. Predictors for adverse events during cardiac lead extraction - Experience from a large single centre. Int J Cardiol 2023; 371:167-174. [PMID: 36272572 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has increased in recent years, the need for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has also steadily increased. However, the TLE procedure could lead to serious complications and even death. Clinical decision-making tools are necessary for predicting these adverse events, but the appropriate tools have not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE To explore the possible predictors and develop a clinical model to predict TLE related adverse events. METHODS All the patients who were admitted to our cardiac center for TLE from January 2014 to January 2021 were included in this study. The patient information, device baseline characteristics, procedure-related information, complications and outcomes were recorded. Independent predictors of TLE related adverse events were identified by univariate, LASSO and multivariate analysis. A nomogram for predicting these adverse events was developed based on these independent predictors. Calibration and decision curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the nomogram. RESULTS One thousand and one hundred patients were included in this study, 778 (70.7%) were male and the median age was 68 years old. A total of 2,208 leads were extracted and 2.01±0.74 leads were extracted per procedure. Fifty-five patients (5%) developed adverse events including minor complications (2.4%), major complications (2.3%) and death (0.27%). Seven independent predictors for TLE related adverse events were identified and selected to establish the nomogram including BMI, female gender, hypoalbuminemia, number of extracted leads>3, longest dwell time of the extracted leads and manual traction. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the prediction model was 0.774. Calibration curve and decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram had good prediction performance. CONCLUSION TLE related adverse events are some of the key issues that concern clinicians. We have identified seven independent factors and established a predictive model that may help clinicians identify at-risk patients and create better plans for lead extraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zengli Xiao
- Intensive care unit, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jinshan He
- Cardiovascular department, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Anqi Du
- Intensive care unit, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dandan Yang
- Cardiovascular department, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Youzhong An
- Intensive care unit, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Xuebin Li
- Cardiovascular department, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Hitler L, Eze JF, Nwagu AD, Edet HO, Unimuke TO, Eno EA, Osabor VN, Adeyinka AS. Computational Study of the Interaction of C
12
P
12
and C
12
N
12
Nanocages with Alendronate Drug Molecule. ChemistrySelect 2023. [DOI: 10.1002/slct.202203607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Hitler
- Computational and Bio-Simulation Research Group University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
| | - John F. Eze
- Computational and Bio-Simulation Research Group University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
| | - Adanna D. Nwagu
- Computational and Bio-Simulation Research Group University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
| | - Henry O. Edet
- Computational and Bio-Simulation Research Group University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
| | - Tomsmith O. Unimuke
- Computational and Bio-Simulation Research Group University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
| | - Ededet A. Eno
- Computational and Bio-Simulation Research Group University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
- Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry Faculty of Physical Sciences University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
| | - Vincent N. Osabor
- Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry Faculty of Physical Sciences University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
| | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
Malavasi VL, Imberti JF, Tosetti A, Romiti GF, Vitolo M, Zecchin M, Mazzeo E, Giuseppina DM, Lohr F, Lopez-Fernandez T, Boriani G. A systematic review and meta-analysis on oncological radiotherapy in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device: Prevalence and predictors of device malfunction in 3121 patients. Eur J Clin Invest 2023; 53:e13862. [PMID: 36004486 PMCID: PMC10078179 DOI: 10.1111/eci.13862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for cancer treatment is growing. At present, prevalence and predictors of RT-induced CIEDs malfunctions are not defined. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted following the PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched from inception to 31/01/2022 for studies reporting RT-induced malfunctions in CIEDs patients. Aim was to assess the prevalence of RT-induced CIEDs malfunctions and identify potential predictors. RESULTS Thirty-two out of 3962 records matched the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 135 CIEDs malfunctions were detected among 3121 patients (6.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1%-8.4%). The pooled prevalence increased moving from pacemaker (PM) to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator (CRT-D) groups (4.1%, 95% CI: 2.9-5.8; 8.2% 95% CI: 5.9-11.3; and 19.8%, 95% CI: 11.4-32.2 respectively). A higher risk ratio (RR) of malfunctions was found when neutron-producing energies were used as compared to non-neutron-producing energies (RR 9.98, 95% CI: 5.09-19.60) and in patients with ICD/CRT-D as compared to patients with PM/CRT-P (RR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.40-3.06). On the contrary, no association was found between maximal radiation dose at CIED >2 Gy and CIEDs malfunctions (RR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.31-2.76). CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy related CIEDs malfunction had a prevalence ranging from 4% to 20%. The use of neutron-producing energies and more complex devices (ICD/CRT-D) were associated with higher risk of device malfunction, while the radiation dose at CIED did not significantly impact on the risk unless higher doses (>10 Gy) were used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Livio Malavasi
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Jacopo Francesco Imberti
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Alberto Tosetti
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giulio Francesco Romiti
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.,Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza-University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Vitolo
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Massimo Zecchin
- Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ercole Mazzeo
- Radiotherapy Division, Department of Oncology, Policlinico Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - De Marco Giuseppina
- Radiotherapy Division, Department of Oncology, Policlinico Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Frank Lohr
- Radiotherapy Division, Department of Oncology, Policlinico Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Monteagudo-Vela M, Tindale A, Monguió-Santín E, Reyes-Copa G, Panoulas V. Right ventricular failure: Current strategies and future development. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:998382. [PMID: 37187786 PMCID: PMC10175590 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.998382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Right heart failure can be defined as a clinical syndrome consisting of signs and symptoms of heart failure resulting from right ventricular dysfunction. Function is normally altered due to three mechanisms: (1) pressure overload (2) volume overload, or (3) a decrease in contractility due to ischaemia, cardiomyopathy or arrythmias. Diagnosis is based upon a combination of clinical assessment plus echocardiographic, laboratory and haemodynamic parameters, and clinical risk assessment. Treatment includes medical management, mechanical assist devices and transplantation if recovery is not observed. Distinct attention to special circumstances such as left ventricular assist device implantation should be sought. The future is moving towards new therapies, both pharmacological and device centered. Immediate diagnosis and management of RV failure, including mechanical circulatory support where needed, alongside a protocolized approach to weaning is important in successfully managing right ventricular failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Monteagudo-Vela
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Correspondence: María Monteagudo-Vela
| | - Alexander Tindale
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emilio Monguió-Santín
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Guillermo Reyes-Copa
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vasileios Panoulas
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Resonancia magnética para portadores de dispositivos cardiovasculares. Consenso SEC-GT CRMTC/SEC-Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco/SERAM/SEICAT. RADIOLOGIA 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
60
|
Ghannam M, Bogun F. Improving Outcomes in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Using Imaging to Identify Arrhythmic Substrates. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2022; 14:609-620. [PMID: 36396180 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is limited by modest acute and long-term success rates, in part due to the challenges in accurately identifying the arrhythmogenic substrate. The combination of multimodality imaging along with information from electroanatomic mapping allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate which facilitates VT ablation, and the use of preprocedural imaging has been shown to improve long-term ablation outcomes. Beyond regional recognition of the arrhythmogenic substrate, advanced imaging techniques can be used to create tailored ablation strategies preprocedurally. This review will focus on how imaging can be used to guide ablation planning and execution with a focus on clinical applications aimed at improving the outcome of VT ablation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ghannam
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC5853, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5853, USA.
| | - Frank Bogun
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., SPC5853, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Lyon AR, López-Fernández T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler-Klein J, Boriani G, Cardinale D, Cordoba R, Cosyns B, Cutter DJ, de Azambuja E, de Boer RA, Dent SF, Farmakis D, Gevaert SA, Gorog DA, Herrmann J, Lenihan D, Moslehi J, Moura B, Salinger SS, Stephens R, Suter TM, Szmit S, Tamargo J, Thavendiranathan P, Tocchetti CG, van der Meer P, van der Pal HJH. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J 2022; 43:4229-4361. [PMID: 36017568 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 770] [Impact Index Per Article: 385.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
|
62
|
Barreiro-Pérez M, Cabeza B, Calvo D, Reyes-Juárez JL, Datino T, Vañó Galván E, Maceira González AM, Delgado Sánchez-Gracián C, Prat-González S, Perea RJ, Bastarrika G, Sánchez M, Jiménez-Borreguero LJ, Fernández-Golfín Lobán C, Rodríguez Palomares JF, Tolosana JM, Hidalgo Pérez JA, Pérez-David E, Bertomeu-González V, Cuéllar H. Resonancia magnética para portadores de dispositivos cardiovasculares. Consenso SEC-GT CRMTC/SEC-Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco/SERAM/SEICAT. Rev Esp Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
63
|
Azraai M, Miura D, Lin YH, Rodrigues TS, Nadurata V. Incidence and Predictors of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Malfunction with Radiotherapy Treatment. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11216329. [PMID: 36362559 PMCID: PMC9654752 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: To investigate the incidence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) malfunction with radiotherapy (RT) treatment and assess predictors of CIED malfunction. Methods: A 6-year retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RT with CIED identified through the radiation oncology electronic database. Clinical, RT (cumulative dose, dose per fraction, beam energy, beam energy dose, and anatomical area of RT) and CIED details (type, manufacturer, and device malfunction) were collected from electronic medical records. Results: We identified 441 patients with CIED who underwent RT. CIED encountered a permanent pacemaker (PPM) (78%), cardiac resynchronization therapy—pacing (CRT-P) (2%), an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (10%), and a CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) (10%). The mean cumulative dose of RT was 36 gray (Gy) (IQR 1.8–80 Gy) and the most common beam energy used was photon ≥10 megavolt (MV) with a median dose of 7 MV (IQR 5–18 MV). We further identified 17 patients who had CIED malfunction with RT. This group had a higher cumulative RT dose of 42.5 Gy (20–77 Gy) and a photon dose of 14 MV (12–18 MV). None of the malfunctions resulted in clinical symptoms. Using logistic regression, the predictors of CIED malfunction were photon beam energy use ≥10 MV (OR 5.73; 95% CI, 1.58–10.76), anatomical location of RT above the diaphragm (OR 5.2, 95% CI, 1.82–15.2), and having a CIED from the ICD group (OR 4.6, 95% CI, 0.75–10.2). Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of predictors of CIED malfunction with RT to ensure the safety of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meor Azraai
- Department of Cardiology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC 3550, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3550, Australia
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +613-5454-6000
| | - Daisuke Miura
- Department of Cardiology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC 3550, Australia
| | - Yuan-Hong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter McCallum, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC 3550, Australia
| | - Thalys Sampaio Rodrigues
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Voltaire Nadurata
- Department of Cardiology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC 3550, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Stühlinger M, Burri H, Vernooy K, Garcia R, Lenarczyk R, Sultan A, Brunner M, Sabbag A, Özcan EE, Ramos JT, Di Stolfo G, Suleiman M, Tinhofer F, Aristizabal JM, Cakulev I, Eidelman G, Yeo WT, Lau DH, Mulpuru SK, Nielsen JC, Heinzel F, Prabhu M, Rinaldi CA, Sacher F, Guillen R, de Pooter J, Gandjbakhch E, Sheldon S, Prenner G, Mason PK, Fichtner S, Nitta T. EHRA consensus on prevention and management of interference due to medical procedures in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace 2022; 24:1512-1537. [PMID: 36228183 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Stühlinger
- Department of Internal Medicine III - Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Haran Burri
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kevin Vernooy
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rodrigue Garcia
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Radoslaw Lenarczyk
- Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Silesia, Silesian Center of Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
- Medical University of Silesia, Division of Medical Sciences, Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Arian Sultan
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center at University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Brunner
- Department of Cardiology and Medical Intensive Care, St Josefskrankenhaus, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Avi Sabbag
- The Davidai Center for Rhythm Disturbances and Pacing, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Emin Evren Özcan
- Heart Rhythm Management Center, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Jorge Toquero Ramos
- Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Di Stolfo
- Cardiac Intensive Care and Arrhythmology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Mahmoud Suleiman
- Cardiology/Electrophysiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | | | | | - Ivan Cakulev
- University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gabriel Eidelman
- San Isidro's Central Hospital, Diagnóstico Maipú, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
| | - Wee Tiong Yeo
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dennis H Lau
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Jens Cosedis Nielsen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Frank Heinzel
- Department of Cardiology, Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Mukundaprabhu Prabhu
- Associate Professor in Cardiology, In charge of EP Division, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Frederic Sacher
- Bordeaux University Hospital, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Raul Guillen
- Sanatorio Adventista del Plata, Del Plata Adventist University Entre Rios Argentina, Entre Rios, Argentina
| | - Jan de Pooter
- Professor of Cardiology, Ghent University, Deputy Head of Clinic, Heart Center UZ Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Estelle Gandjbakhch
- AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Institut de Cardiologie, ICAN, Paris, France
| | - Seth Sheldon
- The Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | | | - Pamela K Mason
- Director, Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Stephanie Fichtner
- LMU Klinikum, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Campus Großhadern, München, Germany
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Emeritus Professor, Nippon Medical School, Presiding Consultant of Cardiology, Hanyu General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Culbertson CJ, Perino AC, Gardner RM, Balasubramanian V, Vora N. Trends in Utilization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stroke Patients With Cardiac Rhythm Devices. Neurohospitalist 2022; 12:624-631. [PMID: 36147760 PMCID: PMC9485690 DOI: 10.1177/19418744221115004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is safe for most patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA) who have CIEDs may undergo MRI less frequently than patients without devices. We assessed contemporary use of MRI for patients with AIS/TIA and the effect of a recent coverage revision by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on MRI utilization. Methods Using Optum® claims data from January 2012 to June 2019, we performed an interrupted time series analysis of MRI utilization during AIS/TIA hospitalizations with the April 2018 CMS coverage revision serving as the intervention. For patients treated after the coverage revision, we used multivariable logistic regression to determine the association between lack of CIED and MRI utilization for AIS/TIA. Results We identified 417,899 patient hospitalizations for AIS/TIA, of which 30,425 (7%) had a CIED present (CIED vs non-CIED patients: age 77.6 ± 9.8 vs 72.7 ± 12.3 years; 45.5% vs 54.3% female). From 2012 to 2019, annual MRI utilization increased from 3% to 20% for CIED patients and 58% to 66% for non-CIED patients. The CMS coverage revision was associated with a 4.2% absolute additional increase in MRI utilization for CIED patients. Non-CIED patients treated after the CMS coverage revision were substantially more likely than CIED patients to undergo MRI (adjusted OR 6.7, 95% CI: 6.3-7.1, P<.001). Conclusions MRI utilization has increased for stroke patients with CIEDs but remains far lower than in similar patients without devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Collin J. Culbertson
- Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Alexander C. Perino
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rebecca M. Gardner
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Nirali Vora
- Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Kattel S, Enriquez AD. Contemporary approach to catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2022; 66:793-805. [PMID: 36056222 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01363-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) comprises a heterogenous group of disorders with myocardial dysfunction unrelated to significant coronary disease. As the use of implantable defibrillators has increased in this patient population, catheter ablation is being utilized more frequently to treat NICM patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). Progress has been made in identifying multiple subtypes of NICM with variable scar patterns. The distribution of scar is often mid-myocardial and subepicardial, and identifying and ablating this substrate can be challenging. Here, we will review the current understanding of NICM subtypes and the outcomes of VT ablation in this population. We will discuss the use of cardiac imaging, electrocardiography, and electroanatomic mapping to define the VT substrate and the ablation techniques required to successfully prevent VT recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharma Kattel
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208017, New Haven, CT, 06520-8017, USA
| | - Alan D Enriquez
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208017, New Haven, CT, 06520-8017, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Barcellini A, Dusi V, Mirandola A, Ronchi S, Riva G, Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Vitolo V, Ciocca M, Rordorf R, Orlandi E. The impact of particle radiotherapy on the functioning of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review of in vitro and in vivo studies according to PICO criteria. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2022; 127:1046-1058. [PMID: 35871428 PMCID: PMC9508006 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01520-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The number of oncological patients who may benefit from proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) or carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), overall referred to as particle radiotherapy (RT), is expected to strongly increase in the next future, as well as the number of cardiological patients requiring cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The management of patients with a CIED requiring particle RT deserves peculiar attention compared to those undergoing conventional photon beam RT, mostly due to the potential generation of secondary neutrons by particle beams interactions. Current consensus documents recommend managing these patients as being at intermediate/high risk of RT-induced device malfunctioning regardless of the dose on the CIED and the beam delivery method used, despite the last one significantly affects secondary neutrons generation (very limited neutrons production with active scanning as opposed to the passive scattering technique). The key issues for the current review were expressed in four questions according to the Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome criteria. Three in vitro and five in vivo studies were included. Based on the available data, PBT and CIRT with active scanning have a limited potential to interfere with CIED that has only emerged from in vitro study so far, while a significant potential for neutron-related, not severe, CIED malfunctions (resets) was consistently reported in both clinical and in vitro studies with passive scattering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Veronica Dusi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy
| | - Maurizio Massaro
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Rordorf
- Coronary Care Unit and Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
White RD, Demirer M, Gupta V, Sebro RA, Kusumoto FM, Erdal BS. Pre-deployment assessment of an AI model to assist radiologists in chest X-ray detection and identification of lead-less implanted electronic devices for pre-MRI safety screening: realized implementation needs and proposed operational solutions. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2022; 9:054504. [PMID: 36310648 PMCID: PMC9603740 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.9.5.054504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Chest X-ray (CXR) use in pre-MRI safety screening, such as for lead-less implanted electronic device (LLIED) recognition, is common. To assist CXR interpretation, we "pre-deployed" an artificial intelligence (AI) model to assess (1) accuracies in LLIED-type (and consequently safety-level) identification, (2) safety implications of LLIED nondetections or misidentifications, (3) infrastructural or workflow requirements, and (4) demands related to model adaptation to real-world conditions. Approach A two-tier cascading methodology for LLIED detection/localization and identification on a frontal CXR was applied to evaluate the performance of the original nine-class AI model. With the unexpected early appearance of LLIED types during simulated real-world trialing, retraining of a newer 12-class version preceded retrialing. A zero footprint (ZF) graphical user interface (GUI)/viewer with DICOM-based output was developed for inference-result display and adjudication, supporting end-user engagement and model continuous learning and/or modernization. Results During model testing or trialing using both the nine-class and 12-class models, robust detection/localization was consistently 100%, with mAP 0.99 from fivefold cross-validation. Safety-level categorization was high during both testing ( AUC ≥ 0.98 and ≥ 0.99 , respectively) and trialing (accuracy 98% and 97%, respectively). LLIED-type identifications by the two models during testing (1) were 98.9% and 99.5% overall correct and (2) consistently showed AUC ≥ 0.92 (1.00 for 8/9 and 9/12 LLIED-types, respectively). Pre-deployment trialing of both models demonstrated overall type-identification accuracies of 94.5% and 95%, respectively. Of the small number of misidentifications, none involved MRI-stringently conditional or MRI-unsafe types of LLIEDs. Optimized ZF GUI/viewer operations led to greater user-friendliness for radiologist engagement. Conclusions Our LLIED-related AI methodology supports (1) 100% detection sensitivity, (2) high identification (including MRI-safety) accuracy, and (3) future model deployment with facilitated inference-result display and adjudication for ongoing model adaptation to future real-world experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D. White
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Center for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Mutlu Demirer
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Center for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Vikash Gupta
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Center for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Ronnie A. Sebro
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Center for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Frederick M. Kusumoto
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Barbaros Selnur Erdal
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Center for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Gonska BD. [Magnetic resonance imaging in cardiological patients : Basic principles for application]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2022; 33:268-271. [PMID: 35781835 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-022-00877-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be safely performed in patients with cardiac implants such as pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Prerequisites for safe use are knowledge of the physical conditions as well as professional indication and cardiological monitoring by an experienced cardiologist.
Collapse
|
70
|
Lyon AR, López-Fernández T, Couch LS, Asteggiano R, Aznar MC, Bergler-Klein J, Boriani G, Cardinale D, Cordoba R, Cosyns B, Cutter DJ, de Azambuja E, de Boer RA, Dent SF, Farmakis D, Gevaert SA, Gorog DA, Herrmann J, Lenihan D, Moslehi J, Moura B, Salinger SS, Stephens R, Suter TM, Szmit S, Tamargo J, Thavendiranathan P, Tocchetti CG, van der Meer P, van der Pal HJH. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 23:e333-e465. [PMID: 36017575 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
71
|
Boersma LV, El-Chami M, Steinwender C, Lambiase P, Murgatroyd F, Mela T, Theuns DAMJ, Khelae SK, Kalil C, Zabala F, Stuehlinger M, Lenarczyk R, Clementy N, Tamirisa KP, Rinaldi CA, Knops R, Lau CP, Crozier I, Boveda S, Defaye P, Deharo JC, Botto GL, Vassilikos V, Oliveira MM, Tse HF, Figueroa J, Stambler BS, Guerra JM, Stiles M, Marques M. Practical considerations, indications, and future perspectives for leadless and extravascular cardiac implantable electronic devices: a position paper by EHRA/HRS/LAHRS/APHRS. Europace 2022; 24:1691-1708. [PMID: 35912932 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas V Boersma
- Cardiology Department, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Cardiology Department, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mikhael El-Chami
- Medicine/Cardiology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Clemens Steinwender
- Department of Cardiology and Internal Intensive Care, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, Linz, Austria
| | - Pier Lambiase
- Department of Cardiology, UCL & Barts Heart Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, UCL, Barts Heart Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Theofania Mela
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Dominic A M J Theuns
- Erasmus MC, Cardiology, Clinical Electrophysiology, CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Carlos Kalil
- Cardiology Department, Hospital São Francisco da Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Federico Zabala
- Electrophysiology Unit, Hospital San Martin de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Markus Stuehlinger
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Radoslaw Lenarczyk
- Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Silesia, Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Curie-Sklodowska Str 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Nicolas Clementy
- Cardiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, France
| | - Kamala P Tamirisa
- Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiac MRI, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, 11970 N, Central Expressway, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Reinoud Knops
- Cardiology Department, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chu-Pak Lau
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Suite 1303, Central Building, 1 Pedder Street, Central, Hong Kong
| | - Ian Crozier
- Department of Cardiology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France.,Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-VUB, Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Brussels, Belgium, and INSERM U970, 75908 Paris Cedex 15 France
| | - Pascal Defaye
- CHU Grenoble Alpes, Unite de Rythmologie Service De Cardiologie, CS10135, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
| | - Jean Claude Deharo
- Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, F-13385 Marseille, France.,Cardiology Department, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Vassilios Vassilikos
- Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece & Hippokrateio General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Mario Martins Oliveira
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Santa Marta, Rua Santa Marta, 1167-024 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Hung Fat Tse
- The Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Hong Kong-Guangdong Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong and Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jorge Figueroa
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, China
| | - Bruce S Stambler
- Unidad de Arritmias y Marcapasos, Sanatorio Allende, Obispo Oro 42, CP 5000, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Jose M Guerra
- Piedmont Heart Institute, 275 Collier Road Northwest, Suite 500, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA
| | - Martin Stiles
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, CIBERCV, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manlio Marques
- Waikato Clinical School, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Chyou JY, Axel L. Considerations for Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:2136-2138. [PMID: 35842797 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
With increasing collective experience with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), guided by published safety data and professional society scientific documents,1 there has been growing interest in extending the application of CMR imaging in patients with CIEDs This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Y Chyou
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Cardiovascular Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leon Axel
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Compact pediatric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocols. Pediatr Radiol 2022:10.1007/s00247-022-05447-y. [PMID: 35821442 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05447-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Cardiac MRI is in many respects an ideal modality for pediatric cardiovascular imaging, enabling a complete noninvasive assessment of anatomy, morphology, function and flow in one radiation-free and potentially non-contrast exam. Nonetheless, traditionally lengthy and complex imaging acquisition strategies have often limited its broader use beyond specialized centers. In this review, the author presents practical cardiac MRI imaging protocols to facilitate the performance of succinct yet successful exams that provide the most salient clinical data for the majority of congenital and acquired pediatric cardiac disease. In addition, the author reviews newer and evolving techniques that permit more rapid but similarly diagnostic MRI, including compressed sensing and artificial intelligence/machine learning reconstruction, four-dimensional flow acquisition and blood pool contrast agents. With the modern armamentarium of cardiac MRI methods, the goal of compact yet comprehensive exams in children can now be realized.
Collapse
|
74
|
Jiang F, Bhusal B, Sanpitak P, Webster G, Popescu A, Kim D, Bonmassar G, Golestanirad L. A comparative study of MRI-induced RF heating in pediatric and adult populations with epicardial and endocardial implantable electronic devices. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2022; 2022:4014-4017. [PMID: 36086095 PMCID: PMC10848149 DOI: 10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Patients with congenital heart defects, inherited arrhythmia syndromes, and congenital disorders of cardiac conduction often receive a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). At least 75% of patients with CIEDs will need magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during their lifetime. In 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first MR-conditional CIEDs for patients with endocardial systems, in which leads are passed through the vein and affixed to the endocardium. The majority of children, however, receive an epicardial CIED, where leads are directly sewn to the epicardium. Unfortunately, an epicardial CIED is a relative contraindication to MRI due to the unknown risk of RF heating. In this work, we performed anthropomorphic phantom experiments to investigate differences in RF heating between endocardial and epicardial leads in both pediatric and adult-sized phantoms, where adult endocardial CIED was the control. Clinical Relevance-This work provides a quantitative comparison of MRI RF heating of epicardial and endocardial leads in pediatric and adult populations.
Collapse
|
75
|
Leitch J, Asakai H, Dawson L, Medi C, Norman M, Stevenson I, Toal E, Turnbull S, Young G. Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) Position Statement on the Follow-Up of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices 2022. Heart Lung Circ 2022; 31:1054-1063. [PMID: 35760743 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Recognising the need for a national approach for the recommended best practice for the follow-up of implanted cardiac rhythm devices to ensure patient safety, this document has been produced by the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). It draws on accepted practice standards and guidelines of international electrophysiology bodies. It lays out methodology, frequency, and content of follow-up, including remote monitoring; personnel, including physician, allied health, nursing and industry; paediatric and adult congenital heart patients; and special considerations including magnetic resonance imaging scanning, perioperative management, and hazard alerts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Leitch
- John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
| | - Hiroko Asakai
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Heart Centre for Children, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Caroline Medi
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Edward Toal
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Samual Turnbull
- Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Glenn Young
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Bosch R. Nachsorge und MRT-Untersuchungen bei Patienten mit implantierten kardialen Aggregaten. AKTUELLE KARDIOLOGIE 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1738-0778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungIn den 2021 publizierten ESC-Leitlinien wird im Rahmen des Kapitels über die Aggregatnachsorge insbesondere die Bedeutung der Telemetrie hervorgehoben. Durch eine telemetrische Nachsorge
sind wesentlich seltener Präsenznachsorgen notwendig bei gleichwertiger oder sogar verbesserter Sicherheit. Eine telemetrische Überwachung sollte daher bei allen Patienten mit CIED erwogen
werden.Die Leitlinien beschreiben detailliert die Möglichkeiten und Einschränkungen von MRT-Untersuchungen bei Patienten mit CIED. Programmierempfehlungen für die verschiedenen Hersteller werden
dargestellt. Unter Einhaltung entsprechender Sicherheitsstandards kann eine MRT auch ohne größeres Risiko bei Patienten mit nicht MRT-kompatiblen Systemen erfolgen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Bosch
- Cardiology, Cardio-Centrum Ludwigsburg-Bietigheim, Ludwigsburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Empfehlungen zur Sondenextraktion – Gemeinsame Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (DGK) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Thorax‑, Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie (DGTHG). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00398-022-00512-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
78
|
Calvo D, Pombo M, Benito B, Cano Ó, Fidalgo Andrés ML, Gómez-Bueno M, Jiménez Candil FJ, Lillo IM, Moriña-Vázquez P, Peñafiel-Verdú P, Rincón LM, Tolosana JM, Avanzas P, Berga Congost G, Boraita A, Bueno H, Calvo D, Campuzano R, Delgado V, Dos L, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Gomez Doblas JJ, Pascual Figal D, Sambola A, Viana Tejedor A, Ferreiro JL, Alfonso F. Comments on the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA (ENGLISH ED.) 2022; 75:370-374. [PMID: 35090861 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
|
79
|
Calvo D, Pombo M. Comentarios a la guía ESC 2021 sobre estimulación cardiaca y terapia de resincronización. Rev Esp Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
80
|
Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A prospective study. Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 91:9-15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
81
|
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Translation of the document prepared by the Czech Society of Cardiology. COR ET VASA 2022. [DOI: 10.33678/cor.2022.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
82
|
Thomas H, Plummer C, Wright IJ, Foley P, Turley AJ. Guidelines for the peri‐operative management of people with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:808-817. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.15728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H. Thomas
- Department of Cardiology Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Northumberland UK
| | - C. Plummer
- Department of Cardiology Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - I. J. Wright
- Department of Cardiology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - P. Foley
- Department of Cardiology Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Swindon UK
| | - A. J. Turley
- Department of Cardiology South Tees NHS Foundation Trust Middlesbrough UK
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Mont L, Roca-Luque I, Althoff TF. Ablation Lesion Assessment with MRI. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2022; 11:e02. [PMID: 35444808 PMCID: PMC9014705 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2021.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI is capable of detecting not only native cardiac fibrosis, but also ablation-induced scarring. Thus, it offers the unique opportunity to assess ablation lesions non-invasively. In the atrium, LGE-MRI has been shown to accurately detect and localise gaps in ablation lines. With a negative predictive value close to 100% it can reliably rule out pulmonary vein reconnection non-invasively and thus may avoid unnecessary invasive repeat procedures where a pulmonary vein isolation only approach is pursued. Even LGE-MRI-guided repeat pulmonary vein isolation has been demonstrated to be feasible as a standalone approach. LGE-MRI-based lesion assessment may also be of value to evaluate the efficacy of ventricular ablation. In this respect, the elimination of LGE-MRI-detected arrhythmogenic substrate may serve as a potential endpoint, but validation in clinical studies is lacking. Despite holding great promise, the widespread use of LGE-MRI is still limited by the absence of standardised protocols for image acquisition and post-processing. In particular, reproducibility across different centres is impeded by inconsistent thresholds and internal references to define fibrosis. Thus, uniform methodological and analytical standards are warranted to foster a broader implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lluís Mont
- Arrhythmia Section, Cardiovascular Institute, Clínic – University Hospital Barcelona Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cardiovascular (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivo Roca-Luque
- Arrhythmia Section, Cardiovascular Institute, Clínic – University Hospital Barcelona Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cardiovascular (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Till F Althoff
- Arrhythmia Section, Cardiovascular Institute, Clínic – University Hospital Barcelona Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Chyou JY, Sanz J. Chest Computed Tomography Imaging and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:1341-1343. [DOI: 10.1111/jce.15476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Y Chyou
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Medicine, CardiologyNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Javier Sanz
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Medicine, CardiologyNew YorkNYUSA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional RadiologyNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Frey P, Irles D, Dompnier A, Akret C, Hosu IC, Narayanan K, Mazoyer F, Yayehd K, Guillon B, Marijon E. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Dysfunctions in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy A Prospective Cohort Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:1013-1023. [PMID: 35299286 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are undergoing radiotherapy for cancer. The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the incidence, characteristics, and associated factors of CIED dysfunctions related to radiotherapy. METHODS Between April 2013 and March 2020, all patients with a CIED who underwent ≥1 radiotherapy session were enrolled. Patients were monitored according to a systematic protocol, including device interrogation before the 1st and after each radiotherapy session. The primary endpoint was CIED dysfunction, defined as oversensing, total or partial deprogramming, and/or unrecoverable reset. RESULTS We included a total of 92 CIED radiotherapy courses: 77 (83.7%) in patients with a pacemaker and 15 (16.3%) in those with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Overall, 13 dysfunctions (14.1%) were observed during 92 courses (1509 sessions), giving an incidence of 0.9 per 100 sessions. These included nine deprogramming (three total resets to back-up pacing mode and six partial deprogramming that were all successfully reprogrammed), three transient oversensing, and one unrecoverable oversensing requiring CIED and leads replacement. There were no adverse clinical events related to device dysfunction. In multivariable analysis, neutron-producing irradiation (odds ratio [OR], 5.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-28.65; P=0.039) and cumulative tumor dose (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; P=0.007) remained significantly associated with CIED dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective study, transient or permanent subclinical CIED dysfunction occurred in 14.1% of radiotherapy courses. Our findings emphasize the importance of high-energy beams and neutron-producing irradiation in risk assessment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Frey
- Department of cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, 74370, Metz-Tessy, France
| | - Didier Irles
- Department of cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, 74370, Metz-Tessy, France
| | - Antoine Dompnier
- Department of cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, 74370, Metz-Tessy, France
| | - Chrystelle Akret
- Department of cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, 74370, Metz-Tessy, France
| | - Iolanda C Hosu
- Department of radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, 74370, Metz-Tessy, France
| | - Kumar Narayanan
- University of Paris, Paris-Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM, F-75015, Paris, France.,Medicover Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Fréderic Mazoyer
- Department of radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 1 Avenue de l'Hôpital, 74370, Metz-Tessy, France
| | - Komlavi Yayehd
- Department of cardiology, CHU Campus Lomé, 03 BP, 30284, Lomé, Togo
| | - Benoît Guillon
- Department of cardiology, University Hospital Besancon, 25000, Besancon, France.,EA3920, University of Burgundy-Franche-Comté, Besancon, France
| | - Eloi Marijon
- University of Paris, Paris-Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM, F-75015, Paris, France.,Cardiology department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, 75908, Paris, Cedex, 15, France
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Amaral AP, Montgomery JA. Remote Programming of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices for MRI: Are We Ready to Change the Channel? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:1010-1012. [PMID: 35245404 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an indispensable diagnostic tool across many fields of clinical medicine. Although reprogramming of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for MRI is now routine at most institutions, early experiences were notable for potential adverse effects such as device-related heating, device or lead movement, and device malfunction. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ansel Philip Amaral
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Jay Alan Montgomery
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Siddamsetti S, Shinn A, Gautam S. Remote Programming of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Novel Approach to Program Cardiac Devices for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:1005-1009. [PMID: 35243710 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with MRI-conditional cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) remain a logistical issue for device programming during the scan. In current practice, a trained person needs to be present on-site to program CIED for MRI scan. This can cause delay in patient care, rescheduling of tests and increase healthcare costs. A novel remote programming (RP) strategy can be utilized to reprogram the CIED remotely. We sought to explore the feasibility and safety of RP of CIEDs in patients undergoing MRI scan. METHODS We implemented the Medtronic CIED RP software at our institution after ensuring HIPAA compliance. The MRI technician started the session by contacting an off-site remote operator and placing a programmer wand from the 2090 Medtronic programmer over the CIED. The remote operator logged into a remote access software and provided a unique access code to the MRI technician. After entering the access code into the programmer, the remote operator was able to program the device as needed. We conducted a periodic audit of the first 209 patients who underwent RP of CIEDs for MRI. Outcomes analyzed were successful completion of RP sessions and time saved per scan. RESULTS Of the 209 MRI scans, 51 scans were performed urgently. There were no connectivity and programming problems or need for MRI rescheduling. In-person reprogramming was not required for any patient. All scans were completed safely in a timely manner, and there were no reports of CIED malfunction. Time saved per scan was estimated to be 28 +/-10 minutes. CONCLUSIONS Remote programming of CIEDs for MRI scans is a safe and effective strategy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisir Siddamsetti
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Alexander Shinn
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Sandeep Gautam
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Kuroda K, Yatsushiro S. New Insights into MR Safety for Implantable Medical Devices. Magn Reson Med Sci 2022; 21:110-131. [PMID: 35228487 PMCID: PMC9199981 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, the status of MR safety has dramatically changed. In particular, ever since the MR-conditional cardiac device was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008 and by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) in 2012, the safety of patients with an implantable medical device (IMD) has been one of the most important issues in terms of MR use. In conjunction with the regulatory approvals for various IMDs, standards, technical specifications, and guidelines have also been rapidly created and developed. Many invaluable papers investigating and reviewing the history and status of MR use in the presence of IMDs already exist. As such, this review paper seeks to bridge the gap between clinical practice and the information that is obtained by standard-based tests and provided by an IMD's package insert or instructions for use. Interpretation of the gradient of the magnetic flux density intensity of the static magnetic field with respect to the magnetic displacement force is discussed, along with the physical background of RF field. The relationship between specific absorption rate (SAR) and B1+RMS, and their effects on image quality are described. In addition, insofar as providing new directions for future research and practice, the feasibility of safety test methods for RF-induced heating of IMDs using MR thermometry, evaluation of tissue heat damage, and challenges in cardiac IMDs will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kagayaki Kuroda
- Department of Human and Information Sciences, School of Information Science and Technology, Tokai University, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yatsushiro
- Department of Human and Information Sciences, School of Information Science and Technology, Tokai University, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan
- Biosim Laboratory, Bioview, Inc., Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Should they stay, or should they go: do we need to remove the old cardiac implantable electronic device if a new system is required on the contralateral side? Heart Rhythm O2 2022; 3:169-175. [PMID: 35496451 PMCID: PMC9043401 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ipsilateral approach in patients requiring cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) revision or upgrade may not be feasible, primarily due to vascular occlusion. If a new CIED is implanted on the contralateral side, a common practice is to explant the old CIED to avoid device interaction. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess a conservative approach of abandoning the old CIED after implanting a new contralateral device. Methods We used an artificial intelligence algorithm to analyze postimplant chest radiographs to identify those with multiple CIEDs. Outcomes of interest included device interaction, abandoned CIED elective replacement indicator (ERI) behavior, subsequent programming changes, and explant of abandoned CIED. Theoretical risk of infection with removal of abandoned CIED was estimated using a validated scoring system. Results Among 12,045 patients, we identified 40 patients with multiple CIEDs. Occluded veins were the most common indication for contralateral implantation (n = 27 [67.5%]). Fifteen abandoned CIEDs reached ERI, with 4 reverting to VVI 65. One patient underwent explant due to device interaction, and 2 required device reprogramming. Of 32 patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, 8 (25%) had treated ventricular arrhythmia. There were no failed or inappropriate therapies due to interaction. Eighteen patients (45%) had hypothetical >1% annual risk of hospitalization for device infection if the abandoned CIED had been explanted. Conclusion In patients requiring new CIED implant on the contralateral side, abandoning the old device is feasible. This approach may reduce the risk of infection and concerns regarding abandoned leads and magnetic resonance imaging scans. Knowledge of ERI behavior is essential to avoid device interactions.
Collapse
|
90
|
Ramirez-Suarez KI, Otero HJ, Biko DM, Dori Y, Smith CL, Feudtner C, White AM. Magnetic resonance lymphangiography in post-Fontan palliation patients with MR non-conditional cardiac electronic devices: An institutional experience. Clin Imaging 2022; 86:43-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
91
|
Daniela Falco M, Andreoli S, Delana A, Barbareschi A, De Filippo P, Leidi C, Marini M, Appignani M, Genovesi D, Di Girolamo E. In-vitro investigation of cardiac implantable electronic device malfunction during and after direct photon exposure: A three-centres experience. Phys Med 2022; 94:94-101. [PMID: 35007940 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy may cause malfunction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and pacemakers (PMs). We carried-out a multicentre randomized in-vitro study on 65 ICDs and 145 PMs to evaluate malfunctions during and after direct irradiation to doses up to 10 Gy. METHODS Three centres equipped with different linear accelerator and treatment-planning systems participated in the study. Computed Tomography (CT) acquisitions were performed to build the treatment plans. All devices were exposed to dose of 2, 5, or 10 Gy (6 MV). All devices underwent a baseline examination and 64 wireless real-time telemetry-transmissions (47 ICDs and 17 PMs) were monitored during photon exposures. All devices were interrogated after exposure and once monthly for six subsequent months. RESULTS Fifty-four of the 64 wireless-enabled CIEDs (84.4%) recorded noise-related interferences during exposure. In detail, 40/47 ICDs (85.1%) reported interference, of which 16 ICDs (34%) reported potentially clinically relevant pacing inhibition and inappropriate detections. Following exposure, a soft reset occurred in 1/145 PM (0.7%) while 7/145 PMs (4.8%) reported battery issues. During the six-month follow-up, 1/145 PM (0.7%) reported a soft reset, while 12/145 more PMs (8.3%) and 1/64 ICD (1.5%) showed abnormal battery depletion. All reported issues occurred independently of exposure dose. Finally, irreversible effects on software and battery life occurred in only non-MRI-compatible devices. CONCLUSION ICDs mostly featured real-time transient sensing issues, while PMs mostly experienced long-term battery or software issues that were observed immediately following radiation exposure and during follow-up. Irreversible effects on battery life and software occurred in only non-MRI-compatible devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Daniela Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "G. D'Annunzio" University, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Stefano Andreoli
- Medical Physics Unit, ASST "Papa Giovanni XXIII", Bergamo, Italy
| | - Anna Delana
- Medical Physics Unit, "S. Chiara" Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Paolo De Filippo
- Electrophysiology Unit, ASST "Papa Giovanni XXIII", Bergamo, Italy
| | - Cristina Leidi
- Electrophysiology Unit, ASST "Papa Giovanni XXIII", Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Domenico Genovesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "G. D'Annunzio" University, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
92
|
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabés JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJ, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylén I, Tolosana JM. Grupo de trabajo sobre estimulación cardiaca y terapia de resincronización cardiaca de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología (ESC). Rev Esp Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
93
|
Malik N, Mukherjee M, Wu KC, Zimmerman SL, Zhan J, Calkins H, James CA, Gilotra NA, Sheikh FH, Tandri H, Kutty S, Hays AG. Multimodality Imaging in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 15:e013725. [PMID: 35147040 DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.121.013725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a rare, heritable myocardial disease associated with the development of ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death in early adulthood. Multimodality imaging is a central component in the diagnosis and evaluation of ARVC. Diagnostic criteria established by an international task force in 2010 include noninvasive parameters from echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. These criteria identify right ventricular structural abnormalities, chamber and outflow tract dilation, and reduced right ventricular function as features of ARVC. Echocardiography is a widely available and cost-effective technique, and it is often selected for initial evaluation. Beyond fulfillment of diagnostic criteria, features such as abnormal tricuspid annular plane excursion, increased right ventricular basal diameter, and abnormal strain patterns have been described. 3-dimensional echocardiography may also expand opportunities for structural and functional assessment of ARVC. Cardiac magnetic resonance has the ability to assess morphological and functional cardiac features of ARVC and is also a core modality in evaluation, however, tissue characterization of the right ventricle is limited by spatial resolution and low specificity for detection of pathological changes. Nonetheless, the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance to identify left ventricular involvement, offer high negative predictive value, and provide a reproducible structural evaluation of the right ventricle enhance the ability and scope of the modality. In this review, the prognostic significance of multimodality imaging is outlined, including the supplemental value of multidetector computed tomography and nuclear imaging. Strengths and weaknesses of imaging techniques, as well as future direction of multimodality assessment, are also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Malik
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (N.M., F.H.S.).,Georgetown University, Washington, DC (N.M., F.H.S.)
| | - Monica Mukherjee
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (M.M., K.C.W., H.C., C.A.J., N.A.G., H.T., A.G.H.)
| | - Katherine C Wu
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (M.M., K.C.W., H.C., C.A.J., N.A.G., H.T., A.G.H.)
| | - Stefan L Zimmerman
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Radiology, Baltimore, MD (S.L.Z.)
| | - Junzhen Zhan
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (J.Z., S.K.)
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (M.M., K.C.W., H.C., C.A.J., N.A.G., H.T., A.G.H.)
| | - Cynthia A James
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (M.M., K.C.W., H.C., C.A.J., N.A.G., H.T., A.G.H.)
| | - Nisha A Gilotra
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (M.M., K.C.W., H.C., C.A.J., N.A.G., H.T., A.G.H.)
| | - Farooq H Sheikh
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (N.M., F.H.S.).,Georgetown University, Washington, DC (N.M., F.H.S.)
| | - Harikrishna Tandri
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (M.M., K.C.W., H.C., C.A.J., N.A.G., H.T., A.G.H.)
| | - Shelby Kutty
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (J.Z., S.K.)
| | - Allison G Hays
- Johns Hopkins University Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Baltimore, MD (M.M., K.C.W., H.C., C.A.J., N.A.G., H.T., A.G.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Minaskeian N, Hajnal SP, Liu MB, Klooster LM, Devick KL, Schwartz L, Jokerst CE, Sorajja D, Scott LRP. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices with generator and lead(s) brand mismatch. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13520. [PMID: 35066975 PMCID: PMC8906220 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable imaging modality for the assessment of both cardiac and non‐cardiac structures. With a growing population of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), 50%–75% of these patients will need an MRI. MRI‐conditional CIEDs have demonstrated safety of MRI scanning with such devices, yet non‐conditional devices such as hybrid CIEDs which have generator and lead brand mismatch may pose a safety risk. In this retrospective study, we examined the outcomes of patients with hybrid CIEDs undergoing MRI compared to those patients with non‐hybrid CIEDs. A total of 349 patients were included, of which 24 patients (7%) had hybrid CIEDs. The primary endpoint was the safety of MRI for patients with hybrid CIEDs as compared to those with non‐hybrid devices, measured by the rate of adverse events, including death, lead or generator failure needing immediate replacement, loss of capture, new onset arrhythmia, or power‐on reset. Secondary endpoints consisted of pre‐ and post‐MRI changes of decreased P‐wave or R‐wave sensing by ≥50%, changes in pacing lead impedance by ≥50 ohms, increase in pacing thresholds by ≥ 0.5 V at 0.4 ms, and decreasing battery voltage of ≥ 0.04 V. The primary endpoint of any adverse reaction was present in 1 (4.2%) patient with a hybrid device, and consistent of atrial tachyarrhythmia, and in 10 (3.1%) patients with a non‐hybrid device, and consisted of self‐limited atrial and non‐sustained ventricular arrhythmias; this was not statistically significant. No significant differences were found in the secondary endpoints. This study demonstrates that MRI in patients with hybrid CIEDs does not result in increased patient risk or significant device changes when compared to those patients who underwent MRI with non‐hybrid CIEDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nareg Minaskeian
- Department of ElectrophysiologyMayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Sofia P Hajnal
- Department of ElectrophysiologyMayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Michael B Liu
- Department of ElectrophysiologyMayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | | | - Katrina L Devick
- Department of ElectrophysiologyMayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Linda Schwartz
- Department of ElectrophysiologyMayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | | | - Dan Sorajja
- Department of ElectrophysiologyMayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Luis RP Scott
- Department of ElectrophysiologyMayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenixArizonaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Okano N, Sakai M, Shibuya K, Tsuda K, Kanzaki T, Sano M, Kaneko Y, Ohno T. Safety verification of carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2022; 63:122-127. [PMID: 34747483 PMCID: PMC8776694 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
According to guidelines, carbon-ion beam therapy is considered to carry a high safety risk for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), although the actual impacts remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the safety of carbon-ion beam therapy in patients with CIEDs. Patients with CIEDs who underwent carbon-ion therapy at Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center between June 2010 and December 2019 were identified and investigated for abnormalities in the operation of their CIEDs, such as oversensing and resetting during irradiation, and abnormalities in operation after treatment. In addition, the risk of irradiation from carbon-ion beam therapy was evaluated by model simulations. Twenty patients (22 sites) with CIEDs were identified, 19 with pacemakers and one with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Treatments were completed without any problems, except for one case in which the treatment was discontinued because of worsening of the primary disease. Monte Carlo simulation indicated that the carbon beam irradiation produced neutrons at a constant and high level in the irradiation field. Nevertheless, with the distances between the CIEDs and the irradiation fields in the analyzed cases, the quantity of neutrons at the CIEDs was lower than that within the irradiation. Although carbon-ion beam therapy can be safely administered to patients with CIEDs, it is advisable to perform the therapy with sufficient preparation and backup devices because of the risks involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoko Okano
- Corresponding author. Naoko Okano, Gunma University, Heavy Ion Medical Center, 371-8511, 3-39-22 Showa-machi Maebashi, Gunma, Japan. Tel: (+81) 27-220-8383; Fax: (+81) 27-220-8384;
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
96
|
Pavon AG, Porretta AP, Arangalage D, Domenichini G, Rutz T, Hugelshofer S, Pruvot E, Monney P, Pascale P, Schwitter J. Feasibility of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in patients with MR-conditional transvenous permanent pacemakers and defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2022; 24:9. [PMID: 35022037 PMCID: PMC8756706 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00842-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of stress perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging remains limited in patients with implantable devices. The primary goal of the study was to assess the safety, image quality, and the diagnostic value of stress perfusion-CMR in patients with MR-conditional transvenous permanent pacemakers (PPM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). METHODS Consecutive patients with a transvenous PPM or ICD referred for adenosine stress-CMR were enrolled in this single-center longitudinal study. The CMR protocol was performed using a 1.5 T system according to current guidelines while all devices were put in MR-mode. Quality of cine, late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE), and stress perfusion sequences were assessed. An ischemia burden of ≥ 1.5 segments was considered significant. We assessed the safety, image quality and the occurrence of interference of the magnetic field with the implantable device. In case of ischemia, we also assessed the correlation with the presence of significant coronary lesions on coronary angiography. RESULTS Among 3743 perfusion-CMR examinations, 66 patients had implantable devices (1.7%). Image quality proved diagnostic in 98% of cases. No device damage or malfunction was reported immediately and at 1 year. Fifty patients were continuously paced during CMR. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure remained unchanged during adenosine stress, while diastolic blood pressure decreased (p = 0.007). Six patients (9%) had an ischemia-positive stress CMR and significant coronary stenoses were confirmed by coronary angiography in all cases. CONCLUSION Stress perfusion-CMR is safe, allows reliable ischemia detection, and provides good diagnostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Giulia Pavon
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Tesserete, 48, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Pia Porretta
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Dimitri Arangalage
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Cardiology Department, AP-HP, Bichat Hospital and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Giulia Domenichini
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Rutz
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Center of the CHUV (CRMC), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UniL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Hugelshofer
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Center of the CHUV (CRMC), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Etienne Pruvot
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UniL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Monney
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Center of the CHUV (CRMC), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UniL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Patrizio Pascale
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UniL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Juerg Schwitter
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Center of the CHUV (CRMC), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UniL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Vuorinen AM, Paakkanen R, Karvonen J, Sinisalo J, Holmström M, Kivistö S, Peltonen JI, Kaasalainen T. Magnetic resonance imaging safety in patients with abandoned or functioning epicardial pacing leads. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:3830-3838. [PMID: 34989847 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08469-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on cardiac pacing from 2021 allow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) but do not recommend MRI in patients with epicardial pacing leads. The clinical dilemma remains whether performing an MRI in patients with CIED and epicardial leads is safe. We aimed to evaluate the safety of performing an MRI in patients with CIED and abandoned or functioning epicardial pacing leads. METHODS We included all adult patients who underwent clinically indicated MRIs with CIED and functioning or abandoned epicardial leads in a single tertiary hospital between November 2011 and October 2019. The data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS Twenty-six MRIs were performed on 17 patients with functioning or abandoned epicardial pacing leads. Sixty-nine percent of the MRI scans (18/26) were conducted on patients with functioning epicardial pacing leads. A definite adverse event occurred in one MRI scan. This was a transient elevation of the pacing threshold in a patient with a functioning epicardial ventricular pacing lead implanted 29 years previously. An irreversible atrial pacing lead impedance elevation was detected 6 months after the MRI in another patient; the association with the previous MRI remained unclear. No adverse events were detected in MRIs performed on patients with modern (implanted in 2000 or later) functioning epicardial leads. CONCLUSIONS MRIs in patients with CIED and modern functioning epicardial pacing leads were performed without detectable adverse events. Further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm MRI safety in patients with epicardial pacing leads. KEY POINTS • Currently, MRI in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and functioning or abandoned epicardial pacing leads is not recommended. • MRIs in patients with CIED and modern functioning epicardial leads (implanted in 2000 or later) were performed without detectable adverse events in our patient cohort. • Allowing MRI in patients with epicardial pacing leads may significantly improve the diagnostic work-up, especially in specific patient groups, such as patients with congenital heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aino-Maija Vuorinen
- Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Riitta Paakkanen
- Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jarkko Karvonen
- Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juha Sinisalo
- Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Miia Holmström
- Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sari Kivistö
- Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juha I Peltonen
- Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Touko Kaasalainen
- Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 340, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabés JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylén I, Tolosana JM, Leyva F, Linde C, Abdelhamid M, Aboyans V, Arbelo E, Asteggiano R, Barón-Esquivias G, Bauersachs J, Biffi M, Birgersdotter-Green U, Bongiorni MG, Borger MA, Čelutkienė J, Cikes M, Daubert JC, Drossart I, Ellenbogen K, Elliott PM, Fabritz L, Falk V, Fauchier L, Fernández-Avilés F, Foldager D, Gadler F, De Vinuesa PGG, Gorenek B, Guerra JM, Hermann Haugaa K, Hendriks J, Kahan T, Katus HA, Konradi A, Koskinas KC, Law H, Lewis BS, Linker NJ, Løchen ML, Lumens J, Mascherbauer J, Mullens W, Nagy KV, Prescott E, Raatikainen P, Rakisheva A, Reichlin T, Ricci RP, Shlyakhto E, Sitges M, Sousa-Uva M, Sutton R, Suwalski P, Svendsen JH, Touyz RM, Van Gelder IC, Vernooy K, Waltenberger J, Whinnett Z, Witte KK. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace 2022; 24:71-164. [PMID: 34455427 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
99
|
Cehic D, Duong M, Eckert M, Corsini N, Sharplin G, Tran P. The Safety of Radiotherapy Treatment in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. Heart Lung Circ 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
100
|
Escande A, Frey P, Lacornerie T, Mervoyer E, Chargari C, Laurans M, Mornex F, Marijon É, Giraud P. Radiotherapy for patient with cardiac implantable electronic device, consensus from French radiation oncology society. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:404-410. [PMID: 34969621 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device such as pacemakers or defibrillators, is a clinical situation that is becoming increasingly common. There is a risk of interaction between the magnetic field induced by accelerators and the cardiac implantable electronic device, but also a risk of device dysfunction due to direct and/or indirect irradiation if the cardiac implantable electronic device is in the field of treatment. The risk can be dose-dependent, but it is most often independent of the total dose and occurs randomly in case of neutron production (stochastic effect). The presence of this type of device is therefore described as a contraindication for radiotherapy by the French national agency for the safety of medicines and health products (Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé, ANSM). Nevertheless, since radiotherapy is often possible, it is advisable to respect the recommendations of good practice, in particular the eligibility criteria, the monitoring modalities before, during and after irradiation according to the type of treatment, the dose and the characteristics of the cardiac implantable electronic device. It is sometimes necessary to discuss repositioning the device and/or modifying the treatment plan to minimize the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device dysfunction. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Escande
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France; Faculté de médecine Henri-Warembourg, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France; UMR 9189, Centre de recherche en informatique, signal et automatique de Lille (Cristal), 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
| | - P Frey
- Département de cardiologie, centre hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 74370 Épagny-Metz-Tessy, France
| | - T Lacornerie
- Département de physique médicale, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - E Mervoyer
- Département de cardiologie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - C Chargari
- Unité de curiethérapie, département de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - M Laurans
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Université de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - F Mornex
- Département de radiothérapie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - É Marijon
- Département de cardiologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - P Giraud
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Université de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|