51
|
Mahmood A, Bhuva N, Fokas E, Glynne-Jones R. Compliance to chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 106:102381. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
52
|
Sluckin TC, Couwenberg AM, Lambregts DM, Hazen SMJ, Horsthuis K, Meijnen P, Beets-Tan RG, Tanis PJ, Marijnen CA, Kusters M. Lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer: do we all think the same? A review of multidisciplinary obstacles and treatment recommendations. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:80-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
53
|
C-Reactive Protein as Predictive Biomarker for Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030491. [PMID: 35158759 PMCID: PMC8833484 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Most patients with locally advanced rectal cancer present resistance or a moderate response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), which is considered the standard of care. To select patients who could benefit from nCRT, while avoiding unnecessary treatment-induced toxicity and surgery-associated morbidity, it is urgent to find biomarkers of response to chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, the aim of our retrospective study was to assess the potential of classical blood analytes collected before chemoradiotherapy as biomarkers of response to treatment and prognostics in locally advanced rectal cancer. Our results identified C-reactive protein ≤3.5 as a strong independent predictor of response to treatment and an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, platelets were found to be independent predictors of DFS and OS and hemoglobin of DFS. These data might contribute to the personalization of rectal cancer treatment by guiding clinicians in decision-making regarding the best treatment strategy for each patient. Abstract The standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery, but complete response rates are reduced. To find predictive biomarkers of response to therapy, we conducted a retrospective study evaluating blood biomarkers before nCRT. Hemoglobin (Hg), C-reactive protein (CRP), platelets, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19.9 levels, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were obtained from 171 rectal cancer patients before nCRT. Patients were classified as responders (Ryan 0–1; ycT0N0), 59.6% (n = 102), or nonresponders (Ryan 2–3), 40.3% (n = 69), in accordance with the Ryan classification. A logistic regression using prognostic pretreatment factors identified CRP ≤ 3.5 (OR = 0.05; 95%CI: 0.01–0.21) as a strong independent predictor of response to treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that CRP was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 5.48; 95%CI: 1.54–19.48) and overall survival (HR = 6.10; 95%CI 1.27–29.33) in patients treated with nCRT. Platelets were an independent predictor of DFS (HR = 3.068; 95%CI: 1.29–7.30) and OS (HR= 4.65; 95%CI: 1.66–13.05) and Hg was revealed to be an independent predictor of DFS (HR = 0.37; 95%CI: 0.15–0.90) in rectal cancer patients treated with nCRT. The lower expression of CRP is independently associated with an improved response to nCRT, DFS, and OS.
Collapse
|
54
|
Bananzadeh A, Hafezi AA, Nguyen N, Omidvari S, Mosalaei A, Ahmadloo N, Ansari M, Mohammadianpanah M. Efficacy and safety of sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy and short-course radiation therapy followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-arm phase II clinical trial with subgroup analysis between the older and young patients. Radiat Oncol J 2022; 39:270-278. [PMID: 34986548 PMCID: PMC8743455 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2021.00654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) and sequential chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery in locally advancer rectal cancer with subgroup analysis between the older and young patients. Materials and Methods In this single-arm phase II clinical trial, eligible patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3–4 and/or N1–2) were enrolled. All the patients received a median three sequential cycles of neoadjuvant CAPEOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) chemotherapy. A total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions during 1 week was prescribed to the gross tumor and regional lymph nodes. Surgery was performed about 8 weeks following radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and grade 3–4 toxicity were compared between older patients (≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years). Results Ninety-six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. There were 32 older patients and 64 younger patients. Overall pCR was 20.8% for all the patients. Older patients achieved similar pCR rate (18.7% vs. 21.8; p = 0.795) compared to younger patients. There was no statistically significance in terms of the tumor and the node downstaging or treatment-related toxicity between older patients and younger ones; however, the rate of sphincter-saving surgery was significantly more frequent in younger patients (73% vs. 53%; p=0.047) compared to older ones. All treatment-related toxicities were manageable and tolerable among older patients. Conclusion Neoadjuvant SCRT and sequential chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery was safe and effective in older patients compared to young patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alimohammad Bananzadeh
- Colorectal Research Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ali Akbar Hafezi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - NamPhong Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Shapour Omidvari
- Breast Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ahmad Mosalaei
- Breast Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Niloofar Ahmadloo
- Breast Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mansour Ansari
- Breast Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
- Colorectal Research Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Kachnic LA, Winter K, Myerson RJ, Goodyear MD, Abitbol AA, Streeter OE, Augspurger ME, Schefter TE, Katz AW, Fisher BJ, Henke LE, Narayan S, Crane CH. Long-Term Outcomes of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0529: A Phase 2 Evaluation of Dose-Painted Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and Mitomycin-C for the Reduction of Acute Morbidity in Anal Canal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:146-157. [PMID: 34400269 PMCID: PMC8688291 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A multi-institutional phase 2 trial assessed long-term outcomes of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) for anal canal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS T2-4N0-3M0 anal cancers received 5FU (1000 mg/m2/d, 96-hour infusion) and MMC (10 mg/m2 bolus) on days 1 and 29 of dose-painted IMRT prescribed as follows: T2N0 = 42 Gy elective nodal and 50.4 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes, 28 fractions; T3-4N0-3 = 45Gy elective nodal, 50.4 Gy ≤3 cm and 54 Gy >3cm metastatic nodal and 54 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes, 30 fractions. Local-regional failures, distant metastases, and colostomy failures were assessed using the cumulative incidence method, and disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Late effects were scored using National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3. RESULTS Of 52 patients, 54% were stage II, 25% were stage IIIA, and 21% were stage IIIB. Median follow-up was 7.9 years (min-max, 0.02-9.2 years). Local-regional failure, colostomy failures, distant metastases, overall survival, disease-free survival, and colostomy-free survival at 5 years are 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%-27%), 10% (95% CI, 4%-20%), 16% (95% CI, 7%-27%), 76% (95% CI, 61%-86%), 70% (95% CI, 56%-81%), and 74% (95% CI, 59%-84%); and at 8 years they are 16% (95% CI, 7%-27%), 12% (95% CI, 5%-23%), 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%), 68% (95% CI, 53%-79%), 62% (95% CI, 47%-74%) and 66% (95% CI, 51%-77%), respectively. Eight patients experienced local-regional failure, with 5 patients having persistent disease at 12 weeks. No isolated nodal failures occurred in the microscopic elective nodal volumes. Six patients required colostomy-5 for local-regional salvage and 1 for a temporary ostomy for anorectal dysfunction. Rates of late adverse events included: 28 patients (55%) with grade 2, 8 patients (16%) with grade 3, 0 patients with grade 4, and 2 patients (4%) with grade 5 events (sinus bradycardia and myelodysplasia, possibly owing to chemotherapy). Only 11 patients reported grade 1 to 3 sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS Dose-painted IMRT with 5FU/MMC for the treatment of anal canal cancer yields comparable long-term efficacy as conventional radiation cohorts. Enhanced normal tissue protection lowered rates of grade 3 and higher late effects without compromising pelvic tumor control.
Collapse
|
56
|
Peiffert D, Huguet F, Vendrely V, Moureau-Zabotto L, Rivin Del Campo E, Créhange G, Dietmann AS, Moignier A. Radiotherapy of anal canal cancer. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:279-285. [PMID: 34955416 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on external radiotherapy and brachytherapy of anal canal carcinoma. The following guidelines are presented: indications, treatment procedure, as well as dose and dose-constraints objectives, immediate postoperative management, post-treatment evaluation, and long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Peiffert
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis-Vautrin, avenue de Bourgogne, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - F Huguet
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, avenue de Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France; Inserm U1035, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - L Moureau-Zabotto
- Service de radiothérapie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13000 Marseille, France
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - G Créhange
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - A-S Dietmann
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis-Vautrin, avenue de Bourgogne, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - A Moignier
- Service de physique médicale, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest centre René-Gauducheau, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Vendrely V, Rivin Del Campo E, Modesto A, Jolnerowski M, Meillan N, Chiavassa S, Serre AA, Gérard JP, Créhanges G, Huguet F, Lemanski C, Peiffert D. Rectal cancer radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:272-278. [PMID: 34953708 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
We present the updated recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for rectal cancer radiotherapy. The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer consists in chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal resection and adjuvant chemotherapy according to nodal status. Although this strategy efficiently reduced local recurrences rates below 5% in expert centres, functional sequelae could not be avoided resulting in 20 to 30% morbidity rates. The early introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has proven beneficial in recent trials, in terms of recurrence free and metastasis free survivals. Complete pathological responses were obtained in 15% of tumours treated by chemoradiation, even reaching up to 30% of tumours when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated to chemoradiotherapy. These good results question the relevance of systematic radical surgery in good responders. Personalized therapeutic strategies are now possible by improved imaging modalities with circumferential margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, by intensity modulated radiotherapy and by refining surgical techniques, and contribute to morbidity reduction. Keeping the same objectives, ongoing trials are now evaluating therapeutic de-escalation strategies, in particular rectal preservation for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment, or radiotherapy omission in selected cases (Greccar 12, Opera, Norad).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, avenue de Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France; Inserm U1035, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - A Modesto
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Claudius-Regaud, université de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - M Jolnerowski
- Service universitaire de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - N Meillan
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - S Chiavassa
- Service de physique médicale, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) centre René-Gauducheau, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - A-A Serre
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - J-P Gérard
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - G Créhanges
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - C Lemanski
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, Institut du cancer de Montpellier, université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - D Peiffert
- Service universitaire de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 54000 Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Wu Y, Kang K, Han C, Wang S, Chen Q, Chen Y, Zhang F, Liu Z. A blind randomized validated convolutional neural network for auto-segmentation of clinical target volume in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Cancer Med 2021; 11:166-175. [PMID: 34811957 PMCID: PMC8704175 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Delineation of clinical target volume (CTV) for radiotherapy is a time‐consuming and labor‐intensive work. This study aims to propose a novel convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based model for fast auto‐segmentation of CTV. To evaluate its performance and clinical utility, a blind randomized validation method was used. Methods Our proposed model was based on the generally accepted U‐Net architecture using computed tomography slices with CTV contours delineated by experienced radiation clinicians from 135 rectal patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (95HD) were used to measure segmentation performance. The validated dataset of additional 20 patients for clinical evaluation by 10 experienced oncology clinicians from 7 centers was randomly and blindly divided into two groups for clinicians' scoring and Turing test, respectively. Second evaluation was performed with different randomization after 2 weeks. Results The mean DSC and 95HD values of the proposed model were 0.90 ± 0.02 and 8.11 ± 1.93 mm for CTV of rectal cancer patients, respectively. The average time for automatic segmentation in the validation groups was 15 s per patient. By clinicians' scoring, the AI model performed better than manually delineating, though the differences were not significant (Week 0: 2.59 vs. 2.52, p = 0.086; Week 2: 2.55 vs. 2.47, p = 0.115). Additionally, the mean positive rates in the Turing test were 40.5% in Week 0 and 45.2% in Week 2, which demonstrated the great intelligence of our model. Conclusions Our proposed model can be used clinically for assisting contouring of CTVs in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy, which improves the efficiency and consistency of radiation clinicians' work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chang Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | | | - Qi Chen
- MedMind Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Yu Chen
- MedMind Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhikai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Sia J, Mou W, Agas RA, Xie J, Burns M, Varghayee N, Chu J, Heriot A, Leong T, Ngan SY. Long-term Patterns of Failure and the Value of Blood Prognostic Markers in Anal Cancers Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 21:e102-e112. [PMID: 34799240 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To analyze the long-term outcomes and prognostic value of hematological parameters in anal cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS Hospital records of consecutive patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma who received curative-intent IMRT according to a standardized contouring protocol between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Coverage of locoregional recurrences by the initial IMRT volumes were assessed. The prognostic value of pretreatment blood counts for PFS and OS were determined using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 166 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 3.3 years. Forty-six percent and 54% of patients had Stage I-II and IIIA-B cancers, respectively. The 5-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS were 81%, 89%, 65% and 76% respectively. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 5% of patients. Of all patients who relapsed, 70% had only locoregional recurrence as first site of failure. Ninety percent of locoregional recurrences were in-field. Hemoglobin, neutrophil and platelet counts were associated with PFS on univariable analysis, but only cancer stage and p16 status remained prognostic on multivariable analysis. Patients with more advanced cancer stages also had higher baseline neutrophil counts. Performance status and neutrophil counts were prognostic for OS on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION This study affirms the long-term efficacy and safety of IMRT. Treatment resistance, rather than radiation geographic miss, is a major issue underpinning locoregional recurrences. Pretreatment blood counts were not validated to be independently prognostic for disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Sia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Wei Mou
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Ryan Anthony Agas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jing Xie
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Burns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nahal Varghayee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julie Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Trevor Leong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Samuel Y Ngan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir PeterMacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Is elective inguinal or external iliac irradiation during neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy necessary for locally advanced lower rectal cancer with anal sphincter invasion? Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:125-134. [PMID: 34670136 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of excluding irradiation of inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) and external iliac lymph nodes (ELNs) during neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in a locally advanced lower rectal cancer (LALRC) with anal sphincter invasion. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 214 LALRC patients with anal sphincter invasion according to pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging who underwent neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy followed by surgery between September 2010 and May 2019 were enrolled. ILNs and ELNs were clinically negative pre-treatment and were excluded from irradiation. Failure rates and patterns of ILNs and ELNs and survival were analyzed. Nomograms for predicting ILN and ELN failure risk were also constructed. RESULTS The median follow-up was 53.3 months. The three-year failure rates were 3.7% for ILNs and 3.3% for ELNs. Only one patient developed isolated ILN failure, and no patient experienced isolated ELN failure. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that lower edge of tumors invaded or located below the dentate line (odds ratio [OR] 7.513, P = 0.013), high histological grade (OR 6.892, P = 0.017), and perineural invasion (OR 7.111, P = 0.023) were significantly related to ILN failure. Both perineural invasion (OR 8.923, P = 0.011) and high histological grade (OR 8.129, P = 0.011) showed a strong correlation with ELN failure. The concordance index of nomograms for predicting ILN and ELN failure risk were 0.842 and 0.880, respectively. The three-year local recurrence free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3%‒97.9%), 77.7% (95% CI, 71.8%‒83.6%), and 91.9% (95% CI, 87.8%‒96.0%), respectively, for the whole cohort. CONCLUSIONS Excluding ILNs and ELNs from irradiation was associated with an acceptably low failure risk for LALRC invading the anal sphincter. These findings help to refine existing guidelines for clinical target volume delineation of ILNs and ELNs during neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in rectal cancer.
Collapse
|
61
|
Optimization of Field Design in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer with Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy: How Many Fields Are Needed to Account for Rectal Distension Uncertainty? Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100749. [PMID: 34646968 PMCID: PMC8498733 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Preoperative chemoradiation represents the standard of care in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Robustness is often compromised in the setting of proton beam therapy owing to the sensitivity of proton particles to tissue heterogeneity, such as with intestinal gas. The ideal beam arrangement to mitigate the anatomic uncertainty caused by intestinal gas is not well defined. Methods and Materials We developed pencil beam scanning plans using (1) 1-beam posteroanterior (PA) plans, (2) 2-beam with right and left posterior oblique (RPO and LPO) plans, (3) 3-beam with PA and opposed lateral plans, and (4) 5-beam with PA, RPO, LPO, and opposed lateral plans. We created 12 plans with robustness optimization and ran a total of 60 plan evaluations for varying degrees of intestinal gas distension to evaluate which plans would maintain clinical goals to the greatest degree. Results A single PA beam resulted in considerable loss of target coverage to the clinical target volume prescribed 50 Gy (volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose [V100%] < 90%) with rectal distension ≥3 cm in diameter in the short axis. In contrast, the other field designs maintained coverage with up to 5 cm of distension. On plans generated based on a 5-cm distended rectum with air medium, the 1-beam, 3-beam, and 5-beam arrangements resulted in loss of target coverage (V100% < 90%) with rectal contraction ≤3 cm, whereas the 2-beam arrangement maintained coverage to as low as 2 cm. On plans generated based on a 3-cm distension of the rectum, both the 2-beam and 3-beam arrangements maintained V100% > 90% even with collapsed rectum to as low as 1 cm, simulating a patient treatment scenario without any rectal gas. Conclusions A single PA beam should be avoided when using proton beam therapy for rectal cancer. RPO/LPO and PA/opposed lateral arrangements may both be considered; RPO/LPO is favored to reduce integral dose and avoid beams traversing the hips. In patients for whom the plan CT has rectal distension of ≥3 cm, resimulation or strategies to reduce intestinal gas should be strongly considered.
Collapse
|
62
|
Nilsson MP, Gunnlaugsson A, Johnsson A, Scherman J. Dosimetric and Clinical Predictors for Acute and Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity Following Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Anal Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:e35-e44. [PMID: 34598844 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To analyse dosimetric and clinical predictors for acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity following chemoradiotherapy of anal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with locally advanced (T2 ≥4 cm - T4 or N+) anal cancer were selected from an institutional database (n = 114). All received intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Gastrointestinal toxicity was retrospectively graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and bowel cavity, small bowel and large bowel were contoured. Dosimetric and clinical variables were tested for associations with acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity and late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity using the Mann-Whitney test, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and logistic regression. RESULTS The median follow-up was 40 months. Acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 51 (44.7%) of the patients; late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 36 of the patients (39.6% of 91 patients with >1 year recurrence-free follow-up). Bowel cavity V30Gy was the best dosimetric predictor for acute gastrointestinal toxicity (AUC 0.633; P = 0.02). Large bowel V20Gy was the best dosimetric predictor for late gastrointestinal toxicity (AUC 0.698; P = 0.001) but showed no association with acute gastrointestinal toxicity. In multivariate logistic regression, increasing age was significantly associated with acute gastrointestinal toxicity; smoking and large bowel V20Gy were significantly associated with late gastrointestinal toxicity. Patients who experienced acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity were not at an increased risk of late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity (odds ratio 1.3; P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS Factors of importance for acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity were not the same. Bowel cavity V30Gy is a good metric to use for the prediction of acute gastrointestinal toxicity, but the results of our study indicate that individual large and small bowel loops need to be contoured for better prediction of late gastrointestinal toxicity. The role of the large bowel as an important organ at risk for late gastrointestinal toxicity merits further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - A Gunnlaugsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Scherman
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Guren MG, Sebag-Montefiore D, Franco P, Johnsson A, Segelov E, Deutsch E, Rao S, Spindler KLG, Arnold D. Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus, Unresolved Areas and Future Perspectives for Research: Perspectives of Research Needs in Anal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:279-287. [PMID: 34645589 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Anal cancer is a relatively rare, mostly HPV-related cancer. The curative treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation delivered with modern radiotherapy techniques. The prognosis for most patients with early localized disease is very favourable; however patients with locally advanced disease and/or HPV negative tumours are at higher risk of locoregional and distant treatment failure. Tailored approaches are presently being investigated to determine the most suitable regimen in terms of radiotherapy dose prescription, target volume selection, normal tissue avoidance, and combination therapy. Metastatic anal cancer is treated with chemotherapy aiming at prolonged survival. The role of immune therapy in the clinical setting is being investigated. There is little knowledge on the biology of anal cancer, and an urgent need for more clinical and translational research dedicated to this disease. In this article, the evidence-base for the current treatment is briefly reviewed, and perspectives on future research needs are high-lighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, AOU ''Maggiore della Carità,'' Novara, Italy
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Segelov
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia and Department of Oncology, Monash Health Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Sheela Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Jang H, Park J, Artz M, Zhang Y, Ricci JC, Huh S, Johnson PB, Kim MH, Chun M, Oh YT, Noh OK, Park HJ. Effective Organs-at-Risk Dose Sparing in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using a Half-Beam Technique in Whole Pelvic Irradiation. Front Oncol 2021; 11:611469. [PMID: 34490075 PMCID: PMC8416480 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.611469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although there are some controversies regarding whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) due to its gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities, it is considered for patients with gynecological, rectal, and prostate cancer. To effectively spare organs-at-risk (OAR) doses using multi-leaf collimator (MLC)’s optimal segments, potential dosimetric benefits in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using a half-beam technique (HF) were investigated for WPRT. Methods While the size of a fully opened field (FF) was decided to entirely include a planning target volume in all beam’s eye view across arc angles, the HF was designed to use half the FF from the isocenter for dose optimization. The left or the right half of the FF was alternatively opened in VMAT-HF using a pair of arcs rotating clockwise and counterclockwise. Dosimetric benefits of VMAT-HF, presented with dose conformity, homogeneity, and dose–volume parameters in terms of modulation complex score, were compared to VMAT optimized using the FF (VMAT-FF). Consequent normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) by reducing the irradiated volumes was evaluated as well as dose–volume parameters with statistical analysis for OAR. Moreover, beam-on time and MLC position precision were analyzed with log files to assess plan deliverability and clinical applicability of VMAT-HF as compared to VMAT-FF. Results While VMAT-HF used 60%–70% less intensity modulation complexity than VMAT-FF, it showed superior dose conformity. The small intestine and colon in VMAT-HF showed a noticeable reduction in the irradiated volumes of up to 35% and 15%, respectively, at an intermediate dose of 20–45 Gy. The small intestine showed statistically significant dose sparing at the volumes that received a dose from 15 to 45 Gy. Such a dose reduction for the small intestine and colon in VMAT-HF presented a significant NTCP reduction from that in VMAT-FF. Without sacrificing the beam delivery efficiency, VMAT-HF achieved effective OAR dose reduction in dose–volume histograms. Conclusions VMAT-HF led to deliver conformal doses with effective gastrointestinal-OAR dose sparing despite using less modulation complexity. The dose of VMAT-HF was delivered with the same beam-on time with VMAT-FF but precise MLC leaf motions. The VMAT-HF potentially can play a valuable role in reducing OAR toxicities associated with WPRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunsoo Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, South Korea
| | - Jiyeon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Mark Artz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Yawei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Jacob C Ricci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Soon Huh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Perry B Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Mi-Hwa Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Mison Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Young-Taek Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - O Kyu Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Hae-Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Rao S, Guren MG, Khan K, Brown G, Renehan AG, Steigen SE, Deutsch E, Martinelli E, Arnold D. Anal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up ☆. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1087-1100. [PMID: 34175386 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Khan
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Brown
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A G Renehan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S E Steigen
- University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - E Deutsch
- INSERM 1030, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - E Martinelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - D Arnold
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Care Medicine and Rheumatology, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Nilsson MP, Johnsson A, Scherman J. Sarcopenia and dosimetric parameters in relation to treatment-related leukopenia and survival in anal cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:152. [PMID: 34399812 PMCID: PMC8365937 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01876-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment-related white blood cell (WBC) toxicity has been associated with an inferior prognosis in different malignancies, including anal cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate predictors of WBC grade ≥ 3 (G3+) toxicity during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of anal cancer. Methods Consecutive patients with locally advanced (T2 ≥ 4 cm—T4 or N+) anal cancer scheduled for two cycles of concomitant 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C chemotherapy were selected from an institutional database (n = 106). All received intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; mean dose primary tumor 59.5 Gy; mean dose elective lymph nodes 45.1 Gy). Clinical data were extracted from medical records. The highest-grade WBC toxicity was recorded according to CTCAE version 5.0. Pelvic bone marrow (PBM) was retrospectively contoured and dose-volume histograms were generated. The planning CT was used to measure sarcopenia. Dosimetric, anthropometric, and clinical variables were tested for associations with WBC G3+ toxicity using the Mann–Whitney test and logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess predictors for overall survival (OS) and anal cancer specific survival (ACSS). Results WBC G3+ was seen in 50.9% of the patients, and 38.7% were sarcopenic. None of the dosimetric parameters showed an association with WBC G3+ toxicity. The most significant predictor of WBC G3+ toxicity was sarcopenia (adjusted OR 4.0; P = 0.002). Sarcopenia was also associated with an inferior OS (adjusted HR 3.9; P = 0.01), but not ACSS (P = 0.07). Sensitivity analysis did not suggest that the inferior prognosis for sarcopenic patients was a consequence of reduced doses of chemotherapy or a prolonged radiation treatment time. Patients who experienced WBC G3+ toxicity had an inferior OS and ACSS, even after adjustment for sarcopenia. Conclusions Sarcopenia was associated with increased risks of both WBC G3+ toxicity and death following CRT for locally advanced anal cancer. In this study, radiation dose to PBM was not associated with WBC G3+ toxicity. However, PBM was not used as an organ at risk for radiotherapy planning purposes and doses to PBM were high, which may have obscured any dose–response relationships. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01876-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lasarettsgatan 23, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lasarettsgatan 23, 221 85, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jonas Scherman
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Piazzese C, Evans E, Thomas B, Staffurth J, Gwynne S, Spezi E. FIELD RT: an open-source platform for the assessment of target volume delineation in radiation therapy. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210356. [PMID: 34289317 PMCID: PMC9328049 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Target volume delineation (TVD) has been identified as a weakness in the accuracy of radiotherapy, both within and outside of clinical trials due to the intra/interobserver variations affecting the TVD quality. Sources of variations such as poor compliance or protocol violation may have adverse effect on treatment outcomes. In this paper, we present and describe the FIELDRT software developed for the ARENA project to improve the quality of TVD through qualitative and quantitative feedbacks and individual and personalized summary of trainee”s performance. Methods: For each site-specific clinical case included in the FIELDRT software, reference volumes, minimum and maximum “acceptable” volumes and organ at risk were derived by outlines of consultants and senior trainees. The software components currently developed include: (a) user-friendly importing interface (b) analysis toolbox to compute quantitative and qualitative (c) visualiser and (d) structured report generator for personalised feedback. The FIELDRT software was validated by comparing the performance of 63 trainees and by measuring performance over time. In addition, a trainee evaluation day was held in 2019 to collect feedback on FIELDRT. Results: Results show the trainees’ improvement when reoutlining a case after reviewing the feedback generated from the FIELDRT software. Comments and feedback received after evaluation day were positive and confirmed that FIELDRT can be a useful application for training purposes. Conclusion: We presented a new open-source software to support education in TVD and ongoing continuous professional development for clinical oncology trainees and consultants. ARENA in combination with FIELDRT implements site-specific modules with reference target and organs at risk volumes and automatically evaluates individual performance using several quantitative and qualitative feedbacks. Pilot results suggests this software could be used as an education tool to reduce variation in TVD so to guarantee high quality in radiotherapy. Advances in knowledge: FIELDRT is a new easy and free to use software aiming at supporting education in TVD and ongoing continuous professional development. The software provides quantitative/qualitative feedback and an exportable report with an individual and personalised summary of trainee’s performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concetta Piazzese
- University of Huddersfield, School of Computing & Engineering, Huddersfield, UK.,Cardiff University, School of Engineering, Cardiff, UK.,Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Elin Evans
- Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Betsan Thomas
- Clinical Oncology, South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Sarah Gwynne
- Clinical Oncology, South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK
| | - Emiliano Spezi
- Cardiff University, School of Engineering, Cardiff, UK.,Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
70
|
Di Carlo C, di Benedetto M, Vicenzi L, Costantini S, Cucciarelli F, Fenu F, Arena E, Mariucci C, Montisci M, Panni V, Patani F, Valenti M, Palucci A, Burroni L, Mantello G. FDG-PET/CT in the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning of Locally Advanced Anal Cancer: A Monoinstitutional Experience. Front Oncol 2021; 11:655322. [PMID: 34277406 PMCID: PMC8281886 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.655322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin-C based chemotherapy has been established as definitive standard therapy approach for anal cancer. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) leads to a precise treatment of the tumor, allowing dose escalation on Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), with a surrounding healthy tissues sparing. Our study assessed the impact of 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) on the radiotherapy contouring process and its contribution to lymphatic spread detection, resulting to a personalization of Clinical Target Volume (CTV) and dose prescription. Methods Thirty-seven patients, with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) were analyzed. All patients were evaluated with history and physical examination, trans-anal endoscopic ultrasound, pelvis magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis and planning 18FDG-PET/CT. The GTV and CTV were drawn on CT, MRI and 18FDG-PET/CT fused images. Results Thirty-four (91%) out of 37 patients presented lymph nodes involvement, in one or more areas, detected on 18FDG-PET/CT and/or MRI. The 18FDG-PET/CT showed positive lymph nodes not detected on MRI imaging (PET+, MRI−) in 14/37 patients (38%). In 14 cases, 18FDG-PET/CT allowed to a dose escalation in the involved nodes. The 18FDG-PET/CT fused images led to change the stage in 5/37(14%) cases: four cases from N0 to N1 (inguinal lymph nodes) and in one case from M0 to M1 (common iliac lymph nodes). Conclusions The 18FDG-PET/CT has a potentially relevant impact in staging and target volume delineation/definition in patients affected by anal cancer. In our experience, clinical stage variation occurred in 14% of cases. More investigations are needed to define the role of 18FDG-PET/CT in the target volume delineation of anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clelia Di Carlo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maika di Benedetto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lisa Vicenzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Sara Costantini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesca Cucciarelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Fenu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Eleonora Arena
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cristina Mariucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maria Montisci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Valeria Panni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Fabiola Patani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marco Valenti
- Department of Medical Physics, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Palucci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luca Burroni
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mantello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I°, GM Lancisi, G Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Zhang YZ, Song M, Geng JH, Zhu XG, Li S, Li YH, Cai Y, Wang WH. Patterns of failure and implications for clinical target volume definition of locally advanced T4b rectal cancer identified with magnetic resonance imaging and treated using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:132-139. [PMID: 34126137 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Elective irradiation of the external iliac lymph nodes (EIN) has always been advocated for T4b rectal cancer with anterior organ invasion without convincing evidence. This study aimed to explore the patterns of treatment failure for locally advanced T4b rectal cancer treated using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and surgery. This information may help to clarify whether the current definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) is still appropriate. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 126 patients with locally advanced T4b rectal cancer who received NCRT, without elective EIN irradiation, followed by surgery between January 2010 and October 2018. Pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging was used to identify the T4b disease in all cases. The locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate and EIN failure rate were evaluated, and the LRR locations were identified using a three-dimensional model. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 53.9 months, LRR occurred in 11.1% of patients (14/126). All LRRs were located in the previously irradiated fields and below the S2-S3 junction. The EIN failure rate was 0.8% (1/126) among all patients and 1.8% (1/56) in the group with anterior genitourinary organ invasion. The estimated 4-year distant relapse-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival were 79.3%, 73.2% and 86.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS It may be feasible to exclude the external iliac region from the CTV during NCRT for locally advanced T4b rectal cancer. However, further studies are needed to clarify whether the cranial border of the CTV can be lowered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang-Zi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, PR China
| | - Maxiaowei Song
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, PR China
| | - Jian-Hao Geng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, PR China
| | - Xiang-Gao Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, PR China
| | - Shuai Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, PR China
| | - Yong-Heng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, PR China
| | - Yong Cai
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, PR China.
| | - Wei-Hu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Pooni A, Schmocker S, Brown C, MacLean A, Hochman D, Williams L, Baxter N, Simunovic M, Liberman S, Drolet S, Neumann K, Jhaveri K, Kirsch R, Kennedy ED. Quality indicator selection for the Canadian Partnership against Cancer rectal cancer project: A modified Delphi study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1393-1403. [PMID: 33626193 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM It is well established that (i) magnetic resonance imaging, (ii) multidisciplinary cancer conference (MCCs), (iii) preoperative radiotherapy, (iv) total mesorectal excision surgery and (v) pathological assessment as described by Quirke are key processes necessary for high quality, rectal cancer care. The objective was to select a set of multidisciplinary quality indicators to measure the uptake of these clinical processes in clinical practice. METHOD A multidisciplinary panel was convened and a modified two-phase Delphi method was used to select a set of quality indicators. Phase 1 included a literature review with written feedback from the panel. Phase 2 included an in-person workshop with anonymous voting. The selection criteria for the indicators were strength of evidence, ease of capture and usability. Indicators for which ≥90% of the panel members voted 'to keep' were selected as the final set of indicators. RESULTS During phase 1, 68 potential indicators were generated from the literature and an additional four indicators were recommended by the panel. During phase 2, these 72 indicators were discussed; 48 indicators met the 90% inclusion threshold and included eight pathology, five radiology, 11 surgical, six radiation oncology and 18 MCC indicators. CONCLUSION A modified Delphi method was used to select 48 multidisciplinary quality indicators to specifically measure the uptake of key processes necessary for high quality care of patients with rectal cancer. These quality indicators will be used in future work to identify and address gaps in care in the uptake of these clinical processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amandeep Pooni
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Selina Schmocker
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carl Brown
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Paul's Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anthony MacLean
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - David Hochman
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Lara Williams
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy Baxter
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marko Simunovic
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sender Liberman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sébastien Drolet
- Department of Surgery, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Katerina Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Kartik Jhaveri
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Kirsch
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erin D Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Bacci M, Quero L, Barbier E, Parrot L, Juguet F, Pommier P, Bazire L, Etienney I, Baba-Hamed N, Spindler L, François E, Ronchin P, Campo ERD, Lemanski C, Lièvre A, Siproudhis L, Abramowitz L, Lepage C, Vendrely V. What is the optimal treatment for T1N0 anal squamous cell carcinoma? Analysis of current practices in the prospective French FFCD ANABASE cohort. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:776-784. [PMID: 33867291 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION for localized T1N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) standard radiotherapy (RT) may result in overtreatment and alternative strategies are debated. METHODS T1N0M0 SCCA treated between 2015 and 2020 by local excision (LE) or RT were analyzed from the French prospective FFCD ANABASE cohort. Treatment strategies, recurrence-free and colostomy-free survivals (RFS, CFS) and prognostic factors were reported. RESULTS among 1135 SCCA patients, 99 T1N0M0 were treated by LE(n = 17,17.2%), or RT (n = 82,82.8%) including RT alone (n = 65,79.2%) or chemo-RT (n = 17, 20.7%). Median follow-up was 27.2 months [0.03-54.44]. Median tumor size were 11.4 mm [0.9-20] and 15.3 mm [2-20] in the LE and RT groups respectively. Mean RT tumor dose was 59.4 Gy [18-69.4 Gy]. One patient in LE group and 9 in RT group had a pelvic recurrence, either local (60%), nodal (10%) or both (30%). RFS and CFS at 24 months were 92.2%[95%CI,83.4-96.4] and 94.6%[95%CI,86.1-98.0], at 36 months 88.1%[95%CI,77.1-94.2] and 88.5%[95%CI,77.0-94.5], in LE and RT group respectively, without any significative difference (HR = 0.57;[95%CI,0.07-4.45];p = 0.60). By univariate analysis, male gender was the only prognostic factor(HR = 5.57;95%CI, 1.76-17.63; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION this cohort confirms the heterogeneity of T1N0M0 SCCA management, questioning the place of RT alone, reduced dose or RT volume, and the safety of LE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Bacci
- Radiation Oncology Department, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Pessac 33600, France
| | - Laurent Quero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 75010, France
| | - Emilie Barbier
- Biostatistics, FFCD, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon 21078, France
| | - Laurène Parrot
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 75010, France
| | - Frédéric Juguet
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Tivoli Ducos Clinic, Bordeaux 33 000, France
| | - Pascal Pommier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon 69008, France
| | - Louis Bazire
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Etienney
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Diaconesses Hospital, Croix Saint Simon, Paris 75012, France
| | - Nabil Baba-Hamed
- Medical Oncology Department, Saint-Joseph Hospital group, Paris 75674, France
| | - Lucas Spindler
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Saint-Joseph Hospital group, Paris 75674, France
| | - Eric François
- Medical Oncology Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice 06189, France
| | - Philippe Ronchin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Azuréen Center, Mougins 06250, France
| | - Eleonor Rivin Del Campo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris 75020, France
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Radiation Oncology Department, Regional Cancer Institute, Montpellier 34070, France
| | - Astrid Lièvre
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Pontchaillou Hospital, CHU Rennes, Rennes 35000, France
| | - Laurent Siproudhis
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Pontchaillou Hospital, CHU Rennes, Rennes 35000, France
| | - Laurent Abramowitz
- Proctology and digestive diseases Department, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 75010, France; Ramsay GDS, clinique Blomet, Paris 75000, France
| | - Côme Lepage
- Departement of hepato-gastroenterology, François Mitterrand Hospital, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon 21078, France
| | - Véronique Vendrely
- Radiation Oncology Department, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Pessac 33600, France; INSERM Unit 1035, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux 33000, France.
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
McDonald J, Chuang CY, Hicks JK, Berry DK, Imanirad I, Rishi A, Frakes JM, Hoffe SE, Felder S. FANCD2 Mutation in a Patient With Early Rectal Cancer Receiving Definitive Chemoradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100717. [PMID: 34258475 PMCID: PMC8260782 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Seth Felder
- Surgical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Possiel J, Ammon HE, Guhlich M, Conradi LC, Ghadimi M, Wolff HA, Schirmer MA, Samel S, Mügge M, Rieken S, Leu M, Dröge LH. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Improves Outcomes in Definitive Radiochemotherapy for Anal Cancer Whilst Reducing Acute Toxicities and Increasing Treatment Compliance. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112533. [PMID: 34064061 PMCID: PMC8196749 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard of care in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal cancer. Only a limited number of studies have analyzed the clinical results with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy, the advanced form of IMRT). We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated at our institution. We compared the outcomes of VMAT-treated and 3DCRT (3D conformal radiotherapy)-treated patients. VMAT reduced acute toxicities (i.e., primarily dermatitis and enteritis) to a great extent. Additionally, VMAT relevantly improved treatment compliance (i.e., less CRT interruptions/delays, shorter overall treatment time, and higher absolute 5-fluorouracil dose applied). Finally, we found improved cancer-specific survival and distant control in VMAT-treated patients. The present study underlines the great progress that has been achieved with IMRT/VMAT in the CRT of anal cancer. Our study is the first to demonstrate an improvement in treatment compliance and outcomes with VMAT. Future studies could address whether VMAT is advantageous when compared to conventional IMRT. Abstract Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard of care in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal cancer. Until now, only a limited number of studies have analyzed the results with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy). We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated at our institution. Patients and Methods: We included patients who received curative CRT for anal cancer. We compared VMAT-treated and 3DCRT (3D conformal radiotherapy)-treated patients. We analyzed toxicities (acute: CTCAE criteria; late: LENT/SOMA criteria), treatment compliance, overall survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), distant control (DC), and locoregional control. Results: A total of 149 patients (3DCRT: n = 87, VMAT: n = 62) were included. The median follow-up was longer in 3DCRT-treated patients (3DCRT: 61.3 months; VMAT: 39.1 months; p < 0.05). VMAT-treated patients had more G3 tumors (3DCRT: 12/87 (13.8%); VMAT: 18/62 (29.0%), p < 0.001). VMAT reduced acute toxicities ≥grade 3 (3DCRT: n = 48/87 (55.2%); VMAT: n = 11/62 (17.7%), p < 0.001). VMAT improved treatment compliance (less interruptions/delays) (3DCRT: 37/87, 42.5%; VMAT: 4/62, 6.5%; p < 0.001), provided a shorter median overall treatment time (3DCRT: 41 days; VMAT: 38 days; p = 0.02), and gave a higher median absolute 5-fluorouracil dose (3DCRT: 13,700 mg; VMAT: 14,400 mg; p = 0.001). Finally, we found improved CSS (p = 0.02; 3DCRT: 81.9% at 3 years; VMAT: 94.1% at 3 years) and DC (p = 0.01; 3DCRT: 89.4% at 3 years; VMAT: 100.0% at 3 years) with VMAT. Summary: Our study is the first to demonstrate improved treatment compliance and outcomes with VMAT for anal cancer. Previous studies have indicated that organs at risk sparing might be more improved with the use of VMAT vs. with conventional IMRT. Future studies should address whether these advantages lead to a further reduction in CRT-associated morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Possiel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Hanne Elisabeth Ammon
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Manuel Guhlich
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Lena-Christin Conradi
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (L.-C.C.); (M.G.)
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (L.-C.C.); (M.G.)
| | - Hendrik Andreas Wolff
- University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany;
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Radiology Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Anton Schirmer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Stephan Samel
- Praxis für Koloproktologie und chirurgische Endoskopie, Waldweg 1, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (S.S.); (M.M.)
| | - Michael Mügge
- Praxis für Koloproktologie und chirurgische Endoskopie, Waldweg 1, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (S.S.); (M.M.)
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Martin Leu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Leif Hendrik Dröge
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-551-398-866
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Wang F, Chen J, Liu J, Zeng H. Cancer theranostic platforms based on injectable polymer hydrogels. Biomater Sci 2021; 9:3543-3575. [PMID: 33634800 DOI: 10.1039/d0bm02149k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Theranostic platforms that combine therapy with diagnosis not only prevent the undesirable biological responses that may occur when these processes are conducted separately, but also allow individualized therapies for patients. Polymer hydrogels have been employed to provide well-controlled drug release and targeted therapy in theranostics, where injectable hydrogels enable non-invasive treatment and monitoring with a single injection, offering greater patient comfort and efficient therapy. Efforts have been focused on applying injectable polymer hydrogels in theranostic research and clinical use. This review highlights recent progress in the design of injectable polymer hydrogels for cancer theranostics, particularly focusing on the elements/components of theranostic hydrogels, and their cross-linking strategies, structures, and performance with regard to drug delivery/tracking. Therapeutic agents and tracking modalities that are essential components of the theranostic platforms are introduced, and the design strategies, properties and applications of the injectable hydrogels developed via two approaches, namely chemical bonds and physical interactions, are described. The theranostic functions of the platforms are highly dependent on the architecture and components employed for the construction of hydrogels. Challenges currently presented by theranostic platforms based on injectable hydrogels are identified, and prospects of acquiring more comfortable and personalized therapies are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feifei Wang
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510700, China. and Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada.
| | - Jingsi Chen
- Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada.
| | - Jifang Liu
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510700, China.
| | - Hongbo Zeng
- Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Concurrent Chemoradiation in Anal Cancer Patients Delivered with Bone Marrow-Sparing IMRT: Final Results of a Prospective Phase II Trial. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11050427. [PMID: 34069862 PMCID: PMC8157357 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the role of the selective avoidance of haematopoietically active pelvic bone marrow (BM), with a targeted intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) approach, to reduce acute hematologic toxicity (HT) in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation. We designed a one-armed two-stage Simon’s design study to test the hypothesis that BM-sparing IMRT would improve by 20% the rate of G0–G2 (vs. G3–G4) HT, from 42% of RTOG 0529 historical data to 62% (α = 0.05; β = 0.20). A minimum of 21/39 (54%) with G0–G2 toxicity represented the threshold for the fulfilment of the criteria to define this approach as ‘promising’. We employed 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within the pelvis. Acute HT was assessed via weekly blood counts and scored as per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4.0. From December 2017 to October 2020, we enrolled 39 patients. Maximum observed acute HT comprised 20% rate of ≥G3 leukopenia and 11% rate of ≥G3 thrombocytopenia. Overall, 11 out of 39 treated patients (28%) experienced ≥G3 acute HT. Conversely, in 28 patients (72%) G0–G2 HT events were observed, above the threshold set. Hence, 18FDG-PET-guided BM-sparing IMRT was able to reduce acute HT in this clinical setting.
Collapse
|
78
|
Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients' health quality perception. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:263-272. [PMID: 34122565 PMCID: PMC8170522 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.106247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) with a boost to residual tumor after external radiotherapy. Material and methods Medical records of patients receiving a brachytherapy boost after radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma in our Institute between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. After receiving pelvic irradiation ± concurrent chemotherapy, patients received PDR-BT boost to residual tumor, in order to deliver a minimal total dose of 60 Gy. Patients’ outcomes were analyzed, with primary focus on local control, sphincter preservation, morbidity, and quality of life. Results A total of 42 patients were identified, included 24, 13, and 5 patients with I, II, and III tumor stages, respectively. Median brachytherapy (BT) dose was 20 Gy (range, 10-30 Gy). Median dose per pulse was 42 cGy (range, 37.5-50 cGy). With median follow-up of 60.4 months (range, 5.4-127.4 months), estimated local control and colostomy-free survival rates at 5 years were both 88.7% (95% CI: 67.4-96.4%). The largest axis of residual lesion after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and poor tumor shrinkage were associated with more frequent relapses (p = 0.02 and p = 0.007, respectively). Out of 40 patients with more than 6 months follow-up, only one experienced severe delayed toxicity (fecal incontinence). Health quality perception was very good or good in 20 of 22 (91%) patients, according to their replies of quality-of-life surveys. A total dose ≥ 63 Gy was associated with higher number of anorectal grade 1+ toxicities (n = 1.5 vs. n = 0.61, p = 0.02). Conclusions In this cohort of 42 patients with mainly I and II tumor stages, PDR-BT boost allowed for local control in 88.7% of patients, with only one grade 3 anorectal toxicity.
Collapse
|
79
|
Frennered A, Scherman J, Buchwald P, Johnsson A, Sartor H, Zackrisson S, Trägårdh E, Nilsson MP. Patterns of pathologic lymph nodes in anal cancer: a PET-CT-based analysis with implications for radiotherapy treatment volumes. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:447. [PMID: 33888074 PMCID: PMC8063376 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08187-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study investigates the patterns of PET-positive lymph nodes (LNs) in anal cancer. The aim was to provide information that could inform future anal cancer radiotherapy contouring guidelines. Methods The baseline [18F]-FDG PET-CTs of 190 consecutive anal cancer patients were retrospectively assessed. LNs with a Deauville score (DS) of ≥3 were defined as PET-positive. Each PET-positive LN was allocated to a LN region and a LN sub-region; they were then mapped on a standard anatomy reference CT. The association between primary tumor localization and PET-positive LNs in different regions were analyzed. Results PET-positive LNs (n = 412) were identified in 103 of 190 patients (54%). Compared to anal canal tumors with extension into the rectum, anal canal tumors with perianal extension more often had inguinal (P < 0.001) and less often perirectal (P < 0.001) and internal iliac (P < 0.001) PET-positive LNs. Forty-two patients had PET-positive LNs confined to a solitary region, corresponding to first echelon nodes. The most common solitary LN region was inguinal (25 of 42; 60%) followed by perirectal (26%), internal iliac (10%), and external iliac (2%). No PET-positive LNs were identified in the ischiorectal fossa or in the inguinal area located posterolateral to deep vessels. Skip metastases above the bottom of the sacroiliac joint were quite rare. Most external iliac PET-positive LNs were located posterior to the external iliac vein; only one was located in the lateral external iliac sub-region. Conclusions The results support some specific modifications to the elective clinical target volume (CTV) in anal cancer. These changes would lead to reduced volumes of normal tissue being irradiated, which could contribute to a reduction in radiation side-effects. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08187-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Frennered
- Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonas Scherman
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hanna Sartor
- Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sophia Zackrisson
- Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Elin Trägårdh
- Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Martin P Nilsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. .,Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lasarettsgatan 23, Skåne University Hospital, S-221 85, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Huang W, Dang J, Li Y, Cui HX, Lu WL, Jiang QF. Effect of Pelvic Bone Marrow Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy on Acute Hematologic Toxicity in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemo-Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:646211. [PMID: 33968746 PMCID: PMC8101329 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While chemo-radiotherapy improves local control in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, it can also increase acute hematological toxicity (HT), which leads to poor outcomes. Patients receiving bone marrow radiation have been shown to develop acute HT. However, the safety and efficacy of bone marrow sparing is undetermined. The aim of our study was to explore the feasible dosimetric constraints for pelvic bone marrow (PBM) that can be widely used in rectal cancer patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy. METHODS 112 rectal cancer patients were selected and divided into the PBM sparing IMRT group (60 cases) and the non-PBM sparing IMRT group (52 cases). All patients underwent pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine-based chemotherapy. The PBM dosimetric constraints in the PBM sparing IMRT group were set to:V10 ≤ 85%, V20 ≤ 65% and V30 ≤ 45%. An independent sample t test was applied for the dose-volume parameters, and Chi-squared analysis was applied for clinical parameters and adverse events. RESULTS The radiation dose to PBM (V5~V45, Dmean, P<0.05), PBM sub-regions (V10~V35, Dmean, P<0.05) and both femoral heads (V5~V40, Dmean, P<0.05) decreased significantly in the PBM sparing IMRT group compared with that of the non-PBM sparing IMRT group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in any dose-volume parameters of the bladder and small bowel in either groups, and none in the planning target volume (PTV) dose homogeneity and conformity (P>0.05). For acute HT observation, the incidence of grade 3 acute HT (χ2 = 7.094, P=0.008) was significantly reduced in patients treated with PBM sparing IMRT compared with patients treated with non-PBM sparing IMRT. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, hand-foot syndrome, cystitis, perianal pain and perianal dermatitis in patients of both groups (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS Applying PBM dosimetric constraints (V10 ≤ 85%, V20 ≤ 65% and V30 ≤ 45%) can significantly reduce the radiation dose to PBM. The patients treated with PBM sparing IMRT had a lower incidence of acute HT compared with those treated with non-PBM sparing IMRT. Applying the PBM dosimetric constraints proposed by our study can benefits the patients with rectal cancer undergoing capecitabine-based chemo-radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Qing-feng Jiang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Radiotherapy with Intensity-Modulated (IMRT) Techniques in the Treatment of Anal Carcinoma (RAINSTORM): A Multicenter Study on Behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Gastrointestinal Study Group. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081902. [PMID: 33920873 PMCID: PMC8071256 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the standard treatment in anal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was proved to reduce severe, acute and late toxicities. Moreover, IMRT techniques allow for the planning and delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), with a differential dose per fraction given to selected sub-regions during the same treatment session. This boost modality provides the chance to employ a dose-painted approach with a reduction in overall treatment time that could result in a potential clinical advantage. Since a large variability in dose prescription to the primary tumor and elective or involved lymph nodes can be found in available guidelines and clinical practice, a multicenter analysis was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and the impact of radiotherapy parameters on clinical outcomes for anal cancer patients treated with IMRT techniques within a national cohort. Abstract A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and clinical outcomes of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. In a cohort of 987 patients, the clinical complete response (CR) rate (beyond 6 months) was 90.6%. The 3-year local control (LC) rate was 85.8% (95% CI: 84.4–87.2), and the 3-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) rate was 77.9% (95% CI: 76.1–79.8). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% and 88.1% (95% CI: 78.8–89.4) (95% CI: 78.5–81.9), respectively. Histological grade 3 and nodal involvement were associated with lower CR (p = 0.030 and p = 0.004, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between advanced stage and nodal involvement, and LC, CFS, PFS, OS and event-free survival (EFS). Overall treatment time (OTT) ≥45 days showed a trend for a lower PFS (p = 0.050) and was significantly associated with lower EFS (p = 0.030) and histological grade 3 with a lower LC (p = 0.025). No statistically significant association was found between total dose, dose/fraction and/or boost modality and clinical outcomes. This analysis reports excellent clinical results and a mild toxicity profile, confirming IMRT techniques as standard of care for the curative treatment of anal cancer patients. Lymph node involvement and histological grade have been confirmed as the most important negative prognostic factors.
Collapse
|
82
|
Lawrence LSP, Chin LCL, Chan RW, Nguyen TK, Sahgal A, Tseng CL, Lau AZ. Method of computing direction-dependent margins for the development of consensus contouring guidelines. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:71. [PMID: 33849576 PMCID: PMC8045331 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01799-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical target volume (CTV) contouring guidelines are frequently developed through studies in which experts contour the CTV for a representative set of cases for a given treatment site and the consensus CTVs are analyzed to generate margin recommendations. Measures of interobserver variability are used to quantify agreement between experts. In cases where an isotropic margin is not appropriate, however, there is no standard method to compute margins in specified directions that represent possible routes of tumor spread. Moreover, interobserver variability metrics are often measures of volume overlap that do not account for the dependence of disagreement on direction. To aid in the development of consensus contouring guidelines, this study demonstrates a novel method of quantifying CTV margins and interobserver variability in clinician-specified directions. METHODS The proposed algorithm was applied to 11 cases of non-spine bone metastases to compute the consensus CTV margin in each direction of intraosseous and extraosseous disease. The median over all cases for each route of spread yielded the recommended margins. The disagreement between experts on the CTV margin was quantified by computing the median of the coefficients of variation for intraosseous and extraosseous margins. RESULTS The recommended intraosseous and extraosseous margins were 7.0 mm and 8.0 mm, respectively. The median coefficient of variation quantifying the margin disagreement between experts was 0.59 and 0.48 for intraosseous and extraosseous disease. CONCLUSIONS The proposed algorithm permits the generation of margin recommendations in relation to adjacent anatomy and quantifies interobserver variability in specified directions. This method can be applied to future consensus CTV contouring studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam S P Lawrence
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lee C L Chin
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel W Chan
- Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, M4N 3M5, ON, Canada
| | - Timothy K Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Angus Z Lau
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, M4N 3M5, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Li J, Xu H, Zou J, Wang X, Li Z, Shen Y. Cisplatin/capecitabine with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:432-436. [PMID: 33556252 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1879250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mitomycin (MMC)/5-fluoroural (5-FU) with concurrent radiation is the standard treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin/capecitabine (XP) as an alternative with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in ASCC setting. METHODS We retrospectively screened all patients with stage I-IV ASCC from January 2010 to June 2019. The records of patients who received definitive chemoradiation with cisplatin/capecitabine (XP) and IMRT were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The first patient was treated with XP in 2017, so totally 11 patients were included in our study from January 2017 to June 2019. All patients have experienced clinical complete response (cCR). After a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 18-39 months), no patient had local recurrence or distant metastasis. Two-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) and two-year disease-free survival (DFS) were both 100%. The median overall survival (OS) has not reached. Grade 3 acute toxicities included leukopenia (1, 9.1%), neutropenia (2, 18.2%) and thrombocytopenia (2, 18.2%). No grade 4 acute adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION In our study, cisplatin/capecitabine combined with IMRT was safe in ASCC patients, with favorable efficacy as an alternative, and is expected to be explored in study with larger sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jielang Li
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Huanji Xu
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Jiahuan Zou
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Zhiping Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Yali Shen
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Dee EC, Byrne JD, Wo JY. Evolution of the Role of Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1208. [PMID: 33801992 PMCID: PMC8001637 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior to the 1980s, the primary management of localized anal cancer was surgical resection. Dr. Norman Nigro and colleagues introduced neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to abdominoperineal resection. Chemoradiotherapy 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C afforded patients complete pathologic response and obviated the need for upfront surgery. More recent studies have attempted to alter or exclude chemotherapy used in the Nigro regimen to mitigate toxicity, often with worse outcomes. Reductions in acute adverse effects have been associated with marked advancements in radiotherapy delivery using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guidance radiation delivery, resulting in increased tolerance to greater radiation doses. Ongoing trials are attempting to improve IMRT-based treatment of locally advanced disease with efforts to increase personalized treatment. Studies are also examining the role of newer treatment modalities such as proton therapy in treating anal cancer. Here we review the evolution of radiotherapy for anal cancer and describe recent advances. We also elaborate on radiotherapy's role in locally persistent or recurrent anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James D. Byrne
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Jennifer Y. Wo
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA 02115, USA;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Blossom St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Jethwa KR, Day CN, Sandhyavenu H, Gonuguntla K, Harmsen WS, Breen WG, Routman DM, Garda AE, Hubbard JM, Halfdanarson TR, Neben-Wittich MA, Merrell KW, Hallemeier CL, Haddock MG. Intensity modulated radiotherapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: A 16-year single institution experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 28:17-23. [PMID: 33732911 PMCID: PMC7943964 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction To report long-term efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Materials and methods This was a retrospective review of patients with ASCC who received curative-intent IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy (98%) between 2003 and 2019. Overall survival (OS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported. Acute and late AEs were recorded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. Results 127 patients were included. The median patient age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55-69) and 79% of patients were female. 33% of patients had T3-4 disease and 68% had clinically involved pelvic or inguinal lymph nodes (LNs).The median patient follow-up was 47 months (IQR: 28-89 months). The estimated 4-year OS, CFS, and PFS were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%-89%), 77% (95% CI: 68%-86%), and 78% (95% CI: 70%-86%), respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidences of LR, LRR, and DM were 3% (95% CI: 1%-9%), 9% (95% CI: 5%-17%), and 10% (95% CI: 6%-18%), respectively. Overall treatment duration greater than 39 days was associated with an increased risk of LRR (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.4-19.5, p = 0.015). The most common grade 3+ acute AEs included hematologic (31%), gastrointestinal (GI) (17%), dermatologic (16%), and pain (15%). Grade 3+ late AEs included: GI (3%), genitourinary (GU) (2%), and pain (1%). Current smokers were more likely to experience grade 3+ acute dermatologic toxicity compared to former or never smokers (34% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions IMRT was associated with favorable toxicity rates and long-term efficacy. These data support the continued utilization of IMRT as the preferred treatment technique for patients with ASCC.
Collapse
Key Words
- 3DCRT, 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
- 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil
- ACT II, United Kingdom Anal Cancer Trial II
- AE, adverse events
- ASCC, anal canal squamous cell carcinoma
- Anal cancer
- BED, biologically effective dose
- CFS, colostomy-free survival
- CI, confidence interval
- CRT, chemoradiotherapy
- CTCAE v 4.0, common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0
- CTV, clinical target volume
- DM, distant metastasis
- DP-IMRT, dose-painted intensity modulated radiotherapy
- DVH, dose-volume histogram
- G, grade
- GI, gastrointestinal
- GU, genitourinary
- HIV, human immunodeficiency virus
- HR, hazard ratio
- IMRT
- IMRT, intensity modulated radiotherapy
- IQR, interquartile range
- LN, lymph node
- LR, local recurrence
- LRR, locoregional recurrence
- MMC, mitomycin-C
- OS, overall survival
- PFS, progression-free survival
- PTV, planning target volume
- RT, radiotherapy
- RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Radiation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Karthik Gonuguntla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - David M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Allison E Garda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Joleen M Hubbard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Kenneth W Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Michael G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Kronborg CJS, Christensen P, Pedersen BG, Spindler KLG. Anorectal function and radiation dose to pelvic floor muscles after primary treatment for anal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:141-146. [PMID: 33545256 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for localized anal cancer (AC). This treatment offers high rates of cure and organ preservation. Radiotherapy can however, result in late persisting anorectal dysfunction, with anal incontinence, urge and clustering. Correlation of radiation doses to pelvic substructures and functional outcome is not well described in AC. We correlated patient reported anorectal function to radiation doses to sphincters and pelvic floor muscles. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy for AC were asked to fill out LARS (lower anterior resection syndrome) questionnaires at follow-up. We compared patients with no LARS (score 0-19) and patients with major LARS (30-42) as well as individual LARS questions to specific radiation doses to sphincters, levators and puborectal muscles. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were included, 18 with no LARS and 18 with major LARS. Gender, age, TNM stage, PTV, chemotherapy, time to LARS score (mean 660 and 749 days) were comparable between the two groups. LARS symptoms, occurring at least once per week, were reported between 25-55.7%, and poorer LARS outcome was associated to worse quality of life. Dose to sphincter complex (Dmean, V50Gy and D90%) differed significantly between patients with no and major LARS (p = 0.048, 0.035 and 0.02 respectively). Further, D90% to the sphincter complex was significantly higher in patients who had accidental leakage of stool, (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION Patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy for AC show high frequency of patient reported anorectal dysfunction. Specific doses to the sphincters could become a useful predictor of anal incontinence and major LARS and incorporated into future radiotherapy planning studies.
Collapse
|
87
|
Kim KS, Cheong KH, Kim K, Koo T, Koh HK, Chang JH, Chang AR, Park HJ. Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:2785. [PMID: 33531643 PMCID: PMC7854655 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82541-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the inter-physician variability in the target contouring of the radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Clinical target volume (CTV) of three patients diagnosed with ASCC was delineated by seven experienced radiation oncologists from multi-institution. These patients were staged as pT1N1a, cT2N0, and cT4N1a, respectively, according to 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). The maximum distance from the boundaries of the STAPLE generated volume with confidence level of 80% to those of the contour of each CTV in 6 directions was compared. CTV of pelvis which includes primary tumor, perirectal tissue and internal/external iliac lymph node (LN) area (CTV-pelvis) and CTV of inguinal area (CTV-inguinal) were obtained from the seven radiation oncologists. One radiation oncologist did not contain inguinal LN area in the treatment target volume of patient 2 (cT2N0 stage). CTV-inguinal displayed moderate agreement for each patient (overall kappa 0.58, 0.54 and 0.6, respectively), whereas CTV-pelvis showed substantial agreement (overall kappa 0.66, 0.68 and 0.64, respectively). Largest variation among each contour was shown in the inferior margin of the CTV-inguinal. For CTV-pelvis, anterior and superior margin showed the biggest variation. Overall, moderate to substantial agreement was shown for CTV delineation. However, large variations in the anterior and cranial boarder of the CTV-pelvis and the caudal margin of the CTV-inguinal suggest that further studies are needed to establish a clearer target volume delineation guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Ho Cheong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea.
| | - Taeryool Koo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Kang Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ah Ram Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Achard V, Ris F, Rouzaud M, Puppa G, Buchs NC, De Perrot T, Koessler T, Picardi C, Zilli T. Sexual organ-sparing with hydrogel spacer injections for rectal cancer radiotherapy: a feasibility pilot study. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20200931. [PMID: 33481641 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this pilot study was to investigate in two rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) the implant feasibility and dosimetric benefit in sexual organ-sparing of an injectable, absorbable, radiopaque hydrogel spacer. METHODS Two rectal cancer patients (one male and one female) underwent hydrogel implant between rectum and vagina/prostate before nCRT and curative surgery. A CT scan was performed before and after injection and a comparative dosimetric study was performed testing a standard (45/50 Gy) and a dose escalated (46/55.2 Gy) schedule. RESULTS In both patients, the spacer implant in the recto-prostatic or recto-vaginal space was feasible and well tolerated. For the male, the dosimetric benefit with spacer was minimal for sexual organs. For the female however, doses delivered to the vagina were significantly reduced with spacer with a mean reduction of more than 5 Gy for both regimens. CONCLUSIONS For organ preservation protocols and selected sexually active female patients, use of hydrogel spacers can be considered to spare sexual organs from the high radiotherapy dose levels. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE For females with advanced rectal tumor, a spacer implant between the rectum and the vagina before nCRT is feasible and reduces doses delivered to the vagina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederic Ris
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michel Rouzaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giacomo Puppa
- Department of Pathology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas C Buchs
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas De Perrot
- Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thibaud Koessler
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Picardi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Filimonova I, Schmidt D, Mansoorian S, Weissmann T, Siavooshhaghighi H, Cavallaro A, Kuwert T, Bert C, Frey B, Distel LV, Lettmaier S, Fietkau R, Putz F. The Distribution of Pelvic Nodal Metastases in Prostate Cancer Reveals Potential to Advance and Personalize Pelvic Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 10:590722. [PMID: 33489887 PMCID: PMC7820617 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.590722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditional clinical target volume (CTV) definition for pelvic radiotherapy in prostate cancer consists of large volumes being treated with homogeneous doses without fully utilizing information on the probability of microscopic involvement to guide target volume design and prescription dose distribution. Methods We analyzed patterns of nodal involvement in 75 patients that received RT for pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastases (LNs) from prostate cancer in regard to the new NRG-CTV recommendation. Non-rigid registration-based LN mapping and weighted three-dimensional kernel density estimation were used to visualize the average probability distribution for nodal metastases. As independent approach, the mean relative proportion of LNs observed for each level was determined manually and NRG and non-NRG levels were evaluated for frequency of involvement. Computer-automated distance measurements were used to compare LN distances in individual patients to the spatial proximity of nodal metastases at a cohort level. Results 34.7% of patients had pelvic LNs outside NRG-consensus, of which perirectal was most common (25.3% of all patients) followed by left common iliac nodes near the left psoas major (6.7%). A substantial portion of patients (13.3%) had nodes at the posterior edge of the NRG obturator level. Observer-independent mapping consistently visualized high-probability hotspots outside NRG-consensus in the perirectal and left common iliac regions. Affected nodes in individual patients occurred in highly significantly closer proximity than at cohort-level (mean distance, 6.6 cm vs. 8.7 cm, p < 0.001). Conclusions Based on this analysis, the common iliac level should extend to the left psoas major and obturator levels should extend posteriorly 5 mm beyond the obturator internus. Incomplete coverage by the NRG-consensus was mostly because of perirectal involvement. We introduce three-dimensional kernel density estimation after non-rigid registration-based mapping for the analysis of recurrence data in radiotherapy. This technique provides an estimate of the underlying probability distribution of nodal involvement and may help in addressing institution- or subgroup-specific differences. Nodal metastases in individual patients occurred in highly significantly closer proximity than at a cohort-level, which supports that personalized target volumes could be reduced in size compared to a “one-size-fits-all” approach and is an important basis for further investigation into individualized field designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Filimonova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniela Schmidt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sina Mansoorian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Weissmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hadi Siavooshhaghighi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Cavallaro
- Institute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Torsten Kuwert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Frey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Luitpold Valentin Distel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Lettmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florian Putz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Kuntz L, Noel G. [Pelvic irradiation and hematopoietic toxicity: A review of the literature]. Cancer Radiother 2020; 25:77-91. [PMID: 33358082 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Pelvic bone marrow is the site of nearly 50% of total hematopoiesis. Radiation therapy of pelvic lymph node areas, and cancers located near the bony structures of the pelvis, exposes to hematological toxicity in the range of 30 to 70%. This toxicity depends on many factors, including the presence or absence of concomitant chemotherapy and its type, the volume of irradiated bone, the received doses, or the initial hematopoietic reserve. Intensity modulated radiation therapy allows the optimisation of dose deposit on at risk organs while providing optimal coverage of target volumes. However, this suggests that dose constraints should be known precisely to limit the incidence of radiation side effects. This literature review focuses firstly on pelvic lymph node areas and bony volumes nearby, then on the effects of irradiation on bone marrow and the current dosimetric constraints resulting from it, and finally on hematological toxicities by carcinologic location and progress in reducing these toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Kuntz
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noel
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Bone Marrow-Sparing IMRT in Anal Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemo-Radiation: Results of the First Phase of a Prospective Phase II Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113306. [PMID: 33182445 PMCID: PMC7696305 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hematological toxicity may be a consistent issue in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation, with a potentially detrimental effect on clinical outcomes and patient compliance to treatment. Chemotherapy is the most important trigger, since it induces myelosuppression, but radiation dose delivered to the hematopoietically active bone marrow (BM) also plays an important role. Active bone marrow can be identified using functional imaging with 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) and selectively spared during radiation delivery via intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We investigated, within a prospective phase II trial, the potential effectiveness of targeted avoidance of active BM comprised within pelvic bones in reducing the acute hematologic toxicity profile of anal cancer patients undergoing concomitant chemo-radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. The results of the first step of the study fulfilled the criteria to define BM-sparing IMRT as “promising” and to continue with the second step of the phase II trial. Abstract Purpose: to investigate the role of selective avoidance of hematopoietically active BM within the pelvis, as defined with 18FDG-PET, employing a targeted IMRT approach, to reduce acute hematologic toxicity (HT) profile in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation. Methods: a one-armed two-stage Simon’s design was selected to test the hypothesis that BM-sparing approach would improve by 20% the rate of G0–G2 (vs. G3–G4) HT, from 42% of RTOG 0529 historical data to 62% (α = 0.05 and the β = 0.20). At the first stage, among 21 enrolled patients, at least 9 should report G0–G2 acute HT to further proceed with the trial. We employed 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within the pelvis. Acute HT was assessed via weekly blood counts and scored as per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4.0. Results: from December 2017 to October 2019, 21 patients were enrolled. Maximum observed acute HT comprised 9% rate of ≥G3 leukopenia and 5% rate of ≥G3 neutropenia and anemia. Overall, only 4 out of 21 treated patients (19%) experienced ≥G3 acute HT. Conversely, 17 patients (81%) experienced G0–G2 events, way above the threshold set by the trial design. Conclusion: 18FDG-PET-guided BM-sparing IMRT was able to reduce acute HT in anal cancer patients treated with concomitant chemo-radiation. These results prompted us to conclude the second part of this prospective phase II trial.
Collapse
|
92
|
Oral contrast agents lead to underestimation of dose calculation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning for pelvic irradiation. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020; 133:2061-2070. [PMID: 32810050 PMCID: PMC7478501 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Background The effects of oral contrast agents (OCAs) on dosimetry have not been studied in detail. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the influence of OCAs on dose calculation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for rectal cancer. Methods From 2008 to 2016, computed tomography (CT) images were obtained from 33 rectal cancer patients administered OCA with or without intravenous contrast agent (ICA) and 14 patients who received no contrast agent. CT numbers of organs at risk were recorded and converted to electronic densities. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were designed before and after the original densities were replaced with non-enhanced densities. Doses to the planned target volume (PTV) and organs at risk were compared between the plans. Results OCA significantly increased the mean and maximum densities of the bowels, while the effects of ICA on these parameters depended on the blood supply of the organs. With OCA, the actual doses for PTV were significantly higher than planned and doses to the bowel increased significantly although moderately. However, the increase in the volume receiving a high-range doses was substantial (the absolute change of intestine volume receiving ≥52 Gy: 1.46 [0.05−3.99, cubic centimeter range: −6.74 to 128.12], the absolute change of colon volume receiving ≥50 Gy: 0.34 [0.01−1.53 cc, range: −0.08 to 3.80 cc]. Dose changes due to ICA were insignificant. Pearson correlation showed that dose changes were significantly correlated with a high intestinal volume within or near the PTV (ρ > 0.5, P < 0.05) and with the density of enhanced intestine (ρ > 0.3, P < 0.05). Conclusions Contrast agents applied in simulation cause underestimation of doses in actual treatment. The overdose due to ICA was slight, while that due to OCA was moderate. The bowel volume receiving ≥50Gy was dramatically increased when OCA within the bowel was absent. Physicians should be aware of these issues if the original plan is barely within clinical tolerance or if a considerable volume of enhanced intestine is within or near the PTV.
Collapse
|
93
|
Li S, Gong Y, Yang Y, Guo Q, Qian J, Tian Y. Evaluation of small bowel motion and feasibility of using the peritoneal space to replace bowel loops for dose constraints during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:211. [PMID: 32873308 PMCID: PMC7466827 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01650-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to assess small bowel motion and explore the feasibility of using peritoneal space (PS) to replace bowel loops (BL) via the dose constraint method to spare the small bowel during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for rectal cancer. METHODS A total of 24 patients with rectal cancer who underwent adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiotherapy were selected. Weekly repeat CT scans from pre-treatment to the fourth week of treatment were acquired and defined as Plan, 1 W, 2 W, 3 W, and 4 W. The 4 weekly CT scans were co-registered to the Plan CT, BL and PS contours were delineated in all of the scans, an IMRT plan was designed on Plan CT using PS constraint method, and then copied to the 4 weekly CT scans. The dose-volume, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the small bowel and their variations during treatment were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 109 sets of CT scans from 24 patients were acquired, and 109 plans were designed and copied. The BL and PS volumes were 250.3 cc and 1339.3 cc. The V15 of BL and PS based plan of pre-treatment were 182.6 cc and 919.0 cc, the shift% of them were 28.9 and 11.3% during treatment (p = 0.000), which was less in the prone position than in the supine position (25.2% vs 32.1%, p = 0.000; 9.9% vs 14.9%, p = 0.000). The NTCPC and NTCPA based plan of pre-treatment were 2.0 and 59.2%, the shift% during treatment were 46.1 and 14.0% respectively. Majority of BL's Dmax and V15 were meet the safety standard during treatment using PS dose limit method except 3 times (3/109) of V15 and 5 times of Dmax (5/109). CONCLUSIONS This study indicated that small bowel motion may lead to uncertainties in its dose volume and NTCP evaluation during IMRT for rectal cancer. The BL movements were significantly greater than PS, and the prone position was significantly less than the supine position. It is feasibility of using PS to replace BL to spare the small bowel, V15 < 830 cc is the dose constraint standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyuan Li
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory for Radiation Oncology, Suzhou, 215004, China
- Department of Oncology, Zhang Jia Gang First Hospital, Suzhou, 215004, China
| | - Yanping Gong
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, China
| | - Yongqiang Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory for Radiation Oncology, Suzhou, 215004, China
| | - Qi Guo
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory for Radiation Oncology, Suzhou, 215004, China
| | - Jianjun Qian
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory for Radiation Oncology, Suzhou, 215004, China.
| | - Ye Tian
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou Key Laboratory for Radiation Oncology, Suzhou, 215004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Garda AE, Navin PJ, Merrell KW, Martenson JA, Neben Wittich MA, Haddock MG, Sio TT, Rule WG, Ashman JB, Sheedy SP, Hallemeier CL. Patterns of inguinal lymph node metastases in anal canal cancer and recommendations for elective clinical target volume (CTV) delineation. Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:128-133. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
95
|
Kuncman Ł, Stawiski K, Masłowski M, Kucharz J, Fijuth J. Dose-volume parameters of MRI-based active bone marrow predict hematologic toxicity of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:998-1005. [PMID: 32621010 PMCID: PMC7653786 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01659-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely used for locoregional staging of rectal cancer and offers promise for the prediction of hematologic toxicity. The present study compares the clinical utility of MRI-based active bone marrow (BMact) delineation with that of CT-based bone marrow total (BMtot) delineation for predicting hematologic toxicity. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed. Eligible patients had stage II/III rectal cancer and qualified for preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The BMact areas on T1-weighted MRI were contoured. The impact of the dose–volume parameters of BMact/BMtot and clinical data on hematologic toxicity were assessed. Basic endpoints were the occurrence of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity and peripheral blood parameters reaching a nadir. Linear regression models were generated for the nadirs and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the occurrence of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity. Results Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Women presented higher dose–volume parameters of BMact, BMtot, and lymphocyte nadir (ALCnadir%) than men. Models for the prediction of ALCnadir% (V5-V20BMtot, V5-V30BMact) and platelet nadir (PLTnadir%; V5-V10BMtot, V5-V20BMact) were statistically significant. In the ROC curves, a baseline lymphocyte level of 1.81 × 103/ml was adopted as the cutoff for predicting grade 3/4 lymphopenia, with specificity of 77.8% and sensitivity of 73.1%. The multivariate linear regression model for ALCnadir% had R2 = 0.53, p = 0.038. In the tenth step of selection, V5BMact (p = 0.002) and gender (p = 0.019) remained. The multivariate linear regression model for PLTnadir% had R2 = 0.20, p = 0.34. In the sixth step of selection, V15BMact remained (p = 0.026). Conclusion The dose–volume parameters of BMact serve as better predictors of ALCnadir% and PLTnadir% than BMtot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Łukasz Kuncman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Zakład Radioterapii, W.W.C.O.iT. im. M. Kopernika w Łodzi, Pabianicka 62 street, 93-513, Łódź, Poland. .,Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Center, Copernicus Memorial Hospital of Lodz, Zakład Teleradioterapii, Wojewódzkie W.W.C.O.iT. im. M. Kopernika w Łodzi, Pabianicka 62 street, 93-513, Łódź, Poland.
| | - Konrad Stawiski
- Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Zakład Biostatystyki i Medycyny Translacyjnej, Cenrum Mazowiecka 15 street, 92-215, Łódź, Poland
| | - Michał Masłowski
- Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Center, Copernicus Memorial Hospital of Lodz, Zakład Teleradioterapii, Wojewódzkie W.W.C.O.iT. im. M. Kopernika w Łodzi, Pabianicka 62 street, 93-513, Łódź, Poland
| | - Jakub Kucharz
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology Warsaw, Klinika Nowotworów Układu Moczowego, Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Jacek Fijuth
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Zakład Radioterapii, W.W.C.O.iT. im. M. Kopernika w Łodzi, Pabianicka 62 street, 93-513, Łódź, Poland.,Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Regional Cancer Center, Copernicus Memorial Hospital of Lodz, Zakład Teleradioterapii, Wojewódzkie W.W.C.O.iT. im. M. Kopernika w Łodzi, Pabianicka 62 street, 93-513, Łódź, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Ofshteyn A, Bingmer K, Dorth J, Dietz D, Steinhagen E, Stein SL. Adding Boost to Standard Neoadjuvant Radiation for Rectal Cancer Improves Likelihood of Complete Response. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1655-1662. [PMID: 32323253 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04594-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathologic tumor response is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with rectal cancer. Standard neoadjuvant radiation (nRT) dosing for locally advanced rectal cancer ranges from 4500 to 5400 centigray (cGy), but it is unknown if tumor regression differs as a consequence adding a boost to the tumor bed. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2006-2016 was used to identify patients 18 years of age and older with clinical stage II and III rectal cancer who received pelvic nRT dosed between 4500 and 5400 cGy. Standard nRT dose (no boost, NB) and dose with boost (DWB) were defined respectively as 4500 and 5040-5400 cGy. Complete pathologic response (pCR) was defined as postoperative pathologic stage of zero. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between radiation dosing and pCR. RESULTS The study cohort was 28,841 patients; the majority received DWB 22,701 (78.7%), while 6140 (21.3%) received NB. pCR was achieved in 3135 (14.4%) patients. On multivariate analysis, patients who received NB were significantly less likely to have complete tumor response (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.2-1.66, p < 0.001). Other factors significantly associated with pCR included insurance, facility type, tumor characteristics, clinical stage, and time between radiation and surgery. CONCLUSIONS This is the first investigation demonstrating that standard dose neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer was associated with a lower likelihood of pCR compared with standard dose with boost. Past studies demonstrate that rectal cancer patient survival is strongly correlated with pCR. Prospective trials should focus on examining neoadjuvant radiation dosing to evaluate if DWB improves outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asya Ofshteyn
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Katherine Bingmer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David Dietz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Sharon L Stein
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Aghili M, Khalili N, Khalili N, Babaei M, Farhan F, Haddad P, Salarvand S, Keshvari A, Fazeli MS, Mohammadi N, Ghalehtaki R. Short-course versus long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Radiat Oncol J 2020; 38:119-128. [PMID: 33012155 PMCID: PMC7533412 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Colorectal cancer is becoming an increasing concern in the middle-aged population of Iran. This study aimed to compare the preliminary results of short-course and long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment for rectal cancer patients. Materials and Methods In this clinical trial we recruited patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located from 5 cm to 15 cm above the anal verge. Patients in group I (short-course) received three-dimensional conformational radiotherapy with a dose of 25 Gy/5 fractions in 1 week plus concurrent XELOX regimen (capecitabine 625 mg/m2 from day 1–5 twice daily and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 once daily). Patients in group II (long-course) received a total dose of 50–50.4 Gy/25–28 fractions for 5 to 5.5 weeks plus capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily. Both groups underwent consolidation chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery at least 8 weeks after radiotherapy completion. The pathological response was assessed with tumor regression grade. Results In this preliminary report on complications and pathological response, 66 patients were randomized into two study groups. Mean duration of radiotherapy in groups I and II was 5 ± 1 days (range, 5 to 8 days) and 38 ± 6 days (range, 30 to 58 days). The median follow-up was 18 months. Pathological complete response was achieved in 32.3% and 23.1% of patients in the short-course and long-course groups, respectively (p = 0.558). Overall, acute grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicities occurred in 24.2% and 22.2% of patients in group I and II, respectively (p = 0.551). No acute grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed in either group except one grade 4 hematologic toxicity that was seen in group II. Within one month of surgery, no significant difference was seen regarding grade ≥3 postoperative complications (p = 0.333). Conclusion For patients with rectal cancer located at least 5 cm above the anal verge, short-course radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy and delayed surgery is not different in terms of acute toxicity, postoperative morbidity, complete resection, and pathological response compared to long-course chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Aghili
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nastaran Khalili
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Neda Khalili
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Babaei
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farshid Farhan
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Peiman Haddad
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Samaneh Salarvand
- Department of Anatomical and Clinical Pathology, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Keshvari
- Colorectal Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli
- Colorectal Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Negin Mohammadi
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Nilsson MP, Nilsson ED, Johnsson A, Leon O, Gunnlaugsson A, Scherman J. Patterns of recurrence in anal cancer: a detailed analysis. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:125. [PMID: 32460785 PMCID: PMC7251738 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01567-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anal cancer is a rare disease, which might be the reason for the “one size fits all” approach still used for radiotherapy target contouring. To refine and individualize future guidelines, detailed and contemporary pattern of recurrence studies are needed. Methods Consecutive anal cancer patients, all treated with curative intent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), were retrospectively studied (n = 170). Data was extracted from medical records and radiological images. Radiotherapy planning CT’s and treatment plans were reviewed, and recurrences were mapped and categorized according to radiation dose. Results The mean dose to the primary tumor was 59.0 Gy. With a median follow-up of 50 months (range 14–117 months), 5-year anal cancer specific survival was 86.1%. Only 1 of 20 local recurrences was located outside the high dose (CTVT) volume. More patients experienced a distant recurrence (n = 34; 20.0%) than a locoregional recurrence (n = 24; 14.1%). Seven patients (4.2%) had a common iliac and/or para-aortic (CI/PA) recurrence. External iliac lymph node involvement (P = 0.04), and metastases in ≥3 inguinal or pelvic lymph node regions (P = 0.02) were associated with a 15–18% risk of CI/PA recurrence. Following chemoradiotherapy, 6 patients with recurrent or primary metastatic CI/PA lymph nodes were free of recurrence at last follow-up. The overall rate of ano-inguinal lymphatic drainage (AILD) recurrence was 2 of 170 (1.2%), and among patients with inguinal metastases at initial diagnosis it was 2 of 65 (3.1%). Conclusions We conclude that other measures than increased margins around the primary tumor are needed to improve local control. Furthermore, metastatic CI/PA lymph nodes, either at initial diagnosis or in the recurrent setting, should be considered potentially curable. Patients with certain patterns of metastatic pelvic lymph nodes might be at an increased risk of harboring tumor cells also in the CI/PA lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Erik D Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Otilia Leon
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jonas Scherman
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Al-Haidari G, Skovlund E, Undseth C, Rekstad BL, Larsen SG, Åsli LM, Dueland S, Malinen E, Guren MG. Re-irradiation for recurrent rectal cancer - a single-center experience. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:534-540. [PMID: 32056476 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1725111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: There is no clear consensus on the use of re-irradiation (reRT) in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). The aim of the present study was to investigate all reRT administered for rectal cancer at a large referral institution and to evaluate patient outcomes and toxicity.Material and methods: All patients with rectal cancer were identified who had received previous pelvic radiotherapy (RT) and underwent reRT during 2006-2016. Medical records and RT details of the primary tumor treatments and rectal cancer recurrence treatments were registered, including details on reRT, chemotherapy, surgery, adverse events, and long-term outcomes.Results: Of 77 patients who received ReRT, 67 had previously received pelvic RT for rectal cancer and were administered reRT for LRRC. Re-irradiation doses were 30.0-45.0 Gy, most often given as hyperfractionated RT in 1.2-1.5 Gy fractions twice daily with concomitant capecitabine. The median time since initial RT was 29 months (range, 13-174 months). Of 36 patients considered as potentially resectable, 20 underwent surgery for LRRC within 3 months after reRT. Operated patients had better 3-year overall survival (OS) (62%) compared to those who were not operated (16%; HR 0.32, p = .001). The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 107 cm3, and 3-year OS was significantly better in patients with GTV <107 cm3 (44%) compared to patients with GTV ≥107 cm3 (21%; HR 0.52, p = .03).Conclusion: Three-year survival was significantly better for patients who underwent surgery after reRT or who had small tumor volume. Prospective clinical trials are recommended for further improvements in patient selection, outcomes, and toxicity assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Stein Gunnar Larsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Svein Dueland
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Alickikus ZA, Kuru A, Aydin B, Akcay D, Gorken IB. The importance of mesorectum motion in determining PTV margins in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2020; 61:335-342. [PMID: 31867610 PMCID: PMC7246061 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2010] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
New precision radiotherapy (RT) techniques reduce the uncertainties in localizing soft and moving tumors. However, there are still many uncontrollable internal organ movements. In our study, patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NA-CRT) for rectal cancer were evaluated to determine inter-fraction mesorectum motion and dosimetric changes. Fourteen patients treated with NA-CRT for rectal cancer between 2014 and 2016 were included in the analysis. The mesorectum and clinical target volume (CTV) were delineated on planning computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CB-CT) scans. After planning with a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan, re-planning was performed on all CB-CTs. Finally, the volumetric and dosimetric changes of PTV and mesorectum were evaluated in all CB-CTs compared with the initial CT and VMAT plans. The geometrical center of mesorectum volume in CB-CTs had moved 1 (0.2-6.6), 1.6 (0.2-3.8) and 1.6 (0-4.9) mm in the x, y and z-axis respectively compared with the initial CT. The dosimetric parameters of PTV including D2, D95 and D98 on CB-CT showed a median 47.19 (46.70-47.80), 45.05 (44.18-45.68) and 44.69 (43.83-45.48) Gy and median 1% (1-2), 0% (0-2) and 1% (0-2) dosimetric change compared with the initial VMAT plan. In our study, we have shown that the mesorectum has moved up to 20 mm in the lateral and anterior-posterior direction and almost 10 mm in the superior/inferior direction during RT, causing a median of ~2% change in dosimetric parameters. Therefore, these movements must be considered in determining PTV margins to avoid dosimetric changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zumre Arican Alickikus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir 35340, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Kuru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir 35340, Turkey
| | - Barbaros Aydin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir 35340, Turkey
| | - Dogukan Akcay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir 35340, Turkey
| | - Ilknur Bilkay Gorken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir 35340, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|