Irradiation at Ultra-High (FLASH) Dose Rates Reduces Acute Normal Tissue Toxicity in the Mouse Gastrointestinal System

Mechanisms of FLASH effect

FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is a novel radiotherapy technology defined as ultra-high dose rate (≥ 40 Gy/s) radiotherapy. The biological effects of FLASH-RT include two aspects: first, compared with conventional dose rate radiotherapy, FLASH-RT can reduce radiation-induced damage in healthy tissue, and second, FLASH-RT can retain antitumor effectiveness. Current research shows that mechanisms of the biological effects of FLASH-RT are related to oxygen. However, due to the short time of FLASH-RT, evidences related to the mechanisms are indirect, and the exact mechanisms of the biological effects of FLASH-RT are not completely clear and some are even contradictory. This review focuses on the mechanisms of the biological effects of FLASH-RT and proposes future research directions.

Dose- and Volume-Limiting Late Toxicity of FLASH Radiotherapy in Cats with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasal Planum and in Mini Pigs

PURPOSE

The FLASH effect is characterized by normal tissue sparing without compromising tumor control. Although demonstrated in various preclinical models, safe translation of FLASH-radiotherapy stands to benefit from larger vertebrate animal models. Based on prior results, we designed a randomized phase III trial to investigate the FLASH effect in cat patients with spontaneous tumors. In parallel, the sparing capacity of FLASH-radiotherapy was studied on mini pigs by using large field irradiation.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Cats with T1-T2, N0 carcinomas of the nasal planum were randomly assigned to two arms of electron irradiation: arm 1 was the standard of care (SoC) and used 10 × 4.8 Gy (90% isodose); arm 2 used 1 × 30 Gy (90% isodose) FLASH. Mini pigs were irradiated using applicators of increasing size and a single surface dose of 31 Gy FLASH.

RESULTS

In cats, acute side effects were mild and similar in both arms. The trial was prematurely interrupted due to maxillary bone necrosis, which occurred 9 to 15 months after radiotherapy in 3 of 7 cats treated with FLASH-radiotherapy (43%), as compared with 0 of 9 cats treated with SoC. All cats were tumor-free at 1 year in both arms, with one cat progressing later in each arm. In pigs, no acute toxicity was recorded, but severe late skin necrosis occurred in a volume-dependent manner (7-9 months), which later resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported outcomes point to the caveats of translating single-high-dose FLASH-radiotherapy and emphasizes the need for caution and further investigations. See related commentary by Maity and Koumenis, p. 3636.

Shining a FLASHlight on Ultrahigh Dose-Rate Radiation and Possible Late Toxicity

A recent study reported results from a clinical trial in cats and from experiments in mini-pigs in which a single dose of radiotherapy was delivered at ultrahigh dose rates (FLASH). There was acceptable acute toxicity; however, some animals suffered severe late toxicity, raising caution in the design of future trials. See related article by Rohrer Bley et al., p. 3814.

FLASH radiotherapy treatment planning and models for electron beams

The FLASH effect designates normal tissue sparing at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s) compared to conventional dose rate (∼0.1 Gy/s) irradiation while maintaining tumour control and has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy (RT). UHDR high-energy electron (HEE, 4-20 MeV) beams are currently a mainstay for investigating the clinical potential of FLASH RT for superficial tumours. In the future very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) UHDR beams may be used to treat deep-seated tumours. UHDR HEE treatment planning focused at its initial stage on accurate dosimetric modelling of converted and dedicated UHDR electron RT devices for the clinical transfer of FLASH RT. VHEE treatment planning demonstrated promising dosimetric performance compared to clinical photon RT techniques in silico and was used to evaluate and optimise the design of novel VHEE RT devices. Multiple metrics and models have been proposed for a quantitative description of the FLASH effect in treatment planning, but an improved experimental characterization and understanding of the FLASH effect is needed to allow for an accurate and validated modelling of the effect in treatment planning. The importance of treatment planning for electron FLASH RT will augment as the field moves forward to treat more complex clinical indications and target sites. In this review, TPS developments in HEE and VHEE are presented considering beam models, characteristics, and future FLASH applications.

Comparing radiolytic production of H2O2 and development of Zebrafish embryos after ultra high dose rate exposure with electron and transmission proton beams

The physico-chemical and biological response to conventional and UHDR electron and proton beams was investigated, along with conventional photons. The temporal structure and nature of the beam affected both, with electron beam at ≥1400 Gy/s and proton beam at 0.1 and 1260 Gy/s found to be isoefficient at sparing zebrafish embryos.

Normal tissue sparing by FLASH as a function of single fraction dose: A quantitative analysis

PURPOSE

The FLASH effect designates normal tissue sparing by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) compared to conventional dose rate (CONV) irradiation without compromising tumor control. Understanding the magnitude of this effect and its dependency on dose are essential requirements for an optimized clinical translation of FLASH radiation therapy. In this context, we evaluated available experimental data on the magnitudes of normal tissue sparing provided by the FLASH effect as a function of dose, and followed a phenomenological data-driven approach for its parameterization.

METHODS

We gathered available in vivo data of the normal tissue sparing of CONV compared to UHDR single fraction doses and converted it to a common scale using isoeffect dose ratios, hereafter referred to as FLASH modifying factors (FMF). We then evaluated the suitability of a piecewise linear function with two pieces to parametrize FMF × D as a function of dose D.

RESULTS

We found that the magnitude of FMF generally decreases (i.e., sparing increases) as function of single fraction dose and that individual data series can be described by the piecewise linear function. The sparing magnitude appears organ specific. Pooled skin reaction data followed a consistent trend as a function of dose. Average FMF values and their standard deviations were 0.95±0.11 for all data below 10 Gy, 0.92±0.06 for mouse gut data between 10-25 Gy, and 0.96±0.07 and 0.71±0.06 for mammalian skin reaction data between 10-25 Gy and >25 Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of normal tissue sparing by FLASH is increasing with dose and is dependent on the irradiated tissue. A piecewise linear function can parameterize currently available individual data series.

Single-fraction 34 Gy Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Proton Transmission Beams: FLASH-dose Calculations and the Influence of Different Dose-rate Methods and Dose/Dose-rate Thresholds

Purpose

Research suggests that in addition to the dose-rate, a dose threshold is also important for the reduction in normal tissue toxicity with similar tumor control after ultrahigh dose-rate radiation therapy (UHDR-RT). In this analysis we aimed to identify factors that might limit the ability to achieve this "FLASH"-effect in a scenario attractive for UHDR-RT (high fractional beam dose, small target, few organs-at-risk): single-fraction 34 Gy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Methods and Materials

Clinical volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans and transmission beam (TB) plans were compared for 6 small and 1 large lung lesion. The TB-plan dose-rate was calculated using 4 methods and the FLASH-percentage (percentage of dose delivered at dose-rates ≥40/100 Gy/s and ≥4/8 Gy) was determined for various variables: a minimum spot time (minST) of 0.5/2 ms, maximum nozzle current (maxN) of 200/40 0nA, and 2 gantry current (GC) techniques (energy-layer based, spot-based [SB]).

Results

Based on absolute doses 5-beam TB and VMAT-plans are similar, but TB-plans have higher rib, skin, and ipsilateral lung dose than IMPT. Dose-rate calculation methods not considering scanning achieve FLASH-percentages between ∼30% to 80%, while methods considering scanning often achieve <30%. FLASH-percentages increase for lower minST/higher maxN and when using SB GC instead of energy-layer based GC, often approaching the percentage of dose exceeding the dose-threshold. For the small lesions average beam irradiation times (including scanning) varied between 0.06 to 0.31 seconds and total irradiation times between 0.28 to 1.57 seconds, for the large lesion beam times were between 0.16 to 1.47 seconds with total irradiation times of 1.09 to 5.89 seconds.

Conclusions

In a theoretically advantageous scenario for FLASH we found that TB-plan dosimetry was similar to that of VMAT, but inferior to that of IMPT, and that decreasing minST or using SB GC increase the estimated amount of FLASH. For the appropriate machine/delivery parameters high enough dose-rates can be achieved regardless of calculation method, meaning that a possible FLASH dose-threshold will likely be the primary limiting factor.

Beam pulse structure and dose rate as determinants for the flash effect observed in zebrafish embryo

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Continuing recent experiments at the research electron accelerator ELBE at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf the influence of beam pulse structure on the Flash effect was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The proton beam pulse structure of an isochronous cyclotron (UHDR_iso) and a synchrocyclotron (UHDR_synchro) was mimicked at ELBE by quasi-continuous electron bunches at 13 MHz delivering mean dose rates of 287 Gy/s and 177 Gy/s and bunch dose rates of 10⁶Gy/s and 10⁹ Gy/s, respectively. For UHDR_synchro, 40 ms macro pulses at a frequency of 25 Hz superimposed the bunch delivery. For comparison, a maximum beam intensity (2.5 x 10⁵ Gy/s mean and ∼10⁹ Gy/s bunch dose rate) and a reference irradiation (of ∼8 Gy/min mean dose rate) were applied. Radiation induced changes were assessed in zebrafish embryos over four days post irradiation.

RESULTS

Relative to the reference a significant protecting Flash effect was observed for all electron beam pulse regimes with less severe damage the higher the mean dose rate of the electron beam. Accordingly, the macro pulsing induced prolongation of treatment time at UHDR_synchro regime reduces the protecting effect compared to the maximum regime delivered at same bunch but higher mean dose rate. The Flash effect of the UHDR_iso regime was confirmed at a clinical isochronous cyclotron comparing the damage induced by proton beams delivered at 300 Gy/s and ∼9 Gy/min.

CONCLUSION

The recent findings indicate that the mean dose rate or treatment time are decisive for the normal tissue protecting Flash effect in zebrafish embryo.

Pencil beam scanning proton FLASH maintains tumor control while normal tissue damage is reduced in a mouse model

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies indicate a normal tissue sparing effect when ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiation is used, while tumor response is maintained. This differential response has promising perspectives for improved clinical outcome. This study investigates tumor control and normal tissue toxicity of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton FLASH in a mouse model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Tumor bearing hind limbs of non-anaesthetized CDF1 mice were irradiated in a single fraction with a PBS proton beam using either conventional (CONV) dose rate (0.33-0.63 Gy/s field dose rate, 244 MeV) or FLASH (71-89 Gy/s field dose rate, 250 MeV). 162 mice with a C3H mouse mammary carcinoma subcutaneously implanted in the foot were irradiated with physical doses of 40-60 Gy (8-14 mice per dose point). The endpoints were tumor control (TC) assessed as no recurrent tumor at 90 days after treatment, the level of acute moist desquamation (MD) to the skin of the foot within 25 days post irradiation, and radiation induced fibrosis (RIF) within 24 weeks post irradiation.

RESULTS

TCD₅₀ (dose for 50% tumor control) was similar for CONV and FLASH with values (and 95% confidence intervals) of 49.1 (47.0-51.4) Gy for CONV and 51.3 (48.6-54.2) Gy for FLASH. RIF analysis was restricted to mice with tumor control. Both endpoints showed distinct normal tissue sparing effect of proton FLASH with MDD₅₀ (dose for 50% of mice displaying moist desquamation) of <40.1 Gy for CONV and 52.3 (50.0-54.6) Gy for FLASH, (dose modifying factor at least 1.3) and FD₅₀ (dose for 50% of mice displaying fibrosis) of 48.6 (43.2-50.8) Gy for CONV and 55.6 (52.5-60.1) Gy for FLASH (dose modifying factor of 1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

FLASH had the same tumor control as CONV, but reduced normal tissue damage assessed as acute skin damage and radiation induced fibrosis.

FLASH irradiation induces lower levels of DNA damage ex vivo, an effect modulated by oxygen tension, dose, and dose rate

OBJECTIVE

FLASH irradiation reportedly produces less normal tissue toxicity, while maintaining tumour response. To investigate oxygen's role in the 'FLASH effect', we assessed DNA damage levels following irradiation at different oxygen tensions, doses and dose rates.

METHODS

Samples of whole blood were irradiated (20 Gy) at various oxygen tensions (0.25-21%) with 6 MeV electrons at dose rates of either 2 kGy/s (FLASH) or 0.1 Gy/s (CONV), and subsequently with various doses (0-40 Gy) and intermediate dose rates (0.3-1000 Gy/s). DNA damage of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were assessed by the alkaline comet assay.

RESULTS

Following 20 Gy irradiation, lower levels of DNA damage were induced for FLASH, the difference being significant at 0.25% (p < 0.05) and 0.5% O2 (p < 0.01). The differential in DNA damage at 0.5% O2 was found to increase with total dose and dose rate, becoming significant for doses ≥20 Gy and dose rates ≥30 Gy/s.

CONCLUSION

This study shows, using the alkaline comet assay, that lower levels of DNA damage are induced following FLASH irradiation, an effect that is modulated by the oxygen tension, and increases with the total dose and dose rate of irradiation, indicating that an oxygen related mechanism, e.g. transient radiation-induced oxygen depletion, may contribute to the tissue sparing effect of FLASH irradiation.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This paper is first to directly show that FLASH-induced DNA damage is modulated by oxygen tension, total dose and dose rate, with FLASH inducing significantly lower levels of DNA damage for doses ≥20 Gy and dose rates ≥30 Gy/s, at 0.5% O2.

Radioprotective effect of X-ray abdominal FLASH irradiation: Adaptation to oxidative damage and inflammatory response may be benefiting factors

BACKGROUND

Ultrahigh dose-rate irradiation (FLASH-IR) was reported to be efficient in tumor control while reducing normal tissue radiotoxicity. However, the mechanism of such phenomenon is still unclear. Besides, the FLASH experiments using high energy X-ray, the most common modality in clinical radiotherapy, is rarely reported. This study aims to investigate the radiobiological response using 6 MV X-ray FLASH-IR or conventional dose-rate IR (CONV-IR).

METHODS

The superconducting linac of Chengdu THz Free Electron Laser (CTFEL) facility was used for FLASH-IR, a diamond radiation detector and a CeBr₃ scintillation detector were used to monitor the time structure and dose rate of FLASH pulses. BALB/c nude mice received whole abdominal 6 MV X-ray FLASH-IR or CONV-IR, the prescribed dose was 15 Gy or 10 Gy and the delivered absolute dose was monitored with EBT3 films. The mice were either euthanized 24 h post-IR to evaluate acute tissue responses or followed up for 6 weeks to observe late-stage responses and survival probability. Complete blood count, histological analyses, and measurement of cytokine expression and redox status were performed.

RESULTS

The mean dose rate of >150 Gy/s and instantaneous dose rate of >5.5×10⁵ Gy/s was reached in FLASH-IR at the center of mice body. After 6 weeks' follow-up of mice that received 15 Gy IR, the FLASH group showed faster body weight recovery and higher survival probability than the CONV group. Histological analysis showed that FLASH-IR induced less acute intestinal damage than CONV-IR. Complete blood count and cytokine concentration measurement found that the inflammatory blood cell counts and pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations were elevated at the acute stage after both FLASH-IR and CONV-IR. However, FLASH irradiated mice had significantly fewer inflammatory blood cells and diminished pro-inflammatory cytokine at the late stage. Moreover, higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) signal intensities but significantly reduced lipid peroxidation were found in the FLASH group than in the CONV group in the acute stage.

CONCLUSIONS

The radioprotective effect of 6 MV X-ray FLASH-IR was observed. The differences in inflammatory responses and redox status between the two groups may be the factors responsible for reduced radiotoxicities following FLASH-IR. Further studies are required to thoroughly evaluate the impact of ROS on FLASH effect. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Characterization of the PTB ultra-high pulse dose rate reference electron beam

Purpose. This investigation aims to present the characterisation and optimisation of an ultra-high pulse dose rate (UHPDR) electron beam at the PTB facility in Germany. A Monte Carlo beam model has been developed for dosimetry study for future investigation in FLASH radiotherapy and will be presented. Material and methods. The 20 MeV electron beams generated by the research linear accelerator has been characterised both in-beamline with profile monitors and magnet spectrometer, and in-water with a diamond detector prototype. The Monte Carlo model has been used to investigate six different setups to enable different dose per pulse (DPP) ranges and beam sizes in water. The properties of the electron radiation field in water have also been characterised in terms of beam size, quality specifier R 50 and flatness. The beam stability has also been studied. Results. The difference between the Monte-Carlo simulated and measured R 50 was smaller than 0.5 mm. The simulated beam sizes agreed with the measured ones within 2 mm. Two suitable setups have been identified for delivering reference UHPDR electron beams. The first one is characterised by a SSD of 70 cm, while in the second one an SSD of 90 cm is used in combination with a 2 mm aluminium scattering plates. The two set-ups are quick and simple to install and enable an expected overall DPP range from 0.13 Gy up to 6.7 Gy per pulse. Conclusion. The electron beams generated by the PTB research accelerator have shown to be stable throughout the four-months length of this investigation. The Monte Carlo models have shown to be in good agreement for beam size and depth dose and within 1% for the beam flatness. The diamond detector prototype has shown to be a promising tool to be used for relative measurements in UHPDR electron beams.

In vitro assays for investigating the FLASH effect

FLASH radiotherapy is a novel technique that has been shown in numerous preclinical in vivo studies to have the potential to be the next important improvement in cancer treatment. However, the biological mechanisms responsible for the selective FLASH sparing effect of normal tissues are not yet known. An optimal translation of FLASH radiotherapy into the clinic would require a good understanding of the specific beam parameters that induces a FLASH effect, environmental conditions affecting the response, and the radiobiological mechanisms involved. Even though the FLASH effect has generally been considered as an in vivo effect, studies finding these answers would be difficult and ethically challenging to carry out solely in animals. Hence, suitable in vitro studies aimed towards finding these answers are needed. In this review, we describe and summarise several in vitro assays that have been used or could be used to finally elucidate the mechanisms behind the FLASH effect.

Abdominopelvic FLASH Irradiation Improves PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Preclinical Models of Ovarian Cancer

Treatment of advanced ovarian cancer using PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade shows promise, however current clinical trials are limited by modest response rates. Radiation therapy has been shown to synergize with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in some cancers but has not been utilized in advanced ovarian cancer due to toxicity associated with conventional abdominopelvic irradiation. While ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation has emerged as a strategy to reduce radiation-induced toxicity, the immunomodulatory properties of FLASH irradiation remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that single high dose abdominopelvic FLASH irradiation promoted intestinal regeneration and maintained tumor control in a preclinical mouse model of ovarian cancer. Reduced tumor burden in conventional and FLASH treated mice was associated with an early decrease in intratumoral regulatory T cells and a late increase in cytolytic CD8+ T cells. Compared to conventional irradiation, FLASH irradiation increased intratumoral T cell infiltration at early timepoints. Moreover, FLASH irradiation maintained the ability to increase intratumoral CD8+ T cell infiltration and enhance the efficacy of αPD-1 therapy in preclinical models of ovarian cancer. These data highlight the potential for FLASH irradiation to improve the therapeutic efficacy of checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Understanding the FLASH effect to unravel the potential of ultra-high dose rate irradiation

A reemergence of research implementing radiation delivery at ultra-high dose rates (UHDRs) has triggered intense interest in the radiation sciences and has opened a new field of investigation in radiobiology. Much of the promise of UHDR irradiation involves the FLASH effect, an in vivo biological response observed to maintain anti-tumor efficacy without the normal tissue complications associated with standard dose rates. The FLASH effect has been validated primarily, using intermediate energy electron beams able to deliver high doses (>7 Gy) in a very short period of time (<200 ms), but has also been found with photon and proton beams. The clinical implications of this new area of research are highly significant, as FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) has the potential to enhance the therapeutic index, opening new possibilities for eradicating radio-resistant tumors without toxicity. As pioneers in this field, our group has developed a multidisciplinary research team focused on investigating the mechanisms and clinical translation of the FLASH effect. Here, we review the field of UHDR, from the physico-chemical to the biological mechanisms.

First demonstration of the FLASH effect with ultrahigh dose rate high-energy X-rays

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate whether high-energy X-rays (HEXs) of the PARTER (platform for advanced radiotherapy research) platform built on CTFEL (Chengdu THz Free Electron Laser facility) can produce ultrahigh dose rate (FLASH) X-rays and trigger the FLASH effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EBT3 radiochromic film and fast current transformer (FCT) devices were used to measure absolute dose and pulsed beam current of HEXs. Subcutaneous tumor-bearing mice and healthy mice were treated with sham, FLASH, and conventional dose rate radiotherapy (CONV), respectively to observe the tumor control efficiency and normal tissue damage.

RESULTS

The maximum dose rate of HEXs of PARTER was up to over 1000 Gy/s. Tumor-bearing mice experiment showed a good result on tumor control (p < 0.0001) and significant difference in survival curves (p < 0.005) among the three groups. In the thorax-irradiated healthy mice experiment, there was a significant difference (p = 0.038) in survival among the three groups, with the risk of death decreased by 81% in the FLASH group compared to that in the CONV group. The survival time of healthy mice irradiated in the abdomen in the FLASH group was undoubtedly higher (62.5% of mice were still alive when we stopped observation) than that in the CONV group (7 days).

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that HEXs of the PARTER system can produce ultrahigh dose rate X-rays and trigger a FLASH effect, which provides a basis for future scientific research and clinical application of HEX in FLASH radiotherapy.